Abstract
Male gametogenesis in plants is tightly controlled and involves the complex and precise regulation of transcriptional reprogramming. Interactions between WRKY proteins and VQ motif-containing proteins are required to control these complicated transcriptional networks. However, our understanding of the mechanisms by which these complexes affect downstream gene expression is quite limited. In this study, we found that WRKY2 and WKRY34 repress MYB97, MYB101, and MYB120 expression during male gametogenesis. MYB expression was up-regulated in the wrky2-1 wrky34-1 vq20-1 triple mutant during male gametogenesis. The expression levels of six potential targets of the three MYBs increased the most in the wrky2-1 wrky34-1 vq20-1 triple mutant, followed by the wrky2-1 wrky34-1 double mutant, compared with in wild-type. Yeast one-hybrid and dual luciferase reporter assays indicated that WRKY2 and WRKY34 recognized the MYB97 promoter by binding to its W-boxes. MYB97 overexpression caused defects in pollen germination and pollen tube length, which impacted male fertility. Thus, WRKY2/34–VQ20 complexes appear to negatively regulate the expression of certain MYBs during plant male gametogenesis.
Introduction
In flowering plants, the male gametophyte (pollen) delivers the male gametes (sperm nuclei) to the embryo sac for double fertilization (McCormick, 2004; Berger and Twell, 2011). The male gametophytic life cycle can be divided into two consecutive phases, developmental and progamic (Borg and Twell, 2011). The developmental phase consists of microsporogenesis and microgametogenesis (Sanders et al., 1999). During this phase, the uninucleate microspore undergoes pollen mitosis I to create bicellular pollen containing a large vegetative cell and a generative cell. Then the generative cell generates two sperms after pollen mitosis II (tricellular pollen), which ends with pollen maturation (mature pollen) (McCormick, 2004). The progamic phase initiates after the pollen grain lands on the stigma, and includes pollen germination, pollen tube growth through the transmitting tissue, sperm nuclei discharge into the embryo sac, and finally the fusion of the male and female gametes (Borg et al., 2009; Hafidh et al., 2016). The two phases are highly transcriptionally regulated (Honys and Twell, 2004; Rutley and Twell, 2015); however, little is known regarding the transcription factors involved in the temporal and spatial regulation of pollen development (Ma and Sundaresan, 2010; Berger and Twell, 2011; Hafidh et al., 2016).
The precise and dynamic regulation of male gametogenesis requires the involvement of multiple transcription factors, and the expression of 607 transcription factors was reported in Arabidopsis thaliana during pollen development (Honys and Twell, 2004). For example, three pollen-expressed MYB genes, MYB97, MYB101 and MYB120, encode highly similar amino acid sequences and play crucial roles in controlling the growth of the pollen tube and its interactions with the synergids. MYB97, MYB101, and MYB120 localize in pollen tube nuclei and induce at pollen growth through pistil tissue. The loss of function of these genes does not lead to defects in pollen development, pollen germination, or pollen tube growth, but the pollen tubes fail to burst and release the pollen sperm cells after entering the pistil tissue. Further analyses revealed that the pollen tubes of the myb97 myb101 myb120 triple mutant exhibit uncontrolled growth and fail to discharge the pollen sperm cells because of the altered expression of a suite of pollen tube-expressed genes (Leydon et al., 2013; Liang et al., 2013). However, the mechanisms regulating the expression levels of MYB97, MYB101, and MYB120 during male gametogenesis are still poorly understood.
The WRKY protein superfamily is among the 10 largest families of transcription factors in higher plants, and it controls a plethora of processes, including biotic and abiotic stress responses, and plant development (Chen et al., 2009; Pandey and Somssich, 2009; Rushton et al., 2010; Castrillo et al., 2013). In Arabidopsis, WRKY34 is specifically expressed in the male gametophytes and involved in the early stages of their development (Honys et al., 2006; Guan et al., 2014). We previously have demonstrated that WRKY34 expression is induced significantly by cold treatment in the wild-type. Mature pollen grains of WRKY34 loss-of-function mutant, wrky34-1 (termed w34-1), are more viable than those of wild-type under cold treatment conditions, having increased germination efficiency levels and pollen tube growth rates in plant (Zou et al., 2010). Jiang and Yu (2009) found that the WRKY2 transcription factor plays a critical role in controlling seed germination and post-germination development in an abscisic acid-dependent manner (Jiang and Yu, 2009). Moreover, Guan et al. (2014) reported that WRKY34 is temporarily phosphorylated by MPK3 and MPK6 kinases at the early stages of male gametogenesis. WRKY2, which is closely related to WRKY34, is also expressed in pollen, and it functions redundantly with WRKY34 in pollen development, pollen germination, and pollen tube growth (Guan et al., 2014). A pollen-specific expressed VQ motif-containing protein, VQ20, interacts with WRKY34 and WRKY2 to modulate the function of WRKYs in pollen development. WRKY and VQ20 loss-of-function enhances the defects in pollen development, pollen germination, and pollen tube growth of wrky34 wrky2 double mutant. A microarray analysis indicated that WRKY2, WRKY34, and VQ20 co-modulate multiple genes involved in pollen development, pollen germination, and pollen tube growth (Lei et al., 2017). Nevertheless, the downstream target genes and mechanisms underlying the WRKY2/34–VQ20 mediated processes are still not fully understood.
In this study, WRKY2 and WKRY34 repressed the expression of MYB97, MYB101, and MYB120 during male gametogenesis. MYB expression was up-regulated in the w2-1 w34-1 vq20-1 triple mutant relative to the wild-type during male gametogenesis. WRKY2 and WRKY34 bind to W-boxes in the promoter of MYB97, as revealed by yeast one-hybrid and dual luciferase reporter assays, and overexpression of MYB97 leads to male fertility defects. This study indicated that WRKY2/34–VQ20 complexes control the expression levels of MYBs during male gametogenesis in plants.
Materials and Methods
Materials and Plant Growth Conditions
Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia-0 was used as the wild-type in this study. w34-1 (SALK_133019), w2-1 (Salk_020399), vq20-1 (CS827030), myb97-1 (Salk_112329C), myb101-2 (Salk_149918C), and myb120-3 (SALK_063698C) were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC) and confirmed by PCR using a T-DNA primer and gene-specific primers (Supplementary Table S2). Seeds were surface sterilized and plated on half-strength Murashige and Skoog medium containing 1% sucrose and 0.6% agar. After stratification at 4°C for 3 days, the plates were incubated in an artificial growth chamber at 22°C under a 14-h light/10-h dark photoperiod for 1 week. Arabidopsis seedlings were then transferred to nutrient soil and grown in an artificial growth chamber at 22°C under 14-h light/10-h dark or 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiods.
Transgenic Plants
For the MYB97-overexpressing transgenic plants, the coding region of MYB97 was amplified from Arabidopsis ecotype Columbia-0 using primers that contained BamHI and SalI restriction enzyme sites. PCR fragments were cloned into the vector pOCA28 under the control of a pollen-specific expression gene (AT5G09500) promoter (Honys and Twell, 2004; Winter et al., 2007). Transgenic plants were selected using 50 mg/mL kanamycin. The primers used are listed in Supplementary Table S2.
Isolation of Pollen Grains
Pollen isolation was performed as described previously with some modifications (Honys and Twell, 2003, 2004). To obtain mature pollen, inflorescences collected from over 500 plants were placed in a large plastic pipe. After adding 30 mL of ice-cold 0.3 M mannitol, the flask was shaken vigorously three times for 30 s. The pollen suspension was sequentially filtered through 100- and 53-μm nylon meshes. Pollen grains were concentrated in 1.5-μL Eppendorf tubes by repeated centrifugation steps at 700 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The final compact pollen pellet was stored at -80°C. For the three stages of immature male gametophytes, after collection and concentration, the spores were loaded onto the top of 25%/45%/80% Percoll step gradient in a 10-mL centrifuge tube and centrifuged 450 × g for 5 min at 4°C. Three subfractions of immature pollen were obtained: microspores; microspores and bicellular pollen mixture; and bicellular pollen. Spores in each fraction were concentrated in Eppendorf tubes by centrifugation at 700 × g for 5 min at 4°C and stored at -80°C.
RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from Arabidopsis pollen grains using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and used for oligo (dT)18-primed cDNA synthesis according to the Fermentas’ reverse transcription protocol (Lei et al., 2017). qRT-PCR was then performed using a SYBR Premix Ex Taq kit (Takara) on a Light-Cycler 480 real-time PCR machine (Roche) (Jiang et al., 2014). Three biological replicates of all qRT-PCR amplifications were performed with different pollen grains, and the ACTIN2 gene was used as a control. Student’s t-test was used for the analysis of statistical significance. All primers are listed in Supplementary Table S2.
Yeast One-Hybrid Assay
The yeast one-hybrid assay was performed as described previously with some modifications (Vidal and Legrain, 1999; Ding et al., 2013). Three fragments (PF1, PF2, and PF3) enriched with two adjacent W-boxes and three corresponding mutant fragments (MPF1, MPF2, and MPF3) with mutant W-boxes of the promotor of MYB97 were independently cloned into the pAbAi vector (Clontech). pAbAi constructs were then separately integrated into the genome of the Y1HGold strain by homologous recombination to generate six bait reporter strains. WRKY2- and WRKY34- coding regions were fused to the pGADT7 prey vector (Clontech). For the yeast transformation, pGADT7-WRKY2, pGADT7-WRKY34, and pGADT7 were independently transformed into six bait reporter strains using yeast transformation system (Clontech). Transformations were plated onto SD media (-Leu) to select for transformed cells and incubated at 28°C for 4 days. Large healthy colonies were selected from the transformed and control cells. Each colony was resuspended in 0.9% NaCl, and the OD600 adjusted to ∼0.002. Then, the suspensions were diluted in a 10×series and 100 μL of the dilution series was spread on plates containing SD (-Leu) and SD (-Leu) supplemented with 150 ng/mL Aureobasidin A (AbA) Clontech. The plates were then incubated for 3 days at 28°C.
