Abstract
The level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) increases under different stresses and, by destroying cellular components, may cause cell death. In addition, ROS are part of the complex network of transduction signals that induce defense reactions against stress or, alternatively, trigger programmed cell death, and key questions are the levels of each ROS that, respectively determine defense and death responses of the cell. The answer to those questions is difficult because there are several patterns of cell death that frequently appear mixed and are hardly distinguishable. Moreover, although considerable progresses have been achieved in the determination of the levels of specific ROS, critical questions remain on the ROS level in specific cell compartments. By considering chloroplasts as the main source of ROS in photosynthetic tissues at light, a comparison of the levels in stress and senescence of the chloroplastic activities involved in the generation and scavenging of ROS suggests plausible differences in the levels of specific ROS between stress defense and death. In effect, the three activities of the chlororespiratory chain increase similarly in stress defense response. However, in senescence, superoxide dismutase (SOD), that converts superoxide anion radical () to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2,) decreases, while the thylakoid Ndh complex, that favors the generation of singlet oxygen (1O2) and , and peroxidase (PX), that consumes H2O2, increase. The obvious inference is that, in respect to defense response, the ratio (1O2 plus )/H2O2 is increased in the senescence previous to cell death. We hypothesize that the different ROS ratios, probably through changes in the jasmonic acid/H2O2 ratio, could determine the activation of the defense network or the death network response of the cell.
INTRODUCTION
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) were formerly known for their damage effects on cellular components. Later, evidences, mainly accumulated along the last decade of twentieth century, showed at the turn of the millennium (; ; Van Breusegem et al., 2001; ; Zimmermann and Zentgraf, 2005; ; Zentgraf, 2007; ) additional roles of ROS as transduction signals within the complex network of molecules controlling developmental processes (mainly those leading to cell death) and responses to environmental stresses. In addition to the formidable problem to understand the functional integration of the complex networks regulating the different developmental processes with moderately stable node molecules as proteins and hormones, ROS signals posed entirely new challenges due to uncertainties on their generation and scavenging, on their mobility among cell compartments and on the molecular mechanisms of their interactions with other components (nodes) of the transduction network.
The involvement of ROS in the senescence of photosynthetic tissues provides a good system to size the magnitude of the challenges and to follow progresses to understand the integration of ROS signals within the networks controlling cell cycle and responses to stress. To distinguish between the ROS mediated effects in stress and in cell death, we address two fundamental aspects related to the roles of ROS in the programmed senescence of photosynthetic tissues under field conditions at light: (1) sources and sinks of ROS, and (2) signals that immediately follow ROS in the transduction networks. Programed senescence and death of photosynthetic leaves probably represents the highest amount of biomass and number of cells in the Earth suffering programmed cell death (PCD). Senescence of photosynthetic fruit tissues is a case of programmed senescence, not immediately followed of death, which is part of the maturation of most fleshy fruits and, as such, of high economic relevance. Similitude and differences between the senescence of leaf and the ripening of fruits were recognized since long time and we will refer the last exclusively for recent advances related to the involvement of components of the ROS generation machinery in fruit maturation. In a lesser extension, we will refer to a few processes where ROS signals are also involved and provide insights to understand leaf senescence under field conditions. Among them, the senescence and death of animal cell provides a lot of research advances that may be relevant. Senescence of non-photosynthetic plant cell, cell death associated to hypersensible response (HR), leaf senescence associated to diverse abiotic stresses (dark, drought, low, and high temperatures, nutrient deficiency,) and stress responses in general are fields where recent investigations provide insight relevant to the involvement of ROS as node signals in networks controlling cell processes.
There are different types of cell senescence and death, which frequently make difficult the comparison of the research results in different organisms, in different tissues of an organism and of different types of senescence and death of a specific tissue. For a comparison with the best characterized types of cell senescence and death in animals (), and in relation to the involvement of ROS, programmed leaf senescence and death shows similarities with the apoptotic/necrotic “intrinsic death pathways,” as far as the mitochondrial ROS source in animal is substituted by the chloroplast ROS source (Zapata et al., 2005; ; Sabater and Martín, 2013).
ROS IN PHOTOSYNTHESIZING LEAVES
Sources and transformation of the main ROS has been intensely investigated in leaves and details may be consulted elsewhere (; Sabater and Martín, 2013). Figure 1 summarized the best-known ROS, their transformation and deleterious effects on cell components. In addition to the main ROS found in non-photosynthetic cells: superoxide anion radical (), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radical (HO∙); another ROS, the singlet oxygen (1O2), is produced in chloroplast by transfer of excitation from triplet excited chlorophyll (3Chl*) to O2. Hydroperoxyl radical () is also formed although probably in a lesser amount (). The main four ROS are currently (and majorly) formed by chloroplasts at light and, to minimize their deleterious effects, scavenged by non-enzymatic and enzymatic reactions as superoxide dismutase (SOD), converting to H2O2, and peroxidase (PX) consuming H2O2., and then H2O2 and HO∙ , are also generated in other cell compartments, especially in mitochondria and peroxisomes where H2O2 is destroyed by catalase. To prevent the generation of excess 1O2, heat dissipation of 3Chl* excitation is enhanced through zeaxanthin formed by the xanthophyll cycle (). At high light intensity, the NADPH generated in the photosynthetic electron transport (PET) exceeds the capacity of the Benson–Calvin cycle to consume it (for example at low temperature or low CO2 supply by partially closed stomata). Then, transporters of the PET become over-reduced, the production of ROS increases and, depending on the environmental severity and the rapidity of the correction responses, it can destroy cell components producing the syndrome of photo-oxidative stress and eventually causing cell death ().
