REVIEW article

Front. Plant Sci., 27 June 2014

Sec. Plant Pathogen Interactions

Volume 5 - 2014 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00307

Dominant resistance against plant viruses

  • Laboratory of Virology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University Wageningen, Netherlands

Abstract

To establish a successful infection plant viruses have to overcome a defense system composed of several layers. This review will overview the various strategies plants employ to combat viral infections with main emphasis on the current status of single dominant resistance (R) genes identified against plant viruses and the corresponding avirulence (Avr) genes identified so far. The most common models to explain the mode of action of dominant R genes will be presented. Finally, in brief the hypersensitive response (HR) and extreme resistance (ER), and the functional and structural similarity of R genes to sensors of innate immunity in mammalian cell systems will be described.

Introduction

During the past decades it has become clear that plants have a unique and complex defense system that consists of several layers, which enables them to avoid, suppress, or actively defend against pathogens from all kingdoms like fungi, bacteria, nematodes, and viruses. Of all plant viruses known, only a few cause serious diseases and, if so, mostly limited to a very small number of crops. In general, most viruses have a limited (natural) host range and the number of so-called non-hosts exceeds those of hosts. In those plants that are hosts, viruses encounter different mechanisms of defense. Some act general against all viruses and this response is part of the innate immune system, while others are virus-specific and involve resistance genes. Triggering of the latter simultaneously mediates a rapid necrosis at the site of virus entry and prevents further spread of the virus throughout the host. In several cases resistance genes do not confer absolute resistance and low levels of virus replication can still be observed. In those cases the genes are referred to as partial resistance genes or tolerance genes.

While throughout the years reviews on resistance genes have appeared with regular intervals, these mostly had their main focus on fungal and bacterial resistance genes, primarily due to the large amount of data available. This review aims to present an overview on the current status of resistance genes against plant viruses, with emphasis on single dominant resistance genes. The very basis of plant pathogens (among others plant viruses) not being able to infect all plants is due to a mechanism called non-host resistance (NHR) (For an extensive review on this, see Uma et al., 2011). NHR holds for all plant pathogens and is a generic, nonspecific resistance that can be divided into two main types, distinguished by the mechanism and mode of recognition (Mysore and Ryu, 2004). Type 1 is the most pre-dominant type of NHR and presents a basic defense mechanism that prevents pathogen invasion, e.g., thickening of the cell-wall, secondary metabolite production, etc. This type of resistance usually is symptomless. In contrast, type 2 NHR is associated with induction of necrosis at the site of infection, and is induced when pathogens overcome type 1 resistance. Here, the pathogen is recognized through specific structures or proteins that are associated with the pathogen. The recognition of these structures/proteins, so called microbe associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) or PAMPS (Pathogen), takes place by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) on plant plasma membranes. These PRRs recognize conserved structures of pathogens, like flaggelin from the flagella of bacteria or chitin from the cell wall of fungi, and induce a so called PAMP triggered immunity (PTI) response (Jones and Dangl, 2006). Since plant viruses need to overcome the physical barrier of a cell wall, they enter their host cells either via mechanical inoculation or the infection is mediated by vectors like insects, nematodes, or even fungi. Direct recognition of viruses probably does not occur in the apoplast. However, a study recently reported on the possible involvement of (intracellular) receptor-like kinases (RLKs), of the like that are involved in PAMP recognition by PRRs, in plant-virus interactions (Kørner et al., 2013).

One of the first innate immune responses all plant viruses encounter when invading a host consists of antiviral RNA silencing [also called RNA interference (RNAi) and in the very early days post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTSG)]. RNA silencing is a host response triggered by double stranded (ds)RNA. These molecules thus act as a MAMP/PAMP and in which RNAi can be regarded as PTI. The main difference with pathogens such as fungi and bacteria is that recognition of viral MAMPs/PAMPs occurs intracellularly (Ding and Voinnet, 2007).

RNA silencing consists of two major “branches”; the first one is that of small-interfering (si)RNAs, and one of the hallmarks for antiviral RNAi, and the second one is that of (host-gene encoded) micro (mi)RNAs involved in gene regulation. The antiviral RNAi response is induced by viral double stranded (ds)RNA molecules that arise from replicative intermediates or secondary RNA folding structures. These structures are sensed by a host RNase type III-like enzyme called Dicer-like (DCL) protein and cleaved into short interfering (si)RNA of 21–24 nucleotides (nt) in size (Sharma et al., 2013). The siRNAs generated are unwound and only one strand, the so-called guide-strand, is uploaded into a functional protein complex termed RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). This activated complex next surveils and subsequently degrades (viral) RNA target molecules with sequence complementarity to the guide-strand. Degradation of the target RNA is mediated by slicer, the core component of RISC, which is represented by a member of the Argonaut (AGO) family of proteins (Vaucheret, 2008; Sharma et al., 2013). After primary siRNAs have been generated, in plants an amplification of siRNAs follows, which is required to mount an RNAi response to effectively combat virus infections locally and systemically. This amplification involves host RNA dependent RNA polymerases (RDRs) that are able to convert (aberrant) viral (m)RNAs into dsRNA in a siRNA-dependent and -independent manner (Csorba et al., 2009). Their subsequent processing by DCL leads to the generation of secondary siRNAs that correspond to sequences outside the primary target sequence, a process also called transitive silencing (Sijen et al., 2001). The antiviral RNAi response acts against all RNA and DNA viruses (Incarbone and Dunoyer, 2013), but in general is a relatively slow process that does not lead to complete clearance of viral infections. For an extensive description of RNAi readers are referred to nice reviews from e.g., Ding (2010) and Sharma et al. (2013).

Besides RNAi, viruses may also run into another, second layer of defense that involves resistance genes. While most of these are triggered by and confer resistance to a specific virus only, some act against several (related) viruses. The major class of these genes represent single dominant resistance genes (and of which the biggest group consists of the NB-LRR type), while others are recessive, tolerance, or partial resistance genes. A very nice example of a dominant resistance gene of the latter case has recently been described with the cloning and characterization of the Ty-1 resistance gene from tomato against Tomato yellow leaf curl geminivirus (TYLCV) This gene encodes an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and is proposed to confer resistance to TYLCV by amplifying the RNAi signal (Verlaan et al., 2013). Tomato plants containing Ty-1 do not show symptoms upon a challenge with TYLCV, but low levels of virus can still be detected.

Recessive resistance (Truniger and Aranda, 2009) acting against viruses, relies on the observation that viruses require host factors (also called susceptibility factors) to enable an infection. The inability of interaction between such host factor and the virus leads to resistance. Since susceptibility factors are dominant, a resistance based on these requires all gene copies to be in the (resistant) recessive state. This explains why such resistance is generally termed recessive resistance. The majority of the recessive resistance genes known against plant viruses have been reported for potyviruses (Kang et al., 2005) and encode translation initiation factors of the 4E or 4G family (eIF4E/eIF4G) (Truniger and Aranda, 2009). The latter proteins need to interact with the cap-structure on (viral) transcripts, to allow for translation. Potyviral transcripts do not contain a cap structure, but provide a VPg (Virus-protein genome linked) to render their transcripts translatable in a cap-independent manner. Potyvirus infection leads to host shut off of cap-dependent transcripts, but only allow the cap-independent transcripts to be translated mediated by a subgroup of translation initiation factors; eIF(iso)4E/G. Viruses that encode their own cap-like structure (like potyviruses: VPg) require interaction with the translation initiation factors eIF4E/eIF4G for translation, this in turn induces a selection pressure on the host to escape the interaction between VPg and eIF4e, leading to recessive resistance. Recessive resistance genes toward other pathogens, such as fungi and bacteria have only been described to a limited extent and their encoded susceptibility factors (S genes) are proposed to provide a more durable resistance than dominant R genes. However due to their functions they may cause pleiotropic effects when knocked out from the host genome (Gawehns et al., 2013).

Dominant resistance

Effector-mediated triggering of single dominant resistance genes

Plant pathogens need to evade or suppress the PTI response in plants and achieve the latter by encoding effector proteins that can interfere with the recognition by PRRs, usually by binding to the substrate that PRRs would otherwise recognize. This process allows the pathogen to establish a successful infection, and is referred to as Effector Triggered Susceptibility (ETS) (Figure 1): a strategy that also applies to antiviral RNAi. One of the most common strategies plant viruses use to counteract RNAi is to encode RNA silencing suppressors (RSS), viral proteins that interfere with a specific part of the RNAi pathway and thereby reduce its effectiveness against plant viruses (Burgyan and Havelda, 2011). The majority of plant virus RSS proteins exert this activity through binding of small interfering (si)RNAs, or sometimes (also) long dsRNA, and thereby prevent their uploading into RISC and Dicer-cleavage, respectively (Lakatos et al., 2006). In recent years some RSS have also been discovered to inhibit the RNAi pathway in other ways, e.g., by binding directly to key-enzyme proteins like AGO1, the core component of RISC during the antiviral RNAi response (Zhang et al., 2006; Giner et al., 2010). Viral suppression of RNAi leads to a stage of ETS during which viruses are able to establish a successful infection.

Figure 1

Single dominant resistance (R) gene products (in)directly sense the presence of a specific pathogen by their effector, termed avirulence factors (Avr), as a counter defense against ETS, leading to a stage called Effector-Triggered Immunity (ETI) (Figure 1). Triggering of R genes is generally associated with a (concomitant) induction of a programmed cell death response, as visualized by the rapid appearance of necrotic lesions (a hypersensitive response, HR) or in rare occasions extreme resistance (ER) during which no necrosis is observed at all. However, more and more evidence is presented, that there is an uncoupling of the resistance response from the programmed cell death response, although both can work in concert. Due to these responses, viruses (and other pathogens) are confined to the site of entry/invasion where infections are prevented. In contrast to the slower onset of antiviral RNAi, the R gene response generally is rapid and within ~3/4 days lead to containment of the virus.

Dominant R genes basically can be grouped into two classes, namely those that encode NB-LRRs and all others. The major class of R genes consists of the NB-LRR type and encode proteins that, irrespective of the pathogen they recognize, consist of three domains; (1) the Nucleotide Binding Site (NBS) in the center of the protein, (2) a Leucine Rich Repeat (LRR) at the C-terminal end, and (3) a Coiled-coil (CC) or Toll and Interleukin-1 Receptor (TIR) domain at the N-terminal end of the resistance gene product (Moffett, 2009). The LRR determines the specificity of the target protein and is the most variable part of the protein, therefore considered to be under selection pressure to evolve for recognition of (new) target proteins. The NBS is composed of a conserved part that contains the Nucleotide Binding site (NB) and an ARC-domain, both required to bind and hydrolyze ATP. R genes that contain an N-terminal TIR domain are only found in dicots from the angiosperms (Collier et al., 2011), and through this domain share homology to Toll-like receptor (TLR) proteins, that act as PRRs in the innate immunity response in animal systems. Those with no predicted structure at its N-terminus, are grouped with the CC-domain (Maekawa et al., 2011a; Hao et al., 2013) in the non-TIR group. All three domains are involved in an interaction with each other and change conformationally upon activation to subsequently induce the resistance response (Lukasik and Takken, 2009; Slootweg et al., 2010).

Only a few cases have been described in which the dominant R gene product recognizes an Avr protein through direct interaction (Jia et al., 2000; Deslandes et al., 2003; Dodds et al., 2006; Krasileva et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2012; Cesari et al., 2013), of which one is the TMV-p50 helicase domain (Ueda et al., 2006). In the majority of known R genes recognition of the pathogen occurs indirectly and involves host proteins, which are considered guardees, decoys, or baits, depending on the model, as further discussed below (Model of R Gene Recognition) (Van Der Biezen and Jones, 1998; Jones and Dangl, 2006; Van Der Hoorn and Kamoun, 2008; Collier and Moffett, 2009).

Cloned R genes and their known Avr determinants

While for fungi and bacteria many resistance genes have been cloned and characterized, resistance genes against plant viruses have received growing interest during the last two decades, still only few of the latter have been cloned so far. Table S1.1 gives an up-to-date summary of all R genes against plant viruses, known or currently under investigation. For some of these genes the viral Avr determinant has been identified. From this large, extensive list of R genes (>200), only 22 have been cloned and characterized. Some R genes have functional alleles in other plant species, often showing a similar Avr recognition. The majority of the known R gene products are of the CC-NB-LRR type, whereas only a small group belongs to the TIR-NB-LRR group (Table 1).

Table 1

Plant hostR geneType: NB-LRRRecognizesVirus genusAVRReferences
Arabidopsis thalianaHRTCC-NB-LRR [HR]TCV [Turnip crinkle virus]CarmovirusCP1, 2
Mouse ear cress
RCY1CC-NB-LRR [HR]CMV [Cucumber mosaic virus]CucumovirusCP3–6
Brassica campestrisBcTuR3TIR-NBS-LRRTuMV [Turnip mosaic virus]PotyvirusUnknown17, 18
Field mustard
Capsicum annuum frutescens chinense chacoenseL-locus: L1 L2 L3 L4CC-NB-LRRTMV [Tobacco mosaic virus] by L1234TobamovirusCP (all)25, 31–34, 43–45
PepperToMV [Tomato mosaic virus] by L1234
TMGMV [Tobacco mild green mosaic virus] by L1234
BPeMV [Bell pepper mottle virus] by L1234
PaMMV [Paprika mild mottle virus] by L234
ObPV [Obuda pepper virus] by L234
PMMoV [Pepper mild mottle virus] by L34(isolate dependent)
Glycine maxRsv1 (locus)CC-NB-LRR [ER/HR]SMV [Soybean mosaic virus]PotyvirusP3+ HC-Pro65–69
Soybean
Cucumis meloPvr1TIR-NB-LRRPRSV [Papaya ringspot virus]PotyvirusUnknown50, 288
MuskmelonPvr2Unknown
Nicotiana glutinosaNTIR-NB-LRR [cell-cell mov.]TMV [Tobacco mosaic virus]Tobamovirusp50 [Helicase]105–111
Tobacco
Phaseolus vulgarisI (locus)TIR-NB-LRR [ER/HR/phloem necr.]BCMV [Bean common mosaic virus]PotyvirusUnknown127–133
Kidney beanBNMV [Bean necrotic mosaic virus]
BICMV [Blackeye cowpea mosaic virus]
AzMV [Azuki mosaic virus]
CABMV [Cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus]
PWV [Passionfruit woodiness virus]
SMV [Soybean mosaic virus]
ThPV [Thailand passiflora virus]
WMV [Watermelon mosaic virus]
ZYMV [Zucchini yellow mosaic virus]
PvVTT1TIR-NB-LRR [HR]BDMV [Bean dwarf mosaic virus]BegomovirusBV1 (NSP)134–139
PvCMR1 (RT4-4)TIR-NB-LRR [syst. necrosis]CMV [Cucumber mosaic virus]Cucumovirus2a156
Poncirus trifoliateCtv (locus)CC-NB-LRRCTV [Citrus tristeza virus]ClosterovirusUnknown158–160
Trifoliate orange
Solanum peruvianumSw5bCC-NB-LRR [HR]TSWV [Tomato spotted wilt virus] and other tospovirusesTospovirusNSm179–183
Tomato
Tm-2CC-NB-LRR [HR]TMV [Tobacco mosaic virus]Tobamovirus30 kD MP171, 188, 189
ToMV [Tomato mosaic virus] and other tobamoviruses
Tm-22CC-NB-LRR [HR]ToMV [Tomato mosaic virus]Tobamovirus30 kD MP171, 190–193
TMV [Tobacco mosaic virus] and other tobamoviruses
Solanum tuberosumRx1CC-NB-LRR [ER/HR]PVX [Potato virus X] and other potex virusesPotexvirusCP195, 198, 199, 230–234
Potato
Rx2CC-NB-LRRPVX [Potato virus X]PotexvirusCP138, 232
Y-1TIR-NB-LRRPVY [Potato virus Y]PotyvirusUnknown237, 238
Vigna mungoCYR1CC-NB-LRRMYMV [Mungbean yellow mosaic virus]BegomovirusCP256, 257
Black gram
Plant hostR geneType: non NB-LRRRecognizesVirus genusAVRReferences
Arabidopsis thalianaJAX1Jacalin-like [lectin gene]Broad resistance against potexvirusPotexvirusUnknown258
Mouse ear cress
RTM1Jacalin-like [prev. syst. mov.] [RTM3 not cloned]TEV [Tobacco etch virus]PotyvirusCP7–9
RTM2PPV [Plum pox virus]CP
RTM3LMV [Lettuce mosaic virus]CP
Solanum chilenseTy-1RDR [Tol.]TYLCV [Tomato yellow leaf curl virus]BegomovirusNo30, 166, 167
TomatoTy-3
Solanum hirsutumTm-1TIM-barrel-like domain protein [ER] [Replication]ToMV [Tomato mosaic virus]TobamovirusReplicase Helicase-domain169–174
Tomato

Cloned dominant resistance genes against plant viruses, organized into the NB-LRRs and the non-NB-LRRs, and their Avr determinants (when identified).

1, Cooley et al., 2000; 2, Ren et al., 2000; 3, Takahashi et al., 2001; 4, Takahashi et al., 2002; 5, Takahashi et al., 2004; 6, Sekine et al., 2006; 7, Chisholm et al., 2000; 8, Whitham et al., 2000; 9, Decroocq et al., 2009; 17, Provvidenti and Hampton, 1992; 18, Ma et al., 2010; 25, Moury and Verdin, 2012; 30, Grube et al., 2000; 31, Tomita et al., 2008; 32, Tomita et al., 2011; 33, Matsumoto et al., 2008; 34, Sawada et al., 2004; 43, De La Cruz et al., 1997; 44, Holmes, 1937; 45, Berzal-Herranz et al., 1995; 50, Anagnostou et al., 2000; 65, Hayes et al., 2004; 66, Hajimorad and Hill, 2001; 67, Hajimorad et al., 2005a; 68, Wen et al., 2013; 69, Eggenberger et al., 2008; 105, Whitham et al., 1994; 106, Erickson et al., 1999; 107, Baker et al., 1995; 108, Dinesh-Kumar et al., 1995; 109, Dinesh-Kumar et al., 2000; 110, Padgett and Beachy, 1993; 111, Padgett et al., 1997; 127, Vallejos et al., 2006; 128, Ariyarathne et al., 1999; 129, Collmer et al., 2000; 130, Kelly et al., 1995; 131, Kyle et al., 1986; 132, Fisher and Kyle, 1994; 133, Fisher and Kyle, 1996; 134, Zhou et al., 2007; 135, Garrido-Ramirez et al., 2000; 136, Seo et al., 2004; 137, Seo et al., 2007; 138, Wang et al., 1999; 139, Gururani et al., 2012; 156, Seo et al., 2006; 158, Yang et al., 2003; 159, Rai, 2006; 160, Harper et al., 2010; 166, Hanson et al., 2000; 167, Verlaan et al., 2013; 169, Ishibashi et al., 2007; 170, Ishibashi et al., 2012; 171, Pelham, 1966; 172, Yamafuji et al., 1991; 173, Meshi et al., 1988; 174, Kato et al., 2013; 179, Finlay, 1953; 180, Holmes, 1948; 181, Brommonschenkel et al., 2000; 182, Hallwass et al., 2014; 183, Hoffmann et al., 2001; 188, Hall, 1980; 189, Meshi et al., 1989; 190, Weber et al., 1993; 191, Lanfermeijer et al., 2003; 192, Lanfermeijer et al., 2005; 193, Tanksley et al., 1998; 195, Cockerham, 1970; 198, Solomon-Blackburn and Barker, 2001b; 199, Solomon-Blackburn and Barker, 2001a; 230, Bendahmane et al., 1995; 231, Bendahmane et al., 1999; 232, Bendahmane et al., 2000; 233, Baures et al., 2008; 234, Querci et al., 1995; 237, Vidal et al., 2002; 238, Zvereva and Pooggin, 2012; 256, Maiti et al., 2012; 257, Pal et al., 1991; 258, Bijaisoradat and Kuhn, 1985; 287, Yamaji et al., 2012; 288, Brotman et al., 2013.

A few dominant R genes against viruses have been described that do not belong to the NB-LRR type of genes, e.g., RTM1, RTM2, and RTM3. Latter resistance genes have been identified from A. thaliana and prevent the systemic spread of several potyviruses. In those cases the virus is not able to upload into the phloem to systemically disseminate into the host. In addition, there is also no induction of HR or production of salicylic acid (SA), as commonly observed with NB-LRR mediated resistance responses (Cosson et al., 2012). No direct interaction occurs between the RTM proteins with the potyvirus CP (Avr) protein. A resistance gene recently identified is JAX, a lectin gene that resembles the RTM gene based resistance and works broadly against potexviruses in A. thaliana, indicating an important role for lectins in plant immunity (Yamaji et al., 2012). Another type of a distinct R gene is Tm-1, found in the wild tomato species S. hirsutum, encoding a protein that contains a TIM-barrel. This barrel binds the replication proteins of Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) and thereby inhibits RNA replication (Ishibashi et al., 2007). Also here, no typical NB-LRR type-associated response, like HR, is induced. Many homologs of Tm-1 are found in other organisms from different kingdoms, like fungi, archae, and bacteria, suggesting that this gene (originally) presents a housekeeping gene (Ishibashi et al., 2012). Both RTM and Tm-1 seem to play a role in the inhibition of a specific step required for successful infection by the virus. Whether these present a new class of dominant resistance genes remains to be determined.

From only a 1/3 of the total number of R genes directed against plant viruses, the virus Avr determinant is identified (Tables 1 and S1.1). Interestingly, functionally quite different viral proteins act as Avr determinants. Several R genes belong to the same locus (for instance the L-proteins in Capsicum spec.) or clearly act as homologs (Rx1 and Rx2 from S. tuberosum) and recognize the same Avr protein from overlapping virus species, indicating that these conserved R proteins are able to recognize similar structures but with an adapted spectrum (Bendahmane et al., 1995, 2000; Moury and Verdin, 2012). For several viruses, their corresponding R genes have not been identified yet, but their single dominant nature is deduced from the observation that an HR is being triggered. In some of these cases, the viral gene responsible for the induction of resistance, as indirectly monitored by HR, has been identified.

As described before and clear from Table 1, many different viral proteins can act as Avr determinants; whether it is the coat protein (e.g., L-locus from Capsicum against Tobamoviruses), the movement protein (e.g., Tm-2/Tm-22 from tomato against Tobamoviruses), the replicase protein (e.g., Tm-1 from tomato against Tobacco mosaic virus) or the RNAi suppressor protein (e.g., HRT from A. thaliana against Turnip crinkle virus), all potentially can act as elicitor of resistance (Meshi et al., 1989; Ishibashi et al., 2012; Moury and Verdin, 2012). Interestingly, for a majority of cases the ability to induce the resistance, as monitored by visual HR, could be uncoupled from the endogenous function of the viral protein but exceptions exist.

While the function of a viral protein is not a selective criterium to act as Avr-determinant, the “Zig-zag-model” by Jones and Dangl (2006) (Figure 1) implies that ETI (R gene mediated resistance) is a response to ETS and governed by effectors, i.e., molecules that act as virulence factors and contribute to (enhance) pathogen fitness. It is obvious that in case of RNAi as a PTI response against viruses, viral Avr proteins containing RSS activity contribute to virus fitness as a result of PTI suppression and thereby initiating ETS. On the other hand, some viral Avr proteins lack RSS activity which would indicate that effectors not necessarily would have to suppress PTI (RNAi) to contribute to virulence, as observed with several bacterial effectors. Unless, instead of RNAi, another innate immune response is being counteracted that is triggered via the activation of different intracellular PAMP receptors (e.g., in analogy to animal TLRs, see below).

Model of R gene recognition

Although the mode of action of resistance genes still remains a matter of debate, models have been proposed for the triggering of the largest and most studied group of the NB-LRR type of dominant R genes. One of the most commonly accepted models is the “guard hypothesis” (Van Der Biezen and Jones, 1998; Jones and Dangl, 2006). In this model the resistance gene product guards a certain host protein, the “guardee,” and perceives alterations of this protein upon interaction with the Avr determinant to subsequently initiate a resistance response. It is possible that multiple R genes guard the same guardee, possibly vice versa as well, which thereby broadens the resistance spectrum of (a limited number of) R genes to a wide range of various pathogens; e.g., Rx1 and GPa2 both interact with the same guardee RanGAP2 (Tameling and Baulcombe, 2007; Moffett, 2009). Unfortunately, this model does not explain how resistance breaking virus isolates maintain their virulence. For this reason, alternative models have been postulated. According to the “decoy model” (Van Der Hoorn and Kamoun, 2008), a (proteinaceous) decoy evolved to act as a molecular sensor to only detect a pathogen without having any other role in the household machinery of the host. The “bait and switch model” and the similar “mousetrap model” have been more recently postulated and proposes that the R gene product in an “OFF” state forms a complex together with the guardee/decoy protein, that upon interaction of the Avr protein with the complex leads to a conformational switch (“ON”) and activates a downstream signaling pathway leading to resistance (Collier and Moffett, 2009; Lukasik and Takken, 2009). Recent studies on the resistance gene Rx from potato against PVX have shown that indeed intramolecular interactions keep the R gene product in an inactive state, while interaction of the effector protein releases these interactions and thereby activating the resistance downstream (Bendahmane et al., 2002; Moffett et al., 2002; Lukasik and Takken, 2009; Slootweg et al., 2013).

The downstream mechanism after resistance induction still remains unclear. However, one described case of the R gene from tobacco, the N gene, has revealed some of the downstream ways of controlling virus replication and obtaining resistance. The N gene encodes a TIR-NB-LRR protein and confers resistance against TMV and, upon transient co-expression with the p50 elicitor (helicase), an HR is induced in N. tabacum, a response that does not occur in N. benthamiana. Bhattacharjee et al. (2009) employed this observation in a series of experiments to dissect and assign downstream signaling of defense responses, related to the R gene. The studies indicated that the N gene based antiviral response leads to a translational arrest of viral transcripts by a process that involves Argonaute 4 (AGO4). As a result, synthesis of viral proteins is inhibited, ultimately preventing virus accumulation and spread. Whether this mechanism is generic to all R genes against plant-viruses remains to be investigated.

More recently, two independent studies were published that showed that the translation of R genes is tightly controlled through the activity of miRNAs. One study showed the miR482/2118 superfamily negatively controlled the translation of NB-LRR proteins by targeting its P-loop motif (Shivaprasad et al., 2012), while Li et al. (2012) showed that other miRNA families controlled the translation of NB-LRR proteins as well, with the TIR-NB-LRR protein N as example. During the on-going “arms race” between virus and host, viruses counter-defend against PTI/antiviral RNAi by their RSS proteins, some of which exhibit strong affinity to bind small (si- and mi-)RNAs. As a consequence such RSS proteins may suppress the miRNA induced silencing of R genes, and lead to enhanced expression of the R genes and induction of ETI. Considering that high expression levels of R genes lead to auto-immunity (Xia et al., 2013), viral RSS proteins with affinity to sRNAs thus may play a major role in the induction of HR. However, viral RSS are clearly not the only criterium as observed by the virus-specific activation of R genes and final HR, which indicates that a more complex interplay between viral effectors and R gene products is (additionally) required.

Downstream defense responses

Dominant R genes trigger a hypersensitive response (HR) or an extreme response (ER) in case the reaction occurs in a single cell. Both involve a programmed cell death (PCD) response that rapidly kills infected cells and prevents systemic spread of the (virus) pathogen. An induced HR is quite characteristic and involves the activation and expression of SA, jasmonic acid (JA), nitride oxide (NO), ethylene, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and Ca2+, and expression of Pathogenesis Related (PR)-genes. While each component has a specificity toward certain pathogens, only SA, ROS, and Ca2+ seem to be effective against viruses (Loebenstein, 2009; Carr et al., 2010).

In the past, an HR was considered to be part of the resistance response, however, recent insights into R protein downstream signaling indicate that programmed cell death (HR) and resistance are distinct physiological pathways (Bendahmane et al., 1999; Bai et al., 2012). One of the best examples in support of this comes from studies on Rx-based resistance against PVX. The Rx gene product is a CC-NB-LRR protein from potato that is triggered by the PVX structural CP protein. The Rx protein localizes in the cytoplasm while shuttling to and from the nucleus thereby triggering resistance (Slootweg et al., 2010). Although an HR is monitored, this response can be knocked out without affecting Rx-mediated resistance against PVX (Bendahmane et al., 1999). Another example is the N-gene mediated resistance against TMV as described above in section Model of R Gene Recognition (Bhattacharjee et al., 2009). Similar observations have been made by others (Cole et al., 2001; Cawly et al., 2005; Genger et al., 2008; Bulgarelli et al., 2010; Bai et al., 2012) and indicate that the actual resistance response is different from an HR, although both mostly are triggered and may act in concert to clear viral invasions. Whether both are triggered by a pathogens' Avr determinant or whether HR is sequentially triggered following the R gene response is not clear.

While several interacting proteins have been identified that control R protein activity in the absence of pathogens (e.g., RAR1, SGT1, WRKY1, TPR1, Hsp90), more recently it has been found that there are also proteins that modulate the strength of defense responses (RanGAP, EDS1-PAD4) (Lu et al., 2003; Wiermer et al., 2005; Sacco et al., 2009). The benefit for the plant in a modulated fine-tuning of the ETI response to specific pathogens lies in improved effector sensing and minimizing the fitness costs involved with certain defense responses (free radical production, defense protein synthesis, cell death) (Padmanabhan and Dinesh-Kumar, 2010). While R gene mediated defense is taking place locally at the site of entry, it is also able to induce defense signaling responses in distally located tissues, known as systemic acquired resistance (SAR) (Vlot et al., 2008). For both the N gene in tobacco and Rx1 in potato, SAR has been demonstrated (Delaney et al., 1994; Liu et al., 2010) and in both cases this response is mediated by the SA-dependent pathway as a mobile signal. SAR also prevents infection by other pathogens in the host by activating PR genes in the systemic tissue, which are used as a hallmark of SAR and were shown to have antimicrobial activity, although a direct inhibition on virus replication has not been shown (Durrant and Dong, 2004; Loebenstein, 2009; Carr et al., 2010).

Functional and structural homology of plant- and animal-sensors of innate immunity

Viruses are pathogens to many different organisms and, irrespective of the host species they infect, often share similarities in genome organization and functions of encoded proteins. A good example of this is exemplified by viruses from the Bunyaviridae family where all members infect animals with the exception of those from the Tospovirus genus that, besides infecting their thrips vector, are plant pathogenic and are postulated to have evolved from a common ancestor. Likewise, as a result of co-evolution driven by host-pathogen interactions, plants and animals show some similarities in their innate immune sensory systems. While in plants the aforementioned R genes are important in mounting an ETI response, in animals two major classes are distinguished that (partially) share similarity to these R genes, however both function as PRRs in the PTI response. The first major class present the “nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeat”-proteins (NLRs) and the second class is that of Toll like receptors (TLRs), which are all found to function as PRRs in the PTI response. Both are immune receptors aimed at detecting “foreign” structures and activating downstream defense responses. The family of NLRs share the most homology, as evidenced when looking at R genes from plants and NACHT-LRR encoding genes from the animal kingdom (NAIP–CIITA–HET-E–TP1 domain) (Leipe et al., 2004; Takken et al., 2006; Maekawa et al., 2011b). They both contain a nucleotide binding domain and a LRR (Maekawa et al., 2011b) (Figure 2). Additionally, plant R proteins also share homology at their N-termini with animal TLRs, membrane-bound immune receptors that function as sensors in pathogen recognition across membranes.

Figure 2

The NLRs of both plant and animal kingdom share homology through the presence of the Leucine-rich repeats (LRR) in these proteins. The most prevalent type of R proteins in plants belong to the NB-LRR protein structural class, from which the central nuclear binding domain (NBS) exhibits similarity to the nucleotide binding domain in several metazoan apoptosis regulating proteins like Apaf-1 from mammals and CED-4 from C. elegans. Due to the latter the NBS domain is also often referred to as NB-ARC domain (from Apaf1–R-protein–CED4) (Van Der Biezen and Jones, 1998; Takken et al., 2006). The N-terminal domain furthermore separates different classes of R genes; TIR-NB-LRRs harbor a Toll/Interleukin-1 Receptor domain with similarity to metazoan TLRs (Burch-Smith et al., 2007; Bernoux et al., 2011; Maekawa et al., 2011b; Hao et al., 2013). CC-NB-LRRs contain coiled coil domain forming the more irregular shaped intertwined alpha-helices (Lupas, 1997). Parallel to the discovery of many NB-LRR encoding R genes in plants in the recent years, the search for homology to Apaf-1 and CED-4 resulted in the recognition of the NACHT-LRR protein family in vertebrates (Koonin and Aravind, 2000; Leipe et al., 2004). Animal NLRs activate caspase-1 leading to activation and release of the cytokine interleukin-1 beta (Case, 2011), which subsequently induces local and systemic immune reactions. Similar to plant NB-LRR proteins, NLRs were found to act as higher-order active complexes, e.g., NLRP1-3 and NLRC4 form a complex often termed the inflammasome (Maekawa et al., 2011b).

TLRs represent the best studied family of PRRs in mammals so far. They are transmembrane glycoprotein receptors with an extracellular PAMP-binding domain consisting of multiple LRR that fold into a “horseshoe” structure. Additionally, it possesses intracellular signaling regions that have similarity to the intracellular domain of the Interleukin-I receptor ((IL-1R), which is referred to as Toll/IL-1R (TIR) domain that mediates downstream signaling upon activation of the receptor. TLRs initiate signal cascades involving the activation of nuclear factor kappa b (NF-κ B), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and interferon regulatory factors (IRFs). This subsequently leads to a concerted expression of interferons, cytokines, and chemokines. Finally, inflammatory processes, cell cycle arrest, and cell death are induced (Honda et al., 2005; Kaisho and Akira, 2006). In humans, 10 TLRs have been identified of which TLR2, -3, -4, -7, and -8 are involved in sensing structural components of RNA viruses like double-stranded RNA, single-stranded RNA and viral glycoproteins (Bowie and Unterholzner, 2008). While most TLRs are involved in extracellular recognition of PAMPs, TLR3, -7, and -8 are primarily restricted to intracellular compartments (endoplasmic-reticulum (ER), endosomes etc.) where they sense structural components of viral RNA. Besides TLRs cytosolic retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like receptors (RLRs; RIG-I, MDA5, and LSP2) have been identified as sensors of RNA viruses and are involved in the very early response of some RNA viruses (Bowie and Unterholzner, 2008; Gerlier and Lyles, 2011; Jensen and Thomsen, 2012).

Pathogen recognition in both animal and plant kingdoms involves the LRR domain, which binds the ligand in its horseshoe shape, often followed by activation of a signaling cascade through kinase phosphorylation. Structural similarities between animal TLR/NLR and plant NB-LRR proteins point to a convergent evolution of these defense-related pathways (Yue et al., 2012). However innate immunity in animals and plants differs substantially in their downstream defense response, with interleukin/interferon-activated inflammatory responses combined with activating the adaptive immune system in mammalian systems and a resistance response (as explained before) often seen as a programmed cell death response in form of HR in plants.

Outlook

Dominant resistance against plant viruses are of increasing interest to breeders and scientists in the past years. More and more is known about the molecular mechanisms behind R gene mediated defense and the induction of the HR. However, the number of well-studied examples is still very limited, and therefore makes it difficult to extrapolate to other less studied R genes. In depth studies on other R genes from different crops providing resistance against different phytopathogens will have to show whether there is common mechanism of defense shared between all R genes, or whether specialization between different classes of R genes occurs. Knowledge on mammalian innate immunity sensors and their mode of action may provide interesting and cross pollinating views in this. The rapid generation of resistance breaking virus isolates against dominant resistance genes already indicates the importance for alternative resistance genes, to provide more durable, and effective resistances.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Statements

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://www.frontiersin.org/journal/10.3389/fpls.2014.00307/abstract

References

  • 1

    Acosta-LealR.BryanB. K.SmithJ. T.RushC. M. (2010). Breakdown of host resistance by independent evolutionary lineages of Beet necrotic yellow vein virus involves a parallel C/U mutation in its p25 gene. Phytopathology100, 127–133. 10.1094/PHYTO-100-2-0127

  • 2

    AmiriR.MoghaddamM.MesbahM.SadeghianS. Y.GhannadhaM. R.IzadpanahK. (2003). The inheritance of resistance to Beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV) in B. vulgaris subsp maritima, accession WB42: Statistical comparisons with Holly-1-4. Euphytica132, 363–373. 10.1023/A:1025063625350

  • 3

    AnagnostouK.JahnM.Perl-TrevesR. (2000). Inheritance and linkage analysis of resistance to Zucchini yellow mosaic virus, Watermelon mosaic virus, Papaya ringspot virus and powdery mildew in melon. Euphytica116, 265–270. 10.1023/A:1004005716806

  • 4

    AngelC. A.HsiehY.-C.SchoelzJ. E. (2011). Comparative analysis of the capacity of Tombusvirus P22 and P19 proteins to function as avirulence determinants in Nicotiana species. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 24, 91–99. 10.1094/MPMI-04-10-0089

  • 5

    AngelC. A.SchoelzJ. E. (2013). A survey of resistance to Tomato bushy stunt virus in the genus Nicotiana reveals that the hypersensitive response is triggered by one of three different viral proteins. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 26, 240–248. 10.1094/MPMI-06-12-0157-R

  • 6

    AriyarathneH. M.CoyneD. P.JungG.SkrochP. W.VidaverA. K.SteadmanJ. R.et al. (1999). Molecular mapping of disease resistance genes for halo blight, common bacterial blight, and bean common mosaic virus in a segregating population of common bean. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 124, 654–662.

  • 7

    BaereckeM. L. (1967). Hypersensitivity to the S-virus of potato in a Bolivian andigena clone. Der Züchter37, 281–286.

  • 8

    BagnallR. H.YoungD. A. (1972). Resistance to virus S in potato. Am. Potato J. 49, 196. 10.1007/Bf02864739.

  • 9

    BaiS.LiuJ.ChangC.ZhangL.MaekawaT.WangQ.et al. (2012). Structure-function analysis of barley NLR immune receptor MLA10 reveals its cell compartment specific activity in cell death and disease resistance. PLoS Pathog. 8:e1002752. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002752

  • 10

    BakerB.DineshkumarS. P.CorrC.WhithamS. (1995). Isolation and characterization of the Tobacco mosaic virus resistance gene N. Plant Physiol. 108, 2.

  • 11

    BarkerH. (1996). Inheritance of resistance to potato viruses Y and A in progeny obtained from potato cultivars containing gene Ry: evidence for a new gene for extreme resistance to PVA. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93, 710–716. 10.1007/BF00224066

  • 12

    BarkerH. (1997). Extreme resistance to Potato virus V in clones of Solanum tuberosum that are also resistant to Potato viruses Y and A: evidence for a locus conferring broad-spectrum potyvirus resistance. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95, 1258–1262. 10.1007/s001220050690

  • 13

    BashirM.IqbalM. S.GhafoorA.AhmadZ.QureshiA. S. (2002). Variability in cowpea germplasm for reaction to virus infection under field conditions. Pak. J. Bot. 34, 47–48.

  • 14

    BauresI.CandresseT.LeveauA.BendahmaneA.SturboisB. (2008). The Rx gene confers resistance to a range of potexviruses in transgenic Nicotiana plants. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 21, 1154–1164. 10.1094/MPMI-21-9-1154

  • 15

    Ben ChaimA.GrubeR. C.LapidotM.JahnM.ParanI. (2001). Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with resistance to Cucumber mosaic virus in Capsicum annuum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102, 1213–1220. 10.1007/s001220100581

  • 16

    BendahmaneA.FarnhamG.MoffettP.BaulcombeD. C. (2002). Constitutive gain-of-function mutants in a nucleotide binding site-leucine rich repeat protein encoded at the Rx locus of potato. Plant J. 32, 195–204. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01413.x

  • 17

    BendahmaneA.KanyukaK.BaulcombeD. C. (1999). The Rx gene from potato controls separate virus resistance and cell death responses. Plant Cell11, 781–792. 10.1105/tpc.11.5.781

  • 18

    BendahmaneA.KohnB. A.DediC.BaulcombeD. C. (1995). The coat protein of Potato virus X is a strain-specific elicitor of Rx1-mediated virus resistance in potato. Plant J. 8, 933–941. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1995.8060933.x

  • 19

    BendahmaneA.QuerciM.KanyukaK.BaulcombeD. C. (2000). Agrobacterium transient expression system as a tool for the isolation of disease resistance genes: application to the Rx2 locus in potato. Plant J. 21, 73–81. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00654.x

  • 20

    BernouxM.VeT.WilliamsS.WarrenC.HattersD.ValkovE.et al. (2011). Structural and functional analysis of a plant resistance protein TIR domain reveals interfaces for self-association, signaling, and autoregulation. Cell Host Microbe9, 200–211. 10.1016/j.chom.2011.02.009

  • 21

    Berzal-HerranzA.De La CruzA.TenlladoF.Diaz-RuizJ. R.LöpezL.SanzA. I.et al. (1995). The Capsicum L3 gene-mediated resistance against the tobamoviruses is elicited by the coat protein. Virology209, 498–505. 10.1006/viro.1995.1282

  • 22

    BhattacharjeeS.ZamoraA.AzharM. T.SaccoM. A.LambertL. H.MoffettP. (2009). Virus resistance induced by NB-LRR proteins involves Argonaute4-dependent translational control. Plant J. 58, 940–951. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03832.x

  • 23

    BijaisoradatM.KuhnC. W. (1985). Nature of resistance in soybean to Cowpea chlorotic mottle virus. Phytopathology75, 351–355. 10.1094/Phyto-75-351

  • 24

    BoermaH. R.KuhnC. W. (1976). Inheritance of resistance to Peanut mottle virus in soybeans. Crop Sci. 16, 533–534. 10.2135/cropsci1976.0011183X001600040024x

  • 25

    BowieA. G.UnterholznerL. (2008). Viral evasion and subversion of pattern-recognition receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8, 911–922. 10.1038/nri2436

  • 26

    BrignetiG.GarciamasJ.BaulcombeD. C. (1997). Molecular mapping of the Potato virus Y resistance gene Ry(sto) in potato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94, 198–203. 10.1007/s001220050400

  • 27

    BrommonschenkelS. H.FraryA.FraryA.TanksleyS. D. (2000). The broad-spectrum tospovirus resistance gene Sw-5 of tomato is a homolog of the root-knot nematode resistance gene Mi. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 13, 1130–1138. 10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.10.1130

  • 28

    BrotmanY.NormantovichM.GoldenbergZ.ZvirinZ.KovalskiI.StovbunN.et al. (2013). Dual resistance of melon to Fusarium oxysporum races 0 and 2 and to Papaya ring spot virus is controlled by a pair of head-to-head-oriented NB-LRR genes of unusual architecture. Mol. Plant6, 235–238. 10.1093/mp/sss121

  • 29

    BrownR. N.Bolanos-HerreraA.MyersJ. R.JahnM. M. (2003). Inheritance of resistance to four cucurbit viruses in Cucurbita moschata. Euphytica129, 253–258. 10.1023/A:1022224327064

  • 30

    BrueningG. (2011). Not as they seem. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 49, 1–16. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-072910-095329

  • 31

    BrueningG.PonzF.GlascockC.RussellM. L.RowhaniA.ChayC. (1987). Resistance of cowpeas to Cowpea mosaic virus and to Tobacco ringspot virus. Ciba Found. Symp. 133, 23–37.

  • 32

    BulgarelliD.BiselliC.CollinsN. C.ConsonniG.StancaA. M.Schulze-LefertP.et al. (2010). The CC-NB-LRR-type Rdg2a resistance gene confers immunity to the seed-borne barley leaf stripe pathogen in the absence of hypersensitive cell death. PLoS ONE5:e12599. 10.1371/journal.pone.0012599

  • 33

    Burch-SmithT. M.SchiffM.CaplanJ. L.TsaoJ.CzymmekK.Dinesh-KumarS. P. (2007). A novel role for the TIR domain in association with pathogen-derived elicitors. PLoS Biol. 5:e68. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050068

  • 34

    BurgyanJ.HaveldaZ. (2011). Viral suppressors of RNA silencing. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 265–272. 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.02.010

  • 35

    BussG. R.RoaneC. W.TolinS. A.VinardiT. A. (1985). A second dominant gene for resistance to Peanut mottle virus in soybeans. Crop Sci. 25, 314–316. 10.2135/cropsci1985.0011183X002500020025x

  • 36

    CadmanC. H. (1942). Autotetraploid-inheritance in the potato: some new evidence. J. Genet. 44, 33–52. 10.1007/BF02982766

  • 37

    CarantaC.PfliegerS.LefebvreV.DaubezeA. M.ThabuisA.PalloixA. (2002). QTLs involved in the restriction of Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) long-distance movement in pepper. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104, 586–591. 10.1007/s001220100753

  • 38

    CarantaC.ThabuisA.PalloixA. (1999). Development of a CAPS marker for the Pvr4 locus: a tool for pyramiding potyvirus resistance genes in pepper. Genome42, 1111–1116. 10.1139/gen-42-6-1111

  • 39

    CarrJ. P.LewseyM. G.PalukaitisP. (2010). Signaling in induced resistance. Adv. Virus Res. 76, 57–121. 10.1016/S0065-3527(10)76003-6

  • 40

    CaseC. L. (2011). Regulating caspase-1 during infection: roles of NLRs, AIM2, and ASC. Yale J. Biol. Med. 84, 333–343. 10.1128/mBio.00117-11

  • 41

    CawlyJ.ColeA. B.KiralyL.QiuW. P.SchoelzJ. E. (2005). The plant gene CCD1 selectively blocks cell death during the hypersensitive response to Cauliflower mosaic virus infection. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 18, 212–219. 10.1094/MPMI-18-0212

  • 42

    CesariS.ThilliezG.RibotC.ChalvonV.MichelC.JauneauA.et al. (2013). The rice resistance protein pair RGA4/RGA5 recognizes the Magnaporthe oryzae effectors AVR-Pia and AVR1-CO39 by direct binding. Plant Cell25, 1463–1481. 10.1105/tpc.112.107201

  • 43

    ChalhoubB. A.SarrafiA.LapierreH. D. (1995). Partial resistance in the Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivar ‘Chikurin Ibaraki 1’ to two PAV-like isolates of Barley yellow dwarf virus: allelic variability at the Yd2 gene Locus. Plant Breed. 114, 303–307. 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1995.tb01238.x

  • 44

    ChelkowskiJ.TyrkaM.SobkiewiczA. (2003). Resistance genes in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and their identification with molecular markers. J. Appl. Genet. 44, 291–309.

  • 45

    ChenH. Y.YangJ.LinC.YuanY. A. (2008). Structural basis for RNA-silencing suppression by Tomato aspermy virus protein 2b. EMBO Rep. 9, 754–760. 10.1038/embor.2008.118

  • 46

    ChenQ.ConnerR. L.AhmadF.LarocheA.FedakG.ThomasJ. B. (1998b). Molecular characterization of the genome composition of partial amphiploids derived from Triticum aestivum x Thinopyrum ponticum and T. aestivum x Th. intermedium as sources of resistance to Wheat streak mosaic virus and its vector, Aceria tosichella.Theor. Appl. Genet. 97, 1–8. 10.1007/s001220050860

  • 47

    ChenQ.FriebeB.ConnerR. L.LarocheA.ThomasJ. B.GillB. S. (1998a). Molecular cytogenetic characterization of Thinopyrum intermedium derived wheat germplasm specifying resistance to Wheat streak mosaic virus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96, 1–7. 10.1007/s001220050701

  • 48

    ChenY.LiuZ.HaltermanD. A. (2012). Molecular determinants of resistance activation and suppression by Phytophthora infestans effector IPI-O. PLoS Pathog. 8:e1002595. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002595

  • 49

    ChisholmS. T.MahajanS. K.WhithamS. A.YamamotoM. L.CarringtonJ. C. (2000). Cloning of the Arabidopsis RTM1 gene, which controls restriction of long-distance movement of Tobacco etch virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 489–494. 10.1073/pnas.97.1.489

  • 50

    ChungH.JeongY.-M.MunJ.-H.LeeS.-S.ChungW.-H.YuH.-J. (2014). Construction of a genetic map based on high-throughput SNP genotyping and genetic mapping of a TuMV resistance locus in Brassica rapa. Mol. Genet. Genomics289, 149–160. 10.1007/s00438-013-0798-9

  • 51

    CockerhamG. (1943). VIII. Potato breeding for virus resistance. Ann. Appl. Biol. 30, 105–107. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1943.tb06166.x

  • 52

    CockerhamG. (1955). Strains of Potato virus X, in Proceedings of the Second Conference on Potato Virus Diseases (Lisse-Wageningen).

