Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Plant Metabolism and Chemodiversity

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1670979

This article is part of the Research TopicMolecular Mechanisms and Multi-Omics Approaches in Plant Secondary Metabolism: Regulation, Stress Responses, and Biotechnological ApplicationsView all articles

Comparative LC-MS/MS-Based Profiling of Phytohormones: A Unified Analytical Approach Across Diverse Plant Matrices

Provisionally accepted
Muhammad Kamran  HakeemMuhammad Kamran Hakeem1Tamilarasan  RajendaranTamilarasan Rajendaran1Esam  Eldin SaeedEsam Eldin Saeed2Ajay Kumar  MishraAjay Kumar Mishra2Khaled  M HazzouriKhaled M Hazzouri2Khaled  M. A. AmiriKhaled M. A. Amiri2,3ILTAF  SHAHILTAF SHAH1*
  • 1Department of Chemistry, College of Science, UAE University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
  • 2Khalifa Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, UAE University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
  • 3Department of Biology, College of Science, UAE University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Phytohormones are critical regulators of plant growth, development, and stress responses. Despite advancements in analytical techniques, profiling multiple phytohormones across various plant matrices using a standardized approach remains underexplored. This study presents a unified LC-MS/MS analytical platform, employing consistent chromatographic and mass spectrometric conditions in combination with tailored matrix-specific extraction procedures, to profile and quantify key phytohormones. This includes abscisic acid (ABA), salicylic acid (SA), gibberellic acid (GA), and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), across five plant matrices of significant agricultural and medicinal value. The method was validated for sensitivity, reproducibility, and matrix adaptability, demonstrating robust performance in profiling phytohormones from these diverse species. The results revealed distinct phytohormonal profiles, reflecting species-specific physiological adaptations to environmental conditions. For instance, cardamom exhibited high levels of SA and ABA, associated with stress responses in arid climates, while aloe vera showed lower phytohormone levels, indicative of its drought tolerance. Statistical analyses confirmed significant variation in hormone concentrations across the matrices, emphasizing the role of both genetic and environmental factors. This unified LC-MS/MS platform offers a comprehensive approach to understanding phytohormone distribution and dynamics, with implications for improving agricultural practices, crop resilience, and the development of functional foods and nutraceuticals. The findings contribute to the broader understanding of plant physiology and offer practical applications in sustainable agriculture, particularly in regions with significant agricultural and medicinal crop production.

Keywords: LCMS (Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry), phytohormones, Plant matrices, Sustainibility, LCMS/MS analysis

Received: 22 Jul 2025; Accepted: 30 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Hakeem, Rajendaran, Eldin Saeed, Mishra, Hazzouri, Amiri and SHAH. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: ILTAF SHAH, Department of Chemistry, College of Science, UAE University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.