Original Research ARTICLE
Stomatal Development and Conductance of a Tropical Forage Legume Are Regulated by Elevated [CO2] Under Moderate Warming
- 1Department of Biology, Faculty of Philosophy, Sciences and Languages of Ribeirão Preto (FFCLRP), University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
- 2Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, United States
The opening and closing of stomata are controlled by the integration of environmental and endogenous signals. Here, we show the effects of combining elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration (eCO2; 600 μmol mol-1) and warming (+2°C) on stomatal properties and their consequence to plant function in a Stylosanthes capitata Vogel (C3) tropical pasture. The eCO2 treatment alone reduced stomatal density, stomatal index, and stomatal conductance (gs), resulting in reduced transpiration, increased leaf temperature, and leading to maintenance of soil moisture during the growing season. Increased CO2 concentration inside leaves stimulated photosynthesis, starch content levels, water use efficiency, and PSII photochemistry. Under warming, plants developed leaves with smaller stomata on both leaf surfaces; however, we did not see effects of warming on stomatal conductance, transpiration, or leaf water status. Warming alone enhanced PSII photochemistry and photosynthesis, and likely starch exports from chloroplasts. Under the combination of warming and eCO2, leaf temperature was higher than that of leaves from the warming or eCO2 treatments. Thus, warming counterbalanced the effects of CO2 on transpiration and soil water content but not on stomatal functioning, which was independent of temperature treatment. Under warming, and in combination with eCO2, leaves also produced more carotenoids and a more efficient heat and fluorescence dissipation. Our combined results suggest that control on stomatal opening under eCO2 was not changed by a warmer environment; however, their combination significantly improved whole-plant functioning.
Since the industrial revolution, anthropogenic activities have increased atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations ([CO2]) from 270 μmol mol-1 to the more than 400 μmol mol-1 we see today (IPCC, 2018). [CO2] is expected to reach 600 μmol mol-1 by 2050 as modeled by the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP; IPCC, 2018). According to the RCP6.0 scenario, elevated [CO2] (eCO2) coupled with the increased emissions of other greenhouses gases (GHG), such as methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O), will cause the global mean surface air temperature to rise by 2°C by 2100 if the goals outlined in the Paris Agreement are not met (IPCC, 2018). Therefore, following the predicted changes in climate, studies to understand how the combined changes in CO2 and temperature will affect plants and ecosystems are paramount.
There is a considerable body of literature regarding the responses of plants and ecosystems to climate change in temperate systems (Marchi et al., 2004; Ainsworth and Long, 2005; Tubiello et al., 2007; Wall et al., 2011; Rojas-Downing et al., 2017; Urban et al., 2017), including temperate pastures (Lee et al., 2017), which are very important to the sustainability of livestock activities. However, information on the climate change sensitivity of tropical forage species is lacking (Webb et al., 2012; Rojas-Downing et al., 2017; IPCC, 2018), particularly considering that a greater area of livestock pasture is found in the tropics and subtropics. Climate change could affect almost every critical factor related to livestock production (Rojas-Downing et al., 2017) including productivity of forage species (Martinez et al., 2014; Gonzalez-Meler et al., 2017). Because temperature and CO2 are important factors affecting plant physiological performance and stomatal control, understanding the impact of eCO2 and warming on plant performance and stomatal functioning in tropical pastures is vital to understanding the effect of climate change on the productivity of pastures in tropical and subtropical regions (Asner et al., 2004; Tubiello et al., 2007; Prado et al., 2016; Rojas-Downing et al., 2017).
The responses of plants to eCO2 and warming include complex anatomical, biochemical, and physiological adjustments (Habermann et al., 2019b). Stomatal closure is one of the most common responses of plants to eCO2 (Morison, 1998). Recently, extensive efforts have been made to understand the underlying mechanisms of CO2-sensing in guard-cells and turgor control, particularly under a CO2-enriched atmosphere. CO2 is a lipophilic molecule that diffuses across membranes and can also move via mass flow through aquaporins (Zhao et al., 2017). In guard cells, CO2 activates K+out efflux channels that increase the intracellular water potential and result in water efflux and stomatal closure (Brearley et al., 1997; Raschke et al., 2003). However, whether CO2-sensing mechanisms are located in guard-cells or mesophyll cells is under debate (Kim et al., 2010). Other effects of eCO2 on stomatal properties include changes in the differentiation of epidermal cells into stomata, reducing stomatal number, and contributing to decreased gs (Doheny-Adams et al., 2012).
These responses of stomata to changes in the environment are integrated over changes in stomatal conductance (gs). Stomatal conductance is sensitive to environmental factors such as light, vapor pressure deficit, boundary layer, and [CO2]. An enriched CO2-world has the potential to significantly affect whole-plant function by improving water use efficiency (WUE; Nadeau and Sack, 2002; Allen et al., 2011) as a consequence of increased net photosynthetic rate and reduced gs. Reduced gs leads to a decrease in transpiration rates, a common response of plants to eCO2, increasing leaf water, leaf temperature and leading to the conservation of soil moisture (Wall et al., 2001; Nelson et al., 2004; Bernacchi et al., 2007; Leakey et al., 2009; Gonzalez-Meler et al., 2017). In contrast, although very uncommon, gs has been shown to increase in woody plants and plants well-adapted to warm and low moisture conditions in response to increased atmospheric [CO2] (Purcell et al., 2018).
In contrast with the effects of eCO2, warming increases gs and leaf transpiration rates (E) under adequate conditions of water availability (Chattaraj et al., 2014). Increased temperature stimulates H+ efflux through guard cells and increases whole-cell conductance to K+, which diffuses to guard cells, promoting water influx (Ilan et al., 1995). This phenomenon may decrease leaf water status (Ruiz-Vera et al., 2013) and WUE (Fu et al., 2014; Guan et al., 2016), affecting the ultrastructure of chloroplasts and the functioning of photosystems and enzymes, including the stability of cell membranes. However, in some studies, there was little or no effect of warming on plant water status, as in the case of wheat plants (Triticum aestivum, Poaceae) grown at 3/1.5°C (daytime/nighttime) above ambient temperatures (Wall et al., 2011). Depending on the specie’s thermal tolerance, plants can acclimate and warming might stimulate plant photosynthesis (Fu et al., 2014; Martinez et al., 2014).
While the isolated effects of eCO2 and warming on gs have been widely investigated, there is little information concerning the combination of these two abiotic factors in tropical environments under field conditions. Imbalances between carbon uptake and hydraulic dynamics under a warmer, CO2-enriched atmosphere may affect whole-plant function, causing negative impacts on forage species and livestock production. Most information on stomatal responses are not from open field experiments (Ainsworth and Long, 2005) and to date there are very limited studies on tropical forages in open environments (Martinez et al., 2014; Gonzalez-Meler et al., 2017; Habermann et al., 2019a). Stomatal functioning under field conditions integrates several biotic and abiotic factors that may produce new and unexpected responses. For example, the magnitude of gs decreases seen under open-air field conditions using FACE technology have been lower than those seen from studies in open-top chambers or growth chambers (Long et al., 2006; Leakey et al., 2009). Also, despite the fact that a multifactorial field approach likely provides more relevant results for predicting plant responses and developing more precise earth systems models (Larsen et al., 2011; Dieleman et al., 2012; Drewniak and Gonzalez-Meler, 2017), studies combining the effects of eCO2 with warming and other factors are rare (Dieleman et al., 2012).
In this study, we used the Trop-T-FACE facility (Habermann et al., 2019b) that combines a FACE (free-air carbon dioxide enrichment) and a T-FACE (free-air temperature-controlled enhancement) system (Kimball et al., 2008). We aimed to unravel the effects of eCO2 and warming on stomatal properties and subsequently on plant functioning in Stylosanthes capitata Vogel (C3). In Brazil, S. capitata is one of the most common legume forage species and is often mixed with grasses due to its resistance to disease, high seed yield, and excellent adaptation to acidic and low fertility soils (Miles and Lapointe, 1992; Embrapa, 2014). We tested the hypotheses that (i) under eCO2 alone, gs, and stomatal density and index will decrease, conserving soil moisture, decreasing antioxidant defenses, and improving water status and photosynthetic performance; that (ii) under warming alone, gs and stomatal density will increase, increasing leaf transpiration rates and decreasing soil moisture, but due to the antioxidant response and heat tolerance of S. capitata, photosynthesis will increase; and that (iii) under an eCO2 and warming combination, the effects of eCO2 on stomatal development and gs will mitigate the antagonistic effect of warming, leading to enhanced leaf water status, antioxidant defense, and photosynthetic performance.
