Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 23 December 2020
Sec. Plant Pathogen Interactions

Development of Neonectria punicea Pathogenic Symptoms in Juvenile Fraxinus excelsior Trees

\r\nDragan Karadi&#x;Dragan Karadžić1Zoran Stanivukovi&#x;Zoran Stanivuković2Slobodan Milanovi&#x;,Slobodan Milanović1,3Katarzyna SikoraKatarzyna Sikora4Zlatan Radulovi&#x;Zlatan Radulović5Vladimír Ra
koVladimír Račko6Monika Kardo&#x;ovMonika Kardošová7Jaroslav urkovi
Jaroslav Ďurkovič7Ivan Milenkovi&#x;,*Ivan Milenković1,8*
  • 1The Chair of Forest Protection, Department of Forestry, University of Belgrade-Faculty of Forestry, Belgrade, Serbia
  • 2Department of Integrated Protection of Forest Ecosystems, Forestry Faculty, University in Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • 3Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czechia
  • 4Department of Forest Protection, Forest Research Institute-IBL, Raszyn, Poland
  • 5Department of Forest Protection, Institute of Forestry Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
  • 6Department of Wood Science, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia
  • 7Department of Phytology, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia
  • 8Phytophthora Research Centre, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czechia

When monitoring the state of health of Fraxinus excelsior trees, unusual symptoms were discovered within a F. excelsior plantation in Bosnia and Herzegovina. These symptoms included the appearance of necrosis and cankers in the basal parts of the trees, followed by the formation of fruiting bodies, however, none of these symptoms were found in the crowns. After sampling and isolation of the necrotic parts from the stem base, pathogen Neonectria punicea was isolated and identified from the characteristics of pure cultures, morphology of the fruiting bodies, and from multilocus sequencing. In field conditions, juvenile F. excelsior trees were inoculated with two N. punicea isolates obtained from the necrotic tissues of both juvenile F. excelsior and mature Fagus sylvatica trees. In both isolates, 12 months post inoculation, the lengths and widths of the necroses were significantly larger compared to the control. Necroses of significantly larger lengths, widths and surfaces were found again in both tested isolates 24 months post inoculation. In the case of the F. excelsior isolate, the lengths of the necroses at both the stem base and at breast height increased by 1.6 times, whereas the F. sylvatica isolate increased in size by up to 1.7 and 1.8 times, respectively. Trees inoculated without a previous bark wound showed no symptoms, similar to the control trees. Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray micro-computed tomography imaging revealed that N. punicea hyphae penetrated from the cankers to the woody outermost annual growth ring and that hyphae were present mostly in the large earlywood vessels and rarely in the axial parenchyma cells. Hyphae also spread radially through the pits in vessels. The infected trees responded with the formation of tyloses in the vessels to prevent a rapid fungal spread through the axial vascular transport pathway. The ability of N. punicea to cause necroses in juvenile ash trees was demonstrated for the first time during this study. It poses a serious threat to planted forests and natural regenerations of F. excelsior especially if F. sylvatica is considered as a possible inoculum reservoir for future infections. This pathogen should be integrated within future ash resistance or breeding programs.

Introduction

Common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) can be found in almost all European countries, but its distribution varies considerably in different parts of Europe. In many areas, it is a keystone floodplain species; in the Balkan peninsula, this species most commonly occurs in submontane and montane forests, beyond rivers and stream valleys (e.g., in Serbia, it is typically found in Acero-Fraxinetum serbicum associations; Jovanović, 1971). In addition to being an important tree species for the forest industry, common ash is a favorite choice for parks, alleys, and gardens. Its two varieties (var. glabra and var. pendula) are used in the parks of the entire region and are commonly grown in numerous nurseries.

In the past 25 years, the exotic pathogenic fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus Baral, Queloz, and Hosoya has been the reported cause of common ash dieback across Europe (Kowalski, 2006; Gross et al., 2014; Keča et al., 2017; Milenković et al., 2017). Numerous studies have described the typical symptoms caused by this pathogenic fungus, including leaf-wilting, general necrosis, premature shedding of leaves, necrosis and lesions on the shoots and branches, increased crown transparency, and dieback (Kowalski, 2006; Bakys et al., 2009; Gross et al., 2014; Kräutler and Kirisits, 2014). Additionally, cankers and lesions at the stem bases of declining ash trees were reported, and these symptoms were initially assigned to different causal agents, mostly secondary pathogens such as Armillaria spp. (Lygis et al., 2005; Skovsgaard et al., 2010; Bakys et al., 2011; Enderle et al., 2013) or species from the Phytophthora genus (Orlikowski et al., 2011). However, Husson et al. (2012) demonstrated the presence of H. fraxineus in infected ash collar tissues for the first time and suggested that this pathogen could be the cause of these symptoms. These findings were confirmed in subsequent studies (Chandelier et al., 2016; Marçais et al., 2016; Enderle et al., 2017; Langer, 2017; Meyn et al., 2019).

Another pathogen, Neonectria punicea (J.C. Schmidt: Fr.) Castlebury and Rossman, closely related to the beech bark disease (BBD) phenomenon (Castlebury et al., 2006) was recorded in necrotic ash tissues (Langer, 2017; Meyn et al., 2019) in addition to H. fraxineus. This species is assumed to be endophytic and develops as a secondary pathogen in ash collar tissue after infection with ash dieback fungus (Meyn et al., 2019); however, the precise mechanisms of its aggressiveness and ability to cause cankers and lesions on ash collars remain unknown to date (Langer, 2017).

With respect to the health status of common ash in Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H), H. fraxineus was first recorded in 2009 in young plants in one planted forest in the western part of the country (Stanivuković et al., 2014). It was also registered in a nursery in the central part of B&H (Treštić and Mujezinović, 2013) in 2013. After these occurrences, the disease quickly spread to almost all the natural stands of common ash in B&H (Stanivuković, unpublished). However, planted common ash forest showing declining symptoms different to those typically caused by ash dieback fungus was recorded in the western part of the country in 2014 during monitoring of ash dieback in B&H. Specifically, bark necrosis and cankers were exclusively recorded at the stem bases of trees, whereas no lesions were recorded on the shoots, branches, and upper parts of the stems. Moreover, following the appearance of bark cankers, numerous stromata were formed on the dead parts of the bark with masses of mostly red-colored ascomycetous perithecia fruiting bodies.

The objectives of this study were to (i) isolate and identify the cause of the symptoms observed in this plantation; (ii) test the pathogenicity of the isolated organism and compare its aggressiveness with similar isolates originating from necrotic European beech tissue; (iii) reveal whether the pathogen can infect the tree through uninjured bark, or whether the bark has to be previously damaged; and (iv) observe pathogen development and tree responses following infection.

