Abstract
Plants assimilate sulfate from the environment to synthesize biologically active sulfur-containing compounds required for growth and cellular development. The primary steps of sulfur metabolism involve sequential enzymatic reactions synthesizing adenosine 5′-phosphosulfate (APS) and 3′-phosphoadenosine 5’-phosphosulfate (PAPS). Recent finding suggests that an adenosine nucleotide transport system facilitating the exchange of PAPS and 3′-phosphoadenosine 5′-phosphate across the plastid envelope is essential for establishing an intimate connection between the plastidic and cytosolic sulfate assimilation pathways in plants. Subcellular partitioning and integration of metabolic pathways provide focal points for investigating metabolic flux regulations. This perspective article presents an integrative view of sulfur metabolic flux control mechanisms with an emphasis on subcellular partitioning of APS/PAPS biosynthetic pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana.
SUBCELLULAR LOCALIZATION AND PATHWAY DISTRIBUTIONS
Sulfate assimilation occurs in both plastids and cytosol in vascular plants (Figure 1; reviewed in ; ; ). Sulfate imported across the plasma membrane is the primary substrate provided to the sulfate assimilation pathways, where the ATP sulfurylase (ATPS) serves as an enzyme to catalyze the initial metabolic reaction generating adenosine 5′-phosphosulfate (APS) from ATP and sulfate in both plastids and cytosol. APS is subsequently phosphorylated to 3′-phosphoadenosine 5′-phosphosulfate (PAPS) by the APS kinase (APK), or reduced to sulfite through the function of the APS reductase (APR). APK is present in both plastids and cytosol for phosphorylation, while APR and the subsequent pathway enzyme, sulfite reductase (SiR), are localized only in plastids for catalyzing the reduction steps. The sulfate assimilation pathway thus bifurcates into two directions to phosphorylate or reduce APS in plastids, whereas only the APS phosphorylation pathway is present in cytosol (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1
Plants switch-control the APS reduction and phosphorylation pathways to change the partitioning of sulfur into the primary and secondary metabolisms (). APR plays a key role in channeling APS into the sulfate reduction pathway, responding to the demands for Cys and GSH. The demand-driven flux control mechanism has been suggested based on observations of APR transcripts and proteins over-accumulating following sulfate deprivation and being repressed in the presence of reduced S sources (; ). The significance of APR in the primary sulfur metabolism is evidenced by the accumulation of sulfate and total S in Arabidopsis accessions with less active variants of APR2 enzyme (; ). In contrast, the expression of plastidic APK, which is required for PAPS biosynthesis providing sulfate donors used in secondary sulfur metabolism, is repressed under sulfur-deficient conditions (; ). In addition to the transcriptional mechanisms, APR and APK enzyme activities are regulated by the redox status as demonstrated by Arabidopsis APR1 and APK1 gaining maximum catalytic efficiency in their oxidized and reduced forms, respectively (; ; , ). Thus, the metabolic flux through the bifurcate pathway for APS utilization is affected by both transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms controlling enzyme activity.
INTEGRATION OF PAPS METABOLISM THROUGH PAPS TRANSPORTER
The plastidic and cytosolic pathways merge following PAPS biosynthesis as PAPS is mainly utilized in the cytosol (Figure 1) where it serves as sulfate donor for synthesizing sulfated metabolites including glucosinolates (; ; ). Therefore, PAPS metabolism has to include a PAPS transporter in the plastid envelopes. Indeed, a PAPS transporter (PAPST1) has been found to export PAPS from plastids to cytosol (). When sulfotransferases (SOT) synthesize sulfated metabolites, the sulfate moieties of PAPS are transferred to the hydroxyl groups of suitable acceptors, and 3′-phosphoadenosine 5′-phosphate (PAP) is generated as a byproduct. PAP is, however, a cytotoxic compound, as it inhibits RNA metabolizing enzymes responsible for decomposing aberrant RNA (). Since PAPST1 is capable of facilitating the plastid import of PAP to be coupled with the export of PAPS, PAP can be degraded to AMP by PAP phosphatase, FIERY1 (FRY1), in plastids (; ). PAPS biosynthesis, PAPS utilization, and PAP degradation are therefore connected as a sequential network of metabolic steps in both plastids and cytosol. Such functional interplays can be achieved only with the presence of a suitable transporter, such as PAPST1, that enables the PAPS/PAP exchange following the concentration gradients of substrates necessarily formed across the plastid envelope (Figure 1).
