Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 15 November 2019
Sec. Plant Pathogen Interactions
This article is part of the Research Topic Novel Insights into Hormonal Crosstalk in Interactions Between Plants and Pathogens/Insect Pests View all 5 articles

The Trichoderma harzianum Kelch Protein ThKEL1 Plays a Key Role in Root Colonization and the Induction of Systemic Defense in Brassicaceae Plants

  • 1Department of Botany and Plant Physiology, Spanish-Portuguese Institute for Agricultural Research (CIALE), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
  • 2Department of Microbiology and Genetics, Spanish-Portuguese Institute for Agricultural Research (CIALE), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain

The fungal genus Trichoderma includes strains with biocontrol and/or biostimulant potential and is recognized as a source of genes with biotechnological value. In a previous study the Kelch domain protein, encoded by the Thkel1 gene of Trichoderma harzianum T34, was found to confer tolerance to salt stress when expressed in plants of Arabidopsis thaliana. In the present work, we have overexpressed Thkel1 in rapeseed plants in order to generate an additional biotechnological tool for analyzing the role of this gene in Trichoderma-plant interactions. The overexpression of this gene in Brassicaceae plants improves responses to pathogens through the induction of systemic defenses mediated by jasmonic acid, facilitates root colonization by modulating the myrosinase activity, and, as a result, increases plant productivity. These effects were also observed in Thkel1 overexpressing plants subjected to abiotic stress conditions. Additionally, the differences detected in root colonization levels by T. harzianum wild type and Thkel1 silenced transformants between Arabidopsis or rapeseed and tomato plants indicate that ThKEL1 interacts in different ways in Brassicaceae and non-Brassicaceae plants.

Introduction

Trichoderma is a genus of soil-borne filamentous fungi able to colonize diverse substrates under different environmental conditions that includes species widely used as biocontrol agents in agriculture. In particular their capacity to antagonize plant pathogens through different mechanisms such as mycoparasitism, antibiosis, and competition is worth noting (Lorito et al., 2010), as well as the ability of some strains to stimulate plant growth and development and induce plant defense against biotic and abiotic stresses (Hermosa et al., 2012; Hermosa et al., 2013; Rubio et al., 2014; Rubio et al., 2017). These effects are the consequence of different metabolic changes modulated by the intimate interaction between Trichoderma and roots. The molecular dialog between this beneficial fungus and plants has been studied intensively through the use of techniques such as proteomics (Marra et al., 2006), metabolomics (Vinale et al., 2008), transcriptomics and co-expression analysis (Morán-Diez et al., 2012; Brotman et al., 2013), secretomics (Mendoza-Mendoza et al., 2018), and confocal microscopy (Carrero-Carrón et al., 2018). Considering the different mechanisms of biocontrol that have been identified, it is clear that this process involves many genes and gene products which can be isolated and cloned to produce disease-resistant genetically modified (GM) crops. A pioneer work showed that a Trichoderma chitinase gene could be functionally expressed in tobacco and potato plants conferring beneficial characteristics, mainly in disease control (Lorito et al. 1998). Subsequently, many examples of transformed plants with other Trichoderma genes, such as those encoding a cellobiohydrolase or a glutathione transferase in tobacco (Dai et al., 1999; Dixit et al., 2011), α and β glucanases in Arabidopsis or pearl millet (Calo et al., 2006; O`Kennedy et al., 2011), a xylanase in fescue (Buanafina et al., 2012), or a heat shock protein 70 in Arabidopsis (Montero-Barrientos et al., 2010) have been reported.

In a previous study, we isolated and characterized the Thkel1 gene from T. harzianum (Hermosa et al., 2011) and observed that this gene: i) codes for a protein which showed similarity to plant nitrile-specifier proteins (NSPs) and epithiospecifier proteins (ESPs), which when interacting with myrosinases convert glucosinolates to both simple nitriles and epithionitriles depending on the glucosinolate structure (Kissen and Bones, 2009); and ii) was related to the β-glucosidase activity of T. harzianum. Thkel1 codes for the ThKEL1 protein which comprises five Kelch-repeat domains (Hermosa et al., 2011). Kelch-like family proteins are highly conserved in evolution and are considered to play important roles in cell morphology (Dhanoa et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013), as well as in protein-protein interactions. They act as substrate adaptor proteins for the SCF (Skp1, Cullin, F-box containing complex) ubiquitin ligase complex, catalyzing the ubiquitination of proteins destined for degradation in the 26S proteasome. In plants, this class of enzymes play a key role in many physiological processes, including the circadian clock, plant growth and development, defense responses, metabolism of cell wall lignification, activation of phytohormones, and secondary metabolism or fruit ripening (Hassan et al., 2015). We also observed that Thkel1 improves T. harzianum adaptation to abiotic stress. Furthermore, the transformation of Arabidopsis plants with this gene produced an enhanced response to salt and osmotic stresses through the modulation of β-glucosidase activity (Hermosa et al., 2011).

The aim of this work is to build upon what is already known about the role of the T. harzinum Thkel1 gene in Trichoderma-plant root colonization. For this purpose, we analyzed the interaction of T. harzianum with Arabidopsis, rapeseed, and tomato plants using previously generated modified organisms (Hermosa et al., 2011), such as the Thkel1-silenced transformants of T. harzianum and transgenic plants of Arabidopsis, expressing this gene, as well as Thkel1 rapeseed transgenic plants obtained in the present work. Thus, we have analyzed plant responses to foliar pathogens, such as B. cinerea or P. lingam, as well as the expression levels of several defense-marker genes. Finally, we determined the degree of root colonization using Trichoderma wild type and Thkel1-silenced mutant strains, myrosinase activity, and rapeseed productivity, both under abiotic stress and control conditions.

Material and Methods

Plant Material

The Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Col-0 and its previously described (Hermosa et al., 2011) M2 transgenic line expressing the Thkel1 gene from T. harzianum T34, named throughout the article as AtKel2, have been used. Since the three independent Thkel1 transgenic lines obtained in our laboratory exhibited similar phenotypes, only results from AtKel2 are shown along the manuscript. Brassica napus cv. Jura and Solanum lycopersicum cv. Marmande were the other plants used in this study. Seeds were surface sterilized as previously described (Rubio et al., 2017).

Rapeseed Transformation

To generate the vector construct used for rapeseed transformation, we used the GATEWAY methodology (Karimi et al., 2002). Two primers were designed to introduce the attB1 and attB2 recombination sites at the 5´ and 3´ ends, respectively of the pDONR201 plasmid (Table 1), obtaining the pENTR201 plasmid. Finally, this plasmid was used to generate the pKGWFS7-Thkel1 construct, the DESTINY plasmid, that contains the T-DNA region that was transferred to Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58C1 by electroporation (Mersereau et al., 1990). Rapeseed plants were transformed by the floral dip method and transgenic seedlings were selected on kanamycin medium (50 µg/ml).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 Oligonucleotides used in this work.

T1 kanamycin-resistant seeds were recovered and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) analyzed using the specific oligonucleotides 35S-GTW-F and Thkel1-R (Table 1). Selected plants were continued until T3 and were considered homozygous. Two independent transgenic lines, namely BnKel1 and BnKel2, were selected for the subsequent analysis.

As expected, the transgene was detected in the transformed plants and the expression levels of Thkel1 gene in both Arabidopsis and rapeseed transgenic plants are shown in Figure S1.

Plant Growth and Conditions

Seeds were grown on Murashige and Skoog (MS) (Duchefa, Haarlem, Netherlands) solid medium (agar 1%) with sucrose (1%) in a growth chamber at 22°C, 40% relative humidity (RH), and a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod at 80–100 µE m−2 s−1, for 7 (rapeseed), 10 (Arabidopsis), and 16 (tomato) days. Arabidopsis seedlings were individually transferred to 0.2 L-pots and rapeseed and tomato seedlings to 5 L-pots, containing a mixture of peat/vermiculite (3:1) and maintained in a greenhouse at 22 ± 2°C as previously described (Montero-Barrientos et al., 2010). Hydroponic culture of A. thaliana was also carried out as previously described (Alonso-Ramírez et al., 2014).

Trichoderma Cultures and Inoculation

T. harzianum CECT 2413 (Spanish Type Culture Collection, Valencia, Spain, referred to as strain T34) was used throughout this study. Moreover, the K4 and K10 T. harzianum transformants, obtained by silencing with self-complementary “hairpin” RNAs (intron hairpin RNA [ihpRNA]) of the Thkel1 gene, together with the transformation control strain ThJL43 were used (Hermosa et al., 2011). Strains were routinely grown on potato-dextrose-agar (PDA, Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain) in the dark at 28°C and the spores were stored at −80°C in a 20% glycerol solution. Spores were harvested from 7-day-old PDA dishes as previously described (Rubio et al., 2014).

Arabidopsis was inoculated with T. harzianum strains in the hydroponic culture following the method described by Alonso-Ramírez et al. (2014). Rapeseed and tomato treated with T. harzianum T34 and its transformants were root inoculated with 1 ml of a conidial suspension containing 2 × 107 spore ml−1, determined using a hemocytometer, 1 week after the seedlings were transplanted.

Quantification of Root Colonization

The quantification of T34 DNA in the roots of rapeseed, Arabidopsis and tomato plants was performed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) as previously described (Morán-Diez et al., 2009; Alonso-Ramírez et al., 2014), with some modifications. Roots were collected during the formation of the floral primordia in 10- (rapeseed) and 7- (tomato) week-old plants, and 7 days after inoculation with the fungus in the case of Arabidopsis hydroponic culture. DNA was extracted using the cetyl-trimethyl-ammonium bromide (CTAB) extraction method (Dellaporta et al., 1983). A mix was prepared in a 10 µl volume using 5 µl of Brilliant SYBR Green QPCR Master Mix (Roche), 10 ng of DNA, the forward and reverse primers at a final concentration of 100 nM, and nuclease-free PCR-grade water to adjust the final volume. The Actin genes of Trichoderma, Arabidopsis, rapeseed, and tomato were used as internal controls for gene expression normalization, and their corresponding primer pairs are indicated in Table 1. Amplifications were performed in an ABI PRISM 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) programmed for 40 cycles under the following conditions: denaturation, 95°C for 15 s; annealing, 60°C for 1 min; extension, 72°C for 1 min. Each PCR was performed in triplicate by using the DNA extracted from the roots collected (3 sets of 5 plants for each condition per plant type). Cycle threshold values served to calculate the amount of fungal DNA using standard curves. Values of Trichoderma DNA were referred to the amount of Arabidopsis, rapeseed, or tomato DNA in every corresponding sample.

Abiotic Stress Conditions

Wild-type and Thkel1 rapeseed plants were watered with a 200 mM NaCl solution every 2 days, starting from the development of the third true leaf (3-week-old plants) until the end of its development cycle, in the case of salt stress or with a progressive reduction of watering in the case of drought stress.

Biotic Stress Test

For the biotic stress test, the phytopathogenic fungal strains B. cinera B05.10, isolated from a grapevine field from Cádiz (Spain), and P. lingam CRD13/125/99, facilitated by the Regional Diagnostic Center of the Regional Government of Castile and Leon (Salamanca, Spain) and isolated from a rapeseed field from Palencia (Spain), were used. The strains were maintained in the same way as in the case of Trichoderma strains.

The tests of infection with the necrotrophic fungus B. cinerea were performed on leaves of the A. thaliana wild-type ecotype Col-0 and the transgenic line AtKel2 on filter paper on Petri dishes saturated with water. This was done in order to maintain the humidity in the microenvironment close to 90%, and the dishes were also sealed using parafilm. The inoculation of this pathogen was carried out by positioning a drop of 5 µl of a germination solution containing 1000 spores of B. cinerea (20 mM glucose, 20 mM KH2PO4, pH 6.5 adjusted by KOH). The dishes were placed in a light chamber (Fitotron AGP-1400-HR, Radiber SA, Barcelona, Spain) with a photoperiod of 16 h of light (80–100 E/m2/s) and 8 h of darkness at a temperature of 22°C and a relative humidity of 40%–50%. For in planta infection the methodology was similar, except that the plants are kept in transparent plastic compartments with high humidity.

The inoculation of rapeseed leaves was performed with the pathogen P. lingam. An agar plug of the fungus was obtained from the edge of a colony of a 7-day-old PDA culture. The plug was deposited onto detached leaves. The fifth and sixth leaves were inoculated when the plant had begun to develop the eighth leaf and then they were placed under high humidity conditions, like those of Arabidopsis.

In all cases, data were obtained from three biological replicates with five plants per replicate for each condition.

Gene Expression Studies

Two leaves were collected from three sets of Arabidopsis plants per assayed condition, and each set included five plants. The pooled leaves were used for RNA extraction with the TRI reagent (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Root RNA extraction was performed following a similar protocol with pooled samples from five plants. The cDNA synthesis was performed as previously described (Rubio et al., 2017). Gene expression was analyzed by reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR). PCR mixtures and amplification conditions were as previously described (Montero-Barrientos et al., 2010). The primers used are given in Table 1, and the Actin gene was used as the Arabidopsis endogenous control. Data are expressed using 2−ΔΔCT method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001).

Myrosinase Activity

Total protein was extracted from 300 mg of plant material, powdered in a chilled mortar on ice, with 1 ml of 30 mM citrate-phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, containing 1 mM EDTA. The homogenate was centrifuged at 16,400 rpm for 4 min at 4°C. Supernatant was transferred to a clean tube and the protein concentration was determined (Bradford, 1976). Protein extracts from different plant samples were assayed for myrosinase activity following a sinigrin-based procedure previously described (Charron and Sams, 2004). The myrosinase activity was calculated as units (U) of activity, based on the amount of enzyme that causes the disappearance of 1 µmol of sinigrin per min, and expressed in units per gram of protein.

Statistical Analysis

The statistical analysis of the data was carried out with the Statistix 8.0 software. Student’s t-test was used for comparison of means at P < 0.05; significant differences are denoted using an asterisk. One-way ANOVA using Tukey’s multiple range test at P < 0.05 was used for pairwise comparisons; the different letters indicate the significant differences. In the case of Figure S1, since no expression was detected in wild ecotypes, a log (x + 1) transformation was used on gene expression data so that it would meet parametric statistical assumptions.

Results

Defense Responses of Thkel1-Expressing Plants Against Biotic Stress

In previous work (Hermosa et al., 2011), we observed that Arabidopsis plants expressing the Thkel1 gene from T. harzianum were more tolerant to abiotic stress conditions. To analyze plant responses to biotic stress, leaf inoculations with the foliar pathogen B. cinerea were performed. As shown in supplementary Figure S2, B. cinerea B05.10 produced small lesions with moderate leaf senescence in detached Col-0 Arabidopsis leaves. The diameter of these chlorotic regions at 120 h after inoculation with this pathogen was significantly higher compared with the leaves of AtKel2 plants expressing the Thkel1 gene of T. harzianum (Figures 1 and S2). Significantly larger lesions were detected in Col-0 Arabidopsis leaves tested in an in planta assay (Figure 1C). Similar results were observed in the case of rapeseed plants inoculated with the foliar pathogen P. lingam. A significant reduction in the size of the lesions caused by this pathogen was observed in transgenic rapeseed BnKel1 and BnKel2 plants expressing the Thkel1 gene, compared with their wild-type counterpart (Figure 2).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 A. thaliana leaf lesions caused by B. cinerea. Leaf bioassay performed on detached leaves of Col-0 and transgenic line AtKel2 at 80 h and 120 h after B. cinerea inoculation (A). In planta assay performed on Col-0 and transgenic line AtKel2 at 120 h after pathogen inoculation (B and C). The quantification of the fungal lesions (A in detached leaf assay, and C in planta assay) is represented by columns that show the percentages of the diameter (mm) lesion groups. Data were obtained from three biological replicates with five plants per replicate for each condition. Asterisks denote significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 using the non-parametric Friedman’s test.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Rapeseed leaf lesions caused by P. lingam. Commercial variety (WT) (A) and transgenic lines BnKel1 and BnKel2 (B and C), 7 days after pathogen inoculation. The quantification of the lesions produced (D) has been represented by columns that show the percentages of the diameter (mm) lesion groups of the lesions. Data were obtained from three biological replicates, and five plants per replicate for each condition. Asterisks denote signifiant differences at P ≤ 0.05 using the non-parametric Friedman’s test.

In view of these results, we analyzed the expression of defense-related genes implicated in both the biosynthesis and responses dependent on the phytohormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA); ICS1 (SA biosynthesis); PR-1 (SA-dependent defense); LOX1 (JA biosynthesis); and VSP2 (JA-dependent defense). A significant increase in the expression levels of the four genes analyzed was observed in the leaves of 5-week-old AtKel2 Arabidopsis plants compared with the wild type Col-0 (Figure 3). In addition, we also analyzed by RT-qPCR the profile of these defense markers genes in Arabidopsis plants challenged with the necrotrophic pathogen B. cinerea 120 h after infection. In this case, a significant increase in the expression levels of JA-related genes was observed in AtKel2 plants, whereas a reduction in the expression of SA-related genes was detected (Figure 4).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3 Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis of the expression of some defense genes in the leaves of A. thaliana wild-type plants (Col-0) and the transgenic line AtKel2 (5-week-old plants). Genes of the isochorismate synthase 1 (ICS1), pathogenesis-related protein 1 (PR-1), lipoxygenase 1 (LOX1), and vegetative storage protein (VSP2). Values correspond to relative measurements against Col-0 (2–ΔΔCt = 1). The Arabidopsis actin gene was used as an internal reference gene. Data are the mean of three biological replicates for each condition with the corresponding standard deviation, and for each biological replicate and condition, two leaves per plant from five plants were used. Student’s t-test was performed. Asterisks denote significant differences at P ≤ 0.05.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4 Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis of the expression of some defense genes in the leaves of A. thaliana wild type (Col-0) and the transgenic line AtKel2 infected with B. cinerea, 120 h after infection (+Bc). Genes of the isochorismate synthase 1 (ICS1), pathogenesis-related protein 1 (PR-1), lipoxygenase 1 (LOX1) and vegetative storage protein (VSP2). Values correspond to relative measurements against plants without infection (2–ΔΔCt = 1). The Arabidopsis actin gene was used as an internal reference gene. Data are the mean of three biological replicates for each condition with the corresponding standard deviation, and for each biological replicate and condition, three leaves per plant from five plants were used. Student’s t-test was performed. Asterisks denote significant differences at P ≤ 0.05.

The Role of the Thkel1 Gene in Root Colonization

In order to characterize the role of Thkel1 of T. harzianum T34 in the colonization of Brassicaceae and non-Brassicaceae plants, the fungal levels of the wild-type strain (T34) and the silenced Thkel1 mutants (K4 and K10) strains were determined in Arabidopsis, rapeseed, and tomato plants, as well as in Arabidopsis (AtKel2) and rapeseed (BnKel1 and BnKel2) Thkel1 transgenic plants. The latter were generated in this particular study. To this end, we conducted a root colonization study in hydroponic culture (Alonso-Ramírez et al., 2014) using previously obtained Thkel1 silenced transformants of T. harzianum (Hermosa et al., 2011). No differences were detected in root colonization levels when the Trichoderma wild-type T34 strain and the transformation control ThJL43 strain were used. Interestingly, a significant reduction in the degree of root colonization was detected when Arabidopsis Col-0 plants were inoculated with the Trichoderma K4 and K10 silenced transformants. Furthermore, colonization was restored when K4 and K10 interacted with AtKel2 plants overexpressing Thkel1, although it was not completely restored when compared to Arabidopsis wild-type (Figures 5A and S3). A similar root colonization profile was observed in rapeseed plants (Figure 5B), although in this case no colonization at all was detected when wild-type plants were inoculated with the silenced transformants. By contrast, the highest degree of tomato root colonization was detected in the interaction with the Thkel1 silenced transformants (Figure 5C).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5 Analysis of root colonization by T. harzianum (T34: control strain; ThJL43: transformation control; K4 and K10: silenced transformats for the Thkel1 gene) in hydroponic culture of A. thaliana(A), rapeseed (B), and tomato (C) in a greenhouse. To quantify Arabidopsis, rapeseed, and tomato root colonization, the DNA of the fungus was quantified by qPCR from radicular samples using the actin genes from both the plants and the fungus. Data are the mean of three biological replicates for each condition with the corresponding standard deviation, and for each biological replicate and condition, roots from five plants were used. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, followed by the Tukey’s test. Different letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05).

Additionally, the expression of defense marker genes was analyzed in Arabidopsis roots of both wild-type and transgenic plants (Figure 6A). Although ICS1 expression levels were significantly reduced in the wild-type plants interacting with the K4 and K10 silenced transformants, compared with those observed in the interaction with T34, it is noteworthy that the expression of the SA-dependent defense PR-1 gene was significantly increased in the interactions between Col-0 plants and strain T34 and the expression was even greater between Col-0 and strain ThJL43. However, reduced expression levels of PR-1 gene were detected in the transgenic line AtKel2 when challenged with K4 and K10 in comparison with those challenged with T34 or ThJL43 strains. Regarding JA-related genes, a significant decrease in their expression levels was observed during the interactions between the wild-type plants and T34, or the wild type and ThJL43. On the contrary, when Arabidopsis wild-type plants were challenged with the silenced transformants K4 or K10, the expression levels of JA-related genes were significantly increased. In the case of the interaction of Thkel1-overexpressing plants with Trichoderma, a significant increase in the expression levels of the JA-related genes was detected, with the highest levels being detected in AtKel2 plants challenged by the T. harzianum silenced mutants K4 and K10. In the case of tomato plants (Figure 6B), the expression levels of ICS1 were significantly reduced in all cases in comparison with those observed in wild-type plants whereas a significant increase in PR-1 levels was detected in tomato plants challenged with any of the Trichoderma strains. Moreover, a significant reduction in LOX1 levels was observed in tomato plants inoculated with the silenced transformants while the expression of EIN2, a major regulator of the ET signaling pathway, did not significantly change.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6 Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis of the expression of some defense genes in the roots of A. thaliana wild type (Col-0) and transgenic line (AtKel2) plants (A) and in tomato WT roots (B) inoculated with the T. harzianum strains T34 (control), ThJL43 (transformation control), K4 or K10 (Thkel1 gene silenced transformants). Genes of the isochorismate synthase 1 (ICS1), pathogenesis-related protein 1 (PR-1), lipoxygenase 1 (LOX1), vegetative storage protein (VSP2), and ethylene signaling protein (EIN2). Values correspond to relative measurements against plants without infection (2–ΔΔCt = 1). The Arabidopsis actin gene and the tomato actin gene were used as an internal reference gene. Data are the mean of three biological replicates for each condition with the corresponding standard deviation, and for each biological replicate and condition, roots from five plants were used. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, followed by the Tukey’s test. Different letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05) between plants with and without fungal inoculation.

Systemic Responses in Leaves of Arabidopsis Plants Inoculated With T. harzianum

In order to assess the systemic responses in leaves of Col-0 and AtKel2 plants challenged with the different Trichoderma strains (Figure 7), we calculated the expression levels of the same defense-marked genes used so far. A significant ICS1 expression increase was observed in Col-0 plants inoculated with T34 and ThJL43, whereas no changes were detected in these plants challenged with the silenced transformants. In addition, a significant increase in ICS1 expression was detected in Atkel2 leaves when these Thkel1-overexpressing plants were inoculated with any of the Trichoderma strains. Similar results were observed in the case of PR-1. Concerning JA-markers, a significant LOX1 and VSP2 expression decrease was observed in Col-0 leaves after Trichoderma inoculation. This decline was more dramatic in the case of K4 and K10 silenced transformants. In contrast, a significant increase in the expression levels of these two genes was detected in leaves of Atkel2 plants.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7 Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis of the expression of some defense genes in the leaves of A. thaliana wild type (Col-0) and transgenic line (AtKel2) plants, after inoculation with the control strain (+T34), the transformation control (+ThJL43), and the transformants with the silenced Thkel1 gene (+K4 and +K10) of T. harzianum. Genes of the isochorismate synthase 1 (ICS1), pathogenesis-related protein 1 (PR-1), lipoxygenase 1 (LOX1), vegetative storage protein (VSP2), and ethylene signaling protein (EIN2). Values correspond to relative measurements against plants without inoculation (2–ΔΔCt = 1). The Arabidopsis actin gene was used as an internal reference gene. Data are the mean of three biological replicates for each condition with the corresponding standard deviation, and for each biological replicate and condition, two leaves from three plants were used. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, followed by the Tukey’s test. Different letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05) between plants with and without fungal inoculation.

Myrosinase Activity

Thkel1 shares sequence similarity to NSPs and ESPs that modulate myrosinase activity in Brassicaceae plants. Thus, we analyzed this enzymatic activity in Arabidopsis and rapeseed plants challenged with the different Trichoderma strains (Figure 8). A significant myrosinase activity increase was observed in Arabidopsis plants inoculated with Trichoderma. The augmentation was significantly greater in the case of the K4 and K10 silenced transformants. In contrast, a significant decrease in this activity was detected in Atkel2 in comparison with Col-0 plants. This reduction was more dramatic in Atkel2 plants challenged with the strains T34 and ThJL43. Similar results were observed in the case of wild type, Bnkel1 and Bnkel2 rapeseed plants.

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8 Myrosinase activity (U/g of protein) in roots of A. thaliana wild type (Col-0) and transgenic line (AtKel2) plants (A) and rapeseed commercial variety (WT) and transgenic lines (BnKel1 and BnKel2) plants (B), after inoculation with the control strain (+T34), the transformation control (+ThJL43), and the transformants with the silenced Thkel1 gene (+K4 and +K10) of T. harzianum. Data are the mean of three biological replicates for each condition with the corresponding standard deviation, and for each biological replicate and condition, roots from five plants were used. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, followed by the Tukey’s test. Different letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05) between plants with and without fungal inoculation.

Productivity

Rapeseed is one of the most important oilseed crops. Thus, we analyzed productivity in both the wild-type and Thkel1-expressing rapeseed plants. The seed weight per plant was significantly higher in the transgenic lines BnKel1 and BnKel2 than that measured for the wild-type plants (Figure 9A) and was also the case under salt (Figure 9B) and drought stress conditions (Figure 9C). Moreover, the higher degree of T. harzianum colonization of BnKel1 and BnKel2 rapeseed roots was accompanied by an increase in productivity (Figure 9D). The wild-type rapeseed plants, on the other hand, challenged with the Thkel1 silenced transformants K4 and K10 showed significantly lower silique production and seed weight values compared to those obtained for wild-type plants colonized with the T. harzianum control strains, the wild type T34, and the transformation control ThJL43.

FIGURE 9
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 9 Rapeseed productivity. The weight of the seeds collected from the commercial variety (WT) and the transgenic Thkel1 lines (BnKel1 and BnKel2) per plant without stress (A), under salt stress (NaCl 200 mM; B), and under drought stress (C). The weight of seeds collected after inoculation with the control strain (+T34), the transformation control (+ThJL43), and the transformants with the silenced Thkel1 gene (+K4 and +K10) of T. harzianum(D). Data are the mean of three biological replicates for each condition with the corresponding standard deviation, and 15 plants per replicate were used. Student’s t-test was performed; asterisks denote significant differences at P ≤ 0.05. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, followed by the Tukey’s test in T. harzianum inoculation. Different letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05).

Discussion

Plant transformation with Trichoderma genes has been shown to improve plant responses to both biotic and abiotic stress conditions (Nicolás et al., 2014). In previous work, we reported that the expression of the Thkel1 from T. harzianum enhanced Arabidopsis plant responses to salt and osmotic stresses (Hermosa et al., 2011) through an increase in β-glucosidase activity. The Thkel1 gene codes for a protein with five Kelch domains. This class of proteins has been involved in several plant processes including circadian clock, flowering, hypocotyl elongation, and plant defense (Hassan et al., 2015).

In the present work we have generated rapeseed transgenic lines able to express the Thkel1 gene (Figure S1), in addition to the already available Arabidopsis AtKel2 plants (Hermosa et al., 2011), and analyzed the responses of these plants to biotic stress. The resulting transgenic rapeseed BnKel1 and BnKel2 lines as well as the AtKel2 line were more resistant than the wild type to the foliar pathogens P. lingam and B. cinerea (Figures 1, 2, and S2). Due to the aggressiveness of B05.10 strain of B. cinerea, one would expect more severe lesions in wild type plants. However, it has been reported that different lesion traits were detected in Arabidopsis leaves depending on the B. cinerea strain used (Fordyce et al., 2018), including B05.10. In any case, the symptoms and the chlorotic regions observed in detached leaves of wild-type Arabidopsis plants were not observed in AtKel2 plants.

To investigate the cause of this increased resistance to foliar pathogens in the different Thkel1 overexpressing lines, we analyzed the expression of several defense marker genes in Arabidopsis. The expression levels of SA- and JA- biosynthesis and defense related genes were significantly increased in the AtKel2 transgenic line compared to those recorded for Col-0 plants (Figure 3). Moreover, a significant increase in JA-related genes was detected when Arabidopsis plants were challenged with B. cinerea, whereas the SA-related gene expression was significantly reduced (Figure 4). These results are consistent with the size of the chlorotic lesion caused by B. cinerea in Col-0 compared with that observed in AtKel2 plants infected with this pathogen. The putative role of proteins with Kelch domains in plant defense responses has been widely studied (Kim and Delaney, 2002; Guo and Stotz, 2007; Thiel et al., 2012). In addition, β-glucosidase activity is also involved in plant defense responses (Opassiri et al., 2010) and it has been reported that proteins with Kelch domains are able to decrease SA responses (Zhang et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2015). These findings are in line with what was observed in AtKel2 plants artificially inoculated with plant pathogens, such as Botrytis and Phoma, as well as the increase in the antagonistic JA response (Figure 4).

The next step was to evaluate the degree of root colonization by T. harzianum in Thkel1-expressing and non-expressing plants and to assign a role for this gene in this process (Figures 5 and S3). In both Arabidopsis and rapeseed Thkel1-expressing plants, a significant increase in root colonization by T34 was detected. Conversely, when the corresponding Arabidopsis and rapeseed wild-type plants were challenged by the silenced transformants K4 and K10, a dramatic reduction in root colonization was observed. This effect was partially restored in the interaction between these silenced transformants and the transgenic AtKel2, BnKel1, or BnKel2 plants (Figures 5A, B). These findings suggest Thkel1 plays a key role in root colonization in Brassicaceae, which is supported by the fact that the results recorded for the tomato plants were completely different (Figure 5C). In this case, the greatest degree of root colonization was observed for ThKel1-silenced mutants. Although we cannot currently explain this result, it indicates that this gene is not likely to be involved in Trichoderma root colonization in non-Brassicaceae species.

Several Trichoderma genes have been shown to play important roles in plant root colonization. For instance, the swollenin TaSwo gene from T. asperellum remarkably increases the ability of overexpressing transformants to colonize cucumber roots, whereas its silencing reduces this ability (Brotman et al., 2008). In addition, two aspartyl proteases and an hydrophobin from T. asperellum were also identified as pivotal genes in the root colonization process (Viterbo et al., 2004; Viterbo and Chet, 2006). The endopolygalacturonase ThPG1 from T. harzianum was reported as a key player in the root colonization while activating SA-dependent defense responses in tomato (Morán-Diez et al., 2009) and Thkel1 could be another Trichoderma gene responsible for root colonization. However, in this case Thkel1 proved itself useful in the colonization of the Brassicaceae root system.

The differences in root colonization observed among T. harzianum strains are consistent with the expression profiles of defense-related genes detected in the roots of Col-0, AtKel2, and tomato plants (Figure 6). As expected, since SA is the key phytohormone regulating the Trichoderma root colonization process (Alonso-Ramírez et al., 2014), a significant increase in PR-1 levels was observed in Col-0 challenged by the T. harzianum wild-type strain, as well as in the case of the transformation control strain. This increase in PR-1 levels was however not detected in the case of K4 and K10 strains. Since these two silenced transformants were not successful enough in colonizing Col-0 roots, the activation of SA pathway would not appear to be required. This increase was also not detected in the AtKel2 plants. In this specific case, a significant increase in the expression of JA-marker genes, such as LOX1 and VSP2, was detected, as well as a reduction in the expression of SA-related genes. These results highlight the involvement of a Kelch domain protein in the JA-mediated defense response due to its ability to inhibit the SA-responsive defense through proteolytic degradation by ubiquitination pathways of SA-related proteins in Arabidopsis (Zhang et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2015). Depending on the presence of the ThKel1 gene in Trichoderma we have observed different degrees of root colonization between Brassicaceae and tomato plants (Figure 5). This result is consistent with the differences in the expression levels of the defense-marker genes analyzed in this study (Figure 6), and highlights, again, the role of Thkel1 gene in the Trichoderma root colonization process in Brassicaceae, probably through the modulation of myrosinase activity (Figure 8).

Concerning systemic responses in Arabidopsis, the silencing of Thkel1 gene leads to a downregulation of JA-related genes after Trichoderma inoculation (Figure 7). In view of this result, it would be expected that this mutant was not able to trigger ISR responses mediated by JA against Botrytis compared to those induced by Trichoderma wild-type strain. To confirm this observation, further research is needed. In addition, overexpression of this gene in Arabidopsis plants leads to an upregulation of JA as well as SA-marker genes, although in this case this upregulation was also observed in wild type plants. These results indicate induction of systemic responses, that has also been reported against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in B. napus after root colonization by T. harzianum (Alkooranee et al., 2017). These authors proved that this induction of systemic defense through JA/ET and SA-signaling pathways occurs at different times, that is in agreement with our results. JA seems to be very important in Thkel1 overexpressing plants against B. cinerea (Figure 4). By contrast, only PR-1 is induced in Arabidopsis Col-0 roots upon Trichoderma inoculation (Figure 6A), an expected result, since we have previously reported the important role of SA in the root colonization process avoiding a massive fungal invasion by Trichoderma (Alonso-Ramírez et al., 2014). It is important to note that PR-1 expression was higher in Col-0 roots colonized by ThJL43 as compared to those colonized by T34. This could be explained by a greater local defense activation by ThJL43 since no differences in root colonization levels were detected between both strains.

The Brassicaceae family is characterized by the presence of glucosinolates, a class of allelopathic compounds involved in plant defense (Cartea et al., 2011). The differences in root colonization between the Brassicaceae and non-Brassicaceae plants observed in this study may be associated with the production of these compounds. ThKEL1 shares a high degree of homology with NSPs and ESPs related with the metabolism of glucosinolates. Glucosinolates and myrosinases, enzymes responsible of hydrolysis, are spatially separated. Only after tissue damage is provoked by a pathogen, does glucosinolate breakdown begin. Other proteins, such as NSPs and ESPs, can modify myrosinase activity leading to the formation of other chemical compounds less toxic than isothiocyanate glucosinolates, such as nitriles or epithionitriles (Agerbirk and Olsen, 2012; Martínez-Ballesta and Carvajal, 2015). Our hypothesis is related to the possible role of Thkel1 in the degradation of glucosinolates, which would in turn help Trichoderma species to colonize the Brassicaceae roots. Thus, we analyzed myrosinase activity in Arabidopsis, B. napus wild-type, AtKel2, and BnKel plants challenged with the different Trichoderma strains (Figure 8). In summary, an increased myrosinase activity was recorded when plants were challenged with the silenced transformants and a decrease in transgenic plants that overexpress Thkel1 gene. These data are consistent with the degree of root colonization of the different Trichoderma strains (Figure 5). Myrosinases and glucosinolates are localized in specialized and different cells. Herbivore attack breaks these cells beginning the plant defense response (Shirakawa et al., 2016). However, it has been recently described that some atypical myrosinases, with antifungal capacities such as PEN2 or PYK10, are not accumulated in those specialized cells. These atypical myrosinases are secreted through ABC transporters and exhibit their effect at the extracellular level (Shirakawa and Hara-Nishimura, 2018). Our data suggest that the Thkel1 gene may modulate myrosinase activity, and we can speculate that the interaction with some of these atypical myrosinase may decrease toxic glucosinolate levels, allowing root colonization by Trichoderma in Brassicaceae. In any case, further progress is needed in this direction to confirm this possibility.

It has been reported that some Trichoderma strains, such as T. asperellum (Kowalska, 2014) and T. koningii (Wang et al., 2009), were able to increase the crop yield of crucifers. Since rapeseed is one of the most economically important oilseed crops, and due to the observed differences in the degree of root colonization, we analyzed both silique and seed production in these plants. The higher degree of root colonization by T. harzianum in BnKel1 and BnKel2 plants was also accompanied by an increase in the number of siliques per plant and in the total seed weight per plant (Figure 9). Furthermore, this effect was enhanced under abiotic stress conditions, which could be expected considering the higher tolerance to salt and osmotic stresses previously reported in AtKel plants (Hermosa et al., 2011). The increase in seed yields may be related to the ability of those proteins with Kelch-repeat domains to improve the number and size of seeds, as previously described in rice (Chen et al., 2013), to the ratio of β-glucosidases in the nutritional cycle (Caruso, 2010), or to the inorganic phosphate accumulation in plants as reported in Arabidopsis (Malboobi and Lefebvre, 1997).

In conclusion, the results presented here show that the overexpression of Thkel1 gene from T. harzianum improves plant responses to pathogens by inducing systemic defenses mediated by JA and that the ThKel1 gene of Trichoderma plays a key role in colonizing the roots of Brassicaceae plants, probably through modulation of myrosinase activity. In addition, its expression in Brassicaceae increases T. harzianum root colonization, which is accompanied by higher plant productivity, both under control conditions and under salt or drought stress.

Data Availability Statement

All datasets generated for this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.

Author Contributions

JP performed the experiments. JP, EM, and CN conceived and designed the experiments. JP, RH, EM, and CN analyzed the data. JP, RH, EM, and CN wrote the paper.

Funding

This work was supported by the grants AGL2015-70671-C2-1-R from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and SA230U13 and SA270P18 from the Regional Government of Castile and Leon (Spain).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2019.01478/full#supplementary-material

References

Agerbirk, N., Olsen, C. E. (2012). Glucosinolate structures in evolution. Phytochem. 77, 16–45. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.02.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alkooranee, J. T., Aledan, T. R., Ali, A. K., Lu, G., Zhang, X., Wu, J., et al. (2017). Detecting the hormonal pathways in oilseed rape behind induced systemic resistance by Trichoderma harzianum TH12 to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. PloS One 12, e0168850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168850

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alonso-Ramírez, A., Poveda, J., Martín, I., Hermosa, R., Monte, E., Nicolás, C. (2014). Salicylic acid prevents Trichoderma harzianum from entering the vascular system of roots. Mol. Plant Pathol. 15, 823–831. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12141

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bradford, M. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 7, 248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brotman, Y., Briff, E., Viterbo, A., Chet, I. (2008). Role of swollenin, an expansin-like protein from Trichoderma, in plant root colonization. Plant Physiol. 147, 779–789. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.116293

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brotman, Y., Landau, U., Cuadros-Inostroza, A., Takayuki, T., Fernie, A. R., Chet, I., et al. (2013). Trichoderma-plant root colonization: escaping early plant defense responses and activation of the antioxidant machinery for saline stress tolerance. PloS Pathog. 9, e1003221. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003221

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Buanafina, M. M., Langdon, T., Dalton, S., Morris, P. (2012). Expression of a Trichoderma reesei β-1,4 endo-xylanase in tall fescue modifies cell wall structure and digestibility and elicits pathogen defence responses. Planta 236, 1757–1774. doi: 10.1007/s00425-012-1724-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Calo, L., García, I., Gotor, C., Romero, L. C. (2006). Leaf hairs influence phytopathogenic fungus infection and conferred an increased resistance when expressing a Trichoderma α-1,3-glucanase. J. Exp. Bot. 56, 3911–3020. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erl155

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carrero-Carrón, I., Rubio, M. B., Niño-Sánchez, J., Navas-Cortés, J. A., Jiménez-Díaz, R. M., Monte, E., et al. (2018). Interactions between Trichoderma harzianum and defoliating Verticillium dahliae in resistant and susceptible wild olive clones. Plant Pathol. 67, 1758–1767. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12879

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cartea, M. E., Francisco, M., Soengas, P., Velasco, P. (2011). Phenolic compounds in Brassica vegetables. Molecules 16, 251–280. doi: 10.3390/molecules16010251

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Caruso, G. (2010). Leucine aminopeptidase, β-glucosidase and alkaline phosphatase activity rates and their significance in nutrient cycles in some coastal Mediterranean sites. Mar. Drugs 8, 916–940. doi: 10.3390/md8040916

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Charron, C. S., Sams, C. E. (2004). Glucosinolate content and myrosinase activity in rapid-cycling Brassica oleracea grown in a controlled environment. J. Am. Soc Hortic. Sci. 129, 321–330. doi: 10.21273/JASHS.129.3.0321

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Xu, Y., Luo, W., Li, W., Chen, N., Zhang, D., et al. (2013). The F-box protein OsFBK12 targets OsSAMS1 for degradation and affects pleiotropic phenotypes, including leaf senescence, in rice. Plant Physiol. 163, 1673–1685. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.224527

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dai, Z., Hooker, B. S., Quesenberry, R. D., Gao, J. (1999). Expression of Trichoderma reesei exo-cellobiohydrolase I in transgenic tobacco leaves and calli. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 79, 689–699. doi: 10.1385/abab:79:1-3:689

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dellaporta, S. L., Wood, J., Hicks, J. B. (1983). A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1, 19–21. doi: 10.1007/BF02712670

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dhanoa, B. S., Cogliati, T., Satish, A. G., Bruford, E. A., Friedman, J. S. (2013). Update on the Kelch-like (KLHL) gene family. Hum. Genomics 7, 13. doi: 10.1186/1479-7364-7-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dixit, P., Mukherjee, P. K., Ramachandran, V., Eapen, S. (2011). Glutathione transferase from Trichoderma virens enhances cadmium tolerance without enhancing its accumulation in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum. PloS One 6, e16360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016360

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fordyce, R. F., Soltis, N. E., Caseys, C., Gwinner, R., Corwin, J. A., Atwell, S., et al (2018). Digital imaging combined with genome-wide association mappings links loci to plant-pathogen interaction traits. Plant Physiol. 178, 1406–1422. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00851

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, X., Stotz, H. U. (2007). Defense against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Arabidopsis is dependent on jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, and ethylene signaling. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 20, 1384–1395. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-20-11-1384

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hassan, M. N. U., Zainal, Z., Ismail, I. (2015). Plant kelch containing F-box proteins: structure, evolution and functions. RSC Adv. 5, 42808–42814. doi: 10.1039/C5RA01875G

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hermosa, R., Botella, L., Keck, E., Jiménez, J. A., Montero-Barrientos, M., Arbona, V., et al. (2011). The overexpression in Arabidopsis thaliana of a Trichoderma harzianum gene that modulates glucosidase activity and enhances tolerance to salt and osmotic stresses. J. Plant Physiol. 168, 1295–1302. doi: 10.1016/jplph.2011.01.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hermosa, R., Viterbo, A., Chet, I., Monte, E. (2012). Plant-beneficial effects of Trichoderma and of its genes. Microbiol. 158, 17–25. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.052274-0

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hermosa, R., Rubio, M. B., Cardoza, R. E., Nicolás, C., Monte, E., Gutiérrez, S. (2013). The contribution of Trichoderma to balancing the costs of plant growth and defense. Int. Microbiol. 16, 69–80. doi: 10.2436/20.1501.01.181

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karimi, M., Inzé, D., Depicker, A. (2002). GATEWAY™ vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Trends Plant Sci. 7, 193–195. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02251-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, H. S., Delaney, T. P. (2002). Arabidopsis SON1 is an F-box protein that regulates a novel induced defense response independent of both salicylic acid and systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 14, 1469–1482. doi: 10.1105/tpc.001867

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kissen, R., Bones, A. M. (2009). Nitrile-specifier proteins involved in glucosinolate hydrolysis in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 12057–12070. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M807500200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kowalska, J. (2014). Organically grown Brassica napus–use of border strips and Trichoderma. Acta Agric. Scand. Sec. B-Soil Plant Sci. 64, 529–536. doi: 10.1080/09064710.2014.929730

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Livak, K. J., Schmittgen, T. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2–ΔΔCT method. Methods 25, 402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lorito, M., Woo, S. L., Fernandez, I. G., Colucci, G., Harman, G. E., Pintor-Toro, J. A., et al. (1998). Genes from mycoparasitic fungi as a source for improving plant resistance to fungal pathogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 7860–7865. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.14.7860

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lorito, M., Woo, S. L., Harman, G. E., Monte, E. (2010). Translational research on Trichoderma: from omics to the field. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 48, 395–417. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114314

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malboobi, M. A., Lefebvre, D. D. (1997). A phosphate-starvation inducible-glucosidase gene (psr3.2) isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana is a member of a distinct subfamily of the BGA family. Plant Mol. Biol. 34, 57–68. doi: 10.1023/a:1005865406382

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marra, R., Ambrosino, P., Carbone, V., Vinale, F., Woo, S. L., Ruocco, M., et al. (2006). Study of the three-way interaction between Trichoderma atroviride, plant and fungal pathogens by using a proteomic approach. Curr. Genet. 50, 307–321. doi: 10.1007/s00294-006-0091-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martínez-Ballesta, M. C., Carvajal, M. (2015). Myrosinase in Brassicaceae: the most important issue for glucosinolate turnover and food quality. Phytochem. Rev. 14, 1045–1051. doi: 10.1007/s11101-015-9430-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mendoza-Mendoza, A., Zaid, R., Lawry, R., Hermosa, R., Monte, E., Horwitz, B. A., et al. (2018). Molecular dialogues between Trichoderma and roots: role of the fungal secretome. Fungal Biol. Rev. 32, 62–85. doi: 10.1016/j.fbr.2017.12.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mersereau, M., Pazour, G. J., Das, A. (1990). Efficient transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens by electroporation. Gene 90, 149–151. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90452-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Montero-Barrientos, M., Hermosa, R., Cardoza, R. E., Gutiérrez, S., Nicolás, C., Monte, E. (2010). Transgenic expression of the Trichoderma harzianum hsp70 gene increases Arabidopsis resistance to heat and other abiotic stresses. J. Plant Physiol. 167, 659–665. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.11.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Morán-Diez, E., Hermosa, R., Ambrosino, P., Cardoza, R. E., Gutiérrez, S., Lorito, M., et al. (2009). The ThPG1 endopolygalacturonase is required for the Trichoderma harzianum–plant beneficial interaction. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 22, 1021–1031. doi: 10.1014/MPMI-22-8-1021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Morán-Diez, E., Rubio, B., Domínguez, S., Hermosa, R., Monte, E., Nicolás, C. (2012). Transcriptomic response of Arabidopsis thaliana after 24 h incubation with the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum. J. Plant Physiol. 169, 614–620. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.12.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nicolás, C., Hermosa, R., Rubio, B., Mukherjee, P. K., Monte, E. (2014). Trichoderma genes in plants for stress tolerance-status and prospects. Plant Sci. 228, 71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.03.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

O`Kennedy, M. M., Crampton, B. G., Lorito, M., Chakauya, E., Breese, W. A., Burger, J. T., et al. (2011). Expression of a β-1,3-glucanase from a biocontrol fungus in transgenic pearl millet. S. Afr. J. Bot. 77, 335–345. doi: 10.1007/s12298-014-0225-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Opassiri, R., Maneesan, J., Akiyama, T., Pomthong, B., Jin, S., Kimura, A., et al. (2010). Rice Os4BGlu12 is a wound-induced β-glucosidase that hydrolyzes cell wall-β-glucan-derived oligosaccharides and glycosides. Plant Sci. 179, 273–280. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.05.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rubio, M. B., Quijada, N. M., Pérez, E., Domínguez, S., Monte, E., Hermosa, R. (2014). Identifying beneficial qualities of Trichoderma parareesei for plants. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 1864–1873. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03375-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rubio, M. B., Hermosa, R., Vicente, R., Gómez-Acosta, F. A., Morcuende, R., Monte, E., et al. (2017). The combination of Trichoderma harzianum and chemical fertilization leads to the deregulation of phytohormone networking, preventing the adaptive responses of tomato plants to salt stress. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 294. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00294

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shirakawa, M., Hara-Nishimura, I. (2018). Specialized vacuoles of myrosin cells: chemical defense strategy in Brassicales plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 59, 1309–1316. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcy082

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shirakawa, M., Ueda, H., Shimada, T., Hara-Nishimura, I. (2016). FAMA: a molecular link between stomata and myrosin cells. Trends Plant Sci. 22, 861–871. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.07.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thiel, H., Hleibieh, K., Gilmer, D., Varrelmann, M. (2012). The P25 pathogenicity factor of Beet necrotic yellow vein virus targets the sugar beet 26S proteasome involved in the induction of a hypersensitive resistance response via interaction with an F-box protein. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 25, 1058–1072. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-03-12-0057-R

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vinale, F., Sivasithamparam, K., Ghisalberti, E. L., Marra, R., Barbetti, M. J., Li, H., et al. (2008). A novel role for Trichoderma secondary metabolites in the interactions with plants. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 72, 80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2008.05.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Viterbo, A. D. A., Chet, I. (2006). TasHyd1, a new hydrophobin gene from the biocontrol agent Trichoderma asperellum, is involved in plant root colonization. Mol. Plant Pathol. 7, 249–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00335.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Viterbo, A. D. A., Harel, M., Chet, I. (2004). Isolation of two aspartyl proteases from Trichoderma asperellum expressed during colonization of cucumber roots. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 238, 151–158. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.07.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, B., Liu, L., Gao, Y., Chen, J. (2009). Improved phytoremediation of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) by Trichoderma mutant constructed by restriction enzyme-mediated integration (REMI) in cadmium polluted soil. Chemosphere 74, 1400–1403. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.11.027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Gou, M., Liu, C. J. (2013). Arabidopsis Kelch repeat F-box proteins regulate phenylpropanoid biosynthesis via controlling the turnover of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase. Plant Cell 25, 4994–5010. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.119644

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X., Gou, M., Guo, C., Yang, H., Liu, C. J. (2015). Down-regulation of Kelch domain-containing F-box protein in Arabidopsis enhances the production of (poly) phenols and tolerance to ultraviolet radiation. Plant Physiol. 167, 337–350. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.249136

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Brassicaceae, rapeseed, Arabidopsis, tomato, myrosinase, root colonization, Thkel1, Trichoderma

Citation: Poveda J, Hermosa R, Monte E and Nicolás C (2019) The Trichoderma harzianum Kelch Protein ThKEL1 Plays a Key Role in Root Colonization and the Induction of Systemic Defense in Brassicaceae Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 10:1478. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01478

Received: 23 June 2019; Accepted: 24 October 2019;
Published: 15 November 2019.

Edited by:

Tina Kyndt, Ghent University, Belgium

Reviewed by:

Barbara De Coninck, KU Leuven, Belgium
Maya Bar, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), Israel

Copyright © 2019 Poveda, Hermosa, Monte and Nicolás. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Enrique Monte, emv@usal.es

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.