Original Research ARTICLE
Depletion of Arabidopsis ACYL-COA-BINDING PROTEIN3 Affects Fatty Acid Composition in the Phloem
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
Oxylipins are crucial components in plant wound responses that are mobilised via the plant vasculature. Previous studies have shown that the overexpression of an Arabidopsis acyl-CoA-binding protein, AtACBP3, led to an accumulation of oxylipin-containing galactolipids, and AtACBP3pro::BETA-GLUCURONIDASE (GUS) was expressed in the phloem of transgenic Arabidopsis. To investigate the role of AtACBP3 in the phloem, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and western blot analysis of phloem exudates from the acbp3 mutant and wild type revealed that the AtACBP3 protein, but not its mRNA, was detected in the phloem sap. Furthermore, micrografting demonstrated that AtACBP3 expressed from the 35S promoter was translocated from shoot to root. Subsequently, AtACBP3 was localised to the companion cells, sieve elements and the apoplastic space of phloem tissue by immunogold electron microscopy using anti-AtACBP3 antibodies. AtACBP3pro::GUS was induced locally in Arabidopsis leaves upon wounding, and the expression of wound-responsive jasmonic acid marker genes (JASMONATE ZIM-DOMAIN10, VEGETATIVE STORAGE PROTEIN2, and LIPOXYGENASE2) increased more significantly in both locally wounded and systemic leaves of the wild type in comparison to acbp3 and AtACBP3-RNAi. Oxylipin-related fatty acid (FA) (C18:2-FA, C18:3-FA and methyl jasmonate) content was observed to be lower in acbp3 and AtACBP3-RNAi than wild-type phloem exudates using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Experiments using recombinant AtACBP3 in isothermal titration calorimetry analysis showed that medium- and long-chain acyl-CoA esters bind (His)6-AtACBP3 with KD values in the micromolar range. Taken together, these results suggest that AtACBP3 is likely to be a phloem-mobile protein that affects the FA pool and jasmonate content in the phloem, possibly by its binding to acyl-CoA esters.
To enhance survival, land plants have developed a complex mechanism to cope with wounding. Early evidence showed that mechanical wounding induces defence-related proteinase inhibitors and their transcripts from potato (Solanum tuberosum) and tomato (S. lycopersicum) (Graham et al., 1986; Farmer and Ryan, 1992) and the vasculature plays an important role in signal transduction for plant defence (for a review see Shah, 2009). The vasculature consists of the phloem and the xylem. Water and mineral nutrients are channelled to the source tissues of plants through the xylem (for a review see De Boer and Volkov, 2003), while the phloem, consisting of the parenchyma cells, sieve elements (SE) and companion cells (CC) (for a review see Schulz, 1998), delivers sucrose (Riesmeier et al., 1994), phytohormones (e.g., abscisic acid, auxins, cytokinins, and gibberellins) (for a review see Hoad, 1995), ribonucleic acids (Xoconostle-Cazares et al., 1999), proteins (Hayashi et al., 2000; Yoo et al., 2002; Carella et al., 2016) and lipids (Madey et al., 2002; Guelette et al., 2012). Putative lipid-transfer proteins (LTPs), such as Arabidopsis thaliana DEFECTIVE IN INDUCED RESISTANCE1 (AtDIR1), tomato DIR1 and a putative rice acyl-CoA-binding protein (ACBP), have been identified in the phloem and likely participate in lipid trafficking (Maldonado et al., 2002; Suzui et al., 2006; Mitton et al., 2009). Along with a recent proteomic study that revealed yet more LTPs with putative roles in lipid-mediated signalling in the phloem (Barbaglia et al., 2016), the vasculature, particularly the phloem, shows great potentials for plant scientists to study the mechanisms of lipid transport in plant defence.
Fatty acids (FAs) are an important source of energy reserve in all organisms and constitute the primary composition of lipids (for a review see Ohlrogge and Browse, 1995). In plants, FAs are also essential for the biosynthesis of jasmonic acid (JA) and its derivatives (together referred to jasmonate hereafter) which play many roles in defence (Creelman and Mullet, 1997; Vijayan et al., 1998; Sanders et al., 2000; Franke et al., 2005). Arabidopsides are galactolipid derivatives containing an oxygenated jasmonic precursor, 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid (OPDA) (Stelmach et al., 2001; Hisamatsu et al., 2003, 2005; Andersson et al., 2006; Buseman et al., 2006; Kourtchenko et al., 2007), and many of them have been directly associated with the plant wound responses (Buseman et al., 2006; Kourtchenko et al., 2007). Upon wounding, JA production has been reported to increase in locally wounded and systemic leaves suggesting transport of a systemic wound signal (Glauser et al., 2008, 2009; Mousavi et al., 2013). Glauser et al. (2009) also demonstrated that direct vascular connexions to wounded leaves are crucial to JA augmentation in systemic tissues.
In plants, FAs are activated by acyl-CoA synthetase and converted into acyl-CoA esters (Gerbling et al., 1994). ACBPs have been suggested to maintain the acyl-CoA pools in plants (Yurchenko et al., 2009). In Arabidopsis, six AtACBPs have been postulated to play different roles in phospholipid metabolism and membrane biogenesis as well as homeostasis (for reviews see Xiao and Chye, 2009, 2011a; Du et al., 2016; Ye and Chye, 2016). In Arabidopsis rosettes, the promoter activities of AtACBP1, AtACBP3, and AtACBP6 are detectable in the phloem besides other tissues (Zheng et al., 2012; Xue et al., 2014; Ye et al., 2016a). AtACBP6 is involved in systemic acquired resistance (SAR) (Xia et al., 2012) and it accumulates in the phloem sap collected from SAR-induced leaves (Carella et al., 2016). Only AtACBP1 and AtACBP6 are known to be induced upon abiotic stress treatments (Chen et al., 2008; Xiao et al., 2008; Du et al., 2010, 2013; Liao et al., 2014). AtACBP1 and AtACBP6 also play overlapping roles with other AtACBPs in plant reproduction (Hsiao et al., 2015; Lung et al., 2017). Recently, AtACBP6 was found to be wound-inducible and to affect jasmonate composition in the phloem (Ye et al., 2016a). So far, only the overexpression of AtACBP3 conferred protection against Pseudomonas syringae DC3000 in transgenic Arabidopsis besides inducing premature leaf senescence (Xiao et al., 2010; Xiao and Chye, 2011b). These phenotypes are likely caused by a shift in lipid homeostasis in the AtACBP3-overexpressors (AtACBP3-OEs) because they accumulated higher amounts of C18:3-CoA esters, phosphatidylethanolamine, lysophospholipids and arabidopsides with a significant decrease in phosphatidylcholine (PC) (Xiao et al., 2010). As the phloem exudate of Arabidopsis has been reported to contain various lipids, such as phospholipids and free FAs (Madey et al., 2002; Guelette et al., 2012), and AtACBP3pro::GUS had been detected in the phloem (Zheng et al., 2012), an investigation was initiated to explore the biological function of AtACBP3 in phloem lipid homeostasis and the plant wound responses. Our results suggest that AtACBP3 is a phloem-mobile and wound-inducible protein that plays a role in balancing the composition of polyunsaturated C18-unsaturated FAs and jasmonate in the phloem.
Materials and Methods
Plant Materials and Growth Conditions
The Arabidopsis acbp3 mutant (stock no. SALK_012290, ecotype Col-0) contains a single T-DNA insertion on Southern blot analysis (Chan, 2004), and it expressed non-translatable truncated AtACBP3 mRNAs as verified by northern blot analysis and western blot analysis (Xiao et al., 2010). Arabidopsis seeds of the acbp3 mutant, AtACBP3-RNAi lines (ecotype Col-0; Xiao et al., 2010), AtACBP3-OE and wild-type Col-0 were surface-sterilised in diluted bleach (Clorox) solution [final concentration 1.25% (w/v) sodium hypochlorite] and 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 for 30 min, followed by several washes in sterile water. They were subsequently germinated on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium. They were stratified for 2 days at 4°C in darkness before germination at 21°C. Plates were incubated in a tissue culture room and seedlings were subsequently potted in soil and grown at 23°C/21°C (day/night) cycles with a day length regime of 16-h light and 8-h dark.