Materials and Methods
Location and Experimental Set-Up
The experiment was conducted during late autumn and early winter of 2015 in the Trop-T-FACE facility (Habermann et al., 2019b; Supplementary Figure 1) located at the University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto campus, São Paulo State, Brazil (S 21° 10′ 8″ W 47° 51′ 48.2″). The 2500 m2 study area is located 580 m above sea level, and the soil was classified as a dystrophic red Latosol with clay texture. Thirty days before seeding, we performed soil liming to correct the pH of the experimental area from a value of 4.0 to 5.5. We fertilized the soil with NPK 4-14-8 at a dose of 1 ton ha-1 17 days after the soil liming, following the recommendations from Werner et al. (1997). Seeds of S. capitata were sown in rows 30 cm apart in 16 plots of 10 m × 10 m. During seedling growth, rainfall was intense and the temperature was high, which stimulated the initial growth of plants (Supplementary Figure 2). Supplemental irrigation was performed when necessary. After approximately three months of vegetative growth and pasture establishment, plants were clipped to 30 cm aboveground, and treatments of eCO2 and warming were initiated and maintained during the plant reproductive regrowth. Plants reached anthesis in the first week after standardization clipping. Plants were rainfed and maintained under experimental conditions of warming and eCO2 for 66 days (Supplementary Figure 2A). We chose not to irrigate plants during the experiment to maintain field conditions of soil moisture, a normal practice for this species in the tropics. Warming was provided by the T-FACE system (Kimball et al., 2008) and eCO2 treatment was applied using the miniFACE system (Miglietta et al., 1999).
We used an experimental design with four randomized blocks to test the effects of two levels of atmospheric [CO2]: ambient (aCO2, current ∼400 μmol mol-1) and elevated (eCO2, ∼600 μmol mol-1) and two levels of air temperature: ambient (aT) and elevated (eT, +2°C above ambient canopy temperature). We combined these two variables in four treatments. Each block contained one plot of each treatment: aCO2aT (ambient [CO2] and ambient temperature); eCO2aT (600 μmol mol-1 [CO2] and ambient temperature); aCO2eT (ambient [CO2] and +2°C above ambient canopy temperature); and eCO2eT (600 μmol mol-1 [CO2] and +2°C above ambient canopy temperature). The target concentration of 600 μmol mol-1 in plots with elevated [CO2] was maintained during daylight hours, and the target temperature of 2°C above ambient was maintained 24 h day-1 in the heated plots. There were 16 (10 m × 10 m) experimental plots (4 aCO2aT plots, 4 eCO2aT plots, 4 aCO2eT plots and 4 eCO2eT plots) containing a 2-m diameter experimental ring of CO2 fumigation placed at the central portion of the plot. All experimental rings were separated by at least 12 m to avoid CO2 cross-contamination (see Supplementary Figure 1).
An automatic microclimate station WS-PH1 connected to a DL2e datalogger (Delta-T Devices Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom) was installed in the center of the Trop-T-FACE facility. The station was responsible for monitoring and recording meteorological data: total solar radiation (Rad), air temperature (Tair), and relative air humidity (Rh) using specific sensors throughout the entire growing season. Precipitation data were obtained from a weather station located near the Trop-T-FACE facility. Volumetric soil water content (SWC) and the soil temperature (Tsoil) in each experimental ring were measured from 0 to 10 cm deep using 16 ThetaProbe ML2X and ST2 sensors, respectively, both located in the center of each ring. The data were collected and stored on the DL2e datalogger (Delta-T Devices Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom).
The Trop-T-FACE facility was described by Habermann et al. (2019b) and in short combines miniFACE (free-air CO2 enrichment) and T-FACE (temperature free-air controlled enhancement) technologies. The miniFACE system (Miglietta et al., 1999) consisted of 2-m diameter PVC rings with laser punctured micro-holes for CO2 fumigation into the canopy. At the center of each plot was a CO2 transmitter sensor model GMT222 (Vaisala, Helsinki, Finland). A central control unit was responsible for integrating wind speed (obtained at one anemometer located in the center of the Trop-T-FACE facility at 3 m above the ground), and [CO2] in the plots. Using a proportional integral derivative (PID) algorithm, the control unit regulated the amount of CO2 needed to elevate the [CO2] to the set point of 600 μmol mol-1 in each plot. A 12-ton cryogenic tank with liquid CO2 (-180°C) and a vaporizer unit supplied gaseous CO2. Dummy PVC rings without punctures were also placed in plots with ambient [CO2]. The daily average [CO2] under aCO2 plots was 412 ± 11 μmol mol-1, while FACE fumigation increased diurnal [CO2] to 595 ± 20 μmol mol-1 under eCO2 plots during the experiment. Although there was no CO2 fumigation during nighttime, due to plant and soil respiration the nighttime average [CO2] was 555 ± 19 μmol mol-1 in aCO2 and eCO2.
The T-FACE system (Kimball et al., 2008) consisted of six infrared Salamander heaters, model TFE 750-240 (Mor Electric Heating, MI, United States) per eT plot. The heaters were arranged in a 2-m diameter hexagonal pattern and mounted on Salamander ALEX-F reflectors (Mor Electric Heating, MI, United States) attached to aluminum bars and maintained 0.8 m above the canopy. Heaters warmed the canopy 2°C above the ambient temperature and their height and angle were constantly adjusted with plant growth. Temperature was controlled by a control unit that integrated the canopy temperature (Tcanopy) of aT and eT plots through model SI-1H1-L20 infrared radiometers (Apogee Instruments, UT, United States). Each infrared radiometer was placed in aluminum structures at an angle of 45° in relation to the plant canopy. The voltage to warm each heater was controlled using a PID control system installed in a model CR1000 datalogger with AM25T multiplexors (Campbell Scientific, UT, United States; Kimball et al., 2008). Each warmed plot used a non-warmed plot of the same block as a reference. Dummy heaters were installed at aT plots to replicate possible shading over canopy. Through the Loggernet V4 software (Campbell Scientific, UT, United States), we collected and monitored the data of the T-FACE system throughout the experiment.
All analyses were performed in mature expanded leaves developed after clipping and grown under both levels of [CO2] and temperature.
Leaf and Canopy Temperature
On two different days, the 41st and 54th day of experiment (DOE), we measured the diurnal course of leaf temperature (Tleaf) using a surface infrared thermometer Testo 845 (Testo, Lenzkirch, Germany). Samplings were made in 10 central leaflets per plot every hour. Tcanopy of each experimental plot was monitored with the infrared radiometers during the entire experiment and 15 min averages of the canopy temperatures were recorded.
Stomatal Density and Stomatal Index
At the end of the experiment, we collected three central leaflets (sun leaves) per plot located at the 5th node from the base to study the effects of the treatments on stomatal distribution at the leaf surface. Sampling was conducted between 13:00 and 14:00 h and leaves were fixed in 50% FAA solution (Johansen, 1941) for 24 h, washed with 50% ethanol for 2 h, and stored in 70% ethanol. Leaf imprints from both leaf surfaces were taken from the central region of the leaf. Samples were digitally photographed (Leica DFC 500, Heidelberg, Germany) using a light microscope (Leica DM4000 B, Heidelberg, Germany). For each sample, we evaluated five different visual fields and counted the number of stomata and epidermal cells. From this, we determined stomatal density per mm2 (SD) and stomatal index (SI) expressed in % (Eq. 1):
where SN = stomata number and EC = the number of epidermal cells.
The stomatal length (SL μm) was measured at the maximum polar length of guard cells for an average of 20 stomata per visual field.
Leaf Gas Exchange and Water Status
In situ measurements of leaf gas exchange were conducted at three central leaflets (sun leaves) per plot between 9:00 and 11:00 h on the 44th and 66th DOE. Measurements were taken using an LCProSD (ADC BioScientifics, Hoddesdon, United Kingdom). Leaves were kept in the chamber until stomatal conductance and the rate of net photosynthesis stabilized. The measurements were taken at a constant radiation of 1740 μmol m-2 s-1, temperature of 25°C (in aCO2aT and eCO2aT plots) or 27°C (in aCO2eT and eCO2eT plots), and [CO2] of 400 μmol mol-1 (in aCO2aT and aCO2eT plots) or [CO2] of 600 μmol mol-1 (in eCO2aT and eCO2eT plots). We measured the net photosynthesis rate (A), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration rate (E), and calculated the water-use efficiency (WUE, A/E). Midday water potential (Ψw) was measured on the 14, 21, 34, 38, and 55 DOE using a Scholander chamber model 3005 (Soil Moisture Equipment Corp., CA, United States; Scholander et al., 1965). Three branches per plot were cut and sealed in plastic bags containing wet filter paper. Within 1.5 min after cutting, the branches were placed in the pressure chamber for Ψw measurements.
