Abstract
Plants have the ability to grow and successfully reproduce in radio-contaminated environments, which has been highlighted by nuclear accidents at Chernobyl (1986) and Fukushima (2011). The main aim of this article is to summarize the advances of the Chernobyl seed project which has the purpose to provide proteomic characterization of plants grown in the Chernobyl area. We present a summary of comparative proteomic studies on soybean and flax seeds harvested from radio-contaminated Chernobyl areas during two successive generations. Using experimental design developed for radio-contaminated areas, altered abundances of glycine betaine, seed storage proteins, and proteins associated with carbon assimilation into fatty acids were detected. Similar studies in Fukushima radio-contaminated areas might complement these data. The results from these Chernobyl experiments can be viewed in a user-friendly format at a dedicated web-based database freely available at http://www.chernobylproteomics.sav.sk.
Introduction
Radioactive minerals have accumulated on the Earth’s surface since early Achaean times (3500–4000 million year ago) and probably helped precipitate and concentrate organic carbon-rich matter (). The first scientific recordings indicating that radioactivity affects living matter dates back to late 19th and early 20th century when Marie Skłodowska-Curie mentioned in her thesis that “The action of radium upon the skin can take place across metal screens, but with weakened effect” (). Similarly, Henri Becquerel observed negative effects of radioactivity on his own body, after he carried a small tube of impure radium in his pocket for a few hours (). Early experiments on the effect of ionizing radiation (IR) on plants were performed during late 19th and early 20th century (). It was soon realized that radiation is a powerful mutagen (), can induce variations within species (; ), and can control rates of mutations ().
Plants can easily cope with increased levels of IR. This has been demonstrated in the radio-contaminated Chernobyl () and Fukushima () environments, as well as their successful growth in space (). Plant radio-resistance is maybe not surprising since radioactive materials occurred on the Earth’s surface when plants first appeared during the Mid-Ordovician period, about 460–470 million years ago (; ). It has also been proposed that present day areas with high-levels of background natural radiation and the reduced levels of plant migration may have both contributed to plant radio-resistance (). To investigate the molecular aspects of this process in plants, various analyses have been undertaken (). Recent meta-analysis of 45 published studies on DNA mutations in Chernobyl showed that plant growth in radio-contaminated environment is associated with increased levels of mutation (). It appears that DNA methylation and increased extra chromosomal homologous recombination events also contribute to successful plant growth in radio-contaminated environments (, ).
However, transcript expression and protein abundance are found to poorly correlate (; ; ; ; ; ), including plants growing in radio-contaminated areas. Therefore, the complementation of expression studies with proteomics can provide new insight into molecular mechanisms of plant growth in radio-contaminated environments. Indeed, proteome alterations induced by IR are the subject of increased research interest, especially in mammalian systems (; ). In plants, this is also appears to be the case, as differential abundances of proteins associated with defense and stress responses were detected in leaves harvested from rice grown in the soil taken around Chernobyl reactor site (). Importantly, it has been demonstrated that proteome changes increase with irradiation dose; observations were based on the analysis of X-rays irradiated plantlets of the reference plant Arabidopsis thaliana ().
Experimental Design of the Chernobyl Seed Project
Experimental design for ecological field experiments should include several experimental fields to avoid pseudoreplication (). However, it is often difficult to establish and manage several experimental fields in heavily controlled radio-contaminated areas. Therefore, experimental design for Chernobyl (Figure 1) was modified and included (i) two non-radioactive fields (control) and one radio-contaminated experimental field (Supplementary Figures S1A,B), (ii) two plant species, and (iii) two successive years. An important aspect of this experimental design (Figure 1) is the changed location of the non-radioactive field after the first year. The logic behind this is to exclude alterations related to the differences between experimental fields (soil, pests, weather, etc).
FIGURE 1
In 2007, local varieties of soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr., variety Soniachna) and flax (Linum usitatissimum, L., variety Kyivskyi) were sown in radio-contaminated experimental fields (soil radioactivity 20650 ± 1050 Bq.kg-1 of 137Cs, and 5180 ± 550 Bq.kg-1 of 90Sr) located near the village Chistogalovka approximately 5 km from the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (CNPP). The non-radioactive control experimental field (1350 ± 75 Bq.kg-1 for 137Cs and 490 ± 60 Bq.kg-1 for 90Sr) was established near Zhukin, a village approximately 100 km from CNPP (Supplementary Figure S1A). Soybean and flax seeds were harvested and mature seed proteomes comparatively analyzed in biological triplicate (Figure 1). In 2008, soybean and flax seeds harvested from the first generation of plants were sown onto the same radio-contaminated field, but a different non-radioactive field in the Chernobyl area (Supplementary Figure S1B), to obtain the second generation of seeds. A new non-radioactive experimental field was established directly in the town of Chernobyl, in an area with soil radioactivity of 1414 ± 71 Bq.kg-1 of 137Cs and 550 ± 55 Bq.kg-1 of 90Sr (Supplementary Figure S1B). The Chernobyl area is characterized by sod-podzolic soil (pH5.6–pH6.6, 12% clay, 2.0% organic compounds) which is a typical soil in the Ukrainian region of Polessia. Generally, in this area, the content of aleurite (silt) and pelitic soil ranges from 20 to 30% ().