Collection of Phloem Exudate
Phloem exudates were collected 2–3 h after the onset of light as previously described (Guelette et al., 2012). Fifteen Arabidopsis rosette leaves with petioles from 5- to 6-week-old plants were excised and the cuttings were immediately immersed in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution (20 mM K2-EDTA, pH 7.0). Subsequently, the petioles were recut to the same length and quickly immersed into 1.3 mL of the EDTA solution. Leaves were then kept in an opaque and humid container. After 1 h, petioles were rinsed in sterile water to remove residual EDTA and returned to the sterile water. Exudates were collected for 6–8 h under a dark humid condition. Phloem RNA was prepared by adding 100 U of RNase inhibitor (Roche) per 1 mL of deionized water before collection of phloem exudates. The phloem exudates were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, lyophilised and stored at -80°C until use.
Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reactions (RT-PCR) Using Phloem mRNA
Phloem mRNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) to detect AtACBP3 (At4g24230) expression in the RT-PCR analysis. According to Guelette et al. (2012), the mRNA of UBC9 (At4g27960) was selected as the positive internal control, because it is known to be present in phloem exudates. The negative internal controls were rbcL (AtCg00490) and rbcS (At5g38410), corresponding to the transcripts of the Rubisco large and small subunits, respectively. The two transcripts (rbcL and rbcS) were chosen as negative controls in the RT-PCR analysis of phloem exudates, as two independent studies (Deeken et al., 2008; Guelette et al., 2012) have confirmed their absence in phloem exudates. Total leaf mRNA similarly extracted from the 4-week-old wild type was used as a positive external control in RT-PCR. Following DNase treatment (Promega), mRNA (200 ng) was reverse-transcribed using the Omniscript RT Kit (Qiagen). The cDNA from phloem exudates and leaf mRNA samples was used as templates in PCR mixes with Taq DNA polymerase (Promega) for amplification under 40 cycles of 94°C, 30 s; 53°C, 30 s, and 72°C, 30 s using primers of UBC9, rbcL, rbcS, and AtACBP3 (Supplementary Table S1). Equal volumes of PCR products were loaded onto a 2% agarose gel for electrophoresis.
Micrografting of Arabidopsis
Micrografting experiments were carried out according to Turnbull et al. (2002) with modifications. Seeds of Col-0, AtACBP3-OEs and the acbp3 mutant were surface-sterilised and sown onto MS plates. MS plates were orientated vertically at 4°C for 4 days for seed stratification, and subsequent germination was carried out at 23°C/21°C (day/night) cycles with a regime of 16-h light and 8-h dark. The micrografting experiment was performed using 7-day-old seedlings. Upper hypocotyls of seedlings containing shoot apical meristem and cotyledons were excised from whole seedlings with a surgical blade and re-aligned with lower hypocotyls, which were separated in the same manner. All grafted plants were examined before planting on soil. Grafted plants that had adventitious roots at the grafting junctions were discarded. Grafted plants with no adventitious roots were grown vertically for 7 days in Petri dishes in a humid environment. Successful reunions were transferred onto soil and grown as normal plants. Phloem exudates from 6-week-old scion (rosette leaf) or rootstock tissues were harvested for protein extraction after micrografting.
Western Blot Analysis
Phloem exudates collected from the 5-week-old wild type and the acbp3 mutant were directly used for western blot analysis. Sterile water was added into the lyophilised exudates. Protein concentration was determined according to Bradford (1976) and 30 μg of protein were loaded for sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), followed by protein transfer to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (GE Healthcare) using the Trans-Blot Cell (Bio-Rad) at 25 V for 20 min. The rabbit polyclonal anti-AtACBP3 antibodies were raised against a synthetic peptide corresponding to amino acids 59 to 72 of AtACBP3 (DARVLESQRNFQVV) (Xiao et al., 2010). The antibodies were preabsorbed overnight in acbp3 mutant protein extract to remove unspecific binding prior to use (Supplementary Figure S1). The blots were incubated with the preabsorbed antibodies. Detection of immuno-reactive signals was performed using the Amersham ECL Prime Western Blotting Detection Reagent according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
Immunoelectron Microscopy (IEM)
Five-week-old stems were fixed in a solution of 2% paraformaldehyde and 1.25% glutaraldehyde in 50 mM piperazine-N,N-bis (2-ethanesulfonic acid) (pH 7.2) for 1 h under vacuum and then further incubated at 4°C overnight with gentle shaking. The tissues were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, infiltrated in stepwise increments of London Resin White (London Resin Company) and polymerised at 65°C for over 24 h (His et al., 2001).
Immuno-gold labelling was carried out according to Ye et al. (2016b) with modifications. Ultra-thin sections (80 nm) were prepared and mounted on nickel grids. Grids were blocked on the liquid surface of 30 μL blocking solution droplets containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 1% TTBS (20 mM Tris, 500 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20, pH7.5) for 1 h at room temperature and subsequently incubated in anti-AtACBP3 antibodies diluted 1:50 (v/v) at 4°C overnight. In the negative controls, the primary antibodies were replaced with blocking solution or preimmune serum diluted 1:50 (v/v). After three 15-min washes with blocking buffer, the grids were incubated with a 1:100 dilution of anti-rabbit antibodies conjugated to 10 nm gold (Sigma–Aldrich) at room temperature for 1 h. Grids were washed twice in TTBS-BSA, once in TTBS and sterile water, and each rinse lasted 15 min. The grids were subsequently stained with 2% uranyl acetate for 1 min at room temperature and photographed under a Philips 100CM TEM immunoelectron microscope at 80 kV.
Images in Figure 2 and other images collected from the same experiment were analysed for gold labelling densities in different cell types according to Lee et al. (2011) with modifications. All raw images in this analysis are available in Supplementary IEM Images. Total number of gold particles and total area from each cell type [CC (n = 7), SE (n = 7) and extracellular space (ES) (n = 7)] were counted and measured in Adobe Photoshop CC 2015. The density of gold particles from each cell type is equal to the total number of gold particles divided by its total area (μm2).
Wound Treatment of Plants
Two days prior to any treatment, plants were transferred to 24-h constant light condition to eliminate the induction of AtACBP3 by darkness (Xiao et al., 2010; Zheng et al., 2012). Wound treatment was carried out according to Farmer et al. (2013) and Mousavi et al. (2013). Five-week-old plants were wounded by gently crushing leaf 8 of the plants with a pair of forceps (Farmer et al., 2013). Tissues of locally wounded [leaf 8; Mousavi et al. (2013)] and systemic [leaf 13; Mousavi et al. (2013)] leaves were collected 1 h post wounding (hpw), 2 and 4 hpw for relative gene expression analysis. For quantitative GUS assays, all leaves were wounded and total proteins were extracted. For quantitative real-time polymerase chain reactions (qRT-PCR), unwounded plants (Col-0, acbp3, and AtACBP3-RNAi) were used as baseline control to monitor the gene expression levels, while gene expression in wounded acbp3 and AtACBP3-RNAi plants were compared with those in wounded Col-0 treated under the same conditions.
Quantitative and Histochemical GUS Assays
Quantification of GUS activity was carried out by measuring the cleavage of the substrate (Jefferson et al., 1987). The substrate, 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucuronide (MUG) was purchased from Sigma–Aldrich. Tissues were collected into Eppendorf tubes and frozen in liquid nitrogen, followed by homogenisation. Subsequently, 1 mL GUS Extraction Buffer (150 mM sodium phosphate pH 7.0, 10 mM EDTA, 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.1% sarcosyl) was added, and samples were gently agitated. The homogenised mixture was centrifuged at 13000 rpm for 15 min. Two hundred μL of supernatant from each sample was used for MUG assays and protein quantification. A 10-μL sample extract and 130-μL Assay Buffer (GUS Extraction Buffer containing 1.2 mM MUG) were mixed and the reaction incubated in the dark at 37°C for 20 min. Subsequently, 10 μL of the reaction was added to 190 μL Stop Buffer (200 mM sodium carbonate) in a 96-well plate. Fluorescence excited at 355 nm was quantified on a plate reader (BMG LABTECH) at 460 nm. A standard curve corresponding to 0, 0.25, 0.5, 2.5, 5, 25, and 50 μM 4-methylumbelliferone (MU) was included for calculation of liberated MU. The fluorescence assay measurements were normalised for protein concentration and recorded as nmoles MU min-1 mg-1 protein.
