Abstract
Plants require several essential mineral nutrients for their growth and development. These nutrients are required to maintain physiological processes and structural integrity in plants. The root architecture has evolved to absorb nutrients from soil and transport them to other parts of the plant. Nutrient deficiency affects several physiological and biological processes in plants and leads to reduction in crop productivity and yield. To compensate this adversity, plants have developed adaptive mechanisms to enhance the acquisition, conservation, and mobilization of these nutrients under deficient or adverse conditions. In addition, plants have evolved an intricate nexus of complex signaling cascades, which help in nutrient sensing and uptake as well as to maintain nutrient homeostasis. In recent years, small non-coding RNAs such as micro RNAs (miRNAs) and endogenous small interfering RNAs have emerged as important component in regulating plant stress responses. A set of these small RNAs (sRNAs) have been implicated in regulating various processes involved in nutrient uptake, assimilation, and deficiency. In response to phosphorus (P) and sulphur (S) deficiencies, role of sRNAs, miR395 and miR399, have been identified to be instrumental; however, many more miRNAs might be involved in regulating the plant response to these nutrient stresses. These sRNAs modulate expression of target genes in response to P and S deficiencies and regulate their uptake and utilization for proper growth and development of the plant. This review summarizes the current understanding of uptake, sensing, and signaling of P and S and highlights the regulatory role of sRNAs in adaptive responses to these nutrient stresses in plants.
Introduction
Plants acquire mineral nutrients from the soil through extensive root system for their growth and development (; ). Conventionally, there are 16 essential mineral nutrients, which are crucial for plant development. These are required in different amounts and thus are categorized as primary, secondary, and micronutrients. Primary or the macronutrients include nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K); essentially required in various processes including photosynthesis, cell division, protein synthesis, and disease resistance. Secondary nutrients comprising calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), and sulfur (S) are required in lesser amount than the primary nutrients by the plants. Similarly, micronutrients required in trace amounts comprise boron (Bo), chlorine (Cl), iron (Fe), manganese (Mg), molybdenum (Mo), and zinc (Zn; Schachtman and Shin, 2007). The requirement of micronutrients is as essential as the primary and secondary nutrients for plant growth and development. These nutrients are taken up by the root system from the soil and associated microorganisms such as rhizobium and mycorrhizal associations. Most of the absorption of nutrients from soil is performed by the root hairs that form the extreme most component of the root system. Roots being the first site to sense nutrient availability maximizes nutrient uptake using high surface area and volume ratio (). Thus, the plants restructure the root architecture according to the nutrient availability, e.g., the succulents have deep penetrating with developed primary root whereas the aquatic plants have sparsely distributed and less developed primary roots. Plants possess counteracting mechanisms against nutrient deficiency that includes sensing, signaling, and acquisition of nutrients and restructuring the root architecture depending upon nutrient availability in the soil. The restructuring happens in the nutrient pockets of the soils where the root hairs and secondary roots develop well to enhance nutrient absorption whereas the number and length of root hairs and other root system components decreases in the nutrient deficient regions of the soil. From the rhizosphere and root epidermal cells, nutrients are transported to the vascular cells and are further allocated to different tissues (). Different transporters including ion channels, electrochemical potential-driven transporters, group translocators, electron carriers, and voltage gated channels present on the plasma membrane take part in the nutrient uptake and allocation in various cellular organelles and tissues (; Saier et al., 2016; Sasaki et al., 2016). Under nutrient deficiency, a complex signaling cascade from aerial plant tissue activates various biochemical components required for uptake and transport of nutrients to meet optimum requirement for growth and development.
In recent past, role of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) have been implicated in stress response including nutrient deficiency (Sunkar et al., 2007; ; ; Sharma et al., 2015). MicroRNAs (miRNAs) and endogenous small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) of 21–24 nucleotides length are two major classes of small regulatory RNAs in plants. Though these small RNAs (sRNAs) differ in their mode of biogenesis, regulate several processes through transcriptional (TGS) and post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS; ; Vaucheret and Fagard, 2001; Valencia-Sanchez et al., 2006; ; Tiwari et al., 2014). A number of studies suggest that these sRNAs regulate gene expression and thus modulate plant growth and development in normal or stress conditions including nutrient deficiency (; Sunkar et al., 2007; ; ; Sharma et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2016). Plants adapt to nutrient deficient conditions by modulating the expression of genes encoding specific group of transporters and metabolic enzymes. This differential regulation of these genes is controlled by a set of miRNA families. Major research endeavors have identified several miRNAs responsive to nutrient deficiencies in different plant species including Arabidopsis, maize, rice, and Medicago truncatula (Sunkar et al., 2007). In Arabidopsis, miR156 family has been identified to be most responsive toward nitrogen deficiency (). In addition, involvement of miR160 and miR170 has been shown in altering root structure architecture of plants in response to nitrogen deficiency (). Nodule development under nitrogen deficiency has been shown to be regulated by miR169 and miR172 reported in (; Yan et al., 2013). These miRNAs up regulate nitrate transporters under nitrogen deficiency conditions. Recent studies using genome-wide expression analysis and functional genomics approaches have identified differentially expressed miRNAs and their regulatory roles in different nutrient as well as other metal stresses including Copper (Cu), Iron (Fe), Manganese (Mn), and, Zinc (Zn). miRNAs including miR397, miR408, and miR857, have been observed to be up-regulated during Cu starvation and functions in the regulation of Cu levels in plants (). Under Fe-deficiency in plants, eight conserved miRNA genes of five families including miR854, were observed to be up-regulated. Analysis of cis-regulatory elements upstream of these miRNA genes revealed presence of IDE1/IDE2 (Iron-deficiency responsive cis-Elements 1 and 2) motifs in their promoter regions (). Notably, the induction of miRNAs modulate expression of array of genes and thus facilitate nutrient homeostasis in plants. In this review, recent progress and updates related to sRNAs-mediated mineral nutrient uptake, sensing and signaling have been reviewed. The focus of the review is on the nutrients P and S, which are essential for the growth and stress response in plants.
Phosphorus (P)
Uptake and Transport System
Phosphorus, is an important constituent of many organic molecules such as nucleic acid, sugars, ATP, and phospholipids, which provides energy and help in the growth and development of living organisms. Plants acquire phosphorus in the inorganic form (Pi) by high affinity transporters (PHTs) and Pi/H+ symporters (). In Arabidopsis, PHT gene family is divided into four groups (PHT1, PHT2, PHT3, and PHT4) are involved in different functions. PHT1;1 and PHT1;4 are high affinity transporters which acquire P from the soil, PHT1;5 is responsible for the source to sink translocation, PHT1;8 and PHT1;9 carry out root-shoot Pi mobilization (; Ye et al., 2015). PHT2;1 is the low affinity transporter and is involved in the Pi translocation between root and shoot. Other Pi transporter, PHO1 (Phosphate 1), contains SPX domain and EXS [Early Responsive to Dehydration1 (ERD1)], is involved in Pi loading into the xylem as pho1 mutant exhibits lower Pi levels in shoots (; Wege et al., 2016). PHO2 (PHOSPHATE2; ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2) acts as a negative regulator of Pi uptake and degrades phosphate transporters (PHT1;1, PHT1;2, PHT1;3, PHT1;4, PHO1) and phosphate transporter facilitator1 (PHF1; ). The identification and detailed investigation of other transporters involved in Pi homeostasis is required to understand the transport, cellular metabolism, and nutrient fluctuations in plants.
The Phosphate Starvation Response 1 (PHR1) is a central regulator of Pi homeostasis and up-regulates the expression of PHT and Pi-starvation induced genes through binding to the PHR1-binding sequences in the promoter region of many Pi-related genes (; Sobkowiak et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2013). Under phosphate deficient conditions, systemic and local signaling pathways are activated for the regulation of Pi uptake, assimilation, and redistribution inside the plant (Scheible and Rojas-Triana, 2015). A series of signaling events regulated by different factors take place leading to modulation in root structure architecture/morphology by increasing root hair length as well as lateral root formation to enhance Pi uptake from the external environment (Table 1) (; Svistoonoff et al., 2007; ; Shukla et al., 2015). In addition to above signaling events, secondary messengers such as Ca2+, inositol polyphosphates (IPs), and reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important role in regulating Pi homeostasis in plants (). As root development and architecture is a complex trait, detailed studies related to hormonal cross-talk and secondary messengers will help in better understanding of the mechanism and overall plant’s efficiency to adapt and combat nutrient deficiency.
Table 1
| Factor | Signal | Experiment | Effect | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| miR399 overexpression | Long distance | Vascular grafting | Suppression of PHO2; increased Pi transporter; increased Pi acquisition | ; , |
| Pi-deficiency in one of the root partner | Systemic/Local | Split-root | Entire sets of PSI transcripts regulated systemically; other groups of PSI gene transcripts are regulated locally | Thibaud et al., 2010 |
| Shoot Pi concentration | Systemic | Split-root | Cluster root growth; citrate exudation (White Lupin); repression of the plant genes involved in AM symbiosis | Shane et al., 2003; Shane and Lambers, 2006; ; |
| Auxin | Systemic | Exogenous application in P-sufficient roots | Mimics Pi-deficiency, i.e., reduced primary root length, higher lateral root density, root hair elongation | ; Williamson et al., 2001; |
| Ethylene | Systemic | Transcriptome analysis of Pi-deficient plants | Upregulation of ethylene responsive genes; antagonistic to auxin signaling | ; ; Uhde-Stone et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2003; ; ; ; Thibaud et al., 2010 |
| Cytokinin | Systemic | Phosphate deficient | Repress induction of PSI genes; increase in intracellular Pi concentration | ; |
Various signaling pathway components involved in Pi-related response.
Regulation of Pi Homeostasis by Small RNA
Various studies identified an array of genes involved in the Pi signaling network mechanisms (). In addition, involvement of sRNAs in regulating the expression of genes involved in phosphate uptake and assimilation in different plant species including Arabidopsis, maize, soybean, rice, and tomato has been demonstrated (; ; Xu et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2013; ). Identification of these phosphate starvation responsive miRNA families (Table 2) has been identified via various approaches including high throughput sRNA sequencing. These miRNAs mediate regulation of phosphate uptake, transport, and assimilation in plants through targeting a set of genes. Studies suggest that miRNA families such as miR156, miR159, miR166, miR319, miR395, miR398, miR399, miR447, and miR827 are commonly responsive to Pi-deficiency among different species and are presumably involved in conserved Pi-deficiency signaling networks (Sun et al., 2012; Sunkar et al., 2012). In most of these studies, enhanced levels of miR156, miR399, miR778, miR827, miR2111 and repressed levels of miR169, miR395, and miR398 were observed under Pi-deficiency (). However, abundance of miR778 and miR2111 is reduced by approximately twofold after the addition of Pi (). Apart from Pi-deficiency, role of miR2111 has been demonstrated in N-starvation (). Similarly, miR827 and miR399 are responsive to N-starvation and target Nitrogen Limitation Adaptation (NLA) gene and enhances the expression of PHO2 transporter. Analysis of proximal promoters of Pi-responsive MIRNA genes suggest presence of conserved motifs which might be involved in regulated expression under Pi-deficiency (Zeng et al., 2010). Detailed characterization of these cis-elements and interacting proteins will help in the better understanding of the molecular regulation mechanism of genes involved in Pi acquisition and transport.
Table 2
| miRNA families | Plant species | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Up-regulated | Down-regulated | ||
| miR156, miR157, miR159, miR163, miR164, miR165, miR166, miR167, miR171, miR172, miR319, miR391, miR393, miR399, miR408, miR447, miR778, miR780, miR822, miR824, miR827, miR828, miR843, miR865, miR866 | miR169, miR395, miR398, miR402, miR779, miR823, miR860, miR2111 | Arabidopsis thaliana | ; ; |
| miR399, miR827 | Oryza sativa | Zhou et al., 2008; | |
| miR156, miR160, miR166, miR168, miR171, miR395, miR396, miR399, miR437, miR447, miR472, miR477, miR809, miR818, miR830, miR845, miR854, miR857, miR863, miR866, miR896, mir903, miR904, miR1222 | miR159, miR164, miR166, miR167, miR319, miR390, miR395, miR396, miR397, miR447, miR530, miR810, miR818, miR857, miR893, miR895, miR1211 | Lupinus albus | Zhu et al., 2010 |
| miR156, miR157, miR159, miR167, miR168, miR319, miR396, miR474, miR482, miR894, miR1509 | miR160, miR165, miR166, miR168, miR396, miR398, miR834, miR854, miR1118, miR1311, miR1427, miR1436, miR1450, miR1507, miR1508, miR1511, miR1846, miR1858, miR1879, miR1881 | Glycine max | Zeng et al., 2010 |
| miR156, miR157, miR170, miR319, miR393, miR399 | miR160, miR167, miR169, miR317, miR397, miR398, miR408, miR1511, miR1513, miR1515, miR1516, miR2118 | Phaseolus vulgaris | Valdés-López et al., 2010 |
| miR171, miR172, miR394, miR395, miR398, miR399, miR779, miR837, miR839, miR840, miR847, miR860, miR861, miR862, miR867 | miR158, miR169, miR172, miR319, miR398, miR771, miR775, miR158, miR169, miR319, miR172, miR771, miR775 | Solanum lycopersicum | |
Plant micro RNA (miRNA) families responsive to Pi-deficiency.
Unique miRNAs are indicated in Bold.
Genes encoding SPX subfamily proteins, SPX-MFS (Major Facility Superfamily) are reported to be involved in the Pi-sensing/transport and are targeted by miR827 (). In addition, miR398a has been shown to regulate the expression of a set of genes under P, N, and C deficiency and helps in the maintenance of mineral balance in plants (). Studies also suggest that phloem enriched sRNAs respond to P-deficiency. Grafting studies carried out on Arabidopsis wild type and the miRNA processing hen1-1 mutant plants identified miR399 and miR395 as phloem sap sRNAs that are transported from shoot to root and target genes in the roots of the seedlings exposed to nutrient deficiency (). miRNA-mediated post-transcriptional and ubiquitin-mediated post-translational regulatory pathways have been shown to modulate Pi transport activity in response to external Pi status (). Interestingly, responsiveness of many miRNAs is species- and tissues/organs-specific under Pi-deficiency. In response to phosphate starvation, miR395 is down-regulated in the Arabidopsis shoots but up-regulated in the shoots of white lupin (Lupinus albus; Zhu et al., 2010).
Among all Pi-responsive miRNAs, miR399 is the most studied phosphate starvation responsive sRNA which is up-regulated under Pi-stressed conditions (; ; Phillips et al., 2007). In Arabidopsis, all the six members of MIR399 genes (MIR399A–F) are induced under Pi-deficiency (). Overexpression of miR399 in transgenic Arabidopsis led to the enhanced Pi uptake and allocation to the shoots (; ). Interestingly, overexpression of Arabidopsis miR399 in tomato exhibited increased Pi accumulation and secretion of acid phosphatase in the roots causing hydrolysis of soil organic P and dissolution of Pi (). Studies suggest that miR399 targets three genes; Pi transporter (PHT1;7), a DEAD box helicase and PHO2 which encodes putative ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (UBC) under Pi deficient condition (). miR399 acts as a positive regulator and enhances Pi uptake and translocation under Pi deficient condition, while PHO2 functions as a negative regulator and suppress these activities to prevent excess Pi uptake under Pi sufficient condition (; Yuan and Liu, 2008). In addition, miR399 also serves as a long-distance signal from shoot to suppress PHO2 expression and maintain Pi homeostasis in plants. Furthermore, miR399 has been shown to function in multiple nutrient deficiency responses in rice. GeneChip analysis of the OsmiR399 overexpressing plants revealed up regulation of number of genes involved in multiple nutrient stress conditions such as iron, potassium, sodium, and calcium ().
In Arabidopsis, the non-protein coding gene IPS1 (Induced by phosphate starvation1) was identified to contain a motif with sequence complementarity to miR399. IPS1 was found to sequester miR399 due to the interrupted pairing of IPS1-miR399. Consequently, overexpression of IPS1 resulted in the reduction of Pi levels in shoots due to the enhanced accumulation of miR399 target PHO2 (). It is noteworthy to mention that identification and analysis of regulated expression of additional endogenous target mimics will help in developing strategies and approaches to withstand environmental constraints by the plants.
Expression and functional genomics approaches have demonstrated the complex network of regulatory genes involved in Pi-deficiency (; Wu et al., 2003; ). Under Pi-deficiency, the major transcriptional regulatory system involving PHR1, SIZ1, miR399, and PHO2 has been suggested in Arabidopsis thaliana (; Schachtman and Shin, 2007). In addition, PHR1-miR399-PHO2 signaling pathway has also been shown to operate in rice in response to Pi-deficiency. OsPHR2, the homolog of AtPHR1, is a key regulator involved in Pi-starvation signaling in rice (Zhou et al., 2008). A recent study suggests that under Pi-deficiency, AtMYB2 regulates miR399f expression by directly binding to MYB-binding site in the promoter region of the miR399f precursor. The over expression of AtMYB2 also affects root system architecture causing reduction in the primary root growth and enhancement in root hair development ().
Interestingly, Pi-responsive miR399 was observed to be induced by Candidatus liberibacter infection which causes Huanglongbing (HLB) disease of citrus. sRNA profiling of infected and healthy sweet orange plants identified number of miRNAs and siRNAs induced in response to the infection. The induction of miR399 is in correspondence to Pi-deficiency in the infected plants as compared to the healthy plants (Zhao et al., 2013). This suggests existence of interplay of sRNAs under nutrient deficiency and biotic stresses in plants.
Various studies demonstrated that miR827 and miR2111 are induced in response to phosphate starvation but not under other nutrient deficiency conditions (). miR827 target gene encoding proteins containing SPX domain, which is involved in Pi-sensing, and transport in yeast and xylem loading in plants (). miR2111 target gene encodes F-box protein, which is a component of SCF ubiquitin ligase complexes. Notably, all the three inducible miRNAs (miR399, miR827, and miR2111) target genes involved in the ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation pathway, which suggest that the post-translational regulation of genes is a key component in the adaptive response of Pi-deficiency. Intriguingly, phosphate starvation responsive miRNAs such as miR828 regulates ta-siRNAs (TAS4) transcript which produces clusters of phased transacting, siRNAs (). It has been reported that TAS4-siR81(-), which is one of the dominant TAS4 siRNAs, targets the transcripts of a group of MYB transcription factors involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis (Rajagopalan et al., 2006). Anthocyanin accumulation is a common stress response and induction of TAS4-siR81(-) under N deficiency indicates autoregulation mechanism in plants.
Sulfur (S)
Uptake and Transport System
Plants take up sulfur in the form of sulfate (SO42–) from the soil via sulfate transporters located on the epidermal and cortical plasma membrane of the roots (). Sulfate transporter gene family has been characterized in different plant species (Takahashi, 2010; , ). Arabidopsis genome encodes 14 sulfate transporters, which are divided into five groups on the basis of their sequence similarity, substrate affinity, and tissue specific localization (; ). Group 1 transporters are high affinity sulfate transporters involved in the uptake of sulfate from the soil (; Yoshimoto et al., 2007). Group 2 transporters are low affinity sulfate transporters responsible for the long-distance transport of sulfate (Takahashi, 2010). Group 3 comprises transporters that work in cooperation with low affinity transporters and mainly translocate sulfate from root to shoot (). Vacuoles are considered to be the ‘store house’ of sulfate, and during sulfate limiting condition, sulfate is mobilized from vacuoles to the cytoplasm. The sulfate efflux transporters are located on the tonoplast and are classified in Group 4 (Zuber et al., 2010). The transporters belonging to group 5 are also termed as molybdenum transporters due to their involvement in transport of molybdenum inside the plant (Shinmachi et al., 2010). Under sulfur deficiency, predominantly, the expression of high affinity transporters (Group 1) increases which helps in uptake of sulfate from the soil to maintain sulfate homeostasis inside the plant ().
After sulfate acquisition, S is assimilated into the plastid by the sulfur assimilation pathway (). Sulfate is converted to adenosine 5′-phosphosulfate (APS) by ATP sulphurylase, the first step of this pathway. Further, sulfate is reduced to sulfite by enzyme APS reductase and subsequently to sulfide by sulfite reductase enzyme. This sulfide is incorporated into cysteine, which is a precursor for various sulfur containing compounds such as phytochelatins, metallothioneins, and glutathiones playing important role in stress tolerance (; ,,).
Regulation of S Homeostasis by Small RNA
A number of studies have been carried out to identify and validate function of S-responsive miRNAs. These S-responsive miRNAs generally target different transcription factors involved in auxin signaling pathway and stress response () and regulate sulfate uptake, transport and assimilation in plants (Figure 1). Deep sequencing identified 27 conserved miRNAs and five novel miRNAs, which express under SO2 stress in Arabidopsis (). The novel miRNAs; miR66 and miR67 were up-regulated more than sixfold whilst miR14, miR20 and miR43 were down-regulated sevenfold in the SO2-treated samples in comparison to control (Table 3). Comparative deep sequencing of Arabidopsis sRNAs treated with different nutrient deficiency including C, N, and S revealed that the targets of differentially expressed miRNAs were related to cellular and metabolic processes, signal transduction, and nutrient homeostasis. miR169b/c, miR826, and miR395 were specifically induced under C, N, and S deficiency, respectively. On the contrary, different miRNAs; miR167, miR172, miR397, miR398, miR399, miR408, miR775, miR827, miR841, miR857, and miR2111 were repressed under the C, N, and S deficient conditions (). Sequencing of sRNA population in Brassica napus identified conserved and novel miRNAs responsive to S deficiency and Cd stress (). This indicated that miRNA genes and their corresponding targets coordinately participate in both the stresses. Deep sequencing analysis of miRNAs in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii identified differential expression of miRNAs under S deficient and sulfur starved conditions (Shu and Hu, 2012). In addition, studies suggest binding of sulfur-responsive transcription factors particularly, Prohibitin (PHB), Squamosa-Promoter Binding (SPB), and Sulfur Limitation 1 (SLIM1) to the promoter of nutrient responsive miRNAs ().
FIGURE 1
Table 3
| miRNA families | Plant species | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Up-regulated | Down-regulated | ||
| miR160, miR164, miR169, miR173, miR319, miR395, miR400, miR403, miR771, miR826, mir829, mir833, miR837, miR846, miR864, mir842, miR5638, miR8172 | miR167, miR 171, miR172, miR390, miR391, miR397, miR398, miR399, miR408, miR775, miR825, miR827, miR841, miR845, miR850, miR857, miR863, mR1888, miR2111 | Arabidopsis thaliana | ; |
| miR156, miR159, miR164, miR393, miR394, miR395 | miR160, miR167, miR168 | Brassica napus | |
| miR156, miR159, miR160, miR162, miR164, miR166, miR167, miR168, miR169, miR171, miR172, miR319, miR390, miR393, miR394, miR395, miR396, miR397, miR398, miR399, miR403, miR408, miR530, miR535, miR3627, miR-c4, miRc-10 | Carica papaya | ||
| miR51, miR62, miR84, miR182, miR196, miR906, miR909, miR910, miR912, miR914, miR1144, miR1147, miR1148, miR1149, miR1150, miR1153, miR1155, miR1156, miR1158, miR1159, miR1160, miR1164, miR1166, miR1172 | Chlamydomonas reinhardtii | Shu and Hu, 2012 | |
Plant miRNA families responsive to S deficiency.
Unique miRNAs are represented in Bold.
Intriguingly, miR395 plays an important role in sulfate homeostasis by regulating the expression of genes involved in the sulfate uptake, transport and assimilation (; Zeng et al., 2014). It has been observed that miR395 is specifically responsive to S deficiency (). The MIR395 loci present in many monocots and dicots express in the vascular system of roots, root tips, and leaves (). Arabidopsis genome encodes six miR395 genes which are located in two clusters (miR395a,b,c and miR395d,e,f) whereas in rice 24 genes encoding miR395 are clustered into four clusters (; ).
In Arabidopsis, out of four ATP sulphurylases (APSs), APS1,3, and 4 are located in the plastid and APS2 is found in the cytosol (). miR395 target the mRNAs of three APSs (APS1, APS3, and APS4; Figure 1) which catalyze the initial activation step of sulfate assimilation into cysteine (; Sunkar et al., 2012). This clearly suggests that miR395 regulates the plastidial sulfate assimilation as sulfate is reduced and assimilated into cysteine in the plastid (Rotte and Leustek, 2000). Sulphation reaction occurs in the cytosol in which 5′-adenylsulfate is used for the synthesis of glucosinolates (). Under S deficiency, the regulation of miR395 remains elusive as induction of miR395 represses the expression of APS1 () whereas in Arabidopsis and Brassica roots expression of APS1 and APS3 and total APS activity increases. Moreover, transcript level of APS1 decreases twofold in the shoots of sulfate deficient conditions. Apart from regulating S assimilation, miR395 also regulates S uptake by targeting the gene encoding low affinity sulfate transporter Sul2;1 which is localized in the vascular tissues of roots and leaves (Takahashi et al., 2000; ; ; Zeng et al., 2014).
The miR395 overexpression in Arabidopsis suppressed the expression of target genes APS1, APS3, APS4, and Sul2;1 (). At the same time, overexpression of OsmiRNA395h in tobacco impaired S homeostasis and affected S distribution among leaves of different ages (Yuan et al., 2016). miR395 overexpressing Brassica napus transgenic plants accumulate higher biomass and sulfur content in Cd treated plants as compared to wild type. In addition, transgenic plants accumulated high level of Cd, with less translocation from root to shoot suggesting miR395 is involved in detoxification of Cd in Brassica napus (Zhang et al., 2013).
Furthermore, the transcription factor of the ethylene-insensitive like (EIL) family, SLIM1, has been observed to directly or indirectly regulate the expression of miR395 (Figure 1) to maintain S homeostasis under deficiency (; ). Under S deficiency, GSH level decreases, which further modulates the expression of genes involved in S metabolism and enhances the expression of miR395. As GSH is an important component of cellular redox signaling, involvement of redox signaling was suggested in the induction of miR395 under S deficiency (). In addition, analysis of miRNA395 over expressing Arabidopsis plants, slim1-1 mutants, and plants with reduced miR395 activity by target mimicry depicted the interplay of SLIM1 and miR395 in the sulfate assimilation in Arabidopsis (Todesco et al., 2010; ). Thus, the S-deficiency induced expression of miR395 represents a link between redox signaling and SLIM1 transcription factor.
Conclusion and Future Perspectives
Plants as sessile organisms have evolved several mechanisms to fulfill any type of nutrient deficiency. The roots and other aerial parts of the plant act as an extension for various signaling cascades to form a nexus to adapt to nutrient stress. miRNAs being an important component of this nexus, have been found to be riboregulatory in regulation of nutrient sensing, transport and assimilation, such as miR395 and miR399 for S and P, respectively. In plants, though lesser number of miRNA gene clusters exist, existence of miR399 and miR395 clusters reflect the occurrence of gene duplication events during evolution. This may be the reason for the coordinated regulation of these miRNAs under nutrient deficiency in plants. Though, a large number of nutrient deficiency responsive miRNAs have been identified, role of these miRNAs in regulating the nutrient stress needs to be studied. To elucidate various components and networks involved in nutrient homeostasis in plants, there is need to study different regulatory aspects (Figure 2) in detail. Future studies required in these areas are summarized below.
FIGURE 2
Apart from genetic regulation of gene expression, the epigenetic regulation also occurs in plants to counter nutrient deficiency as well as sufficiency. Studies have identified that alteration in chromatin structure and methylation pattern govern environmental adaptability in plants under nutrient deficiency (Sirohi et al., 2016). It has been reported that miRNAs also regulate gene expression via DNA methylation. For example, miR165/166 regulate the expression of target genes by DNA methylation (). Thus, investigation of epigenetic control during nutrient deficiency can offer clear and insightful information about the plant adaptability toward environmental constraints.
The recent study in the field of plant interactome suggested an insight into the global organization of various biological processes that constitute a community network of different hypothetical functional links between proteins and pathways (; Reichel et al., 2016). Such studies are required to establish sRNA-protein and protein-protein interaction networks to understand sRNA-mediated regulation and dynamic rewiring of processes such as nutrient sensing, uptake, transport, assimilation, and interactions occurring in plants.
In-depth sequencing of sRNA libraries and target gene analysis under single or multiple nutrient stress might help in the better understanding the cohort of sRNA-mediated stress responses in plant. Identification and characterization of endogenous target mimics for nutrient responsive miRNAs may provide deeper understanding about nutrient acquisition and utilization in plants. Recently, miRNA-PEPs (miPEP) have been shown to regulate a number of miRNAs (; ). It will be interesting to study whether such miPEPs are encoded by MIR genes responsive to nutrient deficiency and play role in nutrient homeostasis. The circular RNAs (circRNAs), a product of back-splicing of precursor mRNA; interfering eukaryotic processes by interference of splicing and transcription and also titrates miRNAs has been reported to regulate and reshape the gene expression (; Wang and Wang, 2015; ). Thus, a combination of various different approaches using high throughput technologies could help us uncover the master regulators and deregulators of plant nutrient stress.
An insight into the complexity of nutrient-plant interaction, the root system restructuring and the nutrient stress is essential for the improvement of crop yield and productivity as these depend upon ability of plant to utilize surrounding nutrients. The in situ imaging studies employing non-destructive X-ray based techniques () will be useful in elucidation of the root system growth dynamics and their restructuring upon various nutrient stresses. This will provide a que for plant breeders in future to develop hybrids with well-developed root architecture that might withstand adversity against many nutrient stresses and drought conditions. Thus, the exploration of precise mechanisms involved in sensing, signaling, and cross-talk of nutrients and miRNAs will help in developing strategies for improving the nutrient use efficiency and increasing crop productivity required for the global sustainability and food security.
Statements
Author contributions
SK and PT conceived the idea and planned the manuscript. SK, SV, and PT wrote the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by research grants from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, as Network Project (BSC-0107). SK thankfully acknowledges the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India, New Delhi for the DST-INSPIRE Faculty Award.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
Abdel-GhanyS. E.PilonM. (2008). MicroRNA-mediated systemic down-regulation of copper protein expression in response to low copper availability in Arabidopsis.J. Biol. Chem.28315932–15945. 10.1074/jbc.M801406200
2
AllenE.XieZ.GustafsonA. M.CarringtonJ. C. (2005). MicroRNA-directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants.Cell121207–221. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.004
3
Arabidopsis Interactome Mapping Consortium (2011). Evidence for network evolution in an Arabidopsis interactome map.Science333601–607. 10.1126/science.1203877
4
AungK.LinS. I.WuC. C.HuangY. T.SuC. L.ChiouT. J. (2006). pho2, a phosphate overaccumulator, is caused by a nonsense mutation in a microRNA399 target gene.Plant Physiol.1411000–1011. 10.1104/pp.106.078063
5
BaekD.KimM. C.ChunH. J.KangS.ParkH. C.ShinG.et al (2013). Regulation of miR399f transcription by AtMYB2 affects phosphate starvation responses in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol.161362–373. 10.1104/pp.112.205922
6
BalzergueC.Puech-PagèsV.BécardG.RochangeS. F. (2011). The regulation of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis by phosphate in pea involves early and systemic signaling events.J. Exp. Bot.621049–1060. 10.1093/jxb/erq335
7
BaoN.LyeK.BartonM. K. (2004). MicroRNA binding sites in Arabidopsis class III HD-ZIP m-RNAs are required for methylation of the template chromosomes.Dev. Cell7653–662. 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.10.003
8
Barciszewska-PacakM.MilanowskaK.KnopK.BielewiczD.NucP.PlewkaP.et al (2015). Arabidopsis microRNA expression regulation in a wide range of abiotic stress responses.Front. Plant Sci.6:e410. 10.3389/fpls.2015.00410
9
BariR.PantB. D.StittM.ScheibleW. R. (2006). PHO2, microRNA399, and PHR1 define a phosphate-signaling pathway in plants.Plant Physiol.141988–999. 10.1104/pp.106.079707
10
BreuillinF.SchrammJ.HajirezaeiM.AhkamiA.FavreP.DruegeU.et al (2010). Phosphate systemically inhibits development of arbuscular mycorrhiza in Petunia hybrida and represses genes involved in mycorrhizal functioning.Plant J.641002–1017. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04385.x
11
BuhtzA.PieritzJ.SpringerF.KehrJ. (2010). Phloem small RNAs, nutrient stress responses, and systemic mobility.BMC Plant Biol.10:e64. 10.1186/1471-2229-10-64
12
ChenL. L. (2016). The biogenesis and emerging roles of circular RNAs.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.17205–211. 10.1038/nrm.2015.32
13
ChiouT. J. (2007). The role of microRNAs in sensing nutrient stress.Plant Cell Environ.30323–332. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01643.x
14
ChiouT. J.AungK.LinS. I.WuC. C.ChiangS. F.SuC. L. (2006). Regulation of phosphate homeostasis by microRNA in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell18412–421. 10.1105/tpc.105.038943
15
ChiouT. J.LinS. I. (2011). Signaling network in sensing phosphate availability in plants.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.62185–206. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103849
16
CombierJ. P.FrugierF.BillyF.BoualemA.El-YahyaouiF.MoreauS.et al (2006). MtHAP2-1 is a key transcriptional regulator of symbiotic nodule development regulated by microRNA169 in Medicago truncatula.Genes Dev.203084–3088.
17
CouzigouJ. M.AndreO.GuillotinB.AlexandreM.CombierJ. P. (2016). Use of microRNA-encoded peptide miPEP172c to stimulate nodulation in soybean.New Phytol.211379–381. 10.1111/nph.13991
18
DixitG.SinghA. P.KumarA.DwivediS.DeebaF.KumarS.et al (2015a). Sulfur alleviates arsenic toxicity by reducing its accumulation and modulating proteome, amino acids and thiol metabolism in rice leaves.Sci. Rep.5:e16205. 10.1038/srep16205
19
DixitG.SinghA. P.KumarA.MishraS.DwivediS.KumarS.et al (2015b). Reduced arsenic accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) shoot involves sulfur mediated improved thiol metabolism, antioxidant system and altered arsenic transporters.Plant Physiol. Biochem.9986–96. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.11.005
20
DixitG.SinghA. P.KumarA.SinghP. K.KumarS.DwivediS.et al (2015c). Sulfur mediated reduction of arsenic toxicity involves efficient thiol metabolism and the antioxidant defense system in rice.J. Hazard. Mater.298241–251. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.06.008
21
DugasD. V.BartelB. (2008). Sucrose induction of Arabidopsis miR398 represses two Cu/Zn superoxide dismutases.Plant Mol. Biol.67403–417. 10.1007/s11103-008-9329-1
22
FangZ.ShaoC.MengY.WuP.ChenM. (2009). Phosphate signaling in Arabidopsis and Oryza sativa.Plant Sci.176170–180. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.09.007
23
Franco-ZorrillaJ. M.MartínA. C.LeyvaA.Paz-AresJ. (2005). Interaction between phosphate-starvation, sugar, and cytokinin signaling in Arabidopsis and the roles of cytokinin receptors CRE1/AHK4 and AHK3.Plant Physiol.138847–857. 10.1104/pp.105.060517
24
Franco-ZorrillaJ. M.ValliA.TodescoM.MateosI.PugaM. I.Rubio-SomozaI.et al (2007). Target mimicry provides a new mechanism for regulation of microRNA activity.Nat. Genet.391033–1037. 10.1038/ng2079
25
FujiiH.ChiouT. J.LinS. IAungK.ZhuJ. K. (2005). A miRNA involved in phosphate-starvation response in Arabidopsis.Curr. Biol.152038–2042. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.016
26
GaoN.SuY.MinJ.ShenW.ShiW. (2010). Transgenic tomato overexpressing ath-miR399d has enhanced phosphorus accumulation through increased acid phosphatase and proton secretion as well as phosphate transporters.Plant Soil334123–136. 10.1007/s11104-009-0219-3
27
GilbertG. A.KnightJ. D.VanceC. P.AllanD. L. (2000). Proteoid root development of phosphorus deficient lupin is mimicked by auxin and phosphonate.Ann. Bot.85921–928. 10.1006/anbo.2000.1133
28
GrossmanA.TakahashiH. (2001). Macronutrient utilization by photosynthetic eukaryotes and the fabric of interactions.Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.52163–210. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.163
29
GruberB. D.GiehlR. F. H.FriedelS.von WirénN. (2013). Plasticity of the Arabidopsis root system under nutrient deficiencies.Plant Physiol.163161–179. 10.1104/pp.113.218453
30
GuM.LiuW.MengQ.ZhangW. Q.ChenA. Q.SunS. B.et al (2014). Identification of microRNAs in six solanaceous plants and their potential link with phosphate and mycorrhizal signalings.J. Integr. Plant Biol.561164–1178. 10.1111/jipb.12233
31
GuM.XuK.ChenA.ZhuY.TangG.XuG. (2010). Expression analysis suggests potential roles of microRNAs for phosphate and arbuscular mycorrhizal signaling in Solanum lycopersicum.Physiol. Plant.138226–237. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01320.x
32
GuddetiS.ZhangD. C.LiA. L.LesebergC. H.HuiK.XiaoG. L.et al (2005). Molecular evolution of the rice miR395 gene family.Cell Res.15631–638. 10.1038/sj.cr.7290333
33
HackenbergM.HuangP. J.HuangC. Y.ShiB. J.GustafsonP.LangridgeP. A. (2013). Comprehensive expression profile of microRNAs and other classes of non-coding small RNAs in barley under phosphorous-deficient and -sufficient conditions.DNA Res.20109–125. 10.1093/dnares/dss037
34
HammondJ. P.BennettM. J.BowenH. C.BroadleyM. R.EastwoodD. C.MayS. T.et al (2003). Changes in gene expression in Arabidopsis shoots during phosphate starvation and the potential for developing smart plants.Plant Physiol.132578–596. 10.1104/pp.103.020941
35
HammondJ. P.WhiteP. J. (2008). Sucrose transport in the phloem: integrating root responses to phosphorus starvation.J. Exp. Bot.5993–109. 10.1093/jxb/erm221
36
HatzfeldY.LeeS.LeeM.LeustekT.SaitoK. (2000). Functional characterization of a gene encoding a fourth ATP sulfurylase isoform from Arabidopsis thaliana.Gene24851–58. 10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00132-3
37
HeL.HannonG. J. (2004). MicroRNAs: small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation.Nat. Rev. Genet.5522–531. 10.1038/nrg1379
38
HeZ.MaZ.BrownK. M.LynchJ. P. (2005). Assessment of inequality of root hair density in Arabidopsis thaliana using the Gini coefficient: a close look at the effect of phosphorus and its interaction with ethylene.Ann. Bot.95287–293. 10.1093/aob/mci024
39
HowarthJ. R.FourcroyP.DavidianJ. C.SmithF. W.HawkesfordM. J. (2003). Cloning of two contrasting high-affinity sulfate transporters from tomato induced by low sulfate and infection by the vascular pathogen Verticillium dahliae.Planta21858–64. 10.1007/s00425-003-1085-5
40
HsiehL. C.LinS. I.ShihA. C. C.ChenJ. W.LinW. Y.TsengC. Y.et al (2009). Uncovering small RNA-mediated responses to phosphate deficiency in Arabidopsis by deep sequencing.Plant Physiol.1512120–2132. 10.1104/pp.109.147280
41
HuB.WangW.DengK.LiH.ZhangZ.ChuC. (2015). MicroRNA399 is involved in multiple nutrient starvation responses in rice.Front.Plant Sci.6:e188. 10.3389/fpls.2015.00188
42
HuangS. Q.XiangA. L.CheL. L.ChenS.LiH.SongJ. B.et al (2010). A set of miRNAs from Brassica napus in response to sulphate deficiency and cadmium stress.Plant Biotechnol. J.8887–899. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00517.x
43
HuangT. K.HanC. L.LinS. I.ChenY. J.TsaiY. C.ChenY. R.et al (2013). Identification of downstream components of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme PHOSPHATE2 by quantitative membrane proteomic in Arabidopsis roots.Plant Cell254044–4060. 10.1105/tpc.113.115998
44
JagadeeswaranG.LiY. F.SunkarR. (2014). Redox signaling mediates the expression of a sulfate-deprivation-inducible microRNA395 in Arabidopsis.Plant J.7785–96. 10.1111/tpj.12364
45
JezJ. M.RaviliousG. E.HerrmannJ. (2016). Structural biology and regulation of the plant sulfation pathway.Chem. Biol. Interact.25931–38. 10.1016/j.cbi.2016.02.017
46
Jones-RhoadesM. W.BartelD. P. (2004). Computational identification of plant microRNAs and their targets, including a stress-induced miRNA.Mol. Cell14787–799. 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.027
47
KataokaT.Watanabe-TakahashiA.HayashiN.OhnishiM.MimuraT.BuchnerP.et al (2004). Vacuolar sulfate transporters are essential determinants controlling internal distribution of sulfate in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell162693–2704. 10.1105/tpc.104.023960
48
KawashimaC. G.MatthewmanC. A.HuangS.LeeB. R.YoshimotoN.KoprivovaA.et al (2011). Interplay of SLIM1 and miR395 in the regulation of sulfate assimilation in Arabidopsis.Plant J.66863–876. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04547.x
49
KawashimaC. G.YoshimotoN.Maruyama-NakashitaA.TsuchiyaY. N.SaitoK.TakahashiH.et al (2009). Sulphur starvation induces the expression of microRNA-395 and one of its target genes but in different cell types.Plant J.57313–321. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03690.x
50
KhraiweshB.ZhuJ.-K.ZhuJ. (2012). Role of miRNAs and siRNAs in biotic and abiotic stress responses of plants.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1819137–148. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.05.00
51
KimH.-J.LynchJ. P.BrownK. M. (2008). Ethylene insensitivity impedes a subset of responses to phosphorus deficiency in tomato and petunia.Plant Cell Environ.311744–1755. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01886.x
52
KongW. W.YangZ. M. (2010). Identification of iron-deficiency responsive microRNA genes and cis-elements in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol. Biochem.48153–159. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.12.008
53
KruszkaK.PieczynskiaM.WindelsD.BielewiczD.JarmolowskiA.Szweykowska-KulinskaZ. (2012). Role of microRNAs and other sRNAs of plants in their changing environments.J. Plant Physiol.1691664–1672. 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.03.009
54
KumarS.AsifM. H.ChakrabartyD.TripathiR. D.DubeyR. S.TrivediP. K. (2015). Comprehensive analysis of regulatory elements of the promoters of rice sulfate transporter gene family and functional characterization of OsSul1;1 promoter under different metal stress.Plant Signal. Behav.10:e990843. 10.4161/15592324.2014.990843
55
KumarS.AsifM. H.ChakrabartyD.TripathiR. D.TrivediP. K. (2011). Differential expression and alternative splicing of rice sulphate transporter family members regulate sulphur status during plant growth, development and stress conditions.Funct. Integr. Genomics11259–273. 10.1007/s10142-010-0207-y
56
KuoH. F.ChiouT. J. (2011). The role of microRNAs in phosphorus deficiency signaling.Plant Physiol.1561016–1024. 10.1104/pp.111.175265
57
LauresserguesD.CouzigouJ. M.ClementeH. S.MartinezY.DunandC.BecardG.et al (2015). Primary transcripts of microRNAs encode regulatory peptides.Nature52090–93. 10.1038/nature14346
58
LeustekT.SaitoK. (1999). Sulfate transport and assimilation in plants.Plant Physiol.120637–644. 10.1104/pp.120.3.637
59
LiL.XueM.YiH. (2016). Uncovering microRNA-mediated response to SO2 stress in Arabidopsis thaliana by deep sequencing.J. Hazard. Mater.316178–185. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.014
60
LiangC.WangJ.ZhaoJ.TianJ.LiaoH. (2014). Control of phosphate homeostasis through gene regulation in crops.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.2159–66. 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.06.009
61
LiangG.AiQ.YuD. (2015). Uncovering miRNAs involved in crosstalk between nutrient deficiencies in Arabidopsis.Sci. Rep.5:e11813. 10.1038/srep11813
62
LiangG.HeH.YuD. (2012). Identification of nitrogen starvation responsive miRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana.PLoS ONE7:e48951. 10.1371/journal.pone.0048951
63
LiangG.LiY.HeH.WangF.YuD. (2013). Identification of miRNAs and miRNA-mediated regulatory pathways in Carica papaya.Planta238739–752. 10.1007/s00425-013-1929-6
64
LiangG.YuD. (2010). Reciprocal regulation among miR395, APS, and SULTR2;1 in Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant Signal. Behav.51257–1259. 10.4161/psb.5.10.12608
65
LinS. I.ChiangS. F.LinW. Y.ChenJ. W.TsengC. Y.WuP. C.et al (2008). Regulatory network of microRNA399 and PHO2 by systemic signaling.Plant Physiol.147732–746. 10.1104/pp.108.116269
66
LinS. I.SantiC.JobetE.LacutE.El KholtiN.KarlowskiW. M.et al (2010). Complex regulation of two target genes encoding SPX-MFS proteins by rice miR827 in response to phosphate starvation.Plant Cell Physiol.512119–2131. 10.1093/pcp/pcq170
67
LinW. Y.HuangT. K.LeongS. J.ChiouT. J. (2014). Long-distance call from phosphate: systemic regulation of phosphate starvation responses.J. Exp. Bot.651817–1827. 10.1093/jxb/ert431
68
LinkohrB. I.WilliamsonL. C.FitterA. H.LeyserH. M. O. (2002). Nitrate and phosphate availability and distribution have different effects on root system architecture of Arabidopsis.Plant J.29751–760. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01251.x
69
LiuT. Y.ChangC. Y.ChiouT. J. (2009). The long-distance signaling of mineral macronutrients.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.12312–319. 10.1016/j.pbi.2009.04.004
70
LiuT. Y.LinW. Y.HuangT. K.ChiouT. J. (2014). MicroRNA-mediated surveillance of phosphate transporters on the move.Trends Plant Sci.19647–655. 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.06.004
71
López-BucioJ.Hernández-AbreuE.Sánchez-CalderónL.Nieto-JacoboM. F.SimpsonJ.Herrera-EstrellaL. (2002). Phosphate availability alters architecture and causes changes in hormone sensitivity in the Arabidopsis root system.Plant Physiol.129244–256. 10.1104/pp.010934
72
LuT.CuiL.ZhouY.ZhuC.FanD.GongH.et al (2015). Transcriptome-wide investigation of circular RNAs in rice.RNA212076–2087. 10.1261/rna.052282.115
73
LudewigU.FrommerW. B. (2002). Genes and proteins for solute transport and sensing.Arabidopsis Book1:e0092. 10.1199/tab.0092
74
LundmarkM.KornerC. J.NielsenT. H. (2010). Global analysis of microRNA in Arabidopsis in response to phosphate starvation as studied by locked nucleic acid-based microarrays.Physiol. Plant14057–68. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2010.01384.x
75
LynchJ. P. (2011). Root phenes for enhanced soil exploration and phosphorus acquisition: tools for future crops.Plant Physiol.1561041–1049. 10.1104/pp.111.175414
76
MaZ.BaskinT. I.BrownK. M.LynchJ. P. (2003). Regulation of root elongation under phosphorus stress involves changes in ethylene responsiveness.Plant Physiol.1311381–1390. 10.1104/pp.012161
77
MaoY.XueX. Y.ChenX. Y. (2009). Are small RNAs a big help to plants?Sci. China C Life Sci.52212–223. 10.1007/s11427-009-0034-3
78
MartínA. C.del PozoJ. C.IglesiasJ.RubioV.SolanoR.de La PeñaA.et al (2000). Influence of cytokinins on the expression of phosphate starvation responsive genes in Arabidopsis.Plant J.24559–567. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00893.x
79
MatthewmanC. A.KawashimaC. G.HuskaD.CsorbaT.DalmayT.KoprivaS. (2012). miR395 is a general component of the sulfate assimilation regulatory network in Arabidopsis.FEBS Lett.5863242–3248. 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.06.044
80
MelnikovaN. V.DmitrievA. A.BelenikinM. S.KorobanN. V.SperanskayaA. S.KrinitsinaA. A.et al (2016). Identification, expression analysis, and target prediction of flax genotroph microRNAs under normal and nutrient stress conditions.Front. Plant Sci.7:399. 10.3389/fpls.2016.00399
81
MlodzinskaE.ZboinskaM. (2016). Phosphate uptake and allocation–a closer look at Arabidopsis thaliana L. and Oryza sativa L.Front. Plant Sci.7:1198. 10.3389/fpls.2016.01198
82
MorcuendeR.BariR.GibonY.ZhengW.PantB. D.BläsingO.et al (2007). Genome-wide reprogramming of metabolism and regulatory networks of Arabidopsis in response to phosphorus.Plant Cell Environ.3085–112. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01608.x
83
NapoliC.LemieuxC.JorgensenR. (1990). Introduction of a chimeric chalcone synthase gene into petunia results in reversible co-suppression of homologous genes in trans.Plant Cell2279–289. 10.1105/tpc.2.4.279
84
NathM.TutejaN. (2016). NPKS uptake, sensing, and signaling and miRNAs in plant nutrient stress.Protoplasma253767–786. 10.1007/s00709-015-0845-y
85
NussaumeL.KannoS.JavotH.MarinE.PochonN.AyadiA.et al (2011). Phosphate import in plants: focus on the PHT1 transporters.Front. Plant Sci.2:83. 10.3389/fpls.2011.00083
86
PacakA.Barciszewska-PacakM.Swida-BarteczkaA.KruszkaK.SegaP.MilanowskaK.et al (2016). Heat stress affects Pi-related genes expression and inorganic phosphate deposition/accumulation in Barley.Front. Plant Sci.7:e926. 10.3389/fpls.2016.00926
87
PandaS. K.SunkarR. (2015). Nutrient- and other stress-responsive microRNAs in plants: role for thiol-based redox signalling.Plant Signal. Behav.10:e1010916. 10.1080/15592324.2015.1010916
88
PantB. D.BuhtzA.KehrJ.ScheibleW. R. (2008). MicroRNA399 is a long-distance signal for the regulation of plant phosphate homeostasis.Plant J.53731–738. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03363.x
89
PantB. D.Musialak-langeM.NucP.MayP.BuhtzA.KehrJ.et al (2009). Identification of nutrient-responsive Arabidopsis and rapeseed microRNAs by comprehensive real-time polymerase chain reaction profiling and small RNA sequencing.Plant Physiol.1501541–1555. 10.1104/pp.109.139139
90
PaulS.DattaS. K.DattaK. (2015). miRNA regulation of nutrient homeostasis in plants.Front. Plant Sci.6:232. 10.3389/fpls.2015.00232
91
PeiL.JinZ.LiK.YinH.WangJ.YangA. (2013). Identification and comparative analysis of low phosphate tolerance associated microRNAs in two maize genotypes.Plant Physiol. Biochem.70221–234. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.05.043
92
PerretJ.Al-BelushiM.DeadmanM. (2007). Non-destructive visualisation and quantification of roots using computed tomography.Soil Biol. Biochem.39391–399. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.07.018
93
PhillipsJ. R.DalmayT.BartelsD. (2007). The role of small RNAs in abiotic stress.FEBS Lett.5813592–3597. 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.04.007
94
RajagopalanR.VaucheretH.TrejoJ.BartelD. P. (2006). A diverse and evolutionarily fluid set of microRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana.Genes Dev.203407–3425. 10.1101/gad.1476406
95
ReichelM.LiaoY.RettelM.RaganC.EversM.AlleaumeA.-M.et al (2016). In planta determination of the mRNA-binding proteome of Arabidopsis etiolated seedlings.Plant Cell282435–2452. 10.1105/tpc.16.00562
96
RotteC.LeustekT. (2000). Differential subcellular localization and expression of ATP sulfurylase and 5’-adenylylsulfate reductase during ontogenesis of Arabidopsis leaves indicates that cytosolic and plastid forms of ATP sulfurylase may have specialized functions.Plant Physiol.124715–724. 10.1104/pp.124.2.715
97
SaierM. H.Jr.ReddyV. S.TsuB. V.AhmedM. S.LiC.GabrielM. H. (2016). The Transporter Classification Database (TCDB): recent advances.Nucleic Acids Res.44D372–D379. 10.1093/nar/gkv1103
98
SasakiA.YamajiN.MaJ. F. (2016). Transporters involved in mineral nutrient uptake in rice.J. Exp. Bot.673645–3653. 10.1093/jxb/erw060
99
SchachtmanD. P.ShinR. (2007). Nutrient sensing and signaling: NPKS.Ann. Rev. Plant Biol.5847–69. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103750
100
ScheibleW. R.Rojas-TrianaM. (2015). “Sensing, signaling and control of phosphate starvation in plants: molecular players and application,” inAnnual Plant Reviews: Phosphorus Metabolism in Plants in the Post-Genomic Era: From Gene to EcosystemVol. 48edsPlaxtonW. C.LambersH. (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc).
101
ShaneM. W.DeVosM.De RoockS.LambersH. (2003). Shoot P status regulates cluster-root growth and citrate exudation in Lupinus albus grown with a divided root system.Plant Cell Environ.26265–273. 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00957.x
102
ShaneM. W.LambersH. (2006). Systemic suppression of cluster-root formation and net P-uptake rates in Grevillea crithmifolia at elevated P supply: a proteacean with resistance for developing symptoms of ‘P toxicity’.J. Exp. Bot.57413–423. 10.1093/jxb/erj004
103
SharmaD.TiwariM.LakhwaniD.TripathiR. D.TrivediP. K. (2015). Differential expression of microRNAs by arsenate and arsenite stress in natural accessions of rice.Metallomics7174–187. 10.1039/C4MT00264D
104
SharmaD.TiwariM.PandeyA.BhatiaC.SharmaA.TrivediP. K. (2016). MicroRNA858 is a potential regulator of phenylpropanoid pathway and plant development in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol.171944–959. 10.1104/pp.15.01831
105
ShinmachiF.BuchnerP.StroudJ. L.ParmarS.ZhaoF. J.McGrathS. P.et al (2010). Influence of sulfur deficiency on the expression of specific sulfate transporters and the distribution of sulfur, selenium and molybdenum in wheat.Plant Physiol.153327–336. 10.1104/pp.110.153759
106
ShuL.HuZ. (2012). Characterization and differential expression of microRNAs elicited by sulfur deprivation in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.BMC Genomics13:108. 10.1186/1471-2164-13-108
107
ShuklaT.KumarS.KhareR.TripathiR. D.TrivediP. K. (2015). Natural variations in expression of regulatory and detoxification related genes under limiting phosphate and arsenate stress in Arabidopsis thaliana.Front. Plant Sci.6:e898. 10.3389/fpls.2015.00898
108
SirohiG.PandeyB. K.DeveshwarP.GiriJ. (2016). Emerging trends in epigenetic regulation of nutrient deficiency response in plants.Mol. Biotechnol.58159–171. 10.1007/s12033-016-9919-0
109
SobkowiakL.BielewiczD.MaleckaE. M.JacobsenI.AlbrechtsenM.Szweykowska-KulinskaZ.et al (2012). The role of the P1BS element containing promoter-driven genes in Pi transport and homeostasis in plants.Front. Plant Sci.3:e58. 10.3389/fpls.2012.00058
110
SunS. B.GuM.CaoY.HuangX. P.ZhangX.AiP. H.et al (2012). A constitutive expressed phosphate transporter, OsPht1;1, modulates phosphate uptake and translocation in phosphate-replete rice.Plant Physiol.1591571–1581. 10.1104/pp.112.196345
111
SunkarR.ChinnusamyV.ZhuJ.ZhuJ. K. (2007). Small RNAs as big players in plant abiotic stress responses and nutrient deprivation.Trends Plant Sci.12301–309. 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.05.001
112
SunkarR.LiY. F.JagadeeswaranG. (2012). Functions of microRNAs in plant stress responses.Trends Plant Sci.17196–203. 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.01.010
113
SvistoonoffS.CreffA.ReymondM.Sigoillot-ClaudeC.RicaudL.BlanchetA.et al (2007). Root tip contact with low-phosphate media reprograms plant root architecture.Nat. Genet.39792–796. 10.1038/ng2041
114
TakahashiH. (2010). Regulation of sulfate transport and assimilation in plants.Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol.281129–159. 10.1016/S1937-6448(10)81004-4
115
TakahashiH.Watanabe-TakahashiA.SmithF. W.Blake-KalffM.HawkesfordM. J.SaitoK. (2000). The roles of three functional sulphate transporters involved in uptake and translocation of sulphate in Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant J.23171–182. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00768.x
116
ThibaudM. C.ArrighiJ. F.BayleV.ChiarenzaS.CreffA.BustosR.et al (2010). Dissection of local and systemic transcriptional responses to phosphate starvation in Arabidopsis.Plant J.64775–789. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04375.x
117
TiwariM.SharmaD.TrivediP. K. (2014). Artificial microRNA mediated gene silencing in plants: progress and perspectives.Plant Mol. Biol.861–18. 10.1007/s11103-014-0224-7
118
TodescoM.Rubio-SomozaI.Paz-AresJ.WeigelD. (2010). A collection of target mimics for comprehensive analysis of microRNA function in Arabidopsis thaliana.PLoS Genet.6:e1001031. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001031
119
Uhde-StoneC.ZinnK. E.Ramirez-YáñezM.LiA.VanceC. P.AllanD. L. (2003). Nylon filter arrays reveal differential gene expression in proteoid roots of white lupin in response to phosphorus deficiency.Plant Physiol.1311064–1079. 10.1104/pp.102.016881
120
Valdés-LópezO.YangS. S.Aparicio-FabreR.GrahamP. H.ReyesJ. L.VanceC. P.et al (2010). MicroRNA expression profile in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) under nutrient deficiency stresses and manganese toxicity.New Phytol.187805–818. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03320.x
121
Valencia-SanchezM. A.LiuJ.HannonG. J.ParkerR. (2006). Control of translation and mRNA degradation by miRNAs and siRNAs.Genes Dev.20515–524. 10.1101/gad.139980
122
VaucheretH.FagardM. (2001). Transcriptional gene silencing in plants: targets, inducers and regulators.Trends Genet.1729–35.
123
WangJ.SunJ.MiaoJ.GuoJ.ShiZ.HeM.et al (2013). A wheat phosphate starvation response regulator Ta-PHR1 is involved in phosphate signalling and increases grain yield in wheat.Ann. Bot.1111139–1153. 10.1093/aob/mct080
124
WangX.LiX.ZhangS.KorpelainenH.LiC. (2016). Physiological and transcriptional responses of two contrasting Populus clones to nitrogen stress.Tree Physiol.36628–642. 10.1093/treephys/tpw019
125
WangY.WangZ. (2015). Efficient backsplicing produces translatable circular mRNAs.RNA21172–179. 10.1261/rna.048272.114
126
WegeS.KhanG. A.JungJ. Y.VogiatzakiE.PradervandS.AllerI.et al (2016). The EXS domain of PHO1 participates in the response of shoots to phosphate deficiency via a root-to-shoot signal.Plant Physiol.170385–400. 10.1104/pp.15.00975
127
WilliamsonL. C.RibriouxS. P.FitterA. H.LeyserH. M. (2001). Phosphate availability regulates root system architecture in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol.126875–882. 10.1104/pp.126.2.875
128
WuP.MaL.HouX.WangM.WuY.LiuF.et al (2003). Phosphate starvation triggers distinct alterations of genome expression in Arabidopsis roots and leaves.Plant Physiol.1321260–1271. 10.1104/pp.103.021022
129
XuF.LiuQ.ChenL.KuangJ.WalkT.WangJ.et al (2013). Genome-wide identification of soybean microRNAs and their targets reveals their organ specificity and responses to phosphate starvation.BMC Genomics14:e66. 10.1186/1471-2164-14-66
130
YanZ.HossainM. S.WangJ.Valdés-LópezO.LiangY.LibaultM.et al (2013). miR172 regulates soybean nodulation.Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.261371–1377. 10.1094/MPMI-04-13-0111-R
131
YeY.YuanJ.ChangX.YangM.ZhangL.LuK.et al (2015). The phosphate transporter gene OsPht1;4 is involved in phosphate homeostasis in rice.PLoS ONE10:e0126186. 10.1371/journal.pone.0126186
132
YoshimotoN.InoueE.Watanabe-TakahashiA.SaitoK.TakahashiH. (2007). Posttranscriptional regulation of high-affinity sulfate transporters in Arabidopsis by sulfur nutrition.Plant Physiol.145378–388. 10.1104/pp.107.105742
133
YuanH.LiuD. (2008). Signaling components involved in plant responses to phosphate starvation.J. Integr. Plant Biol.50849–859. 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00709.x
134
YuanN.YuanS.LiZ.LiD.HuQ.LuoH. (2016). Heterologous expression of a rice miR395 gene in Nicotiana tabacum impairs sulfate homeostasis.Sci. Rep.6:e28791. 10.1038/srep28791
135
ZengH.WangG.HuX.WangH.DuL.ZhuY. (2014). Role of microRNAs in plant responses to nutrient stress.Plant Soil3741005–1021. 10.1007/s11104-013-1907-6
136
ZengH. Q.ZhuY. Y.HuangS. Q.YangZ. M. (2010). Analysis of phosphorus-deficient responsive miRNAs and cis elements from soybean (Glycine max L.).J. Plant Physiol.1671289–1297. 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.04.017
137
ZhangL. W.SongJ. B.ShuX. X.ZhangY.YangZ. M. (2013). miR395 is involved in detoxification of cadmium in Brassica napus.J. Hazard. Mater.25204–211. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.01.053
138
ZhangY. J.LynchJ. P.BrownK. M. (2003). Ethylene and phosphorus availability have interacting yet distinct effects on root hair development.J. Exp. Bot.542351–2361. 10.1093/jxb/erg250
139
ZhaoX.LiuX.GuoC.GuJ.XiaoK. (2013). Identification and characterization of micro RNAs from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under phosphorus deprivation.J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol.22113–123. 10.1007/s13562012-0117-2
140
ZhouJ.JiaoF. C.WuZ. C.LiY. Y.WangX. M.HeX. W.et al (2008). OsPHR2 is involved in phosphate-starvation signaling and excessive phosphate accumulation in shoots of plants.Plant Physiol.1461673–1686. 10.1104/pp.107.111443
141
ZhuY. Y.ZengH. Q.DongC. X.YinX. M.ShenQ. R.YangZ. M. (2010). MicroRNA expression profiles associated with phosphorus deficiency in white lupin (Lupinus albus L.).Plant Sci.17823–29. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.09.011
142
ZuberH.DavidianJ. C.WirtzM.HellR.BelghaziM.ThompsonR.et al (2010). Sultr4;1 mutant seeds of Arabidopsis have an enhanced sulphate content and modified proteome suggesting metabolic adaptations to altered sulphate compartmentalization.BMC Plant Biol.10:e78. 10.1186/1471-2229-10-78
Summary
Keywords
abiotic stress, gene regulation, miRNA, nutrient deficiency, nutrient homeostasis
Citation
Kumar S, Verma S and Trivedi PK (2017) Involvement of Small RNAs in Phosphorus and Sulfur Sensing, Signaling and Stress: Current Update. Front. Plant Sci. 8:285. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00285
Received
15 October 2016
Accepted
16 February 2017
Published
10 March 2017
Volume
8 - 2017
Edited by
Soumitra Paul, University of Calcutta, India
Reviewed by
Jitender Giri, National Institute of Plant Genome Research, India; Riddhi Datta, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Government College, India
Updates
Copyright
© 2017 Kumar, Verma and Trivedi.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Prabodh K. Trivedi, prabodht@hotmail.com; prabodht@nbri.res.in Smita Kumar, smitabiochem@gmail.com
This article was submitted to Plant Nutrition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.