FIGURE 1
It must be emphasized that over-reduction of components of PET causes increases of ROS whose destructive action is associated to their strong oxidant power and frequently is difficult to distinguish effects regulated by ROS from those regulated by the redox state of the chloroplast (). The paradox is not the unique problem to take into account when ROS are investigated as signal within the regulatory network of the cell. As pointed above, high level of ROS, per se, can produce cell death under stress conditions without involving specific signal transduction. To make more complex the situation, many evidences indicate that ROS signals are involved in the response to alleviate photo-oxidative stress that is mainly based on the repression of some genes and induction of some another, mainly those encoding the enzyme systems, as chloroplastic SODs, that scavenge ROS. Under this perspective, the key question is the level of each ROS required for such opposite cell responses as PCD and alleviation of stress to avoid death (Sabater and Martín, 2013). There is not yet a satisfactory response to that question, but there are some aspects, as the nature of the ROS acting as signal and the organelle location of sources and sinks of the different ROS, that provide valuable information on the signaling by ROS in leaf senescence.
ARE ALL ROS TRANSDUCTION SIGNALS?
Damage effects of ROS (Figure 1) are mainly unspecific and could hardly be envisaged as related to their mechanism of interaction with other signal molecules of the regulatory network of the cell. However, effects other than damage are conceivable for H2O2. On the other hand, being 1O2, and HO∙ short-lived, the more stable (and permeable through membranes) H2O2 seems the plausible ROS signal candidate that interacts with other components of the regulatory cellular network and generates genetic and other responses of the cell to stress and PCD. Moreover, as H2O2 is substrate of catalase and diverse PXs, it could conceivably interact (enzymatic or not enzymatically) with proteins downstream in a signal cascade of a cellular network. H2O2 is also the product of the sequence of transformations of 1O2 and (Figure 1), which, in a first approximation, suggests that the increase of these ROS was finally senses by an increase of H2O2 and that, in the simplest imaginable mechanism, H2O2 would be the unique ROS signal of the cellular networks. From a broad perspective, the transformations 1O2 to and then to H2O2 should be no other than stages of signal transduction until the last ROS before non-ROS nodes. As we will see, facts are not so simple. Certainly, there many evidences that H2O2 is a signal, at least in the transduction cascades of the responses to stress, but there are strong evidences suggesting that and, specially, 1O2 could also be signals that, independently of their transformation to H2O2, originate cascade signals involved in leaf senescence.
ROS GENERATION AND SCAVENGING IN STRESS AND SENESCENCE
In effect, the dynamic of ROS generation and scavenging in the healthy and mild-stressed leaves seems to change in senescence. As pointed above, in health photosynthesizing leaf, 1O2 and are formed in chloroplasts by excitation and electron transfer, respectively, to oxygen, processes that are enhanced when there is excess of light in respect to the capacity to consume NADPH (mainly in the Benson–Calvin cycle). Enzymatic and non-enzymatic mechanisms maintain low steady-state levels of ROS by lowering the formation of 1O2 through heath dissipation of excited chlorophyll and, in the reaction catalyzed by SOD, transforming to H2O2, which is consumed by PXs and transformed by the Fenton reaction (Fe2+ + H2O2→Fe3+ + HO∙ + OH-) to (). HO∙ is rapidly consumed in diverse reactions. In an unknown extension, 1O2 seems to be able to oxidize reduced plastoquinone contributing to draining electrons from over-reduced PET (). Among chloroplast PXs, plastoquinol PX (Zapata et al., 1998), in addition to scavenge H2O2, directly drains electrons from PET, contributing to alleviate the excess of reducing power that enhances the production of ROS but, at the same time, decreasing the efficiency of the use of light energy in photosynthesis. Similarly, the Mehler reaction generates by draining electron from PET (mainly from reduced non-heme iron-sulfur protein, FeSPred) and, thus, it decreases the efficiency of photosynthesis. At the photo-physical stage, the heath dissipation of excited chlorophyll to reduce the formation of 1O2 also impairs the use of light energy in photosynthesis. Therefore, plants have evolved mechanisms to regulate the processes of generation and scavenging of ROS by adjusting them to different environmental conditions in order to minimize ROS damage and maximize photosynthesis yield. The adjusting is got through appropriate level of zeaxanthin, SOD, and PX (; ; ; ) for any combination of light intensity, temperature, and CO2 availability (which depends on several factors as stomatal opening).
However, the light intensity that receives the leaf strongly and rapidly fluctuates under natural conditions (; ), which make necessary continuous adjustments of enzyme activities and inevitable transitory burst of ROS and losses of photosynthesis efficiency. The adjustment is not easily reached because many processes are functionally interconnected in photosynthesis. Hence, like photophosphorylation, the dissipation of heat by zeaxanthin requires an appropriate gradient of proton (ΔpH) across the thylakoid membrane (). However, as pointed out by , when the components of PET are over-reduced the rate of cyclic PET is too low to supply the necessary extra transport of protons to thylakoid lumen; the functioning of cyclic PET requires balanced (poised) levels of both reduced and oxidized forms of the electron transporters. From this perspective, the draining of electrons from PET by Mehler reaction and plastoquinol PX allows to poise the redox level of the cyclic electron transporters () and, then, to maintain the appropriate ΔpH for the dissipation as heath of the excess of absorbed light. Thus, the generation of and H2O2 would be a less harmful alternative than the formation of 1O2 under transitory high light. The photo-inhibition of photosystem II (PSII; ) is other important response of the photosynthetic machinery to transitory high light. When light comes back to moderate or low intensity, the recovery to full activity of photo-inhibited PSII could last several seconds and, frequently, minutes; too much time when compared with the rapid light intensity changes (fraction of second) that a section of a trembling leaf confronts frequently in windy fields. Quickly, after transition to low light, the ΔpH would collapse, now because the electron transporters of the cyclic PET become over-oxidized by the transitory low supply of electrons from PSII. The collapse is prevented because the redox poising of transporters is maintained through the feeding of electrons from NADH by the thylakoid Ndh complex (EC 1.6.5.3; ; Sabater and Martín, 2013) a product of the 11 plastid and a few nuclear ndh genes.