Transient Expression Assay
In preparation for the assay, the cDNA sequences of WRKY2 and WRKY34 were amplified and independently cloned into pGreenII 62-SK under the control of the 35S promoter to create the effectors (Hellens et al., 2005). At the same time, the cDNA sequence of VQ20 was amplified and cloned into pGreenII62-SK. A 3,062 bp MYB97 promoter and a 3,062 bp mutant MYB97 promoter (MPF1 and MPF3) were amplified and fused respectively into pGreenII 0800-LUC vector to generate reporters (Hellens et al., 2005). The preparation of Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts from wild-type (Col-0) leaves and subsequent transfections were performed as described by Yoo et al. (2007). The effectors and corresponding reporters were cotransformed into prepared Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts to measure firefly luciferase (LUC) and renilla luciferase (REN) activities using a dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega). The relative REN activity was used as an internal control, and LUC/REN ratios were calculated. All of the primers are listed in Supplementary Table S2.
Cytological and Phenotypic Analyses
Siliques and flowers were examined and photographed with a Leica stereoscopic microscope. Pollen viability was examined using fluorescein diacetate (FDA) staining as described in a previous study (Heslop-Harrison and Heslop-Harrison, 1970). Images of Alexander-stained tissues were obtained under bright light, and GFP-tagged tissues were obtained using a fluorescence microscope (Leica, DM2500) (Lei et al., 2017).
Germination Assays of Pollen Grains
Pollen germination was assayed in vitro by placing pollen grains on plates containing germination buffer solidified with low-melting-point agarose as described previously (Fan et al., 2005). The pollen grains spread on the agar plates were cultured immediately at 23°C and 100% relative humidity. After 6 h, the pollen grains were observed and photographed with a Leica microscope. At least 200 pollen grains and 60 pollen tubes were examined per culture and used to calculate the average germination rate and average pollen tube length, respectively, with Image J software.
To assay in vivo pollen germination, emasculated pistils were pollinated as described previously (Ishiguro et al., 2001). The pollinated pistils were collected 8 h after pollination and fixed in ethanol:acetic acid (3:1) for 2 h at room temperature. The fixed pistils were washed three times with distilled water and then maintained in a softening solution of 8 M NaOH overnight. The pistil tissues were subsequently washed in distilled water and stained in aniline blue solution (0.1% aniline blue in 0.1 M K2HPO4-KOH buffer, pH 11) for 4 h in the dark. The stained pistils were observed and photographed with a fluorescence microscope (Leica).
Results
Expression Patterns of WRKY34, WRKY2, and VQ20 Overlap With the Three MYBs During Male Gametogenesis
Our previous results found that theVQ20 interacts with WRKY2 and WKRY34, and the WRKY2–VQ20 and WRKY34–VQ20 interactions affect the transcriptional functions of WRKYs and are required for pollen development (Lei et al., 2017). However, downstream target genes and mechanisms underlying the WRKY2/34–VQ20 mediated during male gametogenesis in plants are unknown. Therefore, we compared our previous wrky2-1 wrky34-1 vq20-1 (w2-1 w34-1 vq20-1) mature pollen microarray data with previously published pollen microarray data (Liang et al., 2013; Lei et al., 2017). We found that six significantly altered genes in the myb97-1 myb101-2 myb120-3 triple mutant (designated as myb97/101/120) showed opposite changes in the w2-1 w34-1 vq20-1 triple mutant (Supplementary Table S1). We then examined the expression patterns of WRKY2, WRKY34, VQ20, MYB97, MYB101, and MYB120 during male gametogenesis using publicly availabe microarray data, and the data indicated that the WRKY34 and VQ20 expression patterns had opposite trends as those of the three MYBs during this process (Supplementary Figure S1). We further confirmed this result using quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR), transcripts of WRKY34 and VQ20 decreased gradually during male gametogenesis and declined markedly in mature pollen, while the expresssion levels of the three MYBs increased gradually through the developmental process and peaked in mature pollen (Figures 1A,B). These contrasting expression patterns prompted us to hypothesize that MYB97, MYB101, and MYB120 are the potential target genes of WRKY34 and WRKY2 during male gametogenesis, and the overlapping expression of WRKY34, WKRY2, VQ20 and the MYBs suggests that WRKY34/2 (VQ20) may regulate MYB transcription during male gametogenesis.
FIGURE 1
WRKY34, WRKY2, and VQ20 Regulate the Expression Levels of MYBs During Male Gametogenesis
To test this hypothesis, we collected mature pollen grains from wild-type, wrky2-1 (w2-1), w34-1, vq20-1, w2-1 w34-1 double mutant, w2-1 w34-1 vq20-1 triple mutant and myb91/101/120 triple mutant plants and examined the expression levels of MYB97, MYB101, and MYB120 using qRT-PCR. qRT-PCR results showed that the single, double, and the triple mutants conferred very different effects on the expression levels of MYB97, MYB101, and MYB120 in mature pollens. The expression levels of MYB97 and MYB120 were up-regulated in the w2-1 w34-1 double mutant and were more significantly increased in the w2-1 w34-1 vq20-1 triple mutant plants (Figure 1C). There was only a slight rise in MYB101 expression in the w2-1 w34-1 double mutant plants and the w2-1 w34-1 vq20-1 triple mutant plants, and no remarkable changes in its expression were observed in the single mutants (Figure 1C). Thus, WRKY34, WKRY2, and VQ20 suppress the expression of MYB97, MYB101, and MYB120. To further detect the influence of WRKY34/2 and VQ20 on MYBs, we examined the temporal expression patterns of the MYBs, revealing that MYB97’s expression level is higher in the w2-1 w34-1 vq20-1 triple mutant plants than in wild-type throughout male gametogenesis (Figure 1D). The expression of MYB120 was significantly higher in the triple mutant than wild-type during the bicellular pollen stage (BCP), tricellular pollen stage (TCP), and in mature pollen grains (MPG), while MYB101 expression was slightly increased in TCP and MPG (Figure 1D). To confirm the regulatory effects of WRKY34/2–VQ20 on the three MYBs during male gametogenesis, we also detected the expression level of eight putative downstream target genes of MYB97/101/120 in the WRKY/VQ single mutants, w2-1 w34-1 double mutant, w2-1 w34-1 vq20-1 triple mutant and myb97/101/120 triple mutant plants. Six out of the eight selected genes were expressed highest in w2-1 w34-1 vq20-1 triple mutant plants, followed by w2-1 w34-1 double mutant plants when compared with the wild-type, whereas they were significantly reduced in myb97/101/120 triple mutant plants (Figure 2). The results verified the changes in the transcript levels of MYB97, MYB10, and MYB120 in the w2-1 w34-1 and w2-1 w34-1 vq20-1 triple mutant plants. Thus, WRKY2, WRKY34, and VQ20 appear to negatively regulate the three MYBs during male gametogenesis.
FIGURE 2
WRKY2 and WRKY34 Directly Bind to the Promoter of MYB97
WRKY proteins regulate the expression levels of downstream target genes by binding directly to W-boxes in their promoters (Eulgem et al., 2000; Zhang and Wang, 2005; Rushton et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2012). Because WRKY2 and WRKY34 repress the expression of MYB97, MYB101, and MYB120 during male gametogenesis, we investigated whether these WRKY transcription factors might directly bind to W-boxes in the MYB promoters. There are 13 W-boxes with TGAC core sequences in the 2.7 kb MYB97 promoter, which harbors three W-boxes groups containing two adjacent W-box. We conducted a yeast one-hybrid assays to test whether the W-box-enriched region of the promotor (containing two adjacent W-boxes) was the binding site for WRKY34 and/or WRKY2. First, we cloned this enriched region into a pBait-AbAi plasmid and generated a bait reporter strain by introducing the construct into the genome of theY1H Gold strain using homologous recombination. We also constructed negative control bait reporter strains that contained, three groups of mutant W-boxes, using the same method (Figure 3A). The associations between WRKY2 (WRKY34) and these three promoter fragments were confirmed by cotransformation on selective media lacking Leu supplemented with, concentrations of up to 150 ng/mL of AbA, which is toxic to yeast at low concentrations was added to the media to suppress background activation (Figure 3B). The bait reporter strains with the natural promoter regions (PF1 and PF3) grew well in the selective media when transformed with WRKY2, but the strains containing the corresponding mutant promoter fragments (MPF1 and MPF3) did not. WRKY34 was able to bind to the PF2 of the MYB97 promoter but not to the corresponding mutant promoter (Figure 3B). The results indicated that WRKY2 and WRKY34 were able to bind these regions in the MYB97 promoter.
FIGURE 3
We then used a dual luciferase reporter in Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts to confirm whether the binding of WRKY2 and WRKY34 to the MYB97 promoter depended on W-boxes. In this assay, WRKY2 and WKRY34 under the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter were used as effectors. The reporter consisted of 35S promoter-driven REN, as an internal control, and LUC driven by either a normal MYB97 promoter (ProMYB97)or a MYB97 promoter with mutated W-boxes (MProMYB97; Figure 4A) (Hellens et al., 2005; Lei et al., 2017). As shown in Figures 4B,C, the transformation of WRKY2 and WRKY34 inhibited the reporter activity driven by the MYB97 promoter, but not the mutant MYB97 promoter, which had mutations in W-boxes s1-s13. The coexpression of VQ20 and WRKY2 (or WRKY34) dramatically attenuated ProMYB97-LUC activity but did not change the ratio of MproMYB97-LUC/REN activity. Thus the region of the MYB97 promoter containing the W-boxes appears to be critical for its interaction with WRKY34 or WKRY2, and that VQ20, as a partner of WRKY2 and WRKY34, assists in WKRY functioning.
FIGURE 4
MYB97 Overexpression Results in Male Fertility Defects
The expression of MYB97 was up-regulated during each phase of male gametogenesis in w2-1 w34-1 vq20-1 compared with the wild-type. To assess the influence of this elevated MYB97 expression on pollen development, we generated 17 MYB97 overexpression lines (namely, MYB97OE) and chose 2 lines (lines #1 and #3) as the representatives. These two MYB97OE lines exhibited reduced fertility and shorter siliques, but most of the vegetative parts appeared normal compared with those of wild-type (Figures 5A–C). To investigate whether MYB97 overexpression affects male or female functions, MYB97-overexpression plants were used as male or female parents in crosses with the wild-type plants (Table 1). When homozygous MYB97-overexpression plants were used as the female parent in a cross with a wild-type plant, the number of seeds per silique was similar to that of the wild-type. In a reciprocal cross, however, only a few ovules in the silique were fertilized and developed into mature seeds (Table 1). To determine the sex-related transmission efficiency of heterozygous MYB97- overexpression lines, a genetic analysis was performed. When the wild-type plants were used as pollen donors in crosses with heterozygous MYB97-overexpression lines, approximately 50% of the resulting progeny having kanamycin resistance (Table 2). In contrast, the number of resulting progeny harboring contained kanamycin resistance was significantly reduced when the wild-type plants were used as recipients in crosses with the heterozygous MYB97-overexpression lines pollen grains (Table 2).
FIGURE 5
Table 1
| Parent (female × male) | Seed set (%) |
|---|---|
| WT × WT | 96.57 ± 1.27 |
| MYB97OE 1 (self) | 5.22 ± 4.78 |
| MYB97OE 1 × WT | 97.51 ± 3.42 |
| WT × MYB97OE 1 | 4.25 ± 3.93 |
| MYB97OE 3 (self) | 3.87 ± 2.86 |
| MYB97OE × WT | 95.46 ± 3.19 |
| WT × MYB97OE | 3.32 ± 2.67 |
MYB97-overexpression lines exhibit male fertility defects.
The statistical analysis of the seed sets was performed in plants 50 days after transplantation into the soil; 30 siliques were examined for each hybrid combination. Bold numbers indicate significant aberrant seed set from the expected.
Table 2
| Parent (female × male) | Kan+ | Kan- | K+:K- | TEF (%) | TEM (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYB97OE 1/- × WT | 132 | 116 | 1.138:1 | 113 | – |
| WT × MYB97OE 1/- | 7 | 255 | 0.027:1 | – | 2.7 |
| MYB97OE 3/- × WT | 171 | 179 | 0.955:1 | 95.5 | – |
| WT × MYB97OE 3/- | 2 | 187 | 0.069:1 | – | 1.0 |
Genetic transmission ratios of MYB97-overexpression heterozygous lines.
Female transmission efficiency (TEF), male transmission efficiency (TEM); not applicable (–). Bold numbers indicate significant aberrant transmission efficiency from the expected ratio of 100%.
To accurately assess pollen development, we performed FDA staining to determine the pollen viability of MYB97-overexpression lines. Many fewer pollen grains of the MYB97-overexpression lines showed FDA fluorescence compared with those of the wild-type (Figure 6B). We further investigated the pollen germination and tube growth of these MYB97-overexpression lines. We hypothesized that the reduced pollen viability may lead to a reduction in pollen germination. As expected, the mean germination ratio and pollen tube length of pollen grains in plants of MYB97-overexpression lines were dramatically lower than those of wild-type plants (Figures 6A,B). Like the pollen phonotype of the w2-1 w34-1 vq20-1 triple mutant plants, MYB97 overexpression lines plants showed male sterility, with defects in pollen germination and pollen tube length. Thus MYB97 overexpression affected male gametophytic functions.
FIGURE 6
Discussion
Gene expression is precisely regulated at the spatiotemporal level during male gametogenesis (Honys and Twell, 2003; Hafidh et al., 2016). During pollen development in Arabidopsis, 607 transcription factor genes are expressed (Honys and Twell, 2004). These genes are regulated precisely by a gene regulatory network. In Arabidopsis, the germline-specific MYB transcription factor DUO POLLEN1 (DUO1) functions in the development of the male germline and in the transcriptional control of a gene regulatory network (Durbarry et al., 2005; Rotman et al., 2005; Borg et al., 2011). DUO1 expression is controlled by transcriptional regulation during male gametophyte development (Peters et al., 2017). MYB97, MYB101, and MYB120 genes function in the later development of male gametophytes (Liang et al., 2013). We found that these MYBs are expressed in tricellular pollen and their expression peaks in mature pollen, while transcripts of WRKY34 and VQ20 decreased gradually during male gametogenesis and were lowest in mature pollen. The expression levels of MYB97 and MYB120 were highest in the w2-1 w34-1 vq20-1 triple mutant plants, followed by the w2-1 w34-1 double mutants. Only a slight rise in MYB101 expression in the w2-1 w34-1 double mutant plants and the w2-1 w34-1 vq20-1 triple mutant plants was observed (Figure 1C). qRT-PCR results demonstrated that six potential downstream target genes of MYB97/101/120 were markedly up-regulated in the w2-1 w34-1 vq20-1 triple mutant. Thus, WRKY2/34–VQ20 may suppress the expression levels of MYB97 and MYB120 and affect their potential downstream target genes during male gametogenesis. WRKY proteins bind directly to W-boxes in the promoters of their target genes (Yang et al., 1999; Yu et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2013; Li et al., 2016). The transient transformation of Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts suggested that WRKY2 and WRKY34 directly bind to the promoter of MYB97 (Figure 4). WRKY2 and WRKY34 directly bind to different fragments of the MYB97 promoter in yeast cells, which suggested that the binding is specific for WRKY2 and WRKY34. Li et al. (2016) showed that the binding of WRKY12 and WRKY13 to disparate regions of the FUL promoter regulates flowering under short-day conditions in Arabidopsis (Li et al., 2016). There are five and seven W-boxes in the 1.8-kb promoters of MYB101 and MYB120, respectively, suggesting that MYB101 and MYB120 may be regulated by WRKY34 and WRKY2, respectively, during male gametogenesis. We provide evidence that VQ20 assists the function of these WRKY transcription factors and collectively regulates MYB97 and MYB120 expression during male gametogenesis.
The uncontrolled regulation of transcriptional factors affects pollen development in Arabidopsis (Rotman et al., 2005; Brownfield et al., 2009; Berger and Twell, 2011). For example, the loss of MIKC∗ MADS transcription factors affects pollen maturation and tube growth, causing defects in male fertility (Verelst et al., 2007a,b; Adamczyk and Fernandez, 2009). WRKY34 expression is up-regulated and MYB97 transcription is down-regulated in agl65-1 agl66-1 agl104-1 triple mutant plants (Verelst et al., 2007a). Pollen tubes of the myb97/101/120 triple mutant exhibited uncontrolled growth and failed to discharge the pollen sperm cells (Leydon et al., 2013; Liang et al., 2013). Mutations of WRKY2, WRKY34 and VQ20 displayed defects in pollen development by influencing the expression levels of multiple genes involved in pollen development, pollen germination and tube growth (Lei et al., 2017). Here, we found that the expression levels of these MYBs were not properly regulated during male gametogenesis in the w2-1 w34-1 vq20-1 triple mutant plants. When MYB97 expression was up-regulated in a wild-type background, these MYB97-overexpression lines had a similar phenotype as the w2-1 w34-1 vq20-1 triple mutant, with defects in pollen viability, pollen germination, and pollen tube length. These results suggested that the uncontrolled regulation of transcriptional factors may affect pollen development in Arabidopsis.
Accession Numbers
Sequence data from this article can be found in the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative or GenBank/EMBL databases under the following accession numbers: WRKY2 (AT5G56270), WRKY34 (AT4G26440), VQ20 (AT3G18360), MYB97 (AT4G26930), MYB101 (AT2G32460), MYB120 (AT5G55020), DUO1 (AT3G60460), AT5G09500, AT3G19690, AT1G69840, AT5G66300, AT1G69840, AT3G19690, AT3G12580, CAP1 (AT4G34490), CAP2 (AT1G01310), CAP2 (AT3G09590), CAP4 (AT5G02730), AGD11 (AT3G07490), PGP9 (AT4G18050), HIR2 (AT1G69840), AGL30 (AT2G03060), AGL65 (AT1G18750), AGL66 (AT1G77980), AGL104 (AT1G22130), and ACTIN2 (AT3G18780).
Statements
Author contributions
DY and RL designed the study. RL and ZM performed the research. RL analyzed the data and wrote the article. DY, RL, and ZM revised the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1202264 and 31171183), and the program for Innovative Research Team of Yunnan Province (2014HC017).