Materials and Methods

Study Area and Disease Symptoms

The study was carried out in a plantation of common ash in the western part of B&H (44°41′11.87″N; 16°32′23.21″E). This plantation is located at an altitude of around 410–420 m a.s.l., and the site is exposed to relatively low temperatures (Supplementary Table S1) and satisfactory precipitation (Supplementary Table S2). The plantation was established on 0.5 ha, with over 2,000 seedlings planted at a spacing of 1.5 × 1.5 m apart. All the seedlings originated from the local natural common ash forest. The age of the infected trees ranged from 10 to 13 years, and their diameter at breast height (DBH) ranged from 7 to 10 cm. Approximately 50% of the trees were symptomatic, with bark necrosis at the stem base. The necroses quickly spread along the axis of the stem, sometimes encompassing the entire stem circumference (forming girdling cankers). Necroses usually appeared from ground level to a height of 30–50 cm. The initial color of the necrosis was light reddish to brown and subsequently turned dark brown (Figures 1A,B). These necrotic areas penetrated from the surface of the bark toward the sapwood, and the bark soon died away in these spots. Scattered perithecial stromata appeared on the surface of the dead bark (Figures 1C,D) as soon as 3–4 months from the appearance of symptoms of infection. A year after bark dieback, these areas were covered with moss or lichens (Lecanora sp.) on some of the stems.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Recorded symptoms and fungal morphology. (A,B) Root collar necrosis (arrows indicate the positions of perithecial stromata). (C,D) The perithecia on the necrotic bark. (E) Cross section of perithecial stroma. (F) Asci with ascospores. (G) Ascospores. (H) Macroconidia (from culture). Scale bars: (D) = 200 μm, (E) = 100 μm, (F) = 50 μm, (G,H) = 10 μm.

Isolation and Morphological Identification

To isolate and identify the causative agent, samples were collected from necrotic areas at the stem base (Figures 1A–C). A total of 50 trees were randomly selected for sampling, and samples of necrotic bark, approximately 0.5 × 5 × 10 cm in size, were collected using a sterilized knife or ax and transported to the laboratory. The xylem and bark fragments, 3–4 mm in size, were cut out with a scalpel sterilized in 70% ethanol and heated over an open flame. Following surface sterilization, these were plated onto Malt Extract Agar (MEA) nutrient medium (Malt Extract (Merck, Germany) and Agar (Torlak, Serbia), prepared according to the method of Booth (1971). The fragments were surface-sterilized using two methods: (a) the first method consisted of immersion of fragments in a solution of 1% sodium hypochlorite, with 4% active chlorine content, for 3 min. The fragments were subsequently washed in sterile distilled water thrice and plated onto the nutrient medium; (b) the second method consisted of immersion of fragments in a solution of 60% ethyl alcohol; next, they were briefly exposed to an open flame and then plated onto the nutrient medium. The media containing the fragments were incubated at 6°C for 48 h, then transferred to an incubator at 20°C in the dark. Following the appearance of the first hypha, they were immediately transferred onto fresh MEA media and kept for future identification tests. Fragments from all the collected samples were also plated onto an MEA media amended with Streptomycin according to Kowalski (2006) and incubated at 20°C in the dark to test whether the symptomatic tissues were positive for Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. In addition, fragments from necrotic tissues were plated onto a selective V8A-PARPNH media (Jung et al., 1996) and incubated at 20°C in the dark to test whether they were positive for pathogens from the Phytophthora genus.

To determine colony shape patterns, all the isolates were incubated at 20°C in MEA and Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) media for 10 days and 4 weeks, respectively. The media were prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions (HiMedia Laboratories, India), with 15 ml of media per 90 mm Petri dish. To test growth rate patterns, three replicates of five randomly selected isolates were performed on MEA and PDA media (12 ml of media per 90 mm Petri dish) and incubated for 24 h at 20°C in the dark. The isolates were then moved to 4, 10, 15, 20, 25, 27.5, 30, 32.5, 35, and 37.5°C for an additional 24 h. A cross was drawn in permanent marker at the bottom of each Petri dish, and the colony edges were defined by steel needle after every additional 24 h for 5 days, or until the colonies filled the Petri dishes completely.

Morphological observations were noted using an Olympus SZX7 stereomicroscope (Olympus Europa, Hamburg, Germany) and Ceti Magnum-T trinocular light microscope (Medline Scientific Ltd., United Kingdom). Morphological structures were recorded using a Si3000 digital camera (Fisher Scientific, United Kingdom), equipped with XliCap® (Xl Imaging Ltd., United Kingdom) imaging software for the light microscope, and an EOS 3000D digital camera (Canon, Japan) for the stereomicroscope, respectively.

Identification was performed based on the characteristics of perithecial stroma, the shapes of asci and ascospores (Figures 1D–G), growth rate analyses, the colony shape patterns of pure cultures after 10 days and 4 weeks of incubation at 20°C in the dark (Figures 3A–C), and the presence of macro- (Figure 1H) and microconidia in the pure cultures.

Molecular Identification

Two randomly selected isolates were selected for DNA extraction: one originated from F. excelsior in this study (NEO135), and the other originated from Fagus sylvatica necrotic tissue (NEO034). Selected pure cultures of these isolates were transferred onto PDA media and incubated for 2 weeks at 20°C in the dark. Total genomic DNA was isolated from the mycelial mat by scraping with a sterile scalpel from the edges of 14-days-old cultures using a DNeasy® Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Prior to DNA extraction, the mycelia were ground with a mortar and pestle in the presence of liquid nitrogen.

Four loci were sequenced for each isolate, namely ITS (5.8 S ribosomal DNA intervening with internal transcribed spacer 1 and 2), LSU (large subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA), tub (β-tubulin), and tef1 (translation elongation factor 1-α). Amplification of the ITS locus, using primer set ITS1 and ITS4, adhered to the protocol of White et al. (1990). Amplification of the LSU locus, using primer set LSU1Fd (Crous et al., 2009) and LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester, 1990), adhered to the protocol of Quaedvlieg et al. (2012). Amplification of loci tub, using primer set Btub-T1 and Btub-T2 (O’Donnell and Cigelnik, 1997) and tef1, using primer set Tef1-728F (Carbone and Kohn, 1999) and Tef1-1567R (Rehner and Buckley, 2005), adhered to the protocols of Hirooka et al. (2013). Each reaction was performed in a 25 μl mixture containing 1 ng of genomic DNA, 0.5 μM of each primer, 0.2 μM of each dNTP, 2.5 μl of 10 × PCR reaction buffer, and 1U of DreamTaqTM DNA Polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The amplification reactions were performed in a Veriti® 96-Well Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, United States). Immediately after the reaction, 1 μl of PCR product was electrophoresed in 1% TAE agarose gel with 1 kb DNA Ladder Plus (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States) as a molecular weight marker. The amplified PCR fragments of DNA were purified with a CleanUp Kit (A&A Biotechnology, Gdynia, Poland). Both strands of the PCR products were sequenced using a 3730XL DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, United States) at Genomed Company (Warsaw, Poland). The nucleotide sequences were read and edited using FinchTV v.1.4.0 (Geospiza Inc., Seattle, WA, United States) and deposited in the GenBank as listed in Table 1. Other sequences used in the analyses were obtained from GenBank (Table 1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Taxa and GenBank accession numbers used in this study.

