Impact Factor 4.106 | CiteScore 4.47
More on impact ›

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Plant Sci., 25 February 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00037

Characterization of phoA, a Bacterial Alkaline Phosphatase for Phi Use Efficiency in Rice Plant

  • 1Crop Improvement Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, New Delhi, India
  • 2Department of Biotechnology, Uttarakhand Technical University, Dehradun, India
  • 3Department of Biotechnology, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Engineering and Technology, Pauri Garhwal, India
  • 4National Agricultural Science Fund, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India

Fertilizers and herbicides are two major components in the agriculture system for achieving crop productivity. Massive use of orthophosphate fertilizers and herbicides poses threats to phosphate reserves and aids the evolution of herbicide tolerant weed biotypes. Phosphite (Phi), a phosphate analog, has been proposed as more beneficial than traditionally used phosphate fertilizers and herbicides in the agriculture. We developed phoA overexpressing transgenic rice that minimizes the phosphate loss and contributes to weed management in the agriculture. The phoA rice lines showed improved root, shoot length and total biomass production under phosphite conditions. Additionally, the complete phenotype and productivity of phoA lines under the phosphite treatment attained was similar to that of plants under phosphate sufficient condition. The Phi metabolizing properties of the phoA overexpressed lines improved under the Phi application and phi treatment enabled controlling of weeds without compromising the yield of transgenic rice plants. Our results indicated that phoA alone or in combination with other Phi metabolizing gene(s) can possibly be used as an effective ameliorating system for improving crop plants for phi-based fertilization and weed management strategy in the agriculture.

Introduction

Phosphorus is one of the major essential macronutrients required for the growth of plants. It attributes almost 0.2% of the plant’s dry weight and remains a part of DNA, RNA, phosphoproteins, phospholipids, sugar phosphates, enzymes and energy-rich phosphorus compounds such as ATP and NADP (Schachtman et al., 1998). It also plays an important role in numerous key biochemical reactions, cellular signaling and plant defense mechanisms. Phosphorus consumption has dramatically increased over past two decades to meet the growing agricultural demands. The phosphate-based fertilizers are completely dependent on rock phosphate, which is the non-renewable resource available on the earth. It was estimated that rock phosphate would exhaust in the next 80–400 years if the current consumption rate is maintained (Smil, 2000; Vaccari, 2009; Van Kauwenbergh, 2010). Although 90% of mined rock phosphate is used to make fertilizer, 80% of the applied fertilizer becomes unavailable for plant absorption due to its high reactivity with soil cations (Fe, Ca, Mg) and conversion of unavailable organic forms by soil microbial flora (Syers et al., 2008). The available 20% of applied P-fertilizer in the crop field is not sufficient to meet the expected global productivity and it also leads to excess use of fertilizer. This not only increases the cost of production but also leads to the eutrophication of freshwater bodies around the world (Schindler, 1977; Sharpley et al., 1994).

Inefficient use of P fertilizer in farming further intensified weed problems in the agricultural field, as they compete with the crops for nutrition, space and light and thus reduce agricultural productivity (Buhler, 2002). Weeds limit the crop resources and contribute 31.5% total crop yields loss in India (Bhan et al., 1999), 30–40% rice production in Sri Lanka (Abeysekera Anuruddhika, 2001) and 10 million tons of rice in China annually (Ze, 2001). Herbicides are commonly used to control weeds. However, continuous overuse of herbicides multiple times in a growing season increases the potential risk of evolution of resistant weeds, which has become a major concern in agriculture globally. Further, the higher dose of herbicide additionally causes concern to agricultural land and environment (Owen and Zelaya, 2005; Bhat and Chopra, 2006). About 375 resistant weed biotypes have been identified in different regions of the world against commonly used herbicides (Heap, 2012). Therefore, the inaccessibility of P fertilizer and the emergence resistance biotypes are major challenges in modern agriculture. To overcome these problems, it becomes necessary to find out an alternative route for the development of novel environment-friendly herbicides with a lower risk of evolved resistance.

Phosphite (Phi), even if similar in structure and mobility, cannot be metabolized by plants as a source of phosphate (Sukarno et al., 1993; Carswell et al., 1996; Forster et al., 1998), since it is a phytotoxic compound and inhibits overall plant growth at a higher dose (Achary et al., 2017). Many microorganisms have been identified to catalyze the oxidation of Phi into P and use it as a sole Pi source for plant growth (Ohtake et al., 1996). Studies reveal that in P. stutzeri, WM88 strains utilize Phi as a phosphate source, and the protein was later identified as ‘phosphite dehydrogenase’ (PtxD) and could oxidize Phi into Pi using NAD as a cofactor (Metcalf and Wolfe, 1998; Costas et al., 2001). The ptxD gene was further characterized in the overexpressing transgenic tobacco, Arabidopsis and rice plants which showed the Phi metabolizing characteristics by the transgenic plants as the sole P source for growth and development (Lopez-Arredondo and Herrera-Estrella, 2012; Manna et al., 2016). Recent studies involving E. coli phn mutants identified a BAP (bacterial alkaline phosphatase) enzyme that was involved in Phi oxidation (Yang and Metcalf, 2004). The BAP encoded by the phoA gene harboring Phi metabolizing properties has so far not been utilized in transgenic approaches. The present study is the first report to characterize the phoA gene from E. coli, transform it into rice and study the metabolizing activity using Phi as the sole Pi source for plant growth, development and metabolism.

