Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 21 August 2025

Sec. Plant Nutrition

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1668092

Depth-dependent effects of crop rotation and monoculture on dissolved organic matter quantity and quality

  • Department Soil Science and Environmental Analyses, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation-State Research Institute, Puławy, Poland

Introduction: Soil dissolved organic matter (DOM) regulates nutrient cycling and carbon sequestration, yet how cropping systems (rotation vs. monoculture) shape the vertical distribution and molecular traits of DOM remains unclear.

Methods: We leveraged a long-term experiment (est. 1994) at the IUNG-PIB Agricultural Experimental Station, Osiny, eastern Poland, comparing a three-year rotation (winter oilseed rapewinter wheatspring barley) with continuous winter wheat. Soils were sampled at 030, 3060, and 6090 cm. Cold-waterextractable DOM was quantified as dissolved organic carbon (DOC), nitrogen (DON), and phosphorus (DOP). UVVis metrics (SUVA280​, E4/E6) characterized molecular features, and environmental drivers were identified via variable-importance analysis.

Results and discussion: DOM concentrations declined with depth (P < 0.001). A management effect emerged only in the subsoil: DOC at 6090 cm was higher under monoculture than rotation (P < 0.05), indicating detectable but secondary cropping-system influences relative to depth controls. With depth, SUVA280​ increased and E4/E6 decreased consistently across systems, implying greater molecular weight and humification; thus, soil depth is the primary regulator of DOM molecular structure. Key drivers of DOM variability included soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, humus, available phosphorus, and depth. DOC variation was most associated with total nitrogen (14.92% contribution), total carbon (11.68%), and DOP (9.67%). DON was driven by DOC (17.64%), depth (16.00%), and available phosphorus (15.59%). DOP was shaped by humus (15.56%), total phosphorus (15.45%), and available phosphorus (15.43%). Collectively, these findings reveal pronounced depth-dependent differentiation of DOM quantity and traits in agricultural soils, with subsoil responses to management offering leverage points to optimize nutrient cycling and enhance long-term carbon storage.

1 Introduction

Soil dissolved organic matter (DOM), a vital component of terrestrial ecosystems, orchestrates biogeochemical cycles of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) while governing soil fertility, microbial metabolism, and carbon sequestration dynamics. Comprising labile fractions such as dissolved organic carbon (DOC), nitrogen (DON), and phosphorus (DOP), DOM acts as both a substrate for microbial activity and a mobile vector for nutrient transport across soil profiles (Kalbitz et al., 2000; Smreczak and Ukalska-Jaruga, 2021). In agroecosystems, DOM dynamics are intricately linked to agricultural management practices, particularly crop crop rotation and monoculture, which alter root exudation patterns, residue inputs, and soil physicochemical properties (Chen et al., 2022; Smreczak and Ukalska-Jaruga, 2021; Undurraga et al., 2010). Despite its pivotal role in nutrient retention and carbon stabilization, the vertical stratification of DOM components and their molecular evolution across soil depths remain poorly resolved under contrasting cropping systems. This knowledge gap impedes the development of strategies to optimize soil health and climate resilience in intensively managed agricultural landscapes.

Current understanding of DOM dynamics has predominantly focused on surface soils (0–30 cm), where organic inputs are concentrated (Kalbitz et al., 2000; Rumpel and Kögel-Knabner, 2011). However, subsoil horizons (30–90 cm) represent critical yet underexplored reservoirs for stable organic carbon and nutrients, exhibiting distinct biogeochemical processes that diverge from surface layers. For instance, reduced microbial activity and slower organic matter turnover in subsoils may favor DOM stabilization or selective leaching of recalcitrant compounds (Spaccini et al., 2002). Crop management practices, such as monoculture and crop rotation, likely modulate these processes through divergent mechanisms: monoculture systems, characterized by uniform residue inputs and diminished biodiversity, may decrease DOM mineralization or accumulation of aromatic compounds (Zhang et al., 2025, 2021), whereas diversified crop rotations could enhance DOM complexity via heterogeneous organic inputs and rhizosphere interactions (Saadi et al., 2006). Yet, systematic assessments of DOM quantity, molecular traits, and their environmental drivers across soil depths in these systems are lacking, limiting predictive capacity for long-term soil carbon and nutrient cycling.

The molecular architecture of DOM—reflected in metrics such as aromaticity, molecular weight, and humification degree—serves as a fingerprint of its origin, stability, and ecological function (Ding et al., 2020; Wilson and Xenopoulos, 2008). Advanced spectroscopic techniques, including Ultraviolet-Visible absorbance (UV-Vis), enable non-destructive characterization of these properties, revealing shifts in DOM composition driven by microbial processing and environmental conditions (Marschner and Kalbitz, 2003). For example, increasing Specific Ultraviolet Absorbance at 280nm (SUVA280) and declining E4/E6 (absorbance at 465 nm divided by absorbance at 665 nm) ratios with depth suggest progressive humification and molecular weight amplification, processes that may be differentially regulated by cropping systems (Ukalska-Jaruga et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2015). However, disentangling the relative impacts of management practices versus inherent soil properties (e.g., organic carbon content, humus levels) on DOM dynamics requires robust analytical frameworks. Machine learning approaches, such as random forest modeling, offer unparalleled capacity to identify key drivers of DOM variability by quantifying the contributions of edaphic factors, management regimes, and depth-dependent interactions—a critical step toward predictive soil biogeochemistry (Ren et al., 2024).

