Abstract
Some areas in plant abiotic stress research are not frequently addressed by genomic and molecular tools. One such area is the cross reaction of gravitational force with upward capillary pull of water and the mechanical-functional trade-off in plant vasculature. Although frost, drought and flooding stress greatly impact these physiological processes and consequently plant performance, the genomic and molecular basis of such trade-off is only sporadically addressed and so is its adaptive value. Embolism resistance is an important multiple stress- opposition trait and do offer scopes for critical insight to unravel and modify the input of living cells in the process and their biotechnological intervention may be of great importance. Vascular plants employ different physiological strategies to cope with embolism and variation is observed across the kingdom. The genomic resources in this area have started to emerge and open up possibilities of synthesis, validation and utilization of the new knowledge-base. This review article assesses the research till date on this issue and discusses new possibilities for bridging physiology and genomics of a plant, and foresees its implementation in crop science.
Introduction
A green plant is unique in its hydraulic architecture. Hydraulic conductivity of the xylem is closely linked to the minimum leaf area, which it must supply with water and nutrients for survival. Hydraulic conductivity, as quantified by Zimmermann (1974), is generally measured as leaf specific conductivity (flow rate per unit pressure gradient) divided by the leaf area supplied by the xylem pipeline segment. This measure is a key for quick evaluation of pressure gradients within a plant. Modeling the functional and natural architecture of plant water flow pipeline takes more traits in consideration than merely the physical attributes of a mechanical pump. The contribution of living cells and more specifically, genes and proteins, for maintenance of the “green pump” remains largely unaddressed.
Several theories have been proposed to explain ascent of sap. The operation of the green pump is simple yet elegant and is best described by the Cohesion-Tension Theory (CTT) (Dixon, ) but also synthesized from the work of many scientists over the last few decades. Besides physical explanations, the living parenchyma cells around xylem were originally proposed to be of importance by Bose () in his pulsation theory. Later, the living xylem parenchyma cells indeed proved of high importance for the continuous ascent of sap.
The major governing factors are the physical properties of aqueous solution, means of transport and xylem anatomy, consideration of all of which makes the “sap conducting system” comparable to basic hydraulic systems such as pumps and irrigations in household or human blood vasculature. Components of such system are mainly (i) a driving force, (ii) a pipeline system, (iii) a reservoir and other regulating factors. To establish a soil-water-atmosphere continuum, an uninterrupted “water network” is necessary, which is built in the plant where transpirational evaporation is the driving force (Figure 1A). The evaporation of water from the porous green tissue surface creates a capillary pull in the water menisci (Figure 1Ai) and a curvature is induced in them, which is sufficient to support a huge water column against gravity in the stem and root vascular cylinder (Figure 1Aii). The water reservoir is the soil, wherefrom the root draws its supply (Figure 1Aiii). The empirical Jurin law says that a menisci radius of 0.12 μm can support a column of 120 m (Sperry, 2013; Zimmermann, 1983). The pull creates sub-atmospheric pressure in the xylem vessels. As the height of a plant increases, the water potential drops, and it is expected that leaves, twigs and upper extremities will display a 10–1000 times drop of pressure (Figure 1A, Tyree and Sperry, 1989). Sixty five percentage of the water potential drop occurs in tree trunk xylem, with a 20% contribution from root and 14% from leaves (Tyree and Sperry, 1989). This explains why big tree trunks can survive severe localized damages near the base.
Figure 1
Plant architecture and the green pump
Architecture of a plant is defined by its height, girth, woodiness, root system design and shoot disposition. Such architecture varies across the plant kingdom, along which varies the plants' hydraulic nature. Secondary thickening is a major player that governs the green pump. It has been shown that root pressure plays little or no part in maintenance of this column in woody plants. Severing the root may not hamper upward movement of water, if there is a direct supply to the vessels; however leaves are necessary. Even the best vacuum pump is able to pull water to not more than 10.4 m, considering that a Sequoia tree may have to pull water up to 100 m. However, in the monocots, root pressure is considered to be a major player of sap pull.
Considering the physical properties of green-pump, cavitation and embolism are major threats to the water column in xylem and subsequently, to survival, across the kingdom. To successfully transport water and minerals from soil to leaf, existing pressure in xylem conduits needs to remain sub-atmospheric (negative), in contrast to animal system where long distance transport is actively under positive pressure. The molecular property of cohesion gives a high strength to water. Ultrapure water confined to tubes of very small bore will need a tension comparable to the strength needed to break steel columns of the same diameter. Cohesion imparts strength comparable to solid wires in a water column. The vice is: once air is introduced in such system, the column will snap apart. To prevent such snapping, xylem properties play an important role.
Physiology of xylogenesis: the biphasic development in xylem
The biphasic development of xylem in plants is critical to understand the hydraulic architecture as well as the air-water-soil continuum (Figure 1B). Procambium develops into xylem precursor cells that eventually differentiate into xylem fiber cells, xylem parenchyma, and tracheary elements, consisting of vessels and tracheids in the first phase. The second phase deposits secondary xylem walls onto the primary xylem walls (Fukuda,
Physiology of cavitation
The negative pressure in the xylem may descend low enough to make the water metastable. To achieve non-disrupted flow in such system, water must remain liquid below its vapor pressure. This metastable state induces nucleation of vaporization, or cavitation. Cavitation is the introduction of air spaces into the continuous water column and under physical metastable state water is prone to form air bubbles easily. Introduced in a xylem lumen, air cavities rupture the water column and in its worst, block the transport of water and minerals to the leaf. This blockage is known as “embolism” and may lead the plant to a lethal fate.
Cavitation is known to occur in plants frequently. Paradoxically, occurrence of cavitation is the strongest support for CTT. It is only natural to observe cavitation if water is under such negative pressure. The root vessels of field grown, well watered maize plants have been known to embolize daily and then refill. Vessels that were filled by dawn may embolize at mid-afternoon and by sunset they are again refilled (McCully et al., 1998). When transpiration rate is high and water scarcity is at bay, trees display cavitation, which means that embolism can well be induced by water stress. Large metaxylem vessels show a higher rate of embolism, and evidence suggest that water stress-induced embolism is of the frequent most sort (Tyree and Sperry, 1989). It is a prerequisite for cavitation that some vessels are embolized to start with; which is met by bubbles introduced in some of the vessels by mechanical damage, harbivory and insect attack.
Stress-induced embolism in plants
Both abiotic and biotic stresses can induce embolism in a plant. Drought and frost—induced embolisms are most prevalent, while mechanical stress and pathogen-induced damage are often the primary inducers.
Desert plants and dry-season crops are most threatened by drought-induced embolism. Air-seeding increases during drought as the sap pressure becomes increasingly negative due to high suction. The evaporation from leaf surface increases and the porous conduit wall may release air inside the functional conduits. They behave as nucleation centers and cause the sap pressure to increase to atmospheric level. The bubble is then likely to start an embolism that fills up the diameter of conduit, as the surrounding water is pulled up by transpiration.
Interconduit pit membranes with nano-scale pores normally restrict passage of air bubble from affected to functional conduits but at a high pressure difference they fail to stop the propagation. The rate of this propagation is important to measure the cavitation resistance in a plant.
Freezing is another cause of embolism, specially in woody temperate species. Freeze-thaw cycles may lead to 100% loss of water transport due to embolism in some species (Scholander et al., 1961). The primary governing factor in damage intensity seems to be the mean diameter of the conduits. Smaller vessel diameters are more vulnerable to damage.
Frost-induced air seeding is caused by segregation of gas by ice. There is a certain amount of salting out from the sap during freezing of sap, and if the salts are not able to move through the walls, they raise the osmotic pressure of remaining solution (Sevanto et al., 2012). This embolism can be more severe if there is functional drought prevailing. Freezing-induced embolism is a primary stress in forests where seasonal freeze-thaw is observed. Herbaceous plants, on the other hand, hardly survive freezing and are mostly at threat from drought-induced embolism.