Therefore, operating alternatively, the supply of electrons (by the Ndh complex) and the drain of electrons (by concerted actions of the Mehler reaction, SOD and plastoquinol PX) ensure the fine-tuning of the redox level of the transporters of electrons in the cyclic PET. The complete sequence of reactions is:
and results in a global respiratory process named chlororespiration (; ; ):
that is schematized in Figure 2.
FIGURE 2
In the field, rapid increases and fluctuations of the intensity of light, high and low temperatures, hydric stress, and aggressive chemicals rapidly change the rates of electron supply (from PSII) and consumption (by the Benson–Calvin cycle). In this scenario, to maintain functional the cyclic PET and minimize damages by ROS, the activities of the chlororespiratory chain (Ndh complex, SOD, and PX) must be high in comparison with more stable or mild environments. Accordingly, the levels of the Ndh complex increase under different stresses (Serrot et al., 2008; ) and Ndh deficient tobaccos are especially sensible to damages under stress (, ; ; ; ). There is also a large and classic literature reporting the increase of SOD and/or PX under different stress conditions (see a revision in ). In addition to other factors, the relative activities of the thylakoid Ndh complex, SOD, and PX must determine the relative levels the different ROS in the steady state. Therefore, when the activities were measured in parallel assays, levels of the thylakoid Ndh complex and of the chloroplast SODs (FeSOD and Cu/ZnSOD) and plastoquinol PX increase similarly in young photosynthesizing leaves of tobacco or barley plants subjected to diverse stressing agents (, ; , ). Always, increases of the Ndh, SOD, and PX are precisely mediated by ROS () at gene expression and, probably, enzyme activation ().
When adult-senescent leaves are subjected to different stresses, Ndh complex level and activity as well as those of plastid PX increase in a similar way than in young fully photosynthesis active leaves. In contrast, the induction of SOD in response to stress becomes progressively impaired when leaves enter senescence (, ; ; ,; ; ). The results provide clues for the frequently reported interactions between stress response and senescence () and suggest that the fail to induce chloroplastic SOD plays a key role in leaf senescence. This should strongly remember the animal systems where, transgenic over-expressing SOD and catalase show a significant life-span extension (). In the last, catalase must also be over-expressed to avoid the increase of H2O2 formed by over-expressed SOD. Chloroplast lacks catalase but contains several PXs (among them plastoquinol PX) whose increase in senescence must efficiently consume the low amount of H2O2 produced by chloroplast lacking SOD in senescing leaves. In this line, in adult-senescent leaves, over-expression of the Ndh complex and chloroplastic PX and under-expression of chloroplastic SOD must increase the level of and decrease the level of H2O2 in respect to the response of young leaves. As the Ndh complex provides electrons, per se, it must increase the redox level of the transporters and, consequently, the formation of 1O2 and . In contrast to young leaves where increased formations of 1O2 and are neutralized, respectively, by increased heat dissipation and increased scavenging by higher SOD, in adult senescent leaves, 1O2 and produced after a mild stress increased continuously out of control because Ndh complex and PX are induced by ROS.
To the large number of classic publications reporting the decrease of chloroplastic SOD and the increase of PX during leaf senescence, many latter references report the increase of the Ndh complex during leaf senescence and fruit ripening (; , ; ; ; ; Serrot et al., 2012). In addition, the involvement of the Ndh complex in senescence seems clear from the delay of leaf senescence (some 30 days in respect to wild type) in transgenic tobacco defective in the ndhF gene and Ndh complex (Zapata et al., 2005). Significantly also, long-lived conifers, as Pinus longaeva whose needles remain functional for 35 years, lack ndh genes in their sequenced plastid DNA (Wu et al., 2011).
HYPOTHESIS: A HIGH RATIO (1O2 + )/H2O2 CHANGES STRESS DEFENSE RESPONSE TO PROGRAMMED LEAF SENESCENCE
Summarizing the evidences discussed above, the decrease of SOD and the increase of the Ndh complex play crucial roles in senescence by determining an increase of , yet reported by , and a decrease of H2O2 in chloroplasts which contrasts with the increase of these two ROS in stress responses. It seems that, within the network of transduction signals that regulate the response to stress, the nodes involved in the control of the levels of the Ndh complex remain intact in adult-senescent leaves but those controlling the levels of chloroplastic SOD (FeSOD and Cu/ZnSOD) fail to respond. Then, fine-tuning of the redox level of the electron transporters of cyclic PET is broken early in leaf senescence and gives way to their over-reduction and to a growing spiral of ROS production and death.
