Min Li
Jiming Feng1†
Han Zhou
Ullah Najeeb
Yulei Zhu- 1National Engineering Laboratory of Crop Stress Resistance Breeding, School of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei, China
- 2Faculty of Science, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei
The reproductive compromise under heat stress is a major obstacle to achieve high grain yield and quality in wheat worldwide. Securing reproductive success is the key solution to sustain wheat productivity by understanding the physiological mechanism and molecular basis in conferring heat tolerance and utilizing the candidate gene resources for breeding. In this study, we examined the performance on both carbon supply source (as leaf photosynthetic rate) and carbon sink intake (as grain yields and quality) in wheat under heat stress varying with timing, duration, and intensity, and we further surveyed physiological processes from source to sink and the associated genetic basis in regulating reproductive thermotolerance; in addition, we summarized the quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and genes identified for heat stress tolerance associated with reproductive stages. Discovery of novel genes for thermotolerance is made more efficient via the combination of transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and phenomics. Gene editing of specific genes for novel varieties governing heat tolerance is also discussed.
Introduction
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), one of most important cereal crops, is widely cultivated in diverse ecotypes across the world. However, wheat cultivation is often suffering from heat stress damage. According to the IPCC report in 2014, atmospheric temperatures have increased since the beginning of the twenty-first century and are predicted to continue to increase by ~1.0–1.7°C by 2050. As such, wheat growth and development will be subjected to more frequent and severe heat stress as global climate changes (Liu et al., 2017).
Heat stress often occurred during reproduction from flowering to final maturation (Akter and Islam, 2017). It is reported that heat episode during the reproductive phase is fatal to yield and quality of grain by compromising grain setting and grain filling due to lower duration and activities of leaf photosynthesis (Sharkey, 2005), the compromised reproductive development (Farooq et al., 2011), and retarded grain sugar metabolism (Zhang et al., 2018). High temperature results in damages in anther/pollen structure and timing of development (Saini and Aspinall, 1982; Giorno et al., 2013). Pollen development is most sensitive to heat. Pollen dysontogenesis, even abortion, has been reported while exposure to temperatures ≥30°C at this stage (Bheemanahalli et al., 2019; Ullah et al., 2021). Heat stress during rapid grain filling stage can cause photosynthetic capacity reduction, lower metabolic activities, increased oxidative reactive species, and reduced grain filling duration and grain filling rate (Farooq et al., 2011; Akter and Islam, 2017). In addition, high temperature combined with rainfall easily causes pre-harvest sprouting, which is a worldwide problem that reduces wheat yield and quality. The reason is that temperature is one of the most important environmental factors for maintaining dormancy during seed development and for inducing dormancy during seed imbibition (Ali et al., 2019).
Understanding of thermotolerance will help to find solutions to protect heat damage during wheat reproduction, including breeding tolerant cultivars. The physiological mechanisms in controlling the reproductive heat tolerance are focused on the analysis from the activities in both leaf source and grain sink. The enzymes in removing reactive oxygen species (ROS), and heat shock protein (HSP) aggravation, and stay-green traits were shown to be acting to protect heat damage. Meanwhile, efforts have been made to examine genetic markers or genes consistently observed across backgrounds and/or environments with a major or stable effect for heat stress tolerance in wheat. The increasing knowledge of molecular mechanisms of heat tolerance is likely to pave the way for engineering plants with favorable economic yields under heat stress.
Effects of Heat Stress on Leaf Photosynthetic Capacity and Grain Yield Formation in Wheat
High temperature often occurs at the reproductive stage of wheat, and both carbon source supply and carbon sink intake in wheat are sensitive to heat stress varying with timing, duration, and intensity. Heat stress results in the destruction of photosynthetic systems, which ultimately results in a reduced rate of photosynthesis. Heat stress hindered the formation and development processes of grain, and affected grain filling, grain starch synthesis, eventually resulting into great yield loss.
Effects of Heat Stress on Leaf Photosynthetic Performance
Photosynthesis is one of most important physiological processes sensitive to elevated temperature (Wahid et al., 2007; Centritto et al., 2011). The major effect on leaf photosynthesis due to heat stress resulted from premature leaf senescence and impaired photosynthetic machinery (Kumar et al., 2010; Vijayalakshmi et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2017).
High-temperature stress may reduce Chlorophyll (Chl) biosynthesis, accelerated degradation, or a combination of both, and therefore, lesser accumulation of Chl from plants. The inhibition of Chl biosynthesis under high temperature is attributed to the destruction of many enzymes (Dutta et al., 2009). For instance, the activity of 5-aminolevulinate dehydratase, an important enzyme in the pyrrole biosynthesis pathway, decreased significantly in wheat under heat stress (Mohanty et al., 2006). High-temperature stress also accelerated degradation of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b of leaves (Feng et al., 2014; Sattar et al., 2020). Photosynthetic pigments are present in the photosystems, and they are damaged by high-temperature stress, resulting in light absorbing efficiency of both photosystems (PSI and PSII) reduction (Geissler et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2011). PSII has been considered as an important thermal-sensitive component in photosynthesis than PSI (Feng et al., 2014), which is due to disordering of thylakoid membrane fluidity and dissociation of the light-harvesting complex II from the PSII (Iwai et al., 2010). The inhibition of PSII under heat stress is indicated by a sharp increase of chlorophyll fluorescence (Ristic et al., 2007). The fluorescence induction parameter Fv, Fm, and its ratio are generally used as a response of metabolic disorders under stress. Fv/Fm ratio is an important parameter to determine the maximum quantum efficiency of PSII (Baker and Rosenqvist, 2004; Baker, 2008; Baczek-Kwinta et al., 2011).
Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) acts as a key enzyme in regulating photosynthesis to heat stress. Rubisco activation (RCA) is a catalytic chaperone involved in modulating the Rubisco activity and heat stress tolerance in wheat (Kumar et al., 2019). In wheat, RCA was inhibited above 30°C; when the exposure of wheat leaf to high temperatures exceeded 40°C, dark or light treatment causes a great change in Rubisco and RCA, and such changes are irreversible under dark conditions (Mathur et al., 2011). RCA protected the nascent proteins from aggregation under heat stress, and removed the inhibitory sugar phosphates from the active site of Rubisco so as to activating it (Portis, 2003). Compared with other enzyme activities, Rubisco is more sensitive to temperature. This is an important reason that high temperature accelerates the rate of formation of dead-end product and decreases the rate of RCA reactivation, finally inhibiting the photosynthesis process (Qu et al., 2017). In addition, the inhibition of photosynthesis at high temperatures is partially attributed to an increase in photorespiration rate (Pinto et al., 2016, 2017). Respiration rate and mitochondrial activities, which are changed by heat stress, show an initial increase with a rise in temperature, reach a critical level, and then decline due to photorespiratory damage (Pinto et al., 2017). Photorespiration of wheat flag leaf significantly increases under heat stress because of changes in solubility of O2 and CO2 and the affinity of rubisco for these gases (Cossani and Reynolds, 2012).
Consequently, heat stress leads to the synthesis of blocked photosynthetic pigments, membrane disruption, particularly of thylakoid membranes, thereby inhibiting the activities of enzymes and destroying photosynthetic systems (PSII, PSI), which ultimately results in a reduced rate of photosynthesis (Ristic et al., 2008; Rexroth et al., 2011; Ashraf and Harris, 2013).
Effects of Heat Stress on Reproduction in Wheat
Short-term and prolonged exposure of high-temperature stress compromises grain yield and qualities (Feng et al., 2014). The reduction of grain yield under high temperature is mainly due to the loss of grain number and decreased grain weight (Table 1).
Table 1. Effect of high-temperature treatment at different days after anthesis (DAA) on grain number (GN), 1,000-grain weight (TGW) and grain yield (GY) in wheat.
Grain Setting
Grain setting is sensitive to elevated temperature (Table 1). The temperature favorable for anthesis ranges from 12°C to 22°C in wheat (Farooq et al., 2011). Wheat plants exposed to the abovementioned temperatures can significantly increase floret abortion (Bányai et al., 2014) and reduce the number of spikelet and grains per spike (Semenov, 2009; Kaur and Behl, 2010). Temperature above 30°C during anthesis affects pollen cell and microspore resulting into complete male sterility (Kumar et al., 2014). Even 42°C for 2 h at the anthesis stage could reduce the pollen viability as well as growth of the pollen tip (Kumar et al., 2014). When the duration of heat stress during anthesis is less than 3 days, the anther of wheat florets is structurally abnormal and nonfunctional (Hedhly et al., 2009). In addition, a substantial lowering in grain yield plants was observed when plants are exposed to 30°C for 1–3 days between the beginning of meiosis and anthesis (Kumar et al., 2014). When wheat plants were exposed to high temperature for 20 h, pollen mother cells (PMCs) exposed to 35°C were less likely to progress than those exposed to 30°C, and grain number per spike was reduced at 30°C, and further at 35°C (Draeger and Moore, 2017).
Grain Filling, Grain Starch Synthesis, and Grain Quality
Grain-filling duration (GFD) and grain-filling rate (GFR) are important factors in determining the grain yield. High temperature inhibits wheat grain-filling (Jing et al., 2020) and reduces the GFD (Liu et al., 2007). Under high temperature, wheat crop completes its life cycle much quicker than under normal temperature conditions due to accelerated development. Heat stress decreases the grain-filling duration, reducing the time to apoptosis and maturity (Altenbach, 2012). For instance, an increase of 5.4°C above normal temperature reduces the GFD by 8 days in wheat (Tiwari et al., 2012). The time of GFD is shortened to capture resources between anthesis and filling, ultimately reducing the grain yield (Liu et al., 2007; Tiwari et al., 2012). The interesting thing is that high temperature accelerates the GFR, but shortens the GFD; however, under 30°C, the reduced GFD cannot be compensated by high GFR to enhance growth rate (Yang et al., 2014).