This study bridges these knowledge gaps by investigating the vertical concentrations and quality distribution of DOM components (DOC, DON, DOP) across three soil depths (0–30, 30–60, and 60–90 cm) under crop rotation and monoculture systems. Employing cold-water extraction coupled with UV-Vis and Visible and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (VIS-NIR) spectroscopy, we quantified DOM concentrations and quality, while random forest modeling elucidated the hierarchy of environmental drivers. Our objectives were to: (1) resolve depth-dependent variations in DOM quantity under contrasting cropping systems, (2) characterize shifts in DOM quality (e.g., aromaticity, humification) along soil profiles, and (3) identify key predictors governing DOM differentiation, including soil organic carbon, nutrient availability, and management practices. Based on existing knowledge gaps and ecological theories, we hypothesize that: (1) DOM concentrations decrease with soil depth, irrespective of cropping system, due to reduced organic inputs and microbial activity in deeper soil layers. (2) Crop crop rotation systems enhance DOM complexity and stability through increased diversity in organic matter inputs and microbial activity. Monoculture systems may reduce DOM mineralization, leading to the accumulation of recalcitrant DOM fractions, particularly at greater soil depths.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Experimental design and soil sampling

The study was based on a long-term field experiment established in 1994 on an Haplic Luvisol (loamy sand) in Osiny Experimental Station (N: 51°28′, E: 22°30′) belonging to the Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation, Pulawy, Poland (Feledyn-Szewczyk et al., 2024). For the purpose of this study soil samples were collected from different cropping systems: crop rotation and monoculture. The crop rotation system involves three-field crops: rapeseed, winter wheat, and spring barley (from 2005, spring wheat), whereas the monoculture system continuously cultivates winter wheat in the same plot every year (Siebielec et al., 2020). The size of each crop field in the rotation was 1 ha, which reflects the real crop production conditions (Martyniuk et al., 2016). The experiment was carried out with all crops cultivated at the same time, which made it possible to obtain full information from all fields in each year.

Soil sampling was performed in September 2022. Composite soil samples were collected from three depth intervals: 0–30 cm, 30–60 cm, and 60–90 cm, under both crop rotation and monoculture systems. At each depth, three subsamples were collected using a dedicated soil auger, then homogenized after removing visible plant residues. The samples were air-dried at room temperature and sieved through a 2-mm mesh prior to laboratory analysis. The basic physicochemical properties of the soils are presented in Table 1.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Summary of soil physical and chemical properties under monoculture (M) and rotation (R) cropping systems across three soil depths (0–30 cm, 30–60 cm, and 60–90 cm).

2.2 Determination of soil physicochemical properties

Soil pH was determined in a 1 mol·L-¹ KCl solution and water at a 1:2.5 (w/v) ratio using potentiometric method (PN-ISO 10390, 1997). Electrical conductivity (EC) was measured in the same 1:2.5 soil-to-water suspension using a conductivity meter (µS/cm) after equilibration. Soil particle size distribution was determined using the pressure hydrometer method according to PN-R-04032 (1998), which provided percentages of clay (<0.002 mm), silt (0.05–0.002 mm), and sand (2.0–0.05 mm). Total carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN) contents were quantified using a Vario Macro Cube elemental analyzer (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Germany). Total organic carbon (TOC) was determined using the wet oxidation method with potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) and external heat application, followed by back-titration with ferrous ammonium sulfate FeSO4(NH4)2SO4·6H2O, according to PN-ISO 14235 (2003). Humus content was estimated using the equation: Humus = TOC × 1.724, where TOC represents the organic carbon content of the soil, assuming carbon constitutes 58% of humus. Available P were analysed using Egner-Rhiem method with calcium lactate at pH = 3,7 as extraction solution (Korzeniowska and Stanislawska-Glubiak, 2024). Cation exchange capacity (CEC) and hydrolytic acidity were determined using 1 mol L-1 ammonium acetate (pH 7.0) and calcium acetate (pH 8.2), respectively (Sumner and Miller, 1996). Total phosphorus (TP) was quantified after aqua regia digestion using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Nitrate (NO3-) and ammonium (NH4+) ions were extracted with 1 mol L-1 potassium sulfide and analyzed colorimetrically (Keeney and Nelson, 1982).

2.3 DOM extraction

DOM was extracted using a cold-water extraction method. Five grams of air-dried and sieved soil (φ=2mm)were mixed with 50 mL of ultrapure water (Milli-Q, resistivity ≥ 18.2 MΩ·cm) at a 1:10 (w/w) ratio (Jones and Willett, 2006). The suspensions were shaken horizontally at 200 rpm for 24 hours at 25°C in the dark. After shaking, the mixtures were centrifuged at 3000 × g for 10 minutes, and the supernatants were filtered through 0.45μm polyethersulfone membrane filters (Millipore). The filtrates were collected and stored at –20°C prior to further analysis of DOM concentrations and spectral properties. The DOC and DON determined by a total organic carbon (TOC) and total nitrogen (TN) (multi N/C 2100 S, AJ, Germany) while DOP determined using ICP-MS apparatus.

2.4 UV-Vis and VIS-NIR spectroscopic analysis

UV-Vis spectroscopy analyzes DOM molecular composition and chemical properties (Williams et al., 2010; Yuan et al., 2018). Spectra are obtained using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer with 1 cm quartz cuvettes, using Milli-Q water as a reference. Specific UV absorbance (SUVA) is calculated as:

SUVA=UV/DOM concentration×100

SUVA280 (280 nm): indicates aromatic compound content (e.g., lignin, humic substances). Higher values reflect greater aromaticity. SUVA465 (465 nm): indicates the relative content of humic substances (e.g., fulvic and humic acids). E4/E6 ratio (absorbance at 465 nm divided by absorbance at 665 nm): serves as a proxy for DOM molecular size and degree of humification. Higher E4/E6 values are typically associated with low-molecular-weight, microbially derived, and more labile DOM fractions, whereas lower E4/E6 values suggest high-molecular-weight, highly condensed, and more humified DOM components (Ukalska-Jaruga et al., 2021).

The visible and near-infrared (VIS-NIR) measurements were carried out using a PSR-3500® spectroradiometer (Spectral Evolution, Lawrence, MA, USA), operating in the 350–2500nm range (Ukalska-Jaruga et al., 2021). Reflectance values were converted to pseudo-absorbance (A*) using the transformation A*=-log10(R), as provided by the instrument software. The spectral region beyond 1870nm was excluded from analysis due to a marked increase in noise and poor signal-to-noise ratio, primarily caused by strong water absorption bands and reduced detector sensitivity. These effects are particularly pronounced when measuring aqueous extracts in diffuse reflectance mode using a cuvette, resulting in distorted or unstable pseudo-absorbance values that compromise the reliability of the data in this region. Before measurement, DOM solutions were equilibrated to room temperature (~20°C), gently homogenized, and placed in 10mm pathlength quartz cuvettes. Spectral data were collected in pseudo-absorbance mode using a tungsten-halogen light source, and the instrument was calibrated against a Milli-Q water blank before each batch.

2.5 Statistical analysis and modeling

All experimental data were tested for normality and homogeneity of variance prior to statistical analysis. Differences in DOM concentrations and spectral indices across cropping systems and soil depths were assessed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (P < 0.05). To explore the key environmental drivers of DOM dynamics, random forest (RF) modeling was performed using the “randomForest” package in R (version 4.3.1) (Ren et al., 2024). Predictor variables included soil physicochemical properties (e.g., TOC, TN, clay content, pH, humus) and categorical factors (cropping system and soil depth). Variable importance was assessed based on the percentage increase in mean squared error (% IncMSE). VIS-NIR spectra preprocessing was done with Unscrambler 10.3 (Camo Analytics, Oslo, Norway). It included Savitzky-Golay smoothing (11-point window, 2nd order polynomial) followed by baseline offset correction. This procedure removed minor negative values caused by instrumental drift, without altering spectral features.

3 Results

3.1 Crop systems influence quantity of DOM components

Across all three soil depths (0–30 cm, 30–60 cm, and 60–90 cm), concentrations of all DOM components—DOC, DON, and DOP—consistently decreased with increasing depth under both monoculture and crop rotation systems (Figure 1). A significant difference between cropping systems was observed only for DOC in the deepest soil layer (60–90 cm), where monoculture plots exhibited higher DOC concentrations than crop rotation plots (P < 0.05; Figure 1a). No significant differences in DON or DOP concentrations were found between cropping systems at any depth (Figures 1b, c). Statistical comparisons among soil layers revealed significant vertical stratification for DOC and DON (P < 0.05 across all depths). In contrast, DOP only differed significantly between the surface layer (0–30 cm) and the subsoil layers (30–60 and 60–90 cm), with no significant difference between the latter two, indicating a more stable vertical distribution. These patterns suggest that the topsoil plays a critical role in nutrient availability, particularly for phosphorus.

Figure 1
Three bar graphs compare DOC, DON, and DOP concentrations in g/kg across different time intervals (0–30, 30–60, 60–90 days) in rotation (R) and monoculture (M) setups. Significant differences are marked with asterisks, where one asterisk indicates p<0.05, two asterisks p<0.01, and three asterisks p<0.001.

Figure 1. Vertical distribution of soil dissolved organic carbon (DOC), nitrogen (DON), and phosphorus (DOP) under rotation and monoculture systems across different soil depths.Concentrations of cold-water extractable dissolved organic carbon (DOC, panel a), dissolved organic nitrogen (DON, panel b), and dissolved organic phosphorus (DOP, panel c) across three soil depths (030 cm, 3060 cm, and 6090 cm) under rotation (R) and monoculture (M) cropping systems. Data are presented as mean ± standard error (n = 12). Significant differences among depths within each system were evaluated by Tukey's HSD test. Significance levels are indicated as: p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), and p < 0.001 (***).

3.2 Crop systems influence the quality of DOM components

UV-Vis spectroscopic analysis revealed no significant differences in DOM quality between crop rotation and monoculture systems. Specific ultraviolet absorbance at 280 nm (SUVA280), a proxy for DOM aromaticity, showed a significant increase with depth in the crop rotation system (P < 0.01; Figure 2a), particularly in the 60–90 cm layer. While SUVA465 and SUVA665 also exhibited elevated values in the deepest soil layer under both systems, these differences were not statistically significant (Figures 2b, c). In contrast, the E4/E6 ratio, indicative of DOM molecular size and humification, declined significantly with depth in both systems (Figure 2d), confirming a trend toward more humified, high-molecular-weight DOM in subsoils. Figure 3 presents the means of VIS-NIR spectra at the three depths for the two cropping systems. In the visible region, the monoculture system presented higher pseudo-absorbance. On the contrary in the NIR region, pseudo-absorbance was higher with the crop rotation system. At 60–90cm depth, VIS–NIR mean spectra revealed consistently higher absorbance values in monoculture compared to crop rotation. This trend aligns with UV–Vis and chemical data showing elevated DOC concentrations under monoculture, suggesting that VIS–NIR spectroscopy may capture DOC-related variation when concentration differences are sufficiently large. These patterns indicate that soil depth, more than cropping system, governs the molecular complexity and stability of DOM in agricultural soils.