Externally supplied H2O2 increases the expression of the plastid ndh genes, the levels of the Ndh complex and the NADH dehydrogenase activity of the Ndh complex by phosphorylation of the NDH-F subunit (; ; ). In general, H2O2 is involved in the defense response against different biotic and abiotic stresses (, ; ). Although H2O2 probably mediates the increase of the Ndh complex in the defense of young leaves against stress, the increase of the Ndh complex during senescence does not seem due to the increase of H2O2 production in chloroplasts. reported that H2O2 level transitorily doubled in brassicaceae leaf during bolting and flowering time, probably related to decreases of catalase and ascorbate PX and not to a high production of H2O2 in chloroplasts. In fact, although H2O2 could increase in peroxisomes (), there is no evidence of the increase of H2O2 production in chloroplasts during natural leaf senescence under field light and, accordingly, no accumulation of H2O2 was found during the PCD of bundle sheaths in the maize camouflage1 (cf1) mutant (). As pointed above, chloroplasts are probably the main cellular source of H2O2 in the leaf at light, and that source is considerably reduced in adult-senescent leaves. Reduced enough to abolish the main H2O2-dependent transduction signaling in the protection responses against stress. The hypothesis of a low level of H2O2 (in respect to 1O2 and ) during senescence is essentially based on the low levels of the activity that forms it (SOD) and the high level of the activity that consume it (PX). Rapid turnover and damage effects make difficult a precise definition of the level of 1O2 or , of the (1O2 + )/H2O2 ratio, and of a threshold ratio that changes defense response to PCD. At present, the concept of (1O2 + )/H2O2 ratio urges researches on signaling downstream of 1O2 and and on methods for accurate measurements of ROS in plants. The determination of the levels of each 1O2, , and H2O2 in cytosol and in each organelle is difficult but would be particularly relevant with data on the cellular location of the network nodes directly influenced by them.
In contrast to the other ROS produced in chloroplast (1O2, , and HO∙), H2O2 is sufficiently stable and presumably permeable through chloroplast membranes to connect with the cytosolic network of signals that control specific gene expression in the nucleus. Immediate targets of H2O2 are not yet known and plausible candidates in cytosol, or also into the chloroplast, are 2-cysteine peroxiredoxins (PRDX). These could also act as redox signals (; ; ) and as regulators of the level of H2O2. Many evidences connect the H2O2 signaling with cascades of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases that are involved in the H2O2 production and in the regulation of death, mainly in the response to biotic and abiotic stresses (). Moreover, the H2O2-mediated increase of the ndh gene expression seems to depend on protein kinases (; ). However, no protein has yet identified that directly interacts with H2O2 in network signaling.
SIGNALING DOWNSTREAM OF 1O2 AND
If 1O2 and (or) , in the place of H2O2 and its derivative HO∙, are the chloroplast ROS signals involved in programmed leaf senescence, the obvious question refers to its (their) immediate target. As mentioned above, 1O2 or can barely be exit from the chloroplast. Therefore, the immediate target must be into the chloroplast. The modification of amino acids is the main known damage produced by (Figure 1) and, essentially, the same amino acids are modified by and H2O2. Therefore, the oxidation of cysteine residues of proteins by could initiate in chloroplast a signal similar to those supposed for H2O2 in chloroplast and cytosol. However, no precise or specific protein target is yet known that initiates a signal after oxidation by . Other possibility is that the general damage effects of in chloroplasts and the lack of H2O2 for draining the excess of electrons, should impair the rate of cyclic PET collapsing the thylakoid membrane potential and, thus, shooting the production of more 1O2 that would become the key initial signal that compels the cell to death at light. As pointed above, to maintain the leaf functional and healthy, the chloroplast forms other ROS than 1O2. Therefore, the low level of 1O2 must be an objective for enduring cell. For senescence and death, 1O2 probably initiates a signal chain linked to the damage of polyunsaturated fatty acids.
As Figure 1 shows, 1O2 attacks polyunsaturated fatty acids. The first products of the attack of polyunsaturated fatty acids of membrane lipids by 1O2 are 13-hydroperoxy derivate fatty acids. Among them, 13-hydroperoxy linoleic acid is transformed in chloroplasts to the oxylipin (9S, 13S)-12-oxo-phytodienoic acid, which is transformed into jasmonic acid (JA) in peroxisomes and further, in cytosol, to related compounds as methyl jasmonate (; Wasternack, 2007). In this way, JA and several related compounds mediate the rapid response to the stress generated by the production of 1O2 (Wagner et al., 2004) inhibiting the synthesis of protein for the photosynthetic machinery () and stimulating the expression of genes for the defense against stress and of the senescence associated genes (SAG; ). Among other effects, JA and related oxylipin derivatives stimulate the expression of chloroplast lipoxygenase (LOX; ) and increase the level of the thylakoid Ndh complex (). Precisely, LOX catalyzes the reaction of free linoleic acid with O2 to form further 13-hydroperoxy linoleic, which, as described, generates more JA and derivatives (Schaller et al., 2004), now dependent on O2, but not of the 1O2 formed by light excess. Therefore, under appropriate conditions, which are plausibly related to the levels of other signals, JA seems a key signal able to generate an autocatalytic cell path to death (Figure 3). In this regard, it is significant that treatments with JA increase the production of 1O2 () and accelerates senescence (Wasternack, 2007). If not the start gunfire of senescence, the coincidence of high PX, Ndh complex, LOX, and 1O2 with low SOD seems to open the irreversible path to cell death. The spiral increase of ROS (and more precisely of 1O2 or ) is under genetic control, firstly determining the expression of PX and Ndh complex, and later of LOX. The last initiates a light independent increase of JA and, as a consequence, of further light-dependent increase of 1O2. Key nodes of the death path would be JA, which increase and thus induces SAG, and H2O2, which decreases and thus prevent the induction of stress defense genes. Independently of the damage effect of ROS, through the further induction of SAG by JA, the overall process appears a PCD.
FIGURE 3
It would be concluded that the initiation of the program for leaf death is the fail to properly stimulate the expression chloroplastic SODs under mild stress, but the meaning of starting point is fading in an autocatalytic spiral of events as that proposed. Hence, among SAGs, MYB transcription factors have been described (; ) that bind to the AACTAA motif inhibiting the progression of the transcription machinery to downstream genes. Precisely, the AACTAA motif is close to AGATAA and TATA motifs for the initiation of transcription in upstream region of the Csd2 gene (encoding the chloroplast Cu/ZnSOD) in Arabidopsis. In this way, the induction of the SAG for MYB must obstruct the expression of the chloroplastic SOD, hence contributing, in addition to the mechanisms described above, to the growing spiral of the 1O2 and ROS in leaf senescence (Sabater and Martín, 2013).
The regulatory upstream region of the ArabidopsisCsd2 gene also includes two W-boxes (TGAC(T)) recognized by WRKY transcription factors (), some of them induced during leaf senescence (Singh et al., 2002). The gene encoding one of them, WRKY53, also has a high relevance as the crossing point where different signals, and more specifically JA and H2O2 (Zentgraf et al., 2010) should determine defense response or PCD. In effect, although other signals as salicylic acid and nitric oxide (Wang et al., 2013) may be involved, the model described above indicates that the high 1O2 plus /H2O2 ratio in senescence, in respect to non-lethal stress response, is transduced into a high comparative JA/H2O2 ratio. JA and H2O2 would influence (by activation or inhibition, depending on concentration and other factors) at the different steps of complex transduction networks that control stress response and PCD by WRKY53. To add more complexity, several proteins control the expression of the WRKY53 gene and the binding of the WRKY53 protein to DNA upstream of genes expressed in senescence. Therefore, through variable responses to JA and H2O2, the complex network of WRKY proteins could be crucial determining the transition of the defense response to PCD as a consequence of increased 1O2 plus /H2O2 ratio.
The model described for leaf senescence requires, at least in its first stages, light acting on the photosynthesis machinery. But the syndrome of leaf senescence would be more complex in field where alternating light and dark periods during the day could overlap light dependent senescence with dark dependent senescence. Under this condition, the involvement of a high production of H2O2 in cytosol or non-chloroplast organelles could be relevant. In addition, hormonal factors related to developmental processes, as seed filling and shadowing by upper leaves, and nutritional factors can produce a mixture senescence mechanisms, one of which could be dominant in some plants and environments.
CONCLUDING REMARKS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS
In contrast to animals, the development of plants is strongly affected by environmental factors and, not surprisingly, ROS are involved as signals in developmental processes leading to cell death and in the defense response against environmental stress. Difficulties to determine the levels of some specific ROS in the different cell compartments open key questions as the levels and mechanisms through which ROS control different issues such as death and defense. In addition, and similarly to other signals of the networks controlling developmental processes, the level of ROS are subjected to multiple cross, feed-forward, and feed-back effects and poorly known factors, as iRNA and epigenetic modifications, that make difficult to identify a precise cause to effect chain of events explaining the final response of the plant.
However, in contrast to most other signals, the successive steps for enzymatic, and non-enzymatic generation and scavenging of the main ROS (1O2, , H2O2, and HO∙ ) are well known. In addition, the levels of the enzymes involved in the generation and scavenging of most ROS can be accurately determined in different cell compartments and in different stress and senescence conditions. From enzyme data, qualitative level differences between stress and senescence for each ROS can reasonably be proposed for different cell compartments which progresses in ROS determination (Woolley et al., 2013) could test in the future. With this approach, the hypothesis presented here of a high ratio (1O2 + )/H2O2 for the initiation of senescence at light, could be extended or modified after comparison of enzymatic activities in stress responses with those in other types of senescence, including the senescence of non-photosynthetic tissues. The results must facilitate the identification of proteins that directly interact with specific ROS in the regulatory cellular networks. In a first approach, the complex of WRKY proteins deserves full attention. In addition, the results would provide a wide perspective to investigate more precisely the control of genes for generation and scavenging of ROS in stress and PCD.