The absence of FRY1 induces plant responses to drought, salinity, cold, and excess light stresses, where ABA and jasmonate are involved in signaling (; ; ; ; ; ). The significance of the FRY1-mediated pathway lies in the fact that PAP can be a retrograde signal for inducing molecular mechanisms protecting viable cells from stresses in adverse environments. Given the pathway connections with the PAPS/PAP exchange across the plastid envelope (), cellular PAP concentrations are likely modulated by FRY1 in plastids (; ). Chloroplast-mitochondrion dual localizations of FRY1 from Arabidopsis and PAPST from rice further suggest that mitochondria also serve for detoxifying PAP (; ). Cross-species conservation of PAP metabolism requires further investigation.
FLUX CONTROL
In this framework of metabolic pathway connections, abundance and functions of ATPS and APK in plastids and cytosol, together with efficiency of PAPS transport, appear pivotal for controlling subcellular distributions of PAPS and PAP (Figure 1). ATPS and APK are predominant in plastids, as evident from the localization of individual isoforms, distribution of enzyme activities, and phenotypes of corresponding mutants (; ). Such subcellular distributions of ATPS and APK may be important to increase the concentration gradient of PAPS across the plastid envelope, leading to an increased export of PAPS from the plastids to the cytosol as well as a more efficient transport of PAP into the plastids for its detoxification to be accomplished. Since SOTs and consequently PAP production are localized in the cytosol (Figure 1), increase in PAPS synthesis in the cytosol would thus prevent PAP/PAPS shuttling and may lead to accumulation of PAP in the cytosol.
These flux control models are supported in part by evidence showing a strong requirement of plastidic APK for synthesis of sulfated metabolites including glucosinolates (). The phenotypes of the Arabidopsis apk1 apk2 mutant also suggest that cytosolic APK3 is not compensating for the loss of plastidic APK activity to provide sulfate donors to SOT (). Mutants in PAPST1 present similar phenotypes with accumulation of desulfo-precursors of sulfated compounds, pointing to the importance of the transporter, however, as these phenotypes are milder than those of apk1 apk2 plants, another PAPST1 has to be postulated (). It is therefore conceivable that APK, PAPST1, and SOT are functionally coupled to utilize PAPS and sequester PAP to the plastids. In this metabolic cycle, the PAPS/PAP shuttling mechanism may not properly operate when the plastids are deficient in PAPS. To avoid elevation of PAP concentration in the cytosol, the sulfation reactions catalyzed by SOTs may be not only limited by low PAPS supply, but also actively inhibited when the PAPS/PAP shuttling mechanism is disabled. The coordinate induction of PAPST1, SOT, and FRY1 gene expression in the apk1 apk2 mutant suggests that a transcriptional coexpression mechanism is activated in an attempt to overcome the defect in plastidic PAPS production (). In contrast, PAP accumulates disproportionately in the plastids of fry1/fou8 mutants (; ), leading to disturbance of the PAP gradient across plastid envelopes. Such circumstances also appear unfavorable for PAPST1 to shuttle PAPS/PAP and to cooperate with APK and SOT to produce sulfated metabolites ().
The overexpression of a bacterial APK in Arabidopsis in either plastids or cytosol demonstrates, however, rather complex metabolic interconnections (). In the APK-overexpressing lines, APS is more likely used for synthesizing PAPS than producing sulfite. Limitation of PAPS availability can induce the expression of glucosinolate biosynthetic genes (). In contrast, an increased supply of PAPS does not seem to have an opposing effect on gene expression in glucosinolate biosynthesis but rather induces accumulation of MAM3 and SOT17 transcripts in the APK-overexpressing lines (). Furthermore, overexpression of APK causes no significant effect on increasing the flux of glucosinolate production, suggesting that pathways are under control of multifaceted mechanisms. In contrast, the metabolic flux of reductive sulfate assimilation appears to increase for adjustment of Cys and GSH biosynthesis in the APK-overexpressing lines (). It is possible to hypothesize that APS can be limiting in APK overexpressors, and its shortage may trigger an increase in metabolic flux of reductive sulfate assimilation. Metabolic regulation by APS has been described in bacteria ().
