ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Plant Sci., 01 April 2014

Sec. Plant Nutrition

Volume 5 - 2014 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00125

Generation of boron-deficiency-tolerant tomato by overexpressing an Arabidopsis thaliana borate transporter AtBOR1

  • 1. Biotechnology Research Center, The University of Tokyo Tokyo, Japan

  • 2. Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo Tokyo, Japan

  • 3. Creative Research Institution, Hokkaido University, Sapporo Japan

Abstract

Nutrient deficiency in soil poses a widespread agricultural problem. Boron (B) is an essential micronutrient in plants, and its deficiency causes defects in both vegetative and reproductive growth in various crops in the field. In Arabidopsis thaliana, increased expression of a major borate transporter gene AtBOR1 or boric acid channel gene AtNIP5;1 improves plant growth under B-deficient conditions. In this study, we examined whether high expression of a borate transporter gene increases B accumulation in shoots and improves the growth of tomato plant, a model of fruit-bearing crops, under B-deficient conditions. We established three independent transgenic tomato plants lines expressing AtBOR1 using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Micro-Tom). Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis confirmed that two lines (Line 1 and Line 2) more strongly expressed AtBOR1 than Line 3. Wild-type plants and the transgenic plants were grown hydroponically under B-sufficient and B-deficient conditions. Wild-type and Line 3 (weakly expressing transgenic line) showed a defect in shoot growth under B-deficient conditions, especially in the development of new leaves. However, seedlings of Line 1 and Line 2, the transgenic lines showing strong AtBOR1 expression, did not show the B-deficiency phenotype in newly developing leaves. In agreement with this phenotype, shoot biomass under low-B conditions was higher in the strongly expressing AtBOR1 line. B concentrations in leaves or fruits were also higher in Line 2 and Line 1. The present study demonstrates that strong expression of AtBOR1 improved growth in tomato under B-deficient conditions.

INTRODUCTION

Boron (B) is an essential micronutrient for plants (). B mediates cross-linking of rhamnogalacturonan-II (RG-II), a component of the pectic polysaccharide, and proper formation of the RG-II dimer is essential for maintenance of the cell wall structure and plasticity (; ; , ). Hence, B is important for root elongation (), leaf expansion (; ; ), viable pollen grain production, and pollen tube elongation (; ). B-deficient growth conditions impair vegetative and/or reproductive growth (; ), and B-deficiency has been observed in various agricultural soils, which limits crop production globally (). Application of B fertilizer is one approach to grow crops under B-deficient conditions in the field (), but excess B is also toxic to plants (). A narrow B concentration range exists between deficient and toxic levels for plants, which complicates B fertilizer application (; ; ). Thus, understanding the plant B transport mechanisms is important to improve B nutrition of crops.

Passive diffusion was believed to be the major process of transmembrane B transport prior to the identification of B-transporting molecules (). Physiological evidence of preferential B transport is suggestive of the contribution of transporter molecules to B transport in plants (; ; ). In Arabidopsis thaliana roots, AtNIP5;1, a boric acid channel, plays a role in B uptake (). AtBOR1, an efflux B transporter, mediates xylem loading of B (). Another A. thaliana B transporter, AtBOR2, contributes to RG-II dimer formation in roots subjected to limited B environments (). AtNIP6;1, another boric acid channel in A. thaliana, mediates preferential B distribution to developing leaves under B-deficiency (). These findings suggest that long-distance B delivery and local B distribution/supply are important for plant growth under B-deficient conditions.

Using the identified transporters, transgenic plants tolerant to low-B conditions have been generated by artificially upregulating expression of B transporters in A. thaliana plants. Overexpression of AtNIP5;1, a boric acid channel for root B uptake, and/or AtBOR1, an efflux B transporter for xylem loading, improves the vegetative and reproductive growth of A. thaliana under B-deficient conditions (; ). The generation of B-deficiency-tolerant A. thaliana plants suggests that upregulating B-transporter expression can improve the growth of crops under B-deficiency.

AtBOR1 homologous genes have been isolated from crops such as rice (; ), grapevine (), wheat (), and Brassica napus (). In addition, B-deficiency-tolerant cultivars of rice, maize, and wheat show increased BOR1 transcript levels (). This indicates that BOR1 homologs are highly conserved in crops and can be used to improve B-deficiency-tolerance. However, the effects of overexpressing BOR1 on B-deficiency-tolerance have not been examined in crops.

In this study, we introduced the AtBOR1 gene into a tomato model cultivar (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Micro-tom) and established AtBOR1-overexpressing tomato plants. Tomato is a model plant of fruit-bearing crops. The occurrence of B-deficiency in tomato cultivation fields has been reported in several countries from Europe, Asia, South America, and Africa (). We examined the growth and B accumulation in these plants subjected to different B conditions. Two independent lines strongly expressing AtBOR1 showed normal leaf development, even under B-deficient conditions, and higher B accumulatioin in shoots/fruits compared with non-transgenic tomato plants. These results suggest that upregulating B-transporter expression may improve the growth of fruit-bearing crops under B-deficient conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PLANT MATERIAL AND CONSTRUCTION

Seeds of tomato cv. Micro-Tom, a dwarf tomato cultivar () were obtained from Kazusa DNA Research Institute (Chiba, Japan) and University of Tsukuba (Ibaraki, Japan). A plasmid carrying the CaMV 35S RNA promoter (P35S):AtBOR1 was constructed for the transformation of tomato plants based on hygromycin selection. The P35S:AtBOR1 fragment of pTF469 () was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the primers 5′-CACCAGATTAGCCTTTTCAATTTCAG-3′ and 5′-GATCTAGTAACATAGATGACACCGC-3′. The amplified fragment was subcloned into pENTR/D-TOPO (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). P35S:AtBOR1 was then subcloned into pMDC99 () using the LR recombination reaction. The resulting plasmid was named pHH104.

PLANT TRANSFORMATION

pTF469 and pHH104 were used for transformation of tomato plants to obtain plants expressing AtBOR1. Kanamycin (Wako Pure Chemicals, Osaka, Japan) and hygromycin (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) were used for selecting the transformants carrying pTF467 and pHH104, respectively. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Micro-Tom was performed as described previously () with minor modifications. Briefly, for hygromycin selection, 5 mg/L of hygromycin was added to the callus induction and shoot induction media. Antibiotic selection was not applied during the rooting step.

PCR-BASED CONFIRMATION OF THE T-DNA INSERTION

Genomic DNA was extracted from the leaf (about 5 mg) as described previously (). Obtained DNA was used as template to confirm T-DNA integration into the genome by PCR. Primers specific to AtBOR1 and NOS-terminator in the T-DNA were designed as 5′-CGTGGAAACCGTTCCATTC-3′ and 5′-GCCAAATGTTTGAACGATCGG-3′, and were used to amplify the T-DNA fragment. Tomato EST SGN-E341940 was selected as a gene with homology to AtACTIN2 (At3G18780) and was referred to as the Actin-like gene. The primers specific to Actin-like were 5′-TGTTGCTATTCAGGCTGTGC-3′ and 5′-AATCACGACCAGCAAGATCC-3′.

REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION (RT)-PCR ANALYSIS

Seeds of non-transgenic and transgenic plants (T1) were germinated on vermiculite and grown for 14 days (22°C, 16 h light/8 h dark). T-DNA insertion was then examined by PCR as described above. PCR-positive transgenic plants and non-transgenic plants were transferred to MGRL hydroponic solution () containing 100 μM boric acid. The solution was replaced weekly. Fourteen days after transfer, roots of the plants were harvested for RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The RNase-Free DNase Kit (Qiagen) was used to eliminate DNA contamination. Reverse transcription was conducted using PrimeScript RT reagent Kit (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan). PCR was performed using obtained cDNA as template. Primers 5′-AATCTCGCAGCGGAAACG-3′ and 5′-TGGAGTCGAACTTGAACTTGTC-3′ were used for AtBOR1 expression analysis. The expression of the Actin-like gene was also examined as a control using the primers described above.

PLANTS CULTURED UNDER DIFFERENT B SUPPLIES

Plants were incubated at 25°C under a 16 h light/8 h dark cycle. Seeds of non-transgenic and transgenic plants (T1) were sown on vermiculite and grown for 19 days, after which the T-DNA insertion was examined by PCR as described above. PCR-positive transgenic plants and non-transgenic plants were transferred to MGRL hydroponic solution supplemented with 0.1 or 100 μM boric acid. The solution was renewed twice a week for the 0.1 μM boric acid treatment and once a week for the 100 μM boric acid treatment.

