Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 10 December 2025

Sec. Crop and Product Physiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1729301

This article is part of the Research TopicRegulatory Effects of Irrigation and Fertilization on Aboveground and Underground Parts of CropsView all 10 articles

Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on photosynthetic-stoichiometric balance in potato: a leaf physiological and ecological perspective

Bin DuBin Du1Juan Yin,,*Juan Yin1,2,3*Yingpan Yang,,*Yingpan Yang4,5,6*Jinze Li,,Jinze Li4,5,6Ying Tang,,Ying Tang4,5,6
  • 1School of Civil and Water Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
  • 2Engineering Research Center for Efficient Utilization of Water Resources in Modern Agriculture in Arid Regions, Yinchuan, China
  • 3Ningxia Research Center of Technology on Water-saving Irrigation and Water Resources Regulation, Yinchuan, China
  • 4Hydraulic Research Institute of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
  • 5Field Scientific Observation and Research Station for Agricultural Irrigation in Ningxia Yellow River Diversion Irrigation Area, Ministry of Water Resources, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China
  • 6Ningxia Dry Farming, Water Saving and Efficient Agricultural Engineering Technology Research Center, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China

Potato, a globally important food crop, plays a key role in ensuring food security and poverty alleviation. Addressing the prominent contradiction between water scarcity and low nitrogen use efficiency in potato production in the arid regions of northwest China, this study conducted a water-nitrogen regulation experiment to explore the synergistic effects of water-nitrogen management on potato yield and physiological ecology. Irrigation treatments included the full irrigation quota (2250 m3 ha-1, W3), 20% water-saving (1800 m3 ha-1, W2), and 40% water-saving (1350 m3 ha-1, W1), while nitrogen application treatments consisted of the full nitrogen rate (195 kg ha-1, N3), 20% nitrogen reduction (156 kg ha-1, N2), 40% nitrogen reduction (117 kg ha-1, N1), with the local conventional practice as the control (CK). The results showed that the W2N2 treatment had the highest chlorophyll content, which was significantly higher than other treatments and 2.87% higher than CK on average. Under water-nitrogen interaction, potato leaf gas exchange parameters first increased and then decreased with growth stages, peaking at the tuber formation stage, and the W2N2 treatment was significantly superior to other combinations. For nutrient contents in various plant organs, the W2N2 treatment also achieved the highest total nitrogen and total phosphorus contents, which were significantly higher than other treatments. The distribution ratios of nutrient contents in different organs varied with water-nitrogen treatments across years. Based on quadratic regression analysis and the TOPSIS model, the optimal water-nitrogen coupling pattern for potato cultivation in the arid zone of central Ningxia was determined as W2N2, providing theoretical and technical references for efficient potato cultivation with water-saving and nitrogen-reducing practices in arid regions.

1 Introduction

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is a globally important food crop that plays a vital role in ensuring food security and reducing poverty (Ma et al., 2021). However, its cultivation and yield formation are limited by multiple factors, with drought stress and nitrogen fertilizer management being the primary constraints on production (Fandika et al., 2016; Satognon et al., 2021). Practical experience has demonstrated that optimizing irrigation practices to improve crop water use efficiency can enable irrigated farmland to achieve high yields with minimal water input. This approach is not only a crucial strategy to alleviate water scarcity and mitigate ecological and environmental issues in arid and semi-arid regions but also a key research focus within water-saving agriculture (Kang et al., 2025). Concurrently, the rapid increase in potato yield has historically depended on high inputs of chemical nitrogen fertilizers; however, prolonged excessive and improper fertilization has significantly reduced nitrogen use efficiency (Chen et al., 2024). Studies have shown that moderate reductions in nitrogen application can enhance nitrogen use efficiency, whereas excessive reductions result in yield decline (Lombardo et al., 2020). Therefore, achieving water-saving irrigation without compromising potato yield, alongside reasonable reductions in nitrogen fertilizer application, has become a critical scientific challenge in sustainable agricultural development.

Leaf stomatal exchange parameters, as core indicators of plant physiological ecology, directly reflect the gas exchange capacity between potato leaves and the external environment (Yun et al., 2020), and are closely linked to yield formation (Fu et al., 2021). The SPAD value, an important technical parameter for assessing chlorophyll concentration, is significantly affected by water stress, which in turn impacts potato chlorophyll content and tuber yield (Rolando et al., 2015). The coupling of water and nitrogen profoundly influences crop growth, yield, net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, and intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (Hong et al., 2022). Enhancing water and fertilizer use efficiency is essential for sustainable potato production (Kifle and Gebretsadikan, 2016; Chang et al., 2018), with studies showing that optimized irrigation combined with a 25% substitution of nitrogen fertilizer by manure can synergistically improve potato yield (Wang et al., 2024). Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus are the three fundamental elements driving ecosystem processes (Hao et al., 2017). Among these, carbon constitutes the structural basis of plants, while nitrogen and phosphorus are the primary nutrient elements limiting carbon assimilation, plant growth, and other biological functions (Sun et al., 2014; Gao et al., 2019). Nitrogen addition has been shown to significantly decrease the C:N ratio in plants and soils, increase plant N:P ratios, and exacerbate microbial carbon and phosphorus limitations, thereby advancing understanding of nutrient cycling processes in terrestrial ecosystems affected by global nitrogen deposition (Xu et al., 2022). Variations in plant nutrient stoichiometric ratios serve as sensitive indicators of changes in nutrient availability, which are reflected in plant physiological responses (Yan et al., 2015). Investigations into the ecological stoichiometric characteristics of plant carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus help elucidate growth regulation mechanisms, survival strategies, and the effects of different plant organs and water-nitrogen interaction regimes on plant physiology (Chang et al., 2024). Han et al. (2011)pioneered a comprehensive analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in the leaves of over 1900 plant species in China, revealing the relative stability of these limiting elements and their consistent responses to environmental fluctuations. Consequently, research on the effects of water-saving irrigation combined with nitrogen fertilizer reduction on photosynthesis, plant nutrient dynamics, and stoichiometry is both necessary and timely.

Although previous studies have examined the effects of water-nitrogen interactions on photosynthetic parameters, research on the dynamic changes in leaf gas exchange parameters, accumulation and distribution of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, and their stoichiometric ratios throughout the entire growth period of potato under combined water-saving irrigation and nitrogen reduction management in the arid regions of Northwest China remains limited. Notably, a systematic investigation into the mechanisms by which water-nitrogen interactions influence yield through regulation of photosynthetic physiology and nutrient stoichiometric balance is still lacking. Addressing this gap, the present study employs field experiments to analyze the temporal dynamics of leaf gas exchange parameters; carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus contents; nutrient accumulation and distribution ratios; stoichiometric ratios; and nitrogen and phosphorus limitation status across different growth stages of potato under varying water-nitrogen interaction regimes in the arid Northwest China region. The study aims to elucidate the interrelationships among leaf stomatal exchange characteristics, nutrient accumulation and distribution, stoichiometric balance across plant organs, and yield under water-nitrogen interaction, thereby providing a theoretical foundation and practical guidance for understanding the regulatory mechanisms of water-nitrogen interaction on potato photosynthetic physiology and stoichiometric equilibrium.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Experimental site overview

The experiment was conducted during 2022–2023 in Yuwang Town (36°48′2″N, 106°21′53″E, altitude 1489 m), a typical area of the central arid zone in Ningxia, northwest China, as specifically shown in Figure 1a. The experimental area features a continental arid climate characterized by significant diurnal temperature variations, low precipitation, and intense evaporation. The multi-year average rainfall is approximately 270 mm, with annual evaporation reaching about 2,325 mm. The groundwater table lies below 10 m depth. The experimental soil is classified as sandy loam, with basic physical-chemical properties of the 0–40 cm tillage layer before sowing as follows: bulk density 1.41 g cm-3, field water-holding capacity 21.8%, pH 8.57, total salt content 0.6 g kg-1, organic matter content 6.65 g kg-1, alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen content 38 mg kg-1, available phosphorus content 3.94 mg kg-1, available potassium content 130 mg kg-1, total nitrogen content 0.27 g kg-1, total phosphorus content 0.64 g kg-1, and total potassium content 17.4 g kg-1.

Figure 1
(a) A topographic map of a region with elevation color-coded from high (red) to low (green), marking locations like Shi zui shan and Yu zhong. Inset shows the map's position in China. (b) A layout of labeled plots with codes like W2N3-3 and CK-1. (c) Diagram of a planting setup with potatoes under mulching film and drip tape. Dimensions are noted as 120 cm and 60 cm.

Figure 1. Overview of the experimental area. Panel (a) shows the location of the experimental area, Panel (b) illustrates the layout of the plot experiment, and Panel (c) presents the potato planting pattern.

2.2 Experimental design

A two-year experiment was designed with two factors and three levels, involving 3 irrigation quotas and 3 nitrogen application rates, and a control group (CK) was set according to local management practices, which relied solely on rainfall without irrigation, with 15 t ha-1 of cow dung organic fertilizer and 195 kg ha-1 of nitrogen fertilizer applied. The maximum irrigation quota was implemented in accordance with the Technical Specification for Potato Drip Irrigation Cultivation in Ningxia issued by the Water Resources Department of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region in 2017, while the maximum nitrogen application rate adopted the local conventional application amount. Irrigation treatments included three quotas: 2250 m3 ha-1 (W3), 20% water-saving (1800 m3 ha-1, W2), and 40% water-saving (1350 m3 ha-1, W1). Nitrogen application treatments consisted of the recommended nitrogen rate (195 kg ha-1, N3), 20% nitrogen reduction (156 kg ha-1, N2), and 40% nitrogen reduction (117 kg ha-1, N1), using urea (46% nitrogen content) as the nitrogen fertilizer. In total, there were 10 treatments with 3 replicates each, resulting in 30 plots, as detailed in Figure 1b. Irrigation and fertilization were conducted through integrated water and fertilizer management with multiple topdressings, which were applied 6 times during the seedling stage, tuber formation stage, tuber growth stage, and starch accumulation stage in a ratio of 1:2:2:1. Irrigation was carried out 10 times during the sprout growth stage, seedling stage, tuber formation stage, tuber growth stage, and starch accumulation stage in a ratio of 1:2:3:3:1, as shown in Table 1. The cumulative irrigation amounts and nitrogen application rates for potatoes are presented in Figure 2, and the rainfall and temperature during the potato growth stages are shown in Figure 3.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Division of growth stages, irrigation amount and nitrogen application rate of potato.

Figure 2
Four line graphs depict cumulative irrigation volume and nitrogen application over time for 2022 and 2023. Graphs (a) and (b) show irrigation volumes (m³/ha) for 2022 and 2023, with lines W1 (red), W2 (green), and W3 (blue). Arrows indicate nitrogen application dates. Graphs (c) and (d) display nitrogen application (kg/ha) for 2022 and 2023, using lines N1 (red), N2 (green), and N3 (blue). Dates range from May 1 to September 9.

Figure 2. (a–d) Cumulative nitrogen application and irrigation amount during potato growth stages.

Figure 3
Two line graphs compare temperature and rainfall data for 2022 and 2023. The x-axis represents dates from April 22 to October 1, and the y-axes show temperature in degrees Celsius on the left and rainfall in millimeters on the right. The 2022 graph shows fluctuations in maximum and minimum temperatures and rainfall patterns. The 2023 graph also shows similar data trends, with notable differences in temperature peaks and rainfall. Both graphs use red for maximum temperature, blue for minimum temperature, and green for rainfall.

Figure 3. Daily average air temperature and rainfall during potato growth stages in the experimental area.

Potato planting dates were May 1, 2022, and April 30, 2023, with harvest dates on October 3, 2022, and October 2, 2023. The tested variety was “Qingshu 9”, which was bred by Qinghai Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences. It is characterized by late-maturing and fresh-eating, luxuriant branches and leaves, concentrated tuber setting, oblong tubers, and high quality. The planting mode adopted was under-film drip irrigation, with “one film for two rows” planted at equal row spacing. The plastic film was 1.2 m wide, and the seeds were sown at a depth of 10 cm. The 1.2 m-wide plastic mulch covered seeds planted at 10 cm depth. Planting parameters included 50 cm plant spacing and 60 cm row spacing, with 10 plants per row and 40 plants per plot, resulting in a planting density of 33,345 plants ha-1. Basal fertilizers included calcium superphosphate (12% P2O5 content, 82.5 kg ha-1) and potassium sulfate (50% K2O content, 150 kg ha-1), applied as a single basal dose. Each experimental plot measured 17.6 m2 (5.5 m length × 3.2 m width), surrounded by 1 m-wide buffer rows between plots and 2 m-wide peripheral buffer rows. The experimental design comprised 30 plots (3 replicates × 10 treatments). Each plot featured an independent irrigation control unit with a water meter, gate valve, and pressure gauge. The embedded drip tape (16 mm inner diameter, 0.15 mm wall thickness) operated at 0.1 MPa pressure, delivering 2 L h-1 through emitters spaced 50 cm apart (one emitter per plant). Field management practices including weeding and pesticide application followed locally recommended agronomic protocols.

2.3 Sample collections and measurements

2.3.1 Chlorophyll relative content (SPAD value)

The SPAD value is a parameter measured using a portable chlorophyll meter (Konica Minolta, Japan, SPAD-502Plus), which is mainly used for the rapid assessment of the relative chlorophyll content in plant leaves. Mature functional leaves from the middle part of the plant were selected—specifically the 3rd to 5th inverted leaves of potato. These leaves exhibit vigorous photosynthetic function and stable status, which can represent the overall physiological level of the plant. Additionally, intact leaves without damage were chosen to ensure data representativeness. Three to five healthy potato leaves were selected from each experimental plot for SPAD measurement, and the average value was calculated. Measurements were performed from 9:00 to 11:00 (Beijing Time) at the seedling stage, tuber formation stage, tuber bulking stage, starch accumulation stage, and late harvest stage of potato, with three replicates for each treatment.

2.3.2 Leaf gas exchange parameters

Leaf gas exchange parameters were measured using a Li-6800 photosynthesis system (LI-COR, USA) to determine net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs), and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) in potato leaves. The photosynthetic measurement system automatically recorded and stored leaf gas exchange parameters. The selection method for leaves was consistent with that used for determining relative chlorophyll content. Settings of the L-6800 instrument: The photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in the leaf chamber was set to 1200 µmol·m-²·s-¹ to simulate normal light conditions. The reference CO2 concentration was set to 400 ppm (standard atmospheric concentration) for gas exchange measurements. The gas flow rate was adjusted to 500 µmol·s-¹ to ensure the stability of gas exchange determination. The leaf temperature was maintained at 25°C to provide optimal conditions for photosynthesis. The vapor pressure deficit (VPD) was controlled within the range of 1.0–1.5 kPa to simulate a normal transpiration environment. Measurements were conducted from 9:00 to 11:00, as light conditions are relatively stable during this period, which is suitable for photosynthesis-related gas exchange assays.

2.3.3 Plant nutrient status

At the harvest stage, potato plant samples were collected, rinsed thoroughly with water, and then separated by organs (stems, leaves, roots, tubers). The samples were placed in a blast drying oven (Shanghai Yiheng Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd., DHG-9240A), blanched at 105°C for 30 minutes, and then dried to constant weight at 75°C. The dried samples were crushed using a small grinder (Tianjin Tester Instrument Co., Ltd., FW-100) and passed through a 0.5 mm sieve for the determination of total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and organic carbon contents in each organ. The TN content was measured by the Kjeldahl method (FOSS, Kjeltec 8400), the TP content by the molybdenum-antimony anti spectrophotometric method (Shanghai Yuanxi Instruments Co., Ltd., UV-5500PC), and the TOC content by the potassium dichromate titration method (Shanghai Shuli Instruments Co., Ltd., DS-101S).

2.3.4 Potato yield

At potato harvest stage, randomly selected 2×2 m² plots with uniform plant growth were sampled from each treatment. Three replicated plots per treatment were cleaned with water to remove soil adhering to potato surfaces, air-dried, and weighed using an electronic balance (accuracy 0.01 g). The total yield per hectare under different treatments was calculated based on planting density.

2.3.5 Leaf water use efficiency

Leaf water use efficiency (LWUE) of potato leaves Specific formulas see Equation 1.

LWUE=Pn/Tr(1)

Where: LWUE represents leaf water use efficiency (μmol mmol-¹), where Pn denotes net photosynthetic rate of potato leaves (μmol (m² s)-¹), and Tr indicates transpiration rate of potato leaves (mmol (m² s)-¹).

2.3.6 Stoichiometric characteristics of potato plant tissues

Carbon-nitrogen-phosphorus (C:N:P) stoichiometric ratios in different potato tissues (Olivera Viciedo et al., 2019) Specific formulas see Equation 24.

C/N=TOC/TN(2)
C/P=TOC/TP(3)
N/P=TN/TP(4)

Where: C/N represents carbon-to-nitrogen ratio, C/P denotes carbon-to-phosphorus ratio, and N/P indicates nitrogen-to-phosphorus ratio in various tissues of potato plants.

2.4 TOPSIS model

The technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) was used to identify a solution from the feasible solution set by defining the positive ideal solution and the negative ideal solution for the decision problem so that it was closest to the positive ideal solution and farthest from the negative ideal solution (Yang et al., 2023).

1. Nine treatments were set as evaluation objects, with nine evaluation indicators including tuber yield, SPAD, Tr, Pn, Gs, Ci, PSN, PLN, PRN, PTN, PSP, PLP, PRP, PTP, PSC, PLC, PRC, PTC. The evaluation indicators were normalized to establish a normalized matrix Specific formulas see Equation 5:

zij=xiji=1nxij2(5)

where zij is the j index normalized value in i treatment; xij is the j index value in the i treatment. i = 1, 2,···, n; j = 1, 2,···, m;

2. The ideal solution (Zij+) and the negative solution (Zij) were determined to form the ideal solution vector Z+ and the negative solution vector Z, respectively Specific formulas see Equation 6, 7:

Zij+=(zi1+,zi1+,zi3+zij+)(6)
Zij=(zi1,zi1,zi3zij)(7)

where Zij+ and Zij represent the maximum and minimum values of the evaluation object in the j-th index, respectively;

3. The Euclidean distances (Di+ and Di) were determined Specific formulas see Equation 8, 9:

Di+=j=1m[wj×(zij-Zij+)]2(8)
Di-=j=1m[wj×(zij-Zij-)]2(9)

where wj is the weight of indicator j;

4. The relative proximity coefficient Ri of each treatment was calculated; that is, the proximity between the evaluation object and the optimal scheme was calculated as follows Specific formulas see Equation 10:

Ri=Di-Di++Di-(10)

2.5 Statistical analysis

Data collation was performed using Microsoft Excel 2019 (developed by Microsoft Corporation, USA); graphing was conducted with Origin 2021 (developed by OriginLab Corporation, USA); Duncan’s multiple comparison significance test (p< 0.05) was carried out via SPSS 26 (developed by International Business Machines Corporation, USA); and R (V.4.3.1, developed by Ross Ihaka and Robert Gentleman from the Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, New Zealand) was utilized for Pearson correlation analysis, plotting of fixed-model correlation analysis, as well as the construction of random forest and TOPSIS models.

3 Results and analysis

3.1 Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on relative chlorophyll content in potato leaves

The effects of water-nitrogen interaction on the relative chlorophyll content of potato leaves are shown in Figure 4. Consistent trends were observed across both experimental years. During the growth period, leaf SPAD values under water-nitrogen regulation exhibited an initial increase followed by a decline, reaching their maximum at the tuber formation stage. At constant nitrogen levels, SPAD values first increased and then decreased with rising irrigation quotas; similarly, under fixed irrigation, SPAD values initially rose before declining as nitrogen application rates increased. Among all treatments, the W2N2 regime resulted in the highest relative chlorophyll content, with an average increase of 2.87% compared to the CK treatment across all growth stages over both years. Statistical analysis confirmed significant interactive effects between water and nitrogen, with both factors significantly influencing leaf chlorophyll content (p < 0.05).

Figure 4
Bar graphs comparing SPAD values across different growth stages and treatments for 2022 and 2023. The graphs display treatments N1, N2, N3, and CK over seedling, tuber formation, tuber growth, starch accumulation, and harvest periods. Statistical significance is indicated by symbols.

Figure 4. (a, b) Relative chlorophyll content in potato leaves under different treatments. In the figure, W stands for irrigation quota and N for nitrogen application rate. ** indicates an extremely significant effect. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).

3.2 Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on gas exchange parameters in potato leaves

3.2.1 Transpiration rate

The effects of water-nitrogen interaction on potato leaf Tr are presented in Figure 5. Throughout the growth period, leaf transpiration generally exhibited an initial increase followed by a decline, peaking during the tuber initiation stage. Across both experimental years, under constant irrigation quotas, transpiration rates increased with rising nitrogen application up to a point, then decreased at higher nitrogen levels. Notably, the W2N2 treatment showed significantly higher Tr than other treatments, with an average increase of 228.49% compared to the CK treatment across all growth stages. Under fixed irrigation, the N1 treatment exhibited a steady increase in transpiration during the seedling and tuber initiation stages, whereas the N2 and N3 treatments demonstrated an initial rise followed by a decline. During the tuber bulking and starch accumulation stages, all treatments showed a consistent pattern of increase followed by decrease. The interaction between water and nitrogen reached a significant level (excluding the tuber bulking stage), and both irrigation and nitrogen application had significant effects on leaf Tr (Tr) (p<0.05)., underscoring that optimized irrigation and nitrogen application synergistically enhance potato leaf transpiration.

Figure 5
Bar charts compare transpiration rates across different growth stages and treatments in 2022 and 2023. Treatments N1, N2, and N3 are illustrated in pink, blue, and light blue. Divided into seedling stage, tuber formation, tuber growth, and starch accumulation. Significance is noted with W**, N**, and W×N**. Treatment levels are W1, W2, W3, and CK0/CK1, indicating various conditions. Bars are labeled 'a' to 'h' for significance levels. Error bars show variability.

Figure 5. (a, b) Transpiration rate (Tr) of potato leaves. In the figure, W stands for irrigation quota and N for nitrogen application rate. ** indicates an extremely significant effect. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05).

3.2.2 Net photosynthetic rate

The effect of water-nitrogen interaction on the net Pn of potato leaves is shown in Figure 6. The net photosynthetic rate of potato leaves generally first increased and then decreased with the progression of growth stages, peaking at the tuber formation stage. In the two-year experiment, under the same irrigation quota, the net photosynthetic rate first increased and then decreased with the increase of nitrogen application rate. Under water-nitrogen interaction, the W2N2 treatment was significantly higher than other treatments, with an average increase of 150.09% compared to the CK treatment across all growth stages in two years. The variation trends were basically consistent in the two-year experiment. Under the same irrigation quota: for the N1 treatment, the net Pn increased with the increase of irrigation quota at the seedling stage and tuber bulking stage, while it first increased and then decreased at the tuber formation stage and starch accumulation stage; for the N2 treatment, it first increased and then decreased with the increase of irrigation quota at all growth stages; for the N3 treatment, it first increased and then decreased at the seedling stage and starch accumulation stage, increased at the tuber formation stage, and first decreased and then increased at the tuber bulking stage (note: corrected the repeated “tuber formation stage” in the original text). All treatments reached an extremely significant level under water-nitrogen regulation, and the significance of the water-nitrogen interaction varied among different growth stages. An appropriate irrigation quota and nitrogen application rate can improve the net photosynthetic rate of potato leaves.

Figure 6
Bar charts comparing photosynthetic rates (\(Pn\)) under different treatments (N1, N2, N3) across four plant growth stages: Seedling Stage, Tuber Formation Period, Tuber Growth Period, and Starch Accumulation Period for 2022 and 2023. The data show variations in photosynthetic rates with distinctions in statistical significance denoted by letters and asterisks. The treatments are labeled W1, W2, W3, and CK for 2022, and W1, W2, W3, CK0, and CK1 for 2023. Asterisks indicate significant differences in nitrogen (N), water (W), and their interaction (W×N).

Figure 6. (a, b) Net photosynthetic rate (Pn) of potato leaves.

3.2.3 Stomatal conductance

The effect of water-nitrogen interaction on the Gs of potato leaves is shown in Figure 7. The Gs of potato leaves generally first increased and then decreased with the progression of growth stages, peaking at the tuber formation stage. The variation trends were basically consistent in the two-year experiment: under the same irrigation quota, the leaf Gs first increased and then decreased with the increase of nitrogen application rate. Under water-nitrogen interaction, the W2N2 treatment was significantly higher than other treatments, with an average increase of 186.49% compared to the CK treatment across all growth stages in two years. Under the same irrigation quota, for the N1 treatment, Gs first increased and then decreased with the increase of irrigation quota at the seedling stage, tuber formation stage, and starch accumulation stage, and followed the same trend at the tuber bulking stage; for the N2 treatment, it first increased and then decreased with the increase of irrigation quota at all growth stages; for the N3 treatment, it increased with the increase of irrigation quota at the seedling stage, while first increasing and then decreasing at the tuber formation stage, tuber bulking stage, and starch accumulation stage. All treatments reached an extremely significant level under water-nitrogen regulation. In the second year of the experiment, the interaction between water and nitrogen had a significant effect on Gs. An appropriate irrigation quota and nitrogen application rate can improve the leaf Gs of potatoes.

Figure 7
Bar graphs comparing the stomatal conductance \(Gs\) in mmol per square meter per second under different treatments across four growth stages in 2022 and 2023. The graphs are divided into seedling stage, tuber formation period, tuber growth period, and starch accumulation period. Three nitrogen treatments, N1, N2, and N3, are represented by pink, blue, and light blue bars, respectively. Significance indicators (W**, N**, W×N**) are noted for each stage, and error bars show the variability of data.

Figure 7. (a, b) Stomatal conductance (Gs) of potato leaves.

3.2.4 Intercellular CO2 concentration

The effect of water-nitrogen interaction on the Ci of potato leaves is shown in Figure 8. The Ci of potato leaves generally first increased and then decreased with the progression of growth stages, with the maximum value observed at the tuber formation stage. In the two-year experiment, under the same irrigation quota, the leaf Ci first increased and then decreased with the increase of nitrogen application rate. Under water-nitrogen interaction, the W2N2 treatment was significantly higher than other treatments, with an average increase of 63.09% compared to the CK treatment across all growth stages in two years. Under the same irrigation quota, for the N1 treatment, Ci first increased and then decreased with the increase of irrigation quota at the seedling stage and tuber formation stage, and followed the same trend at the starch accumulation stage and tuber bulking stage; for the N2 treatment, it first increased and then decreased with the increase of irrigation quota at all growth stages; for the N3 treatment, it increased with the increase of irrigation quota at the seedling stage and tuber bulking stage, while first increasing and then decreasing at the tuber formation stage and starch accumulation stage. The interaction between water and nitrogen had a minor effect on leaf Ci, and no significant difference was observed at some growth stages. An appropriate irrigation quota and nitrogen application rate can improve the leaf Ci of potatoes.

Figure 8
Bar graphs display the effects of different treatments (W1, W2, W3, CK0, CK1) on \(C_i\) levels during seedling, tuber formation, growth, and starch accumulation periods in 2022 and 2023. Each graph compares treatments N1 (pink), N2 (blue), and N3 (purple). Significant interactions (W, N, \(W \times N\)) are highlighted with asterisks. Bars are labeled with letters indicating statistical differences. Data is divided into distinct stages within each year.

Figure 8. (a, b) Intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) of potato leaves.

3.2.5 Leaf water use efficiency

The effects of water-nitrogen interaction on potato leaf water use efficiency are shown in Figure 9. The LWUE of potato increased with the advancement of growth stages, being higher during tuber expansion and starch accumulation stages compared to seedling and tuber formation stages. Under water-nitrogen interaction, LWUE showed significant variations across different treatments. In 2022, the W2N1 treatment achieved the maximum value during seedling stage, representing a 40.58% increase compared to CK treatment, whereas W1N1 showed the highest values during tuber formation, tuber expansion, and starch accumulation stages due to water-nitrogen stress-induced enhancement. In 2023, the W1N1 treatment decreased by 14.44% compared to CK during seedling stage, but increased by 4.91%, 11.97%, and 30.75% during tuber formation, tuber expansion, and starch accumulation stages, respectively. These results demonstrate substantial impacts of water-nitrogen interaction on potato LWUE.

Figure 9
Bar chart panels showing LWUE measurements for 2022 and 2023 across different growth stages: Seedling Stage, Tuber Formation Period, and Starch Accumulation Period. Each bar represents treatments N1, N2, and N3 in shades of pink, purple, and blue. Treatments W1, W2, W3, and CK0/CK1 are shown. Statistical significance is indicated by letters a through g and asterisks next to “W,” “N,” and “W×N” for interactions, with significance levels denoted by asterisks. Error bars indicate variability in the data.

Figure 9. (a, b) Potato leaf water use efficiency (LWUE).

3.3 Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on potato plant nutrients

3.3.1 Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on organic carbon content in potato plants

Plant organic carbon refers to the carbon element contained in organic matter within plant tissues. The effects of water-nitrogen interaction on organic carbon content in various organs of potato plants are shown in Table 2. Under water-nitrogen treatments, the organic carbon content trends across potato plant organs were generally consistent. Under the same irrigation quota, organic carbon content in all organs increased with higher nitrogen application rates. Under the same nitrogen application rate, organic carbon content increased with higher irrigation quotas. However, the interaction between the two factors did not reach a significant level, likely due to the relatively stable variation in organic carbon content.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Organic carbon content in potato plants under different treatments.

3.3.2 Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on total nitrogen content in potato plants

The effect of water-nitrogen interaction on the total nitrogen content of various potato plant organs is shown in Table 3. The two-year experimental results indicated that the variation trends of all treatments were basically consistent with the change of water-nitrogen interaction. Under the same irrigation quota, the total nitrogen content of potato stems first increased and then decreased with the increase of nitrogen application rate. Under the same nitrogen application rate, with the increase of irrigation quota, the total nitrogen content increased with the increase of nitrogen application rate in the N1 treatment, while it first increased and then decreased in the N2 and N3 treatments. Among all treatments, the W2N2 treatment achieved the highest value, with an average increase of 55.61% compared to the CK treatment over two years. Under the same irrigation quota, the total nitrogen content of potato tubers first increased and then decreased with the increase of nitrogen application rate. Under the same nitrogen application rate, in 2022, the total nitrogen content increased with the increase of irrigation quota in the N1 treatment, while it first increased and then decreased in the N2 and N3 treatments; in 2023, the total nitrogen content of all treatments first decreased and then increased with the increase of irrigation quota. The W2N2 treatment had the highest value, with an average increase of 61.02% compared to the CK treatment over two years. Under the same irrigation quota, the total nitrogen content of potato roots first increased and then decreased with the increase of nitrogen application rate. Under the same nitrogen application rate, the total nitrogen content of all treatments first decreased and then increased with the increase of irrigation quota. The W2N2 treatment showed the highest value, with an average increase of 90.95% compared to the CK treatment over two years. Across the two-year experiment, the W2N2 treatment had the highest total nitrogen content of potato leaves under water-nitrogen interaction, with an average increase of 121.91% compared to the CK treatment. The interaction between water and nitrogen had a significant effect on the total nitrogen content of potato leaves.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Total nitrogen content in potato plants under different treatments.

3.3.3 Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on total phosphorus content in potato plants

The effects of water-nitrogen interaction on the total phosphorus content in various organs of potato plants are shown in Table 4. Results from the two-year experiment indicated that the variation trends of all treatments under water-nitrogen interaction were generally consistent. Under the same irrigation quota, for the W1 treatment, the total phosphorus content in potato stems showed an increasing trend with the increase of nitrogen application rate; while for the W2 and W3 treatments, it first increased and then decreased. Under the same nitrogen application rate, the total phosphorus content in potato stems first increased and then decreased with the increase of nitrogen application rate. Among them, the W2N2 treatment was the highest, with an average increase of 80.94% compared with the CK treatment over the two years. Under the same irrigation quota, the total phosphorus content in potato stems first increased and then decreased as the nitrogen application rate increased. Under the same nitrogen application rate, with the increase of irrigation quota, the total phosphorus content in potato stems also showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. The W2N2 treatment was the maximum in this scenario, with an average increase of 35.36% compared with the CK treatment over the two years. Under the same irrigation quota, for the W1 treatment, the total phosphorus content in potato stems increased with the increase of nitrogen application rate; for the W2 and W3 treatments, the total phosphorus content in potato stems first increased and then decreased as the nitrogen application rate increased. Under the same nitrogen application rate, all treatments first decreased and then increased with the increase of irrigation quota. The W2N2 treatment was the highest, with an average increase of 102.11% compared with the CK treatment. Overall, the two-year experimental results showed that under water-nitrogen interaction, the W2N2 treatment had the highest total phosphorus content, with an average increase of 34.34% compared with the CK treatment over the two years.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Total phosphorus content of potato plants under different treatments.

3.3.4 Distribution ratio of nutrient content in different organs of potato plants

The distribution ratios of organic carbon content in various organs of potato plants in 2022 are shown in Figure 10a. Under water-nitrogen regulation in 2022, the organic carbon content in potato stems and roots was greater than that in leaves and tubers. In the W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, and W2N3 treatments, the organic carbon content followed the order: stem > root > leaf > tuber. In the W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments, the order was root > stem > leaf > tuber. In 2023, the W1N1 and W3N3 treatments showed organic carbon content in the order: leaf > root > tuber > stem, while the W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, and W3N2 treatments followed root > leaf > tuber > stem. This indicates that water-nitrogen interaction can improve the organic carbon content distribution among potato plant organs.

Figure 10
Bar charts showing the distribution of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus allocation to plant parts in 2022 and 2023 across different treatments. The bars represent proportions for stem, leaf, root, and tubers, with varying allocations for each element and treatment. Each treatment includes data for both years, illustrating how resource distribution changes. The charts are labeled (a) to (f) for different measurements, with each bar segmented by element contribution percentages in the plants.

Figure 10. (a–f) Distribution ratios of nutrient content in different organs of potato plants.

The distribution ratios of total nitrogen content in various organs of potato plants are shown in Figure 10b. Under water-nitrogen interaction in 2022, stem total nitrogen accounted for 13%~16% of the total, leaf total nitrogen for 39%~47%, root total nitrogen for 19%~24%, and tuber total nitrogen for 18%~22%, with leaves exhibiting the highest total nitrogen content. Under water-nitrogen regulation, the W1N1, W1N2, and W1N3 treatments showed total nitrogen content in the order: leaf > tuber > root > stem, while the W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments followed leaf > root > tuber > stem. In 2023, stem total nitrogen accounted for 13%~18%, leaf total nitrogen for 39%~45%, root total nitrogen for 21%~25%, and tuber total nitrogen for 17%~22%, with leaves and tubers showing the highest total nitrogen content. Under water-nitrogen regulation, all treatments exhibited total nitrogen content in the order: leaf > root > tuber > stem. This indicates that water-nitrogen interaction can improve total nitrogen content distribution among potato plant organs.

The distribution ratios of total phosphorus content in various organs of potato plants are shown in Figure 10c. Under water-nitrogen interaction in 2022, stem total phosphorus accounted for 18%~20%, leaf total phosphorus for 34%~36%, root total phosphorus for 17%~20%, and tuber total phosphorus for 25%~30%, with leaves exhibiting the highest total phosphorus content. Under water-nitrogen regulation, the W1N1, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments showed total phosphorus content in the order: leaf > tuber > stem > root, while the W1N2 and W1N3 treatments followed leaf > tuber > root > stem. In 2023, stem total phosphorus accounted for 16%~20%, leaf total phosphorus for 27%~31%, root total phosphorus for 11%~18%, and tuber total phosphorus for 35%~42%, with leaves exhibiting the highest total phosphorus content. Under water-nitrogen regulation, all treatments exhibited total phosphorus content in the order: tuber > leaf > stem > root. This indicates that water-nitrogen interaction can improve total phosphorus content distribution among potato plant organs.

3.4 Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on stoichiometric characteristics of potato plants

3.4.1 Carbon-nitrogen stoichiometric ratios in different potato plant parts

The C:N stoichiometric ratios of different parts of potato plants under various water-nitrogen interaction treatments are shown in Table 5. The variation trends over the two-year experimental period were generally consistent. Under the same irrigation quota, the C:N ratio of stems showed an initial decrease followed by an increase with increasing nitrogen application. Under the same nitrogen application rate, the C:N ratio exhibited an initial decrease then increase with increasing irrigation quota. Compared to the CK treatment, the W1N1 treatment increased by 3.58%, while the W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments decreased by 22.02%, 4.27%, 11.62%, 32.03%, 28.44%, 13.02%, 18.59%, and 18.65%, respectively. The C:N ratios of leaves in the W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments decreased by 6.03%, 22.21%, 14.50%, 10.69%, 28.86%, 27.31%, 9.29%, 16.45%, and 10.97%, respectively, compared to CK. The C:N ratios of roots in the W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments increased by 65.84%, 61.48%, 68.56%, 17.53%, 25.89%, 47.33%, 55.66%, 51.66%, and 35.82%, respectively, compared to CK. The C:N ratios of tubers in the W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments increased by 21.00%, 12.04%, 23.05%, 13.48%, 5.03%, 12.29%, 3.54%, 41.68%, respectively, compared to CK, while the W2N2 treatment decreased by 10.03%.

Table 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Carbon-nitrogen stoichiometric ratios in different parts of potato plants.

3.4.2 Carbon-phosphorus stoichiometric ratios in different potato plant parts

The carbon and nitrogen stoichiometric ratios in various parts of potato plants under different water-nitrogen interaction treatments are shown in Table 6. The variation trends over the two-year experimental period were generally consistent. The C:P ratios of stems in the W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments decreased by 5.25%, 10.98%, 19.05%, 26.35%, 39.96%, 29.54%, 20.54%, 30.90%, and 23.42%, respectively, compared to the CK treatment. The C:P ratios of leaves in the W1N1, W1N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments increased by 3.07%, 2.31%, 4.44%, 3.73%, and 14.02%, respectively, while the W1N2, W2N1, W2N2, and W2N3 treatments decreased by 3.91%, 4.54%, 14.72%, and 5.22%, compared to CK. The C:P ratios of roots in the W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments increased by 140.05%, 141.37%, 105.65%, 76.70%, 93.44%, 121.18%, 124.63%, 128.56%, and 164.79%, respectively, compared to CK. The C:P ratios of tubers in the W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments increased by 80.93%, 83.39%, 89.81%, 77.07%, 63.54%, 71.35%, 72.47%, 80.92%, and 96.79%, respectively, compared to CK.

Table 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6. Carbon: Phosphorus (C:P) stoichiometric ratios in different tissues of potato plants.

3.4.3 Nitrogen: phosphorus stoichiometric ratios in different tissues of potato plants

Under different water-nitrogen interaction treatments, the carbon-nitrogen stoichiometric ratios of various parts of potato plants are shown in Table 7. The carbon-nitrogen stoichiometric ratio of potato stems in treatments W1N1, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 changed by 8.97%, 15.44%, 18.27%, 12.77%, 1.70%, 10.16%, 15.04%, and 7.21% compared to the CK treatment, respectively, while the W1N2 treatment changed by 14.07% compared to CK. The carbon-nitrogen stoichiometric ratio of potato leaves in treatments W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 increased by 9.52%, 22.75%, 19.04%, 16.16%, 20.05%, 30.48%, 19.31%, 22.20%, and 25.13% compared to the CK treatment, respectively. The carbon-nitrogen stoichiometric ratio of potato roots in treatments W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 increased by 218.02%, 199.75%, 151.48%, 205.43%, 203.09%, 196.30%, 187.04%, 196.17%, and 289.51% compared to the CK treatment, respectively. The carbon-nitrogen stoichiometric ratio of potato tubers in treatments W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 increased by 205.87%, 227.93%, 208.94%, 224.86%, 264.53%, 228.77%, 215.92%, 249.72%, and 186.31% compared to the CK treatment, respectively.

Table 7
www.frontiersin.org

Table 7. Nitrogen: Phosphorus (N:P) stoichiometric ratios in different tissues of potato plants.

3.5 Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on potato yield

The interactive effects of water and nitrogen on total potato yield are shown in Figure 11. The variation trends of total potato yield under water-nitrogen regulation were generally consistent across the two experimental years. In 2022, under the same irrigation quota, total yield initially increased and then decreased with increasing nitrogen application rate. Under the same nitrogen application rate, total yield showed increasing trends with higher irrigation quotas for N1 and N3 treatments, while N2 treatment exhibited an initial increase followed by decrease. Compared with CK treatment, W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N, and W3N3 increased yields by 9.03%, 36.67%, 19.39%, 40.43%, 64.71%, 48.53%, 49.33%, 62.45%, and 55.90% respectively. In 2023, under W1 treatment, total yield increased continuously with nitrogen application, while W2 and W3 treatments showed an initial increase followed by decrease. Under the same nitrogen application rate, all treatments exhibited an initial increase followed by decrease in total yield with increasing irrigation quota. Compared with CK treatment, W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N, and W3N3 increased yields by 11.62%, 17.88%, 28.70%, 49.05%, 65.84%, 54.81%, 46.98%, 56.37%, and 52.62% respectively. Excessive irrigation and nitrogen application were detrimental to yield formation, while water and nitrogen demonstrated synergistic effects in enhancing potato productivity.

Figure 11
Bar charts show potato yield in kilograms per hectare for different treatments from 2022 to 2023. Treatments W1, W2, and W3 have varying yields under four conditions: N1, N2, N3, and CK. The 2023 yields are generally higher. Statistical significance is indicated with letters above bars and asterisks for wage (W) and nitrogen (N) factors.

Figure 11. Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on potato yield.

3.6 Correlation between potato yield and key indicators under water-nitrogen interaction and optimization of water-nitrogen regimes

The physiological ecosystem of plant leaves exhibits significant spatial variability, and it is difficult for a single process of changes in potato physiological indicators and plant nutrients to reflect the scientific nature of potato growth. To further clarify the regulatory mechanism of water-nitrogen interaction on the photosynthetic stoichiometric balance of potatoes and the relationship between potato yield and various indicators, a Mantel test analysis was conducted on each potato indicator and potato yield (Y) (Figure 12). Since the potato tuber growth stage is the most critical period for yield formation, the correlation analysis was performed using the average values of the potato tuber growth stage. As shown in Figure 12a, the results of Mantel test analysis on soil indicators and potato yield in 2022 indicated that the overlap between SPAD index and potato yield was poor (Mantel r< 0.4), suggesting that the SPAD index had little impact on yield. Other indicators showed good overlap with potato yield (Mantel r ≥ 0.4) and had a strong correlation with potato yield (Mantel P ≤ 0.05), indicating that Tr, Pn, Gs, Ci, PSN, PLN, PRN, PTN, PSP, PLP, PRP, PTP, PSC, PLC, PRC, and PTC all had significant impacts on potato yield. As can be seen from Figure 12b, in 2023, the overlap between potato leaf SPAD, PRN, PLC indicators and potato yield was poor (Mantel r< 0.2), implying that SPAD, PRN, and PLC had little influence on potato yield. Except for soil Tr, PSN, and PTP, which had a weak correlation with potato yield (Mantel P< 0.05), other soil indicators showed a strong correlation with potato yield (Mantel P ≤ 0.05). There were correlations among various indicators of potato plants (except SPAD), indicating that there was a promoting effect between the physiological indicators of the plant. Therefore, Pearson correlation analysis clarified that there were strong correlations among various soil indicators under water-nitrogen interaction, and also illuminated the correlations among SPAD, leaf photosynthesis, and plant nutrients, providing a reference for clarifying the regulatory mechanism of water-nitrogen interaction on the photosynthetic stoichiometric balance of potatoes.

Figure 12
Two side-by-side triangular matrices for 2022 and 2023 show Pearson's r values for various variables like SPAD, Tr, Pn, etc. Cells are color-coded, with red indicating stronger correlations. Mantel's p-value significance is visualized with lines: pink for less than 0.01, green for 0.01 to 0.05, and grey for greater than or equal to 0.05. Mantel's r is represented with different line thicknesses, and a color legend for Pearson’s r is included.

Figure 12. Correlation between potato yield and various indicators. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Random forest modeling predicted crop yield using SPAD, Tr, Pn, Gs, Ci, PSN, PLN, PRN, PTN, PSP, PLP, PRP, PTP, PSC, PLC, PRC, and PTC (Figure 13). The 2022 model (Figure 13a) identified PTP, PRN, PLC, PRP, and Tr as key yield determinants, while the 2023 model (Figure 13b) highlighted PRP, PLN, PSP, PSC, PTC, PTP, and PRC as major influencing factors.

Figure 13
Two horizontal bar charts, labeled (a) 2022 and (b) 2023, show “%IncMSE” for various factors. Bars are colored to indicate significance, with pink for non-significant and orange for significant. The top factors in both charts are significant. 2022's top factor is PTP, while 2023's is PRP. Both charts include p-values and R-squared values, with similar p-values of 0.0101 and R-squared values near 0.9128 for 2022 and 0.9238 for 2023.

Figure 13. (a, b) Relative importance of various indicators on potato yield predicted by random forest model.

3.7 Evaluation and optimization of water-nitrogen regimes based on binary quadratic regression model and TOPSIS model

Taking yield (Y) as the target dependent variable, with irrigation quota and nitrogen application rate as dependent variables, and irrigation water amount (W) and pure nitrogen application rate (N) as independent variables, regression analysis was performed on the data to establish a binary quadratic regression equation model (retaining three decimal places). In the 2022 experiment, the model formula for irrigation quota, nitrogen application rate, and yield was Y2022 = -128779.309 + 82.698W + 1174.116N - 0.019W² - 3.569N² - 0.017W·N, with R²=0.9788 and P = 0.0001. In the 2023 experiment, the model formula was Y2023 = -143778.716 + 155.395W + 595.990N - 0.037W² - 1.432N² - 0.059W·N, with R²=0.9650 and P = 0.0001. The R² values were all greater than 0.85, and predicted values showed significant correlation with measured values, indicating that the established models could effectively predict the interactive effects of water and nitrogen on yield. As shown in Figure 14, the irrigation amount and nitrogen application rate at maximum yield were 2107.84 m3 ha-1 and 159.93 kg ha-1 in 2022, and 1966.25 m3 ha-1 and 167.86 kg ha-1 in 2023. Comprehensive analysis recommended the W2 and W3 irrigation treatments and N2 nitrogen application treatment.

Figure 14
Two 3D surface plots comparing agricultural yield based on irrigation and nitrogen application for the years 2022 and 2023. The left plot shows 2022 data, with yield ranging from 31,800 to 52,300 kg per hectare. The right plot depicts 2023 data, with yield ranging from 42,500 to 59,050 kg per hectare. Yield values increase with higher irrigation quotas and nitrogen application. Both plots have color gradients, transitioning from yellow to blue, to represent varying yield levels.

Figure 14. (a, b) Relationship between irrigation quota, nitrogen application rate, and yield.

To further optimize the water-nitrogen regime, the TOPSIS model was employed using 18 indicators including yield, SPAD, Tr, Pn, Gs, Ci, PSN, PLN, PRN, PTN, PSP, PLP, PRP, PTP, PSC, PLC, PRC, and PTC to select the most efficient irrigation and nitrogen fertilization scheme for potatoes. Table 8 presents the score ranking table for each treatment. Analysis revealed that the W2N2 treatment achieved the highest total score, while the CK treatment had the lowest score. Under the experimental conditions, the W2N2 treatment is recommended as the optimal water-nitrogen coupling pattern for potato cultivation in the central arid zone of Ningxia.

Table 8
www.frontiersin.org

Table 8. Statistical data of TOPSIS evaluation indicators.

4 Discussion

4.1 Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on gas exchange parameters in potato leaves

A reasonable irrigation system helps maintain soil moisture balance (Xu et al., 2017). In this study, the W2N2 treatment showed the highest relative chlorophyll content, with an average increase of 2.87% compared to the CK treatment at all growth stages over the two-year experiment. This indicates that appropriate water and nitrogen management can increase the SPAD value (Ma et al., 2023) and maintain a relatively high chlorophyll content. When nitrogen supply is sufficient, the synthesis of chlorophyll in leaves increases, and the SPAD value rises accordingly. Transpiration in potato leaves is a process where water diffuses into the atmosphere in gaseous form. Through transpiration, plants lose over 97% of the water they absorb, highlighting the vital significance of water for plant life activities (Chaves et al., 2016; Griffani et al., 2024). The study found that under water-nitrogen interaction, the W2N2 treatment was significantly higher than other treatments, with an average increase of 228.49% compared to the CK treatment at all growth stages over the two years. This indicates that water-nitrogen interaction can enhance the absorption and transport of water by potato leaves and regulate the transpiration rate of potato leaves. Different water treatments affect the water status of potato plants, thereby influencing the absorption and transport of water by plants as well as the leaf transpiration rate (Zhang et al., 2018). Increased nitrogen application leads to increased biomass accumulation and excessive canopy leaf area, resulting in excessive increases in transpiration and water loss, and ultimately excessive consumption of soil moisture (Wang et al., 2020). The net photosynthetic rate of potato leaves plays a crucial role in plant organic matter accumulation, water regulation, and nutrient distribution, serving as a key physiological indicator of plants (Zahoor et al., 2017). Under water-nitrogen interaction, the W2N2 treatment showed a significantly higher net photosynthetic rate than other treatments, with an average increase of 150.09% compared to the CK treatment across all growth stages over the two years. This indicates that an appropriate supply of water and nitrogen can maintain the normal metabolic activities of leaf cells, ensuring the smooth progress of photosynthesis. Stomatal conductance of potato leaves refers to the degree of stomatal opening, which is a key factor affecting potato photosynthesis, respiration, and transpiration (Damour et al., 2010). Under water-nitrogen interaction, the leaf stomatal conductance of the W2N2 treatment was significantly higher than that of other treatments, with an average increase of 186.49% compared to the CK treatment across all growth stages over the two years. This indicates that when water is sufficient, the stomata of potato leaves usually remain relatively open, facilitating gas exchange. Nitrogen supply can promote the growth and development of potato leaves, increasing the number of stomata and their opening degree; however, either excessive or insufficient nitrogen may have adverse effects on stomatal conductance (Querejeta et al., 2022). The intercellular CO2 concentration in potato leaves refers to the concentration of carbon dioxide within the leaf, which is essential for photosynthesis as potatoes absorb CO2 to drive this process—directly influencing the rate and efficiency of photosynthesis, and thereby affecting potato growth and development (Shah et al., 2017). Under water-nitrogen interaction, the W2N2 treatment showed a significantly higher intercellular CO2 concentration than other treatments, with an average increase of 63.09% compared to the CK treatment across all growth stages over the two years. When water and nitrogen supplies are sufficient, potato leaf stomata remain open, facilitating CO2 entry into leaf cells, which in turn. The ratio of photosynthetic rate to transpiration rate provides insight into the water use efficiency (WUE) of potato leaves. This study revealed that WUE reflects the efficiency with which leaves utilize water during photosynthesis: higher WUE indicates stronger growth capacity of potatoes in arid regions. Thus, water-nitrogen interaction can regulate the WUE of potato leaves, thereby promoting potato growth (Wang et al., 2018).

4.2 Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on plant nutrient stoichiometry and yield

The content, accumulation, and distribution of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) in different organs are constrained by growth conditions and their own structural characteristics (Sanchez-Bragado et al., 2017). The concentrations and ratios of C, N, and P in plants are important indicators of ecological processes (Liu and Lu, 2024). Nitrogen (N) uptake is regulated by water availability. Water deficiency can limit crop nitrogen response by reducing nitrogen uptake and utilization. The complex and multi-faceted interactions between water supply and crop nitrogen response make it difficult to predict and quantify the impact of water deficiency on crop nitrogen status (Zhao et al., 2024a). This study found that water-nitrogen interaction significantly affects the uptake and distribution of C, N, and P nutrients in potato plants. The level of nitrogen supply directly affects carbon metabolism: appropriate nitrogen application (N2 treatment) enhances photosynthesis by promoting chlorophyll synthesis, thereby improving leaf carbon assimilation capacity. However, excessive nitrogen application (N3 treatment) stimulates excessive growth of aboveground parts, leading to over-distribution of photosynthates to stems and leaves and a reduction in carbon accumulation in tubers. Phosphorus uptake is greatly affected by water conditions. Increasing phosphorus application during the tuber expansion stage can improve nutrient use efficiency, and optimizing the nitrogen-phosphorus ratio can promote plant growth (Rosell et al., 2023). The interactive effect of nitrogen and water is obvious: under drought conditions, high nitrogen levels will exacerbate the imbalance of carbon and nitrogen metabolism, while appropriate irrigation (W2) can alleviate nitrogen stress and promote the transport of nitrogen and phosphorus to tubers. Water-nitrogen interaction significantly affects the accumulation of organic carbon in potato plants by altering the efficiency of photosynthetic carbon assimilation and distribution. Among all water-nitrogen interaction treatments, the W2N2 treatment showed the highest organic carbon accumulation. Reasonable water and nitrogen combination can optimize carbon metabolism pathways, increase the activity of starch synthesis-related enzymes, and improve the carbon conversion efficiency in tubers.

The synergistic effect of water and nitrogen affects the distribution of organic carbon by regulating plant metabolic processes. In 2022, the proportion of organic carbon in stems and roots was relatively high, which may be related to the enhanced supply of water and nitrogen promoting the transport of photosynthates to structural organs (stems and roots). In 2023, however, the increased proportion of organic carbon in leaves and roots reflects the improvement of photosynthetic carbon assimilation efficiency and the enhancement of root carbon storage capacity after water and nitrogen optimization. The characteristic that total nitrogen distribution is dominated by leaves is consistent with the function of leaves as the core organ of nitrogen metabolism. The interaction of water and nitrogen promotes the preferential enrichment of nitrogen in metabolically active leaves by affecting the pathways of nitrate absorption, reduction, and amino acid synthesis (Wang et al., 2022). The lowest proportion of nitrogen in stems is related to their lower nitrogen demand. The dynamic distribution of total phosphorus is closely related to the energy metabolism demand driven by water and nitrogen. The differences in the proportions of phosphorus in roots and stems among different treatments suggest that there is a threshold effect of water status on the radial transport of phosphorus.

The stoichiometry of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) (C:N:P) in leaves, stems, and roots reflects the trade-offs between plant resource acquisition and their growth strategies (Yin et al., 2021). The water-nitrogen interaction drives nutrient allocation and metabolic coordination among organs by regulating the stoichiometric characteristics of C, N, and P (Zheng et al., 2023). The water-nitrogen ratio in the W2N2 treatment can maximize metabolic efficiency and yield formation, providing a theoretical basis for precise water and nitrogen management in potato production. The carbon-nitrogen ratio in stems decreased by 5.25% to 39.96%, indicating that the synergistic effect of water and nitrogen promoted nitrogen enrichment in stems, which may be related to the developmental needs of their vascular tissues and the improved efficiency of water transport. The relatively high carbon-nitrogen ratio in roots reflects the enhanced carbon deposition in roots under water regulation, while the carbon-nitrogen ratio in tubers ranged from 77.07% to 96.79%, suggesting that moderate water restriction combined with high nitrogen supply can optimize the reallocation of carbon to tubers. The increased fluctuation in the leaf carbon-nitrogen ratio indicates a dynamic balance between photosynthetic carbon assimilation and nitrogen metabolism. Among all treatments, the leaf carbon-nitrogen ratio in the W3N3 treatment increased significantly, which may be associated with the promotion of chlorophyll synthesis by high nitrogen levels. The nitrogen-phosphorus ratio in tubers was positively correlated with yield (with a 64.71% yield increase in the W2N2 treatment), further illustrating the contribution of efficient nitrogen and phosphorus utilization to yield formation. The water-nitrogen interaction had the most significant impact on potatoes during the tuber formation stage. This period is a critical turning point for nutrient allocation to tubers, and the synergy of water and nitrogen directly affects the number and initial size of tubers by regulating the transport of photosynthates, the enlargement of stolons, and nutrient accumulation. Adequate water can improve nitrogen use efficiency, and reasonable nitrogen supply can enhance water absorption; an imbalance between the two will hinder tuber development, exerting the most prominent restrictive effect on yield formation (Ma et al., 2023). The nitrogen-phosphorus stoichiometric ratio (N:P) is a key indicator for assessing plant nutrient limitations. For potato leaves, an N:P ratio<14 indicates phosphorus limitation, >16 indicates nitrogen limitation, and a ratio between 14 and 16 indicates nitrogen-phosphorus balance or co-limitation (Güsewell, 2004). Zebarth et al. (2004) reported that potatoes absorb nitrogen rapidly during the seedling stage, and the leaf N:P ratio is often higher than 16, suggesting a high risk of nitrogen limitation. Phosphorus limitation is rare at the seedling stage unless the soil phosphorus level is extremely low. Bélanger et al. (2002) found that an increase in the leaf N:P ratio during the maturity stage is a normal phenomenon, but a sustained ratio higher than 16 may indicate excessive nitrogen fertilization.

In potato planting systems, water and nitrogen supply are crucial factors controlling production levels, especially in arid and semi-arid regions (Badr et al., 2012). Excessive irrigation and nitrogen application can have negative impacts on the yield and quality of potato tubers; overly high levels of irrigation and nitrogen are not conducive to yield formation. The mutual promotion of water and nitrogen on potato yield is consistent with the results of this study (Shrestha et al., 2023). Yield showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with the water and nitrogen gradients, revealing that there exists an optimal threshold for water-nitrogen interaction. The W2N2 treatment achieved an average yield increase of 65.08% over the two years. Optimizing the water and nitrogen regime balances the relationship between photosynthesis-stoichiometry synergy and yield formation. The water-nitrogen interaction (W2N2) can simultaneously realize physiological regulation and yield maximization (Wang et al., 2024), providing both theoretical and practical support for precise water and nitrogen management of potatoes in arid regions.

5 Conclusions

Water-nitrogen interaction significantly improved the photosynthetic performance of potatoes. Compared with the control (CK), the W2N2 treatment increased leaf transpiration rate (Tr), net photosynthetic rate (Pn), and stomatal conductance (Gs) by an average of 228.49%, 150.09%, and 186.49%, respectively, with photosynthetic indicators peaking during the tuber formation stage. In terms of nutrient content, the W2N2 treatment increased the total nitrogen content in tubers by an average of 121.91% compared with CK, while the total nitrogen in stems, leaves, and roots increased by 55.61%–90.95%. The organic carbon content was the highest in tubers. The water-nitrogen interaction had a significant effect on the leaf transpiration rate of potatoes, with a 63.09% increase in intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) during the tuber formation stage. The W2N2 treatment (irrigation quota: 2107.84–1966.25 m3 ha-1; nitrogen application rate: 159.93–167.86 kg ha-1) achieved the optimal synergy among photosynthesis, carbon-nitrogen metabolism, and yield. Compared with CK, the yield increased by 64.71% in 2022 and 65.84% in 2023.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

BD: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. JY: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. YY: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft. JL: Formal Analysis, Writing – review & editing. YT: Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the Key Research and Development Program of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (2023BCF01017).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Badr, M. A., El-Tohamy, W. A., and Zaghloul, A. M. (2012). Yield and water use efficiency of potato grown under different irrigation and nitrogen levels in an arid region. Agric. Water Manage. 110, 9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.03.008

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bélanger, G., Walsh, J. R., Richards, J. E., Milburn, P. H., and Ziadi, N. (2002). Nitrogen fertilization and irrigation affects tuber characteristics of two potato cultivars. Am. J. Potato Res. 79, 269–279. doi: 10.1007/BF02986360

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chang, B., Chen, W., He, X., and Yu, S. (2024). Characterization of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stoichiometry of plant leaves in the riparian zone of dahuofang reservoir. Ecol. Evol. 14, e70152. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70152

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chang, D. C., Jin, Y. I., Nam, J. H., Cheon, C. G., Cho, J. H., Kim, S. J., et al. (2018). Early drought effect on canopy development and tuber growth of potato cultivars with different maturities. Field Crops Res. 215, 156–162. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.10.008

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chaves, M. M., Costa, J. M., Zarrouk, O., Pinheiro, C., Lopes, C. M., and Pereira, J. S. (2016). Controlling stomatal aperture in semi-arid regions—the dilemma of saving water or being cool? Plant Sci. 251, 54–64. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.06.015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Chen, Y., Yu, J., Shi, X., Jia, L., and Fan, M. (2024). Implementing a soil ammonium n fertilizer management for synchronizing potato n demands. Heliyon 10, e30456. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30456

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Damour, G., Simonneau, T., Cochard, H., and Urban, L. (2010). An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level. Plant Cell Environ. 33, 1419–1438. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02181.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fandika, I. R., Kemp, P. D., Millner, J. P., Horne, D., and Roskruge, N. (2016). Irrigation and nitrogen effects on tuber yield and water use efficiency of heritage and modern potato cultivars. Agric. Water Manage. 170, 148–157. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.10.027

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fu, P., Meacham-Hensold, K., Siebers, M. H., and Bernacchi, C. J. (2021). The inverse relationship between solar-induced fluorescence yield and photosynthetic capacity: benefits for field phenotyping. J. Exp. Bot. 72, 1295–1306. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa537

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, X., Xiao, Y., Deng, L., LI, Q., Wang, C., Li, B., et al. (2019). Spatial variability of soil total nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in renshou county of sichuan basin, china. J. Integr. Agric. 18, 279–289. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62069-6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Griffani, D. S., Rognon, P., and Farquhar, G. D. (2024). The role of thermodiffusion in transpiration. New Phytol. 243, 1301–1311. doi: 10.1111/nph.19642

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Güsewell, S. (2004). N: p ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance. New Phytol. 164, 243–266. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01192.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, W. X., Fang, J. Y., Reich, P. B., Ian Woodward, F., and Wang, Z. H. (2011). Biogeography and variability of eleven mineral elements in plant leaves across gradients of climate, soil and plant functional type in China. Ecol. Lett. 14, 788–796. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01641.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hao, Z., Gao, Y., and Yang, T. (2017). Seasonal variation of dom and associated stoichiometry for freshwater ecosystem in the subtropical watershed: indicating the optimal c: n: p ratio. Ecol. Indic. 78, 37–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.004

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hong, T., Cai, Z., Li, R., Liu, J., Li, J., Wang, Z., et al. (2022). Effects of water and nitrogen coupling on watermelon growth, photosynthesis and yield under co2 enrichment. Agric. Water Manage. 259, 107229. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107229

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kang, J., Ding, R., Chen, J., Wu, S., Gao, W., Wen, Z., et al. (2025). Crop root system phenotyping with high water-use efficiency and its targeted precision regulation: present and prospect. Agric. Water Manage. 309, 109327. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109327

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kifle, M. and Gebretsadikan, T. G. (2016). Yield and water use efficiency of furrow irrigated potato under regulated deficit irrigation, atsibi-wemberta, north Ethiopia. Agric. Water Manage. 170, 133–139. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.01.003

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, H. and Lu, X. (2024). Leaf–soil c:n:p stoichiometry and homeostasis characteristics of plantations in the yellow river floodplain in western shandong, China. Forests 15, 1433. doi: 10.3390/f15081433

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lombardo, S., Pandino, G., and Mauromicale, G. (2020). Optimizing nitrogen fertilization to improve qualitative performances and physiological and yield responses of potato (solanum tuberosum l.). Agronomy 10, 352. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10030352

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, R., Liu, W., Li, S., Zhu, X., Yang, J., Zhang, N., et al. (2021). Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression analysis of the cipk gene family in potato (solanum tuberosum l.) And the role of stcipk10 in response to drought and osmotic stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 13535. doi: 10.3390/ijms222413535

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, Z., Yin, J., Yang, Y., Sun, F., and Yang, Z. (2023). Effect of water and nitrogen coupling regulation on the growth, physiology, yield, and quality attributes and comprehensive evaluation of wolfberry (lycium barbarum l.). Front. Plant Sci. 14. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1130109

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Olivera Viciedo, D., de Mello Prado, R., Martínez, C. A., Habermann, E., and de Cássia Piccolo, M. (2019). Short-term warming and water stress affect panicum maximum jacq. Stoichiometric homeostasis and biomass production. Sci. Total Environ. 681, 267–274. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.108

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Querejeta, J. I., Prieto, I., Armas, C., Casanoves, F., Dieme, J. S., Diouf, M., et al. (2022). Higher leaf nitrogen content is linked to tighter stomatal regulation of transpiration and more efficient water use across dryland trees. New Phytol. 235, 1351–1364. doi: 10.1111/nph.18254

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rolando, J. L., Ramírez, D. A., Yactayo, W., Monneveux, P., and Quiroz, R. (2015). Leaf greenness as a drought tolerance related trait in potato (solanum tuberosum l.). Environ. Exp. Bot. 110, 27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.09.006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rosell, J. A., Marcati, C. R., Olson, M. E., Lagunes, X., Vergilio, P. C. B., Jiménez Vera, C., et al. (2023). Inner bark vs sapwood is the main driver of nitrogen and phosphorus allocation in stems and roots across three tropical woody plant communities. New Phytol. 239, 1665–1678. doi: 10.1111/nph.19085

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanchez-Bragado, R., Serret, M. D., and Araus, J. L. (2017). The nitrogen contribution of different plant parts to wheat grains: exploring genotype, water, and nitrogen effects. Front. Plant Sci. 7. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01986

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Satognon, F., Lelei, J. J., and Owido, S. F. O. (2021). Performance of apical rooted cuttings of potato grown in mollic andosols under different nitrogen fertilization and irrigation regimes. Heliyon 7, e7999. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07999

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shah, A., Wu, X., Ullah, A., Fahad, S., Muhammad, R., Yan, L., et al. (2017). Deficiency and toxicity of boron: alterations in growth, oxidative damage and uptake by citrange orange plants. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 145, 575–582. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.08.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shrestha, B., Darapuneni, M., Stringam, B. L., Lombard, K., and Djaman, K. (2023). Irrigation water and nitrogen fertilizer management in potato (solanum tuberosum l.): A review. Agronomy 13, 2566. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13102566

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, P., Li, X., Gong, X., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., and Wang, L. (2014). Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus ecological stoichiometry of lateolabrax macultus and acanthogobius ommaturus in the estuary of yangtze river, China. Acta Ecologica Sin. 34, 196–203. doi: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2013.06.009

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Huang, Y., Fu, W., Guo, W., Ren, N., Zhao, Y., et al. (2020). Efficient physiological and nutrient use efficiency responses of maize leaves to drought stress under different field nitrogen conditions. Agronomy 10, 523. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10040523

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, C., Wu, S., Tankari, M., Zhang, X., Li, L., Gong, D., et al. (2018). Stomatal aperture rather than nitrogen nutrition determined water use efficiency of tomato plants under nitrogen fertigation. Agric. Water Manage. 209, 94–101. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.020

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Yang, B., Jiang, L., Zhao, S., Liu, M., Xu, X., et al. (2024). Organic substitution regime with optimized irrigation improves potato water and nitrogen use efficiency by regulating soil chemical properties rather than microflora structure. Field Crops Res. 316, 109512. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109512

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Zhao, L., Zhang, Y., Li, D., Chen, L., Wei, Z., et al. (2022). The active role of metabolic regulators in nitrogen loss reduction and organic nitrogen transformation during different materials composting. J. Clean. Prod. 345, 131134. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131134

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, H., Qu, Q., Li, G., Liu, G., Geissen, V., Ritsema, C. J., et al. (2022). Impact of nitrogen addition on plant-soil-enzyme c–n–p stoichiometry and microbial nutrient limitation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 170, 108714. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108714

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, B., Shao, D., Tan, X., Yang, X., Gu, W., and Li, H. (2017). Evaluation of soil water percolation under different irrigation practices, antecedent moisture and groundwater depths in paddy fields. Agric. Water Manage. 192, 149–158. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.06.002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, Z., Kim, N., Han, W., Guo, Y., Han, T., Du, E., et al. (2015). Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus supply on growth rate, leaf stoichiometry, and nutrient resorption of arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Soil 388, 147–155. doi: 10.1007/s11104-014-2316-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, Y., Yin, J., Ma, Z., Wei, X., Sun, F., and Yang, Z. (2023). Water and nitrogen regulation effects and system optimization for potato (solanum tuberosum l.) Under film drip irrigation in the dry zone of ningxia China. Agronomy 13, 308. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13020308

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yin, H., Zheng, H., Zhang, B., Tariq, A., Lv, G., Zeng, F., et al. (2021). Stoichiometry of c:n:p in the roots of alhagi sparsifolia is more sensitive to soil nutrients than aboveground organs. Front. Plant Sci. 12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.698961

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Yun, K., Timlin, D., and Kim, S. (2020). Coupled gas-exchange model for c4 leaves comparing stomatal conductance models. Plants 9, 1358. doi: 10.3390/plants9101358

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zahoor, R., Dong, H., Abid, M., Zhao, W., Wang, Y., and Zhou, Z. (2017). Potassium fertilizer improves drought stress alleviation potential in cotton by enhancing photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism. Environ. Exp. Bot. 137, 73–83. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.02.002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zebarth, B. J., Tai, G., Tarn, R., de Jong, H., and Milburn, P. H. (2004). Nitrogen use efficiency characteristics of commercial potato cultivars. Can. J. Plant Sci. 84, 589–598. doi: 10.4141/P03-050

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, S., Xu, X., Sun, Y., Zhang, J., and LI, C. (2018). Influence of drought hardening on the resistance physiology of potato seedlings under drought stress. J. Integr. Agric. 17, 336–347. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61758-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, B., Qin, A., Feng, W., Qiu, X., Wang, P., Qin, H., et al. (2024). Water deficit affects the nitrogen nutrition index of winter wheat under controlled water conditions. J. Integr. Agric. 24:724–738. doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2024.08.027

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, Z., Wu, X., Gong, L., Li, R., Zhang, X., Li, Z., et al. (2023). Studies on the correlation between δ13c and nutrient elements in two desert plants. Forests 14, 2394. doi: 10.3390/f14122394

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: water-nitrogen interaction, potato, photosynthetic characteristics, plant ecological stoichiometry, random forest model

Citation: Du B, Yin J, Yang Y, Li J and Tang Y (2025) Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on photosynthetic-stoichiometric balance in potato: a leaf physiological and ecological perspective. Front. Plant Sci. 16:1729301. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1729301

Received: 21 October 2025; Accepted: 20 November 2025; Revised: 14 November 2025;
Published: 10 December 2025.

Edited by:

Shoutian Ma, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China

Reviewed by:

Jiang Fuchang, Tarim University, China
Chao Ma, Hebei University of Engineering, China

Copyright © 2025 Du, Yin, Yang, Li and Tang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Juan Yin, eWo3MTE1QDEyNi5jb20=; Yingpan Yang, eXBhbjMxMkAxNjMuY29t

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.