Impact Factor 4.106 | CiteScore 4.47
More on impact ›

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Plant Sci., 02 December 2016 |

Multicolor Fluorescence Imaging as a Candidate for Disease Detection in Plant Phenotyping

  • Department of Biochemistry, Cellular and Molecular Biology of Plants, Estación Experimental del Zaidín – Spanish Council of Scientific Research, Granada, Spain

The negative impact of conventional farming on environment and human health make improvements on farming management mandatory. Imaging techniques are implemented in remote sensing for monitoring crop fields and plant phenotyping programs. The increasingly large size and complexity of the data obtained by these techniques, makes the implementation of powerful mathematical tools necessary in order to identify informative parameters and to apply them in precision agriculture. Multicolor fluorescence imaging is a useful approach for the study of plant defense responses to stress factors at bench scale. However, it has not been fully applied to plant phenotyping. This work evaluates the possible application of multicolor fluorescence imaging in combination with thermography for the particular case of zucchini plants affected by soft-rot, caused by Dickeya dadantii. Several statistical models -based on logistic regression analysis (LRA) and artificial neural networks (ANN)- were obtained for the experimental system zucchini-D. dadantii, which classify new samples as “healthy” or “infected.” The LRA worked best in identifying high dose-infiltrated leaves (in infiltrated and non-infiltrated areas) whereas ANN offered a higher accuracy at identifying low dose-infiltrated areas. To assess the applicability of these results to cucurbits in a more general way, these models were validated for melon infected by the same pathogen, achieving accurate predictions for the infiltrated areas. The values of accuracy achieved are comparable to those found in the literature for classifiers identifying other infections based on data obtained by different techniques. Thus, MCFI in combination with thermography prove useful at providing data at lab scale that can be analyzed by machine learning. This approach could be scaled up to be applied in plant phenotyping.


Plant pathogens are severe constraints to the production yield of crop fields worldwide. Current agricultural policies are aimed to minimize the use of pesticides and fertilizers through better targeting, and the integration with cultural control of weeds, pests, and diseases (Maloy, 2005). The implementation of precision agriculture relies on the development of technologies that allow the identification and mapping of constraints in the crop fields, such as imaging techniques (Mulla, 2013). They can be used to evaluate the effects of stress on plant metabolism (Cerovic et al., 1999; Barón et al., 2012, 2016). Consequently, imaging techniques are powerful non-destructive tools that have become essential: they provide crucial information for the decision-making and for the right timing of the procedures to be applied (Usha and Singh, 2013; Li et al., 2014; Mahlein, 2016).

Imaging techniques implemented on plant phenotyping provide complex and large scale spatial and temporal information, which is very difficult to analyze and interpret by conventional statistical methods. Another important contribution to precision agriculture is the development of mathematical tools that allow monitoring and classification of plants and fruits by the severity of the disease (Hahn, 2009), based on advanced statistical methods, as reviewed by Mulla (2013) and Behmann et al. (2015). Some of these mathematical tools could be used as classifiers, identifying stressed plants, or monitoring the evolution of pests. This strategy can also be applied in the same way on plant phenotyping programs (Fiorani and Schurr, 2013). The classifiers are mathematical models that are obtained by machine learning: systems that learn from data corresponding to different categories or subpopulations (Hahn, 2009; Behmann et al., 2015; Singh et al., 2016). Successful models are able to identify what category new data belong to, thus classifying them accurately. Machine learning includes a wide range of classifiers, such as ANN and LRA. ANN is a network inspired by biological neural networks that learn from input and output data (Hill et al., 1994). On the other hand, LRA is a statistical method that estimates the probability of a dichotomous outcome (“healthy” vs. “infected”) based on one or more independent variables. For this reason, LRA is of particular interest and widely used in biomedicine (Hosmer et al., 2013). Independently from the model used, part of the dataset obtained by experimental measurements (usually about two thirds of the total set of data) is used for training the model, and the remaining part is used for its validation. The goodness of the model is provided by the parameters sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The proportion of samples predicted to be infected that are actually “infected” is referred to as sensitivity or true positive rate, while the proportion of samples that are correctly predicted to be “healthy” is called specificity, or true negative rate. Accuracy is the proportion of right guesses, both “healthy” and “infected” samples (Parikh et al., 2008).

Reflectance and thermography are imaging techniques used widely in remote sensing and plant phenotyping. On the contrary, MCFI, otherwise very used in fundamental research on plant defense responses upon abiotic and biotic stress factors (Cerovic et al., 1999), has not been developed for its use at large scale. In the past, MCFI was applied in crop fields for some particular cases, although no systematic analysis of the images could be carried out at that time (Heisel et al., 1996; Johansson et al., 1996; Saito et al., 1998). In later years, advances have been made in its implementation at large scale (Tremblay et al., 2012; Latouche et al., 2015).

Multicolor fluorescence imaging is a non-invasive technique by which UV-excited autofluorescence is collected from plants or leaves. Fluorescence in the red and far red regions is emitted by chlorophyll a. In addition, the fluorescence in the blue and green regions (BGF) is emitted by secondary metabolites, many of them phenolics related to plant defense (Buschmann and Lichtenthaler, 1998). Therefore, the results serve as an indication of the activity of plant metabolism.

Imaging of leaf and canopy temperature by thermography has been widely used in plant phenotyping, mainly to characterize drought susceptibility (Li et al., 2014). Leaf temperature inversely correlates with transpiration and stomatal conductance (Jones, 1999), which is tightly regulated by plants as a general mechanism of defense upon abiotic stress, but also against pathogens (Melotto et al., 2008). This technique has been used in the study of infections by virus, bacteria, and fungi, as reviewed by Barón et al. (2016).

The pectinolytic Dickeya spp. are necrotrophic, Gram-negative plant pathogens that cause soft-rot disease and black-leg. A very wide range of plants are host for these species, including many economically important horticultural and ornamental plants worldwide (Czajkowski et al., 2011; Mansfield et al., 2012). Dickeya dadantii is able to infect fleshy, succulent plant parts, such as tubers, rhizomes, stems, and leaves, causing localized symptoms, thus limiting the crop yield and quality, and exerting significant losses in fields and in postharvest. D. dadantii is particularly pernicious due to its ability to live as saprophyte, epiphyte, or endophyte (Reverchon and Nasser, 2013), with great capacity for adaptation to new geographic areas and to new hosts (Reverchon et al., 2016). D. dadantii can be found in ground water, crop residues, soils, and also on other plants causing no infection, that would serve as a reservoirs (Nelson, 2009). It can also be isolated from the roots of healthy weeds in agricultural fields (Tsror et al., 2010). On the other hand, it can infect insects, which in turn may serve as dissemination vectors (Reverchon and Nasser, 2013). All these features make D. dadantii be among the top 10 most important bacterial pathogens in agriculture, according to Mansfield et al. (2012). In this scenario, early detection and appropriate farming practices are essential to minimize the spreading of infections. Bacteria enter primarily through hydathodes, stomata, and wounds to invade intercellular spaces. Once inside the plant tissue, D. dadantii produces and secretes degradative enzymes, mostly pectate lyases, which catalyze the hydrolysis of pectin, an essential component of the plant cell walls (Duprey et al., 2014). The consequent degradation of cell walls to gain access to nutrients, is the cause of soft-rot, the typical symptom of maceration (Hugouvieux-Cotte-Pattat et al., 1996).

In this work, the experimental host-pathogen systems were cucurbits (zucchini and melon) infected by D. dadantii. The main aim of this work is to explore the possible application of advanced statistical methods to data obtained by MCFI, on its own or by combination with thermography, for early disease detection. For this purpose, the predictions obtained by ANN and LRA are compared. The results show the convenience of MCFI in plant disease detection as a new approach for plant phenotyping.

Materials and Methods

Biological Material and Inoculation

Seeds of zucchini (Cucurbita pepo) v. Negro Belleza and melon (Cucumis melo) v. Rochet Panal (Semillas Fitó, Barcelona, Spain) were allowed to germinate in sterile conditions in petri dishes for 1 week at 24°C. Seedlings were planted in soil and transferred to a growth chamber under 150 μmol m-2 s-1 photosynthetically active radiation with a 16/8 h (22/18°C) light/dark photoperiod and 65% relative humidity.

Dickeya dadantii strain 3937, formerly Erwinia chrysanthemi 3937, was grown for 24 h at 28°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) plates containing 25 μg ml-1 rifampicin. Bacterial suspensions were prepared in 10 mM MgCl2 by adjusting their optical density at 600 nm to 0.1, which corresponded to 108 colony forming units per ml. Serial dilutions of the bacterial suspension were carried out to obtain the two concentrations used for inoculations, high and low dose (HD and LD, 106 or 104 colony forming units per ml, respectively).

The second leaf of 3-weeks old zucchini and melon plants was inoculated by infiltration as described in Pérez-Bueno et al. (2016) by pressing the LD or HD bacterial suspension into the abaxial side of the leaf using the blunt end of a 1 ml syringe. Mock-inoculated control plants were infiltrated with 10 mM MgCl2. Three regions of the leaf were defined: the infiltrated area (I, accurately outlined using a marker pen at the moment of the infiltration), neighboring area (N), and distant regions away from the I area (D), as shown in Figure 1A for zucchini. Infiltrations were carried out in four distant areas of approximately 1 mm2 on the second fully-developed leaf of each plant. Five plants per treatment and experiment were used. Seven independent experiments were carried out on zucchini, and measurements were taken at 3, 5, and 7 dpi, respectively. In the case of melon, four independent experiments were carried out and measurements were taken at 3 and 7 dpi.


FIGURE 1. (A) Areas defined for image analysis of mock and bacteria-infiltrated zucchini leaves: I is the infiltrated area, accurately outlined using a marker pen at the moment of the infiltration; N is the neighboring area; and D are distal regions away from the I area. (B) Evolution of symptoms of zucchini leaves inoculated with D. dadantii at LD or HD.