DETERMINATION OF BORON CONCENTRATIONS IN PLANT TISSUES

To determine the shoot B concentration, whole shoots were harvested after 20 days of hydroponic culture and then dried at 60°C for at least 3 days. After determination of total shoot dry weight, samples were acid-digested and subjected to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS; SPQ-9000, Seiko Instruments Inc., Chiba, Japan) for quantifying the B concentration (). Plants were also grown hydroponically until fruit ripening and harvest. After drying and acid digestion, B concentrations in the fruits were determined by ICP-MS.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

To verify the statistical significance of differences among the lines, the data were analyzed using the Student’s t-test (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

GENERATION OF TRANSGENIC TOMATO EXPRESSING AtBOR1

After several batches of transformation, 11 independent candidate lines were obtained. Among them, three lines showed good fertility and more than 100 seeds were obtained from each line. These three lines were used for the following experiments. Genomic DNA was extracted from a leaf of regenerated plants (T0). The T-DNA integration into the genome was examined on these plants by PCR analysis using the specific primers for T-DNA (Figure 1A). All tested regenerated T0 plants showed a band at the expected size. No band corresponding to the T-DNA fragment was obtained from non-transgenic plants using PCR. The Actin-like gene was used as a positive control and all plants (including non-transgenic plants) showed a band at the expected size. These results indicated that the regenerated plants contained the T-DNA insertion in their genome. These three lines were named L1, L2, and L3.

FIGURE 1

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis was conducted to investigate whether the introduced AtBOR1 gene was expressed in these transgenic lines (Figure 1B). AtBOR1 expression was clearly observed after 20 cycles of PCR in L1 and L2, whereas no signal was detected in non-transgenic plants and L3. A relatively weak signal of AtBOR1 was obtained from L3 after 30 cycles of PCR compared to L1 and L2, but not from non-transgenic plants. These results suggest that introduced AtBOR1 is expressed relatively strongly in L1 and L2 compared to L3.

TRANSGENIC TOMATO PLANTS WITH STRONG EXPRESSION OF AtBOR1 DID NOT SHOW B-DEFICIENCY SYMPTOMS UNDER LOW-B GROWTH CONDITIONS

To investigate the effect of heterologous AtBOR1 expression on growth of tomato plants under B-deficiency, non-transgenic plants and three transgenic T1 lines were grown hydroponically in the presence of 0.1 or 100 μM boric acid. Experiments were performed with at least four replications and representative individuals are shown in Figure 2. Under B-sufficient conditions (100 μM B), shoot growth and development were normal in all tested lines (Figures 2A,D,G,J), although L3 showed relatively small shoots (Figure 2J) compared to other samples (Figures 2A,D,G). Phenotypic differences among lines were clear under the low-B conditions (0.1 μM B). In non-transgenic plants under the low-B conditions, shoot growth was retarded compared to the control (Figures 2A,B). Curly leaves were observed and development of newly growing leaves was often inhibited by the B-deficient treatment (Figure 2C). These phenotypes were also observed in L3 subjected to the low-B treatment (Figures 2K,L), but not observed in L1 and L2 plants (Figures 2E,F,H,I). In L1 and L2, development of new leaves was normal, even under the low-B condition (Figures 2F,I). These results indicated that heterologous expression of AtBOR1 increases tolerance of tomato plants to B-deficiency stress.

FIGURE 2

ENHANCED BORON ACCUMULATION IN TOMATO PLANTS EXPRESSING AtBOR1 UNDER THE LOW-B GROWTH CONDITION

Shoot dry weight and B concentration were measured after 20 days of hydroponic culture under the B-sufficient and B-deficient conditions. L1 was not tested in this experiment due to the limited seed numbers. Shoot dry weight of L2, which showed improved B-deficiency-tolerance (Figures 2H,I), was slightly higher than those of the non-transgenic plants and L3, although not significantly (Figure 3A). This tendency was not observed in the 100 μM boric acid treatment.

The B concentration in shoots was compared among the lines (Figure 3B). Under the low-B treatment, shoot B concentration was 1.4-fold higher in L2 than in non-transgenic plants and L3. When plants were supplied with 100 μM boric acid, B accumulation in shoots did not differ significantly between the non-transgenic plants and L2. L3 tended to accumulate less B than non-transgenic plants.