For histochemical GUS assay (Jefferson et al., 1987), Arabidopsis leaves was submerged in X-Gluc solution [1 mg mL-1 X-Gluc, 100 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.5, 2 mM K3Fe(CN)6, 2 mM K4Fe(CN)6, 0.1% Triton X-100] and infiltrated by vacuuming for 1 h, followed by a 4-h incubation at 37°C in darkness. Chlorophyll removal was performed by using 70% ethanol. Samples were then placed above a light-box for photography.
Two sets of controls were used in both GUS assays; a vector line (pBI101) was used as a negative control, and unwounded AtACBP3pro::GUS transgenic plants served as a baseline control in GUS expression.
Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reactions (qRT-PCR)
Total leaf mRNA was extracted from 5-week-old Arabidopsis using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) followed by DNase (Promega) treatment. First-strand cDNA was synthesised using the Superscript First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen). Subsequently, qRT-PCR were carried out using the FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master Mix (Roche) on a StepOne Plus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Primers of JASMONATE ZIM-DOMAIN10 (JAZ10), LIPOXYGENASE2 (LOX2), VEGETATIVE STORAGE PROTEIN2 (VSP2), AtACBP3 and ACTIN2 are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Relative gene expression of JAZ10 (1 hpw), LOX2 (2 hpw), VSP2 (4 hpw), and AtACBP3 (1 hpw) was normalised to the expression of ACTIN2. The duration of wound treatment for analysis of each marker gene (JAZ10, LOX2, and VSP2) was according to Glauser et al. (2009) and Mousavi et al. (2013). Three independent biological repeats were performed to analyse the relative mRNA expression.
FA Analysis by Gas Chromatography- Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)
FA analysis was conducted following Carvalho and Malcata (2005) with modifications. Phloem exudates collected and pooled from 150 leaves were dissolved in a transmethylation solution containing 1 mL of toluene, 2 mL of 1% (v/v) sulphuric acid in methanol together with 5 μL of an internal standard [C19:0 (1 mg mL-1 hexane)]. The transmethylation solution containing phloem exudates was incubated for 12 h at 50°C for the transmethylation of FAs. After several washes with 5% (w/v) NaCl and hexane, the hexane layer was washed with 4 mL 2% (w/v) KHCO3 and then transferred into another test tube followed by vigorous vortexing. Nitrogen gas was passed through each tube to evaporate the hexane. Then 100 μL of hexane was re-added to the test tube to concentrate the FA residues. One μL of the hexane supernatant, containing the FAs, was analysed by Agilent 6890N equipped with a 5973 Mass Selective Detector (MSD) and a 30 m × 0.250 mm DB-WAX column (0.25 μm in film thickness). The samples were positioned and then automatically injected into the column. For sample detection, the oven temperature was increased from 100 to 230°C with a rate of 4°C min-1 and postrun at 235°C for 4 min. The GC/MSD On-line Data Analysis was used for data processing after data acquisition; the FAME library was used for compound identification. Quantification of FA species was calculated by comparing the peak area of each FA to the internal standard, followed by normalisation to ng/leaf.
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry Assays (ITC)
(His)6-AtACBP3 expressed from plasmid pAT223 in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) pLysS cells was purified as previously described (Leung et al., 2006). ITC assays were performed using a MicroCal iTC200 system (GE Healthcare). Acyl-CoA esters (C12:0-, C14:0-, C16:1-, C17:0-, C18:2-, and C18:3-CoA esters) were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids. The 600 μM acyl-CoA ester in the titration syringe was 20-fold higher than the protein concentration (30 μM) in the reaction chamber. Solutions of acyl-CoA esters and (His)6-AtACBP3 were degassed under vacuum. Assays were conducted at 25°C, and injections were initiated after equilibration to baseline stability. The acyl-CoA ester (1.5 μL) was injected 20 times into the reaction chamber and each injection lasted 3.6 s at an interval of 120 s between injections. Immediate mixing was ensured by stirring. Raw data was integrated, corrected for non-specific heat, and analysed using the ORIGIN software (OriginLab). Dissociation constants (KD) were calculated by non-linear regression fitting the isotherm. Each binding assay was performed at least twice independently.
AtACBP3, But Not Its mRNA, Was Detected in Wild-Type Col-0 Phloem Exudates
Given that AtACBP3pro::GUS was localised in the phloem (Zheng et al., 2012), phloem exudates were collected from leaf petioles to verify whether AtACBP3 and/or its mRNA were present in the phloem sap. In RT-PCR analysis, the positive control (UBC9) was detected both in the phloem exudates and leaves, indicating that mRNA extraction and RT-PCR analysis were properly performed. Two negative controls (rbcL and rbcS) were only detectable in leaves but not in phloem exudates (Figure 1A), confirming the collection of phloem exudates were free from cellular contaminations of other cell types. Using an AtACBP3-specific primer pair (ML1202 and ML1203) (Supplementary Table S1), the 174-bp AtACBP3 mRNA was not detected in phloem exudate (Figure 1A), but western blot analysis showed a strong 39-kDa AtACBP3 cross-reacting band in wild-type phloem exudate (Figure 1B). Through micrografting, a 39-kDa AtACBP3 cross-reacting band was also detected in root protein extracts of acbp3 rootstock micrografted below AtACBP3-OE scions while the same cross-reacting band was not detectable in non-grafted acbp3 roots, indicating that AtACBP3 is mobile from shoot to root (Figure 1C). However, no such band was detected in the phloem exudates collected from acbp3 scions micrografted above the AtACBP3-OE rootstocks, implying that AtACBP3 is not mobile from root to shoot (Figure 1B).
FIGURE 1. Reverse transcription PCR and western blot analysis of phloem exudates from Arabidopsis. (A) Total RNA was collected from phloem exudates and rosette leaves of Col-0 to detect AtACBP3 and controls (UBC9, rbcL, and rbcS) transcripts. Original images of the analysis are available in Supplementary Figure S2. (B) Western blot analysis using anti-AtACBP3 antibodies on 30 μg total phloem exudate proteins from the acbp3 mutant, wild-type Col-0 and acbp3 scion grafted on AtACBP3-OE rootstock (acbp3/AtACBP3-OE) (left). A Coomassie Blue-stained gel loaded with the same amount of protein in western blot analysis is shown (right). (C) Western blot analysis using anti-AtACBP3 antibodies on 30 μg total root proteins collected from AtACBP3-OE/acbp3, Col-0/acbp3, acbp3 (left). A Coomassie Blue-stained gel loaded with the same amount of protein in western blot analysis is shown below (right). Arrowheads indicate the 39-kDa cross-reacting AtACBP3 band. These experiments were repeated twice with consistent results.
AtACBP3 Was Immunolocalised to Companion Cells, Sieve Elements and the Extracellular Space of the Phloem
To further investigate the localisation of AtACBP3 in the phloem, IEM was carried out after preabsorption of antibodies (Supplementary Figure S1). Immunogold particles were localised in the phloem (Figure 2), particularly in the cytosol of CC (Figure 2A) and SE (Figure 2B). Immunogold particles were also detected in ES (Figures 2C,D), but not in the control incubated with blocking solution (Supplementary Figure S3). A quantitative analysis of gold particle densities showed that the labelling was localised more preferably to ES in comparison to CC and SE (Figure 2E).
FIGURE 2. Immunogold localisation of AtACBP3 using anti-AtACBP3 antibodies in transmission electron microscopy of cross sections of apical stems from 5-week-old Arabidopsis. (A) Companion cell. (B) Sieve element. (C,D) Extracellular space. (E) Densities of gold particles were quantified per μm2. Arrowheads indicate gold particles. Multiple floral stems from different individual plants sectioned and analysed in this experiment showed consistent results. Further images are available in Supplementary IEM Images. CC, companion cell; ES, extracellular space; SE, sieve element. Scale bar = 0.5 μm.
AtACBP3 Expression Was Induced by Mechanical Wounding
To investigate the effect of wounding on the expression of AtACBP3, AtACBP3pro::GUS plants were utilised in quantitative and histochemical GUS assays. The results of GUS activity using 4-week-old transgenic plants, 1–4 hpw, showed that AtACBP3pro::GUS expression peaked at 3 hpw in comparison to unwounded AtACBP3pro::GUS (Figure 3A). Histochemical staining of AtACBP3pro::GUS also confirmed that AtACBP3 expression was induced by wounding with the highest expression at 3 hpw, while the wounded vector line showed no expression (Figure 3B).
FIGURE 3. GUS activity assays of transgenic Arabidopsis AtACBP3pro::GUS plants following wounding. (A) Four-week-old AtACBP3pro::GUS transgenic plants were wounded with a pair of forceps and harvested at 1, 2, 3, and 4 h post wounding (hpw) for quantitative GUS activity measurements. Vector (pBI101.3)-transformed plants were analysed at 1 hpw and served as a negative control, while unwounded AtACBP3pro::GUS plants were used as a baseline control. “∗∗” indicates statistically significant difference (P < 0.01, n = 3 by Student’s t-test) in comparison to unwounded samples collected at the same time point. Error bars represent standard deviations. (B) A representation of histochemical staining of wounded 4-week-old leaves from AtACBP3pro::GUS and vector (pBI101.3)-transformed (VC) Arabidopsis. These experiments were repeated twice with consistent results. Scale bars = 0.8 cm.
The acbp3 Mutant Was Less Responsive to Wound in Local and Distal Leaves
The role of AtACBP3 in the wound response was investigated by comparing wild type, acbp3 and AtACBP3-RNAi leaves in qRT-PCR assays examining JAZ10, LOX2 and VSP2 expression, as they are deemed to be robust wound-responsive JA marker genes (Bell et al., 1995; Liu et al., 2005; Yan et al., 2007). The expression of JAZ10, LOX2, VSP2 was drastically elevated 1, 2, and 4 hpw in the wild type (Figures 4A–C), while their expression was significantly reduced in acbp3 and AtACBP3-RNAi (Figures 4A–C and Supplementary Figure S4). Furthermore, the expression of the marker genes was higher in wild-type than either acbp3 or AtACBP3-RNAi distal leaves, indicating that the wound response was adversely affected in acbp3 and AtACBP3-RNAi lines. Another line of evidence on the wound-inducibility of AtACBP3 was reflected in the upregulation of its mRNA (approximately five times higher at 1 hpw in locally wounded leaves), in comparison to little expression in the distal leaves (Figure 4D).
FIGURE 4. Relative expression of AtACBP3 and marker genes in the Arabidopsis jasmonate pathway after wounding. Rosette leaves harvested from 5-week-old Col-0 and acbp3 were leaf 8 (wounded locally) and leaf 13 (distally wounded at leaf 8). Numbering of rosette leaves was according to Farmer et al. (2013). (A) Relative expression of JAZ10 1 h post wounding (hpw) following Mousavi et al. (2013). (B) Relative expression of LOX2 (2 hpw) following Glauser et al. (2009). (C) Relative expression of VSP2 (4 hpw) following Mousavi et al. (2013). (D) Relative expression of AtACBP3 1 hpw. Error bars represent standard deviation in each analysis. Square brackets indicate which two groups were compared using the Student’s t-test. ∗∗P < 0.01, n = 3; ∗P < 0.05, n = 3; NS, not significant, n = 3; Local, wounded leaf 8; Distal, leaf 13 distal to wounded leaf 8. These experiments were repeated twice with consistent results.
The differences in expression of the three marker genes before and after wounding were also investigated in an acbp3 complemented line [acbp3-C1; generated using a 35S::AtACBP3 construct as verified by Xiao et al. (2010)]. However, acbp3-C1 did not show the same extent of induction of the three marker genes in wounded leaves as in the wild type, and the induction of JAZ10 and VSP2 was significantly upregulated only in distal leaves (Supplementary Figure S5). When comparing the innate expression level of JAZ10, LOX2, and VSP2 between acbp3-C1 and wild type, it was noted that the expression of JAZ10 in unwounded acbp3-C1 was 15 times that of the wild type. However, the expression of LOX2 and VSP2 decreased when compared to the wild type (Supplementary Figure S6).
Reduced Levels of Defence-Related FAs Accumulate in acbp3 Mutant and AtACBP3-RNAi Lines
GC-MS analysis of phloem exudates from the wild-type Col-0, the acbp3 mutant as well as the AtACBP3-RNAi lines revealed that C16:0- and C18:0-FAs were the major FAs in all genotypes (Figure 5). Levels of defence-related C18:2-FA and C18:3-FA decreased in acbp3 and AtACBP3-RNAi in comparison to the wild type (Figure 5). Also, a decrease in methyl jasmonate (MeJA) in both acbp3 and AtACBP3-RNAi and an accumulation of saturated C12- and C14-FAs in acbp3 were observed in comparison to the wild type (Figure 5).
FIGURE 5. Quantitative gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of fatty acids from phloem exudates of 5-week-old wild-type Col-0 Arabidopsis, acbp3 and AtACBP3-RNAi lines. Error bars represent standard deviation (n = 3) in each analysis. The Student’s t-test was used for statistical analyses. “∗” indicates a statistically significant (P < 0.05) elevation or reduction in comparison with the wild-type Col-0. “∗∗” indicates a very statistically significant different (P < 0.01) elevation or reduction in comparison with the wild-type Col-0. These experiments were repeated twice with consistent results.
Recombinant (His)6-AtACBP3 Binds Defence-Related Acyl-CoA Esters In Vitro
ITC assays were next performed to expand on the in vitro binding profile of AtACBP3 with acyl-CoA esters. A range of medium- and long-chain acyl-CoA esters corresponding to the FAs identified in the phloem exudates were selected for analysis. The binding isotherms of recombinant (His)6-AtACBP3 titrated with C12:0-, C14:0-, C18:2-, and C18:3-CoA esters at 25°C are displayed in Figures 6, 7. ITC assays were carried out at two different pH values, pH 7.0 (Figures 6A,C, 7A,C) and pH 6.4 (Figures 6B,D, 7B,D), because AtACBP3 is expected to be subjected to an acidic pH when targeted to the apoplast and the phloem (Gao et al., 2004; Leung et al., 2006; Hijaz and Killiny, 2014). All four acyl-CoA esters were shown to bind (His)6-AtACBP3 in vitro, with KD values in the micromolar range (Figures 6, 7). The assays using C12:0- and C18:3-CoA esters also indicated lower KD values at pH 6.4 in comparison to pH 7.0 (Table 1). However, (His)6-AtACBP3 did not bind MeJA (Supplementary Figure S8), suggesting that AtACBP3 is not likely to transport MeJA directly in the phloem.
FIGURE 6. Binding isotherms of recombinant (His)6-AtACBP3 titrated with C12:0- and C14:0-CoA esters at 25°C in isothermal titration calorimetry. The panel shows raw data of 30 μM recombinant (His)6-AtACBP3 titrated with 600 μM of C12:0-CoA ester, pH 7.0 (A); C12:0-CoA ester, pH 6.4 (B); C14:0-CoA ester, pH 7.0 (C) and C14:0-CoA ester, pH 6.4 (D). Each assay had three technical repeats and was repeated at least twice, each using independently prepared (His)6-AtACBP3.
FIGURE 7. Binding isotherms of recombinant (His)6-AtACBP3 titrated with C18:2- and C18:3-CoA esters at 25°C in isothermal titration calorimetry. The panel shows raw data of 30 μM recombinant (His)6-AtACBP3 titrated with 600 μM of C18:2-CoA ester, pH 7.0 (A); C18:2-CoA ester, pH 6.4 (B); C18:3-CoA ester, pH 7.0 (C) and C18:3-CoA ester, pH 6.4 (D). Each assay had three technical repeats and was repeated at least twice, each using independently prepared (His)6-AtACBP3.
AtACBP3 Is Likely an Apoplastic Phloem-Mobile Protein
As mature SEs are enucleated, it is likely that the AtACBP3 protein which was detected in phloem exudates on western blot analysis (Figure 1), is synthesised in the neighbouring CCs or immature SEs and subsequently exported to mature SEs. Indeed, IEM localised AtACBP3 to both cell types (Figure 2). Detection of AtACBP3 in the apoplast is consistent with previous observation that AtACBP3 is targeted extracellularly (Leung et al., 2006). Together with the detection of AtACBP3 in wild-type phloem exudate (Figure 1B) and the promoter activity of AtACBP3 in the root vasculature of transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings (Supplementary Figure S9) and 32-day-old mature plants (Zheng et al., 2012), the detection of AtACBP3 in the roots of grafted plants is not surprising and further suggests that AtACBP3 can be transported from shoot to root (Figure 1C).
Proteins previously identified in the phloem include signalling molecules in flowering time regulation and plant defence (Corbesier et al., 2007; Mathieu et al., 2007; Champigny et al., 2013; Carella et al., 2016) as well as a sucrose/H+ symporter, AtSUC2 (Srivastava et al., 2008). Phloem LTPs have been postulated to participate in systemic transport related to SAR in the phloem (Champigny et al., 2013; Barbaglia et al., 2016). AtDIR1 is an apoplastic phloem LTP that was reported to function in long-distance transport related to SAR in the phloem (Maldonado et al., 2002; Champigny et al., 2013). Its ability to interact with lipids was confirmed by observation of its binding to two lysophosphatidylcholines with KD values in the nanomolar range (Lascombe et al., 2008).
The movement of proteins via plasmodesmata into SEs has been demonstrated by Balachandran et al. (1997) and Ishiwatari et al. (1998). More recently, PLASMODESMATA-LOCALISED PROTEIN5 (PDLP5) was reported to mediate cell-to-cell communication (Lee et al., 2011), and the overexpression of PDLP5 affected the long-distance movement of AtDIR1 (Carella et al., 2015). Although AtDIR1 localises to the apoplast, it may access the phloem via the plasmodesmata, either after cleavage of its signal peptide or from a cytosolic or ER pool, such that AtDIR1 protein accesses the phloem via plasmodesmata during SAR (Champigny et al., 2011). Given the demonstrated association of AtACBP3 with the ER/Golgi complex as well as its apoplastic localisation (Xiao et al., 2010) and involvement in SAR (Xiao and Chye, 2011b; Xia et al., 2012), it is possible that some AtACBP3 protein may be transported symplastically via the plasmodesmata similar to AtDIR1. In fact, another AtACBP, AtACBP6 has been shown to interact with plasmodesmata-localised protein, PDLP8 (Ye et al., 2017) and is localised to the plasmodesmata in the phloem (Ye et al., 2016a). Taken together, these data suggest that an intracellular pool of AtACBP3 may access SEs via the plasmodesmata for long-distance transport in the phloem.
AtACBP3 May Participate in Jasmonate Production after Wounding
In this study, AtACBP3 was demonstrated to be locally wound-inducible at 2 hpw and peaked at 3 hpw as shown in Figure 3. Depletion of AtACBP3, however, impaired the induction of wound-responsive JA marker genes in both local and distal leaves after wounding (Figure 4). However, a similar level of induction in marker gene expression was not detected in the complementary line (acbp3-C1) (Supplementary Figures S4, S5). This observation in acbp3-C1 may be attributed to the use of the 35S promoter driving AtACBP3 resulting in an increased amount of endogenous salicylic acid (SA) (Xiao and Chye, 2011b) which may have interfered with JA biosynthesis (discussed in Caarls et al., 2015). Furthermore, C18:3-FA and MeJA accumulation was lower in the phloem exudate of acbp3 and AtACBP3-RNAi excised leaves in comparison to the wild type (Figure 5). The rapid accumulation of jasmonate in distal leaves after wounding has been well characterised (Glauser et al., 2008, 2009). But the mechanism(s) on how these wound signals are mobilised systemically remains to be resolved. In tomato and Arabidopsis, it has been suggested that jasmonate itself is a systemic signal (Li et al., 2002; Thorpe et al., 2007; Sato et al., 2011; Chauvin et al., 2013; Gasperini et al., 2015). On the other hand, a competing theory suggests that JA-related leaf-to-leaf wound signalling and the systemic biosynthesis of JA are facilitated by electric signals known as wound-activated surface potential changes (Mousavi et al., 2013).
To this end, there are two possibilities on the role of AtACBP3 in jasmonate biosynthesis in the phloem. In Arabidopsis, PC homeostasis is crucial for plastidic galactolipid biosynthesis (Warwick et al., 1986; Wang et al., 2014). Upon wounding, free C18:3-FA is released from plastid membranes (Narváez-Vásquez et al., 1999; Ishiguro et al., 2001) and its content increases in leaves (Conconi et al., 1996), thereby providing the precursors for JA biosynthesis (for a review see Koo and Howe, 2009). AtACBP3-OEs have been reported to have markedly lower PC but higher galactolipid, including arabidopside, content than the wild type (Xiao et al., 2010), suggesting that AtACBP3 may participate in the transition of extraplastidic lipids from PC to galactolipids. Depletion of AtACBP3 in the phloem in Arabidopsis rosettes supports its involvement in the homeostasis of extraplastidic lipid exchange (Xiao et al., 2010) in the phloem and production of JA upon or after wounding (Figure 5). Another possibility is that AtACBP3 regulates arabidopsides in the phloem as they have been widely postulated to function in wounding and JA production (Stelmach et al., 2001; Hisamatsu et al., 2003, 2005; Andersson et al., 2006; Buseman et al., 2006; Kourtchenko et al., 2007). Wounding and insect infestations can trigger the accumulation of arabidopsides and other 9-LOX–derived oxylipins in Arabidopsis (Buseman et al., 2006; Nalam et al., 2012), and AtACBP3-OEs have been shown to overaccumulate arabidopsides (Xiao et al., 2010).
A recent study also demonstrated that blockage of plastidic galactolipid biosynthesis causes overproduction of arabidopsides and leads to abnormal phloem cap lignification in Arabidopsis (Lin et al., 2016). Although little is known about the exact functions of these oxygenated galactolipids in relation to the biosynthesis of free oxylipins at a cellular level, the accumulation of MeJA in phloem exudates collected from excised leaf petioles (Figure 5) and arabidopsides in AtACBP3-OEs (Xiao et al., 2010) strengthened the role of arabidopsides in wounding and jasmonate biosynthesis. Although it would be interesting to investigate the jasmonate content in phloem exudates collected from excised leaf petioles after wounding the leaves, transcripts of rbcS and rbcL can be detected in the phloem exudates collected after wounding (data not shown), indicating the phloem exudates collected after wounding contained cellular contamination from the wounded tissues, thereby preventing the analysis of jasmonate content in phloem exudates after wounding.
C12:0- and C14:0-FA accumulation in acbp3 phloem exudates, but not in the AtACBP3-RNAi lines or the wild type (Figure 5), may have arisen from complete loss of AtACBP3 function in acbp3 but a partial loss in the AtACBP3-RNAi lines [as verified in northern blot analysis by Xiao et al. (2010)]. In canola plants, sublethal UV irradiation caused an 11-fold increase in C12:0-FA and moderate accumulation of C14:0-FA in the phloem (Madey et al., 2002). Herein, the accumulation of C12:0- and C14:0-FAs in acbp3 phloem exudates bears resemblance to similar accumulation following response to UV irradiation in canola phloem sap (Madey et al., 2002).
