Abstract
Due to post-harvest losses more than 30% of harvested fruits will not reach the consumers’ plate. Fungal pathogens play a key role in those losses, as they cause most of the fruit rots and the customer complaints. Many of the fungal pathogens are already present in the unripe fruit but remain quiescent during fruit growth until a particular phase of fruit ripening and senescence. The pathogens sense the developmental change and switch into the devastating necrotrophic life style that causes fruit rotting. Colonization of unripe fruit by the fungus initiates defensive responses that limit fungal growth and development. However, during fruit ripening several physiological processes occur that correlate with increased fruit susceptibility. In contrast to plant defenses in unripe fruit, the defense posture of ripe fruit entails a different subset of defense responses that will end with fruit rotting and losses. This review will focus on several aspects of molecular and metabolic events associated with fleshy fruit responses induced by post-harvest fungal pathogens during fruit ripening.
Introduction
Food waste from the grower to the consumer is an important issue as it depletes natural resources. Recent researches and surveys done by NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council), USDA (US Department of Agriculture), FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), and the OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) revealed that food losses are estimated to be more than 33% (Gustavsson et al., 2011; Lipinski et al., 2013; Buzby et al., 2014; Okawa, 2014). Post-harvest losses of fruits and vegetables are even higher and are estimated to be 40–50%. Post-harvest fruit rotting are a major cause of those losses and are chiefly caused by fungal pathogens after fruit ripening. In a manner similar to foliar diseases that occur in the field, several factors as: fungal pathogenicity, host response and environment determine the outcome of host resistance or susceptibility. However, in post-harvest diseases fruit ripening is another major component that will determine fruit resistance and must be considered (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1
Disease pyramid of post-harvest fruits and pathogenic fungi interaction. The disease of post-harvest fruits and pathogenic fungi is regulated by four elements: (1) Fungal pathogenicity, (2) host response, (3) environment, and (4) ripening or senescence.
Post-harvest Disease Development
Fruits infected by post-harvest fungal pathogens develop, in general, disease symptoms after harvest and during storage. Post-harvest fungal pathogens germinate and enter the fruit by breaching the host cuticle (Emery et al., 2000; Alkan et al., 2015). This is achieved by: degrading host cuticle (Rijkenberg et al., 1980), entering through natural openings of the host and wounds (Barkai-Golan, 2001), or by living endophytically in the stem end (Johnson et al., 1992; Prusky et al., 2009). When those particularly insidious pathogens encounter unripe fruit these fungi often remain quiescent and confined to the initial site of introduction. They are unnoticed to visual examination, for as long as months of storage, until the harvested fruit ripen (Prusky et al., 2013). Several species of fungal pathogens, such as Colletotrichum, Alternaria, Botrytis, Monilinia, Lasiodiplodia, Phomopsis, and Botryosphaeria have been reported to live quiescently in their hosts until the fruits ripen (Prusky et al., 1981; Adaskaveg et al., 2000; Prins et al., 2000). As fruit ripen, post-harvest fungal pathogens switch to aggressive growth. At this aggressive stage, the fungi are necrotrophs, which kill the host cell and obtain nutrients from the host, leading to decomposed fruit tissue and decay (Prusky, 1996; Prusky et al., 2013). However, before this devastating stage those fungi adopt different types of life styles. Some fungi as Lasiodiplodia, Phomopsis, Colletotrichum, Alternaria and others, cause stem-end-rot and colonize the stem-end by adopting endophytic-like lifestyle before fruit ripening (Johnson et al., 1992). Other fungi, e.g., Colletotrichum are defined as hemibiotroph, those fungi live quiescently as biotrophs in unripe fruit cells without killing them (O’Connell et al., 2012; Alkan et al., 2015). In a parallel manner, fully necrotrophic fungi as Botrytis can infect and live in a restricted 1–3 cells of unripe fruit without damaging the surrounding tissue (Cantu et al., 2008a).
Botrytis and Colletotrichum Model
Due to lack of omics data and in-depth knowledge in the stem-end-rot pathosystems, this review will focus on the better understood Colletotrichum (anthracnose) representing hemibiotrophic fungi and on Botrytis (gray mold) as necrotrophic fungi. These fungi are two of the most common post-harvest fruit disease agents that are known to attack many economically important fruits and present problems world-wide (Sutton, 1992; Cannon et al., 2000; Hyde et al., 2009). Colletotrichum gloeosporioides causes the anthracnose disease to at least 470 host genera (Sutton, 1980; Hyde et al., 2009) and Botrytis cinerea causes the gray mold disease on over 200 species of fruit. On unripe fruit, Colletotrichum conidia germinate and develop appressoria which penetrate the fruit cuticle via an infection peg. C. gloeosporioides enters the quiescent stage whereupon two distinct structures develop: dendritic-like protrusions which form within the fruit cuticle and swollen hyphae which colonize the first epidermal cell layer but advance no further (Alkan et al., 2015). When C. gloeosporioides germinates on the cuticle of ripe fruit it germinates as on green fruit and goes through a short biotrophic stage. Only this time it is much more rapid and the quiescent structures immediately switch to necrotrophic growth. This indicates that hemibiotrophic growth in C. gloeosporioides is developmentally cued when encounter with fruit cuticle. On the other hand, Botrytis spore germlings tend to penetrate through small wounds or cracks in the epidermis or cuticle of unripe fruit and remain confined within the lumen of the wounds (Williamson et al., 2007; Cantu et al., 2008a). When the hemibiotrophic C. gloeosporioides germinates on small wounds of unripe fruits, its colonization skips the biotrophic-like stage and it adopts the necrotrophic strategy, similarly to B. cinerea (Alkan et al., 2015). Growth of either pathogen on wounds in unripe fruit is limited for long periods, and upon ripening, both pathogens become necrotrophic, degrade host tissues and produce symptoms of disease (Prusky, 1996; Prusky et al., 2013).
Unripe Fruit Tolerance and Changes Occurring during Ripening
During fruit ripening, significant physiological shifts occur: cell wall remodeling (Brummell et al., 1999; Huckelhoven, 2007), soluble sugar accumulation, decrease in the amount of phytoanticipins and phytoalexins (Prusky, 1996); decline of inducible host defense responses (Beno-Moualem and Prusky, 2000); cuticle biosynthesis (Bargel and Neinhuis, 2005) and changes in the ambient host pH (Prusky et al., 2013; Figure 2). Most of those changes are thought to be governed by complex hormonal signals including ethylene, ABA, jasmonic acid (JA), and salicylic acid (SA), which occur during natural fruit ripening (Giovannoni, 2001; Seymour et al., 2013). Interestingly, similar phytohormones are regulated in the host in response to pathogens (Blanco-Ulate et al., 2013; Alkan et al., 2015). In response to the changes in the host, pathogens alter the enzymes and compounds they produce which allow them to infect and break down or macerate the fruit tissue (Blanco-Ulate et al., 2014; Agudelo-Romero et al., 2015; Alkan et al., 2015). Signals for release from quiescence probably occur during fruit ripening and may include: disassembled cell wall substrates, alterations in cuticle and other signals (Cantu et al., 2008a,b; Mengiste et al., 2012; Figure 2). When the fungi are re-activated they induce rotting disease that impairs crop quantity, quality and appearance. These aspects will be discussed in the following sections.
FIGURE 2
Changes in the fruit that occur during ripening and senescence that regulate susceptibility. Morphological and biochemical changes taking place during the transition from unripe and tolerant to ripe and susceptible fruit. These changes could stimulate the release from quiescent/ latent or confined colonization to the aggressive colonization of the necrotrophic fungi in ripe fruits.
Host Factors Modulating Post-Harvest Fungal Development
Recently, with the expansion of omics technique several observations elaborated on the involvement of differential response of ripe and unripe fruit to fungal pathogens (Blanco-Ulate et al., 2014; Agudelo-Romero et al., 2015; Alkan et al., 2015).
This review will describe both the changes occurring during fruit ripening and the fruit response to post-harvest fungal pathogens.
Phytohormones: Jasmonate-salicylate Crosstalk and More
Phytohormones are well-known to affect fruit ripening (Burg and Burg, 1965; Alexander and Grierson, 2002) and the defense responses to pathogens (Alkan et al., 2012, 2015; Blanco-Ulate et al., 2013; Agudelo-Romero et al., 2015). Important signaling roles have been ascribed to classical defense hormones SA, JA, abscisic acid (ABA), and ethylene (ET) in molding plant–pathogen interactions (Fujita et al., 2006; Spoel and Dong, 2008). Gibberellic acid (GA), auxin (IAA), brassinosteroids (BRs), and cytokinines (CK) have recently been emerged as important modulators of plant defenses against microorganisms based mostly on vegetative tissues data and on the lifestyle of the infecting pathogen (Robert-Seilaniantz et al., 2011).
Jasmonate-salicylate Crosstalk
Salicylic acid and JA signaling pathways are generally considered as antagonistic dependent on NPR1 and hormone concentration (Spoel et al., 2007; Spoel and Dong, 2008; Pieterse et al., 2012). This interplay between SA and JA was suggested to optimize host-response to pathogen’s lifestyle (Glazebrook, 2005; Spoel et al., 2007; Spoel and Dong, 2008; Pieterse et al., 2012). In vegetative tissue it is commonly postulated that an effective responses to biotrophic pathogens are typically mediated by SA and programmed cell death (PCD; Glazebrook, 2005; Spoel et al., 2007), and responses to necrotrophic pathogens, which benefit from host cell death, involve JA and ethylene signaling (Glazebrook, 2005; Spoel et al., 2007; Figures 3 and 4B).
FIGURE 3
Fungal pathogenicity and host response at different stages of fruit maturity. (A) Fungal pathogenicity factors during quiescent and during aggressive necrotrophic stage. (B) Host response to fungal colonization in unripe and in ripe fruit.
