Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 11 December 2025

Sec. Plant Physiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1711383

This article is part of the Research TopicRegulation of Stress Tolerance in Plants by BiostimulantsView all 10 articles

Dual benefits of Bacillus velezensis LJ-19: contact-dependent biocontrol of Fusarium wilt and growth promotion in cucumber

Songwei Li&#x;Songwei LiJingjing Li&#x;Jingjing LiMinghui Yuan&#x;Minghui YuanJingxia RenJingxia RenYang JiaoYang JiaoLinjie ZhaoLinjie ZhaoYeyun WangYeyun WangZihan YanZihan YanJinYu LiJinYu LiJianfeng Du*Jianfeng Du*Hongliang Wang*Hongliang Wang*Chenyu Yang*Chenyu Yang*
  • School of Plant Protection and Environment (School of Bee Science), Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, Henan, China

Cucumber is an important economic crop widely cultivated globally. Fusarium wilt, caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum, seriously affects its yield and quality and is difficult to control. Here, we isolated a novel Bacillus velezensisstrain (LJ-19) from cucumber rhizosphere. Through assays for antibacterial activity, enzymatic activity, detection of disease resistance genes, and plant growth-promoting activity, this strain exhibited pronounced antagonistic activity against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum and possessed plant growth-promoting traits. Notably, the inhibition of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum mycelial growth and spore germination by LJ-19 was primarily contact-dependent, rather than mediated by diffusible antibiotics. Meanwhile, LJ-19 enhanced the activities of key defense enzymes—superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), and polyphenol oxidase (PPO), thereby contributing to plant protection, and the transcript levels of defense-related genes, including Nonexpressor of pathogenesis-related genes 1 (NPR1), Pathogenesis-related gene 3 (PR3), Lipoxygenase 1 (LOX1), Constitutive triple response 1 (CTR1), and Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase 1 (PAL1), were up-regulated. Pot experiments demonstrated that LJ-19 treatment significant increased the stem thickness, fresh weight, leaf area, and overall biomass in cucumber. LJ-19 was also been confirmed could thrive in nitrogen-free environment and solubilize inorganic phosphorus, produce indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and siderophores. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that Bacillus velezensis LJ-19 suppresses cucumber Fusarium wilt via direct antagonism and induction of systemic resistance. They also provide insights into the molecular mechanisms by which LJ-19 controls Fusarium Wilt and promotes cucumber growth, highlighting its potential as an effective biocontrol agent for sustainable cucumber.

1 Introduction

Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum is a soil-borne pathogen that causes cucumber wilt, posing a severe threat to cucumber production and leading to yield losses (Ali et al., 2022; Xu et al., 2023). In recent years, cucumber wilt has become one of the most challenging issues in cucumber cultivation, aggravated by factors including long-term monocropping, declining soil fertility, and microbial community imbalances (Lian et al., 2023). In response, biological control strategies have gained increasing attention as sustainable and environmentally safe approaches to managing soil-borne diseases (Naranjo et al., 2015). Microbial-based biocontrol not only mitigates environmental pollution caused by excessive fertilizer and pesticide use but also improves soil health and reduces the recurrence of crop diseases (Nadarajah and Abdul Rahman, 2023).

Natural soil microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, and protozoa, can exert beneficial, pathogenic, or neutral effects on host plants (Ortíz-Castro et al., 2009). Biocontrol agents derived from microorganisms can inhibit plant pathogens through multiple mechanisms, such as niche competition, nutrient rivalry, secretion of antibiotics and volatile compounds, lysozyme production, and induction of plant resistance (Marilley et al., 1998; Sun et al., 2022). When plants are attacked by fungal pathogens, biocontrol agents can help establish a “defense barrier” to combat infections (Trivedi et al., 2022; Hibbing et al., 2010; René et al., 2020). Plant rhizobacteria are an important group of soil microorganisms that play significant roles in promoting plant growth and enhancing disease resistance (René et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2021), thus emerging as a potential approach for controlling cucumber wilt.

Bacillus velezensis, as an emerging biocontrol microbial agent, has attracted considerable attention for its roles in plant disease management and plant growth promotion (Li et al., 2022). Numerous Bacillus velezensis strains, including B. subtilis (Xu et al., 2022), Bacillus velezensis (Luo et al., 2019), and B. amyloliquefaciens (Wu et al., 2015), have demonstrated broad-spectrum antagonism against phytopathogens through the synthesis of antifungal metabolites and niche competition (Keshmirshekan et al., 2024). Notably, Bacillus velezensis inhibits pathogens through multiple synergistic mechanisms, such as producing antifungal substances (e.g., lipopeptides, polyketides, and bacteriocins) via distinct metabolic pathways and inducing systemic resistance in host plants (Zhang et al., 2020; Xie et al., 2021). For instance, Bacillus velezensis strain YB15 secretes β-glucanase to suppress pathogenic fungi (Xu et al., 2014); strain VJH504 promotes plant growth by producing siderophores and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) (Yang et al., 2023) and strain SH-1471 induces plant defense-related substances including pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins, secondary metabolites, and cyclic lipopeptides to limit pathogen invasion (Shen et al., 2023; Lau et al., 2020; Stoll et al., 2021). Other strains can induce systemic resistance by enhancing the activity of defense enzymes like superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), and Catalase (CAT) (Zhai et al., 2023; Ha-Tran et al., 2021; Bhattacharyya et al., 2020). Furthermore, Bacillus velezensis has also been shown to promote plant growth through mechanisms such as phosphorus solubilization, nitrogen fixation, secretion of plant growth hormones, and enhancement of plant nutrient uptake. For example, Bacillus velezensis strain HNU24 facilitates tomato root growth (Cao et al., 2022); strain BAC03 exerts growth-promoting effects on crops such as cucumber, potato, and tomato (Meng et al., 2016); and strain CE100 inhibits pathogens including Botrytis cinerea and Fusarium oxysporum while producing IAA to promote plant growth (Moon et al., 2021). Thus, Bacillus velezensis has garnered widespread attention as a highly effective biocontrol agent in sustainable agriculture (Zhou et al., 2023).

In this study, we reported Bacillus velezensis LJ-19, which exerts dual functions: biocontrol against Fusarium wilt via a contact-dependent mechanism and possesses growth promotion in cucumber. These findings provide a sustainable approach for cucumber cultivation and pathogen control.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Isolation of cucumber rhizosphere bacteria

Rhizosphere bacteria were isolated from soil samples collected from the root zone of cucumber plants following a modified protocol based on Li et al. (2020). Soil samples were randomly obtained from a cucumber greenhouse located on Donggan Road Street, Muye District, Xinxiang City, Henan Province, China (GPS coordinates: N35.3296, E113.9063). Four grams of each soil sample were mixed with 36 mL of sterile water and shaken for 20 minutes. The resulting rhizosphere bacterial suspension was serially diluted to 10-6. A 100 µL aliquot of the diluted suspension was spread onto Luria-Bertani (LB) agar plates and incubated for 16–18 hours. Colonies exhibiting distinct morphological features were selected and subcultured in fresh LB medium for 1–3 days. After three rounds of purification, the isolated colonies were screened for antagonistic activity against the fungal pathogen. The Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum used in this study was provided and preserved by the Henan Province Engineering Research Center of Biological Pesticide & Fertilizer Development and Synergistic Application.

2.2 Screening of cucumber rhizosphere bacteria antagonistic to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum

The screening for rhizosphere bacteria with antagonistic activity against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum was performed according to a previously described method (Wang et al., 2021), with minor modifications. A 5 mm mycelial disc of a candidate cucumber rhizosphere bacterial isolate and a 5 mm mycelial disc were placed on opposite sides of a potato dextrose agar (PDA) plate in 90 mm Petri dishes, with a distance of 50 mm between them. The plates were incubated at 25 °C for 7 days. A control plate was prepared with only a disc. The antagonistic effect was assessed by measuring the inhibition of hyphal growth; the diameter of the colony was used as a statistical indicator to quantify the level of antagonism. Each experiment was repeated three times.

2.3 Identification of cucumber rhizosphere bacterial strain LJ-19

To characterize the antagonistic strain LJ-19, its morphological and genetic features were examined following a previously described method (Ma et al., 2023), with minor modifications. Briefly, strain LJ-19 was streaked onto LB agar plates and incubated at 28 °C for 48 hours. Colony morphology, including edge, size, and color, was recorded. Gram staining was performed using a commercial kit (Beijing Solaibao Technology Co., Ltd.) and observed under an oil immersion microscope at 100× magnification. For molecular identification, genomic DNA was extracted from strain LJ-19 using a bacterial genomic DNA extraction kit (Beijing ComWin Biotech Co., Ltd.). The 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR with universal primers 27F:5’- AGAGTTTGATCATGGCTCAG-3’ and 1492R: 5’- TACGGCTA CCTTGTTACGA-3’). The 25 μL PCR reaction mixture contained 2 μL of DNA template, 1 μL of each primer, 8.5 μL of ddH2O, and 12.5 μL of 2× Taq plus Master Mix. The amplified product was purified and sequenced by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. The resulting sequence was analyzed using the BLAST algorithm on the NCBI database, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA 6.0 software (Wang et al., 2024). The resulting sequence was analyzed using the BLAST algorithm on the NCBI database, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed with MEGA 6.0 software.

2.4 Assessment of nitrogen fixation, phosphorus solubilization, and potassium solubilization by strain LJ-19

The nitrogen fixation, phosphorus solubilization, and potassium solubilization capabilities of strain LJ-19 were evaluated according to previously described methods (Zhai et al., 2023), with slight modifications. The strain was inoculated onto nitrogen-free Ashby medium, Pikovskaya (PVK) medium, and potassium feldspar (PF) solid medium, followed by incubation at 30 °C for 5 days. The formation of transparent zones around the colonies was examined as an indicator of nitrogen fixation, phosphorus solubilization, and potassium solubilization activities, respectively.

2.5 IAA production assay

To quantify IAA production, strain LJ-19 was initially cultured in liquid LB medium at 30 °C for 48 hours. A bacterial suspension with a concentration of 107–108 CFU/mL was then transferred into a nutrient broth supplemented with 100 μg/mL tryptophan and incubated in the dark at 30 °C for 72 hours. After incubation, the culture was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 minutes to collect the supernatant. Then, 3 mL of the supernatant was mixed with an equal volume of Salkowski reagent and incubated in darkness at 30 °C for 30 minutes. The development of a pink color indicated IAA production. A medium control without bacterial inoculation was included. The absorbance of the solution was measured at 540 nm using a spectrophotometer to confirm IAA synthesis (Zhai et al., 2023).

2.6 Siderophore production assay

Siderophore production was qualitatively assessed using the chrome azurol S (CAS) agar plate method as described by Zhai et al. (2023). Strain LJ-19 was inoculated onto CAS agar plates and incubated at 28 °C for 7 days. Siderophores secreted by the strain chelate iron from the iron-CAS complex in the medium, resulting in the formation of an orange halo around the bacterial colony. The presence of an orange halo around the colony of LJ-19 was considered a positive indicator of siderophore production.

2.7 Effect of strain LJ-19 on the induction of defense enzymes in cucumber

Uniformly grown cucumber seedlings (Zhongnong No. 8) were selected as experimental materials. The seedlings were cultivated in a greenhouse under the following conditions: temperature maintained between 24 °C and 28 °C, a photoperiod of 16 hours light/8 hours dark, and relative humidity ranging from 64% to 83%. During the two-leaf stage, the seedlings were transplanted into plastic pots, with 10 seedlings per pot. Four treatment groups were established as follows: the first group was treated with sterile water(control); the second group was treated with a bacterial suspension of strain LJ-19 (1 × 108 CFU/mL); the third group was treated with a suspension of the cucumber wilt pathogen (1 × 106 spores/mL); the fourth group was treated with both the LJ-19 bacterial suspension (1 × 108 CFU/mL) and pathogen suspension (1 × 106 spores/mL). After 96 hours of treatment, root samples were collected from the cucumber seedlings. A total of 0.1 g of root tissue was homogenized in 1 mL extraction buffer of the specific assay kit (Suzhou Greis Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China) using a pre-cooled mortar and pestle. The homogenate was kept at 4 °C during processing and then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4 °C. The resulting supernatant was collected, and its absorbance was measured at 240 nm, 290 nm, 470 nm, 560 nm, and 495 nm to determine the activities of CAT, PAL, POD, SOD, and PPO, respectively. Each treatment was repeated three times (Wang et al., 2020b).

2.8 Quantification of gene expression using RT-qPCR

Quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed to analyze the transcript levels of defense-related genes in cucumber plants treated with strain LJ-19 or sterile water (control) following inoculation with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum. The root samples from cucumber plants were collected at 72 hours post-inoculation according to the method described by Pu et al. (2014). For each sample, 0.1 g of tissue was homogenized in 1 mL of TRI Gene Reagent (purchased from Nanjing Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., China) using a pre-cooled mortar and pestle. The expression of the following genes was examined: Actin (internal reference), PR1, PR3, LOX1, CTR1, and PAL1. Gene-specific primers were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 based on the cDNA sequences of each target gene (Supplementary Table S1). RT-qPCR was carried out using an ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR System. Each 15 µL reaction mixture contained: 7.5 μL of 2× TransStart™ Green qPCR SuperMix, 0.5 μL of passive reference dye II, 0.5 μL of each forward and reverse primer, 6 μL of ddH2O, and 0.5 μL of cDNA template. The amplification protocol consisted of an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 seconds, 59 °C for 30 seconds, and 72 °C for 35 seconds. The Actin gene was used as an endogenous control to normalize cDNA levels across samples. Relative gene expression was calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method. Each treatment included fifteen seedlings, and data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from three independent biological replicates (Pu et al., 2014).

2.9 Poison food technique

Strain LJ-19 was cultured in 250 mL of LB medium at 28 °C for 7 days with shaking at 180 r/min. After fermentation, the broth was centrifuged at 8000 × g for 10 minutes to collect the supernatant. The supernatant was then filter-sterilized using a 0.22 μm membrane and incorporated into PDA plates inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum to assess antagonistic activity. The presence of a growth inhibition zone around the Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum inoculum indicated antagonistic effects attributable to the extracellular metabolites produced by strain LJ-19 (Dong et al., 2023).

2.10 Effect of strain LJ-19 on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum spore germination

Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum was cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium, and spores were harvested to prepare a spore suspension. Three treatment groups were established as follows: the first group served as a control, LB medium without bacteria was mixed with the Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum spore suspension in a 1:1 ratio; the second group mixed the liquid culture of strain LJ-19 was mixed with the Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum spore suspension in a 1:1 ratio; and the third group mixed the filter-sterilized extracellular metabolite filtrate of strain LJ-19 was mixed with the Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum spore suspension in a 1:1 ratio. The mixtures were placed on concave slides and incubated at 28 °C. After 48 hours, spore germination was observed under a MOTIC SK160 microscope (MOTIC CHINA GROUP CO., LTD.). A conidium was considered germinated when the germ tube length exceeded half of the conidium length. Each treatment was repeated three times (Li et al., 2015).