To study the effects of experimental conditions on ultrastructural traits, we collected one central leaflet per plot located at the fourth node from the base. Sampling was conducted at the end of the experiment between 11:00 and 12:00 h. Leaf fragments were cut from the median region of the leaves and fixed in a 2% formaldehyde and 1% glutaraldehyde solution, with a 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer at pH 7.2 for 24 h, washed in phosphate buffer solution 0.1 M (pH 6.8–7.0; Karnovsky, 1965), and post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 2 h at 4°C. Leaf segments were dehydrated in an acetone series and embedded in Araldite 6005. Ultrathin cross-sections (c.a. 60 nm) were obtained using an ultramicrotome (Leica Reichert) and contrasted with 2% uranyl acetate for 15 min (Watson, 1958) and lead citrate for 15 min (Reynolds, 1963). Samples were observed using a transmission electron microscope (Philips EM 208).
After leaf gas exchange measurements were taken on the 66th DOE, the same three sun leaves per plot were collected to measure chlorophyll fluorescence parameters using an imaging-PAM M-series chlorophyll fluorescence system (MINI-version model, Heinz Walz GmbH, Germany; Walz, 2014). Measurements were performed according to Martinez et al. (2014). Leaves were detached, maintained in water, and dark-adapted for 15 min at room temperature to measure dark fluorescence yield (Fo) and the maximum fluorescence yield (Fm). Fo was measured using a low frequency of pulse-modulated measuring light (0.5 μmol m-2 s-1, 100 μs, 1 Hz), while Fm was measured using a saturation pulse (2700 μmol m-2 s-1, 0.8 s, 10 Hz). Then, the same leaves were submitted to increasing photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) levels (from 0 to 784 μmol photons m-2 s-1) to measure the effective PS II quantum yield during illumination [Y(II)], the quantum yield of non-regulated energy dissipation [Y(NO)], quantum yield of regulated energy dissipation [Y(NPQ)], the “puddle model” coefficient of photochemical quenching (qP), the “lake model” coefficient of photochemical quenching of PS II antenna pigment organization (qL), and maximum electron transport rate (ETRmax). Images were acquired at maximum PPFD (784 μmol photons m-2 s-1).
Extraction and Determination of Enzymatic Activity
Enzymatic analyses were performed from leaves of different plants collected at midday in each plot at the end of the experimental period. Crude extracts were obtained according to Azevedo et al. (1998), with a few modifications. We macerated 1 g of leaves without the major vein region in liquid nitrogen and solubilized it in 10 mL of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) with 1 mM EDTA, 3 mM DTT, and 2% of PVP (m/v). Crude protein content in each sample was measured at 595 nm according to Bradford (1976).
The superoxide dismutase activity (SOD, EC 184.108.40.206) was measured using the spectrophotometric method as described by Giannopolitis and Ries (1977) and catalase activity (CAT, EC 220.127.116.11) was measured using the spectrophotometric method as described by Azevedo et al. (1998). Ascorbate peroxidase activity (APX, EC 18.104.22.168) was measured using the spectrophotometric method as described by Nakano and Asada (1981). We used the coefficient of molar extinction 3051.4 M-1cm-1 obtained from our experimental conditions to our calculations. The activities of non-specific peroxidases (POD, EC 22.214.171.124) were measured according to Zeraik et al. (2008) using guaiacol substrate. The results were expressed in μmol min-1 mg-1 of protein, using the coefficient of molar extinction 26.6 mM-1 cm-1 (Chance and Maehly, 1955) to our calculations.
Leaves from different plants in each experimental plot were used to quantify midday photosynthetic pigments at the end of the experimental period. Measurements were performed according to Lichtenthaler and Wellburn (1983), with a few modifications. We macerated 100 mg of fresh leaves in liquid nitrogen and solubilized samples in 5 mL of 80% acetone. The solution was centrifuged in order to precipitate the biggest particles. From the supernatant, we measured the absorbance at 480, 645, and 663 nm. Thus, we determined the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoid content of the leaves. From this, we calculated the following proportions: total chlorophyll (a + b) and total chlorophyll/ carotenoid.
The level of lipid peroxidation of membranes in leaf tissues was measured by the level of malondialdehyde (MDA), which was determined by the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) method, according to Heath and Packer (1968), with a few modifications. We macerated 100 mg of leaves in liquid nitrogen and solubilized in 2.5 mL of 0.1% (m/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA). An aliquot (500 μL) from the supernatant was transferred to sealed glass tubes, in which 2 mL of 20% TCA with 0.5% TBA were added to the aliquot. This solution was warmed at 95°C for 30 min and then placed on ice to stop the reaction. The supernatant absorbance was determined at 532 and 600 nm. The MDA concentration was calculated using a coefficient of molar extinction of 155 mM-1cm-1 (Heath and Packer, 1968).
For quantitative data, we used a 2 × 2 factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) to test the main effects of [CO2] and temperature levels, as well as their interaction when factors were combined. Data were checked for normality and log-transformed when necessary. We also used the student’s t-test to compare means. Analyses were performed using R software 3.2.3, with a significance level of 5% (p < 0.05).
Throughout the experiment, air relative humidity (Rh), air temperature (Tair), total solar radiation (Rad), soil water content (SWC), and soil temperature (Tsoil) gradually decreased (Figures 1, 2). Days were usually cloud-free with maximum total solar radiation of 0.89 kW m-2, and total diurnal average of 0.27 kW m-2 (Figure 1). Total precipitation during the experimental period was 120 mm, mostly during the first half of the experimental period. The second half of the experimental period was marked by drier conditions with total rainfall of only 26.7 mm over 41 consecutive days (Supplementary Figure 2B). Average Tair during the experiment was 20.5°C with highest and lowest recorded Tair 32.6 and 7.6°C, respectively. Average Rh was 82.2% and the recorded lowest Rh during the experimental period was 33% (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Daily average of relative air humidity (Rh), air temperature (Tair) and average diurnal total solar radiation (Rad), during the experimental period.
Soil Water Content and Soil Temperature
The first half of the experiment had more frequent rainfall (Supplementary Figure 2B), which caused fluctuations in SWC (Figure 2A), whereas in the second half of the experimental period, reduced precipitation caused an almost linear decrease in SWC (Figure 2A). At 10 cm deep, SWC at eCO2aT remained higher than at aCO2aT plots. During the experiment, average SWC at aCO2aT was 0.30 ± 0.07 m3 m-3 while eCO2aT increased SWC to 0.34 ± 0.06 m3 m-3 (Figure 2A). However, aCO2eT had no effect on average SWC (0.30 ± 0.07 m3 m-3) while eCO2eT counterbalanced the increase in SWC promoted by eCO2aT and reduced SWC to 0.29 ± 0.07 m3 m-3. During the entire experiment, soil temperature of eT plots was on average 1°C warmer than the aT plots (Figure 2B).
Figure 2. (A) Daily average of soil water content (SWC) and (B) daily average of soil temperature under all treatments during the entire experimental period. Arrows indicate dates in which the leaf gas exchange parameters were measured. Treatments: aCO2aT (ambient [CO2] and ambient temperature), eCO2aT (elevated [CO2] and ambient temperature), aCO2eT (ambient [CO2] and elevated temperature) and eCO2eT (elevated [CO2] and elevated temperature). DOE = day of experiment. Stack bars indicate the standard deviation.
Canopy and Leaf Temperature
Compared to aCO2aT, the eCO2aT treatment increased Tcanopy during the experimental period (Figure 3A), especially during the hottest hours of the day. The average difference in Tcanopy between eCO2aT and aCO2aT during the entire experiment was 0.25°C (Figure 3A). During the experiment, Tcanopy of aCO2eT plots was close to the 2°C above ambient setting (aCO2aT), especially during the nighttime. During daytime, Tcanopy drifted from the set point as wind and plant transpiration varied. The average difference between Tcanopy of aCO2eT and aCO2aT during the entire experiment was 1.6°C (Figure 3B). However, during the experiment, the eCO2eT treatment caused an additive increase in Tcanopy from the eCO2 and eT treatments. The average difference in Tcanopy between eCO2eT and aCO2aT during the entire experiment was 1.8°C (Figure 3C). The difference in Tcanopy between eCO2eT and aCO2eT was approximately 0.2°C (Figure 3D), showing again the synergistic effect of elevated [CO2] on the increase in Tcanopy.
Figure 3. Difference in canopy temperature (Δ Tcanopy) of Stylosanthes capitata during the experiment. (A) Δ Tcanopy between eCO2aT–aCO2aT plots. (B) Δ Tcanopy between aCO2eT–aCO2aT plots. (C) Δ Tcanopy between eCO2eT–aCO2aT plots. (D) Δ Tcanopy between eCO2eT–aCO2eT plots. Tcanopy was recorded every 15 min by Apogee infrared radiometers. Arrows indicate the point 2°C above the ambient canopy temperature that was set in warmed treatments. The missing values between days 35 and 37 after treatment are due to a dead datalogger battery on these days. Treatments: aCO2aT (ambient [CO2] and ambient temperature), eCO2aT (elevated [CO2] and ambient temperature), aCO2eT (ambient [CO2] and elevated temperature) and eCO2eT (elevated [CO2] and elevated temperature).
