Abstract
This review summarizes the research on physiological responses to flooding of trees in the seasonal black-water wetland of the Mapire River in Venezuela. Inter-annual variability was found during 8 years of sampling, in spite of which a general picture emerged of increased stomatal conductance (gs) and photosynthetic rate (PN) during the flooded period to values as high as or higher than in plants in drained wet soil. Models explaining the initial inhibitory responses and the acclimation to flooding are proposed. In the inhibitory phase of flooding, hypoxia generated by flooding causes a decrease in root water absorption and stomatal closure. An increase with flooding in xylem water potential (ψ) suggests that flooding does not cause water deficit. The PN decreases due to changes in relative stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to photosynthesis; an increase in the latter is due to reduced chlorophyll and total soluble protein content. Total non-structural carbohydrates (TNC) accumulate in leaves but their content begins to decrease during the acclimatized phase at full flooding, coinciding with the resumption of high gs and PN. The reversal of the diminution in gs is associated, in some but not all species, to the growth of adventitious roots. The occurrence of morpho-anatomical and biochemical adaptations which improve oxygen supply would cause the acclimation, including increased water absorption by the roots, increased rubisco and chlorophyll contents and ultimately increased PN. Therefore, trees would perform as if flooding did not signify a stress to their physiology.
Introduction
Flooding brings about a number of changes to the soil environment, including among others reduction in oxygen concentration (Kozlowski, ), generation of reduced ions and, additionally, diminution of irradiance incident on leaves. Flood tolerance depends on the depth of the water column, the duration of the flooded period and specific plant traits (Colmer and Voesenek, ). Partial or total oxygen deficiency in the roots of higher plants causes morphological, anatomical and biochemical changes, and anoxia-tolerance seems to be strictly organ-specific (Drew, ); such changes allow plants of tolerant species to revert to normoxic condition as flooding progresses (Pezeshki, ).
A large number of articles have been published on physiological responses to waterlogging/flooding in temperate tolerant plants, both herbs and trees, as well as the tropical herb, rice, but less is known about the physiological, let alone biochemical or molecular, responses of tropical species, especially trees. I here review the existing literature on tropical tolerant trees, while comparing these with temperate tolerant and intolerant species.
Flood tolerance varies greatly with, among other factors, plant species and age, and time and duration of flooding (Kozlowski, ). A reduction in gs and PN are the earliest response to flooding observed in intolerant as well as tolerant species (Pezeshki, ; Batzli and Dawson, ; Fernández et al., ). In tropical flood-tolerant trees, reductions in PN and gs are reverted later on as flooding progresses (Fernández et al., ; Rengifo et al., ), as shown previously in temperate flood-tolerant trees (Pezeshki, ).
One of the main reasons why hypoxia due to flooding reduces gs is decreased root water absorption (Kozlowski, ; Tournaire-Roux et al., 2003) through reductions in root hydraulic conductivity (Aroca et al., ). The decrease in PN observed in flood-tolerant herbaceous and tree species is apparently governed not only by stomatal but also by non-stomatal (mesophyll) factors (Pezeshki, , ).
In riparian Panamazonian forests, trees can suffer regular, long-lasting and deep flooding, when white-water rivers such as the Orinoco or black-water rivers such as the Rio Negro overflow, thus creating floodplain ecosystems called in the first case várzea and in the second, igapó (Prance, ). These ecosystems differ, among other traits, in quality of the waters; várzeas have nutrient-rich, turbid and higher pH waters, whereas in the igapós waters are very nutrient-poor, transparent and acidic. These characteristics are bound to affect plant physiology and growth differently. Amazonian wetlands cover over 1,000,000 km2 (Melack et al., ), more than three times the area of the British Isles; therefore, knowing how tropical plants cope with flooding becomes of global importance.
Flood tolerance has been extensively examined in herbaceous or small floating and submerged angiosperms (revised by Colmer and Voesenek, ). Here, I will be dealing with large trees, which will surely make a difference because of resistances encountered by long-distance transport of O2 and the slow diffusion of this gas in water. In tropical wetlands, the water-column may be as high as 10–15 m and the flood period last up to 7 months (Vegas-Vilarrúbia and Herrera, 1993a; Parolin et al., ).
This review summarizes the results of research on physiological responses to flooding of trees in the seasonal igapó of the Mapire River. This igapó is formed when the black-water Mapire River, a northern tributary of the Orinoco, increases its flow due to rainfall and is additionally dammed by the Orinoco. Four broad phases can be defined in the flood cycle (Figure 1A): drainage (D, December–March), rising-waters (RW, April–May), full flood (FF, June–August), and falling-waters (FW, September–November). The igapó lake covers trees at various heights depending on tree size and position along a gradient from the savanna to the river channel (Figure 1B). The species that have been examined along this gradient are Acosmium nitens (Papilionaceae), Campsiandra laurifolia (Mimosaceae), Eschweilera tenuifolia (Lecythidaceae), Pouteria orinocoensis (Sapotaceae), Symmeria paniculata (Polygonaceae), and Psidium ovatifolium (Myrtaceae). The aspect of this ecosystem at drainage and full flood is shown in Figure 2. All species in the Mapire igapó are evergreen. Several, such as C. laurifolia, S. paniculata, and P. ovatifolium, retain leaves underwater.