Vascular wilt pathogens can wipe out entire crop. It is known that vascular pathogens induce water stress in their hosts; but can embolism be a cause of such stress? All vascular wilt pathogens break into rigid secondary xylem walls to enter the vessels as well as the pit membranes. Generally vascular wilt pathogens or their spores and conidia are too large to pass through pit membrane pores (Mollenhauer and Hopkins, 1974; Choat et al.,
There is also an internal mechanical stress associated with ascent of sap. The high negative tension within the xylem pipeline causes an inward pool. Depending on the sapwood elasticity, there is a daily diameter change of tree trunk correlated to transpiration and daylight. In Scots pine, Perämäki et al. (2001) described daily changes in the sapwood diameter. The pull causes pressure on a stem surface element directed toward the center of the stem and the tracheal structure resists the movement of the surface element. The mechanical strength of the tracheary wall and its composition is, hence, an important factor in maintaining normal xylem activity as is the plasticity of pit membrane structure and composition.
Vulnerability of xylem to cavitation
Xylem seems to be vulnerable to cavitation in many different ways. This vulnerability can vary depending on the species, season, and availability, state and temperature of water. Broadly, the vulnerability of plants to cavitation is often plotted on xylem vulnerability curves, which is a function of decline in xylem hydraulic conductivity due to increasingly negative xylem pressure. Such declines are typically expressed relative to the maximum decline possible as the Percentage Loss of Conductivity (PLC). Comparisons of the vulnerability to cavitation among species are made using the xylem pressure at 50% loss of conductivity (P50) with the traditional plotting of vulnerability curve (Meinzer and McCulloh, 2013). There remain controversies related to the techniques used for measurement of vulnerability described elsewhere in details (McElrone et al., 2012; Cochard et al.,
The vulnerability curve for a number of tree species, as put forward by Tyree et al. (1999) shows a typical exponential shape, indicating that sub-zero pressure is a direct inducer of cavitation. This makes cavitation a regular process and necessitates a resistance mechanism in plants. It has also been claimed that cavitation is rapidly repaired by a miraculous mechanism (Holbrook and Zwieniecki,
Cavitation resitance by refilling: a questionable trait
The removal of air seeds from lumen to turn a non-functional vessel to functional is known as refilling. The idea, though widely observed, recently was confronted with a serious doubt voiced by the plant hydraulic scientists. The long-established experimental procedure that has been followed to measure cavitation has been pronounced faulty (Sperry, 2013). It has been claimed that the standard procedure of xylem hydraulic conductivity measurement, by excising the stem under water to avoid air aspiration in the open conduits, is not a valid observation procedure. It has been suggested that in many species, significant amount of cavitation is introduced even when the stem is cut under water. The consequences of this artifact on previous datasets were significant, as it may be reflected in all vulnerability to cavitation curves obtained in other species for a long period of time; and perturb our analysis of refilled vessels.
However debatable the issue may be, recent high resolution and real-time imaging studies (Holbrook et al.,
Genetic control of refilling mechanism
Bay leaf tree, Laurus nobilis is an aromatic shrub in which mechanism of refilling is proposed to be linked to starch to sugar conversion. Reserve carbohydrate depletion from xylem parenchyma induces phloem unloading in a radial manner via ray parenchyma (Salleo et al., 2009; Nardini et al., 2011). Xylem-phloem solute exchange has been found to occur along both symplastic and apoplastic paths (Van Bel, 1990). It has been hypothesized that solutes might move radially along the ray cell walls, enter the embolized xylem conduits and increase the solute concentration of the residual water within them, thus promoting xylem refilling by altering osmoticum. The role of xylem parenchyma in refilling is significant. Lianas, shrubs and vine fibers are often observed to have living protoplasts and starch granules (Fahn and Leshem,
Water stressed Populus trichocarpa plants revealed an upregulation of ion transporters, aquaporins, and carbon metabolism related genes (Secchi et al., 2011; Secchi and Zwieniecki, 2012). A putative sucrose-cation co-transporter may aid the refilling process as suggested by the chemical profiling of vessel lumen. Grapevine refilling petioles show strong upregulation of carbon metabolism and aquaporin expression (Perrone et al., 2012).
A basic assumption is made that in dicots, to enhance refilling ability trait, one might target carbohydrate metabolizing genes in a localized manner to improve sucrose release. Sucrose may be used as an osmoticum inside non-functional lumens or may be used as energy currency. Localization of increased aquaporins (PIPs and TIPs) within axial parenchyma surrounding conduits may prove important. It is now proved by imaging studies (Brodersen et al.,
In monocots, root pressure is the most important mechanism for refilling reported till date. Grasses exhibit root pressure more often, and with the increase of plant height the basal root pressure increases (Cao et al.,
Genomic perspective: genes, proteins and models implicated in refilling
The battle with cavitation is fought either with efficient refilling or fine structural modulation of pit membrane and strength of vascular cylinder wall. The genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic studies may thus come under two broad sections: genomic basis of refilling and genomic basic of mechanical strength (Figure 2A).
Figure 2

(A) The strategies of vascular plant in a battle against embolism. Monocots often employ root pressure, while dicots employ novel refilling mechanism, and mechanical resistance to resist cavitation. There is no clear demarcation between the strategies employed by the two groups, and the strategies may overlap. (B) The sugar sensing model of embolism refilling process, modified from Secchi et al. (2011). For detail explanations of the model, refer text and Secchi et al. (2011). Briefly, when vessels are filled and functional, a default “switch off” mode is active. Sucrose is continuously transported from accompanying xylem parenchyma cells into the vessels. Cavitation induces a “switch on” mode of sensing. When a vessel is filled with air, free passage of sucrose to the vessel lumen is hindered, and the sucrose molecules are deposited on vessel wall. This, with a positive feedback loop generates a cascade of high starch to sucrose conversion (Bucci et al.,
Genomic basis of refilling
The process of refilling or repair of embolism requires pumping water in an air-filled cavity. Physically this will require an empty or air-filled vessel, functional neighbor vessels, a source of energy to drive the refilling and a source of water to refill. In the previous sections, the physical and physiological components of embolism repair have been discussed in detail. However, a reductionist biologist looks further beyond for the possible identities of molecular candidates that repair the non-functional vessel. It is hypothesized that refilling is a result of an intricate interaction of xylem parenchyma, (even possibly phloem), vessel wall chemistry, and the composition and flexibility of pit membranes (Holbrook and Zwieniecki,
Aquaporins
Aquaporins are conservedly implicated in the refilling process of angiosperms and gymnosperms from the very beginning. The refilling of vessels in Populus trichocarpa is accompanied by selective upregulation of PIPs (Plasma Membrane Intrinsic Proteins). Secchi et al. (2011) proposed that the sensing of embolism and accomplishment of refilling is mediated by sugar signals, specifically sucrose. According to their proposed model, when a vessel is filled with air, free passage of sucrose to the vessel lumen is hindered, and the sucrose molecules are deposited on vessel wall. This, with a positive feedback loop generate a cascade of high starch to sucrose conversion (Bucci et al.,
Table 1A
| Gene families | Specific genes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family | Subfamily | Gene name | JGIv2.0 annotation name | Arabidopsis homologs | |
| Aquaporins | PIP (Plasma Intrinsic Protein) | PoptrPIP1 | PoptrPIP1.1 | POPTR_0008s06580 | For analysis, the entire aquaporin family of Arabidopsis has been used instead of only specific homologs, refer to Table 1B. |
| PoptrPIP1.2 | POPTR_0003s12870 | ||||
| PoptrPIP1.3 | POPTR_0010s19930 | ||||
| PoptrPIP1.4 | POPTR_0006s09920 | ||||
| PoptrPIP1.5 | POPTR_0016s12070 | ||||
| PoptrPIP2 | PoptrPIP2.1 | POPTR_0006s09910 | |||
| PoptrPIP2.2 | POPTR_0009s13890 | ||||
| PoptrPIP2.3 | POPTR_0004s18240 | ||||
| PoptrPIP2.4 | POPTR_0016s09090 | ||||
| PoptrPIP2.5 | POPTR_0010s22950 | ||||
| PoptrPIP2.6 | POPTR_0006s12980 | ||||
| PoptrPIP2.7 | POPTR_0008s03950 | ||||
| PoptrPIP2.8 | POPTR_0009s01940 | ||||
| Alpha-beta amylases | Alpha-amylase | PoptrAMY | PtAMY1 | POPTR_0515s00220 | AT4G25000 |
| PtAMY2 | POPTR_0002s01570 | AT1G76130 | |||
| PtAMY3 | POPTR_0010s10300 | AT1G69830 | |||
| Beta amylase | PoptrBMY | PtBMY1a | POPTR_0008s17420 | AT3G23920 | |
| PtBMY1b | POPTR_0001s11000 | AT3G23920 | |||
| PtBMY2 | POPTR_0003s10570 | AT5G45300 | |||
| PtBMY3 | POPTR_0008s20870 | AT5G18670 | |||
| PtBMY4 | POPTR_0003s08360 | AT2G02860 | |||
| PtBMY5 | POPTR_0017s06840 | AT1G09960 | |||
| Sucrose transporters | Sucrose transporter | PtSUC2.1 | POPTR_0019s11560 | AT5G55700 | |
| PtSUT1.2 | POPTR_0013s11950 | AT4G15210 | |||
| PtSUT2.a | POPTR_0008s14750 | AT1G22710 | |||
Genes, families and members important in refilling experimentally reported in Populus trichocarpa.