FIGURE 4
Role of phytohormones, ROS, and pH in post-harvest disease. (A) Ethylene and abscisic acid (ABA) activate fruit ripening and susceptibility in fruit but also participate in the defense response to pathogens together with JA. This interplay of hormonal signals can lead to increased tolerance. (B) Fruit defense response to fungal pathogens is mediated by phytohormones as salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), ABA, and ethylene. Phytohormones cross-talk can determine fruit tolerance to biotrophic or necrotrophic fungal pathogens. JA and ethylene are classically reported to be involved in tolerance to necrotrophs and SA to biotrophs. (C) ROS is one of the components that control fruit ripening and thus susceptibility. ROS also participate in fruit defense response, depending on it relative concentration it could lead to susceptive or tolerant response. (D) Fruit ripening, fruit defense response and fungal elicitors modify the pH in the court of host-pathogen interaction.
During normal fruit ripening many phytohormones as ethylene, IAA, ABA, GA, JA, and SA are regulated (Bari and Jones, 2009; Symons et al., 2012; Zaharah et al., 2012; Seymour et al., 2013; Figure 2), which complicate the effective fruit response to pathogens. Indeed, in infections of grapes and tomato fruit with Botrytis (Blanco-Ulate et al., 2013; Agudelo-Romero et al., 2015) and tomato fruit infections with Colletotrichum (Alkan et al., 2015) several stress hormone responsive pathways including ethylene, ABA, JA, and SA were regulated. In fruit, high levels of ET and ABA, which stimulate senescence/ripening processes, may facilitate colonization by necrotrophs. The balance between SA and JA responses seems to be crucial for fruit resistance (Blanco-Ulate et al., 2013; Alkan et al., 2015).
During the biotrophic-like quiescence stage of C. gloeosporioides the resistant unripe fruit mainly responded through activation of JA, ethylene, and ABA (Alkan et al., 2015). However, the ripe tomato is more susceptible to disease and the fungi adopt a necrotrophic mode of host colonization. In the fruit response to necrotrophic infections, SA biosynthetic, signaling and response pathways were activated (Alkan et al., 2015; Figure 3). SA signaling was shown to have an important role in necrotrophic colonization stage of Colletotrichum on tomato fruit by inducing cell death and likely as a means to suppress JA mediated defense response (Alkan et al., 2012). The activation of this pathway was dependent on NADPH oxidase activity that was induced by ammonia secreted by the fungus (Alkan et al., 2009). Indeed, JA application leads to increase tolerance and SA application leads to PCD and increased susceptibility to C. gloeosporioides at it necrotrophic stage (Alkan et al., 2012). Similarly, ripe NahG tomato fruit mutant, lacking SA responses, showed increased tolerance to C. gloeosporioides. In a reciprocal manner, the Spr1 mutant, deficient in JA signaling, showed increased susceptibility (Alkan et al., 2015).
The responses of tomato fruit to Botrytis involved several stress hormone responsive pathways including ethylene, ABA, JA, and SA in a complex manner that differ during infections of ripe and unripe tomato fruit. In general, both grape and tomato defense response to Botrytis were mainly mediated by JA and ET (Blanco-Ulate et al., 2013; Agudelo-Romero et al., 2015; Figure 3). Similarly, Arabidopsis leaves response to Botrytis was mediated mainly by JA and ET (AbuQamar et al., 2006). However, in unripe tomato fruit the NahG gene showed susceptibility to Botrytis (Blanco-Ulate et al., 2013). This result suggests that SA has an important role in unripe fruit resistance to Botrytis. In grapes of susceptible cultivar infected with B. cinerea, the pathogen causes shutdown of defenses, which are regulated by SA and are expressed during the normal ripening (Agudelo-Romero et al., 2015). It remains to be established whether SA-mediated defense system is inhibited or not in resistant cultivars.
In climacteric fruit ET and ABA stimulate ripening and may affect the host defense response (Seymour et al., 2013). Thus, resistance of sitiens mutants at ripe fruit stage to Botrytis and ABA elevation in response to Botrytis was correlated to susceptibility (Blanco-Ulate et al., 2013). The ethylene and ABA elevation seems to play a dual role, on the one hand it correlated with JA and ethylene resistance response, and on the other hand it induced ripening and increase susceptibility (Figure 4A). This assumption will be further discussed below.
Not Only SA and JA Crosstalk
As discussed above, major responses to fungal pathogens are mediated by ethylene, ABA, JA, and SA phytohormones (Figure 3). Additional phytohormones and growth regulators such as gibberellin, cytokinins, steroid, polyamines, and BRs were reported to affect fruit response to fungal pathogens. For example gibberellin-treated persimmon fruit had increased resistance of to Alternaria alternata by delaying fruit maturation and reducing cuticle cracks (Eshel et al., 2000; Biton et al., 2014). Gibberellin seems to act also in an alternative way, the DELLA transcription factors enable plants to respond to gibberellin; this mechanism seems to maintain transient growth arrest and lead to plant response to biotic and abiotic stress (Harberd et al., 2009). DELLA transcription factors were shown to promote susceptibility to biotrophs and resistance to necrotrophs in leaves (Navarro et al., 2008).
Polyamines may have a role in response to post-harvest pathogens. In fact, genes involved in polyamine biosynthesis are up-regulated in Botrytis-grapes pathosystem (Geny et al., 2003; Agudelo-Romero et al., 2015). Over-expression of ARGAH2 in Arabidopsis leads to enhanced resistance to B. cinerea, thus suggesting a role for the polyamine arginase in plant resistance (Brauc et al., 2012). Furthermore, polyamines seem to be co-regulated with ethylene biosynthesis and seem to co-work with ABA (Bitrian et al., 2012).
Steroids such as β-sitosterol and stigmasterol have been previously shown to be involved in plant–pathogen interactions (Griebel and Zeier, 2010). Indeed, several genes involved in steroid biosynthesis were also upregulated in grape and tomato response to Botrytis (Blanco-Ulate et al., 2013; Agudelo-Romero et al., 2015). Furthermore, BRs play a role in grape ripening (Symons et al., 2006) and are known to change in plants response pathogen infection (Krishna, 2003). BAK1, known for BRs signaling, contributes to pathogen associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity (PAMP) to necrotrophic pathogens (Mengiste et al., 2012). Loss of BAK1 results in increased susceptibility to the necrotrophic fungi (Kemmerling et al., 2007). Several genes coding for BAK1 were down-regulated in grapes infected with Botrytis at the onset of ripening (Blanco-Ulate et al., 2013; Agudelo-Romero et al., 2015). Application of BRs reduced Penicillium expansum decay in jujube fruit and delayed fruit senescence (Zhu et al., 2010).
Ethylene Dual Role in Ripening and Defense Response
Ethylene is a key post-harvest hormone with a dual role. In climacteric fruit ripening (Giovannoni, 2001; Seymour et al., 2013), the presence of ethylene will lead to susceptibility, however, ethylene could also acts as a defense hormone together with JA (Spoel and Dong, 2008; Figure 4A).
In tomato, a climacteric fruit, ethylene is known to commence during the breaker stage of fruit ripening (Seymour et al., 2013). Post-harvest fungal pathogen as B. cinerea and C. gloeosporioides infections induce the ethylene biosynthesis pathway, transcription factors as non-ripening (NOR), ripening-inhibitor (RIN) and never-ripe (NR) and the ethylene-regulated defense genes in both ripe and unripe tomato fruit (Blanco-Ulate et al., 2013; Alkan et al., 2015). Therefore, they enhance the ripening process and hasten the release from quiescence.
The increased susceptibility of ripe fruit to B. cinerea depends on the ripening regulator NOR, but not on RIN, and only partially on the fruit’s perception of ethylene. The rin mutant fruits and those treated with 1-MCP did not ripe but, nevertheless, were susceptible to B. cinerea (Cantu et al., 2009; Blanco-Ulate et al., 2013). The differential effect of NOR and RIN indicate the existence of a specific susceptibility factor. Although nor and rin act together in a cascade for ripening nor appears to have a more global effect indicating that it operates upstream of rin (Osorio et al., 2011). Inspection of the differential expression of genes in these mutants may point to a source for susceptibility.
Applications of 1-MCP, an inhibitor of ethylene perception, are widely used due to the beneficial effects in delaying fruit senescence and prolonging storage (Watkins, 2006; Watkins and Nock, 2008). Indeed, in apples (Saftner et al., 2003), peaches (Liu et al., 2005), and plums (Menniti et al., 2004) 1-MCP treatment reduced fungal pathogens rotting. However, in tomato (Su and Gubler, 2012; Biswas et al., 2014), avocado (Woolf et al., 2005), custard apple, mango, and papaya (Hofman et al., 2001), citrus (Porat et al., 1999), apples (Janisiewicz et al., 2003) 1-MCP promoted susceptibility to pathogens. It seems that 1-MCP could affect citrus, strawberry, and tomato fruits susceptibility in a concentration dependent manner. At low concentrations it enhances tolerance, but reduces it at high concentrations (Ku et al., 1999; Dou et al., 2005; Blanco-Ulate et al., 2013). Thus, small amounts of endogenous ethylene may be necessary to maintain basic levels of resistance to pathogens due to ethylene involvement in regulation of plant defense genes (Marcos et al., 2005).
These results support the conclusion that ethylene has dual opposing roles: as a ripening hormone it promotes susceptibility (Burg and Burg, 1965) and as a participant in hormone-activated defense responses ethylene provide resistance (Glazebrook, 2005; Spoel et al., 2007). Thus, the timing of ethylene release, perception and the levels of ethylene are likely to be crucial for the outcomes of resistance or susceptibility (Figure 4A).
ROS Role in Ripening and Defense Response
Accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are the result of the balance between ROS production and antioxidant activity. The mitochondria chloroplast and peroxisome are all potential sources for ROS production. ROS and particularly hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and singlet oxygen (1O2) contribute to fruit ripening and senescence (Brennan and Frenkel, 1977; Lacan and Baccou, 1998; Rogiers et al., 1998; Tian et al., 2013). In grape and tomato, ROS, lipid peroxidation, and protein oxidation were increased at breaker stage (Figure 4C). In many fruits, storage is associated with an increase in ROS, which results either from increased ROS production or from a decrease in antioxidative makeup (Hodges, 2003). Antioxidants inhibit fruit ripening and senescence (Lester, 2003), while, high O2 or application of H2O2 leads to increase ROS and senescence (Tian et al., 2013). Oxidative damage of several mitochondrial proteins, which involved in fruit senescence would result in impairment of mitochondrial function and lead to fruit senescence (Tian et al., 2013).