Sequence data were initially aligned in CLC Main Workbench 8. Following sequence alignment, a Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree was estimated for each DNA region, and the multilocus data set (a total of 2,628 bp; positions containing gaps were eliminated). For each sequence set, the best-fitting substitution model was selected. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Jukes-Cantor (ITS), Kimura 2-parameter (LSU, tef1), Tamura 3-parameter (tub), and Tamura-Nei (multilocus set) models. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. Representative GenBank sequences of Neonectria punicea, N. coccinea, and N. hederae (outgroup) were included (Table 1) for confirmation of morphological identification (Figure 2). Bootstrap (BP) analyses were replicated 1,000 times. A reciprocal 70% BP threshold was used to determine if partitions could be combined into a single phylogeny.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Multilocus phylogenetic tree (Maximum Likelihood) of Neonectria spp. based on the Tamura-Nei model with the best log likelihood (–4609.9001). Bootstrap values ≥ 70%. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site.

Pathogenicity of N. punicea

One isolate of N. punicea (NEO135), obtained from the necrotic tissue of juvenile F. excelsior, was randomly selected and used to test the pathogenicity of the isolated fungus. As a comparison, an unusual isolate of N. punicea (NEO034), obtained from the necrotic tissue of mature F. sylvatica, was developed and used in a pathogenicity test. This isolate differed from the other N. punicea isolates as the macroconidia were not formed as pustules in older colonies. Although they had the same cardinal temperatures on MEA and PDA, their growth rates were slightly lower, averaging 2.83 mm per day at 25°C on MEA and 2.28 mm per day at an optimal 20°C on PDA. Both isolates were developed on MEA media and incubated at 20°C in the dark for 4 weeks until they filled the 90 mm Petri dish. Wood fragments, 4–5 mm high and 9 mm in diameter, were subsequently collected from living, healthy, common ash branches with a metal cork borer of the same size and autoclaved at 120°C for 20 min. After cooling, the wood fragments were placed wood-side down on the developed mycelia of both isolates and incubated for an additional 4 weeks (Figure 3C).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Colony shape patterns and pathogenicity of Neonectria punicea. (A) Pure culture on MEA, and (B) on PDA media after 10 days of incubation at 20°C in the dark. (C) Sterilized ash wood fragments plated on the surface of pure cultures to be overgrown by N. punicea colonies. (D,E) Stand where inoculation was carried out. (F) Necrosis on ash trees 12 months post inoculation at BH. (G) Ash trees 12 months post inoculation at SB with N. punicea originating from common ash (arrows indicate the position of perithecial stromata). (H) Numerous stromata with fruiting bodies. (I) Close view of stromata with numerous perithecia. Scale bars: (I) = 200 μm.

Artificial inoculation of 180 stems of 10–12-years-old F. excelsior (in three repetitions) was performed in the field (Figures 3D,E) using the underbark stem inoculation test (Karadžić et al., 2019). A total of 60 trees (30 with wounded tissues and 30 unwounded ones) were used for both inoculation with the isolate from F. excelsior and as the control. Furthermore, 60 trees were inoculated with the isolate originating from F. sylvatica as a comparison.

In the case of the isolate originating from F. excelsior, wounds were made on 30 stems (10 stems per repetition) using a metal cork borer (9 mm in diameter). The inoculum overgrown with fungal mycelium was subsequently applied to the injured sites in a wood to wood position. The inoculation was performed at two sites on the same tree, including the stem base (SB) (approximately 0.2 m) and breast height (BH) (approximately 1.30 m). The inoculum containing the fungus was applied directly to the bark without previous wounding on 30 stems (at the SB and BH sites). The remaining 30 stems used as a control group were wounded with a cork borer, and sterile wood fragments were retrieved. The same procedure was similarly applied for the inoculation of 90 F. excelsior trees aged between 10 and 12 years with the isolate from F. sylvatica. After inoculation, the inoculated sites were covered with a small piece of sterile cotton and sealed with plastic sheeting. The average DBH in the group of trees inoculated with the isolate from F. excelsior was 7.5 ± 0.17 cm, whereas DBH in the group of trees inoculated with the isolate from F. sylvatica was 6.7 ± 0.22 cm.

Inoculated trees were first inspected after 12 months, and control reisolations from 50% of randomly selected trees within all the groups were performed. The experiment was completed after 24 months, and reisolations were performed at the edges of the necrotic zones and from the formed fruiting bodies.

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Wood sections (transverse, radial, and tangential surfaces), sampled from three infected trees, were mounted on specimen stubs, sputter-coated with gold in the Sputter Coater K650X (Quorum Technologies, Ashford, United Kingdom) in an argon atmosphere, and examined by high-vacuum SEM using a JEOL JSM-6390 instrument (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) operating at 15 kV.

X-ray Micro-Computed Tomography

X-ray micro-computed tomography (X-ray microCT) imaging of woody tissues sampled from three infected trees was carried out with a Phoenix V|Tome|X L 240 device (GE Sensing & Inspection Technologies, Wunstorf, Germany) equipped with a 180 kV/15 W high-power nanofocus X-ray tube. Scanning parameters were set as follows: voltage 70 kV; current 220 μA; projections 1,800; average 3, skip 1, timing 500 ms; and voxel size 2.5 μm. After the scanning process was completed, three-dimensional data sets were evaluated using VGSTUDIO MAX 2.2 software for industrial CT data (Volume Graphics, Heidelberg, Germany).

Statistical Analyses

The surface of each necrotic area was calculated using the mathematical formula for elliptic surfaces based on length and width. Analysis of variance was performed using a Generalized Linear Model (GLM), with necrotic area height, width, and surface as dependent variables; the site of inoculation (SB or BH), time after inoculation, and origin of inoculum as predictors; and plant diameter as a covariate (α = 0.05). The significance of differences in mean necrotic area length, width, and surface between different treatments was tested using the Duncan post hoc test (α = 0.05). Statistical procedures were performed using STATISTICA 13.4 (TIBCO software Inc. 1984–2018).

Results

Isolation and Morphological Identification

After the isolation tests, 100% of the plated pieces were positive, and 54 isolates were obtained. There was no difference between surface sterilization methods, and both proved to be efficient during isolation. The mycelium growing on MEA and PDA media gradually assumed a sparse, hairy appearance (Figures 3A,B). In the MEA media, it was mostly aerial surrounding the inocula, whereas, in PDA, it was slightly cottony and located in the middle of the colony. After 10 days of incubation at 20°C in the dark, the colonies on both tested media were white (Figures 3A,B), whereas the older, aerial hyphae were cottony whitish-yellow or light reddish-brown; the agar also turned reddish-brown (Figure 3C). Colony growth was medium-fast, and the mycelium grew under a range of temperatures from 4 to 30°C. The optimum temperature for growth in the MEA medium was 25°C, with an average growth rate of 3.19 ± 0.05 mm per day. On the contrary, that of the PDA medium was 20°C, with an average growth rate of 3.25 ± 0.06 mm per day. After 7 days of incubation, microconidia appeared in cultures incubated at 20°C in the dark. These were elliptical to cylindrical, formed on lateral phialides, and were single-celled or two-celled, reaching dimensions of 8.6 ± 0.2 × 3.2 ± 0.07 μm, with a range of 6.6–12.3 × 2–4 μm (N = 47). In cultures incubated for more than 4 weeks, macroconidia were formed as small, light-yellow pustules, scattered mostly in the growth center. The macroconidia were cylindrocarpon-like, hyaline, cylindrical, narrowing slightly toward the rounded ends and with three–eight septa (Figure 1H). The average dimensions were 47.5 ± 1 × 6.6 ± 0.08 μm, with a range of 36.1–55.7 × 5.7–7.5 μm (N = 34). However, none of the examples yielded Hymenoscyphus fraxineus or Phytophthora spp. colonies.