APS biosynthesis is a thermodynamically unfavorable reaction and can be a bottleneck of the sulfate assimilation pathway. With regard to the metabolic flux control through the function of ATPS, plastidic ATPS1 makes substantial contribution to the reductive sulfate assimilation pathway (i.e., Cys and GSH biosynthesis) in Arabidopsis (). In support of this evidence, ATPS1 is found as a genetic locus that significantly affects sulfate accumulation among the Arabidopsis natural variations (). Furthermore, a reaction mechanism of substrate-enzyme interaction is proposed based on structural and kinetic analyzes of ATPS1 (). In contrast to a wealth of information documenting the function and regulation of plastidic ATPS1, the genetic identity of a cytosolic isoform has remained elusive until recently, when alternative translational initiation of ATPS2 has been identified as a potential mechanism underlying the cytosolic ATPS activity in Arabidopsis (). It has been reported that cytosolic ATPS activity becomes relatively abundant in matured Arabidopsis leaves (), suggesting that the presence of cytosolic isoform may be conditional. Identification of mechanisms involved in regulation of cytosolic ATPS isoform will open a way to altering the function of this key enzyme and engineering metabolic flux partitioning of sulfate assimilation.
CONCLUSION
Sulfur metabolic enzymes are not equally expressed in all plant cell types and organelles. ATPS, APK, APR, and PAPST focused on in this article, represent a sub-network of sulfur assimilation pathway, in which partitioning between cytosol and plastids is particularly important. Details of the subcellular localizations of individual isoforms have only recently been acquired and although the identity of at least one additional PAPST1 is still not known, this knowledge will facilitate the dissection of isoform-dependent and compartment-specific functions of these enzymes and transporters and provide new insights into their contributions to control of flux through sulfate assimilation. Given the biological significance of metabolites synthesized in this pathway, the flux regulation of APS/PAPS biosynthesis in specific cell-types and compartments may be associated with physiological adaptations.
Statements
Acknowledgments
Hideki Takahashi is supported by the National Science Foundation (MCB 1244300) and the AgBioResearch. Stanislav Kopriva is supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC 1028).
Conflict of interest
The Reviewer Stephan Krueger declares that, despite having collaborated in the past with the author Stanislav Kopriva, the review process was handled objectively and no conflict of interest exists. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
1
BickJ. A.SetterdahlA. T.KnaffD. B.ChenY.PitcherL. H.ZilinskasB. A.et al (2001). Regulation of the plant-type 5’-adenylyl sulfate reductase by oxidative stress.Biochemistry409040–9048. 10.1021/bi010518v
2
BohrerA.-S.YoshimotoN.SekiguchiA.RykulskiN.SaitoK.TakahashiH. (2014). Alternative translational initiation of ATP sulfurylase underlying dual localization of sulfate assimilation pathways in plastids and cytosol in Arabidopsis thaliana.Front. Plant Sci.5:750. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00750
3
BykowskiT.van der PloegJ. R.Iwanicka-NowickaR.HryniewiczM. M. (2002). The switch from inorganic to organic sulphur assimilation in Escherichia coli: adenosine 5’-phosphosulphate (APS) as a signalling molecule for sulphate excess.Mol. Microbiol.431347–1358. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02846.x
4
ChanK. X.WirtzM.PhuaS. Y.EstavilloG. M.PogsonB. J. (2013). Balancing metabolites in drought: the sulfur assimilation conundrum.Trends Plant Sci.1818–29. 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.07.005
5
ChaoD.-Y.BaranieckaP.DankuJ.KoprivovaA.LahnerB.LuoH.et al (2014). Variation in sulfur and selenium accumulation is controlled by naturally occurring isoforms of the key sulfur assimilation enzyme APR2 across the Arabidopsis thaliana species range.Plant Physiol.1661593–608. 10.1104/pp.114.247825
