ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 17 July 2020

Sec. Aquatic Photosynthetic Organisms

Volume 11 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.01105

Hydrogen Sulfide Signaling Protects Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Against Allelopathic Damage From Cyanobacterial Toxin Microcystin-LR

  • 1. School of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Marine Resource Utilization in South China Sea, Hainan University, Haikou, China

  • 2. School of Environmental and Biological Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China

  • 3. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Bio-Energy Crops, School of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China

  • 4. College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China

Article metrics

View details

16

Citations

3,7k

Views

1,4k

Downloads

Abstract

Cyanobacterial blooms have become more frequent and serious in recent years. Not only do massive blooms cause environmental pollution and nutrient eutrophication, but they also produce microcystins (MCs), a group of toxic cycloheptapeptides, which threaten aquatic ecosystem and human health. As such, clarifying the allelopathic interactions between cyanobacteria and other algae is critical to better understand the driving factors of blooms. To date, however, such studies remain largely insufficient. Here, we treated model alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii with microcystin-LR (MC-LR) to determine its allelopathic effects. Results showed that MC-LR markedly suppressed C. reinhardtii cell viability. Comparative proteomic and physiological analyses revealed that MC-LR significantly up-regulated protein abundance of antioxidants ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and catalase (CAT) at the beginning stage of exposure. This was accompanied by an over-accumulation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), suggesting that MC-LR suppresses cell viability via oxidative damage. Furthermore, we found that MCs induced desulfhydrase (DES) activity for hydrogen sulfide (H2S) generation at the beginning stage. Additional H2S donors reactivated antioxidant enzyme activity, which reduced H2O2 accumulation and ultimately enhanced C. reinhardtii tolerance to MC-LR damage. This effect could be reserved by inhibiting H2S biosynthesis. Simultaneously, we found that H2S also suppressed MC-LR-induced cell autophagy, and thus attenuated the toxic effects of MC-LR. Our findings suggest that oxidative bursts may be the main reason for the allelopathic effects of MC-LR on C. reinhardtii viability and that H2S signaling may enhance C. reinhardtii tolerance to MC-LR through the activation of antioxidant enzyme activity and suppression of cell autophagy.

Introduction

Toxic cyanobacterial algal blooms have become more frequent and serious in freshwater environments in recent years due to the effects of climatic change and nutrient overload. These blooms threaten ecosystem functioning and are directly harmful to aquatic algae, macrophytes, invertebrates, fish, and humans (Duan et al., 2009; Paerl and Paul, 2012; Jiang et al., 2014). Among the large cyanobacterial family, Microcystis aeruginosa is the most common bloom-forming species due to its wide distribution, which has reached up to 70% of the global cyanobacteria biomass, and has strong ability to produce microcystin (MC) toxins. MCs belong to a group of cycloheptapeptide inhibitors of intracellular protein phosphatases 1&2A (PP1/PP2A). These toxins have been found to have adverse effects on the liver, small intestine, colon, brain, kidney, lung, heart, and reproductive system, and also exhibit potential cancer-promoting activity (Mankiewicz-Boczek et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2018). In recent years, the toxic effects of MCs have been well documented in aquatic microorganisms, phytoplankton, zooplankton, and fish (Hitzfeld et al., 2000; Weng et al., 2007; Mezhoud et al., 2008). To date, however, the related mechanism of MC toxicity remains poorly known.

MCs are reported to damage animal tissue by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) and triggering oxidative stress (Shi et al., 2017). Oxidative stress occurs after ROS over-accumulation, which can be overcome by the cellular antioxidant enzymes, such as APX or CAT (Wang et al., 2019; Liu Y. et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2020). For example, MCs extracted from the cyanobacterium Radiocystis fernandoi strain R28 have been shown to induce anemia and oxidative stress in fish erythrocytes (Sakuragui et al., 2019). In plants, small molecular antioxidants, such as glutathione and ascorbate acid, can also efficiently scavenge ROS accumulation (Vaidyanathan et al., 2003). Hydrogen sulfide (H2S), a small gaseous molecule, is involved in multiple physiological functions in mammals, such as blood vessel relaxation, neurotransmission, insulin signaling, and angiogenesis (Wang, 2012; Li et al., 2016). H2S is also reported to enhance plant tolerance to environmental stress (Lisjak et al., 2013). In plants, cysteine desulfhydrases, including L-cysteine and D-cysteine desulfhydrases, catalyze the degradation of cysteine into H2S, ammonia, and pyruvate (Papenbrock et al., 2007). Desulfhydrases (DES) are members of the O-acetyl-L-serine(thiol)lyase protein family and are mainly responsible for the generation of H2S in Arabidopsis (Li et al., 2016; Mei et al., 2019). Previous studies have demonstrated that H2S signaling enhances plant tolerance to environmental or metal stress by up-regulating antioxidant enzyme activity to reduce ROS over-accumulation (Alvarez et al., 2012; Corpas et al., 2019). H2S is also reported to negatively regulate cell autophagy and increase the accumulation of ATG8, which is an important marker of autophagy (Gonzalez-Ballester et al., 2010; Alvarez et al., 2012; Gotor et al., 2013). Our previous study further showed that nitric oxide (NO), another small molecule gas, can enhance C. reinhardtii tolerance to salt stress by modulating cell autophagy (Chen et al., 2016). It is reported that ROS can trigger cell autophagy in algae after MC treatment (Liu et al., 2018), suggesting the possible role of H2S signaling and cell autophagy in MC-induced damage or the allelopathic interaction of cyanobacteria and other algae. However, relevant evidence has not yet been reported.

To better understand the allelopathic interactions between cyanobacteria and other algae, we treated unicellular C. reinhardtii with the cyanobacterial toxin MC-LR. Using comparative proteomics and physiological experiments, we found that MC-LR induced the differential expression of several proteins, including APX and CAT, induced the over-accumulation of ROS, mainly hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and increased the activities of APX and CAT at the early stage of exposure. We also found that MC-LR induced DES activity for the release of H2S. Interestingly, additional H2S also enhanced the activity of APX and CAT to efficiently scavenge ROS production, and thus ultimately improved the tolerance of C. reinhardtii to MC-LR. H2S signaling also suppressed MC-LR-induced cell autophagy and thus reduced toxic damage in C. reinhardtii. Our findings revealed a novel mechanism by which H2S is involved in the allelopathic interaction between cyanobacteria and other algae.

Materials and Methods

Growth of C. reinhardtii and MC-LR Treatment

The C. reinhardtii wild-type strain was purchased from the Freshwater Algae Culture Collection Center at the Institute of Hydrobiology (Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Wuhan, China). Cells were cultured under continuous light at 23°C in Tris-acetate-phosphate (TAP) medium. MC-LR was purchased from the Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO, USA). For MC-LR treatment, C. reinhardtii cells in the stationary phase (106 cells/ml) were treated with different concentrations of MC-LR. At different time points, cells were removed for further analysis.