AtACBP3 Potentially Binds Fatty-Acyl-CoA Esters in the Phloem
Previous in vitro Lipidex binding assays had shown that (His)6-AtACBP3 binds to C16:0-, C18:1- and C20:4-CoA esters (Leung et al., 2006). In this study, ITC demonstrated that (His)6-AtACBP3 not only binds medium-chain (C12:0- and C14:0-) but also long-chain (C16:1-, C17:0-, C18:2-, and C18:3-) acyl-CoA esters (Figures 6, 7 and Supplementary Figure S7). Some of their FA derivatives (C12:0-, C14:0-, C16:1-, and C18:2-FAs) have already been identified in Arabidopsis phloem exudate (Guelette et al., 2012). A recent study using microscale thermophoresis (MST) has shown that recombinant AtACBP3 binds long-chain (C18:2- and C20:0-) and very-long-chain (C22:0- and C24:0-) acyl-CoA esters (Xie et al., 2015). Interestingly, the KD values from our study and Xie et al. (2015) were both within the micromolar range.
An attempt to determine the binding affinity between (His)6-AtACBP3 with MeJA in ITC showed that AtACBP3 is unlikely to be a MeJA transporter in the phloem (Supplementary Figure S8). Only recently, did evidence emerge that the Arabidopsis JASMONATE TRANSPORTER1 (AtJAT1), also known as Arabidopsis ABC TRANSPORTER G FAMILY MEMBER16, is a cellular jasmonoyl-isoleucine transporter that mediates nuclear entry of jasmonoyl-isoleucine (Li et al., 2017). Although jasmonate has been considered as a long-distance signal (Li et al., 2002; Thorpe et al., 2007; Sato et al., 2011), the long-distance transporter(s) of jasmonate remains elusive.
Some proteins that are involved in JA-mediated plant defence are also known to be involved in SA-mediated defence pathways. Noteworthy examples include various fatty-acid desaturases (FAD) which convert C18:2-FA to C18:3-FA, and C18:3-FA is the precursor of jasmonic acid (Zimmerman and Feng, 1978). Arabidopsis fad3 fad7 fad8 is deficient in C18:3-FA and is hypersensitive to insect infection (McConn et al., 1997). However, a loss-of-function mutation in tomato fad7 enhanced aphid resistance in a SA-dependent manner (Avila et al., 2012). Interestingly, AtACBP3 appears to be involved in this complex network of JA- and SA-mediated plant defence (Figure 8). AtACBP3 is induced by both JA and SA (Xiao and Chye, 2011b). Locally, the overexpression of AtACBP3 confers upregulation of PATHOGEN-RELATED genes and NONEXPRESSOR OF PR GENES1-dependent resistance to P. syringae (Xiao and Chye, 2011b). In this study, mechanical wounding upregulated the expression of AtACBP3 and JA marker genes in local leaves. Distally, AtACBP3 is involved in the transport of wound signalling, possibly by complexing with C18:2- and C18:3-acyl-CoA esters, culminating in the upregulation of JA marker genes. However, PR genes were not induced in distal tissues when Arabidopsis rosette leaves were infected distally by P. syringae (Xiao and Chye, 2011b). Nevertheless, our observations support AtACBP3 participation in the maintenance of a pool of FA/acyl-CoA esters in the phloem, similar to the role of AtACBP6 in the cytosol for jasmonate production (Ye et al., 2016a). Thus, the existence of two AtACBPs in the phloem now provides new evidence on the importance of these proteins in phloem lipid metabolism and plant defence.
FIGURE 8. A proposed model of AtACBP3 in plant stress responses was illustrated. Two leaves (labelled Local and Distal) are connected by vascular tissues which include phloem (blue lines) and xylem (not shown). Black colour scheme represents a JA-related pathway. Red colour scheme represents a SA-related pathway. ACC, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid; AtACBP3, Arabidopsis thaliana ACYL-COA-BINDING PROTEIN3; JA, jasmonic acid; JAZ10, JASMONATE-ZIM-DOMAIN PROTEIN10; LOX2, LIPOXYGENASE2; MeJA, methyl jasmonate; NPR1, NONEXPRESSOR OF PR GENES1; PR genes, PATHOGENESIS-RELATED genes; SA, salicylic acid; VSP2, VEGETATIVE STORAGE PROTEIN2.
T-HH and M-LC conceived and designed the experiments. T-HH and S-CL performed and analysed the isothermal titration calorimetry assays. T-HH performed and analysed the fatty acid analysis. M-LC, S-CL, and Z-WY provided critical advice and suggestions on the design of experiments. T-HH performed all other experiments and analysed the data. T-HH, S-CL, Z-WY and M-LC wrote the manuscript.
This work was supported by the Wilson and Amelia Wong Endowment Fund and the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (HKU765813M). T-HH and Z-WY were supported by a HKU Postgraduate Scholarship and a University Postgraduate Fellowship, respectively; and S-CL by a HKU Postdoctoral Fellowship.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
We thank Mingfu Wang (HKU) for advice on GC-MS.
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2018.00002/full#supplementary-material
Andersson, M. X., Hamberg, M., Kourtchenko, O., Brunnstrom, A., McPhail, K. L., Gerwick, W. H., et al. (2006). Oxylipin profiling of the hypersensitive response in Arabidopsis thaliana: formation of a novel oxo-phytodienoic acid-containing galactolipid, arabidopside E. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 31528–31537. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M604820200
Avila, C. A., Arévalo-Soliz, L. M., Jia, L., Navarre, D. A., Chen, Z., Howe, G. A., et al. (2012). Loss of function of FATTY ACID DESATURASE7 in tomato enhances basal aphid resistance in a salicylate-dependent manner. Plant Physiol. 158, 2028–2041. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.191262
Balachandran, S., Xiang, Y., Schobert, C., Thompson, G. A., and Lucas, W. J. (1997). Phloem sap proteins from Cucurbita maxima and Ricinus communis have the capacity to traffic cell to cell through plasmodesmata. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 14150–14155. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.25.14150
Barbaglia, A. M., Tamot, B., Greve, V., and Hoffmann-Benning, S. (2016). Phloem proteomics reveals new lipid-binding proteins with a putative role in lipid-mediated signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 7:563. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00563
Bell, E., Creelman, R. A., and Mullet, J. E. (1995). A chloroplast lipoxygenase is required for wound-induced jasmonic acid accumulation in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 8675–8679. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.19.8675
Bradford, M. M. (1976). Rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
Buseman, C. M., Tamura, P., Sparks, A. A., Baughman, E. J., Maatta, S., Zhao, J., et al. (2006). Wounding stimulates the accumulation of glycerolipids containing oxophytodienoic acid and dinor-oxophytodienoic acid in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiol. 142, 28–39. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.082115
Carella, P., Isaacs, M., and Cameron, R. (2015). Plasmodesmata-located protein overexpression negatively impacts the manifestation of systemic acquired resistance and the long-distance movement of Defective in Induced Resistance1 in Arabidopsis. Plant Biol. 17, 395–401. doi: 10.1111/plb.12234
Carella, P., Merl-Pham, J., Wilson, D. C., Dey, S., Hauck, S. M., Vlot, A. C., et al. (2016). Comparative proteomics analysis of phloem exudates collected during the induction of systemic acquired resistance. Plant Physiol. 171, 1495–1510. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00269
Carvalho, A. P., and Malcata, F. X. (2005). Preparation of fatty acid methyl esters for gas-chromatographic analysis of marine lipids: Insight studies. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53, 5049–5059. doi: 10.1021/jf048788i
Champigny, M. J., Isaacs, M., Carella, P., Faubert, J., Fobert, P. R., and Cameron, R. K. (2013). Long distance movement of DIR1 and investigation of the role of DIR1-like during systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 4:230. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00230
Champigny, M. J., Shearer, H., Mohammad, A., Haines, K., Neumann, M., Thilmony, R., et al. (2011). Localization of DIR1 at the tissue, cellular and subcellular levels during systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis using DIR1: GUS and DIR1: EGFP reporters. BMC Plant Biol. 11:125. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-125
Chan, S. W. (2004). Identification of Mutants in Genes Encoding Arabidopsis acyl-Coenzyme a Binding Proteins ACBP3, ACBP4 and ACBP5. MPhil thesis, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam. doi: 10.5353/th_b3621319.