Many post-harvest fungi can modulate host ROS production. Fungi secrete elicitors, toxins and antioxidants in order to modify the plant ROS production (Aver’Yanov et al., 2012; Alkan et al., 2013a). For example, oxalate secreted by Sclerotinia generates reducing conditions and inhibited plant oxidative burst at pH 3–4 (Cessna et al., 2000; Williams et al., 2011). In contrast, oxalic acid also induced plant NADPH oxidase and ROS production that correlated with a pH increase to 5–6, that later induced host PCD (Kim et al., 2008). Another example is ammonia that is secreted by Colletotrichum, which activated the tomato NADPH oxidase, this resulted in oxidative burst leading to induction of SA mediated defense response, host cell death and enhanced necrotrophic colonization (Alkan et al., 2009, 2012). How these small molecules manipulate the NADPH oxidase is unknown.
Plant ROS can be toxic, e.g., in photo-oxidative stress, but are also known to play an important role in eliciting a wide range of defense mechanisms (Baker and Orlandi, 1995; D’Autréaux and Toledano, 2007; Figure 4C). One of the earliest plant cellular responses following successful pathogen recognition is the production of ROS, also called oxidative burst (Torres et al., 2006). ROS also play a central role in redox-dependent defense signaling and in creating toxic environments that induce cell death (Dickman and Fluhr, 2013). In this regard, at the cellular juncture of pathogenesis, NPR1, the master regulator of SA-mediated defense, is actually reduced by thioredoxin, which removes the effect of nitrosylation (Tada et al., 2008). Once reduced, the NPR1 oligomer is disrupted and its monomers enter the nucleus, and activate SA-mediated defense and PCD. It should be noted that in a manner that is not fully understood such signaling can take place even under conditions of cellular oxidative stress.
Reactive oxygen species levels can regulate the host cells fate. High ROS levels in plant cells results in a spreading cell death, which provides nutrients to necrotrophic pathogens. Intermediate concentration of ROS usually results in restricted PCD, and low concentration of ROS can act as a signaling molecule, including the activation of antioxidant enzymes usually leading to host protection against necrotrophs (Dickman and Fluhr, 2013). Mitochondria ROS was shown to be involved in plant PCD in both biotic and abiotic stress responses (Dickman and Fluhr, 2013; Tian et al., 2013). A recent report revealed another ROS, singlet oxygen, which plays a major role in plant response to both biotic and abiotic stress (Mor et al., 2014). Signaling of ROS is important in both the ripening process and defense response (Figure 4C). However, the exact roles of ROS can appear counterintuitive and there is a need to better understand their compartmentalization.
Cuticle and Fatty Acid Biosynthesis
Necrotrophic plant pathogens such as B. cinerea and C. gloeosporioides, at the pathogenic stage, produce cutinases and pectinolytic enzymes to penetrate plant cuticle and epidermal cell wall. Cuticle and cuticular wax are known to regulate fungal cutinase gene expression, leading to the release of cutin monomers from the plant cuticle (Woloshuk and Kolattukudy, 1986). Cutin monomers induce typical PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) responses including medium alkalization, ethylene production, ROS, and upregulation of defense-related genes (Schweizer et al., 1996; Kauss et al., 1999). Furthermore, treatments with cutin monomers or their production in vivo enhances resistance to both biotrophic and necrotrophic fungi (Mengiste et al., 2012). Arabidopsis plants expressing a fungal cutinase or mutants with a defective cuticle, such as long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase2 which is involved in cutin biosynthesis, are surprisingly resistant to B. cinerea (Bessire et al., 2007; Chassot et al., 2007). This may be due to faster perception and response to fungal elicitors, easier diffusion of defense signals and antifungal compounds to the infection site and faster oxidative burst (Mengiste et al., 2012). Bdg and lacs2.3 mutants impaired in cutin synthesis are known to display a high level of resistance to B. cinerea produced ROS even in the absence of wounding of the leaves (L’Haridon et al., 2011). Moreover, aba2 and aba3 mutants together with bdg and lacs2.3 mutants presented increased permeability of the cuticle and enhanced ROS production. In fact, ABA was reported to play an essential role in cuticular permeability, which may influence tomato fruit resistance to B. cinerea and may lead to the termination of quiescence (Curvers et al., 2010).
Cuticle related mutants that alter cuticle development and composition were shown to modify plant defenses response and resistance (Voisin et al., 2009). Therefore, the processes of degradation of cuticle and cell wall may have an effect on quiescence. Thus, cell wall and cuticle can constitute valuable targets for improvement of early sensing of pathogen and activation of immune responses accompanied with fruit quality traits. Due to this reason the regulatory mechanisms involved in cuticle deposition have been investigated (Hen-Avivi et al., 2014). The first identified cuticle – associated transcription factor was SHINE1/WAXINDUCER1 (SHN1/WIN; Aharoni et al., 2004; Broun et al., 2004). Recently, it was shown that silencing a tomato ortholog (SlSHN3) in the fruit resulted in a dramatic reduction in cuticle formation (Shi et al., 2013). It was suggested in this study that SlSHN3 regulates not only the genes involved in cutin metabolism but also controls the expression of regulatory genes associated with epidermal cell patterning including tomato genes similar to GLABRA2 and MIXTA (Shi et al., 2013). Recent data showed that SlMIXTA-like is a major transcriptional regulator of cutin biosynthesis, likely acting downstream of SlSHINE3. SlMIXTA-like not only promoted conical-type epidermal cell development in tomato fruit but also positively regulated cuticular lipids in particular cutin monomer biosynthesis as well as cuticle assembly (Lashbrooke et al., 2015). Tomato fruit silenced in either SlSHN3 or SlMIXTA-like had a significant increase susceptibility to Colletotrichum (Shi et al., 2013; Lashbrooke et al., 2015). In another study, leaves of SlSHN3 over-expressing plants were shown to be more resistant to B. cinerea than wild-type leaves, highlighting the importance of cuticle in plant–pathogen interactions (Buxdorf et al., 2014).
The thickness and composition of the cuticle has been shown to influence infection of grape berries by B. cinerea (Figure 2; Commenil et al., 1997). Hexacosanoic acid, an important component of wax, is present in higher amounts in Touriga Nacional berries than in Trincadeira berries (Agudelo-Romero et al., 2013) and this may be involved in tolerance of Touriga Nacional cultivar to B. cinerea. Recently, it was reported that Trincadeira berries infected with B. cinerea accumulate saturated long-chain fatty acids which are major constituents of grape waxes accompanied with up-regulation of several acyl-CoA synthetases and wax synthases (Agudelo-Romero et al., 2015). In this study, significant changes were observed in the contents of glycerol and fatty acids such as oleic acid. In addition, a gene encoding a stearyl acyl carrier protein desaturase, which catalyzes the desaturation of stearic acid to oleic acid, was up-regulated in infected berries. It has been shown that a reduction in oleic acid levels results in constitutive activation of the SA-dependent pathway and repression of the JA-dependent pathway (Kachroo and Kachroo, 2009; Kachroo and Robin, 2013). The results in grapes supported these data, since increased oleic acid levels were correlated with activation of JA biosynthesis and signaling in infected berries (Agudelo-Romero et al., 2015). Thus, changes in lipid composition likely represent fruit response to infection.
Interestingly, transcriptome analysis of C. gloeosporioides and tomato fruit pathosystem revealed that during appressoria formation and before fungal penetration the tomato fruit host recognizes the fungus and activates fatty acid biosynthesis, elongation, and synthesis of cutin and waxes (Alkan et al., 2015). Specifically, genes involved in synthesis of very long chain fatty acids that are components of cutin and waxes were up-regulated namely 3-ketoacyl CoA synthase and CYP86A cytochrome p450. Interestingly, tomato fruit mutated in CYP86 were much more susceptive to Colletotrichum infection (Shi et al., 2013). These genes were also up-regulated in grape berries infected with B. cinerea along with a decrease in expression of genes involved in glycerolipid catabolism (Agudelo-Romero et al., 2015). Both pathosystems also reported the induction of β-oxidation fatty acid degradation pathway (Agudelo-Romero et al., 2015; Alkan et al., 2015). This would provide both reducing power and carbon components for metabolism of very long chain fatty acids or alternatively would provide more sugars that might be metabolized by the fungus or serve as precursors of plant secondary metabolites involved in defense. These observations further emphasize the critical role of fatty acids, wax and cutin during infection. This topic deserves further attention, since pathogen and host lipids and lipid metabolites have a critical role in the dynamics of pathogenesis and in plants defense.
Cell Wall Remodeling and Soluble Sugar Accumulation
Cell walls are structurally complex network of polysaccharides, including cellulose, hemicelluloses, and pectin (Cosgrove, 2005). They serve as a physical barrier that limits pathogen access, but are also involved in pathogen recognition and in the deployment of plant responses to pathogens (Vorwerk et al., 2004; Cantu et al., 2008a,b; Hématy et al., 2009). In order to break down the cell wall barrier pathogens use mechanical force as appressoria (Deising et al., 2000) or release cell wall degrading enzymes (CWDEs), which serve as a pathogenicity factors (Walton, 1994). Also post-harvest pathogens as Botrytis (vanKan et al., 1997; Blanco-Ulate et al., 2014) and Colletotrichum (Alkan et al., 2013b, 2015) produces CWDEs during pathogenic colonization of tomato fruit. The degradation of the plant cell wall matrix by pathogens may affect the proteins embedded in the cell wall and are likely to activate PAMP-triggered immunity (van Loon et al., 2006; Mengiste, 2012), which often leads to callose deposition at sites of penetration, accumulate phenolic compounds and various toxins in the cell wall and synthesize lignin-like polymers to reinforce the wall (Huckelhoven, 2007).
