Abstract
As sessile organisms, plants have evolved effective mechanisms to protect themselves from environmental stresses. Damaged (i.e., wounded) plants recognize a variety of endogenous molecules as danger signals, referred to as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). ATP is among the molecules that are released by cell damage, and recent evidence suggests that ATP can serve as a DAMP. Although little studied in plants, extracellular ATP is well known for its signaling roles in animals, including acting as a DAMP during the inflammatory response and wound healing. If ATP acts outside the cell, then it is reasonable to expect that it is recognized by a plasma membrane-localized receptor. Recently, DORN1, a lectin receptor kinase, was shown to recognize extracellular ATP in Arabidopsis. DORN1 is the founding member of a new purinoceptor subfamily, P2K (P2 receptor kinase), which is plant-specific. P2K1 (DORN1) is required for ATP-induced cellular responses (e.g., cytosolic Ca2+ elevation, MAPK phosphorylation, and gene expression). Genetic analysis of loss-of-function mutants and overexpression lines showed that P2K1 participates in the plant wound response, consistent with the role of ATP as a DAMP. In this review, we summarize past research on the roles and mechanisms of extracellular ATP signaling in plants, and discuss the direction of future research on extracellular ATP as a DAMP signal.
ENDOGENOUS DANGER SIGNALS, DAMPs IN PLANTS
Multicellular organisms have assembled complex signaling networks that mediate specific and dynamic responses following various environmental stimuli. Among these are mechanisms that recognize a potentially life-threatening event as a danger signal. Danger signals include exogenous, enemy-derived signal molecules, e.g., pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), which are recognized by pattern recognition receptors to activate immune responses. In addition, endogenous molecules and fragments from damaged cells and tissues can also be recognized as danger signals, referred to as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Multicellular organisms use DAMPs for damage-self recognition to evoke immune inflammatory responses and damage healing independent of but in cooperation with exogenous danger signals (Matzinger, 2007).
Because of their sessile nature, plants are continuously exposed to various stresses caused by changes in the environment and attacks by other organisms, i.e., abiotic and biotic stresses. Therefore, plants require sophisticated surveillance systems to detect a variety of danger signals. Indeed, plants have evolved a large number of receptor kinases (e.g., >600 genes in Arabidopsis), most of which are likely involved in the response to different stresses, based on the observation that many duplication events have occurred in the genes involved in defense responses and disease resistance (Shiu et al., 2004). These plant receptors recognize not only exogenous danger signals such as PAMPs and herbivore-associated molecule patterns (HAMPs) but also endogenous danger signals such as DAMPs. A number of PAMPs have been identified, and their recognition systems and downstream signaling events are well studied and understood (Zipfel, 2014). In contrast, only a few DAMPs have been extensively studied (Table 1) and the details regarding their recognition and signaling mechanisms remain unclear. To date, few receptors have been identified that specifically recognize DAMP signals (Table 1). Further studies are needed to clarify each of their signaling mechanisms.
Table 1
| Type | Molecule/fragment | Representative reference | Receptor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nucleotides | ATP | Jeter et al. (2004) | P2K1/DORN1 |
| NAD(P)H | Zhang and Mou (2009) | n.d. | |
| DNA | Wen et al. (2009) | n.d. | |
| Saccharides | Sucrose | n.d. | |
| Oligogalacturonic acid (OGA) | Reymond et al. (1995) | WAK1 , | |
| Volatile organic compounds | Green leaf volatiles | Paré and Tumlinson (1999) | n.d. |
| Peptides | Systemin* | Ryan and Pearce (2003) | SR160 Scheer and Ryan (2002) |
| Pep914/890** | Yamaguchi et al. (2011) | n.d. | |
| Subtilase peptide (SubPep)** | Pearce et al. (2010) | n.d. | |
| Hydroxyproline-rich glycopeptides | Pearce et al. (2007) | n.d. | |
| Elicitor peptides (Peps) | Huffaker et al. (2006) | PEPR1/2 Yamaguchi et al. (2006, 2010) |
Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in plants.
(*) Solanaceae specific peptide; (**) legume specific peptide; (n.d.) not determined.
Extracellular ATP is one of the well studied DAMP signals in both animals and plants. Although ATP is well recognized as a source of high energy phosphate bonds to support cellular metabolism, once ATP is released from cells following cellular damage, it acts as a DAMP signal (Figure 1). ATP is a good choice for such a role since cells contain a high concentration of ATP (1–10 mM), which is highly reactive and involved in more chemical reactions than any other compound except H2O. In animals, extracellular ATP has been studied for over 60 years. The released ATP is recognized by plasma membrane-localized purinergic receptors (P2X and P2Y) that involve a wide range of animal physiology (Khakh and Burnstock, 2009). In plants, a number of earlier studies reported that extracellular ATP plays essential roles in plant growth and development (Tanaka et al., 2010a). The recent discovery of the plant P2K1 (DORN1) receptor by demonstrated that extracellular ATP also serves as a DAMP signal in plants. For example, most ATP-responsive genes were also regulated in response to a wound treatment. As would be expected, dorn1 mutant plants showed a reduced transcriptional response to both ATP treatment and wounding. Similarly, overexpression of DORN1 resulted in an elevated response to both ATP and wounding. These data strongly suggest that ATP plays an important role in response to wounding, which is mediated by ATP recognition by the P2K1 (DORN1) receptor.
FIGURE 1
Detailed analysis of ATP-induced genes by suggested that extracellular ATP signaling, mediated by P2K1, was also involved in plant responses to a variety of stresses. The suppression of ATP-hydrolyzing enzymes, apyrases (AtAPY1 and AtAPY2), which results in an elevation of extracellular ATP levels, induced the expression of genes involved in stress responses (Lim et al., 2014). Therefore, extracellular ATP likely plays a role as a central danger signaling during a variety of plant stress responses.
