Abstract
Commercial carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus) cultivars are vegetatively propagated from axillary stem cuttings through adventitious rooting; a process which is affected by complex interactions between nutrient and hormone levels and is strongly genotype-dependent. To deepen our understanding of the regulatory events controlling this process, we performed a comparative study of adventitious root (AR) formation in two carnation cultivars with contrasting rooting performance, “2101–02 MFR” and “2003 R 8”, as well as in the reference cultivar “Master”. We provided molecular evidence that localized auxin response in the stem cutting base was required for efficient adventitious rooting in this species, which was dynamically established by polar auxin transport from the leaves. In turn, the bad-rooting behavior of the “2003 R 8” cultivar was correlated with enhanced synthesis of indole-3-acetic acid conjugated to aspartic acid by GH3 proteins in the stem cutting base. Treatment of stem cuttings with a competitive inhibitor of GH3 enzyme activity significantly improved rooting of “2003 R 8”. Our results allowed us to propose a working model where endogenous auxin homeostasis regulated by GH3 proteins accounts for the cultivar dependency of AR formation in carnation stem cuttings.
Introduction
New carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus) cultivars are mainly bred for traits affecting flower morphology, such as flower size, petal shape, petal number, flower color, and flower vase-life among others, as well as for traits improving plant production and pathogen resistance (Sheela, 2008). However, less attention is usually paid to breed the hidden-part of the plant, its root system, which is very important to warrant water and mineral nutrient supply. Commercial carnation cultivars are vegetatively propagated from axillary stem cuttings that undergo controlled rooting and acclimation (, ), which are high energy-demanding processes that lead to severe losses in certain cultivars (; ). Effective rooting of stem cuttings in several species strongly depends on the production of a functional adventitious root (AR) system, which is in turn affected by complex interactions between nutrient and hormone levels (; ; ).
We previously performed a detailed analysis of the morphological and physiological changes occurring in the basal region of stem cuttings during rooting in a reference cultivar “Master”, and we reported how these were modified in response to exogenous auxin application (). We found significant crosstalk between auxin levels, stress hormone homeostasis, and sugar availability in the stem cutting base of “Master” during the initial steps of adventitious rooting (). To further characterize these interactions, we made use of a large collection of commercial carnation cultivars selecting two additional cultivars because of their contrasting rooting performance (). The “2101–02 MFR” cultivar showed higher number of roots and faster growth than other spray cultivars, while the “2003 R 8” standard cultivar displayed a smaller root system because of a delay in root emergence and further slow root growth (). We characterized gene expression and functional changes in the stem cutting base during the early stages of adventitious rooting in these two cultivars, which provided a number of molecular, histological, and physiological markers to initiate the genetic dissection of AR formation in this species (Villacorta-Martín et al., 2015).
In the current work, we performed a comparative study of AR formation in “2101–02 MFR”, “Master”, and “2003 R 8” grown in vitro and in soil plugs. We found that local auxin response in the stem cutting base was required for adventitious rooting, and that this local auxin maximum was dynamically established by active polar auxin transport (PAT) from the leaves. In turn, the bad-rooting behavior of the “2003 R 8” cultivar correlated with enhanced auxin inactivation in the root-formative region. Taking together, our results provide a detailed view of the major pathways triggering AR formation and how differential auxin homeostasis in the stem cutting base might account for cultivar-dependent adventitious rooting in carnation stem cuttings.
Materials and Methods
Plant Materials and Growth Conditions
Stem cuttings from the cultivars used in this work (“Master”, “2101–02 MFR”, and “2003 R 8”) are available upon request. All the mother plants had been grown in the same glasshouse under environmental conditions at 37°34’50′′ N, 1°46’35′′ W, and 395 m altitude within the rooting station of Barberet & Blanc, S.A. (Puerto Lumbreras, Murcia, Spain). Water, fertilizers, and adequate phytosanitary treatments were periodically applied, as described previously (; ).
Auxin Transport Inhibition
Terminal stem cuttings of about 10–15 cm with four to five pairs of leaves were manually harvested from several mother plants by skilled operators at the rooting station at noon on 26 April 2016, wrapped in plastic bags just after pinching and stored in a cold chamber at 5 ± 2°C for about 24 h, as described previously (; ). A ring of lanolin paste (Sigma–Aldrich, United States) was individually set at about 6–8 mm of the basal end of each stem cutting using a syringe. Previously, warm lanolin was thoroughly mixed with 1% (w/w) of 1-naphthoxyacetic acid (1-NOA; Sigma–Aldrich, United States), 1% (w/w) of 1-N-naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA; Sigma–Aldrich, United States), or an equimolar mixture (0.8% w/w) of α-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA; Duchefa, Netherlands) and indole-3-butyric acid (IBA; Duchefa, Netherlands) for the different treatments. Non-supplemented lanolin paste was used as a mock treatment. After the treatments, the cuttings were individually planted in 104-well trays containing moistened peat/perlite (90/10 v/v) plugs (3.5 cm diameter × 3.5 cm length; ∼26 cm3) in a Gothic Arch Greenhouse at 38°16’43′′ N, 0°41’15′′ W, and 96 m altitude (Elche, Spain). Stem cuttings were grown from 27 April to 2 June 2016 under the environmental conditions of the greenhouse, with periodic sprinkler irrigation (5 min every 4 h).
For scoring adventitious rooting, the soil plug was carefully removed by washing it with high pressure tap water and the entire root system was imaged using a Nikon D3200 camera with an AF-S DX NIKKOR 18–55 mm f/3.5-5.6G VR objective. We visually defined seven rooting stages representing the different AR phenotypes observed ().
Auxin Transport Analysis
Three-to-five stem cutting basal sections (50 mm) from each carnation cultivar were used to estimate the basipetal indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) transport, as previously described (; Nicolás et al., 2007). The isolated stem sections were placed on top of an agar block keeping their endogenous apical–basal orientation and a 5 μl drop of a 200 μM labeled IAA ([13C]6C4H9NO2) was added to the top of each stem section. Every 30 min, the agar block was replaced by a new agar block and the experiment was carried out for 240 min. The amount of labeled IAA present in the agar blocks was analyzed by U-HPLC–MS Orbitrap (ThermoFisher Scientific, United States) using negative electrospray mode (ESI). Detection was made using the m/z ratio for labeled IAA (m/z 180.0761) and retention time to unequivocally identify transported labeled IAA. The linear traces of the cumulative labeled IAA transported per time unit were used to estimate different transport parameters according to Van der Weij (1932).
Chemical Inhibition of Auxin Degradation
Terminal stem cuttings were collected from several mother plants at noon on 28 September 2017 and immediately placed on Erlenmeyer flasks filled with 50 mL of Murashige and Skoog salt media with Gamborg’s vitamins, pH 5.0 supplemented with 10 μM adenosine-5’-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]phosphate (AIEP) or with distilled water as a mock treatment. After 15 h in the dark, the cuttings were individually planted in 104-well trays and kept in a Gothic Arch Greenhouse as described above. Adventitious rooting stage and total root area were scored 29 days after planting as indicated elsewhere ().
Phytohormone Extraction and Analysis
Phytohormones were extracted and analyzed according to and Villacorta-Martín et al. (2015). Auxin homeostasis metabolites were identified according to molecular mass and retention time from Total Ion Chromatograms obtained in the phytohormone analysis.
RNA Isolation and First-Strand cDNA Synthesis
Sample collection and RNA extractions were performed as described elsewhere (Villacorta-Martín et al., 2015). Briefly, total RNA from ∼120 mg of powdered carnation stem tissue from 10 to 15 individuals was extracted in triplicate using Spectrum Plant Total RNA Kit (Sigma–Aldrich, United States) as previously described (Villacorta-Martín et al., 2015), and cDNA samples were synthesized from purified RNA using the iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix (Bio-Rad, United States). RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis were preformed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Gene Expression Analysis by Real-Time Quantitative PCR
Primers were designed to amplify 87–178 bp of the cDNA sequences (Supplementary Table S1). To avoid amplifying genomic DNA, forward and reverse primers were designed to bind different exons and to hybridize across consecutive exons.
For real-time quantitative PCR, 14 μl reactions were prepared with 7 μl of the SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, United States), 4 μM of specific primer pairs, and 1 μl of cDNA- and DNase-free water (up to 14 μl of total volume reaction). PCR amplifications were carried out in 96-well optical reaction plates on a Step One Plus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, United States). Three biological and two technical replicates were performed for each gene. The thermal cycling program started with a step of 10 s at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles (15 s at 95°C and 60 s at 60°C), and the melt curve (from 60 to 95°C, with increments of 0.3°C every 5 s). Dissociation kinetics of the amplified products confirmed their specificity.
Primer pair validation was performed by using the 2-ΔΔCT method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001). Gene expression was measured by the absolute quantification method (Lu et al., 2012) by using a standard curve which comprised equal amounts from each cDNA sample. The Dca3524 gene (homolog of the Arabidopsis thaliana housekeeping gene EF1α; AT5G60390) was chosen for normalization of the assayed genes, when needed. In each gene, mean of fold-change values relative to the distal region of the leaf in the “Master” cultivar (for the leaf data) and to the -23 h dataset in “2101–02 MFR” (for stem cutting base data) was used for graphic representation. ΔCT values were analyzed using SPSS 21.0.0 (SPSS Inc., United States) by applying the Mann–Whitney U-test for statistical differences between cDNA samples (P-value ≤ 0.05).
In Silico Identification of Candidate Genes From RNA-Sequencing Data and Heat Map Drawing
Sixty-nine differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified from previous RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data using the Short Time-Series Expression Miner (STEM) program (Villacorta-Martín et al., 2015) and annotated as GO:0009734 “auxin-activated signaling pathway” were initially selected; this list was further completed by including 35 genes from CarnationDB (Yagi et al., 2014) using keyword search (Supplementary Table S2). Sixty-six of these carnation genes were confirmed as putative auxin-responsive genes based on their highest homology with the A. thaliana annotation (). Following a similar approach, 49 genes were selected as cytokinin (CK)-related genes (GO:0009736 and GO:0009690) (Supplementary Table S2). Gene expression data from previous experiments (Villacorta-Martín et al., 2015) were processed using the heatmap.plus package of R1. Neighbor-joining distance matrixes between genes (rows) and between samples (columns) were calculated to build the dendrograms.
Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using the StatGraphics Centurion XV software (StatPoint Technologies, Inc., Warrenton, VA, United States). Data outliers were identified based on aberrant standard deviation values and excluded for posterior analyses. One-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests were performed to analyze the goodness-of-fit between the distribution of the data and a given theoretical distribution as previously described (). Average ± standard deviation values were represented, except for those cases that did not exhibit a normal distribution and for which the median was used instead. The differences between the data groups were analyzed by t-test (P ≤ 0.05) when only two groups were compared. To compare the data for a given variable, we performed multiple testing analyses with a two-way ANOVA (cultivar × day after planting or cultivar × treatment) and the Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) tests (P ≤ 0.05). Nonparametric tests were used when necessary.
Results
Adventitious Rooting in Carnation Stem Cuttings Is Genotype-Dependent
Using an environmentally controlled hydroponic system developed previously (), we characterized the root system architecture during rooting of stem cuttings of two standard cultivars, “Master” and “2003 R 8”, and one spray cultivar, “2101–02 MFR” (Figure 1). In the “2101–02 MFR” and the “Master” cultivars, ARs emerged between 13 and 15 days after planting while there was a significant delay in AR emergence in the “2003 R 8” cultivar (Figure 1A). Although the three cultivars showed a well-developed and functional root system at 29 days, the “2101–02 MFR” cultivar showed a larger root system than the other two (Figure 1A). Considering total root length as an indicator of rooting performance (), exponential root growth in “Master” initiated earlier (15 days) than in the two other cultivars: “2101–02 MFR” at 17 days and “2003 R 8” at 22 days (Figure 1B). The bad-rooting performance of “2003 R 8” was mostly caused by the severe growth delay of its root system compared to the other studied cultivars (Figure 1B). Conversely, the “2101–02 MFR” cultivar showed continuous root growth along the experiment with higher root growth rates (mm/day) than the two other cultivars (Figure 1B).
FIGURE 1
Periclinal cell divisions within the cambial ring were among the first morphological markers for the AR induction phase () observed in this species (). Discrete clusters of meristematic cells appeared along the cambial ring shortly afterward (), which correspond to AR initiation phase (). Consistently with early AR initiation in “Master” and “2101–02 MFR”, cell clusters were observed within the vascular cambium at 54 h after planting (Figure 1C), while only sporadic periclinal divisions at the cambial ring were observed in “2003 R 8” growing in the hydroponic system (Figure 1C).
Based on a previously defined qualitative scale for rooting performance (Figure 2A; ), we confirmed the AR phenotypes of these three cultivars grown in soil plugs at the rooting station of our commercial provider. At 20 days, most stem cuttings in “Master” and “2101–02 MFR” were on stages 3 and 4, while only 60% of them reached stage 2 in “2003 R 8” (Supplementary Figure S1A). One week later, “Master” and “2003 R 8” cuttings reached similar rooting performances (Supplementary Figure S1A), but the root density in “2101–02 MFR” cuttings increased significantly (Supplementary Figures S1A,B). These results confirmed that the rooting behavior of “2003 R 8” (bad-rooting), “Master” (intermediate-rooting), and “2101–02 MFR” (good-rooting), despite it might be influenced by the environment and by the physiological status of the mother plants (Villanova et al., 2017), was under strict genetic control.
FIGURE 2
Auxin Is Required for AR Initiation and AR Growth in Stem Cuttings
After stem cutting harvest, basipetal transport of auxin from mature leaves contributes to auxin accumulation in the stem cutting base and hence to AR formation (). In agreement with these results, exogenous auxin application improved AR formation in stem cuttings of “Master” (Figures 2A–C), likely by accelerating the formative divisions that lead to the establishment of the new root primordia (). The bad-rooting behavior of “2003 R 8” was rescued by exogenous auxin application, while a slightly negative effect of exogenously applied auxin was observed for adventitious rooting of “2101–02 MFR” cuttings (Figures 2A–C), leading to enhanced formation of callus-like tissue. However, the effect of the auxin treatment seems to be stronger at 29 days, because then the three cultivars showed similar root phenotypes (Figure 2C).
To confirm the relevance of a functional auxin transport through the stem for rooting, we chemically inhibited PAT either by NPA (), which disrupts membrane trafficking (), or by 1-NOA, which blocked the activities of both auxin influx and efflux carriers (Parry et al., 2001; Lanková et al., 2010). Chemical disruption of PAT strongly inhibited AR formation in the stem cutting base in all three cultivars (Figure 2B). The inhibitory effect of NPA was stronger than that of 1-NOA, which also caused subtle cultivar-specific differences in AR development and growth, with incomplete inhibition of AR formation in “2101–02 MFR” (Figure 2C).
We next measured endogenous IAA transport through the stem using labeled IAA. The IAA transport rate was higher in “2003 R 8” than in the two other cultivars, while “Master” showed the highest IAA transport intensity (i.e., IAA mobilization) of the three (Figure 2D). In addition, we gathered the expression data of several genes putatively encoding auxin influx (AUX/LAX) and auxin efflux (PIN and ABCB) transporters (Oliveros-Valenzuela et al., 2008; Villacorta-Martín et al., 2015; Sánchez-García et al., 2018).
We validated these results by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) and extended them to additional time-points at -23 and -15 h. On the one hand, the expression of DcAUX1 (Dca32369) and DcLAX3 (Dca6786) auxin influx genes was not considerably changed over the rooting experiment in these two contrasting cultivars, although it was slightly higher in “2003 R 8” (Supplementary Figures S2A,B). On the other hand, the expression of auxin efflux genes, DcABCB1 (Dca43405), DcABCB19 (Dca25164), and DcPIN1 (Dca20927), was higher in the stem cutting base at harvest time (-23 h) and diminished after planting in “2101–02 MFR” and specially in “2003 R 8” (Supplementary Figures S2C–E). In addition, the expression levels of DcABCB1, DcABCB19, and DcPIN1, were significantly higher in “2003 R 8” than in “2101–02 MFR” (Supplementary Figures S2C–E). These results indicated that the differences in PAT through the stem between “2101–02 MFR” and “2003 R 8” are likely caused by differential expression of auxin transporters, although these differences did not explain the contrasting rooting performance between “2003 R 8” and “2101–02 MFR”.
Auxin Is Produced in Mature Leaves and Is Actively Transported to the Stem
The differences in AR formation between cultivars might arise by differential auxin production from mature leaves, as these are the main source of endogenous auxin required for rooting stem cuttings (). Carnation leaves are linear, display parallel venation, and are directly attached to the stem by a proximal sheath-like tissue, resembling monocot leaves (Figure 3A; ). We measured endogenous auxin levels in proximal and distal regions of the leaf blade (Figures 3A,B). IAA was found at similar, albeit low levels, at the proximal region of the leaves in the three studied cultivars and it was below detection in their distal region (Figure 3C). In most plants, such as Arabidopsis and rice, the major IAA biosynthesis pathway occurs through indole-3-pyruvic acid (IPyA) (Zhao, 2010). The tryptophan aminotransferase (TAA/TAR) family produces IPyA and the YUCCA (YUC) family functions downstream in the conversion of IPyA to IAA (Mashiguchi et al., 2011; Won et al., 2011; Mano and Nemoto, 2012; Tivendale et al., 2014). Putative carnation orthologs DcTAR2a (Dca35926) and DcYUC1 (Dca37589) were differentially expressed in proximal regions of mature leaves in all the three cultivars (Figures 3D,E). In addition, the expression of DcTAR2a and DcYUC1 was significantly lower in “2101–02 MFR” than in “Master”, which was in agreement with the higher IAA levels found in the leaves of “Master” (Figure 3C). Consistent with local auxin biosynthesis occurring preferentially in the tip of the leaf, as it occurs in rice (Yamamoto et al., 2007), we confirmed that IPyA accumulated in the distal region of mature leaves, with significantly lower levels in “2101–02 MFR” leaves (Figure 3B). Auxin influx genes DcAUX1 and DcLAX3 were significantly expressed at higher levels in the proximal leaf region (Supplementary Figures S3A,B). The expression of genes involved in auxin efflux, such as DcPIN1, DcABCB1, and DcABCB19, was significantly higher in the proximal region of the leaves in the three cultivars (Supplementary Figures S3C,E,F). On the other hand, the carnation ortholog of PIN3, Dca17139, did not showed significant changes along the studied leaf regions (Supplementary Figure S3D). Similarly to that found for the stem (see above), combined expression levels of these auxin transporter genes were lower in “2101–02 MFR” than in the other two cultivars (Supplementary Figure S3), suggesting lower auxin transport rates also in the leaves of “2101–02 MFR”. To confirm the establishment of a gradient of IAA concentration within the leaf blade, we studied the expression of the auxin-induced DcIAA19 gene (Villacorta-Martín et al., 2015) as a signaling read-out for the endogenous auxin gradient in the leaves (Figure 3F).
FIGURE 3
Differential Accumulation of Active IAA in the Stem Cutting Base Between Cultivars Affects Rooting
Auxin flooding in the vascular region above the wounding has been proposed to trigger de-differentiation and cell cycle reactivation of cambial cells in this region (). Endogenous IAA levels in the stem cutting base of “Master” transiently increased after harvesting and before planting from 8 to 65 ng g-1 FW (Figure 4A), similarly to as previously reported (). In “2101–02 MFR”, the IAA levels increased fivefold from steady-state levels up to 42 ng g-1 FW at planting time (Figure 4A). DcYUC1 transcript levels were significantly downregulated in the stem cutting base of “2003 R 8” and “2101–02 MFR” after harvesting (Supplementary Figure S2F), and negligible IPyA concentrations were detected in these tissues. These results allowed us to discard the hypothesis that local auxin biosynthesis had contributed to the endogenous IAA accumulation found in the stem cutting base of these two cultivars after harvesting them from the mother plants.
FIGURE 4
Despite the highest PAT rate in the stem cutting base of “2003 R 8” (Figure 2D), its endogenous IAA level did not significantly increase after harvesting and during rooting (Figure 4A). These results suggested that the auxin maximum in the stem cutting base of “2003 R 8” was not properly formed. In A. thaliana, the main IAA degradation pathways (Ludwig-Müller, 2011) include oxidation by DIOXYGENASE FOR AUXIN OXIDATION 1 (DAO1) (Porco et al., 2016) and conjugation by GRETCHEN HAGEN 3 (GH3) amide synthetases (Staswick et al., 2005), which played highly redundant roles to regulate endogenous auxin levels (Mellor et al., 2016). To account for IAA degradation in the stem cutting base of the studied cultivars, we measured IAA conjugated to aspartic acid (IAA-Asp) and 2-oxoindole-3-acetic acid (oxIAA), which are metabolically inactive forms unable to be transported through the PAT system (Pencík et al., 2013). At harvest time (-23 h) and before rooting (-15 h), the levels of IAA-Asp in the stem cutting base of the three cultivars were low, but significantly increased at planting time and during rooting in “2003 R 8” (Figure 4B). On the other hand, oxIAA levels were low in the stem cutting base of these cultivars up to 54 h (Figure 4C). Remarkably, IAA-Asp levels in the stem cutting base of the bad-rooting cultivar, “2003 R 8”, increased threefold between planting time and 24 h (161.4 ± 14.1 ng g-1 FW) and returned to initial levels at 54 h (Figure 4B), which suggest further modification of the IAA-Asp pool by additional conjugations or oxidative reactions. OxIAA levels were not significantly different in the stem cutting base of “2003 R 8” during rooting, although some variation was found in oxIAA levels in “2101–02 MFR” during early rooting (Figure 4C).
We wondered whether the differences in endogenous IAA levels in the stem cutting base shortly after harvesting and before rooting might have a functional relevance for the rooting differences observed between cultivars. As described above, we used DcIAA19 expression as a read-out for endogenous IAA levels. Interestingly, DcIAA19 expression in the stem cutting base of the good-rooting cultivar (“2101–02 MFR”) matched its endogenous IAA levels (Figure 4D), while in the bad-rooting cultivar (“2003 R 8”), DcIAA19 expression significantly decreased after planting (Figure 4D).
We previously identified five carnation genes encoding GH3-like proteins whose orthologs synthesize IAA–amino acid conjugates, such as IAA-Asp (Staswick et al., 2005), two of which are known to be differentially expressed during rooting (Sánchez-García et al., 2018). The expression of DcGH3.1 (Dca37575) was significantly higher in “2003 R 8” than in “2101–02 MFR”, with the strongest differences in expression after severance and before rooting (Figure 4E). In line with the endogenous oxIAA levels found in “2101–02 MFR” and “2003 R 8”, differences in gene expression levels were observed for the DAO1 ortholog, DcDAO1 (Dca2789) (Figure 4F). To confirm whether the differential accumulation of IAA-Asp in the studied cultivars contributed to rooting performance, we incubated freshly harvested stem cuttings of “2101–02 MFR”, “Master”, and “2003 R 8” with AIEP, a known chemical inhibitor of GH3 activities (). Treatment with 10 μM AIEP did not significantly improve rooting performance either in the good-rooting cultivar “2101–02 MFR” or in “Master” (Figure 5A). In contrast, AIEP significantly improved the rooting performance of the bad-rooting cultivar “2003 R 8” (Figure 5A), which now produced more roots than in “Master” (Figure 5B). We found that the AIEP treatment increased both the percentage of cuttings with visible roots (Figure 5C) and the total root area (Figure 5D) in “2003 R 8”, with hardly any effect in the two other cultivars. Our results confirmed that GH3-mediated IAA-Asp accumulation in “2003 R 8” reduced IAA accumulation in the stem cutting base, which in turn negatively affects its rooting performance.
FIGURE 5
Cytokinins and Stress-Related Hormone Levels in Cultivars With Contrasting Rooting Performance
Cytokinins are negative regulators of AR formation (; Werner et al., 2003; ). We previously found that trans-zeatin (tZ) levels were high in the stem cutting base of “Master” after excision and they dropped abruptly after planting (). Consistently with these results, we found high tZ levels in the stem cutting base of “2101–02 MFR” and “2003 R 8” after excision (43.9 ± 15.8 and 34.8 ± 16.1 ng g-1 FW, respectively) that were quickly reduced in both cultivars before planting (Supplementary Figure S4A). From 24 h, tZ levels significantly increased in “2003 R 8” compared with those in “2101–02 MFR”, and remained at low levels during the experiment in this later cultivar (Supplementary Figure S4A).
Stem cutting excision from the mother plant alters the endogenous levels of the hormones regulating stress responses, particularly jasmonate (JA), abscisic acid (ABA), and ethylene (). In the stem cutting base of “Master”, endogenous levels of the metabolic precursor of ethylene, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), were low after excision and slightly increased during rooting (). While we found similar results regarding the ACC levels in the stem cutting base of “2101–02 MFR”, those in “2003 R 8” were constitutively and significantly lower during rooting (Supplementary Figure S4B). The increasing levels of ACC in “Master” and “2101–02 MFR” might reflect the decrease in endogenous ethylene production during adventitious rooting. The highest levels of endogenous ABA were found after cutting excision and during cold storage, with significant higher levels of ABA in “2101–02 MFR” than in “2003 R 8” (Supplementary Figure S4C). ABA levels diminished at planting time in both cultivars due to stem cutting rehydration and slightly increased during rooting (Supplementary Figure S4C).
Auxin- and Cytokinin-Responsive Gene Expression Are Correlated With Rooting Performance
Auxin signaling is mediated through the interaction of active auxin (e.g., IAA) with the TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE 1/AUXIN SIGNALING F-BOX PROTEIN (TIR1/AFB) co-receptor and the Auxin/INDOLE-3-ACETIC ACID (Aux/IAA) transcriptional repressors, resulting in degradation of the Aux/IAAs and the release of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR (ARF) transcriptional partners (Lavy and Estelle, 2016). Some genes putatively encoding Aux/IAA repressors of auxin signaling, such as SUPPRESSOR OF HY2 MUTATION (SHY2), also named IAA3 (Tian et al., 2002) (Dca3109), IAA4 (Dca29160), or MASSUGU 2 (MSG2, also named IAA19; Tatematsu et al., 2004) (Dca30890), were expressed at higher levels in “2101–02 MFR” than in “2003 R 8” at 6 h (Figure 6A). In addition, other early auxin-responsive genes, such as DcIAA13 (Weijers et al., 2005) (Dca43286), and DcSAUR66 (Dca30062), were expressed at higher levels in “2101–02 MFR” across the experiment (Supplementary Table S2). Conversely, carnation genes putatively encoding DcAFB5 (Dca28499), DcARF4 (Dca49318), and DcARF16 (Dca57896) were also expressed at higher levels in the stem cutting base of “2003 R 8” than in “2101–02 MFR” (Supplementary Table S2). Interestingly, the putative ortholog of the root-specific gene LATERAL ROOT PRIMORDIUM 1 (LRP1; Smith and Fedoroff, 1995) (Dca58211) was expressed at higher levels in the stem cutting base of “2101–02 MFR” at 54 h, coinciding with cell cluster formation in this region (Villacorta-Martín et al., 2015). These results were consistent with the high amount of active IAA in the stem cutting base of “2101–02 MFR” at earlier time points during rooting (Figure 4A) that triggered AR formation.
FIGURE 6
Consistently with the high amount of tZ found in the stem cutting base of “2003 R 8” (Supplementary Figure S4A), the expression levels of Dca19350, the putative ortholog encoding CYP735A1 that catalyzes an early step of tZ biosynthesis in Arabidopsis (Takei et al., 2004), were increased in “2003 R 8” compared with those in “2101–02 MFR”, particularly during the first hours after planting (Figure 6B, and Supplementary Figure S5A and Supplementary Table S2). In addition, the expression of Dca3875, the closest carnation homolog to LONELY GUY 8 (LOG8), which is also required for tZ biosynthesis (), was also found at higher levels in the stem cutting base of “2003 R 8” (Figure 6B and Supplementary Table S2). Regarding the expression of other CK-related genes, carnation genes encoding some ARABIDOPSIS RESPONSE REGULATOR (ARR) proteins, such as Dca18714, Dca18024, and Dca47559, were expressed at high levels in the stem cutting base of “2003 R 8” shortly after planting, while in the good-rooting cultivar, “2101–02 MFR”, their expression levels were initially low and increased much later after planting (Figure 6B, and Supplementary Figure S5B and Supplementary Table S2). In Arabidopsis, the expression of CK RESPONSE FACTOR (CRF) genes is rapidly induced by CKs (Rashotte et al., 2006). We found that Dca43835, putatively encoding CRF2, was expressed at higher levels in the stem cutting base of “2003 R 8” than in “2101–02 MFR”, confirming higher CK signaling in the bad-rooting cultivar during early rooting (Figure 6B, and Supplementary Figure S5C and Supplementary Table S2).
Discussion
We characterized the root system architecture of stem cuttings in two standard (“Master” and “2003 R 8”) and one spray (“2101–02 MFR”) carnation (D. caryophyllus) cultivars selected because of their contrasting rooting performance (). We determined that the bad-rooting performance of “2003 R 8” was mostly caused by a severe delay in AR initiation compared to the other cultivars (; Villacorta-Martín et al., 2015). On the other hand, the highly developed root system of “2101–02 MFR” was caused by an early AR initiation and a sustained growth of its AR system.
Auxin is mainly produced at the tip of the leaf through the IPyA pathway in most species (; Yamamoto et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2014) and it is then channeled through PAT to the vasculature and into the root (; Naramoto, 2017). The standard cultivars “Master” and “2003 R 8” showed increased production of IPyA compared to the spray cultivar (“2101–02 MFR”), due to their higher expression of DcTAR2a in the most distal region of the leaf, with less differentiated cells (). IPyA is converted to IAA in the distal region of the leaf where DcYUC1 is highly expressed, as this is the rate-limiting step of auxin biosynthesis (Zhao, 2012). We found very low IAA levels in the proximal region of the leaf in all the studied cultivars, suggestive of IAA mobilization via the PAT system preventing its accumulation in the leaf. In Arabidopsis, PIN1 is mainly expressed at the stele region of the root and the treatment with low concentrations of auxin up-regulates PIN1 gene expression and modifies its protein localization (Vieten et al., 2005; Sauer et al., 2006; Omelyanchuk et al., 2016). These results suggest that endogenous auxin could directly affect the directionality and intensity of its own transport. Similarly, higher auxin biosynthesis in the standard cultivars (as measured by the amount of the IPyA precursor) could up-regulate PIN1 expression in the distal region of the leaves which, in turn, will increase PAT in these two cultivars. We found higher expression levels of several auxin influx genes (DcAUX1 and DcLAX3) and auxin efflux genes (DcPIN1, DcABCB1, and DcABCB19) in the leaves of the cultivars with higher IPyA (and thus IAA) levels. These results suggested that “Master” and “2003 R 8” transported IAA through the leaf more efficiently than “2101–02 MFR”. Therefore, auxin was produced in the distal region of mature carnation leaves in all three cultivars at a different pace where it was quickly mobilized by PAT toward their proximal region (Figure 7). As a consequence, a gradient of IAA concentration along the leaf blade could be established, which was visualized by DcIAA19 expression, used previously as a read-out of endogenous auxin levels (Villacorta-Martín et al., 2015).
