EDITORIAL article
Front. Plant Sci.
Sec. Plant Biotechnology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1720325
This article is part of the Research TopicEngineering Future Crops Through Genome EditingView all 17 articles
Editorial: Engineering future crops through genome editing
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, United States
- 2Department of Bioindustry and Bioresource Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- 3Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Four), Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
highlight both the progress achieved and the challenges that remain in translating genome editing breakthroughs into agricultural practice. In the sections that follow, we synthesize these contributions and discuss how they collectively illuminate the path forward for crop genome engineering. Drought and pathogens are among the most significant constraints on global crop yields. Enhancing resilience to these challenges is essential for achieving stable productivity under deteriorating environmental conditions. The three contributions in this Research Topic highlight how CRISPR-based strategies can be applied to enhance stress resistance in diverse crops through both targeted experimental studies and broader reviews of emerging targets and approaches.Cap-binding proteins (CBPs), which are central to abscisic acid signaling and RNA processing, have been associated with drought resistance in Arabidopsis (Hugouvieux et al., 2001) and barley (Daszkowska-Golec et al., 2017). In potato, RNAi-mediated suppression of StCBP80 improved drought performance (Pieczynski et al., 2013). Building on this knowledge, Decima-Oneto et al. used CRISPR-Cas9 to generate CBP80-edited potato lines with enhanced drought resistance. This work demonstrates the potential of genome editing in developing drought-resilient potato varieties, with broader implications for other crops.Among biotic stresses, downy mildew is a major disease that severely reduces grapevine yield. Giacomelli et al. targeted the Downy Mildew Resistance 6 (DMR6) susceptibility genes, which are known to play key roles in pathogen interactions (Thomazella et al., 2021). By simultaneously disrupting DMR6-1 and DMR6-2, the authors were able to produce grapevine plants with reduced susceptibility to Plasmopara viticola, the causal agent of downy mildew. This study shows how genome editing can be applied to perennial fruit crops and highlights the potential for disease resistance by modifying host susceptibility genes.Complementing these experimental studies, several reviews in this collection provide broader perspectives on CRISPR-based stress resistance. Ton et al. offer a comprehensive survey of CRISPR-Cas applications in Brassica crops, covering abiotic stresses like drought, salinity, and temperature extremes, as well as biotic stresses from diverse pathogens. This review highlights promising gene targets and describes a genome editing workflow for developing resilient cultivars. Park et al. further expand this discussion by examining CRISPR-based mutant library screening as a powerful approach to identify novel immune-related genes with a focus on rice and cotton. Chandrasekaran et al. add another perspective by proposing subtilases as genome editing targets to improve yield and quality, citing their roles in immunity, fruit development, and abscission. They present a phylogenetic analysis of pepper subtilases to highlight potential candidates. Beyond yield and stress resilience, consumer-oriented traits such as flavor, allergenicity, and food waste reduction are becoming increasingly important in crop improvement. This Research Topic includes two studies that exemplify these goals, addressing enzymatic browning in wheat and seed protein allergens in soybean.Polyphenol oxidases (PPOs) drive enzymatic browning, which lowers the quality and marketability of plant products and contributes to food waste. In wheat, PPO activity resulting from grain milling causes progressive browning and discoloration of flour, dough, and other endproducts (Taranto et al., 2017). To address this issue, Wold-McGimsey et al. employed a sgRNA targeting a conserved region across seven copies of PPO1 and PPO2 in different wheat cultivars. The edited plants exhibited substantially reduced PPO activity, leading to dough with significantly less browning. This study illustrates how genome editing can improve food quality with direct benefits for consumers and food industry.Soybean allergenicity can be a concern for consumer health. Among soybean seed proteins, GmP34 is considered a major allergen (Helm et al., 2000). Earlier genome editing efforts mainly focused on disrupting GmP34 (Sugano et al., 2020). Baek et al. expanded this strategy by also targeting the homologous genes GmP34h1 and GmP34h2, which share conserved allergenic peptide motifs with Gmp34. Using multiplex CRISPR-Cas9, they generated single, double, and triple mutants with reduced amounts of the allergenic proteins in the seeds. These edited lines provide the groundwork for future allergenicity testing and development of hypoallergenic cultivars. The effectiveness of plant genome editing relies on advancing the methods and resources that enable precise and efficient editing. Four articles in this collection showcase how innovations in multiplexing, nuclease evaluation, mutational diversity, and computational platforms are expanding the CRISPR toolbox for plant genome editing.Milner et al. addressed the challenges of multiplexing, a key strategy for targeting multiple genes particularly in polyploid crops. They compared two widely used systems for multiplexing, tRNA processing and ribozyme-based guide delivery, by targeting the same genes in rice, wheat, and barley with identical sgRNAs. Both systems performed similarly in rice, but the tRNA system was more efficient in wheat and barley, providing valuable guidance for multiplexing strategies in cereals.Building on the need for reliable ways to measure nuclease and sgRNA activity, Cao et al. developed a rapid and accessible hairy root-based assay in soybean. The system uses a ruby reporter for visual identification of transformation-positive roots and was first validated by combining it with Cas9 editing. The authors then applied the assay to engineer and optimize the ISAam1 TnpB nuclease, demonstrating its potential as a compact Cas alternative. Unlike protoplast-based assays, this hairy root platform is simple, doesn't require sterile conditions, and enables rapid in planta evaluation of nuclease and sgRNA efficiency.In some species, mutational frequency is limited by low transformation and regeneration efficiencies. Ito et al. explored an alternative strategy to generate mutational diversity in tomato by crossing wild type plant with a T0 line carrying biallelic mutations in the RIPENING INHIBITOR (RIN) gene. The F1 progeny displayed novel edits absent in the parent, indicating that CRISPR-Cas9 activity can persist beyond transformation and generate additional variation through crossing. This strategy offers a practical option for species or cultivars where primary transformation yields few or no desirable edits. Complementing these experimental advances, Saraswat et al. review the computational tools in genome editing. They summarize databases and tools used for classification and prediction of CRISPR systems, as well as platforms for gRNA design and off-target analysis. Such resources are essential for expanding the CRISPR toolbox and improving the accuracy, efficiency, and predictability of editing outcomes. Efficient delivery of genome-editing reagents is highly critical in plant biotechnology, particularly for species that are difficult to transform and regenerate (Chen et al., 2022). This collection features three complementary strategies, including viral delivery of compact nucleases, transgene-free RNP editing, and in planta transformation methods that help overcome these challenges.One major limitation of virus-induced genome editing (VIGE) is the restricted cargo capacity of viral vectors, which hampers delivery of large nucleases such as SpCas9. Workarounds include infecting Cas9-expressing plants with mobile gRNAs (Ellison et al., 2020) and using compact nucleases (Weiss et al., 2025). In this context, earlier work with potato virus X (PVX) showed that SpCas9 could induce mutagenesis in inoculated Nicotiana benthamiana leaves but failed to achieve systemic editing (Ariga et al., 2020). Ishibashi et al. addressed this by deploying an engineered AsCas12f (about one-third the size of SpCas9) via a PVX vector. This enabled systemic, efficient mutagenesis across infected tissues, demonstrating that compact nucleases can circumvent size limitations and expand the reach of VIGE.Transgene-free genome editing can ease regulatory hurdles and improve public acceptance. Protoplast transformation with subsequent plant regeneration provides a powerful route, especially for perennial fruit trees with long generation cycles. Citrus is a timely example, as canker disease severely reduces yields. In earlier work, (Su et al., 2023) generated canker-resistant citrus using Cas12a ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) with a single crRNA. In their contribution here, Su et al. extended this strategy by employing three crRNAs targeting CsLOB1, the canker susceptibility gene. While the earlier study primarily produced small indels, the multiplex RNP approach yielded long deletions and inversions, demonstrating the feasibility of RNP-based multiplex editing for more complex edits while remaining transgene-free.Correia et al. review in planta transformation methods as alternatives to tissue culture for perennial grasses. Perennial grasses can be highly beneficial for sustainable agriculture because of their potential to reduce soil erosion and improve carbon sequestration, and they require less inputs than annuals. However, their transformation is hindered by genotype recalcitrance and low regeneration efficiency, leaving progress behind other crops. The review explores approaches such as meristem-targeted and virus-mediated transformation, and discusses their potential for genome editing and domestication of these crops. Although genome editing technologies and applications are advancing rapidly, regulatory and policy frameworks continue to determine how quickly these innovations reach farmers and consumers. Ricroch et al. provide a global overview of field trials, which are essential for assessing the agronomic potential of new traits under real-world conditions, with genetically engineered and genome-edited crops. Their survey shows that research activity is expanding across multiple crop species and trait categories, reflecting strong scientific momentum. Yet persistent obstacles remain, including regulatory delays and, in some regions, restrictive frameworks that slow or prevent field testing. This study highlights the need for harmonized, science-based regulations to ensure that advances in trait engineering move beyond the lab to support sustainable agriculture and global food security. The Research Topic Engineering Future Crops Through Genome Editing highlights the rapid progress of plant genome editing across traits, methodologies, transformation approaches, and regulatory perspectives. Together, these contributions showcase how CRISPR is being applied to enhance stress resilience, improve consumer-oriented traits, and expand the editing toolbox for diverse crops. Despite this momentum, barriers such as transformation and editing efficiency, genotype dependence, and regulatory hurdles remain. Moving forward, continued tool development, integration into breeding pipelines, and progressive policies will be essential to realize the full potential of genome editing for food security, consumer health, and sustainable agriculture.
Keywords: Plant genome editing, CRISPR-Cas, Stress resistance, nutritional quality, plant transformation, Regulatory policy
Received: 07 Oct 2025; Accepted: 13 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Tuncel, Kim and Kim. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Aytug Tuncel, aytugtuncel@gmail.com
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.