The perithecia on the necrotic bark were densely crowded and developed in succession on an erumpent reddish stroma (Figure 1D) formed of homogeneous, globose, thin-walled cells. The stroma base penetrated the lenticels and was usually attached to the cortical tissue of the host by this narrow wedge of tissue (Figure 1E). Perithecia were red to reddish-brown, globose, subglobose to ovate, with a small apical disc (ostiolum), and averaged 281.8 ± 9.5 × 265 ± 8.6 μm, with a range of 205.5–342.4 × 185.6 × 313.8 μm. Asci were clavate (Figure 1F), with a rounded apex and eight monostichous to apically distichous ascospores and averaged 88 ± 2.8 × 9 ± 0.28 μm in our measurements, with a range of 73.3–117.2 × 7.4–11.4 μm. Ascospores were hyaline to light brown at maturity with slightly roughened walls, fusoid, broadly fusoid to ellipsoid, and slightly constricted at the single central septum (Figure 1G). The average dimensions of the ascospores were 12.5 ± 0.2 × 5.2 ± 0.07 μm, with a range of 9–16.2 × 3.7–6.3 μm. The ascospores usually showed variation in the size and shape of each ascus.

Molecular Identification

DNA sequences of four loci, i.e., ITS (446 bp), LSU (797 bp), tub (approximately 590 bp), and tef1α (approximately 800 bp), were successfully obtained for both isolates of N. punicea. Based on the alignment of the ITS sequences to the GenBank database, both of the isolates belong to the N. punicea taxon. Further analysis of the remaining loci suggests ambiguous species affiliation of isolate NEO034. Generally speaking, two main patterns of tree topology were found. Based on ITS and LSU analyses (Supplementary Figures S1, S2), both of the isolates belonged to N. punicea clade (ML BP > 50%), whereas tef1 and tub analyses (Supplementary Figures S3, S4) showed that isolate NEO034 is more congenial with N. coccinea. A similar result, well supported by BP values, was obtained by the analysis of concatenated multilocus sequence (ML BP > 90%) (Figure 2) and suggested that isolate NEO034, originating from F. sylvatica, does not belong to N. punicea clade.

Pathogenicity of N. punicea

After pathogenicity testing in the field, both isolates of N. punicea were found to be pathogenic to ash trees in the case of previous wounding of the bark (Figures 3, 4). However, no wood tissue infections occurred in direct inoculum application to the healthy bark or the control group. After 12 months, the fungus N. punicea was reisolated from stems inoculated with the isolate from F. excelsior (Figure 3F) in 94% of the cases. However, in stems infected with the isolate originating from F. sylvatica the fungus was reisolated in 67% of the cases. The control trees remained without developing necroses. In contrast, inoculated trees showed necrotic areas of different sizes, which were visible at both BH and SB sites (Figure 3G), and the formation of numerous stromata with fruiting bodies was recorded at the inoculation sites (Figures 3H,I).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Representative photos of ash stems 24-months post inoculation. Neonectria punicea originating from common ash: (A) Tree inoculated at both SB and BH. (B,C) Cankers at BH. (D) Canker at SB, with sunken bark (black arrow) and active margin (yellow arrow). N. punicea originating from European beech: (E,F) Cankers at BH with active margin (white arrows). (G) canker at SB with active margin (yellow arrow). (H) Irregular shape of canker at BH. (I) Irregular shape of canker at SB with active margins (black arrows). (J–L) Control trees.

Twenty-four months after inoculation, all the trees within the inoculated groups showed visible cankers of different sizes, and the experiment was completed. Apart from the slight yellowing and atrophy of the leaves in some cases, other symptoms, such as dieback of crowns and branches, were not recorded. Reisolation was successful from the cankers of all the inoculated trees (100%), whereas reisolation from the control group was negative. The necrotic areas on the stems spread mostly in a regular shape, initially forming a circle around the inoculation site (Figure 3F), subsequently forming symmetric or asymmetric elliptic shapes (Figures 4A–G). Some irregular and interesting shapes were also recorded (Figures 4H,I). The control trees remained without visible cankers or necroses and the wound sites were almost completely closed over by callus tissue (Figures 4J–L). Typical sunken bark was recorded on the lesions in most of the cases.

The substantial impact of time post-inoculation (T), inoculum origin, place of inoculation, and interactions between T and inoculum origin, as well as covariates, were established, but not in relation to interactions between T, inoculum origin, and site of inoculation (Table 2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Results of multivariate tests of significance.

The substantial impact of T and inoculum origin on necrosis length, width, and the surface was also established (Table 3). Interactions between T and inoculum origin also had a significant impact on all necrosis traits.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Results of general linear models for analysis of the spread of N. punicea necroses, including individual stem diameter at breast height as a covariate.

Twelve months post-inoculation, necrotic area lengths and widths at SB were statistically significantly larger compared to the control trees in the case of both the used isolates, whereas only the isolate from common ash caused significantly larger necrotic surfaces (Figure 5). No significant difference was recorded between the used isolates (Figure 5). A similar situation was recorded at the site of BH inoculation, where both isolates did not statistically significantly differ from the control (Figure 5) in the case of necrotic surfaces.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. N. punicea necrosis spreading axially (A), tangentially (B) and necrosis surface (C) 12 and 24 months after inoculation by inoculum originating from common ash and European beech. Means (±SE) under different letters above, are significantly different based on the Duncan post hoc test at p < 0.05.

Twenty-four months post-inoculation, statistically significantly larger necrotic area lengths, widths, and surfaces (compared to the control trees) were recorded in the case of both tested isolates (Figure 5). Although not significantly different, there was a slight trend of greater widths and necrotic surfaces caused by the isolate from F. excelsior recorded at SB 24-months post-inoculation (Figure 5). A trend of larger necrotic areas caused by the isolate from F. sylvatica at BH was recorded, in contrast, and necrotic area widths were statistically significantly greater.

When comparing necrotic area size and time post-inoculation, all the necrosis values increased significantly within 12 months between the two measurements. Specifically, necrotic area lengths at SB and BH increased 1.6 times in the case of the isolate from F. excelsior, and 1.7 and 1.8 times in the case of the isolate from F. sylvatica (Figure 5). A similar situation was recorded in the case of necrotic area widths, and the situation in the case of necrotic area surfaces was even more pronounced. Necrotic area surfaces at SB and BH increased from 515.2 ± 88.16 to 1305.4 ± 267.92 mm2, and from 438.2 ± 31.65 to 1020.5 ± 167.36 mm2, respectively, in the case of tested isolate originating from F. excelsior. Necrotic area surfaces at SB and BH in the case of the isolate from F. sylvatica also increased from 437.6 ± 27.65 to 1182.5 ± 138.54, and 435.1 ± 23.88 to 1163.7 ± 126.81 mm2, respectively.

Tree Responses and the Spread of Infection

Upon inoculation, the fungal mycelium colonized the surface surrounding the inoculation sites. This was followed by rupture of the bark and cambium necrosis. The inoculation sites became extensive open cankers with necrotic tissue. Infected trees responded by forming a small concentric annual growth ring of the canker in the next growing season after inoculation. However, a dysfunction in the discontinuous and necrotic cambium in close proximity to the inoculation sites prevented the spread of the callus tissue of the concentric annual growth ring throughout the cankers. The same situation was repeated during the second growing season after inoculation. However, in the third year after inoculation, a large area of the concentric annual growth ring tissue was formed, which began to close over the cankers. In addition, small, red, and globose perithecia were formed at the necrotic sites of both the first and second annual growth rings after inoculation (Figures 6A–C).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Light microscopy (A) and scanning electron microscopy (B,C) images of the globose perithecia of Neonectria punicea isolate NEO135 growing on the wood of an infected Fraxinus excelsior tree. Scale bars: (A,B) = 200 μm, (C) = 50 μm.

Regarding the fungal spread through the xylem tissues, the hyphae penetrated mostly into the outermost annual growth ring. The majority of hyphae were found in the large earlywood vessels and rarely in the axial parenchyma cells (Figures 7A–E and Supplementary Video S1). Infected trees responded with the formation of tyloses in vessels to prevent a rapid fungal spread through the axial vascular transport pathway (Figure 7F and Supplementary Video S2).

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Scanning electron microscopy images of juvenile Fraxinus excelsior wood (the outermost annual growth ring) infected by Neonectria punicea isolate NEO135. (A,B) Growth of fungal hyphae inside earlywood vessels, cross-sections. (C) Spread of hyphae through axial parenchyma cells, cross-section. (D) Hyphae growing inside earlywood vessel, radial section. (E) Hyphae penetrating through pits and invading the earlywood vessel, radial section. (F) Tyloses formed in an earlywood vessel in response to fungal inoculation, radial section. Scale bars: (A,F) = 100 μm, (B,D) = 20 μm, (C) = 10 μm, (E) = 5 μm.

Discussion

The presence of N. punicea in F. excelsior was confirmed by isolation, the morphological features of the micro- and macroconidia, perithecia, asci, and ascospores, the shape and growth rates of the obtained isolates, and their molecular identification. This was the only isolated organism from the margins of active collar cankers in the studied locality. To our knowledge, this is the first report of N. punicea on common ash trees in B&H. N. punicea has a wide host range, and it was previously reported in multiple hosts in Europe, Asia, and North America (Booth, 1959; Hirooka et al., 2013; Langer, 2017). This fungus has also been reported in common ash in Germany (Langer, 2017; Meyn et al., 2019) and recently in the narrow-leaved ash in neighboring Croatia (Kranjec Orlović et al., 2020). In B&H, N. punicea (Nectria punicea var. ilicis Booth) was previously mentioned in studies on species from the Neonectria genus in beech forests (Lazarev and Jokanović, 2007), and this could be considered as the first report of N. punicea in B&H. Therefore, it is most likely that N. punicea has been present for an extended period in B&H but has not been studied in detail to date. In contrast, N. coccinea (Pers.: Fr.) Rossman and Samuels, the cause of BBD, is widely present in beech trees in B&H (Lazarev and Jokanović, 2007; Karadžić et al., 2012b), causing substantial damage in different beech ecosystems along with other Neonectria/Nectria species and other damaging agents.

Despite the attempts to isolate H. fraxineus from the recorded necrotic tissues, all the collected samples remained negative for this pathogenic fungus. In studies by Stanivuković et al. (2014), H. fraxineus was recorded near the studied planted forest, but only in plants newly introduced from another area, while local seedling stock and plants from native natural regeneration remained completely free of ash dieback symptoms. Ash dieback fungus was introduced into the planted forest with tree seedling stock that had been previously infected; however, local, native plants showed some level of resistance and tolerance to H. fraxineus infection as reported previously in several studies (Stener, 2013, 2018; Lobo et al., 2014; McKinney et al., 2014). It is also possible that the inoculum level was not yet high enough to cause any significant symptoms or to be detected. In this scenario, N. punicea originating from various surrounding hosts could colonize these weakened plants and cause some secondary symptoms, as demonstrated by Meyn et al. (2019). However, ash trees originating by natural regeneration in the nearby forest of the surrounding area did not show any signs of collar necrosis or H. fraxineus presence. Intriguingly, these surrounding plants are of similar age and are exposed to similar environmental conditions and, subsequently, a similar inoculum level of H. fraxineus and N. punicea. The presence of necrotic tissues on newly introduced plants could be partially explained by additional stress due to planting and moving them onto post-agricultural land. This phenomenon was recorded in the case of beech trees, where inoculated fresh beech logs were more susceptible to the same fungal isolates as inoculated living trees (Kunca and Leontovyč, 1999). Ash dieback symptoms were also not recorded in the crowns and branches of trees affected with collar cankers in this planted forest, suggesting the absence of H. fraxineus. However, similar situations where only symptoms such as collar cankers appeared were previously recorded (Muñoz et al., 2016; Enderle et al., 2017). Additional studies on this subject, as well as studies at other localities with similar symptoms, are needed to determine the presence of H. fraxineus, as demonstrated by Meyn et al. (2019). Regardless of the causative agent, the site conditions in this planted forest are favorable for collar necrosis development based on the descriptions of similar sites (Marçais et al., 2016; Enderle et al., 2017).

Following a pathogenicity test in field conditions, all injured stems, which were subsequently inoculated with wood fragments overgrown by mycelia, were infected. It was found that the fungus spreads more rapidly in the axial, rather than the radial direction on the stems (Figure 5). However, almost no statistically significant difference was established between inoculation at SB and BH (Figure 5). Although inoculated at two sites, with significantly larger necroses being recorded (Figures 3, 4), the plants did not show signs of severe decline for over 2 years of observation, except for a few slight symptoms in the crowns. A similar situation also continued in the third year, post-inoculation. This could be explained by the duration of observation, and the infection process and pathogenesis itself are certainly variable under natural conditions. The exact time of contamination and pathogen penetration into host tissues is also very hard to determine under natural conditions. In the case of common ash and H. fraxineus infections via ascospores, some findings were obtained previously (Cleary et al., 2013; Mansfield et al., 2018). Additional studies are needed to clarify these issues and determine the schedule of development in ash trees in the case of N. punicea.

In most of the underbark pathogenicity trials, under laboratory and field conditions, one inoculation site is usually created in the selected stem position (SB or BH) (Karadžić et al., 2019; Vemić et al., 2019) using a sterilized scalpel, metal cork borer, or similar tool (Biggs, 1992). Contrary to this, in the case of natural infection, there are usually several infection points, which means that plants need to allocate significant resources for their defense. In the case of H. fraxineus infection of common ash trees, it has been proven through genotyping studies that in addition to several different infection sites, there are also several different genotypes infecting the same host tree (Husson et al., 2012; Meyn et al., 2019), causing the tree to weaken substantially and eventually decline. No genotyping studies of N. punicea in infected common ash tissue have been carried out to date, and it would be interesting to perform these studies in the future and test the aggressiveness of different genotypes of both H. fraxineus and N. punicea. The genome sequence for N. punicea has also been recently studied and published (Salgado-Salazar and Crouch, 2019), making future development of detection methods and working with this pathogen easier.