During natural fleshy fruit ripening the fruit soften as a result of fruit activation of CWDEs as polygalacturonase (PG), pectin methylesterase, pectate lyase, β-galactosidase, cellulase, and expansin (Brummell et al., 1999; Paniagua et al., 2014). Phytohormones as ethylene, ABA, SA and JA, are known to influence the expression of CWDEs which contribute to fruit softening (Huckelhoven, 2007). Because, fruit CWDEs are normally activated during ripening, it was commonly assumed that fruit softening contributes to the transition to susceptibility to pathogens (Figure 2; Paniagua et al., 2014). In tomato, the suppression of softening-associated CWDEs, SlPG and SlExp1, reduced susceptibility to B. cinerea infection during ripening, indicating that PG and Exp support both softening (Brummell et al., 1999, 2002; Kalamaki et al., 2003; Powell et al., 2003) and susceptibility to B. cinerea (Cantu et al., 2008a,b). Interestingly, B. cinerea infections induce SlPG and SlExp1 expression (GonzalezBosch et al., 1996; Flors et al., 2007), suggesting that Botrytis induces similar softening to the softening that occurs during fruit ripening. Endo-β-1,4-glucanase (EGase) is another CWDE that have a role in fruit softening. Tomato fruit EGase antisense had enhanced callose deposition and was more resistant against Botrytis infection (Flors et al., 2007). Plants PG inhibiting proteins (PGIPs) reduce the pathogen pectin degradation (De Lorenzo et al., 2001). PGIPs inhibit most of the Botrytis PGs during pear pathogenesis (Sharrock and Labavitch, 1994). An over-expression of PGIPs enhances ripe tomato fruit tolerance to Botrytis (Powell et al., 2000). To conclude, fruit cell wall is a complex and dynamic barrier which changes during ripening and its interaction with fungal pathogens plays a major role in the defense response against pathogens.
pH Change during Fruit Ripening and Fungal Colonization
The pH change plays an important role in three different aspects of fruit-fungal interaction: (1) the pH change during fruit ripening, (2) fungal-dependent pH modulation of the local infection court, and (3) the local host pH modulation during the activation of defense responses (Figure 4D). The combined pH changes were suggested to trigger defense related processes as ROS and activate cell wall hydrolases in the fruit.
The ratio between sugar and pH are determinants of the fruit taste. During fruit ripening total soluble sugars (TSSs) increase and organic acid usually decreases leading to increase in pH. For instance, the pH of avocado fruit increases from 5.2 to 6.0 during ripening (Yakoby et al., 2000). However, in tomato fruit the apoplastic pH decreases during ripening from 6.7 to 4.4 (Almeida and Huber, 1999).
Also fungal pathogens alter their local pH by secretion of ammonia or organic acids to optimize the environment to each fungus enzymatic arsenal (reviewed in Alkan et al., 2013a). Interestingly, fruit pH greatly affects fungal pathogenicity. Acidified environment induce ammonia secretion in alkalizing fungi as Colletotrichum and Alternaria (Eshel et al., 2002; Alkan et al., 2008), while alkaline environment activate organic acid secretion in acidifying fungi as Penicillium and Botrytis (Manteau et al., 2003; Hadas et al., 2007). The pH dependent fungal pathogenicity factors are controlled in filamentous fungi by Pal signaling pathway which activates PACC transcription factor (Penalva et al., 2008). PACC activates transcription of those pathogenicity factors at alkaline pH and the AREB transcription factor, which represses acidic expressed pathogenicity factors at alkaline environment (Alkan et al., 2013b; Ment et al., 2015). In this way, fungi adjust their ambient pH in order to optimize the activity of their enzymatic arsenal.
Changes in apoplastic pH, could lead to oxidative burst (Gao et al., 2004). For example, exposing bean cells to alkaline condition resulted in oxidative burst (Wojtaszek et al., 1995). Medium alkalization activate NADPH oxidase, probably as a result of induced K+/H+ exchange, followed by Ca2+ influx/Cl2 efflux (Simon-Plas et al., 1997; Nurnberger and Scheel, 2001; Zhao et al., 2005). Transient extracellular alkalization is an essential factor in induction of defense response and PCD (Schaller and Oecking, 1999; Clarke et al., 2005; Hano et al., 2008). In this connection, changes in Arabidopsis thaliana roots external pH rapidly alter plant gene expression and modulate host responses, similarly to elicitors (Lager et al., 2010). Similarly, tomato fruit apoplastic alkalization by Colletotrichum or application of ammonia lead to activation of fruit NADPH oxidase, oxidative burst and SA mediated defense response that ended with extended cell death (Alkan et al., 2012). P. expansum secrets gluconic acid and acidify its ambient pH in apples; this acidification was correlated with oxidative burst (Hadas et al., 2007). Taken together both pathogen and fruit modulate their ambient pH in order to optimize respectively their attack and responses (Figure 4D).
Preformed and Inducible Antifungal Resistance
Plants contain preformed secondary metabolites of a defensive nature such as phenolics, sulfur compounds, saponins, cyanogenic glycosides, and glucosinolates. Phenolic compounds play an important role in non-host resistance to fungi. They can either be performed occurring constitutively in healthy plants (phytoanticipins) or synthesized from precursors in response to pathogen attack, being more restricted to the damaged tissue (phytoalexins). Some antibiotic phenolics are stored in plant cells as inactive bound forms but are readily converted into biologically active antibiotics by plant glycosidases in response to pathogen attack. Since these compounds do not involve de novo transcription of gene products they are also considered phytoanticipins (Lattanzio et al., 2006). Concentrations of preformed phytoanticipins and inducible phytoalexins were found to decline during fruit ripening (Figure 2) and this occurred more rapidly in susceptible cultivars than in resistant cultivars (Prusky, 1996; Lattanzio et al., 2001; Prusky et al., 2013).
The grape berry cultivar Trincadeira is susceptible to B. cinerea and downy mildew. It presents lower phenolics content than the tolerant cultivars Touriga Nacional and Aragonês (Ali et al., 2011). The green and veraison stages of Aragonês and Touriga Nacional showed higher levels of quercetin glucoside, catechin and hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives such as caftaric acid and coutaric acid than the ripe grape berry (Ali et al., 2011; Agudelo-Romero et al., 2013). A decrease in caffeic acid was also detected in ripe berries of all the three varieties (Agudelo-Romero et al., 2013). This decline may be related to increased susceptibility of ripe fruits to pathogenic fungi. In fact, caffeic acid presents antimicrobial activity (Widmer and Laurent, 2006). Further, constitutive secondary metabolites of the bitter orange Citrus aurantium are the flavanone-naringin and the polymethoxyflavone-tangeretin, which showed antifungal activity against Penicillium digitatum (Arcas et al., 2000).
Other widely reported preformed antifungal compounds are the family of mono-, di-, and triene compounds in avocado; the resorcinol derivates in mango; the tannins in banana peel (Prusky, 1996) and tomatine in tomato fruits (Itkin et al., 2011). These compounds were shown to decline dramatically during fruit ripening, thus enabling development of penetrating mycelia (Verhoeff, 1974; Prusky et al., 2013).
Inducible Phenylpropanoid Metabolism
Phytoalexins are generally induced after infection. They accumulate rapidly in response to infection and reach high antimicrobial levels in resistant plants, while there is either lesser or slower accumulation in susceptible plants (Lattanzio et al., 2006). When the accumulation of phytoalexins is either increased or decreased by manipulation of the experimental conditions such as post-harvest stress treatments, the plant and fruit become either more resistant or more susceptible (Lattanzio et al., 2006). Fawe et al. (1998) reported that silicon is involved in the increased resistance of cucumber to powdery mildew by enhancing the antifungal activity due to the presence of metabolites such as flavonol aglycone rhamnetin (3,5,3′,4′-tetrahydroxy-7-O-methoxyflavone).
Pathogens often remain quiescent in unripe fruits. During ripening the concentrations of pathogen-induced and pre-formed antifungal phenolics decrease to subtoxic levels (Figure 2); this chemical decline occurs more rapidly in susceptible cultivars than in resistant ones (Lattanzio et al., 2006). The principal phenolics in the peach fruit include chlorogenic acid, catechin, and epicatechin. The decline in chlorogenic acid and other endogenous phenolics during fruit ripening correspond to the transition to susceptibility (Bostock et al., 1999). In immature strawberry fruits with a high content of proanthocyanidins B. cinerea remains quiescent. When the inhibitory activity of proanthocyanidins in fruits decreases due to maturation, the quiescent fungus can switch to the necrotrophic stage and progress further into the fruit tissue (Jersch et al., 1989). In addition, inducible antifungal compounds, such as capsicannol in pepper, scoparone in citrus, resveratrol in grapes, and others, have been reported to be activated in unripe fruits but not always in ripe fruits (Prusky, 1996). These compounds were hypothesized to be quiescence modulating factors.
The resistance of Vitis sp. to B. cinerea infection has been shown to correlate with trans-resveratrol content (Gabler et al., 2003). Touriga Nacional is not infected by B. cinerea under normal field conditions; this cultivar presents higher content in trans-resveratrol than the susceptible cultivar Trincadeira (Agudelo-Romero et al., 2013). Recently, in-field infections of Trincadeira cultivar with B. cinerea led to profound alterations in secondary metabolism linked to stress response together with a significant increase in trans-resveratrol. Indeed, several genes involved in phytoalexin biosynthesis and coding for stilbene synthase and resveratrol synthase were up-regulated at pre-veraison in infected grapes (Agudelo-Romero et al., 2015). Therefore, resveratrol was considered a potential positive metabolic marker of B. cinerea infection at this stage. Other identified positive markers of infection were gallic acid and 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid which present antifungal properties (Lattanzio et al., 2006). In fact, plant benzoic acids and their derivatives are common and widespread mediators of plant responses to biotic and abiotic stress (Wildermuth, 2006). In another work with grape, flavonoid compounds were only found in botrytized berries of botrytized bunches at harvest stage (Hong et al., 2012).