6
ChenH.ZhangB.HicksL. M.XiongL. (2011). A nucleotide metabolite controls stress-responsive gene expression and plant development.PLoS ONE6:e26661. 10.1371/journal.pone.0026661
7
EstavilloG. M.CrispP. A.PornsiriwongW.WirtzM.CollingeD.CarrieC.et al (2011). Evidence for a SAL1-PAP chloroplast retrograde pathway that functions in drought and high light signaling in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell233992–4012. 10.1105/tpc.111.091033
8
GigolashviliT.GeierM.AshykhminaN.FrerigmannH.WulfertS.KruegerS.et al (2012). The Arabidopsis thylakoid ADP/ATP carrier TAAC has an additional role in supplying plastidic phosphoadenosine 5’-phosphosulfate to the cytosol.Plant Cell244187–4204. 10.1105/tpc.112.101964
9
GigolashviliT.KoprivaS. (2014). Transporters in plant sulfur metabolism.Front. Plant Sci.5:442. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00442
10
GyI.GasciolliV.LauresserguesD.MorelJ.-B.GombertJ.ProuxF.et al (2007). Arabidopsis FIERY1, XRN2, and XRN3 are endogenous RNA silencing suppressors.Plant Cell193451–3461. 10.1105/tpc.107.055319
11
HerrmannJ.RaviliousG. E.McKinneyS. E.WestfallC. S.LeeS. G.BaranieckaP.et al (2014). Structure and mechanism of soybean ATP sulfurylase and the committed step in plant sulfur assimilation.J. Biol. Chem.28910919–10929. 10.1074/jbc.M113.540401
12
HiraiM. Y.KleinM.FujikawaY.YanoM.GoodenoweD. B.YamazakiY.et al (2005). Elucidation of gene-to-gene and metabolite-to-gene networks in Arabidopsis by integration of metabolomics and transcriptomics.J. Biol. Chem.28025590–25595. 10.1074/jbc.M502332200
13
KawashimaC. G.MatthewmanC. A.HuangS.LeeB.-R.YoshimotoN.KoprivovaA.et al (2011). Interplay of SLIM1 and miR395 in the regulation of sulfate assimilation in Arabidopsis.Plant J.66863–876. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04547.x
14
KleinM.PapenbrockJ. (2004). The multi-protein family of Arabidopsis sulphotransferases and their relatives in other plant species.J. Exp. Bot.551809–1820. 10.1093/jxb/erh183
15
KoprivaS.MugfordS. G.BaranieckaP.LeeB.-R.MatthewmanC. A.KoprivovaA. (2012). Control of sulfur partitioning between primary and secondary metabolism in Arabidopsis.Front. Plant Sci.3:163. 10.3389/fpls.2012.00163
16
KoprivovaA.GiovannettiM.BaranieckaP.LeeB.-R.GrondinC.LoudetO.et al (2013). Natural variation in the ATPS1 isoform of ATP sulfurylase contributes to the control of sulfate levels in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol.1631133–1141. 10.1104/pp.113.225748
17
KoprivovaA.KoprivaS. (2014). Molecular mechanisms of regulation of sulfate assimilation: first steps on a long road.Front. Plant Sci.5:589. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00589
18
LeeB.-R.HusebyS.KoprivovaA.ChételatA.WirtzM.MugfordS. T.et al (2012). Effects of fou8/fry1 mutation on sulfur metabolism: is decreased internal sulfate the trigger of sulfate starvation response?PLoS ONE7:e39425. 10.1371/journal.pone.0039425
19
LoudetO.Saliba-ColombaniV.CamilleriC.CalengeF.GaudonV.KoprivovaA.et al (2007). Natural variation for sulfate content in Arabidopsis thaliana is highly controlled by APR2.Nat. Genet.39896–900. 10.1038/ng2050
20
Maruyama-NakashitaA.NakamuraY.TohgeT.SaitoK.TakahashiH. (2006). Arabidopsis SLIM1 is a central transcriptional regulator of plant sulfur response and metabolism.Plant Cell183235–3251. 10.1105/tpc.106.046458
21
MugfordS. G.LeeB.-R.KoprivovaA.MatthewmanC.KoprivaS. (2011). Control of sulfur partitioning between primary and secondary metabolism.Plant J.6596–105. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04410.x
22
MugfordS. G.YoshimotoN.ReicheltM.WirtzM.HillL.MugfordS. T.et al (2009). Disruption of adenosine-5’-phosphosulfate kinase in Arabidopsis reduces levels of sulfated secondary metabolites.Plant Cell21910–927. 10.1105/tpc.109.065581
23
PiotrowskiM.SchemenewitzA.LopukhinaA.MüllerA.JanowitzT.WeilerE. W.et al (2004). Desulfoglucosinolate sulfotransferases from Arabidopsis thaliana catalyze the final step in the biosynthesis of the glucosinolate core structure.J. Biol. Chem.27950717–50725. 10.1074/jbc.M407681200
24
RaviliousG. E.JezJ. M. (2012). Nucleotide binding site communication in Arabidopsis thaliana adenosine 5’-phosphosulfate kinase.J. Biol. Chem.28730385–30394. 10.1074/jbc.M112.387001
25
RaviliousG. E.NguyenA.FrancoisJ. A.JezJ. M. (2012). Structural basis and evolution of redox regulation in plant adenosine-5’-phosphosulfate kinase.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.109309–314. 10.1073/pnas.1115772108
26
RaviliousG. E.WestfallC. S.JezJ. M. (2013). Redox-linked gating of nucleotide binding by the N-terminal domain of adenosine 5’-phosphosulfate kinase.J. Biol. Chem.2886107–6115. 10.1074/jbc.M112.439414
27
RodríguezV. M.ChételatA.MajcherczykP.FarmerE. E. (2010). Chloroplastic phosphoadenosine phosphosulfate metabolism regulates basal levels of the prohormone jasmonic acid in Arabidopsis leaves.Plant Physiol.1521335–1345. 10.1104/pp.109.150474
28
RotteC.LeustekT. (2000). Differential subcellular localization and expression of ATP sulfurylase and 5’-adenylylsulfate reductase during ontogenesis of Arabidopsis leaves indicates that cytosolic and plastid forms of ATP sulfurylase may have specialized functions.Plant Physiol.124715–724. 10.1104/pp.124.2.715
29
TakahashiH.KoprivaS.GiordanoM.SaitoK.HellR. (2011). Sulfur assimilation in photosynthetic organisms: molecular functions and regulations of transporters and assimilatory enzymes.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.62157–184. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103921
30
TakahashiH.YamazakiM.SasakuraN.WatanabeA.LeustekT.EnglerJ. A.et al (1997). Regulation of sulfur assimilation in higher plants: a sulfate transporter induced in sulfate-starved roots plays a central role in Arabidopsis thaliana.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.9411102–11107. 10.1073/pnas.94.20.11102
31
VauclareP.KoprivaS.FellD.SuterM.SticherL.von BallmoosP.et al (2002). Flux control of sulphate assimilation in Arabidopsis thaliana: adenosine 5’-phosphosulphate reductase is more susceptible than ATP sulphurylase to negative control by thiols.Plant J.31729–740. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01391.x
32
WilsonP. B.EstavilloG. M.FieldK. J.PornsiriwongW.CarrollA. J.HowellK. A.et al (2009). The nucleotidase/phosphatase SAL1 is a negative regulator of drought tolerance in Arabidopsis.Plant J.58299–317. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03780.x
33
XiongL.LeeB.IshitaniM.LeeH.ZhangC.ZhuJ. K. (2001). FIERY1 encoding an inositol polyphosphate 1-phosphatase is a negative regulator of abscisic acid and stress signaling in Arabidopsis.Genes Dev.151971–1984. 10.1101/gad.891901
34
XuJ.YangJ.WuZ.LiuH.HuangF.WuY.et al (2013). Identification of a dual-targeted protein belonging to the mitochondrial carrier family that is required for early leaf development in rice.Plant Physiol.1612036–2048. 10.1104/pp.112.210831
Summary
Keywords
sulfur metabolism, sulfate assimilation, subcellular localization, metabolic flux, metabolite distribution
Citation
Bohrer A-S, Kopriva S and Takahashi H (2015) Plastid-cytosol partitioning and integration of metabolic pathways for APS/PAPS biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 5:751. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00751
Received
03 November 2014
Accepted
08 December 2014
Published
22 January 2015
Volume
5 - 2014
Edited by
Ruediger Hell, University of Heidelberg, Germany
Reviewed by
Joseph M. Jez, Washington University in St. Louis, USA; Stephan Krueger, University of Cologne, Germany
Copyright
© 2015 Bohrer, Kopriva and Takahashi.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hideki Takahashi, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, 603 Wilson Road, 209 Biochemistry Building, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA e-mail: htakaha@msu.edu
This article was submitted to Plant Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.