At eCO2aT daily leaf temperature (Tleaf) increased on average 1.3 and 0.7°C more at 41 and 55 DOE, respectively, than under ambient conditions. The combination of eCO2 and warming had an additive effect, increasing Tleaf (Supplementary Figure 3).
Stomatal Density, Stomatal Index, and Stomatal Size
Leaves of S. capitata are amphistomatic with higher SD on the abaxial surface (lower leaf surface). There was no alteration of this pattern under any experimental condition (Figure 4). There were also no interactions of [CO2] × temperature for any stomatal parameters. Furthermore, there were no effects of eCO2 on SD (Figure 4A) or SI (Figure 4C) in the adaxial surface (upper leaf surface). However, on the abaxial surface eCO2 decreased SD by approximately 16% (Figure 4B) and SI by 11% regardless of temperature level (Figure 4D). Also, SL was reduced by eT by 7% on average at the adaxial surface (Figure 4E) and 8% at the abaxial leaf surface (Figure 4F), regardless of CO2 level.
Figure 4. (A,B) Stomatal density (SD). (C,D) Stomatal index (SI). (E,F) Stomatal length (SL) on adaxial leaf surface (left column) and abaxial leaf surface (right column) from leaves of S. capitata grown under different levels of [CO2] and temperature at 66th day of experiment. [CO2] levels: ambient (aCO2) and elevated (eCO2, 600 μmol mol-1). Temperature levels: ambient (aT) and elevated (eT, +2°C above ambient canopy temperature). ANOVA p-values are shown for main effects (CO2 or T) or interactions CO2 × T. Stack bars indicate the standard error.
Leaf Gas Exchange and Leaf Water Status
Following the observed reductions in SD and SI, the eCO2 treatment resulted in an up to 33% reduction of stomatal conductance (gs) regardless of temperature level for both sampling days (Figures 5A,B). At 66th DOE, E was reduced at eCO2 treatments (Figures 5C,D), but this response was dependent on the temperature treatment, with warming partially offsetting this reduction. Net photosynthesis rates (A) were increased by eCO2 and by warming (eT). At 44th DOE, A increased by 27% at eCO2 regardless of the temperature treatment (Figure 5E). At the end of the experiment, warming also affected A by approximately 39% (Figure 5F). At aCO2aT average A rates were 18.2 ± 1.7 μmol m-2 s-1, while rates were 31.2 ± 1.8 and 25.3 ± 2.1 μmol m-2 s-1 for the eCO2aT and aCO2eT treatments, respectively (Figure 5F). Main effects caused an additive increase without significant interaction for plants grown at eCO2eT (p < 0.01, Figure 5F).
Figure 5. Leaf gas exchange of S. capitata performed at 44th (left column) and 66th DOE (right column) under different levels of [CO2] and temperature. (A,B) Stomatal conductance (gs). (C,D) Transpiration rate (E). (E,F) Net photosynthesis rate (A). (G,H) Instantaneous water-use efficiency (WUE). [CO2] levels: ambient (aCO2) and elevated (eCO2, 600 μmol mol-1). Temperature levels: ambient (aT) and elevated (eT, +2°C above ambient canopy temperature). DOE = day of experiment. ANOVA p-values are shown for main effects (CO2 or T) or interactions CO2 × T. Stack bars indicate the standard error.
The effects of eCO2 on stomatal aperture, along with increased A, improved instantaneous WUE. WUE increased by approximately 69% and 139% regardless of temperature level at 44th and 66th DOE, respectively (Figures 5G,H). Despite changes in gas exchange, leaf water potential was not modified during the growing season. The lowest values of midday water potential were observed in the second half of the experiment (Table 1), when SWC was reduced due to decreased precipitation.
Table 1. Midday water potential (MPa) in leaves of S. capitata exposed to elevated levels of atmospheric [CO2] and temperature at the Trop-T-FACE facility.
Chloroplasts Ultrastructural Qualitative Analysis
We used transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to study the effects of temperature and CO2 treatments on the chloroplast ultrastructure of palisade mesophyll cells (Figure 6). Plants grown at aCO2aT had well-developed chloroplasts with organized thylakoid membranes and large starch grains (Figures 6A,B,D). Few cells exhibited the typical association between chloroplasts and mitochondria related to photorespiration (Figure 6C). Plants grown in the eCO2aT treatment showed an increase in the size and number of chloroplasts as well as the size of starch grains in palisade mesophyll cells when compared to control plants (Figures 6E,F) with no changes in thylakoid membrane structure (Figure 6G). In the aCO2eT treatment, plants showed a reduction in the size and number of chloroplasts and starch grains but an increase in the number and size of plastoglobuli in their stroma and an increase in the spacing of thylakoid membranes when compared to aCO2aT (Figures 6H–J). There was a tighter association between chloroplasts and mitochondria in aCO2eT plots (Figures 6I,J) than in controls. Plants grown at eCO2eT exhibited a reduction in the number and size of starch grains (Figures 6K–O), an increase in the number of stroma plastoglobuli (Figures 6M,N) and had poor stacking of thylakoid membranes (Figures 6L,O) when compared to controls. These plants also had a tight association between chloroplasts and mitochondria (Figure 6K).
Figure 6. Transmission electron micrograph of S. capitata leaves grown under different levels of [CO2] and temperature at 66th day of experiment. (A–D) aCO2aT samples. (A,B) Longitudinal section of chloroplast showing large and numerous starch grains. Scale bar of 10 μm in panels (A,B). (C) Longitudinal section of the terminal portion of a chloroplast associated with mitochondria. Arrowheads show intact thylakoid membranes. Scale bar 3 μm. (D) Details of thylakoid membranes of an intact chloroplast (arrowhead). Scale bar 2 μm. (E–G) eCO2aT samples. (E) Overview of a chloroplast in longitudinal section showing a large number of starch grains. Scale bar 10 μm. (F) Enlarged cell. Scale bar 4 μm. (G) Details of a chloroplast showing the integrity of thylakoid membranes (arrowhead). Scale bar 3 μm. (H–J) aCO2eT samples (H) Overview of a chloroplast from leaf mesophyll with a reduced number and size of starch grains and the presence of plastoglobuli in the stroma of chloroplast. Scale bar 3 μm. (I,J) Detail of chloroplasts with a greater association with mitochondria. (J) Evidence that the internal membranes are less organized in the thylakoid (arrowhead). Scale bars 3 μm in (I) and 2 μm in (J). (K–O) eCO2eT samples. (K) Overview of the mesophyll cell with chloroplasts in association with mitochondria and vacuole with presence of electrodense amorphous material. Scale bar 5 μm. (L) Detail of a chloroplast in longitudinal section. Arrowhead – internal membranes of chloroplasts. Scale bars 2 μm. (M) Detail of chloroplasts in cross section showing the large number of plastoglobuli in the stroma. Scale bar 2 μm. (N,O) Details of chloroplasts showing plastoglobuli, starch grains, and internal membranes not associated in thylakoids (arrowhead). Scale bar 3 μm in N and O. Abbreviations: S, starch grain; M, mitochondria; CW, cell wall; N, nucleus; L, plastoglobuli; C, chloroplasts; V, vacuole.
The analysis of the rapid light-induced fluorescence curves showed significant effects of treatments for many fluorescence parameters during increasing stages of PPFD. We compared the treatments in each parameter at maximum irradiance (784 μmol photons m-2 s-1). The parameter ETRmax increased in warmed plots depending on CO2 level by approximately 22% (Figure 7).
Figure 7. Maximum electron transport rate (ETRmax) of S. capitata leaves under different levels of atmospheric [CO2] and temperature at 66th day of experiment at maximum PPFD (784 μmol photons m-2 s-1). [CO2] levels: ambient (aCO2) and elevated (eCO2, 600 μmol mol-1). Temperature levels: ambient (aT) and elevated (eT, +2°C above ambient canopy temperature). ANOVA p-values are shown for main effects (CO2 or T) or interactions CO2 × T. Stack bars indicate the standard error.