H2S Signal Donors and Inhibitor Treatments

The H2S artifical donors NAHS or GYY, and H2S scavenger hypotaturine (HY) was used for investigating H2S function as previous report (Garciamata and Lamattina, 2010). Aminooxyacetic acid was used as special inhibitor to suppress the activity of cystathionine-beta-synthase (CBS)/cystathionine-gamma-lyase (CSE), which is responsible for H2S biosynthesis in organism (Asimakopoulou et al., 2013; Ahmad and Szabo, 2016). For chemical treatments, the H2S artificial donor NAHS or GYY, H2S scavenger HY, H2S biosynthesis enzyme inhibitor AOA was used, respectively. These chemicals were added into the alga liquid culture containing MC-LR, the sample was collected at indicated time for further analysis.

Viability Assay

Evans blue dye E2129 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as a marker of cell death (Voigt et al., 2017). In brief, C. reinhardtii cells (45 ml, 106 cells/ml) were incubated with 0.1% (w/v) Evans blue for 5 min, then washed once with 50 ml of TAP medium, and re-suspended in an equal volume of TAP medium. Viability was determined by counting the colored cells in a hemocytometer, with 10 random counts performed. Control tests of viability were performed with suspension cultures fixed in 70% ethanol or in FAA (5% formaldehyde, 5% glacial acetic acid, 70% ethanol, by vol.). The photosynthesis Fv/Fm ratio was measured as reported (Chen et al., 2016).

Total Protein Extract for iTRAQ Analysis

Total proteins were extracted from cultured algal cell samples using phenol extraction (Cheng et al., 2016). Briefly, after MC-LR treatment, 50 ml of algal culture was centrifuged at 5,000g for 15 min at 4°C. The resulting pellet was collected, frozen in liquid N2, and well ground using a mortar and pestle, keeping the sample submerged in liquid N2. Ice-cold protein extraction buffer (10 ml) containing KCl (100 mM), Triton X-100 (1% v/v), β-mercaptoethanol (1% v/v), L-ascorbic acid (50 mM), and phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (1 mM) in Tris-HCl buffer (100 mM, pH 7.8) was used and powdered, and the suspension was mixed with an equal volume of Tris-phenol (pH 8.0) and vortexed thoroughly. The upper phenolic phase was obtained after centrifugation at 12,000g for 30 min at 4°C and mixed with five volumes of ammonium acetate (10 mM) in methanol, with the mixture kept at −20°C overnight. The protein pellet was then obtained after centrifugation at 12,000g for 15 min at 4°C, followed by washing in cold acetone containing 0.1% β-mercaptoethanol and drying for storage at −80°C. To dissolve the protein pellet, Tris–HCl lysis buffer (pH 8.5, 40 mM) containing urea (7 M), EDTA (2 mM), thiourea (2 M), CHAPS (4% v/v), and PMSF (1 mM) was added at a final ratio of 10 mg/ml, with the solution sonicated at 200 W for 15 min to accelerate dissolution, then centrifuged for 15 min at 12,000g in a cold room. The pellet was discarded, and the supernatant was transferred to another tube. After this, 10 mM DTT was added to reduce the disulfide bond, iodoacetamide (IAM, 55 mM) was added under dark conditions to covalently block cysteine, and five volumes of cold acetone were added under −20°C for 2 h to the pellet protein, which was then dried and re-dissolved in 500 μl TEAB (tetraethylammonium bromide, 0.5 M) and centrifuged for 15 min at 12,000g in a cold room. The protein concentration was quantified by the Bradford method (Whiffen et al., 2007) using a Bio-Rad protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

iTRAQ Mass Spectrometry

Extracted protein (100 µg) from C. reinhardtii was used for iTRAQ analysis. We first digested the protein using Gold Trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) at a ratio of 30:1 (protein/trypsin) for 16 h at room temperature. The digested peptides were dried using vacuum centrifugation, and then dissolved in TEAB buffer (0.5 M) as recommended by the protocols for the 8-plex iTRAQ reagent (AB Sciex Inc., MA, USA). One unit of iTRAQ reagent 113 to 117 isobaric tags in 24 μl of isopropanol was used to label the sample for 2 h under room temperature. After labeling, the peptide mixture was pooled and dried using vacuum centrifugation, then re-suspended in 4 ml of dissolution buffer containing 25 mM NaH2PO4 and 25% acetonitrile (pH 2.7). The sample was separated by an Ultremex strong cationic exchange column (4.6 × 250 mm) in a Shimadzu LC-20AB HPLC Pump system (Kyoto, Japan). Sample fractions were eluted with a linear gradient flow at 1 ml min−1 and an elution program of 5% buffer B (1 M KCl and 25 mM NaH2PO4 in 25% ACN, pH 2.7) for 7 min, 5–60% gradient buffer B for 20 min, 60–100% buffer B for 2 min, and maintenance with 100% buffer B. The elution was divided into 20 fractions by monitoring absorbance at 214 nm, and then desalted using a C-18 column. The desalted fraction was dissolved in buffer C containing 5% ACN and 0.1% formic acid at a ratio of 0.5 µg µl−1 and centrifuged at 20,000g for 10 min at 4°C. For high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS), 5 μl of the supernatant was loaded by the sampler onto a Shimadzu LC-20 AD nanoHPLC (Kyoto, Japan) with a C18 column (200 µm inner diameter). The peptide was eluted with a linear gradient program, with a washing program of 5% buffer D (95% ACN, 0.1% formic acid) for 5 min, 3–35% buffer D for 35 min, 60–80% buffer D for 2min, and maintenance in 80% buffer D. Mass spectrometry following HPLC was performed using a TripleTOF 5600 system (AB SCIEX, Concord, ON, Canada) equipped with a Nanospray III source, and raw data were obtained under ion spray voltage at 2.5 kV, 30 psi N gas, 15 psi nebulize gas, and heater temperature at 150°C. The instrument was operated in information dependent acquisition (IDA) mode, with mass range between 100–2 400 m/z and detection resolution over 30,000 (FWHM) in the Orbitrap analyzer set for TOF-MS scans. The 30 most intense ions above a threshold of 120 cps with a 2+ to 5+ charge state were selected for fragmentation. A sweeping collision energy at 35 ± 5 eV coupled with iTRAQ adjusted rolling collision energy was used for all precursor ions during collision-induced dissociation.

Bioinformatics Analysis

The raw MS/MS data files were converted to Mascot generic files by Proteome Discoverer 1.2 and searching was performed using the C. reinhardtii proteome database (http://plants.ensembl.org). Peptide mass and fragment mass tolerance values were 10 ppm and 0.1 Da, respectively, and one missing cleavage in the trypsin digestion was allowed. For all searching, oxidation of methionine residues and pyroglutamate formation of N-terminal glutamine residues were set as the variable modifications, and carbamidomethyl formation of cysteine residues and iTRAQ labeling of lysine sites were set as the fixed modifications. Only peptides with significance scores over 20 at a 99% confidence interval and false discovery rate (FDR) of less than 1.5% were selected for quantification. Cutoffs of 1.5- or 0.6-fold with a p-value of less than 0.05 were set to indicate significantly differential protein expression.

