Abstract
Silicon (Si), the quasi-essential element occurs as the second most abundant element in the earth's crust. Biological importance of Si in plant kingdom has become inevitable particularly under stressed environment. In general, plants are classified as high, medium, and low silicon accumulators based on the ability of roots to absorb Si. The uptake of Si directly influence the positive effects attributed to the plant but Si supplementation proves to mitigate stress and recover plant growth even in low accumulating plants like tomato. The application of Si in soil as well as soil-less cultivation systems have resulted in the enhancement of quantitative and qualitative traits of plants even under stressed environment. Silicon possesses several mechanisms to regulate the physiological, biochemical, and antioxidant metabolism in plants to combat abiotic and biotic stresses. Nevertheless, very few reports are available on the aspect of Si-mediated molecular regulation of genes with potential role in stress tolerance. The recent advancements in the era of genomics and transcriptomics have opened an avenue for the determination of molecular rationale associated with the Si amendment to the stress alleviation in plants. Therefore, the present endeavor has attempted to describe the recent discoveries related to the regulation of vital genes involved in photosynthesis, transcription regulation, defense, water transport, polyamine synthesis, and housekeeping genes during abiotic and biotic stress alleviation by Si. Furthermore, an overview of Si-mediated modulation of multiple genes involved in stress response pathways such as phenylpropanoid pathway, jasmonic acid pathway, ABA-dependent or independent regulatory pathway have been discussed in this review.
Introduction
The surface of earth is covered with 27.70% of silicon (Si) next to oxygen, but the existence of Si in its pure form is rare (Mitra, 2015). Silicon is deposited in the form of quartz (SiO2), sand, and sand stone in the earth crust (Rédei, 2008). In biological organisms, Si occurs in the form of amorphous silica (SiO2 nH2O) and soluble silicic acid (Si(OH)4) (Das and Chattopadhyay, ). Moreover in eukaryotes, Si is important for bones, cartilage, connective tissue formation, enzymatic activities, and lymphocyte proliferation (Carlisle, , ). In plants, Si is absorbed as an uncharged monomeric silicic acid in the pH range below 9 (Knight and Kinrade, 2001; Ma and Yamaji, 2006). The level of Si accumulation by plants can be directly correlated with the beneficial effects attributed by Si. Among the plants, monocots like rice, sugarcane, maize, and cereals absorb Si in large quantities on comparison with dicots due to the presence of Si transporters (Ma et al., 2016). The absorption and transportation of Si in plants is a complex process which involves influx and efflux Si transporters belonging to aquaporin family with specific selectivity properties. For instance, the high Si accumulator like rice consists of low silicon rice 1 (Lsi1) transporter, a nodulin 26-like intrinsic protein (NIP) in roots.
Recently, several putative silicon transporters have been identified in monocot and dicot plants by Deshmukh et al. (). According to the report, uptake of Si is particularly confined to the plant species consisting of NIP type aquaporins with GSGR selectivity filter along with an exact distance of 108 amino acids between the asparagine-proline-alanine (NPA) domain (Deshmukh et al., ). The exogenous supplementation of Si proves to be beneficial for plants particularly under abiotic and biotic stress conditions (Supplementary Table 1). Silicon nutrition resulted in the improvement of growth and development (Eneji et al., ; Soundararajan et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2015), increase in yield (Epstein, ), abiotic and biotic stress tolerance (Ma, 2004; Zhu et al., 2004; Liang et al., 2007; Muneer et al., 2014), management of macro and micro nutrients (Tripathi et al., 2014), resistance against pest and pathogens (Lanning, 1966; Cookson et al., ).
Apart from the abovementioned advantages, Si augmentation in soil-less cultivation of corn salad improved the edible yield, quality, and shelf life of baby leaf vegetable corn salad by the regulation of nutrient acquisition, uptake of nitrate/iron, phenoloxidase gene expression, and protection of chlorophyll degradation (Gottardi et al., ). Likewise, Si inclusion in tissue culture medium resulted in the enhancement of axillary shoot induction (Manivannan et al., 2017), alleviation of hyperhydricity (Soundararajan et al., 2017a), callus induction (Islam et al., ), and root morphogenesis (Asmar et al., ). Even though, the effect of Si in plants was studied for several years, the mechanisms behind the physiological responses or molecular regulation in plants upon Si nutrition under normal and stressed conditions is still under study.
Broadly, Si-mediated tolerance to stress can be interpreted either in the form of mechanical barrier through Si(OH)4 polymerization in cell walls to prevent the penetration of host tissue by pest or pathogen (Yoshida et al., 1962) or by triggering the chemical resistance mechanism (Fawe et al., ). According to Chérif et al. (), in cucumber the Si treatment increased the activities of chitinases, peroxidases, and polyphenoloxidases against Pythium ultimum. Similarly, Si nutrition enhanced the plant growth by the regulation of antioxidant and nutrient uptake in salt stressed in Salvia (Soundararajan et al., 2014). Moreover, Si retarded the Na+ and Cl− transportation due to silicon deposition to cope up the plants under salinity stress (Gong et al., ; Shi et al., 2013). Likewise, Si supplementation decreased metal toxicity such as toxicity of aluminum (Al) (Wang et al., 2004), boron (B) (Gunes et al., ), cadmium (Cd) (Liang et al., 2005), chromium (Cr) (Tripathi et al., 2012) copper (Cu) (Li et al., 2008), and zinc (Zn) (Neumann and Zur Nieden, 2001). Recently Debona et al. (), has elaborately reviewed the possible stress tolerance mechanisms attributed by Si upon abiotic and biotic stresses. According to the review, upon metal toxicity, silicon tends to modulate the pH range of soil, changes the metal speciation, compartmentalization and co-precipitation of metals, and sequestration strategies to combat the metal stress (Debona et al., ). In addition, the Si-fortified fertilizers are gaining interest in recent days due to its beneficial results particularly in the improvement of growth, photosynthesis, and maintenance of electrolyte leakage even under stressed conditions (Chen et al., ).
Overall, the inclusion of Si is important for plant growth and numerous reports and reviews illustrated the Si dependent modulations of antioxidant enzymes, nutrient contents, homeostasis in reactive oxygen species however, very few studies have dealt with the Si-mediated molecular regulation of genes in plants under abiotic and biotic stresses (Brunings et al., ; Song et al., 2014; Yin et al., 2016). The modern high-throughput approaches can aid in deciphering the important genes involved in the Si-mediated stress response in plants (Tables 1–3). The Si-dependent expression of genes was first investigated in rice using the microarray approach by Watanabe et al. (2004). According to the results, the addition of Si up-regulated the abundance of a zinc finger protein homolog and down-regulated the expressions of chlorophyll a/b binding protein, metallothione-like protein, Xa21 gene family member, and carbonic anhydrase homolog (Watanabe et al., 2004). In general, the zinc finger proteins act as the major transcription factors for stress responsible genes and the enhancement of its expression can increase the regulation of stress responsible genes which might increase the stress tolerance in Si treated plants (Watanabe et al., 2004). In the following sections, the Si-mediated regulations of genes involved in several physiological processes have been discussed.