ATP IS RELEASED INTO THE EXTRACELLULAR MILIEU AS A DAMP SIGNAL
The presence of extracellular ATP in plants was detected under various conditions (Table 2), which suggests the existence of mechanisms by which this energy molecule is released into the apoplast. Several mechanisms have been proposed for mediating ATP release (Figure 2). For example, similar to the mechanism of ATP release at animal neuronal synapses, ATP appears to be released at sites of active growth via vesicular exocytosis (Kim et al., 2006). AtPGP1, an ABC transporter, and PM-ANT1, a plasma membrane-localized nucleotide transporter were shown to export intracellular ATP into the extracellular milieu (ECM; Thomas et al., 2000; Rieder and Neuhaus, 2011). However, it remains unclear how these ATP-releasing systems are controlled by environmental stimuli.
Table 2
| Category | Type of stress | Stimulus | Organism | Tissue | ATP concentration or fold change (peak time) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abiotic stress | Mechanical stimulation | Shaking at 150 rpm | Arabidopsis | Whole seedlings | 3-fold (2 min) | Jeter et al. (2004) |
| Touching by a pipette tip | Arabidopsis | Root and shoot tips | 10–15 nM (1 min) | Weerasinghe et al. (2009) | ||
| Wounding | Arabidopsis | Seedling roots | 70–80 nM (15 min) | |||
| Rosette leaves | 25–45 μM (immediately) | Song et al. (2006) | ||||
| Osmotic stress | Sorbitol (300 mM) | Arabidopsis | Whole seedlings | 40–50 nM (15 min) | ||
| MgCl2, Mg(NO3)2 (100 mM) | Arabidopsis | Whole seedlings | ∼1.5-fold (1 h) | Kim et al. (2006) | ||
| NaCl (100–300 mM) | Populus euphratica | Suspension culture | ∼15 nM (5 min) | Sun et al. (2012) | ||
| Arabidopsis | Whole seedlings | 2.5-fold (1 min) | Jeter et al. (2004) | |||
| 60–70 nM (15 min) | ||||||
| ∼1.5-fold (1 h) | Kim et al. (2009) | |||||
| Others | L-Glutamate (10 μM) | Arabidopsis | Seedling roots | 25–30 nM (5 min) | ||
| Light treatment of dark-adapted leaves | Arabidopsis | Guard cells | 3.5-fold (10 min)** | |||
| Abscisic acid (10 μM) | Arabidopsis | Seedling roots | 20–30 nM (10 min) | |||
| Guard cells | 4.5-fold (5 min)** | |||||
| Biotic stress | Pathogen elicitors | Chitin mixture (100 μg/mL) | Medicago truncatula | Root hair | - (30 min)* | Kim et al. (2006) |
| Yeast extract (100 μg/mL) | Salvia miltiorrhiza | Hairy root culture | 70-fold (10 h) | Wu et al. (2008) | ||
| Mycotoxin beauvericin (40 μM) | Wheat | Leaf | ∼1.75-fold | Šrobárová et al. (2009) | ||
| Spontaneous | Cell growth | Cell propagation | Arabidopsis | Suspension culture | - *** | |
| Tip growth | Fiber elongation | Cotton | Ovule fiber | 330 nM | ||
| Root hair elongation | Medicago truncatula | Root hair | - * | Kim et al. (2006) | ||
| Pollen germination and elongation | Arabidopsis | Germinating pollen | ∼6-fold | Wu et al. (2007) | ||
| 42.1 pmol/106 pollen | ||||||
| ∼4.5 pmol/mg protein | Rieder and Neuhaus (2011) |
Release of extracellular ATP during plant growth, development, and stress responses.
(-) Indicates that ATP release was qualitatively visualized rather than quantified. ATP measurement was performed by a conventional luciferase method unless otherwise noted by asterisks as follow: (*) luciferase fused with cellulose binding domain (Kim et al., 2006); (**) luciferase fused with secretory signal peptides (); or (***) thin layer chromatography ().
FIGURE 2
Cell breakage is a simple mechanism for ATP release that could be caused by herbivore attack (i.e., wounding) or pathogen-induced cell lysis (i.e., necrosis). This released ATP would be expected to act as a DAMP. Interestingly, ∼60% of the genes induced by ATP treatment are also induced by wounding, 90% of which responded early to wounding (). In previous studies, the ATP concentrations measured at the wound sites of Arabidopsis leaves (Jeter et al., 2004) and damaged roots () were 40 μM and 80 nM, respectively. The effective concentration for ATP signaling at damaged sites may be lower than these measurements, considering that the ATP pool is competitively shared with other ectoenzymes, such as ectophosphatases, ectokinases, and other cell wall enzymes. Given the high affinity of P2K1 for ATP recognition (Kd ∼46 nM), these levels of extracellular ATP would be sufficient to trigger P2K1-mediated ATP signaling. This finding suggests that extracellular ATP released during wounding acts as a DAMP signal and is recognized by the P2K1 receptor (Figure 2).
More subtle treatments of plants have also been shown to release sufficient ATP to potentially activate the P2K1 receptor. For example, nanomolar levels of ATP were released from Arabidopsis roots when a mild touch was applied with a force of 198 ± 178 mN (Table 2), which is a typical range for plants growing through soil (Weerasinghe et al., 2009). Plants can also experience mechanical stress when infected by microbes. Jayaraman et al. (2014) reported that pathogenic fungi and oomycetes exert mechanical stress by turgor pressure from penetrating pegs and hyphae. Indeed, mechanical stimulation was shown to activate disease resistance (). Interestingly, pathogen attachment causes nuclear repositioning and cytoplasmic streaming at the contact points on the plant cell (; ; ). These cytoskeletal arrangements are general responses caused by mechanical stimulation (). Considering that exogenous ATP can also cause cytoplasmic streaming in plant cells (Williamson, 1975), it is conceivable that mechanical stress following pathogen infection likely stimulates plants to release ATP as a DAMP signal, which eventually evokes cellular responses against the invaders. ATP-induced actin filament formation and cytoskeletal rearrangements are widely observed in animal cells in which ATP modulates inflammation, wound healing and angiogenesis (Kaczmarek et al., 2005). Although such a role for ATP in plants is speculative at this point, it is clear that ATP has the potential to be a missing signal that mediates many of the responses previously attributed solely to mechanical stimulation.