Another possible scenario is that H. fraxineus is not present in the studied common ash plantation and that N. punicea infection was achieved through wounds and natural openings, such as lenticels. After the pathogenicity trial, the results showed that none of the trees without previously damaged bark, to which the inocula were applied, were infected. Similar results were obtained from the studies on N. coccinea development in European beech in Slovakia (Kunca, 2005) and in studies on Cryphonectria parasitica (Murrill) Barr pathogenicity on sessile oak trees in Serbia (Karadžić et al., 2019). This indicates that the fungus is unable to infect stems with undamaged bark, which corresponds to the known Nectria/Neonectria mechanisms of infection (Lortie, 1969; Perrin, 1977; Marinković and Karadžić, 1985; Biggs, 1992; Karadžić et al., 2012a). However, cases when some species from the Nectria/Neonectra genus were able to penetrate the healthy bark and cause infections, as demonstrated by Lortie (1969), have also been recorded. Therefore, it can be concluded that the N. punicea fungus most likely has no enzymes that can disintegrate the dead cork layer of the host bark. Bark injuries (caused by insects, frost, wind-induced cracks at the stem base, mechanical damage caused by animals or during harvesting and hauling of trees, etc.), or natural openings such as lenticels, are therefore favorable entry points for ascospores transported by raindrops, where they can start germinating and establish an infection. The studied area is exposed to low temperatures (Supplementary Table S1) and frosts, which create microcracks in the bark, and these are also favorable points of entry for N. punicea and the other opportunistic pathogens. Lenticels have been previously suggested as infection points on ash shoots (Nemesio-Gorriz et al., 2019) and ash collars (Meyn et al., 2019). The N. punicea var. ilicis species description (Booth, 1959) describes the stromata as having a wedge-shaped base and appearing from the lenticels. We obtained similar findings during pathogen identification (Figure 1E), and together with the results from path trials, this suggests that the lenticels at the stem base are the most probable point of entry for N. punicea. It may be appropriate to perform future detailed pathogenicity tests using ascospore suspensions to clarify these conclusions and previous assumptions.

Additionally, because the stem base is covered by surrounding weeds, ground flora, and sometimes even moss, light deficiency and moisture conditions in these areas are optimal for spore germination and the establishment of an infection. This can also explain why most infections by N. punicea and H. fraxineus (Meyn et al., 2019) originate at the root collar level. Likewise, a similar phenomenon was observed in natural beech stands affected by BBD in B&H and Serbia (Karadžić, unpublished data).

SEM and X-ray microCT imaging shed more light on how the hyphae of N. punicea penetrate into woody tissues when living bark tissues, including phloem and cambium, are decaying. Infected trees responded with the formation of tyloses in vessels to prevent fungal spread through the axial vascular transport pathway. Similar defense mechanisms were also previously reported in interspecific Ulmus hybrids infected by Ophiostoma novo-ulmi Brasier, a causative agent of Dutch elm disease (Ďurkovič et al., 2014).

During this study, an unusual isolate (NEO034) of N. punicea originating from mature F. sylvatica tissue was used to compare the pathogenicity trial. Based on morphological characteristics, this isolate was preliminarily identified as N. punicea what was confirmed by the sequencing of ITS and LSU loci (Supplementary Figures S1, S2). After further analyses, based on the sequencing of tef1 and tub loci (Supplementary Figures S3, S4) and multilocus sequence alignment (Figure 2), the NEO034 isolate originating from Fagus sylvatica does not belong to the N. punicea clade and it is closer to N. coccinea. However, this isolate is also clearly different from N. coccinea by having different colony shape patterns and lower maximal temperature for growth and does not grow at 32.5°C on tested MEA and PDA media. This indicates either the presence of a new species or some hybrid from the Neonectria genus on F. sylvatica trees affected by BBD, and additional studies are required for a final description.

Nevertheless, this isolate was equally aggressive, and after 24 months of incubation, it demonstrated a trend of greater necrotic area lengths at BH compared to the isolate from F. excelsior, whereas the necrotic area widths were statistically significantly longer (Figure 5). This implies a high risk for ash stands in the future due to the presence of huge inocula reservoirs from F. sylvatica trees affected by BBD. It would be interesting to also test the aggressiveness of N. coccinea isolates as a causative agent of BBD on ash plants and the aggressiveness of N. punicea originating from F. excelsior on F. sylvatica plants to clarify these potential risks and define appropriate management strategies.

The ability of N. punicea to cause lesions and discoloration in F. excelsior tissues was demonstrated for the first time in this study. Screening and selection of common ash genotypes resistant to H. fraxineus were suggested to be possible (Stener, 2018) and will be the main task of future preservation and breeding programs for this important tree species (Pautasso et al., 2013). This study results suggest that there is a serious threat to both planted and naturally regenerated forests, particularly to the long-term resistance screening program of F. excelsior. Therefore, this pathogen, among others, should be taken into consideration and integrated within future ash resistance and breeding programs.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.

Author Contributions

DK and IM: conceptualization. DK, IM, SM, KS, and JĎ: data curation and writing—original draft. DK, ZS, IM, SM, and ZR: methodology—sampling, isolation, morphological identification, and methodology—pathogenicity test. KS: methodology—molecular identification. JĎ, VR, and MK: methodology—SEM and X-ray microCT. DK, IM, JĎ, and SM: writing—review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia, grant no. 451-02-68/2020/14/2000169 from 24 January 2020 for financing scientific research at the Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade in 2020, by the “Phytophthora Research Centre,” funded by the Czech Ministry for Education, Youth and Sports and the European Regional Development Fund, Reg. No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000453, and by the Slovak scientific grant agency VEGA, grant no. 1/0450/19.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We were grateful to Dr. Michal Tomšovský for advice and assistance in regard to molecular studies.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2020.592260/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Figure S1 | Phylogenetic analyses of Neonectria spp. isolates by the Maximum Likelihood method based on the ITS sequences. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−770.6076) is shown. Bootstrap values ≥ 70%. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa are clustered together is shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site.

Supplementary Figure S2 | Phylogenetic analyses of Neonectria spp. isolates by the Maximum Likelihood method based on the LSU sequences. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−1192.6684) is shown. Bootstrap values ≥ 70%. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa are clustered together is shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site.

Supplementary Figure S3 | Phylogenetic analyses of Neonectria spp. isolates by the Maximum Likelihood method based on the tef1 sequences. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−1440.5161) is shown. Bootstrap values ≥ 70%. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa are clustered together is shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site.

Supplementary Figure S4 | Phylogenetic analyses of Neonectria spp. isolates by the Maximum Likelihood method based on the tub sequences. The tree with the highest log likelihood (−1052.3578) is shown. Bootstrap values ≥ 70%. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa are clustered together is shown next to the branches. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site.

