Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Plant Breeding

Integrating Linkage Mapping and GWAS Reveals Novel Genetic Architecture of Seed Weight in Soybean (Glycine max L.)

Provisionally accepted
Chunlei  ZhangChunlei Zhang1Huilong  HongHuilong Hong2Rongqiang  YuanRongqiang Yuan1Kezhen  ZhaoKezhen Zhao1Bire  ZhaBire Zha1Sobhi  F LamlomSobhi F Lamlom1,3Xiaoyu  XiXiaoyu Xi1Honglei  RenHonglei Ren1*Qiu  LijuanQiu Lijuan2Jiajun  WangJiajun Wang1
  • 1Soybean Research Institute, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, China
  • 2Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Institute of Crop Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 3Alexandria University Faculty of Agriculture Sababasha, Alexandria, Egypt

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: Seed weight is a key factor in soybean yield and value, but its genetic basis and environmental stability are not fully understood. Despite many QTL studies, there's a lack of integration between bi-parental linkage mapping and diverse germplasm association analysis. We hypothesized that combining high-resolution QTL mapping in recombinant inbred lines with GWAS in natural populations could identify both population-specific and broadly segregating seed weight loci, aiding in candidate gene discovery for breeding. Methods: We integrated biparental QTL mapping with genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to comprehensively dissect the genetics of hundred-seed weight (HSW). A recombinant inbred line population of 325 F₂:₅ lines from Qihuang 34 × Dongsheng 16 was phenotyped across three environments and genotyped using SLAF-seq, generating a high-density genetic map with 6,297 SNP markers spanning 2,945.26 cM (0.47 cM resolution). Simultaneously, 348 diverse soybean accessions underwent whole-genome resequencing (10× coverage), yielding 1,882,531 SNPs for association analysis across two years. Results: QTL mapping identified 11 significant loci explaining 2.47-8.59% of phenotypic variance, with broad-sense heritability of 0.78. The major-effect QTL qHSW-19-4 (44.84-44.85 Mb, LOD = 9.72) demonstrated unprecedented 11.4 kb mapping precision. GWAS independently detected six genome-wide significant associations (P < 1 × 10⁻⁸), including a stable chromosome 19 peak at 45.28 Mb (P = 2.06 × 10⁻²³) explaining 15.3-18.7% of variance. Remarkably, this GWAS signal co-localized within 580 kb of qHSW-19-4, providing robust cross-population validation of chromosome 19 as a major seed weight regulatory region. Functional analysis of 44 candidate genes, validated by quantitative RT-PCR across seed developmental stages, identified four high-priority candidates: Glyma.19G195400 (cell wall invertase, 2.7-fold upregulation in large-seeded parent, r = 0.68 with HSW), Glyma.19G194300 (PEBP/Dt1 family protein), Glyma.19G193400 (bZIP transcription factor), and Glyma.06G095100 (Myb DNA-binding domain). Novelty and Conclusions: This first integrated QTL-GWAS analysis for soybean seed weight reveals both major-effect loci and polygenic architecture, providing validated molecular markers and candidate genes for breeding programs targeting yield improvement.

Keywords: Soybean, Seed weight, QTL mapping, GWAS, SLAF-seq, candidate genes, molecularbreeding

Received: 24 Sep 2025; Accepted: 20 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Hong, Yuan, Zhao, Zha, Lamlom, Xi, Ren, Lijuan and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Honglei Ren, renhonglei2022@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.