Starch makes up ~70% of the dry grain weight; high temperature during grain filling has a great influence on contents and compositions of starch (Wang et al., 2015), and the decrease in yield is mainly attributed to a reduction in the starch content (Li et al., 2017). ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase), soluble starch synthase (SSS), granule-bound starch synthase (GBSS), starch branching enzyme (SBE), and sucrose synthase (SS) are the key enzymes for starch synthesis during grain filling in wheat, and this activity was positively correlated with the starch accumulation rate (Yan et al., 2007; Li et al., 2017). The activity of AGPase, SSS, GBSS, and the content of starch was decreased under high-temperature treatment during grain filling (Yan et al., 2007). Overexpression of the rice soluble starch synthase I (SSI) gene in transgenic wheat can improve wheat productivity under terminal heat stress, with the increase in photosynthetic duration and 1,000 grain weight by 21–34% in T2 and T3 transgenic plants compared with the non-transgenic control plants (Tian et al., 2018). Starch accumulation is correlated with the sucrose content of the kernels (Yan et al., 2008); on the one hand, high temperature decreases the inactivation of key enzymes in starch synthesis and inhibits the conversion of sucrose into starch (Asthir et al., 2009); on the other hand, high temperature decreased the time of the maximum grain dry weight and resulted in reduced starch accumulation (Dupont and Altenbach, 2003). High temperature altered the timing of the starch biosynthetic process and resulted in an earlier peak in the gene expression during starch biosynthesis due to an enhanced -amylase activity (Li et al., 2017). A low sucrose content and a decline in the enzymatic activity involved in starch synthesis are responsible for the reduction of starch accumulation (Balla et al., 2011).
Protein is an important characteristic to define grain quality. High-temperature stress affects protein content of the grain, which has a great relationship with leaf nitrogen content (Iqbal et al., 2017). Moderate nighttime warming is more conducive to accumulate protein and increase gluten content in grain, especially the increase of glutenin content (Bian et al., 2012). However, high-temperature stress reduces total protein content, thus shortening the sedimentation time of protein in grains (Labuschagne et al., 2009); meanwhile, high temperature reduces the amino acid level and sedimentation index of grains (Dias et al., 2008).
The Physiological Mechanisms of Heat Tolerance
Air temperature exceeding certain threshold levels cause excessive accumulation of ROS, oxidative stress, excess membrane damage (Bita and Gerats, 2013; Hasanuzzaman et al., 2013), irreversible degeneration of proteins, and even protein misfolding and raft disruption (Goraya et al., 2017; Lippmann et al., 2019). Plants use various methods to resist heat stress injury, such as mobilizing antioxidant protection system, HSP, phytohormone, prolonging stay-green time, and regulating sugar metabolism of heat tolerance.
Antioxidant Protection for Heat Tolerance
When the temperature is favorable for the plant, ROS in the form of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide anions (), hydroxyl radical (OH•), and singlet oxygen (1O2) is present in plant vacuoles at lower levels. However, when plants are exposed to temperatures beyond the optimum, ROS level can be significantly enhanced, which will cause negative effects on cell metabolism (Esfandiari et al., 2007). Hence, an efficient antioxidant defense system is important for protecting plants against heat stress (Farooq et al., 2011). Both antioxidant defense system and non-enzymatic antioxidant systems contributed to scavenging ROS. Antioxidant defense system includes superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), peroxiredoxin (PRX), glutathione S-transferase (GST), and glutathione reductase (GR) (Farooq et al., 2011; You and Chan, 2015); non-enzymic antioxidants include glutathione (GSH), ascorbic acid (AsA), ascorbate, and tocopherols (Farooq et al., 2011; You and Chan, 2015).
Heat Shock Protein for Heat Tolerance
Heat stress can disturb cellular homeostasis and hindering reproduction in wheat (Sehgal et al., 2018; Hütsch et al., 2019). HSPs play a multifaceted role in plant heat tolerance (Table 2) (Hu et al., 2010; Jacob et al., 2017; Bi et al., 2020), such as protecting proteins from aggregation under heat stress and promoting protein refolding during recovery (Li and Howell, 2021), and involvement in heat stress independent signaling (Liu et al., 2011; Kumar et al., 2016; Jacob et al., 2017; Malik and Lone, 2021). HSPs fall into five categories, namely, HSP110, HSP90, HSP70, HSP60, and small heat shock proteins (sHSPs), respectively (Thomas et al., 2005). It was reported that HSPs regulate the transcription of HSP genes (Schoffl et al., 1998); some genes of protective proteins involved in sensing and responding to heat stress during grain filling stage were characterized by overexpression/expression in Arabidopsis or wheat (Kumar et al., 2017; Lu et al., 2018). The wheat chloroplastic sHSP (sHSP26) is involved in seed maturation and germination, and greater tolerance to heat stress (Chauhan et al., 2012). Transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing TaHsfA2d produced greater biomass and grain yield under constant heat stress conditions (Chauhan et al., 2013). Overexpressed TaHsfC2a, a transcriptional activator of heat protection genes that serves as a proactive mechanism for heat protection in developing grains, in transgenic wheat, improved the thermotolerance, but did not contribute to dehydration tolerance (Hu et al., 2018). The expression of heat shock factor Tahsfa6f is increased in wheat leaves by overexpressing TaHsfA6f, which could increase abscisic acid (ABA) levels and enhance tolerance to heat stress in transgenic plants (Bi et al., 2020).
Table 2. Heat shock protein genes involved in sensing and response to heat stress.
Phytohormone for Heat Tolerance
Plant hormones are the endogenous signal molecules that play a key role in the response to the extreme heat during grain filling in wheat (Kumar et al., 2015). ABA is an important signaling molecule under high-temperature stress (Suzuki et al., 2016). ABA reduces the damage of chloroplast structure by preventing photoinhibition and improving PSII efficiency (Li et al., 2020), activating various antioxidant mechanisms by producing various osmolytes, and improving ability of basic and acquired resistance high temperature (Rezaul et al., 2019; Li et al., 2020). For example, ABA induces the expression of NADPH oxidase (RBOHs) in the Arabidopsis genome, known as respiratory burst oxidase homologs (RBOHs), to induce ROS (Suzuki et al., 2011; Kaya et al., 2019) and antioxidant protection (Li et al., 2014; Rezaul et al., 2019). In addition, ABA can activate the expression of sucrose transporter gene and metabolism-related genes in heat stress, for instance, sucrose transporter, sucrose synthase gene, and sucrose invertase genes to maintain ATP formation to enhance heat tolerance of plants (Chen et al., 2019; Rezaul et al., 2019). Cytokinins (CTKs) play a key role in the response to temperature stress (O'Brien and Benkova, 2013), which is the most potent general coordinator between the stay-green trait and senescence (Yang et al., 2016), and promotion of grain filling under heat stress (Zavaleta-Mancera et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2012; Hoenig et al., 2018). CTKs protect plants from the deleterious effects of heat stress by activating antioxidant mechanisms, reducing lipid peroxidation protecting photosynthetic apparatus, and delaying senescence (Liu and Huang, 2002). Brassinosteroids (BRs) enhanced activities of enzymes involved in the ascorbate–glutathione (AsA-GSH) cycle and expression of genes encoding these enzymes to resist heat stress; in addition, BRs could increase the production of HSPs against irreversible heat-induced damage (Wu et al., 2014; Jin et al., 2015; Li et al., 2018). Jasmonates (JAs) could activate the defense system to resist heat stress in rice by improved antioxidant enzyme activity, increased proline content, and enhanced osmotic regulation ability (Clarke et al., 2009; Farhangi-Abriz and Ghassemi-Golezani, 2019; Sharma et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2020). The airborne ethylene (ET) may reduce thermotolerance to heat stress by deterring antioxidant defenses (Munne-Bosch et al., 2004). Expression patterns of a heat-responsive gene, TaGASR1, revealed that it was strongly induced by stress factors, such as high temperature, drought, high salinity and oxidation, as well as the phytohormones, including methyl jasmonate and ABA, which suggested that the TaGASR1 gene might participate in these stress and hormone signal transduction pathways.
Stay-Green Traits Regulating Heat Tolerance
Stay-green, antagonist to senescence, chlorophyll, and photosynthetic capacity of leaves were maintained or prolonged, which is considered an indicator of heat tolerance (Fokar et al., 1998). Since the loss of chlorophyll is associated with senescence, stay-green genotypes are better able to maintain green area of photosynthesis, resulting in a high percentage of carbohydrates. Compared with the stay-green varieties, the yield and inferior grains of no-stay-green cultivar were much more influenced by high-temperature stress (Yang et al., 2014). Moreover, a study showed that high temperatures during reproduction resulted in a significant decline in C and N assimilation and translocation in the heat-susceptible rice (Shi et al., 2013). The stay-green genotype has the characteristics of delayed C-N transfer, or when the transfer occurs, the process of N re-transfer is slower (Thomas and Ougham, 2014). A stay-green cultivar Wennong 6 had relatively higher grain yield under heat stress due to a lower gibberellin (GA3) content and a higher zeatin riboside (ZR) content (Yang et al., 2016). The stay-green character showed its potential use in plant breeding, as wheat genotypes in maintaining stay-green of photosynthetic tissues had a greater capacity for grain filling, resulting in increased average weight of grains (Kumar et al., 2010).
Sugar Metabolism Regulates Heat Tolerance
Previous studies suggested that the high sensitivity of reproductive development to heat stress is attributed to the sugar starvation in non-wheat crops (Frank et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2013, 2019; Ruan, 2014), which could be due to reduced photosynthesis, increased respiration, or compromised sugar unloading into grains (Mittler and Blumwald, 2010; Zhang et al., 2018).
It is reported that soluble sugars have been directly linked to the production rates of ROS (Couee et al., 2006) in regulating ROS metabolic pathways, such as mitochondrial respiration or photosynthesis. Sugars may act as signaling molecules for plant development (Zhang and Zhou, 2013), for instance, higher concentrations of sugars may be ROS scavengers in plants, while lower concentrations of sugars may act as substrates or as a stress signal (Van den Ende and Valluru, 2009). Soluble carbohydrate plays an important role in stabilizing cell membrane and maintaining turgor pressure (Peshev and Ende, 2013). The protective characteristics of soluble sugars during oxidative stress are usually attributed to the production of ROS scavengers and/or repair enzymes triggered by direct or indirect signals (Van den Ende and Valluru, 2009). Fructan and hexose contents in grains were significantly reduced under high-temperature stress (Hütsch et al., 2019), for example, hexose is mainly used in starch synthesis, which directly affects starch accumulation (Hütsch et al., 2019). Further study reveals that sucrose and fructan have premium ROS scavenging properties (Keunen et al., 2013; Peshev and Ende, 2013). Heat stress reduces vacuolar invertase activity in maize grains, thereby preventing sucrose degradation to hexose and reducing starch biosynthesis in the endosperm (Cheikh and Jones, 1995). Due to heat stress leading to oxidative stress, they further proved that galactinol and raffinose at an appropriate concentration have good antioxidant capacity and can protect plant cells from oxidative damage (Nishizawa et al., 2008). However, further study is needed to illustrate how sugar participates in the metabolic process of wheat organisms.
Breeding Strategies Coping With Heat Stress
To cope with high-temperature stress at the reproductive stage, appropriate measures have been taken to improve crop yield. Strategies to improve heat stress tolerance in wheat include selecting heat tolerance varieties, identifying QTL/genes and exploitation of closely linked markers, and application of closely linked markers in selecting heat-tolerant varieties and marker-assisted breeding in wheat.
Selection of Heat-Tolerant Varieties
Some traits such as grain yield, 1,000-grain weight, canopy temperature (CT) depression, stay-green, and membrane thermostability that appear to be effective indicators could be used in selecting heat-tolerant varieties, though there is no direct screening method to select heat-tolerant varieties (Ni et al., 2018). Stable yield performance of genotypes under heat stress conditions is vital to identify heat-tolerant genotypes (Mason et al., 2010). Thus, the relative performance of yield traits under heat-stressed and non-stressed environments has been widely used as an indicator to identify heat-tolerant wheat genotypes (Sharma et al., 2016). The heat susceptibility index (HSI) was shown to be a reliable indicator of yield stability and a proxy for heat tolerance (Geng et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2020). Twenty-six wheat varieties with stable heat resistance were screened using the HSI of 1,000-grain weight and yield all less than 1; even 11 varieties had relatively strong heat resistance with HSI less than 1 in consecutive years (Zhang et al., 2020). Using integrated HSI of yield-related traits and cell membrane thermostability as selection criteria, seven wheat varieties (lines) were selected with heat tolerance (Geng et al., 2016). Leaf senescence is an early response to heat stress, so delayed senescence/stay-green genotypes are important germplasm for resistance heat stress (Abdelrahman et al., 2017). Compared with non-stay-green varieties, stay-green varieties are of agronomic interest, as although the photosynthetic capacity is maintained, the onset of senescence is delayed or the development of senescence is slowed under heat stress (Thomas and Ougham, 2014). CT can be successfully used as an important selection parameter in breeding program at field, which showed a significant and negative correlation with grain yield, biomass, and 1,000-grain weight, and a positive correlation with spike number per plant during wheat growing period, especially after flowering (Gautam et al., 2015). Lower CT during late grain-filling protected chlorophyll and photosynthesis, exhibiting a greater degree of tolerance to terminal heat (Gautam et al., 2015).
Based on these conventional methods, a series of heat-resistant varieties were selected from existing varieties (Table 3), and these germplasm resources were defined as carriers with actual or potential utilization value and biological genetic information. However, traditional phenotypic screening for heat stress tolerance in wheat is slow, laborious, and expensive, which has trailed the high-speed development of genomics and transcriptomics, thereby restricting crop breeding and functional genomics study. More attention needs to be paid to high-precision and high-throughput phenomics studies, in particular, phenomics and multiomics joint analysis in identifying heat-tolerant germplasm resources (Cobb et al., 2013; Zhou et al., 2018). High-throughput phenotypic screening is faster and can capture more genetic information and comprehensive information for the effect of injuries caused by heat stress (Crain et al., 2018; Schmidt et al., 2020). Crain et al. (2018) evaluated a portable phenotypic system named “Phenocart,” which was used to record more than 1.1 million phenotypic observations in 1,170 wheat germplasm resources under drought and heat stress, and more than 2,000 GBS markers were identified and genotyped using genotyping sequencing (GBS) technique (Crain et al., 2018). An X-ray computed tomographic analysis was carried out on 203 diverse wheat accessions under heat stress. It takes only 7 min per ear to scan the main shape of the seed (smaller, shriveled seeds with an increased seed surface), and computed tomography evaluating grain set with an accuracy of 95–99% (Schmidt et al., 2020). The application of high-throughput plant phenomics, especially for abiotic stress, will greatly accelerate breeding efficiency. They suggest that advances in yield prediction models and the ability to generate data from genomic and phenotypic data will make these selection strategies easy to adopt by plant breeders for improved genetic gain rates.
Table 3. Heat-tolerant and heat-sensitive wheat genotypes and the selected indicators and performance to high-temperature stress.
Identification of QTL/Genes Related to Heat Tolerance
Over the last three decades, efforts have been made to elucidate the genetic basis of heat stress during grain filling (Ni et al., 2018). The QTLs associated with heat tolerance were identified on all 21 wheat chromosomes in wheat (Table 4; Pinto et al., 2016; Ogbonnaya et al., 2017; Bhusal et al., 2018), of which, some of the QTLs detected by different researchers or under different genetic backgrounds were located at the same or similar regions. QTLs for stay-green related traits were identified mainly on chromosome 2A and 7D, and several important QTLs mainly associated with yield and CT were detected on chromosome 3B. This indicates that certain chromosomal regions may have genes closely related to heat tolerance in wheat, and these promising molecular markers could be used in wheat molecular assisted breeding in the future. For example, 14 SSR markers linked to some important traits, including grain filling duration, HSI grain filling duration, HSI single kernel weight of main spike, and HSI kernel weight under heat stress have been used to screen varieties for heat tolerance (Sadat et al., 2013). Recently published sequencing information will be of great benefit for map-based cloning of major QTLs controlling heat tolerance during grain filling (IWGSC RefSeq 1.0; https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/blast_iwgsc/blast.php; IWGSC, 2018). Most of these QTLs were identified during grain-filling stage, while fewer QTLs were identified for heat stress tolerance during flowering in wheat. Only a genome-wide association analysis of spike ethylene under heat stress at the anthesis stage was reported using an Illumina iSelect 90K SNP genotyping array in 130 diverse wheat elite lines (Valluru et al., 2017).
Table 4. QTLs for traits associated with terminal heat tolerance in wheat.
QTL Clusters in Same or Similar Regions
Most of the QTLs were found to be associated with heat tolerance in wheat grain filling, and there existed QTL clusters in same or similar regions on chromosome 1B, 2D, and 5AS (Table 4). Same QTL region on 1B was identified with heat tolerance for grain-filling duration (Yang et al., 2002; Mason et al., 2010; Acuna-Galindo et al., 2015; Sharma et al., 2016) and for kernel weight (Mason et al., 2010) closely linked to markers gwm11 and gwm268. A strong QTL for yield found on 1B (Pinto et al., 2016) co-located with a QTL for green leaf duration flanking markers wPt3477 to Xbarc119 was detected in spring wheat grown under heat stress in greenhouse experiments (Naruoka et al., 2012). A stable QTL for flag leaf wax content was identified on chromosome 1B flanked with wmc419 and wmc156 (Mondal et al., 2015), which was co-located with a QTL for non-glaucousness spike in a similar position (Dubcovsky et al., 1997). Two HSI QTLs mapped to chromosome 2D were linked with gwm261 and gwm484 located closely with a GFD QTLs on chromosomes 2D (Tiwari et al., 2013). The yield-related marker-trait associations (MTAs) identified on chromosome 2D between 96 and 104 cM (Ogbonnaya et al., 2017) were previously identified as stable MTAs for grain yield using 9 K SNP markers within the same region (Edae et al., 2014). Hgfd.iiwbr-5A and QLgfd.iiwbr-5A associated with early and late grain filling efficiency detected by Sharma et al. (2016) were also located on the short arm of chromosome 5A, which is very close to a meta-QTL MQTL39 (close to gwm639) for grain filling reported by Acuna-Galindo et al. (2015).
Important QTLs Mainly Associated With Yield and Canopy Temperature
Numerous important QTLs controlling heat tolerance during grain-filling were identified on chromosome 3B, and were mainly associated with yield and CT (Table 4). An important QTL region flanked with markers wmc527 and wmc326 on chromosome 3B was identified to be associated with HSI of yield components explaining 19.0–21.2% genetic variance using a Halberd × Cutter RIL population (Mason et al., 2010). Two key QTLs were detected on chromosome 3B using a set of 255 doubled haploid lines, which had a large effect on CT and grain yield, accounting for up to 22% of the variance for these traits; in particular, the locus on chromosome arm 3BL had its largest effect under the heat stress conditions, with the RAC875 allele increasing grain yield by 131 kg/ha (Bennett et al., 2012), while Pinto et al. (2010) also detected a QTL of relatively large effect in a similar region under similar heat stress conditions. One stable QTL linked with markers barc229 and barc164 influencing HSI single kernel weight main spike and temperature depression of main spike was mapped on chromosome 3B using the same Halberd × Karl92 RIL population across environments (Mason et al., 2011; Mondal et al., 2015). In agreement with the results of Pinto et al. (2016), in the Seri × Babax RIL population on 3B chromosomes seemed to contain genes driving total green biomass, the velocity of greenness loss, and the proportion of plant greenness lost in the middle of grain filling. Naruoka et al. (2012) also found that the 3B chromosomes controlled duration-related QTL of green leaf in spring wheat grown under heat and drought stress. In addition, major and stable QTLs contributing 10.4% ~ 32.1% phenotypic variation for spike temperature depression and CT depression were detected on chromosome 6D in the Halberd × Karl92 population RILs (Mason et al., 2010, 2011) and on chromosomes 7B in the NW1014 × HUW468 RILs (Paliwal et al., 2012) (Table 4).
QTLs for Stay-Green Related Traits
Stay-green is reported to be induced by heat stress and the duration of the leaves staying green is dependent on the genetic background (Kumar et al., 2010). QTLs for stay-green related traits under heat stress were identified mainly on chromosome 2A and 7D in wheat (Table 4). QTLs for such traits were mapped on chromosome 2A within markers interval gwm356 and XCGT.TGCG-349 (Vijayalakshmi et al., 2010). Nine QTLs were clustered on chromosome 2A affecting chlorophyll fluorescence and chlorophyll content; Qchc.iiwbr-2A, linked with marker gwm372 that explained 3.8–18.1% of phenotypic variation, was the consistent QTL on the same locus (Bhusal et al., 2018). The maximum phenotypic variance of 15.0% QTL linked with marker acc/cat-10 was detected on chromosome 7D associated with stay-green, which was co-located with the QTL for grain filling, CT, and days to heading (Pinto et al., 2016), and this locus has been previously described as associated with permanence of greenness under high temperatures in wheat (Kumar et al., 2010; Vijayalakshmi et al., 2010).
Putative Genes Were Revealed in Response to Heat Stress in Wheat
Discovery of novel genes is made more efficient via the combination of transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and phenomics; some putative genes were revealed by omics techniques in response to high-temperature stress in wheat at the grain filling stage (Table 5). Differentially expressed proteins through proteomics approach or transcript profiling are mainly involved in carbohydrate metabolism (Majoul et al., 2003; Laino et al., 2010), starch synthesis (Majoul et al., 2003), ATP synthesis (Majoul et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2015), HSPs (Laino et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2015), photosynthesis (Wang et al., 2015; Kumar et al., 2019), and some defense-related proteins (Laino et al., 2010), translation initiation factors (Majoul et al., 2003), and antioxidant enzymes (Wang et al., 2015). Whole transcriptome analysis of thermotolerant wheat HD2985 found a putative Rubisco to be significantly upregulated under terminal heat stress. A positive correlation was established between the RCA enzyme activity and radical scavenging potential in the leaves of wheat (Kumar et al., 2017, 2019). Similarly, a novel candidate gene miR430 on 3B was found using de novo assembly and cloned from wheat cv. HD2985, which can be used to manipulate the expression of target genes under heat stress toward enhancing thermotolerance for the development of “climate-smart” wheat crop (Kumar et al., 2017). TaBI-1.1, a wheat BI-1 conserved gene, and TaFKBP62, a TaBI-1.1-interacting protein that colocalized with TaBI-1.1 on the endoplasmic reticulum membrane and enhanced heat stress tolerance, were identified by an RNA sequencing analysis of heat-treated wheat Xiaobaimai (Lu et al., 2018). In addition, TaZnF which belongs to C4HC3-type zinc finger transcription factor was found to be highest in the seed and it starts at the post anthesis period 3–5 DAA. Overexpression of TaZnF in Arabidopsis thaliana conferred improved tolerance to heat during their growth and development, had larger primary roots, more lateral branching, bigger, and more numerous leaves, resulting in more yield (Agarwal and Khurana, 2018). TaWRKY1 and TaWRKY33 transgenic wheat plants exhibited enhanced tolerance to heat stress (He et al., 2016).
Table 5. Putative genes for heat stress in wheat.
Although these genes have been shown to be involved in heat stress signaling, more components remain to be identified and characterized in effectively elucidating the mechanism of thermotolerance. Gene editing techniques have been used to improve abiotic stress resistance of crops. By knocking out OsARM1, OsNramp5, and OsHAK1, breeders have developed rice strains with low levels of cadmium, radioactive cesium, and arsenic, respectively (Nieves-Cordones et al., 2017; Tang et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017). In 2018, research on the OsPYL abscisic acid receptor gene family revealed that pyl1/4/6 triple knockout rice created by CRISPR/Cas9 editing had increased grain yield, greater high-temperature tolerance, and reduced pre-harvest sprouting compared with the wild type (Miao et al., 2018). This provides a possibility for the application of gene editing technology in heat tolerance enhancement and molecular level mechanism analysis of wheat, which requires attention in the future.
Conclusion and Future Perspectives
The high temperature during wheat reproductive stage has been receiving increased attention due to climate change. This review assessed the effects of heat stress on leaf photosynthetic capacity and grain yield formation in wheat, the associated physiological mechanisms of heat tolerance, and the breeding strategies. Heat stress during the reproductive stage causes great loss to wheat production through compromise in both photosynthetic capacity and sink size and activities. The heat during anthesis is fatal for grain setting through disturbing reproductive success, while the heat after anthesis reduces starch content by decreasing the activity of key enzymes in starch synthesis and grain filling duration. Antioxidant system, HSPs, and hormones were stimulated to protect the damage to cell and enzyme integrity from heat stress. The trait of staying-green acts together in protecting heat damage.
Identified genomic region and genes will play an important role for wheat improvement in terms of introgression of heat-tolerant genes/QTLs into an elite variety or pyramiding of all heat-tolerant genes into an agronomically superior variety/genotype, which will provide markers to assist selection for breeding strategy. It is noted that most of QTLs or genes were identified mainly associated with grain filling under heat stress. Hence, more research about the QTLs detected with traits of seed setting under high temperature should be done in the future. In addition, candidate genes involved in regulating heat tolerance will be available in breeding heat-tolerant varieties using the gene editing technology. The great potential of plant phenotyping in identification of more valuable traits using high-throughput image system facilitates to clarify the molecular network of heat tolerance. As such, this overview provides a thorough understanding of the impact of heat stress from leaf source to grain sink, protection mechanisms from heat damage, as well as associated molecular regulation and breeding contribution.
Author Contributions
YZ and YS conceived this review. ML, JF, and YZ collected information and drafted this review. ML, JF, and HZ drafted tables. ML, UN, JL, and YS finalized the study. All authors read the manuscript and approved it for publication.
Funding
The study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31901540), the Anhui's University Natural Science Research Project (No. KJ2019A0175), and the National Key Research and Development Plan Program of China (No. 2017YFD0300204-3).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Abdelrahman, M., El-Sayed, M., Jogaiah, S., Burritt, D. J., and Lam-Son Phan, T. (2017). The “STAY-GREEN” trait and phytohormone signaling networks in plants under heat stress. Plant Cell Rep. 36, 1009–1025. doi: 10.1007/s00299-017-2119-y
Acuna-Galindo, M. A., Mason, R. E., Subramanian, N. K., and Hays, D. B. (2015). Meta-analysis of wheat QTL regions associated with adaptation to drought and heat stress. Crop Sci. 55, 477–492. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2013.11.0793
Agarwal, P., and Khurana, P. (2018). Characterization of a novel zinc finger transcription factor (TaZnF) from wheat conferring heat stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Cell Stress Chaperones. 23, 253–267. doi: 10.1007/s12192-017-0838-1
Akter, N., and Islam, M. R. (2017). Heat stress effects and management in wheat: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 37:37. doi: 10.1007/s13593-017-0443-9
Ali, A., Cao, J., Jiang, H., Chang, C., Zhang, H., Sheikh, S. W., et al. (2019). Unraveling molecular and genetic studies of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) resistance against factors causing pre-harvest sprouting. Agronomy 9, 117. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9030117
Altenbach, S. B. (2012). New insights into the effects of high temperature, drought and post-anthesis fertilizer on wheat grain development. J. Cereal Sci. 56, 39–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2011.12.012
Ashraf, M., and Harris, P. J. C. (2013). Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview. Photosynthetica. 51, 163–190. doi: 10.1007/s11099-013-0021-6
Asthir, B., Kaur, S., and Mann, S. K. (2009). Effect of salicylic and abscisic acid administered through detached tillers on antioxidant system in developing wheat grains under heat stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 31, 1091–1096. doi: 10.1007/s11738-009-0335-y
Baczek-Kwinta, R., Koziel, A., and Seidler-Lozykowska, K. (2011). Are the fluorescence parameters of German chamomile leaves the first indicators of the anthodia yield in drought conditions? Photosynthetica. 49, 87–97. doi: 10.1007/s11099-011-0013-3
Baker, N. R. (2008). Chlorophyll fluorescence: A probe of photosynthesis in vivo. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 89–113. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092759
Baker, N. R., and Rosenqvist, E. (2004). Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence can improve crop production strategies: an examination of future possibilities. J. Exp. Bot. 55, 1607–1621. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh196
Balla, K., Rakszegi, M., Li, Z., Bekes, F., Bencze, S., and Veisz, O. (2011). Quality of winter wheat in relation to heat and drought shock after anthesis. Czech J. Food Sciences. 29, 117–128. doi: 10.17221/227/2010-cjfs
Bányai, J., Karsai, I., Balla, K., Kiss, T., Bedo, Z., and Lang, L. (2014). Heat stress response of wheat cultivars with different ecological adaptation. Cereal Res. Commun. 42, 413–425. doi: 10.1556/crc.42.2014.3.5
Barakat, M. N., Al-Doss, A. A., Elshafei, A. A., and Moustafa, K. A. (2011). Identification of new microsatellite marker linked to the grain filling rate as indicator for heat tolerance genes in F-2 wheat population. Austr. J. Crop Sci. 5, 104–110. doi: 10.1080/00380768.2010.551281
Bennett, D., Reynolds, M., Mullan, D., Izanloo, A., Kuchel, H., Langridge, P., et al. (2012). Detection of two major grain yield QTL in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under heat, drought and high yield potential environments. Theor. Appl. Genet. 125, 1473–1485. doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-1927-2
Bheemanahalli, R., Sunoj, V. S. J., Saripalli, G., Prasad, P. V. V., Balyan, H. S., Gupta, P. K., et al. (2019). Quantifying the impact of heat stress on pollen germination, seed set, and grain filling in spring wheat. Crop Sci. 59, 684–696. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2018.05.0292
Bhusal, N., Sharma, P., Sareen, S., and Sarial, A. K. (2018). Mapping QTLs for chlorophyll content and chlorophyll fluorescence in wheat under heat stress. Biologia Plantarum. 62, 721–731. doi: 10.1007/s10535-018-0811-6
Bi, H., Zhao, Y., Li, H., and Liu, W. (2020). Wheat heat shock factor TaHsfA6f increases aba levels and enhances tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses in transgenic plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 9. doi: 10.3390/ijms21093121
Bian, X. B., Chen, D. D., Wang, Q. S., and Wang, S. H. (2012). Effects of different day and night temperature enhancements on wheat grain yield and quality after anthesis under free air controlled condition. Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 45, 1489–1498. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.08.004
Bita, C. E., and Gerats, T. (2013). Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: scientific fundamentals and production of heat stress-tolerant crops. Front Plant Sci. 4, 273. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00273
Cao, X., Mondal, S., Cheng, D., Wang, C., Liu, A., Song, J., et al. (2015). Evaluation of agronomic and physiological traits associated with high temperature stress tolerance in the winter wheat cultivars. Acta Physiol. Plant. 37, 6. doi: 10.1007/s11738-015-1835-6
Centritto, M., Brilli, F., Fodale, R., and Loreto, F. (2011). Different sensitivity of isoprene emission, respiration and photosynthesis to high growth temperature coupled with drought stress in black poplar (Populus nigra) saplings. Tree Physiol. 31, 275–286. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpq112
Chauhan, H., Khurana, N., Agarwal, P., Khurana, J. P., and Khurana, P. (2013). A seed preferential heat shock transcription factor from wheat provides abiotic stress tolerance and yield enhancement in transgenic Arabidopsis under heat stress environment. PLoS ONE. 8:11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079577
Chauhan, H., Khurana, N., Nijhavan, A., Khurana, J. P., and Khurana, P. (2012). The wheat chloroplastic small heat shock protein (sHSP26) is involved in seed maturation and germination and imparts tolerance to heat stress. Plant Cell Environ. 35, 1912–1931. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02525.x
Cheikh, N., and Jones, R. J. (1995). Heat stress effects on sink activity of developing maize kernels grown in vitro. Physiologia Plantaritm. 95, 59–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1995.tb00808.x
Chen, D. M., Ma, Y. A., Liu, B. H., Su, Y. H., and Wang, X. X. (2017). Appraisal and screening of heat resistant wheat germplasm resources. J. Hebei Agricult. Sci. 21, 64–69. doi: 10.16318/j.cnki.hbnykx.2017.04.018
Chen, T. T., Li, G. Y., Islam, M. R., Fu, W. M., Feng, B. H., Tao, L. X., et al. (2019). Abscisic acid synergizes with sucrose to enhance grain yield and quality of rice by improving the source-sink relationship. BMC Plant Biol. 19, 525. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-2126-y
Clarke, S. M., Cristescu, S. M., Miersch, O., Harren, F. J. M., Wasternack, C., and Mur, L. A. J. (2009). Jasmonates act with salicylic acid to confer basal thermotolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 182, 175–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02735.x
Cobb, J. N., Declerck, G., Greenberg, A., Clark, R., and Mccouch, S. (2013). Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype-phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 126, 867–887. doi: 10.1007/s00122-013-2066-0
Cossani, C. M., and Reynolds, M. P. (2012). Physiological traits for improving heat tolerance in wheat. Plant Physiol. 160, 1710–1718. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.207753
Couee, I., Sulmon, C., Gouesbet, G., and El Amrani, A. (2006). Involvement of soluble sugars in reactive oxygen species balance and responses to oxidative stress in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 449–459. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erj027
Crain, J., Mondal, S., Rutkoski, J., Singh, R. P., and Poland, J. (2018). Combining high-throughput phenotyping and genomic information to increase prediction and selection accuracy in wheat breeding. The Plant Genome. 11, 170043. doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2017.05.0043
Dias, A. S., Bagulho, A. S., and Lidon, F. C. (2008). Ultrastructure and biochemical traits of bread and durum wheat grains under heat stress. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 20, 323–333. doi: 10.1590/s1677-04202008000400008
Draeger, T., and Moore, G. (2017). Short periods of high temperature during meiosis prevent normal meiotic progression and reduce grain number in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 130, 1785–1800. doi: 10.1007/s00122-017-2925-1
Dubcovsky, J., Echaide, M., Giancola, S., Rousset, M., Luo, M. C., Joppa, L. R., et al. (1997). Seed storage protein loci in RFLP maps of tetraploid and hexaploid wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95, 1169–1180
Dupont, F. M., and Altenbach, S. B. (2003). Molecular and biochemical impacts of environmental factors on wheat grain development and protein synthesis. J. Cereal Sci. 38, 133–146. doi: 10.1016/s0733-5210(03)00030-4
Dutta, S., Mohanty, S., and Tripathy, B. C. (2009). Role of temperature stress on chloroplast biogenesis and protein import in pea. Plant Physiol. 150, 1050–1061. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.137265
Edae, E. A., Byrne, P. F., Haley, S. D., Lopes, M. S., and Reynolds, M. P. (2014). Genome-wide association mapping of yield and yield components of spring wheat under contrasting moisture regimes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 127, 791–807. doi: 10.1007/s00122-013-2257-8
Esfandiari, E., Shekari, F., Shekari, F., and Esfandiari, M. (2007). The effect of salt stress on antioxidant enzymes activity and lipid peroxidation on the wheat seedlings. Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj. 35:1. doi: 10.15835/nbha351251
Farhangi-Abriz, S., and Ghassemi-Golezani, K. (2019). Jasmonates mechanisms and functions in abiotic stress tolerance of plants. Biocataly. Agricult. Biotechnol. 20, 101210. doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101210
Farooq, M., Bramley, H., Palta, J. A., and Siddique, K. H. M. (2011). Heat stress in wheat during reproductive and grain-filling phases. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 30, 491–507. doi: 10.1080/07352689.2011.615687
Feng, B., Liu, P., Li, G., Dong, S. T., Wang, F. H., Kong, L. A., et al. (2014). Effect of heat stress on the photosynthetic characteristics in flag leaves at the grain-filling stage of different heat-resistant winter wheat varieties. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 200, 143–155. doi: 10.1111/jac.12045
Feng, C. N., Guo, W. S., Shi, J. S., Peng, Y. X., and Zhu, X. K. (2000). Effect of high temperature after anthesis on endosperm cell development and grain weight in wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica. 26, 399–405
Fokar, M., Blum, A., and Nguyen, H. T. (1998). Heat tolerance in spring wheat. II. Grain filling. Euphytica. 104, 9–15
Frank, G., Pressman, E., Ophir, R., Althan, L., Shaked, R., Freedman, M., et al. (2009). Transcriptional profiling of maturing tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) microspores reveals the involvement of heat shock proteins, ROS scavengers, hormones, and sugars in the heat stress response. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 3891–3908. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp234
Gautam, A., Sai Prasad, S. V., Jajoo, A., and Ambati, D. (2015). Canopy temperature as a selection parameter for grain yield and its components in durum wheat under terminal heat stress in late sown conditions. Agric. Res. 4, 238–244. doi: 10.1007/s40003-015-0174-6
Geissler, N., Hussin, S., and Koyro, H. W. (2009). Interactive effects of NaCl salinity and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration on growth, photosynthesis, water relations and chemical composition of the potential cash crop halophyte Aster tripolium L. Environ. Exp. Bot. 65, 220–231. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.11.001
Geng, X. L., Zhang, Y. L., Zang, X. S., Zhao, Y., Zhang, J. B., You, M. S., et al. (2016). Evaluation the thermotolerance of the wheat(Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars and advanced lines collected from the northern China and north area of Huanghuai winter wheat regions. J. Triticeae Crops. 36, 172–181. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2016.02.07
Giorno, F., Wolters-Arts, M., Mariani, C., and Rieu, I. (2013). Ensuring reproduction at high temperatures: the heat stress response during anther and pollen development. Plants (basel, switzerland). 2, 489–506. doi: 10.3390/plants2030489
Goraya, G. K., Kaur, B., Asthir, B., Bala, S., Kaur, G., and Farooq, M. (2017). Rapid injuries of high temperature in plants. J. Plant Biol. 60, 298–305. doi: 10.1007/s12374-016-0365-0
Han, L. M., Zhang, Y., Peng, H. R., Qiao, W. C., He, M. Q., Wang, H. G., et al. (2010). Analysis of heat resistance for cultivars from north china winter wheat region by yield and quality traits. Acta Agronomica Sinica. 36, 1538–1546. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.01538
Hasanuzzaman, M., Nahar, K., Alam, M. M., Roychowdhury, R., and Fujita, M. (2013). Physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of heat stress tolerance in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 9643–9684. doi: 10.3390/ijms14059643
Hassan, M. I., Mohamed, E. A., El-Rawy, M. A., and Amein, K. A. (2016). Evaluating interspecific wheat hybrids based on heat and drought stress tolerance. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 19, 85–98. doi: 10.1007/s12892-015-0085-x
He, G. H., Xu, J. Y., Wang, Y. X., Liu, J. M., Li, P. S., Chen, M., et al. (2016). Drought responsive WRKY transcription factor genesTaWRKY1 and TaWRKY33 from wheat confer drought and or heat resistance in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 16, 116. doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0806-4
Hedhly, A., Hormaza, J. I., and Herrero, M. (2009). Global warming and sexual plant reproduction. Trends Plant Sci. 14, 30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.11.001
Hoenig, M., Plihalova, L., Husickova, A., Nisler, J., and Dolezal, K. (2018). Role of cytokinins in senescence, antioxidant defence and photosynthesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19:4045. doi: 10.3390/ijms19124045
Hu, X. J., Chen, D. D., McLntyre, C. L., Dreccer, M. F., Zhang, Z. B., Drenth, J., et al. (2018). Heat shock factor C2a serves as a proactive mechanism for heat protection in developing grains in wheat via an ABA-mediated regulatory pathway. Plant Cell Environ. 41, 79–98. doi: 10.1111/pce.12957
Hu, X. L., Liu, R. X., Li, Y. H., Wang, W., Tai, F. J., Xue, R. L., et al. (2010). Heat shock protein 70 regulates the abscisic acid-induced antioxidant response of maize to combined drought and heat stress. Plant Growth Regul. 60, 225–235. doi: 10.1007/s10725-009-9436-2
Hütsch, B. W., Jahn, D., and Schubert, S. (2019). Grain yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under long-term heat stress is sink-limited with stronger inhibition of kernel setting than grain filling. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 205, 22–32. doi: 10.1111/jac.12298
Iqbal, M., Raja, N., Yasmeen, F., Hussain, M., Ejaz, M., and Shah, M. A. (2017). Impacts of heat stress on wheat a critical review. Adv. Crop Sci. Technol. 5, 251–259. doi: 10.4172/2329-8863.1000251
Iwai, M., Yokono, M., Inada, N., and Minagawa, J. (2010). Live-cell imaging of photosystem II antenna dissociation during state transitions. P Natl Acad Sci Usa P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. P. 107, 2337–2342. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908808107
Jacob, P., Hirt, H., and Bendahmane, A. (2017). The heat-shock protein/chaperone network and multiple stress resistance. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15, 405–414. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12659
Jin, S. H., Li, X. Q., Wang, G. G., and Zhu, X. T. (2015). Brassinosteroids alleviate high-temperature injury in Ficus concinna seedlings via maintaining higher antioxidant defence and glyoxalase systems. Aob Plants. 7, plv009. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plv009
Jing, J. G., Guo, S. Y., Li, Y. F., and Li, W. H. (2020). The alleviating effect of exogenous polyamines on heat stress susceptibility of different heat resistant wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties. Scientific Rep. 10, 7467. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64468-5
Jing, H. X., Wang, C. Y., Zuo, X. L., Hu, J. B., Wang, Y. H., and Guo, T. C. (2010). Effect of post-anthesis high temperature stress on grain yield and protein content of different wheat cultivars. J. Triticeae Crops. 30, 459–463. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2010.03.013
Kaur, V., and Behl, R. K. (2010). Grain yield in wheat as affected by short periods of high temperature, drought and their interaction during pre- and post-anthesis stages. Cereal Res. Commun. 38, 514–520. doi: 10.1556/crc.38.2010.4.8
Kaya, H., Takeda, S., Kobayashi, M. J., Kimura, S., Iizuka, A., Imai, A., et al. (2019). Comparative analysis of the reactive oxygen species-producing enzymatic activity of Arabidopsis NADPH oxidases. Plant J. 98, 291–300. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14212
Keunen, E., Peshev, D., Vangronsveld, J., Van den Ende, W., and Cuypers, A. (2013). Plant sugars are crucial players in the oxidative challenge during abiotic stress: extending the traditional concept. Plant Cell Environ. 36, 1242–1255. doi: 10.1111/pce.12061
Kumar, M., Kumar, R. R., Goswami, S., Verma, P., Rai, R. D., Chinnusamy, V., et al. (2017). miR430: the novel heat-responsive microRNA identified from miRNome analysis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Indian J. Plant Physiol. 22, 566–576. doi: 10.1007/s40502-017-0341-9
Kumar, R. R., Goswami, S., Dubey, K., Singh, K., Singh, J. P., Kumar, A., et al. (2019). RuBisCo activasea catalytic chaperone involved in modulating the RuBisCo activity and heat stress-tolerance in wheat. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 28, 63–75. doi: 10.1007/s13562-018-0463-9
Kumar, R. R., Goswami, S., Gadpayle, K. A., Singh, K., Sharma, S. K., Singh, G. P., et al. (2014). Ascorbic acid at pre-anthesis modulate the thermotolerance level of wheat (Triticum aestivum) pollen under heat stress. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 23, 293–306. doi: 10.1007/s13562-013-0214-x
Kumar, R. R., Goswami, S., Gupta, R., Verma, P., Singh, K., Singh, J. P., et al. (2016). The stress of suicide: temporal and spatial expression of putative heat shock protein 70 protect the cells from heat injury in wheat (triticum aestivum). J. Plant Growth Regul. 35, 65–82. doi: 10.1007/s00344-015-9508-7
Kumar, R. R., Goswami, S., Sharma, S. K., Singh, K., Gadpayle, K. A., Singh, S. D., et al. (2013). Differential expression of heat shock protein and alteration in osmolyte accumulation under heat stress in wheat. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 22, 16–26. doi: 10.1007/s13562-012-0106-5
Kumar, R. R., Sharma, S. K., Goswami, S., Verma, P., Singh, K., Dixit, N., et al. (2015). Salicylic acid alleviates the heat stress-induced oxidative damage of starch biosynthesis pathway by modulating the expression of heat-stable genes and proteins in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Acta Physiol. Plant. 37, 143. doi: 10.1007/s11738-015-1899-3
Kumar, U., Joshi, A. K., Kumari, M., Paliwal, R., Kumar, S., and Roeder, M. S. (2010). Identification of QTLs for stay-green trait in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the 'Chirya 3' x 'Sonalika' population. Euphytica. 174, 437–445. doi: 10.1007/s10681-010-0155-6
Labuschagne, M. T., Elago, O., and Koen, E. (2009). Influence of extreme temperatures during grain filling on protein fractions, and its relationship to some quality characteristics in bread, biscuit, and durum wheat. Cereal Chem. 86, 61–66. doi: 10.1094/cchem-86-1-0061
Laino, P., Shelton, D., Finnie, C., De Leonardis, A. M., Mastrangelo, A. M., Svensson, B., et al. (2010). Comparative proteome analysis of metabolic proteins from seeds of durum wheat (cv. Svevo) subjected to heat stress. Proteomics. 10, 2359–2368. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200900803
Li, C. Y., Zhang, R. Q., Fu, K. Y., Li, C., and Li, C. (2017). Effects of high temperature on starch morphology and the expression of genes related to starch biosynthesis and degradation. J. Cereal Sci. 73, 25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2016.11.005
Li, G. Y., Zhang, C. X., Zhang, G. H., Fu, W. M., Feng, B. H., Chen, T. T., et al. (2020). Abscisic acid negatively modulates heat tolerance in rolled leaf rice by increasing leaf temperature and regulating energy homeostasis. Rice. 13, 18. doi: 10.1186/s12284-020-00379-3
Li, H., Liu, S. S., Yi, C. Y., Wang, F., Zhou, J., Xia, X. J., et al. (2014). Hydrogen peroxide mediates abscisic acid-induced HSP70 accumulation and heat tolerance in grafted cucumber plants. Plant Cell Environ. 37, 2768–2780. doi: 10.1111/pce.12360
Li, X., Wei, J.-P., Ahammed, G. J., Zhang, L., Li, Y., Yan, P., et al. (2018). Brassinosteroids attenuate moderate high temperature-caused decline in tea quality by enhancing theanine biosynthesis in camellia sinensis L. Front Plant Sci. 9, 1016. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01016
Li, Z., and Howell, S. H. (2021). Heat stress responses and thermotolerance in maize. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 948. doi: 10.3390/ijms22020948
Lippmann, R., Babben, S., Menger, A., Delker, C., and Quint, M. (2019). Development of wild and cultivated plants under global warming conditions. Curr. Biol. 29, R1326–R1338. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.10.016
Liu, B., Asseng, S., Wang, A. N., Wang, S. h., Tang, L., et al. (2017). Modelling the effects of post-heading heat stress on biomass growth of winter wheat. Agric. For. Meteorol. 247, 476–490. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.08.018
Liu, H. C., Liao, H. T., Charng, Y. Y., Liu, H. C., Liao, H. T., and Charng, Y. Y. (2011). The role of class A1 heat shock factors (HSFA1s) in response to heat and other stresses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 34, 738–751. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02278.x
Liu, P., Guo, W. S., Pu, H. C., Feng, C. N., Zhu, X. K., and Peng, Y. X. (2007). Effects of transient high temperature after anthesis on grain protein content and physiological mechanism in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Acta Agronomica Sinica. 33, 1516–1522. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2007.09.019
Liu, X. Z., and Huang, B. (2002). Cytokinin effects on creeping bentgrass response to heat stress: II. leaf senescence and antioxidant metabolism. Crop Sci. 42, 466–472. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2002.0466
Liu, Y., Li, J., Zhu, Y., Jones, A., Rose, R. J., and Song, Y. (2019). Heat stress in legume seed setting: effects, causes, and future prospects. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 938. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00938
Liu, Y. H., Offler, C. E., and Ruan, Y. L. (2013). Regulation of fruit and seed response to heat and drought by sugars as nutrients and signals. Front Plant Sci. 4, 282. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00282
Lu, P. P., Zheng, W. J., Wang, C. T., Shi, W. Y., Fu, J. D., Chen, M., et al. (2018). Wheat Bax Inhibitor-1 interacts with TaFKBP62 and mediates response to heat stress. BMC Plant Biol. 18:259. doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1485-0
Majoul, T., Bancel, E., Triboi, E., Ben Hamida, J., and Branlard, G. (2003). Proteomic analysis of the effect of heat stress on hexaploid wheat grain: Characterization of heat-responsive proteins from total endosperm. Proteomics. 3, 175–183. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200390026
Malik, J. A., and Lone, R. (2021). Heat shock proteins with an emphasis on HSP 60. Mol. Biol. Rep. 48, 6959–6969. doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-06676-4
Mason, R. E., Mondal, S., Beecher, F. W., and Hays, D. B. (2011). Genetic loci linking improved heat tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to lower leaf and spike temperatures under controlled conditions. Euphytica. 180, 181–194. doi: 10.1007/s10681-011-0349-6
Mason, R. E., Mondal, S., Beecher, F. W., Pacheco, A., Jampala, B., Ibrahim, A. M. H., et al. (2010). QTL associated with heat susceptibility index in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under short-term reproductive stage heat stress. Euphytica. 174, 423–436. doi: 10.1007/s10681-010-0151-x
Mathur, S., Jajoo, A., Mehta, P., and Bharti, S. (2011). Analysis of elevated temperature-induced inhibition of photosystem II using chlorophyll a fluorescence induction kinetics in wheat leaves (Triticum aestivum). Plant Biol. 13, 1–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00319.x
Miao, C., Xiao, L., Huaa, K., Zou, C., Zhao, Y., Bressan, R. A., et al. (2018). Mutations in a subfamily of abscisic acid receptor genes promote rice growth and productivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115, 6058–6063. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804774115
Mittler, R., and Blumwald, E. (2010). Genetic engineering for modern agriculture: challenges and perspectives. Ann. Rev Plant Biol. 61, 443–462. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112116
Mohanty, S., Grimm, B., and Tripathy, B. C. (2006). Light and dark modulation of chlorophyll biosynthetic genes in response to temperature. Planta. 224, 692–699. doi: 10.1007/s00425-006-0248-6
Mondal, S., Mason, R. E., Huggins, T., and Hays, D. B. (2015). QTL on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) chromosomes 1B, 3D and 5A are associated with constitutive production of leaf cuticular wax and may contribute to lower leaf temperatures under heat stress. Euphytica. 201, 123–130. doi: 10.1007/s10681-014-1193-2
Munne-Bosch, S., Penuelas, J., Asensio, D., and Llusia, J. (2004). Airborne ethylene may alter antioxidant protection and reduce tolerance of holm oak to heat and drought stress. Plant Physiol. 136, 2937–2947. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.050005
Nagar, S., Singh, V. P., Arora, A., Dhakar, R., and Ramakrishnan, S. (2015). Assessment of terminal heat tolerance ability of wheat genotypes based on physiological traits using multivariate analysis. Acta Physiol. Plant. 37, 2. doi: 10.1007/s11738-015-2017-2
Naruoka, Y., Sherman, J. D., Lanning, S. P., Blake, N. K., Martin, J. M., and Talbert, L. E. (2012). Genetic analysis of green leaf duration in spring wheat. Crop Sci. 52, 99–109. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2011.05.0269
Nawaz, A., Farooq, M., Cheema, S. A., and Wahid, A. (2013). Differential response of wheat cultivars to terminal heat stress. Int. J. Agricult. Biol. 15, 1354–1358. doi: 10.1590/brag.2013.045
Ni, Z. F., Li, H. J., Zhao, Y., Peng, H. R., Hu, Z. R., Xin, M. M., et al. (2018). Genetic improvement of heat tolerance in wheat: Recent progress in understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms. Crop J. 6, 32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2017.09.005
Nieves-Cordones, M., Mohamed, S., Tanoi, K., Kobayashi, N. I., Takagi, K., Vernet, A., et al. (2017). Production of low-Cs+ rice plants by inactivation of the K+ transporter OsHAK1 with the CRISPR-Cas system. Plant J. 92, 43–56. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13632
Nishizawa, A., Yabuta, Y., and Shigeoka, S. (2008). Galactinol and raffinose constitute a novel function to protect plants from oxidative damage. Plant Physiol. 147, 1251–1263. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.122465
O'Brien, J. A., and Benkova, E. (2013). Cytokinin cross-talking during biotic and abiotic stress responses. Front Plant Sci. 4, 451. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00451
Ogbonnaya, F. C., Rasheed, A., Okechukwu, E. C., Jighly, A., Makdis, F., Wuletaw, T., et al. (2017). Genome-wide association study for agronomic and physiological traits in spring wheat evaluated in a range of heat prone environments. Theor. Appl. Genet. 130, 1819–1835. doi: 10.1007/s00122-017-2927-z
Paliwal, R., Roeder, M. S., Kumar, U., Srivastava, J. P., and Joshi, A. K. (2012). QTL mapping of terminal heat tolerance in hexaploid wheat (T. aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 125, 561–575. doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-1853-3
Peshev, D., and Ende, W. V. (2013). “Sugars as antioxidants in plants,” in Crop Improvement Under Adverse Conditions, eds Tuteja N., Gill S. (New York, NY: Springer), p. 13. Peshev, D., Vergauwen, R., Moglia, A., Hideg, E., and Van den Ende, W. (2013). Towards understanding vacuolar antioxidant mechanisms: a role for fructans? J. Exp. Bot. 64, 1025–1038. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers377
Pinto, R. S., Lopes, M. S., Collins, N. C., and Reynolds, M. P. (2016). Modelling and genetic dissection of staygreen under heat stress. Theor. Appl. Genet. 129, 2055–2074. doi: 10.1007/s00122-016-2757-4
Pinto, R. S., Molero, G., and Reynolds, M. P. (2017). Identification of heat tolerant wheat lines showing genetic variation in leaf respiration and other physiological traits. Euphytica. 213, 76. doi: 10.1007/s10681-017-1858-8
Pinto, S. R., Reynolds, M. P., Mathews, K. L., McIntyre, C. L., Olivares-Villegas, J. J., and Chapman, S. C. (2010). Heat and drought adaptive QTL in a wheat population designed to minimize confounding agronomic effects. Theor. Appl. Genet. 121, 1001–1021. doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1351-4
Portis, A. R. (2003). Rubisco activase-Rubisco's catalytic chaperone. Photosynth. Res. 75, 11–27. doi: 10.1023/a:1022458108678
Qu, M., Bunce, J. A., Sicher, R. C., Zhu, X. C., Gao, B., et al. (2017). An attempt to interpret a biochemical mechanism of C-4 photosynthetic thermotolerance under sudden heat shock on detached leaf in elevated CO2 grown maize. PLoS ONE. 12, e0187437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187437
Rexroth, S., Mullineaux, C. W., Ellinger, D., Sendtko, E., Roegner, M., and Koenig, F. (2011). The plasma membrane of the cyanobacterium gloeobacter violaceus contains segregated bioenergetic domains. Plant Cell. 23, 2379–2390. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.085779
Rezaul, I. M., Feng, B., Chen, T., Fu, W., Zhang, C., Tao, L., et al. (2019). Abscisic acid prevents pollen abortion under high-temperature stress by mediating sugar metabolism in rice spikelets. Physiologia Plantarum. 165, 644–663. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12759
Ristic, Z., Bukovnik, U., Momcilovic, I., Fu, J. M., and Prasad, P. V. V. (2008). Heat-induced accumulation of chloroplast protein synthesis elongation factor, EF-Tu, in winter wheat. J. Plant Physiol. 165, 192–202. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2007.03.003
Ristic, Z., Bukovnik, U., and Prasad, P. V. V. (2007). Correlation between heat stability of thylakoid membranes and loss of chlorophyll in winter wheat under heat stress. Crop Sci. 47, 2067–2073. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2006.10.0674
Ruan, Y. L. (2014). Sucrose metabolism: gateway to diverse carbon use and sugar signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 65, 33–67. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040251
Sadat, S., Saeid, K. A., Bihamta, M. R., Torabi, S., Salekdeh, S. G. H., and Ayeneh, G. A. L. (2013). Marker assisted selection for heat tolerance in bread wheat. World Appl. Sci. J. 21, 1181–1189. doi: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.21.8.2866
Saini, H. S., and Aspinall, D. (1982). Abnormal sporogenesis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) induced by short periods of high temperature. Ann. Bot. 49, 835–846
Sattar, A., Sher, A., Ijaz, M., Ul-Allah, S., Rizwan, M. S., Hussain, M., et al. (2020). Terminal drought and heat stress alter physiological and biochemical attributes in flag leaf of bread wheat. PLoS ONE. 15, e0232974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232974
Schmidt, J., Claussen, J., Worlein, N., Eggert, A., Fleury, D., Garnett, T., et al. (2020). Drought and heat stress tolerance screening in wheat using computed tomography. Plant Methods. 16, 15. doi: 10.1186/s13007-020-00565-w
Schoffl, F., Prandl, R., and Reindl, A. (1998). Regulation of the heat-shock response. Plant Physiol. 117, 1135–1141. doi: 10.1104/pp.117.4.1135
Sehgal, A., Sita, K., Siddique, K. H. M., Kumar, R., Bhogireddy, S., Varshney, R. K., et al. (2018). Drought or/and heat-stress effects on seed filling in food crops: impacts on functional biochemistry, seed yields, and nutritional quality. Front Plant Sci. 9, 1705. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01705
Semenov, M. A. (2009). Impacts of climate change on wheat in England and Wales. J. Royal Soc. Interface. 6, 343–350. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0285
Sharkey, T. D. (2005). Effects of moderate heat stress on photosynthesis: importance of thylakoid reactions, rubisco deactivation, reactive oxygen species, and thermotolerance provided by isoprene. Plant Cell Environ. 28, 269–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01324.x
Sharma, A., Shahzad, B., Kumar, V., Kohli, S. K., Sidhu, G. P. S., Bali, A. S., et al. (2019). Phytohormones regulate accumulation of osmolytes under abiotic stress. Biomolecules. 9, 285. doi: 10.3390/biom9070285
Sharma, D., Singh, R., Rane, J., Gupta, V. K., Mamrutha, H. M., and Tiwari, R. (2016). Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with grain filling duration and grain number under terminal heat stress in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Breed. 135, 538–545. doi: 10.1111/pbr.12405
Shi, W., Muthurajan, R., Rahman, H., Selvam, J., Peng, S., Zou, Y., et al. (2013). Source-sink dynamics and proteomic reprogramming under elevated night temperature and their impact on rice yield and grain quality. New Phytol. 197, 825–837. doi: 10.1111/nph.12088
Suzuki, N., Bassil, E., Hamilton, J. S., Inupakutika, M. A., Zandalinas, S. I., Tripathy, D., et al. (2016). ABA is required for plant acclimation to a combination of salt and heat stress. PLoS ONE. 11, e0147625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147625
Suzuki, N., Miller, G., Morales, J., Shulaev, V., Angel Torres, M., and Mittler, R. (2011). Respiratory burst oxidases: the engines of ROS signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14, 691–699. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.07.014
Tang, L., Mao, B., Li, Y., Lv, Q., Zhang, L., Chen, C., et al. (2017). Knockout of OsNramp5 using the CRISPR/Cas9 system produces low Cd-accumulating indica rice without compromising yield. Scientific Rep. 7, 14438. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14832-9
Thomas, H., and Ougham, H. (2014). The stay-green trait. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 3889–3900. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru037
Thomas, X., Campos, L., Mounier, C., Cornillon, J., Flandrin, P., Le, Q. H., et al. (2005). Expression of heat-shock proteins is associated with major adverse prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk. Res. 29, 1049–1058. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2005.02.010
Tian, B., Talukder, S. K., Fu, J., Fritz, A. K., and Trick, H. N. (2018). Expression of a rice soluble starch synthase gene in transgenic wheat improves the grain yield under heat stress conditions. In Vitro Cell. Development. Biol. Plant. 54, 216–227. doi: 10.1007/s11627-018-9893-2
Tiwari, C., Wallwork, H., Dhari, R., Arun, B., Mishra, V. K., and Joshi, A. K. (2012). Exploring the possibility of obtaining terminal heat tolerance in a doubled haploid population of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the eastern Gangetic plains of India. Field Crops Res. 135, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.06.006
Tiwari, C., Wallwork, H., Kumar, U., Dhari, R., Arun, B., Mishra, V. K., et al. (2013). Molecular mapping of high temperature tolerance in bread wheat adapted to the Eastern Gangetic Plain region of India. Field Crops Res. 154, 201–210. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.08.004
Ullah, A., Nadeem, F., Nawaz, A., Siddique, K. H. M., and Farooq, M. (2021). Heat stress effects on the reproductive physiology and yield of wheat. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 28, 1–17. doi: 10.1111/jac.12572
Valluru, R., Reynolds, M. P., Davies, W. J., and Sukumaran, S. (2017). Phenotypic and genome-wide association analysis of spike ethylene in diverse wheat genotypes under heat stress. New Phytol. 214, 271–283. doi: 10.1111/nph.14367
Van den Ende, W., and Valluru, R. (2009). Sucrose, sucrosyl oligosaccharides, and oxidative stress: scavenging and salvaging? J. Exp. Bot. 60, 9–18. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern297
Vijayalakshmi, K., Fritz, A. K., Paulsen, G. M., Bai, G., Pandravada, S., and Gill, B. S. (2010). Modeling and mapping QTL for senescence-related traits in winter wheat under high temperature. Mol. Breed. 26, 163–175. doi: 10.1007/s11032-009-9366-8
Wahid, A., Gelani, S., Ashraf, M., and Foolad, M. R. (2007). Heat tolerance in plants: an overview. Environ. Exp. Bot. 61, 199–223. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.011
Wang, F. Z., Chen, M. X., Yu, L. J., Xie, L. J., Yuan, L. B., Qi, H., et al. (2017). OsARM1, an R2R3 MYB transcription factor, is involved in regulation of the response to arsenic stress in rice. Front Plant Sci. 8, 868. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01868
Wang, K., Zhang, X., and Ervin, E. (2012). Antioxidative responses in roots and shoots of creeping bentgrass under high temperature: effects of nitrogen and cytokinin. J. Plant Physiol. 169, 492–500. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.12.007
Wang, X., Dinler, B. S., Vignjevic, M., Jacobsen, S., and Wollenweber, B. (2015). Physiological and proteome studies of responses to heat stress during grain filling in contrasting wheat cultivars. Plant Sci. (Amsterdam, Neth.). 230, 33–50. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.10.009
Wu, X., Yao, X., Chen, J., Zhu, Z., Zhang, H., and Zha, D. (2014). Brassinosteroids protect photosynthesis and antioxidant system of eggplant seedlings from high-temperature stress. Acta Physiol. Plant. 36, 251–261. doi: 10.1007/s11738-013-1406-7
Yan, S. H., Wang, Z. L., Dai, Z. M., Li, W. Y., Fu, G. Z., He, M. R., et al. (2007). Activities of enzymes involved in starch synthesis and accumulation in grains of two wheat cultivars with a different amylose content. Acta Agronomica Sinica. 33, 84–89. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2007.01.014
Yan, S. H., Yin, Y. P., Li, W. Y., Liang, T. B., Li, Y., Wu, Y. H., et al. (2008). Effect of high temperature during grain filling on starch accumulation, starch granule distribution, and activities of related enzymes in wheat grains. Acta Agronomica Sinica. 34, 1092–1096. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01092
Yang, D. Q., Li, Y., Shi, Y. H., Cui, Z. Y., Luo, Y. L., Zheng, M. J., et al. (2016). Exogenous cytokinins increase grain yield of winter wheat cultivars by improving stay-green characteristics under heat stress. PLoS ONE. 11, e0155437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155437
Yang, D. Q., Wang, Z. L., Ni, Y. L., Yin, Y. P., Cai, T., Yang, W. B., et al. (2014). Effect of high temperature stress and spraying exogenous ABA post-anthesis on grain filling and grain yield in different types of stay-green wheat. Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 47, 2109–2125. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.11.005
Yang, J., Fei, K., Chen, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, W., and Zhang, J. (2020). Jasmonates alleviate spikelet-opening impairment caused by high temperature stress during anthesis of photo-thermo-sensitive genic male sterile rice lines. Food Energy Secur. 9, e233. doi: 10.1002/fes3.233
Yang, J., Sears, R. G., Gill, B. S., and Paulsen, G. M. (2002). Quantitative and molecular characterization of heat tolerance in hexaploid wheat. Euphytica. 126, 275–282. doi: 10.1023/a:1016350509689
Yi, X. M., Sun, A. Q., Han, X. Y., Zhang, J. D., Wang, Z. L., Wang, C. W., et al. (2015). Identification of dry-hot wind resistance of major wheat cultivars (strains) in Huanghuai wheat region. J. Triticeae Crop. 35, 274–284. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2015.02.18
You, J., and Chan, Z. (2015). ROS regulation during abiotic stress responses in crop plants. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 1092. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01092
Zavaleta-Mancera, H. A., Lopez-Delgado, H., Loza-Tavera, H., Mora-Herrera, M., Trevilla-Garcia, C., Vargas-Suarez, M., et al. (2007). Cytokinin promotes catalase and ascorbate peroxidase activities and preserves the chloroplast integrity during dark-senescence. J. Plant Physiol. 164, 1572–1582. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2007.02.003
Zhang, C. X., Feng, B. H., Chen, T. T., Fu, W. M., Li, H. B., Li, G. Y., et al. (2018). Heat stress-reduced kernel weight in rice at anthesis is associated with impaired source-sink relationship and sugars allocation. Environ. Exp. Bot. 155, 718–733. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.08.021
Zhang, H., and Zhou, C. (2013). Signal transduction in leaf senescence. Plant Mol. Biol. 82, 539–545. doi: 10.1007/s11103-012-9980-4
Zhang, J. B., Wang, X. B., Yan, Y. L., Xiao, J., Peng, H. R., and Cong, H. (2020). Evaluation the heat tolerance of the Xin Jiang spring wheat cultivars. J. Triticeae Crops. 40, 1055–1063. doi: 10.7606/jissn.1009-−104120200905
Zhang, L. T., Zhang, Z. S., Gao, H. Y., Xue, Z. C., Yang, C., Meng, X. L., et al. (2011). Mitochondrial alternative oxidase pathway protects plants against photoinhibition by alleviating inhibition of the repair of photodamaged PSII through preventing formation of reactive oxygen species in Rumex K-1 leaves. Physiologia Plantarum. 143, 396–407. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01514.x
Keywords: Triticum aestivum L, terminal heat stress, grain-filling stage, QTL, genetic regulation
Citation: Li M, Feng J, Zhou H, Najeeb U, Li J, Song Y and Zhu Y (2022) Overcoming Reproductive Compromise Under Heat Stress in Wheat: Physiological and Genetic Regulation, and Breeding Strategy. Front. Plant Sci. 13:881813. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.881813
Received: 23 February 2022; Accepted: 14 April 2022;
Published: 13 May 2022.
Edited by:
Leo Marcelis, Wageningen University and Research, NetherlandsReviewed by:
Costas Delis, University of Peloponnese, GreeceJauhar Ali, International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Philippines
Copyright © 2022 Li, Feng, Zhou, Najeeb, Li, Song and Zhu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yulei Zhu, zhuyulei2011@126.com; Youhong Song, uqysong@163.com
†These authors have contributed equally to this work