In Situ H2O2 Staining and Content Analysis

For in situ detection of H2O2, 3, 3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining was performed as described previously (Chen et al., 2016). In brief, the cell culture was treated with MC-LR for indicated time, collected by centrifugation at 3,000g for 10 min at 22°C, and then mixed with 1 mg ml−1DAB containing 0.05% v/v Tween-20 and 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The reaction was terminated at 6–7 h post-inoculation when a brown precipitate became visible in the cell after microscope observation. The cells were then fixed for 15 min in ethanol:acetic acid:glycerol (3:1:1) and destained with acetone for 12 h. The cells were observed by light microscopy under bright field at 100× magnification. The H2O2 levels were determined using a Synergy 2 Multi-mode Reader (Biotek, Winooski, VT, USA) equipped for excitation in the range of 530–560 nm and fluorescence emission at 590 nm. The H2O2 concentration was calculated using a H2O2 standard curve.

Antioxidant Enzyme Activity Assay

To determine antioxidant enzyme activities, 10 ml of algal culture was centrifuged at 3,000g for 15 min at 4°C. The resulting pellet was quickly homogenized in liquid nitrogen and extracted with 5 ml of extraction buffer [50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 0.2 mM EDTA, and 2% polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP)] for 10 min. The homogenates were filtered through two layers of cheesecloth and centrifuged at 4°C and 15,000g for 15 min. The supernatants were desalted on a Sephadex G-50 column and used to measure enzymatic antioxidant activities. Total soluble protein concentration of the supernatants was determined by the Bradford method. The activities of APX and CAT were determined as described previously (Bernstein et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2016).

The activity of APX was determined based on the oxidation of ascorbate. The reaction solution (3 ml) contained 0.1mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.4), 1 M EDTA, 0.8 mM H2O2, 0.17 mM ascorbate, and 100 μl of extracted solution. The reaction was initiated by adding the enzyme extract. Changes in absorbance at 290 nm were read every 10 s for 60 s using a spectrophotometer (Spectronic Genesys Series; Spectronic Instruments, Rochester, NY, USA). Enzyme activity was quantified using the molar extinction coefficient for ascorbate (2.8 mM− 1 cm−1) and results were expressed in μmol min−1 gFW−1 (gFW, gram fresh weight), taking into consideration that 2 mol of ascorbate is required for reduction of 1 mol of H2O2. Results from four independent replicates were analyzed (usually with two subsampled plants per replicate).

The activity of CAT was determined based on the oxidation of H2O2. The reaction solution (1.5 ml) contained 35 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 15 mM H2O2, and 100 μl of extracted solution. The reaction was initiated by adding the enzyme solution. Changes in absorbance at 240 nm were read every 10 s for 90 s using a spectrophotometer. Enzyme activity was quantified using the molar extinction coefficient for H2O2 (36 M−1 cm−1) and results were expressed in μmol min−1 gFW− 1. Results from three to eight independent replicates were analyzed (usually with two subsampled plants per each replicate).

H2S Content and DES Enzyme Activity Analysis

After MC-LR treatment, the cells (50 ml) were harvested and ground to a fine powder with liquid nitrogen and extracted in 10 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 6.8, 50 mM) containing 0.1 mM EDTA and 0.2 mM ascorbic acid. The homogenate was mixed in a test tube containing 100 mM PBS (pH 7.4), 10 mM L-Cys, and 2 mM phosphopyridoxal at room temperature, and the released H2S was absorbed in a zinc acetate trap. The trap consisted of a small glass tube containing 3 ml of 0.5% (w/v) zinc acetate fixed to the bottom of the reaction bottle. After 30-min reaction, 0.3 ml of 20 mM dimethyl-p-phenylenediamine was dissolved in 7.2 mM HCl and added to the trap. This was followed by injection of 0.3 ml of 30 mM ferric ammonium sulfate in 1.2 ml of HCl. After incubation for 15 min at room temperature, the amount of H2S in the zinc acetate trap was determined colorimetrically at 667 nm. A calibration curve was established by NaHS according to the above method, and H2S content in C. reinhardtii was expressed as nmol g−1 fresh weight.

DES activity was measured by the release of sulfide from L-Cys, as described previously (Ma et al., 2015). The assay contained a total volume of 1 ml: 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM L-Cys, 100 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, and enzyme extract. The reaction was initiated by the addition of L-Cys. After incubation for 15 min at 37°C, the reaction was terminated with the addition of 100 ml of 30 mM FeCl3 dissolved in 1.2 N HCl and 100 ml of 20 mM N,N-dimethyl-p-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride dissolved in 7.2 N HCl. The formation of methylene blue was determined at 670 nm, and enzyme activity was calculated using the extinction coefficient of 15 × 106 cm2 mol−1 (Ma et al., 2015).

RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

For qRT-PCR analysis, C. reinhardtii samples were collected after different treatments to extract total RNA using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). First-strand cDNA synthesis and qRT-PCR analysis were performed as described previously (Liu et al., 2020). The primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in Supplemental Table 1. For each sample, the experiment was repeated three times.

Immunoblot Analysis

Immunoblotting was performed as described previously (Cheng et al., 2016). Total protein extracts were separated on 15% SDS-PAGE gel. Equal amounts of sample were loaded into the wells. For immunoblot analysis, the protein samples were electroblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes using a Trans-Blot well (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). After transfer, the membranes were probed with the appropriate primary antibodies and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat secondary antibody (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), and signals were detected using an ECL Kit (GE Company, Evansville, IN, USA). The primary antibodies against C. reinhardtii tubulin and ATG8 (Cat. AS142769) were obtained from AgriSera (Vännäs, Sweden), and diluted 1:3,000 for anti-tubulin and 1:1,000 for ATG8.

Results

Effects of Cyanobacterial Toxin MC-LR on C. reinhardtii Growth

To determine the toxic effects of MC-LR on the growth of C. reinhardtii, we first examined the dose effect of MC-LR on C. reinhardtii biomass. The C. reinhardtii cells were cultured in TAP medium for 3 d, followed by treatment with different concentrations of MC-LR for 7 d. After this, we checked cell viability and biomass. As shown in Supplemental Figure 1, at concentrations below 10 nM, MC-LR slightly repressed the growth of C. reinhardtii, accompanied by low cell death, as determined by Evans blue staining. Once the concentration of MC-LR was over 100 nM, cell biomass was significantly reduced by 40% and cell death dramatically increased, reaching over 80% at 300 nM MC-LR. Thus, we selected 100 nM MC-LR for further study. As shown in Figures 1A, B, cell chlorophyll content after 100nM MC-LR treatment was markedly lower than that of the control without MC-LR treatment (Supplemental Figure 2), indicating that MC-LR suppressed cell growth. Cell density was also reduced after MC-LR treatment (Figure 1C). Thus, these results suggest that MC-LR treatment suppresses cell viability and increases cell damage of C. reinhardtii.

