In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 1 as published. We erroneously inserted the description of each item. The corrected Table 1 appears below.
Table 1
| Code | M | Sd | S | K | Corr. item-total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morale (αtot = 0.85) | B1 | 2.99 | 0.683 | −0.499 | 0.636 | 0.560 |
| B3 | 2.97 | 0.702 | −0.436 | 0.331 | 0.754 | |
| B4 | 2.70 | 0.724 | −0.286 | −0.043 | 0.606 | |
| B5 | 2.78 | 0.786 | −0.331 | −0.205 | 0.731 | |
| B12 | 2.59 | 0.731 | −0.398 | −0.097 | 0.672 | |
| Appraisal and recognition | B6 | 2.40 | 0.854 | 0.064 | −0.627 | 0.500 |
| (αtot = 0.87) | B41 | 2.37 | 0.772 | −0.053 | −0.461 | 0.738 |
| B43 | 2.39 | 0.778 | −0.123 | −0.501 | 0.713 | |
| B44 | 2.37 | 0.852 | −0.004 | −0.675 | 0.674 | |
| B47 | 2.26 | 0.720 | 0.168 | −0.174 | 0.694 | |
| B49 | 2.54 | 0.759 | −0.230 | −0.301 | 0.681 | |
| Curriculum coordination | B7 | 2.75 | 0.773 | −0.357 | −0.114 | 0.640 |
| (αtot = 0.80) | B9 | 2.97 | 0.697 | −0.490 | 0.517 | 0.655 |
| B22 | 2.68 | 0.658 | −0.451 | 0.264 | 0.551 | |
| B39 | 3.10 | 0.642 | −0.317 | 0.267 | 0.553 | |
| Effective Discipline Policy | B2 | 2.86 | 0.648 | −0.416 | 0.606 | 0.460 |
| (αtot = 0.73) | B11 | 2.86 | 0.772 | −0.247 | −0.354 | 0.561 |
| B13 | 2.80 | 0.737 | −0.330 | −0.008 | 0.620 | |
| B56 | 2.98 | 0.742 | −0.455 | 0.093 | 0.432 | |
| Excessive work demands | B8 | 2.65 | 0.950 | −0.187 | −0.877 | 0.533 |
| (αtot = 0.76) | B14 | 3.07 | 0.769 | −0.353 | −0.603 | 0.635 |
| B17 | 2.62 | 0.883 | −0.162 | −0.675 | 0.449 | |
| B21 | 2.99 | 0.835 | −0.380 | −0.632 | 0.621 | |
| Goal Congruence | B15 | 3.01 | 0.652 | −0.450 | 0.752 | 0.590 |
| (αtot = 0.80) | B18 | 2.76 | 0.731 | −0.402 | 0.115 | 0.521 |
| B19 | 3.04 | 0.682 | −0.386 | 0.228 | 0.649 | |
| B20 | 2.90 | 0.662 | −0.302 | 0.287 | 0.672 | |
| B45 | 2.92 | 0.685 | −0.602 | 0.880 | 0.460 | |
| Professional Growth | B16 | 2.24 | 0.830 | 0.113 | −0.651 | 0.530 |
| (αtot = 0.75) | B23 | 2.57 | 0.837 | −0.043 | −0.569 | 0.569 |
| B25 | 2.31 | 0.965 | 0.108 | −1.00 | 0.398 | |
| B33 | 3.02 | 0.690 | −0.533 | 0.654 | 0.580 | |
| B42 | 2.61 | 0.830 | −0.175 | −0.494 | 0.568 | |
| Participant Decision Making | B27 | 2.34 | 0.779 | −0.021 | −0.496 | 0.505 |
| (αtot = 0.74) | B32 | 2.54 | 0.690 | −0.178 | −0.176 | 0.576 |
| B46 | 2.66 | 0.717 | −0.483 | 0.121 | 0.595 | |
| B51 | 2.81 | 0.788 | −0.438 | −0.057 | 0.488 | |
| Professional Interaction | B28 | 2.71 | 0.724 | −0.279 | −0.051 | 0.592 |
| (αtot = 0.85) | B29 | 3.25 | 0.709 | −0.744 | 0.495 | 0.674 |
| B31 | 2.94 | 0.711 | −0.292 | −0.070 | 0.587 | |
| B36 | 2.78 | 0.637 | −0.250 | 0.191 | 0.550 | |
| B50 | 3.23 | 0.722 | −0.772 | 0.611 | 0.585 | |
| B53 | 3.35 | 0.671 | −0.860 | 0.824 | 0.657 | |
| B55 | 3.14 | 0.618 | −0.224 | 0.090 | 0.576 | |
| Role Clarity | B48 | 2.67 | 0.814 | −0.325 | −0.322 | 0.288 |
| (αtot = 0.63) | B52 | 3.58 | 0.565 | −0.954 | −0.095 | 0.477 |
| B54 | 3.23 | 0.612 | −0.376 | 0.415 | 0.478 | |
| B57 | 3.02 | 0.641 | −0.367 | 0.592 | 0.471 | |
| Student Orientation | B24 | 3.14 | 0.588 | −0.261 | 0.742 | 0.524 |
| (αtot = 0.70) | B26 | 3.29 | 0.609 | −0.314 | −0.261 | 0.473 |
| B35 | 2.99 | 0.774 | −0.689 | 0.478 | 0.418 | |
| B38 | 3.17 | 0.649 | −0.403 | 0.265 | 0.581 | |
| Supportive Leadership | B10 | 2.95 | 0.824 | −0.483 | −0.261 | 0.729 |
| (αtot = 0.91) | B30 | 2.81 | 0.836 | −0.454 | −0.238 | 0.852 |
| B34 | 2.93 | 0.816 | −0.543 | −0.058 | 0.831 | |
| B37 | 2.83 | 0.710 | −0.336 | 0.119 | 0.790 | |
| B40 | 2.69 | 0.875 | −0.391 | −0.475 | 0.739 |
Items distribution: descriptive, and reliability analysis by subdimension.
Furthermore, in the original article, there was an error. We neglected to include a copyright clause regarding the “School Organizational Health Questionnaire”, around which this article was based on.
A correction has been made to the Data Availability statement:
“The School Organizational Health Questionnaire is subject to copyright and cannot be used without the permission of Insight SRC Pty Ltd (info@insightsrc.com.au).”
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Summary
Keywords
school climate, teachers' morale, teachers' wellbeing, confirmatory factor analysis, adaptation, validation
Citation
Converso D, Cortini M, Guidetti G, Molinengo G, Sottimano I, Viotti S and Loera B (2019) Corrigendum: Organizational Climate and Teachers’ Morale: Developing a Specific Tool for the School Context – A Research Project in Italy. Front. Psychol. 10:2464. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02464
Received
16 October 2019
Accepted
17 October 2019
Published
01 November 2019
Approved by
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Volume
10 - 2019
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Converso, Cortini, Guidetti, Molinengo, Sottimano, Viotti and Loera.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Gloria Guidetti gloria.guidetti@unito.it
This article was submitted to Organizational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.