Materials and Methods

Purification of Recombinant Protein and in vitro Enzyme Activity Assay

The rice codon-optimized phoA gene was chemically synthesized (Life Technologies, United States) along with Nco1 and NotI sites and was cloned into pET28a. The E. Coli BL21 (DE3) harboring the pET28a-phoA recombinant were allowed to grow in liquid LB medium till OD600 and were induced with 1 mM Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 37°C for 4 h. The recombinant protein was purified near to the homogeneity by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography performed at 4°C. The PhoA recombinant protein was confirmed by western blotting using anti-His antibody.

Growth Inhibition Assay of E. coli

The E. Coli BL21 (DE3) containing either phoA gene or empty pET28a(+) was grown separately in 10 ml liquid M9 minimal medium. At absorbance OD600 0.5, induced with 1 mM IPTG and further allowed to grow for 2 h. Following induction for 2hr, varying concentrations of Phi (100, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, and 500 mM) were added in culture media of both empty pET control and pET28a-phoA E. Coli and allowed further growth for 4 h. The cell growth was monitored at 600 mm by measuring the absorbance difference at every 1 h of incubation before and after 4 h of Phi treatment.

Construction of Plant Expression Cassette of phoA

The plant expression cassette of PhoA gene (OsAct2-P+phoA+OsAct2-T) was constructed under the regulation of OsAct2 promoter and OsAct2 terminator from the Japonica rice variety Nipponbare and cloned initially in a Gateway compatible entry vector (pL12R34-Amp). The phoA expression cassette was transferred into plant transformation vector pMDC99 (contains hpt+ gene as plant selection marker) using LR recombinase mediated gateway cloning process.

Generation and Screening of Transgenic Plants

The Agrobacterium EHA105 harboring the recombinant pMDC99-phoA clone were used for plant transformation and all the plant tissue culture steps were performed in the CHU N6 media. The transformation was performed by immersing 21 day old embryogenic calli in the Agrobacterium culture (0.5 OD600) in the presence of 200 μM acetosyringone. The culture was incubated for 20–25 min on a rotator shaker at 50 rpm in the dark at 28°C. Following transformation, the infected calli were dried on Whatman filter paper and transferred to the co-cultivation medium and incubated at 28°C for 48 h. The calli were washed 6–8 times with 62.5 mg/L carbenicillin, 250 mg/L cefotaxime in sterile distilled water, dried on Whatman filter paper and transferred onto selection medium containing 50 mg/L hygromycin. After three rounds of selection with hygromycin for 30 days, the healthy secondary calli were shifted to pre-regeneration media containing 1 mg/L NAA, 2 mg/L kinetin, and 50 mg/L hygromycin for 10 days, and further transferred to regeneration media for the development of shoot for 30 days. The young regenerated shoots were transferred into half-strength MS medium for rooting and followed by hardening under greenhouse condition.

Molecular Conformation and Identification of Transgenic Lines

Genomic DNA was isolated from putative transgenic and wild-type (wt) plants by CTAB method (Dellaporta et al., 1983) and initially screened for the presence of phoA with the help of PCR using sequence-specific phoA primers (Supplementary Table S1). The PCR conditions performed using 200 ng genomic DNA with initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min; 30 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 58°C for 30 s, 72°C for 1 min, and the final extension at 72°C for 10 min.

The PCR positive transgenic lines were further confirmed by Southern blotting using 10 μg RNAse treated pure genomic DNA from wt and transgenic lines. The Genomic DNA was separately digested with Bcl1 restriction enzyme and the restricted DNA fragments were electrophoresed on 0.8% agarose gel for 18 h at 30 V and subsequently transferred to a positively charged nylon membrane using the capillary method. The membrane was sequentially hybridized with phoA DIG-labeled gene probe and proceed for hybridization and post-hybridization and signal detection following manufacturer’s instruction (Roche Diagnostics, Germany).

Transgenic Expression Analysis of phoA Gene

The expression analysis of the phoA gene was performed by extracting total mRNA from 30 days old control and transgenic plants using the TriZol method. The fomide-formaldehyde heat denatured 15 μg total RNA from rice line were fractionated on 1% formaldehyde-denaturing agarose gel and subsequently transferred onto a positive nylon membrane. The hybridization probe was synthesized from phoA coding region (660bp) was amplified by using primers specific to phoA. All further steps, including membrane washing and detection, were followed according to the supplier’s instructions (Roche Diagnostics, Germany).

The expression of phoA transgene was performed semi-quantitative real-time PCR (semi-quantitative RT-PCR) using gene-specific primers (Supplementary Table S1). A total of 1 μg RNA from control and transgenic lines were used for the synthesis of cDNA fragment using Verso cDNA synthesis kit. The PCR conditions performed with an initial denaturation 94°C for 1 min, 58°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min for 30 cycles with initial denaturation at 94°C for 4 min using phoA gene-specific primers. The expression of the house-keeping rice eF-1α gene was used as the internal standard control.

Seed Germination and Comparative in vitro Growth Analysis Under Phi Treatment

Fortnight old Japonica rice seedlings were (grown in pots) foliar sprayed with different concentrations of potassium phosphite (0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, and 500 mM) containing 0.1% tween 20 and allowed to grow further under the controlled greenhouse conditions. The plant growth was photographed with different day intervals (on day 4th, 7th, and 14th).

To study the ability of transgenic rice to utilize Phi as a sole phosphorus source, seeds from both wt and T3 homozygous transgenic lines were surfaced, sterilized and germinated on half strength MS medium with and without 10 mM Phi and grown for 15 days under controlled conditions (25°C, 12:12 hr light/dark cycle). Seeds of wt plants that were grown in identical conditions with and without Phi served as positive [wt(+)] and negative [wt(-)] controls, respectively. Root length, shoot length and seedling biomass was measured after 18 days of seed germination, and photographed. The root architecture and leaf greenness were observed under the stereo zoom microscope (Model: Carl Zeiss SteREO Discovery.V8) using the 1X objective lens with 45% zooming.

To determine the level of tolerance of transgenic lines to Phi concentrations, the surface sterilized wt seeds and transgenic lines were grown on half strength MS media containing different concentrations of Phi 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 mM for 15 days in Petri plates under a growth chamber with a 12–12 light-dark cycle at 25°C.

Assessment of Herbicidal Effects of Phi on Weed and Transgenic Rice

To determine the herbicide effect of Phi on the non-transgenic plant, 100 mM potassium phosphite containing 0.1% tween 20 was used for the foliar application. Transgenic lines and wt along with weeds (Phyllanthus urinaria, Portulaca oleracea, and Amaranthus sp.) were grown parallelly in the treatment tray containing soil and vermiculite mixture (2:5) for 1 month. One-month-old plants were sprayed with foliar application of Phi solution. The spraying was performed three times with an interval of 3 days between each spray and regularly photographed/recorded.

Yield Analysis and Data Collection

The yield related experiments and phoA-transgenic plants evaluation were conducted in greenhouse conditions (14/10 h light/dark cycle illumination at 370 μEm-2 S-1 and 27 ± 1°C with 70% relative humidity) with proper biosafety levels. The yield parameters such as plant height, number of tillers per plant, panicle length, seed weight, number of seeds per panicle, 100 seed weight and total yield were recorded at the maturity stage of plant. A total 15 plants from each group were used for measurements and data collection. The pooled data were subjected to statistical analysis.

Statistical Analysis

The quantitative experiments (Figures 1D, 4–8) were performed in duplicate or triplicate with biological replications (n). Pooled data were statistically analyzed for analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a least significant difference (LSD) test.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Recombinant protein expression and bacterial growth inhibition assay. (A) Heterologous expression of phoA (B) IPTG induction and purification of recombinant phoA protein by Ni-NTA method. (C) Western blotting confirms the expression of phoA protein in the eluted fractions. (D) Effect of various concentration of Phi on growth percentage of overexpression pET-phoA and empty-pET E. coli cells. Increase significant compared to pET empty control cells p ≤ 0.01 (∗∗). The experiment having four biological replications was repeated thrice (n = 12).

Results

Efficient Metabolization of Phi as Source of Phosphorus by E. coli

The phoA protein was initially functionally validated in the heterologous overexpressing E. coli system using M9 minimal media along with the increased phi concentrations (100–500 mM) as the sole phosphorus source. The growth of phoA over-expressing and empty pET28a (+) E. coli cells were decreased significantly (p ≤ 0.01) as compared to corresponding untreated cells at concentrations 100 mM and above (Figure 1D). Furthermore, the growth of phoA overexpression cells were significantly (p ≤ 0.01) higher compared to empty control cells along with all the Phi treatment concentrations. In addition to the above fact, the overexpressing PhoA cells also showed a significant (p ≤ 0.01) survival rate compared to pET control empty cells within the individual treatment group.

To monitor the kinetic properties of the phoA protein, the phoA gene was over-expressed with the pET28a (+) system and the recombinant phoA protein was purified near to homogeneity following Ni-NTA based affinity chromatography. The recombinant phoA was electrophorized and visualized on a 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) polyacrylamide gel and western blotting, which corresponded to 49.5 kDa protein (Figures 1A–C).