Advances in the Establishment of Protein Abundance Profiles and Web-Based Database
In soybeans of the first generation, only 9.2% 2-DE spots, out of 698 quantified, were found differentially abundant between mature seeds harvested from non-radioactive and radio-contaminated Chernobyl areas (). Similar to this, the analysis of the first generation of mature flax seeds showed differential abundance only in about 4.9% of resolved features from 720 quantified 2-DE spots (). However, the results from these initial soybean and flax generations do not represent a large enough dataset upon which it is possible to base solid conclusions; it appears that growth in radio-contaminated environments has a relatively small effect on the seed proteome. Similar effects of IR have been previously shown on animal proteomes (; ) and support the notion that the exposure to low levels of IR do not significantly alter overall metabolism. Such speculation may be further supported by a study on the roots of the reference plant Arabidopsis thaliana under low levels of 137Cs, where only a small percentage of the transcriptome was differentially expressed ().
In order to provide a more detailed insight into the seed proteome in radio-contaminated environments, protein abundances profiles were established from developing soybean and flax seeds (Figure 2) from the second generation which were harvested from both Chernobyl experimental fields (Supplementary Figure S1B). Protein abundance profiles are capable of comprehensively characterizing protein abundances during seed filling. The approach has been used successfully in soybean (), canola (), castor (), and Arabidopsis (). In these Chernobyl studies, protein abundance profiles were first established for each experimental field and then matched to obtain joint abundance profiles (Figure 2). Using this approach, it was possible to provide a detailed overview of protein abundances during seed filling in soybean () and flax () across both experimental fields. For instance, it was revealed that β-conclycinin significantly decreased during seed filling in radio-contaminated areas in the second soybean generation (). These analyses also revealed alterations of proteins associated with carbon metabolism in the cytoplasm and plastids and to the carboxylic acid cycle in the mitochondria (). In flax, increased abundance of proteins associated with isocitrate dehydrogenation, L-malate decarboxylation, pyruvate biosynthesis, and ethanol oxidation to acetaldehyde were detected at early stages of seed filling ().
FIGURE 2
The data from these experiments can be viewed in a user-friendly format at dedicated web-based database that is freely available at www.chernobylproteomics.sav.sk. The aim of this online data depository is to allow scientific community (but also general public) to access the data from this project in user-friendly format. At the time of the database establishment (
Chernobyl Seed Project Suggested the Identity of Proteins Putatively Associated with Plant Growth in Radio-Contaminated Environments
The aim of these studies was to detect alterations in seed proteomes related to the radio-contaminated environment. However, the alterations in seed proteomes described above might also be associated with the differences between the experimental fields (soil, pests, weather etc). To exclude this possibility, data were further analyzed and alterations common for both plant generations and plant species identified.
Altered abundance of enzymes associated with the glycine betaine biosynthetic pathway was jointly detected in the first generation of soybean (
The mobilization of seed storage proteins (SSP) and alteration of proteins associated with carbon assimilation and fatty acid metabolism were observed jointly in both generations of soybean and flax. These data support the notion that SSPs are involved in seed defense against various threats, as has been shown previously with their role in defense against Bruchids (
An interesting aspect of these Chernobyl studies are differential abundance of proteins associated with carbon assimilation and fatty acid metabolism in both generations of soybean and flax. As a result of this, the second generation of soybean (
Studies in Fukushima Radio-Contaminated Environment
Similar to the disaster at the CNPP in 1986, the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in 2011 contaminated large areas with radioactivity (
It will be interesting to compare results from the Chernobyl studies using similar experimental setups in the Fukushima radio-contaminated area. The web based database (chernobylproteomics.sav.sk) might be a good tool for quick data comparison. Ideally, follow-up studies in Fukushima should include several non-radioactive and radio-contaminated experimental fields to avoid pseudoreplication (
Conclusion
The outcome of these Chernobyl studies was the identification of several proteins with differentially abundances in soybean and flax seeds harvested during two successive generations. It is tempting to speculate that these proteins are associated with plant growth and adaptation in radio-contaminated environments. However, follow-up studies in both the Chernobyl and Fukushima radio-contaminated areas are required to further develop these hypotheses.