Leaf Thermography

Infrared images of plant leaves were taken in the growth chamber with a FLIR A305sc camera (FLIR Systems, Wilsonville, OR, USA) vertically positioned approximately 500 mm above the leaves according to Pérez-Bueno et al. (2015). The camera collects 320 × 240 pixel resolution images with a thermal sensitivity <0.05°C in the spectral range 7.5–13 μm. Thermal images were collected at midday over the period of study. Average temperatures were determined for the three leaf areas defined using the software FLIR Research & Development software version 3.4. Images, displayed using a false color scale, correspond to standard experiments.

Autofluorescence by Multicolor Fluorescence Imaging

Multicolor fluorescence imaging was performed on the adaxial side of zucchini leaves using an Open FluorCam FC 800-O (Photon Systems Instruments, Brno, Czech Republic) according to Pérez-Bueno et al. (2015). Autofluorescence images were captured in the blue (F440), green (F520), red (F680), and far red (F740) regions of the spectrum. The fluorescence ratios F440/F520, F440/F680, F440/F740, F520/F680, F520/F740, and F680/F740 were also calculated. Black and white images of both fluorescence and calculated ratios were displayed using a false color scale, applied by the FluorCam software version For each fluorescence parameter and ratio, average values were calculated for each of the three regions of interest, both for mock-control and bacteria-infiltrated leaves. Images correspond to standard experiments.

Data Analysis

All images were analyzed considering the three defined areas (I, N, and D) separately. For each parameter, mean values were calculated per area and leaf using the software as described above. All calculations were performed with Microsoft Office Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Statistical analysis of data was carried out using Student’s t-test with SigmaPlot 13.0v (Systat Software Inc., Richmond, CA, USA).

The large amount of data generated was classified in a database for each host-pathogen system using Microsoft Access 2010 (Microsoft Corporation). The database was used to train LRAs and ANNs based on multilayer perceptrons, a type of ANN, using R (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria). The learning heuristic used for training the ANNs was resilient backpropagation. The experimental parameters used to train the ANNs were those found more informative by the LRAs (Tables 1 and 2). The data obtained for around two thirds of all the zucchini samples analyzed was used for training (n specified in Tables 1 and 2). The rest, about 33% of the data, was used for validating the models. On the other hand, to evaluate their performance on melon samples, the zucchini models were validated with the whole dataset obtained for melon.


TABLE 1. Best logistic regression fits for the prediction of healthy and Dickeya dadantii infected zucchini leaves.


TABLE 2. Artificial neural networks (ANN) models for the prediction of healthy and D. dadantii infected zucchini leaves.


Symptomatology in Zucchini

The symptoms of infection by D. dadantii in the three regions of interest (Figure 1A) are shown in Figure 1B. In the case of LD-infiltration, symptoms consisted in chlorosis that developed progressively from 3 dpi in the I area, followed by the appearance of small necrotic spots from 7 dpi. N and D areas of LD-infiltrated leaves showed no symptoms throughout the period of study.

In the case of HD-infiltrated leaves, I areas showed signs of maceration within few hours after infiltration, leading to death of the infiltrated tissue by 3 dpi. N and D areas of HD-infiltrated leaves developed chlorosis progressively from 7 dpi.

Effect of the Infection on Secondary Metabolism of Zucchini Leaves

The infection by D. dadantii caused an increase in the BGF. This increase was restricted to the I areas, and was statistically significant from 3 or 5 dpi in HD or LD infected leaves, respectively (data not shown). However, the ratios F440/F740, F520/F740, and particularly F440/F520 (Figure 2A), showed changes in the LD leaves prior to the development of symptoms. The value of F440/F520 significantly decreased (p < 0.001) in I areas of LD and HD-infiltrated leaves from 3 dpi (Figure 2B), proportionally to the time post-infection and bacterial dose. On the other hand, the N and D areas of LD infected leaves showed statistically significant decreases in F440/F520 at 3 dpi (p < 0.01). In contrast, among the non-infiltrated areas of HD leaves, only N areas showed significant differences at 7 dpi (p < 0.1; Figures 2C,D).


FIGURE 2. (A) Standard F440/F520 images of mock-control, LD, and HD-inoculated zucchini leaves at 3 dpi, and their corresponding RGB images. Progression of F440/F520 signal in I (B), N (C), and D (D) areas of the leaves along the period of study. Symbols , ∗∗, and ∗∗∗ stand for p < 0.1, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.

Effect of the Infection on Zucchini Leaf Transpiration

At earlier stages of the infection (3 dpi), the infection by D. dadantii caused an increase in the temperature across the whole inoculated leaves (Figure 3A). In I areas, this increment was only significant for HD at 3 dpi (0.7°C, p < 0.1; Figure 3B). Conversely, the most drastic increase was found in the N and D areas of HD inoculated leaves, where the temperature increased up to 2°C relative to the temperature of corresponding areas in mock-control leaves (p < 0.001). Moreover, the temperature in the N and D areas of LD leaves also increased, although to a lesser extent (0.6–0.7°C, p < 0.1; Figures 3C,D). Later in the infection process the temperature of inoculated leaves decreased reaching control values.


FIGURE 3. (A) Standard thermal images of mock-control, LD, and HD-inoculated zucchini leaves at 3 dpi, and their corresponding RGB images. (B) Evolution of temperature in I (B), N (C), and D (D) areas of the leaves along the period of study. Symbols and ∗∗∗ stand for p < 0.1 and 0.001, respectively.

Statistical Models for Diagnosis on Zucchini Infected Plants

Prior to the development of the first symptoms, autofluorescence and thermography images did not report a pattern that could be clearly correlated to the infection. However, the numeric data obtained from these images could be analyzed using mathematical tools to build statistical models. The values for all the MCFI parameters measured (F440, F520, F680, and F740) and those calculated (F440/F520, F440/F680, F440/F740, F520/F680, F520/F740, and F680/F740), plus the temperature were arranged on a database by leaf area and dpi. Thus, the data could be used to fit a LRA per leaf area, dpi and bacterial dose. In this way, the predictors, informative variables offering a clear contrast between healthy and infected leaves, were determined. The predictors that provided the best fits by LRA for each leaf area and dpi are shown in Table 1. According to the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) provided in Table 1, the best fits were those for I areas, followed by those for N areas. The fits for HD leaves were in general better than those for LD leaves.

The predictor variables selected by LRAs, for each leaf area and dpi, were used for training ANNs. The best fits, were those corresponding to I areas, according to the values of cross-entropy (CE), steps, AIC, and Bayesian information criterion (BIC), shown in Table 2.

The goodness of the fits obtained by LRAs and ANNs was evaluated for zucchini plants infected by D. dadantii with new data from samples previously not used for training the models (Figure 4). In the overall, the models with the highest accuracy (90–100%) were those ANNs obtained for I areas of HD-infected leaves. On the contrary, the LRAs showed higher specificity and sensitivity than the ANNs when classifying N and D areas. For HD-infected zucchini leaves, the LRAs of N areas showed an accuracy ranging from 75 to 92% and for those of D areas the accuracy was 63–83%. In the case of LD-infected leaves, the models with the highest accuracy (75–80%) were the ANNs for I areas, especially at 5 and 7 dpi.


FIGURE 4. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the best fits obtained by LRA and for the best ANN for the I, N, and D areas of zucchini leaves LD and HD-inoculated with D. dadantii.

Effect of the Infection on the Metabolism of Melon Leaves and Applicability of Zucchini-D. dadantii Statistical Models

The effect of soft-rot was assessed on another cucurbit, Cucumis melo (melon), inoculated with D. dadantii following the same experimental design described above for zucchini. Symptoms were similar to those described for D. dadantii-zucchini infected plants. Moreover, the metabolic changes in melon leaves upon infection were similar to those found in zucchini.

The suitability of the prediction models generated for zucchini leaves was assessed for melon by validating the models with the dataset obtained for D. dadantii-infected melon plants. The performance of zucchini models on melon plants infected at HD was very similar to that found on zucchini plants infected with LD. The prediction models performed best for I areas, for which both LRAs and ANNs had values of sensitivity and specificity of 80–100%, providing a very high accuracy of 95–100%. However, these values were 50–70% in N and D areas (Figure 5).


FIGURE 5. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the zucchini models applied to melon. The best fits obtained for zucchini (by LRA and ANN) were applied to the corresponding areas of melon leaves LD and HD-inoculated with D. dadantii.


Dealing with current problems in agriculture involves the development of new methodology to evaluate and monitor crops. Li et al. (2014) and von Bueren et al. (2015) have reviewed a number of techniques that are currently in use in vegetation analyses, including several techniques based on reflectance (RGB imaging, hyperspectral near infrared, multi and hyperspectral spectrometers), and thermography. Reflectance and thermography are well established approaches in precision agriculture (Oerke et al., 2014; Humplik et al., 2015). These techniques have also been applied to automated high-throughput analysis for plant phenotyping. In most cases, the screenings aimed for varieties resistant mainly to abiotic stress factors such as drought, heat and cold, salt stress, and nutrient deficiency, as reviewed by Humplik et al. (2015). A relatively small number of works have addressed the study of biotic stress, most of them focused on fungal infections. For example, Baranowski et al. (2015) reported the analysis of Alternaria infections in oilseed rape; Calderón et al. (2013, 2015) analyzed olive trees infected by Verticillium dahliae; the infection of almond trees with red leaf blotch was studied by López-López et al. (2016); and powdery mildew on tomato plants was investigated by Raza et al. (2015). However, other techniques on their own, or combined, could also be of great help in precision agriculture and plant phenotyping, as reviewed by Tremblay et al. (2012).

Thermography provides useful information in the study of biotic stress. It reflects changes in leaves temperature as a consecuence of modifications in the stomatal aperture, which regulates evapotranspiration (Jones, 1999). The activation of stomatal closure triggered by recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns is a widespread defense mechanism in vascular plants against bacterial invasion via abscisic acid, salicylic acid, and jasmonic acid (Melotto et al., 2006, 2008; Sawinski et al., 2013). The increase of temperature found at 3 dpi in zucchini seemed to be dose-dependent. It is worth noticing that the larger differences relative to mock-control values were found in N and D regions of the leaves, where no symptoms were visible (Figure 1). This is in agreement with Pérez-Bueno et al. (2016).