In addition to wounding and mechanical stress, ATP is also released, without visible cell damage, in response to treatment with biotic and abiotic stress agents (Table 2). Abiotic stimuli such as osmotic and salt stress, as well as abscisic acid (a stress-related hormone), and L-glutamate (known as a fast excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian nervous system) induce ATP release in plants (Table 2). Biotic stress agents such as pathogen-derived elicitors (i.e., chitin, yeast extract, and mycotoxin beauvericin) also trigger ATP release (Table 2).
Taken together, these findings clearly demonstrate that plants release ATP outside cells in response to various stresses, and the released ATP likely acts as a DAMP signal to trigger plant defenses and environmental stress responses (Figure 2). Further studies are necessary to understand how the ATP-releasing machinery (e.g., transporters and exocytotic vesicles) are regulated by an array of different stimuli.
ROLE OF EXTRACELLULAR ATP AS A DAMP
IMMUNE DEFENSE SYSTEM FOLLOWING WOUNDING AND CELL DAMAGE
Herbivore feeding, similar to physical wounding, would be expected to passively release high doses of ATP into the extracellular milieu. If this ATP triggers plant defense mechanisms, it would be expected that insects may have adapted to counter this defense. Indeed, some herbivorous caterpillars and whitefly larvae secrete saliva containing apyrases while feeding on plant leaves (Su et al., 2012; Wu et al., 2012). Interestingly, the exogenous application of purified caterpillar apyrase at the wound site suppressed glandular trichome production, which is involved in the defense against herbivores, and the expression of defense-related genes regulated by jasmonic acid and ethylene (Wu et al., 2012). A clear mechanism for this response would be that the salivary apyrases dampen wound-released ATP to restrict the plant defense response. Furthermore, a higher catalytic activity of apyrases was detected in globose insect galls on Calliandra brevipes (). Similar mechanisms for controlling extracellular ATP concentrations are observed in the interactions between animals and parasitic worms or blood sucking insects (Valenzuela et al., 2001; ).
Pathogen attacks cause cell damage that allows cytoplasmic ATP to leak into the extracellular space. The reduction of extracellular ATP levels was observed following plant infection by the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Interestingly, this reduction was not observed using a P. syringae strain lacking a canonical protein secretion system (), suggesting that some effector proteins may contribute to ATP depletion. A recent study showed that adenylate kinases (which phosphorylates AMP using ATP as a phosphate donor) are secreted by Xanthomonas oryzae (Robin et al., 2014). These enzymes could play a role in quenching DAMP-utilized ATP during colonization. Adenylate cyclase were also shown to be important for the virulence of animal pathogens (Markaryan et al., 2001; Munier-Lehmann et al., 2003). Given that extracellular ATP was shown to be involved in cytolysis, cell adhesion, and growth of various microbes (Roberto Meyer-Fernandes, 2002; Meyer-Fernandes et al., 2004; Li et al., 2011), these pathogenic microbes may be merely protecting themselves from ATP, a very reactive molecule. Correspondingly, a recent report by Long et al. (2014) demonstrated that conidial germination, appressorium formation and pathogenicity of rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae were significantly reduced by pretreatment with nucleotidase-specific inhibitors.
The above results suggest that pathogens and insects directly manipulate extracellular ATP levels to weaken or block plant immunity; thereby promoting colonization of the plant host (Figure 1).
Plants use hormone-mediated pathways, either salicylic acid, jasmonic acid and/or ethylene, to activate defense against pathogens or herbivores (Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008; Mur et al., 2013). The application of ATP induces the expression of genes encoding biosynthetic enzymes for jasmonic acid and ethylene (Jeter et al., 2004; Song et al., 2006). Interestingly, observed that ATP addition to slightly wounded tissue induced the secretion of extrafloral nectar in the lima bean. The secretion of extrafloral nectar is a jasmonic acid-dependent defense response, known to attract ants and other predatory insects (). These results suggest that ATP released following wound damage activates signaling by stress hormones that eventually activates additional defense systems.
It is expected that more than two DAMPs would be present together in the plant apoplastic area at the wound site, where the signals would function together to activate defense response signaling. Oligogalacturonic acid (OGA), another DAMP generated by cell wall degradation (Table 1), is known to trigger cytosolic Ca2+ elevation, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and other downstream defense responses (). These same responses are also triggered by ATP (; Tanaka et al., 2010b). Co-treatment with both OGA and ATP resulted in an enhancement of cytosolic Ca2+ elevation (Jeter et al., 2004). Given that similar defense signaling and gene expression are triggered by both ATP and OGA (Rojo et al., 1999; Jeter et al., 2004), it is likely that these two signals may act synergistically to insure a robust response to wounding.
HEALING AFTER WOUNDING AND CELL DAMAGE
Wound healing is an essential biological process composed of complex, sequential steps to restore function of damaged cells and surrounding tissues. In animals, this process starts with conserved cellular damage signals (e.g., Ca2+, ROS, and ATP) that diffuse into ambient tissue, surround the wounded area, and initiate immediate cellular events including cell shape changes, actomyosin formation, and immune cell recruitment ().
Plants lack cellular mobility because of the cell wall and must restore tissue through cellular regeneration at the damaged site. A recent report by Lim et al. (2014) using RNAi silencing of ectoapyrases suggested that accumulated levels of extracellular ATP caused significant changes in the expression of genes regulating wall composition and extensibility. The silenced lines showed changes in wall lignification and decreased methyl ester bonds. These results suggest that extracellular ATP induced by wounding could play an important role in wall reorganization during tissue healing.