Acknowledgments
We thank the Arabidopsis Resource Center at the Ohio State University for the T-DNA insertion mutants, and Sarah Jose, Ph.D. and Lesley Benyon, Ph.D. for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewers LB and SK and handling Editor declared their shared affiliation.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2018.00331/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AdamczykB. J.FernandezD. E. (2009). MIKC∗ MADS domain heterodimers are required for pollen maturation and tube growth in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol.1491713–1723. 10.1104/pp.109.135806
2
BergerF.TwellD. (2011). Germline specification and function in plants.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.62461–484. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103824
3
BorgM.BrownfieldL.KhatabH.SidorovaA.LingayaM.TwellD. (2011). The R2R3 MYB transcription factor DUO1 activates a male germline-specific regulon essential for sperm cell differentiation in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell23534–549. 10.1105/tpc.110.081059
4
BorgM.BrownfieldL.TwellD. (2009). Male gametophyte development: a molecular perspective.J. Exp. Bot.601465–1478. 10.1093/jxb/ern355
5
BorgM.TwellD. (2011). “Pollen: structure and development,” in eLS (Encyclopedia of Life Sciences), (Chichester: Wiley). Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470015902.a0002039.pub2/figures
6
BrownfieldL.HafidhS.DurbarryA.KhatabH.SidorovaA.DoernerP.et al (2009). Arabidopsis DUO POLLEN3 is a key regulator of male germline development and embryogenesis.Plant Cell211940–1956. 10.1105/tpc.109.066373
7
CastrilloG.Sanchez-BermejoE.De LorenzoL.CrevillenP.Fraile-EscancianoA.TcM.et al (2013). WRKY6 transcription factor restricts arsenate uptake and transposon activation in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell252944–2957. 10.1105/tpc.113.114009
8
ChenL.SongY.LiS.ZhangL.ZouC.YuD. (2012). The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant abiotic stresses.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1819120–128. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.09.002
9
ChenL. G.ZhangL. P.LiD. B.WangF.YuD. Q. (2013). WRKY8 transcription factor functions in the TMV-cg defense response by mediating both abscisic acid and ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.110E1963–E1971. 10.1073/pnas.1221347110
10
ChenY. F.LiL. Q.XuQ.KongY. H.WangH.WuW. H. (2009). The WRKY6 transcription factor modulates PHOSPHATE1 expression in response to low Pi stress in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell213554–3566. 10.1105/tpc.108.064980
11
DingZ. J.YanJ. Y.XuX. Y.LiG. X.ZhengS. J. (2013). WRKY46 functions as a transcriptional repressor of ALMT1, regulating aluminum-induced malate secretion in Arabidopsis.Plant J.76825–835. 10.1111/tpj.12337
12
DurbarryA.VizirI.TwellD. (2005). Male germ line development in Arabidopsis. duo pollen mutants reveal gametophytic regulators of generative cell cycle progression.Plant Physiol.137297–307. 10.1104/pp.104.053165
13
EulgemT.RushtonP. J.RobatzekS.SomssichI. E. (2000). The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors.Trends Plant Sci.5199–206. 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01600-9
14
FanL. M.WangY. F.WangH.WuW. H. (2005). In vitro Arabidopsis pollen germination and characterization of the inward potassium currents in Arabidopsis pollen grain protoplasts.J. Exp. Bot.521603–1614. 10.1093/jexbot/52.361.1603
15
GuanY.MengX.KhannaR.LamontagneE.LiuY.ZhangS. (2014). Phosphorylation of a WRKY transcription factor by MAPKs is required for pollen development and function in Arabidopsis.PLoS Genet.10:e1004384. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004384
16
HafidhS.FilaJ.HonysD. (2016). Male gametophyte development and function in angiosperms: a general concept.Plant Reprod.2931–51. 10.1007/s00497-015-0272-4
17
HellensR. P.AllanA. C.FrielE. N.BolithoK.GraftonK.TempletonM. D.et al (2005). Transient expression vectors for functional genomics, quantification of promoter activity and RNA silencing in plants.Plant Methods1:13. 10.1186/1746-4811-1-13
18
Heslop-HarrisonJ.Heslop-HarrisonY. (1970). Evaluation of pollen viability by enzymatically induced fluorescence; intracellular hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate.Stain Technol.45115–120. 10.3109/10520297009085351
19
HonysD.OhS. A.RenakD.DondersM.SolcovaB.JohnsonJ. A.et al (2006). Identification of microspore-active promoters that allow targeted manipulation of gene expression at early stages of microgametogenesis in Arabidopsis.BMC Plant Biol.6:31. 10.1186/1471-2229-6-31
20
HonysD.TwellD. (2003). Comparative analysis of the Arabidopsis pollen transcriptome.Plant Physiol.132640–652. 10.1104/pp.103.020925
21
HonysD.TwellD. (2004). Transcriptome analysis of haploid male gametophyte development in Arabidopsis.Genome Biol.5:R85.