2.11 Effect of strain LJ-19 on seed germination and seedling growth of cucumber

Cucumber seeds were surface-disinfected to remove external contaminants. The seeds were rinsed with distilled water, soaked in 75% alcohol for 3 min, and then immersed in a 5% sodium hypochlorite solution for 30 seconds, followed by three washes with sterile distilled water. Two main treatment groups were established for the germination assay: First group: thirty seeds were soaked in sterile water for 6 hours. Half of these were then transferred to a bacterial suspension of strain LJ-19 (1 × 107 CFU/mL) for 1 hour. Second group: thirty seeds were soaked in the LJ-19 bacterial suspension (1 × 107 CFU/mL) for 6 hours. Half were then treated with a Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum spore suspension (1 × 106 spores/mL) for 20 minutes, while the other half were soaked in sterile water for 20 minutes. Germination was monitored daily. The following parameters were calculated: germination rate (percentage of normal seedlings), germination index (GI), and seedling vigor index (SVI). GI was calculated as the cumulative number of germinated seeds divided by the number of days after sowing, assessed over 7 days. SVI was determined by multiplying GI by seedling fresh weight. After 7 days, seedlings at the cotyledon stage were transplanted into pots. The experimental group received irrigation with the LJ-19 bacterial suspension (1 × 107 CFU/mL), while the control group was irrigated with sterile water. Plants were grown in a greenhouse under the following conditions: temperature 24–28 °C, 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod, and relative humidity 64–83%, with 10 seedlings per pot. Each treatment was replicated three times. After 45 days, plant growth parameters were recorded. Seedlings were carefully removed from the pots, and plant height, root length, fresh weight, biomass, and maximum leaf area were measured to evaluate the growth-promoting effects of strain LJ-19 (Yang et al., 2024).

2.12 Effect of strain LJ-19 on cucumber disease prevention

Strain LJ-19 was cultured in LB medium at 30 °C for 24 hours with shaking at 180 r/min, and the bacterial concentration was adjusted to 108 CFU/mL based on OD600 measurement. Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum was grown on PDA medium at 28 °C for 5 days. Then, ten 5-mm mycelial plugs were excised and transferred into 100 mL of potato dextrose broth (PDB), followed by incubation in a shaker at 28 °C and 180 r/min for 3 days. The resulting culture was filtered through four layers of sterile gauze, and the spore concentration was adjusted to 105 spores/mL. Uniform cucumber seeds were surface-sterilized by soaking in 5% sodium hypochlorite for 30 seconds and 75% ethanol for 3 minutes, then rinsed three times with sterile water. The seeds were placed in sterile Petri dishes and transferred to seedling trays for growth in a greenhouse at 25 °C under a 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod until the two-leaf stage was reached. Each pot of cucumber seedlings was subjected to one of the following treatments: (1) Soaking with 15 mL of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum spore suspension; (2) Soaking with 15 mL of LJ-19 bacterial suspension followed, after 24 hours, by soaking with 15 mL of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum spore suspension. After treatment, the seedlings were transplanted into plastic pots. Each treatment consisted of 12 cucumber seedlings and was repeated three times. The disease index of plants inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum, with or without LJ-19 pretreatment, was recorded 25 days after inoculation (Xu et al., 2022).

2.13 Statistical analysis

All experimental data were processed using Origin 2019 software. Statistical significance of differences was assessed through analysis of variance (ANOVA) performed with SPSS (version 19.0 for Windows, USA). Pairwise comparisons were carried out using t-tests and one-way ANOVA implemented in GraphPad Prism software. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The following symbols were used to denote significance levels: P < 0.05. NS, not significant.

3 Results

3.1 Cucumber rhizobacterium LJ-19 inhibits hyphal growth of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum

In this study, 156 bacterial strains were isolated from the cucumber rhizosphere and screened for antagonistic activity against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum. Among these, strain LJ-19 exhibited the strongest antifungal activity (Figures 1a b, Supplementary Table S2), with an inhibition rate of 83.59% (Figure 1c). To determine whether inhibition required physical contact, the distance between LJ-19 and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum was varied. When not in direct contact, the hyphal diameter of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Cucumerinum showed no significant difference compared to the control. In contrast, hyphal growth was completely inhibited upon direct contact with LJ-19 (Figures 1d, e). Furthermore, microscopic observation revealed that upon contact with LJ-19, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum hyphae ceased polarized growth, exhibited increased branching, and underwent severe structural alterations. Compared to the control, most hyphae lost their original morphology, forming irregular clusters with apparent surface shrinkage and deformation (Figure 1f). Together, these results indicate that strain LJ-19 inhibits Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum hyphal growth through direct contact, resulting in morphological disruption and impaired fungal development.

Figure 1
a) Two petri dishes showing fungal growth with Foc and LJ-19+Foc treatments. b) Bar graph comparing hyphal diameters between treatments CK and LJ-19. c) Time-lapse images of fungal colonies over seven days for Foc and LJ-19+Foc. d) Bar graph of hyphal diameter over time for both treatments. e) Microscopic images of fungi under Foc and LJ-19+Foc treatments. f) Petri dish with CK and EM treatments. g) Bar graph comparing hyphal diameters for CK and EM treatments. h) Microscopic view of fungal growth under CK and EM treatments. i) Microscopic images of samples under CK, LJ-19, and EM treatments.

Figure 1. Contact-dependent antagonistic activity of Bacillus velezensis LJ-19 against Fusarium oxysporum f sp. cucumerinum. (a) Inhibition of Fusarium oxysporum f sp. cucumerinum growth by LJ-19. (b) Effect of LJ-19 treatment on Fusarium oxysporum f sp. cucumerinum colony diameter. (c) Hyphal growth of Fusarium oxysporum f sp. Cucumerinum before contact with LJ-19. (d) Changes in hyphal diameter of Fusarium oxysporum f sp. cucumerinum before contact with LJ-19. (e) Microscopic morphology of Fusarium oxysporum f sp. cucumerinum hyphae after contact with LJ-19. (f) Antagonistic inhibition of extracellular metabolites hyphae. (g) The diameter of Fusarium oxysporum f sp. cucumerinum after LJ-19 extracellular metabolites treatment. (h) Microscopic morphology of Fusarium oxysporum f sp. cucumerinum hyphae grown with extracellular metabolites of LJ-19. (i) The effects of strain LJ-19 and its extracellular metabolites on the development of Fusarium oxysporum f sp. cucumerinum spores. Foc: Fusarium oxysporum f sp. cucumerinum. Error bars represent standard deviation (SD) of the mean (n = 3). Asterisks indicate significant differences: *** p < 0.001; NS, Non-significant.

3.2 Effect of cucumber rhizobacterium LJ-19 on the severity of cucumber wilt disease

Although the antagonistic effect of cucumber rhizobacterium LJ-19 against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum was established, its ability to mitigate Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Cucumerinum induced damage in cucumber plants warranted further investigation. The germination rate of cucumber seeds was evaluated following treatment with LJ-19 and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum, both individually and in combination. Under normal conditions, seed germination was comparable between LJ-19-treated and untreated groups (Figure 2a). However, under Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum infection, seeds treated with LJ-19 showed significantly higher germination percentage, germination index, and seedling vigor index compared to the infected control. In contrast, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum infection alone resulted in markedly reduced values across these indices relative to the sterile water control (Figures 2b–d). Additionally, cucumber seedlings treated with LJ-19 exhibited a substantially lower disease incidence, with a disease index of 34, compared to the control value of 50.68 (Figures 2e, f). These findings indicate that strain LJ-19 effectively alleviates Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum induced damage and delays the onset of cucumber wilt disease.

Figure 2
Panel (a) shows seedlings under four treatments: Foc, LJ-19-Foc, CK1, and LJ-19. Panels (b) to (d) are bar charts depicting germination percentage, germination index, and seedling vigor index, comparing Normal and Foc treatments with significance levels. Panel (e) displays plants in pots labeled LJ-19 and CK2. Panel (f) presents a bar chart of the disease index between CK2 and LJ-19, showing a significant difference.

Figure 2. Effect of Bacillus velezensis strain LJ-19 on seed germination and disease index of cucumber wilt disease. (a) Seed germination rate; (b) Germination potential; (c) Germination index; (d) Seedling vigor; (e) Phenotype of cucumber seedlings; (f) Disease index of cucumber wilt. CK1, untreated control; CK2, inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum f sp. cucumerinum only. Values represent mean ± SD (n = 3). Significance levels: ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; NS, Non-significant.

3.3 Morphological and molecular identification of cucumber rhizobacterium LJ-19

To characterize the cucumber rhizobacterium LJ-19, both morphological and molecular biological identification were carried out. Colonies of strain LJ-19 appeared round, opaque, pale yellow, with irregular margins, rough surfaces, and raised profiles. Physiological and biochemical assays confirmed that the strain is Gram-positive and rod-shaped (Figures 3a, b, Supplementary Figure S1, Supplementary Table S3). The 16S rDNA gene was amplified from strain LJ-19 and sequenced. Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rDNA sequence revealed that LJ-19 shares high homology with members of the Bacillus velezensis group and clusters within this species in the phylogenetic tree (Figure 3c). Combined results from colonial and cellular morphology, physiological and biochemical characteristics, and molecular identification confirm that strain LJ-19 belongs to Bacillus velezensis.

Figure 3
Panel a shows a Petri dish with clustered bacterial colonies on an agar surface. Panel b presents a microscopic image of stained Bacillus cells, appearing as purple rod-shaped structures. Panel c features a phylogenetic tree depicting relationships among Bacillus strains. The tree emphasizes strain LJ-19, marked with a red triangle, branching near Bacillus albus strain HYS and Bacillus velezensis strains. Bootstrap values are indicated for clades.

Figure 3. Characterize of the cucumber rhizobacterium LJ-19. (a, b) Morphological, physiological, and biochemical characterization of strain LJ-19. (c) Phylogenetic tree of strain LJ-19 based on 16S rDNA gene sequence.

3.4 Plant growth-promoting activity of strain LJ-19 in vitro

As a cucumber rhizosphere microorganism, strain LJ-19 not only exhibited antagonistic activity against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum but also demonstrated potential for enhancing plant growth. To evaluate its growth-promoting effects, key parameters of cucumber plants, including stem thickness, root length, maximum leaf area, fresh weight, and dry weight, were measured following treatment with LJ-19. Compared to the control, LJ-19 treatment led to significant increases in stem thickness (15.44 ± 0.04%), fresh weight (13.82 ± 0.3%), maximum leaf area (37.75 ± 6.31%), and biomass (13.22 ± 0.02%) (Figures 4a–f), indicating pronounced growth promotion. The plant growth-promoting potential of LJ-19 was further assessed in vitro. When cultured on phosphorous-solubilizing medium for three days, the strain formed a distinct dissolution halo (Figure 4g), confirming its ability to solubilize inorganic phosphorus. No halos were observed on nitrogen-free Ashby, Pikovskaya (PVK), or potassium feldspar (PF) media, supporting the specificity of its phosphorus-solubilizing trait. Additionally, the formation of an orange halo around LJ-19 colonies on chrome azurol S (CAS) medium indicated siderophore production (Figure 4h), which facilitates iron acquisition in plants. Moreover, the culture supernatant supplemented with L-tryptophan developed a deeper red color compared to the unsupplemented control, verifying the synthesis of IAA (Figure 4i). These findings demonstrate that Bacillus velezensis LJ-19 is capable of producing siderophores, solubilizing phosphorus, and synthesizing IAA in vitro, which may collectively contribute to its plant growth-promoting effects in cucumber.

Figure 4
Bar charts and images illustrate the effects of LJ-19 treatment on various plant metrics. Panels (a-f) show bar charts with data points for plant height, root length, stem thickness, fresh weight, maximum leaf area, and biomass between CK and LJ-19 treatments, with significance marked as NS or **. Panel (g) depicts a single colony on a Petri dish. Panel (h) shows three colonies on a Petri dish. Panel (i) displays two test tubes with colored solutions labeled +L-try and -L-try.

Figure 4. Effect of LJ-19 on cucumber growth. (a-f) Growth promotion of cucumber by strain LJ-19; (g) Phosphate-solubilizing activity; (h) Siderophore production; (i) IAA producing activities. Error bars represent standard deviation (SD) of the mean (n = 45). Significance levels: **, P < 0.01; NS, Non-significant.

3.5 Detection of defense enzyme activities induced by strain LJ-19 in cucumber in response to Fusarium wilt

To determine whether strain LJ-19 enhances the defense response in cucumber, the activities of several defense-related enzymes were measured. The results showed that under Fusarium wilt stress, treatment with strain LJ-19 significantly increased the activities of several defense enzymes in cucumber roots compared to the control (CK) group: POD by 5.22% (Figure 5a), SOD by 34.59% (Figure 5b), and PPO by 22.04% (Figure 5c). Furthermore, LJ-19 treatment markedly enhanced PAL activity both under pathogen stress and in the absence of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum, with a stronger induction effect than that caused by Fusarium wilt infection alone (Figure 5d). In contrast, no significant effect on CAT activity was observed (Figure 5e). These results indicate that strain LJ-19 induces the activity of defense enzymes POD, SOD, PPO, and PAL, thereby enhancing cucumber resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum.

Figure 5
Five scatter plots (a-e) display enzyme activity levels across two treatments: CK1LJ-19 and CK2LJ-19, under Normal and Foc conditions. (a) POD activity shows significant increase with CK2LJ-19 under Foc. (b) SOD activity significantly higher with CK2LJ-19 under Foc. (c) PPO activity significantly elevated with CK2LJ-19 under Foc. (d) PAL activity significantly increased with CK2LJ-19 under Foc. (e) CAT activity shows no significant difference. Significance levels indicated by asterisks: *, ***, NS (not significant).

Figure 5. Effects of strain LJ-19 on the activities of defense enzymes in cucumber under Fusarium wilt stress. (a) Peroxidase (POD); (b) Superoxide dismutase (SOD); (c) Polyphenol oxidase (PPO); (d) Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL); (e) Catalase (CAT). CK1, untreated control; CK2, inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum f sp. cucumerinum only. Error bars represent mean ± SD (n = 3). Significance levels: * P < 0.05; *** P < 0.001; NS, Non-significant.

3.6 Expression pattern analysis of defense-related genes

The expression dynamics of defense-related genes in cucumber roots treated with strain LJ-19 and inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum were analyzed using quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR). Defense-related genes play essential roles in plant disease resistance, with many being induced by beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms. Our results showed transcript levels of several key defense-related genes were significantly up-regulated 72 hours after treatment with strain LJ-19. Specifically, NPR1—a marker gene in the salicylic acid (SA) pathway—was up-regulated 3.14-fold (Figure 6a). PR3 expression increased by 6.16-fold compared to the Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum only treatment group (Figure 6b), suggesting its involvement in the induced defense response. LOX1, which is associated with lipid metabolism regulation, showed a 9.43-fold increase (Figure 6c). CTR1, a regulator of the ethylene signaling pathway, was up-regulated 2.14-fold (Figure 6d), while PAL1, critical for secondary metabolite synthesis, exhibited a 4.97-fold increase in expression (Figure 6e). Collectively, the up-regulation of NPR1, PR3, LOX1, CTR1, and PAL1 indicates that strain LJ-19 activates multiple metabolic pathways linked to plant disease resistance, enhancing cucumber’s ability to combat Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum infection.