The coefficient of photochemical quenching (lake model) (qL) (Figures 8A–D), the coefficient of photochemical quenching (puddle model) (qP) (Figures 8E–H), the effective PSII quantum yield Y(II) (Figures 8I–L), and the quantum yield of regulated energy dissipation [Y(NPQ); Figures 8Q–T] increased under warmed plots depending on [CO2] level by 28, 18, 20, and 5%, respectively. The ANOVA analysis showed that Y(NO) decreased due to the main effects of eCO2 and eT by approximately 17% (Figure 8N) and 7% (Figure 8O), respectively. For the eCO2eT treatment, Y(NO) decreased by 27% (Figure 8P) compared to the aCO2aT (student’s t-test comparison). This same phenomenon was seen for qL, where isolated effects of eCO2 and eT increased qL by 7% (Figures 8B,C), while under the combination eCO2eT a synergistic effect improved qL by 28% (Figure 8D) when compared to aCO2aT (student’s t-test comparison).
Figure 8. Images of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters made in leaves of S. capitata exposed to different levels of atmospheric [CO2] and temperature at maximum PPFD (784 μmol photons m-2 s-1). (A–D) Coefficient of photochemical quenching (lake model) (qL). (E–H) Coefficient of photochemical quenching (puddle model) (qP). (I–L) Effective PSII quantum yield Y(II). (M–P) Quantum yield of non-regulated energy dissipation Y(NO). (Q–T) Quantum yield of regulated energy dissipation Y(NPQ). Measurement was performed at 66th day of experiment. [CO2] levels: ambient (aCO2) and elevated (eCO2, 600 μmol mol-1). Temperature levels: ambient (aT) and elevated (eT, +2°C above ambient canopy temperature). Different letters in the same row indicate statistical differences between treatments determined by t-test. Relative values of each parameter in the images have been mapped to a color palette ranging from 0 to 1 and displayed using an identical false color scale (bar is at the bottom of image).
Enzymatic Activity, Pigments and Malondialdehyde Levels
The activity of catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and malondialdehyde levels (MDA) were not affected by any treatment. However, ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity decreased under eT regardless of the [CO2]. Total chlorophyll (chlorophyll a + b) was not changed by treatments; however, carotenoid content increased under eCO2eT by about 36% and the chlorophyll-to-carotenoid ratio increased at eT regardless of the [CO2] level at which plants were grown (Table 2).
Table 2. Biochemical parameters in leaves of S. capitata exposed to elevated levels of atmospheric [CO2] and temperature at the Trop-T-FACE facility at 66th day of experiment.
In this study, we explored the interacting effects of two opposing abiotic forcing factors (temperature and CO2) on stomatal regulation of a tropical forage species grown in the field. Our key findings were: (i) eCO2 had an influence on gs, SD, and SI; (ii) eT reduced the size of stomata; (iii) eT partially or fully mitigated the effects eCO2 effects on E and SWC; and (iv) eCO2 augmented the increase in leaf temperature over that of the experimental warming treatment. These results suggest plant photosynthetic performance and water use efficiency may be enhanced in response to the combination of high [CO2] and temperature for this tropical foraging species.
As expected, gs was reduced by eCO2 during the growing season by 33% on average in both temperature treatments, similar to the reduction reported in a meta-analysis by Ainsworth and Rogers (2007) who reported an average gs reduction 22% across all plant species in FACE studies. Reduced gs under eCO2 is consistent in long-term experiments, with no strong indication of reduced sensitivity (Herrick et al., 2004; Marchi et al., 2004; Leakey et al., 2006). The number of studies reporting the combined effect of eCO2 and warming on gs is very limited, and the existing studies report little or no interaction between eCO2 and eT (Naudts et al., 2013; Fauset et al., 2018). This means that the effects of these abiotic forcing factors are generally independent. Our findings are supported by these studies, as we also found no effect of interaction between [CO2] and temperature levels. We also found similar magnitude of effects of eCO2 on gs regardless of the temperature level and across different soil moisture conditions (0.35 m3 m-3 and 0.15 m3 m-3 in the first and second gas exchange sampling, respectively). This is presumably associated with the high drought tolerance of S. capitata (Bill, 1992), which develops deep roots for water uptake in deep soil profile layers (Williams and Gardener, 1984). A closely related species such as S. hamata produces roots up to 70 cm long even in compacted soils (Lesturgez et al., 2004). It is important to note that SWC data were measured between 0 and 10 cm deep and may not reflect full soil profile conditions. Therefore, even under restricted superficial soil moisture, gs and gas exchange can still be sustained by deeper soil layers moisture (Kirschbaum and McMillan, 2018).
Other important effects of eCO2 were found in our study such as the coinciding decrease in SD and SI which co-vary with the reduced gs, indicate that elevated [CO2] affected stomata differentiation on the abaxial leaf surface of this species. These changes in SD and SI optimize gas exchange for greater carbon fixation while providing better control over water loss via transpiration (Lin et al., 2001; Nadeau and Sack, 2002; Franks et al., 2012; Pillitteri and Torii, 2012). The decreases in stomatal number under eCO2 are also reported for both leaf surfaces in other species. For example, Teng et al. (2006) found that leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) grown under 700 μmol mol-1 of [CO2] had SD reduced by 19% and 14% at adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces, respectively, with a consequent decrease of gs. Therefore, gs was presumably reduced owing to the combination of decreased stomatal aperture and stomatal numbers. This same result was found by Habermann et al. (2019b) in leaves of the C4 tropical forage species Panicum maximum under eCO2 combined with warming.
Direct effects of warming over gs are not always simple to measure because other variables such as leaf water status and VPD co-vary with air temperature (Urban et al., 2017). Isohydric leaves adjust their gs in response to leaf water potential and VPD (Klein, 2014). However, there were no effects of eT on water status of plants during the entire experiment, which partially explains the absence of gs responses to warming. Despite infrared warming in the T-FACE system often increasing VPD in warmed plots (Kimball, 2005), the VPD increment observed in our experiment did not affect gs, presumably because this species is adapted to warm and arid environments with leaf trichomes, presumably affecting microclimate and acting as a buffer to moderate VPD increases. Regardless of [CO2] level, plants grown under eT had smaller stomata on both leaf surfaces, which might be an adaptation that allows plants to keep the stomata open under water stress conditions (Spence et al., 1986) that frequently accompany heat in tropical regions. This is because smaller stomata increase resistance to gas diffusion (Drake et al., 2013) limiting water loss whilst still allowing carbon uptake under prolonged drought (Spence et al., 1986). Smaller stomata have also been suggested to exhibit a faster response to environmental changes than larger stomata due to a larger surface area to volume ratio in guard cell membranes, allowing faster solute influx or efflux (Drake et al., 2013; Raven, 2014). However, the relationship between stomatal size and kinetics may not be conserved over a wide range of species and possibly will only occur in species with comparable stomata structures (Lawson and Vialet-Chabrand, 2019). Our study found no evidence of an opposing interaction force of temperature against eCO2 and its effects on gs and anatomical changes. Both main effects produced leaves with fewer and smaller stomata under eCO2 and may have improved C uptake and water use simultaneously.
Water-saving mechanisms observed under eCO2aT were supported by the SWC data where soil moisture under ambient temperature remained higher during the experiment, presumably because of less soil water uptake by roots. Soil moisture maintenance can benefit plants during water shortages periods (Leakey et al., 2009; AbdElgawad et al., 2015) because plants will sustain photosynthesis for longer under these conditions (Allen et al., 2011). However, under eCO2eT, SWC was not conserved, probably owing to the greater VPD and soil evapotranspiration caused by warming. The increase in WUE indicates an enhancement of carbon (C) fixation per unit of water transpired in changing conditions. Improved WUE was also observed in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum, Poaceae; Marin et al., 2013) and coffee (Coffea arabica, Rubiaceae; Ghini et al., 2015) developed under eCO2. A greater WUE is also related to enhanced drought tolerance (Mega et al., 2019), which could enable S. capitata plants to better tolerate dry environments and improve the resistance under seasonal water shortages (Wullschleger et al., 2002). Studies performed with other C3 grasses (Naudts et al., 2013) and legumes (AbdElgawad et al., 2015) have shown that elevated CO2 has the potential to compensate the impacts of drought and warming on plant photosynthesis and growth. This response would be especially important in the tropics, as climate models predict a significant reduction in rainfall and increased incidences of extreme drought in the next few decades (Lyra et al., 2017). In our study, eCO2 improved WUE in very different conditions of soil moisture and ambient temperature levels, indicating that S. capitata has the potential to adjust to future conditions of temperature and soil water availability. Very few studies have combined high [CO2], warming, and drought together (Dias de Oliveira et al., 2013), and in wheat (Triticum aestivum, Poaceae) interactions between all three variables on WUE, photosynthesis, and biomass were not found (Dias de Oliveira et al., 2015a,b). However, further studies are necessary to better understand the interactions between CO2 × drought × warming on plants’ water use and how different physiological parameters co-vary within climatic variation.