Statements
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency (APVV-0740-11), by European Community under Project no 26220220180: Building Research Centre “AgroBioTech,” and Seventh Framework Program of the European Union (IRSES-GA-2013-612587). This research was also partially supported by the Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of the Slovak Republic and Slovak Academy of Sciences (VEGA-2/0016/14).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2015.00493
Figure S1The location of the Chernobyl experimental fields. The radio-contaminated field (R) was established 5 km from Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (C), within the exclusion zone (D). The non-radioactive field (C1)was initially established in 2007 about 100 km from C (A) but since 2008 the non-radioactive field (C2) has been transferred directly to the town of Chernobyl (B).
References
1
AghaeiK.EhsanpourA. A.ShahA. H.KomatsuS. (2009). Proteome analysis of soybean hypocotyl and root under salt stress.Amino Acids3691–98. 10.1007/s00726-008-0036-7
2
AzimzadehO.AtkinsonM. J.TapioS. (2014). Proteomics in radiation research: present status and future perspectives.Radiat. Environ. Biophys.5331–38. 10.1007/s00411-013-0495-4
3
BabcockE. B.CollinsJ. L. (1929). Does natural ionizing radiation control rate of mutation?Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.15623–628. 10.1073/pnas.15.8.623
4
BaskervilleC. (1905). “Radium and radio-active substances. Their application especially to medicine,” in The Physiological Action of Radio-Active Substances and their Therapeutic Applications (Philadelphia: Williams, Brown & Earle).
5
BuesselerK.AoyamaM.FukasawaM. (2011). Impacts of the Fukushima nuclear power plants on marine radioactivity.Environ. Sci. Technol.459931–9935. 10.1021/es202816c
6
ChenG. A.GharibT. G.HuangC. C.TaylorJ. M.MisekD. E.KardiaS. L.et al (2002). Discordant protein and mRNA expression in lung adenocarcinomas.Mol. Cell. Proteomics1304–313. 10.1074/mcp.M200008-MCP200
7
DanchenkoM.SkultetyL.RashydovN. M.BerezhnaV. V.MátelL.SalajT.et al (2009). Proteomic analysis of mature soybean seeds from the Chernobyl area suggests plant adaptation to the contaminated environment.J. Proteome Res.82915–2922. 10.1021/pr900034u
8
DubininN. P.VaulinaE. N.KosikovK. V.AnikeevaI. D.MoskvitinE. V.ZapadnayaA. A.et al (1973). Effects of space flight factors on the heredity of higher and lower plants.Life Sci. Space Res.11105–110.
9
GagerC. S. (1908). “Effects of the rays of radium on plants,” in Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden, Vol. 4 (Lancaster, PA: The New Era Printing Company), 1–278.
10
GicquelM.EsnaultM. A.Jorrin-NovoJ. V.Cabello-HurtadoF. (2011). Application of proteomics to the assessment of the response to ionising radiation in Arabidopsis thaliana.J. Proteomics741364–1377. 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.03.025
11
GoodspeedT. H.OlsonA. R. (1928). The production of variation in Nicotiana species by X-ray treatment of sex cells.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1466–69. 10.1073/pnas.14.1.66
12
GriffinT. J.GygiS. P.IdekerT.RistB.EngJ.HoodL.et al (2002). Complementary profiling of gene expression at the transcriptome and proteome levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Mol. Cell. Proteomics1323–333. 10.1074/mcp.M200001-MCP200
13
GuipaudO.HollerV.BuardV.TarletG.RoyerN.VinhJ.et al (2007). Time-course analysis of mouse serum proteome changes following exposure of the skin to ionizing radiation.Proteomics73992–4002. 10.1002/pmic.200601032
14
HajduchM.CasteelJ. E.HurrelmeyerK. E.SongZ.AgrawalG. K.ThelenJ. J. (2006). Proteomic analysis of seed filling in Brassica napus. Developmental characterization of metabolic isozymes using high-resolution two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.Plant Physiol.14132–46. 10.1104/pp.105.075390
15
HajduchM.GanapathyA.SteinJ. W.ThelenJ. J. (2005). A systematic proteomic study of seed filling in soybean. Establishment of high-resolution two-dimensional reference maps, expression profiles, and an interactive proteome database.Plant Physiol.1371397–1419. 10.1104/pp.104.056614
16
HajduchM.HearneL. B.MiernykJ. A.CasteelJ. E.JoshiT.AgrawalG. K.et al (2010). Systems analysis of seed filling in Arabidopsis: using general linear modeling to assess concordance of transcript and protein expression.Plant Physiol.1522078–2087. 10.1104/pp.109.152413
17
HayashiG.ShibatoJ.ImanakaT.ChoK.KuboA.KikuchiS.et al (2014). Unraveling low-level gamma radiation-responsive changes in expression of early and late genes in leaves of rice seedlings at litate village, Fukushima.J. Heredity105723–738. 10.1093/jhered/esu025
18
HornshojH.BendixenE.ConleyL. N.AndersenP. K.HedegaardJ.PanitzF.et al (2009). Transcriptomic and proteomic profiling of two porcine tissues using high-throughput technologies.BMC Genomics10:30. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-30
19
HoustonN. L.HajduchM.ThelenJ. J. (2009). Quantitative proteomics of seed filling in castor: comparison with soybean and rapeseed reveals differences between photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic seed metabolism.Plant Physiol.151857–868. 10.1104/pp.109.141622
20
HurlbertS. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments.Ecol. Monogr.54187–211. 10.2307/1942661
21
KaramP. A.LeslieS. A. (2005). “Changes in terrestrial natural radiation levels over the history of life,” in Natural Radiation Environment Vol. 7 Proceedings of an International Symposium, Rhodes, Greece, 20–24 May 2002, edsMcLaughlinJ. P.SimopoulosS. E.SteinhäuslerF. (Dordrecht: Elsevier), 107–117.
22
KinoshitaN.SuekiK.SasaK.KitagawaaJIkarashiaS.NishimuraT.et al (2011). Assessment of individual radionuclide distributions from the Fukushima nuclear accident covering central-east Japan.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10819526–19529. 10.1073/pnas.1111724108
23
KlubicovaK.DanchenkoM.SkultetyL.BerezhnaV. V.RashydovN. M.HajduchM. (2013). Radioactive chernobyl environment has produced high-oil flax seeds that show proteome alterations related to carbon metabolism during seed development.J. Proteome Res.124799–4806. 10.1021/pr400528m
24
KlubicovaK.DanchenkoM.SkultetyL.BerezhnaV. V.UvackovaL.RashydovN. M.et al (2012a). Soybeans grown in the chernobyl area produce fertile seeds that have increased heavy metal resistance and modified carbon metabolism.PLoS ONE7:e48169. 10.1371/journal.pone.0048169
25
KlubicovaK.VeselM.RashydovN. M.HajduchM. (2012b). Seeds in Chernobyl: the database on proteome response on radioactive environment.Front. Plant Sci.3:231. 10.3389/fpls.2012.002313
26
KlubicovaK.DanchenkoM.SkultetyL.MiernykJ. A.RashydovN. M.BerezhnaV. V.et al (2010). Proteomics analysis of flax grown in Chernobyl area suggests limited effect of contaminated environment on seed proteome.Environ. Sci. Technol.446940–6946. 10.1021/es100895s
27
KovalchukI.AbramovV.PogribnyI.KovalchukO. (2004). Molecular aspects of plant adaptation to life in the Chernobyl zone.Plant Physiol.135357–363. 10.1104/pp.104.040477
28
KovalchukO.BurkeP.ArkhipovA.KuchmaN.JamesS. J.KovalchukI.et al (2003). Genome hypermethylation in Pinus silvestris of Chernobyl – a mechanism for radiation adaptation?Mutat. Res.52913–20. 10.1016/S0027-5107(03)00103-9
29
LeszczynskiD. (2014). Radiation proteomics: a brief overview.Proteomics14481–488. 10.1002/pmic.201300390
30
MimuraT.MimuraM.KobayashiD.KomiyamaC.SekimotoH.MiyamotoM.et al (2014). Radioactive pollution and accumulation of radionuclides in wild plants in Fukushima.J. Plant Res.1275–10. 10.1007/s10265-013-0599-6
31
MollerA. P.MousseauT. A. (2013). The effects of natural variation in background radioactivity on humans, animals and other organisms.Biol. Rev.88226–254. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00249.x
32
MollerA. P.MousseauT. A. (2015). Strong effects of ionizing radiation from Chernobyl on mutation rates.Sci. Rep.58363. 10.1038/srep08363
33
MonobeM.UzawaA.HinoM.AndoK.KojimaS. (2005). Glycine betaine, a beer component, protects radiation-induced injury.J. Radiat. Res.46117–121. 10.1269/jrr.46.117
34
NadsonG. A.PhilippovG. S. (1925). Influence des rayons x sur la sexualité et la formation des mutantes chez les champignons inferieurs.C. R. Soc. Biol. Paris93473–474.
35
OlsonA. R.GilbertL. N. (1928). Natural reactivity and the origin of species.Nature121673–674. 10.1038/121673a0
36
OrntoftT. F.ThykjaerT.WaldmanF. M.WolfH.CelisJ. E. (2002). Genome-wide study of gene copy numbers, transcripts, and protein levels in pairs of non-invasive and invasive human transitional cell carcinomas.Mol. Cell. Proteomics137–45. 10.1074/mcp.M100019-MCP200
37
ParkE. C.YoonJ. B.SeongJ. S.ChoiK. S.KongE. S.KimY. J.et al (2006). Effect of ionizing radiation on rat tissue: proteomic and biochemical analysis.Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol.3619–35. 10.1080/10826060500388470
38
ParnellJ. (2004). Mineral radioactivity in sands as a mechanism for fixation of organic carbon on the early Earth.Orig. Life Evol. Biosph.34533–547. 10.1023/B:ORIG.0000043132.23966.a1
39
PascalL. E.TrueL. D.CampbellD. S.DeutschE. W.RiskM.ColemanI. M.et al (2008). Correlation of mRNA and protein levels: cell type-specific gene expression of cluster designation antigens in the prostate.BMC Genomics9:246. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-246
40
RajjouL.BelghaziM.HuguetR.RobinC.MoreauA.JobC.et al (2006). Proteomic investigation of the effect of salicylic acid on Arabidopsis seed germination and establishment of early defense mechanisms.Plant Physiol.141910–923. 10.1104/pp.106.082057
41
RakwalR.AgrawalG. K.ShibatoJ.ImanakaT.FukutaniS.TamogamiS.et al (2009). Ultra low-dose radiation: stress responses and impacts using rice as a Grass Model.Int. J. Mol. Sci.101215–1225. 10.3390/ijms10031215
42
RashydovN. M.MalinovskiyY. Y. (2002). Migration of radionuclides from the “hot” particles to the root behavior zone in the soil and their accumulation in the cultural plants.Physiol. Biochem. Cult. Plants34132–137.
43
RegenteM.De La CanalL. (2001). Are storage 2S albumins also defensive proteins?Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.59275–276. 10.1006/pmpp.2001.0365
44
RichardsA. (1915). Recent studies on the biological effects of radioactivity.Science (New York, N.Y.)42287–300. 10.1126/science.42.1079.287
45
SahrT.VoigtG.SchimmackW.ParetzkeH. G.ErnstD. (2005). Low-level radiocaesium exposure alters gene expression in roots of Arabidopsis.New Phytol.168141–148. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01485.x
46
SalesM. P.GerhardtI. R.Grossi-De-SaM. F.XavierJ. (2000). Do legume storage proteins play a role in defending seeds against bruchids?Plant Physiol.124515–522. 10.1104/pp.124.2.515
47
ShkvarnikovP. K. (1990). A cytological study of plants growing under exposure to different radiation levels.Tsitol. Genet.2433–37.
48
WaditeeR.BhuiyanN. H.HirataE.HibinoT.TanakaY.ShikataM.et al (2007). Metabolic engineering for betaine accumulation in microbes and plants.J. Biol. Chem.28234185–34193. 10.1074/jbc.M704939200
49
WellmanC. H.GrayJ. (2000). The microfossil record of early land plants.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.355717–731. 10.1098/rstb.2000.0612
50
YasunariT. J.StohlA.HayanoR. S.BurkhartJ. F.EckhardtS.YasunariT. (2011). Cesium-137 deposition and contamination of Japanese soils due to the Fukushima nuclear accident.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10819530–19534. 10.1073/pnas.1112058108
Summary
Keywords
soybean, flax, ionizing radiation, ecology, experimental design, seed filling, 2-DE, mass spectrometry
Citation
Rashydov NM and Hajduch M (2015) Chernobyl seed project. Advances in the identification of differentially abundant proteins in a radio-contaminated environment. Front. Plant Sci. 6:493. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00493
Received
19 December 2014
Accepted
22 June 2015
Published
06 July 2015
Volume
6 - 2015
Edited by
Joshua L. Heazlewood, The University of Melbourne, Australia
Reviewed by
Harriet T. Parsons, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; Neil James Willey, University of the West of England, UK
Copyright
© 2015 Rashydov and Hajduch.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Martin Hajduch, Department of Developmental and Reproduction Biology, Institute of Plant Genetics and Biotechnology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Akademicka 2, P.O. Box 39A, Nitra, Slovakia, hajduch@savba.sk
This article was submitted to Plant Proteomics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.