Multicolor fluorescence imaging has offered several parameters as good markers of infection in the zucchini-D. dadantii system. A vast number of phenolic compounds produced by the plant secondary metabolism are part of the defense response. These compounds emit BGF upon excitation with UV light (Cerovic et al., 1999; Dixon, 2001). According to the findings here reported, F440 and F520 of I areas significantly increased when compared to the mock-controls at 3 (HD) or 5 dpi (LD). Both F440 and F520 also increased in N and D areas of infected leaves. These results point to an enhancement on plant secondary metabolism in response to infection (Buschmann and Lichtenthaler, 1998; Cerovic et al., 1999). Moreover, F520 increased to a higher extent than F440, causing the decrease in their ratio F440/F520. This ratio showed statistically significant differences at 3 dpi in the three regions of interest. At later timepoints, the same trend was observed although no significant differences could be found out of the I areas. However, these results were consistent in all the experiments carried out. A decrease in F440/F520 values have been previously reported in relation to long-term stress conditions, under which the accumulation of particular green fluorescing compounds could be induced (Buschmann and Lichtenthaler, 1998).

For a long time, MCFI has been used in fundamental research to study the effects of a variety of stress factors in plant metabolism. BGF is well known to be influenced by the nutrient content in soil. Several authors reported changes in BGF related to alterations in the phenolics content in plants upon treatments with low or high nitrogen, depending on the species (Heisel et al., 1996; Langsdorf et al., 2000). MCFI has also been used in a number of works analyzing the effect of pathogens in their hosts. Viral infections in model plants have been analyzed by Pineda et al. (2008) and in crop plants by Chaerle et al. (2007) and Montero et al. (2016). Some bacterial and fungal infections have been studied by this technique (Granum et al., 2015; Pérez-Bueno et al., 2015, 2016). Currently, the use of this technique on proximal sensing is limited to the use of few available devices (Cerovic et al., 2012; Latouche et al., 2015). These devices have proved useful in the assessment of flavonoids content in grapes or kiwifruit, and in the detection of the nitrogen status for several species (Julkunen-Tiitto et al., 2014). However, the devices available up to date are not imaging sensors, which limits their applicability in field measurements and plant phenotyping programs. To our best knowledge, this work is the first one using data provided by MCFI in combination with thermal imaging to obtain statistical models able to identify infected plants at lab scale.

Data obtained from healthy and infected zucchini leaves by MCFI and thermography were used to train LRAs and ANNs. These models were validated for zucchini healthy and infected samples, achieving in some cases high values of accuracy, particularly for I areas. It is worth noticing that zucchini models also showed a very high accuracy for the classification of I areas of melon leaves. Other authors have addressed the detection of other infections by statistical models. Thus, infection by huanglongbing in citrus could be detected by support vector machine classification trees (Sankaran et al., 2013) and blight diseases on tomato leaves by extreme learning machine (Xie et al., 2015) with an accuracy ranging from 70 to 100%, respectively. On the other hand, several diseases in cucurbits have been analyzed by a combination of thermal, chlorophyll fluorescence dynamics, and hyperspectral imaging (Berdugo et al., 2014). In that work, a general linear model was able to classify plants infected with two different viruses and one fungal pathogen with an accuracy of 85–100%. Moreover, Rumpf et al. (2010) reported a support vector machine classifying beetroot leaves infected with three different fungi with an accuracy of 65–100%, based on measurements with a non-imaging spectroradiometer. The accuracy of the models in this work is comparable to those found in the literature, although none of them made use of MCFI.

The results here reported show the potential application of MCFI, in combination with thermography, particularly to classify infiltrated (symptomatic) areas as “healthy” or “infected.” The automatic detection of symptomatic areas has been carried out by other authors using image processing (Al-Hiary et al., 2011; Tian et al., 2012; Pujari et al., 2015). This pre-analysis of images was applied by Huang (2007) to isolate symptomatic areas caused by bacterial diseases in Phalaenopsis seedlings prior to their classification by mathematical models. Such an approach could constitute a possible strategy to scale up the use of MCFI to crop fields or phenotyping. Further development of the technique would be desirable in order to facilitate its applicability in plant phenotyping and breeding programs.

Author Contributions

MP-B and MP took part in the experimental design, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, and on writing up. FC contributed to the data analysis. MB took part in the experimental design, the interpretation of data and writing up.


This work was supported by a grant from CICE-Junta de Andalucía (P12-AGR-0370), and Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad-CSIC and European Regional Development Fund (RECUPERA 2020/20134R060).

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


The authors thank Prof. Enrique Pérez (IAA, CSIC) for critical reading of the manuscript. Dickeya dadantii strain 3937 was kindly provided by Prof. Pablo Rodríguez-Palenzuela and Dr. Emilia López-Solanilla (CBGP, UPM-INIA, Madrid, Spain).


ANN, artificial neural network; BGF, blue and green fluorescence; D, leaf region distant from infiltrated areas; dpi, days post-infection; F440, F520, F680, and F740, autofluorescence in the blue, green, red and far red spectrum regions, respectively; HD, high bacterial dose; I, infiltrated area of the leaf; LD, low bacterial dose; LRA, logistic regression analysis; MCFI, multicolor fluorescence imaging; N, leaf region neighboring the infiltrated area.


Al-Hiary, H., Bani-Ahmad, S., Reyalat, M., Braik, M., and Alrahammeh, Z. (2011). Fast and accurate detection and classification of plant diseases. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 17, 31–38. doi: 10.5120/2183-2754

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baranowski, P., Jedryczka, M., Mazurek, W., Babula-Skowronska, D., Siedliska, A., and Kaczmarek, J. (2015). Hyperspectral and thermal imaging of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) response to fungal species of the genus Alternaria. PLoS ONE 10:e0122913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122913

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barón, M., Flexas, J., and Delucia, E. H. (2012). “Photosynthetic responses to biotic stress,” in Terrestrial Photosynthesis in a Changing Environment: A Molecular, Physiological, and Ecological Approach, eds J. Flexas, F. Loreto, and H. Medrano (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 331–350.

Google Scholar

Barón, M., Pineda, M., and Pérez-Bueno, M. L. (2016). Picturing pathogen infection in plants. Z. Naturforsch. C 71, 355–368. doi: 10.1515/znc-2016-0134

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Behmann, J., Mahlein, A.-K., Rumpf, T., Römer, C., and Plümer, L. (2015). A review of advanced machine learning methods for the detection of biotic stress in precision crop protection. Precis. Agric. 16, 239–260. doi: 10.1007/s11119-014-9372-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Berdugo, C. A., Zito, R., Paulus, S., and Mahlein, A. K. (2014). Fusion of sensor data for the detection and differentiation of plant diseases in cucumber. Plant Pathol. 63, 1344–1356. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12219

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Buschmann, C., and Lichtenthaler, H. K. (1998). Principles and characteristics of multi-colour fluorescence imaging of plants. J. Plant Physiol. 152, 297–314. doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(98)80144-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Calderón, R., Navas-Cortés, J. A., Lucena, C., and Zarco-Tejada, P. J. (2013). High-resolution airborne hyperspectral and thermal imagery for early, detection of Verticillium wilt of olive using fluorescence, temperature and narrow-band spectral indices. Remote Sens. Environ. 139, 231–245. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.031

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Calderón, R., Navas-Cortés, J. A., and Zarco-Tejada, P. J. (2015). Early detection and quantification of Verticillium wilt in olive using hyperspectral and thermal imagery over large areas. Remote Sens. 7, 5584–5610. doi: 10.3390/rs70505584

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cerovic, Z. G., Masdoumier, G., Ben Ghozlen, N., and Latouche, G. (2012). A new optical leaf-clip meter for simultaneous non-destructive assessment of leaf chlorophyll and epidermal flavonoids. Physiol. Plant. 146, 251–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01639.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cerovic, Z. G., Samson, G., Morales, F., Tremblay, N., and Moya, I. (1999). Ultraviolet-induced fluorescence for plant monitoring: present state and prospects. Agronomie 19, 543–578. doi: 10.1051/agro:19990701

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chaerle, L., Lenk, S., Hagenbeek, D., Buschmann, C., and Van Der Straeten, D. (2007). Multicolor fluorescence imaging for early detection of the hypersensitive reaction to tobacco mosaic virus. J. Plant Physiol. 164, 253–262. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2006.01.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Czajkowski, R., Pérombelon, M. C. M., Van Veen, J. A., and Van Der Wolf, J. M. (2011). Control of blackleg and tuber soft rot of potato caused by Pectobacterium and Dickeya species: a review. Plant Pathol. 60, 999–1013. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02470.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dixon, R. A. (2001). Natural products and plant disease resistance. Nature 411, 843–847. doi: 10.1038/35081178

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duprey, A., Reverchon, S., and Nasser, W. (2014). Bacterial virulence and Fis: adapting regulatory networks to the host environment. Trends Microbiol. 22, 92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2013.11.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fiorani, F., and Schurr, U. (2013). Future scenarios for plant phenotyping. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 267–291. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120137

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Granum, E., Pérez-Bueno, M. L., Calderón, C. E., Ramos, C., de Vicente, A., Cazorla, F. M., et al. (2015). Metabolic responses of avocado plants to stress induced by Rosellinia necatrix analysed by fluorescence and thermal imaging. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 142, 625–632. doi: 10.1007/s10658-015-0640-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hahn, F. (2009). Actual pathogen detection: sensors and algorithms – A review. Algorithms 2, 301–338. doi: 10.3390/a2010301

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heisel, F., Sowinska, M., Miehé, J. A., Lang, M., and Lichtenthaler, H. K. (1996). Detection of nutrient deficiencies of maize by laser induced fluorescence imaging. J. Plant Physiol. 148, 622–631. doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(96)80083-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hill, T., Marquez, L., O’connor, M., and Remus, W. (1994). Artificial neural network models for forecasting and decision making. Int. J. Forecast. 10, 5–15. doi: 10.1016/0169-2070(94)90045-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hosmer, J., David, W., Lemeshow, S., and Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied Logistic Regression, 3rd Edn. Hoboken, NJ: Jon Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Google Scholar

Huang, K.-Y. (2007). Application of artificial neural network for detecting Phalaenopsis seedling diseases using color and texture features. Comput. Electron. Agric. 57, 3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2007.01.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hugouvieux-Cotte-Pattat, N., Condemine, G., Nasser, W., and Reverchon, S. (1996). Regulation of pectinolysis in Erwinia chrysanthemi. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 50, 213–257. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.50.1.213

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Humplik, J. F., Lazar, D., Husickova, A., and Spichal, L. (2015). Automated phenotyping of plant shoots using imaging methods for analysis of plant stress responses – a review. Plant Methods 11:29. doi: 10.1186/s13007-015-0072-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Johansson, J., Andersson, M., Edner, H., Mattsson, J., and Svanberg, S. (1996). Remote fluorescence measurements of vegetation spectrally resolved and by multi-colour fluorescence imaging. J. Plant Physiol. 148, 632–637. doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(96)80084-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, H. G. (1999). Use of thermography for quantitative studies of spatial and temporal variation of stomatal conductance over leaf surfaces. Plant Cell Environ. 22, 1043–1055. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00468.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Julkunen-Tiitto, R., Nenadis, N., Neugart, S., Robson, M., Agati, G., Vepsäläinen, J., et al. (2014). Assessing the response of plant flavonoids to UV radiation: an overview of appropriate techniques. Phytochem. Rev. 14, 273–297. doi: 10.1007/s11101-014-9362-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Langsdorf, G., Buschmann, C., Sowinska, M., Babani, F., Mokry, M., Timmermann, F., et al. (2000). Multicolour fluorescence imaging of sugar beet leaves with different nitrogen status by flash lamp UV-excitation. Photosynthetica 38, 539–551. doi: 10.1023/A:1012409423487

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Latouche, G., Debord, C., Raynal, M., Milhade, C., and Cerovic, Z. G. (2015). First detection of the presence of naturally occurring grapevine downy mildew in the field by a fluorescence-based method. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 14, 1807–1813. doi: 10.1039/c5pp00121h

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, L., Zhang, Q., and Huang, D. (2014). A review of imaging techniques for plant phenotyping. Sensors 14, 20078–20111. doi: 10.3390/s141120078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

López-López, M., Calderón, R., González-Dugo, V., Zarco-Tejada, P., and Fereres, E. (2016). Early detection and quantification of almond red leaf Blotch using high-resolution hyperspectral and thermal imagery. Remote Sens. 8:276. doi: 10.3390/rs8040276

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mahlein, A.-K. (2016). Plant disease detection by imaging sensors – parallels and specific demands for precision agriculture and plant phenotyping. Plant Dis. 100, 241–251. doi: 10.1094/pdis-03-15-0340-fe

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Maloy, O. C. (2005). Plant disease management. Plant Health Instructor doi: 10.1094/PHI-I-2005-0202-01

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mansfield, J., Genin, S., Magori, S., Citovsky, V., Sriariyanum, M., Ronald, P., et al. (2012). Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 13, 614–629. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00804.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Melotto, M., Underwood, W., and He, S. Y. (2008). Role of stomata in plant innate immunity and foliar bacterial diseases. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 46, 101–122. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.121107.104959

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Melotto, M., Underwood, W., Koczan, J., Nomura, K., and He, S. Y. (2006). Plant stomata function in innate immunity against bacterial invasion. Cell 126, 969–980. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Montero, R., Perez-Bueno, M. L., Baron, M., Florez-Sarasa, I., Tohge, T., Fernie, A. R., et al. (2016). Alterations in primary and secondary metabolism in Vitis vinifera ‘Malvasia de Banyalbufar’ upon infection with Grapevine Leafroll associated Virus 3 (GLRaV-3). Physiol. Plant. 157, 442–452. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12440

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mulla, D. J. (2013). Twenty five years of remote sensing in precision agriculture: key advances and remaining knowledge gaps. Biosys. Eng. 114, 358–371. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.08.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nelson, S. (2009). Bacterial Leaf Blight of Aglaonema: Plant Disease. Honolulu, HI: College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, PD-64.

Google Scholar

Oerke, E.-C., Mahlein, A.-K., and Steiner, U. (2014). “Proximal sensing of plant diseases,” in Detection and Diagnostics of Plant Pathogens, eds M. L. Gullino and P. J. M. Bonants (Dordrecht: Springer), 55–68. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9020-8_4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Parikh, R., Mathai, A., Parikh, S., Chandra Sekhar, G., and Thomas, R. (2008). Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 56, 45–50. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.37595

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pérez-Bueno, M. L., Granum, E., Pineda, M., Flors, V., Rodríguez-Palenzuela, P., López-Solanilla, E., et al. (2016). Temporal and spatial resolution of activated plant defense responses in leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana infected with Dickeya dadantii. Front. Plant Sci. 6:1209. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01209

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pérez-Bueno, M. L., Pineda, M., Díaz-Casado, M. E., and Barón, M. (2015). Spatial and temporal dynamics of primary and secondary metabolism in Phaseolus vulgaris challenged by Pseudomonas syringae. Physiol. Plant. 153, 161–174. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12237

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pineda, M., Gaspar, L., Morales, F., Szigeti, Z., and Barón, M. (2008). Multicolor fluorescence imaging of leaves-a useful tool for visualizing systemic viral infections in plants. Photochem. Photobiol. 84, 1048–1060. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00357.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pujari, J. D., Yakkundimath, R., and Byadgi, A. S. (2015). Image processing based detection of fungal diseases in plants. Procedia Comput. Sci. 46, 1802–1808. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.02.137

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Raza, S.-E.-A., Prince, G., Clarkson, J. P., and Rajpoot, N. M. (2015). Automatic detection of diseased tomato plants using thermal and stereo visible light images. PLoS ONE 10:e0123262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reverchon, S., Muskhelisvili, G., and Nasser, W. (2016). Virulence program of a bacterial plant pathogen: the Dickeya model. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 142, 51–92. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2016.05.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reverchon, S., and Nasser, W. (2013). Dickeya ecology, environment sensing and regulation of virulence programme. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 5, 622–636. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rumpf, T., Mahlein, A. K., Steiner, U., Oerke, E. C., Dehne, H. W., and Plümer, L. (2010). Early detection and classification of plant diseases with Support Vector Machines based on hyperspectral reflectance. Comput. Electron. Agric. 74, 91–99. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2010.06.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saito, Y., Kanoh, M., Hatake, K., Kawahara, T. D., and Nomura, A. (1998). Investigation of laser-induced fluorescence of several natural leaves for application to lidar vegetation monitoring. Appl. Opt. 37, 431–437. doi: 10.1364/AO.37.000431

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sankaran, S., Maja, J. M., Buchanon, S., and Ehsani, R. (2013). Huanglongbing (citrus greening) detection using visible, near infrared and thermal imaging techniques. Sensors 13, 2117–2130. doi: 10.3390/s130202117

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sawinski, K., Mersmann, S., Robatzek, S., and Bohmer, M. (2013). Guarding the green: pathways to stomatal immunity. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 26, 626–632. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-12-12-0288-CR

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, A., Ganapathysubramanian, B., Singh, A. K., and Sarkar, S. (2016). Machine learning for high-throughput stress phenotyping in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 21, 110–124. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.10.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tian, J., Hu, Q., Ma, X., and Han, M. (2012). An improved KPCA/GA-SVM classification model for plant leaf disease recognition. J. Comput. Inform. Syst. 8, 7737–7745.

Google Scholar

Tremblay, N., Wang, Z., and Cerovic, Z. (2012). Sensing crop nitrogen status with fluorescence indicators. A review. Agronomy Sustain. Dev. 32, 451–464. doi: 10.1007/s13593-011-0041-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tsror, L., Lebiush, S., Erlich, O., Ben-Daniel, B., and Van Der Wolf, J. (2010). First report of latent infection of Cyperus rotundus caused by a biovar 3 Dickeya sp. (Syn. Erwinia chrysanthemi) in Israel. New Dis. Rep. 22:14. doi: 10.5197/j.2044-0588.2010.022.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Usha, K., and Singh, B. (2013). Potential applications of remote sensing in horticulture – A review. Sci. Hortic. 153, 71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.01.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

von Bueren, S. K., Burkart, A., Hueni, A., Rascher, U., Tuohy, M. P., and Yule, I. J. (2015). Deploying four optical UAV-based sensors over grassland: challenges and limitations. Biogeosciences 12, 163–175. doi: 10.5194/bg-12-163-2015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xie, C. Q., Shao, Y. N., Li, X. L., and He, Y. (2015). Detection of early blight and late blight diseases on tomato leaves using hyperspectral imaging. Sci. Rep. 5:16564. doi: 10.1038/srep16564

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Dickeya dadantii, Cucumis melo, Cucurbita pepo, multicolor fluorescence imaging, thermal imaging, phenotyping, artificial neural network, logistic regression analysis

Citation: Pérez-Bueno ML, Pineda M, Cabeza FM and Barón M (2016) Multicolor Fluorescence Imaging as a Candidate for Disease Detection in Plant Phenotyping. Front. Plant Sci. 7:1790. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01790

Received: 17 August 2016; Accepted: 14 November 2016;
Published: 02 December 2016.

Edited by:

Ashraf El-kereamy, University of California Cooperative Extension Kern County, USA

Reviewed by:

Gavin M. George, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Pavel Pospíšil, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czechia

Copyright © 2016 Pérez-Bueno, Pineda, Cabeza and Barón. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: María L. Pérez-Bueno,