Gene ID data compiled from Secchi et al. (2011); TAIR and phytozome public database.
Table 1B
| Gene family name | Accession | TIGR Protein Type |
|---|---|---|
| Delta tonoplast integral protein family | At1g31880 | Major intrinsic protein, putative |
| At1g80760 | Nodulin-like protein | |
| At1g73190 | Tonoplast intrinsic protein, alpha (alpha-TIP) | |
| At2g45960 | Aquaporin (plasma membrane intrinsic protein 1B) | |
| AT3g06100 | Putative major intrinsic protein | |
| AT5g47450 | Membrane channel protein-like; aquaporin (tonoplast intrinsic protein)-like | |
| AT3g53420 | Plasma membrane intrinsic protein 2a | |
| At2g36830 | Putative aquaporin (tonoplast intrinsic protein gamma) | |
| At2g37170 | Aquaporin (plasma membrane intrinsic protein 2B) | |
| At2g37180 | Aquaporin (plasma membrane intrinsic protein 2C) | |
| AT4g35100 | Plasma membrane intrinsic protein (SIMIP) | |
| At2g29870 | Putative aquaporin (plasma membrane intrinsic protein) | |
| At1g01620 | Plasma membrane intrinsic protein 1c, putative | |
| AT3g61430 | Plasma membrane intrinsic protein 1a | |
| AT3g54820 | Aquaporin/MIP–like protein | |
| At1g17810 | Tonoplast intrinsic protein, putative | |
| AT3g47440 | Aquaporin-like protein | |
| At2g16850 | Putative aquaporin (plasma membrane intrinsic protein) | |
| At2g39010 | Putative aquaporin (water channel protein) | |
| AT3g16240 | Delta tonoplast integral protein (delta-TIP) | |
| At1g52180 | Aquaporin, putative | |
| AT4g23400 | Water channel–like protein | |
| At2g25810 | Putative aquaporin (tonoplast intrinsic protein) | |
| AT4g00430 | Probable plasma membrane intrinsic protein 1c | |
| AT5g37810 | Membrane integral protein (MIP)–like | |
| AT5g37820 | Membrane integral protein (MIP)–like | |
| AT4g17340 | Membrane channel like protein | |
| AT4g10380 | Major intrinsic protein (MIP)–like |
The entire aquaporin family in Arabidopsis extracted from TAIR.
Figure 3

The protein-protein interaction network of Arabidopsis sucrose transporters, amylases and aquaporins, generated using String database. Thicker lines indicate stronger reaction (Szklarczyk et al., 2010).
Figure 4

(A) Localization of the genes from Tables 1, 2 in various Arabidopsis tissue, from public microarray databases, and e-northern tool at Botany Array Resource (Toufighi et al., 2005). (B) Co-expression profile of the genes in Arabidopsis (Szklarczyk et al., 2010). (C) Distribution of relevant n-mers in the promoters of the above genes. That may induce shared expression. The results are generated using String and Promomer tools in Botany Array Resource (Toufighi et al., 2005). A tabulated form of the results are presented in Supplementary Table 5.
Table 2
| n-mers | Z-score | Regulation mode | Probable role | Consensus matches to n-mer in the PLACE 25.0.1 database |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAAT** | 3.5 | Positive | Dehydration responsive | Matched AAAT at offset 4 in CACTAAATTGTCAC 14BPATERD1: “14 bp region” (from −599 to −566) necessary for expression of erd1 (early responsive to dehydration) in dehydrated Arabidopsis |
| ATAA** | 4.0 | Positive | Sugar responsive | Matched ATAA at offset 2 in ACATAAAATAAAAAAAGGCA −314MOTIFZMSBE1: located between −314 and −295 region of maize (Z.m.) Sbe1 gene promoter; critical positive cis element; important for the high-level, sugar-responsive expression of the Sbe1 gene in maize endosperm cells; recognized by nuclear protein |
| ATAT** | 2.7 | Positive/negative | MADS domain | Matched [AT][AT][AT][AT] at offset 5 in TTDCCWWWWWWGGHAA AGAMOUSATCONSENSUS: binding consensus sequence of Arabidopsis (A.t.) AGAMOUS MADS domain |
| AATA | 3.3 | Positive | Sugar-responsive | Matched AATA at offset 6 in ACATAAAATAAAAAAAGGCA −314MOTIFZMSBE1: Located between −314 and −295 region of maize (Z.m.) Sbe1 gene promoter; critical positive cis element; important for the high-level, sugar-responsive expression of the Sbe1 gene in maize endosperm cells; recognized by nuclear protein |
| TTAT | 3.1 | Positive | Sugar responsive, binding activity to Myb core | Matched AATA at offset 6 in ACATAAAATAAAAAAAGGCA −314MOTIFZMSBE1: located between −314 and −295 region of maize (Z.m.) Sbe1 gene promoter; critical positive cis element; important for the high-level, sugar-responsive expression of the Sbe1 gene in maize endosperm cells; recognized by nuclear protein; matched TATT at offset 2 in TTTATTTACCAAACGGTAACATC23BPUASNSCYCB1: “23 bp UAS (Upstream activating sequence)” found in the promoter of Nicotiana sylvestris (N.s.) CycB1 gene; located between −386 and −409; contains a 5 bp element identical to the MYB binding core (ACGT); required for M-phase-specific expression; binds protein complexes in a cell cycle-regulated manner |
| ATCA** | 4.5 | Positive/negative | MADS domain, homeobox binding domain | Matched [AT][AT][ACGT][ACGT] at offset 8 in NTTDCCWWWWNNGGWAAN AGL1ATCONSENSUS: binding consensus sequence of Arabidopsis (A.t.) AGL1 (AGAMOUS-like 1); AGL1 contains MADS domain; see S000339; AGL20 is a MADS domain gene from Arabidopsis that is activated in shoot apical meristem during the transition to flowering; AGL20 is also regulated by the Gibberellin pathway; complex regulatory net works involving several MADS-genes underlie development of vegetative structures |
| GAAG** | 4.0 | Positive | ABA-responsive, MADS | Matched GAAG at offset 6 in ATGTACGAAGC ABAREG2: motif related to ABA regulation; gene: sunflower helianthinin; transacting factor: bZIP? Matched [ACGT][ACGT][AT][ACGT] at offset 0 in NNWNCCAWWWWTRGWWAN AGL2ATCONSENSUS: binding consensus sequence of Arabidopsis (A.t.) AGL2 (AGAMOUS-like 2); AGL2 contains MADS domain; AGL2 binds DNA as a dimer |
| CGAA | 2.4 | Positive | ABA-responsive | Matched CGAA at offset 5 in ATGTACGAAGC ABAREG2: motif related to ABA regulation; gene: sunflower helianthinin; transacting factor: bZIP? |
Representative common n-mer details over represented in the embolism with respective transcription factors and their probable roles.
An html table for all n-mers is presented in Supplementary Table 1.
denotes overrepresentation.
Transcription factors
The corregulation of sugar metabolism and water transport pathways require a complex transcriptional switch. Indeed, a large number of transcription factors control the refilling process, and they may regulate the diurnal pattern, the temporal accuracy and spatial distribution of the pathways involved. The role of TFs is shared; However, a look at the cis elements of pathway components may elucidate the nature of such sharing. The transcription factors important for xylogenesis and probably embolism are: AP2/EREBP, bZIP, C3HHD-ZIPIII, NAC, MYB, bHLH, WRKY, AP2/ERF, WRKY, HD, AUX/IAA, ARF, ZF, AP2, MYC, (Arabidopsis); HD-ZIPIII, MYB, MADS, and LIM in Populus, MYB and Hap5a in Pine and HRT in Hordeum (Dharmawardhana et al.,
Table 3
| WRKY family transcription factor |
| DRE binding protein (DREB1A) |
| Ethylene responsive element binding factor |
| Putative AP2 domain transcription factor |
| Ethylene responsive element binding factor 4 (aterf4,9) |
| Homeodomain–like protein.1 |
| Auxin response transcription factor (ARF1,9) |
| WRKY family transcription factor |
| ATPAO4 (POLYAMINE OXIDASE 4); amine oxidase |
| Ethylene-responsive transcriptional coactivator |
| Lateral root primordia (LRP1) |
| Transcription factor TINY, putative |
| MADS-box protein |
| Putative CCCH-type zinc finger protein |
| bHLH protein/contains helix-loop-helix DNA binding motif |
| Zinc finger protein Zat12 |
| WRKY family transcription factor |
| BEL1-like homeobox 4 protein (BLH4) |
| TINY-like protein |
| Myb family transcription factor |
| Putative squamosa-promoter binding protein |
| Putative transcription factor/similar to transcription factor SF3 |
| ES43 like protein/ES43 protein |
| AP2 domain protein RAP2.1 |
| Abscisic acid responsive elements-binding factor (ABF3) |
| bHLH protein/contains helix-loop-helix DNA binding motif |
| Myb family transcription factor |
| CCAAT-binding transcription factor subunit A (CBF-A) |
Some representative transcription factors in Populus trichocarapa Xylem Maturation (Dharmawardhana et al.,
Table 4
| Xylogenesis | Embolism | Lignin biosynthesis |
|---|---|---|
| Li et al., 2013 | Secchi et al., 2011 | Hertzberg et al., |
| Carvalho et al., | Zhong et al., 2011 | |
| Pesquet et al., 2005 | Lu et al., 2005 | |
| Li et al., 2012 | Schrader et al., 2004 | |
| Dharmawardhana et al., | ||
| Karpinska et al., | ||
| Bao et al., | ||
| Rengel et al., 2009 | ||
| Mishima et al., 2014 | ||
| Plavcová et al., 2013 | ||
| Zhong et al., 2011 |
Representative transcriptome studies in literature.
Cavitation resistance introduced by pit membrane
The major key of cavitation resistance is pit membrane adaptation. To survive, ultrastructure of pit membrane needs to balance between minimizing vascular resistance and limiting invasion by pathogen and microbes. While the first is favored by thin and highly porous membrane, the later needs thick membrane and narrower pores. This calls for a trade-off between water transport function and biotic invasion resistance.
The thickness range of the pit membranes in the angiosperms is very broad, almost 70–1900 nm and so are the diameter of the pores (10–225 nm). Species with thicker pit membrane and smaller pores prevent seeding and embolism more successfully and thus may represent the group of species which has higher drought resistance.
Pit membrane porosity is not the only determinant of air bubble propagation among conduits. The other factor which serve equally important role is the contact angle between pit membrane and air water interface. This particular property is a direct function of pit membrane composition. The more hydrophobic the membranes are the more the contact angle and subsequently lower the pressure needed for air-seeding. Additionally, high lignin content, though required for mechanical strength, interrupt with the hydrogeling of pectins. Pectic substances can swell or shrink in presence or absence of water and thus they control the porosity of membranes. Polygalacturonase mutants in Arabidopsis showed a higher P50 value (−2.25MPa), suggesting a role for pectins in vulnerability to cavitation (Tixier et al., 2013). Mechanically stronger pit membranes thus may resist stretching and expansion of pore membranes indicating a compromise in function. Water stress has been reported to exhibit a direct relation to low lignin synthesis (Donaldson,
Suggested genetic basis of cavitation resistance by pit membrane modulation and mechanical support
Identification of genes and proteins behind the structural and mechanical controls of pit membrane formation has not progressed so far as repair mechanism of embolism is concerned. Genetic aspects of plant hydraulics are little studied, since most of the xylem studies are done in woody trees and study of herbaceous crops is rather scant. It is hard to obtain mutants in trees as the generation time is high, and the study process is long and laborious. Also, hydraulics in plants is not a simple structural or functional trait but is a complex physiological phenomenon. Figuring out the multitrait control switch of this function is thus difficult.
Can lignin biosynthesis be considered as a control switch?
Among the living cell processes that may take active part in controlling hydraulics, lignin biosynthesis is a major candidate and highly deciphered. In chemical nature, it is a polymer of phenylpropanoid compounds synthesized through a complex biosynthetic route (Figure 5; Hertzberg et al.,
Figure 5

Simplified scheme for monolignol synthesis. The main pathway in dicotyledonous plants is highlighted in black, involving phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H), 4-coumarate CoA ligase (4CL), p-hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA: quinate shikimate p-hydroxycinnamoyltransferase (HCT), p-coumarate 3-hydroxylase (C3H), caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase (CCOMT), hydroxycinnamyl-CoA reductase (CCR), ferulate 5-hydroxylase (F5H), caffeate O-methyltransferase (COMT), and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD). Alternate pathways are in light gray. H subunits are only minor lignin components in dicots. Adapted from Quentin et al. (2009).
Lignin is made from monolignols (hydroxy-cinnamyl alcohol), sinapyl alcohol, coniferyl alchol, and p-coumaryl alcohol in a smaller quantity. The complex metabolic grid and the transcriptional switches are described in details elsewhere (Hertzberg et al.,
There are stresses in nature that change plant lignin content. For example, lignin amount in Picea abies is predicted to correlate positively with annual average temperature (Gindl et al.,
Biotechnological modification of lignin metabolism
With the advancement of genomic data, it is now possible to map the genetic changes which may influence hydraulic architecture. However, the model systems are questionable. Among the woody plant species, the genome of poplar has been sequenced; and the lignin biosynthesis network is fully characterized in Arabidopsis and rice. It is expected that change in lignin content may result differently in herbaceous and woody plants. There are controversial results obtained so far. In free-standing transgenic poplar trees, a 20–40% reduction in lignin content was associated with increased xylem vulnerability to embolism, shoot dieback and mortality (Voelker et al., 2011). Similarly the severe inhibition of cell wall lignification produced trees with a collapsed xylem phenotype, resulting in compromised vascular integrity, and displayed reduced hydraulic conductivity and a greater susceptibility to wall failure and cavitation (Coleman et al.,
A weak pipeline and less lignification compromises vascular integrity as observed from the above results. On the other hand, low lignin helps to increase the plasticity of the pit membrane pectin. Thus compromising lignin quantity may have serious impact on strength of the vascular cylinder; on the other hand, it may increase the pit membrane hydrophilic property and may offer resistance toward cavitation.
Lately, Arabidopsis has been taken in as a model for secondary tissue development, although it lacks formation of secondary wood. Tixier et al. (2013) argued that Arabidopsis might be as well considered to be a model of xylem hydraulics. They regarded the inflorescence stem of A. thaliana as a model for xylem hydraulics despite its herbaceous habit, as it has been shown previously that the inflorescence stem achieves secondary growth (Altamura et al.,
There are a few transcriptional control switches in lignin production which can be used in modification of vascular conductance. Modulation of co-ordinate expression of cellulose and lignin in rice is an important study regarding such transgene opportunities. Expression of the Arabidopsis SHN2 gene (Aharoni et al.,
As the best studied pathway related to secondary cell wall formation, lignin biosynthesis should offer the best metabolic grid that can be tweaked in plants to genetically understand mechanical functional trade-off and resistance to cavitation. General reduction of PAL (Phenylalanine ammonia lyase, E.C. 4.3.1.5) activities in developing plants may be one possible point of interest. PAL is a “metabolic branch- point” where Phe is directed toward either lignins or proteins (Rubery and Fosket, 1969). However, according to Anterola et al. (
Conclusion
Hydraulic safety margin in a plant is clearly driven by its phylogenetic origin. Conifers have developed minimal hydraulic resistance which is a necessity for water transport through short unicellular tracheids. The unique torus-margo anatomy of the conifer pit membrane let them adaptively overpower multicellular vessels in angiosperms in certain cases. Conifer stems are proposed to have larger hydraulic safety margins when compared with most angiosperm stems (Meinzer et al., 2009; Choat et al.,
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Statements
Acknowledgments
Sonali Sengupta thanks the Fast-Track Young Scientist Award Program of the Department of Science and Technology and the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, for support. Arun Lahiri Majumder is a Raja Ramanna Fellow of the Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India. We cordially thank Dr. Harald Keller, Senior Scientist, INRA, France, for his kind permission to reproduce the lignin biosythetic pathway figure from his publication, appropriately cited. We further thank the reviewers for their valuable comments which helped us to improve the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://www.frontiersin.org/journal/10.3389/fpls.2014.00224/abstract
References
1
AharoniA.DixitS.JetterR.ThoenesE.van ArkelG.PereiraA. (2004). The SHINE clade of AP2 domain transcription factors activates wax biosynthesis, alters cuticle properties, and confers drought tolerance when overexpressed in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell16, 2463–2480. 10.1105/tpc.104.022897
2
AlexanderssonE.FraysseL.Sjovall-LarsenS.GustavssonS.FellertM.KarlssonM.et al. (2005). Whole gene family expression and drought stress regulation of aquaporins. Plant Mol. Biol. 59, 469–484. 10.1007/s11103-005-0352-1
3
Almeida-RodriguezA. M.HackeU. G.LaurJ. (2011). Influence of evaporative demand on aquaporin expression and root hydraulics of hybrid poplar. Plant Cell Environ. 34, 1318–1331. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02331.x
4
AltamuraM. M.PossentiM.MatteucciA.BaimaS.RubertiI.MorelliG. (2001). Development of the vascular system in the inflorescence stem of Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 151, 381–389. 10.1046/j.0028-646x.2001.00188.x
5
AlvarezS.MarshE. L.SchroederS. G.SchachtmanD. P. (2008). Metabolomic and proteomic changes in the xylem sap of maize under drought. Plant Cell Environ. 31, 325–340. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01770.x
6
AndreJ. P. (1998). A study of the vascular organization of bamboos (Poaceae-Bambuseae) using a microcasting method. IAWA J. 19, 265–278. 10.1163/22941932-90001529
7
AnterolaA. M.JeonJ. H.DavinL. B.LewisN. G. (2002). Transcriptional control of monolignol biosynthesis in Pinus taeda: factors affecting monolignol ratios and carbon allocation in phenylpropanoid metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 18272–18280. 10.1074/jbc.M112051200
8
AnterolaA. M.LewisN. G. (2002). Trends in lignin modification: a comprehensive analysis of the effects of genetic manipulations/mutations on lignification and vascular integrity. Phytochemistry61, 221–294. 10.1016/S0031-9422(02)00211-X
9
AnterolaA. M.van RensburgH.van HeerdenP. S.DavinL. B.LewisN. G. (1999). Multi-sitemodulationoffluxduringmonolignol formation in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 261, 652–657. 10.1006/bbrc.1999.1097
10
BaoH.LiE.MansfieldS. D.CronkQ. C. B.El-KassabyY. A.DouglasC. J. (2013). The developing xylem transcriptome and genome-wide analysis of alternative splicing in Populus trichocarpa (black cottonwood) populations. BMC Genomics14:359. 10.1186/1471-2164-14-359
11
BaoY.DharmawardhanaP.MocklerT.StraussS. H. (2009). Genome scale transcriptome analysis of shoot organogenesis in Populus. BMC Plant Biol. 9:132. 10.1186/1471-2229-9-132
12
BoerjanW.RalphJ.BaucherM. (2003). Lignin biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 54, 519–546. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134938
13
BoseJ. C. (1923). The Physiology of the Ascent of Sap. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
14
BrodersenC.McelroneA.ChoatB.LeeE.ShackelK.MatthewsM. (2013). In vivo visualizations of drought-induced embolism spread in Vitis vinifera. Plant Physiol. 161, 1820–1829. 10.1104/pp.112.212712
15
BrodersenC. R.McElroneA. J.ChoatB.MatthewsM. A.ShackelK. A. (2010). The dynamics of embolism repair in xylem: in vivo visualizations using high-resolution computed tomography. Plant Physiol. 154, 1088–1095. 10.1104/pp.110.162396
16
BrodribbT. J.BowmanD.NicholsS.DelzonS.BurlettR. (2010). Xylem function and growth rate interact to determine recovery rates after exposure to extreme water deficit. New Phytol. 188, 533–542. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03393.x
17
BrounP.PoindexterP.OsborneE.JiangC. Z.RiechmannJ. L. (2004). WIN1, a transcriptional activator of epidermal wax accumulation in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 4706–4711. 10.1073/pnas.0305574101
18
BucciS. J.ScholzF. G.GoldsteinG.MeinzerF. C.DaL.SternbergS. L. (2003). Dynamic changes in hydraulic conductivity in petioles of two savanna tree species: factors and mechanisms contributing to the refilling of embolized vessels. Plant Cell Environ. 26, 1633–1645. 10.1046/j.0140-7791.2003.01082.x
19
CaoK. F.YangS. J.ZhangY. J.BrodribbT. J. (2012). The maximum height of grasses is determined by roots. Ecol. Lett. 15, 666–672. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01783.x
20
CarlquistS. (2009). Xylem heterochrony: an unappreciated key to angiosperm origin and diversifications. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 161, 26–65. 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00991.x
21
CarvalhoA.PaivaJ.LouzadaJ.Lima-BritoJ. (2013). The transcriptomics of secondary growth and wood formation in conifers. Mol. Biol. Int. 2013:974324. 10.1155/2013/974324
22
ChoatB.BallM.LulyJ.HoltumJ. (2003). Pit membrane porosity and water stress-induced cavitation in four co-existing dry rainforest tree species. Plant Physiol. 131, 41–48. 10.1104/pp.014100
23
ChoatB.CobbA. R.JansenS. (2008). Structure and function of bordered pits: new discoveries and impacts on whole-plant hydraulic function. New Phytol. 177, 608–626. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02317.x
24
ChoatB.JansenS.BrodribbT. J.CochardH.DelzonS.BhaskarR.et al. (2012). Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought. Nature491, 752–756. 10.1038/nature11688
25
ChoatB.JansenS.ZwienieckiM. A.SmetsE.HolbrookN. M. (2004). Changes in pit membrane porosity due to deflection and stretching: the role of vestured pits. J. Exp. Bot. 55, 1569–1575. 10.1093/jxb/erh173
26
ChoatB.PittermannJ. (2009). New insights into bordered pit structure and cavitation resistance in angiosperms and conifers. New Phytol. 182, 557–560. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02847.x
27
ChristmanM. A.SperryJ. S. (2010). Single-vessel flow measurements indicate scalariform perforation plates confer higher flow resistance than previously estimated. Plant Cell Environ. 33, 431–443. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02094.x
28
CochardH.BadelE.HerbetteS.DelzonS.ChoatB.JansenS. (2013). Methods for measuring plant vulnerability to cavitation: a critical review. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 4779–4791. 10.1093/jxb/ert193
29
ColemanH. D.SamuelsA. L.GuyR. D.MansfieldS. D. (2008). Perturbed lignification impacts tree growth in hybrid poplar - a function of sink strength, vascular integrity and photosynthetic assimilation. Plant Physiol. 148, 1229–1237. 10.1104/pp.108.125500
30
De BoerA. H.VolkovV. (2003). Logistics of water and salt transport through the plant: structure and functioning of the xylem. Plant Cell Environ. 26, 87–101. 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00930.x
31
DecourteixM.AlvesG.BrunelN.AmeglioT.GuilliotA.LemoineR.et al. (2006). JrSUT, a putative xylem sucrose transporter, could mediate sucrose influx into xylem parenchyma cells and be upregulated by freeze–thaw cycles over the autumn–winter period in walnut tree (Juglans regia L.). Plant Cell Environ. 29, 36–47. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01398.x
32
DharmawardhanaP.BrunnerA. M.StraussS. H. (2010). Genome-wide transcriptome analysis of the transition from primary to secondary stem development in Populus trichocarpa. BMC Genomics11:150. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-150
33
DixonH. (1914). Transpiration and the Ascent of Sap in Plants. New York, NY: Macmillian.
34
DonaldsonL. A. (2002). Abnormal lignin distribution in wood from severely drought stressed Pinus radiata trees. IAWA J. 23, 161–178. 10.1163/22941932-90000295
35
DulinM. W.KirchoffB. K. (2010). Paedomorphosis, secondary woodiness, and insular woodiness in plants. Bot. Rev. 76, 405–490. 10.1007/s12229-010-9057-5
36
El KayalW.KellerG.DebaylesC.KumarR.WeierD.TeulieresC.et al. (2006). Regulation of tocopherol biosynthesis through transcriptional control of tocopherol cyclase during cold hardening in Eucalyptus gunnii. Physiol. Plantarum126, 212–223. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00614.x
37
FahnA.LeshemB. (1963). Wood fibres with living protoplasts. New Phytol. 62, 91–98. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1963.tb06317.x
38
FahrendorfT.DixonR. A. (1993). Stress responses in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) XVIII: molecular cloning and expression of the elicitor-inducible cinnamic acid 4-hydroxylase cytochrome P450. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 305, 509–515. 10.1006/abbi.1993.1454
39
FanL.LinkerR.GepsteinS.TanimotoE.YamamotoR.NeumannP. M. (2006). Progressive inhibition by water deficit of cell wall extensibility and growth along the elongation zone of maize roots is related to increased lignin metabolism and progressive stelar accumulation of wall phenolics. Plant Physiol. 140, 603–612. 10.1104/pp.105.073130
40
FordC. W.MorrisonI. M.WilsonJ. R. (1979). Temperature effects on lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose in tropical and temperate grasses. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 30, 621–633. 10.1071/AR9790621
41
FukudaH. (1997). Programmed cell death during vascular system formation. Cell Death Differ. 4, 684–688. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400310
42
FukudaH. (2004). Signals that control plant vascular cell differentiation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 379–391. 10.1038/nrm1364
43
GindlW.GrabnerM.WimmerR. (2000). The influence of temperature on latewood lignin content in treeline Norway spruce compared with maximum density and ring width. Trees14, 409–414. 10.1007/s004680000057
44
HackeU. G.SperryJ. S. (2003). Limits of xylem refilling under negative pressure in Laurus nobilis and Acer negundo. Plant Cell Environ. 26, 303–311. 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00962.x
45
HackeU. G.SperryJ. S.WheelerJ. K.CastroL. (2006). Scaling of angiosperm xylem structure with safety and efficiency. Tree Physiol. 26, 689–701. 10.1093/treephys/26.6.689
46
HeinenR. B.YeQ.ChaumontF. (2009). Role of aquaporins in leaf physiology. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 2971–2985. 10.1093/jxb/erp171
47
HertzbergM.AspeborgH.SchraderJ.AnderssonA.ErlandssonR.BlomqvistK.et al. (2001). A transcriptional roadmap to wood formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 14732–14737. 10.1073/pnas.261293398
48
HolbrookN. M.AhrensE. T.BurnsM. J.ZwienieckiM. A. (2001). In vivo observation of cavitation and embolism repair using magnetic resonance imaging. Plant Physiol. 126, 27–31. 10.1104/pp.126.1.27
49
HolbrookN. M.ZwienieckiM. A. (1999). Embolism repair and xylem tension: do we need a miracle?Plant Physiol. 120, 7–10. 10.1104/pp.120.1.7
50
JohnsonD. M.McCullohK. A.WoodruffD. R.MeinzerF. C. (2012). Hydraulic safety margins an embolism reversal in stems and leaves: why are conifers and angiosperms so different?Plant Sci. 195, 48–53. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.06.010
51
JonesA. M. (2001). Programmed cell death in development and defense. Plant Physiol. 125, 94–97. 10.1104/pp.125.1.94
52
JonesL.EnnosA. R.TurnerS. R. (2001). Cloning and characterization of irregular xylem4 (irx4): a severely lignin-deficient mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 26, 205–216. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01021.x
53
KannangaraR.BraniganC.LiuY.PenfieldT.RaoV.MouilleG.et al. (2007). The transcription factor WIN1/SHN1 regulates cutin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell19, 1278–1294. 10.1105/tpc.106.047076
54
KarabaA. (2007). Improvement of Water use Efficiency in Rice and Tomato Using Arabidopsis Wax Biosynthetic Genes and Transcription Factors. Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen.
55
KarpinskaB.KarlssonM.SrivastavaM.StenbergA.SchraderJ.SterkyF.et al. (2004). MYB transcription factors are differentially expressed and regulated during secondary vascular tissue development in hybrid aspen. Plant Mol. Biol. 56, 255–270. 10.1007/s11103-004-3354-5
56
KoJ. H.HanK. H.ParkS.YangJ. (2004). Plant body weight-induced secondary growth in Arabidopsis and its transcription phenotype revealed by whole-transcriptome profiling. Plant Physiol. 135, 1069–1083. 10.1104/pp.104.038844
57
LaskarD. D.JourdesM.PattenA. M.HelmsG. L.DavinL. B.LewisN. G. (2006). The Arabidopsis cinnamoyl CoA reductase irx4 mutant has a delayed but coherent (normal) program of lignification. Plant J. 48, 674–686. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02918.x
58
LiX.WuH. X.SouthertonS. G. (2012). Identification of putative candidate genes for juvenile wood density in Pinus radiate. Tree Physiol. 32, 1046–1057. 10.1093/treephys/tps060
59
LiX.YangX.WuH. X. (2013). Transcriptome profiling of radiata pine branches reveals new insights into reaction wood formation with implications in plant gravitropism. BMC Genomics14:768. 10.1186/1471-2164-14-768
60
LopezF.BousserA.SissoëffI.GasparM.LachaiseB.HoarauJ.et al. (2003). Diurnal regulation of water transport and aquaporin gene expression in maize roots: contribution of PIP2 proteins. Plant Cell Physiol. 44, 1384–1395. 10.1093/pcp/pcg168
61
LuS.SunY.-H.ShiR.ClarkC.LiL.ChiangV. L. (2005). Novel and mechanical stress-responsive MicroRNAs in Populus trichocarpa that are absent from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell17, 2186–2203. 10.1105/tpc.105.033456
62
McCullyM. E.HuangC. X.LingL. E. (1998). Daily embolism and refilling of xylem vessels in the roots of field-grown maize. New Phytol. 138, 327–342. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00101.x
63
McDowellN. G. (2011). Mechanisms linking drought, hydraulics, carbon metabolism, and vegetation mortality. Plant Physiol. 155, 1051–1059. 10.1104/pp.110.170704
64
McElroneA. J.BrodersenC. R.AlsinaM. M.DraytonW. M.MatthewsM. A.ShackelK. A.et al. (2012). Centrifuge technique consistently overestimates vulnerability to water stress-induced cavitation in grapevines as confirmed with high-resolution computed tomography. New Phytol. 196, 661–665. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04244.x
65
MeinzerF. C.JohnsonD. M.LachenbruchB.McCullohK. A.WoodruffD. R. (2009). Xylem hydraulic safety margins in woody plants: coordination of stomatal control of xylem tension with hydraulic capacitance. Funct. Ecol. 23, 922–930. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01577.x
66
MeinzerF. C.McCullohK. A. (2013). Xylem recovery from drought-induced embolism: where is the hydraulic point of no return?Tree Physiol. 33, 331–334. 10.1093/treephys/tpt022
67
MishimaK.FujiwaraT.IkiT.KurodaK.YamashitaK.TamuraM.et al. (2014). Transcriptome sequencing and profiling of expressed genes in cambial zone and differentiating xylem of Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica). BMC Genomics15:219. 10.1186/1471-2164-15-219
68
MollenhauerH. H.HopkinsD. L. (1974). Ultrastructural study of Pierce's disease bacterium in grape xylem tissue. J. Bacteriol. 119, 612–618.
69
NardiniA.SalleoS.JansenS. (2011). More than just a vulnerable pipeline: xylem physiology in the light of ion-mediated regulation of plant water transport. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 4701–4718. 10.1093/jxb/err208
70
NedelkinaS.JupeS. C.BleeK. A.SchalkM.Werck-ReichhartD.BolwellG. P. (1999). Novel characteristics and regulation of a divergent cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (CYP73A15) from French bean: engineering expression in yeast. Plant Mol. Biol. 39, 1079–1090. 10.1023/A:1006156216654
71
OlenichenkoN.ZagoskinaN. (2005). Response of winter wheat to cold: production ofphenolic compounds and l-phenylalanine ammonia lyase activity. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 41, 600–603. 10.1007/s10438-005-0109-2
72
PattenA. M.CardenasC. L.CochraneF. C.LaskarD. D.BedgarD. L.DavinL. B.et al. (2005). Reassessment of effects on lignification and vascular development in the irx4 Arabidopsis mutant. Phytochemistry66, 2092–2107. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.12.016
73
PerämäkiM.NikinmaaE.SevantoS.IlvesniemiH.SiivolaE.HariP.et al. (2001). Tree stem diameter variations and transpiration in Scot pine: analysis using a dynamic sap flow model. Tree Physiol. 21, 889–897. 10.1093/treephys/21.12-13.889
74
Pérez-DonosoA. G.SunQ.RoperM. C.GreveL. C.KirkpatrickB.LabavitchJ. M. (2010). Cell wall-degrading enzymes enlarge the pore size of intervessel pit membranes in healthy and Xylella fastidiosa-infected grapevines. Plant Physiol. 152, 1748–1759. 10.1104/pp.109.148791
75
PerroneI.PagliaraniC.LovisoloC.ChitarraW.RomanF.SchubertA. (2012). Recovery from water stress affects grape leaf petiole transcriptome. Planta235, 1383–1396. 10.1007/s00425-011-1581-y
76
PesquetE.RanochaP.LegayS.DigonnetC.BarbierO.PichonM.et al. (2005). Novel markers of xylogenesis in zinnia are differentially regulated by auxin and cytokinin. Plant Physiol. 139, 1821–1839. 10.1104/pp.105.064337
77
PlavcováL.HackeU. G.Almeida-RodriguezA. M.LiE.DouglasC. J. (2013). Gene expression patterns underlying changes in xylem structure and function in response to increased nitrogen availability in hybrid poplar. Plant Cell Environ. 36, 186–199. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02566.x
78
PostaireO.Tournaire-RouxC.GrondinA.BoursiacY.MorillonR.SchäffnerA. R.et al. (2010). A PIP1 aquaporin contributes to hydrostatic pressure-induced water transport in both the root and rosette of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 152, 1418–1430. 10.1104/pp.109.145326
79
PouA.MedranoH.FlexasJ.TyermanS. D. (2013). A putative role for TIP and PIP aquaporins in dynamics of leaf hydraulic and stomatal conductances in grapevine under water stress and re- watering. Plant Cell Environ. 36, 828–843. 10.1111/pce.12019
80
QinG. M.ValladG. E.SubbaraoK. V. (2008). Characterization of Verticillium dahliae and V. tricorpus isolates from lettuce and artichoke. Plant Dis. 92, 69–77. 10.1094/PDIS-92-1-0069
81
QuentinM.AllasiaV.PegardA.AllaisF.DucrotP.-H.FaveryB. (2009). Imbalanced lignin biosynthesis promotes the sexual reproduction of homothallic oomycete pathogens. PLoS Pathog. 5:e1000264. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000264
82
RegierN.StrebS.CocozzaC.SchaubM.CherubiniP.ZeemanS.et al. (2009). Drought tolerance of two black poplar (Populus nigra L.) clones: contribution of carbohydrates and oxidative stress defence. Plant Cell Environ. 32, 1724–1736. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02030.x
83
RengelD.ClementeH. S.ServantF.LadouceN.PauxE.WinckerP.et al. (2009). A new genomic resource dedicated to wood formation in Eucalyptus. BMC Plant Biol. 9:36. 10.1186/1471-2229-9-36
84
RuberyP. H.FosketD. E. (1969). Changes in phenylalanine ammonia lyase activity during xylem differentiation in Coleus and soybean. Planta87, 54–62. 10.1007/BF00386964
85
SackL.HolbrookN. M. (2006). Leaf hydraulics. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 57, 361–381. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144141
86
SalaA.PiperF.HochG. (2010). Physiological mechanisms of drought-induced tree mortality are far from being resolved. New Phytol. 186, 274–281. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03167.x
87
SalaA.WoodruffD. R.MeinzerF. C. (2012). Carbon dynamics in trees: feast or famine?Tree Physiol. 32, 764–775. 10.1093/treephys/tpr143
88
SalleoS.Lo GulloM. A.De PaoliD.ZippoM. (1996). Xylem recovery from cavitation-induced embolism in young plants of Laurus nobilis: a possible mechanism. New Phytol. 132, 47–56. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb04507.x
89
SalleoS.Lo GulloM. A.TrifiloP.NardiniA. (2004). New evi- dence for a role of vessel-associated cells and phloem in the rapid xylem refilling of cavitated stems of Laurus nobilis L. Plant Cell Environ. 27, 1065–1076. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01211.x
90
SalleoS.TrifilòP.EspositoS.NardiniA.Lo GulloM. A. (2009). Starch-to-sugar conversion in wood parenchyma of field-growing Laurus nobilis plants: a component of the signal pathway for embolism repair?Funct. Plant Biol. 36, 815–825. 10.1071/FP09103
91
ScheenenT. W.VergeldtF. J.HeemskerkA. M.Van AsH. (2007). Intact plant magnetic resonance imaging to study dynamics in long-distance sap flow and flow-conducting surface area. Plant Physiol. 144, 1157–1165. 10.1104/pp.106.089250
92
SchochG.GoepfertS.MorantM.HehnA.MeyerD.UllmannP.et al. (2001). CYP98A3 from Arabidopsis thaliana is a 30-hydroxylase of phenolic esters, a missing link in the phenyl- propanoid pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 36566–36574. 10.1074/jbc.M104047200
93
ScholanderP. F.HemmingsenE. A.GareyW. (1961). Cohesive lift of sap in the Rattan vine. Science134, 1835–1838. 10.1126/science.134.3493.1835
94
SchraderJ.NilssonJ.MellerowiczE. E.BerglundA.NilssonP.HertzbergM.et al. (2004). A high-resolution transcript profile across the wood-forming meristem of poplar identifies potential regulators of cambial stem cell identity. Plant Cell16, 2278–2292. 10.1105/tpc.104.024190
95
SchweingruberF. H. (2006). Anatomical characteristics and ecological trends in the xylem and phloem of Brassicaceae and Resedaceae. IAWA J. 27, 419–442. 10.1163/22941932-90000164
96
SecchiF.GilbertM. E.ZwienieckiM. A. (2011). Transcriptome response to embolism formation in stems of Populus trichocarpa provides insight into signaling and the biology of refilling. Plant Physiol. 157, 1419–1429. 10.1104/pp.111.185124
97
SecchiF.MacIverB.ZeidelM. L.ZwienieckiM. A. (2009). Functional analysis of putative genes encoding the PIP2 water channel subfamily in Populus trichocarpa. Tree Physiol. 29, 1467–1477. 10.1093/treephys/tpp060
98
SecchiF.ZwienieckiM. A. (2010). Patterns of PIP gene expression in Populus trichocarpa during recovery from xylem embolism suggest a major role for the PIP1 aquaporin subfamily as moderators of refilling process. Plant Cell Environ. 33, 1285–1297. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02147.x
99
SecchiF.ZwienieckiM. A. (2012). Analysis of xylem sap from functional (non-embolized) and non- functional (embolized) vessels of Populus nigra -chemistry of refilling. Plant Physiol. 160, 955–964. 10.1104/pp.112.200824
100
SecchiF.ZwienieckiM. A. (2013). The physiological response of Populus tremula x alba leaves to the down-regulation of PIP1 aquaporin gene expression under no water stress. Front. Plant Sci. 4:507. 10.3389/fpls.2013.00507
101
SecchiF.ZwienieckiM. A. (2014). Down-regulation of plasma intrinsic protein1 aquaporin in poplar trees is detrimental to recovery from embolism. Plant Physiol. 164, 1789–1799. 10.1104/pp.114.237511
102
SevantoS.HolbrookN. M.BallM. C. (2012). Freeze/Thaw-induced embolism: probability of critical bubble formation depends on speed of ice formation. Front. Plant Sci. 6:107. 10.3389/fpls.2012.00107
103
SperryJ. S. (2013). Cutting-edge research or cutting-edge artefact? An overdue control experiment complicates the xylem refilling story. Plant Cell Environ. 36, 1916–1918. 10.1111/pce.12148
104
SperryJ. S.HackeU. G.WheelerJ. K. (2005). Comparative analysis of end wall resistivity in xylem conduits. Plant Cell Environ. 28, 456–465. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01287.x
105
StillerV.SperryJ. S.LafitteR. (2005). Embolized conduits of rice (Oryza sativa, Poaceae) refill despite negative xylem pressure. Am. J. Bot. 92, 1970–1974. 10.3732/ajb.92.12.1970
106
SzklarczykD.FranceschiniA.KuhnM.SimonovicM.RothA.MinguezP.et al. (2010). The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res. 39(Database issue), D561–D568. 10.1093/nar/gkq973
107
TelewskiF. W. (2006). A unified hypothesis of mechanoperception in plants. Am. J. Bot. 93, 1466–1476. 10.3732/ajb.93.10.1466
108
TixierA.CochardH.BadelE.Dusotoit-CoucaudA.JansenS.HerbetteS. (2013). Arabidopsis thaliana as a model species for xylem hydraulics: does size matter?J. Exp. Bot. 64, 2295–2305. 10.1093/jxb/ert087
109
ToufighiK.BradyS. M.AustinR.LyE.ProvartN. J. (2005). The Botany Array Resource: e-Northerns, Expression Angling, and promoter analyses. Plant J. 43, 153–163. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02437.x
110
TyreeM. T.SalloS.NardiniA.GulloM. A. L.MoscaR. (1999). Refilling of embolized vessels in young stems of laurel. Do we need a new paradigm?Plant Physiol. 120, 11–21. 10.1104/pp.120.1.11
111
TyreeM. T.SperryJ. S. (1989). Vulnerability of xylem to cavitation and embolism. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Mol. Biol. 40, 19–38. 10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.000315
112
TyreeM. T.ZimmermannM. H. (2002). Xylem Structure and the Ascent of Sap. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978-3-662-04931-0
113
Van BelA. J. E. (1990). Xylem-phloem exchange via the rays: the undervalued route of transportJ. Exp. Bot. 41, 631–644. 10.1093/jxb/41.6.631
114
VanholmeR.DemedtsB.MorreelK.RalphJ.BoerjanW. (2010). Lignin Biosynthesis and Structure. Plant Physiol. 153, 895–905. 10.1104/pp.110.155119
115
VoelkerS. L.LachenbruchB.MeinzerF. C.KitinP.StraussS. H. (2011). Transgenic poplars with reduced lignin show impaired xylem conductivity, growth efficiency and survival. Plant Cell Environ. 34, 655–668. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02270.x
116
WheelerE. A.BaasP.RodgersS. (2007). Variations in dicot wood anatomy: a global analysis based on the insidewood database. IAWA J. 28, 229–258.
117
WheelerJ. K.HuggettB. A.TofteA. N.RockwellF. E.HolbrookN. M. (2013). Cutting xylem under tension or supersaturated with gas can generate PLC and the appearance of rapid recovery from embolism. Plant Cell Environ. 36, 1938–1949. 10.1111/pce.12139
118
WindtC. W.VergeldtF. J.De JagerP. A.Van ASH. (2006), MRI of long-distance water transport: a comparison of the phloem and xylem flow characteristics and dynamics in poplar, castor bean, tomato and tobacco. Plant Cell Environ. 29, 1715–1729. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01544.x
119
YeZ. H. (2002). Vascular tissue differentiation and pattern formation in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 53, 183–202. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135245
120
YokoyamaR.NishitaniK. (2006). Identification and characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana genes involved in xylem secondary cell walls. J. Plant Res. 119, 189–194. 10.1007/s10265-006-0261-7
121
ZhangJ.EloA.HelariuttaY. (2011). Arabidopsis as a model for wood formation. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 22, 293–299. 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.11.008
122
ZhangZ.FradinE.JongeR.van EsseH. P.SmitP.LiuC.-M.et al. (2013). Optimized agroinfiltration and virus-induced gene silencing to study Ve1-mediated Verticillium resistance in tobacco. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 26, 182–190. 10.1094/MPMI-06-12-0161-R
123
ZhongR.McCarthyR. L.LeeC.YeZ.-H. (2011). Dissection of the transcriptional program regulating secondary wall biosynthesis during wood formation in poplar. Plant Physiol. 157, 1452–1468. 10.1104/pp.111.181354
124
ZhongR.YeZ. H. (2009). Transcriptional regulation of lignin biosynthesis. Plant Signal. Behav. 4, 1028–1034. 10.4161/psb.4.11.9875
125
ZimmermannM. H. (1974). Long distance transport. Plant Physiol. 54, 472–479. 10.1104/pp.54.4.472
126
ZimmermannM. H. (1983). Xylem Structure and the Ascent of Sap. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 143. 10.1007/978-3-662-22627-8
Summary
Keywords
embolism, cavitation, xylem, drought, freezing, mechanical stress
Citation
Sengupta S and Majumder AL (2014) Physiological and genomic basis of mechanical-functional trade-off in plant vasculature. Front. Plant Sci. 5:224. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00224
Received
12 February 2014
Accepted
05 May 2014
Published
28 May 2014
Volume
5 - 2014
Edited by
Mukesh Jain, National Institute of Plant Genome Research, India
Reviewed by
Adriana Garay, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico; Li Yang, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, USA
Copyright
© 2014 Sengupta and Majumder.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sonali Sengupta, Division of Plant Biology, Acharya J C Bose Biotechnology Innovation Centre, Bose Institute, P-1/12, C.I.T. Scheme VIIM, Kolkata 700 054, India e-mail: sonalisengupta2000@yahoo.co.in
This article was submitted to Plant Genetics and Genomics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.