Statements
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Grant BFU2010-15916 of the Spanish Dirección General de Investigación (Ministerio de Economía y Desarrollo).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
1
AbarcaD.MartínM.SabaterB. (2001a). Differential leaf stress responses in young and senescent plants.Physiol. Plant.113409–415. 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1130314.x
2
AbarcaD.RoldánM.MartínM.SabaterB. (2001b). Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Cvi shows an increased tolerance to photo-oxidative stress and contains a new chloroplastic copper/zinc superoxide dismutase isoenzyme.J. Exp. Bot.521417–1425. 10.1093/jexbot/52.360.1417
3
ApelK.HirtH. (2004). Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.55373–379. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701
4
BachmannA.HauseB.MaucherH.GarbeE.VörösK.WeicherH.et al (2002). Jasmonate-induced lipid peroxidation in barley leaves initiated by distinct 13-LOX forms of chloroplasts.Biol. Chem.3831645–1657. 10.1515/BC.2002.185
5
BeheraS. K.NayakL.BiswalB. (2003). Senescing leaves possess potential for stress adaptation: developing leaves acclimated to high light resist osmotic stress during senescence.J. Plant Physiol.160125–131. 10.1078/0176-1617-00791
6
BialikS.ZalckarE.AssafY. B.RubinsteinA. D.KimchiA. (2010). System biology analysis of programmed cell death.Trends Biochem. Sci.36556–564. 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.04.008
7
BiekerS.RiesterL.StahlM.FranzaringJ.ZentgrafU. (2012). Senescence-specific alteration of hydrogen peroxide levels in Arabidopsis thaliana and oilseed rape spring variety Brassica napus L. cv. MozartF.J. Integ. Plant Biol.54540–554. 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2012.01147.x
8
BowlerC.Van MontaguMInzéD. (1992). Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance.Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.4383–116. 10.1146/annurev.pp.43.060192.000503
9
Buchanan-WollastonV.PageT.HarrisonE.BreezeE.PyungO. L.NamH. G.et al (2005). Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals significant differences in gene expression and signalling pathways between developmental and dark/starvation-induced senescence in Arabidopsis.Plant J.42567–585. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02399.x
10
CasanoL. M.MartínM.SabaterB. (1994). Sensitivity of superoxide dismutase transcript levels and activities to oxidative stress is lower in mature-senescent than in young barley leaves.Plant Physiol.1061033–1039. 10.1104/pp.106.3.1033
11
CasanoL. M.MartínM.SabaterB. (2001). Hydrogen peroxide mediates the induction of chloroplastic Ndh complex under photooxidative stress in barley.Plant Physiol.1251450–1458. 10.1104/pp.125.3.1450
12
CasanoL. M.MartínM.ZapataJ. M.SabaterB. (1999). Leaf age- and paraquat-dependent effects on the levels of enzymes protecting against photooxidative stress.Plant Sci.14913–22. 10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00138-7
13
CasanoL. M.ZapataJ. M.MartínM.SabaterB. (2000). Chlororespiration and poising of cyclic electron transport: plastoquinone as electron transporter between thylakoid NADH dehydrogenase and peroxidase.J. Biol. Chem.275942–948. 10.1074/jbc.275.2.942
14
ChenW.ProvartN. J.GlazebrookJ.KatagiriF.ChangH. S.EulgemT.et al (2002). Expression profile matrix of Arabidopsis transcription factor genes suggests their putative functions in response to environmental stresses.Plant Cell14559–574. 10.1105/tpc.010410
15
CreelmanR. A.MulpuriR. (2002). The oxylipin pathway in Arabidopsis.Arabidopsis Book1e0012. 10.1199/tab.0012
16
CuelloJ.QuilesM. J.RosauroJ.SabaterB. (1995). Effects of growth regulators and light on chloroplast NAD(P)H dehydrogenase activities of senescent barley leaves.Plant Growth Regul.17225–232. 10.1007/BF00024730
17
Del RioL. A.PastoriG. M.PalmaJ. M.SandalioL. M.SevillaF.CorpasF. J.et al (1998). The activated oxygen role of peroxisomes in senescence.Plant Physiol.1161195–1200. 10.1104/pp.116.4.1195
18
DietzK. J. (2003). Plant peroxiredoxins.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.5493–107. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134934
19
DoyleS. M.DiamondM.McCabeP. F. (2010). Chloroplast and reactive oxygen species involvement in apoptotic-like programmed cell death in Arabidopsis suspension cultures.J. Exp. Bot.61473–482. 10.1093/jxb/erp320
20
EndoT.ShikanaiT.TakabayashiA.AsadaK.SatoF. (1999). The role of chloroplastic NAD(P)H dehydrogenase in photoprotection.FEBS Lett.4575–8. 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00989-8
21
EsklingM.EmanuelssonA.AkerlundH. E. (2001). “Enzyme and mechanisms for violaxanthin-zeaxanthin conversions,” inRegulation of PhotosynthesisedsAroE. M.AnderssonB. (Dordrecht: Kluwer) 433–452.
22
EulgemT.RushtonP. J.RobatzekS.SomssichI. E. (2000). The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors.Trends Plant Sci.5199–206. 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01600-9
23
GechevT. S.Van BreusegemF.StoneJ. M.DenevI.LaloiC. (2006). Reactive oxygen species as signals that modulate plant stress responses and programmed cell death.BioEssays281091–1101. 10.1002/bies.20493
24
GraceS. C. (2005). “Phenolics as antioxidants,” inAntioxidant and Reactive Oxygen Species in Plantsed.SmirnoffN. (Oxford: Blackwell) 141–168.
25
GuoX. X.YanX. Q.YangR. Y.ZengQ. P. (2010). Salicylic acid and methyl jasmonate but not Rose Bengal enhance artemisinin production through invoking burst of endogen singlet oxygen.Plant Sci.178390–397. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.01.014
26
HeberU.WalkerD. (1992). Concerning a dual function of coupled cyclic electron transport in leaves.Plant Physiol.1001621–1626. 10.1104/pp.100.4.1621
27
HuangM.BraunD. M. (2010). Genetic analyses of cell death in maize (Zea mays, Poaceae) leaves reveal a distinct pathway operating in the camouflage1 mutant.Am. J. Bot.97357–364. 10.3732/ajb.0900233
28
JakobB.HeberU. (1996). Photoproduction and detoxification of hydroxyl radicals in chloroplasts and leaves and relation to photoinactivation of photosystems I and II.Plant Cell Physiol.37629–635. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a028991
29
JoëtT.CournacL.PeltierG.HavauxM. (2002). Cyclic electron flow around photosystem I in C3 plants. In vivo control by the redox state of chloroplasts and involvement of the NADH-dehydrogenase complex.Plant Physiol.128760–769. 10.1104/pp.010775
30
KarpinskiS.WingsleG.KarpinskaBHällgrenJ. E. (2001). “Redox sensing of photooxidative stress and acclamatory mechanisms in plants,” inRegulation of PhotosynthesisedsAroE. M.AnderssonB. (Dordrecht: Kluwer) 469–486.