Figure 6
Bar graphs labeled a to e display relative expression values for genes NPR1, PR3, LOX1, CTR1, and PAL1 under treatments Foc-CK and Foc-LJ-19. Green bars (Foc-LJ-19) show significantly higher expression, marked with three asterisks, than blue bars (Foc-CK).

Figure 6. Expression levels of defense-related genes in cucumber roots. (a) NPR1; (b) PR3; (c) LOX1; (d) CTR1; (e) PAL1. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences, *** P < 0.001.

4 Discussion

The occurrence of plant soil-borne diseases is governed by complex interactions within the rhizosphere microbiome. Rhizosphere biodiversity plays a crucial role in modulating these interactions and influencing disease outcomes (Gao et al., 2021; Abbass et al., 2022). Rhizobacteria can reshape microbial community structure, enhance soil enzyme activities, and improve nutrient availability, thereby promoting plant growth and inducing systemic resistance against pathogens (Saeed et al., 2021; Santoyo et al., 2021). Among them, Bacillus velezensis has garnered widespread attention due to its numerous beneficial traits, including regulating the rhizosphere microbiome, increasing microbial diversity, enriching beneficial microorganisms, mobilizing nutrients, promoting plant growth, inhibiting pathogen infection, and activating plant immunity (Fazle Rabbee and Baek, 2020; Wang et al., 2020a; Liu et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2024). For instance, Bacillus velezensis strain B4–7 reduces the incidence of tobacco wilt disease and promotes plant growth (Meng et al., 2024); strain C16 inhibits Alternaria solani via lipopeptides and volatile organic compounds (Zhang et al., 2021a); and strain HN-2 induces antioxidant defense mechanisms in pepper to resist viral infection (Xuan et al., 2024). Currently, Bacillus velezensis has emerged as a crucial resource for the green control of crop diseases, as it can effectively inhibit the growth and pathogenicity of phytopathogenic fungi through multiple mechanisms. In this study, the rhizobacterial strain LJ-19 isolated from cucumber rhizosphere was identified as Bacillus velezensis (Figure 3). This strain exhibited significant antagonistic activity against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum with an inhibition rate of 83.59% (Figure 1c), indicating strain L-19 holds potential for the development of biocontrol agents.

Traditional biocontrol Bacillus velezensis exhibit diverse mechanisms of action, with the most representative being their secreted antimicrobial metabolites—a process that does not rely on direct contact between biocontrol bacteria and pathogens (Deveau et al., 2018; Steffan et al., 2020; Zhou et al., 2022). For example, Phenazine-1-carboxamide secreted by Pseudomonas chlororaphis ZJU60 can directly target topoisomerase IV (Topo IV) of Bacillus subtilis, thereby inhibiting bacterial cell division (Zhou et al., 2025). Bacillus velezensis XT1 metabolized surfactin to inhibit the infection of Botrytis cinerea in tomatoes (Toral et al., 2018) and strain TP-1 enhanced grape resistance to gray mold by inducing the activities of plant defense enzymes PAL, PPO, and POD in grapes (Zou et al., 2023). Corallococcus sp. strain EGB controlled cucumber Fusarium wilt by migrating to the plant root and regulating the soil microbial community (Ye et al., 2020). In our study, LJ-19 treatment significantly enhanced the activities of PPO, POD, SOD, and PAL in cucumber plants under Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum challenge (Figure 5), indicating a robust biochemical defense response elicited by LJ-19. PPO and POD contribute to pathogen inhibition via quinone formation and lignin polymerization (Kumar and Ebel, 2016; Dos Santos-Costa et al., 2022), while SOD mitigoxidative stress by scavenging reactive oxygen species (Zhang et al., 2021b). PAL is essential for synthesizing phenylpropanoid-derived defense compounds (Cuéllar-Torres et al., 2022). Moreover, LJ-19 induced the expression of key defense-related genes (Figure 6). NPR1, a central regulator of salicylic acid-dependent immunity, was up-regulated, along with PR3, which encodes a pathogenesis-related protein involved in antifungal defense (Zavaliev and Dong, 2024) The increased expression of LOX1 suggests activation of oxylipin signaling (Gousiadou and Kouskoumvekaki, 2018), while up-regulation of CTR1 and PAL1 reflects modulation of ethylene signaling and phenolic metabolism, respectively (Chen et al., 2022; Park et al., 2023). These results indicate that strain LJ-19 can simultaneously trigger the plant’s multi-pathway defense response, thereby enhancing the plant’s ability to resist infection by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum.

In recent years, a contact-based antibacterial activity mode independent of antifungal metabolites have garnered increasing attention, which was achieved through intercellular contact between bacterial cells and fungal conidia, and provided a novel idea for plants to resist fungal infections (Lin et al., 2025). Studies have shown that beneficial bacteria can effectively defend against pathogenic fungal infections through type VI secretion system (T6SS/T4SS), contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) systems, and antibiotic-independent intercellular interactions (Nikolakakis et al., 2012; Klein et al., 2020; Shen et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2021). Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 harbors multiple functional T6SS gene clusters and secretes a variety of antibacterial effector proteins (e.g., Tse1, Tse2, and Tse3), exerting a potent inhibitory effect on a wide range of gram-negative bacteria (Sana et al., 2016). Lysobacter enzymogenes OH11 inhibited the infection of Xanthomonas citri by secreting toxic effectors via the type IV secretion system (T4SS) (Shen et al., 2021). Pseudomonas strains 2P24 and FoE9 inhibited the growth of Fusarium in a contact-dependent manner mediated by T6SS (Lin et al., 2025). Escherichia coli EC93 possesses a functional CDI system, which can deliver the CdiA-CT toxin to neighboring bacteria through cell contact, inhibiting their growth (Nikolakakis et al., 2012). In our study, LJ-19 did not suppress hyphal development of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum via extracellular compounds (Figures 1f–i). Instead, it significantly reduced germ tube elongation of the pathogen’s spores during direct coculture (Figures 1a–e), indicating that its antagonism primarily operates through contact-dependent mechanisms—rarely reported in Bacillus velezensis. This distinctive mode of action, differing from other strains of the species and diffusional antibiotics, has potential advantages in reducing the risk of drug resistance and accurately targeting pathogenic bacteria and also has great advantages in adaptability in microbial community competition and niche occupation, which provides a novel strategy for pathogen control. In addition, LJ-19 was demonstrated multiple plant growth-promoting traits (Figures 4a–f). It solubilized phosphorus, produced siderophores, and synthesized IAA (Figures 4g–i)—key mechanisms that enhance nutrient availability and stimulate plant development (Zhang et al., 2024; Martinez-Viveros et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2021; Ma et al., 2023; Ta et al., 2024), which were consistent with other reported Bacillus velezensis strains that simultaneously promote growth, such as strain YXDHD1–7 in tomato against early blight (Li et al., 2024). These results indicate that strain LJ-19 possesses dual functions in controlling Fusarium wilt of cucumber and promoting cucumber growth.

