Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Plant Nutrition

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1669876

This article is part of the Research TopicHarnessing Plant–Microbe Interactions to Improve Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Plant-Soil Health for Sustainable AgricultureView all 20 articles

Microbial Response to Long-term Spatially Stratified Phosphorus Application in Northeast China

Provisionally accepted
Liyuan  HouLiyuan HouBing  HanBing HanYixin  WangYixin WangXiaoli  WangXiaoli WangWuliang  ShiWuliang ShiNing  CaoNing Cao*Yubin  ZhangYubin Zhang*
  • College of Plant Science, Jilin University, Changchun, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

As a critical factor influencing crop productivity in agricultural ecosystems, phosphorus (P)-fertilizer application can significantly alter soil physicochemical properties. However, the relative efficiencies of different types of spatially stratified P fertilizers and their underlying biological mechanisms remain insufficiently elucidated. In this study, an 8-year field experiment was conducted in a black soil region of Northeast China to compare the effects of five P-fertilization regimes: CK (without P application), FP (100% as basal fertilizer), APP (20% as starter fertilization by ammonium polyphosphate), MAP (20% as starter fertilization by monoammonium phosphate), and CMP (20% as starter fertilization by calcium magnesium phosphate). We systematically investigated the effects of spatially stratified P fertilization on soil physical properties, nutrient accumulation, maize yield performance, and bacterial and fungal community structure. CMP demonstrated the best performance in improving soil aeration and enhancing water infiltration capacity. MAP significantly increased the soil total P content by 18.62% and the soil Olsen-P content by 81.46% compared to those of FP. Both MAP and CMP promoted P uptake in various parts of maize plants, including the roots, straw, and grains. All tested starter P fertilizers improved P use efficiency. Compared to that of FP, the soil P surplus was reduced by 7.52%, 14.74%, and 13.04% under APP, MAP, and CMP, respectively. MAP demonstrated the most pronounced yield-increasing effect. Based on amplicon sequencing (16S rRNA for bacteria, interspacer region for fungi) and microbiome profiling, this study confirms that fungi are more susceptible than bacteria to variations in fertilizer types and application methods. Furthermore, the relative abundance of Tausonia was most significantly influenced by MAP. By enhancing the relative abundance of P-cycling functional genes (gph, phoU), MAP modulated the abundance of dominant microbial taxa such as Acidobacteria and Proteobacteria, thereby significantly improving maize yield. Therefore, in maize cropping systems in the black soil region of Northeast China, optimized P fertilizer selection and application methods can effectively reduce soil P surplus and modulate microbial community structure and functional diversity while maintaining stable crop yields.

Keywords: spatially stratified fertilization, Phosphorus efficiency, Maize yield, Microbialcommunity structure, functional genes

Received: 20 Jul 2025; Accepted: 26 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Hou, Han, Wang, Wang, Shi, Cao and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Ning Cao, cao_ning@jlu.edu.cn
Yubin Zhang, ybzhang@jlu.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.