The molecular mechanisms of the early stage, plant healing process remain largely unknown, in contrast to those of later-stage wound healing, which has been well studied (, ; Xu et al., 2006; Iwase et al., 2011). noted that auxin plays an important role during communication between the repair site and other parts of the plant. Auxin accumulates on the acropetal side of the wound while lower levels are found on the basipetal side. Given that extracellular ATP strongly inhibits polar auxin transport (Tang et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2012), ATP released by wounding could contribute to the auxin distribution at the wound site. Jasmonic acid and ethylene has been postulated to activate specific wound responsive genes that further promote wound healing (). The addition of ATP induces the expression of genes involved in the biosynthesis of jasmonic acid and ethylene (). Although definitive experimental evidence is lacking, the literature certainly contains clues that extracellular ATP could be playing a very important signaling role during the wound healing process.
PLANT–SYMBIONT INTERACTION
The role of extracellular ATP in symbiosis has been suggested by studies of ectoapyrases, which control the level of extracellular nucleotides. For example, overexpression of soybean ectoapyrase in Lotus japonicus, Medicago truncatula, and soybean resulted in enhanced infection by rhizobia and an increased number of nodules (McAlvin and Stacey, 2005; Tanaka et al., 2011a). In contrast, RNAi silencing and antisense suppression of ectoapyrases in soybean and L. japonicus blocked symbiont infection, resulted in markedly reduced nodulation (; Roberts et al., 2013). These results are corroborated by earlier studies in which nodule formation on soybean and Dolichos biflorus was inhibited by treatment with specific antibodies against ectoapyrases (; ; Kalsi and Etzler, 2000). A recent study by Roberts et al. (2013) also demonstrated that the suppression of ectoapyrase blocked infection by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Taken together, these data suggest that ectoapyrases are essential for both rhizobial and mycorrhizal symbiosis, presumably due to their ability to modulate extracellular ATP levels.
Lipochitooligosaccharides (LCOs), which are known as Nod factors and Myc factors, are key symbiotic signals essential for rhizobial and mycorrhizal symbioses, respectively. Treatment of soybean seedlings with LCO was shown to increase ectoapyrase gene expression (). LCO treatment was also shown to result in a re-localization of the apyrase to the root hair tip, which is the site of rhizobial infection (Kalsi and Etzler, 2000). Indeed, LCO treatment was shown to increase the enzymatic activity of the ectoapyrase isolated from D. biflorus demonstrating that this ectoapyrase has the ability to bind directly to LCO (). Therefore, one can hypothesize that, in order to enhance infection, the symbionts use LCO to increase ectoapyrase expression and/or activity; thereby quenching DAMP, extracellular ATP, either released due to mechanical stress during infection (Jayaraman et al., 2014) or as a result of a response to LCO (Tanaka et al., 2011a,b). Studies have shown that ATP, but not ADP, induces ROS production in the root hairs of Medicago truncatula (Kim et al., 2006) and Arabidopsis (), as well as Arabidopsis epidermal cells (). ROS are well-known signals in the plant defense response. Therefore, symbionts may control ectoapyrase activity using LCOs, in which the ATP function as a DAMP is suppressed so that plant defenses are not triggered.
The products of ectoapyrase activity are ADP and/or AMP, which may also have biological activity. For example, ADP was shown to change plasma membrane conductance in root hairs (Lew and Dearnaley, 2000) and induce calcium influx in root epidermal cells (). Interestingly, while RNAi silencing of ectoapyrase expression in soybean reduced nodulation, this effect was partially reversed by the addition of exogenous ADP, suggesting a role for extracellular ADP in the nodulation process. used electrophysiological methods to verify the presence of an ADP signaling pathway, independent of ATP signaling, with ionotrophic receptor-like activity at the plasma membrane. P2K1 (DORN1) shows slightly less affinity for ADP over ATP (). It is possible that a second, distinct receptor could exist in plants for ADP, as suggested by . Alternatively, it is also possible that ADP recognition by P2K1 could activate distinct downstream signaling events, which would also account for the apparent distinct response of ADP vs. ATP. Further research on ADP/ATP signaling pathways, possible additional purinoceptors and P2K1 function should provide answers to these and other questions relevant to nucleotide signaling in plants.
FUTURE PERSPECTIVES OF EXTRACELLULAR ATP AS A DAMP SIGNAL
The release and response to extracellular ATP is conserved across many taxa, including lower vertebrates, insects, protozoa, and prokaryotes (; ), indicating that a role for ATP as an extracellular signal is an ancient trait. Therefore, it is not surprising that ATP also plays such a role in plants. However, the P2K purinoceptor family is quite distinct from the P2X and P2Y receptors found in animal systems. Hence, although ATP signaling is widely conserved, the means by which plants and animals recognize this signal appears to have evolved independently. However, caution should be used in making such broad conclusions since we are clearly at a very early stage of our understanding of ATP recognition and action in plants. Additional comparative studies are needed to fully elucidate the similarities and differences between the mechanism of action of extracellular ATP in plants and animals.
Plant enemies such as pathogens and insects usually interfere with one or more defense signals to promote colonization and infection. It is now clear that among these mechanisms are strategies for modulating the levels of extracellular ATP. This underlines the important role that ATP plays in general plant stress response (Figure 1).
Although a number of molecular components need to be identified for a complete understanding of extracellular ATP signaling, the recent discovery of the P2K1 (DORN1) purinoceptor () creates the possibility for further genetic and biochemical studies. As shown in Figure 2, the repertoire of the molecular components identified to date covers a variety of responses induced by extracellular ATP. The following research avenues are of particular interest for further investigation: (1) understanding how these molecular components are controlling extracellular ATP levels following various environmental stimulations and (2) learning the molecular mechanisms of how the ATP signal influences the immune system and subsequent wound healing processes. We propose that extracellular ATP is a key missing signal in many plant stress responses that were previously believed to be due to a direct effect of the stress stimulus itself. Therefore, further knowledge of the role of ATP in plants is crucial to understanding how plants adapt to environmental changes, a crucial question in lieu of a rapidly changing climate.