FIGURE 7
We found that IAA transport through the stem was higher in “Master” and “2003 R 8” than in “2101–02 MFR”, which mirrored the expression of their auxin transport genes in this tissue. Auxin transport inhibitors block PIN cycling between the plasma membrane and endosomal compartments (; Parry et al., 2001). Inhibition of PAT through the stem with NPA abolished AR formation in all three cultivars, while the auxin influx inhibitor 1-NOA strongly affected “Master” and “2003 R 8”. These cultivar-specific responses to PAT inhibitors might be caused by the differential expression of auxin transport genes, which were much lower in the “2101–02 MFR”. Indeed, the reduced rate of auxin biosynthesis in the leaves and the slower PAT in the stem cutting base of “2101–02 MFR” might contribute to the temporal delay and its lower IAA concentration found after harvesting compared to that of “Master”. However, the contrasting rooting behavior of “Master” and “2003 R 8” could not be explained because of their differences in auxin biosynthesis in mature leaves or in their auxin transport rates through the stem. Exogenously added auxins enhanced AR formation in “Master” and they partially restored the bad-rooting behavior of “2003 R 8”, indicating that both cultivars are similarly responsive to auxin.
Interestingly, despite the high auxin biosynthesis and transport rate in “2003 R 8”, the localized auxin accumulation in the stem cutting base required for rooting was not observed, suggesting altered auxin homeostasis (i.e., auxin degradation) in the stem cutting base of “2003 R 8”. The dynamic regulation of IAA oxidation by the DAO1 family of dioxygenases and of amino acid IAA conjugation by GH3 represents the major contribution to auxin homeostasis in Arabidopsis (Mellor et al., 2016; Porco et al., 2016). We found very low oxIAA levels in the stem cutting base of the studied cultivars which otherwise was not detected in leaves (Sánchez-García et al., 2018), indicating that IAA oxidation is not involved in the main regulatory pathway of IAA homeostasis in carnation. The expression of DcDAO1 genes was constitutively low and remained unchanged during rooting. As oxIAA can be further metabolized by conjugation to glucose, one possibility is that glucosylation of oxIAA to 2-oxoindole-3-acetic acid glucose (oxIAA-Glc) by the UDP glucosyltransferase UGT74D1 (Tanaka et al., 2014) reduced endogenous oxIAA levels. However, we could not detect oxIAA-Glc in the stem cutting base of these cultivars, despite of the high expression of DcUGT74D1 in this tissue (Sánchez-García et al., 2018), which confirmed the low relevance of the oxIAA pathway to explain varietal differences during rooting of carnation stem cuttings.
Several forms of auxin conjugates have been identified in plants, including IAA-sugar (i.e., IAA-Glucose and IAA-Glc) and IAA–amino acid conjugates (Ludwig-Müller, 2011). The conversion of IAA to IAA-Glc is catalyzed by the UDP glucosyltransferase UGT84B1, and its overexpression in Arabidopsis caused phenotypes compatible with auxin depletion, suggesting that IAA-Glc is an irreversible IAA catabolite rather than as an intermediate in the synthesis of other conjugates (). IAA-Glc was not detected either in leaves or in the stem cutting base of the studied cultivars, indicating that IAA-Glc conjugates might represent relatively minor components of the conjugate pool in carnation (Sánchez-García et al., 2018). The conjugation of IAA to amino acids, such as aspartic acid and glutamic acid, is catalyzed by a group of IAA–amido synthetases belonging to the family of GH3 proteins (Staswick et al., 2005). We found low levels of IAA-Asp both in the leaves and in basal region of the stem in cuttings harvested from the mother plants (Sánchez-García et al., 2018). Interestingly, IAA-Asp levels in the stem cutting base of “2003 R 8” progressively increased after planting and during rooting. On the other hand, endogenous IAA-Asp levels remained low and constant during rooting in “2101–02 MFR”. Although the expression of DcGH3.1 was strongly up-regulated in the stem cutting base of both cultivars during rooting, the highest expression in the stem cutting base of “2003 R 8” might increase its endogenous GH3 activity leading to the observed IAA reduction after harvesting and before planting.
Indole-3-acetic acid conjugated to aspartic acid is believed to be inactive (Ludwig-Müller, 2011); hence, high IAA-Asp might interfere with the build-up of the localized auxin response required for AR formation in the stem cutting base of “2003 R 8”. Previous results in pea suggested that there are high levels of IAA inactivation in the base of mature cuttings compared with the juvenile ones, which might directly contribute for the observed decline in AR formation with age in this species (Rasmussen et al., 2015). To confirm our hypothesis that enhanced IAA-Asp conjugation in the stem cutting base reduced rooting of “2003 R 8”, we applied AIEP, a known inhibitor of the GH3 family of enzymes that it has been shown to be effective in vivo (). Treatment of stem cuttings with AIEP significantly improved rooting of “2003 R 8”. The percentage of AIEP-treated cuttings with roots increased significantly only in “2003 R 8” compared to the non-treated ones and without any effect on the other studied cultivars, indicating that the active IAA levels in the stem cutting base required for AR initiation were only limiting in the bad-rooting cultivar (“2003 R 8”). Hence, the delay in AR initiation of “2003 R 8” was fully rescued by chemically inhibiting GH3 activities, confirming that enhanced auxin homeostasis in the stem cutting base of “2003 R 8” was responsible for its bad-rooting performance. It might be possible that other bad-rooting cultivars could also accumulate IAA-Asp in the stem cutting base during storage and that AIEP treatment might improve adventitious rooting. Preliminary results indicate that other standard cultivars with poor rooting performance, such as “2441-7 R” (), also responded to the AIEP treatment (M.S. Justamante and J.M. Pérez-Pérez, personal communication).
Several Aux/IAA genes were expressed at high levels in the stem cutting base of “2101–02 MFR” during early rooting. Due to most Aux/IAA genes are auxin-inducible (Overvoorde et al., 2005; Paponov et al., 2008), the Aux/IAA function is regulated by endogenous auxin at both protein stability and gene expression level (Pierre-Jerome et al., 2013). In Arabidopsis, several Aux/IAA gain-of-function mutants, such as msg2/iaa19 (Tatematsu et al., 2004), shy2/iaa3 (Tian et al., 2002), bodenlos/iaa12 (), or solitary root/indole-3-acetic acid14 (), are auxin insensitive and are defective in LR formation, indicating that multiple Aux/IAA–ARF modules cooperatively regulate the developmental steps during LR formation (; ). Some of these Aux/IAA–ARF modules are also conserved during AR formation from whole leaves (). Hence, the high expression levels of DcIAA3, DcIAA13 (the closest ortholog of BDL/IAA12), and DcIAA19 in the stem cutting base of the good-rooting cultivar might indicate low levels of these three repressors after PAT-induced auxin accumulation in the formative region of the stem. Conversely, lower IAA levels in the stem cutting base of the bad-rooting cultivar (“2003 R 8”) might allow the DcIAA co-repressors to accumulate and hence inhibit rooting. Intriguingly, we found DcAFB5 and some DcARFs were expressed at higher levels in the stem cutting base of “2003 R 8”, which might indicate a compensatory mechanism to regulate high DcIAA activity. It is tempting to speculate that ARF dimerization in the stem cutting base of “2101–02 MFR” will thus activate the expression of specific targets involved in AR initiation more efficiently than in “2003 R 8”, one of which might be LRP1, which is 1 of the 10 members of the SHI gene family (). LRP1 is induced by auxin and expressed in cells derived from the pericycle and appears to be active both in LR and AR formation (Welander et al., 2014).
We found that CK levels (tZ) in the stem cutting base of the bad-rooting cultivar (“2003 R 8”) increased during rooting at higher levels than in the other studied cultivars, which was correlated with the higher expression of two tZ biosynthesis genes (), DcCYP735A1 and DcLOG8. Notably, a negative role for CK in AR formation has been proposed as mutants defective in CK biosynthesis or perception displayed increased production of ARs whereas enhanced CK biosynthesis has the opposite effects (; Werner et al., 2003; Riefler et al., 2006; Ramírez-Carvajal et al., 2009). In agreement with a negative role of CKs in AR formation, two ARR CK response genes, DcARR3 and DcARR9, were significantly upregulated in the stem cutting base of “2003 R 8”. ARR3 and ARR4 are type-A of response regulators () that are quickly induced by CKs and that redundantly regulate branching patters in the shoot in response to nitrate availability (Müller et al., 2015). Recently, ammonium has been shown to improve adventitious rooting in leafy cuttings of Petunia hybrida (). Further investigations will clarify the role of DcARR3 and DcARR4 in nutrient-induced AR formation in carnation stem cuttings.
Our deep understanding of the physiological and molecular events leading to the specific developmental responses of AR formation in “2101–02 MFR” and “2003 R 8” cultivars will allow establishing a marker-assisted selection approach of DEGs to select for enhanced adventitious rooting traits during breeding and to limit production losses during vegetative propagation of elite lines.
Statements
Author contributions
MA and JMP-P were involved in the conceptualization and supervision. AC, AA, MA, and JMP-P performed the methodology. AC, ABS-G, AA, RG-B, MSJ, and SI were involved in the investigation. AC, MA, and JMP-P performed the formal analysis. JMP-P was involved in the writing of the original draft. AC, MA, and JMP-P were involved in the writing and review and editing of the manuscript. JMP-P provided the funding acquisition. AA, MA, and JMP-P collected resources for the study.
Funding
This work was supported by the Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (MINECO) of Spain (Grant Nos. AGL2012-33610 and BIO2015-64255-R), and by Fonds Européen de Développement Régional (FEDER) Funds of the European Commission.
Acknowledgments
We thank Emilio Á. Cano (Barberet & Blanc S.A., Puerto Lumbreras, Murcia, Spain) for plant material, Christine Böttcher (CSIRO Plant Industry, Glen Osmond, Australia) for providing the IAA–amido synthetase inhibitor, and Francisco Pérez-Alfocea (CEBAS-CSIC) for the use of the U-HPLC–MS Orbitrap equipment.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2018.00566/full#supplementary-material
FIGURE S1Rooting stages in carnation stem cuttings grown in soil plugs. (A) Stacked histograms of rooting stages in a representative sample (n = 50) of stem cuttings growing in soil plugs for 20 or 27 days after planting. Letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) over samples (cultivar × time). (B) Representative soil plug images of stem cuttings rooting for 20 or 27 days.
FIGURE S2Real-time PCR quantification of the expression of selected transcripts related to auxin transport (auxin influx, A,B; auxin efflux, C,E) or auxin biosynthesis (F) in the stem cutting base during adventitious rooting. Bars indicate normalized expression levels ± standard deviation relative to the -23 h dataset in the “2101–02 MFR” cultivar. Letters indicate significant differences between samples (P < 0.05).
FIGURE S3Real-time PCR quantification of the expression of selected transcripts related to auxin transport (auxin influx, A–B; auxin efflux, C–F) in mature leaves of carnation stem cuttings at harvesting time. Bars indicate normalized expression levels ± standard deviation relative to the distal region of the leaf in the ‘Master’ cultivar. Letters indicate significant differences between samples (P < 0.05).
FIGURE S4Endogenous levels of other key hormones in the stem cutting base during adventitious rooting. (A)trans-zeatin (tZ), (B) the ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), and (C) abscisic acid (ABA). Average ± standard deviation values are shown. Asterisks indicate significant differences (P < 0.05) over time for a given treatment. H, harvesting; P, planting.
FIGURE S5Real-time PCR quantification of the expression of selected transcripts related to CK biosynthesis (A) or signaling (B,C) in the stem cutting base during adventitious rooting. Bars indicate normalized expression levels ± standard deviation relative to the -23 h dataset in the “2101–02 MFR” cultivar. Letters indicate significant differences between samples (P < 0.05).
TABLE S6Oligonucleotides used in this study.
TABLE S7RNA-seq data from carnation genes selected as putative auxin-responsive and CK-related genes.
Footnotes
References
1
AcostaM.Oliveros-ValenzuelaM. R.NicolasC.Sanchez-BravoJ. (2009). Rooting of carnation cuttings. The auxin signal.Plant Signal. Behav.4234–236. 10.4161/psb.4.3.7912
2
Agulló-AntónM.OlmosE.Pérez-PérezJ. M.AcostaM. (2013). Evaluation of ploidy level and endoreduplication in carnation (Dianthus spp.).Plant Sci.201–202, 1–11. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.11.006
3
Agulló-AntónM. A.Sánchez BravoJ.AcostaM.DruegeU. (2011). Auxins or sugars: What makes the difference in the adventitious rooting of stored carnation cuttings?J. Plant Growth Regul.30100–113. 10.1007/s00344-010-9174-8
4
Agulló-AntónM. Á.Ferrández-AyelaA.Fernández-GarcíaN.NicolásC.AlbaceteA.Pérez-AlfoceaF.et al (2014). Early steps of adventitious rooting: morphology, hormonal profiling and carbohydrate turnover in carnation stem cuttings.Physiol. Plant.150446–462. 10.1111/ppl.12114
5
BerardiniT. Z.ReiserL.LiD.MezheritskyY.MullerR.StraitE.et al (2015). The Arabidopsis information resource: making and mining the “gold standard” annotated reference plant genome.Genesis53474–485. 10.1002/dvg.22877
6
BirlangaV.VillanovaJ.CanoA.CanoE. A.AcostaM.Pérez-PérezJ. M. (2015). Quantitative analysis of adventitious root growth phenotypes in carnation stem cuttings.PLoS One10:e0133123. 10.1371/journal.pone.0133123
7
BöttcherC.DennisE. G.BookerG. W.PolyakS. W.BossP. K.DaviesC. (2012). A novel tool for studying auxin-metabolism: the inhibition of grapevine indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetases by a reaction intermediate analogue.PLoS One7:e37632. 10.1371/journal.pone.0037632
8
Bustillo-AvendañoE.IbáñezS.SanzO.Sousa BarrosJ. A.GudeI.Perianez-RodriguezJ.et al (2017). Regulation of hormonal control, cell reprogramming and patterning during de novo root organogenesis.Plant Physiol.1761709–1727. 10.1104/pp.17.00980
9
ChacónB.BallesterR.BirlangaV.Rolland-LaganA. G.Pérez-PérezJ. M. (2013). A quantitative framework for flower phenotyping in cultivated carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.).PLoS One8:e82165. 10.1371/journal.pone.0082165
10
ChengY.DaiX.ZhaoY. (2007). Auxin synthesized by the YUCCA flavin monooxygenases is essential for embryogenesis and leaf formation in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell192430–2439. 10.1105/tpc.107.053009
11
de KlerkG. J.HanecakovaJ.JasikJ. (2001). The role of cytokinins in rooting of stem slices cut from apple microcuttings.Plant Biosyst.13579–84. 10.1080/11263500112331350680
12
de KlerkG. J.van der KriekenW.de JongJ. C. (1999). Review the formation of adventitious roots: new concepts, new possibilities.In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant35189–199. 10.1007/s11627-999-0076-z
13
De SmetI.LauS.VossU.VannesteS.BenjaminsR.RademacherE. H.et al (2010). Bimodular auxin response controls organogenesis in Arabidopsis.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1072705–2710. 10.1073/pnas.0915001107
14
Díaz-SalaC. (2014). Direct reprogramming of adult somatic cells toward adventitious root formation in forest tree species: the effect of the juvenile-adult transition.Front. Plant Sci.5:310. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00310
15
DruegeU.FrankenP.HajirezaeiM. R. (2016). Plant hormone homeostasis, signaling, and function during adventitious root formation in cuttings.Front. Plant Sci.7:381. 10.3389/fpls.2016.00381
16
FukakiH.TamedaS.MasudaH.TasakaM. (2002). Lateral root formation is blocked by a gain-of-function mutation in the SOLITARY-ROOT/IAA14 gene of Arabidopsis.Plant J.29153–168. 10.1046/j.0960-7412.2001.01201.x
17
GaoX.NagawaS.WangG.YangZ. (2008). Cell polarity signaling: focus on polar auxin transport.Mol. Plant1899–909. 10.1093/mp/ssn069
18
GarridoG.CanoE. A.AcostaM.Sánchez-BravoJ. (1998). Formation and growth of roots in carnation cuttings: influence of cold storage period and auxin treatment.Sci. Hortic.74219–231. 10.1016/S0304-4238(98)00078-8
19
GarridoG.CanoE. A.ArnaoM. B.AcostaM.Sánchez-BravoJ. (1996). Influence of cold storage period and auxin treatment on the subsequent rooting of carnation cuttings.Sci. Hortic.6573–84. 10.1016/0304-4238(95)00860-8
20
GarridoG.GuerreroJ. R.CanoE. A.AcostaM.Sánchez-BravoJ. (2002). Origin and basipetal transport of the IAA responsible for rooting of carnation cuttings.Physiol. Plant.114303–312. 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1140217.x
21
GeldnerN.FrimlJ.StierhofY. D.JürgensG.PalmeK. (2001). Auxin transport inhibitors block PIN1 cycling and vesicle trafficking.Nature413425–428. 10.1038/35096571
22
GohT.KasaharaH.MimuraT.KamiyaY.FukakiH. (2012). Multiple AUX/IAA-ARF modules regulate lateral root formation: the role of Arabidopsis SHY2/IAA3-mediated auxin signalling.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.3671461–1468. 10.1098/rstb.2011.0232
23
GroßkinskyD. K.AlbaceteA.JammerA.KrbezP.van der GraaffE.PfeifhoferH.et al (2014). A rapid phytohormone and phytoalexin screening method for physiological phenotyping.Mol. Plant71053–1056. 10.1093/mp/ssu015
24
GuerreroJ. R.GarridoG.AcostaM.Sánchez-BravoJ. (1999). Influence of 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid and 1-N-naphthylphthalamic acid on indoleacetic acid transport in carnation cuttings: relationship with rooting.J. Plant Growth Regul.18183–190. 10.1007/PL00007068
25
HamannT.BenkovaE.BäurleI.KientzM.JürgensG. (2002). The Arabidopsis BODENLOS gene encodes an auxin response protein inhibiting MONOPTEROS-mediated embryo patterning.Genes Dev.161610–1615. 10.1101/gad.229402
26
HiloA.ShahinniaF.DruegeU.FrankenP.MelzerM.RuttenT.et al (2017). A specific role of iron in promoting meristematic cell division during adventitious root formation.J. Exp. Bot.684233–4247. 10.1093/jxb/erx248
27
HwangI.SheenJ.MüllerB. (2012). Cytokinin signaling networks.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.63353–380. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105503
28
JacksonR. G.KowalczykM.LiY.HigginsG.RossJ.SandbergG.et al (2002). Over-expression of an Arabidopsis gene encoding a glucosyltransferase of indole-3-acetic acid: phenotypic characterisation of transgenic lines.Plant J.32573–583. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01445.x
29
JawaharlalM.GangaM.PadmadeviK.JegadeeswariV.KarthikeyanS. (2009). A technical Guide on Carnation.Coimbatore: Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, 1–56.
30
KibaT.TakeiK.KojimaM.SakakibaraH. (2013). Side-chain modification of cytokinins controls shoot growth in Arabidopsis.Dev. Cell27452–461. 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.10.004
31
KoniecznyR.KepczynskiJ.PilarskaM.CembrowskaD.MenzelD.SamajJ. (2009). Cytokinin and ethylene affect auxin transport-dependent rhizogenesis in hypocotyls of common ice plant (Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L.).J. Plant Growth Regul.28331–340. 10.1007/s00344-009-9097-4
32
KurohaT.TokunagaH.KojimaM.UedaN.IshidaT.NagawaS.et al (2009). Functional analyses of LONELY GUY cytokinin-activating enzymes reveal the importance of the direct activation pathway in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell213152–3169. 10.1105/tpc.109.068676
33
KuuskS.SohlbergJ. J.Magnus EklundD.SundbergE. (2006). Functionally redundant SHI family genes regulate Arabidopsis gynoecium development in a dose-dependent manner.Plant J.4799–111. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02774.x
34
LankováM.SmithR. S.PesekB.KubesM.ZazímalováE.PetrásekJ.et al (2010). Auxin influx inhibitors 1-NOA, 2-NOA, and CHPAA interfere with membrane dynamics in tobacco cells.J. Exp. Bot.613589–3598. 10.1093/jxb/erq172
35
LavyM.EstelleM. (2016). Mechanisms of auxin signaling.Development1433226–3229. 10.1242/dev.131870
36
LiuH.XieW. F.ZhangL.ValpuestaV.YeZ. W.GaoQ. H.et al (2014). Auxin biosynthesis by the YUCCA6 flavin monooxygenase gene in woodland strawberry.J. Integr. Plant Biol.56350–363. 10.1111/jipb.12150
37
LivakK. J.SchmittgenT. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method.Methods25402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262
38
LuY.XieL.ChenJ. (2012). A novel procedure for absolute real-time quantification of gene expression patterns.Plant Methods8:9. 10.1186/1746-4811-8-9
39
Ludwig-MüllerJ. (2011). Auxin conjugates: their role for plant development and in the evolution of land plants.J. Exp. Bot.621757–1773. 10.1093/jxb/erq412
40
ManoY.NemotoK. (2012). The pathway of auxin biosynthesis in plants.J. Exp. Bot.632853–2872. 10.1093/jxb/ers091
41
MashiguchiK.TanakaK.SakaiT.SugawaraS.KawaideH.NatsumeM.et al (2011). The main auxin biosynthesis pathway in Arabidopsis.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10818512–18517. 10.1073/pnas.1108434108
42
MellorN.BandL. R.PěnčikA.NovákO.RashedA.HolmanT.et al (2016). Dynamic regulation of auxin oxidase and conjugating enzymes AtDAO1 and GH3 modulates auxin homeostasis.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.11311022–11027. 10.1073/pnas.1604458113
43
MüllerD.WaldieT.MiyawakiK.ToJ. P.MelnykC. W.KieberJ. J.et al (2015). Cytokinin is required for escape but not release from auxin mediated apical dominance.Plant J.82874–886. 10.1111/tpj.12862
44
NaramotoS. (2017). Polar transport in plants mediated by membrane transporters: focus on mechanisms of polar auxin transport.Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.408–14. 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.06.012
45
NicolásJ. I.AcostaM.Sánchez-BravoJ. (2007). Variation in indole-3-acetic acid transport and its relationship with growth in etiolated lupin hypocotyls.J. Plant Physiol.164851–860. 10.1016/j.jplph.2006.06.005
46
Oliveros-ValenzuelaM. R.ReyesD.Sánchez-BravoJ.AcostaM.NicolásC. (2008). Isolation and characterization of a cDNA clone encoding an auxin influx carrier in carnation cuttings. Expression in different organs and cultivars and its relationship with cold storage.Plant Physiol. Biochem.461071–1076. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2008.07.009
47
OmelyanchukN. A.KovrizhnykhV. V.OshchepkovaE. A.PasternakT.PalmeK.MironovaV. V. (2016). A detailed expression map of the PIN1 auxin transporter in Arabidopsis thaliana root.BMC Plant Biol.16(Suppl. 1):5. 10.1186/s12870-015-0685-0
48
OvervoordeP. J.OkushimaY.AlonsoJ. M.ChanA.ChangC.EckerJ. R.et al (2005). Functional genomic analysis of the AUXIN/INDOLE-3-ACETIC ACID gene family members in Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant Cell173282–3300. 10.1105/tpc.105.036723
49
PaponovI. A.PaponovM.TealeW.MengesM.ChakraborteeS.MurrayJ. A.et al (2008). Comprehensive transcriptome analysis of auxin responses in Arabidopsis.Mol. Plant1321–337. 10.1093/mp/ssm021
50
ParryG.DelbarreA.MarchantA.SwarupR.NapierR.Perrot-RechenmannC.et al (2001). Novel auxin transport inhibitors phenocopy the auxin influx carrier mutation aux1.Plant J.25399–406. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.00970.x
51
PencíkA.SimonovikB.PeterssonS. V.HenykováE.SimonS.GreenhamK.et al (2013). Regulation of auxin homeostasis and gradients in Arabidopsis roots through the formation of the indole-3-acetic acid catabolite 2-oxindole-3-acetic acid.Plant Cell253858–3870. 10.1105/tpc.113.114421
52
Pierre-JeromeE.MossB. L.NemhauserJ. L. (2013). Tuning the auxin transcriptional response.J. Exp. Bot.642557–2563. 10.1093/jxb/ert100
53
PorcoS.PěnčikA.RashedA.VoßU.Casanova-SáezR.BishoppA.et al (2016). Dioxygenase-encoding AtDAO1 gene controls IAA oxidation and homeostasis in Arabidopsis.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.11311016–11021. 10.1073/pnas.1604375113
54
Ramírez-CarvajalG. A.MorseA. M.DervinisC.DavisJ. M. (2009). The cytokinin type-B response regulator PtRR13 is a negative regulator of adventitious root development in Populus.Plant Physiol.150759–771. 10.1104/pp.109.137505
55
RashotteA. M.MasonM. G.HutchisonC. E.FerreiraF. J.SchallerG. E.KieberJ. J. (2006). A subset of Arabidopsis AP2 transcription factors mediates cytokinin responses in concert with a two-component pathway.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10311081–11085. 10.1073/pnas.0602038103
56
RasmussenA.HosseiniS. A.HajirezaeiM. R.DruegeU.GeelenD. (2015). Adventitious rooting declines with the vegetative to reproductive switch and involves a changed auxin homeostasis.J. Exp. Bot.661437–1452. 10.1093/jxb/eru499
57
RieflerM.NovakO.StrnadM.SchmüllingT. (2006). Arabidopsis cytokinin receptor mutants reveal functions in shoot growth, leaf senescence, seed size, germination, root development, and cytokinin metabolism.Plant Cell1840–54. 10.1105/tpc.105.037796
58
Sánchez-GarcíaA. B.IbáñezS.CanoA.AcostaM.Pérez-PérezJ. M. (2018). A comprehensive phylogeny of auxin homeostasis genes involved in adventitious root formation in carnation stem cuttings.PLoS One (in press). 10.1371/journal.pone.0196663
59
SauerM.BallaJ.LuschnigC.WisniewskaJ.ReinöhlV.FrimlJ.et al (2006). Canalization of auxin flow by Aux/IAA-ARF-dependent feedback regulation of PIN polarity.Genes Dev.202902–2911. 10.1101/gad.390806
60
SheelaV. L. (2008). “Carnation,” inFlowers for Trade,edsSheelaV. L.SheelaM. N. (New Delhi: New India Publishing), 95–112.
61
SmithD. L.FedoroffN. V. (1995). LRP1, a gene expressed in lateral and adventitious root primordia of Arabidopsis.Plant Cell7735–745. 10.1105/tpc.7.6.735
62
StaswickP. E.SerbanB.RoweM.TiryakiI.MaldonadoM. T.MaldonadoM. C.et al (2005). Characterization of an Arabidopsis enzyme family that conjugates amino acids to indole-3-acetic acid.Plant Cell17616–627. 10.1105/tpc.104.026690
63
TakeiK.YamayaT.SakakibaraH. (2004). Arabidopsis CYP735A1 and CYP735A2 encode cytokinin hydroxylases that catalyze the biosynthesis of trans-Zeatin.J. Biol. Chem.27941866–41872. 10.1074/jbc.M406337200
64
TanakaK.HayashiK.NatsumeM.KamiyaY.SakakibaraH.KawaideH.et al (2014). UGT74D1 catalyzes the glucosylation of 2-oxindole-3-acetic acid in the auxin metabolic pathway in Arabidopsis.Plant Cell Physiol.55218–228. 10.1093/pcp/pct173
65
TatematsuK.KumagaiS.MutoH.SatoA.WatahikiM. K.HarperR. M.et al (2004). MASSUGU2 encodes Aux/IAA19, an auxin-regulated protein that functions together with the transcriptional activator NPH4/ARF7 to regulate differential growth responses of hypocotyl and formation of lateral roots in Arabidopsis thaliana.Plant Cell16379–393. 10.1105/tpc.018630
66
TianQ.UhlirN.ReedJ. (2002). Arabidopsis SHY2/IAA3 inhibits auxin-regulated gene expression.Plant Cell14301–319. 10.1105/tpc.010283
67
TivendaleN. D.RossJ. J.CohenJ. D. (2014). The shifting paradigms of auxin biosynthesis.Trends Plant Sci.1944–51. 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.012
68
Van der WeijH. G. (1932). Der mechanismus des wuchsstofftransportes.Rec. Trav. Bot. Néerl.31810–857.
69
VietenA.VannesteS.WisniewskaJ.BenkováE.BenjaminsR.BeeckmanT.et al (2005). Functional redundancy of PIN proteins is accompanied by auxin-dependent cross-regulation of PIN expression.Development1324521–4531. 10.1242/dev.02027
70
Villacorta-MartínC.Sánchez-GarcíaA. B.VillanovaJ.CanoA.van de RheeM.de HaanJ.et al (2015). Gene expression profiling during adventitious root formation in carnation stem cuttings.BMC Genomics16:789. 10.1186/s12864-015-2003-5
71
VillanovaJ.CanoA.AlbaceteA.LópezA.CanoE. ÁAcostaM.et al (2017). Multiple factors influence adventitious rooting in carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) stem cuttings.Plant Growth Regul.81511–521. 10.1007/s10725-016-0228-1
72
WeijersD.BenkovaE.JägerK. E.SchlerethA.HamannT.KientzM.et al (2005). Developmental specificity of auxin response by pairs of ARF and Aux/IAA transcriptional regulators.EMBO J.241874–1885. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600659
73
WelanderM.GeierT.SmolkaA.AhlmanA.FanJ.ZhuL. H. (2014). Origin, timing, and gene expression profile of adventitious rooting in Arabidopsis hypocotyls and stems.Am. J. Bot.101255–266. 10.3732/ajb.1300258
74
WernerT.MotykaV.LaucouV.SmetsR.Van OnckelenH.SchmullingT. (2003). Cytokinin-deficient transgenic Arabidopsis plants show multiple developmental alterations indicating opposite functions of cytokinins in the regulation of shoot and root meristem activity.Plant Cell152532–2550. 10.1105/tpc.014928
75
WonC.ShenX.MashiguchiK.ZhengZ.DaiX.ChengY.et al (2011). Conversion of tryptophan to indole-3-acetic acid by TRYPTOPHAN AMINOTRANSFERASES OF ARABIDOPSIS and YUCCAs in Arabidopsis.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10818518–18523. 10.1073/pnas.1108436108
76
YagiM.KosugiS.HirakawaH.OhmiyaA.TanaseK.HaradaT.et al (2014). Sequence analysis of the genome of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.).DNA Res.21231–241. 10.1093/dnares/dst053
77
YamamotoY.KamiyaN.MorinakaY.MatsuokaM.SazukaT. (2007). Auxin biosynthesis by the YUCCA genes in rice.Plant Physiol.1431362–1371. 10.1104/pp.106.091561
78
ZhaoY. (2010). Auxin biosynthesis and its role in plant development.Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.6149–64. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112308
79
ZhaoY. (2012). Auxin biosynthesis: a simple two-step pathway converts tryptophan to indole-3-acetic acid in plants.Mol. Plant5334–338. 10.1093/mp/ssr104
Summary
Keywords
adventitious rooting, auxin homeostasis, auxin-conjugating enzymes, Dianthus caryophyllus, IAA degradation, polar auxin transport, stem cuttings
Citation
Cano A, Sánchez-García AB, Albacete A, González-Bayón R, Justamante MS, Ibáñez S, Acosta M and Pérez-Pérez JM (2018) Enhanced Conjugation of Auxin by GH3 Enzymes Leads to Poor Adventitious Rooting in Carnation Stem Cuttings. Front. Plant Sci. 9:566. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00566
Received
24 January 2018
Accepted
10 April 2018
Published
26 April 2018
Volume
9 - 2018
Edited by
Michael James Considine, The University of Western Australia, Australia
Reviewed by
Elison B. Blancaflor, Noble Research Institute, United States; Amanda Rasmussen, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Cano, Sánchez-García, Albacete, González-Bayón, Justamante, Ibáñez, Acosta and Pérez-Pérez.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: José Manuel Pérez-Pérez, arolab.edu.umh.es; jmperez@umh.es
This article was submitted to Plant Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.