31
Khanna-ChopraR.NutanK. K.PareekA. (2013). “Regulation of leaf senescence: role of reactive oxygen species,” inPlant Development in Leaves During Growth and Senescence. Advances in Photosynthesis and RespirationVol. 36edsBiswalB.KrupinskaK.BiswalU. C. (Dordrecht: Springer) 393–416. 10.1007/978-94-007-5724-0_17
32
KrukJSzymánskaR. (2012). Singlet oxygen and non-photochemical quenching contribute to oxidation of the plastoquinone-pool under high light stress in Arabidopsis.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1817705–710. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.02.011
33
KülheimC.ÅgrenJ.JanssonS. (2002). Rapid regulation of light harvesting and plant fitness in the field.Science29791–93. 10.1126/science.1072359
34
KurepaJ.HérouartD.Van MontaguM.InzéD. (1997) Differential expression of CuZn- and Fe-superoxide dismutase genes of tobacco during development, oxidative stress and hormonal treatments.Plant Cell Physiol.38463–470. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029190
35
LascanoH. R.CasanoL. M.MartínM.SabaterB. (2003). The activity of the chloroplastic Ndh complex is regulated by phosphorylation of the NDH-F subunit.Plant Physiol.132256–262. 10.1104/pp.103.020321
36
LevineA. (1999). “Oxidative stress as a regulator of environmental responses in plants,” inPlant Responses to Environmental Stress: from Phytohormones to Genome Organizationed.LernerH. R. (New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc) 247–264.
37
MartínM.CasanoL. M.SabaterB. (1996). Identification of the product of ndhA gene as a thylakoid protein synthesized in response to photooxidative treatment.Plant Cell Physiol.37293–298. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a028945
38
MartínM.CasanoL. M.ZapataJ. M.GuéraA.del CampoE. M.Schmitz-LinneweberC.et al (2004). Role of thylakoid Ndh complex and peroxidase in the protection against photo-oxidative stress: fluorescence and enzyme activities in wild-type and ndhF-deficient tobacco.Physiol. Plant.122443–452. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2004.00417.x
39
MartínM.FunkH. T.SerrotP. H.PoltniggP.SabaterB. (2009). Functional characterization of the thylakoid Ndh complex phosphorylation by site-directed mutations in the ndhF gene.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1787920–928. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.03.001
40
McRaeD. G.ThompsonJ. E. (1983). Senescence-dependent changes in superoxide-anion production in illuminated chloroplasts from bean leaves.Planta158185–193. 10.1007/BF01075253
41
MuthuramalingamM.SeidelT.LaxaM.Nunes de MirandaS. M.GärtnerF.StröherE.et al (2009). Multiple redox and non-redox interactions define 2-Cys peroxiredoxin as a regulatory hub in the chloroplast.Mol. Plant21273–1288. 10.1093/mp/ssp089
42
NashilevitzS.Melamed-BessudoC.IzkovichY.RogachevI.OsorioS.ItkinM.et al (2010). An orange ripening mutant links plastid NAD(P)H dehydrogenase complex activity to central and specialized metabolism during tomato fruit maturation.Plant Cell221977–1997. 10.1105/tpc.110.074716
43
NiloR. P.Campos-VargasR.OrellanaA. (2012). Assessment of Prunus persica fruit softening using a proteomics approach.J. Proteomics751618–1638. 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.11.037
44
NixonP. J.RichP. R. (2007). “Chlororespiratory pathways and their physiological significance,” inThe Structure and Function of PlastidsedsWiseR. R.HooberJ. K. (Berlin: Springer) 237–251.
45
OheM.RapoluM.MiedaT.MiyagawaY.YabutaY.YoshimuraK.et al (2005). Decline of leaf photooxidative stress tolerance with age in tobacco.Plant Sci.1681487–1493. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.01.020
46
OrrW. C.SohalR. S. (1994). Extension of life-span by overexpression of superoxide dismutase and catalase in Drosophila melanogaster.Science2631128–1130. 10.1126/science.8108730
47
OsmondC. B. (1994). “What is photoinhibition? Some insights from comparison of shade and sun plants,” inPhotoinhibition of PhotosynthesisedsBakerN. R.BowyerJ. R. (Oxford: BIOS Scientific) 1–23.
48
OvermyerK.BroschéM.KangasjärviJ. (2003). Reactive oxygen species and hormonal control of cell death.Trends Plant Sci.8335–342. 10.1016/S1360-1385(03)00135–133
49
ParedesM.QuilesM. J. (2013). Stimulation of chlororespiration by drought under heat and high illumination in Rosa meillandina.J. Plant Physiol.170165–171. 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.09.010
50
PearcyR. W. (1994). “Photosynthetic response to sunflecks and light gaps: mechanism and constrain,” inPhotoinhibition of PhotosynthesisedsBakerN. R.BowyerJ. R. (Oxford: BIOS Scientific) 255–271.