FIGURE 3

We also examined fruit yields of non-transgenic and transgenic plants. In all lines, low-B treatment impaired fruit yield; however, no consistent result was obtained due to the large variation among plants (data not shown). We next measured B concentration in fruits harvested from the plants grown under B-sufficient and B-deficient conditions (Figure 4). For the low-B treatment, the fruits of L1 accumulated significantly higher B than non-transgenic plants (Figure 4A). Fruit B concentration under the B-deficient condition appeared higher in L2 than in non-transgenic plants, although the difference was not significant. This tendency of an increased B concentration in L1 and L2 was not observed under B-sufficient conditions (Figure 4B). The B concentrations in fruits of L3 was relatively lower than in non-transgenic plants under both B treatments. These results suggest that B accumulation in shoots and fruits is enhanced in the stronger AtBOR1 expression lines.

FIGURE 4

DISCUSSION

As discussed in a recent review (), regulation and manipulation of plant membrane transporters can be used to improve crop production under various soil-derived stresses such as aluminum toxicity and nutrient deficiency. B-deficiency occurs in various fields globally (). Based on the molecular mechanisms of B transport, we generated A. thaliana plants tolerant to low-B conditions by upregulating B-transporter genes (; ). Increased expression of AtNIP5;1 and/or AtBOR1 significantly improved vegetative and reproductive growth of A. thaliana with limited B supply. Since the concentration range between B-deficiency and toxicity is rather narrow in many plants, improper B fertilization can lead to an excess dosage and negatively affect crop growth (; ; ). Therefore, as established in A. thaliana, molecular breeding of crops with enhanced B-transport activity is a promising approach to address B-deficiency (; ). However, no attempt has been made to establish B-deficiency-tolerant crops by enhancing BOR1 expression.

In this study, tomato was selected as a test plant because it is a common model of fruit-bearing crops. The occurrence of B-deficiency has been reported for tomato cultivation in many countries (). Genotypic variation of B-uptake activity and B-deficiency-tolerance among tomato cultivars has been observed (; ), which indicates that enhancement of B-transport efficiency confers B-deficiency-tolerance in tomato. B-deficiency symptoms of tomato plants are represented by shoot growth inhibition, curly and yellowish leaves of young seedlings, and defects in quality fruit setting during the reproductive growth stages (; ; ).

In the present study, wild-type tomato plants showed retarded whole shoot growth, curled leaves, and abnormal and poor development of new leaves in the presence of 0.1 μM boric acid (Figures 2A–C and 3A). These phenotypes are typical B-deficiency symptoms reported in early tomato seedlings, suggesting that our experimental condition was suitable for evaluating the effects of AtBOR1 overexpression in young tomato plants grown under limited B availability. We performed several batches of transformation experiments and obtained three independent transgenic tomato lines carrying P35S-AtBOR1 (Figure 1A) with substantial seed yields. Expression analysis of introduced AtBOR1 in these lines demonstrated that L1 and L2 were strongly expressing lines and L3 was a rather weakly expressing line (Figure 1B). These strongly expressing lines did not show severe B-deficiency symptoms, which were observed in non-transgenic plants as well as in weakly expressing L3 (Figure 2). Furthermore, shoot and fruit B accumulation under the low-B conditions significantly increased in L1 and L2, respectively, compared to non-transgenic plants, but not in L3 (Figures 3B and 4A). These results suggest that enhanced expression of a B transporter improves the root-to-shoot translocation of B in tomato under low-B availability, which contributes to maintaining proper shoot development. Since the effect of AtBOR1 expression on yield remains unclear due to the considerable variation observed under our hydroponic conditions, this should be further examined with an improved cultivation system and moderate B-deficiency conditions.

