Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Crop and Product Physiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1694779

This article is part of the Research TopicPhysiology and Production of Cash Crops: Seeking Ways to Increasing Productivity and Stabilizing YieldView all 6 articles

Pesticide Residue Detection Techniques for Increasing Productivity and Yield: Recent Progress and Future Outlooks

Provisionally accepted
Muhammad  UmerMuhammad Umer1Abid  NaseerAbid Naseer2Mustansar  MubeenMustansar Mubeen2Yasir  IftikharYasir Iftikhar2*Rafia  UmerRafia Umer2Ayesha  AkramAyesha Akram2Muhammad  Tanveer AltafMuhammad Tanveer Altaf3Essam  H. IbrahimEssam H. Ibrahim4Ahmed  Ezzat AhmedAhmed Ezzat Ahmed4Mingzheng  DuanMingzheng Duan1*
  • 1Zhaotong University College of Agronomy and Life Sciences, Zhaotong, China
  • 2College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan
  • 3Recep Tayyip Erdogan Universitesi, Rize, Türkiye
  • 4King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The intensive use of pesticides in modern agriculture has significantly improved crop yield and food security but also introduced serious health concerns by accumulation of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables and environment, and poses serious health risks. This review comprehensively explores the various residue detection techniques and plant metabolomics as an emerging tool to unravel the biochemical and physiological consequences of pesticide exposure. The article critically evaluates current methodologies for pesticide residue analysis, encompassing sampling strategies, storage considerations, and a wide range of extraction techniques including QuEChERS, solid-phase extraction (SPE), and emerging green alternatives such as supercritical fluid extraction and ultrasound-assisted extraction. A detailed comparison of analytical techniques—particularly gas chromatography (GC), liquid chromatography (LC), mass spectrometry (MS), and novel non-separative methods such as biosensors and spectroscopy—is presented, emphasizing sensitivity, specificity, and adaptability to complex matrices. Furthermore, the integration of metabolomics with advanced platforms such as machine learning, green chemistry principles, and microfluidic innovations is discussed as a transformative direction for future pesticide residue monitoring. The review is a novel compilation of conventional residue detection methods and emerging omics-driven, AI-assisted approaches, while identifying current limitations, including matrix interferences and regulatory disparities, and advocates for the harmonization of residue standards, alongside the development of cost-effective, high-throughput analytical platforms to ensure food safety, improve risk assessment, and enhance understanding of plant metabolic responses under pesticide stress. Moreover, multi-omics approaches can be more reliable in evaluating the quality of claimed organic farming products.

Keywords: Pesticide Residue, MRLs, Metabolites, plant health, green chemistry, Biosensors, machine learning

Received: 28 Aug 2025; Accepted: 14 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Umer, Naseer, Mubeen, Iftikhar, Umer, Akram, Altaf, Ibrahim, Ahmed and Duan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yasir Iftikhar, yasir.iftikhar@uos.edu.pk
Mingzheng Duan, duanmingzheng@ztu.edu.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.