Chauvin, A., Caldelari, D., Wolfender, J.-L., and Farmer, E. E. (2013). Four 13-lipoxygenases contribute to rapid jasmonate synthesis in wounded Arabidopsis thaliana leaves: a role for lipoxygenase 6 in responses to long-distance wound signals. New Phytol. 197, 566–575. doi: 10.1111/nph.12029
Chen, Q. F., Xiao, S., and Chye, M. L. (2008). Overexpression of the Arabidopsis 10-kilodalton acyl-coenzyme A-binding protein ACBP6 enhances freezing tolerance. Plant Physiol. 148, 304–315. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.123331
Conconi, A., Miquel, M., and Ryan, C. (1996). Intracellular levels of free linolenic and linoleic acids increase in tomato leaves in response to wounding. Plant Physiol. 111, 797–803. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.3.797
Corbesier, L., Vincent, C., Jang, S., Fornara, F., Fan, Q., Searle, I., et al. (2007). FT protein movement contributes to long-distance signaling in floral induction of Arabidopsis. Science 316, 1030–1033. doi: 10.1126/science.1141752
De Boer, A. H., and Volkov, V. (2003). Logistics of water and salt transport through the plant: structure and functioning of the xylem. Plant Cell Environ. 26, 87–101. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00930.x
Deeken, R., Ache, P., Kajahn, I., Klinkenberg, J., Bringmann, G., and Hedrich, R. (2008). Identification of Arabidopsis thaliana phloem RNAs provides a search criterion for phloem-based transcripts hidden in complex datasets of microarray experiments. Plant J. 55, 746–759. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03555.x
Du, Z. Y., Arias, T., Meng, W., and Chye, M.-L. (2016). Plant acyl-CoA-binding proteins: an emerging family involved in plant development and stress responses. Prog. Lipid Res. 63, 165–181. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2016.06.002
Du, Z. Y., Chen, M. X., Chen, Q. F., Xiao, S., and Chye, M. L. (2013). Overexpression of Arabidopsis acyl-CoA-binding protein ACBP2 enhances drought tolerance. Plant Cell Environ. 36, 300–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02574.x
Du, Z. Y., Xiao, S., Chen, Q. F., and Chye, M. L. (2010). Depletion of the membrane-associated acyl-coenzyme A-binding protein ACBP1 enhances the ability of cold acclimation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 152, 1585–1597. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.147066
Franke, R., Briesen, I., Wojciechowski, T., Faust, A., Yephremov, A., Nawrath, C., et al. (2005). Apoplastic polyesters in Arabidopsis surface tissues - a typical suberin and a particular cutin. Phytochemistry 66, 2643–2658. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.09.027
Gao, D. J., Knight, M. R., Trewavas, A. J., Sattelmacher, B., and Plieth, C. (2004). Self-reporting Arabidopsis expressing pH and [Ca2+] indicators unveil ion dynamics in the cytoplasm and in the apoplast under abiotic stress. Plant Physiol. 134, 898–908. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.032508
Glauser, G., Dubugnon, L., Mousavi, S. A. R., Rudaz, S., Wolfender, J. L., and Farmer, E. E. (2009). Velocity estimates for signal propagation leading to systemic jasmonic acid accumulation in wounded Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 34506–34513. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.061432
Glauser, G., Grata, E., Dubugnon, L., Rudaz, S., Farmer, E. E., and Wolfender, J. L. (2008). Spatial and temporal dynamics of jasmonate synthesis and accumulation in Arabidopsis in response to wounding. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 16400–16407. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M801760200
Guelette, B. S., Benning, U. F., and Hoffmann-Benning, S. (2012). Identification of lipids and lipid-binding proteins in phloem exudates from Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 3603–3616. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers028
Hayashi, H., Fukuda, A., Suzui, N., and Fujimaki, S. (2000). Proteins in the sieve element-companion cell complexes: their detection, localization and possible functions. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 27, 489–496. doi: 10.1071/PP99184
His, I., Andeme-Onzighi, C., Morvan, C., and Driouich, A. (2001). Microscopic studies on mature flax fibers embedded in LR white: Immunogold localization of cell wall matrix polysaccharicles. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 49, 1525–1535. doi: 10.1177/002215540104901206
Hisamatsu, Y., Goto, N., Hasegawa, K., and Shigemori, H. (2003). Arabidopsides A and B, two new oxylipins from Arabidopsis thaliana. Tetrahedron Lett. 44, 5553–5556. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(03)01148-1
Hsiao, A. S., Yeung, E. C., Ye, Z. W., and Chye, M. L. (2015). The Arabidopsis cytosolic acyl-CoA-binding proteins play combinatory roles in pollen development. Plant Cell Physiol. 56, 322–333. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu163
Ishiguro, S., Kawai-Oda, A., Ueda, J., Nishida, I., and Okada, K. (2001). The DEFECTIVE IN ANTHER DEHISCENCE1 gene encodes a novel phospholipase A1 catalyzing the initial step of jasmonic acid biosynthesis, which synchronizes pollen maturation, anther dehiscence, and flower opening in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 13, 2191–2209. doi: 10.1105/tpc.13.10.2191
Ishiwatari, Y., Fujiwara, T., McFarland, K., Nemoto, K., Hayashi, H., Chino, M., et al. (1998). Rice phloem thioredoxin h has the capacity to mediate its own cell-to-cell transport through plasmodesmata. Planta 205, 12–22. doi: 10.1007/s004250050291
Kourtchenko, O., Andersson, M. X., Hamberg, M., Brunnstrom, A., Gobel, C., McPhail, K. L., et al. (2007). Oxo-phytodienoic acid-containing galactolipids in Arabidopsis: jasmonate signaling dependence. Plant Physiol. 145, 1658–1669. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.104752
Lascombe, M. B., Bakan, B., Buhot, N., Marion, D., Blein, J. P., Larue, V., et al. (2008). The structure of “defective in induced resistance” protein of Arabidopsis thaliana, DIR1, reveals a new type of lipid transfer protein. Protein Sci. 17, 1522–1530. doi: 10.1110/ps.035972.108
Lee, J. Y., Wang, X., Cui, W., Sager, R., Modla, S., Czymmek, K., et al. (2011). A plasmodesmata-localized protein mediates crosstalk between cell-to-cell communication and innate immunity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 23, 3353–3373. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.087742
Li, L., Li, C., Lee, G. I., and Howe, G. A. (2002). Distinct roles for jasmonate synthesis and action in the systemic wound response of tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 6416–6421. doi: 10.1073/pnas.072072599
Li, Q., Zheng, J., Li, S., Huang, G., Skilling, S. J., Wang, L., et al. (2017). Transporter-mediated nuclear entry of jasmonoyl-isoleucine is essential for jasmonate signaling. Mol. Plant 10, 695–708. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.01.010
Liao, P., Chen, Q. F., and Chye, M. L. (2014). Transgenic Arabidopsis flowers overexpressing acyl-CoA-binding protein ACBP6 are freezing tolerant. Plant Cell Physiol. 55, 1055–1071. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu037
Lin, Y. T., Chen, L. J., Herrfurth, C., Feussner, I., and Li, H. M. (2016). Reduced biosynthesis of digalactosyldiacylglycerol, a major chloroplast membrane lipid, leads to oxylipin overproduction and phloem cap lignification in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 28, 219–232. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.01002
Liu, Y. L., Ahn, J. E., Datta, S., Salzman, R. A., Moon, J., Huyghues-Despointes, B., et al. (2005). Arabidopsis vegetative storage protein is an anti-insect acid phosphatase. Plant Physiol. 139, 1545–1556. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.066837
Lung, S. C., Liao, P., Yeung, E. C., Hsiao, A. S., Xue, Y., and Chye, M. L. (2017). Acyl-CoA-binding protein ACBP1 modulates sterol synthesis during embryogenesis. Plant Physiol. 174, 1420–1435. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00412
Maldonado, A. M., Doerner, P., Dixon, R. A., Lamb, C. J., and Cameron, R. K. (2002). A putative lipid transfer protein involved in systemic resistance signalling in Arabidopsis. Nature 419, 399–403. doi: 10.1038/nature00962
