Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

EDITORIAL article

Front. Plant Sci.

Sec. Crop and Product Physiology

This article is part of the Research TopicFruit Trees Under Stress: Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular MechanismsView all 7 articles

Editorial: Fruit Trees Under Stress: Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Mechanisms

Provisionally accepted
  • Hubei Key Laboratory of Germplasm Innovation and Utilization of Fruit Trees, Research Institute of Fruit and Tea, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

that modulate salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), and indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) levels to fine-tune resistance. CmMES1.1/CmMES1.5 boost SA content and CBC tolerance, while CmMES10.2/CmMES17.3 increase JA/IAA levels and susceptibility, which provided actionable targets for CBC-tolerant citrus breeding.Abiotic cues and environmental fluctuations also shape fruit tree performance and quality. Zhang et al. uncover a light-mediated regulatory cascade in pear, showing that the AGL8-LFY transcription factor complex directly activates PpPSY (a rate-limiting enzyme in β-carotene biosynthesis), which linked light signaling to carotenoid accumulation and fruit peel coloration. This finding explains the significant reduction in β-carotene content in bagged (shaded) fruits compared to non-bagged counterparts, offering a molecular basis for optimizing light management to improve fruit nutritional quality. Beyond discrete stressors, Gariglio et al.'s review synthesizes the "epidermal growth control hypothesis" to explain water relations in growing fruits, emphasizing how skin-flesh tissue crosstalk mediated by turgor pressure, osmotic potential, and sugar gradients-drives physiological disorders (e.g., cracking, purple spot). This framework bridges developmental biology and stress physiology, providing a holistic perspective for mitigating abiotic stress-induced losses.Collectively, these studies advance stress biology by identifying core molecular players (e.g., AcWRKY75, MES genes) and conserved pathways, validating key research tools, and highlighting tissue/species-specific adaptations. Future research should prioritize field validation of regulators, deciphering rootstock-scion crosstalk, developing multi-stress tolerant cultivars, and integrating multi-omics. Translating these findings into practical solutions will enhance fruit tree resilience amid climate change and pathogen pressures.On behalf of all editors in this Research Topic, i want to thank all authors for their rigorous contributions, the reviewers for their insightful feedback, and the Frontiers in Plant Science team for supporting this Research Topic. These studies collectively lay the groundwork for a comprehensive understanding of fruit tree stress biology, paving the way for sustainable and resilient horticultural production.

Keywords: huanglongbing (HBL), AcWRKY75, Peach gummosis, citrus canker, Water stress, pear carotenoid

Received: 17 Nov 2025; Accepted: 18 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Qiu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Wenming Qiu, qiuwm1984@sina.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.