5 Conclusions

Here, we confirmed that Bacillus velezensis LJ-19, isolated from the cucumber rhizosphere, exerts dual synergistic effects: potent biocontrol against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum via a contact-dependent mechanism and significant promotion of cucumber growth. This discovery mediated by contact-dependent antagonism redefines the functional potential of Bacillus velezensis, proving that its biocontrol efficacy is not limited to metabolite secretion but can also rely on direct interaction with pathogens. The results showed that LJ-19’s efficacy depends on direct contact with pathogens (inducing hyphal deformation), while activating plant immunity (up-regulating the activities of defense enzymes and the expression of defense-related genes) and possessing growth-promoting traits (phosphorus solubilization, siderophore production, and IAA synthesis) (Figure 7), demonstrating its multifunctional synergy rather than a single functional trait. This understanding provides valuable insights for the rational development of sustainable biocontrol agents in agriculture, offering a green alternative to chemical pesticides for the control of cucumber Fusarium wilt while enhancing crop yield.

Figure 7
Illustration of a plant with labeled mechanisms promoting growth. Boxes show: IAA/phosphate-solubilizing and special carriers by bacteria, an antagonism mechanism against pathogens, and induction of resistance. Each mechanism is visually represented with arrows and symbols.

Figure 7. Bacillus velezensis strain LJ-19 antagonizing Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum growth, inducing disease resistance, and stimulating growth. Strain LJ-19 played a role in stimulating cucumber growth by dissolving inorganic phosphorus, producing indole-3-acetic acid and iron carriers. Meanwhile, strain LJ-19 inhibited the hyphal growth of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum to suppress its infection and activated the resistance response of cucumber.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

SL: Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Writing – original draft. JJL: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft. MY: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. JR: Validation, Writing – review & editing. YJ: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. LZ: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. YW: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. ZY: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. JYL: Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. JD: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. HW: Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. CY: Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declared financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This manuscript was funded by Science and Technology Research Projects of Henan Province (242102110206, 252102111106, 252102111115), Key R&D Special Project of Henan Province (241111111700), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number:32302441, 32502584).

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1711383/full#supplementary-material

References

Abbass, K., Qasim, M. Z., Song, H., Murshed, M., Mahmood, H., and Younis, I. (2022). A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environ. Sci. pollut. Res. Int. 29, 42539–42559. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ali, A., Elrys, A. S., Liu, L., Iqbal, M., Zhao, J., Huang, X., et al. (2022). Cover plants-mediated suppression of fusarium wilt and root-knot incidence of cucumber is associated with the changes of rhizosphere fungal microbiome structure-under plastic shed system of north China. Front. Microbiol. 13, 697815. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.697815

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bhattacharyya, C., Banerjee, S., Acharya, U., Mitra, A., Mallick, I., Haldar, A., et al. (2020). Evaluation of plant growth promotion properties and induction of antioxidative defense mechanism by tea rhizobacteria of Darjeeling, India.Sci. Rep. 10 (1), 1–19. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72439-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, Y., Chen, P., Cao, X., Hu, A., Ye, Y., and Li, P. (2022). Bacillus velezensis HNU24 with significant antagonistic activity against Ralstonia solanacearum and promoting plant growth activity. J. Hainan Normal Univ. (Natural Science) 35, 50–56. doi: 10.12051/j.issn.1674-4942.2022.01.008

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, D., Hu, H., He, W., Zhang, S., Tang, M., Xiang, S., et al. (2022). Endocytic protein Pal1 regulates appressorium formation and is required for full virulence of Magnaporthe oryzae. Mol. Plant Pathol. 23, 133–147. doi: 10.1111/mpp.13149

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cuéllar-Torres, E. A., Aguilera-Aguirre, S., Del Carmen Bañuelos-González, M., Xoca-Orozco, LÁ, Ortiz-Basurto, R. I., Montalvo-González, E., et al. (2022). Postharvest application effect of agave fructans on anthracnose disease, defense-related enzyme activities, and quality attributes in avocado fruit. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 31, 1411–1421. doi: 10.1007/s10068-022-01135-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Deveau, A., Bonito, G., Uehling, J., Paoletti, M., Becker, M., Bindschedler, S., et al. (2018). Bacterial-fungal interactions: ecology, mechanisms and challenges. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 42, 335–352. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuy008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dong, Q., Liu, Q., Goodwin, P., Deng, X., Xu, W., Xia, M., et al. (2023). Isolation and Genome-Based Characterization of Biocontrol Potential of Bacillus siamensis YB-1631 against Wheat Crown Rot Caused by Fusarium pseudograminearum. J. Fungi (Basel) 9 (5), 547. doi: 10.3390/jof9050547

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dos Santos-Costa, D., Alviano-Moreno, D. S., Alviano, C. S., and Riveiro-da Silva, A. J. (2022). Extension of solanaceae food crops shelf life by the use of elicitors and sustainable practices during postharvest phase. Food Bioprocess Technology. 15, 249–274. doi: 10.1007/s11947-021-02713-z

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fazle Rabbee, M. and Baek, K. H. (2020). Antimicrobial activities of lipopeptides and polyketides of bacillus velezensis for agricultural applications. Molecules 25, 4973. doi: 10.3390/molecules25214973

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, M., Xiong, C., Gao, C., Tsui, C. K., Wan, M., Zhou, X., et al. (2021). Disease-induced changes in plant microbiome assembly and functional adaptation. Microbiome 9, 187. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01138-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gousiadou, C. and Kouskoumvekaki, I. (2018). Computational analysis of LOX1 inhibition identifies descriptors responsible for binding selectivity. ACS Omega. 3, 2261–2272. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.7b01622

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ha-Tran, D. M., Nguyen, T. T. M., Hung, S. H., Huang, E., and Huang, C. C. (2021). Roles of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria(PGPR) in stimulating salinity stress defense in plants: A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 3154. doi: 10.3390/ijms22063154

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hibbing, M. E., Fuqua, C., Parsek, M. R., and Peterson, S. B. (2010). Bacterial competition: surviving and thriving in the microbial jungle. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 15–25. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2259

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keshmirshekan, A., De Souza Mesquita, L. M., and Ventura, S. P. M. (2024). Biocontrol manufacturing and agricultural applications of Bacillus velezensis. Trends Biotechnol. 42, 986–1001. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2024.02.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Klein, T. A., Ahmad, S., and Whitney, J. C. (2020). Contact-dependent interbacterial antagonism mediated by protein secretion machines. Trends Microbiol. 28, 387–400. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2020.01.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, N. and Ebel, R. C. (2016). Oxidative metabolism in ‘Valencia’ Sweet orange (Citrus sinensis osbeck) abscission zone tissue treated with the abscission agent 5-chloro-3-methyl-4-nitro-1H-pyrazole. HortScience 51, 377–382. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.51.4.377

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lau, E. T., Tani, A., Khew, C. Y., Chua, Y. Q., and San Hwang, S. (2020). Plant growth-promoting bacteria as potential bio-inoculants and biocontrol agents to promote black pepper plant cultivation. Microbiological Res. 240, 126549. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2020.126549

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z., Guo, B., Wan, K., and Cong, M. (2015). Effects of bacteria-free filtrate from Bacillusmegaterium strain L2 on the mycelium growth and spore germination of Alternariaalternata. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 29, 1062–1068. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2015.1068135

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, J., Hu, M., Xue, Y., Chen, X., Lu, G., Zhang, L., et al. (2020). Screening, identification and efficacy evaluation of antagonistic bacteria for biocontrol of soft rot disease caused by dickeya zeae. Microorganisms 8 (5), 697. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8050697

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, W., Sun, L., Wu, H., Gu, W., Lu, Y., Liu, C., et al. (2024). Bacillus velezensis YXDHD1–7 prevents early blight disease by promoting growth and enhancing defense enzyme activities in tomato plants. Microorganisms 12, 921. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12050921

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, S., Xiao, Q., Yang, H., Huang, J., and Li, Y. (2022). Characterization of a new Bacillus velezensis as a powerful biocontrol agent against tomato gray mold. Pestic Biochem. Physiol. 187, 105199. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2022.105199

