Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Functional and Applied Plant Genomics

This article is part of the Research TopicPlant Genotyping: From Traditional Markers to Modern Technologies, Volume IIView all 14 articles

Research Evolution of Flat Peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch): A Decadal Bibliometric Analysis

Provisionally accepted
Abebe  Misganaw GedamuAbebe Misganaw Gedamu1,2Yong  LiYong Li1,3,4Jinlong  WuJinlong Wu1,4Ke  caoKe cao1,4Muhammad  AneesMuhammad Anees1Wang  ZhaohuiWang Zhaohui1Liu  SungLiu Sung1Xing  HongyangXing Hongyang1Wei  PengchengWei Pengcheng1Muhammed  JehangirMuhammed Jehangir1Umer  HaytUmer Hayt1Ren  WeiRen Wei1Lirong  WangLirong Wang1,3*
  • 1Zhengzhou Fruit Research Institute, National Key Laboratory for Germplasm Innovation & Utilization of Horticultural Crops, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, China
  • 2College of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Mekdela Amba University, Tulu Awulia , Amhara, Ethiopia
  • 3Institute of Western Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changji, Xinjiang,, China
  • 4Zhongyuan Research Center, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang, Henan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction: The flat peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.), characterized by its oblate shape and determined by a known genetic inversion, is a high-value cultivar gaining global market share. Mapping the intellectual landscape of its research is crucial to consolidate knowledge and direct future scientific and breeding programs. Methods: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis was conducted on a curated dataset of forty open-access research articles published between 2010 and 2024, sourced from Web of Science and Scopus. Following rigorous data deduplication, the bibliometrix R package was employed to analyze publication trends, collaboration networks, and keyword co-occurrence patterns. Collaboration networks were subsequently visualized and analyzed using VOS viewer. Results: The analysis identified a striking surge in annual publications, particularly post-2019, underscoring growing interest. China was the unequivocal dominant force in production and citation impact. Key research themes clustered around "fruit quality," "genetics," and "postharvest physiology," with "quality" exhibiting the strongest network centrality. The network analysis identified "flat peach" as a central hub, demonstrating the highest co-occurrence link strength and affirming its strong, multifaceted connections within the research domain. Discussion: This first systematic bibliometric review delineates the rapid evolution of flat peach research, highlighting its core drivers and conceptual focus. The steep growth in output reflects rising academic and commercial interest. Critically, the analysis identifies significant gaps in molecular genomics, postharvest optimization, and climate resilience research. These findings provide a strategic, evidence-based roadmap to align future research priorities with market demands and sustainable cultivation challenges.

Keywords: Bibliometric, citation, fruit quality, Flat peach, Research landscape, structural variation

Received: 21 Sep 2025; Accepted: 31 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Gedamu, Li, Wu, cao, Anees, Zhaohui, Sung, Hongyang, Pengcheng, Jehangir, Hayt, Wei and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Lirong Wang, wanglirong@caas.cn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.