ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Functional Plant Ecology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1668310
This article is part of the Research TopicIntegrating Nature-based Solutions for Land Degradation Neutrality and Deriving Co-BenefitsView all 10 articles
The Hilly-gully watershed exhibits Distinct deep soil moisture characteristics: a comparative study of paired watersheds in the Chinese Loess Plateau
Provisionally accepted
- 1School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Haidian, China
- 2University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, United States
- 3Istituto di Ricerca per la Protezione Idrogeologica Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Sede di Padova, Padua, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Deep soil moisture constitutes a critical component of hydrological processes in the Loess Plateau, playing an essential role in sustaining vegetation growth, maintaining ecosystem stability, and serving as an important indicator of regional water resource carrying capacity. However, the mechanisms by which long-term vegetation restoration influences deep soil moisture remain insufficiently understood. In this study, we selected two typical paired small watersheds–an Artificial forest watershed and a Farmland watershed-located in the Caijiachuan watershed in the hilly-gully region of the Loess Plateau in western Shanxi Province, China. Based on in situ measurements of soil moisture (0–500 cm) during the 2024 growing season (May-October), the vertical distribution and spatial variability of soil moisture have been systematically analyzed, and the impacts of long-term vegetation restoration on deep soil moisture content have been assessed. The results revealed significant differences between the paired watersheds. The average soil moisture content in the Farmland watershed (0.096 g/g) was significantly higher than in the Artificial forest watershed (0.070 g/g), indicating that artificially introduced vegetation has substantially reduced deep soil moisture reserves. Land use has pronouncedly influenced deep soil moisture, with farmland and native grassland exhibiting the highest moisture retention capacity, while vegetation restoration sites showed the lowest levels. Deep-rooted plantations in the Artificial forest watershed markedly intensified soil moisture deficits in the 200–500 cm layers, whereas the Farmland watershed exhibited comparatively moderate deficits. Moreover, soil moisture spatial heterogeneity was significantly greater in the Farmland watershed, while long-term vegetation restoration promoted a more homogeneous distribution of deep soil moisture. Overall, large-scale restoration dominated by deep-rooted species exerted substantial impacts on deep soil moisture dynamics. These findings provide a scientific basis for vegetation restoration planning and watershed management in the Loess Plateau region.
Keywords: soil moisture, Vegetation restoration, vertical distribution, spatial variability, Loess plateau
Received: 17 Jul 2025; Accepted: 05 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhu, Yu, Wang, Zhao, Lin, Qian, Wang and Cavalli. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Yang Yu, School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Haidian, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.