Figure 1

iTRAQ Analysis of Dynamic Protein Profiles in C. reinhardtii After MC-LR Treatment

To understand the mechanism of the C. reinhardtii response to MC-LR, we performed comparative iTRAQ proteomics to monitor the dynamic protein changes after 100 nM MC-LR treatment. Samples were collected at 1, 3, and 5 d for iTRAQ labeling. Samples without MC-LR exposure were used as the control. Each iTRAQ experiment was replicated three times. Protein prediction after data collection was conducted using Mascot software and the public C. reinhardtii protein database. Protein abundance was divided into three groups: group 1 (1 d of MC-LR treatment/untreated control), group 2 (3 d of MC-LR treatment/untreated control), and group 3 (5 d of MC-LR treatment/untreated control), with a fold-change cut off of >1.5-fold for significantly increased expression and <0.6-fold for significantly decreased expression. In total, we detected 68 proteins with a significant change in expression in response to MC-LR treatment (p <0.05) (Table 1). These proteins were divided into nine groups based on their biological function; most were classified by material and energy metabolism, followed by plant antioxidant proteins, DNA damage and repair, autophagy-related, photosynthesis, signal transduction, and defense related proteins (Figure 2A). Among the differentially expressed proteins, 20 were up-regulated and 29 were down-regulated after 1 d of treatment, 27 were up-regulated and 30 were down-regulated after 3 d of treatment, and 24 were up-regulated and 30 were down-regulated after 5 d of treatment (Figure 2B).

Table 1

NCBI Accession No.aProtein NameRatio
1d/CKp value3d/CKp value5d/CKp value
Autophagy
gi|159462550autophagy protein VPS301.520.0091.820.0121.570.022
gi|159482262autophagy protein 81.890.0111.750.0411.800.046
gi|159483493autophagy protein 31.120.0171.560.0351.930.015
Cell structure related
gi|157836652Chain F0.890.0061.420.0431.670.021
gi|159482014actin1.440.0181.600.0251.320.029
Defense response
gi|159464168Thioredoxin M-type1.130.0061.210.041.860.005
gi|159468684chaperonin 60B20.120.0210.260.0240.170.020
gi|159472883thioredoxin h12.270.0121.190.0172.330.042
gi|159474294heat shock protein 90A0.500.0120.230.0070.150.042
gi|159488379L-ascorbate peroxidase1.380.0232.020.0161.610.024
gi|159482406glutathione-S-transferase1.940.0102.130.0111.530.040
gi|159485966Heat shock 22 kDa protein, chloroplastic1.110.0291.510.0281.830.031
gi|2388691catalase2.170.0161.650.0241.500.019
gi|386363671mitochondrial chaperonin 60 precursor0.270.0100.320.0280.530.009
DNA damage and repair
gi|20750301serine acetyl transferase1.020.0091.650.0471.390.019
gi|30038276REX1-B1.380.0151.970.0251.330.033
gi|37545634RNA-binding protein RB381.690.0331.900.0222.190.031
gi|45685351putative DNA repair protein0.940.0191.140.0441.690.043
gi|159470203DNA repair protein1.400.0201.650.0351.380.044
gi| 159480812DNA damage inducible protein0.760.0201.240.0071.070.021
gi|159472699RAN binding protein, RANBP1, partial0.580.0220.430.0060.560.050
gi|159464823DEAH-box helicase, possible nuclear pre-mRNA splicing factor0.750.0460.620.0440.550.004
gi|159464884histone H31.960.0491.990.0261.860.018
Material and energy related
gi|735959aconitate hydratase0.970.0120.840.0151.560.016
gi|5716967ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein 13B.1.520.0301.660.0021.960.004
gi|5718614Adenylosuccinate synthetase0.620.0120.530.0230.420.016
gi|5722217S-adenosylmethionine synthase0.320.0080.300.0010.230.026
gi|159483707Glutamine synthetase cytosolic isozyme0.560.0400.520.0020.490.048
gi|29786351ATP syntase-associated protein ASA10.260.0160.200.0360.190.032
gi|37777035Matrix metalloprotease1.570.0211.160.0111.220.039
gi| 6573214nitrate reductase2.160.0351.740.0471.510.038
gi| 159469564adenylosuccinate synthase0.300.0140.370.0390.400.013
gi|159466052low-CO2 inducible protein1.560.0022.000.0041.900.034
gi|159469782glutamine synthetase0.390.0120.120.0010.440.017
gi| 5726568D-Cys desulfhydrase1.540.0431.870.0271.340.045
gi| 5726998OASTL2/cysteine synthase1.130.0312.280.0060.930.025
gi|159477849ubiquinol: cytochrome c oxidoreductase 50.170.0090.490.0410.120.043
gi|159487741Transketolase0.540.0240.130.0430.580.045
gi|5721691OASTL1/cysteine synthase3.430.0320.820.0320.570.015
gi|294846036LEU1Sm0.520.0050.40.0350.260.032
Photosynthesis related
gi|159468772light-harvesting protein of photosystem I1.530.0111.140.0371.910.040
gi|159472705ribosomal protein S1 homologue1.510.0020.820.0251.570.022
gi|159475641minor chlorophyll a-b binding protein of photosystem II0.380.0410.310.0490.230.013
gi|159477687prohibitin0.610.0200.780.0360.880.040
gi|159487669chloroplast elongation factor G1.270.0091.370.0031.330.032
gi|159491492light-harvesting complex II chlorophyll a-b binding protein M30.930.0471.390.0051.270.003
Protein kinase
gi|159482940phosphoglycerate kinase0.380.0290.280.0110.450.001
gi|159487006galactose kinase1.290.0181.430.0281.330.029
Protein synthesis and refolding
gi|4104541protein disulfide isomerase0.570.0101.630.0171.350.026
gi|159466510eukaryotic initiation factor 4A-like protein1.420.0321.800.0161.680.011
gi|159487489protein disulfide isomerase0.360.0250.270.0470.420.002
Signal transduction related
gi|801495Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 10.540.0430.520.0310.410.007
gi|15947702814-3-3 protein0.980.0491.210.0291.300.036
gi|5718946calreticulin 2, calcium-binding protein0.350.0220.140.0160.340.046
gi|159462862Calreticulin 20.620.0490.550.030.320.046
gi|159467397ran-like small GTPase0.470.0350.200.0080.500.036
gi|159482892Caltractin1.590.0381.180.0442.680.040
gi|159475410HISTONE DEACETYLASE 90.520.0230.430.0170.410.012
gi|159479607translation initiation factor eIF-2B subunit beta0.780.0450.650.0030.530.043
gi|159482540DnaJ-like protein and Myb-like transcription factor0.960.0061.230.0041.520.037
gi|159482727General transcription factor IIH subunit0.630.0200.520.0360.460.042
gi|159465996bZIP transcription factor0.850.0010.750.0260.630.042
gi|75220811Nitrate transporter 2.11.680.0071.960.0131.990.011
gi|544280867Axonemal coiled-coil protein ODA100.430.0360.410.0240.360.035
Hypothetical or unknown protein
gi|159466034hypothetical translation initiation factor0.480.0110.190.0310.040.005
gi|159468534predicted protein0.500.0430.210.0080.180.015
gi|257307175unnamed protein product0.420.0030.320.0090.130.017
gi|300659064unnamed protein product0.230.0230.470.0480.650.041