Optimal B concentrations in culture media are narrow, and overdose of B leads to increased B accumulation in plant tissues and plant growth inhibition (; ; ). Excess B increases DNA damage, which may cause B toxicity in plants (). Concentrations of B in shoot and fruits under B-sufficient conditions were similar between the non-transgenic and AtBOR1-expressing plants (Figures 3B and 4B). Growth under the 100 μM boric acid condition was comparable among the non-transgenic and transgenic plants (Figures 2 and 3A), suggesting that overexpression of AtBOR1 has a negligible adverse effect on tomato young seedlings under B-sufficient conditions. In A. thaliana roots, AtBOR1 protein levels are regulated by post-translational mechanisms, and protein degradation is promoted under B-sufficient conditions through ubiquitination of AtBOR1 (; ). This regulation of AtBOR1 likely prevents B overaccumulation in plants. In fact, AtBOR1-overexpressing A. thaliana accumulates wild-type levels of B under excess B treatments (). In this study, we examined the effects of heterologous AtBOR1 expression in tomato, but similar mechanisms may regulate AtBOR1 levels in tomato under B-sufficient conditions.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, we established transgenic tomato plants tolerant to B-deficient environments by upregulating a B-transporter gene. Since B-deficiency is a serious issue in various crop productions, our findings suggest that application of AtBOR1 or its ortholog to crop breeding may improve growth under B-deficient cultivation conditions.

Statements

Acknowledgments

The authors thank K. Aizawa for providing technical assistance. This work was supported in part by a grant from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research S. No. 21228002 to Toru Fujiwara). The authors also thank Prof. Ezura for suggesting on Micro-Tom transformation.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1

    BellalouiN.BrownP. (1998). Cultivar differences in boron uptake and distribution in celery (Apium graveolens), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) and wheat (Triticum aestivum).Plant Soil198153158. 10.1023/A:1004343031242

  • 2

    BrownJ. C.JonesW. E. (1971). Differential transport of boron in tomato (Lycopersicon esculenlumMill.). Physiol. Plant.25279282. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1971.tb01443.x

  • 3

    ChengC.RerkasemB. (1993). Effects of boron on pollen viability in wheat.Plant Soil155313315. 10.1007/BF00025045

  • 4

    CurtisM. D.GrossniklausU. (2003). A gateway cloning vector set for high-throughput functional analysis of genes in planta.Plant Physiol.133462469. 10.1104/pp.103.027979

  • 5

    DannelF.PfefferH.RomheldV. (2000). Characterization of root boron pools, boron uptake and boron translocation in sunflower using the stable isotopes B-10 and B-11.Aust. J. Plant Physiol.27397405. 10.1071/PP99086

  • 6

    DellB.HuangL. B. (1997). Physiological response of plants to low boron.Plant Soil193103120. 10.1023/A:1004264009230

  • 7

    FrancoisL. E. (1984). Effect of excess boron on tomato yield, fruit size, and vegetative growth.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.109322324.

  • 8

    FujiwaraT.HiraiM. Y.ChinoM.KomedaY.NaitoS. (1992). Effects of sulfur nutrition on expression of the soybean seed storage protein genes in transgenic petunia.Plant Physiol.99263268. 10.1104/pp.99.1.263

  • 9

    GargO.SharmaA.KonaG. (1979). Effect of boron on the pollen vitality and yield of rice plants (Oryza sativa L. var. Jaya). Plant Soil52591594. 10.1007/BF02277956

  • 10

    GuptaU. C.JameY. W.CampbellC. A.LeyshonA. J.NicholaichukW. (1985). Boron toxicity and deficiency: a review.Can. J. Soil Sci.65381409. 10.4141/cjss85-044

  • 11

    HuangL.YeZ.BellR. (1996). The importance of sampling immature leaves for the diagnosis of boron deficiency in oilseed rape (Brassica napus cv. Eureka). Plant Soil183187198. 10.1007/BF00011434

  • 12

    HuH. I.BrownP. H. (1994). Localization of boron in cell-walls of squash and tobacco and Its association with pectin – evidence for a structural role of boron in the cell-wall.Plant Physiol.105681689. 10.1104/pp.105.2.681

  • 13

    JohnstonE. S.FisherP. L. (1930). The essential nature of boron to the growth and fruiting of the tomato.Plant Physiol.5387392. 10.1104/pp.5.3.387

  • 14

    KasaiK.TakanoJ.MiwaK.ToyodaA.FujiwaraT. (2011). High boron-induced ubiquitination regulates vacuolar sorting of the BOR1 borate transporter in Arabidopsis thaliana.J. Biol. Chem.28661756183. 10.1074/jbc.M110.184929

  • 15

    KasajimaI.IdeY.Ohkama-OhtsuN.HayashiH.YoneyamaT.FujiwaraT. (2004). A protocol for rapid DNA extraction from Arabidopsis thaliana for PCR analysis.Plant Mol. Biol. Rep.224952. 10.1007/BF02773348

  • 16

    KatoY.MiwaK.TakanoJ.WadaM.FujiwaraT. (2009). Highly boron deficiency-tolerant plants generated by enhanced expression of NIP5;1, a boric acid channel.Plant Cell Physiol.505866. 10.1093/Pcp/Pcn168

  • 17

    KirkG. J.LoneraganJ. F. (1988). Functional boron requirement for leaf expansion and Its use as a critical value for diagnosis of boron deficiency in soybean.Agron. J.80758762. 10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000050013x

  • 18

    KouchiH.KumazawaK. (1975). Anatomical responses of root tips to boron deficiency II.Effect of boron deficiency on the cellular growth and development in root tips. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.21137150. 10.1080/00380768.1975.10432630

  • 19

    LeaungthitikanchanaS.FujibeT.TanakaM.WangS.SottaN.TakanoJ.et al (2013). Differential expression of three BOR1 genes corresponding to different genomes in response to boron conditions in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Cell Physiol.5410561063. 10.1093/pcp/pct059

  • 20

    LeaungthitikanchanaS.TanakaM.LordkaewS.JamjodS.RerkasemB.FujiwaraT. (2014). Comparison of BOR1-like gene expression in two genotypes with different boron efficiencies in commercial crop plants in Thailand.Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 10.1080/00380768.2014.881707

  • 21

    MatohT.KawaguchiS.KobayashiM. (1996). Ubiquity of a borate rhamnogalacturonan II complex in the cell walls of higher plants.Plant Cell Physiol.37636640. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a028992

  • 22

    MatohT.OchiaiK. (2005). Distribution and partitioning of newly taken-up boron in sunflower.Plant Soil278351360. 10.1007/s11104-005-0372-2

  • 23

    MiwaK.TakanoJ.FujiwaraT. (2006). Improvement of seed yields under boron-limiting conditions through overexpression of BOR1, a boron transporter for xylem loading, in Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant J.4610841091. 10.1111/J.1365-313x.2006.02763.X

  • 24

    MiwaK.WakutaS.TakadaS.IdeK.TakanoJ.NaitoS.et al (2013). Roles of BOR2, a boron exporter, in cross linking of rhamnogalacturonan II and root elongation under boron limitation in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol.16316991709. 10.1104/pp.113.225995

  • 25

    NableR. O.BañuelosG. S.PaullJ. G. (1997). Boron toxicity.Plant Soil193181198. 10.1023/A:1004272227886

  • 26

    NakagawaY.HanaokaH.KobayashiM.MiyoshiK.MiwaK.FujiwaraT. (2007). Cell-type specificity of the expression of Os BOR1, a rice efflux boron transporter gene, is regulated in response to boron availability for efficient boron uptake and xylem loading.Plant Cell1926242635. 10.1105/tpc.106.049015

  • 27

    O’NeillM. A.EberhardS.AlbersheimP.DarvillA. G. (2001). Requirement of borate cross-linking of cell wall rhamnogalacturonan II for Arabidopsis growth.Science294846849. 10.1126/science.1062319

  • 28

    O’NeillM. A.WarrenfeltzD.KatesK.PellerinP.DocoT.DarvillA.G.et al (1996). Rhamnogalacturonan-II, a pectic polysaccharide in the walls of growing plant cell, forms a dimer that is covalently cross-linked by a borate ester. In vitro conditions for the formation and hydrolysis of the dimer. J. Biol. Chem.2712292322930. 10.1074/jbc.271.37.22923

  • 29

    Pérez-CastroR.KasaiK.Gainza-CortésF.Ruiz-LaraS.CasarettoJ. A.Peña-CortésH.et al (2012). VvBOR1, the grapevine ortholog of AtBOR1, encodes an efflux boron transporter that is differentially expressed throughout reproductive development ofVitis vinifera L. Plant Cell Physiol.53485494. 10.1093/pcp/pcs001

  • 30

    SakamotoT.InuiY. T.UraguchiS.YoshizumiT.MatsunagaS.MastuiM.et al (2011). Condensin II alleviates DNA damage and is essential for tolerance of boron overload stress in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell2335333546. 10.1105/tpc.111.086314

  • 31

    SchonM. K.BlevinsD. G. (1990). Foliar boron applications increase the final number of branches and pods on branches of field-grown soybeans.Plant Physiol.92602607. 10.1104/pp.92.3.602

  • 32

    SchroederJ. I.DelhaizeE.FrommerW. B.GuerinotM. L.HarrisonM. J.Herrera-EstrellaL.et al (2013). Using membrane transporters to improve crops for sustainable food production.Nature4976066. 10.1038/nature11909

  • 33

    ScottJ. W.HarbaughB. K. (1989). Micro-Tom. A miniature dwarf tomato. Florida Agric. Exp. Station Circ.37016.

  • 34

    ShorrocksV. M. (1997). The occurrence and correction of boron deficiency.Plant Soil193121148. 10.1023/A:1004216126069

  • 35

    SunH.-J.UchiiS.WatanabeS.EzuraH. (2006). A highly efficient transformation protocol for Micro-Tom, a model cultivar for tomato functional genomics.Plant Cell Physiol.47426431. 10.1093/pcp/pci251

  • 36

    SunJ.ShiL.ZhangC.XuF. (2012). Cloning and characterization of boron transporters in Brassica napus.Mol. Biol. Rep.3919631973. 10.1007/s11033-011-0930-z

  • 37

    TakanoJ.MiwaK.FujiwaraT. (2008). Boron transport mechanisms: collaboration of channels and transporters.Trends Plant Sci.13451457. 10.1016/J.Tplants.2008.05.007

  • 38

    TakanoJ.MiwaK.YuanL. X.Von WirenN.FujiwaraT. (2005). Endocytosis and degradation of BOR1, a boron transporter of Arabidopsis thaliana, regulated by boron availability.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1021227612281. 10.1073/Pnas.0502060102

  • 39

    TakanoJ.NoguchiK.YasumoriM.KobayashiM.GajdosZ.MiwaK.et al (2002). Arabidopsis boron transporter for xylem loading.Nature420337340. 10.1038/Nature01139

  • 40

    TakanoJ.WadaM.LudewigU.SchaafG.Von WirenN.FujiwaraT. (2006). The Arabidopsis major intrinsic protein NIP5;1 is essential for efficient boron uptake and plant development under boron limitation.Plant Cell1814981509. 10.1105/tpc.106.041640

  • 41

    TanakaM.WallaceI. S.TakanoJ.RobertsD. M.FujiwaraT. (2008). NIP6;1 is a boric acid channel for preferential transport of boron to growing shoot tissues in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell2028602875. 10.1105/tpc.108.058628

  • 42

    TanakaN.UraguchiS.SaitoA.KajikawaM.KasaiK.SatoY.et al (2013). Roles of pollen-specific boron efflux transporter, OsBOR4, in the rice fertilization process.Plant Cell Physiol.5420112019. 10.1093/pcp/pct136

  • 43

    UraguchiS.FujiwaraT. (2011). Significant contribution of boron stored in seeds to initial growth of rice seedlings.Plant Soil340435442. 10.1007/s11104-010-0614-9

  • 44

    WaringtonK. (1923). The effect of boric acid and borax on the broad bean and certain other plants.Ann. Bot.os-37629672.

  • 45

    YamauchiT.HaraT.SonodaY. (1986). Effects of boron deficiency and calcium supply on the calcium metabolism in tomato plant.Plant Soil93223230. 10.1007/BF02374224

Summary

Keywords

AtBOR1, boron-deficiency, nutrient, tomato, transgenic, transporter

Citation

Uraguchi S, Kato Y, Hanaoka H, Miwa K and Fujiwara T (2014) Generation of boron-deficiency-tolerant tomato by overexpressing an Arabidopsis thaliana borate transporter AtBOR1. Front. Plant Sci. 5:125. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00125

Received

05 December 2013

Accepted

16 March 2014

Published

01 April 2014

Volume

5 - 2014

Edited by

Felipe Klein Ricachenevsky, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Reviewed by

Fangsen Xu, Huazhong Agricultural University, China; Longbin Huang, The University of Queensland, Australia

Copyright

*Correspondence: Toru Fujiwara, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan e-mail:

Present address: Shimpei Uraguchi, Department of Plant Physiology, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany

This article was submitted to Plant Nutrition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science.

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics