Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Plant Abiotic Stress

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1678142

This article is part of the Research TopicPlant Adaptations in Extreme Environments from Wild Species to Crop SystemsView all articles

Elevated relative humidity significantly decreases cannabinoid concentrations while delaying flowering development in Cannabis sativa L

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Colorado State University Pueblo, Pueblo, United States
  • 2Chuncheon Bioindustry Foundation, Chuncheon-si, Republic of Korea

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Relative humidity (RH) is critical for regulating transpiration, plant morphology, and the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites in crops. However, its specific impacts on cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.) genotypes, especially concerning optimal growth and cannabinoid concentration, remain inadequately understood. This study aimed to investigate the effects of canopy-level RH on plant development and cannabinoid concentration in a CBD–dominant strain. Plants were cultivated under controlled conditions at two distinct RH ranges: low RH (37-58%) and high RH (78-98%). Growth metrics, including stem length, trunk diameter, number of nodes, apical internode spacing, and flowering time, were recorded weekly. Upon floral maturation and harvest, biomass and cannabinoid concentrations were measured. A total of 14 cannabinoids were quantified via high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to assess compositional shifts under different RH conditions. Cultivation under high RH resulted in a reduced vapor pressure deficit (VPD) ranging from 0.62 kPa to 0.25 kPa during flowering, indicating values outside the optimal range for cannabis cultivation. This environment led to significant reductions in total biomass (-75.3%), flower biomass (-71.0%), trunk diameter (-0.4%), and node count (29.3%), compared to low RH conditions (n = 10 per range, p < 0.001). Conversely, stem length increased by 9.7%, and apical internodal spacing expanded by 0.04% under high RH (n = 10, p < 0.0001). Flowering was delayed by three weeks with high RH, accompanied by notable reductions in both vegetative growth and inflorescence production. Furthermore, high RH significantly suppressed cannabinoid accumulation: cannabidiolic acid (CBD-A), cannabidiol (CBD), and cannabichromenic acid (CBC-A) levels decreased by approximately 4.9-fold, 3.2-fold, and 13-fold, respectively. Total cannabinoid concentrations of CBD and CBC were similarly diminished by 4.6-fold and 1.5-fold (n = 10, p < 0.0001). This study highlights that elevated humidity at the canopy level, outside the optimal VPD thresholds, can significantly delay flowering, reduce biomass accumulation, and negatively impact the cannabinoid concentrations in the Cannabis sativa L. cv. Cherry Berry. These findings underscore the importance of maintaining appropriate humidity levels to maximize yield and phytochemical production. Further research should explore how high-humidity environments, combined with optimized plant spacing and standardized cultivation protocols, can improve cannabinoid concentration during flowering.

Keywords: Canopy-range relative humidity, Cannabis, Vapor pressure deficit (VPD), biomass, morphology, Cannabinoids, Cannabidiol (CBD), cannabidiolic acid (CBD-A)

Received: 01 Aug 2025; Accepted: 13 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Corredor-Perilla, Kwon and Park. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: SangHyuck Park, sanghyuck.park@csupueblo.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.