Mathieu, J., Warthmann, N., Kuttner, F., and Schmid, M. (2007). Export of FT protein from phloem companion cells is sufficient for floral induction in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 17, 1055–1060. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.009
Mousavi, S. A. R., Chauvin, A., Pascaud, F., Kellenberger, S., and Farmer, E. E. (2013). GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR-LIKE genes mediate leaf-to-leaf wound signalling. Nature 500, 422–429. doi: 10.1038/nature12478
Nalam, V. J., Keeretaweep, J., Sarowar, S., and Shah, J. (2012). Root-derived oxylipins promote green peach aphid performance on Arabidopsis foliage. Plant Cell 24, 1643–1653. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.094110
Narváez-Vásquez, J., Florin-Christensen, J., and Ryan, C. A. (1999). Positional specificity of a phospholipase A activity induced by wounding, systemin, and oligosaccharide elicitors in tomato leaves. Plant Cell 11, 2249–2260. doi: 10.1105/tpc.11.11.2249
Sanders, P. M., Lee, P. Y., Biesgen, C., Boone, J. D., Beals, T. P., Weiler, E. W., et al. (2000). The Arabidopsis DELAYED DEHISCENCE1 gene encodes an enzyme in the jasmonic acid synthesis pathway. Plant Cell 12, 1041–1061. doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.7.1041
Sato, C., Aikawa, K., Sugiyama, S., Nabeta, K., Masuta, C., and Matsuura, H. (2011). Distal transport of exogenously applied jasmonoyl–isoleucine with wounding stress. Plant Cell Physiol. 52, 509–517. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcr011
Srivastava, A. C., Ganesan, S., Ismail, I. O., and Ayre, B. G. (2008). Functional characterization of the Arabidopsis AtSUC2 sucrose/H+ symporter by tissue-specific complementation reveals an essential role in phloem loading but not in long-distance transport. Plant Physiol. 148, 200–211. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.124776
Stelmach, B. A., Muller, A., Hennig, P., Gebhardt, S., Schubert-Zsilavecz, M., and Weiler, E. W. (2001). A novel class of oxylipins, sn1-O-(12-oxophytodienoyl)-sn2-O-(hexadecatrienoyl)-monogalactosyl diglyceride, from Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 12832–12838. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M010743200
Suzui, N., Nakamura, S., Fujiwara, T., Hayashi, H., and Yoneyama, T. (2006). A putative acyl-CoA-binding protein is a major phloem sap protein in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Exp. Bot. 57, 2571–2576. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erl021
Thorpe, M. R., Ferrieri, A. P., Herth, M. M., and Ferrieri, R. A. (2007). 11C-imaging: methyl jasmonate moves in both phloem and xylem, promotes transport of jasmonate, and of photoassimilate even after proton transport is decoupled. Planta 226, 541–551. doi: 10.1007/s00425-007-0503-5
Turnbull, C. G. N., Booker, J. P., and Leyser, H. M. O. (2002). Micrografting techniques for testing long-distance signalling in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 32, 255–262. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01419.x
Wang, L., Kazachkov, M., Shen, W., Bai, M., Wu, H., and Zou, J. (2014). Deciphering the roles of Arabidopsis LPCAT and PAH in phosphatidylcholine homeostasis and pathway coordination for chloroplast lipid synthesis. Plant J. 80, 965–976. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12683
Warwick, N., Somerville, C., and Slack, C. (1986). Fluxes through the prokaryotic and eukaryotic pathways of lipid synthesis in the ‘16:3’plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochem. J. 235, 25–31. doi: 10.1042/bj2350025
Xia, Y., Yu, K., Gao, Q. M., Wilson, E. V., Navarre, D., Kachroo, P., et al. (2012). Acyl CoA binding proteins are required for cuticle formation and plant responses to microbes. Front. Plant Sci. 3:224. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00224
Xiao, S., and Chye, M. L. (2011a). New roles for acyl-CoA-binding proteins (ACBPs) in plant development, stress responses and lipid metabolism. Prog. Lipid Res. 50, 141–151. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2010.11.002
Xiao, S., and Chye, M. L. (2011b). Overexpression of Arabidopsis ACBP3 enhances NPR1-dependent plant resistance to Pseudomonas syringe pv tomato DC3000. Plant Physiol. 156, 2069–2081. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.176933
Xiao, S., Gao, W., Chen, Q. F., Chan, S. W., Zheng, S. X., Ma, J. Y., et al. (2010). Overexpression of Arabidopsis acyl-CoA binding protein ACBP3 promotes starvation-induced and age-dependent leaf senescence. Plant Cell 22, 1463–1482. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.075333
Xiao, S., Gao, W., Chen, Q. F., Ramalingam, S., and Chye, M. L. (2008). Overexpression of membrane-associated acyl-CoA-binding protein ACBP1 enhances lead tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 54, 141–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03402.x
Xie, L. J., Yu, L. J., Chen, Q. F., Wang, F. Z., Huang, L., Xia, F. N., et al. (2015). Arabidopsis acyl-CoA-binding protein ACBP3 participates in plant response to hypoxia by modulating very-long-chain fatty acid metabolism. Plant J. 81, 53–67. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12692
Xoconostle-Cazares, B., Yu, X., Ruiz-Medrano, R., Wang, H. L., Monzer, J., Yoo, B. C., et al. (1999). Plant paralog to viral movement protein that potentiates transport of mRNA into the phloem. Science 283, 94–98. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5398.94
Xue, Y., Xiao, S., Kim, J., Lung, S. C., Chen, L., Tanner, J. A., et al. (2014). Arabidopsis membrane-associated acyl-CoA-binding protein ACBP1 is involved in stem cuticle formation. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 5473–5483. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru304
Yan, Y. X., Stolz, S., Chetelat, A., Reymond, P., Pagni, M., Dubugnon, L., et al. (2007). A downstream mediator in the growth repression limb of the jasmonate pathway. Plant Cell 19, 2470–2483. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.050708
Ye, Z. W., Chen, Q. F., and Chye, M. L. (2017). Arabidopsis thaliana Acyl-CoA-binding protein ACBP6 interacts with plasmodesmata-located protein PDLP8. Plant Signal. Behav. 12:e1359365. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2017.1359365
Ye, Z. W., Lung, S. C., Hu, T. H., Chen, Q. F., Suen, Y. L., Wang, M., et al. (2016a). Arabidopsis acyl-CoA-binding protein ACBP6 localizes in the phloem and affects jasmonate composition. Plant Mol. Biol. 92, 717–730.
Ye, Z. W., Xu, J., Shi, J., Zhang, D., and Chye, M. L. (2016b). Kelch-motif containing acyl-CoA binding proteins AtACBP4 and AtACBP5 are differentially expressed and function in floral lipid metabolism. Plant Mol. Biol. 93, 209–225. doi: 10.1007/s11103-016-0557-5
Yoo, B. C., Lee, J. Y., and Lucas, W. J. (2002). Analysis of the complexity of protein kinases within the phloem sieve tube system-characterization of Cucurbita maxima calmodulin-like domain protein kinase 1. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 15325–15332. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M200382200
Yurchenko, O. P., Nykiforuk, C. L., Moloney, M. M., Stahl, U., Banas, A., Stymne, S., et al. (2009). A 10-kDa acyl-CoA-binding protein (ACBP) from Brassica napus enhances acyl exchange between acyl-CoA and phosphatidylcholine. Plant Biotechnol. J. 7, 602–610. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00427.x
Zheng, S. X., Xiao, S., and Chye, M. L. (2012). The gene encoding Arabidopsis acyl-CoA-binding protein 3 is pathogen inducible and subject to circadian regulation. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 2985–3000. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers009
Keywords: acyl-CoA esters, fatty acids, linolenic acid, jasmonate, oxylipins, wounding
Citation: Hu T-H, Lung S-C, Ye Z-W and Chye M-L (2018) Depletion of Arabidopsis ACYL-COA-BINDING PROTEIN3 Affects Fatty Acid Composition in the Phloem. Front. Plant Sci. 9:2. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00002
Received: 09 September 2017; Accepted: 03 January 2018;
Published: 25 January 2018.
Edited by:Ján A. Miernyk, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), United States
Reviewed by:Robin K. Cameron, McMaster University, Canada
Kent D. Chapman, University of North Texas, United States
Copyright © 2018 Hu, Lung, Ye and Chye. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mee-Len Chye, email@example.com