Trincadeira, a Botrytis-susceptible variety, is able to initiate to some extent a basal defense reprogramming of the transcriptome and metabolome that is unable to slow down disease progression (Agudelo-Romero et al., 2015). This can be due to the fact that the pathogen can shut down host defenses. For example, sesquiterpenoid biosynthesis, as measured by genes involved in their synthesis; namely beta-amyrin synthase and (-)-germacrene D synthase, was down-regulated at the veraison stage. Oleanolic acid, a triterpenoid, decreased in infected grapes at pre-veraison and veraison stages. Unconjugated triterpenoids, such as oleanolic acid, are often found in the epicuticular waxes of plants serving as a first defense barrier against pathogens (Heinzen et al., 1996). This result suggested that infection renders the fruit to be more susceptible by down-regulating defense compounds.
Recently, it was showed through a combined analysis of the transcriptomes of C. gloeosporioides and tomato fruit pathosystem that during the quiescent stage, defense pathways were up-regulated including the phenypropanoid pathway for phytoalexin and lignin precursors such as cinnamic, cumarayl, coniferyl, caffeoyl, shikimic, quinic, and sinapyl derivatives (Alkan et al., 2015). The authors suggested that phytoalexin biosynthesis and lignification comprise a major ongoing fruit defense pathway employed by the fruit in response to the persistent presence of quiescent fungi. Such host responses may effectively restrain the pathogen. Indeed, the number of infection sites emerging from quiescence appears to be below the potential primary infection sites, indicating successful containment of the infection. In this study, genes involved in the synthesis of sesquiterpenoids (e.g., rishitin) were also down-regulated together with the up-regulation of key steroid glycoalkaloid (e.g., tomatine) transcripts. Previously, α-tomatine was shown to inhibit Colletotrichum fungal growth and germination (Itkin et al., 2011). Hence, transcript expression suggests the occurrence of shifts from rishitin to α -tomatine biosynthetic pathway as an effective response to this fungus. All of those antifungal compounds decline in ripe fruits, which may permit emergence of fungi from quiescence (Prusky, 1996).
Conclusion
During ripening, fruit undergo major changes such as activation of ethylene synthesis and other phytohormones, pH change, cuticular changes, cell-wall loosening and increase of soluble sugars, decline of antifungal compounds (Figure 2), which release the fungus from its quiescent state and promote a necrotrophic and pathogenic life style. Knowledge on the molecular and metabolic events responsible for the onset of necrotrophic stage, occurring both in the host and in fungi, is important key in order to develop strategies to enhance fruit defense and decrease of fungal virulence that ultimately will result in increased quality of fruits. This knowledge can be considered in breeding programs, pre and post-harvest treatments or alternatively provide a framework for biotechnological approaches.
Statements
Acknowledgments
We thank Professor Robert Fluhr for his critical comments on the manuscript. This manuscript is contribution no. 728/14 from the Agricultural Research Organization, the Volcani Center, P.O. Box 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel. This work was developed within BioFig (PEst-OE/BIA/UI4046/2014) and funded by Portuguese FCT (SFRH/BPD/100928/2014). The review is integrated in the COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) Action FA1106 ‘Quality fruit.’
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AbuQamarS.ChenX.DhawanR.BluhmB.SalmeronJ.LamS.et al (2006). Expression profiling and mutant analysis reveals complex regulatory networks involved in Arabidopsis response to Botrytis infection.Plant J.4828–44. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02849.x
2
AdaskavegJ. E.ForsterH.ThompsonD. F. (2000). Identification and etiology of visible quiescent infections of Monilinia fructicola and Botrytis cinerea in sweet cherry fruit.Plant Dis.84328–333. 10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.3.328
3
Agudelo-RomeroP.ErbanA.RegoC.Carbonell-BejeranoP.NascimentoT.SousaL.et al (2015). Transcriptome and metabolome reprogramming in Vitis vinifera cv. Trincadeira berries upon infection with Botrytis cinerea.J. Exp. Bot.661769–1785. 10.1093/jxb/eru517
4
Agudelo-RomeroP.ErbanA.SousaL.PaisM. S.KopkaJ.FortesA. M. (2013). Search for transcriptional and metabolic markers of grape pre-ripening and ripening and insights into specific aroma development in three portuguese cultivars.PLoS ONE8:e60422. 10.1371/journal.pone.0060422
5
AharoniA.DixitS.JetterR.ThoenesE.van ArkelG.PereiraA. (2004). The SHINE clade of AP2 domain transcription factors activates wax biosynthesis, alters cuticle properties, and confers drought tolerance when overexpressed in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell162463–2480. 10.1105/tpc.104.022897
6
AlexanderL.GriersonD. (2002). Ethylene biosynthesis and action in tomato: a model for climacteric fruit ripening.J. Exp. Bot.532039–2055. 10.1093/jxb/erf072
7
AliK.MalteseF.FortesA. M.PaisM. S.ChoiY. H.VerpoorteR. (2011). Monitoring biochemical changes during grape berry development in Portuguese cultivars by NMR spectroscopy.Food Chem.1241760–1769. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.08.015
8
AlkanN.DavydovO.SagiM.FluhrR.PruskyD. (2009). Ammonium secretion by Colletotrichum coccodes activates host NADPH oxidase activity enhancing host cell death and fungal virulence in tomato fruits.Mol. Plant Microbe221484–1491. 10.1094/MPMI-22-12-1484
9
AlkanN.EspesoE. A.PruskyD. (2013a). Virulence regulation of phytopathogenic fungi by pH.Antioxid. Redox Signal.191012–1025. 10.1089/ars.2012.5062
10
AlkanN.MengX.FriedlanderG.ReuveniE.SuknoS.ShermanA.et al (2013b). Global aspects of pacC regulation of pathogenicity genes in Colletotrichum gloeosporioides as revealed by transcriptome analysis.Mol. Plant Microbe261345–1358. 10.1094/MPMI-03-13-0080-R
11
AlkanN.FluhrR.PruskyD. (2012). Ammonium secretion during Colletotrichum coccodes infection modulates salicylic and jasmonic acid pathways of ripe and unripe tomato fruit.Mol. Plant Microbe2585–96. 10.1094/MPMI-01-11-0020
12
AlkanN.FluhrR.ShermanA.PruskyD. (2008). Role of ammonia secretion and pH modulation on pathogenicity of Colletotrichum coccodes on tomato fruit.Mol. Plant Microbe211058–1066. 10.1094/MPMI-21-8-1058
13
AlkanN.FriedlanderG.MentD.PruskyD.FluhrR. (2015). Simultaneous transcriptome analysis of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and tomato fruit pathosystem reveals novel fungal pathogenicity and fruit defense strategies.New Phytol.205801–815. 10.1111/nph.13087
14
AlmeidaD. P.HuberD. J. (1999). Apoplastic pH and inorganic ion levels in tomato fruit: a potential means for regulation of cell wall metabolism during ripening.Physiol. Plant.105506–512. 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1999.105316.x
15
ArcasM. C.BotiaJ. M.OrtunoA. M.Del RioJ. A. (2000). UV irradiation alters the levels of flavonoids involved in the defence mechanism of Citrus aurantium fruits against Penicillium digitatum.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.106617–622. 10.1023/A:1008704102446
16
Aver’YanovA. A.BelozerskayaT. A.GesslerN. N. (2012). Fungus Development and Reactive Oxygen: Phytopathological Aspects, Biocommunication of Fungi (Berlin: Springer) 261–271.
17
BakerC. J.OrlandiE. W. (1995). Active oxygen in plant pathogenesis.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.33299–321. 10.1146/annurev.py.33.090195.001503
18
BargelH.NeinhuisC. (2005). Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruit growth and ripening as related to the biomechanical properties of fruit skin and isolated cuticle.J. Exp. Bot.561049–1060. 10.1093/jxb/eri098
19
BariR.JonesJ. (2009). Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses.Plant Mol. Biol.69473–488. 10.1007/s11103-008-9435-0
20
Barkai-GolanR. (2001). Postharvest Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables: Development and Control.Amsterdam: Elsevier.
21
Beno-MoualemD.PruskyD. (2000). Early events during quiescent infection development by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in unripe avocado fruits.Phytopathology90553–559. 10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.5.553
22
BessireM.ChassotC.JacquatA. C.HumphryM.BorelS.PetétotJ. M. C.et al (2007). A permeable cuticle in Arabidopsis leads to a strong resistance to Botrytis cinerea.EMBO J.262158–2168. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601658
23
BiswasP.EastA.HewettE.HeyesJ. (2014). Ripening delay caused by 1-MCP may increase tomato chilling sensitivity.N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci.42145–150. 10.1080/01140671.2013.870218
24
BitonE.KobilerI.FeygenbergO.YaariM.FriedmanH.PruskyD. (2014). Control of alternaria black spot in persimmon fruit by a mixture of gibberellin and benzyl adenine, and its mode of action.Postharvest Biol. Technol.9482–88. 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.03.009
25
BitrianM.ZarzaX.AltabellaT.TiburcioA. F.AlcazarR. (2012). Polyamines under abiotic stress: metabolic crossroads and hormonal crosstalks in plants.Metabolites2516–528. 10.3390/metabo2030516
26
Blanco-UlateB.Morales-CruzA.AmrineK.LabavitchJ. M.PowellA.CantuD. (2014). Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of Botrytis cinerea genes targeting plant cell walls during infections of different hosts.Front. Plant Sci.5:435. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00435
27
Blanco-UlateB.VincentiE.PowellA. L. T.CantuD. (2013). Tomato transcriptome and mutant analyses suggest a role for plant stress hormones in the interaction between fruit and Botrytis cinerea.Front. Plant Sci.4:142. 10.3389/fpls.2013.00142
28
BostockR. M.WilcoxS. M.WangG.AdaskavegJ. E. (1999). Suppression of Monilinia fructicola cutinase production by peach fruit surface phenolic acids.Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.5437–50. 10.1006/pmpp.1998.0189
29
BraucS.De VooghtE.ClaeysM.GeunsJ. M. C.HofteM.AngenonG. (2012). Overexpression of arginase in Arabidopsis thaliana influences defence responses against Botrytis cinerea.Plant Biol.1439–45. 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2011.00520.x
30
BrennanT.FrenkelC. (1977). Involvement of hydrogen peroxide in the regulation of senescence in pear.Plant Physiol.59411–416. 10.1104/pp.59.3.411
31
BrounP.PoindexterP.OsborneE.JiangC. Z.RiechmannJ. L. (2004). WIN1 a transcriptional activator of epidermal wax accumulation in Arabidopsis.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1014706–4711. 10.1073/pnas.0305574101
32
BrummellD. A.HarpsterM. H.CivelloP. M.PalysJ. M.BennettA. B.DunsmuirP. (1999). Modification of expansin protein abundance in tomato fruit alters softening and cell wall polymer metabolism during ripening.Plant Cell112203–2216. 10.1105/tpc.11.11.2203
33
BrummellD. A.HowieW. J.MaC.DunsmuirP. (2002). Postharvest fruit quality of transgenic tomatoes suppressed in expression of a ripening-related expansin.Postharvest Biol. Technol.25209–220. 10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00179-X
34
BurgS. P.BurgE. A. (1965). Ethylene action and the ripening of fruits ethylene influences the growth and development of plants and is the hormone which initiates fruit ripening.Science1481190–1196. 10.1126/science.148.3674.1190
35
BuxdorfK.RubinskyG.BardaO.BurdmanS.AharoniA.LevyM. (2014). The transcription factor SlSHINE3 modulates defense responses in tomato plants.Plant Mol. Biol.8437–47. 10.1007/s11103-013-0117-1
36
BuzbyJ. C.WellsH. F.HymanJ. (2014). The Estimated Amount, Value, and Calories of Postharvest Food Losses at the Retail and Consumer Levels in the United States.USDA EIB-121, US. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.10.2139/ssrn.2501659
37
CannonP. F.BridgeP. D.MonteE. (2000). “Linking the past, present, and future of Colletotrichum systematics,” in‘Colletotrichum: Host Specificity, Pathology, and Host Pathogen InteractionedsPruskyD. F. S.DickmanM. B. (St. Paul, MI: APS Presspp) 1–20.
38
CantuD.Blanco-UlateB.YangL.LabavitchJ. M.BennettA. B.PowellA. L. T. (2009). Ripening-regulated susceptibility of tomato fruit to Botrytis cinerea requires NOR but not RIN or ethylene.Plant Physiol.1501434–1449. 10.1104/pp.109.138701
39
CantuD.VicenteA. R.GreveL. C.DeweyF. M.BennettA. B.LabavitchJ. M.et al (2008a). The intersection between cell wall disassembly, ripening, and fruit susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.105859–864. 10.1073/pnas.0709813105
40
CantuD.VicenteA. R.LabavitchJ. M.BennettA. B.PowellA. L. T. (2008b). Strangers in the matrix: plant cell walls and pathogen susceptibility.Trends Plant Sci.13610–617. 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.09.002
41
CessnaS. G.SearsV. E.DickmanM. B.LowP. S. (2000). Oxalic acid, a pathogenicity factor for Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, suppresses the oxidative burst of the host plant.Plant Cell122191–2199. 10.1105/tpc.12.11.2191
42
ChassotC.NawrathC.MetrauxJ. P. (2007). Cuticular defects lead to full immunity to a major plant pathogen.Plant J.49972–980. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.03017.x
43
ClarkeA.MurL. A. J.DarbyR. M.KentonP. (2005). Harpin modulates the accumulation of salicylic acid by Arabidopsis cells via apoplastic alkalization.J. Exp. Bot.563129–3136. 10.1093/jxb/eri310
44
CommenilP.BrunetL.AudranJ.-C. (1997). The development of the grape berry cuticle in relation to susceptibility to bunch rot disease.J. Exp. Bot.481599–1607. 10.1093/jexbot/48.313.1599
45
CosgroveD. J. (2005). Growth of the plant cell wall.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.6850–861. 10.1038/nrm1746
46
CurversK.SeifiH.MouilleG.de RyckeR.AsselberghB.Van HeckeA.et al (2010). Abscisic acid deficiency causes changes in cuticle permeability and pectin composition that influence tomato resistance to Botrytis cinerea.Plant Physiol.154847–860. 10.1104/pp.110.158972
47
D’AutréauxB.ToledanoM. B. (2007). ROS as signalling molecules: mechanisms that generate specificity in ROS homeostasis.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.8813–824. 10.1038/nrm2256
48
De LorenzoG.D’OvidioR.CervoneF. (2001). The role of polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins (PGIPS) in defense against pathogenic fungi.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.39313–335. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.39.1.313
49
DeisingH. B.WernerS.WernitzM. (2000). The role of fungal appressoria in plant infection.Microbes Infect.21631–1641. 10.1016/S1286-4579(00)01319-8
50
DickmanM. B.FluhrR. (2013). Centrality of host cell death in plant-microbe interactions.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.51543–570. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-173027
51
DouH.JonesS.RitenourM. (2005). Influence of 1-MCP application and concentration on post-harvest peel disorders and incidence of decay in citrus fruit.J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol.80786–792.
52
EmeryK. M.MichailidesT. J.SchermH. (2000). Incidence of latent infection of immature peach fruit by Monilinia fructicola and relationship to brown rot in Georgia.Plant Dis.84853–857. 10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.8.853
53
EshelD.Ben-ArieR.DinoorA.PruskyD. (2000). Resistance of gibberellin-treated persimmon fruit to Alternaria alternata arises from the reduced ability of the fungus to produce endo-1,4-beta-glucanase.Phytopathology901256–1262. 10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.11.1256
54
EshelD.MiyaraI.AilingT.DinoorA.PruskyD. (2002). pH regulates endoglucanase expression and virulence of Alternaria alternata persimmon fruit.Mol. Plant Microbe15774–779. 10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.8.774
55
FaweA.Abou-ZaidM.MenziesJ. G.BelangerR. R. (1998). Silicon-mediated accumulation of flavonoid phytoalexins in cucumber.Phytopathology88396–401. 10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.5.396
56
FlorsV.LeyvaM. D.VicedoB.FinitiI.RealM. D.Garcia-AgustinP.et al (2007). Absence of the endo-beta-1,4-glucanases Cel1 and Cel2 reduces susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea in tomato.Plant J.521027–1040. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03299.x
57
FujitaM.FujitaY.NoutoshiY.TakahashiF.NarusakaY.Yamaguchi-ShinozakiK.et al (2006). Crosstalk between abiotic and biotic stress responses: a current view from the points of convergence in the stress signaling networks.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.9436–442. 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.05.014
58
GablerF. M.SmilanickJ. L.MansourM.RammingD. W.MackeyB. E. (2003). Correlations of morphological, anatomical, and chemical features of grape berries with resistance to Botrytis cinerea.Phytopathology931263–1273. 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.10.1263
59
GaoD.KnightM. R.TrewavasA. J.SattelmacherB.PliethC. (2004). Self-reporting Arabidopsis expressing pH and [Ca2+] indicators unveil ion dynamics in the cytoplasm and in the apoplast under abiotic stress.Plant Physiol.134898–908. 10.1104/pp.103.032508
60
GenyL.DarrieumerlouA.DonecheB. (2003). Conjugated polyamines and hydroxycinnamic acids in grape berries during Botrytis cinerea disease development: differences between ‘noble rot’ and ‘grey mould’.Austr. J. Grape Wine Res.9102–106. 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2003.tb00259.x
61
GiovannoniJ. (2001). Molecular biology of fruit maturation and ripening.Annu. Rev. Plant Phys.52725–749. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.725
62
GlazebrookJ. (2005). Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.43205–227. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.135923
63
GonzalezBoschC.BrummellD. A.BennettA. B. (1996). Differential expression of two endo-1,4-beta-glucanase genes in pericarp and locules of wild-type and mutant tomato fruit.Plant Physiol.1111313–1319.
64
GriebelT.ZeierJ. (2010). A role for beta-sitosterol to stigmasterol conversion in plant-pathogen interactions.Plant J.63254–268. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04235.x
65
GustavssonJ.CederbergC.SonessonU.van OtterdijkR.MeybeckA. (2011). Global Food Losses and Food Waste - Extent, Causes and Prevention.Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
66
HadasY.GoldbergI.PinesO.PruskyD. (2007). Involvement of gluconic acid and glucose oxidase in the pathogenicity of Penicillium expansum in apples.Phytopathology97384–390. 10.1094/PHYTO-97-3-0384
67
HanoC.AddiM.FliniauxO.BensaddekL.DuvergerE.MesnardF.et al (2008). Molecular characterization of cell death induced by a compatible interaction between Fusarium oxysporum f. sp linii and flax (Linum usitatissimum) cells.Plant Physiol. Biochem.46590–600. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2008.02.004
68
HarberdN. P.BelfieldE.YasumuraY. (2009). The angiosperm gibberellin-GID1-DELLA growth regulatory mechanism: how an “Inhibitor of an Inhibitor” enables flexible response to fluctuating environments.Plant Cell211328–1339. 10.1105/tpc.109.066969
69
HeinzenH.deVriesJ. X.MoynaP.RembergG.MartinezR.TietzeL. F. (1996). Mass spectrometry of labelled triterpenoids: thermospray and electron impact ionization analysis.Phytochem. Anal.7237–244. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1565(199609)7:5<237::AID-PCA310>3.0.CO;2-M
70
HématyK.CherkC.SomervilleS. (2009). Host–pathogen warfare at the plant cell wall.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.12406–413. 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.06.007
71
Hen-AviviS.LashbrookeJ.CostaF.AharoniA. (2014). Scratching the surface: genetic regulation of cuticle assembly in fleshy fruit.J. Exp. Bot.654653–4664. 10.1093/jxb/eru225
72
HodgesD. (2003). Overview: Oxidative Stress and Postharvest Produce. Postharvesst Oxidative Stress in Horticultural Crops (New York, NY: Food Products Press) 1–12.
73
HofmanP. J.Jobin-DecorM.MeiburgG. F.MacnishA. J.JoyceD. C. (2001). Ripening and quality responses of avocado, custard apple, mango and papaya fruit to 1-methylcyclopropene.Aust. J. Exp. Agric.41567–572. 10.1071/EA00152
74
HongY.MartinezA.Liger-BelairG.JeandetP.NuzillardJ.CilindreC. (2012). Metabolomics reveals simultaneous influences of plant defence system and fungal growth in Botrytis cinerea-infected Vitis vinifera cv.Chardonnay berries. J. Exp. Bot.635773–5785. 10.1093/jxb/ers228
75
HuckelhovenR. (2007). Cell wall - associated mechanisms of disease resistance and susceptibility.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.45101–127. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.45.062806.094325
76
HydeK. D.CaiL.CannonP. F.CrouchJ. A.CrousP. W.DammU.et al (2009). Colletotrichum - names in current use.Fungal Divers39147–182.
77
ItkinM.RogachevI.AlkanN.RosenbergT.MalitskyS.MasiniL.et al (2011). GLYCOALKALOID METABOLISM1 is required for steroidal alkaloid glycosylation and prevention of phytotoxicity in tomato.Plant Cell234507–4525. 10.1105/tpc.111.088732
78
JanisiewiczW. J.LeverentzB.ConwayW. S.SaftnerR. A.ReedA. N.CampM. J. (2003). Control of bitter rot and blue mold of apples by integrating heat and antagonist treatments on 1-MCP treated fruit stored under controlled atmosphere conditions.Postharvest Biol. Technol.29129–143. 10.1016/S0925-5214(03)00040-1
79
JerschS.SchererC.HuthG.SchlosserE. (1989). Proanthocyanidins as basis for quiescence of Botrytis-cinerea in immature strawberry fruits.Z. Pflanzenk. Pflanzen96365–378.
80
JohnsonG. I.MeadA. J.CookeA. W.DeanJ. R. (1992). Mango stem end rot pathogens - fruit infection by endophytic colonization of the inflorescence and pedicel.Ann. Appl. Biol.120225–234. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1992.tb03420.x
81
KachrooA.KachrooP. (2009). Fatty acid-derived signals in plant defense.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.47153–176. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081820
82
KachrooA.RobinG. P. (2013). Systemic signaling during plant defense.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.16527–533. 10.1016/j.pbi.2013.06.019
83
KalamakiM. S.HarpsterM. H.PalysJ. M.LabavitchJ. M.ReidD. S.BrummellD. A. (2003). Simultaneous transgenic suppression of LePG and LeExp1 influences rheological properties of juice and concentrates from a processing tomato variety.J. Agric. Food Chem.517456–7464. 10.1021/jf034164l
84
KaussH.FauthM.MertenA.JeblickW. (1999). Cucumber hypocotyls respond to cutin monomers via both an inducible and a constitutive H2O2-generating system.Plant Physiol.1201175–1182. 10.1104/pp.120.4.1175
85
KemmerlingB.SchwedtA.RodriguezP.MazzottaS.FrankM.Abu QamarS.et al (2007). The BRI1-associated kinase 1, BAK1, has a Brassinoli-independent role in plant cell-death control.Curr. Biol.171116–1122. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.046
86
KimK. S.MinJ. Y.DickmanM. B. (2008). Oxalic acid is an elicitor of plant programmed cell death during Sclerotinia sclerotiorum disease development.Mol. Plant Microbe21605–612. 10.1094/MPMI-21-5-0605
87
KrishnaP. (2003). Brassinosteroid-mediated stress responses.J. Plant Growth Regul.22289–297. 10.1007/s00344-003-0058-z
88
KuV. V. V.WillsR. B. H.Ben-YehoshuaS. (1999). 1-methylcyclopropene can differentially affect the postharvest life of strawberries exposed to ethylene.Hortscience34119–120.
89
LacanD.BaccouJ.-C. (1998). High levels of antioxidant enzymes correlate with delayed senescence in nonnetted muskmelon fruits.Planta204377–382. 10.1007/s004250050269
90
LagerI.AndréassonO.DunbarT. L.AndreassonE.EscobarM. A.RasmussonA. G. (2010). Changes in external pH rapidly alter plant gene expression and modulate auxin and elicitor responses.Plant Cell Environ.331513–1528. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02161.x
91
LashbrookeJ. G.AdatoA.AlkanN.TsimbalistT.RechavK.FernandezJ. P.et al (2015). The tomato MIXTA-like transcription factor coordinates fruit epidermis conical cell development and cuticular lipid biosynthesis and assembly.Plant Physiol.10.1104/pp.15.01145[Epub ahead of print].
92
LattanzioV.Di VenereD.LinsalataV.BertoliniP.IppolitoA.SalermoM. (2001). Low temperature metabolism of apple phenolics and quiescence of Phlyctaena vagabunda.J. Agric. Food Chem.495817–5821. 10.1021/jf010255b
93
LattanzioV.LattanzioV. M. T.CardinaliA. (2006). “Role of phenolics in the resistance mechanisms of plants against fungal pathogens and insects,” inPhytochemistry: Advances in Researched.ImperatoF. (Kerala: Research Signpost) 23–67.
94
LesterG. (2003). Oxidative Stress Affecting Fruit Senescence. Postharvest Oxidative Stress in Horticultural Crops (New York: Food Products Press) 113–129.
95
L’HaridonF.Besson-BardA.BindaM.SerranoM.Abou-MansourE.BaletF.et al (2011). A permeable cuticle is associated with the release of reactive oxygen species and induction of innate immunity.PLoS Pathog.7:e1002148. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002148
96
LipinskiB.HansonC.LomaxJ.KitinojaL.RaiteW.SearchingerT. (2013). Reducing Food Loss and Waste.Washington, DC: United Nations Environment Programme.
97
LiuH. X.JiangW. B.ZhouL. G.WangB. G.LuoY. B. (2005). The effects of 1-methylcyclopropene on peach fruit (Prunus persica L. cv. Jiubao) ripening and disease resistance.Int. J. Food Sci. Technol.401–7. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.00905.x
98
ManteauS.AbounaS.LambertB.LegendreL. (2003). Differential regulation by ambient pH of putative virulence factor secretion by the phytopathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea.FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.43359–366. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2003.tb01076.x
99
MarcosJ. F.González-CandelasL.ZacaríasL. (2005). Involvement of ethylene biosynthesis and perception in the susceptibility of citrus fruits to Penicillium digitatum infection and the accumulation of defence-related mRNAs.J. Exp. Bot.562183–2193. 10.1093/jxb/eri218
100
MengisteT. (2012). Plant immunity to necrotrophs.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.50267–294. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-172955
101
MengisteT.VanAlfenN.LeachJ.LindowS. (2012). Plant immunity to necrotrophs.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.50267–294. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-172955
102
MennitiA. M.GregoriR.DonatiI. (2004). 1-methylcyclopropene retards postharvest softening of plums.Postharvest Biol. Technol.31269–275. 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2003.09.009
103
MentD.AlkanN.LuriaN.BiF.-C.ReuveniE.FluhrR.et al (2015). A role of AREB in the regulation of PACC-dependent acid-expressed-genes and pathogenicity of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides.Mol. Plant Microbe28154–166. 10.1094/MPMI-09-14-0252-R
104
MorA.KohE.WeinerL.RosenwasserS.Sibony-BenyaminiH.FluhrR. (2014). Singlet oxygen signatures are detected independent of light or chloroplasts in response to multiple stresses.Plant Physiol.165249–261. 10.1104/pp.114.236380
105
NavarroL.BariR.AchardP.LisonP.NemriA.HarberdN. P.et al (2008). DELLAs control plant immune responses by modulating the balance of jasmonic acid and salicylic acid signaling.Curr. Biol.18650–655. 10.1016/j.cub.2008.03.060
106
NurnbergerT.ScheelD. (2001). Signal transmission in the plant immune response.Trends Plant Sci.6372–379. 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02019-2
107
O’ConnellR. J.ThonM. R.HacquardS.AmyotteS. G.KleemannJ.TorresM. F.et al (2012). Lifestyle transitions in plant pathogenic Colletotrichum fungi deciphered by genome and transcriptome analyses.Nat. Genet.441060–1065. 10.1038/ng.2372
108
OkawaK. (2014). Market and Trade Impacts of Food Loss and Waste Reduction (Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development).
109
OsorioS.AlbaR.DamascenoC. M.Lopez-CasadoG.LohseM.ZanorM. I.et al (2011). Systems biology of tomato fruit development: combined transcript, protein, and metabolite analysis of tomato transcription factor (nor, rin) and ethylene receptor (Nr) mutants reveals novel regulatory interactions.Plant Physiol.157405–425. 10.1104/pp.111.175463
110
PaniaguaC.PoseS.MorrisV. J.KirbyA. R.QuesadaM. A.MercadoJ. A. (2014). Fruit softening and pectin disassembly: an overview of nanostructural pectin modifications assessed by atomic force microscopy.Ann. Bot. Lond.1141375–1383. 10.1093/aob/mcu149
111
PenalvaM. A.TilburnJ.BignellE.ArstH. N. (2008). Ambient pH gene regulation in fungi: making connections.Trends Microbiol.16291–300. 10.1016/j.tim.2008.03.006
112
PieterseC. M. J.Van der DoesD.ZamioudisC.Leon-ReyesA.Van WeesS. C. M. (2012). Hormonal modulation of plant immunity.Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.28489–521. 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154055
113
PoratR.WeissB.CohenL.DausA.GorenR.DrobyS. (1999). Effects of ethylene and 1-methylcyclopropene on the postharvest qualities of ‘Shamouti’ oranges.Postharvest Biol. Technol.15155–163. 10.1016/S0925-5214(98)00079-9
114
PowellA. L. T.KalamakiM. S.KurienP. A.GurrieriS.BennettA. B. (2003). Simultaneous transgenic suppression of LePG and LeExp1 influences fruit texture and juice viscosity in a fresh market tomato variety.J. Agric. Food Chem.517450–7455. 10.1021/jf034165d
115
PowellA. L. T.van KanJ.ten HaveA.VisserJ.GreveL. C.BennettA. B.et al (2000). Transgenic expression of pear PGIP in tomato limits fungal colonization.Mol. Plant Microbe13942–950. 10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.9.942
116
PrinsT. W.TudzynskiP.von TiedemannA.TudzynskiB.ten HaveA.HansenM. E.et al (2000). “Infections strategies of Botrytis cinerea and related necrotrophic pathogens,” inFungal Pathologyed.KronstadW. (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic) 33–65. 10.1007/978-94-015-9546-9_2
117
PruskyD. (1996). Pathogen quiescence in postharvest diseases.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.34413–434. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.34.1.413
118
PruskyD.AlkanN.MengisteT.FluhrR. (2013). Quiescent and necrotrophic lifestyle choice during postharvest disease development.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.5155–76. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102349
119
PruskyD.BenarieR.GuelfatreichS. (1981). Etiology and histology of Alternaria rot of persimmon fruits.Phytopathology711124–1128. 10.1094/Phyto-71-1124
120
PruskyD.KobilerI.MiyaraI.AlkanN. (2009). “Fruit diseases,” inThe Mango, Botany, Production and Uses2nd Edned.LitzR. E. (Cambridge: CABI International) 210–231. 10.1079/9781845934897.0210
121
RijkenbergF.LeeuwG. D.VerhoeffK. (1980). Light and electron microscopy studies on the infection of tomato fruits by Botrytis cinerea.Can. J. Bot.581394–1404. 10.1139/b80-170
122
Robert-SeilaniantzA.GrantM.JonesJ. D. G. (2011). Hormone crosstalk in plant disease and defense: more than just jasmonate-salicylate antagonism.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.49317–343. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114447
123
RogiersS. Y.KumarG. N. M.KnowlesN. R. (1998). Maturation and ripening of fruit of Amelanchier alnifolia Nutt are accompanied by increasing oxidative stress.Ann. Bot. Lond.81203–211. 10.1006/anbo.1997.0543
124
SaftnerR. A.AbbottJ. A.ConwayW. S.BardenC. L. (2003). Effects of 1-methylcyclopropene and heat treatments on ripening and postharvest decay in ‘Golden Delicious’ apples.J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.128120–127.
125
SchallerA.OeckingC. (1999). Modulation of plasma membrane H+-ATPase activity differentially activates wound and pathogen defense responses in tomato plants.Plant Cell11263–272.
126
SchweizerP.FelixG.BuchalaA.MüllerC.MétrauxJ. P. (1996). Perception of free cutin monomers by plant cells.Plant J.10331–341. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.10020331.x
127
SeymourG. B.ØstergaardL.ChapmanN. H.KnappS.MartinC. (2013). Fruit development and ripening.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.64219–241. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120057
128
SharrockK. R.LabavitchJ. M. (1994). Polygalacturonase inhibitors of bartlett pear fruits differential effects on Botrytis cinerea polygalacturonase isozymes, and influence on products of fungal hydrolysis of pear cell walls and on ehylene induction in cell culture.Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.45305–319. 10.1016/S0885-5765(05)80061-X
129
ShiJ. X.AdatoA.AlkanN.HeY. H.LashbrookeJ.MatasA. J.et al (2013). The tomato SlSHINE3 transcription factor regulates fruit cuticle formation and epidermal patterning.New Phytol.197468–480. 10.1111/nph.12032
130
Simon-PlasF.RusterucciC.MilatM. L.HumbertC.MontilletJ. L.BleinJ. P. (1997). Active oxygen species production in tobacco cells elicited by cryptogein.Plant Cell Environ.201573–1579. 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-45.x
131
SpoelS. H.DongX. (2008). Making sense of hormone crosstalk during plant immune responses.Cell Host Microbe3348–351. 10.1016/j.chom.2008.05.009
132
SpoelS. H.JohnsonJ. S.DongX. (2007). Regulation of tradeoffs between plant defenses against pathogens with different lifestyles.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10418842–18847. 10.1073/pnas.0708139104
133
SuH.GublerW. D. (2012). Effect of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) on reducing postharvest decay in tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.).Postharvest Biol. Technol.64133–137. 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.06.005
134
SuttonB. C. (1980). The Coelomycetes. Fungi Imperfecti with Pycnidia, Acervuli and Stromata.Kew: Commonwealth Mycological Institute.
135
SuttonB. C. (1992). “The genus Glomerella and its anamorph Colletotrichum,” inColletotrichum: Biology, Pathology and ControledsBaileyJ. A.JegerJ. M. (Wallingford: Centre for Biosciences and Agriculture International) 1–26.
136
SymonsG.ChuaY.-J.RossJ.QuittendenL.DaviesN.ReidJ. (2012). Hormonal changes during non-climacteric ripening in strawberry.J. Exp. Bot.634741–4750. 10.1093/jxb/ers147
137
SymonsG.DaviesC.ShavrukovY.DryI.ReidJ.ThomasM. (2006). Grapes on steroids. Brassinosteroids are involved in grape berry ripening.Plant Physiol.150–158.
138
TadaY.SpoelS. H.Pajerowska-MukhtarK.MouZ.SongJ.WangC.et al (2008). Plant immunity requires conformational charges of NPR1 via S-nitrosylation and thioredoxins.Science321952–956. 10.1126/science.1156970
139
TianS.QinG.LiB. (2013). Reactive oxygen species involved in regulating fruit senescence and fungal pathogenicity.Plant Mol. Biol.82593–602. 10.1007/s11103-013-0035-2
140
TorresM. A.JonesJ. D.DanglJ. L. (2006). Reactive oxygen species signaling in response to pathogens.Plant Physiol.141373–378. 10.1104/pp.106.079467
141
van LoonL. C.RepM.PieterseC. M. J. (2006). Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.44135–162. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143425
142
vanKanJ. A. L.vantKloosterJ. W.WagemakersC. A. M.DeesD. C. T.van der VlugtBergmansC. J. B. (1997). Cutinase a of Botrytis cinerea is expressed, but not essential, during penetration of gerbera and tomato.Mol. Plant Microbe1030–38. 10.1094/MPMI.1997.10.1.30
143
VerhoeffK. (1974). Latent infections by fungi.Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.1299–110. 10.1146/annurev.py.12.090174.000531
144
VoisinD.NawrathC.KurdyukovS.FrankeR. B.Reina-PintoJ. J.EfremovaN.et al (2009). Dissection of the complex phenotype in cuticular mutants of Arabidopsis reveals a role of SERRATE as a mediator.PLoS Genet.5:e1000703. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000703
145
VorwerkS.SomervilleS.SomervilleC. (2004). The role of plant cell wall polysaccharide composition in disease resistance.Trends Plant Sci.9203–209. 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.02.005
146
WaltonJ. D. (1994). Deconstructing the cell wall.Plant Physiol.1041113–1118.
147
WatkinsC. B. (2006). The use of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) on fruits and vegetables.Biotechnol. Adv.24389–409. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.01.005
148
WatkinsC. B.NockJ. F. (2008). Effects of delayed controlled atmosphere storage of apples after rapid 1-MCP treatment.Hortscience431087–1087.
149
WidmerT. L.LaurentN. (2006). Plant extracts containing caffeic acid and rosmarinic acid inhibit zoospore germination of Phytophthora spp. pathogenic to Theobroma cacao.Eur. J. Plant Pathol.115377–388. 10.1007/s10658-006-9024-5
150
WildermuthM. C. (2006). Variations on a theme: synthesis and modification of plant benzoic acids.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.9288–296. 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.03.006
151
WilliamsB.KabbageM.KimH. J.BrittR.DickmanM. B. (2011). Tipping the balance: Sclerotinia sclerotiorum secreted oxalic acid suppresses host defenses by manipulating the host redox environment.PLoS Pathog.7:e1002107. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002107
152
WilliamsonB.TudzynskB.TudzynskiP.van KanJ. A. L. (2007). Botrytis cinerea: the cause of grey mould disease.Mol. Plant Pathol.8561–580. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00417.x
153
WojtaszekP.TrethowanJ.BolwellG. P. (1995). Specificity in the immobilization of cell-wall proteins in response to different elicitor molecules in suspension-cultured cells of french bean (Phaseolus-vulgaris L).Plant Mol. Biol.281075–1087. 10.1007/BF00032668
154
WoloshukC. P.KolattukudyP. E. (1986). Mechanism by which contact with plant cuticle triggers cutinase gene-expression in the spores of Fusarium-solani F-Sp Pisi.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.831704–1708. 10.1073/pnas.83.6.1704
155
WoolfA. B.Requejo-TapiaC.CoxK. A.JackmanR. C.GunsonA.ArpaiaM. L.et al (2005). 1-MCP reduces physiological storage disorders of ‘Hass’ avocados.Postharvest Biol. Technol.3543–60. 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.07.009
156
YakobyN.KobilerI.DinoorA.PruskyD. (2000). pH regulation of pectate lyase secretion modulates the attack of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides on avocado fruits.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.661026–1030. 10.1128/AEM.66.3.1026-1030.2000
157
ZaharahS. S.SinghZ.SymonsG. M.ReidJ. B. (2012). Role of brassinosteroids, ethylene, abscisic acid, and indole-3-acetic acid in mango fruit ripening.J. Plant Growth Regul.31363–372. 10.1007/s00344-011-9245-5
158
ZhaoJ.DavisL. C.VerpoorteR. (2005). Elicitor signal transduction leading to production of plant secondary metabolites.Biotechnol. Adv.23283–333. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2005.01.003
159
ZhuZ.ZhangZ. Q.QinG. Z.TianS. P. (2010). Effects of brassinosteroids on postharvest disease and senescence of jujube fruit in storage.Postharvest Biol. Technol.5650–55. 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.11.014
Summary
Keywords
post-harvest, ripening, plant response, phytohormones, cuticle, softening, phytoalexin, quiescent
Citation
Alkan N and Fortes AM (2015) Insights into molecular and metabolic events associated with fruit response to post-harvest fungal pathogens. Front. Plant Sci. 6:889. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00889
Received
15 July 2015
Accepted
07 October 2015
Published
20 October 2015
Volume
6 - 2015
Edited by
Zuhua He, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences – Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Reviewed by
Wei-Hua Tang, Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology – Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; Vasileios Fotopoulos, Cyprus University of Technology, Cyprus
Updates
Copyright
© 2015 Alkan and Fortes.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Noam Alkan, noamal@volcani.agri.gov.il
This article was submitted to Plant Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.