Table 1
| Abiotic stress | Gene identifier | Functional annotation | Process | Organism | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metal toxicity | Os08g02630 | Subunit of oxygen evolving complex-PSII | Photosynthesis | Oryza sativa | Song et al., 2014 |
| Metal toxicity | Os05g48630 | Photosynthetic co8y stability maintenance | Photosynthesis | Oryza sativa | Song et al., 2014 |
| Metal toxicity | Os07g37030 | Maintenance of cytochrome | Photosynthesis | Oryza sativa | Song et al., 2014 |
| Metal toxicity | Os03g57120 | Ferrodoxin NADP+ reductase | Photosynthesis | Oryza sativa | Song et al., 2014 |
| Metal toxicity | Os09g26810 | Subunit of LHC II complex | Photosynthesis | Oryza sativa | Song et al., 2014 |
| Metal toxicity | Os04g38410 | Subunit of LHC II complex | Photosynthesis | Oryza sativa | Song et al., 2014 |
| Drought | AK070732 | Member of RING domain containing protein family | Regulatory gene | Oryza sativa | Khattab et al., |
| Drought | AF300971 | Dehydration responsive element binding protein | Regulatory gene | Oryza sativa | Khattab et al., |
| Drought | AJ578494 | Choline monooxygenase | Regulatory gene | Oryza sativa | Khattab et al., |
| Drought | AB028184 | NAC regulons (No apical meristem(NAM), Arabidopsis thaliana activating factor [ATAF], and cup-shaped cotyledon [CUC]) | Regulatory gene | Oryza sativa | Khattab et al., |
| Drought | NM_001074375 | Dehydrin | Regulatory gene | Oryza sativa | Khattab et al., |
| Salt stress | Sb02g025110 | S-Adenosyl-L-methionine decarboxylase | Polyamine synthesis | Sorghum bicolor | Yin et al., 2016 |
| Salt stress | Sb04g025720 | S-Adenosyl-Metdecarboxylase | Polyamine synthesis | Sorghum bicolor | Yin et al., 2016 |
| Salt stress | Sb06g021540 | S-Adenosyl-Metdecarboxylase | Polyamine synthesis | Sorghum bicolor | Yin et al., 2016 |
| Salt stress | Sb10g002070 | Arginine decarboxylase | Polyamine synthesis | Sorghum bicolor | Yin et al., 2016 |
| Salt stress | Sb04g021790 | N-Carbamoyl putrescine amidohydrolase | Polyamine synthesis | Sorghum bicolor | Yin et al., 2016 |
| Metal toxicity | At5g22460 | Esterase lipase thioesterase family protein | Transporter gene | Arabidopsis thaliana | Li et al., 2008 |
| Metal toxicity | At5g59030 | Copper transporter | Transporter gene | Arabidopsis thaliana | Li et al., 2008 |
List of genes up regulated upon the supplementation of Si under abiotic stress.
Table 2
| Biotic stress | Gene identifier | Functional annotation | Biological process | Organism | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rice blast disease | Os01g0713200 | β-1,3-Glucanase precursor | Defense | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os02g0584800. | Heavy metal transport/detoxification protein domain-containing protein | Defense | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os02g0585100 | Heavy metal transport/detoxification protein domain-containing protein | Defense | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os04g0469000 | Heavy metal transport/detoxification protein domain-containing protein | Defense | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os04g0610400 | Pathogenesis-related transcriptional factor and ERF domain-containing protein | Defense | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os07g0104100 | Peroxidase precursor | Defense | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os11g0692500 | Bacterial blight resistance Protein | Defense | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os01g0963200 | Peroxidase BP 1 precursor | Defense | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os01g0378100 | Peroxidase precursor | Defense | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Bacterial wilt | AF494201 | Tomato stress-responsive factor | Defense | Solanum lycopersicum | Ghareeb et al., |
| Bacterial wilt | M69247 | Pathogenesis-related protein 1 | Defense | Solanum lycopersicum | Ghareeb et al., |
| Bacterial wilt | M80604 | β-Glucanase | Defense | Solanum lycopersicum | Ghareeb et al., |
| Bacterial wilt | U30465 | Chitinase class II | Defense | Solanum lycopersicum | Ghareeb et al., |
| Bacterial wilt | X94943 | Peroxidase | Defense | Solanum lycopersicum | Ghareeb et al., |
| Bacterial wilt | M83314 | Phenylalanine ammonia lyase | Defense | Solanum lycopersicum | Ghareeb et al., |
| Bacterial wilt | X99147 | Arabinogalactan protein | Defense | Solanum lycopersicum | Ghareeb et al., |
| Bacterial wilt | L26529 | Polygalacturonase inhibitor protein | Defense | Solanum lycopersicum | Ghareeb et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os02g0807000 | Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase kinase | Housekeeping gene | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os01g0554100 | RNA-directed DNA polymerase (reverse transcriptase) domain containing protein | Housekeeping gene | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os03g0803500 | 2OG-Fe(II) oxygenase domain-containing protein | Housekeeping gene | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os10g0559500 | 2OG-Fe(II) oxygenase domain-containing protein | Housekeeping gene | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os09g0432300 | AAA ATPase, central region domain-containing protein | Housekeeping gene | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os06g0676700 | High pI α-glucosidase | Housekeeping gene | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os08g0190100 | Oxalate oxidase-like protein | Housekeeping gene | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os05g0495600 | P-type ATPase | Housekeeping gene | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os03g0405500 | PDI-like protein | Housekeeping gene | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Bacterial wilt | AY157064 | WRKY group II transcription Factor | Regulatory gene | Solanum lycopersicum | Ghareeb et al., |
| Bacterial wilt | AY383630 | Jasmonate and ethylene responsive factor 3 | Regulatory gene | Solanum lycopersicum | Ghareeb et al., |
| Bacterial wilt | Z75520 | Ferredoxin I | Photosynthesis | Solanum lycopersicum | Ghareeb et al., |
List of genes up regulated upon the supplementation of Si under biotic stress.