MC-LR induced different proteins in Chlamydomonas after 100nM MC-LR stress for 5d identified by iTRAQ.

Figure 2

We also conducted hierarchical cluster analysis to categorize the proteins that showed differential expression profiling during MC-LR toxicity stress (Figure 2C). The abundance of antioxidant proteins, such as L-ascorbate peroxidase (APX, gi|159488379), glutathione-S-transferase (gi|159482406), and catalase (CAT, gi|2388691), were up-regulated. Several proteins associated with autophagy, such as autophagy protein VPS30 (gi|159462550), autophagy protein 8 (gi|159482262), and autophagy protein 3 (gi|159483493), and other proteins, such as the bZIP transcription factor (gi|159465996), DnaJ-like protein and Myb-like transcription factor (gi|159482540), signal transduction related protein 14-3-3 protein (gi|159477028), and refolding related protein disulfide isomerase (gi|4104541), were also differentially regulated after MC-LR treatment, suggesting that MC-LR damaged C. reinhardtii cell viability through different strategies.

MC-LR Induced Generation of ROS and Impaired Antioxidant Enzyme Activities

Our above proteomics data showed that MC-LR treatment increased protein abundance of a series of antioxidant enzymes, including APX and CAT. Our previous study also showed that environmental stress, e.g., salinity, induced a rapid increase in ROS, mainly H2O2, and damage to cell viability (Chen et al., 2016). Therefore, it is possible that low concentrations of MC-LR also trigger protective antioxidant enzyme activity for the scavenging of H2O2 damage. To test this, we first determined the accumulation of H2O2 by in-situ DAB staining. A strong brown color was observed in the algal cells after 12 and 24 h of MC-LR treatment (Figure 3A). In agreement, quantification of H2O2 generation in the cell culture showed that MC-LR treatment dramatically increased H2O2 production (Figure 3B), indicating high accumulation of H2O2. Our proteomics data also showed that MC-LR treatment increased protein abundance of antioxidant-associated enzymes, such as APX and CAT, hinting at their protective function against ROS damage. We then measured the antioxidant enzyme activities of APX and CAT after MC-LR treatment. MC-LR treatment indeed induced an increase in APX and CAT activity during the first 2 d of MC-LR treatment, followed by a gradual reduction after 3 d of MC-LR treatment (Figure 3C). These results suggest the possible protective function of these antioxidants in algae during the early stage of MC-LR exposure.

Figure 3

MC-LR Induced Accumulation of H2S and DES Enzyme Activity

Accumulated evidence demonstrates that H2S acts as a novel signal to modulate plant defense responses (Li et al., 2016; Corpas et al., 2019; Mei et al., 2019). O-acetylserine(thiol)lyase (OASTL) and D-Cys DES are the main enzymes responsible for H2S generation in plants (Alvarez et al., 2012; Mei et al., 2019). Based on our proteomics data, protein abundance of putative O-acetylserine(thiol)lyase (gi|5721691, gi|5726998) and DES (gi|5726568) increased after 1 d of MC-LR treatment and then decreased after 3 and 5 d of MC-LR treatment (Table 1). Because both of these proteins are associated with H2S biosynthesis (Jin et al., 2017), we explored the possible role of H2S signaling in C. reinhardtii in response to MC-LR treatment. We first determined the effects of MC-LR treatment on the production of H2S and activity of DES, which is responsible for H2S in vivo (Jin et al., 2017). As shown in Figure 4A, MC-LR treatment induced the rapid production of H2S, which peaked after 12 h of treatment and then quickly declined. For the C. reinhardtii control without MC-LR treatment, the content of H2S did not present an obvious change. In agreement with the generation profile of H2S, MC-LR treatment also increased the activity of DES, which reached a maximum level after 12 h of treatment and then declined after prolonged treatment (Figure 4B). Thus, these results indicate that MC-LR treatment increases DES activity for H2S generation during the early stage of exposure.

Figure 4

H2S Protected C. reinhardtii From Toxicity of MC-LR by Scavenging ROS

To determine the function of H2S in C. reinhardtii responses to the MC toxin, we treated C. reinhardtii with the H2S donor NaHS and then compared cell density. As shown in Figure 5A, adding 10 µM NaHS alone did not obviously affect the growth of C. reinhardtii, whereas MC-LR treatment suppressed the growth of C. reinhardtii. However, NaHS treatment remarkably attenuated the inhibitory effect of MC-LR on the growth of C. reinhardtii. Additional NaHS treatment with MC-LR also increased the Fv/Fm ratio compared with that following MC-LR treatment alone (Figure 5B). These findings suggest that the H2S signaling enhances C. reinhardtii tolerance to MC toxicity.

Figure 5

As shown above, MC-LR induced the over-accumulation of ROS in C. reinhardtii. As H2S signaling is reported to scavenge ROS (Qi et al., 2019), we reasoned that additional H2S may reduce the accumulation of ROS in C. reinhardtii. Therefore, we treated C. reinhardtii with 100 nM MC-LR with or without H2S artifical donor NaHS, GYY, H2S scavenger hypotaurine (HY), H2S biosynthesis enzyme inhibitor aminooxyacetic acid (AOA) for 24 h, and then compared H2O2 accumulation. As shown in Figure 5C, the addition NaHS and GYY suppressed MC-LR-mediated H2O2 accumulation, whereas addition of AOA and HY aggravated MC-LR-induced H2O2 accumulation. Furthermore, we measured the activity of APX and CAT after MC-LR and different chemical treatment. As shown in Figure 5D, the addition of NaHS and GYY enhanced APX and CAT activity, but additional AOA and HY suppressed APX and CAT activity. These results suggest that H2S signaling protects C. reinhardtii from the damage induced by MC-LR through the up-regulation of APX and CAT activity to reduce H2O2 over-accumulation.