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lian, H., Li, R., Ma, G., Zhao, Z., Zhang, T., and Li, M. (2023). The effect of Trichoderma harzianum agents on physiological-biochemical characteristics of cucumber and the control effect against Fusarium wilt. Sci. Rep. 13, 17606. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44296-z

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, L., Shen, D., Shao, X., Yang, Y., Li, L., Zhong, C., et al. (2025). Soil microbiome bacteria protect plants against filamentous fungal infections via intercellular contacts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 122, e2418766122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2418766122

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Li, Y., Bi, Y., Jiang, Q., Mao, R., Liu, Z., et al. (2021). Induction of defense response against Alternaria rot in Zaosu pear fruit by exogenous L-lysine through regulating ROS metabolism and activating defense-related proteins. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 179, 111567. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2021.111567

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Luo, W., Liu, L., Qi, G., Yang, F., Shi, X., and Zhao, X. (2019). Embedding Bacillus velezensis NH-1in microcapsules for biocontrol of cucumber fusarium wilt. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85, 13. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03128-18

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, S., Wang, Y., and Teng, W. (2023). Bacillus velezensis K-9 as a potential biocontrol agent for managing potato scab. Plant Dis. 107, 3943–3951. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-12-22-2829-RE

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Marilley, L., Vogt, G., Blanc, M., and Aragno, M. (1998). Bacterial diversity in the bulk soil and rhizosphere fractions of Lolium perenne and Trifolium repens as revealed by PCR restriction analysis of 16S rDNA. Plant Soil 198, 219–224. doi: 10.1023/A:1004309008799

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Martinez-Viveros, O., Jorquera, M. A., Crowley, D. E., Gajardo, G., and Mora, M. L. (2010). Mechanisms and practical considerations involved in plant growth promotion by rhizobacteria. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 10, 293–319. doi: 10.4067/S0718-95162010000100006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Meng, Q., Jiang, H., and Hao, J. (2016). Effects of Bacillus velezensis strain BAC03 in promoting plant growth. Biol. Control. 6), 18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.03.010

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Meng, X., Wang, L., Ma, B., Wei, X., Zhou, Y., Sun, Z., et al. (2024). Screening, identification and evaluation of an acidophilic strain of Bacillus velezensis B4–7 for the biocontrol of tobacco bacterial wilt. Front. Plant Sci. 15. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1360173

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Moon, J. H., Won, S. J., Maung, C. E. H., Choi, J. H., Choi, S. I., Ajuna, H. B., et al. (2021). Bacillus velezensis CE100 inhibits root rot diseases (Phytophthora spp.) and promotes growth of Japanese cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa endlicher) seedlings. Microorganisms. 9, 821. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9040821

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nadarajah, K. and Abdul Rahman, N. S. N. (2023). The microbial connection to sustainable agriculture. Plants 12, 2307. doi: 10.3390/plants12122307

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Naranjo, S. E., Ellsworth, P. C., and Frisvold, G. B. (2015). Economic value of biological control in integrated pest management of managed plant systems. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 60, 621–645. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-021005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nikolakakis, K., Amber, S., Wilbur, J. S., Diner, E. J., Aoki, S. K., Poole, S. J., et al. (2012). The toxin/immunity network of Burkholderia pseudomallei contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) systems. Mol. Microbiol. 84, 516–529. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08039.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ortíz-Castro, R., Contreras-Cornejo, H. A., Macías-Rodríguez, L., and López-Bucio, J. (2009). The role of microbial signals in plant growth and development. Plant Signaling Behav. 4, 701–712. doi: 10.4161/psb.4.8.9047

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Park, H. L., Seo, D. H., Lee, H. Y., Bakshi, A., Park, C., Chien, Y. C., et al. (2023). Ethylene-triggered subcellular trafficking of CTR1 enhances the response to ethylene gas. Nat. Commun. 14, 365. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-35975-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pu, X., Xie, B., Li, P., Mao, Z., Ling, J., Shen, H., et al. (2014). Analysis of the defence-related mechanism in cucumber seedlings in relation to root colonization by nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum CS-20. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 355, 142–151. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12461

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

René, C. A., Tugizimana, F., Steenkamp, P. A., Dubery, I. A., Hassen, A. I., and Labuschagne, N. (2020). Rhizobacteria-induced systemic resilience in Sorghum bicolor(L.) Moench against Fusarium pseudograminearum crown rot under drought stress conditions.Biol. Control 151, 104395–104406. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2019.126388

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Saeed, Q., Xiukang, W., Haider, F. U., Kučerik, J., Mumtaz, M. Z., Holatko, J., et al. (2021). Rhizosphere bacteria in plant growth promotion, biocontrol, and bioremediation of contaminated sites: A comprehensive review of effects and mechanisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (19), 10529. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910529

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sana, T. G., Berni, B., and Bleves, S. (2016). The T6SSs of pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PAO1 and their effectors: beyond bacterial-cell targeting. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 6, 61. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00061

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Santoyo, G., Urtis-Flores, C. A., Loeza-Lara, P. D., Orozco-Mosqueda, M. D. C., and Glick, B. R. (2021). Rhizosphere colonization determinants by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria(PGPR). Biology. 10, 475. doi: 10.3390/biology10060475

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shen, Y., Shi, Z., Zhao, J., Li, M., Tang, J., Wang, N., et al. (2023). Whole genome sequencing provides evidence for Bacillus velezensis SH-1471 as a beneficial rhizosphere bacterium in plants. Sci. Rep. 13, 20929. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48171-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shen, X., Wang, B., Yang, N., Zhang, L., Shen, D., Wu, H., et al. (2021). Lysobacter enzymogenes antagonizes soilborne bacteria using the type IV secretion system. Environ. Microbiol. 23, 4673–4688. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15662

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Steffan, B. N., Venkatesh, N., and Keller, N. P. (2020). Get physical: bacterial-fungal interactions and their consequences in agriculture and health. J. Fungi (Basel) 6, 243. doi: 10.3390/jof6040243

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Stoll, A., Salvatierra-Martinez, R., Gonzalez, M., and Araya, M. (2021). The role of surfactin production by Bacillus velezensis on colonization, biofilm formation on tomato root and leaf surfaces and subsequent protection(ISR) against Botrytis cinerea. Microorganisms 9, 14. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9112251

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, X., Xu, Z., Xie, J., Hesselberg-Thomsen, V., Tan, T., Zheng, D., et al. (2022). Bacillus velezensis stimulates resident rhizosphere Pseudomonas stutzeri for plant health through metabolic interactions. Isme J. 16, 774–787. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01125-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ta, Y., Fu, S., Liu, H., Zhang, C., He, M., Yu, H., et al. (2024). Evaluation of Bacillus velezensis F9 for Cucumber Growth Promotion and Suppression of Fusarium wilt Disease. Microorganisms 12, 1882. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12091882

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Toral, L., Rodriguez, M., Béjar, V., and Sampedro, I. (2018). Antifungal activity of lipopeptides from Bacillus XT1 CECT8661 against Botrytis cinerea. Front. Microbiolog. 9, 1315. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01315

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Trivedi, P., Batista, B. D., Bazany, K. E., and Singh, B. K. (2022). Plant–microbiome interactions under a changing world: responses, consequences and perspectives. New Phytol. 234, 1951–1959. doi: 10.1111/nph.18016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, R., Chen, D., Raja, A. A. K., Cui, J., Hou, J. M., and Liu, T. (2021). A novel Trichoderma asperellum strain DQ-1 promotes tomato growth and induces resistance to gray mold caused by Botrytis cinerea. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 368, 140. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnab140

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Wang, Y., Fu, Y., Zhai, Y., Bai, X., Liu, T., et al. (2024). Multiple omics revealed the growth-promoting mechanism of Bacillus velezensis strains on ramie. Front. Plant Sci. 15. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1367862

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, C., Zhao, D., Qi, G., Mao, Z., Hu, X., Du, B., et al. (2020a). Effects of Bacillus velezensis FKM10 for Promoting the Growth of Malus hupehensis Rehd. and Inhibiting Fusarium verticillioides. Front. Microbiol. 10. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02889

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Zhou, X., Cai, Z., Guo, L., Chen, X., Chen, X., et al. (2020b). A Biocontrol Strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa CQ-40 Promote Growth and Control Botrytis cinerea in Tomato. Pathogens 10(1), 22. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10010022

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, Q., Wang, B., Shen, X., Shen, D., Wang, B., Guo, Q., et al. (2021). Unlocking the bacterial contact-dependent antibacterial activity to engineer a biocontrol alliance of two species from natural incompatibility to artificial compatibility. Stress Biol. 1, 19. doi: 10.1007/s44154-021-00018-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, L., Wu, H., Chen, L., Yu, X., Borriss, R., and Gao, X. (2015). Difficidin and bacilysin from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 have antibacterial activity against Xanthomonas oryzae rice pathogens. Sci. Rep. 5, 9. doi: 10.1038/srep12975

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xie, X., Zhang, J., Wang, H., and Lei, C. (2021). Research progress of the synthetic and functional mechanisms of natural lipopeptide antibiotics from Bacillus. Chin. J. Antibiot. 46, 362–370. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8689.2021.05.002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, M., Shi, Y., Fan, D., Kang, Y., Yan, X., and Wang, H. (2023). Co-Culture of White Rot Fungi Pleurotus ostreatus P5 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B2: A Strategy to Enhance Lipopeptide Production and Suppress of Fusarium Wilt of Cucumber. J. Fungi(Basel) 9 (11), 1049. doi: 10.3390/jof9111049

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, W., Yang, Q., Yang, F., Xie, X., Goodwin, P. H., Deng, X., et al. (2022). Evaluation and genome analysis of bacillus subtilis YB-04 as a potential biocontrol agent against fusarium wilt and growth promotion agent of cucumber. Front. Microbiol. 13. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.885430

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, T., Zhu, T., Li, S., and Qiao, T. (2014). Fungus-inhibitory activity and gene cloning of beta-glucanase from Bacillus velezensis YB15. Chin. J. Biol. Control. 30, 276–281. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-039X.2014.02.021

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xuan, Z., Wang, Y., Shen, Y., Pan, X., Wang, J., Liu, W., et al. (2024). Bacillus velezensis HN-2: a potent antiviral agent against pepper veinal mottle virus. Front. Plant Sci. 15, 1403202. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1403202

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, F., Jiang, H., Ma, K., Hegazy, A., Wang, X., Liang, S., et al. (2024). Genomic and phenotypic analyses reveal Paenibacillus polymyxa PJH16 is a potential biocontrol agent against cucumber fusarium wilt. Front. Microbiol. 15, 1359263. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1359263

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, F., Jiang, H., Ma, K., Wang, X., Liang, S., Cai, Y., et al. (2023). Genome sequencing and analysis of Bacillus velezensis VJH504 reveal biocontrol mechanism against cucumber Fusarium wilt. Front. Microbiol. 14. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1279695

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ye, X., Li, Z., Luo, X., Wang, W., Li, Y., Li, R., et al. (2020). A predatory myxobacterium controls cucumber Fusarium wilt by regulating the soil microbial community. Microbiome. 8, 49. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00824-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zavaliev, R. and Dong, X. (2024). NPR1, a key immune regulator for plant survival under biotic and abiotic stresses. Mol. Cell. 84, 131–141. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhai, Q.-H., Pan, Z.-Q., Zhang, C., Yu, H.-L., Zhang, M., Gu, X.-H., et al. (2023). Colonization by Klebsiella variicola FH-1 stimulates soybean growth and alleviates the stress of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. J. Integr. Agric. 22, 2729–2745. doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2023.01.007

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, D., Gao, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, C., and Shi, C. (2020). Advances in taxonomy, antagonistic function and application of Bacillus velezensis. Microbiol. China 47, 3634–3649. doi: 10.13344/j.microbiol.china.190947

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Tan, C., and Li, W. (2024). Phosphorus-, potassium-, and silicon-solubilizing bacteria from forest soils can mobilize soil minerals to promote the growth of rice(Oryza sativa L.). Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 11, 103. doi: 10.1186/s40538-024-00622-9

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, D., Yu, S., Zhao, D., Zhang, J., Pan, Y., Yang, Y., et al. (2021a). Inhibitory effects of non-volatiles lipopeptides and volatiles ketones metabolites secreted by Bacillus velezensis C16 against Alternaria solani. Biol. Control 152, 104421. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104421

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, M., Zhang, C., Zhang, S., Yu, H., Pan, H., and Zhang, H. (2021b). Klebsiella jilinsis 2N3 promotes maize growth and induces resistance to northern corn leaf blight. Biol. Control 156, 104554. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104554

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, Z., Tang, X., Peng, L., and Ding, H. (2023). Complete genome sequence of Bacillus velezensis GUAL210, a potential biocontrol agent isolated from pepper rhizosphere. Plant Dis. 107, 915–918. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-07-22-1585-A

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, Y., Wang, H., Sun, J., Wicaksono, W. A., Liu, C., He, Y., et al. (2025). Phenazines contribute to microbiome dynamics by targeting topoisomerase IV. Nat. Microbiol. 10, 2396–2411. doi: 10.1038/s41564-025-02118-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, Y., Wang, H., Xu, S., Liu, K., Qi, H., Wang, M., et al. (2022). Bacterial-fungal interactions under agricultural settings: from physical to chemical interactions. Stress Biol. 2, 22. doi: 10.1007/s44154-022-00046-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, X., Yang, Y., Yin, Q., Zhang, X., and Li, M. (2021). Application potential of Comamonas testosteroni ZG2 for vegetable cultivation in nickel and cadmium polluted soil. Environ. Technol. Innovation 23, 101626. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101626

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zou, Q., Niu, X., Liu, P., Yang, H., Chu, M., Wang, N., et al. (2023). Growth characteristics of Bacillus velezensis antagonistic to Botrytis cinerea and its effects on related defense enzyme activities. Sci. Technol. Food Industry. 44, 1–16. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022060270

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Bacillus velezensis LJ-19, Fusarium wilt, biocontrol, growth promotion, contact-dependent inhibition, induced systemic resistance

Citation: Li S, Li J, Yuan M, Ren J, Jiao Y, Zhao L, Wang Y, Yan Z, Li J, Du J, Wang H and Yang C (2025) Dual benefits of Bacillus velezensis LJ-19: contact-dependent biocontrol of Fusarium wilt and growth promotion in cucumber. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1711383. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1711383

Received: 23 September 2025; Accepted: 26 November 2025; Revised: 17 November 2025;
Published: 11 December 2025.

Edited by:

Michael Moustakas, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece

Reviewed by:

Laith Khalil Tawfeeq Al-Ani, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia
Amelia Cristina Montoya Martinez, Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora (ITSON), Mexico
Jiantao Fu, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, China

Copyright © 2025 Li, Li, Yuan, Ren, Jiao, Zhao, Wang, Yan, Li, Du, Wang and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jianfeng Du, amZkQGhpc3QuZWR1LmNu; Hongliang Wang, d2FuZ2hsemJAMTYzLmNvbQ==; Chenyu Yang, eWFuZ2NoZW55dUBoaXN0LmVkdS5jbg==

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.