Generation of Transgenic Rice Lines and Molecular Analysis

The codon-optimized 1416 bp phoA gene from E. coli was used by replacing rare codon for higher level expression in rice (Supplementary Figure S1). The synthetic phoA gene was cloned between the constitutive OsAct2 promoter and OsAct2 terminator in EV-1 and the plant expression cassette was cloned into pMDC99 plant transformation vector (Figures 2A,B). The Agrobacterium EHA105 strain carrying the recombinant pMDC99-phoA expression cassette was transferred into Japonica rice cultivar var Nipponbare (Figure 2C). Following the rice tissue culture protocol, a total of 32 putative rice transgenic lines were generated. The putative transgenic lines were initially screened for the integration of phoA gene and the PCR positive lines (Figure 3A) were germinated on hygromycin and allowed multiplication up to T3 generation. The T3 homozygous transgenic line along with wt plant was subjected to Southern analysis to identify the independent transgenic event along with the transgene copy number.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Construction of phoA expression cassette and plant transformation. (A) Schematic representation of full expression cassette of phoA gene. (B) Restriction digestion confirmation of Act2 promoter, phoA gene and Act2 terminator in pMDC99. (C) Various stages of plant tissue culture method for the generation of transgenics plant.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Molecular analysis of transgenic lines overexpressing phoA. (A) PCR amplification of bacterial alkaline phosphatase (phoA) gene using gene-specific primers; wt indicates wild-type; +Ve and –Ve represents positive plasmid and negative control; T0 transgenic lines L1-L09. (B) Southern blot analysis of ten T2 transgenic lines showing single and multiple copy insertion of the transgene. (C,D) Semiquantitative RT-PCR and northern blotting showing overexpression of transgenic lines (L2, L3, and L10) as compared to wt. The rice eEF-1α used as a reference control for RNA.

All the (L1-L10) transgenic lines showed one or more hybridization bands, however, there was no southern positive band in the wt control plant (Figure 3B). The three-independent and single transgene integrated lines (L2, L3, and L10) were selected for their expression study by semi-quantitative RT-PCR and northern analysis (Figures 3C,D). All the selected lines showed expression level of phoA gene while there was no expression found in the control wt plant (Figures 3C,D). Furthermore, among the transgenic lines, the L2 showed a relatively high level of transgene expression followed by L3 and L10 lines.

Effect of Varying Concentration of Phi on phoA Transgenic Rice

In order to standardize the toxic concentration of Phi on wt rice seedlings, 14 days old rice seedlings were foliar sprayed with 50–500 mM potassium phosphite (Figure 4). The wt control plants without Phi spray appear normal, whereas plants sprayed with Phi showed symptoms of leaf chlorosis and the symptom appeared at 50 mM and further Phi concentrations. The intensity of chlorosis was dose-dependent and was increased with higher concentrations of Phi. The present study revealed that 50 mM Phi is the optimum and beyond this concentration, seedlings completely die within 14 days of spraying (Figure 4).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Evaluation of phytotoxicity of Phi on wt rice seedling. Fortnight old wt rice seedlings were foliar sprayed with a range of Phi concentration 50–500 mM. The symptom was photographed on 4nd, 7th, and 14th days after spray. The experiment having three biological replications was repeated twice (n = 6).

The Phi metabolizing properties of phoA transgenic rice were evaluated by germinating rice seed from wt and phoA transgenic lines (L2, L3, and L10) on phosphate-free half MS medium supplemented with varying concentrations of potassium phosphite (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 mM). Here we observed that with the increased Phi concentration, wt plants showed a negative effect on the root growth and architecture that followed a dose-dependent phenotype (P ≤ 0.01) at 10 mM and higher concentrations. However, the root growth of transgenic lines showed normal root morphology up to 15 mM Phi concentration and was marginally inhibited at 20 mM. (Figures 5A,B). Similarly, the shoot development was significantly reduced (P ≤ 0.01) in wt plants at 15 mM Phi, whereas transgenic plants showed normal phenotype at 15 mM and no effect up to 20 mM Phi concentration. The results indicate the effective metabolizing properties of Phi by the phoA-transgenic lines used as a sole phosphorus source in this experimental condition and showed comparatively improved root and shoot length and total biomass production at each of the given concentrations compared to wt control plant (Supplementary Figure S2).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Effects of Phi treatment on root morphology of wt and phoA transgenic lines. (A) The growth of wt and transgenic lines on varying concentration of Phi (5–20 mM). The wt and transgenic lines were continuously grown for 12 days on half MS medium containing Phi, deficient in Pi. (B) Comparison of root hair or root formation in wt and transgenic lines. The experiment having three biological replications was repeated twice (n = 6).

In order to assess the response and identification of the best transgenic events, selected phoA transgenic lines were separately germinated on 10 mM Phi containing phosphate free half the strength of MS medium along with wt control seeds for 20 days (Figure 6A). A similar set of experiments were conducted using 10 mM Pi containing half the strength of MS medium as a reference or positive control. No significant morphological difference between the L2, L3 and L10 transgenic events were observed in the Pi germination media, which were comparable to that of wt control (Figure 6B). In contrast to the Pi treatment, wt plants showed leaf chlorosis, stunted root-shoot growth and reduced biomass in Phi growth medium (Figure 6A). On the other hand, the transgenic lines with overexpressed phoA effectively metabolize Phi as P source without affecting the plant growth and development, and showed significantly (P ≤ 0.01) higher root-shoot length and higher biomass compared to wt control plants (Figures 6A–C).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Seedling morphology of transgenic rice lines under Phi and Pi condition. (A) Comparative growth morphology of wt and transgenic lines under Phi condition. The growth of wt and T3 phoA lines in half MS medium supplemented with 10mM Phi, deficient in Pi. (B) Transgenic and wt seeds were grown in half MS medium containing Pi, without phi. (C) Comparative analysis of root-shoot length (cm) and fresh weight (mg) of wt and transgenic lines grown under Phi condition. Increase significant compared to control p ≤ 0.05 () or 0.01 (∗∗). Data represent mean ± standard deviation (n = 9). The experiment having three biological replications was repeated thrice.

Herbicidal Effect of Phi on Weeds-Transgenic Crop Competition and Yield Penalty in the Transgenic Lines

Weeds compete parallelly with crop plants in the crop field and increase production and processing costs. To determine the effect of Phi as a post emergence herbicide, a 1-month-old wt plant, phoA transgenic lines L2, L3 and L10 along with weeds (Phyllanthus urinaria, Portulaca oleracea and Amaranthus sp.) were foliar sprayed with 100 mM potassium phosphite (Figure 7A). The initial symptoms of leaf chlorosis were seen after the fourth day of foliar spray and it started from the leaf tips in wt control rice. Clear visible symptoms of leaf chlorosis were observed in the wt plants which were absent in the transgenic lines. Further, among the weeds Phyllanthus urinaria died quickly on day 3 of Phi spray, followed by Amaranthus. However, application of Phi at this concentration has a moderate effect on Portulaca oleracea, which survived even after the third round of foliar spray. This could be due to the difference in physiological and/or morphological tolerance among the weed biotype. Phi acts as a toxic compound and its effects are systematic in nature, which is well documented and demonstrated in many crop plants. Similar instances of systematic chlorosis that spread over the whole leaf were observed during the present study on weeds and wt control plants (Figure 7B). This also gives a confidence that Phi can be utilized as a post-emergent herbicide to kill or suppress weed growth.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Effect of Phi on wt plant, phoA transgenic line and weed population. Post-emergent herbicide effect of Phi. The Figure represents the before (A) and after (B) spray of Phi on wt (1), weeds [Phyllanthus urinaria (2), Amaranthus sp (6) and Portulaca oleracea (7) and transgenic lines L2 (3), L3 (4) and L10 (5). The experiment having four biological replications was repeated twice (n = 8).

To assess the yield penalty of wt and phoA-transgenic lines, the 1-month-old rice seedlings were sprayed with 100 mM potassium phosphite thrice with an interval of 3 days and the plants were allowed to grow until maturity under controlled greenhouse conditions (Figures 8A,B). No visible morphological differences were observed between the transgenic lines on Phi application and showed normal plant growth and stay-green in nature comparable to wt(-) control plant. However, the wt plants were able to survive, but showed overall stunted growth and leaf chlorosis. The transgenic lines showed normal morphology including plant height, number of panicles per plant, panicle length, and 100-grain weight (Table 1). The above yield contributing traits were highly influenced and got reduced in the wt(+) plant on Phi treatment. No significant variations were observed among the transgenic lines for the yield contributing traits. The study clearly demonstrated that Phi acts as a post emerging herbicide by significantly suppressing the non-transgenic plants.

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. Effects of Phi on yield. (A,B) The phenotype difference of wt and transgenic lines before and after foliar application Phi 100 mM. (C) Yield parameters and penicle phenotype of wt and phoA transgenic lines under Phi application. The experiment having five biological replications was repeated thrice (n = 15).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Yield of wt and phoA transgenic lines under control and Phi treated conditions.

Discussion

Phosphorus is one of the major macronutrients, the scarcity of which directly affects crop health and agricultural productivity. It is a non-renewable resource, expected to exhaust in the near future due to the overuse of phosphate-based fertilizers. The decline in reserves of rock phosphorus is a major global concern due to its high consumption rate in agriculture. Looking to the issue of resistance due to the application of herbicides and cost to the environment, an alternate strategy is required to overcome the problem, without compromising crop productivity. More than two-thirds of the phosphorus applied is not utilized by the plant. They are either locked-up with soil particles or move into water bodies, affecting the soil, health and environment. The efforts to improve phosphorus use efficiency had little success for crop productivity. Phosphite, an alternate structural form of inorganic phosphate cannot be metabolized by plants since plants do not have a mechanism for its metabolism. Recently, Lopez-Arredondo and colleagues (Lopez-Arredondo and Herrera-Estrella, 2012) and Manna et al. (2016) have shown the use of phosphite as a sole phosphorus source by the overexpression of the Phosphite dehydrogenase gene from Pseudomonas stutzeri in transgenic plants (Lopez-Arredondo and Herrera-Estrella, 2012; Manna et al., 2016). Similarly, the bacterium E. coli possesses two different mechanisms to oxidize phosphite into inorganic phosphate. The enzyme C-P lyase is one of the mechanisms consisting of 14-gene phn operon and the second mechanism involves phoA locus, which encodes bacterial alkaline phosphatase (BAP). In E. coli, under phosphate-limiting conditions, it acts as an inorganic phosphate scavenger, releasing inorganic phosphate from the phosphate-esters of the external medium. However, studies revealed that purified BAP catalyzes the conversion of phosphite to phosphate and molecular H2. BAP is a phosphite dependent hydrogenase, located in periplasmic space in E. coli, that involves a direct transfer of a hydride from the substrate to water derived protons converts Phi to Pi (Kechao and William, 2004).

The present study involves overexpression of phoA gene of E. coli in Japonica rice cultivar for functionally validating the Phi use efficiency of the transgenic rice plants. For being a non-metabolizable form of P and plant’s quick uptake and distribution throughout the system, Phi interferes with the Pi metabolism pathway and suppresses the expression of starvation-induced genes including acid phosphatases (Carswell et al., 1997; Ticconi et al., 2001). Such behavior of Phi can be harnessed for utilising it as a herbicide. Moreover, phoA mediated detoxification of Phi will render it’s use as an alternative form of P fertilizer for the cultivation of transgenic rice. The accumulated Phi in the plant interferes with those biochemical pathways which use Pi as one of their substrates thus misleading the Pi-sensing mechaniary of the plants. Attenuation of Pi-starvation response further creates phosphate starvation situation inside the plants leading to phytotoxicity and suppression of plant growth (Carswell et al., 1997). Similar findings were observed in the 15 days-old seedlings sprayed with 50 mM Phi that showed optimum growth. However, the concentrations beyond this affected the survival of the plants in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 4). Similarly, Phi was found to negatively affect the growth of spinach plants, the shoot dry weight was found to decrease along with an increased Phi concentration (Thao et al., 2008a). Experiments with Brassica rapa var Peruviridis also yielded similar results (Thao et al., 2008b). Hirosse et al. (2012) found that the increase in the dose of Phi resulted in decreased growth, length and dry weight of sweet potato (Hirosse et al., 2012).

The codon-optimized phoA gene was overexpressed under the control of Act2 constitutive promoter. We have generated 25 independent phoA-overexpression transgenic events, of which L2, L3, and L10 showed single transgene integration (Figure 3B). The success of crop biotechnology lies with the tissue-specific and high-level transgene expression. Rice Act2 promoter has been proven as an efficient promoter in many monocot plants (Chengkun et al., 2009). The phoA transgenic rice showed normal root morphology and shoot phenotype at 10 mM Phi treatment. The result indicates the effective metabolizing properties of Phi by the phoA-transgenic lines used as a sole source of phosphorus and showed comparatively improved and higher root, shoot length and total biomass compared to wt control plant. The root, shoot and biomass of transgenic lines were significantly higher than wt plant. On the other hand, wt plant showed leaf chlorosis, stunted root-shoot growth (Figure 6). The similar morphological changes were witnessed due to the negative effect of Phi on the growth of onion, tomato, B. nigra and Arabidopsis (Sukarno et al., 1993; Carswell et al., 1996, 1997; Forster et al., 1998). Manna et al. (2016) showed that 25 mM sodium Phi concentration severely affects the root to shoot ratio of wt rice seedling. Our results demonstrated that phoA transgenic plants had overall improved physiology and phenotype compared to the wt rice plants when supplemented with Phi as the sole source of P. This indicated that phoA transgenic plants were able to metabolize Phi to Pi and use it as a P source. Therefore, phoA can be a good candidate gene for the development of a transgenic plant that utilizes Phi as a sole Pi source for its growth and development.

In order to meet the growing demand for food, a large quantity of P fertilizers have been used in agriculture globally. More than 80% of the unavailable Pi fertilizer get washed away ultimately into ocean water bodies which cannot be recovered or recycled. This not only damages the water ecosystem through eutrophication but also raises alarming P scarcity concerns in near future. Moreover, excess applied Pi fertilizer aggravates weed problems in agriculture competing for P nutrient with crop plant. Chemical based herbicide has been extensively applied in the past few decades to control or kill various weed populations in agriculture. Continuous and excess application of the same herbicide builds selection pressure on weed that leads to the evolution of a large number of herbicide-resistant superweeds. Furthermore, chemical herbicide damages both the environment and human health (Van Bruggen et al., 2018). The other mechanism by which weeds escape from the herbicidal activity is by reduced herbicide uptake or sequestering herbicide into subcellular compartments. Phi application on plants fails to stimulate phosphate starvation responses (PSRs) that leads to break the sense of Pi deficiency mechanism and produce phytotoxicity symptoms. Phi being phytotoxic in nature, can be greatly explored as weedicide since the normal plant cannot metabolize it. With an objective to roll-out use of Phi as weed control strategies, we demonstrated that Phi suppresses the growth of weed population effectively (Figure 8). A similar observation has been reported in earlier studies in the ptxD overexpressing transgenic lines (Lopez-Arredondo and Herrera-Estrella, 2012; Manna et al., 2016). The present finding underscored the role of the phoA gene and the use of Phi as a weed control strategy to suppress various harmful weeds in agriculture and add benefits to phoA transgenic lines. Furthermore, the strategy checks huge phosphorus loss, keeping the environment clean and reducing the burden of additional herbicide application in the field. Phi has dual advantage over conventional herbicide as Phi absorbs and transports into plants that cannot avoid its uptake and, secondly, to develop resistance against Phi, an extra gene in required in the weed genome to metabolize Phi, which may take several generations to accumulate.

Furthermore, the Phi application showed advantages in phoA-transgenic lines with no morphological difference recorded and the transgenic plants showed normal plant growth and physiology. The transgenic lines showed normal growth including plant height, number of panicles per plant, panicle length and 100-grain weight without compromising the yield potential of the plant. An earlier study in the overexpression ptxD transgenic lines showed that about 30–50% less Phi is required to attain similar productivity to that obtained by the same plants using Pi based fertilizer (Lopez-Arredondo and Herrera-Estrella, 2012). A similar observation has also been reported by Manna et al. in the overexpression ptxD rice transgenic lines (Lopez-Arredondo and Herrera-Estrella, 2012). Thus, there is a technical possibility to economize P use in actual field conditions.

Conclusion

The above results clearly suggest that transgenic overexpressed phoA effectively utilizes Phi as a P source without compromising plant growth and development. The phoA transgenic showed a double advantage to check the overuse of ortho-phosphate based fertilizer and keep water bodies clean. Moreover, Phi based fertilization controls a variety of the weed population that leads to an advantage to the crops as well as the farmers to stop the additional herbicide use. Phi, being an excellent fungicide, has been used in many parts of the world to suppress and kill fungus pathogens which damage crop plants and this provides an additional advantage in Phi technology. To conclude, Phi based agriculture technology can not only be used as an alternative to ortho phosphorus based fertilization, but at the same time, can also act as a weedicide and a fungicide to control fungal pathogens in the agriculture field.

Author Contributions

BR and VA developed the plant expression cassette. BR, DF, VS, BB, RY, AB, and PV involved in plant tissue culture and helped in molecular analysis of transgenic plant. BR, VA, and DJ carried out all physiological experiments. MR and PA conceived the presented idea. VA and BR designed all the experiments, critically analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Agricultural Science Fund, ICAR, to MR.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

VA thanks SERB, India, for awarding the NPDF is duly acknowledged.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.00037/full#supplementary-material

FIGURE S1 | The coding sequence of codon optimized phoA gene from E. coli.

FIGURE S2 | Seedling morphology of wt and phoA transgenic lines under different Phi applications.

TABLE S1 | List of primers used for making phoA plant expression cassette, cloning into the protein expression vector system, validation of transgenic plant by PCR and expression analysis.

References

Abeysekera Anuruddhika, S. K. (2001). Management of Echinochloa spp. in rice in Sri Lanka. Paper Presented at the FAO Workshop on Echinochloa spp. Control, Beijing, 13.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Achary, V. M. M., Ram, B., Manna, M., Datta, D., Bhatt, A., Reddy, M. K., et al. (2017). Phosphite: a novel P fertilizer for weed management and pathogen control. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15, 1493–1508. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12803

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bhan, V. M., Sushil, K., and Raghuwanshi, M. S. (1999). Weed management in India. Indian J. Plant Prot. 17, 71–202.

Google Scholar

Bhat, S. R., and Chopra, V. L. (2006). Choice of technology for herbicide resistant transgenic crops in India: examination of issues. Curr. Sci. 91, 435–438.

Google Scholar

Buhler, D. D. (2002). Challenges and opportunities for integrated weed management. Weed Sci. 50, 273–280. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01537

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carswell, C., Grant, B. R., Theodorou, M. E., Harris, J., Niere, J. O., and Plaxton, W. C. (1996). The fungicide phosphonate disrupts the phosphate starvation response in Brassica nigra seedlings. Plant Physiol. 110, 105–110. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.1.105

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carswell, M. C., Grant, B. R., and Plaxton, W. C. (1997). Disruption of the phosphate-starvation response of oilseed rape suspension cells by the fungicide phosphonate. Planta 203, 67–74. doi: 10.1007/s00050166

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chengkun, H., Zhihong, L., David, M., and Ray, W. (2009). Identification of a rice Actin2 gene regulatory region for high-level expression of transgenes in monocots. Plant Biotechnol. J. 7, 227–239. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00393.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Costas, A. M., White, A. K., and Metcalf, W. W. (2001). Purification and characterization of a novel Phosphorus-oxidising enzyme from Pseudomonas stutzeri WM88. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 17429–17436. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M011764200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dellaporta, S. L., Wood, J., and Hicks, J. B. (1983). A plant DNA minipreparation: Version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1, 19–21. doi: 10.1007/BF02712670

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Forster, H., Adaskaveg, J. E., Kim, D. H., and Stanghellini, M. E. (1998). Effect of phosphite on tomato and pepper plants and on susceptibility of pepper to Phytophthora root and crown rot in hydroponic culture. Plant Dis. 82, 1165–1170. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.10.1165

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heap, I. M. (2012). International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Available at: http://www.weedscience.org

Google Scholar

Hirosse, E. H., Creste, J. E., Custodio, C. C., and Machado-Neto, N. B. (2012). In vitro growth of sweet potato fed with potassium phosphite. Acta Sci. Agron. 34, 85–91. doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v34i1.10810

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kechao, Y., and William, W. M. (2004). A new activity for an old enzyme: Escherichia coli bacterial alkaline phosphatase is a phosphite-dependent hydrogenase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 7919–7924. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400664101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lopez-Arredondo, D. L., and Herrera-Estrella, L. (2012). Engineering phosphorus metabolism in plants to produce a dual fertilization and weed control system. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 889–893. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2346

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Manna, M., Achary, V. M. M., Islam, T., Agrawal, P. K., and Reddy, M. K. (2016). The development of a phosphite-mediated fertilization and weed control system for rice. Sci. Rep. 6:24941. doi: 10.1038/srep24941

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Metcalf, W. W., and Wolfe, R. S. (1998). Molecular genetic analysis of phosphite and hypophosphite oxidation by Pseudomonas stutzeri WM88. J. Bacteriol. 180, 5547–5558.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Ohtake, H., Wu, H., Imazu, K., Anbe, Y., Kato, J., and Kuroda, A. (1996). Bacterial phosphonate degradation, phosphite oxidation and polyphosphate accumulation. Res. Cons. Recy. 18, 125–134. doi: 10.1016/S0921-3449(96)01173-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Owen, M. D. K., and Zelaya, I. A. (2005). Herbicide-resistance crops and weed resistance to herbicides. Pest. Manag. Sci. 61, 301–311. doi: 10.1002/ps.1015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schachtman, D. P., Reid, R. J., and Ayling, S. (1998). Phosphorus uptake by plants: from soil to cell. Plant Physiol. 116, 447–453. doi: 10.1104/pp.116.2.447

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schindler, D. W. (1977). Evolution of phosphorus limitation in lakes. Science 195, 260–262. doi: 10.1126/science.195.4275.260

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sharpley, A. N., Chapra, S. C., and Wedepohl, R. (1994). Managing agricultural phosphorus for protection of surface waters: issues and options. J. Environ. Qual. 23, 437–451. doi: 10.2134/jeq1994.00472425002300030006x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smil, V. (2000). Phosphorus in the environment: natural flows and human interferences. Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 25, 53–88. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.53

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sukarno, N., Smith, S. E., and Scott, E. S. (1993). The effect of fungicides on vesiculararbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: I. The effects on vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth. New Phytol. 25, 139–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03872.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Syers, J. K., Johnston, A. E., and Curtin, D. (2008). Efficiency of Soil and Fertilizer Phosphorus Use. Reconciling changing Concepts of Soil Phosphorus Behaviour with Agronomic Information. Rome: FAO.

Google Scholar

Thao, H. T. B., Yamakawa, T., Myint, A. K., and Sarr, P. S. (2008a). Effects of phosphite, a reduced form of phosphate, on the growth and phosphorus nutrition of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 54, 761–768. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0765.2008.00290.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thao, H. T. B., Yamakawa, T., Shibata, K., Sarr, P. S., and Myint, A. K. (2008b). Growth response of komatsuna (Brassica rapa var. peruviridis) to root and foliar applications of phosphite. Plant Soil. 308, 1–10. doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9598-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ticconi, C. A., Delatorre, C. A., and Abel, S. (2001). Attenuation of phosphate starvation responses by phosphite in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 127, 963–972. doi: 10.1104/pp.010396

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vaccari, D. (2009). Phosphorus: a looming crisis. Sci. Am. 300, 54–59. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0609-54

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Van Bruggen, A. H. C., He, M. M., Shin, K., Mai, V., Jeong, K. C., Finckh, M. R., et al. (2018). Environmental and health effects of the herbicide glyphosate. Sci. Total Environ. 61, 255–268. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.309

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Van Kauwenbergh, S. (2010). World Phosphate Reserves and Resources. Washington, DC: International Fertilizer Development Centre.

Google Scholar

Yang, K., and Metcalf, W. W. (2004). A new activity for an old enzyme: Escherichia coli bacterial alkaline phosphatase is a phosphite-dependent hydrogenase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 7919–7924. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400664101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ze, P. Z. (2001). Weed management in rice in China. Paper Presented at FAO Workshop on Echinochloa spp. Control, Beijing.

Google Scholar

Keywords: phoA, weed control, phosphite, phosphorus use efficiency, rice

Citation: Ram B, Fartyal D, Sheri V, Varakumar P, Borphukan B, James D, Yadav R, Bhatt A, Agrawal PK, Achary VMM and Reddy MK (2019) Characterization of phoA, a Bacterial Alkaline Phosphatase for Phi Use Efficiency in Rice Plant. Front. Plant Sci. 10:37. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00037

Received: 25 July 2018; Accepted: 10 January 2019;
Published: 25 February 2019.

Edited by:

Goetz Hensel, Leibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK), Germany

Reviewed by:

Wusirika Ramakrishna, Central University of Punjab, India
Guotian Li, University of California, Davis, United States
Shri Ram Yadav, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, India

Copyright © 2019 Ram, Fartyal, Sheri, Varakumar, Borphukan, James, Yadav, Bhatt, Agrawal, Achary and Reddy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: V. Mohan M. Achary, vmmachary@gmail.com Malireddy K. Reddy, reddy@icgeb.res.in