22
IshiguroS.Kawai-OdaA.UedaJ.NishidaI.OkadaK. (2001). The DEFECTIVE IN ANTHER DEHISCENCE1 gene encodes a novel phospholipase A1 catalyzing the initial step of jasmonic acid biosynthesis, which synchronizes pollen maturation, anther dehiscence, and flower opening in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell132191–2209. 10.1105/tpc.13.10.2191
23
JiangW.YuD. (2009). Arabidopsis WRKY2 transcription factor mediates seed germination and postgermination arrest of development by abscisic acid.BMC Plant Biol.9:96. 10.1186/1471-2229-9-96
24
JiangY.LiangG.YangS.YuD. (2014). Arabidopsis WRKY57 functions as a node of convergence for jasmonic acid–and auxin-mediated signaling in jasmonic acid-induced leaf senescence.Plant Cell26230–245. 10.1105/tpc.113.117838
25
LeiR.LiX.MaZ.LvY.HuY.YuD. (2017). Arabidopsis WRKY2 and WRKY34 transcription factors interact with VQ20 protein to modulate pollen development and function.Plant J.91962–976. 10.1111/tpj.13619
26
LeydonA. R.BealeK. M.WoronieckaK.CastnerE.ChenJ.HorganC.et al (2013). Three MYB transcription factors control pollen tube differentiation required for sperm release.Curr. Biol.231209–1214. 10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.021
27
LiW.WangH. P.YuD. Q. (2016). Arabidopsis WRKY transcription factors WRKY12 and WRKY13 oppositely regulate flowering under short-day conditions.Mol. Plant91492–1503. 10.1016/j.molp.2016.08.003
28
LiangY.TanZ. M.ZhuL.NiuQ. K.ZhouJ. J.LiM.et al (2013). MYB97, MYB101 and MYB120 function as male factors that control pollen tube-synergid interaction in Arabidopsis thaliana fertilization.PLoS Genet.9:e1003933. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003933
29
MaH.SundaresanV. (2010). Development of flowering plant gametophytes.Curr. Top. Dev. Biol.91379–412. 10.1016/S0070-2153(10)91013-2
30
McCormickS. (2004). Control of male gametophyte development.Plant Cell16S142–S153. 10.1105/tpc.016659
31
PandeyS. P.SomssichI. E. (2009). The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant immunity.Plant Physiol.1501648–1655. 10.1104/pp.109.138990
32
PetersB.CaseyJ.AidleyJ.ZohrabS.BorgM.TwellD.et al (2017). A conserved cis-regulatory module determines germline fate through activation of the transcription factor DUO1 promoter.Plant Physiol.173280–293. 10.1104/pp.16.01192
33
RotmanN.DurbarryA.WardleA.YangW. C.ChaboudA.FaureJ. E.et al (2005). A novel class of MYB factors controls sperm-cell formation in plants.Curr. Biol.15244–248. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.013
34
RushtonP. J.SomssichI. E.RinglerP.ShenQ. J. (2010). WRKY transcription factors.Trends Plant Sci.15247–258. 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.02.006
35
RutleyN.TwellD. (2015). A decade of pollen transcriptomics.Plant Reprod.2873–89. 10.1007/s00497-015-0261-7
36
SandersP. M.BuiA. Q.WeteringsK.McintireK. N.HsuY. C.LeeP. Y.et al (1999). Anther developmental defects in Arabidopsis thaliana male-sterile mutants.Sex. Plant Reprod.11297–322. 10.1007/s004970050158
37
VerelstW.SaedlerH.MunsterT. (2007a). MIKC∗ MADS-protein complexes bind motifs enriched in the proximal region of late pollen-specific Arabidopsis promoters.Plant Physiol.143447–460.
38
VerelstW.TwellD.De FolterS.ImminkR.SaedlerH.MunsterT. (2007b). MADS-complexes regulate transcriptome dynamics during pollen maturation.Genome Biol.8:R249.
39
VidalM.LegrainP. (1999). Yeast forward and reverse ‘n’-hybrid systems.Nucleic Acids Res.27919–929. 10.1093/nar/27.4.919
40
WinterD.VinegarB.NahalH.AmmarR.WilsonG. V.ProvartN. J. (2007). An “Electronic Fluorescent Pictograph” browser for exploring and analyzing large-scale biological data sets.PLoS One2:e718. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000718
41
YangP. Z.ChenC. H.WangZ. P.FanB. F.ChenZ. X. (1999). A pathogen- and salicylic acid-induced WRKY DNA-binding activity recognizes the elicitor response element of the tobacco class I chitinase gene promoter.Plant J.18141–149. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00437.x
42
YooS. D.ChoY. H.SheenJ. (2007). Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis.Nat. Protoc.21565–1572. 10.1038/nprot.2007.199
43
YuD.ChenC.ChenZ. (2001). Evidence for an important role of WRKY DNA binding proteins in the regulation of NPR1 gene expression.Plant Cell131527–1540. 10.1105/tpc.13.7.1527
44
ZhangY.WangL. (2005). The WRKY transcription factor superfamily: its origin in eukaryotes and expansion in plants.BMC Evol. Biol.5:1.
45
ZouC.JiangW.YuD. (2010). Male gametophyte-specific WRKY34 transcription factor mediates cold sensitivity of mature pollen in Arabidopsis.J. Exp. Bot.613901–3914. 10.1093/jxb/erq204
Summary
Keywords
WRKY2, WRKY34, MYB97, MYB120, male gametogenesis, Arabidopsis
Citation
Lei R, Ma Z and Yu D (2018) WRKY2/34–VQ20 Modules in Arabidopsis thaliana Negatively Regulate Expression of a Trio of Related MYB Transcription Factors During Pollen Development. Front. Plant Sci. 9:331. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00331
Received
15 August 2017
Accepted
28 February 2018
Published
19 March 2018
Volume
9 - 2018
Edited by
Jo Ann Banks, Purdue University, United States
Reviewed by
Sharon Ann Kessler, Purdue University, United States; Leonor C. Boavida, Purdue University, United States; Neelima Roy Sinha, University of California, Davis, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Lei, Ma and Yu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Diqiu Yu, ydq@xtbg.ac.cn
This article was submitted to Plant Evolution and Development, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.