Figure 1
Figure 2

The Mapire igapó forest during (A) drainage and (B) under full flood.
Similar plant responses have been repeatedly observed during the various stages of the flood cycle. I will focus this review on results obtained in the field by Fernández et al. (
Figure 3

Seasonal changes in photosynthetic rate (green) and stomatal conductance (gray) of the species indicated. Values are mean ± SE of measurements were made during 1995, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2003, 2004, and 2005. Different letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. Modified from Fernández et al. (
Figure 4

Possible mechanisms of inhibition and acclimation of photosynthesis by flooding. Blue, water; brown, soil; orange, roots and stems; green, leaf; yellow, undetermined.
I will present evidence in favor or against the proposed models. Results on water status, leaf gas exchange and Total non-structural carbohydrates (TNC) are shown in Table 1 and will be discussed where pertinent. The following issues will be examined: (1) Just how low does oxygen concentration become and how does it affect root water absorption and water status? (2) Are reductions in gs and PN under flooding reversible? (3) Does flooding cause photoinhibition? (4) Are changes in PN under flooding caused by changes in stomatal and non-stomatal limitations? (5) How does leaf carbohydrate balance change during flooding?
Table 1
| Species | Season | ψ | ψs | Fv/Fm | Chl | PN | gs | TNC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (MPa) | (μg cm−2) | (μ mol m−2 s−1) | (mmol m−2 s−1) | (g hexose m−2) | ||||
| A. nitens | D | −4.27 | −4.13 | 0.79 | 28.9 | 8.1 | 207 | 9.4 |
| FF | −0.22 | −3.50 | 0.79 | 22.6 | 12.3 | 399 | 14.4 | |
| E. tenuifolia | D | −1.53 | −1.66 | 0.83 | 25.6 | 7.6 | 153 | 9.8 |
| FF | −0.18 | −1.10 | 0.79 | 23.0 | 4.2 | 196 | 22.1 | |
| C. laurifolia | D | −1.07 | −1.33 | 0.82 | 36.0 | 12.4 | 276 | 6.2 |
| FF | −0.47 | −1.87 | 0.82 | 19.1 | 16.0 | 671 | 13.7 | |
| S. paniculata | D | −1.70 | −2.02 | 0.81 | 34.0 | 15.3 | 1161 | 7.7 |
| FF | −0.28 | −1.43 | 0.79 | 23.7 | 5.2 | 98 | 27.5 | |
| P. ovatifolium | D | −2.10 | −2.53 | 0.84 | 24.0 | 13.3 | 269 | 15.4 |
| FF | −0.30 | −1.50 | 0.80 | 22.2 | 5.7 | 109 | 26.6 | |
Changes from drainage (D) to full-flooding (FF) in morning leaf water ( ψ) and osmotic ( ψs) potential, maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm), total chlorophyll content (Chl), photosynthetic rate (PN), stomatal conductance (gs), and total non-structural carbohydrate contents (TNC) as hexose equivalents of the species indicated.
Values are mean. Modified from Rengifo et al. (
The significance of under-water photosynthesis for whole-plant C balance and the possible changes under flooding in leaf anatomy will be examined, and some eco-physiological and ecological considerations made.
Models of physiological responses to the inhibitory and the acclimatized phases of flooding
Flooding at the inhibitory phase (RW) causes hypoxia, probably not anoxia. Hypoxia generates changes in hormone balance that cause stomatal closure and a decrease in absorption of water by roots, which may also promote stomatal closure. This brings about a decrease in intercellular CO2 concentration, Ci and PN. The decrease in gs and PN under high radiation and air evaporative demand could induce chronic photoinhibition. The decrease with flooding in soil N and absorption capacity of the roots creates a deficiency of N and possibly other nutrients, thus reducing the content and/or activity of rubisco, decreasing PN, increasing relative non-stomatal limitation to photosynthesis (LNS) and decreasing relative stomatal limitation (LS) [for definitions see Herrera et al. (
During the acclimatized phase, the appearance under full flood of morpho-anatomical adaptations which improve oxygen supply would cause the acclimation. These structures would result in a situation of normoxia for the tree and cause stomatal opening and increased N and water absorption by the roots because of synthesis of new aquaporins. The increase in N uptake would cause an increase in rubisco and chlorophyll contents, and PN. Increased root water absorption would promote stomatal opening. This would also lead to increased PN. In the process of acclimation of PN to full flood, LNS decreases and LS increases. The role of hormones in this acclimation is presumed but no evidence for it is available. After acclimation, the tree would perform as if flooding did not signify a stress to its physiology, growth or reproduction.
Oxygen concentration under flooding and its effects on root water absorption and water status
Oxygen concentration in the water of the Mapire igapó decreases with flooding from 5 mg L−1 (300 μM) at the surface of the lake to 2 mg L−1 (120 μM) at a depth of 15 m (details in Herrera et al.,
Since O2 diffuses very slowly in water, the question remains: how much of that 120 μM O2 reaches root cells? The occurrence of anaerobic root respiration has been well documented in intolerant as well as tolerant species (Crawford,
Changes in O2 concentration from RW to FF should not totally compromise aerobic respiration; nevertheless, a 60% decrease in O2 concentration could certainly be reflected in whole-plant and leaf performance, as seems to happen. This marked decrease in O2 concentration would be alleviated after a short period under flooding by the production of new morpho-anatomical structures and the operation of physiological and biochemical processes, such as pressurized gas transport and aquaporin synthesis.
In an ingenuous approach to the issue of aquaporin influence on root water absorption, McElrone et al. (
The improvement of oxygen transport to the roots by pressurized gas transport, experimentally demonstrated in some temperate tree species (Grosse et al.,
In intolerant species, the initial reduction under flooding in gs is accompanied by decreased ψ and leaf water status (Crawford,
The ABA content of leaves and xylem sap extracted under positive pressure increased from D to RW and FF in C. laurifolia and P. orinocoensis, together with the known decrease in gs, suggesting a positive relationship between ABA and stomatal closure. In fact, the regression between ABA and gs was linear with r2 = 0.98 (Rengifo et al.,
Trees under flood in the igapó showed values of leaf osmotic potential (ψs) consistently lower than those of ψ (Table 1), suggesting the occurrence of osmotic adjustment (Rengifo et al.,
When it is due to water transport from the roots to the atmosphere and not to replenishment of reservoirs, xylem sap flux may indicate the ability of roots to absorb water. In trees of C. laurifolia, sap flux changed seasonally; relative to the highest values measured during drainage in November, sap flux was 47% at the dry season, decreasing to 25% at rising-waters and resuming 49% under full flood [calculated from Herrera et al. (
Since at RW dawn ψ remained high, it became apparent that the initial stages of flooding imposed a restriction to sap flux unrelated to water deficit. The decrease at RW in highest daytime sap flux was due to reduced leaf-specific hydraulic conductivity, whereas the recovery of daytime sap flux observed 1.5 months later was correlated to an increase in leaf-specific hydraulic conductivity, and attributed to acclimation.
The decrease with flooding in root hydraulic conductivity has been documented and attributed to cytoplasmic acidification due to increased CO2 concentration and inhibition of aquaporin activity (Aroca et al.,
A substantial night-time flux accompanied by nocturnal stomatal aperture was found in C. laurifolia under FF (Herrera et al.,
Stomatal closure and reduction in PN under flooding are reversible
In three out of four tropical tree species that grow on drained soils in drylands, experimentally subjected to waterlogging (Lopez and Kursar,
In Table 2, values of maximum PN of evergreen trees in a Brazilian várzea and the Mapire igapó are compared during the drained and flooded periods. None of the várzea species showed changes with flooding, whereas in the igapó PN increased in all the species. The observation that although igapó waters are poorer and more acidic than várzea waters, average maximum PN at FF was similar between wetlands merits further comparative research.
Table 2
| Species | Wetland | PN(μmol m−2 s−1) | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D | FF | |||
| Pouteria glomerata | várzea | 10.0 ± 1.3 | 10.4 ± 2.0 | Parolin et al. ( |
| Pouteria glomerata | várzea | 12.0 | 12.2 | Armbrüster et al. ( |
| Cecropia latiloba | várzea | 16.8 ± 1.5 | 15.0 ± 4.6 | Parolin ( |
| Senna reticulata | várzea | 20.0 ± 4.0 | 18.4 ± 4.3 | |
| Nectandra amazonum | várzea | 9.3 ± 2.4 | 7.6 ± 3.1 | |
| All | 13.6 | 12.7 | ||
| Acosmium nitens | igapó | 8.7 ± 0.9 | 11.6 ± 0.7 | |
| Eschweilera tenuifolia | igapó | 6.3 ± 0.7 | 8.6 ± 1.3 | |
| Campsiandra laurifolia | igapó | 8.0 ± 1.2 | 13.6 ± 0.5 | |
| Symmeria paniculata | igapó | 4.3 ± 0.8 | 10.0 ± 0.9 | |
| Psidium ovatifolium | igapó | 3.7 ± 0.4 | 10.0 ± 0.9 | |
| All | 6.2 | 10.8 | ||
Maximum values of photosynthetic rate in evergreen trees growing in a várzea and an igapó during drainage (D) and flooding (FF).
Values are mean ± SE for species and mean for each wetland (in bold). Data for the igapó are means of value reported by Fernández et al. (
The reversal of diminished gs to values under drainage was associated in C. laurifolia and S. paniculata to the growth of adventitious roots (Figure 5). The occurrence with flooding of adventitious roots and hypertrophied lenticels has been reported in trees of several species in the central Amazonian floodplains (Parolin,
Figure 5

Adventitious roots observed in October at falling-waters in trees of: (A) Campsiandra laurifolia and (B) Symmeria paniculata. Note in (B) the mud deposits on leaves from previous flood.
Flooding and photoinhibition
Despite decreased gs and PN and high radiation and air temperature, emerged leaves of tolerant trees do not become photoinhibited during RW, when decreased PN is often observed. Values of maximum quantum yield of PSII, Fv/Fm (Table 1), were always higher than 0.70, the threshold proposed by Bolhàr-Nordenkampf and Öquist (
In the Mapire igapó, most leaves of plants of S. paniculata and P. ovatifolium under FF for approximately 6 months may become photoinhibited because the entire tree is covered with a 15-m-high water column. This, together with a reduction of 50% in radiation at a depth of 60 cm in June (Fernández et al.,
Reversible reduction in PN under flooding is associated to changes in stomatal and non-stomatal limitations
It has not been systematically examined whether in flood-tolerant trees PN decreases under flood due to decreased gs only. In flooded plants of the tropical species Genipa americana, photosynthesis was co-limited by stomatal and non-stomatal factors (Mielke et al.,
In order to determine whether in species of the Mapire igapó PN is reduced due to changes in LS and LNS, response curves of PN to Ci were done (Figure 6). Photosynthetic capacity was affected by flooding, as indicated by variations in CO2-saturated PN (Figures 6, 7). The LS (the difference in CO2-saturated PN and PN at ambient CO2 concentration divided by the former) decreased, whereas LNS (CO2-saturated PN at a given time divided by the maximum CO2-saturated PN) increased relative to drainage (Figure 7). The increase in LNS was related to a decrease in total soluble protein (TSP), an indirect measure of rubisco content, and chlorophyll content (Figure 7). Nevertheless, it was previously reported that rubisco content was similar in emerged and submerged leaves of P. ovatifolium and higher in submerged than emerged leaves of S. paniculata (Fernández et al.,
Figure 6

Response curves of photosynthetic rate to intercellular [CO2] in the species indicated during drainage (black), rising-waters (blue), flooding by 2-m water column (green), and full flood by 5-m water-column (red). Modified from Herrera et al. (
Figure 7

Seasonal changes in CO2-saturated photosynthetic rate (green), stomatal conductance at ambient CO2 concentration (gray), relative stomatal (yellow) and non-stomatal (dark green) limitations of photosynthesis, chlorophyll (purple), and total soluble protein (cyan) content of the species indicated. D, drainage; RW, rising-waters; FF-Jul, full flood in July; and FF-Oct, full flood in October. Modified from Herrera et al. (
Soil NO−3 content in the Mapire igapó decreases markedly during the flooded period, whereas NH+4 content progressively increases until drainage (Barrios and Herrera,
An increase with flood in LNS in legumes would not necessarily involve a decrease in rubisco content due to low N supply, since legumes do not depend on NO−3 availability for protein synthesis. Instead, the increase in LNS and decrease in TSP of legumes of the Mapire igapó could be due to low availability/absorption of other nutrients, extremely low O2 concentration in the nodules or toxicity caused by reduced ions. Uptake of NO−3 and NH+4 by saplings of Fagus sylvatica (flood-intolerant) was severely inhibited by waterlogging, whereas in Populus tremula × P. alba (flood-tolerant) absorption of both N forms was unaffected (Kreuzwieser et al.,
Leaf N content of species in the Mapire igapó (Rosales,
Leaf carbohydrate balance changes during flooding
Information on changes in TNC content of flood-tolerant species is scant. In seedlings of the várzea species Himatanthus sucuuba experimentally subjected to submergence in the dark, root starch content diminished while alcoholic dehydrogenase activity remained relatively constant after an initial increase (Ferreira et al.,
Leaves of all the trees studied in the Mapire igapó accumulated TNC under flooding (Table 1) but this accumulation was not always related to a higher PN. Similarly, flooded seedlings of the temperate tolerant species L. laricina showed a marked increase in shoot starch after 27 days of flooding, as opposed to seedlings of the intolerant species Picea mariana (Islam and Macdonald,
Significance of under-water photosynthesis for whole-plant C balance
In the Mapire igapó, some of the tree species maintain live leaves submerged for as long as 6 months. Submerged leaves brought to the air showed values of PN similar to emerged leaves (Figure 8), indicating that leaves may be photosynthetically active under water.
Figure 8

Seasonal changes in photosynthetic rate of emerged and submerged leaves of the species indicated. Green circles, emerged leaves; blue circles, submerged leaves. The blue indicates the duration of the flood period. Modified from Herrera et al. (
The significance for whole-tree physiology of underwater photosynthesis has not been examined yet; the energy-costly process of maintaining live leaves under water may be compensated by continued O2 supply to the roots produced by the photosynthetic activity of these submerged leaves. Significant daily oscillations in TNC content of submerged leaves of P. ovatifolium and C. laurifolia that were 53 and 131% of those in aerial leaves, respectively (Fernández et al.,
The occurrence of radial oxygen loss in submerged plants has been interpreted as evidence of photosynthetic O2 production and transport to roots (Armstrong et al.,
Indirect evidence of the occurrence of underwater photosynthesis is contradicted by the finding in seedlings of P. orinocoensis that O2 consumption by submerged leaves measured with an O2 electrode became almost zero after 12 days and remained so for 45 days, while emerged leaves, although continually reducing PN and gs during 45 days of treatment, had values of PN after 12 days of 70% the value at the beginning of flooding (Fernández,
The case of S. paniculata and P. ovatifolium is particularly interesting, because plants of these species are covered by water earlier and remain submerged longer than other species in the igapó forest. Most of the foliage of these plants remains under water at 25% of incident radiation, yet is fully functional as soon was waters fall (Fernández et al.,
Leaf anatomy remains unchanged under flooding
In many tolerant was well as intolerant species, flooding leads to a programmed destruction of cells in the leaves as well as stems that ends in the formation of aerenchyma, in a process designed to improve aeration of organs. In the Mapire igapó, as observed in tolerant trees of the Solimões River igapó (Waldhoff and Furch, 2002; Waldhoff, 2009), leaf anatomy remained practically unchanged regardless of phase of the flood cycle (Herrera et al.,
Figure 9

Cross-sections of emerged leaves of the species indicated produced during drainage and after full flooding. The sections were stained with toluidine blue. Modified from Herrera et al. (
A xeromorphic leaf anatomy, such as described for drought-tolerant trees (Roth and Lindorf,
Leaves collected in the Mapire igapó at FW from trees on drained soil and trees under flooding had few differences in proportional tissue thickness, the sole significant ones being a reduction in whole-leaf thickness of E. tenuifolia, P. orinocoensis, and S. paniculata and a change in relative thickness of parenchymata in E. tenuifolia (Herrera et al.,
Specific leaf area (SLA = area/mass) decreased with flooding, being higher in young than mature leaves and similar in mature emerged and submerged leaves (Herrera et al.,
Eco-physiological and ecological considerations
The occurrence in all the species of the Mapire igapó examined of values of gs and PN as high under D as under FF suggests that even though these species are indeed tolerant to flooding, they thrive under drainage as long as the soil is wet. This is supported by the finding that in C. laurifolia, A. nitens, P. orinocoensis, and P. ovatifolium, a strong relationship between the formation of new wood rings and the fluctuation of the river level during the non-flooded months suggested that an increase in the river water level during drainage promoted growth probably because of better access to ground water (Dezzeo et al.,
Flooding is frequently considered a generalized stress (e.g., Jackson and Colmer,
Of the 85 species identified in the Mapire igapó, 85% flowered and 73% set fruit during the flooded period, mostly during August-September (Figure 10). Detailed time-series of leaf production and reproduction in conspecific trees growing under flood and in dry lands would be welcome when dealing with flood tolerance. Together with high PN values and maintenance of leaf area, the reproductive phenological behavior seems to indicate that flooding increases fitness through its two components, survival and fecundity. This supports the idea that flooding, far from constituting a stress to these wetland plants, is a natural and necessary part of the suite of environmental variables that make their presence in this ecosystem possible.
Figure 10

Frequency distribution of flower (yellow) and fruit (brown) production in trees of the Mapire igapó. The blue bar on the ordinate indicates the length of the flood period. Modified from Rosales (
Concluding remarks and future perspectives
Thus far, a wealth of information is available on the responses to flood of leaf gas exchange and leaf and whole-plant water status but we know very little about mechanisms underlying such responses. The following is important to solve this issue:
In order to gain knowledge on plant tolerance to hypoxia/anoxia in tropical tolerant trees, the morpho-anatomical, biochemical and molecular characteristics of roots must be literally unearthed. De novo synthesis of root aquaporins and the occurrence of pressurized O2 transport could help explain acclimation to flooding. Difficulty in accessing the root system of large trees has hindered progress in this area and data from more feasible experiments with seedlings may not necessarily be extrapolated to adult trees.
Examination of the hormonal balance of these trees under flooding seems imperative; preliminary data on leaf and xylem ABA contents point in the direction of promising research.
Long-term phenological observations under continually drained conditions should help elucidate whether these species are dependent on flooding for the completion of their life cycle.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Statements
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
ArmbrüsterN.MüllerE.ParolinP. (2004). Contrasting responses of two amazonian floodplain trees to hydrological changes. Ecotropica10, 73–84.
2
ArmstrongJ.JonesR. E.ArmstrongW. (2006). Rhizome phyllosphere oxygenation in Phragmites and other species in relation to redox potential, convective gas flow, submergence and aeration pathways. New Phytol. 172, 719–731. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01878.x
3
ArmstrongW.WebbT.DarwentM.BeckettP. M. (2009). Measuring and interpreting respiratory critical oxygen pressures in roots. Ann. Bot. 103, 281–293. 10.1093/aob/mcn177
4
ArocaR.PorcelR.Ruiz-LozanoJ. M. (2011). Regulation of root water uptake under abiotic stress conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 43–57. 10.1093/jxb/err266
5
Bailey-SerresJ.VoesenekL. A. C. J. (2008). Flooding stress: acclimations and genetic diversity. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 313–339. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092752
6
BarriosE.HerreraR. (1994). Nitrogen cycling in a Venezuelan tropical seasonally flooded forest: soil nitrogen mineralization and nitrification. J. Trop. Ecol. 10, 399–416.
7
BatzliJ. M.DawsonJ. O. (1997). Physiological and morphological responses of red alder and sitka alder to flooding. Physiol. Plant. 99, 653–663.
8
Bolhàr-NordenkampfH. R.ÖquistG. (1993). Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool in photosynthesis research, in Photosynthesis and Production in a Changing Environment, eds HallD. O.ScurlockJ. M. O.Bolhàr-NordenkampfH. R.LeegoodR. C.LongS. P. (London: Chapman and Hall), 193–206.
9
ColmerT. D.VoesenekL. A. C. J. (2009). Flooding tolerance: suites of plant traits in variable environments. Funct. Plant Biol. 36, 665–681.
10
CrawfordM. M. (1992). Oxygen availability as an ecological limit to plant distribution. Adv. Ecol. Res. 23, 93–185.
11
CrawfordR. M. M. (1982). Physiological responses to flooding, in Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, eds PirsonA.ZimmermannM. H. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 453–477.
12
DezzeoN.WorbesM.IshiiI.HerreraR. (2003). Annual tree rings revealed by radiocarbon dating in seasonally flooded forest of the Mapire River, a tributary of the lower Orinoco River, Venezuela. Plant Ecol. 168, 165–175.
13
DrewM. C. (1997). Oxygen deficiency and root metabolism: injury and acclimation under hypoxia and anoxia. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48, 223–250. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.223
14
ElseM. A.DaviesW. J.MaloneM.JacksonM. B. (1995). A negative hydraulic message from oxygen-deficient roots of tomato plants?Plant Physiol. 109, 1017–1024. 10.1104/pp.109.3.1017
15
ElseM. A.JanowiakF.AtkinsonC. J.JacksonM. B. (2009). Root signals and stomatal closure in relation to photosynthesis, chlorophyll a fluorescence and adventitious rooting of flooded tomato plants. Ann. Bot. 103, 359–376. 10.1093/aob/mcn208
16
FernándezM. D. (2006). Changes in photosynthesis and fluorescence in response to flooding in emerged and submerged leaves of Pouteria orinocoensis. Photosynthetica44, 32–38.
17
FernándezM. D.PietersA.DonosoC.HerreraC.TezaraW.RengifoE.et al. (1999). Seasonal changes in photosynthesis of trees in the flooded forest of the Mapire river. Tree Physiol. 19, 79–85. 10.1093/treephys/19.2.79
18
FerreiraC. S.PiedadeM. T. F.FrancoA. C.Carvalho GoncalvesJ. F.JunkW. F. (2009). Adaptive strategies to tolerate prolonged flooding in seedlings of floodplain and upland populations of Himatanthus sucuuba, a Central Amazon tree. Aquat. Bot. 90, 246–252.
19
García-SánchezF.SyvertsenJ. P.GimenoV.BotíaP.Perez-PerezJ. G. (2007). Response to flooding and drought stress by two citrus rootstock seedlings with different water-use efficiency. Physiol. Plant. 130, 532–542.
20
GeigenbergerP. (2003). Response of plant metabolism to too little oxygen. Environ. Pollut. 116, 31–35.
21
GraffmannK.GrosseW.JunkW. J.ParolinP. (2005). Pressurized gas transport in Amazonian floodplain trees. Biotropica37, 609–619.
22
GrosseW.FryeJ.LattermannS. (1992). Root aeration in wetland trees by pressurized gas transport. Tree Physiol. 10, 285–295. 10.1093/treephys/10.3.285
23
HerreraA.EscalaM.RengifoE. (2009). Leaf anatomy changes related to physiological adaptations to flooding in Amazonian tree species. Brazil. J. Plant Physiol. 21, 301–308.
24
HerreraA.RengifoE.TezaraW. (2001). Leaf gas exchange of trees in a tropical seasonally flooded forest, in The Tree 2000, ed LabrecqueM. (Montreal, QC: Isabelle Quentin), 257–262.
25
HerreraA.TezaraW.RengifoE.FloresS. (2008a). Changes with seasonal flooding in sap flow of the tropical flood-tolerant tree species, Campsiandra laurifolia. Trees22, 551–558.
26
HerreraA.TezaraW.MarínO.RengifoE. (2008b). Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations of photosynthesis in trees of a tropical seasonally flooded forest. Physiol. Plant. 134, 41–48. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01099.x
27
IslamM. A.MacdonaldS. E. (2004). Ecophysiological adaptations of black spruce (Picea mariana) and tamarack (Larix laricina) seedlings to flood. Trees18, 35–42.
28
IzquierdoL. (1988). Efecto de la Inundación Sobre la Actividad Metabólica en Raíces de una Especie Arbórea, Acosmium nitens (Vog.) Yakoul (Papilonaceae) de áreas Estacionalmente Inundables. Licenciado thesis, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas.
29
JacksonM. (1997). Hormones from roots as signals for the shoots of stressed plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2, 22–28.
30
JacksonM. B.ColmerT. D. (2005). Response and adaptation by plants to flooding stress. Ann. Bot. 96, 501–505. 10.1093/aob/mci205
31
JamesE. K.CrawfordR. M. M. (1998). Effect of oxygen availability on nitrogen fixation by two Lotus species under flooded conditions. J. Exp. Bot. 49, 599–609.
32
JolyC. A.CrawfordR. M. M. (1982). Variation in tolerance and metabolic responses to flooding in some tropical trees. J. Exp. Bot. 33, 799–809.
33
KonnerupD.SorrellB. K.BrixH. (2011). Do tropical wetland plants possess convective gas flow mechanisms?New Phytol. 190, 379–386. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03585.x
34
KozlowskiT. T. (1984). Plant responses to flooding of soil. BioScience34, 162–167.
35
KozlowskiT. T. (1997). Responses of woody plants to flooding and salinity. Tree Physiol. Monogr. 1, 1–29.
36
KreuzwieserJ.FurnissS.RennenbergH. (2002). Impact of waterlogging on the N-metabolism of flood tolerant and non-tolerant tree species. Plant Cell Environ. 25, 1039–1049.
37
KreuzwieserJ.PapadopoulouE.RennenbergH. (2004). Interaction of flooding with carbon metabolism of forest trees. Plant Biol. 6, 299–306. 10.1055/s-2004-817882
38
LopezO. R.KursarT. A. (1999). Flood tolerance of four tropical tree species. Tree Physiol. 19, 925–932. 10.1093/treephys/19.14.925
39
McElroneA. J.BichlerJ.PockmanW. T.AddingtonR. N.LinderC. R.JacksonR. B. (2007). Aquaporin-mediated changes in hydraulic conductivity of deep tree roots accessed via caves. Plant Cell Environ. 30, 1411–1421. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01714.x
40
MelackJ. M.HessL. L.GastilM.ForsbergB. R.HamiltonS. K. I.LimaB. T.et al. (2004). Regionalization of methane emissions in the Amazon Basin with microwave remote sensing. Glob. Change Biol. 10, 530–544.
41
MielkeM. S.de AlmeidaA.-A. F.GomesF. P.AguilarM. A. G.MangabeiraP. A. O. (2003). Leaf gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and growth responses of Genipa americana seedlings to soil flooding. Environ. Exp. Bot. 50, 221–231.
42
MommerL.PonsT.Wolters-ArtsM.VenemaJ.VisserE. (2005). Submergence-induced morphological, anatomical, and biochemical responses in a terrestrial species affect gas diffusion resistance and photosynthetic performance. Plant Physiol. 139, 497–508. 10.1104/pp.105.064725
43
OtteM. L. (2001). What is stress to a wetland plant?Environ. Exp. Bot. 46, 195–202.
44
ParolinP. (2000). Phenology and CO2-assimilation of trees in Central Amazonian floodplains. J. Trop. Ecol. 16, 465–473.
45
ParolinP. (2001). Morphological and physiological adjustments to waterlogging and drought in seedlings of Amazonian floodplain trees. Oecologia128, 326–335.
46
ParolinP.ArmbrüsterN.JunkW. J. (2002). Seasonal changes of leaf nitrogen content in trees of amazonian floodplains. Acta Amazon. 32, 123–132.
47
ParolinP.ArmbrüsterN.JunkW. J. (2006). Two Amazonian flooplain trees react differently to periodical flooding. Trop. Ecol. 47, 243–250.
48
ParolinP.WittmannF. (2010). Struggle in the flood: tree responses to flooding stress in four tropical floodplain systems. AoB Plants2010:plq003. 10.1093/aobpla/plq003
49
PerataP.ArmstrongW.VoesenekL. A. C. J. (2011). Plants and flooding stress. New Phytol. 190, 269–273. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03702.x
50
PezeshkiS. R. (1987). Gas exchange response of tupelo-gum (Nissa aquatica L.) to flooding and salinity. Photosynthetica21, 489–493.
51
PezeshkiS. R. (1993). Differences in patterns of photosynthetic responses to hypoxia in flood-tolerant and flood-sensitive tree species. Photosyntetica28, 423–430.
52
PranceG. T. (1979). Notes on the vegetation of Amazonia. III. Terminology of Amazonian forest types subjected to inundation. Brittonia31, 26–38.
53
RengifoE.HerreraA.TezaraW.FloresS. (2006). Efecto de la Inundación y la Sequía Sobre la Conductancia Estomática, el Contenido ABA Xilemático y Foliar y el Estado Hídrico de dos Especies Arbóreas Tropicales Tolerantes a la Inundación. Santo Domingo: IX Congreso Latinoamericano de Botánica.
54
RengifoE.TezaraW.HerreraA. (2005). Water relations, chlorophyll a fluorescence and carbohydrate contents in trees of a tropical forest in response to flood. Photosynthetica43, 203–210.
55
RoçasG.ScaranoF. R. (2001). Leaf anatomical variation in Alchornea triplinervia (Spreng) Müll. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae) under distinct light and soil water regimes. Trop. Ecol. 47, 243–250.
56
RosalesJ. (1988). Análisis Florístico-Estructural y Algunas Relaciones Ecológicas en un Bosque Inundable en la Boca del río Mapire, Edo. Anzoátegui. M.Sc. thesis, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Caracas, 233.
57
RothI.LindorfH. (1991). Leaf structure of species of Pachira indigenous of Venezuela from different habitats. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 113, 203–219.
58
Ruiz-SánchezM. C.DomingoR.MoralesD.TorrecillasA. (1996). Water relations of Fino lemon plants on two rootstocks under flooded conditions. Plant Sci. 120, 119–125.
59
SnyderK. A.JamesJ. J.RichardsJ. H.DonovanL. A. (2008). Does hydraulic lift or nighttime transpiration facilitate nitrogen acquisition?Plant Soil306, 159–166.
60
SunO. J.SweetG. B.WhiteheadD.BuchanG. D. (1995). Physiological responses to water stress and waterlogging in Nothofagus species. Tree Physiol. 15, 629–638. 10.1093/treephys/15.10.629
61
Tournaire-RouxC.SutkaM.JavotH.GoutE.GerbeauP.LuuD.-T.et al. (2003). Cytosolic pH regulates root water transport during anoxic stress through gating of aquaporins. Nature425, 393–397. 10.1038/nature01853
62
Vegas-VilarrúbiaT.HerreraR. (1993a). Seasonal alternation of lentic/lotic conditions in the Mapire system, a tropical floodplain lake in Venezuela. Hydrobiologia262, 43–55.
63
Vegas-VilarrúbiaT.HerreraR. (1993b). Effects of periodic flooding on the water chemistry and primary production of the Mapire system (Venezuela). Hydrobiologia262, 31–42.
64
WaldhoffD. (2009). Leaf structure in trees of Central Amazonian floodplain forests (Brazil). Environ. Exp. Bot. 66, 135–142.
65
WaldhoffD.FurchB. (2002). Leaf morphology and anatomy in eleven tree species from Central Amazonian floodplains (Brazil). Amazoniana17, 79–94.
66
WaldhoffD.FurchB.JunkW. (2002). Fluorescence parameters, chlorophyll concentration, and anatomical features as indicators for flood adaptation of an abundant tree species in Central Amazonia: Symmeria paniculata. Environ. Exp. Bot. 48, 225–235.
67
WangW.YanZ.YouS.ZhangY.ChenL.LinG. (2011). Mangroves: obligate or facultative halophytes? A review. Trees25, 953–963.
Summary
Keywords
flooding, photosynthesis, sap flux, stomatal conductance, tolerance
Citation
Herrera A (2013) Responses to flooding of plant water relations and leaf gas exchange in tropical tolerant trees of a black-water wetland. Front. Plant Sci. 4:106. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00106
Received
26 January 2013
Accepted
08 April 2013
Published
01 May 2013
Volume
4 - 2013
Edited by
Rens Voesenek, Utrecht University, Netherlands
Reviewed by
Uener Kolukisaoglu, University of Tuebingen, Germany; Vasileios Fotopoulos, Cyprus University of Technology, Cyprus
Copyright
© 2013 Herrera.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
*Correspondence: A. Herrera, Centro de Botánica Tropical, Instituto de Biología Experimental, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Calle Suapure, Colinas de Bello Monte, Caracas 1050, Venezuela. e-mail: ana.herrera@ciens.ucv.ve
This article was submitted to Frontiers in Plant Physiology, a specialty of Frontiers in Plant Science.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.