  • 53

    CockerhamG. (1958). Experimental breeding in relation to virus resistance, in Proceedings of the Third Conference on Potato Virus Diseases (Lisse-Wageningen).

  • 54

    CockerhamG. (1970). Genetical studies on resistance to Potato viruses X and Y. Heredity25, 309–348. 10.1038/hdy.1970.35

  • 55

    ColeA. B.KiralyL.RossK.ScheolzJ. E. (2001). Uncoupling resistance from cell death in the hypersensitive response of Nicotiana species to Cauliflower mosaic virus infection. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 14, 31–41. 10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.1.31

  • 56

    CollierS. M.HamelL. P.MoffettP. (2011). Cell death mediated by the N-terminal domains of a unique and highly conserved class of NB-LRR protein. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 24, 918–931. 10.1094/MPMI-03-11-0050

  • 57

    CollierS. M.MoffettP. (2009). NB-LRRs work a “bait and switch” on pathogens. Trends Plant Sci. 14, 521–529. 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.08.001

  • 58

    CollinsN. C.PaltridgeN. G.FordC. M.SymonsR. H. (1996). The Yd2 gene for Barley yellow dwarf virus resistance maps close to the centromere on the long arm of barley chromosome 3. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92, 858–864. 10.1007/BF00221898

  • 59

    CollmerC. W.MarstonM. F.TaylorJ. C.JahnM. (2000). The I gene of bean: a dosage-dependent allele conferring extreme resistance, hypersensitive resistance, or spreading vascular necrosis in response to the potyvirus Bean common mosaic virus. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 13, 1266–1270. 10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.11.1266

  • 60

    CooleyM. B.PathiranaS.WuH. J.KachrooP.KlessigD. F. (2000). Members of the Arabidopsis HRT/RPP8 family of resistance genes confer resistance to both viral and oomycete pathogens. Plant Cell12, 663–676. 10.1105/tpc.12.5.663

  • 61

    CossonP.Schurdi-LevraudV.LeQ. H.SicardO.CaballeroM.RouxF.et al. (2012). The RTM resistance to potyviruses in Arabidopsis thaliana: natural variation of the RTM genes and evidence for the implication of additional genes. PLoS ONE7:e39169. 10.1371/journal.pone.0039169

  • 62

    CruzS. S.BaulcombeD. C. (1993). Molecular analysis of Potato virus X isolates in relation to the potato hypersensitivity gene Nx. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 6, 707–714. 10.1094/MPMI-6-707

  • 63

    CsorbaT.PantaleoV.BurgyanJ. (2009). RNA silencing: an antiviral mechanism. Adv. Virus Res. 75, 35–71. 10.1016/S0065-3527(09)07502-2

  • 64

    CuiY.LeeM. Y.HuoN. X.BraggJ.YanL. J.YuanC.et al. (2012). Fine mapping of the Bsr1 Barley stripe mosaic virus resistance gene in the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. PLoS ONE7:e38333. 10.1371/journal.pone.0038333

  • 65

    Danin-PolegY.TadmorY.TzuriG.ReisN.HirschbergJ.KatzirN. (2002). Construction of a genetic map of melon with molecular markers and horticultural traits, and localization of genes associated with ZYMV resistance. Euphytica125, 373–384. 10.1023/A:1016021926815

  • 66

    DardickC. D.TaraporewalaZ.LuB.CulverJ. N. (1999). Comparison of tobamovirus coat protein structural features that affect elicitor activity in pepper, eggplant, and tobacco. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 12, 247–251. 10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.3.247

  • 67

    DecroocqV.SalvadorB.SicardO.GlasaM.CossonP.Svanella-DumasL.et al. (2009). The determinant of potyvirus ability to overcome the RTM resistance of Arabidopsis thaliana maps to the N-terminal region of the coat protein. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 22, 1302–1311. 10.1094/MPMI-22-10-1302

  • 68

    De La CruzA.LópezL.TenlladoF.Díaz-RuízJ. R.SanzA. I.VaqueroC.et al. (1997). The coat protein is required for the elicitation of the Capsicum L2 gene-mediated resistance against the tobamoviruses. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 10, 107–113. 10.1094/MPMI.1997.10.1.107

  • 69

    DelaneyT. P.UknesS.VernooijB.FriedrichL.WeymannK.NegrottoD.et al. (1994). A central role of salicylic-acid in plant-disease resistance. Science266, 1247–1250. 10.1126/science.266.5188.1247

  • 70

    DeloguG.CattivelliL.SnidaroM.StancaA. M. (1995). The Yd2 gene and enhanced resistance to Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) in winter barley. Plant Breed. 114, 417–420. 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1995.tb00823.x

  • 71

    De RondeD.ButterbachP.LohuisD.HedilM.Van LentJ. W. M.KormelinkR. (2013). Tsw gene-based resistance is triggered by a functional RNA silencing suppressor protein of the Tomato spotted wilt virus. Mol. Plant Pathol. 14, 405–415. 10.1111/mpp.12016

  • 72

    DeslandesL.OlivierJ.PeetersN.FengD. X.KhounlothamM.BoucherC.et al. (2003). Physical interaction between RRS1-R, a protein conferring resistance to bacterial wilt, and PopP2, a type III effector targeted to the plant nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 8024–8029. 10.1073/pnas.1230660100

  • 73

    De ZeeuwD. J.BallardJ. C. (1959). Inheritance in cowpea of resistance to Tobacco ringspot virus. Phytopathology49, 332–334.

  • 74

    Dinesh-KumarS. P.ThamW. H.BakerB. J. (2000). Structure-function analysis of the Tobacco mosaic virus resistance gene N. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 14789–14794. 10.1073/pnas.97.26.14789

  • 75

    Dinesh-KumarS. P.WhithamS.ChoiD.HehlR.CorrC.BakerB. (1995). Transposon tagging of Tobacco mosaic virus resistance gene N: its possible role in the TMV-N-mediated signal-transduction pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 4175–4180. 10.1073/pnas.92.10.4175

  • 76

    DingJ. Q.LiH. M.WangY. X.ZhaoR. B.ZhangX. C.ChenJ. F.et al. (2012). Fine mapping of Rscmv2, a major gene for resistance to Sugarcane mosaic virus in maize. Mol. Breed. 30, 1593–1600. 10.1007/s11032-012-9741-8

  • 77

    DingS. W. (2010). RNA-based antiviral immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 10, 632–644. 10.1038/nri2824

  • 78

    DingS.-W.VoinnetO. (2007). Antiviral immunity directed by small RNAs. Cell130, 413–426. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.039

  • 79

    DivekiZ.SalankiK.BalazsE. (2004). The necrotic pathotype of the Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) Ns strain is solely determined by amino acid 461 of the 1a protein. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 17, 837–845. 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.8.837

  • 80

    DoddsP. N.LawrenceG. J.CatanzaritiA.-M.TehT.WangC.-I. A.AyliffeM. A.et al. (2006). Direct protein interaction underlies gene-for-gene specificity and coevolution of the flax resistance genes and flax rust avirulence genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 8888–8893. 10.1073/pnas.0602577103

  • 81

    DogimontC.PalloixA.DaubzeA. M.MarchouxG.SelassieK. G.PochardE. (1996). Genetic analysis of broad spectrum resistance to potyviruses using doubled haploid lines of pepper (Capsicum annuum L). Euphytica88, 231–239. 10.1007/BF00023895

  • 82

    DurrantW. E.DongX. (2004). Systemic acquired resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 42, 185–209. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140421

  • 83

    DussleC. M.QuintM.XuM. L.MelchingerA. E.LubberstedtT. (2002). Conversion of AFLP fragments tightly linked to SCMV resistance genes Scmv1 and Scmv2 into simple PCR-based markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105, 1190–1195. 10.1007/s00122-002-0964-7

  • 84

    DziewonskaM. A.OstrowskaK. (1978). Resistance to Potato virus M in certain wild potato species. Potato Res. 21, 129–131. 10.1007/BF02361611

  • 85

    EdwardsM. C.GonsalvesD.ProvvidentiR. (1983). Genetic analysis of Cucumber mosaic virus in relation to host resistance: location of determinants for pathogenicity to certain legumes and Lactuca saligna. Phytopathology73, 269–273. 10.1094/Phyto-73-269

  • 86

    EdwardsM. C.SteffensonB. J. (1996). Genetics and mapping of Barley stripe mosaic virus resistance in barley. Phytopathology86, 184–187. 10.1094/Phyto-86-184

  • 87

    EggenbergerA. L.HajimoradM. R.HillJ. H. (2008). Gain of virulence on Rsv1-genotype soybean by an avirulent Soybean mosaic virus requires concurrent mutations in both P3 and HC-Pro. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 21, 931–936. 10.1094/MPMI-21-7-0931

  • 88

    EricksonF. L.HolzbergS.Calderon-UrreaA.HandleyV.AxtellM.CorrC.et al. (1999). The helicase domain of the TMV replicase proteins induces the N-mediated defence response in tobacco. Plant J. 18, 67–75. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00426.x

  • 89

    FahimM.MechanicosA.Ayala-NavarreteL.HaberS.LarkinP. J. (2012). Resistance to Wheat streak mosaic virus - a survey of resources and development of molecular markers. Plant Pathol. 61, 425–440. 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02542.x

  • 90

    FanQ. L.NiroulaM.FeldsteinP. A.BrueningG. (2011). Participation of the Cowpea mosaic virus protease in eliciting extreme resistance. Virology417, 71–78. 10.1016/j.virol.2011.04.022

  • 91

    FinlayK. W. (1953). Inheritance of spotted wilt resistance in the tomato. II. Five genes controlling spotted wilt resistance in four tomato types. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 6, 153–163.

  • 92

    FisherM. L.KyleM. M. (1994). Inheritance of resistance to potyviruses in Phaseolus vulgaris L. III. Cosegregation of phenotypically similar dominant responses to nine potyviruses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89, 818–823.

  • 93

    FisherM. L.KyleM. M. (1996). Inheritance of resistance to potyviruses in Phaseolus vulgaris L. IV. Inheritance, linkage relations, and environmental effects on systemic resistance to four potyviruses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92, 204–212. 10.1007/BF00223377

  • 94

    FlisB.HermigJ.Strzelczyk-ZytaD.GebhardtC.MarezewskiW. (2005). The Ry-f(sto) gene from Solanum stoloniferum for extreme resistant to Potato virus Y maps to potato chromosome XII and is diagnosed by PCR marker GP122(718) in PVY resistant potato cultivars. Mol. Breed. 15, 95–101. 10.1007/s11032-004-2736-3

  • 95

    FordC. M.PaltridgeN. G.RathjenJ. P.MoritzR. L.SimpsonR. J.SymonsR. H. (1998). Rapid and informative assays for Yd2, the Barley yellow dwarf virus resistance gene, based on the nucleotide sequence of a closely linked gene. Mol. Breed. 4, 23–31. 10.1023/A:1009686932457

  • 96

    FranckiM. G.OhmH. W.AndersonJ. M. (2001). Novel germplasm providing resistance to Barley yellow dwarf virus in wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 52, 1375–1382. 10.1071/AR01020

  • 97

    FribourgC. E.NakashimaJ. (1984). Characterization of a new potyvirus from potato. Phytopathology74, 1363–1369. 10.1094/Phyto-74-1363

  • 98

    Garrido-RamirezE. R.SudarshanaM. R.LucasW. J.GilbertsonR. L. (2000). Bean dwarf mosaic virus BV1 protein is a determinant of the hypersensitive response and avirulence in Phaseolus vulgaris. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 13, 1184–1194. 10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.11.1184

  • 99

    GawehnsF.CornelissenB. J. C.TakkenF. L. W. (2013). The potential of effector-target genes in breeding for plant innate immunity. Microb. Biotechnol. 6, 223–229. 10.1111/1751-7915.12023

  • 100

    GengerR. K.JurkowskiG. I.McdowellJ. M.LuH.JungH. W.GreenbergJ. T.et al. (2008). Signaling pathways that regulate the enhanced disease resistance of Arabidopsis “defense, no death” mutants. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 21, 1285–1296. 10.1094/MPMI-21-10-1285

  • 101

    GerlierD.LylesD. S. (2011). Interplay between innate immunity and negative-strand RNA viruses: towards a rational model. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 75, 468–490, second page of table of contents. 10.1128/MMBR.00007-11

  • 102

    GhazalaW.VarrelmannM. (2007). Tobacco rattle virus 29K movement protein is the elicitor of extreme and hypersensitive-like resistance in two cultivars of Solanum tuberosum. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 20, 1396–1405. 10.1094/MPMI-20-11-1396

  • 103

    GilbertR. Z.KyleM. M.MungerH. M.GrayS. M. (1994). Inheritance of resistance to Watermelon mosaic virus in Cucumis melo L. HortScience29, 107–110.

  • 104

    Gilbert-AlbertiniF.LecoqH.PitratM.NicoletJ. L. (1993). Resistance of Cucurbita moschata to Watermelon mosaic virus type 2 and its genetic relation to resistance to Zucchini yellow mosaic virus. Euphytica69, 231–237. 10.1007/BF00022369

  • 105

    GinerA.LakatosL.García-ChapaM.López-MoyaJ. J.BurgyánJ. (2010). Viral protein inhibits RISC activity by argonaute binding through conserved WG/GW motifs. PLoS Pathog. 6:e1000996. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000996

  • 106

    GoodrickB. J.KuhnC. W.BoermaH. R. (1991). Inheritance of nonnecrotic resistance to Cowpea chlorotic mottle virus in soybean. J. Hered. 82, 512–514.

  • 107

    GrubeR. C.WintermantelW. M.HandP.AburomiaR.PinkD. A. C.RyderE. J. (2005). Genetic analysis and mapping of resistance to lettuce dieback: a soilborne disease caused by tombusviruses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 110, 259–268. 10.1007/s00122-004-1825-3

  • 108

    GrubeR. C.ZhangY. P.MurphyJ. F.Loaiza-FigueroaF.LackneyV. K.ProvvidentiR.et al. (2000). New source of resistance to Cucumber mosaic virus in Capsicum frutescens. Plant Dis. 84, 885–891. 10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.8.885

  • 109

    GrumetR. (1995). Genetic engineering for crop virus resistance. HortScience30, 449–456.

  • 110

    GrumetR.KabelkaE.McqueenS.WaiT.HumphreyR. (2000). Characterization of sources of resistance to the watermelon strain of Papaya ringspot virus in cucumber: allelism and co-segregation with other potyvirus resistances. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101, 463–472. 10.1007/s001220051504

  • 111

    GururaniM. A.VenkateshJ.UpadhyayaC. P.NookarajuA.PandeyS. K.ParkS. W. (2012). Plant disease resistance genes: current status and future directions. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 78, 51–65. 10.1016/j.pmpp.2012.01.002

  • 112

    HajimoradM.EggenbergerA.HillJ. (2005a). Absence of Soybean mosaic virus elicitor functions provoking Rsv1-mediated resistance response is insufficient for virulence on Rsv1-genotype soybean. Phytopathology95:S39.

  • 113

    HajimoradM. R.EggenbergerA. L.HillJ. H. (2005b). Loss and gain of elicitor function of Soybean mosaic virus G7 provoking Rsv1-mediated lethal systemic hypersensitive response maps to P3. J. Virol. 79, 1215–1222. 10.1128/JVI.79.2.1215-1222.2005

  • 114

    HajimoradM. R.HillJ. H. (2001). Rsv1-mediated resistance against Soybean mosaic virus-N is hypersensitive response independent at inoculation site, but has the potential to initiate a hypersensitive response-like mechanism. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 14, 587–598. 10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.5.587

  • 115

    HallT. J. (1980). Resistance at the Tm-2 locus in the tomato to Tomato mosaic virus. Euphytica29, 189–197. 10.1007/BF00037266

  • 116

    HallwassM.Silva Da OliveiroA.DianeseE.LohuisD.BoiteuxL. S.Inoue-NagataA. K.et al. (2014). The Tomato spotted wilt virus cell-to-cell movement protein (NSm) triggers a hypersensitive response in Sw-5 containing resistant tomato lines and Nicotiana benthamiana transformed with the functional Sw-5b resistance gene copy. Mol. Plant Pathol. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1111/mpp.12144

  • 117

    HamalainenJ. H.SorriV. A.WatanabeK. N.GebhardtC.ValkonenJ. P. T. (1998). Molecular examination of a chromosome region that controls resistance to potato Y and A potyviruses in potato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96, 1036–1043. 10.1007/s001220050836

  • 118

    HansonP. M.BernacchiD.GreenS.TanksleyS. D.MuniyappaV.PadmajaS.et al. (2000). Mapping a wild tomato introgression associated with tomato yellow leaf curl virus resistance in a cultivated tomato line. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 125, 15–20.

  • 119

    HaoW.CollierS. M.MoffettP.ChaiJ. (2013). Structural basis for the interaction between the Potato virus X resistance protein (Rx) and its cofactor Ran GTPase-activating Protein 2 (RanGAP2). J. Biol. Chem. 288, 35868–35876. 10.1074/jbc.M113.517417

  • 120

    HaoY. F.WangY. Y.ChenZ. B.BlandD.LiS. S.Brown-GuediraG.et al. (2012). A conserved locus conditioning Soil-borne wheat mosaic virus resistance on the long arm of chromosome 5D in common wheat. Mol. Breed. 30, 1453–1464. 10.1007/s11032-012-9731-x

  • 121

    HarperS. J.DawsonT. E.PearsonM. N. (2010). Isolates of Citrus tristeza virus that overcome Poncirus trifoliata resistance comprise a novel strain. Arch. Virol. 155, 471–480. 10.1007/s00705-010-0604-5

  • 122

    HassanS.ThomasP. E. (1983). Two types of immunity to Tomato yellow top virus identified in Lycopersicon peruvianum and its tomato hybrids. Phytopathology73, 959–959.

  • 123

    HassanS.ThomasP. E. (1984a). Discovery of resistance to infection and translocation of Tomato yellow top virus (TYTV) in Lycopersicon peruvianum and some of its tomato hybrids. Phytopathology74, 1138.

  • 124

    HassanS.ThomasP. E. (1984b). Etiological distinctions between Tomato yellow top virus and Potato leafroll and Beet western yellows viruses. Plant Dis. 68, 684–685. 10.1094/PD-69-684

  • 125

    HassanS.ThomasP. E. (1988). Extreme resistance to Tomato yellow top virus and Potato leaf roll virus in Lycopersicon peruvianum and some of its tomato hybrids. Phytopathology78, 1164–1167. 10.1094/Phyto-78-1164

  • 126

    HayesA. J.JeongS. C.GoreM. A.YuY. G.BussG. R.TolinS. A.et al. (2004). Recombination within a nucleotide-binding-site/leucine-rich-repeat gene cluster produces new variants conditioning resistance to Soybean mosaic virus in soybeans. Genetics166, 493–503. 10.1534/genetics.166.1.493

  • 127

    HayesA. J.MaG. R.BussG. R.MaroofM. A. S. (2000). Molecular marker mapping of RSV4, a gene conferring resistance to all known strains of Soybean mosaic virus. Crop Sci. 40, 1434–1437. 10.2135/cropsci2000.4051434x

  • 128

    HikidaH. R.RaymerW. B. (1972). Sources and inheritance of peru tomato virus tolerance in tomato. Phytopathology62, 764.

  • 129

    HobbsH. A.JosseyS.WangY.HartmanG. L.DomierL. L. (2012). Diverse soybean accessions identified with temperature-sensitive resistance to Tobacco streak virus. Crop Sci. 52, 738–744. 10.2135/cropsci2011.05.0265

  • 130

    HobbsH. A.KuhnC. W.PapaK. E.BrantleyB. B. (1987). Inheritance of non-necrotic resistance to Southern bean mosaic virus in cowpea. Phytopathology77, 1624–1629. 10.1094/Phyto-77-1624

  • 131

    HoffmannK.QiuW. P.MoyerJ. W. (2001). Overcoming host- and pathogen-mediated resistance in tomato and tobacco maps to the M RNA of Tomato spotted wilt virus. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 14, 242–249. 10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.2.242

  • 132

    HolmesF. O. (1937). Inheritance of resistance to tobacco mosaic disease in the pepper. Phytopathology24, 984–1002.

  • 133

    HolmesF. O. (1948). Resistance to spotted wilt in tomato. Phytopathology38, 467–473.

  • 134

    HondaK.YanaiH.NegishiH.AsagiriM.SatoM.MizutaniT.et al. (2005). IRF-7 is the master regulator of type-I interferon-dependent immune responses. Nature434, 772–777. 10.1038/nature03464

  • 135

    HuZ.ZhangT.YaoM.FengZ.MiriamK.WuJ.et al. (2012). The 2a protein of Cucumber mosaic virus induces a hypersensitive response in cowpea independently of its replicase activity. Virus Res. 170, 169–173. 10.1016/j.virusres.2012.10.007

  • 136

    HughesS. L.GreenS. K.LydiateD. J.WalshJ. A. (2002). Resistance to Turnip mosaic virus in Brassica rapa and B. napus and the analysis of genetic inheritance in selected lines. Plant Pathol. 51, 567–573. 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2002.00755.x

  • 137

    HughesS. L.HunterP. J.SharpeA. G.KearseyM. J.LydiateD. J.WalshJ. A. (2003). Genetic mapping of the novel Turnip mosaic virus resistance gene TuRB03 in Brassica napus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107, 1169–1173. 10.1007/s00122-003-1363-4

  • 138

    HussainM.MansoorS.IramS.FatimaA. N.ZafarY. (2005). The nuclear shuttle protein of Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus is a pathogenicity determinant. J. Virol. 79, 4434–4439. 10.1128/JVI.79.7.4434-4439.2005

  • 139

    IncarboneM.DunoyerP. (2013). RNA silencing and its suppression: novel insights from in planta analyses. Trends Plant Sci. 18, 382–392. 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.04.001

  • 140

    IshibashiK.MasudaK.NaitoS.MeshiT.IshikawaM. (2007). An inhibitor of viral RNA replication is encoded by a plant resistance gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 13833–13838. 10.1073/pnas.0703203104

  • 141

    IshibashiK.MawatariN.MiyashitaS.KishinoH.MeshiT.IshikawaM. (2012). Coevolution and hierarchical interactions of Tomato mosaic virus and the resistance gene Tm-1. PLoS Pathog. 8:e1002975. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002975

  • 142

    JahnM.ParanI.HoffmannK.RadwanskiE. R.LivingstoneK. D.GrubeR. C.et al. (2000). Genetic mapping of the Tsw locus for resistance to the Tospovirus Tomato spotted wilt virus in Capsicum spp. and its relationship to the Sw-5 gene for resistance to the same pathogen in tomato. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 13, 673–682. 10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.6.673

  • 143

    JanzacB.FabreF.PalloixA.MouryB. (2009). Constraints on evolution of virus avirulence factors predict the durability of corresponding plant resistances. Mol. Plant Pathol. 10, 599–610. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00554.x

  • 144

    JanzacB.MontarryJ.PalloixA.NavaudO.MouryB. (2010). A point mutation in the polymerase of Potato virus Y confers virulence toward the Pvr4 resistance of pepper and a high competitiveness cost in susceptible cultivar. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 23, 823–830. 10.1094/MPMI-23-6-0823

  • 145

    JefferiesS. P.KingB. J.BarrA. R.WarnerP.LogueS. J.LangridgeP. (2003). Marker-assisted backcross introgression of the Yd2 gene conferring resistance to Barley yellow dwarf virus in barley. Plant Breed. 122, 52–56. 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2003.00752.x

  • 146

    JennerC. E.SanchezF.NettleshipS. B.FosterG. D.PonzF.WalshJ. A. (2000). The cylindrical inclusion gene of Turnip mosaic virus encodes a pathogenic determinant to the Brassica resistance gene TuRB01. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 13, 1102–1108. 10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.10.1102

  • 147

    JenningsD. L. (1964). Studies on inheritance in red raspberry of immunities from three nematode-borne viruses. Genetica35, 152–164. 10.1007/BF01804883

  • 148

    JensenS.ThomsenA. R. (2012). Sensing of RNA viruses: a review of innate immune receptors involved in recognizing RNA virus invasion. J. Virol. 86, 2900–2910. 10.1128/JVI.05738-11

  • 149

    JeongS. C.KristipatiS.HayesA. J.MaughanP. J.NoffsingerS. L.GunduzI.et al. (2002). Genetic and sequence analysis of markers tightly linked to the Soybean mosaic virus resistance gene, Rsv3. Crop Sci. 42, 265–270. 10.2135/cropsci2002.0265

  • 150

    JiaY.McadamsS. A.BryanG. T.HersheyH. P.ValentB. (2000). Direct interaction of resistance gene and avirulence gene products confers rice blast resistance. EMBO J. 19, 4004–4014. 10.1093/emboj/19.15.4004

  • 151

    JinM.LeeS.-S.KeL.KimJ.SeoM.-S.SohnS.-H.et al. (2014). Identification and mapping of a novel dominant resistance gene, TuRB07 to Turnip mosaic virus in Brassica rapa. Theor. Appl. Genet. 127, 509–519. 10.1007/s00122-013-2237-z

  • 152

    JonesA. T.MurantA. F.JenningsD. L.WoodG. A. (1982). Association of Raspberry bushy dwarf virus with raspberry yellows disease; reaction of Rubus species and cultivars, and the inheritance of resistance. Ann. Appl. Biol. 100, 135. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1982.tb07200.x

  • 153

    JonesJ. D. G.DanglJ. L. (2006). The plant immune system. Nature444, 323–329. 10.1038/nature05286

  • 154

    JonesM. W.RedinbaughM. G.LouieR. (2007). The Mdm1 locus and maize resistance to Maize dwarf mosaic virus. Plant Dis. 91, 185–190. 10.1094/PDIS-91-2-0185

  • 155

    JonesR. A. C. (1990). Strain group specific and virus specific hypersensitive reactions to infection with potyviruses in potato cultivars. Ann. Appl. Biol. 117, 93–105. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1990.tb04198.x

  • 156

    JonesR. A. C. (2012). Virus diseases of annual pasture legumes: incidences, losses, epidemiology, and management. Crop Pasture Sci. 63, 399–418. 10.1071/CP12117

  • 157

    KaiH.TakataK.TsukazakiM.FurushoM.BabaT. (2012). Molecular mapping of Rym17, a dominant and rym18 a recessive Barley yellow mosaic virus (BaYMV) resistance genes derived from Hordeum vulgare L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 124, 577–583. 10.1007/s00122-011-1730-5

  • 158

    KaishoT.AkiraS. (2006). Toll-like receptor function and signaling. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 117, 979–987. 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.02.023

  • 159

    KanekoY. H.InukaiT.SuehiroN.NatsuakiT.MasutaC. (2004). Fine genetic mapping of the TuNI locus causing systemic veinal necrosis by Turnip mosaic virus infection in Arabidopsis thaliana. Theor. Appl. Genet. 110, 33–40. 10.1007/s00122-004-1824-4

  • 160

    KangB. C.YeamI.JahnM. M. (2005). Genetics of plant virus resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 43, 581–621. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.011205.141140

  • 161

    KangW. H.HoangN. H.YangH. B.KwonJ. K.JoS. H.SeoJ. K.et al. (2010). Molecular mapping and characterization of a single dominant gene controlling CMV resistance in peppers (Capsicum annuum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 120, 1587–1596. 10.1007/s00122-010-1278-9

  • 162

    KangW. H.SeoJ. K.ChungB. N.KimK. H.KangB. C. (2012). Helicase domain encoded by Cucumber mosaic virus RNA1 determines systemic infection of Cmr1 in Pepper. PLoS ONE7:e43136. 10.1371/journal.pone.0043136

  • 163

    KarasawaA.OkadaI.AkashiK.ChidaY.HaseS.Nakazawa-NasuY.et al. (1999). One amino acid change in Cucumber mosaic virus RNA polymerase determines virulent/avirulent phenotypes on cowpea. Phytopathology89, 1186–1192. 10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.12.1186

  • 164

    KatoM.IshibashiK.KobayashiC.IshikawaM.KatohE. (2013). Expression, purification, and functional characterization of an N-terminal fragment of the Tomato mosaic virus resistance protein Tm-1. Protein Expr. Purif. 89, 1–6. 10.1016/j.pep.2013.02.001

  • 165

    KelleyK. B.WhitworthJ. L.NovyR. G. (2009). Mapping of the Potato leafroll virus resistance gene, Rlr (etb), from Solanum etuberosum identifies interchromosomal translocations among its E-genome chromosomes 4 and 9 relative to the A-genome of Solanum L. sect. Petota. Mol. Breed. 23, 489–500. 10.1007/s11032-008-9251-x

  • 166

    KellyJ. D.AfanadorL.HaleyS. D. (1995). Pyramiding genes for resistance to Bean common mosaic virus. Euphytica82, 207–212. 10.1007/BF00029562

  • 167

    KhatabiB.FajoluO. L.WenR. H.HajimoradM. R. (2012). Evaluation of north American isolates of Soybean mosaic virus for gain of virulence on Rsv-genotype soybeans with special emphasis on resistance-breaking determinants on Rsv4. Mol. Plant Pathol. 13, 1077–1088. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00817.x

  • 168

    KimB. M.SuehiroN.NatsuakiT.InukaiT.MasutaC. (2010). The P3 protein of Turnip mosaic virus can alone induce hypersensitive response-like cell death in Arabidopsis thaliana carrying TuNI. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 23, 144–152. 10.1094/MPMI-23-2-0144

  • 169

    KimC. H.PalukaitisP. (1997). The plant defense response to Cucumber mosaic virus in cowpea is elicited by the viral polymerase gene and affects virus accumulation in single cells. EMBO J. 16, 4060–4068. 10.1093/emboj/16.13.4060

  • 170

    KiralyL.ColeA. B.BourqueJ. E.SchoelzJ. E. (1999). Systemic cell death is elicited by the interaction of a single gene in Nicotiana clevelandii and gene VI of Cauliflower mosaic virus. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 12, 919–925. 10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.10.919

  • 171

    KnightV. H.BarbaraD. J. (1981). Susceptibility of red raspberry varieties to Raspberry bushy dwarf virus and its genetic control. Euphytica30, 803–811. 10.1007/BF00038809

  • 172

    KnorrD. A.DawsonW. O. (1988). A point mutation in the Tobacco mosaic virus capsid protein gene induces hypersensitivity in Nicotiana sylvestris. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 170–174. 10.1073/pnas.85.1.170

  • 173

    KooninE. V.AravindL. (2000). The NACHT family – a new group of predicted NTPases implicated in apoptosis and MHC transcription activation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25, 223–224. 10.1016/S0968-0004(00)01577-2

  • 174

    Kopisch-ObuchF. J.KovalN. C.MuellerE. M.PaineC.GrauC. P.DiersB. W. (2008). Inheritance of resistance to Alfalfa mosaic virus in soybean PI 153282. Crop Sci. 48, 933–940. 10.2135/cropsci2007.08.0454

  • 175

    KørnerC. J.KlauserD.NiehlA.Domínguez-FerrerasA.ChinchillaD.BollerT.et al. (2013). The immunity regulator BAK1 contributes to resistance against diverse RNA viruses. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 26, 1271–1280. 10.1094/MPMI-06-13-0179-R

  • 176

    KrasilevaK. V.DahlbeckD.StaskawiczB. J. (2010). Activation of an Arabidopsis resistance protein is specified by the in planta association of its leucine-rich repeat domain with the cognate oomycete effector. Plant Cell22, 2444–2458. 10.1105/tpc.110.075358

  • 177

    KyleM. M.DicksonM. H. (1988). Linkage of hypersensitivity to five viruses with the B-locus in Phaseolus vulgaris L. J. Hered. 79, 308–311.

  • 178

    KyleM. M.ProvvidentiR. (1987). Inheritance of resistance to potato Y viruses in Phaseolus vulgaris L.I. Two independent genes for resistance to Watermelon mosaic virus 2. Theor. Appl. Genet. 74, 595–600. 10.1007/BF00288858

  • 179

    KyleM. M.ProvvidentiR. (1993). Inheritance of resistance to potyviruses in Phaseolus vulgaris L.II. Linkage relations and utility of a dominant gene for lethal systemic necrosis to Soybean mosaic virus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86, 189–196.

  • 180

    KyleM. M.ProvvidentiR.MungerH. M. (1986). A major gene for broad-spectrum virus resistance in Phaseolus vulgaris L. HortScience21, 874.

  • 181

    LakatosL.CsorbaT.PantaleoV.ChapmanE. J.CarringtonJ. C.LiuY. P.et al. (2006). Small RNA binding is a common strategy to suppress RNA silencing by several viral suppressors. EMBO J. 25, 2768–2780. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601164

  • 182

    LanfermeijerF. C.DijkhuisJ.SturreM. J. G.De HaanP.HilleJ. (2003). Cloning and characterization of the durable Tomato mosaic virus resistance gene Tm-2(2) from Lycopersicon esculentum. Plant Mol. Biol. 52, 1037–1049. 10.1023/A:1025434519282

  • 183

    LanfermeijerF. C.WarminkJ.HilleJ. (2005). The products of the broken Tm-2 and the durable Tm-2(2) resistance genes from tomato differ in four amino acids. J. Exp. Bot. 56, 2925–2933. 10.1093/jxb/eri288

  • 184

    LarkinP. J.YoungM. J.GerlachW. L.WaterhouseP. M. (1991). The Yd2 resistance to Barley yellow dwarf virus is effective in barley plants but not in their leaf protoplasts. Ann. Appl. Biol. 118, 115–125. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1991.tb06090.x

  • 185

    LecoqH.PochardE.PitratM.LaterrotH.MarchouxG. (1982). Research and utilization of virus-resistance in vegetables. Cryptogam. Mycol. 3, 333–345.

  • 186

    LeeM. Y.YanL. J.GorterF. A.KimB. Y. T.CuiY.HuY.et al. (2012). Brachypodium distachyon line Bd3-1 resistance is elicited by the Barley stripe mosaic virus triple gene block 1 movement protein. J. Gen. Virol. 93, 2729–2739. 10.1099/vir.0.045880-0

  • 187

    LehmannP.PetrzikK.JennerC.GreenlandA.SpakJ.KozubekE.et al. (1997). Nucleotide and amino acid variation in the coat protein coding region of Turnip mosaic virus isolates and possible involvement in the interaction with the Brassica resistance gene TuRBO1. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 51, 195–208. 10.1006/pmpp.1997.0116

  • 188

    LeipeD. D.KooninE. V.AravindL. (2004). STAND, a class of P-loop NTPases including animal and plant regulators of programmed cell death: multiple, complex domain architectures, unusual phyletic patterns, and evolution by horizontal gene transfer. J. Mol. Biol. 343, 1–28. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.08.023

  • 189

    LewellenR. T. (1973). Inheritance of Beet mosaic virus resistance in sugarbeet. Phytopathology63, 877–881. 10.1094/Phyto-63-877

  • 190

    LiF.PignattaD.BendixC.BrunkardJ. O.CohnM. M.TungJ.et al. (2012). MicroRNA regulation of plant innate immune receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 1790–1795. 10.1073/pnas.1118282109

  • 191

    LiH. W.LucyA. P.GuoH. S.LiW. X.JiL. H.WongS. M.et al. (1999). Strong host resistance targeted against a viral suppressor of the plant gene silencing defence mechanism. EMBO J. 18, 2683–2691. 10.1093/emboj/18.10.2683

  • 192

    LimW. L.WangS. H.NgO. C. (1978). Resistance in chinese cabbage to Turnip mosaic virus. Plant Dis. Rep. 62, 660–662.

  • 193

    LiuP. P.BhattacharjeeS.KlessigD. F.MoffettP. (2010). Systemic acquired resistance is induced by R gene-mediated responses independent of cell death. Mol. Plant Pathol. 11, 155–160. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00564.x

  • 194

    LoebensteinG. (2009). Local Lesions and Induced Resistance. Adv. Virus Res. 75, 73–117. 10.1016/S0065-3527(09)07503-4

  • 195

    LuR.MalcuitI.MoffettP.RuizM. T.PeartJ.WuA. J.et al. (2003). High throughput virus-induced gene silencing implicates heat shock protein 90 in plant disease resistance. EMBO J. 22, 5690–5699. 10.1093/emboj/cdg546

  • 196

    LukasikE.TakkenF. L. W. (2009). STANDing strong, resistance proteins instigators of plant defence. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 12, 427–436. 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.03.001

  • 197

    LupasA. (1997). Predicting coiled-coil regions in proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7, 388–393. 10.1016/S0959-440X(97)80056-5

  • 198

    MaJ. F.HouX. L.XiaoD.QiL.WangF.SunF. F.et al. (2010). Cloning and characterization of the BcTuR3 gene related to resistance to Turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) from Non-heading chinese cabbage. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 28, 588–596. 10.1007/s11105-010-0183-3

  • 199

    MaekawaT.ChengW.SpiridonL. N.TöllerA.LukasikE.SaijoY.et al. (2011a). Coiled-coil domain-dependent homodimerization of intracellular barley immune receptors defines a minimal functional module for triggering cell death. Cell Host Microbe9, 187–199. 10.1016/j.chom.2011.02.008

  • 200

    MaekawaT.KuferT. A.Schulze-LefertP. (2011b). NLR functions in plant and animal immune systems: so far and yet so close. Nat. Immunol. 12, 817–826. 10.1038/ni.2083

  • 201

    MaitiS.PaulS.PalA. (2012). Isolation, characterization, and structure analysis of a non-TIR-NBS-LRR encoding candidate gene from MYMIV-resistant Vigna mungo. Mol. Biotechnol. 52, 217–233. 10.1007/s12033-011-9488-1

  • 202

    MakkoukK. M.ComeauA.StpierreC. A. (1994). Screening for Barley yellow dwarf Luteovirus resistance in barley on the basis of virus movement. J. Phytopathol. 141, 165–172. 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1994.tb01458.x

  • 203

    MalcuitI.MaranoM. R.KavanaghT. A.De JongW.ForsythA.BaulcombeD. C. (1999). The 25-kDa movement protein of PVX elicits Nb-mediated hypersensitive cell death in potato. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 12, 536–543. 10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.6.536

  • 204

    MallorC.AlvarezJ. M.Luis-ArteagaM. (2003). A resistance to systemic symptom expression of Melon necrotic spot virus in melon. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 128, 541–547.

  • 205

    MarczewskiW.FlisB.SyllerJ.Schafer-PreglR.GebhardtC. (2001). A major quantitative trait locus for resistance to Potato leafroll virus is located in a resistance hotspot on potato chromosome XI and is tightly linked to N-gene-like markers. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 14, 1420–1425. 10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.12.1420

  • 206

    MarczewskiW.FlisB.SyllerJ.Strzelczyk-ZytaD.HennigJ.GebhardtC. (2004). Two allelic or tightly linked genetic factors at the PLRV.4 locus on potato chromosome XI control resistance to Potato leafroll virus accumulation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109, 1604–1609. 10.1007/s00122-004-1780-z

  • 207

    MarczewskiW.HennigJ.GebhardtC. (2002). The Potato virus S resistance gene Ns maps to potato chromosome VIII. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105, 564–567. 10.1007/s00122-002-0976-3

  • 208

    MarczewskiW.OstrowskaK.Zimnoch-GuzowskaE. (1998). Identification of RAPD markers linked to the Ns locus in potato. Plant Breed. 117, 88–90. 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1998.tb01455.x

  • 209

    MarczewskiW.Strzelczyk-ZytaD.HennigJ.WitekK.GebhardtC. (2006). Potato chromosomes IX and XI carry genes for resistance to Potato virus M. Theor. Appl. Genet. 112, 1232–1238. 10.1007/s00122-006-0224-3

  • 210

    MaroofM. A. S.JeongS. C.GunduzI.TuckerD. M.BussG. R.TolinS. A. (2008). Pyramiding of Soybean mosaic virus resistance genes by marker-assisted selection. Crop Sci. 48, 517–526. 10.2135/cropsci2007.08.0479

  • 211

    MatsumotoK.JohnishiK.HamadaH.SawadaH.TakeuchiS.KobayashiK.et al. (2009). Single amino acid substitution in the methyltransferase domain of Paprika mild mottle virus replicase proteins confers the ability to overcome the high temperature-dependent Hk gene-mediated resistance in Capsicum plants. Virus Res. 140, 98–102. 10.1016/j.virusres.2008.11.011

  • 212

    MatsumotoK.SawadaH.MatsumotoK.HamadaH.YoshimotoE.ItoT.et al. (2008). The coat protein gene of tobamovirus P-0 pathotype is a determinant for activation of temperature-insensitive L-1a-gene-mediated resistance in Capsicum plants. Arch. Virol. 153, 645–650. 10.1007/s00705-008-0032-y

  • 213

    MelchingerA. E.KuntzeL.GumberR. K.LubberstedtT.FuchsE. (1998). Genetic basis of resistance to sugarcane mosaic virus in European maize germplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96, 1151–1161. 10.1007/s001220050851

  • 214

    MeshiT.MotoyoshiF.AdachiA.WatanabeY.TakamatsuN.OkadaY. (1988). Two concomitant base substitutions in the putative replicase genes of Tobacco mosaic virus confer the ability to overcome the effects of a tomato resistance gene, Tm-1. EMBO J. 7, 1575–1581.

  • 215

    MeshiT.MotoyoshiF.MaedaT.YoshiwokaS.WatanabeH.OkadaY. (1989). Mutations in the Tobacco mosaic virus 30 kD protein gene overcome Tm-2 resistance in tomato. Plant Cell1, 515–522. 10.1105/tpc.1.5.515

  • 216

    MestreP.BrignetiG.BaulcombeD. C. (2000). An Ry-mediated resistance response in potato requires the intact active site of the NIa proteinase from Potato virus Y. Plant J. 23, 653–661. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00834.x

  • 217

    MestreP.BrignetiG.DurrantM. C.BaulcombeD. C. (2003). Potato virus Y NIa protease activity is not sufficient for elicitation of Ry-mediated disease resistance in potato. Plant J. 36, 755–761. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01917.x

  • 218

    MignounaH. D.AbangM. M.OnasanyaA.AgindotanB.AsieduR. (2002). Identification and potential use of RAPD markers linked to Yam mosaic virus resistance in white yam (Dioscorea rotundata). Ann. Appl. Biol. 140, 163–169. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2002.tb00169.x

  • 219

    MiklasP. N.SeoY. S.GilbertsonR. L. (2009). Quantitative resistance to Bean dwarf mosaic virus in common bean is associated with the Bct gene for resistance to Beet curly top virus. Plant Dis. 93, 645–648. 10.1094/PDIS-93-6-0645

  • 220

    ModawiR. S.HeyneE. G.BrunettaD.WillisW. G. (1982). Genetic studies of field reaction to Wheat soilborne mosaic virus. Plant Dis. 66, 1183–1184. 10.1094/PD-66-1183

  • 221

    MoffettP. (2009). Mechanisms of recognition in dominant R gene mediated resistance. Adv. Virus Res. 75, 1–33. 10.1016/S0065-3527(09)07501-0

  • 222

    MoffettP.FarnhamG.PeartJ.BaulcombeD. C. (2002). Interaction between domains of a plant NBS-LRR protein in disease resistance-related cell death. EMBO J. 21, 4511–4519. 10.1093/emboj/cdf453

  • 223

    MontesclarosL.NicolN.UbalijoroE.LeclercpotvinC.GanivetL.LaliberteJ. F.et al. (1997). Response to potyvirus infection and genetic mapping of resistance loci to potyvirus infection in Lactuca. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94, 941–946. 10.1007/s001220050499

  • 224

    Montes-GarciaC. E.Garza-OrtegaS.BrownJ. K. (1998). Inheritance of the resistance to Squash leaf curl virus in Cucurbita pepo, in Cucurbitaceae '98. Evaluation and Enhancement of Cucurbit Germplasm, ed McCreightJ. D. (Alexandria, VA: ASHS Press), 328–330.

  • 225

    MouryB.CaromelB.JohansenE.SimonV.ChauvinL.JacquotE.et al. (2011). The helper component proteinase cistron of Potato virus Y induces hypersensitivity and resistance in Potato genotypes carrying dominant resistance genes on chromosome IV. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 24, 787–797. 10.1094/MPMI-10-10-0246

  • 226

    MouryB.VerdinE. (2012). Viruses of pepper crops in the mediterranean basin: a remarkable stasis. Adv. Virus Res. 84, 127–162. 10.1016/B978-0-12-394314-9.00004-X

  • 227

    MubinM.AminI.AmraoL.BriddonR. W.MansoorS. (2010). The hypersensitive response induced by the V2 protein of a monopartite begomovirus is countered by the C2 protein. Mol. Plant Pathol. 11, 245–254. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00601.x

  • 228

    MunozF. J.PlaistedR. L.ThurstonH. D. (1975). Resistance to Potato virus Y in Solanum tuberosum Spp Andigena. Am. Potato J. 52, 107–115. 10.1007/BF02852043

  • 229

    MysoreK. S.RyuC. M. (2004). Nonhost resistance: how much do we know?Trends Plant Sci. 9, 97–104. 10.1016/j.tplants.2003.12.005

  • 230

    NeuhausG.WernerK.WeyenJ.FriedtW.OrdonF. (2003). First results on SNP-scanning in fragments linked to resistance genes against the Barley yellow mosaic virus complex. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 110, 296–303.

  • 231

    NiksR. E.HabekussA.BekeleB.OrdonF. (2004). A novel major gene on chromosome 6H for resistance of barley against the Barley yellow dwarf virus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109, 1536–1543. 10.1007/s00122-004-1777-7

  • 232

    Nono-WomdimR.MarchouxG.PochardE.PalloixA.Gebre-SelassieK. (1991). Resistance of pepper lines to the movement of Cucumber mosaic virus. J. Phytopathol. 132, 21–32. 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1991.tb00090.x

  • 233

    NovyR. G.GillenA. M.WhitworthJ. L. (2007). Characterization of the expression and inheritance of Potato leafroll virus (PLRV) and Potato virus Y (PVY) resistance in three generations of germplasm derived from Solanum etuberosum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 114, 1161–1172. 10.1007/s00122-007-0508-2

  • 234

    OsornoJ. M.MunozC. G.BeaverJ. S.FerwerdaF. H.BassettM. J.MiklasP. N.et al. (2007). Two genes from Phaseolus coccineus confer resistance to Bean golden yellow mosaic virus in common bean. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 132, 530–533.

  • 235

    OvesnaJ.VackeJ.KuceraL.ChrpovaJ.NovakovaI.JahoorA.et al. (2000). Genetic analysis of resistance in barley to Barley yellow dwarf virus. Plant Breed. 119, 481–486. 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2000.00522.x

  • 236

    PadgettH. S.BeachyR. N. (1993). Analysis of a Tobacco mosaic virus strain capable of overcoming N gene-mediated resistance. Plant Cell5, 577–586. 10.1105/tpc.5.5.577

  • 237

    PadgettH. S.WatanabeY.BeachyR. N. (1997). Identification of the TMV replicase sequence that activates the N gene-mediated hypersensitive response. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 10, 709–715. 10.1094/MPMI.1997.10.6.709

  • 238

    PadmanabhanM. S.Dinesh-KumarS. P. (2010). All hands on deck-the role of chloroplasts, endoplasmic reticulum, and the nucleus in driving plant innate immunity. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 23, 1368–1380. 10.1094/MPMI-05-10-0113

  • 239

    PalS. S.DhaliwalH. S.BainsS. S. (1991). Inheritance of resistance to Yellow mosaic virus in some Vigna species. Plant Breed. 106, 168–171. 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1991.tb00496.x

  • 240

    PaltridgeN. G.CollinsN. C.BendahmaneA.SymonsR. H. (1998). Development of YLM, a codominant PCR marker closely linked to the Yd2 gene for resistance to barley yellow dwarf disease. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96, 1170–1177. 10.1007/s001220050853

  • 241

    PalukaitisP. (2012). Resistance to viruses of potato and their vectors. Plant Pathol. J. 28, 248–258. 10.5423/PPJ.RW.06.2012.0075

  • 242

    PalukaitisP.Garcia-ArenalF. (2003). Cucumoviruses. Adv. Virus Res. 62, 241–323. 10.1016/S0065-3527(03)62005-1

  • 243

    ParisH. S.BrownR. N. (2005). The genes of pumpkin and squash. HortScience40, 1620–1630.

  • 244

    ParkS. J.TuJ. C. (1991). Inheritance and allelism of resistance to a severe strain of Bean yellow mosaic virus in common bean. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 13, 7–10. 10.1080/07060669109500967

  • 245

    ParrellaG.MorettiA.GognalonsP.LesageM. L.MarchouxG.Gebre-SelassieK.et al. (2004). The Am gene controlling resistance to Alfalfa mosaic virus in tomato is located in the cluster of dominant resistance genes on chromosome 6. Phytopathology94, 345–350. 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.4.345

  • 246

    PatelP.MligoJ.LeynaH.KuwiteC.MmbagaE. (1982). Sources of resistance, inheritance, and breeding of cowpeas for resistance to a strain of Cowpea aphid-borne mosaic virus from Tanzania. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 42, 221–229.

  • 247

    PeiroA.Carmen CanizaresM.RubioL.LopezC.MorionesE.AramburuJ.et al. (2014). The movement protein (NSm) of Tomato spotted wilt virus is the avirulence determinant in the tomato Sw-5 gene-based resistance. Mol. Plant Pathol. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1111/mpp.12142

  • 248

    PelhamJ. (1966). Resistance in tomato to Tobacco mosaic virus. Euphytica15, 258. 10.1007/Bf00022331

  • 249

    PitratM.LecoqH. (1980). Inheritance of resistance to Cucumber mosaic virus transmission by Aphis gossypii in Cucumis melo. Phytopathology70, 958–961. 10.1094/Phyto-70-958

  • 250

    PitratM.LecoqH. (1983). Two alleles for Watermelon mosaic virus 1 resistance in muskmelon. Cucurbit Genet. Coop. Rep. 6, 52–53.

  • 251

    PitratM.LecoqH. (1984). Inheritance of Zucchini yellow mosaic virus resistance in Cucumis melo L. Euphytica33, 57–61. 10.1007/BF00022750

  • 252

    PonzF.RussellM. L.RowhaniA.BrueningG. (1988). A cowpea line has distinct genes for resistance to Tobacco ringspot virus and Cowpea mosaic virus. Phytopathology78, 1124–1128. 10.1094/Phyto-78-1124

  • 253

    ProvvideR. (1974). Inheritance of resistance to Watermelon mosaic virus 2 in Phaseolus vulgaris. Phytopathology64, 1448–1450. 10.1094/Phyto-64-1448

  • 254

    ProvvidentiR. (1988). Inheritance of resistance to Broad bean wilt virus in bean. HortScience23, 895–896.

  • 255

    ProvvidentiR. (2000). Inheritance of resistance to Passionfruit woodiness virus in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). HortScience35, 880–881.

  • 256

    ProvvidentiR.GonsalvesD.RanalliP. (1982). Inheritance of resistance to Soybean mosaic virus in Phaseolus vulgaris. J. Hered. 73, 302–303.

  • 257

    ProvvidentiR.GonsalvesD.TaiwoM. A. (1983). Inheritance of resistance to Blackeye cowpea mosaic and Cowpea aphid-borne mosaic viruses in Phaseolus vulgaris. J. Hered. 74, 60–61.

  • 258

    ProvvidentiR.HamptonR. O. (1992). Sources of resistance to viruses in the Potyviridae. Arch. Virol. Suppl. 5, 189–211. 10.1007/978-3-7091-6920-9_17

  • 259

    ProvvidentiR.RobinsonR. W.ShailJ. W. (1980). A source of resistance to a strain of Cucumber mosaic virus in Lactuca saligna L. HortScience15, 528–529.

  • 260

    QuerciM.BaulcombeD. C.GoldbachR. W.SalazarL. F. (1995). Analysis of the resistance-breaking determinants of Potato virus X (PVX) strain Hb on different potato genotypes expressing extreme resistance to Pvx. Phytopathology85, 1003–1010. 10.1094/Phyto-85-1003

  • 261

    QuintM.MihaljevicR.DussleC. M.XuM. L.MelchingerA. E.LubberstedtT. (2002). Development of RGA-CAPS markers and genetic mapping of candidate genes for Sugarcane mosaic virus resistance in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105, 355–363. 10.1007/s00122-002-0953-x

  • 262

    RaiM. (2006). Refinement of the Citrus tristeza virus resistance gene (Ctv) positional map in Poncirus trifoliata and generation of transgenic grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) plant lines with candidate resistance genes in this region. Plant Mol. Biol. 61, 399–414. 10.1007/s11103-006-0018-7

  • 263

    RenT.QuF.MorrisT. J. (2000). HRT gene function requires interaction between a NAC protein and viral capsid protein to confer resistance to Turnip crinkle virus. Plant Cell12, 1917–1926. 10.1105/tpc.12.10.1917

  • 264

    RobbinsM. A.WitsenboerH.MichelmoreR. W.LaliberteJ. F.FortinM. G. (1994). Genetic mapping of Turnip mosaic virus resistance in Lactuca sativa. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89, 583–589. 10.1007/BF00222452

  • 265

    RomanM. A.CastanedaA. M.SanchezJ. C. A.MunozC. G.BeaverJ. S. (2004). Inheritance of normal pod development in bean golden yellow mosaic resistant common bean. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 129, 549–552.

  • 266

    RossA. F. (1961). Localized acquired resistance to plant virus infection in hypersensitive hosts. Virology14, 329. 10.1016/0042-6822(61)90318-X

  • 267

    RugeB.LinzA.PickeringR.ProeselerG.GreifP.WehlingP. (2003). Mapping of Rym14(Hb), a gene introgressed from Hordeum bulbosum and conferring resistance to BaMMV and BaYMV in barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107, 965–971. 10.1007/s00122-003-1339-4

  • 268

    Ruge-WehlingB.LinzA.HabekussA.WehlingP. (2006). Mapping of Rym16(Hb), the second soil-borne virus-resistance gene introgressed from Hordeum bulbosum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 113, 867–873. 10.1007/s00122-006-0345-8

  • 269

    SaccoM. A.KoropackaK.GrenierE.JaubertM. J.BlanchardA.GoverseA.et al. (2009). The cyst nematode SPRYSEC protein RBP-1 elicits Gpa2 and RanGAP2 dependent plant cell death. PLoS Pathog. 5:e1000564. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000564

  • 270

    SaitoT.MeshiT.TakamatsuN.OkadaY. (1987). Coat protein gene sequence of Tobacco mosaic virus encodes a host response determinant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84, 6074–6077. 10.1073/pnas.84.17.6074

  • 271

    SalankiK.GellertA.Naray-SzaboG.BalazsE. (2007). Modeling-based characterization of the elicitor function of amino acid 461 of Cucumber mosaic virus 1a protein in the hypersensitive response. Virology358, 109–118. 10.1016/j.virol.2006.08.014

  • 272

    SawadaH.TakeuchiS.HamadaH.KibaA.MatsumotoM.HikichiY. (2004). A new tobamovirus-resistance gene, L-1a, of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 73, 552–557. 10.2503/jjshs.73.552

  • 273

    SawadaH.TakeuchiS.MatsumotoK.HamadaH.KibaA.MatsumotoM.et al. (2005). A new tobamovirus-resistance gene, Hk, in Capsicum annuum. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 74, 289–294. 10.2503/jjshs.74.289

  • 274

    SchoelzJ.ShepherdR. J.DaubertS. (1986). Region VI of Cauliflower mosaic virus encodes a host range determinant. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6, 2632–2637. 10.1128/mcb.6.7.2632

  • 275

    SchroederW. T.ProvvidentiR. (1968). Resistance of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) to PV2 strain of Bean yellow mosaic virus conditioned by single dominant gene By. Phytopathology58, 1710.

  • 276

    SeifersD. L.PerumalR.LittleC. R. (2012). New sources of resistance in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) germplasm are effective against a diverse array of potyvirus spp. Plant Dis. 96, 1775–1779. 10.1094/PDIS-03-12-0224-RE

  • 277

    SekineK. T.IshiharaT.HaseS.KusanoT.ShahJ.TakahashiH. (2006). Single amino acid alterations in Arabidopsis thaliana RCY1 compromise resistance to Cucumber mosaic virus, but differentially suppress hypersensitive response-like cell death. Plant Mol. Biol. 62, 669–682. 10.1007/s11103-006-9048-4

  • 278

    SeoY. S.GeptsP.GilbertsonR. L. (2004). Genetics of resistance to the geminivirus, Bean dwarf mosaic virus, and the role of the hypersensitive response in common bean. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108, 786–793. 10.1007/s00122-003-1504-9

  • 279

    SeoY. S.JeonJ. S.RojasM. R.GilbertsonR. L. (2007). Characterization of a novel Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR)-TIR gene differentially expressed in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Othello) undergoing a defence response to the geminivirus Bean dwarf mosaic virus. Mol. Plant Pathol. 8, 151–162. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00379.x

  • 280

    SeoY. S.RojasM. R.LeeJ. Y.LeeS. W.JeonJ. S.RonaldP.et al. (2006). A viral resistance gene from common bean functions across plant families and is up-regulated in a non-virus-specific manner. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 11856–11861. 10.1073/pnas.0604815103

  • 281

    SharmaN.SahuP. P.PuranikS.PrasadM. (2013). Recent advances in plant-virus interaction with emphasis on small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). Mol. Biotechnol. 55, 63–77. 10.1007/s12033-012-9615-7

  • 282

    SharmaP.IkegamiM. (2010). Tomato leaf curl Java virus V2 protein is a determinant of virulence, hypersensitive response and suppression of posttranscriptional gene silencing. Virology396, 85–93. 10.1016/j.virol.2009.10.012

  • 283

    ShepherdD. N.MartinD. P.Van Der WaltE.DentK.VarsaniA.RybickiE. P. (2010). Maize streak virus: an old and complex ‘emerging’ pathogen. Mol. Plant Pathol. 11, 1–12. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00568.x

  • 284

    ShivaprasadP. V.ChenH.-M.PatelK.BondD. M.SantosB. A.BaulcombeD. C. (2012). A microRNA superfamily regulates nucleotide binding site–leucine-rich repeats and other mRNAs. Plant Cell24, 859–874. 10.1105/tpc.111.095380

  • 285

    SijenT.FleenorJ.SimmerF.ThijssenK. L.ParrishS.TimmonsL.et al. (2001). On the role of RNA amplification in dsRNA-triggered gene silencing. Cell107, 465–476. 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00576-1

  • 286

    SimkoI.PechenickD. A.MchaleL. K.TrucoM. J.OchoaO. E.MichelmoreR. W.et al. (2009). Association mapping and marker-assisted selection of the lettuce dieback resistance gene Tvr1. BMC Plant Biol. 9:135. 10.1186/1471-2229-9-135

  • 287

    SinclairJ. B.WalkerJ. C. (1955). Inheritance of resistance to Cucumber mosaic virus in cowpea. Phytopathology45, 563–564.

  • 288

    SinghA. K.SinghA. K. (1987). Chemical composition of cowpea seeds as influenced by Southern bean mosaic virus and Cowpea mosaic virus. Phyton26, 165–170.

  • 289

    SinghR. P. (1993). Genetic association of gene Bdv1 for tolerance to Barley yellow dwarf virus with genes Lr34 and Yr18 for adult-plant resistance to rusts in bread wheat. Plant Dis. 77, 1103–1106. 10.1094/PD-77-1103

  • 290

    SinghS. P.SchwartzH. F. (2010). Breeding common bean for resistance to diseases: a review. Crop Sci. 50, 2199–2223. 10.2135/cropsci2009.03.0163

  • 291

    SlootwegE. J.SpiridonL. N.RoosienJ.ButterbachP.PompR.WesterhofL.et al. (2013). Structural determinants at the interface of the ARC2 and leucine-rich repeat domains control the activation of the plant immune receptors Rx1 and Gpa2. Plant Physiol. 162, 1510–1528. 10.1104/pp.113.218842

  • 292

    SlootwegE.RoosienJ.SpiridonL. N.PetrescuA. J.TamelingW.JoostenM.et al. (2010). Nucleocytoplasmic distribution is required for activation of resistance by the potato NB-LRR receptor Rx1 and is balanced by its functional domains. Plant Cell22, 4195–4215. 10.1105/tpc.110.077537

  • 293

    Solomon-BlackburnR. M.BarkerH. (2001a). Breeding virus resistant potatoes (Solanum tuberosum): a review of traditional and molecular approaches. Heredity86, 17–35. 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00799.x

  • 294

    Solomon-BlackburnR. M.BarkerH. (2001b). A review of host major-gene resistance to potato viruses X, Y, A and V in potato: genes, genetics and mapped locations. Heredity86, 8–16. 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00798.x

  • 295

    StamovaB. S.ChetelatR. T. (2000). Inheritance and genetic mapping of Cucumber mosaic virus resistance introgressed from Lycopersicon chilense into tomato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101, 527–537. 10.1007/s001220051512

  • 296

    StewartL. R.HaqueM. A.JonesM. W.RedinbaughM. G. (2013). Response of maize (Zea mays L.) lines carrying Wsm1, Wsm2, and Wsm3 to the potyviruses Johnsongrass mosaic virus and Sorghum mosaic virus. Mol. Breed. 31, 289–297. 10.1007/s11032-012-9789-5

  • 297

    StoutjesdijkP.KammholzS. J.KlevenS.MatsayS.BanksP. M.LarkinP. J. (2001). PCR-based molecular marker for the Bdv2 Thinopyrum intermedium source of Barley yellow dwarf virus resistance in wheat. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 52, 1383–1388. 10.1071/AR01083

  • 298

    SwiezynskiK. M.KrusiecJ.OsieckaM.SieczkaM. T.ZarzyckaH. (1993). Potato-tuber resistance to Phytophthora infestans and its relation to maturity. Plant Breed. 110, 161–164. 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1993.tb01229.x

  • 299

    SzajkoK.ChrzanowskaM.WitekK.Strzelczyk-ZytaD.ZagorskaH.GebhardtC.et al. (2008). The novel gene Ny-1 on potato chromosome IX confers hypersensitive resistance to Potato virus Y and is an alternative to Ry genes in potato breeding for PVY resistance. Theor. Appl. Genet. 116, 297–303. 10.1007/s00122-007-0667-1

  • 300

    TaiwoM. A.ProvvidentiR.GonsalvesD. (1981). Inheritance of resistance to Blackeye cowpea mosaic virus in Vigna unguiculata. J. Hered. 72, 433–434.

  • 301

    TakacsA.KazincziG.HorvathJ.HadzsiM. (2006). Natural virus infection of tomato plants in Hungary. Cereal Res. Commun. 34, 689–691. 10.1556/CRC.34.2006.1.172

  • 302

    TakacsA. P.KazincziG.HorvathJ.GaborjanyiR. (2003). Reaction of Lycopersicon species and varieties to Potato virus Y (PVY(NTN)) and Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV). Commun. Agric. Appl. Biol. Sci. 68, 561–565.

  • 303

    TakahashiH.KanayamaY.ZhengM. S.KusanoT.HaseS.IkegamiM.et al. (2004). Antagonistic interactions between the SA and JA signaling pathways in Arabidopsis modulate expression of defense genes and gene-for-gene resistance to Cucumber mosaic virus. Plant Cell Physiol. 45, 803–809. 10.1093/pcp/pch085

  • 304

    TakahashiH.MillerJ.NozakiY.TakedaM.ShahJ.HaseS.et al. (2002). RCY1, an Arabidopsis thaliana RPP8/HRT family resistance gene, conferring resistance to Cucumber mosaic virus requires salicylic acid, ethylene and a novel signal transduction mechanism. Plant J. 32, 655–667. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01453.x

  • 305

    TakahashiH.SuzukiM.NatsuakiK.ShigyoT.HinoK.TeraokaT.et al. (2001). Mapping the virus and host genes involved in the resistance response in Cucumber mosaic virus infected Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 42, 340–347. 10.1093/pcp/pce039

  • 306

    TakkenF. L. W.AlbrechtM.TamelingW. I. L. (2006). Resistance proteins: molecular switches of plant defence. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 9, 383–390. 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.05.009

  • 307

    TamelingW. I.BaulcombeD. C. (2007). Physical association of the NB-LRR resistance protein Rx with a Ran GTPase-activating protein is required for extreme resistance to Potato virus X. Plant Cell19, 1682–1694. 10.1105/tpc.107.050880

  • 308

    TanksleyS. D.BernachiD.Beck-BunnT.EmmattyD.EshedY.InaiS.et al. (1998). Yield and quality evaluations on a pair of processing tomato lines nearly isogenic for the Tm2(a) gene for resistance to the Tobacco mosaic virus. Euphytica99, 77–83. 10.1023/A:1018320232663

  • 309

    TaoX. R.ZhouX. P.LiG. X.YuJ. L. (2002). The pathogenicity on legumes of Cucumber mosaic virus was determined by 243 nucleotides on 2a polymerase gene of viral RNA2. Chin. Sci. Bull. 47, 748. 10.1360/02tb9169

  • 310

    TaylorS.MartinR. R. (1999). Sequence comparison between common and resistance breaking strains of Raspberry bushy dwarf virus. Phytopathology89:576.

  • 311

    TianY. P.ValkonenJ. P. T. (2013). Genetic determinants of Potato virus Y required to overcome or trigger hypersensitive resistance to PVY strain group O controlled by the gene Ny in potato. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 26, 297–305. 10.1094/MPMI-09-12-0219-R

  • 312

    TomitaR.MuraiJ.MiuraY.IshiharaH.LiuS.KuboteraY.et al. (2008). Fine mapping and DNA fiber FISH analysis locates the tobamovirus resistance gene L(3) of Capsicum chinense in a 400-kb region of R-like genes cluster embedded in highly repetitive sequences. Theor. Appl. Genet. 117, 1107–1118. 10.1007/s00122-008-0848-6

  • 313

    TomitaR.SekineK. T.MizumotoH.SakamotoM.MuraiJ.KibaA.et al. (2011). Genetic basis for the hierarchical interaction between tobamovirus spp. and L resistance gene alleles from different pepper species. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 24, 108–117. 10.1094/MPMI-06-10-0127

  • 314

    TroutmanJ. L.FultonR. W. (1958). Resistance in tobacco to Cucumber mosaic virus. Virology6, 303–316. 10.1016/0042-6822(58)90084-9

  • 315

    TrunigerV.ArandaM. A. (2009). Recessive resistance to plant viruses. Adv. Virus Res. 75, 119–159. 10.1016/S0065-3527(09)07504-6

  • 316

    UedaH.YamaguchiY.SanoH. (2006). Direct interaction between the Tobacco mosaic virus helicase domain and the ATP-bound resistance protein, N factor during the hypersensitive response in tobacco plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 61, 31–45. 10.1007/s11103-005-5817-8

  • 317

    UmaB.RaniT. S.PodileA. R. (2011). Warriors at the gate that never sleep: non-host resistance in plants. J. Plant Physiol. 168, 2141–2152. 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.09.005

  • 318

    ValkonenJ. P. T. (1994). Natural genes and mechanisms for resistance to viruses in cultivated and wild potato species (Solanum Spp). Plant Breed. 112, 1–16. 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1994.tb01270.x

  • 319

    ValkonenJ. P. T.KoivuK.SlackS. A.PehuE. (1995). Modified resistance of Solanum brevidens to Potato Y potyvirus and Tobacco mosaic tobamovirus following genetic-transformation and explant regeneration. Plant Sci. 106, 71–79. 10.1016/0168-9452(95)04065-3

  • 320

    VallejosC. E.Astua-MongeG.JonesV.PlylerT. R.SakiyamaN. S.MackenzieS. A. (2006). Genetic and molecular characterization of the I locus of Phaseolus vulgaris. Genetics172, 1229–1242. 10.1534/genetics.105.050S15

  • 321

    Van Der BiezenE. A.JonesJ. D. G. (1998). The NB-ARC domain: a novel signalling motif shared by plant resistance gene products and regulators of cell death in animals. Curr. Biol. 8, R226–R227. 10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70145-9

  • 322

    Van Der HoornR. A. L.KamounS. (2008). From guard to decoy: a new model for perception of plant pathogen effectors. Plant Cell20, 2009–2017. 10.1105/tpc.108.060194

  • 323

    Van KoeveringM.HauflerK. Z.FulbrightD. W.IsleibT. G.EversonE. H. (1987). Heritability of resistance in winter wheat to Wheat spindle streak mosaic virus. Phytopathology77, 742–744. 10.1094/Phyto-77-742

  • 324

    VaucheretH. (2008). Plant ARGONAUTES. Trends Plant Sci. 13, 350–358. 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.04.007

  • 325

    VerlaanM. G.HuttonS. F.IbrahemR. M.KormelinkR.VisserR. G.ScottJ. W.et al. (2013). The Tomato yellow leaf curl virus resistance genes Ty-1 and Ty-3 are allelic and code for DFDGD-Class RNA-dependent RNA polymerases. PLoS Genet. 9:e1003399. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003399

  • 326

    VidalS.CabreraH.AnderssonR. A.FredrikssonA.ValkonenJ. P. T. (2002). Potato gene Y-1 is an N gene homolog that confers cell death upon infection with Potato virus Y. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 15, 717–727. 10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.7.717

  • 327

    VlotA. C.KlessigD. F.ParkS. W. (2008). Systemic acquired resistance: the elusive signal(s). Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 11, 436–442. 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.05.003

  • 328

    WadeB. L.ZaumeyerW. J. (1940). Genetic studies of resistance to Alfalfa mosaic virus and of stringiness in Phaseolus Vulgaris. Agron. J. 32, 127–134. 10.2134/agronj1940.00021962003200020005x

  • 329

    WaiT.GrumetR. (1995). Inheritance of resistance to the watermelon strain of Papaya ringspot virus in the cucumber line Tmg-1. HortScience30, 338–340.

  • 330

    WalshJ. A.RusholmeR. L.HughesS. L.JennerC. E.BambridgeJ. M.LydiateD. J.et al. (2002). Different classes of resistance to Turnip mosaic virus in Brassica rapa. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 108, 15–20. 10.1023/A:1013962911906

  • 331

    WangH. L.SudarshanaM. R.GilbertsonR. L.LucasW. J. (1999). Analysis of cell-to-cell and long-distance movement of a bean dwarf mosaic geminivirus-green fluorescent protein reporter in host and nonhost species: identification of sites of resistance. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 12, 345–355. 10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.4.345

  • 332

    WangY.HobbsH. A.HillC. B.DomierL. L.HartmanG. L.NelsonR. L. (2005). Evaluation of ancestral lines of US soybean cultivars for resistance to four soybean viruses. Crop Sci. 45, 639–644. 10.2135/cropsci2005.0639

  • 333

    WardJ. A.BooneW. E.MooreP. P.WeberC. A. (2012). Developing molecular markers for marker assisted selection for resistance to Raspberry bushy dwarf virus (RBDV) in Red Raspberry. Acta Hortic. 946, 61–66.

  • 334

    WasM.DziewonskaM. A. (1984). Reaction of PVM and PVS in potato clones with the genes Gm and Ns, in 9th Triennial Conference of the European Association of Potato Researchers (Interlaken).

  • 335

    WeberH.SchultzeS.PfitznerA. J. (1993). Two amino acid substitutions in the Tomato mosaic virus 30-kilodalton movement protein confer the ability to overcome the Tm-2(2) resistance gene in the tomato. J. Virol. 67, 6432–6438.

  • 336

    WeedenN. F.ProvvidentiR. (1988). A marker locus, Adh-1, for resistance to Pea enation mosaic virus in Pisum sativum. J. Hered. 79, 128–131.

  • 337

    WelzH. G.SchechertA.PernetA.PixleyK. V.GeigerH. H. (1998). A gene for resistance to the Maize streak virus in the African CIMMYT maize inbred line CML202. Mol. Breed. 4, 147–154. 10.1023/A:1009602620244

  • 338

    WenR. H.KhatabiB.AshfieldT.Saghai MaroofM. A.HajimoradM. R. (2013). The HC-Pro and P3 cistrons of an avirulent Soybean mosaic virus are recognized by different resistance genes at the complex Rsv1 locus. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 26, 203–215. 10.1094/MPMI-06-12-0156-R

  • 339

    WhithamS. A.AnderbergR. J.ChisholmS. T.CarringtonJ. C. (2000). Arabidopsis RTM2 gene is necessary for specific restriction of Tobacco etch virus and encodes an unusual small heat shock-like protein. Plant Cell12, 569–582. 10.1105/tpc.12.4.569

  • 340

    WhithamS.DineshkumarS. P.ChoiD.HehlR.CorrC.BakerB. (1994). The product of the Tobacco mosaic virus resistance gene N: similarity to Toll and the Interleukin-1 receptor. Cell78, 1101–1115. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90283-6

  • 341

    WiermerM.FeysB. J.ParkerJ. E. (2005). Plant immunity: the EDS1 regulatory node. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 8, 383–389. 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.05.010

  • 342

    XiaS.ChengY. T.HuangS.WinJ.SoardsA.JinnT.-L.et al. (2013). Regulation of transcription of nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat-encoding genes SNC1 and RPP4 via H3K4 trimethylation. Plant Physiol. 162, 1694–1705. 10.1104/pp.113.214551

  • 343

    XiaX. C.MelchingerA. E.KuntzeL.LubberstedtT. (1999). Quantitative trait loci mapping of resistance to Sugarcane mosaic virus in maize. Phytopathology89, 660–667. 10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.8.660

  • 344

    XuM. L.MelchingerA. E.LubberstedtT. (2000). Origin of Scm1 and Scm2 - two loci conferring resistance to Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV) in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100, 934–941. 10.1007/s001220051373

  • 345

    XuQ. F.MaY. Z.XinZ. Y.ChenX.LinZ. S. (1999). In situ hybridization and RAPD analyses of disomic Thinopyrum intermedium addition lines in wheat with Barley yellow dwarf virus resistance. Acta Genet. Sin. 26, 52–53.

  • 346

    YamafujiR.WatanabeY.MeshiT.OkadaY. (1991). Replication of TMV-L and Lta1 RNAs and their recombinants in TMV-resistant Tm-1 tomato protoplasts. Virology183, 99–105. 10.1016/0042-6822(91)90122-R

  • 347

    YamajiY.MaejimaK.KomatsuK.ShiraishiT.OkanoY.HimenoM.et al. (2012). Lectin-mediated resistance impairs plant virus infection at the cellular level. Plant Cell24, 778–793. 10.1105/tpc.111.093658

  • 348

    YangZ. N.YeX. R.MolinaJ.RooseM. L.MirkovT. E. (2003). Sequence analysis of a 282-kilobase region surrounding the Citrus tristeza virus resistance gene (Ctv) locus in Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf. Plant Physiol. 131, 482–492. 10.1104/pp.011262

  • 349

    YuJ.GuW. K.ProvvidentiR.WeedenN. F. (1995). Identifying and mapping 2 DNA markers linked to the gene conferring resistance to pea enation mosaic-virus. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 120, 730–733.

  • 350

    YuY. G.MaroofM. A. S.BussG. R.MaughanP. J.TolinS. A. (1994). RFLP and microsatellite mapping of a gene for Soybean mosaic virus resistance. Phytopathology84, 60–64. 10.1094/Phyto-84-60

  • 351

    YueJ.-X.MeyersB. C.ChenJ.-Q.TianD.YangS. (2012). Tracing the origin and evolutionary history of plant nucleotide-binding site–leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) genes. New Phytol. 193, 1049–1063. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.04006.x

  • 352

    ZaumeyerW. J.MeinersJ. P. (1975). Disease resistance in beans. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 13, 313–334. 10.1146/annurev.py.13.090175.001525

  • 353

    ZhangQ. P.LiQ.WangX.WangH. Y.LangS. P.WangY. N.et al. (2005). Development and characterization of a Triticum aestivum-Haynaldia villosa translocation line T4VS center dot 4DL conferring resistance to Wheat spindle streak mosaic virus. Euphytica145, 317–320. 10.1007/s10681-005-1743-8

  • 354

    ZhangX.YuanY. R.PeiY.LinS. S.TuschlT.PatelD. J.et al. (2006). Cucumber mosaic virus encoded 2b suppressor inhibits Arabidopsis Argonaute1 cleavage activity to counter plant defense. Genes Dev. 20, 3255–3268. 10.1101/gad.1495506

  • 355

    ZhangZ. Y.LinZ. S.XinZ. Y. (2009). Research progress in BYDV resistance genes derived from wheat and its wild relatives. J. Genet. Genomics36, 567–573. 10.1016/S1673-8527(08)60148-4

  • 356

    ZhangZ. Y.XinZ. Y.LarkinP. J. (2001). Molecular characterization of a Thinopyrum intermedium Group 2 chromosome (2Ai-2) conferring resistance to Barley yellow dwarf virus. Genome44, 1129–1135. 10.1139/gen-44-6-1129

  • 357

    ZhangZ. Y.XinZ. Y.LinZ. S.ChenX.WangX. P. (2000). Identification of molecular markers for the Thinopyrum intermedium chromosome 2Ai-2 with resistance to Barley yellow dwarf virus. Acta Bot. Sin. 42, 1051–1056.

  • 358

    ZhangZ. Y.XuJ. S.XuQ. J.LarkinP.XinZ. Y. (2004). Development of novel PCR markers linked to the BYDV resistance gene Bdv2 useful in wheat for marker-assisted selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109, 433–439. 10.1007/s00122-004-1649-1

  • 359

    ZhengY.EdwardsM. C. (1990). Expression of resistance to Barley stripe mosaic virus in barley and oat protoplasts. J. Gen. Virol. 71, 1865–1868. 10.1099/0022-1317-71-8-1865

  • 360

    ZhouY. C.Garrido-RamirezE. R.SudarshanaM. R.YendluriS.GilbertsonR. L. (2007). The N-terminus of the Begomovirus nuclear shuttle protein (BV1) determines virulence or avirulence in Phaseolus vulgaris. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 20, 1523–1534. 10.1094/MPMI-20-12-1523

  • 361

    ZverevaA. S.PoogginM. M. (2012). Silencing and innate immunity in plant defense against viral and non-viral pathogens. Viruses4, 2578–2597. 10.3390/v4112578

Summary

Keywords

R genes, PTI, PAMP-triggered immunity, ETI, RNAi, avirulence, hypersensitive response

Citation

de Ronde D, Butterbach P and Kormelink R (2014) Dominant resistance against plant viruses. Front. Plant Sci. 5:307. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00307

Received

13 April 2014

Accepted

10 June 2014

Published

27 June 2014

Volume

5 - 2014

Edited by

Corné M. J. Pieterse, Utrecht University, Netherlands

Reviewed by

Peter Moffett, Université de Sherbrooke, Canada; Frank L. W. Takken, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands

Copyright

© 2014 de Ronde, Butterbach and Kormelink.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Richard Kormelink, Laboratory of Virology, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands e-mail:

This article was submitted to Plant-Microbe Interaction, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science.

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Share on WeChat

Scan with WeChat to share this article

Article metrics