Figure 2
Four scatter plots labeled (a) to (d) compare SUVA values and E4/E6 ratios across different time intervals for rotation (R) and monoculture (M) treatments. (a) SUVA280 shows significant differences in the 60-90 day interval. (b) SUVA465 has higher values for rotation at 60-90 days. (c) SUVA665 presents higher values at 60-90 days for rotation. (d) E4/E6 ratios are lower for rotation, particularly significant at the 0-30 day interval. Significant differences are marked with asterisks.

Figure 2. UV-Vis spectrum characteristics of cold-water extractable dissolved organic matter (DOM) across soil depths under rotation and monoculture systems. Spectral indices derived from UVVis absorbance of cold-water extractable DOM in soils sampled from three depths (030 cm, 3060 cm, and 6090 cm) under rotation (R) and monoculture (M) cropping systems. (a) SUVA280: Specific UV absorbance at 280 nm, indicating aromaticity and protein-like content. (b) SUVA465: Specific UV absorbance at 465 nm, associated with humic substances. (c) SUVA665: Specific UV absorbance at 665 nm, reflecting the presence of highly aromatic and condensed structures. (d) E4/E6 ratio (SUVA465/SUVA665), indicating molecular size and humification degree of DOM. Data are presented as mean ± standard error (n = 12). Significant differences among depths within each system were evaluated by Tukey's HSD test. Significance levels are indicated as: p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), and p < 0.001 (***).

Figure 3
Graph showing pseudo-absorbance versus wavelength from 350 to 1870 nm. Six curves represent different depths. Peaks are marked at 1505 nm, 1645 nm, and 1673 nm. Lines vary in color and style, representing DOM_R and DOM_M at depths of 0–30, 30–60, and 60–90.

Figure 3. Mean VISNIR spectra of cold-water extractable dissolved organic matter (DOM) from soils under different cropping systems and depths. Average pseudo-absorbance spectra (3501850 nm) of cold-water extractable dissolved organic matter (DOM) under rotation (R) and monoculture (M) cropping systems across three soil depths (030 cm, 3060 cm, and 6090 cm). The spectral curves represent the mean pseudo-absorbance values from triplicate or composite samples. Solid lines indicate rotation (DOM _R) and dotted lines indicate monoculture (DOM _M). Colors denote soil depth: black (030 cm), blue (3060 cm), and red (6090 cm).

3.3 Key predictors governing DOM differentiation

Correlation analysis and random forest modeling identified key soil properties associated with DOM component variability (Figures 4, 5). DOC variation was primarily driven by total nitrogen (IncMSE = 14.92%), total carbon (11.68%), and DOP (9.67%) (Figure 5A). For DON, the most influential predictors were DOC (17.64%), soil depth (16.00%), and available phosphorus (15.59%) (Figure 5B). DOP was most strongly influenced by humus content (15.56%), total phosphorus (15.45%), and available phosphorus (15.43%) (Figure 5C). Subsequent linear regression confirmed the robustness of these relationships, emphasizing the importance influence of both soil characteristics and management practices on the biogeochemical behavior of DOM in agricultural systems.

Figure 4
Scatter plot showing the relationship between DOC and DON in grams per kilogram, with a trend line. Dots represent different soil depths (0-30 cm in gray, 30-60 cm in red, 60-90 cm in blue) and vary in size according to DOP levels. R-squared values indicate strong correlations: 0.96 for DON-DOC, 0.45 for DOP-DOC, and 0.59 for DON-DOP.

Figure 4. Relationships among dissolved organic carbon (DOC), dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), and dissolved organic phosphorus (DOP) across soil depths. Scatter plots illustrate the correlations between DOC and DON (R² = 0.96), DOP and DOC (R² = 0.45), and DOP and DON (R² = 0.59), all statistically significant (p < 0.001, ***). Points are color-coded by soil depth: grey (030 cm), red (3060 cm), and blue (6090 cm). Circle sizes are proportional to DOP concentrations, providing a third dimension to the bivariate relationship.

Figure 5
A collage of three panels shows data visualizations. Panel A displays a correlation matrix with color-coded correlation coefficients of soil properties. Panel B features bar charts illustrating the mean importance of variables (DOC, DON, and DOP) under different treatments, with significant and non-significant markers. Panel C presents scatter plots with regression lines and R-squared values, analyzing relationships between different soil properties and treatments. Color coding distinguishes between rotation and monoculture, with circles varying by E4/E6 ratios. Legends and significance levels are provided throughout.

Figure 5. Integrated controls and relationships of cold-waterextractable DOM. (A) Spearman correlation matrix among CWE-DOC, CWE-DON, CWE-DOP and soil physicochemical variables; ellipse orientation and color encode r (red positive, blue negative), with significance marked as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. (B) Random-forest variable importance (%IncMSE) for predicting DOC, DON and DOP; bars show mean ± SD; colored bars denote significant predictors (adjusted P < 0.05; orange = DOC, green = DON, blue = DOP). (C) Linear relationships between DOM components and key soil properties across cropping systems; points are rotation (black) and monoculture (red), point size scales with E4/E6 (aromaticity/humification proxy), shaded bands indicate 95% confidence intervals; all regressions P < 0.001.

4 Discussion

4.1 Effects of cropping systems on DOM concentration

Our findings demonstrate that soil depth exerts a stronger control than cropping systems on the distribution of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in agricultural soils. Concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), nitrogen (DON), and phosphorus (DOP) consistently decreased with increasing depth across all layers (0–30 cm, 30–60 cm, and 60–90 cm). This pronounced vertical stratification is consistent with previous studies (Kaiser and Kalbitz, 2012; Kalbitz et al., 2000), and can largely be explained by reduced inputs of plant residues, lower root exudation, and diminished microbial activity in subsoils. The minimal differences in DOM concentrations between crop rotation and monoculture systems in the upper soil layers likely reflect long-term homogenization of soil properties due to decades of similar fertilization, tillage, and management practices. Although crop rotation generally enhances microbial diversity and activity through more diverse organic inputs and root exudates (Chen et al., 2022). In contrast, monoculture tends to reduce microbial diversity and promote microbial communities specialized in decomposing uniform crop residues (Zhang et al., 2025), these effects appear insufficient to cause measurable differences in DOM concentrations in surface soils. Significant cropping system effects were detected only in the deepest layer (60–90 cm), where monoculture soils exhibited higher DOC levels than rotation soils. This pattern likely reflects reduced microbial diversity and slower decomposition rates under monoculture, promoting the accumulation of more recalcitrant DOC fractions at depth (Findlay and Parr, 2017; Zhang et al., 2025). Furthermore, prolonged monoculture could impair soil aggregate stability, facilitating vertical transport and retention of particulate organic matter and associated DOC in deeper horizons (Dou et al., 2025; Rumpel and Kögel-Knabner, 2011; Xu et al., 2021). In contrast, DON and DOP concentrations did not differ significantly between cropping systems, implying these nutrient fractions are more strongly governed by intrinsic soil processes, such as microbial mineralization and adsorption interactions, rather than management practices (Helfenstein et al., 2018; Karl and Björkman, 2015). The significant variation of DOP primarily between surface (0–30 cm) and deeper soil layers (30–90 cm) is consistent with the established “surface enrichment–deep depletion” phosphorus distribution pattern (Jobbagy and Jackson, 2001), driven by the strong affinity of phosphate compounds for mineral adsorption sites.

4.2 Effects of cropping systems on DOM quality

Despite contrasting management practices, no significant differences in DOM molecular characteristics were detected between crop rotation and monoculture systems across all soil depths. Spectroscopic analyses consistently highlighted the dominant influence of soil depth over management effects in shaping DOM quality. UV–Vis results showed a marked increase in aromaticity (higher SUVA280; Figure 2a) and humification (lower E4/E6 ratio; Figure 2d) with depth, indicating progressive molecular condensation and stabilization of DOM in subsoils. Complementary VIS–NIR analyses provided additional compositional insights across the visible (400–700 nm) and near-infrared regions (1450–1750 nm) (Figure 3). Although overall DOM concentrations declined with depth, pseudo-absorbance in the visible region increased slightly in the deepest layer (60–90 cm), reflecting enhanced accumulation of aromatic, humified compounds with stronger visible light absorption. Near-infrared spectra revealed a broad absorption peak around 1505 nm, associated with labile DOM constituents such as carbohydrates and microbial metabolites (Stenberg et al., 2010; Workman and Weyer, 2007). This feature was particularly pronounced under monoculture in the deepest soil, suggesting preferential leaching and accumulation of microbially derived hydrophilic DOM fractions. In contrast, sharper peaks at 1645 nm and 1673 nm, linked to aromatic and phenolic structures (e.g., lignin derivatives) (Ben-Dor and Banin, 1995; Workman and Weyer, 2007), were less intense in monoculture at depth, implying reduced humification compared to rotation soils. Depth-driven changes in DOM composition likely result from selective microbial decomposition of surface-derived labile compounds, coupled with downward migration and preservation of recalcitrant aromatic fractions (Sanderman et al., 2009; Weishaar et al., 2003). Cropping systems may influence these processes indirectly through microbial activity. Enhanced enzyme production under crop rotation (e.g., oxidative enzymes such as phenol oxidase and peroxidases, or hydrolases like β-glucosidase) could accelerate DOM mineralization, thereby limiting the accumulation of recalcitrant aromatic fractions and contributing to lower DOC concentrations in rotation subsoils compared with monoculture systems (Saadi et al., 2006). Additionally, oxygen-limited conditions in subsoil layers may promote oxidative condensation reactions, producing structurally complex humic substances with enhanced stability and long-term carbon storage potential, albeit potentially limiting microbial bioavailability (Bravo-Escobar et al., 2024; Khan et al., 2024; Rumpel and Kögel-Knabner, 2011). Although root activity and organic inputs differ between cropping systems, UV–Vis indices were not sensitive enough to resolve subtle molecular differences, likely due to long-term homogenization of soil properties under similar fertilization regimes and the overriding effect of soil depth. Future research employing high-resolution molecular analyses (e.g., FT-ICR-MS, 13C-NMR) combined with microbial community profiling and enzymatic assays would allow a more detailed examination of DOM chemodiversity and stabilization pathways (Ding et al., 2020). Such integrative approaches could reveal nuanced management effects not detectable with conventional spectroscopic techniques, advancing understanding of DOM transformation mechanisms and their implications for soil carbon sequestration.

4.3 Key environmental controls and implications for subsoil carbon and nutrient management

Using correlation analysis and Random Forest modeling, this study systematically identified the primary environmental factors regulating DOM component distribution. The results reveal that distinct drivers govern different DOM fractions, reflecting their independent roles within biogeochemical cycles. For DOC, soil TC and TN emerged as dominant predictors, underscoring the pivotal role of soil organic matter as the primary source of dissolved carbon. This finding aligns with the well-established paradigm that DOM originates largely from the mineralization and leaching of soil organic matter pools (Bolan et al., 2011; Kaiser and Kalbitz, 2012; Karavanova, 2013). Additionally, cropping systems contribute to DOC dynamics by altering carbon input pathways (Figure 5A). For instance, the accumulation of DOC in deeper monoculture layers may reflect the selective preservation of recalcitrant aromatic compounds, as evidenced by the depth-related increase in SUVA280 (Figure 2a) and a higher visible region (400–700nm) at 60-90 cm by VIS-NIR (Figure 3). Linear regression analysis supports this relationship, suggesting that augmenting soil organic carbon (SOC) inputs—through crop residues, root turnover, or organic amendments—can effectively elevate DOC concentrations (Ren et al., 2024; Smreczak and Ukalska-Jaruga, 2021). In contrast, DON dynamics were primarily influenced by DOC (IncMSE = 17.64%), soil depth (IncMSE = 16.00%), and available phosphorus (IncMSE = 15.59%). The strong linkage between DOC and DON underscores the structural coupling of organic nitrogen within DOM (Figure 3), consistent with co-migration or co-mineralization mechanisms (Neff et al., 2003). The pronounced effect of soil depth reflects the vertical gradients in microbial activity, root distribution, and organic inputs, with DON typically declining with depth due to reduced biological turnover and substrate availability (Berman and Bronk, 2003; Sipler and Bronk, 2015). Intriguingly, available phosphorus emerged as a key predictor of DON, hinting at cross-regulation between phosphorus and nitrogen cycles. Under phosphorus-limited conditions, microorganisms may accelerate organic nitrogen mineralization to meet nutrient demands, thereby elevating DOP levels in the soil solution (Karl and Björkman, 2015). DOP, in turn, was predominantly controlled by humus content (IncMSE = 15.56%), total phosphorus (IncMSE = 15.45%), and available phosphorus (IncMSE = 15.43%). These factors collectively illustrate the interplay between organic and inorganic phosphorus pools and their modulation by microbial processes. Humus acts as a long-term organic phosphorus reservoir, gradually releasing DOP via microbial decomposition or enzymatic hydrolysis (Kalbitz et al., 2000; Zsolnay, 2003). The concurrent influence of total and available phosphorus suggests that DOP production hinges on the equilibrium between phosphorus storage and microbial demand (Karl and Björkman, 2015). Effective subsoil phosphorus management should thus balance the availability of labile phosphorus with the stabilization of organic phosphorus within the humus matrix. A notable asymmetry exists in the relationship between DOP and DOC: DOP significantly predicts DOC, but DOC does not reciprocally influence DOP. This likely reflects the structural and functional hierarchy within DOM. DOP compounds, such as phospholipids and nucleotides, contribute carbon to the DOC pool, with their release—particularly during microbial turnover—enriching both phosphorus and carbon in the dissolved phase (Karl and Björkman, 2015). Conversely, DOC encompasses a diverse array of carbon-containing compounds, most of which lack phosphorus (Ding et al., 2020), explaining why DOC fluctuations do not necessarily affect DOP. Moreover, DOP release is governed by phosphorus-specific processes, such as microbial phosphorus demand and the mineralization of humus-bound phosphorus, which operate independently of broader DOC dynamics (Richardson and Simpson, 2011). From an agricultural management perspective, these insights emphasize the importance of enhancing SOC storage and optimizing nutrient supply to regulate DOM dynamics, particularly for carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus retention and slow release in subsoils.

5 Conclusions

This study examined the effects of crop rotation and monoculture systems on the quantity and quality of DOM components—dissolved organic carbon (DOC), nitrogen (DON), and phosphorus (DOP)—across three soil depths (0–30 cm, 30–60 cm, and 60–90 cm). Our findings establish soil depth as the primary determinant of DOM distribution, with concentrations decreasing and molecular complexity increasing with depth. Random Forest modeling identified total C, N, humus, and available P as key predictors of DOM variability, providing a framework for targeted soil management. The differential drivers of DOC, DON, and DOP reflect their distinct origins and regulatory pathways. These findings underscore the need for depth-specific strategies in soil carbon and nutrient management, especially in subsoils that act as long-term reservoirs. Sustainable practices like crop rotation that enhance organic matter accumulation and nutrient availability can improve DOM stability, support crop productivity, and contribute to climate resilience.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

TR: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GD: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. AU-J: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. BS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. The European Joint Project COFUND (EJP SOIL) –”Towards climate-smart sustainable management of agricultural soils” (862695) financially supported this work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The reviewer TH declared a past co-authorship with the author TR to the handling editor.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Ben-Dor, E. and Banin, A. (1995). Near-infrared analysis as a rapid method to simultaneously evaluate several soil properties. Soil Sci. Soc. America J. 59, 364–372. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900020014x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Berman, T. and Bronk, D. A. (2003). Dissolved organic nitrogen: a dynamic participant in aquatic ecosystems. Aquat. Microbial Ecol. 31, 279–305. doi: 10.3354/ame031279

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bolan, N. S., Adriano, D. C., Kunhikrishnan, A., James, T., McDowell, R., and Senesi, N. (2011). Dissolved organic matter. In pp, 1–75). doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-385531-2.00001-3