Table 3
| Stress | Gene identifier | Functional annotation | Biological process | Organism | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rice blast disease | Os11g0608300 | Barley stem rust resistance protein | Defense | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os11g0673600 | Disease resistance protein family protein | Defense | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os03g0266300 | Heat shock protein Hsp20 domain-containing protein | Defense | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os03g0235000 | Peroxidase | Defense | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os12g0491800 | Terpene synthase-like domain-containing protein | Defense | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os10g0191300 | Type 1 pathogenesis-related protein | Defense | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os09g0417800 | DNA-binding WRKY domain-containing protein | Regulatory gene | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os08g0332700 | Trans-acting transcriptional protein ICP0 | Regulatory gene | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os02g0695200 | P-type R2R3 Myb protein | Regulatory gene | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os09g0110300 | Putative cyclase family protein | Housekeeping gene | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os08g0112300 | Transferase family protein | Housekeeping gene | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os10g0154700 | Cyclophilin Dicyp-2 | Housekeeping gene | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os08g0155700 | DNA-directed RNA polymerase largest chain (isoform B1)-like protein | Housekeeping gene | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os11g0194800 | DNA-directed RNA polymerase II | Housekeeping gene | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os11g0106700 | Ferritin 1, chloroplast precursor | Housekeeping gene | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os12g0258700 | Multi copper oxidase, type 1 domain-containing protein | Housekeeping gene | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os01g0770200 | Tyrosine decarboxylase 1 | Housekeeping gene | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Rice blast disease | Os01g0627800 | Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase | Photosynthesis | Oryza sativa | Brunings et al., |
| Salt stress | Sb01g009450 | 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase | Polyamine synthesis | Sorghum bicolor | Yin et al., 2016 |
List of genes down regulated upon the supplementation of Si under abiotic and biotic stresses.
Silicon regulated the genes involved in photosynthesis upon metal toxicity
Among several mechanism of Si-mediated stress amelioration, the primary stress-combating strategies utilized by Si is the enhancement of photosynthesis process in the stressed plants. Broadly, the oxidative stress resulting from both abiotic and biotic stress target photosynthesis by affecting the major enzymes in calvin cycle and photosynthetic electron transport chain (Nwugo and Huerta, 2008; Gong and Chen, ; Muneer et al., 2014). Even though, various studies have evidenced the beneficial effects of Si on photosynthesis, only a few have examined the molecular rationale behind the gene expression upon Si addition, particularly in rice. The report by Song et al. (2014) illustrated the transcriptional regulation of photosynthesis related genes under Si amendment and zinc stress. Supplementation of Si increased the transcript levels of PsbY (Os08g02630), a vital polyprotein involved in photosystem II (PSII) whereas, the Zn in higher concentration retarded the PsbY expression. In detail, the PsbY is a subunit of oxygen-evolving complex of PSII with manganese-binding polypeptide consisting L-arginine metabolizing enzyme activity (Kawakami et al., ). Furthermore, the Si-mediated increase in the level of PsbY transcripts could activate the manganese-binding capacity, oxidation of water that might improve the efficiency of PS II and electron transfer rate (Song et al., 2014). Likewise, the application of Si has improved the abundance of PsaH which encodes the vital polypeptide subunits in the PSI dimer (Pfannschmidt and Yang, 2012). The PsaH knockout mutant damaged the LCH-II complex resulting in the energy transition delay between PS II and PS I (Lunde et al., 2000).
Similarly, the Zn toxicity resulted in the down regulation of PetC which has been recovered by Si supplementation. In general, PetC codes Rieske Fe-S center-binding polypeptide of cytochrome bf complex which is responsible for the proper functioning of cytochrome (Breyton et al., ). Hence, the Si mediated up-regulation of PetC could augment the structural integrity of the chloroplast (Song et al., 2014). Moreover, Si treatment increased the expression of PetH in similar manner with PetC. The product of PetH is ferredoxin NADP+ reductase, an important enzyme involved in the synthesis of NADPH via photosynthetic electron transport chain. Furthermore, reducible glutathione content in the cells is maintained by PetH (Song et al., 2014). In addition to the above listed genes, the supplementation of Si resulted in the up-regulation of genes (Os03g57120 and Os09g26810) involved in the light harvesting complex. Thus, the molecular insight into Si-dependent up-regulation of genes associated with PS I and PS II illustrate the positive effects rendered by Si on photosynthesis process. The physiological improvement of photosynthetic apparatus and reduction in the degradation of chlorophyll pigmentation reported by several researches can be correlated with the genic regulation of photosynthetic genes by Si at molecular level. A putative model representing the Si-mediated regulation of photosynthesis associated genes discussed above have been illustrated in Figure 1. Overall, the augmentation of Si instigated the expression levels of important genes in both photosystems to increase the efficiency of photosynthesis particularly under stressful environment.
Figure 1
Silicon modulated the expression of housekeeping genes upon pathogen infection
In general, housekeeping genes are expressed constitutively in all cells regardless of its patho-physiological state and these genes are vital for the maintenance of proper functioning of cells. Although, the expression of housekeeping genes is constant, several studies illustrated their loss of stability under stressed conditions (Nicot et al., 2005; Jain et al.,
Silicon altered the expression of regulatory elements associated with stress response genes
Stressful environment can induce the expression of myriads of genes involved in stress tolerance, metabolic processes, and signal transduction, etc. in plants (Shinozaki and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, 2000; Xiong et al., 2002; Rabbani et al., 2003; Shinozaki et al., 2003). Amongst the stress induced genes, transcription factors (TF) are the primary regulators of the downstream genes important for plant tolerance against biotic and abiotic stresses (Gao et al.,
Figure 2

A schematic representation of the regulation of transcription factors under abiotic stress condition with or without Si supplementation. (A) Model displaying the OsDREB2A regulation in ABA-independent pathway to combat stress. (B) Regulation of OsNAC5 transcription factor in ABA-dependent pathway to trigger stress tolerance related genes. (C) The OsRDCP1 mediated stress tolerance response via the ubiquitin-proteosome degradation pathway. (D) Improvement of glycine betaine biosynthesis by OsCMO to combat ROS generation. The black standard arrows represent the up-regulation of gene in the presence of Si and red dotted arrows indicate the down-regulation of gene and corresponding functions upon stress in Si- plant. DRE, Dehydration responsive element; DREB2A; dehydration-responsive element binding protein 2A; NAC, no apical meristem (NAM), Arabidopsis thaliana activating factor (ATAF), and cup-shaped cotyledon (CUC) regulons; OsRDCP1, Oryza sativa RING domain containing protein; OsCMO, Oryza sativa choline monooxygenase; SNAC1, stress-responsive NAC protein, OsLEA3, Oryza sativa late embryogenesis abundant protein; E1, ubiquitin activating; E2, ubiquitin conjugating; E3,ubiquitin ligating enzymes, ATP, adenosine triphosphate; ADP, adenosine diphosphate. The diagram was conceived based on the interpretation from the following literatures (Mizoi et al., 2012; Nakashima et al., 2012; Khattab et al.,
In eukaryotes, the protein turnover is maintained by the Ubiquitin (Ub)-26S proteasome pathway. During the process of ubiquitination, the target proteins are linked to multiple Ub chains by ubiquitin ligases such as E1, E2, and E3 (Kraft et al., 2005; Stone et al., 2005). According to previous reports, the RING E3 Ub ligases play a vital role particularly in response to drought stress in rice (Bae et al.,
Modulation of genes involved in water uptake and transportation upon Si nutrition
Aquaporins are essential transmembrane proteins that maintain the uptake and movement of water molecules across cell membranes, particularly under abiotic stress condition (Boursiac et al.,
Figure 3

A model representation of aquaporin related genes regulation under osmotic stress condition with or without Si supplementation. The green standard arrows represent the up-regulation of genes in Si+ and red dotted arrows indicate the down-regulation of genes and corresponding functions upon stress in Si- conditions. The down regulation of PIP genes could result in the lesser activity of Aquaporin mediated transportation however upon Si augmentation the up-regulation of PIP genes improve the water status of the plants under stress. SbPIP1, Sorghum plasma membrane intrinsic protein, and PIP (plasma membrane intrinsic protein). The model was conceived based on the interpretation from the following literatures (Liu et al., 2015; Maurel et al., 2015).
Regulation of polyamine biosynthesis genes by Si supplementation
Plants with higher levels of polyamines like putrescine, spermidine, and spermine reported to possess more resistance against environmental onslaughts like salinity (Liu et al., 2006; Chai et al.,
Figure 4

A schematic illustration of polyamine biosynthesis gene regulation under stress condition with or without Si supplementation. The green standard arrows represent the up-regulation of genes in Si+ and red dotted arrows indicate the down-regulation of genes and corresponding functions upon stress in Si- conditions. SAMDC, S-adenosyl-L-methionine decarboxylase; ADC, arginine decarboxylase; CAP, N-carbamoylputrescine amidohydrolase; ACC, 1-aminocyclopropane- 1-carboxylic acid; SAM, S-adenosyl-L-methionine; ODC, ornithine decarboxylase; SPDS, spermidine synthase; SPMS, spermine synthase; CuAO, copper amine oxidase; PAO, polyamine oxidase; AIH, agmatine iminohydrolase; PAO, polyamine oxidase; NOS, nitric oxide synthase. The model was conceived based on the interpretation from the following literatures (Mizoi et al., 2012; Khattab et al.,
Silicon-Mediated expression of defense responsive genes
The defensive role of Si against biotic and abiotic stresses has been evidenced by several plant biologists. Especially, the Si-mediated protection against potential plant diseases such as powdery mildew and rice blast disease has been studied widely (Figure 5). The extensive study by Rodrigues et al. (2004) elucidated the positive regulation of genes related to the defense mechanism such as chalcone synthase (CHS), phenylalanine-ammonia lyase (PAL), pathogenesis related protein (PR1), peroxidase (POX), chitinases, and β-1, 3-glucanases by Si upon Magnaporthe grisea infection. Among the listed genes, CHS is a rate limiting enzyme in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway and PAL plays a vital role in the synthesis of secondary metabolites with potential chemical defense property via phenylpropanoid pathway (Rodrigues et al., 2004). Furthermore, the peroxidases enzymes are important for lignin biosynthesis which acts as the potential mechanical barrier against pathogens (Rhodes, 1994). Similarly, the pathogenesis related (PR-1) protein in combination with genes related to secondary metabolism acts as the primary outcome of the plant defense response (Zeier et al., 2004). Moreover, the supplementation of Si altered the expression pattern of defense genes in rice to render resistance against Magnaporthe oryzae (Brunings et al.,
Figure 5

Schematic representation of Si-mediated regulation of vital genes associated with defense and phytohormones upon biotic stress. Rcht2, Chitinase; Prla, PR-1; Lox, Lipoxygenase; PAL, phenylalanine ammonia lyase; CAD, cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase; CHS, Chalcone synthase; PGIP, Polygalactouranase inhibitor protein; PA, phosphatase associated to defense; PR-1, pathogenesis-related protein; ERF, Ethylene response factor; JERF, Jasmonate and ethylene responsive factor 3; TSRF, Tomato stress-responsive factor; ACCO, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase; FD-1, Ferredoxin-I; POD, Peroxidase; WRKY II, WRKY group II transcription factor; SA, Salicylic acid; JA, Jasmonic acid. The diagram was conceived based on the interpretation from the following literatures (Ghareeb et al.,
Conclusions
Silicon is the modest and a major element of soil with enormous benefits to plants especially in the mitigation of abiotic and biotic stress. Owing to its numerous advantages, the inclusion of Si in modern cultivation systems likes soil-less cultivation system has been blooming in several areas. In recent days, the modernization of technology allows us to investigate the molecular level regulation of compounds which has been extended to study the role of silicon in gene level by plant biologists under different stress conditions. Even though, the research on understanding of molecular rationale behind the Si-mediated stress tolerance is in rudimentary stage, upcoming outcomes from the recent studies have shed light into several possible ways of Si-dependent stress tolerance in plants. Based on the current reports it is evident that silicon possess multifaceted role in the regulation of genes involved in photosynthesis, secondary metabolism, polyamine biosynthesis, transcription, and water uptake. The molecular level modulations triggered by Si supplementation under stressed environment corresponded to the physiological improvement of plant growth and recovery from stress. In addition, several other novel molecular mechanisms behind the stress alleviation by Si have to be unraveled in the future.
Statements
Author contributions
AM, collected the literatures and wrote the manuscript; YA proof-read, finalized, and approved the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
This research work was supported by the National Agricultural Genome Program (NAGP) [Project No. PJ010449], Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpls.2017.01346/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AsmarS. A.CastroE. M.PasqualM.PereiraF. J.SoaresJ. D. R. (2013). Changes in leaf anatomy and photosynthesis of micropropagated banana plantlets under different silicon sources. Sci. Hortic.161, 328–332. 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.07.021
2
AzadA. K.SawaY.IshikawaT.ShibataH. (2004). Phosphorylation of plasma membrane aquaporin regulates temperature-dependent opening of tulip petals. Plant Cell Physiol.45, 608–617. 10.1093/pcp/pch069
3
BaeH.KimS. K.ChoS. K.KangB. G.KimW. T. (2011). Overexpression of OsRDCP1, a rice RING domain-containing E3 ubiquitin ligase, increased tolerance to drought stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Sci.180, 775–782. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.02.008
4
Bies-EtheveN.Gaubier-ComellaP.DeburesA.LasserreE.JobetE.RaynalM.et al. (2008). Inventory, evolution and expression profiling diversity of the LEA (late embryogenesis abundant) protein gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol., 67, 107–124. 10.1007/s11103-008-9304-x
5
BoursiacY.ChenS.LuuD. T.SorieulM.van den DriesN.MaurelC. (2005). Early effects of salinity on water transport in Arabidopsis roots. Molecular and cellular features of aquaporin expression. Plant Physiol.139, 790–805. 10.1104/pp.105.065029
6
BoursiacY.PrakS.BoudetJ.PostaireO.LuuD.-T.Tournaire-RouxC.et al. (2008). The response of Arabidopsis root water transport to a challenging environment implicates reactive oxygen species-and phosphorylation-dependent internalization of aquaporins. Plant Signal. Behav. 3, 1096–1098. 10.4161/psb.3.12.7002
7
BreytonC.de VitryC.PopotJ. L. (1994). Membrane association of cytochrome b6f subunits. The Rieske iron-sulfur protein from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is an extrinsic protein. J. Biol. Chem.269, 7597–7602.
8
BruningsA. M.DatnoffL. E.MaJ. F.MitaniN.NagamuraY.RathinasabapathiB.et al. (2009). Differential gene expression of rice in response to silicon and rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae. Ann. Appl. Biol.155, 161–170. 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2009.00347.x
9
BurnetM.LafontaineP. J.HansonA. D. (1995). Assay, purification, and partial characterization of choline monooxygenase from spinach. Plant Physiol.108, 581–588. 10.1104/pp.108.2.581
10
CarlisleE. M. (1997). Silicon, in Handbook of Nutritionally Essential Mineral Elements, eds O'DellB. L.SundeR. A. (New York, NY: Marcel Dekker Inc.), 603–608
11
CarlisleE. M. (1988). Silicon as a trace nutrient. Sci. Total Environ.73, 95–106.
12
ChaiY. Y.JiangC. D.ShiL.ShiT. S.GuW. B. (2010). Effects of exogenous spermine on sweet sorghum during germination under salinity. Biol. Plant.54, 145–148. 10.1007/s10535-010-0023-1
13
ChavesM. M.OliveiraM. M. (2004). Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. J. Exp. Bot.55, 2365–2384. 10.1093/jxb/erh269
14
ChenJ. Q.MengX. P.ZhangY.XiaM.WangX. P. (2008). Over-expression of OsDREB genes lead to enhanced drought tolerance in rice. Biotechnol. Lett.30, 2191–2198. 10.1007/s10529-008-9811-5
15
ChenW.YaoX.CaiK.ChenJ. (2011). Silicon alleviates drought stress of rice plants by improving plant water status, photosynthesis and mineral nutrient absorption. Biol. Trace Elem. Res.142, 67–76. 10.1007/s12011-010-8742-x
16
ChérifM.BenhamouN.MenziesJ. G.BélangerR. R. (1992). Silicon induced resistance in cucumber plants against Pythium ultimum. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.41, 411–425. 10.1016/0885-5765(92)90053-X
17
CooksonL. J.ScownD. K.McCarthyK. J.ChewN. (2007). The effectiveness of silica treatments against wood-boring invertebrates. Holzforschung61, 326–332. 10.1515/HF.2007.045
18
DasS.ChattopadhyayU. K. (2000). Role of silicon in modulating the internal morphology and growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Ind. J. Tub47, 87–91.
19
DebonaD.RodriguesF. A.DatnoffL. E. (2017). Silicon's role in abiotic and biotic plant stresses. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.55, 4.1–4.23. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035312
20
DeshmukhR. K.VivancosJ.RamakrishnanG.GuérinV.CarpentierG.SonahH.et al. (2015). A precise spacing between the NPA domains of aquaporins is essential for silicon permeability in plants. Plant J.83, 489–500. 10.1111/tpj.12904
21
DubouzetJ. G.SakumaY.ItoY.KasugaM.DubouzetE. G.MiuraS.et al. (2003). OsDREB genes in rice, Oryza sativa L., encode transcription activators that function in drought-, high-salt-and cold-responsive gene expression. Plant J.33, 751–763. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01661.x
22
El-GarhyH. A. S.RashidI. A. S.Abou-AliR. M.MoustafaM. M. A. (2016). Field application of safe chemical elicitors induced the expression of some resistance genes against grey mold and cottony rot diseases during snap bean pods storage. Gene576, 358–365. 10.1016/j.gene.2015.10.048
23
EnejiA. E.InanagaS.MuranakaS.LiJ.HattoriT.AnP.et al. (2008). Growth and nutrient use in four grasses under drought stress as mediated by silicon fertilizers. J. Plant Nutr.31, 355–365. 10.1080/01904160801894913
24
EpsteinE. (1999). Silicon. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.50, 641–664. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.641
25
FaweA.Abou-ZaidM.MenziesJ. G.BélangerR. R. (1998). Silicon-mediated accumulation of flavonoid phytoalexins in cucumber. Phytopathology88, 396–401. 10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.5.396
26
FujitaY.FujitaM.ShinozakiK.Yamaguchi-ShinozakiK. (2011). ABA-mediated transcriptional regulation in response to osmotic stress in plants. J. Plant Res.124, 509–525. 10.1007/s10265-011-0412-3
27
GaoJ. P.ChaoD. Y.LinH. X. (2007). Understanding abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms: recent studies on stress response in rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol.49, 742–750. 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2007.00495.x
28
GaoZ.HeX.ZhaoB.ZhouC.LiangY.GeR.et al. (2010). Overexpressing a putative aquaporin gene from wheat, TaNIP, enhances salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol.51, 767–775. 10.1093/pcp/pcq036
29
GhareebH.BozsóZ.OttP. G.RepenningC.StahlF.WydraK. (2011b). Transcriptome of silicon-induced resistance against Ralstonia solanacearum in the silicon non-accumulator tomato implicates priming effect. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.75, 83–89. 10.1016/j.pmpp.2011.02.003
30
GhareebH.BozsóZ.OttP. G.WydraK. (2011a). Silicon and Ralstonia solanacearum modulate expression stability of housekeeping genes in tomato. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.75, 176–179. 10.1016/j.pmpp.2011.02.003
31
GongH.ChenK. (2012). The regulatory role of silicon on water relations, photosynthetic gas exchange, and carboxylation activities of wheat leaves in field drought conditions. Acta Physiol. Plant. 34, 1589–1594. 10.1007/s11738-012-0954-6
32
GongH. J.RandallD. P.FlowersT. J. (2006). Silicon deposition in the root reduces sodium uptake in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings by reducing bypass flow. Plant Cell Environ.29, 1970–1979. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01572.x
33
GottardiS.IacuzzoF.TomasiN.CortellaG.ManzoccoL.PintonR.et al. (2012). Beneficial effects of silicon on hydroponically grown corn salad (Valerianella locusta (L.) Laterr) plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem.56, 14–23. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.04.002
34
GunesA.InalA.BagciE. G.CobanS.SahinO. (2007). Silicon increases boron tolerance and reduces oxidative damage of wheat grown in soil with excess boron. Biol. Plant.51, 571–574. 10.1007/s10535-007-0125-6
35
HuH.YouJ.FangY.ZhuX.QiZ.XiongL. (2008). Characterization of transcription factor gene SNAC2 conferring cold and salt tolerance in rice. Plant Mol. Biol.67, 169–181. 10.1007/s11103-008-9309-5
36
HuW.YuanQ.WangY.CaiR.DengX.WangJ.et al. (2012). Overexpression of a wheat aquaporin gene, TaAQP8, enhances salt stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Physiol.53, 2127–2141. 10.1093/pcp/pcs154
37
HussainS. S.KayaniM. A.AmjadM. (2011). Transcription factors as tools to engineer enhanced drought stress tolerance in plants. Biotechnol. Prog.27, 297–306. 10.1002/btpr.514
38
IslamM. M.AhmedM.MahaldarD. (2005). In vitro callus induction and plant regeneration in seed explants of rice (Oryza Sativa L.). Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci.1, 72–75.
39
JainM.NijhawanA.TyagiA. K.KhuranaJ. P. (2006). Validation of housekeeping genes as internal control for studying gene expression in rice by quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.345, 646–651. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.04.140
40
JaroschB.CollinsN. C.ZellerhoffN.SchaffrathU. (2005). RAR1, ROR1, and the actin cytoskeleton contribute to basal resistance to Magnaporthe grisea in barley. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interacti.18, 397–404. 10.1094/MPMI-18-0397
41
JayawardanaH. A. R. K.WeerahewaH. L. D.SaparamaduM. D. J. S. (2015). Enhanced resistance to anthracnose disease in chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) by amendment of the nutrient solution with silicon. J. Horticult. Sci. Biotechnol. 90, 557–562. 10.1080/14620316.2015.11668714
42
KawakamiK.IwaiM.IkeuchiM.KamiyaN.ShenJ. R. (2007). Location of PsbY in oxygen-evolving photosystem II revealed by mutagenesis and X-ray crystallography. FEBS Lett.581, 4983–4987. 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.09.036
43
KhattabH. I.EmamM. A.EmamM. M.HelalN. M.MohamedM. R. (2014). Effect of selenium and silicon on transcription factors NAC5 and DREB2A involved in drought-responsive gene expression in rice. Biol. Plant.58, 265–273. 10.1007/s10535-014-0391-z
44
KnightC. T.KinradeS. D. (2001). A primer on the aqueous chemistry of silicon. Studies Plant Sci.8, 57–84. 10.1016/S0928-3420(01)80008-2
45
KraftE.StoneS. L.MaL.SuN.GaoY.LauO. S.et al. (2005). Genome analysis and functional characterization of the E2 and RING-type E3 ligase ubiquitination enzymes of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.139, 1597–1611. 10.1104/pp.105.067983
46
KurepinL. V.IvanovA. G.ZamanM.PharisR. P.AllakhverdievS. I.HurryV.et al. (2015). Stress-related hormones and glycinebetaine interplay in protection of photosynthesis under abiotic stress conditions. Photosyn. Res. 126, 221–235. 10.1007/s11120-015-0125-x
47
LanningF. C. (1966). Relation of silicon in barley to disease, cold, and pest resistance. J. Agric. Food Chem.14, 636–638. 10.1021/jf60148a026
48
LenkaS. K.KatiyarA.ChinnusamyV.BansalK. C. (2011). Comparative analysis of drought-responsive transcriptome in Indica rice genotypes with contrasting drought tolerance. Plant Biotechnol. J.9, 315–327. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00560.x
49
LiJ.LeisnerS. M.FrantzJ. (2008). Alleviation of copper toxicity in Arabidopsis thaliana by silicon addition to hydroponic solutions. J. Am. Soc. Horticult. Sci.133, 670–677.
50
LiangY.SunW.ZhuY. G.ChristieP. (2007). Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of abiotic stresses in higher plants: a review. Environ. Pollut.147, 422–428. 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.06.008
51
LiangY.WongJ. W. C.WeiL. (2005). Silicon-mediated enhancement of cadmium tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) grown in cadmium contaminated soil. Chemosphere58, 475–483. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.09.034
52
LiuJ. H.NadaK.HondaC.KitashibaH.WenX. P.PangX. M.et al. (2006). Polyamine biosynthesis of apple callus under salt stress: importance of the arginine decarboxylase pathway in stress response. J. Exp. Bot.57, 2589–2599. 10.1093/jxb/erl018
53
LiuP.YinL.WangS.ZhangM.DengX.ZhangS.et al. (2015). Enhanced root hydraulic conductance by aquaporin regulation accounts for silicon alleviated salt-induced osmotic stress in Sorghum bicolor L. Environ. Exp. Bot.111, 42–51. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.10.006
54
LucasS.DurmazE.AkpınarB. A.BudakH. (2011). The drought response displayed by a DRE-binding protein from Triticum dicoccoides. Plant Physiol. Biochem.49, 346–351. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.01.016
55
LundeC.JensenP. E.HaldrupA.KnoetzelJ.SchellerH. V. (2000). The PSI-H subunit of photosystem I is essential for state transitions in plant photosynthesis. Nature408, 613–615. 10.1038/35046121
56
MaD.SunD.WangC.QinH.DingH.LiY.et al. (2016). Silicon application alleviates drought stress in wheat through transcriptional regulation of multiple antioxidant defense pathways. J. Plant Growth Regul.35, 1–10. 10.1007/s00344-015-9500-2
57
MaJ. F. (2004). Role of silicon in enhancing the resistance of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.50, 11–18. 10.1080/00380768.2004.10408447
58
MaJ. F.YamajiN. (2006). Silicon uptake and accumulation in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci. 11, 392–397. 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.06.007
59
ManivannanA.SoundararajanP.ChoY. S.ParkJ. E.JeongB. R. (2017). Sources of silicon influence photosystem and redox homeostasis-related proteins during the axillary shoot multiplication of Dianthus caryophyllus. Plant Biosyst.1–7. 10.1080/11263504.2017.1320312
60
MaurelC.BoursiacY.LuuD. T.SantoniV.ShahzadZ.VerdoucqL. (2015). Aquaporins in plants. Physiol. Rev.95, 1321–1358. 10.1152/physrev.00008.2015
61
MitraG. N. (2015). Regulation of Nutrient Uptake by Plants. New Delhi: Springer.
62
MizoiJ.ShinozakiK.Yamaguchi-ShinozakiK. (2012). AP2/ERF family transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1819, 86–96. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.08.004
63
MuneerS.ParkY. G.ManivannanA.SoundararajanP.JeongB. R. (2014). Physiological and proteomic analysis in chloroplasts of Solanum lycopersicum L. under silicon efficiency and salinity stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci.15, 21803–21824. 10.3390/ijms151221803
64
NakashimaK.ItoY.Yamaguchi-ShinozakiK. (2009). Transcriptional regulatory networks in response to abiotic stresses in Arabidopsis and grasses. Plant Physiol.149, 88–95. 10.1104/pp.108.129791
65
NakashimaK.TakasakiH.MizoiJ.ShinozakiK.Yamaguchi-ShinozakiK. (2012). NAC transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1819, 97–103. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.10.005
66
NeumannD.Zur NiedenU. (2001). Silicon and heavy metal tolerance of higher plants. Phytochemistry56, 685–692. 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00472-6
67
NicotN.HausmanJ. F.HoffmannL.EversD. (2005). Housekeeping gene selection for real-time RT-PCR normalization in potato during biotic and abiotic stress. J. Exp. Bot.56, 2907–2914. 10.1093/jxb/eri285
68
NingY.JantasuriyaratC.ZhaoQ.ZhangH.ChenS.LiuJ.et al. (2011). The SINA E3 ligase OsDIS1 negatively regulates drought response in rice. Plant Physiol.157, 242–255. 10.1104/pp.111.180893
69
NwugoC. C.HuertaA. J. (2008). Effects of silicon nutrition on cadmium uptake, growth and photosynthesis of rice plants exposed to low-level cadmium. Plant Soil311, 73–86. 10.1007/s11104-008-9659-4
70
PandeyS.RanadeS. A.NagarP. K.KumarN. (2000). Role of polyamines and ethylene as modulators of plant senescence. J. Biosci.25, 291–299. 10.1007/BF02703938
71
ParentB.HachezC.RedondoE.SimonneauT.ChaumontF.TardieuF. (2009). Drought and abscisic acid effects on aquaporin content translate into changes in hydraulic conductivity and leaf growth rate: a trans-scale approach. Plant Physiol.149, 2000–2012. 10.1104/pp.108.130682
72
ParkJ. J.YiJ.YoonJ.ChoL. H.PingJ.JeongH. J.et al. (2011). OsPUB15, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, functions to reduce cellular oxidative stress during seedling establishment. Plant J.65, 194–205. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04416.x
73
PfannschmidtT.YangC. (2012). The hidden function of photosynthesis: a sensing system for environmental conditions that regulates plant acclimation responses. Protoplasma249, 125–136. 10.1007/s00709-012-0398-2
74
PottosinI.ShabalaS. (2014). Polyamines control of cation transport across plant membranes: implications for ion homeostasis and abiotic stress signaling. Front. Plant Sci.5:154. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00154
75
QinF.ShinozakiK.Yamaguchi-ShinozakiK. (2011). Achievements and challenges in understanding plant abiotic stress responses and tolerance. Plant Cell Physiol.52, 1569–1582. 10.1093/pcp/pcr106
76
QuinetM.NdayiragijeA.LefèvreI.LambillotteB.Dupont-GillainC. C.LuttsS. (2010). Putrescine differently influences the effect of salt stress on polyamine metabolism and ethylene synthesis in rice cultivars differing in salt resistance. J. Exp. Bot.61, 2719–2733. 10.1093/jxb/erq118
77
RabbaniM. A.MaruyamaK.AbeH.KhanM. A.KatsuraK.ItoY.et al. (2003). Monitoring expression profiles of rice genes under cold, drought, and high-salinity stresses and abscisic acid application using cDNA microarray and RNA gel-blot analyses. Plant Physiol.133, 1755–1767. 10.1104/pp.103.025742
78
RahmanA.WallisC. M.UddinW. (2015). Silicon-induced systemic defense responses in perennial ryegrass against infection by Magnaporthe oryzae. Phytopathology105, 748–757. 10.1094/PHYTO-12-14-0378-R
79
RédeiG. P. (2008). Silicon (Si), in Encyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics, Proteomics, and Informatics (Springer), 1817.
80
RhodesM. J. C. (1994). Physiological roles for secondary metabolites in plants: some progress, many outstanding problems. Plant Mol. Biol.24, 1–20. 10.1007/BF00040570
81
RodriguesF. Á.McNallyD. J.DatnoffL. E.JonesJ. B.LabbéC.BenhamouN.et al. (2004). Silicon enhances the accumulation of diterpenoid phytoalexins in rice: a potential mechanism for blast resistance. Phytopathology94, 177–183. 10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.2.177
82
Romero-ArandaM. R.JuradoO.CuarteroJ. (2006). Silicon alleviates the deleterious salt effect on tomato plant growth by improving plant water status. J. Plant Physiol. 163, 847–855. 10.1016/j.jplph.2005.05.010
83
RoyM.WuR. (2001). Arginine decarboxylase transgene expression and analysis of environmental stress tolerance in transgenic rice. Plant Sci.160, 869–875. 10.1016/S0168-9452(01)00337-5
84
ShettyR.FrettéX.JensenB.ShettyN. P.JensenJ. D.JørgensenH. J. L.et al. (2011). Silicon-induced changes in antifungal phenolic acids, flavonoids, and key phenylpropanoid pathway genes during the interaction between miniature roses and the biotrophic pathogen Podosphaera pannosa. Plant Physiol.157, 2194–2205. 10.1104/pp.111.185215
85
ShiH.ChanZ. (2014). Improvement of plant abiotic stress tolerance through modulation of the polyamine pathway. J. Integr. Plant Biol.56, 114–121. 10.1111/jipb.12128
86
ShiY.WangY.FlowersT. J.GongH. (2013). Silicon decreases chloride transport in rice (Oryza sativa L.) in saline conditions. J. Plant Physiol.170, 847–853. 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.01.018
87
ShinozakiK.Yamaguchi-ShinozakiK. (2000). Molecular responses to dehydration and low temperature: differences and cross-talk between two stress signaling pathways. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.3, 217–223. 10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00067-4
88
ShinozakiK.Yamaguchi-ShinozakiK.SekiM. (2003). Regulatory network of gene expression in the drought and cold stress responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6, 410–417. 10.1016/S1369-5266(03)00092-X
89
SongA.LiP.FanF.LiZ.LiangY. (2014). The effect of silicon on photosynthesis and expression of its relevant genes in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under high-zinc stress. PLoS ONE9:e113782. 10.1371/journal.pone.0113782
90
SongA.XueG.CuiP.FanF.LiuH.YinC.et al. (2016). The role of silicon in enhancing resistance to bacterial blight of hydroponic-and soil-cultured rice. Sci. Rep.6:24640. 10.1038/srep24640
91
SongS. Y.ChenY.ChenJ.DaiX. Y.ZhangW. H. (2011). Physiological mechanisms underlying OsNAC5-dependent tolerance of rice plants to abiotic stress. Planta234, 331–345. 10.1007/s00425-011-1403-2
92
SoundararajanP.ManivannanA.ChoY. S.JeongB. R. (2017a). Exogenous supplementation of silicon improved the recovery of hyperhydric shoots in Dianthus caryophyllus L. by stabilizing the physiology and protein expression. Front. Plant Sci.8:738. 10.3389/fpls.2017.00738
93
SoundararajanP.ManivannanA.KoC. H.JeongB. R. (2017b). Silicon enhanced redox homeostasis and protein expression to mitigate the salinity stress in rosa hybrida ‘Rock Fire’. J. Plant Growth Regul.1–19. 10.1016/j.pmpp.2011.02.003
94
SoundararajanP.SivanesanI.JanaS.JeongB. R. (2014). Influence of silicon supplementation on the growth and tolerance to high temperature in Salvia splendens. Horticul. Environ. Biotechnol.55, 271–279. 10.1007/s13580-014-0023-8
95
StoneS. L.HauksdóttirH.TroyA.HerschlebJ.KraftE.CallisJ. (2005). Functional analysis of the RING-type ubiquitin ligase family of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.137, 13–30. 10.1104/pp.104.052423
96
SutkaM.LiG.BoudetJ.BoursiacY.DoumasP.MaurelC. (2011). Natural variation of root hydraulics in Arabidopsis grown in normal and salt-stressed conditions. Plant Physiol.155, 1264–1276. 10.1104/pp.110.163113
97
TakasakiH.MaruyamaK.KidokoroS.ItoY.FujitaY.ShinozakiK.et al. (2010). The abiotic stress-responsive NAC-type transcription factor OsNAC5 regulates stress-inducible genes and stress tolerance in rice. Mol. Genet. Genomics284, 173–183. 10.1007/s00438-010-0557-0
98
TangW.NewtonR. J.LiC.CharlesT. M. (2007). Enhanced stress tolerance in transgenic pine expressing the pepper CaPF1 gene is associated with the polyamine biosynthesis. Plant Cell Rep.26, 115–124. 10.1007/s00299-006-0228-0
99
TranL. S. P.NishiyamaR.Yamaguchi-ShinozakiK.ShinozakiK. (2010). Potential utilization of NAC transcription factors to enhance abiotic stress tolerance in plants by biotechnological approach. GM Crops1, 32–39. 10.4161/gmcr.1.1.10569
100
TripathiD. K.SinghV. P.GangwarS.PrasadS. M.MauryaJ. N.ChauhanD. K. (2014). Role of silicon in enrichment of plant nutrients and protection from biotic and abiotic stresses, in Improvement of Crops in the Era of Climatic Changes, eds AhmadP.WaniM. R.AzoozM. M.TranL. S. P. (New York, NY: Springer), 39–56.
101
TripathiD. K.SinghV. P.KumarD.ChauhanD. K. (2012). Impact of exogenous silicon addition on chromium uptake, growth, mineral elements, oxidative stress, antioxidant capacity, and leaf and root structures in rice seedlings exposed to hexavalent chromium. Acta Physiol. Plant.34, 279–289. 10.1007/s11738-011-0826-5
102
TunnacliffeA.WiseM. J. (2007). The continuing conundrum of the LEA proteins. Naturwissenschaften94, 791–812. 10.1007/s00114-007-0254-y
103
UmezawaT.FujitaM.FujitaY.Yamaguchi-ShinozakiK.ShinozakiK. (2006). Engineering drought tolerance in plants: discovering and tailoring genes to unlock the future. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.17, 113–122. 10.1016/j.copbio.2006.02.002
104
WangQ.GuanY.WuY.ChenH.ChenF.ChuC. (2008). Overexpression of a rice OsDREB1F gene increases salt, drought, and low temperature tolerance in both Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Mol. Biol.67, 589–602. 10.1007/s11103-008-9340-6
105
WangY.StassA.HorstW. J. (2004). Apoplastic binding of aluminum is involved in silicon-induced amelioration of aluminum toxicity in maize. Plant Physiol.136, 3762–3770. 10.1104/pp.104.045005
106
WatanabeS.ShimoiE.OhkamaN.HayashiH.YoneyamaT.YazakiJ.et al. (2004). Identification of several rice genes regulated by Si nutrition. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.50, 1273–1276. 10.1080/00380768.2004.10408603
107
XiongL.SchumakerK. S.ZhuJ. K. (2002). Cell signaling during cold, drought, and salt stress. Plant Cell14, S165–S183.
108
YinL.WangS.TanakaK.FujiharaS.ItaiA.DenX.et al. (2016). Silicon-mediated changes in polyamines participate in silicon-induced salt tolerance in Sorghum bicolor L. Plant Cell Environ.39, 245–258. 10.1111/pce.12521
109
YoshidaS.OhnishiY.KitagishiK. (1962). Histochemistry of silicon in rice plant: III. The presence of cuticle-silica double layer in the epidermal tissue. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 8, 1–5. 10.1080/00380768.1962.10430982
110
ZeierJ.DelledonneM.MishinaT.SeveriE.SonodaM.LambC. (2004). Genetic elucidation of nitric oxide signaling in incompatible plant-pathogen interactions. Plant Physiol.136, 2875–2886. 10.1104/pp.104.042499
111
ZhangQ.LiuJ.LuH.ZhaoS.WangW.DuJ.et al. (2015). Effects of silicon on growth, root anatomy, radial oxygen loss (ROL) and Fe/Mn plaque of Aegiceras corniculatum (L.) Blanco seedlings exposed to cadmium. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monitor. Manage.4, 6–11. 10.1016/j.enmm.2015.04.001
112
ZhuZ.WeiG.LiJ.QianQ.YuJ. (2004). Silicon alleviates salt stress and increases antioxidant enzymes activity in leaves of salt-stressed cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant Sci.167, 527–533. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.04.020
Summary
Keywords
defense response, gene regulation, photosynthesis, polyamine biosynthesis, regulatory elements
Citation
Manivannan A and Ahn Y-K (2017) Silicon Regulates Potential Genes Involved in Major Physiological Processes in Plants to Combat Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 8:1346. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01346
Received
24 April 2017
Accepted
19 July 2017
Published
03 August 2017
Volume
8 - 2017
Edited by
Rupesh Kailasrao Deshmukh, Laval University, Canada
Reviewed by
Stefano Cesco, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Italy; Amit A. Deokar, University of Saskatchewan, Canada
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2017 Manivannan and Ahn.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yul-Kuyn Ahn aykyun@korea.kr
This article was submitted to Plant Nutrition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.