Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Plant Systematics and Evolution

Phylogenomic study of Orostachys using Angiosperms353: Polyphyly of subsections with taxonomic consequences

Provisionally accepted
Ha-Rim  LeeHa-Rim Lee1Halam  KangHalam Kang1Yoo-Jung  ParkYoo-Jung Park1Ho-Kwon  KwakHo-Kwon Kwak1Hyeyeon  KimHyeyeon Kim1Jieun  ParkJieun Park1Hyeok Jae  ChoiHyeok Jae Choi2Kyung-Ah  KimKyung-Ah Kim3*Kyeong-Sik  CheonKyeong-Sik Cheon1*
  • 1Sangji University, Wonju, Republic of Korea
  • 2Changwon National University, Changwon, Republic of Korea
  • 3Kangwon National University, Chuncheon-si, Republic of Korea

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The genus Orostachys (Crassulaceae) has been subject to considerable disagreement regarding its taxonomic boundaries because of extensive morphological similarities among taxa and widespread intraspecific variation. Additionally, previous phylogenetic studies based on molecular markers have consistently demonstrated that the two subsections of Orostachys (subsect. Orostachys and subsect. Appendiculatae) do not constitute a monophyletic group, leaving the generic boundaries unresolved to date. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the generic boundaries and accurate taxonomic positions of individual taxa via the Angiosperms353 target enrichment approach. We analyzed a total of 43 individuals representing 25 taxa from 5 genera, including 14 Orostachys taxa and closely related genera such as Hylotelephium and Meterostachys. High-quality genomic data were obtained, with an average gene recovery rate of 99.1% (349.5/353 genes) and substantial sequence length recovery (average 1,223 bp per locus), resulting in concatenated datasets of 397-400 kbp sequences. Phylogenetic analyses using concatenation and coalescent-based approaches with datasets based on different threshold values revealed exceptionally high concordance across all the phylogenetic trees, demonstrating the high reliability of our results. Our findings confirmed the polyphyletic nature of Orostachys, with O. subsect. Orostachys forming a monophylum distinct from O. subsect. Appendiculatae and related genera. Particularly significant is our discovery that, unlike previous studies, O. subsect. Orostachys constituted a monophyletic group rather than exhibiting a paraphyletic relationship with Hylotelephium, which we consider the most important finding of this study. At the species level, we resolved several taxonomic issues. O. ramosa and O. japonica f. polycephala were confirmed as synonyms of O. malacophylla and O. japonica, respectively. Furthermore, the endemic Korean species O. margaritifolia, O. latielliptica, O. chongsunensis, and O. iwarenge f. magnus were effectively identified as independent taxa. Most nodes in the phylogenetic tree constructed in this study had UFBoot values ≥95% and LPP values ≥0.95, indicating high reliability. Therefore, this study represents another demonstration of the effectiveness of the Angiosperms353 approach in resolving complex evolutionary relationships within morphologically challenging plant groups.

Keywords: Crassulaceae, Angiosperms353, phylogenomics, Target enrichment, Polyphyly

Received: 01 Sep 2025; Accepted: 26 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Lee, Kang, Park, Kwak, Kim, Park, Choi, Kim and Cheon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Kyung-Ah Kim
Kyeong-Sik Cheon

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.