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bravo-Escobar, A. V., O’Donnell, A. J., Middleton, J. A., and Grierson, P. F. (2024). Differences in dissolved organic matter (DOM) composition of soils from native eucalypt forests and exotic pine plantations impacted by wildfire in Southwest Australia. Geoderma Regional 37, e00793. doi: 10.1016/j.geodrs.2024.e00793

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, S., Yao, F., Mi, G., Wang, L., Wu, H., and Wang, Y. (2022). Crop rotation increases root biomass and promotes the correlation of soil dissolved carbon with the microbial community in the rhizosphere. Front. Bioeng Biotechnol. 10. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1081647

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ding, Y., Shi, Z., Ye, Q., Liang, Y., Liu, M., Dang, Z., et al. (2020). Chemodiversity of soil dissolved organic matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 6174–6184. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c01136

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dou, T., Zhang, K., Shi, X., Liu, W., Yu, F., and Liu, D. (2025). Crop–mushroom rotation: A comprehensive review of its multifaceted impacts on soil quality, agricultural sustainability, and ecosystem health. Agronomy 15, 563. doi: 10.3390/agronomy15030563

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Feledyn-Szewczyk, B., Jończyk, K., and Stalenga, J. (2024). The effect of crop production systems and cultivars on spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield in a long-term experiment. Agriculture 14, 625. doi: 10.3390/agriculture14040625

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Findlay, S. E. G. and Parr, T. B. (2017). Dissolved organic matter. In Methods Stream Ecol. pp, 21–36). doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-813047-6.00002-4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Helfenstein, J., Tamburini, F., von Sperber, C., Massey, M. S., Pistocchi, C., Chadwick, O. A., et al. (2018). Combining spectroscopic and isotopic techniques gives a dynamic view of phosphorus cycling in soil. Nat. Commun. 9, 3226. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05731-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jobbagy, E. G. and Jackson, R. B. (2001). The distribution of soil nutrients with depth: global patterns and the imprint of plants. Biogeochemistry 53, 51–77. doi: 10.1023/A:1010760720215

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, D. and Willett, V. (2006). Experimental evaluation of methods to quantify dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38, 991–999. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.012

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaiser, K. and Kalbitz, K. (2012). Cycling downwards–dissolved organic matter in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 52, 29–32. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kalbitz, K., Solinger, S., Park, J.-H., Michalzik, B., and Matzner, E. (2000). Controls on the dynamics of dissolved organic matter in soils: a review. Soil Sci. 165, 277–304. doi: 10.1097/00010694-200004000-00001

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Karavanova, E. I. (2013). Dissolved organic matter: Fractional composition and sorbability by the soil solid phase (Review of literature). Eurasian Soil Sci. 46, 833–844. doi: 10.1134/s1064229313080048

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Karl, D. M. and Björkman, K. M. (2015). Dynamics of dissolved organic phosphorus. In Biogeochemistry Mar. dissolved organic matter pp, 233–334). doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-405940-5.00005-4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keeney, D. R. and Nelson, D. W. (1982). Nitrogen—inorganic forms. Methods Soil analysis: Part 2 Chem. microbiological properties 9, 643–698. doi: 10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c33

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Khan, A., Li, T., He, B., and Zhang, G. (2024). Insights from fertilization and cultivation management for interpreting the variations in the quantity and quality of dissolved organic carbon and microbial community structure on purple soil sloping farmland in southwest China. Agronomy 14, 426. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14030426

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Korzeniowska, J. and Stanislawska-Glubiak, E. (2024). Evaluation of the egner–riehm DL and mehlich 3 tests for the determination of phosphorus: the influence of soil properties on extraction efficiency and test conversion. Agronomy 14, 2921. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14122921

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Marschner, B. and Kalbitz, K. (2003). Controls of bioavailability and biodegradability of dissolved organic matter in soils. Geoderma 113, 211–235. doi: 10.1016/s0016-7061(02)00362-2

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Martyniuk, S., Koziel, M., Stalenga, J., and Jonczyk, K. (2016). Labile factions of soil organic matter and microbial characteristics of soil under organic and conventional crop management systems. Biol. Agric. Horticulture 32, 1–6. doi: 10.1080/01448765.2015.1015054

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Neff, J. C., Chapin, F. S., III, and Vitousek, P. M. (2003). Breaks in the cycle: dissolved organic nitrogen in terrestrial ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1, 205–211. doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0205:BITCDO]2.0.CO;2

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ren, T., Ukalska-Jaruga, A., Smreczak, B., and Cai, A. (2024). Dissolved organic carbon in cropland soils: A global meta-analysis of management effects. Agriculture Ecosyst. Environ. 371, 109080. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2024.109080

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Richardson, A. E. and Simpson, R. J. (2011). Soil microorganisms mediating phosphorus availability update on microbial phosphorus. Plant Physiol. 156, 989–996. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.175448

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rumpel, C. and Kögel-Knabner, I. (2011). Deep soil organic matter—a key but poorly understood component of terrestrial C cycle. Plant Soil 338, 143–158. doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0391-5

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Saadi, I., Borisover, M., Armon, R., and Laor, Y. (2006). Monitoring of effluent DOM biodegradation using fluorescence, UV and DOC measurements. Chemosphere 63, 530–539. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.07.075

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanderman, J., Lohse, K. A., Baldock, J. A., and Amundson, R. (2009). Linking soils and streams: Sources and chemistry of dissolved organic matter in a small coastal watershed. Water Resour. Res. 45. doi: 10.1029/2008WR006977

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Siebielec, G., Matyka, M., Łopatka, A., Kaczyński, R., Kuś, J., and Oleszek, W. (2020). Testing long-term impact of agriculture on soil and environment in Poland. In Long-Term Farming Syst. Res. pp, 123–146). doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-818186-7.00008-4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sipler, R. E. and Bronk, D. A. (2015). Dynamics of dissolved organic nitrogen. Biogeochemistry Mar. dissolved organic matter 127-232. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-405940-5.00004-2

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Smreczak, B. and Ukalska-Jaruga, A. (2021). Dissolved organic matter in agricultural soils. Soil Sci. Annu. 72, 132234. doi: 10.37501/soilsa/132234

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Spaccini, R., Piccolo, A., Conte, P., Haberhauer, G., and Gerzabek, M. (2002). Increased soil organic carbon sequestration through hydrophobic protection by humic substances. Soil Biol. Biochem. 34, 1839–1851. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00197-9

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Stenberg, B., Rossel, R. A. V., Mouazen, A. M., and Wetterlind, J. (2010). Visible and near infrared spectroscopy in soil science. Adv. Agron. 107, 163–215. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(10)07005-7

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sumner, M. E. and Miller, W. P. (1996). Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. Methods Soil analysis: Part 3 Chem. Methods 5, 1201–1229. doi: 10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c40

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ukalska-Jaruga, A., Bejger, R., Debaene, G., and Smreczak, B. (2021). Characterization of soil organic matter individual fractions (Fulvic acids, humic acids, and humins) by spectroscopic and electrochemical techniques in agricultural soils. Agronomy 11, 1067. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11061067

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Undurraga, P. D., Zagal, E. V., Sepúlveda, G., and Valderrama, N. V. (2010). Dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen in Andisol for six crop rotations with different soil management intensity. Available online at: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/45768 (August 2025).

Google Scholar

Wang, Y.-L., Yang, C.-M., Zou, L.-M., and Cui, H.-Z. (2015). Spatial distribution and fluorescence properties of soil dissolved organic carbon across a riparian buffer wetland in chongming island, China. Pedosphere 25, 220–229. doi: 10.1016/s1002-0160(15)60007-8

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Weishaar, J. L., Aiken, G. R., Bergamaschi, B. A., Fram, M. S., Fujii, R., and Mopper, K. (2003). Evaluation of specific ultraviolet absorbance as an indicator of the chemical composition and reactivity of dissolved organic carbon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 4702–4708. doi: 10.1021/es030360x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Williams, C. J., Yamashita, Y., Wilson, H. F., Jaffé, R., and Xenopoulos, M. A. (2010). Unraveling the role of land use and microbial activity in shaping dissolved organic matter characteristics in stream ecosystems. Limnology Oceanography 55, 1159–1171. doi: 10.4319/lo.2010.55.3.1159

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wilson, H. F. and Xenopoulos, M. A. (2008). Effects of agricultural land use on the composition of fluvial dissolved organic matter. Nat. Geosci. 2, 37–41. doi: 10.1038/ngeo391

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Workman, J., Jr. and Weyer, L. (2007). Practical guide to interpretive near-infrared spectroscopy (Boca Raton: CRC press). doi: 10.1201/9781420018318

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, P., Zhu, J., Wang, H., Shi, L., Zhuang, Y., Fu, Q., et al. (2021). Regulation of soil aggregate size under different fertilizations on dissolved organic matter, cellobiose hydrolyzing microbial community and their roles in organic matter mineralization. Sci. Total Environ. 755, 142595. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142595

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, X., Si, Y., Lin, W., Yang, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, Q., et al. (2018). Effects of short-term warming and nitrogen addition on the quantity and quality of dissolved organic matter in a subtropical Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation. PloS One 13, e0191403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191403

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, S., Ren, T., Fang, Y., Zhao, J., Zhu, J., Cong, W.-f., et al. (2025). Enhancing soil labile organic matter through oilseed rape-rice rotation and straw returning in paddy-upland systems. Plant Soil. 1–18. doi: 10.1007/s11104-025-07517-0

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Wen, J., Zhang, Y., Su, S., Wen, Y., et al. (2021). The C/N ratio and phenolic groups of exogenous dissolved organic matter together as an indicator for evaluating the stability of mineral-organic associations in red soil. J. Soils Sediments 21, 821–831. doi: 10.1007/s11368-020-02874-y

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zsolnay, Á. (2003). Dissolved organic matter: artefacts, definitions, and functions. Geoderma 113, 187–209. doi: 10.1016/s0016-7061(02)00361-0

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: dissolved organic matter, rotation, monoculture, soil depths, spectroscopy

Citation: Ren T, Debaene G, Ukalska-Jaruga A and Smreczak B (2025) Depth-dependent effects of crop rotation and monoculture on dissolved organic matter quantity and quality. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1668092. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1668092

Received: 17 July 2025; Accepted: 31 July 2025;
Published: 21 August 2025.

Edited by:

Kailou Liu, Jiangxi Institute of Red Soil, China

Reviewed by:

Tianfu Han, Zhengzhou University, China
Fahui Jiang, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China

Copyright © 2025 Ren, Debaene, Ukalska-Jaruga and Smreczak. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Tianjing Ren, cmVudGlhbmppbmdAb3V0bG9vay5jb20=; Bożena Smreczak, Ym96ZW5hc0BpdW5nLnB1bGF3eS5wbA==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.