51
Puerto-GalánL.Pérez-RuizJ. M.FerrándezJ.CanoB.NaranjoB.NájeraV. A.et al (2013). Overoxidation of chloroplast 2-Cys peroxiredoxins: balancing toxic and signaling activities of hydrogen peroxide.Front. Plant Sci.4:310. 10.3389/fpls.2013.00310
52
PotikhaT. S.CollinsC. C.JohnsonD. I.DelmerD. P.LevineA. (1999). The involvement of hydrogen peroxide in the differentiation of secondary walls in cotton fibers.Plant Physiol.119849–858. 10.1104/pp.119.3.849
53
ProchazkovaD.SairamR. K.SrivastavaG. C.SinghD. V. (2001). Oxidative stress and antioxidant activity as the basis of senescence in maize.Plant Sci.161765–771. 10.1016/S0168-9452(01)00462-9
54
QuirinoB. F.NohY. S.HimelblauE.AmasinoR. M. (2000). Molecular aspects of leaf senescence.Trends Plant Sci.5278–282. 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01655-1
55
ReinbotheS.ReinbotheC.ParthierB. (1993). Methyl jasmonate-regulated translation of nuclear encoded chloroplast protein in barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Salome).J. Biol. Chem.26810606–10611.
56
RumeauD.PeltierG.CournacL. (2007). Chlororespiration and cyclic electron flow around PSI during photosynthesis and plant stress response.Plant Cell Environ.301041–1051. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01675.x
57
SabaterBMartínM. (2013). “Chloroplast control of leaf senescence,” inPlant Development in Leaves During Growth and Senescence. Advances in Photosynthesis and RespirationVol. 36edsBiswalB.KrupinskaK.BiswalU. C. (Dordrecht: Springer) 529–550.
58
SchallerF.SchalllerA.StintziA. (2004). Biosynthesis and metabolism of jasmonates.J. Plant Growth Regul.23179–199. 10.1007/s00344-004-0047x
59
SerrotP. H.SabaterBMartínM. (2008). Expression of the ndhCKJ operon of barley and editing at the 13th base of the mRNA of the ndhC gene.Biol. Plant52347–350. 10.1007/s10535-008-0071-y
60
SerrotP. H.SabaterBMartínM. (2012). Activity, polypeptide and gene identification of thylakoid Ndh complex in trees: potential physiological relevance of fluorescence assays.Physiol. Plant146110–120. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01598.x
61
SinghK. B.FoleyR. COñate-SánchezL. (2002). Transcription factors in plant defense and stress responses.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.5430–436. 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00289-3
62
Van BreusegemF.VranováE.DatJ. FInzéD. (2001). The role of active oxygen species in plant signal transduction.Plant Sci.161405–414. 10.1016/S0168-9452(01)00452-6
63
WagnerD.PrzybylaD.op den CampR.KimC.LandgrafF.LeeK. P.et al (2004). The genetic basis of singlet oxygen-induced stress responses of Arabidopsis thaliana.Science3061183–1185. 10.1126/science.1103178
64
WangY.LoakeG. J.ChuC. (2013). Cross-talk of nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species in plant programmed cell death.Front. Plant Sci.4:314. 10.3389/fpls.2013.00314
65
WasternackC. (2007). Jasmonates: an update on biosynthesis, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development.Ann. Bot.100681–697. 10.1093/aob/mcm079
66
WoolleyJ. F.StanickaJ.CotterT. G. (2013). Recent advances in reactive oxygen species measurement in biological systems.Trends Biochem. Sci.38556–565. 10.1016/j.tibs.2013.08.009
67
WuC. S.LinC. P.HsuC. Y.WangR. J.ChawS. M. (2011). Comparative chloroplast genomes of Pinaceae: insights into the mechanism of diversified genomic organizations.Genome Biol. Evol.3309–319. 10.1093/gbe/evr026
68
ZapataJ. M.GuéraA.Esteban-CarrascoA.MartínM.SabaterB. (2005). Chloroplasts regulate leaf senescence: delayed senescence in transgenic ndhF-defective tobacco.Cell Death. Differ121277–1284. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401657
69
ZapataJ. M.SabaterBMartínM. (1998). Identification of a thylakoid peroxidase which oxydized hydroquinone.Phytochemistry481119–1123. 10.1016/S0031-9422(98)00133-2
70
ZentgrafU. (2007). “Oxidative stress and leaf senescence,” inSenescence Processes in Plantsed.GanS. (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd) 69–86.
71
ZentgrafU.LaumT.MiaoY. (2010). The complex regulation of WRKY53 during leaf senescence of Arabidopsis thaliana.Eur. J. Cell Biol.89133–137. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2009.10.014
72
ZimmermannP.ZentgrafU. (2005). The correlation between oxidative stress and leaf senescence during plant leaf development.Cell Mol. Biol. Lett.10515–534. 10.1007/s10343-004-0050-y
Summary
Keywords
chloroplast, chlororespiration, jasmonic acid, leaf senescence, programmed cell death, ROS, stress
Citation
Sabater B and Martín M (2013) Hypothesis: increase of the ratio singlet oxygen plus superoxide radical to hydrogen peroxide changes stress defense response to programmed leaf death. Front. Plant Sci. 4:479. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00479
Received
04 September 2013
Accepted
05 November 2013
Published
25 November 2013
Volume
4 - 2013
Edited by
Hayat El-Maarouf-Bouteau, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, France
Reviewed by
Jirong Huang, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; Hannetz Roschzttardtz, University of Wisconsin – Madison, USA
Copyright
© 2013 Sabater and Martín.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Bartolomé Sabater, Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida (Fisiología Vegetal), Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, 28871 Madrid, Spain e-mail: bartolome.sabater@uah.es
This article was submitted to Plant Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.