ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 26 September 2022

Sec. Plant Metabolism and Chemodiversity

Volume 13 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.969316

Phytochemical profiling of antimicrobial and potential antioxidant plant: Nepeta cataria

  • 1. Plant Pathology Lab, Department of Biological Sciences, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan

  • 2. Department of Plant Biology, Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, United States

  • 3. International Centre for Public Health (ICPH), New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States

  • 4. Clinical Epigenetics Lab, University Institute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

  • 5. Atta-Ur-Rahman School of Applied Biosciences (ASAB), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan

  • 6. Department of Biochemistry, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan

Article metrics

View details

20

Citations

9,1k

Views

6,4k

Downloads

Abstract

Traditional and phytochemical studies have confirmed the richness and diversity of medicinal plants such as Nepeta cataria (N. cataria), but more studies are needed to complete its metabolite profiling. The objective of this research was to enhance the metabolomic picture and bioactivity of N. cataria for better evaluation. Phytochemical analysis was performed by bio-guided protocols and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS). For this, solvents such as methanol, ethanol, water, acetone, and hexane were used to extract a wide number of chemicals. Antibacterial analysis was performed using the 96-well plate test, Kirby Bauer's disk diffusion method, and the resazurin microdilution test. Antioxidant activity was determined by the DPPH assay and radical scavenging capacity was evaluated by the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assay. GC/MS analysis revealed a total of 247 identified and 127 novel metabolites from all extracts of N. cataria. Water and acetone extracts had the highest identified metabolites (n = 79), whereas methanol extract was the highest in unidentified metabolites (n = 48). The most abundant phytochemicals in methanol extract were 1-isopropylcyclohex-1-ene (concentration = 27.376) and bicyclo [2.2.1] heptan-2-one (concentration = 20.437), whereas in ethanol extract, it was 9,12,15-octadecatrienoic acid (concentration = 27.308) and 1-isopropylcyclohex-1-ene (concentration = 25.854). An abundance of 2 methyl indoles, conhydrin, and coumarin was found in water extracts; a good concentration of eucalyptol was found in acetone extract; and 7,9-di-tert-butyl-1-oxaspiro is the most abundant phytochemicals in hexane extracts. The highest concentration of flavonoids and phenols were identified in hexane and methanol extracts, respectively. The highest antioxidant potential (DPPH assay) was observed in acetone extract. The ethanolic extract exhibited a two-fold higher ORAC than the methanol extract. This examination demonstrated the inhibitory effect against a set of microbes and the presence of polar and non-polar constituents of N. cataria. The results of this study provide a safe resource for the development of food, agriculture, pharmaceutical, and other industrial products upon further research validation.

Introduction

The Nepeta genus belongs to the family Lamiaceae, which is rich in bioactive secondary metabolites. The word Cataria was derived from the Latin word for cat, “Cathus.” N. cataria is a perennial herb that grows to a height of 50–100 cm (Scott, 2003). It has been found predominately in the regions of southern and eastern Europe, the Middle East, Central Asia, and China. Bioactive compounds of N. cataria have prehistorically been used and have a wide range of biological activities, including analgesic, anti-asthmatic, anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties. Nepeta cataria essential oil and metabolites have important applications in the pharmaceutical, agrochemical, and food industries (Sharma et al., 2021). Researchers found them to be antifungal, antibacterial (Bandh and Kamili, 2011; Sharma et al., 2019), antioxidant (Adiguzel et al., 2009), insecticidal, anti-inflammatory, anti-nociceptive, and potentially spasmolytic (Pargaien et al., 2020; Giarratana et al., 2017). Essential oils, flavonoids, phenolic acid, steroids, terpenoids, and terpenoid hydrocarbons have all been found in this plant.

Nepeta cataria has widely been used to treat diarrhea because of spasmolytic and myorelaxant metabolites in its extracts (Gilani et al., 2009). Essential oils of N. cataria have a promising impact on raw materials of industrial food importance (Frolova et al., 2020). Studies established the presence of nepetalactones in catnip essential oil by TLC and GC–MS analysis. Using GC/MS analysis, three populations of N. crassifolia and four populations of N. nuda were studied (Sharma et al., 2021).

Essential oils and flavonoids have typically been linked to the therapeutic benefits of Nepeta species. Prior investigations on the essential oils of N. cataria identified nepetalactone as a major constituent (Mamadalieva et al., 2017; Sharma et al., 2019). In a recent study, water-based extracts of N. cataria significantly inhibited herpes virus replication in humans (Hinkov et al., 2020). Previously, N. cataria has been used to alleviate symptoms of bronchial asthma, bronchitis, and bronchial congestion. The traditional herbal medicine derived from these along with other medicinal plants may have multiple applications, including symptom relief for people with COVID-19 and the development of effective antiviral medicines. During the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, also termed COVID-19, leaves of N. cataria were used to alleviate symptoms of the disease (Khan et al., 2021). Essential oils from Nepeta species that naturally produce nepetalactones can be synthesized in other regions and then be distilled to serve as a natural source of efficient Aedes aegypti repellent for effective dengue prevention (Reichert et al., 2019). Previous studies demonstrate that N. cataria essential oils effectively reduced liver damage caused by acetaminophen and enhanced mRNA expression of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) and sulfotransferases (SULTs) and decreased CYP2E1 activity (Tan et al., 2019). It has been shown that N. cataria and its derivatives have been used to treat gastrointestinal and respiratory disorders. They have also been reported for their effective antibacterial, antiviral, and antioxidant activities (Sharma et al., 2019). Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PPSRV) affects pigs and causes reproductive failure in developing pigs. According to the findings of a study, the load of PRRSV could be greatly reduced by using N. cataria hydrosol. It is strongly recommended that further research be conducted into the antiviral processes and characteristics of these plant hydrosols, both in vitro and in vivo (Kaewprom et al., 2017).

Recent research has been focused on the essential oils and antibacterial properties of plants, as they have been utilized to increase the shelf life of foods and in traditional medicine (Ergün, 2021; Özkan et al., 2021). Numerous studies demonstrate that the antibacterial and antifungal properties of N. cataria are mostly attributable to the essential oil constituents. Surprisingly, less is known about the antimicrobial activity of catnip essential oil. In these investigations, the antimicrobial activity of catnip essential oil was investigated on a limited number of bacteria or fungi (Angelini et al., 2006; Suschke et al., 2007; Bourrel et al., 2011).

In the past two decades, the antioxidant effect of the essential oils and/or extracts of medicinal and aromatic plants has received considerable attention. Therefore, these extracts can be employed as safe and effective synthetic preservative replacements. Natural antioxidants have been investigated extensively for their ability to protect organisms and cells against oxidative stress-induced damage, which is believed to be a cause of aging, degenerative illnesses, and cancer (Sharma et al., 2019). It has been known for some time that plant extracts and/or essential oils possess antioxidant properties. However, less is known about the antioxidant activity of the essential oil or extract of N. cataria.

In another study, aromatic and medicinal plants from Turkey have been characterized and reported on the antibacterial and antioxidant activities of N. cataria's essential oil, methanol extract, and its essential oil composition. They also highlighted essential oil to contain 4aβ, 7α, 7aβ-nepetalactone, 4aα, 7α, 7aβ-nepetalactone, 1,8-cineole, and elemol as major oil constituents in N. crassifolia (Dabiri and Sefidkon, 2003), while 7aβ-nepetalactone, 4aα, 7α, 7aβ-nepetalactone, pulegone, and piperitenone oxide were identified in N. nuda (Narimani et al., 2017). Research studies focused mainly on essential oil extracts of N. cataria, which indicated a need to study its metabolites in polar and nonpolar solvents. Our team was motivated to explore the constituents of N. cataria, based on polarity, via minor adjustments to already established lab protocols.

Materials and methods (experimental)

Plant collection

Nepeta cataria was collected from Swat (Himalayas), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan (35°22′59.99″ N, 72°10′60.00″E), locally named as catnip mint/catmint (in northern Pakistan) and Badranj boya (in central Pakistan). Species verification and identification were done at the National Herbarium, and they confirmed and identified it as N. cataria. Furthermore, it was cleaned, rinsed, dried, and preserved at the Antimicrobial Biological Laboratory (AMBL), International Islamic University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Plant extraction and filtration

Nepeta cataria's stem and leaves were rinsed, dried, and grounded in a fine powder by a lab grinder carefully. Fine powder was soaked separately in methanol, ethanol, water, acetone, and hexane using 1:10 ratio for 24–48 h at room temperature, to increase the maximum solubility. Filtrations and extraction were done using Whatman's # 41 and rota-evaporator at Stockbridge Medicinal and Aromatic Lab, University of Massachusetts Amherst, USA. Extracts were labeled and aliquoted in glass vials at 4°C until further use.

Phytochemical analysis

Qualitative analysis

Saponins and phenolic compounds, water-soluble and insoluble phenols, alkaloid flavonoids, poly-steroids, terpenoids, cardiac glycosides, free and combined anthraquinones, tannins, and alkaloids were chemically identified in all plant extracts (Prabhavathi et al., 2016).

Quantitative analysis—Phenols and flavonoids

Concentrations of phenols and flavonoids were identified in all extracts of N. cataria via established protocols previously explained in Nadeem et al. (2021).

GC/MS analysis of N. cataria extracts

The GC/MS is the widely adopted technique for the detection of biologically active compounds, i.e., metabolites. A set of extracts, methanol, ethanol, water, acetone, and hexane were subjected to GC/MS analysis to detect bioactive phytochemicals. Phytochemical compounds were identified and presented with their compound names, molecular formulas, molecular weight, and retention times (RT) using NIST Library 17.

Metabolic profiling of N. cataria extracts was conducted via GC/MS (Bruker Scion 456 GC, EVOQ triple quadrupole GC-MS/MS). A column of 15 m was used with a diameter and film thickness of 0.25 mm. The flow rate of helium as a carrier gas was 1.5 ml/min. For gas chromatography, temperature conditions were 45°C for 3 min, 250°C at 8°C/min for 10 min. Injection volume was 1 μl [varying split ratio (5:1/15:1/20:1), range (45–350 m/z)]. Automated Mass Spectral Deconvolution and Identification System (AMDIS) Software MSWS 8 for GC/MS and NIST library were used for compilation of all results.

Antibacterial activity

Bacterial cultures (Table 1) were grown on a tryptic soy broth (TSB) medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) (Nadeem et al., 2021). To evaluate antibacterial susceptibility testing (AST) of N. cataria extracts, three different methods were used, i.e., 96-well test, Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion, and resazurin-based well plate microdilution method.

Table 1

MicroorganismAccession numberStrain
Escherichia coliATCC_25922Gram negative
Klebsiella oxytocaATCC_43863
Salmonella entericaATCC_14028
Shigella sonneiATCC_25931
Citrobacter ferundiiATCC_8090
Bacillus subtilisATCC_6051Gram positive
Lactococcus lactisATCC_LMO230
Listeria monocytogenesATCC_LM21
Micrococcus luteusATCC_4698
staphylococcus aureusATCC_25923

Microbial profile of bacterial ingredients used in the antimicrobial analysis.

The 96-well plate method

In each well of a 96-well microtiter plate, 100 μl of plant extract and TSB media were used. Each plant extract was checked at five bacterial concentrations (i.e., 1,000, 500, 250, 125, and 62.5 μg) for optimum antimicrobial potential. Only TSB medium was added to negative control well to ensure sterility of media. A single negative control lacked plant extract to observe normal bacterial growth. Microtiter plates were incubated for 24 h before reading at 570 nm. Chloramphenicol as standard was used to evaluate the results. Bacterial inhibition was calculated via the following formula:

Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method

Solidified agar plates were used to analyze the antimicrobial potential of N. cataria extracts. Paper disks of 10 mm were soaked in 20 μl extracts, then placed on prepared culture plates and incubated for 24 h at a 25–35°C temperature. Paper disks (10 mm) were soaked in 20 μl of distilled water as a negative control to avoid any influence on bacterial growth (Sarin and Bafna, 2012). Aseptic conditions were maintained via working in a laminar flow. All extracts were tested in biological triplicates, and results were represented as average values of inhibition zones in mm ± standard deviation.

Resazurin-based well plate microdilution method

Resazurin solution was prepared (121.5 mg resazurin powder in 18 ml of ddH2O) and mixed for 1 h (pH = 7.4). TSB liquid medium and N. cataria extracts (100 μl each) were added to each well. Plant extract was added in serial dilution to separate wells. Each well was supplied with 106 CFU/ml of bacterial inoculum. Double negative control well was supplied with TSB media only. Single negative control well was supplied with TSB media and bacterial culture. Plates were incubated overnight and then 20 μl of resazurin was added to each well and incubated for another 4 h. Absorbance at 550–590 nm was read via spectrophotometer (SPECTRA MAX M2e plate reader) (Packialakshmi and Naziya, 2014).

DPPH antioxidant assay

The Bersuder (Edewor and Usman, 2011) method was used for antioxidant determination via DPPH radical scavenging assay. All solvent extracts were mixed with DMSO addition and DPPH-ethanol reagent was made separately. Plant-DMSO mix was saturated with DPPH-ethanol reagent for 6 h. Negative control was prepared by dissolving ascorbic acid in DMSO (50–500 μmol/L), which was used to generate calibration curve with 517 nm absorbance read via SPECTRA MAX M2e plate reader (Packialakshmi and Naziya, 2014).

Oxygen radical absorbance capacity assay protocol

Various dilutions of methanolic and extracted samples were mixed with buffered saline (10 mM, pH 7.6). Decaying of fluorescein induced by AAPH was compared to Trolox (positive control) over 120 min to evaluate the antioxidant activity via the SPECTRAMAX M2e Plate reader. Results were presented as μM Trolox Equivalent/100 μl of plant extract.

Statistical analysis

The results of all the experiments were analyzed under a complete randomized design (CRD) with three replications for each treatment. Results were statistically analyzed using GraphPad Prism and Microsoft Office Excel 2016 version. Means were calculated, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was performed for multiple comparisons of all the mean values. Mean differences were calculated by least significant difference (LSD) at 0.05 probability.

Results

Nepeta cataria contains medicinally important phytochemicals along with many unknown metabolites that need further studies (Elshikh et al., 2016; Mir et al., 2016). High antioxidant activity was exhibited in acetone extract of N. cataria. Moreover, high flavonoid content was found in water and hexane extracts, and methanol extracts were specifically rich in phenols.

Preliminary phytochemical analysis

Qualitative phytochemical analysis of N. cataria

Saponins were found in the methanol-based extracts of N. cataria. Phenols were positive in all extracts and showed high μg/ml concentration in methanol. Water-soluble phenols were present in all the polar solvents only. Water insoluble phenols were identified in the ethanol, acetone, and hexane-based extracts. A qualitative test for flavonoids was carried out, and the development of intense yellow color indicates presence of flavonoids (Figure 1). A qualitative test for terpenoids was conducted by observing a reddish-brown coloration development, which confirms the positive test results in all extracts. Cardiac glycosides were indicated via development of green-blue color. Acetone-based extracts were positive only. Free anthraquinones were present in all extracts of N. cataria except hexane-based extract. Combined anthraquinones were only present in methanol-based extract of N. cataria. Qualitative tests for tannins were found positive only in extraction of polar solvents. Alkaloids were present in all the extracts of N. cataria.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Qualitative analysis of phytochemicals in polar and non-polar extracts of Nepeta cataria. List of phytochemicals from (i) to (xi) were identified in various polar and non-polar extracts. The 2-D structure of phytochemicals are supported via PubChem.

DPPH antioxidant activity

presence of antioxidants was determined in N. cataria extracts in a set of different extractions and was measured spectrophotometrically, results were drawn as μmol of ascorbic acid equivalents/L, and the results are given in Figure 2A. The presence of antioxidants was found in the following order: acetone extracts > water extracts> ethanol extracts > methanol extracts > hexane extracts.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Quantitative analysis of phytochemicals (A) DPPH mediated antioxidant activity, (B) flavonoids concentration, (C) phenols concentration, (D) oxygen radical absorbance capacity values.

Total flavonoid and phenol content

The flavonoids in polar and non-polar extracts of N. cataria were quantified in terms of μg of catechin equivalents/ml. Hexane and water-based extracts showed high levels of flavonoids as compared to acetone, methanol, and ethanol-based extracts. Flavonoid results are summarized in Figure 2B. Several other studies prove the presence of flavonoids in N. cataria extract and indicate therapeutic potential for lung cancer because of its flavonoid content (Naguib et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2020).

The methanol, ethanol, water, acetone, and hexane extracts of N. cataria were examined in terms of μg of gallic acid equivalents per ml to quantify levels of total phenols. Methanol, acetone, and ethanol-based extracts showed the maximum presence of phenols as compared to water and hexane-based extracts. The order of phenolics (Figure 2C) presence in the sample was found as follows:

ORAC assay on N. cataria extracts

Oxygen radical absorbance capacity was performed to study the antiradical activity in methanol and ethanol extract of N. cataria. Results showed two-fold higher ORAC in ethanolic extracts than methanol extract (Figure 2D), signifying our results of DPPH, free radical scavenging activity (Lucas-Abellán et al., 2008).

Determination of antibacterial activity

Percentage growth inhibition by 96-well method

Percentage growth inhibition of each tested bacteria, viz., Shigella sonnei, Bacillus subtilis, Klebsiella oxytoca, Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, Micrococcus luteus, and Staphylococcus aureus (S. Lactococcus lactis, Listeria monocytogenes, and Citrobacter freundii). Percentage growth inhibition of bacterial isolates is given in Figure 3.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Percentage growth inhibition of bacterial strains by Nepeta cataria plant extracts in different solvents at different dose levels (96 well method).

Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method

Kirby disk diffusion method was followed to measure the antimicrobial efficacy of plant extracts by the zone of inhibition (mm) in vitro conditions on solidifying agar media. Chloramphenicol was used as a standard and zone of inhibition was >25 mm for all strains according to CLSI guidelines (Humphries et al., 2018).

Resazurin-based well plate microdilution method

The resazurin method was used to check the antimicrobial efficacy of each prepared plant extract against tested bacterial agents. Chloramphenicol was used as a positive control at 6.25–100 μl/ml dose levels, and data on percentage bacterial growth inhibition was recorded. Plant extract of N. cataria showed a varied efficacy against all the tested bacterial isolates compared to the positive and negative control, and results are presented in Figure 4.

Figure 4

Figure 4

(A,B) Percentage inhibition of bacterial growth determined in comparison with the growth inhibition by chloramphenicol (resazurin method).

GC/MS analysis of N. cataria

The GC/MS analysis of a methanolic extract of N. cataria showed (68 identified phytochemicals + 48 unmatched) chemicals (Table 2). Analysis of ethanol-based extracts confirmed the existence of 79 known phytochemical constituents, while 31 unmatched chemicals were detected (Table 3). Water-based extracts of N. cataria contain 28 known phytochemicals, while 11 unmatched chemicals were also detected (Table 4). Acetone-based extract confirmed the existence of 13 known compounds' extract, while 9 chemical constituents were unmatched (Table 5). Analysis of hexane-based extracts confirmed the presence of 9 known chemical constituents, while 8 unmatched chemicals were detected, as given in Table 6. GC/MS spectral chromatograms of all the solvent-based extracts are given in Figure 5 along with the most abundant metabolite in each extract. In methanol, water, and acetone extract, 1-isopropylcyclohex-1-ene was the most abundant phytochemical. The most abundant metabolite in ethanol extract is 9,12,15-octadecatrienoic acid, and the most abundant phytochemical in hexane extract is 7,9-di-tert-butyl-1-oxaspiro (Figure 5).

Table 2

CompoundMol. formulaAmount/Conc.%Mol. weight (g/mol)RT
(Min)
Extract
1-Isopropylcyclohex-1-eneC9H1627.376124.2212.402Methanol
Bicyclo [2.2.1] heptan-2-one,C7H10O20.437110.157.728Methanol
gamma. -SitosterolC29H50O8.626414.733.566Methanol
EucalyptolC10H18O8.505154.2495.112Methanol
n-Hexadecanoic acidC16H32O27.973256.424120.364Methanol
No match6.4196.933Methanol
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acidC18H30O26.401278.4322.304Methanol
1-Isopropylcyclohex-1-eneC9H166.144124.2213.699Methanol
1,6-Octadien-3-ol, 3,7-dimetC10H18O5.855154.259.981Methanol
Ethyl 2-5-methyl-5-vinyltetC13H22O45.845242.31146.551Methanol
Beta-SitosterolC29H50O5.461414.7132.541Methanol
No match4.14813.303Methanol
No match3.89322.205Methanol
Pentane, 1-chloro-5- methylC5H11Cl3.739106.59410.696Methanol
No match3.06312.903Methanol
No match3.00813.718Methanol
Bicyclo [3.1.0] hexane-2-undecC6H102.97482.1413.804Methanol
No match2.78626.376Methanol
Alpha-AmyrinC30H50O2.691426.72933.062Methanol
Pregnan-18-ol, 20-methyl-20-C22H39NO2.64333.613.916Methanol
No match2.61911.726Methanol
No match2.4314.296Methanol
No match2.07421.141Methanol
No match2.02114.919Methanol
No match1.97525.235Methanol
Caryophyllene oxideC15H24O1.916220.3515.129Methanol
No match1.80711.016Methanol
No match1.65934.964Methanol
No match1.49816.925Methanol
No match1.44714.094Methanol
No match1.43627.233Methanol
No match1.4335.912Methanol
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 7-metC13H15NO21.381217.2618.071Methanol
UvaolC30H50O21.365442.736.319Methanol
No match1.32635.143Methanol
Trans-Z-alpha-BisaboleneC15H241.312204.3516.216Methanol
Ursolic aldehydeC30H48O21.302440.734.718Methanol
No match1.2797.678Methanol
No match1.24517.965Methanol
Methyl 8,11,14-heptadecatrieC21H36O21.22320.509322.864Methanol
No match1.17912.826Methanol
PhytolC20H40O1.179128.170521.998Methanol
No match1.14813.285Methanol
No match1.0813.897Methanol
No match1.01326.209Methanol
No match0.99735.231Methanol
Octadecanoic acidC18H36O20.97284.4822.623Methanol
Hexadecanoic acid, methyl esC17H34O20.954270.519.887Methanol
No match0.93712.007Methanol
Methyl 8,11,14-heptadecatrieC21H36O20.92320.509321.853Methanol
BetulinC30H50O20.91442.7235.472Methanol
1,1,4a-Trimethyl-5,6-dimethylC15H240.891204.3533.896Methanol
CoumarinC9H6O20.878146.142713.867Methanol
No match0.87512.736Methanol
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 7-metC13H15NO20.826217.2617.04Methanol
1-Chlorosulfonyl-3-methyl-1-C9H14ClNO3S0.823251.7316.173Methanol
Beta-AmyrinC30H50O0.763426.72933.739Methanol
Methyl 2-hydroxy-octadeca-9,C19H32O30.754308.528.775Methanol
Hexadecanoic acid, 2-hydroxyC16H32O30.744272.4226.101Methanol
No match0.71713.206Methanol
(1R,7S, E)-7-Isopropyl-4,10-dC15H24O0.702220.350517.243Methanol
No match0.68835.27Methanol
CampesterolC28H48O0.657400.6832.877Methanol
Urs-12-en-28-alC30H48O0.654424.735.305Methanol
2-Butyl-5-methyl-3-2-methylC15H26O0.645222.3714.281Methanol
Caryophylla-4(12),8(13)-dienC15H24O0.632220.350516.429Methanol
endo-BorneolC10H18O0.623154.258.246Methanol
1-Methyl-2-methylenecyclohexC8H140.622110.19714.461Methanol
No match0.61627.717Methanol
Caryophylla-4(12),8(13)-dienC15H24O0.603220.350517.45Methanol
StigmasterolC29H48O0.595412.6933.091Methanol
No match0.58514.134Methanol
No match0.57913.446Methanol
TritetracontaneC43H880.574605.227.798Methanol
No match0.56615.531Methanol
(3S,3aS,6R,7R,9aS)-1,1,7-TriC15H240.562204.351119.087Methanol
MegastigmatrienoneC13H18O0.56190.2816.78Methanol
No match0.55312.88Methanol
No match0.54911.886Methanol
Urs-12-en-28-oic acid, 3-hydC30H48O30.546456.735.636Methanol
No match0.54522.421Methanol
No match0.54312.559Methanol
3,5-Dimethylcyclohex-1-ene-4C8H140.542110.214.226Methanol
Eicosanoic acidC20H40O20.515312.530425.775Methanol
No match0.48613.019Methanol
Olean-12-en-3-ol, acetate,C32H52O20.486468.832.724Methanol
Alpha-Tocospiro AC29H50O40.484462.730.208Methanol
Cyclohexene,1-propyl-C9H160.483124.2211.611Methanol
Alpha-Tocospiro BC29H50O40.463462.704930.023Methanol
No match0.44711.436Methanol
No match0.44712.434Methanol
Phenol, 2,4-bis 1-methyl-1-pC24H26O0.445330.526.725Methanol
11,11-Dimethyl-4,8-dimethylC15H24O0.429220.3516.954Methanol
No match0.41926.522Methanol
Tricyclo [20.8.0.07,16] triaC30H52O20.413444.718.261Methanol
No match0.39417.818Methanol
1,5,7-Octatrien-3-ol, 3,7-diC10H16O0.39152.23348.782Methanol
2-Pentadecanone, 6,10,14-triC18H36O0.386268.477818.826Methanol
11,14-Octadecadienoic acidC18H32O20.364280.422.811Methanol
No match0.36315.481Methanol
Caryophylla-4(12),8(13)-dienC15H24O0.358220.350515.937Methanol
No match0.35634.665Methanol
5-Cholestene-3-ol, 24-methylC28H48O0.344400.731.863Methanol
No match0.32514.381Methanol
No match0.32311.703Methanol
No match0.32221.365Methanol
NeophytadieneC20H380.313278.518.782Methanol
No match0.30417.223Methanol
2-Furanmethanol, 5-ethenylteC10H18O20.287170.24876.078Methanol
9,12-Hexadecadienoic acid, mC16H28O20.273252.3921.796Methanol
Beta-GuaieneC15H240.271204.35132.882Methanol
6-Hydroxy-4,4,7a-trimethyl-5C11H16O30.258196.2417.648Methanol
Bicyclo [2.2.1] heptane, 7,7-dC9H160.24124.229.955Methanol
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3-methylC7H10O0.23110.1511.529Methanol
HentriacontaneC31H640.188436.8528.969Methanol
Methyl octadec-6,9-dien-12-yC18H32O20.149280.415.763Methanol

GC/MS analysis of a methanol extract of N. cataria using NIST 17 Library showed (68 identified phytochemicals + 48 unmatched) chemicals, arranged according to concentration present.

Table 3

CompoundMol. formulaAmount/Conc.%Mol. weight
(g/mol)
RT
(Min)
Extract
No match57.0842.058Ethanol
No match42.9162.039Ethanol
9,12,15-Octadecatrienoic acidC18H30O227.308278.4317.266Ethanol
1-Isopropylcyclohex-1-eneC9H1625.854124.2211.456Ethanol
1-Isopropylcyclohex-1-eneC9H1614.94124.229.585Ethanol
1-Isopropylcyclohex-1-eneC9H1613.741124.229.33Ethanol
Beta-SitosterolC29H50O13.312414.7124.939Ethanol
n-Hexadecanoic acidC16H32O210.3256.42419.386Ethanol
Alpha-AmyrinC30H50O6.667426.72925.504Ethanol
No match4.60616.278Ethanol
Urs-12-en-28-olC30H50O4.295426.723.833Ethanol
Methyl 13,14-octadecadienoateC19H34O23.793294.47213.689Ethanol
Octadecanoic acidC18H36O23.62284.4817.464Ethanol
Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl estC18H36O23.361284.47715.865Ethanol
Ethyl 9,12,15-octadecatrienoC20H34O23.315306.521.626Ethanol
PhytolC20H40O3.068128.170516.907Ethanol
CoumarinC9H6O22.94146.14279.646Ethanol
1-Chlorosulfonyl-3-methyl-1-C9H14ClNO3S2.175251.7315.242Ethanol
Ursolic aldehydeC30H48O22.109440.733.113Ethanol
Ethyl 9.cis., 11.trans.-octadC20H38O22.045310.51517.352Ethanol
No match1.9511.165Ethanol
No match1.75615.716Ethanol
No match1.669.685Ethanol
4,4,8-Trimethyltricyclo [6.3].C15H26O21.458238.36618.101Ethanol
No match1.45615.943Ethanol
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 7-metC13H15NO21.381217.2616.049Ethanol
No match1.1999.727Ethanol
HentriacontaneC31H641.197436.8520.74Ethanol
Tetracontane, 3,5,24-trimethC43H881.194605.220.201Ethanol
6-Octadecynoic acid, methylC19H36O21.149296.48824.253Ethanol
Eicosanoic acidC20H40O21.138312.530419.118Ethanol
Sulfurous acid, butyl tetradC21H44O3S1.134376.623.243Ethanol
UvaolC30H50O21.125442.724.513Ethanol
Bicyclo [3.1.0] hexane-2-undecC6H101.10882.1412.837Ethanol
Tetracosamethyl-cyclododecasC16H321224.42527.703Ethanol
No match0.98412.821Ethanol
Octadecanoic acid, 17-methylC20H40O20.982312.517.68Ethanol
No match0.93912.875Ethanol
Methyl 2-hydroxy-octadeca-9,C19H32O30.895308.521.548Ethanol
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 7-metC13H15NO20.893217.2612.956Ethanol
No match0.88411.045Ethanol
No match0.86513.906Ethanol
No match0.83615.628Ethanol
[1,1′-Bicyclopropyl]-2-octanC21H38O20.823322.516.857Ethanol
11,14-Octadecadienoic acid,C18H32O20.819280.421.561Ethanol
BetulinC30H50O20.802442.7233.839Ethanol
No match0.77219.585Ethanol
5-HydroxymethylfurfuralC6H6O30.768126.116.985Ethanol
No match0.75412.601Ethanol
No match0.74211.881Ethanol
No match0.72712.675Ethanol
Urs-12-en-28-oic acid, 3-hydC30H48O30.722456.723.776Ethanol
Sulfurous acid, butyl tetradC21H44O3S0.667376.622.185Ethanol
No match0.66511.947Ethanol
Alpha-Tocospiro AC29H50O40.654462.722.498Ethanol
Oleic AcidC18H34O20.653282.4716.515Ethanol
Tricyclo [20.8.0.07,16] triaC18H24O40.647304.3825.158Ethanol
No match0.64311.217Ethanol
StigmasterolC29H48O0.63412.6924.507Ethanol
Methyl 10,11-tetradecadienoaC15H26O20.573238.36610.069Ethanol
Sulfurous acid, butyl tridecC17H36O3S0.572320.522.897Ethanol
No match0.56212.242Ethanol
24-Noroleana-3,12-dieneC29H460.537394.67631.418Ethanol
No match0.5349.47Ethanol
No match0.51722.775Ethanol
Cholestan-3-ol, 2-methylene-C28H48O0.515400.715.446Ethanol
Tetracontane, 3,5,24-trimethC43H880.506605.225.112Ethanol
No match0.50126.914Ethanol
2-MethylindolineC9H11N0.49133.196.58Ethanol
No match0.48116.473Ethanol
No match0.4578.924Ethanol
3,7,11,15-Tetramethyl-2-HexaC20H40O0.444296.523.191Ethanol
No match0.43510.634Ethanol
1-HeptatriacotanolC37H76O0.43253713.943Ethanol
No match0.42413.117Ethanol
1R,4S,7S,11R-2,2,4,8-TetrameC15H26O0.419222.36631.553Ethanol
No match0.40610.249Ethanol
Sulfurous acid, butyl tridecC17H36O3S0.399320.524.233Ethanol
No match0.39516.248Ethanol
No match0.37525.618Ethanol
No match0.36923.972Ethanol
6-Hydroxy-4,4,7a-trimethyl-5C11H16O30.367196.2416.663Ethanol
Ethyl 9.cis.,11. trans.-octadC20H38O20.34310.51517.345Ethanol
Tau-CadinolC15H26O0.335222.3712.143Ethanol
24(H)-Benzofuranone, 5,6,7,7C11H16O20.319180.24410.757Ethanol
Glycine, N-[3alpha, 5beta]C30H53NO4Si0.313519.824.109Ethanol
Tetracontane, 3,5,24-trimethC43H880.304605.220.193Ethanol
2-Pentadecanone, 6,10,14-triC18H36O0.298268.47817.839Ethanol
NeophytadieneC20H380.294278.525.337Ethanol
2-Pentadecanone, 6,10,14-triC18H36O0.286268.47814.346Ethanol
2,4-Dihydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3C6H8O40.284144.123.404Ethanol
n-Propyl 9,12-hexadecadienoaC19H34O20.262294.511.116Ethanol
Tetradecanoic acidC14H28O20.25228.370913.552Ethanol
10,10-Dimethyl-2,6-dimethyleC15H240.199204.35112.067Ethanol
Ergost-5-en-3-ol (3beta)-C28H48O0.18400.724.141Ethanol
Fumaric acid, ethyl 2-methylC10H14O40.179198.2211.356Ethanol
TritetracontaneC43H880.177605.222.18Ethanol
Azulene, 1,2,3,3a,4,5,6,7-ocC15H240.17204.35115.056Ethanol
(4aS,7S,7aR)-4,7-Dimethyl-2C10H14O20.169166.21710.885Ethanol
cis-5,8,11,14,17-EicosapentaC20H30O20.148302.513.276Ethanol
Carbamic acid, N-[1,1-bis tr]C12H24N2O40.124260.3313.319Ethanol
Bicyclo [4.4.0] dec-1-ene, 2-iC15H240.116204.3511.54Ethanol
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 4,5-dimeC8H12O0.113124.1810.585Ethanol
12-Methyl-E, E-2,13-octadecadC19H36O0.113280.48911.164Ethanol
StigmasterolC29H48O0.102412.6924.241Ethanol
2-Cyclohexen-1-one, 3-methylC7H10O0.083110.158.592Ethanol
MegastigmatrienoneC13H18O0.081190.2811.924Ethanol
2,4-Dihydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3C6H8O40.032144.123.23Ethanol
Cyclopentanecarboxylic acidC6H10O20.008114.149.434Ethanol
2-MethylindolineC9H11N133.198.12Ethanol

GC/MS analysis of ethanol extract of N. cataria using NIST 17 Library showed (79 identified phytochemicals + 31 unmatched) chemicals, arranged according to concentration present.

Table 4

CompoundMol. formulaAmount/Conc.%Mol. weight (g/mol)RT (Min)Extract
1-Isopropylcyclohex-1-eneC9H1622.387124.2210.657Water
7-MethylhexahydrocyclopentaC9H14O25.399154.2111.265Water
2H-1-Benzopyran-2-one, 7-metC13H15NO25.336217.2614.95Water
(R) -(-)-14-Methyl-8-hexadecyC17H34O5.106254.451310.79Water
No match4.91715.825Water
Benzofuran, 2,3-dihydro-C8H8O4.002120.158.48Water
Hydro coumarinC9H8O23.699148.158610.843Water
Bicyclo [3.1.0] hexane-2-undecC6H103.182.1412.831Water
No match2.94213.861Water
CoumarinC9H6O22.265146.142711.545Water
Cyclopentane carboxylic acid,C6H10O22.165114.1410.486Water
13-Tetradece-11-yn-1-olC14H24O2.146208.3411.581Water
No match1.73811.098Water
No match1.6314.825Water
No match1.47215.575Water
(S-2-1R,4R)-4-Methyl-2-oxoC4H6O31.274102.088612.723Water
(4R,4aR,7S,7aR)-4,7-DimethylC10H18O1.17154.2511.326Water
Homovanillyl alcoholC9H12O31.118168.1912.621Water
2-Cyclohexene-1-one, 4-3-hydC13H20O20.997208.296713.984Water
No match0.93213.036Water
2-MethylindolineC9H11N0.825133.198.353Water
(E)-2,6-Dimethylocta-3,7-dieC10H18O20.67170.258.078Water
No match0.56211.045Water
Ethanone, 1-2-hydroxyphenylC8H8O20.559136.1511.463Water
2-Methoxy-4-vinyl phenol0.539.845Water
6-Hydroxy-4,4,7a-trimethyl-5C11H16O30.496196.2415.394Water
No match0.4693.652Water
No match0.4375.652Water
No match0.40416.262Water
3-AcetylthymineC5H6N2O20.402126.113313.283Water
3-Oxo-4-phenylbutyronitrileC10H9NO0.371159.188.825Water
No match0.3374.368Water
7-Oxabicyclo [4.1.0] heptan-3-C6H10O20.295114.1416.821Water
n-Hexadecanoic acidC16H32O20.263256.424117.288Water
1H-Pyrrole-2,5-dione, 3-ethy0.258.69Water
1,7-Octadiene-3,6-diol, 2,6-C10H18O20.238170.259.271Water
ConhydrinC8H17NO0.212143.237.847Water
Methyl 7,8-octadecadienoateC19H34O20.206294.472112.898Water
1H-Indene, 1-ethylideneoctahC11H100.07142.214.737Water

GC/MS analysis of water extract of N. cataria using NIST 17 Library showed (79 identified phytochemicals + 31 unmatched) chemicals, arranged according to concentration present.

Table 5

CompoundMol. formulaAmount/conc. %Mol. weight (g/mol)RT (Min)Extract
Oxime-, methoxy-phenyl-C8H9NO22.849151.163.685Acetone
1-Isopropylcyclohex-1-eneC9H1629.552124.228.206Acetone
Caryophyllene oxideC15H24O6.868220.3511.452Acetone
(+)-2-BornanoneC10H16O6.365152.2335.984Acetone
n-Hexadecanoic acidC16H32O25.337256.42417.237Acetone
No match3.443-10.391Acetone
Endo-BorneolC10H18O3.083154.256.191Acetone
HotrienolC10H16O2.947152.237.692Acetone
No match2.573-13.475Acetone
(E)-2,6-Dimethylocta-3,7-dieC10H18O22.572170.256.217Acetone
No match2.57-8.885Acetone
Cyclopentanecarboxylic acidC6H10O22.496114.148.04Acetone
No match2.289-9.631Acetone
No match2.038-8.424Acetone
No match2.007-8.53Acetone
No match1.947-8.127Acetone
No match1.844-9.297Acetone
EucalyptolC10H18O1.513154.2495.004Acetone
No match1.196-7.749Acetone
Cyclohexane, 1-propyl-C9H161.093124.227.507Acetone
alpha-methyl- alpha-[4-methyl]C6H11NO21.026129.165.292Acetone
1,7-Octadiene-3,6-diol, 2,6-dimethylC10H18O20.819170.257.049Acetone

GC/MS analysis of an acetone-based extract of N. cataria using NIST 17 Library showed (12 identified phytochemicals + 9 unmatched) chemicals, arranged according to concentration present.

Table 6

CompoundMol. formulaAmount/Conc. %Mol. weight
(g/mol)
RT
(Min)
Extract
(+)-2-BornanoneC10H16O6.809152.2339.187Hexane
Methyl 6,9,12,15,18-heneicos11.00816.663Hexane
1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acidC8H6O48.551166.1410.181Hexane
Dibutyl phthalateC16H22O45.877278.3421.611Hexane
No match5.19912.947Hexane
No match4.07512.537Hexane
No match3.96919.713Hexane
endo-BorneolC10H18O3.719154.259.774Hexane
BenzophenoneC13H10O3.591182.21717.321Hexane
No match3.47218.437Hexane
No match3.17212.675Hexane
Tetracontane, 3,5,24-trimethC43H882.939605.28.975Hexane
No match2.75612.391Hexane
Benzoic acid, 4-ethoxy-, ethC11H14O32.535194.2315.905Hexane
7,9-Di-tert-butyl-1-oxaspiroC17H24O31.956276.420.957Hexane
No match1.42112.21Hexane
No match1.17617.73Hexane

GC/MS analysis of a hexane-based extract of N. cataria using NIST 17 Library showed (9 identified phytochemicals + 8 unmatched) chemicals, arranged according to concentration present.

Figure 5

Figure 5

(A) GC/MS chromatogram of set of extracts of Nepeta cataria showing peaks of metabolites in each extract. (B) The 2-D structures of important phytochemicals are retrieved via PubChem. i. Betulin was most abundant phytochemical in methanol and ethanol (ME), ii. Uvol in ethanol, iii. 2-methyl Indole in water, iv. Eucalyptol in acetone and methanol (AM) and v. 7,9-Di-ter-butyl-1-oxaspiro is most abundant phytochemical in hexane extract.

Discussion

One of the most well-known species in the genus Nepeta is N. cataria. Several studies have performed qualitative identification of phytochemical constituents from leaves and flowers of N. cataria extract as well as oils from the plant (Edewor and Usman, 2011; Reichert et al., 2018; Azizian et al., 2021). The antibacterial of N. cataria from previous research likewise demonstrated sufficient antibacterial activity against S. aureus, K. pneumoniae and S. typhi (Mukhtar and Singh, 2019). The results from our studies corroborate the results exhibited in previous studies. In addition to N. cataria, other species of the Nepeta genus have also been studied extensively for their phytochemical analysis, and among all species, N. cataria is the most promising of all species (Azizian et al., 2021).

Several studies corroborate our findings and indicate high DPPH activity in acetone extracts while others exhibit versatile results (Dienaite et al., 2018). Some studies presented more efficient DPPH activity in methanol, 70% ethanol and others in aqueous extract of N. cataria (Kraujalis et al., 2011; Mihaylova et al., 2013; Dienaite et al., 2018). Modernized extraction protocols, i.e., ultrasound-based microextraction, are being used to maximize output of phenolic compounds from methanol extract of N. cataria, which corroborates with our study (Hajmohammadi et al., 2021). Several other studies also indicate rosmarinic acid as a prominent phenolic compound in N. cataria extracts (Hadi et al., 2017).

Water extracts of N. cataria exhibit reasonable ORAC activity as per different studies (Dienaite et al., 2018; Baranauskiene et al., 2019). Another study showed excellent radical scavenging properties of N. cataria via FRAP assay, which improves the confidence in this plant (Duda et al., 2015).

Among all the treatments, ethanol-based extracts of N. cataria showed maximum percentage inhibition of all the tested bacteria at 1,000–250 μg/ml concentration, followed by methanolic extracts at 1,000 and 500 μg/ml dose levels and water-based extracts at 1,000 and 500 μg/ml dose levels. In contrast, acetone and hexane-based extracts of N. cataria did not significantly inhibit all the tested bacterial isolates compared to control treatments. Many studies provide insights for the use of N. cataria extract in inhibition of S. aureus and B. subtilis and its oil as a topical treatment of respiratory tract infections (Suschke et al., 2007; Bandh and Kamili, 2011). MIC values indicated that the ethanol-based extract of all N. cataria extracts showed maximum inhibition of B. subtilis, followed by C. freundii and M. luteus. At the same time, methanol-based extracts also showed maximum efficacy against S. sonnei, E. coli, M. luteus, and C. freundii. Water, acetone, and hexane-based extracts were almost equally effective against tested bacterial isolates, as given in Table 7. Studies indicate promising effect of N. cataria extract as antibacterial agent against S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, and Salmonella typhi (Edewor and Usman, 2011). Considering resazurin methodology, by using combined extractions of all solvents in DMSO, N. cataria plant extract at the dose level of 12.5 μl/ml showed maximum inhibition of all the bacterial strains, followed by 6.25 μl/ml. The antibacterial screening of the N. cataria from other studies also exhibited sufficient evidence of antibacterial activity against S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, and S. typhi (Morombaye et al., 2018).

Table 7

Bacterial pathogensZone of inhibition (mm)
MethanolEthanolWaterAcetoneHexaneChloramphenicol
Gram negativeE. coli15 ± 0.114 ± 0.112 ± 0.1014 ± 0.125 ± 0.2
K. oxytoca14 ± 0.214 ± 0.116 ± 0.114 ± 0.213 ± 0.326 ± 0.1
S. enterica13 ± 0.114 ± 0.100025 ± 0.1
S. sonnei15 ± 0.215 ± 0.1016 ± 0.214 ± 0.126 ± 0.2
C. ferundii15 ± 0.222 ± 0.412 ± 0.112 ± 0.211 ± 0.125 ± 0.2
Gram positiveB. subtilis14 ± 0.121 ± 0.50014 ± 0.231 ± 0.1
L. lactis00013 ± 0.1025 ± 0.2
L. monocytogenes13 ± 0.114 ± 0.213 ± 0.113 ± 0.1025 ± 0.2
M. luteus15 ± 0.216 ± 0.216 ± 0.116 ± 0.2026 ± 0.1
S. aureus13 ± 0.113 ± 0.100020 ± 0.1

Antimicrobial efficacy of N. cataria extracts against a set of gram-negative and gram-positive bacterial strains.

GC/MS analysis of methanol and ethanol revealed the presence of betulin extracts, which is a promising antitumorigenic candidate and escalates the importance of N. cataria in cancer treatment (Liu et al., 2009). Arachidic acid (eicosanoic acid) is used to produce detergents, photographic materials, and lubricants. Caryophyllene oxide is a potential preservative used in food, drugs, and cosmetics. It also displays anti-inflammatory and anti-carcinogenic properties (Salaria et al., 2020). Uvaol also displays anti-inflammatory properties and antioxidant effects (Botelho et al., 2019). Campesterols found in methanol extracts is phytosterol, used in growth induction in animals, commonly abused anabolic steroid in sports can also reduce the absorption of cholesterol in intestine by targeting transporter protein, minimizing the effect of cardiovascular disease (Choudhary and Tran, 2011). Phytol in ethanol has been investigated for its potential anxiolytic, metabolism-modulating, cytotoxic, antioxidant, autophagy- and apoptosis-inducing, antinociceptive, anti-inflammatory, immune-modulating, and antimicrobial effects (Islam et al., 2018). Phytol is likely the most abundant acyclic isoprenoid compound present in the biosphere and its degradation products have been used as biogeochemical tracers in aquatic environments (Rontani and Volkman, 2003). Phytol is used in the fragrance industry and is used in cosmetics, shampoos, toilet soaps, household cleaners, and detergents (McGinty et al., 2010). Coumarin (2H-1-benzopyran-2-one) in methanol and ethanol is famous for pharmacological properties such as anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant, antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, anticancer, antihypertensive, antitubercular, anticonvulsant, antiadipogenic, antihyperglycemic, antioxidant, and neuroprotective properties (Venugopala et al., 2013). Similarly in water extracts, 2-methylindole is used as an intermediate to synthesize dyes, pigments, and pharmaceuticals. Conhydrin is a poisonous alkaloid, when ingested interruption with the central nervous system, paralyzing respiratory muscles and causing failure (Hotti and Rischer, 2017). Likewise, extracts of hexane contain eucalyptol, an active ingredient as a cough suppressant as it controls mucus secretion from airway and asthma via anti-inflammatory cytokines (Juergens, 2014). Hexane soluble constituents conformed to identification of 7, 9-di-tert-butyl-1-oxaspiro which is used against skin diseases, gonorrhea, migraine, intestinal parasites, and warts (Sharif et al., 2015), and dibutyl phthalate is used in making flexible plastics. In addition to this, several other studies indicate presence of nepetalactone and other terpenoids as essential components of oil extracts of N. cataria (Handjieva et al., 2011; Sharma et al., 2019).

This study gave a thorough brief of antibacterial and antioxidant activity and its constituents. Present methodology can be beneficial in devising and exploring different bioactive compounds that can be exploited for the constructing novel antimicrobial agents for alternative therapeutic intervention against several bacterial and viral infections after processing. It may also help to treat different antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Its chemicals if used in pharmacology industries can serve as indigenous, cheaper, and readily available source.

Conclusion

Many aspects of plants were studied, but complete metabolomic profiling and identification of unmatched chemicals remain a question mark. MS-MS analysis of plant metabolites should be considered for knowing the medicinal potential of unknown and novel plant metabolites. Data compilation and individual chemical studies need a larger scale with a set of skills to combat emerging diseases. Yet, to the best of our knowledge, the concluded information, reported results, and this research is comprehensive to the best of our scale, our team tried to achieve.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the Higher Education Commission, Government of Pakistan, for funding part of the research under the International Research Support Initiative Program (IRSIP) at the University of Massachusetts, USA.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

Practical performance and data compilation were performed solely by AN. Experimental assistance for GC/MS, and antibacterial analysis was given by BA. Data analysis was performed by HS. Manuscript drafting and proofreading were conducted by HS, in assistance with MW and AT. All authors contributed to the study design and implementation. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Higher Education Commission, Government of Pakistan and University of Massachusetts, USA, for providing us with the research facilities and support to publish this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1

    AdiguzelA.OzerH.SokmenM.GulluceM.SokmenA.KilicH.et al. (2009). Antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of the essential oil and methanol extract of Nepeta cataria. Polish J. Microbiol.58, 69-76. Available at: www.microbiology.pl/pjm

  • 2

    AngeliniP.PagiottiR.MenghiniA.VianelloB. (2006). Antimicrobial activities of various essential oils against foodborne pathogenic or spoilage moulds. Ann. Microbiol. 56, 6569. 10.1007/BF03174972

  • 3

    AzizianT.AlirezaluA.HassaniA.BahadoriS.SonboliA. (2021). Phytochemical analysis of selected Nepeta species by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS and GC-MS methods and exploring their antioxidant and antifungal potentials. J. Food Meas. Charact. 15, 24172429. 10.1007/s11694-021-00819-8

  • 4

    BandhS.KamiliA. (2011). Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of aqueous extracts of Nepeta cataria Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses following Immunization with Surface/excretory secretory Antigens of Abomasal Nematodes of Sheep View project BOOK PROJECTS View project.Artic. J. Pharm. Res. Available online at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235769154 (accessed July 14, 2022).

  • 5

    BaranauskieneR.BendŽiuvieneV.RagaŽinskieneO.VenskutonisP. R. (2019). Essential oil composition of five Nepeta species cultivated in Lithuania and evaluation of their bioactivities, toxicity and antioxidant potential of hydrodistillation residues. Food Chem. Toxicol. 129, 269280. 10.1016/j.fct.2019.04.039

  • 6

    BotelhoR. M.TenorioL. P. G.SilvaA. L. M.TanabeE. L. L.PiresK. S. N.GonçalvesC. M.et al. (2019). Biomechanical and functional properties of trophoblast cells exposed to Group B Streptococcus in vitro and the beneficial effects of uvaol treatment. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 1863, 14171428. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2019.06.012

  • 7

    BourrelC.PerineauF.MichelG.BessiereJ. M. (2011). Catnip (Nepeta cataria L.) essential oil: analysis of chemical constituents, bacteriostatic and fungistatic properties. J. Essent. Oil Res.5, 159167. 10.1080/10412905.1993.9698195

  • 8

    ChoudharyS.TranL. (2011). Phytosterols: perspectives in human nutrition and clinical therapy. Curr. Med. Chem. 18, 45574567. 10.2174/092986711797287593

  • 9

    DabiriM.SefidkonF. (2003). Chemical composition of Nepeta crassifolia Boiss. and Buhse oil from Iran. Flavour Fragr. J. 18, 225227. 10.1002/ffj.1199

  • 10

    DienaiteL.PukalskieneM.MatiasA. A.PereiraC. V.PukalskasA.VenskutonisP. R. (2018). Valorization of six Nepeta species by assessing the antioxidant potential, phytochemical composition and bioactivity of their extracts in cell cultures. J. Funct. Foods45, 512522. 10.1016/j.jff.2018.04.004

  • 11

    DudaS. C.Mărghita,şL. A.DezmireanD.DudaM.MărgăoanR.Bobi,şO. (2015). Changes in major bioactive compounds with antioxidant activity of Agastache foeniculum, Lavandula angustifolia, Melissa officinalis and Nepeta cataria: effect of harvest time and plant species. Ind. Crops Prod. 77, 499507. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.09.045

  • 12

    EdeworI. T.UsmanA. L. (2011). Phytochemical and antibacterial activities of leaf extracts of Nepeta cataria. African J. Pure Appl. Chem. 5, 503506. 10.5897/AJPAC11.074

  • 13

    ElshikhM.AhmedS.FunstonS.DunlopP.McGawM.MarchantR.et al. (2016). Resazurin-based 96-well plate microdilution method for the determination of minimum inhibitory concentration of biosurfactants. Biotechnol. Lett. 38, 10151019. 10.1007/s10529-016-2079-2

  • 14

    ErgünZ. (2021). Seed oil content and fatty acid profiles of endemic Phoenix theophrasti greuter, Phoenix roebelenii o'brien, Phoenix caneriensis hort. Ex chabaud, and Phoenix dactylifera l. grown in the same locality in Turkey. Turkish J. Agric. For. 45, 557564. 10.3906/tar-2105-34

  • 15

    FrolovaN.UktainetsA.KorablovaO.VoitsekhivskyiV. (2020). Plants of Nepeta cataria var. citriodora Beck. and essential oils from them for food industry. Potravin. J. Food Sci.13, 449455. 10.5219/1109

  • 16

    GiarratanaF.MuscolinoD.ZiinoG.Lo PrestiV.RaoR.ChiofaloV.et al. (2017). Activity of Catmint (Nepeta cataria) essential oil against Anisakis larvae. Trop. Biomed.34, 2231.

  • 17

    GilaniA. H.ShahA. J.ZubairA.KhalidS.KianiJ.AhmedA.et al. (2009). Chemical composition and mechanisms underlying the spasmolytic and bronchodilatory properties of the essential oil of Nepeta cataria L. J. Ethnopharmacol. 121, 405411. 10.1016/j.jep.2008.11.004

  • 18

    HadiN.SefidkonF.ShojaeiyanA.ŠilerB.JafariA. A.AničićN.et al. (2017). Phenolics' composition in four endemic Nepeta species from Iran cultivated under experimental field conditions: the possibility of the exploitation of Nepeta germplasm. Ind. Crops Prod.95, 475484. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.10.059

  • 19

    HajmohammadiM. R.Najafi AsliPashakiS.Rajab DizavandiZ.AmiriA. (2021). Ultrasound-assisted vesicle-based microextraction as a novel method for determination of phenolic acid compounds in Nepeta cataria L. samples. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 18, 15591566. 10.1007/s13738-020-02131-6

  • 20

    HandjievaN. V.PopovS. S.EvstatievaL. N. (2011). Constituents of essential oils from Nepeta cataria L., N. grandiflora M.B. and N. nuda L.8, 639643. 10.1080/10412905.1996.9701032

  • 21

    HinkovA.AngelovaP.MarchevA.HodzhevY.TsvetkovV.DragolovaD.et al. (2020). Nepeta nuda ssp. nuda L. water extract: inhibition of replication of some strains of human alpha herpes virus (genus simplex virus) in vitro, mode of action and NMR-based metabolomics. J. Herb. Med. 21, 100334. 10.1016/j.hermed.2020.100334

  • 22

    HottiH.RischerH. (2017). The killer of Socrates: coniine and related alkaloids in the plant kingdom. Molecule22, 1962. 10.3390/molecules22111962

  • 23

    HumphriesR. M.AmblerJ.MitchellS. L.CastanheiraM.DingleT.HindlerJ. A.et al. (2018). CLSI methods development and standardization working group best practices for evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility tests. J. Clin. Microbiol. 56, e01934-17. 10.1128/JCM.01934-17

  • 24

    IslamM. T.AliE. S.UddinS. J.ShawS.IslamM. A.AhmedM. I.et al. (2018). Phytol: a review of biomedical activities. Food Chem. Toxicol. 121, 8294. 10.1016/j.fct.2018.08.032

  • 25

    JuergensU. R. (2014). Anti-inflammatory properties of the monoterpene 18-cineole: current evidence for co-medication in inflammatory airway diseases. Drug Res. (Stuttg). 64, 638646. 10.1055/s-0034-1372609

  • 26

    KaewpromK.ChenY. H.LinC. F.ChiouM. T.LinC. N. (2017). Antiviral activity of Thymus vulgaris and Nepeta cataria hydrosols against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Thai J. Vet. Med.47, 2533.

  • 27

    KhanT.KhanM. A.MashwaniZ.urR.UllahN.NadhmanA. (2021). Therapeutic potential of medicinal plants against COVID-19: the role of antiviral medicinal metabolites. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol.31, 101890. 10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101890

  • 28

    KraujalisP.Rimantas VenskutonisP.RagazinskieneO. (2011). “Antioxidant activities and phenolic composition of extracts from nepeta plant species,” in Proceedings of the 6th Baltic Conference on Food Science and Technology.

  • 29

    LiuH.WangS.CaiB.YaoX. (2009). Anticancer activity of compounds isolated from Engelhardtia serrata Stem Bark. Pharm. Biol.42, 475477. 10.3109/13880200490889028

  • 30

    Lucas-AbellánC.Mercader-RosM. T.ZafrillaM. P.ForteaM. I.GabaldónJ. A.Núñez-DelicadoE. (2008). ORAC-fluorescein assay to determine the oxygen radical absorbance capacity of resveratrol complexed in cyclodextrins. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56, 22542259. 10.1021/jf0731088

  • 31

    MamadalievaN. Z.AkramovD. K.OvidiE.TiezziA.NaharL.AzimovaS. S.et al. (2017). Aromatic medicinal plants of the Lamiaceae family from Uzbekistan: ethnopharmacology, essential oils composition, and biological activities. Medicine4, 8. 10.3390/medicines4010008

  • 32

    McGintyD.LetiziaC. S.ApiA. M. (2010). Fragrance material review on phytol. Food Chem. Toxicol. 48, S59S63. 10.1016/j.fct.2009.11.012

  • 33

    MihaylovaD.PopovaA.DesevaI. N. (2013). In vitro antioxidant activity and phenolic composition of Nepeta cataria L. extracts. Int. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 1, 7479.

  • 34

    MirM. A.PariharK.TabasumU.KumariE.MirA.Amin MirM. (2016). Estimation of alkaloid, saponin and flavonoid, content in various extracts of Crocus sativa. J. Med. Plants Stud. 4, 171174.

  • 35

    MorombayeS. M.KangogoM.RevathiG.NyerereA.OchoraJ.MorombayeS. M.et al. (2018). Evaluation of the antimicrobial effect of Nepeta cataria and Basella alba against clinically resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Nairobi, Kenya. Adv. Microbiol. 8, 790803. 10.4236/aim.2018.810052

  • 36

    MukhtarH. M.SinghG. P. (2019). Pharmacognostic and phytochemical investigations of aerial parts of Nepeta cataria Linn. Asian J. Pharm. Pharmacol.5, 810815. 10.31024/ajpp.2019.5.4.23

  • 37

    NadeemA.AhmedB.ShahzadH.CrakerL. E.MunteanT. (2021). Verbascum Thapsus (Mullein) versatile polarity extracts: GC-MS analysis, phytochemical profiling, anti-bacterial potential and anti-oxidant activity. Res. Artic. Pharmacogn. J.13, 14881497. 10.5530/pj.2021.13.189

  • 38

    NaguibA. M. M.EbrahimM. E.AlyH. F.MetawaaH. M.MahmoudA. H.MahmoudE. A.et al. (2012). Phytochemical screening of Nepeta cataria extracts and their in vitro inhibitory effects on free radicals and carbohydrate-metabolising enzymes. Nat. Product Res.26, 21962198. 10.1080/14786419.2011.635342

  • 39

    NarimaniR.MoghaddamM.Ghasemi PirbaloutiA.MojarabS. (2017). Essential oil composition of seven populations belonging to two Nepeta species from Northwestern Iran. Int. J. Food Proper.20, 22722279. 10.1080/10942912.2017.1369104

  • 40

    ÖzkanK.KaradagA.SagdiçO. (2021). Determination of the in vitro bioaccessibility of phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of Juniper berry (Juniperus drupacea Labill.) pekmez. Turk. J. Agric. For. 45, 290300. 10.3906/tar-2009-2

  • 41

    PackialakshmiN.NaziyaS. (2014). Phytochemical and antimicrobial screening of the polar and non-polar solvent stem extract of Caralluma fimbriyata. Int. J. Pure Appl. Biosci. 2, 3237. 10.3126/ijasbt.v2i3.10796

  • 42

    PargaienA. V.BishtN.JoshiH.PargaienS.AdhikariM. (2020). Analysis of ethanomedicinally potential extract of Nepeta cataria. Eco. Env. Cons.26, 9095. Available online at: http://www.envirobiotechjournals.com/EEC/Vol26OctSuppl20/EEC-15.pdf

  • 43

    PrabhavathiR. M.PrasadM. P.JayaramuM. (2016). Studies on qualitative and quantitative phytochemical analysis of Cissus quadrangularis. Adv. Appl. Sci. Res. 7, 1117.

  • 44

    ReichertW.EjercitoJ.GudaT.DongX.WuQ.RayA.et al. (2019). Repellency assessment of Nepeta cataria essential oils and isolated nepetalactones on Aedes aegypti. Sci. Rep.9, 19. 10.1038/s41598-018-36814-1

  • 45

    ReichertW.VillaniT.PanM. H.HoC. T.SimonJ. E.WuQ. (2018). Phytochemical analysis and anti-inflammatory activity of Nepeta cataria accessions. J. Med. Active Plants7, 1927. 10.7275/1mca-ez51

  • 46

    RontaniJ. F.VolkmanJ. K. (2003). Phytol degradation products as biogeochemical tracers in aquatic environments. Org. Geochem. 34, 135. 10.1016/S0146-6380(02)00185-7

  • 47

    SalariaD.RoltaR.SharmaN.DevK.SourirajanA.KumarV. (2020). In silico and in vitro evaluation of the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant potential of Cymbopogon citratus from North-western Himalayas. bioRxiv 2020.05.31.124982. 10.1101/2020.05.31.124982

  • 48

    SarinR. V.BafnaP. A. (2012). Herbal antidiarrhoeals: a review. Int. J. Res Pharmacol. Biomed. Sci. 3, 637649.

  • 49

    ScottH. (2003). Catnip, Nepeta cataria, a morphological comparison of mutant and wild type specimens to gain an ethnobotanical perspective. Econ. Bot. 57, 135142. 10.1663/0013-0001(2003)057[0135:CNCAMC]2.0.CO;2

  • 50

    SharifH. B.MukhtarM. D.MustaphaY.LawalA. O. (2015). Preliminary investigation of bioactive compounds and bioautographic studies of whole plant extract of Euphorbia pulcherrima on Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhi, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Adv. Pharm. 2015, 14. 10.1155/2015/485469

  • 51

    SharmaA.CooperR.BhardwajG.CannooD. S. (2021). The genus Nepeta: traditional uses, phytochemicals and pharmacological properties. J. Ethnopharmacol. 268, 113679. 10.1016/j.jep.2020.113679

  • 52

    SharmaA.NayikG. A.CannooD. S. (2019). Pharmacology and Toxicology of Nepeta cataria (Catmint) Species of Genus Nepeta: A Review. Cham: Springer.

  • 53

    SuschkeU.SporerF.SchneeleJ.GeissH. K.ReichlingJ. (2007). Antibacterial and cytotoxic activity of Nepeta cataria L., N. cataria Var. Citriodora (Beck.) Balb. and Melissa officinalis L. essential oils. Nat. Prod.Commun.2, 12771286. 10.1177/1934578X0700201218

  • 54

    TanJ.LiJ.MaJ.QiaoF. (2019). Hepatoprotective effect of essential oils of Nepeta cataria L. On acetaminophen-induced liver dysfunction. Biosci. Rep. 39, BSR20190697. 10.1042/BSR20190697

  • 55

    VenugopalaK. N.RashmiV.OdhavB. (2013). Review on natural coumarin lead compounds for their pharmacological activity. Biomed Res. Int. 2013, 963248. 10.1155/2013/963248

  • 56

    YangF.ChenY.XueZ.LvY.ShenL.LiK.et al. (2020). High-throughput sequencing and exploration of the lncRNA-circRNA-miRNA-mRNA network in type 2 diabetes Mellitus. Biomed. Res. Int. 2020, 13. 10.1155/2020/8162524

Summary

Keywords

Nepeta cataria, gas chromatograph/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), antibacterial susceptibility testing (AST), antioxidants, phytochemicals

Citation

Nadeem A, Shahzad H, Ahmed B, Muntean T, Waseem M and Tabassum A (2022) Phytochemical profiling of antimicrobial and potential antioxidant plant: Nepeta cataria. Front. Plant Sci. 13:969316. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.969316

Received

12 July 2022

Accepted

24 August 2022

Published

26 September 2022

Volume

13 - 2022

Edited by

Sezai Ercisli, Atatürk University, Turkey

Reviewed by

Gülçe Ilhan, Atatürk University, Turkey; Mushtaq Ahmad, Quaid-i-Azam University, Pakistan

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Bashir Ahmed ;

This article was submitted to Plant Metabolism and Chemodiversity, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics