Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Plant Metabolism and Chemodiversity

This article is part of the Research TopicMolecular Architects of the Green World: Genetic, Epigenetic, and Transcriptional Regulation of Plant Metabolism and Chemo-diversityView all 8 articles

Transcriptome Time-Course Analysis unravels the regulatory networks governing ratooning decline in sugarcane

Provisionally accepted
Sisi  ZhangSisi Zhang1Feiyan  ZhaoFeiyan Zhao1Zongtao  YangZongtao Yang2Ting  YangTing Yang2Yanye  LiYanye Li2Zhongfu  ZhangZhongfu Zhang2Jianming  WuJianming Wu3Jiayong  LiuJiayong Liu2Jun  DengJun Deng2Yong  ZhaoYong Zhao2*Yuebing  ZhangYuebing Zhang2
  • 1Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China
  • 2Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences Yunnan Sugarcane Research Institute, Kaiyuan, China
  • 3Sugarcane Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, Nanning, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Ratooning cultivation is the predominant production mode for sugarcane, yet ratooning decline represents a critical constraint limiting high and stable yields. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, this study integrated five consecutive years of field yield data (from plant cane to the fourth ratoon, PC–R4) with root time-course transcriptome data from three sugarcane varieties (YT93-159, YZ05-51, and YZ08-1609). Results showed that yields of the three varieties decreased significantly by 14.3%, 12.64%, and 9.45% (P < 0.05), respectively, in R3 (third ratoon) compared to PC (plant cane), indicating the R2-R3 transition as the critical turning point for ratooning decline. Based on this pivotal period, 11,348, 20,638, and 21,977 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with ratooning decline were identified of R3 versus R2 in the three varieties, respectively. Further Mfuzz time-course clustering and WGCNA analyses identified five highly overlapping gene modules with overlap rates ranging from 48% to 100%, from which 25 hub genes were screened. Among these, 15 exhibited peak expression - 删除[张思思]: during R3. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that these hub genes coordinately constitute a regulatory network encompassing energy metabolism, signal transduction, protein homeostasis, and defense responses. Notably, different varieties exhibited specific response pathways within this regulatory network. Transcriptome profiling combined with qRT-PCR validation demonstrated that during the R3 decline phase, YT93-159 specifically upregulated galactinol synthase (GOLS) to enhance osmotic adjustment; YZ05-51 primarily relied on thiosulfate sulfurtransferase (STR) to maintain cellular redox homeostasis; and YZ08-1609 upregulated ubiquitin ligase and proteasome subunit genes to strengthen protein quality control. This study identifies the critical period of ratooning decline and uncovers variety-specific coping mechanisms at the molecular level. The key hub genes revealed here offer valuable molecular targets and genetic resources for the breeding of strong-ratooning sugarcane varieties.

Keywords: Criticalturning point, Ratooning decline, sugarcane, time-course transcriptome, variety-specific response

Received: 04 Nov 2025; Accepted: 05 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Zhao, Yang, Yang, Li, Zhang, Wu, Liu, Deng, Zhao and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Yong Zhao

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.