Supplementary Video S1 | Spatial X-ray micro-computed tomography imaging of a vessel. The video shows the presence of hyphae inside the vessel (the area is marked with a red ellipse).

Supplementary Video S2 | Spatial X-ray micro-computed tomography imaging of tyloses. The video shows tyloses filling and plugging the lumen of an earlywood vessel in response to fungal inoculation.

References

Bakys, R., Vasaitis, R., Barklund, P., Thomsen, I. M., and Stenlid, J. (2009). Occurrence and pathogenicity of fungi in necrotic and non-symptomatic shoots of declining common ash (Fraxinus excelsior) in Sweden. Eur. J. For. Res. 128, 51–60. doi: 10.1007/s10342-008-0238-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bakys, R., Vasiliauskas, A., Ihrmark, K., Stenlid, J., Menkis, A., and Vasaitis, R. (2011). Root rot, associated fungi and their impact on health condition of declining Fraxinus excelsior stands in Lithuania. Scand. J. For. Res. 26, 128–135. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2010.536569

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Biggs, A. R. (1992). “Responses of angiosperm bark tissues to fungi causing cankers and canker rots,” in Defense Mechanisms of Woody Plants Against Fungi. Springer Series in Wood Science, eds R. A. Blanchette and A. R. Biggs (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 41–61. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-01642-8_3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Booth, C. (1959). Studies of Pyrenomycetales: IV. Nectria (Part I). Mycological Papers, No. 73. Kew: Commonwealth Mycological Institute, 1–115.

Google Scholar

Booth, C. (1971). Methods in Microbiology, Vol. 4. London: Academic Press, 1–795. doi: 10.1016/S0580-9517(09)70006-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carbone, I., and Kohn, L. M. (1999). A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 91, 553–556. doi: 10.1080/00275514.1999.12061051

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Castlebury, L., Rossman, A. Y., and Hyten, A. S. (2006). Phylogenetic relationships of Neonectria / Cylindrocarpon on Fagus in North America. Can. J. Bot. 84, 1417–1433. doi: 10.1139/b06-105

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chandelier, A., Gerarts, F., San Martin, G., Herman, M., and Delahaye, L. (2016). Temporal evolution of collar lesions associated with ash dieback and the occurrence of Armillaria in Belgian forests. For. Pathol. 46, 289–297. doi: 10.1111/efp.12258

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cleary, M., Daniel, G., and Stenlid, J. (2013). Light and scanning electron microscopy studies of the early infection stages of Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus on Fraxinus excelsior. Plant Pathol. 62, 1294–1301. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12048

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Crous, P. W., Schoch, C. L., Hyde, K. D., Wood, A. R., Gueidan, C., and de Hoog, G. S. (2009). Phylogenetic lineages in the Capnodiales. Stud. Mycol. 64, 17–47.S7. doi: 10.3114/sim.2009.64.02

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ďurkovič, J., Kačík, F., Olňák, D., Kučerová, V., and Krajňáková, J. (2014). Host responses and metabolic profiles of wood components in Dutch elm hybrids with a contrasting tolerance to Dutch elm disease. Ann. Bot. 114, 47–59. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu076

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Enderle, R., Peters, F., Nakou, A., and Metzler, B. (2013). Temporal development of ash dieback symptoms and spatial distribution of collar rots in a provenance trial of Fraxinus excelsior. Eur. J. For. Res. 132, 865–876. doi: 10.1007/s10342-013-0717-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Enderle, R., Sander, F., and Metzler, B. (2017). Temporal development of collar necroses and butt rot in association with ash dieback. iForest 10, 529–536. doi: 10.3832/ifor2407-010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gross, A., Holdenrieder, O., Pautasso, M., Queloz, V., and Sieber, T. N. (2014). Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus, the causal agent of European ash dieback. Mol. Plant Pathol. 15, 5–21. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hirooka, Y., Rossman, A. Y., Zhuang, W.-Y., Salgado-Salazar, C., and Chaverri, P. (2013). Species delimitation for Neonectria coccinea group including the causal agents of beech bark disease in Asia, Europe, and North America. Mycosystema 32, 485–517.

Google Scholar

Husson, C., Caël, O., Grandjean, J. P., Nageleisen, L. M., and Marçais, B. (2012). Occurrence of Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus on infected ash logs. Plant Pathol. 61, 889–895. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02578.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jovanović, B. (1971). Dendrologija sa Osnovima Fitocenologije. II Neizmenjeno Izdanje. Beograd: Naučna kniga, 1–576.

Google Scholar

Jung, T., Blaschke, H., and Neumann, P. (1996). Isolation, identification and pathogenicity of Phytophthora species from declining oak stands. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 26, 253–272. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1996.tb00846.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karadžić, D., Milanović, S., and Radulović, Z. (2012a). “Present state of beech bark disease in Serbia,” in Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference: Forests in Future – Sustainable Use, Risks and Challenges. 4–5th October 2012, Belgrade, 623–631.

Google Scholar

Karadžić, D., Milanović, S., Radulović, Z., and Obradović, S. (2012b). “The most important parasitic Nectria species and their role in killing trees of Fagus in Serbia and Republic of Srpska,” in Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference: Forestry Science and Practice for the Purpose of Sustainable Development of Forestry–20 Years of the Faculty of Forestry in Banja Luka. 1th – 4th November 2012, Banja Luka, 545–553.

Google Scholar

Karadžić, D., Radulović, Z., Sikora, K., Stanivuković, Z., Golubović Ćurguz, V., Oszako, T., et al. (2019). Characterisation and pathogenicity of Cryphonectria parasitica on sweet chestnut and sessile oak trees in Serbia. Plant Protect. Sci. 55, 191–201. doi: 10.17221/38/2018-PPS

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keča, N., Kirisits, T., and Menkis, A. (2017). First report of the invasive ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus fraxineus on Fraxinus excelsior and F. angustifolia in Serbia. Balt. For. 23, 56–59.

Google Scholar

Kowalski, T. (2006). Chalara fraxinea sp. nov. associated with dieback of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) in Poland. For. Pathol. 36, 264–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2006.00453.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kranjec Orlović, J., Moro, M., and Diminić, D. (2020). Role of root and stem base fungi in Fraxinus angustifolia (Vahl) dieback in Croatian floodplain forests. Forests 11:607. doi: 10.3390/f11060607

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kräutler, K., and Kirisits, T. (2014). The ash dieback pathogen Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus is associated with leaf symptoms on ash species (Fraxinus spp.). J. Agric. Ext. Rural Dev. 4, 261–265. doi: 10.5897/JAERD12.065

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kunca, A. (2005). Susceptibility of wounds of the European beech bark to infection by Neonectria coccinea and efficiency of the wound treatment. Lesnícky Časopis For. J. 51, 21–29. [in English],

Google Scholar

Kunca, A., and Leontovyč, R. (1999). Relationship between beech bark wounds and bark necrosis and possible methods to control bark necrosis. Lesnícky Časopis For. J. 45, 317–324. [in English with abstract in Slovakian],Google Scholar

Langer, G. (2017). Collar Rots in forests of northwest Germany affected by ash dieback. Balt. For. 23, 4–19.

Google Scholar

Lazarev, V., and Jokanović, B. (2007). Species of Nectria genus in beech forests. Bull. Fac. For. Univ. Banja Luka 7, 65–82. [in Serbian with English abstract and summary],

Google Scholar

Lobo, A., Hansen, J. K., McKinney, L. V., Nielsen, L. R., and Kjær, E. D. (2014). Genetic variation in dieback resistance: growth and survival of Fraxinus excelsior under the influence of Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus. Scand. J. For. Res. 29, 519–526. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2014.950603

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lortie, M. (1969). Inoculations of Nectria galligena on northern hardwoods. Laval Univ. For. Res. Found. Contrib. No. 13, 3–31.

Google Scholar

Lygis, V., Vasiliauskas, R., Larsson, K.-H., and Stenlid, J. (2005). Wood-inhabiting fungi in stems of Fraxinus excelsior in declining ash stands of northern Lithuania, with particular reference to Armillaria cepistipes. Scand. J. For. Res. 20, 337–346. doi: 10.1080/02827580510036238

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mansfield, J. W., Galambos, N., and Saville, R. (2018). The use of ascospores of the dieback fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus for infection assays reveals a significant period of biotrophic interaction in penetrated ash cells. Plant Pathol. 67, 1354–1361. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12844

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marçais, B., Husson, C., Godart, L., and Caël, O. (2016). Influence of site and stand factors on Hymenoscyphus fraxineus-induced basal lesions. Plant Pathol. 65, 1452–1461. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12542

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marinković, P., and Karadžić, D. (1985). Nectria coccinea (Pers. ex Fr.) Fries., causal agent of beech die-back in Serbia. Zaštita Bilja 36, 263–272. [in Serbian with English abstract and summary],

Google Scholar

McKinney, L. V., Nielsen, L. R., Collinge, D. B., Thomsen, I. M., Hansen, J. K., and Kjær, E. D. (2014). The ash dieback crisis: genetic variation in resistance can prove a long-term solution. Plant Pathol. 63, 485–499. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12196

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meyn, R., Langer, G. J., Gross, A., and Langer, E. J. (2019). Fungal colonization patterns in necrotic rootstocks and stem bases of dieback-affected Fraxinus excelsior L. For. Pathol. 49:e12520. doi: 10.1111/efp.12520

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Milenković, I., Jung, T., Stanivuković, Z., and Karadžić, D. (2017). First report of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus on Fraxinus excelsior in Montenegro. For. Pathol. 47:e12359. doi: 10.1111/efp.12359

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Muñoz, F., Marçais, B., Dufour, J., and Dowkiw, A. (2016). Rising out of the ashes: additive genetic variation for susceptibility to Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in Fraxinus excelsior. Phytopathology 106, 1535–1543. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-11-15-0284-R

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nemesio-Gorriz, M., McGuinness, B., Grant, J., Dowd, L., and Douglas, G. C. (2019). Lenticel infection in Fraxinus excelsior shoots in the context of ash dieback. iForest 12, 160–165. doi: 10.3832/ifor2897-012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

O’Donnell, K., and Cigelnik, E. (1997). Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 7, 103–116. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1996.0376

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Orlikowski, L. B., Ptaszek, M., Rodziewicz, A., Nechwatal, J., Thinggaard, K., and Jung, T. (2011). Phytophthora root and collar rot of mature Fraxinus excelsior in forest stands in Poland and Denmark. For. Pathol. 41, 510–519. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2011.00714.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pautasso, M., Aas, G., Queloz, V., and Holdenrieder, O. (2013). European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) dieback – a conservation biology challenge. Biol. Conserv. 158, 37–49. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.08.026

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Perrin, R. (1977). Le deprissement du hetre. Rev. For. Fr. XXIX–2, 101–126. doi: 10.4267/2042/21124

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Quaedvlieg, W., Groenewald, J. Z., de Jesús Yáñez-Morales, M., and Crous, P. W. (2012). DNA barcoding of Mycosphaerella species of quarantine importance to Europe. Persoonia 29, 101–115. doi: 10.3767/003158512x661282

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rehner, S. A., and Buckley, E. A. (2005). Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-alpha sequences: evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs. Mycologia 97, 84–98. doi: 10.3852/mycologia.97.1.84

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Salgado-Salazar, C., and Crouch, A. J. (2019). Genome resources for the stem and bark canker pathogens Corinectria fuckeliana, Neonectria hederae and N. punicea. Plant Dis. 103, 389–391. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-18-0904-A

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Skovsgaard, J. P., Thomsen, I. M., Skovgaard, I. M., and Martinussen, T. (2010). Associations among symptoms of dieback in even−aged stands of ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). For. Pathol. 40, 7–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2009.00599.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stanivuković, Z., Karadžić, D., and Milenković, I. (2014). The first record of the parasitic fungus Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (Kowalski) Baral, Queloz, Hosoya on the common ash in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Šumarstvo 3–4, 19–34. [in Serbian with English abstract and summary],

Google Scholar

Stener, L.-G. (2013). Clonal differences in susceptibility to the dieback of Fraxinus excelsior in southern Sweden. Scand. J. For. Res. 28, 205–216. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2012.735699

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stener, L.-G. (2018). Genetic evaluation of damage caused by ash dieback with emphasis on selection stability over time. For. Ecol. Manag. 409, 584–592. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.11.049

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Treštić, T., and Mujezinović, O. (2013). “Ash dieback in Bosnia and Herzegovina?! Program and abstracts,” in Poster at the COST Action FP1103 FRAXBACK, 4th Management Committee Meeting and Workshop “Frontiers in Ash Dieback Research”, September 4–6th, 2013, Malmö, 30–31.

Google Scholar

Vemić, A., Tomšovský, M., Jung, T., and Milenković, I. (2019). Pathogenicity of fungi associated with ash dieback symptoms of one-year old Fraxinus excelsior in Montenegro. For. Pathol. 49:e12539. doi: 10.1111/efp.12539

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vilgalys, R., and Hester, M. (1990). Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 172, 4238–4246. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S., and Taylor, J. (1990). “Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics,” in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, eds M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), 315–322. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: common ash, ash dieback, collar necrosis, pathogenicity, SEM, X-ray microCT imaging

Citation: Karadžić D, Stanivuković Z, Milanović S, Sikora K, Radulović Z, Račko V, Kardošová M, Ďurkovič J and Milenković I (2020) Development of Neonectria punicea Pathogenic Symptoms in Juvenile Fraxinus excelsior Trees. Front. Plant Sci. 11:592260. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.592260

Received: 06 August 2020; Accepted: 27 November 2020;
Published: 23 December 2020.

Edited by:

Sabrina Sarrocco, University of Pisa, Italy

Reviewed by:

Bruno Scanu, University of Sassari, Italy
Giovanni Beccari, University of Perugia, Italy

Copyright © 2020 Karadžić, Stanivuković, Milanović, Sikora, Radulović, Račko, Kardošová, Ďurkovič and Milenković. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ivan Milenković, ivan.milenkovic@sfb.bg.ac.rs

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.