In soybeans (Glycine max, Fabaceae) grown in a temperate climate, for every 10% reduction in gs a decrease of 8.6% in evapotranspiration is expected (Bernacchi et al., 2007). However, decreases in leaf-level gs should be carefully extrapolated to the ecosystem level because many negative feedbacks can offset or even reverse this straight-forward response (Marchi et al., 2004). Here, we observed that warming partially offset the reduction of E by eCO2, which is presumably associated with increased VPD in warmed plots. According to calculations performed on other plant species, a 10% decrease in gs under eCO2 would be enough to mitigate an increase in gs caused by a warming of 1°C in air temperature (Kirschbaum and McMillan, 2018).
Interestingly, warming alone did not increase E during the experiment. One possible explanation is that leaf temperature (Tleaf) was higher under eCO2eT than under aCO2eT, due to the additive effects of heating caused by the T-FACE warming system and elevated [CO2]-induced stomatal closure. In canopies with less turbulence, such as grasslands, stomatal closure increases Tleaf (Kirschbaum and McMillan, 2018). Here, Tleaf increased on average 2.6 and 1.8°C, under eCO2eT and aCO2eT, respectively, when compared with aCaT. Leaf temperature represents a balance between the net heat gain from short- and long-wave radiation, heat loss by heat exchange (convection and conduction), latent heat loss by evapotranspiration, heat stored in metabolic processes, and physical heat storage (Jones and Rotenburg, 2011). The effects of eCO2 in Tleaf were more intense in moments of increased solar radiation but were not significant in the early and late hours of the day. The changes in Tleaf were coupled with total incoming solar radiation, which indicates that the leaf boundary layer was thin, probably due to the small size of the leaves (Jones and Rotenburg, 2011).
Increases in Tleaf is beneficial when plants are below their optimum temperature of photosynthesis and increases biomass production (Ghannoum et al., 2000). Martinez et al. (2014) found that moderate canopy warming (+2°C) increased leaf area index by 32% and biomass by 16% in S. capitata. They also observed a significant increase in the electron transport rate (ETR) and the effective PSII quantum yield Y(II) in leaves under warming compared to leaves at aT. In grassland communities composed by grasses, forbs, and legumes, Bloor et al. (2010) found that a 3.2°C warming increased carbon uptake and biomass regardless of the [CO2] or drought conditions. Increased rates of A (like those observed under eCO2 and eT) may not always be translated into more biomass for foraging as in many cases there is increased allocation to roots and increased respiration from specific tissues (Gonzalez-Meler et al., 2004). We have to point out that photosynthesis measurements were made matching each growing condition and not all measurements were made under the same condition. We wanted to measure point values of net photosynthesis to reflect what plants were experiencing, not a measurement to compare photosynthetic potentials or photosynthesis acclimation. Because S. capitata is a perennial species, measurements of acclimation could be informative; however, it was a short-term experiment and the dynamics of its response to the environment were preferred here. In our study, the main effects of eCO2 and eT greatly increased A, and under eCO2aT, A increase was probably associated with increased intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), while under aCO2eT and eCO2eT, A improvement was probably associated with enhanced ETR. It makes intuitive sense that plants grown under eT would have improved A since the products of linear electron transport, ATP and NADPH, are used in downstream processes in photosynthetic carbon assimilation (the Calvin cycle; Murchie and Lawson, 2013). We observed that eCO2aT and eCO2eT reduced the quantum yield of non-light-induced non-photochemical fluorescence quenching [Y (NO)] (Figures 8N,O). This reduction in quantum yield was probably caused by a greater fraction of closed PSII centers, which led to a significant increase in the Y(II) value compared to aCO2aT. On the other hand, Y(NPQ) was not altered by eCO2aT (Figure 8R) when compared to aCO2aT (Figure 8Q), suggesting that elevated CO2 improved A and served as the main sink for ATP and NADPH, potentially lowering the requirement for thermal dissipation of energy (Pan et al., 2018).
The combination eCO2aT increased A which resulted in an increase in the number and size of starch grains in the chloroplasts of photosynthetic cells, as observed in Figures 6E,F. According to the MDA levels and intact ultrastructure of thylakoid membranes of chloroplasts under this treatment, we observed that elevated [CO2] greatly affected stomatal functioning and anatomy, benefiting the photosynthetic performance and WUE. We also observed that eT significantly reduced the size and number of starch grains regardless of [CO2] (Figure 6). Starch is the primary storage carbohydrate in plants and plays an essential role in the response of plants to abiotic stress. It is mobilized as sucrose and transported through the plant in complex source-sinks networks. When the sink is strong, a source tissue has a decreased starch pool because starch is exported. Presumably, warming is driving starch breakdown and transportation. This same stimulus of starch remobilization was found in the tropical forage species Panicum maximum under 2°C warming in the T-FACE system (Habermann et al., 2019a,b). In addition, warming promoted a tighter association between chloroplasts and mitochondria (Figures 6I–K), suggesting a mechanism known as photorespiratory CO2 scavenging, which increases the likelihood of CO2 being re-fixed by chloroplasts (Betti et al., 2016). We also observed fewer membranes organized in a thylakoid structure, but no negative effects on photosynthetic performance were detected.
Legume species have been poorly represented at the biochemical level in climate change studies (AbdElgawad et al., 2015). Here, antioxidant defenses were not affected, except by decreased APX activity under eT regardless of [CO2] level, which may indicate that ROS is presumably being scavenged. This is because ROS content is one of the stimuli of antioxidant enzyme production and activity (Tripathy and Oelmüller, 2012; AbdElgawad et al., 2015). It has been suggested that eCO2 can ameliorate drought and warming’s impacts on antioxidative defenses (AbdElgawad et al., 2015). In this study, the enhanced content of carotenoids under eCO2eT indicated improved heat dissipation, which is in agreement with our Chlorophyll Fluorescence data. In addition, the number and size of plastoglobuli greatly increased under aCO2eT and eCO2eT treatments (Figure 6). Plastoglobuli are lipoprotein structures surrounded by a monolayer membrane that is attached to thylakoid membranes of chloroplasts, and its occurrence often increases under abiotic stress under abiotic stress (Austin et al., 2006). Several substances were identified as part of the chemical composition of plastoglobuli, such as triacylglycerol, α-tocopherol, plastoquinol-9, and carotenoids that mostly belong to the xanthophyll cycle, such as xanthophylls zeaxanthin, antheraxanthin, and violaxanthin. Many of these substances act as ROS scavengers and can improve heat dissipation in plants (van Wijk and Kessler, 2017). Thus, the increase in the plastoglobuli is presumably driving plant acclimation to warmer conditions.
In conclusion, our results indicate that elevated [CO2] was the main driver of the observed changes in stomatal opening control and anatomy, while warming showed more pronounced effects on PSII performance and antioxidant defenses. The physiological performance of S. capitata under the combination eCO2eT indicates great resilience to challenging conditions such as drought. These findings show how important S. capitata can be for maintaining grassland productivity under the predicted climate change conditions.
EH and EDdO wrote the manuscript. EH, DC, CAM, EDdO, JABSM, and LC collected data in the field and processed the data. CAM and MAG-M conceived and designed the experiments. All authors contributed to the revision of the manuscript.
This work was supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), Thematic Project (Grant 2008/58075-8), and by The Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (Grant 446357/2015-4) to CAM FAPESP provided graduate studentships to EH (Grant 14/26821-3; 16/09742-8) and EDdO (Grant 14/00317-7). CNPq provided a scholarship to DC (Grant 385485/2015-8). CAM is a research fellow supported by CNPq (Grant 306039/2016-8), and CNPq provided a graduate scholarship to LC.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
We thank Bruce Kimball from the USDA and Franco Miglietta from IBIMET, Italy. We also thank Embrapa and “Boi Gordo” Seeds for providing S. capitata seeds.
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.00609/full#supplementary-material
AbdElgawad, H., Farfan-Vignolo, E. R., de Vos, D., and Asard, H. (2015). Elevated CO2 mitigates drought and temperature-induced oxidative stress differently in grasses and legumes. Plant Sci. 231, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.11.001
Ainsworth, E., and Long, S. P. (2005). What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? a meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytol. 165, 351–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01224.x
Ainsworth, E., and Rogers, A. (2007). The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 30, 258–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01641.x
Allen, L. H., Kakani, V. G., Vu, J. C. V., and Boote, K. J. (2011). Elevated CO2 increases water use efficiency by sustaining photosynthesis of water-limited maize and sorghum. J. Plant Physiol. 168, 1909–1918. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.05.005
Asner, G. P., Elmore, A. J., Olander, L. P., Martin, R. E., and Harris, A. T. (2004). Grazing systems, ecosystem responses, and global changes. Annu. Rev. Environ. Res. 29, 261–299. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.29.062403.102142
Austin, J. R., Frost, E., Vidi, P. A., Kessler, F. and Staehelin, L. A. (2006). Plastoglobules are lipoprotein subcompartments of the chloroplast that are permanently coupled to thylakoid membranes and contain biosynthetic enzymes. Plant Cell. 18, 1693–1703. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.039859
Azevedo, R. A., Alas, R. M., Smith, R. J., and Lea, P. J. (1998). Response of antioxidant enzymes to transfer from elevated carbon dioxide to air and ozone fumigation, in the leaves and roots of wild-type and a catalase-deficient mutant of barley. Physiol. Plant. 104, 280–292. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1998.1040217.x
Bernacchi, C. J., Kimball, B., Quarles, D. R., Long, S. P., and Ort, D. R. (2007). Decreases in stomatal conductance of soybean under open-air elevation of [CO2] are closely coupled with decreases in ecosystem evapotranspiration. Plant Physiol. 143, 134–144. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.089557
Betti, M., Bauwe, H., Busch, F. A., Fernie, A. R., Keech, O., Levey, M., et al. (2016). Manipulating photorespiration to increase plant productivity: recent advances and perspectives for crop improvement. J. Exp. Bot. 67, 2977–2988. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw076
Bloor, J. M. G., Pichon, P., Falcimagne, R., Leadley, P., and Soussana, J. F. (2010). Effects of warming, summer drought, and CO2 enrichment on aboveground biomass production, flowering phenology, and community structure in an upland grassland ecosystem. Ecosystems 13, 888–900. doi: 10.1007/s10021-010-9363-0
Bradford, M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999
Chattaraj, S., Chakraborty, D., Sehgal, V. K., Paul, R. K., Singh, S. D., Daripa, A., et al. (2014). Predicting the impact of climate change on water requirement of wheat in the semi-arid indo-gangetic plains of India. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 197, 174–183. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.07.023
Dias de Oliveira, E., Bramley, H., Siddique, K. H. M., Henty, S., Berger, J., and Palta, J. A. (2013). Can elevated CO2 combined with high temperature ameliorate the effect of terminal drought in wheat? Funct. Plant Biol. 40, 160–171. doi: 10.1071/FP12206
Dias de Oliveira, E. A., Palta, J. A., Bramley, H., Stefanova, K., and Siddique, K. H. M. (2015a). Elevated CO2 reduced floret death in wheat under warmer average temperatures and terminal drought. Front. Plant Sci. 6:1010. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01010
Dias de Oliveira, E. A., Siddique, K. H. M., Bramley, H., Stefanova, K., and Palta, J. A. (2015b). Response of wheat restricted-tillering and vigorous growth traits to variables of climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 21, 857–873. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12769
Dieleman, W. I., Vicca, S., Dijkstra, F. A., Hagedorn, F., Hovenden, M. J., Larsen, K. S., et al. (2012). Simple additive effects are rare: a quantitative review of plant biomass and soil process responses to combined manipulations of CO2 and temperature. Glob. Chang. Biol. 18, 2681–2693. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02745.x
Doheny-Adams, T., Hunt, L., Franks, P. J., Beerling, D. J., and Gray, J. E. (2012). Genetic manipulation of stomatal density influences stomatal size, plant growth and tolerance to restricted water supply across a growth carbon dioxide gradient. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 367, 547–555. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0272
Drewniak, B. A., and Gonzalez-Meler, M. A. (2017). Earth system model needs for including the interactive representation of nitrogen deposition and drought effects on forested ecosystems. Forests 8, 1–22. doi: 10.3390/f8080267
Fauset, S., Oliveira, L., Buckeridge, M. S., Foyer, C. H., Galbraith, D., Tiwari, R., et al. (2018). Contrasting responses of stomatal conductance and photosynthetic capacity to warming and elevated CO2 in the tropical tree species Alchornea glandulosa under heatwave conditions. Environ. Exp. Bot. 158, 28–39. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.10.030
Franks, P. J., Leitch, I. J., Ruszala, E. M., Hetherington, A. M., and Beerling, D. J. (2012). Physiological framework for adaptation of stomata to CO2 from glacial to future concentrations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 367, 537–546. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0270
Fu, G., Shen, X., Sun, W., Zhong, Z. M., Zhang, X. Z., and Zhou, Y. T. (2014). A Meta-analysis of the effects of experimental warming on plant physiology and growth on the Tibetan Plateau. J. Plant Growth Reg. 34, 57–65. doi: 10.1007/s00344-014-9442-0
Ghannoum, O., Von Caemmerer, S., Ziska, L. H., and Conroy, J. P. (2000). The growth response of C4 plants to rising atmospheric CO2 partial pressure: a reassessment. Plant Cell Environ. 23, 931–942. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00609.x
Ghini, R., Torre-Neto, A., Dentzien, A. F. M., Guerreiro-Filho, O., Iost, R., Patrício, F. R. A., et al. (2015). Coffee growth, pest and yield responses to free-air CO2 enrichment. Clim. Chang. 132, 307–320. doi: 10.1007/s10584-015-1422-2
Gonzalez-Meler, M. A., Silva, L. B. C., Dias-De-Oliveira, E., Flower, C. E., and Martinez, C. A. (2017). Experimental air warming of a Stylosanthes capitata, vogel dominated tropical pasture affects soil respiration and nitrogen dynamics. Front. Plant Sci. 8:46. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00046
Gonzalez-Meler, M. A., Taneva, L., and Trueman, R. J. R. J. (2004). Plant respiration and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration: cellular responses and global significance. Ann. Bot. 94, 647–656. doi: 10.1093/aob/mch189
Guan, M., Jin, Z., Li, J., Pan, X., Wang, S., and Li, Y. (2016). Effect of simulated climate warming on the morphological and physiological traits of Elsholtzia haichowensis in copper contaminated soil. Int. J. Phytoremediation 18, 368–377. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2015.1109591
Habermann, E., Dias de Oliveira, E. A., Contin, D. R., Delvecchio, G., Viciedo, D., Moraes, M. A., et al. (2019a). Warming and water deficit impact leaf photosynthesis and decrease forage quality and digestibility of a C4 tropical grass. Physiol. Plant. 165, 383–402. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12891
Habermann, E., San Martin, J. A. B., Contin, D. R., Bossan, V. P., Barboza, A., Braga, M. R., et al. (2019b). Increasing atmospheric CO2 and canopy temperature induces anatomical and physiological changes in leaves of the C4 forage species Panicum maximum. PLoS One 14:e0212506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212506
Heath, R. L., and Packer, L. (1968). Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 125, 189–198. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1
Herrick, J. D., Maherali, H., and Thomas, R. B. (2004). Reduced stomatal conductance in sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) sustained over long-term CO2 enrichment. New Phytol. 162, 387–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01045.x
IPCC (2018). “Summary for policymakers,” in Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C Above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty, eds V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H. O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla, et al. (Geneva: World Meteorological Organization).
Kim, T. H., Böhmer, M., Hu, H., Nishimura, N., and Schroeder, J. I. (2010). Guard cell signal transduction network: advances in understanding abscisic acid, CO2, and Ca2+ signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61, 561–591. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112226
Kimball, B. A., Conley, M. M., Wang, S., Lin, X., Luo, C., Morgan, J., et al. (2008). Infrared heater arrays for warming ecosystem field plots. Glob. Chang. Biol. 14, 309–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01486.x
Klein, T. (2014). The variability of stomatal sensitivity to leaf water potential across tree species indicates a continuum between isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. Funct. Ecol. 28, 1313–1320. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12289
Larsen, K. S., Andresen, L. C., Beier, C., Jonasson, S., Albert, K. R., Ambus, P., et al. (2011). Reduced N cycling in response to elevated CO2, warming, and drought in a Danish heathland: synthesizing results of the CLIMAITE project after two years of treatments. Glob. Chang. Biol. 17, 1884–1899. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02351.x
Leakey, A. D. B., Ainsworth, E., Bernacchi, C. J., Rogers, A., Long, S. P., and Ort, D. R. (2009). Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 2859–2876. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp096
Leakey, A. D. B., Bernacchi, C. J., Ort, D. R., and Long, S. P. (2006). Long-term growth of soybean at elevated [CO2] does not cause acclimation of stomatal conductance under fully open-air conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 29, 1794–1800. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01556.x
Lee, M. A., Davis, A. P., Chagunda, M. G. G., and Manning, P. (2017). Forage quality declines with rising temperatures, with implications for livestock production and methane emissions. Biogeosciences 14, 1403–1417. doi: 10.5194/bg-14-1403-2017
Lesturgez, G., Poss, R., Hartmann, C., Bourdon, E., Noble, A., and Ratana-Anupap, S. (2004). Roots of Stylosanthes hamata create macropores in the compact layer of a sandy soil. Plant Soil 260, 101–109. doi: 10.1023/b:plso.0000030184.24866.aa
Lichtenthaler, H. K., and Wellburn, A. R. (1983). Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 11, 591–592. doi: 10.1042/bst0110591
Lin, J., Jach, M. E., and Ceulemans, R. (2001). Stomatal density and needle anatomy of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) are affected by elevated CO2. New Phytol. 150, 665–674. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00124.x
Long, S. P., Ainsworth, E. A., Leakey, A. D. B., Nosberger, J., and Ort, D. R. (2006). Food for thought: lower-than-expected crop yield stimulation with rising CO2 concentrations. Science 312, 1918–1921. doi: 10.1126/science.1114722
Lyra, A., Tavares, P., Chou, S. C., Sueiro, G., Dereczynski, C. P., Sondermann, M., et al. (2017). Climate change projections over three metropolitan regions in Southeast Brazil using the non-hydrostatic Eta regional climate model at 5-km resolution. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 132, 663–682. doi: 10.1007/s00704-017-2067-z
Marchi, S., Tognetti, R., Vaccari, F. P., Lanini, M., Kaligaric, M., Miglietta, F., et al. (2004). Physiological and morphological responses of grassland species to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations in FACE-systems and natural CO2 springs. Funct. Plant Biol. 31, 181–194. doi: 10.1071/FP03140
Marin, F. R., Jones, J. W., Singels, A., Royce, F., Assad, E. D., Pellegrino, G. Q., et al. (2013). Climate change impacts on sugarcane attainable yield in southern Brazil. Clim. Chang. 117, 227–239. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0561-y
Martinez, C. A., Bianconi, M., Silva, L., Approbato, A., Lemos, M., Santos, L., et al. (2014). Moderate warming increases PSII performance, antioxidant scavenging systems and biomass production in Stylosanthes capitata vogel. Environ. Exp. Bot. 102, 58–67. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.02.001
Mega, R., Abe, F., Kim, J. S., Tsuboi, Y., Tanaka, K., Kobayashi, H., et al. (2019). Tuning water-use efficiency and drought tolerance in wheat using abscisic acid receptors. Nat. Plants 5, 153–159. doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0361-8
Miglietta, F., Hoosbeek, M. R., Foot, J., Gigon, F., Hassinen, A., Heijmans, M., et al. (1999). Spatial and temporal performance of the miniFACE (Free air CO2 enrichment) system on bog ecosystems in Northern and Central Europe. Environ. Monit. Assess. 66, 107–127.
Miles, J. W., and Lapointe, S. L. (1992). “Regional germplasm evaluation: a portfolio of germplasm options for the major ecosystems of tropical America,” in CIAT (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical): Pastures for the Tropical Lowlands: CIATs Contribution ed. B. Hardy (Cali: CIAT), 9–28.
Naudts, K., Van den Berge, J., Janssens, I., Nijs, I., and Ceulemans, R. (2013). Combined effects of warming and elevated CO2 on the impact of drought in grassland species. Plant Soil 369, 497–507. doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1595-2
Nelson, J. A., Morgan, J. A., LeCain, D. R., Mosier, A. R., Milchunas, D. G., and Parton, B. A. (2004). Elevated CO2 increases soil moisture and enhances plant water relations in a long-term field study in semi-arid shortgrass steppe of Colorado. Plant Soil 259, 169–179. doi: 10.1023/b:plso.0000020957.83641.62
Pan, C., Ahammed, G. J., Li, X., and Shi, K. (2018). Elevated CO2 improves photosynthesis under high temperature by attenuating the functional limitations to energy fluxes, electron transport and redox homeostasis in tomato leaves. Front. Plant Sci. 9:1739. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01739
Prado, C. H. B. A., Camargo-Bortolin, L. H. G., Castro, E., and Martinez, C. A. (2016). Leaf dynamics of Panicum maximum under future climatic changes. PLoS One 11:e0149620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149620
Purcell, C., Batke, S. P., Yiotis, C., Caballero, R., Soh, W. K., Murray, M., et al. (2018). Increasing stomatal conductance in response to rising atmospheric CO2. Ann. Bot. 121, 1137–1149. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx208
Raschke, K., Shabahang, M., and Wolf, R. (2003). The slow and the quick anion conductance in whole guard cells: their voltage-dependent alternation, and the modulation of their activities by abscisic acid and CO2. Planta 217, 639–650. doi: 10.1007/s00425-003-1033-4
Rojas-Downing, M. M., Nejadhashemi, A. P., Harrigan, T., and Woznicki, S. A. (2017). Climate change and livestock: impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Clim. Risk Manag. 16, 145–163. doi: 10.1016/j.crm.2017.02.001
Ruiz-Vera, U. M., Siebers, M., Gray, S. B., Drag, D. W., Rosenthal, D. M., Kimball, B., et al. (2013). Global warming can negate the expected CO2 stimulation in photosynthesis and productivity for soybean grown in the Midwestern United States(1[W][OA]). Plant Physiol. 162, 410–423. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.211938
Scholander, P. F., Hammel, H. T., Bradstreet, E. D., and Hemmingsen, E. A. (1965). Sap pressure in plants: negative hydrostatic pressure can be measured in plants. Science 149:920. doi: 10.1126/science.149.3687.920
Spence, R. D., Wu, H., Sharpe, P. J. H., and Clark, K. G. (1986). Water stress effects on guard cell anatomy and the mechanical advantage of the epidermal cells. Plant Cell Environ. 9, 197–202. doi: 10.1111/1365-3040.ep11611639
Teng, N., Wang, J., Chen, T., Wu, X., Wang, Y., and Lin, J. (2006). Elevated CO2 induces physiological, biochemical and structural changes in leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 172, 92–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01818.x
van Wijk, K. J., and Kessler, F. (2017). Plastoglobuli: plastid micro compartments with integrated functions in metabolism, plastid developmental transitions, and environmental adaptation. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 68, 253–289. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-111737
Wall, G. W., Brooks, T. J., Adam, N. R., Cousins, B., Kimball, B., Pinter, P. J., et al. (2001). Elevated atmospheric CO2 improved sorghum plant water status by ameliorating the adverse effects of drought. New Phytol. 152, 231–248. doi: 10.1046/j.0028-646X.2001.00260.x
Wall, G. W., Kimball, B., White, J. W., and Ottman, M. J. (2011). Gas exchange and water relations of spring wheat under full-season infrared warming. Glob. Chang. Biol. 17, 2113–2133. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02399.x
Watson, M. L. (1958). Staining of tissue sections for electron microscopy with heavy metals. II. Application of solutions containing lead and barium. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 4, 727–730. doi: 10.1083/jcb.4.6.727
Webb, N. P., Stokes, C. J., and Scanlan, J. C. (2012). Interacting effects of vegetation, soils and management on the sensitivity of Australian savanna rangelands to climate change. Clim. Chang. 112, 925–943. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0236-0
Werner, J. C., Paulino, V. T., Cantarella, H., Andrade, N. O., and Quaggio, J. A. (1997). “Forages,” in Fertilization and Liming Recommendations for the State of São Paulo, 2nd Edn, eds B. Raij, H. Cantarella, J. A. Quaggio, and A. M. C. Furlani (Campinas: IAC),263–273.
Williams, J., and Gardener, C. J. (1984). “Environmental constraints to growth and survival of Stylosanthes,” in The Biology and Agronomy of Stylosanthes, eds H. M. Stace and L. A. Edye (Sydney, NSW: Academic Press), 181–201. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-661680-4.50014-7
Wullschleger, S. D., Tschaplinski, T. J., and Norby, R. J. (2002). Plant water relations at elevated CO2 - implications for water-limited environments. Plant Cell Environ. 25, 319–331. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00796.x
Zhao, M., Tan, H. T., Scharwies, J., Levin, K., Evans, J. R., and Tyerman, S. D. (2017). Association between water and carbon dioxide transport in leaf plasma membranes: assessing the role of aquaporins. Plant Cell Environ. 40, 789–801. doi: 10.1111/pce.12830
Keywords: elevated CO2, gas exchange, global climate change, stomatal conductance regulation, tropical forage legume, warming
Citation: Habermann E, Dias de Oliveira EA, Contin DR, San Martin JAB, Curtarelli L, Gonzalez-Meler MA and Martinez CA (2019) Stomatal Development and Conductance of a Tropical Forage Legume Are Regulated by Elevated [CO2] Under Moderate Warming. Front. Plant Sci. 10:609. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00609
Received: 25 January 2019; Accepted: 25 April 2019;
Published: 31 May 2019.
Edited by:Xiangnan Li, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology (CAS), China
Reviewed by:Mauro Guida Santos, Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil
Elias Kaiser, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Germany
Copyright © 2019 Habermann, Dias de Oliveira, Contin, San Martin, Curtarelli, Gonzalez-Meler and Martinez. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Carlos Alberto Martinez, firstname.lastname@example.org