Statements
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the U.S. Department of Energy, grant no. DE-FG02-08ER15309, and the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program Systems and Synthetic Agrobiotech Center, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea, grant no. PJ009068 (to Gary Stacey), as well as a start-up fund from Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agricultural, Human, and Natural Resource Sciences, Agricultural Research Center, Washington State University (to Kiwamu Tanaka).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
1
AsahinaM.AzumaK.PitaksaringkarnW.YamazakiT.MitsudaN.Ohme-TakagiM.et al (2011). Spatially selective hormonal control of RAP2.6L and ANAC071 transcription factors involved in tissue reunion in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10816128–16132. 10.1073/pnas.1110443108
2
AsahinaM.IwaiH.KikuchiA.YamaguchiS.KamiyaY.KamadaH.et al (2002). Gibberellin produced in the cotyledon is required for cell division during tissue reunion in the cortex of cut cucumber and tomato hypocotyls.Plant Physiol.129201–210. 10.1104/pp.010886
3
BenikhlefL.L’HaridonF.Abou-MansourE.SerranoM.BindaM.CostaA.et al (2013). Perception of soft mechanical stress in Arabidopsis leaves activates disease resistance.BMC Plant Biol.13:133. 10.1186/1471-2229-13-133
4
BernardC.TraubM.KunzH.-H.HachS.TrentmannO.MohlmannT. (2011). Equilibrative nucleoside transporter 1 (ENT1) is critical for pollen germination and vegetative growth in Arabidopsis.J. Exp. Bot.624627–4637. 10.1093/jxb/err183
5
BrutusA.SiciliaF.MaconeA.CervoneF.LorenzoG. D. (2010). A domain swap approach reveals a role of the plant wall-associated kinase 1 (WAK1) as a receptor of oligogalacturonides.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1079452–9457. 10.1073/pnas.1000675107
6
BurnstockG. (1996). Purinoceptors: ontogeny and phylogeny.Drug Dev. Res.39204–242. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2299(199611/12)39:3/4<204::AID-DDR2>3.0.CO;2-V
7
BurnstockG.VerkhratskyA. (2009). Evolutionary origins of the purinergic signalling system.Acta Physiol.195415–447. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2009.01957
8
CaoY.TanakaK.NguyenC. T.StaceyG. (2014). Extracellular ATP is a central signaling molecule in plant stress responses.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.2082–87. 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.04.009
9
ChandraS.LowP. S. (1997). Measurement of Ca2+ fluxes during elicitation of the oxidative burst in aequorin-transformed tobacco cells.J. Biol. Chem.27228274–28280. 10.1074/jbc.272.45.28274
10
ChivasaS.MurphyA. M.HamiltonJ. M.LindseyK.CarrJ. P.SlabasA. R. (2009). Extracellular ATP is a regulator of pathogen defence in plants.Plant J.60436–448. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03968.x
11
ChivasaS.NdimbaB. K.SimonW. J.LindseyK.SlabasA. R. (2005). Extracellular ATP functions as an endogenous external metabolite regulating plant cell viability.Plant Cell173019–3034. 10.1105/tpc.105.036806
12
ChoiJ.TanakaK.CaoY.QiY.QiuJ.LiangY.et al (2014). Identification of a plant receptor for extracellular ATP.Science343290–294. 10.1126/science.343.6168.290
13
ClarkG.FraleyD.SteinebrunnerI.CervantesA.OnyirimbaJ.LiuA.et al (2011). Extracellular nucleotides and apyrases regulate stomatal aperture in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol.1561740–1753. 10.1104/pp.111.174466
14
ClarkG.TorresJ.FinlaysonS.GuanX.HandleyC.LeeJ.et al (2010a). Apyrase (Nucleoside Triphosphate-Diphosphohydrolase) and extracellular nucleotides regulate cotton fiber elongation in cultured ovules.Plant Physiol.1521073–1083. 10.1104/pp.109.147637
15
ClarkG.WuM.WatN.OnyirimbaJ.PhamT.HerzN.et al (2010b). Both the stimulation and inhibition of root hair growth induced by extracellular nucleotides in Arabidopsis are mediated by nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species.Plant Mol. Biol.74423–435. 10.1007/s11103-010-9683-7
16
CordeiroJ. V.JacintoA. (2013). The role of transcription-independent damage signals in the initiation of epithelial wound healing.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.14249–262. 10.1038/nrm3541
17
Da’daraA. A.BhardwajR.SkellyP. J. (2014). Schistosome apyrase SmATPDase1, but not SmATPDase2, hydrolyses exogenous ATP and ADP.Purinergic Signal.10.1007/s11302-014-9416-5[Epub ahead of print].
18
DarkA.DemidchikV.RichardsS. L.ShabalaS.DaviesJ. M. (2011). Release of extracellular purines from plant roots and effect on ion fluxes.Plant Signal. Behav.61855–1857. 10.4161/psb.6.11.17014
19
DayR. B.McAlvinC. B.LohJ. T.DennyR. L.WoodT. C.YoungN. D.et al (2000). Differential expression of two soybean apyrases, one of which is an early nodulin.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.131053–1070. 10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.10.1053
20
DecreuxA.ThomasA.SpiesB.BrasseurR.CutsemP. V.MessiaenJ. (2006). In vitro characterization of the homogalacturonan-binding domain of the wall-associated kinase WAK1 using site-directed mutagenesis.Phytochemistry671068–1079. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.03.009
21
DemidchikV.ShangZ.ShinR.ColacoR.LaohavisitA.ShabalaS.et al (2011). Receptor-like activity evoked by extracellular ADP in Arabidopsis root epidermal plasma membrane.Plant Physiol.1561375–1385. 10.1104/pp.111.174722
22
DemidchikV.ShangZ.ShinR.ThompsonE.RubioL.LaohavisitA.et al (2009). Plant extracellular ATP signalling by plasma membrane NADPH oxidase and Ca2+ channels.Plant J.58903–913. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03830.x
23
DetoniM. L.Faria-PintoP.QuellisL. R.RustN. M.TavaresL. S.SantosM. O.et al (2012). Galls from Calliandra brevipes BENTH (Fabaceae: Mimosoidae): evidence of apyrase activity contribution in a plant – insect interaction.Aust. J. Bot.60:559. 10.1071/BT12096
24
EtzlerM. E.KalsiG.EwingN. N.RobertsN. J.DayR. B.MurphyJ. B. (1999). A nod factor binding lectin with apyrase activity from legume roots.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.965856–5861. 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5856
25
GenreA.OrtuG.BertoldoC.MartinoE.BonfanteP. (2009). Biotic and abiotic stimulation of root epidermal cells reveals common and specific responses to Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.Plant Physiol.1491424–1434. 10.1104/pp.108.132225
26
GovindarajuluM.KimS.-Y.LibaultM.BergR. H.TanakaK.StaceyG.et al (2009). GS52 ecto-apyrase plays a critical role during soybean nodulation.Plant Physiol.149994–1004. 10.1104/pp.108.128728
27
HardhamA. R.BlackmanL. M. (2010). Molecular cytology of Phytophthora-plant interactions.Australas. Plant Pathol.3929–35. 10.1071/AP09062
28
HardhamA. R.TakemotoD.WhiteR. G. (2008). Rapid and dynamic subcellular reorganization following mechanical stimulation of Arabidopsis epidermal cells mimics responses to fungal and oomycete attack.BMC Plant Biol.8:63. 10.1186/1471-2229-8-63
29
HeilM.Ibarra-LacletteE.Adame-ÁlvarezR. M.MartínezO.Ramirez-ChávezE.Molina-TorresJ.et al (2012). How plants sense wounds: damaged-self recognition is based on plant-derived elicitors and induces octadecanoid signalingPLoS ONE7:e30537. 10.1371/journal.pone.0030537
30
HeilM.KochT.HilpertA.FialaB.BolandW.LinsenmairK. E. (2001). Extrafloral nectar production of the ant-associated plant, Macaranga tanarius, is an induced, indirect, defensive response elicited by jasmonic acid.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.981083–1088. 10.1073/pnas.98.3.1083
31
HuffakerA.PearceG.RyanC. A. (2006). An endogenous peptide signal in Arabidopsis activates components of the innate immune response.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10310098–10103. 10.1073/pnas.0603727103
32
IwaseA.MitsudaN.KoyamaT.HiratsuK.KojimaM.AraiT.et al (2011). The AP2/ERF transcription factor WIND1 controls cell dedifferentiation in Arabidopsis.Curr. Biol.21508–514. 10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.020
33
JayaramanD.GilroyS.AnéJ.-M. (2014). Staying in touch: mechanical signals in plant-microbe interactions.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.20104–109. 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.05.003
34
JeterC. R.TangW.HenaffE.ButterfieldT.RouxS. J. (2004). Evidence of a novel cell signaling role for extracellular adenosine triphosphates and diphosphates in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell162652–2664. 10.1105/tpc.104.023945
35
JungB.HoffmannC.MöhlmannT. (2011). Arabidopsis nucleoside hydrolases involved in intracellular and extracellular degradation of purines: Arabidopsis nucleoside hydrolase family.Plant J.65703–711. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04455
36
KaczmarekE.ErbL.KoziakK.JarzynaR.WinkM. R.GuckelbergerO.et al (2005). Modulation of endothelial cell migration by extracellular nucleotides. Involvement of focal adhesion kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase – mediated pathways.Thromb. Haemost.93735–742. 10.1267/THRO05040735
37
KalsiG.EtzlerM. E. (2000). Localization of a Nod factor-binding protein in legume roots and factors influencing its distribution and expression.Plant Physiol.1241039–1048. 10.1104/pp.124.3.1039
38
KhakhB. S.BurnstockG. (2009). The double life of ATP.Sci. Am.30184–92. 10.1038/scientificamerican1209-84
39
KimS.-H.YangS. H.KimT.-J.HanJ.-S.SuhJ.-W. (2009). Hypertonic stress increased extracellular ATP levels and the expression of stress-responsive genes in Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings.Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.731252–1256. 10.1271/bbb.80660
40
KimS.-Y.SivaguruM.StaceyG. (2006). Extracellular ATP in plants. Visualization, localization, and analysis of physiological significance in growth and signaling.Plant Physiol.142984–992. 10.1104/pp.106.085670
41
KoornneefA.PieterseC. M. J. (2008). Cross talk in defense signaling.Plant Physiol.146839–844. 10.1104/pp.107.112029
42
LewR. R.DearnaleyJ. D. (2000). Extracellular nucleotide effects on the electrical properties of growing Arabidopsis thaliana root hairs.Plant Sci.1531–6. 10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00242-3
43
LiangC.TianJ.LamH.-M.LimB. L.YanX.LiaoH. (2010). Biochemical and molecular characterization of PvPAP3, a novel purple acid phosphatase isolated from common bean enhancing extracellular ATP utilization.Plant Physiol.152854–865. 10.1104/pp.109.147918
44
LiM.LeeS.-K.YangS. H.KoJ. H.HanJ. S.KimT.-J.et al (2011). ATP modulates the growth of specific microbial strains.Curr. Microbiol.6284–89. 10.1007/s00284-010-9677-3
45
LimM. H.WuJ.YaoJ.GallardoI. F.DuggerJ. W.WebbL. J.et al (2014). Apyrase suppression raises extracellular ATP levels and induces gene expression and cell wall changes characteristic of stress responses.Plant Physiol.1642054–2067. 10.1104/pp.113.233429
46
LiuX.WuJ.ClarkG.LundyS.LimM.ArnoldD.et al (2012). Role for apyrases in polar auxin transport in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol.1601985–1995. 10.1104/pp.112.202887
47
LongB.LiG.-H.FengR.-R.TaoL.LiuD.-D.FengH.-Q.et al (2014). NTPDase specific inhibitors suppress rice infection by Magnaporthe oryzae.J. Phytopathol.10.1111/jph.12267[Epub ahead of print].
48
MarkaryanA.ZaborinaO.PunjV.ChakrabartyA. M. (2001). Adenylate kinase as a virulence factor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.J. Bacteriol.1833345–3352. 10.1128/JB.183.11.3345-3352.2001
49
MatzingerP. (2007). Friendly and dangerous signals: is the tissue in control?Nat. Immunol.811–13. 10.1038/ni0107-11
50
McAlvinC. B.StaceyG. (2005). Transgenic expression of the soybean apyrase in Lotus japonicus enhances nodulation.Plant Physiol.1371456–1462. 10.1104/pp.104.055939
51
Meyer-FernandesJ. R.Saad-NehmeJ.Peres-SampaioC. E.Belmont-FirpoR.BisaggioD. F. Do CoutoL. C.et al (2004). A Mg-dependent ecto-ATPase is increased in the infective stages of Trypanosoma cruzi.Parasitol. Res.9341–50. 10.1007/s00436-003-1066–1064
52
MöhlmannT.SteinebrunnerI.NeuhausE. (2014). “Nucleotides and nucleosides: transport, metabolism, and signaling function of extracellular ATP,” inProgress in Botany Progress in BotanyedsLüttgeU.BeyschlagW.CushmanJ. (Berlin Heidelberg: Springer)119–144.
53
Munier-LehmannH.Chenal-FrancisqueV.IonescuM.ChristovaP.FoulonJ.CarnielE.et al (2003). Relationship between bacterial virulence and nucleotide metabolism: a mutation in the adenylate kinase gene renders Yersinia pestis avirulent.Biochem. J.373:515. 10.1042/BJ20030284
54
MurL. A. J.PratsE.PierreS.HallM. A.HebelstrupK. H. (2013). Integrating nitric oxide into salicylic acid and jasmonic acid/ethylene plant defense pathways.Front. Plant Sci.4:215. 10.3389/fpls.2013.00215
55
ParéP. W.TumlinsonJ. H. (1999). Plant volatiles as a defense against insect herbivores.Plant Physiol.121325–332. 10.1104/pp.121.2.325
56
PearceG.SiemsW. F.BhattacharyaR.ChenY.-C.RyanC. A. (2007). Three hydroxyproline-rich glycopeptides derived from a single Petunia polyprotein precursor activate defensin I, a pathogen defense response gene.J. Biol. Chem.28217777–17784. 10.1074/jbc.M701543200
57
PearceG.YamaguchiY.BaronaG.RyanC. A. (2010). A subtilisin-like protein from soybean contains an embedded, cryptic signal that activates defense-related genes.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10714921–14925. 10.1073/pnas.1007568107
58
ReymondP.GrünbergerS.PaulK.MüllerM.FarmerE. E. (1995). Oligogalacturonide defense signals in plants: large fragments interact with the plasma membrane in vitro.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.924145–4149. 10.1073/pnas.92.10.4145
59
RiederB.NeuhausH. E. (2011). Identification of an Arabidopsis plasma membrane-located ATP transporter important for anther development.Plant Cell231932–1944. 10.1105/tpc.111.084574
60
RieweD.GrosmanL.FernieA. R.ZauberH.WuckeC.GeigenbergerP. (2008). A cell wall-bound adenosine nucleosidase is involved in the salvage of extracellular ATP inSolanum tuberosum.Plant Cell Physiol.491572–1579. 10.1093/pcp/pcn127
61
Roberto Meyer-FernandesJ. (2002). Ecto-ATPases in protozoa parasites: looking for a function.Parasitol. Int.51299–303. 10.1016/S1383-5769(02)00017-X
62
RobertsN. J.MorieriG.KalsiG.RoseA.StillerJ.EdwardsA.et al (2013). Rhizobial and mycorrhizal symbioses in Lotus japonicus require lectin nucleotide phosphohydrolase, which acts upstream of calcium signaling.Plant Physiol.161556–567. 10.1104/pp.112.206110
63
RobinG. P.OrtizE.SzurekB.BrizardJ.-P.KoebnikR. (2014). Comparative proteomics reveal new HrpX-regulated proteins of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae.J. Proteomics97256–264. 10.1016/j.jprot.2013.04.010
64
RojoE.LeónJ.Sánchez-SerranoJ. J. (1999). Cross-talk between wound signalling pathways determines local versus systemic gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant J.20135–142. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00570.x
65
RyanC. A.PearceG. (2003). Systemins: a functionally defined family of peptide signals that regulate defensive genes in Solanaceae species.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10014577–14580. 10.1073/pnas.1934788100
66
ScheerJ. M.RyanC. A. (2002). The systemin receptor SR160 from Lycopersicon peruvianum is a member of the LRR receptor kinase family.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.999585–9590. 10.1073/pnas.132266499
67
ShiuS.-H.KarlowskiW. M.PanR.TzengY.-H.MayerK. F. X.LiW.-H. (2004). Comparative analysis of the receptor-like kinase family in Arabidopsis and rice.Plant Cell161220–1234. 10.1105/tpc.020834
68
SongC. J.SteinebrunnerI.WangX.StoutS. C.RouxS. J. (2006). Extracellular ATP induces the accumulation of superoxide via NADPH oxidases in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol.1401222–1232. 10.1104/pp.105.073072
69
ŠrobárováA.da SilvaJ. A. T.KoganG.RitieniA.SantiniA. (2009). Beauvericin decreases cell viability of wheat.Chem. Biodivers.61208–1215.
70
SunJ.ZhangC.-L.DengS.-R.LuC.-F.ShenX.ZhouX.-Y.et al (2012). An ATP signalling pathway in plant cells: extracellular ATP triggers programmed cell death in Populus euphratica: eATP signalling in poplar PCD.Plant Cell Environ.35893–916. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02461.x
71
SuY.-L.LiJ.-M.LiM.LuanJ.-B.YeX.-D.WangX.-W.et al (2012). Transcriptomic analysis of the salivary glands of an invasive whitefly.PLoS ONE7:e39303. 10.1371/journal.pone.0039303
72
TanakaK.GilroyS.JonesA. M.StaceyG. (2010a). Extracellular ATP signaling in plants.Trends Cell Biol.20601–608. 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.07.005
73
TanakaK.SwansonS. J.GilroyS.StaceyG. (2010b). Extracellular nucleotides elicit cytosolic free calcium oscillations in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol.154705–719. 10.1104/pp.110.162503
74
TanakaK.NguyenC. T.LibaultM.ChengJ.StaceyG. (2011a). Enzymatic activity of the soybean ecto-apyrase GS52 is essential for stimulation of nodulation.Plant Physiol.1551988–1998. 10.1104/pp.110.170910
75
TanakaK.NguyenT. H. N.StaceyG. (2011b). Enzymatic role for soybean ecto-apyrase in nodulation.Plant Signal. Behav.6:1034–1036. 10.4161/psb.6.7.15601
76
TangW.BradyS. R.SunY.MudayG. K.RouxS. J. (2003). Extracellular ATP inhibits root gravitropism at concentrations that inhibit polar auxin transport.Plant Physiol.131147–154. 10.1104/pp.013672
77
ThomasC.RajagopalA.WindsorB.DudlerR.LloydA.RouxS. J. (2000). A role for ectophosphatase in xenobiotic resistance.Plant Cell12519–533. 10.1105/tpc.12.4.519
78
ValenzuelaJ. G.BelkaidY.RowtonE.RibeiroJ. M. (2001). The salivary apyrase of the blood-sucking sand fly Phlebotomus papatasi belongs to the novel Cimex family of apyrases.J. Exp. Biol.204229–237.
79
WeerasingheR. R.SwansonS. J.OkadaS. F.GarrettM. B.KimS.-Y.StaceyG.et al (2009). Touch induces ATP release in Arabidopsis roots that is modulated by the heterotrimeric G-protein complex.FEBS Lett.5832521–2526. 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.07.007
80
WenF.WhiteG. J.VanEttenH. D.XiongZ.HawesM. C. (2009). Extracellular DNA is required for root tip resistance to fungal infection.Plant Physiol.151820–829. 10.1104/pp.109.142067
81
WilliamsonR. E. (1975). Cytoplasmic streaming in Chara: a cell model activated by ATP and inhibited by cytochalasin B.J. Cell Sci.17655–668.
82
WuJ.SteinebrunnerI.SunY.ButterfieldT.TorresJ.ArnoldD.et al (2007). Apyrases (Nucleoside Triphosphate-Diphosphohydrolases) play a key role in growth control in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol.144961–975. 10.1104/pp.107.097568
83
WuS.-J.LiuY.-S.WuJ.-Y. (2008). The signaling role of extracellular ATP and its dependence on Ca2+ flux in elicitation of salvia miltiorrhiza hairy root cultures.Plant Cell Physiol.49617–624. 10.1093/pcp/pcn033
84
WuS.PeifferM.LutheD. S.FeltonG. W. (2012). ATP hydrolyzing salivary enzymes of caterpillars suppress plant defenses.PLoS ONE7:e41947. 10.1371/journal.pone.0041947
85
XuJ.HofhuisH.HeidstraR.SauerM.FrimlJ.ScheresB. (2006). A molecular framework for plant regeneration.Science311385–388. 10.1126/science.1121790
86
YamaguchiY.BaronaG.RyanC. A.PearceG. (2011). GmPep914, an eight-amino acid peptide isolated from soybean leaves, activates defense-related genes.Plant Physiol.156932–942. 10.1104/pp.111.173096
87
YamaguchiY.HuffakerA.BryanA. C.TaxF. E.RyanC. A. (2010). PEPR2 is a second receptor for the Pep1 and Pep2 peptides and contributes to defense responses in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell22508–522. 10.1105/tpc.109.068874
88
YamaguchiY.PearceG.RyanC. A. (2006). The cell surface leucine-rich repeat receptor for AtPep1, an endogenous peptide elicitor in Arabidopsis, is functional in transgenic tobacco cells.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10310104–10109. 10.1073/pnas.0603729103
89
ZhangX.MouZ. (2009). Extracellular pyridine nucleotides induce PR gene expression and disease resistance in Arabidopsis.Plant J.57302–312. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03687.x
90
ZipfelC. (2014). Plant pattern-recognition receptors.Trends Immunol.35345–351. 10.1016/j.it.2014.05.004
Summary
Keywords
extracellular ATP, DAMPs, immune defense, wound healing, symbiosis and immunity
Citation
Tanaka K, Choi J, Cao Y and Stacey G (2014) Extracellular ATP acts as a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) signal in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 5:446. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00446
Received
11 July 2014
Accepted
19 August 2014
Published
03 September 2014
Volume
5 - 2014
Edited by
Martin Heil, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Población Nacional – Unidad Irapuato, Mexico
Reviewed by
Stanley Roux, The University of Texas at Austin, USA; Stephen Chivasa, Durham University, UK
Copyright
© 2014 Tanaka, Choi, Cao and Stacey.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kiwamu Tanaka, Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, P.O. BOX 646430, Pullman, WA 99164, USA e-mail: kiwamu.tanaka@wsu.edu
This article was submitted to Plant-Microbe Interaction, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.