H2S Signaling Suppressed MC-Induced Cell Autophagy

Previous study has demonstrated that ROS induce cell autophagy, whereas H2S signaling suppresses cell autophagy (Alvarez et al., 2012), suggesting that cell autophagy may be involved in the toxic effects of MCs in C. reinhardtii. To check the effect of MC-LR on cell autophagy, we performed the qRT-PCR analysis to measure the transcriptional levels of ATG1, AGT7, AGT8, and ATG101, all of them are used as the autophagy-related marker genes. As shown in Figure 6A, we found that MC-LR treatment for 24 h markedly activated their expression, such activation effect could be attenuated by addition of H2S donors NaHS and GYY. Addition of H2S signal inhibitors AOA and HY further enhanced MC-LR-induced expressions of ATG1, AGT7, AGT8, and ATG101. These results suggest that MC-LR suppressed the growth of C. reinhardtii by activating the cell autophagy pathway. Consistently, we used the anti-ATG8 antibody to test the effects of H2S and MC-LR on the accumulation of ATG8, as a marker of cell autophagy. As shown in Figure 6B, MC-LR increased the protein abundance of ATG8, addition of NaHS and GYY repressed MC-LR-induced accumulation of ATG8, and addition of AOA and HY increased protein abundance of ATG8. These results support that MC-LR induces C. reinhardtii cell death through activation of the cell autophagy pathway.

Figure 6

Discussion

As a by-product of bloom-forming cyanobacteria, MCs show toxicity to most aquatic microorganisms (Duan et al., 2009; Xu et al., 2018). Currently, however, the underlying mechanism remains unknown. In this study, we used unicellular alga C. reinhardtii to test the toxic effects of MC-LR. We found that MC-LR markedly suppressed C. reinhardtii growth, as presented by lower cell density and Fv/Fm ratio and higher cell death, suggesting general toxic allelopathic effects of MC-LR on C. reinhardtii. To better understand the detailed mechanism by which MC-LR attacks C. reinhardtii, we performed proteomic iTRAQ analysis and found several proteins that were differentially regulated by MC-LR treatment, including several defense proteins and antioxidant enzymes, suggesting that these proteins are possibly related to the effects of MC-LR on C. reinhardtii growth.

Among the differentially regulated proteins, the abundance of putative O-acetylserine(thiol)lyase and cysteine synthase increased at the beginning stage of MC-LR treatment. These proteins are both associated with the biosynthesis of H2S in vivo (Alvarez et al., 2012). In addition, H2S signaling is reported to enhance plant tolerance to environmental stress (Li et al., 2016), suggesting the possible role of H2S in the C. reinhardtii response to MC toxicity. Our data revealed that MC-LR indeed induced the rapid generation of H2S, accompanied by an increase in DES activity. Furthermore, we found that the addition of H2S donors NaHS and GYY enhanced the tolerance of C. reinhardtii to MC-LR toxicity by increasing the cell density and Fv/Fm ratio. In contrast, suppressing H2S biosynthesis by AOA and HY aggravated the toxicity of MCs on C. reinhardtii growth. These results suggest a novel function of H2S in protecting C. reinhardtii from MC toxicity.

ROS, mainly H2O2, are strongly induced by environmental stress to damage plants. As a result, plants have evolved a defense mechanism to avoid ROS-induced damage, e.g., enhancing antioxidant enzyme activity to scavenge ROS accumulation (Noctor et al., 2018; Smirnoff and Arnaud, 2019). Our proteomic data showed that MC-LR treatment up-regulated the protein abundance of APX and CAT at the beginning stage, suggesting that H2O2 signaling may be involved in C. reinhardtii responses to MC. We measured the dynamic changes in H2O2 and found that MC-LR treatment dramatically induced the accumulation of H2O2, which may be the main reason for the effects of MC on C. reinhardtii cell viability. Consistently, we analyzed the activity of APX and CAT. Although MC-LR induced increases in APX and CAT enzyme activity at the beginning stage, their activities decreased after long-term (e.g., 3 d) MC-LR treatment. It is possible that the reason why MC-LR caused an increase in ROS is because MC-LR did not efficiently sustain high levels of enzyme activity to successfully scavenge the over-accumulation of ROS. We demonstrated that H2S signaling activated antioxidant enzyme activity, thus it is possible that H2S enhanced the tolerance to C. reinhardtii against MC by activating antioxidant enzymes to scavenge ROS toxicity. We treated C. reinhardtii with MC-LR and additional H2S donors and found that the addition of NaHS and GYY improved cell viability, including an increase in cell density and Fv/Fm ratio. In contrast, inhibiting H2S biosynthesis with AOA and HY aggravated MC-LR toxicity on C. reinhardtii cell viability. Thus, these findings confirm the protective function of H2S against MC damage. We also found that the addition of H2S donors reactivated APX and CAT activity compared to that after MC-LR treatment alone, whereas addition of H2S biosynthesis inhibitors further suppressed enzyme activity. Therefore, we propose that H2S enhances the tolerance of C. reinhardtii cells to MC exposure by up-regulating and sustaining high levels of antioxidant enzyme activity to scavenge MC-LR-induced ROS.

ROS can induce cell autophagy (Huang et al., 2019; Signorelli et al., 2019; Tran et al., 2019). Here, we also found that MC-LR activated cell autophagy by increasing the transcriptional level of autophagy-related genes and protein abundance of ATG8. Thus, it is possible that MC-LR suppressed C. reinhardtii cell viability through ROS-induced cell autophagy. As H2S signaling negatively regulates cell autophagy (Wang et al., 2017), we also investigated the function of H2S in MC-LR-induced autophagy. We found that H2S suppressed cell autophagy because H2S donors suppressed MC-LR-induced expression of autophagy-related genes and ATG8 protein accumulation, whereas H2S biosynthesis inhibitors aggravated MC-LR-induced autophagy. We therefore propose that H2S-inhibited cell autophagy may also explain the protective role of H2S against MC damage.

In summary, we identified a novel function of H2S in enhancing C. reinhardtii cell tolerance to MC toxicity and proposed a model to explain the underlying mechanism. As shown in Figure 7, we propose that MC-LR treatment induced the strong accumulation of ROS, which subsequently activated cell autophagy to impair C. reinhardtii cell viability. Though MC-LR induced the accumulation of H2S and increased APX and CAT antioxidant enzyme activities to reduce the accumulation of ROS, this effect was inadequate and only occurred at the beginning stage, resulting in the over-accumulation of ROS and damage to C. reinhardtii cell viability. However, additional H2S could sustain the high level of antioxidant enzyme activity, as well as suppress cell autophagy, ultimately enhancing the tolerance of C. reinhardtii to MC toxicity. Taken together, our findings reveal a novel mechanism by which H2S acts as a signal to improve C. reinhardtii tolerance to MC by activating antioxidant enzyme activity and suppressing cell autophagy.

Figure 7

Funding

This study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0201401), National Natural Science Foundation of China (41766006), and Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province.

Statements

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

X-DC, X-YH, and A-QJ designed the research. X-DC and YL performed the experiments. X-DC, L-MY, X-YH, and A-QJ analyzed the data. X-DC, X-YH, and A-QJ wrote the paper.

Acknowledgments

We dedicate to this work to Prof. Jun Zhou and Prof. Ning-Hua Tan for their outstanding research in the field of plant cyclopeptides. Prof. Yongping Yang (Kunming Institute of Botany, CAS, China) and Congzhao Zhou (University of Science and Technology of China, China) are thanked for their constructive advice on this work. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for their comments on the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2020.01105/full#supplementary-material

Supplemental Figure 1

Dose effect of MC-LR on growth (A) and cell death (B) of C. reinhardtii. Here, 3-d-old C. reinhardtii cells were treated with MC-LR at different concentrations for 72 h, with cell density (A) and cell death (B) then measured. Values are means ± SD of three biological replicates.

Supplemental Figure 2

Dose effect of MC-LR on cell photosynthesis capability of C. reinhardtii. Here, 3-d-old C. reinhardtii cells were treated with MC-LR at different concentrations for 6 d, with Fv/Fm ratio then calculated. Values are means ± SD of three biological replicates.

References

  • 1

    AhmadA.SzaboC. (2016). Both the H2S biosynthesis inhibitor aminooxyacetic acid and the mitochondrially targeted H2S donor AP39 exert protective effects in a mouse modle of burn injury. Pharmacol. Res.113, 348–355. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.105403

  • 2

    AlvarezC.GarciaI.MorenoI.Perez-PerezM. E.CrespoJ. L.RomeroL. C.et al. (2012). Cysteine-generated sulfide in the cytosol negatively regulates autophagy and modulates the transcriptional profile in Arabidopsis. Plant. Cell.24 (11), 4621–4634. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.105403

  • 3

    AsimakopoulouA.PanopoulosP.ChasapisC. T.ColettaC.ZhouZ.CirinoG.et al. (2013). Selectivity of commonly used pharmacological inhibitors for cystathionine β synthesis (CBS) and cystathionine γ lyase (CSE). Br. Tournal Pharmacol.169 (4), 922–932. doi: 10.1111/bph.12171

  • 4

    BernsteinN.ShoreshM.XuY.HuangB. (2010). Involvement of plant antioxidative response in the differential growth sensitivity to salinity of leaves vs roots during cell development. Free Radical Biol. Med.49 (7), 1161–1171. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.06.032

  • 5

    ChenJ.XieP.LiL.XuJ. (2009). First Identification of the Hepatotoxic Microcystins in the Serum of a Chronically Exposed Human Population Together with Indication of Hepatocellular Damage. Toxicol. Sci.108 (1), 81–89. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp009

  • 6

    ChenX.TianD.KongX.ChenQ.Abd AllahE. F.HuX.et al. (2016). The role of nitric oxide signalling in response to salt stress in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Planta244 (3), 651–669. doi: 10.1007/s00425-016-2528-0

  • 7

    ChengT. L.ChenJ. H.Abd, AllahE. F.WangP. K.WangG. P.HuX. Y.et al. (2016). Quantitative proteomics analysis reveals that S-nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR) and nitric oxide signaling enhance poplar defense against chilling stress. Planta242 (6), 1361–1390. doi: 10.1007/s00425-015-2374-5

  • 8

    CorpasF. J.BarrosoJ. B.Gonzalez-GordoS.Munoz-VargasM. A.PalmaJ. M. (2019). Hydrogen sulfide: A novel component in Arabidopsis peroxisomes which triggers catalase inhibition. J. Integr. Plant Biol.61 (7), 871–883. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12779

  • 9

    DuanH. T.MaR. H.XuX. F.KongF. X.ZhangS. X.KongW. J.et al. (2009). Two-Decade Reconstruction of Algal Blooms in China’s Lake Taihu. Enviro. Sci. Technol.43 (10), 3522–3528. doi: 10.1021/es8031852

  • 10

    GarciamataC.LamattinaL. (2010). Hydrogen sulphide, a novel gasotransmitter involved in guard cell signalling. New Phytol.188 (4), 977–984. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03465

  • 11

    Gonzalez-BallesterD.CaseroD.CokusS.PellegriniM.MerchantS. S.GrossmanA. R. (2010). RNA-seq analysis of sulfur-deprived Chlamydomonas cells reveals aspects of acclimation critical for cell survival. Plant Cell.22 (6), 2058–2084. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.071167

  • 12

    GotorC.GarciaI.CrespoJ. L.RomeroL. C. (2013). Sulfide as a signaling molecule in autophagy. Autophagy9 (4), 609–611. doi: 10.4161/auto.23460

  • 13

    HitzfeldB. C.HogerS. J.DietrichD. R. (2000). Cyanobacterial toxins: removal during drinking water treatment, and human risk assessment. Environ. Health Persp.108 (Suppl 1), 113–122. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108s1113

  • 14

    HuangL.YuL. J.ZhangX.FanB.WangF. Z.DaiY. S.et al. (2019). Autophagy regulates glucose-mediated root meristem activity by modulating ROS production in Arabidopsis. Autophagy15 (3), 407–422. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2018.1520547

  • 15

    JiangY. J.HeW.LiuW. X.QinN.OuyangH. L.WangQ. M.et al. (2014). The seasonal and spatial variations of phytoplankton community and their correlation with environmental factors in a large eutrophic Chinese lake (Lake Chaohu). Ecol. Indic.40, 58–67. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.01.006

  • 16

    JinZ.WangZ.MaQ.SunL.ZhangL.LiuZ.et al. (2017). Hydrogen sulfide mediates ion fluxes inducing stomatal closure in response to drought stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Soil.419 (1-2), 141–152. doi: 10.1007/s11104-017-3335-5

  • 17

    LiZ. G.MinX.ZhouZ. H. (2016). Hydrogen Sulfide: A Signal Molecule in Plant Cross-Adaptation. Front. Plant Sci.7:1621:1621. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01621

  • 18

    LisjakM.TeklicT.WilsonI. D.WhitemanM.HancockJ. T. (2013). Hydrogen sulfide: environmental factor or signalling molecule? Plant Cell. Environ.36 (9), 1607–1616. doi: 10.1111/pce.12073

  • 19

    LiuH.ZhangX.ZhangS.HuangH.WuJ.WangY.et al. (2018). Oxidative Stress Mediates Microcystin-LR-Induced Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Autophagy in KK-1 Cells and C57BL/6 Mice Ovaries. Front. Physiol.9:1058:1058. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01058

  • 20

    LiuD.LiJ.LiZ.PeiY. (2020). Hydrogen sulfide inhibits ethylene-induced petiole abscission in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Hortic. Res.7 (1), 1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41438-019-0237-0

  • 21

    LiuY.ZhangJ.GaoB. (2020). Proteomic mechanisms for the stimulatory effects of antibiotics on Microcystis aeruginosa during hydrogen peroxide treatment. Chemosphere247, 125837. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.125837

  • 22

    MaL.YangL.ZhaoJ.WeiJ.KongX.WangC.et al. (2015). Comparative proteomic analysis reveals the role of hydrogen sulfide in the adaptation of the alpine plant Lamiophlomis rotata to altitude gradient in the Northern Tibetan Plateau. Planta241 (4), 887–906. doi: 10.1007/s00425-014-2209-9

  • 23

    Mankiewicz-BoczekJ.IzyorezykK.JurczakT. (2006). Risk assessment of toxic Cyanobacteria in Polish water bodies. Environ. Toxicol.10, 49–58. doi: 10.2495/ETOX060061

  • 24

    MeiY. D.ZhaoY. Y.JinX. X.WangR.XuN.HuJ. W.et al. (2019). L-Cysteine desulfhydrase-dependent hydrogen sulfide is required for methane-induced lateral root formation. Plant Mol. Biol.99 (3), 283–298. doi: 10.1007/s11103-018-00817-3

  • 25

    MezhoudK.BauchetA. L.Chateau-JoubertS.PraseuthD.MarieA.FrancoisJ. C.et al. (2008). Proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis of cellular responses in medaka fish (Oryzias latipes) following oral gavage with microcystin-LR. Toxicon51 (8), 1431–1439. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2008.03.017

  • 26

    NoctorG.ReichheldJ. P.FoyerC. H. (2018). ROS-related redox regulation and signaling in plants. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol.80, 3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.07.013

  • 27

    PaerlH. W.PaulV. J. (2012). Climate change: links to global expansion of harmful cyanobacteria. Water. Res.46 (5), 1349–1363. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.08.002

  • 28

    PapenbrockJ.RiemenschneiderA.KampA.Schulz-VogtH. N.SchmidtA. (2007). Characterization of cysteine-degrading and H2S-releasing enzymes of higher plants-from the field to the test tube and back. Plant Biol.9 (05), 582–588. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965424

  • 29

    QiQ.GuoZ.LiangY.LiK.XuH. (2019). Hydrogen sulfide alleviates oxidative damage under excess nitrate stress through MAPK/NO signaling in cucumber. Plant Physiol. Bioch.135, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.11.017

  • 30

    SakuraguiM. M.PaulinoM. G.da SilvaE. S. N. E.TavaresD.TerezanA. P.PesentiE.et al. (2019). Crude extract of cyanobacterium Radiocystis fernandoi strain R28 induces anemia and oxidative stress in fish erythrocytes. Toxicon169, 18–24. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2019.08.002

  • 31

    ShiJ.DengH.PanH.XuY.ZhangM. (2017). Epigallocatechin-3-gallate attenuates microcystin-LR induced oxidative stress and inflammation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Chemosphere168, 25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.037

  • 32

    SignorelliS.TarkowskiL. P.Van, den, EndeW.BasshamD. C. (2019). Linking Autophagy to Abiotic and Biotic Stress Responses. Trends. Plant Sci.24 (5), 413–430. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.02.001

  • 33

    SmirnoffN.ArnaudD. (2019). Hydrogen peroxide metabolism and functions in plants. New. Phytol.221 (3), 1197–1214. doi: 10.1111/nph.15488

  • 34

    TranQ. G.ChoK.ParkS. B.KimU.LeeY. J.KimH. S. (2019). Impairment of starch biosynthesis results in elevated oxidative stress and autophagy activity in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Sci. Rep.9 (1), 1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46313-6

  • 35

    VaidyanathanH.SivakumarP.ChakrabartyR.ThomasG. (2003). Scavenging of reactive oxygen species in NaCl-stressed rice (Oryza sativa L.)—differential response in salt-tolerant and sensitive varieties. Plant Sci.165 (6), 1411–1418. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.08.005

  • 36

    VoigtJ.MorawskiM.WostemeyerJ. (2017). The Cytotoxic Effects of Camptothecin and Mastoparan on the Unicellular Green Alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.64 (6), 806–819. doi: 10.1111/jeu.12413

  • 37

    WangS. S.ChenY. H.ChenN.WangL. J.ChenD. X.WengH. L.et al. (2017). Hydrogen sulfide promotes autophagy of hepatocellular carcinoma cells through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Cell. Death. Dis.8 (3), e2688–e2688. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.18

  • 38

    WangZ.LiG.WuQ.LiuC.ShenJ.YanW. (2019). Microcystin-LR exposure induced nephrotoxicity by triggering apoptosis in female zebrafish. Chemosphere214, 598–605. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.103

  • 39

    WangR. (2012). Physiological Implications of Hydrogen Sulfide: A Whiff Exploration That Blossomed. Physiol. Rev.92 (2), 791–896. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00017.2011

  • 40

    WengD.LuY.WeiY.LiuY.ShenP. (2007). The role of ROS in microcystin-LR-induced hepatocyte apoptosis and liver injury in mice. Toxicology232 (1), 15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2006.12.010

  • 41

    WhiffenL. K.MidgleyD. J.McGeeP. A. (2007). Polyphenolic compounds interfere with quantification of protein in soil extracts using the Bradford method. Soil. Biol. Biochem.39 (2), 691–694. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.08.012

  • 42

    XuH. Z.PeiH. Y.JinY.MaC. X.WangY. T.SunJ. M.et al. (2018). High-throughput sequencing reveals microbial communities in drinking water treatment sludge from six geographically distributed plants, including potentially toxic cyanobacteria and pathogens. Sci. Total. Environ.634 (1), 769–779. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.008

  • 43

    ZhaoS.ZhongS.WangF.WangH.XuD.LiG. (2020). Microcystin-LR exposure decreased the fetal weight of mice by disturbance of placental development and ROS-mediated endoplasmic reticulum stress in the placenta. Environ. Pollut.256, 113362. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113362

Summary

Keywords

hydrogen sulfide signaling, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, antioxidant enzyme autophagy, proteomic analyses, microcystin-LR

Citation

Chen X-D, Liu Y, Yang L-M, Hu X-Y and Jia A-Q (2020) Hydrogen Sulfide Signaling Protects Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Against Allelopathic Damage From Cyanobacterial Toxin Microcystin-LR. Front. Plant Sci. 11:1105. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01105

Received

17 April 2020

Accepted

06 July 2020

Published

17 July 2020

Volume

11 - 2020

Edited by

Miroslav Obornik, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (ASCR), Czechia

Reviewed by

Kang-Di Hu, Hefei University of Technology, China; Yoshihisa Hirakawa, University of Tsukuba, Japan

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Li-Ming Yang, ; Xiang-Yang Hu, ; Ai-Qun Jia,

This article was submitted to Marine and Freshwater Plants, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics