Abstract
Due to excess nutrient loading, loss of submersed macrophytes is a worldwide phenomenon in shallow lakes. Phosphorus is known to contribute significantly to macrophyte recession, but the role of nitrogen has received increasing attention. Our understanding of how high nitrogen concentrations affect the growth of submersed macrophytes, particularly under natural conditions, is still limited. In this study, we conducted experiments with canopy-forming Potamogeton crispus in 10 ponds subjected to substantial differences in nitrogen loading (five targeted total nitrogen concentrations: control, 2, 10, 20, and 100 mg L-1) and compared the results with those of our earlier published experiments with rosette-forming Vallisneria natans performed 1 year before. Canopy-forming P. crispus was more tolerant than rosette-forming V. natans to exposure to high NH4 concentrations. This is probably because canopy-forming species reach the water surface where there is sufficient light for production of carbohydrates, thereby allowing the plants to partly overcome high NH4 stress. Both the canopy-forming P. crispus and the rosette-forming V. natans showed clear declining trends with increasing chlorophyll a in the water. Accordingly, shading by phytoplankton might be of key importance for the decline in submersed macrophytes in this experiment. Both experiments revealed free amino acids (FAA) to be a useful indicator of physiological stress by high ammonium but is not a reliable indicator of macrophyte growth.
Introduction
The mechanisms behind the loss of submersed macrophytes in shallow lakes have received ample attention due to the important role that macrophytes play for maintaining healthy conditions in such ecosystems (; ; ; ; ). In addition to excessive loading of phosphorus (P) (; ), high nitrogen (N) loading has also been suggested to contribute importantly to the recession of macrophytes (; ; ). High N may cause physiological damage to the submersed macrophytes by generating oxidative stress (; ), disturbing the metabolism of carbon and nitrogen (; ; ) and inhibiting photosynthesis (; ). High N may also affect the plants indirectly by promoting the growth of phytoplankton (,) or periphyton (; ) and hence their shading effects. The effect of high N may, however, vary with the macrophyte species present (,). Different key mechanisms have been identified in various studies and it has been suggested that such difference may partly reflect variation in temporal scale of the conducted experiments and timing (season). For example, toxic effects tend to play a key role in acute tests, while shading effects of algae are important in chronic tests (; ; ; ). In a long-term pond experiment carried out by , ), shading by phytoplankton was identified as the main cause of declining growth for plants of Vallisneria natans, and high N-induced toxic stress seemed to have negative effects in both the growing season (summer and autumn) and the low-growth season (winter); however, active growth in the growing season enabled V. natans to partly overcome the stress.
Growth form may also influence the response of submersed macrophytes to the stress of high N loading. As to growth form, submersed macrophytes can be divided into rosette-forming species (e.g., V. natans), canopy-forming species (e.g., P. crispus), bottom-dwelling species (e.g., Najas marina), and erect species (e.g., Hydrilla verticillata) (; ). Canopy-forming and rosette-forming species are the two most common submersed macrophytes. Canopy-forming species form canopies on the water surface, whereas rosette-forming species spread under water through formation of ramets. Thus, canopy-forming species have better access to light than rosette-forming species. Low light may aggravate ammonium (NH4)-related physiological stress, as suggested in a 2-month tank (2 m × 1 m × 1 m) experiment (). This is because extra energy and carbohydrates are needed for the detoxication process (; ) and photosynthesis is limited under low light conditions (, ; , ). Therefore, we hypothesize that canopy-forming submersed macrophytes may be more tolerant to NH4 stress than rosette-forming species.
The aim of this study was to explore the effects of high N concentrations on the growth of canopy-forming submersed macrophytes and compare their tolerance to high N with that of the rosette-forming species V. natans reported in , which showed that leaf length and dry mass of V. natans in summer declined with increasing ammonium (NH4) concentrations. P. crispus, a typical canopy-forming and cosmopolitan species (; ), was selected and the experiment was performed 1 year before that of . The two experiments were undertaken in the same pond system. The purposes of our study were twofold: (1) to test whether high N concentrations affect canopy-forming Potamogeton crispus through physiological stress or by promoting growth of phytoplankton or periphyton to form shading effects; (2) to compare the responses of canopy-forming and rosette-forming macrophytes to high N loading.
Materials and Methods
Study Area and Experimental System
The experiments were conducted in 10 equally sized (ca. 0.08 ha) experimental ponds (N 30°17′17″, E 114°43′45″) being constructed from a lotus pond (culturing Nelumbo nucifera) by dredging surface sediments rich in nutrients and organic matter and introducing sediments and water from a nearby lake, Lake Bao’an (surface area 48 km2, mean water depth, ZM, and 1.9 m) (see for the initial environmental conditions of the 10 ponds). The experimental area is located in the middle Yangtze River Basin with a warm, humid subtropical climate (annual mean air temperature ca. 19°C and precipitation ca. 1030 mm). The monthly rainfall during the experiments was 125.7 mm in and 214.7 mm in this study (Supplementary Table 1). The mean air and water temperatures were 28.0 and 29.1°C in and 22.2 and 23.7°C in this study. Light intensity was 40998 and 38776 lux in this experiment and , respectively. Mean Secchi depth (SD) in and this study were similar, being 52.1 and 51.9 cm, respectively.
Experimental Treatments
A gradient of five target concentrations of total nitrogen (TN) (control, 2, 10, 20, and 100 mg L-1) and two duplicates were made. The target TN concentrations of the control ponds (ca. 0.5 mg L-1) functioned as background concentrations. In China, a nitrogen concentration of 2 mg L-1 TN refers to V type of water based on environmental quality standards for surface water (), 10 mg L-1 NO3-N refers to standards for drinking water quality (), and 20 mg L-1 TN refers to primary B based on the discharge standard of pollutants for municipal wastewater treatment plants (). In part of the United States, 100 mg L-1 NO3-N refers to water quality standards for agriculture and livestock (). Our gradient therefore covers the range observed in the real world. To maintain target concentrations, NH4Cl fertilizer (NH4Cl, ≥99.5%, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai) was added every month relative to the difference between the measured and target concentrations. No phosphate fertilizer was added to the ponds in the experiment.
On 15 March 2013, P. crispus were collected from Lake Biandantang (N 30°32′, E 114°33′), a sub-area of Lake Bao’an. Similar-sized plants were selected and cut into a unified leaf length of 15 cm. The plants were then cultured in batches for 15 days in boxes (65 cm × 41 cm × 31 cm) filled with lake water. On 1 April 2013, similar-sized plants were selected and planted in plastic pots (23 cm in top diameter, 13 cm in bottom diameter, and 13 cm in height) filled with 10 cm sediments mixed with 1/3 washed sand (three plants in each pot). Sediment was taken from the experimental pond of the control treatment, with an original total nitrogen concentration of 1.93 mg g-1, a total phosphorus concentration of 0.67 mg g-1, and an organic matter concentration of 39.8 mg g-1. Three pots with plants were hung on bamboo racks (6 m in length, 2 m in width, and 3 m in height) at three water layers: 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 m, and a total of nine pots were placed in each pond. Macrophytes with lower C: N ratios (N-enriched waters) may be more readily consumed by herbivorous or omnivorous fish (). Before the experiment published in , we performed an experiment with the same treatments but without excluding fish. All the macrophytes had been removed by the fish at the beginning of the experiment. Therefore, to ensure sufficient exposure time of macrophytes to high ammonium stress, nets with a mesh size of 2 cm × 2 cm were fixed around the bamboo racks to prevent fish from entering. The experiment lasted around two and a half month, from 1 April to 12 June 2013.
Sampling and Measurement
All plants were harvested at the end of the experiment and washed with tap water. The number of shoots (NShoot) was counted and shoot height (HShoot) was measured. To prevent the accumulation of NH4 in plant organs, macrophytes usually incorporate it into some nitrogenous compounds [mainly free amino acids (FAA)] and/or transport it out of the organs, which processes consume carbohydrate and energy. About 100 mg of fresh shoots were ground in 5 mL 10% acetic acid solution to measure the contents of FAA. The above solution was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 min. The supernatant was used to examine FAA using the ninhydrin colorimetric method with leucine as standard ().
The dry mass of shoots (DMShoot) was measured with an electronic balance (0.01 g, BL-2200H, Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) after drying at 80°C (Jinghong, DHG-9071A, Shanghai) for 48 h to constant mass. Relative growth rates (RGRs, day-1) of the macrophytes were calculated using the formula:
where T is the experimental period, Wt is the shoot number/shoot height/shoot biomass at the end of the experiment, and W0 is the initial shoot number/shoot height/shoot biomass of the macrophytes.
There was no water flow through the ponds during the experiments. Environmental parameters were measured every 20 days. Dissolved oxygen and water temperature at 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 m from the water surface were measured in situ with a YSI ProPlus (Yellow Spring Inc., United States). The water temperature difference between 0.4 m (upper layer) and 1.2 m (lower layer) was less than 1°C. Light intensity was measured by luminometer (KONICA MINOLTA, T-10, China) at the air-water interface (just above the water surface) and 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 m below the water surface. Water samples for chemical analysis were collected at 5 randomly chosen locations within each pond by integrating the water column with a tube sampler (height 1.5 m and diameter 10 cm). Chlorophyll a of phytoplankton (ChlaPhyt) was extracted with 90% acetone (at 4°C for 24 h) after filtration through GF/C filters (Whatman, GE Healthcare UK Limited, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom), and absorbance was read at 665 and 750 nm, both before and after acidification with 10% HCl using a spectrophotometer. The ChlaPeri concentration was calculated following the equation in :
where C is the concentration of ChlaPeri in mg m-2; Eb is D-value of absorbance at 665 and 750 nm before acidification with HCl; Ea is D-value of absorbance at 665 and 750 nm after acidification with HCl; R = 1.7; K = 11.24; Ve is total volume of extract in mL; and S is surface area of the slides in m2.
Total nitrogen and total phosphorus (TP) were determined spectrophotometrically after digestion with K2S2O8 solution (). Total ammonium (NH4) was determined with Nessler’s reagent colorimetric method (; ). NH3 was calculated following the equation in and :
where pKa = 0.09018 + 2729.92/(273.2 + Temp), NH4 is the measured concentration of total ammonium (including both NH3 and NH4+), pH is the measured pH of the solution, and Temp is water temperature in °C. In and this study, NH3 and NH4+ were expressed as total ammonium. Highly significant positive correlations were found between NH3 and NH4+ in (r = 0.90, n = 9, p < 0.001) and in this study (r = 0.98, n = 9, p < 0.001), reflecting that the high concentrations of NH3 were accompanied by high NH4+ concentrations. Consequently, the concentration of total ammonium (NH4) in the two experiments serves as a combined indicator of toxicity, whether due to NH3, NH4+, or both. Therefore, measured NH4 was used to express toxicity in both and this study.
In order to study the possible effects of periphyton on plants, artificial substrates were used to monitor the growth of periphyton. Three glass slides were embedded into a box with an open top and bottom, which was hung within the canopy of growing plants. Every 15 days, the glass slides were gently removed from the box for laboratory measurements after which a new set of three glass slides was embedded in the macrophytes. The periphyton growing on the glass slides was gently removed by a soft brush and flushed with 25 mL distilled water followed by filtered water, after which the concentration of periphyton chlorophyll a (ChlaPeri) was determined via acetone extraction.
Statistical Analyses
Median values were used for analyses to avoid deviation caused by extreme values of TN, TP, ChlaPhyt, etc. Pearson’s correlations were used to test for relationships between macrophyte variables and environmental variables. Variables that did not follow normal distributions (Shapiro-Wilk test, p < 0.05) were log10 (x)-transformed and these included NH4, ChlaPhyt, and ChlaPeri. STATISTICA 8.0 and Microsoft Excel 2013 were used for all data analyses. Plants in pond N2b were grazed by invading fish as the net fell down. We therefore only analyzed the data from the other nine treatments.
Results
Growing Conditions of P. crispus
Both realized TN and ammonium (NH4) formed a significant treatment gradient, with medians ranging from 1.0 to 34.0 mg L-1 (Figure 1A) and from 0.2 to 25.6 mg L-1 (Figure 1B), respectively. The total amounts of added fertilizer are shown in Figure 1C. ChlaPhyt also increased significantly, with medians ranging between 10.5 and 162.4 μg L-1. ChlaPeri declined from the upper (3.3–29.3 mg m-2) over the middle (1.8–17.0 mg m-2) to the lower (1.0–9.6 mg m-2) layers in most treatments, except N0.5a and N100b (ChlaPeri was a little bit higher in the middle layer than the upper layer in the two treatments). Pearson’s correlations among the representative variables are given in Table 1. A highly significant positive relationship was found between TN and NH4 (p < 0.01). There was no relationship between TN and ChlaPhyt (Figure 2A). A significant negative correlation was found between TN and ChlaPeri in the upper layer (p < 0.05) (Table 1 and Figure 2B) and between ChlaPeri and ChlaPhyt in the middle (p < 0.01) and lower layers (p < 0.05) (Table 1 and Figure 2C). A significant positive correlation was found between TP and ChlaPhyt (p < 0.05) (Figure 2D), and a negative correlation between ChlaPeri and TP, in the middle and lower layer (p < 0.05) (Figure 2E). No significant correlation was found between TN and TP (Figure 2F).
FIGURE 1
Table 1
| log10 | log10 | log10 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Layer | (NH4) | (ChlaPhyt) | (ChlaPeri) | |
| log10 (TN) | Upper | 0.94** | 0.12 | -0.64* |
| Middle | –0.37 | |||
| Lower | –0.26 | |||
| log10 (NH4) | Upper | –0.19 | –0.68* | |
| Middle | –0.11 | |||
| Lower | –0.01 | |||
| log10 (ChlaPhyt) | Upper | –0.21 | ||
| Middle | –0.86** | |||
| Lower | –0.64* |
Pearson’s correlations coefficients (r-values) among environmental variables; significant correlations are shown (*p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01) in bold (n = 9).
FIGURE 2
Growth of P. crispus at Contrasting Nitrogen Concentrations
Growth and physiological variables of plants are shown in Table 2. No significant correlations were found between NH4 and the growth variables (Table 3). The scatterplots did not show any clear changes in growth variables with increasing NH4 concentrations (Figures 3A–C). FAA showed a significant increasing trend with NH4 when pooling data from all depths (p < 0.001) (Figure 3D). When regressing FAA with growth variables of plants, NShoot demonstrated a significant positive relationship with increasing FAA in the middle and lower layers (p < 0.05). When pooling the data from all three layers, similar results were obtained (Figure 3E). HShoot in the middle layer exhibited a significant relationship with FAA (p < 0.05) (Figure 3F), while DMShoot was not related to increasing FAA (Figure 3G).
Table 2
| Treatment | Water | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| number | layer | NShoot | HShoot | DMShoot | FAA | SC |
| N0.5a | Upper | 11 | 77.0 | 2.27 | 0.076 | 2.13 |
| Middle | 6 | 91.7 | 0.58 | 0.008 | 1.44 | |
| Lower | 4 | 74.7 | 2.55 | 0.062 | 2.03 | |
| N0.5b | Upper | 11 | 82.0 | 1.44 | 0.041 | 12.35 |
| Middle | 8 | 83.0 | 3.24 | 0.032 | 10.74 | |
| Lower | 3 | 104.7 | 1.69 | 0.051 | 14.04 | |
| N2a | Upper | 7 | 71.7 | 4.13 | 0.037 | 8.37 |
| Middle | 6 | 79.3 | 2.73 | 0.002 | 20.99 | |
| Lower | 2 | 54.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| N10a | Upper | 6 | 49.7 | 3.33 | 0.160 | 2.14 |
| Middle | 3 | 58.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Lower | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | – | – | |
| N10b | Upper | 17 | 109.3 | 11.13 | 0.042 | 4.29 |
| Middle | 17 | 115.3 | 9.09 | 0.187 | 5.00 | |
| Lower | 9 | 124.3 | 6.54 | 0.156 | 7.15 | |
| N20a | Upper | 11 | 80.3 | 5.62 | 0.100 | 5.94 |
| Middle | 10 | 84.7 | 1.26 | 0.169 | 6.86 | |
| Lower | 2 | 52.7 | 0.56 | 0.090 | 8.54 | |
| N20b | Upper | 19 | 120.0 | 7.02 | 0.204 | 1.83 |
| Middle | 19 | 118.3 | 7.17 | 0.324 | 3.04 | |
| Lower | 8 | 126 | 3.76 | 0.160 | 12.83 | |
| N100a | Upper | 4 | 62.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Middle | 1 | 48.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Lower | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | – | – | |
| N100b | Upper | 12 | 86.3 | 7.83 | 0.204 | 4.76 |
| Middle | 9 | 104.7 | 3.59 | 0.248 | 6.04 | |
| Lower | 5 | 117.3 | 1.27 | 0 | 0 |
Characteristics of the growth and physiological variables of Potamogeton crispus (mean) in various experimental ponds (plants in pond N2b were grazed by invading fish because the net fell down).
NShoot, number of shoots; HShoot, height of shoots, cm; DMshoot, dry mass of shoots, g; FAA, free amino acids of plants, mg/g; SC, soluble carbohydrate, mg/g; “-” no sample of plants was obtained. In “treatment number” the value after N indicates the target concentration of total nitrogen, a and b represent two ponds subjected to the same nitrogen treatment. Due to its natural decay in early summer, P. crispus was fragile during the last measurement conducted on 12 June, preventing accurate measurements of number and height. Instead, data from 20th May (the period before the last measurement) were used in the analysis.
Table 3
| log10 | log10 | log10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Layer | (NH4) | (ChlaPhyt) | (ChlaPeri) | FAA | |
| NShoot | Upper | 0.28 | –0.65 | 0.34 | 0.26 |
| Middle | 0.31 | –0.58 | 0.91∗∗ | 0.80∗ | |
| Lower | 0.29 | –0.77∗ | 0.73∗ | 0.88∗ | |
| HShoot | Upper | 0.40 | –0.75∗ | 0.26 | 0.13 |
| Middle | 0.26 | –0.75∗ | 0.89∗∗ | 0.81∗ | |
| Lower | 0.22 | –0.79∗ | 0.82∗ | 0.64 | |
| DMShoot | Upper | 0.39 | –0.38 | 0.29 | 0.22 |
| Middle | 0.28 | –0.62 | 0.81∗ | 0.60 | |
| Lower | 0.16 | –0.61 | 0.69 | 0.74 |
Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r-values) between growth and physiological variables of Potamogeton crispus relative to environmental variables (see Tables 1, 2 for explanation of the abbreviations and units).
Significant differences are shown (∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01) in bold (n = 9).
FIGURE 3
ChlaPhyt showed significant negative correlations with NShoot and HShoot in the lower layer and with HShoot in the upper and middle layers (p < 0.05) (Table 3). The scatterplots also showed generally declining trends of growth variables with increasing ChlaPhyt, significantly so for NShoot in the lower layer, for HShoot in all three layers, and for all growth indices when pooling the data from all three layers (Figures 4A–C).
FIGURE 4
ChlaPeri showed significant positive correlations with NShoot and HShoot in the middle and lower layers, and with DMShoot in the middle layer (p < 0.05) (Table 3). The scatterplots also demonstrated clear increasing trends of growth variables with increasing ChlaPeri, significantly so for NShoot and HShoot in the middle and lower layers, for DMShoot in the middle layer, and for all growth indices when pooling the data from all three layers (Figures 4D–F).
Comparison Between P. crispus and V. natans
Although the precipitation varied in the experiments with P. crispus and V. natans, we maintained a fixed water level by pumping water out of the ponds after rainfall events. The average Secchi depth (SD) was similar in the two experiments, indicating that the two experiments apart from the temperature (see Discussion) were comparable despite the fact that they were conducted in two different years.
The relationships between NH4 and growth variables for P. crispus and V. natans in the lower layer (1.2 m), a natural growth depth in the field, are compared in Figure 5. We found that 67% of the relative growth rates of shoot number (RGRNS) was higher for V. natans than for P. crispus, while 78% of the relative growth rates of leaf length (RGRLength) and 56% of dry mass (RGRDM) of P. crispus were systematically higher than those of V. natans (Figures 5A–C). The RGRNS of P. crispus and of V. natans demonstrated no significant relationships with increasing NH4 (Figure 5A). RGRLength and RGRDM of V. natans both displayed a significant declining trend with NH4, while no such trend was found for P. crispus (Figures 5B,C).
FIGURE 5
Discussion
In an earlier aquarium study by , an NH4 concentration of >1 mg L-1 in the water column induced physiological stress on P. crispus at low light availability, while neither growth inhibition nor NH4 accumulation was observed in the plant tissue of P. crispus at normal light availability (). In addition, high NH4 concentrations (>5 mg L-1) produced significant acute biochemical changes in P. crispus (). Moderate NH4 concentrations (0.16–0.25 mg L-1) were not directly toxic to V. natans (), but an NH4 concentration of 1 mg L-1 may inhibit the growth and the carbon and nitrogen metabolism of V. natans (). However, in the present study, none of the growth variables of the canopy-forming P. crispus (including NShoot, HShoot, and DMShoot) decreased with increasing nitrogen loading, whereas all growth variables decreased with increasing phytoplankton chlorophyll a. Five ponds exhibited NH4 concentrations (3.1–25.6 mg L-1) higher than the above thresholds of 1 and 5 mg L-1. This suggests that P. crispus was able to overcome the stress induced by high nitrogen concentrations under field conditions. In our previous experiment with the rosette-forming V. natans, both leaf length and leaf mass decreased significantly with increasing NH4 concentrations (). These results suggest that the canopy-forming P. crispus is more tolerant than the rosette-forming V. natans when exposed to high NH4 concentrations. A potential caveat is that the two experiments were undertaken in two years with different associated pond temperatures and precipitation. In the present experiment with P. crispus, the air and water temperature were lower than in the previously published experiment with V. natans. In , higher growth rates of V. natans were found in the summer-autumn experiment than in the winter-spring experiment, which suggests that V. natans growth benefits from higher temperatures, perhaps increasing its tolerance to damage induced by ammonium enrichment. Accordingly, the difference in tolerance of V. natans and P. crispus would expectedly have been even greater if they had been growing at similar temperatures, further substantiating our hypothesis that canopy-forming submersed macrophytes are more tolerant to NH4 stress than rosette-forming species. The amount of precipitation may disturb pond conditions, cause resuspension of the sediment, and create shading effects. When phytoplankton abundance increases, so do the levels of detritus and inorganic suspended matter (see ). Although the precipitation in this study was much higher than that in , the average ChlaPhyt concentration (41.7 μg L-1) did not differ significantly from those in (33.8 μg L-1), indicating that the resuspension of the sediment caused by precipitation might not have had a significant effect on the macrophytes.
Macrophytes may excessively synthesize FAA to avoid NH4 toxicity when experiencing high NH4 stress. However, this process costs extra energy and consumption of carbohydrates (; ), which may reduce the growth of macrophytes, particularly at low light availability (, ; , ). FAA content is therefore commonly used as an indicator of nitrogen stress (; ; ). In our experiment, FAA tended to increase with increasing NH4 concentrations. However, significant positive relationships were recorded between FAA and shoot number (NShoot) (in the middle and lower layers) and shoot height (HShoot) (in middle layer). These positive relationships of FAA with NH4 and growth variables, together with weak relationships between NH4 and growth variables, suggest that FAA might be a useful indicator of physiological stress by high ammonium but not of macrophyte growth. A similar conclusion was made in our previous pond experiment on V. natans, both for the low-growth season (in winter) () and the high growth season (in summer and autumn) ().
All the growth variables of P. crispus declined with increasing concentrations of phytoplankton chlorophyll a, suggesting that the decline may mainly be due to shading of phytoplankton, which in our experiment was not significantly related to N loading. Similar results were found for the rosette-forming V. natans (). In contrast, all the growth variables of P. crispus increased with increasing periphyton chlorophyll a. This finding probably reflects the fact that the development of periphyton and macrophytes both rely on underwater light conditions. If light is sufficient, both plant growth metrics and periphyton density will increase. In this experiment, ChlaPeri, particularly in the middle and lower layers, tended to decrease with enhanced TP. Shading effects by phytoplankton, as suggested by the negative relation between ChlaPeri and ChlaPhyt, were likely promoted by TP. Periphyton on glass may not fully represent those on plants, but measurement of periphyton on glass has its advantages: (1) It does not cause damage to plant tissue and has little impact on plant growth; (2) it is possible to standardize measurement to ensure consistent results. Our results suggest that phytoplankton shading affected both the growth of submerged macrophytes and periphyton negatively.
Our findings can be summarized with a conceptual model of growth-NH4 relationships between canopy-forming P. crispus and rosette-forming V. natans exposed to high N stress (Figure 6). Rosette-forming species tend to have a higher number of shoots but lower shoot height and mass than canopy formers, both in the presence and absence of high NH4 stress. For canopy-forming species, high NH4 stress may not significantly affect any growth variables (Figure 6). By contrast, for the rosette-forming species, high NH4 stress may not necessarily affect the shoot number but may lead to a decline in shoot height and mass. The difference in the ability of canopy-forming and rosette-forming species to access underwater light might explain their contrasting tolerance to high NH4 stress. In shallow lakes, canopy-forming species are often able to reach the water surface where there is sufficient light to produce carbohydrates and thereby avoid NH4 toxicity. Rosette-forming species are often relatively short and therefore relatively prone to low-light conditions. At high N concentrations, rosette-forming species may therefore not produce enough carbohydrates to detoxify NH4. Moreover, rosette-forming species become even more affected by high N loading which may cause higher phytoplankton growth or higher periphyton growth as seen in some studies (; ). Our findings are of practical importance and imply that canopy-forming species may potentially be preferred in the restoration of shallow lakes undergoing high N stress. Moreover, canopy-forming species, if covering the water surface, may block light penetration, limit gas exchange, adversely affect water oxygen concentrations, and probably alter biochemical processes (). However, more tests, especially of different canopy-forming species are needed to draw firm conclusions regarding this study’s conceptual model, so as to cover more species to help better understand the mechanisms underlying macrophyte decline in shallow lakes.
FIGURE 6
Statements
Author contributions
QY, H-JW, H-ZW, and EJ designed the research. QY, YL, S-NM, and X-ML carried out the research. QY and H-JW performed the data analyses. QY prepared the original draft of the paper. EJ, CX, and H-JW commented on the various drafts.
Funding
The project was supported by the State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology (2016FBZ09, 2014FB14, and 2011FBZ14) and the Science and Technology Support Program of Hubei Province (2015BBA225). H-JW was supported by the Youth Innovation Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences (2014312). CX was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41271197). EJ received funding from the MARS project (Managing Aquatic ecosystems and water Resources under multiple Stress) funded under the 7th EU Framework Programme, Theme 6 (Environment including Climate Change), Contract No. 603378 (HYPERLINK “http://www.mars-project.eu”), Centre for Water Technology (WATEC), Aarhus University, and AnaEE, Denmark.
Acknowledgments
We thank Shu-Ran Wang for assistance with water-quality measurements and Anne Mette Poulsen for valuable editing of the paper.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2018.01845/full#supplementary-material
References
1
BlindowI. (1992). Long- and short-term dynamics of submerged macrophytes in two shallow eutrophic lakes.Freshw. Biol.2815–27. 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1992.tb00558.x
2
CaoT.NiL. Y.XieP. (2004). Acute biochemical responses of a submersed macrophyte, Potamogeton crispus L., to high ammonium in an aquarium experiment.J. Freshw. Ecol.19279–284. 10.1080/02705060.2004.9664542
3
CaoT.NiL. Y.XieP.XuJ.ZhangM. (2011). Effects of moderate ammonium enrichment on three submersed macrophytes under contrasting light availability.Freshwater Biol.561620–1629. 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02601.x
4
CaoT.XieP.LiZ. Q.NiL. Y.ZhangM.XuJ. (2009a). Physiological stress of high NH4+ concentration in water column on the submersed macrophyte Vallisneria natans L.Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.82296–299. 10.1007/s00128-008-9531-5
5
CaoT.XieP.NiL. Y.ZhangM.XuJ. (2009b). Carbon and nitrogen metabolism of a eutrophication tolerative macrophyte, Potamogeton crispus, under NH4+ stress and low light availability.Environ. Exp. Bot.6674–78. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.10.004
6
CarpenterS. R. (2003). Regime shifts in lake ecosystems: pattern and variation.Excell. Ecol.15i–195.
7
ChambersP. A. (1987). Light and nutrients in the control of aquatic plant community structure. II. In situ observations.J. Ecol.75621–628. 10.2307/2260194
8
ChambersP. A.KalffJ. (1987). Light and nutrients in the control of aquatic plant community structure. I. In situ experiments.J. Ecol.75611–619.
9
DorenboschM.BakkerE. S. (2011). Herbivory in omnivorous fishes: effect of plant secondary metabolites and prey stoichiometry.Freshw. Biol.561783–1797. 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02618.x
10
EmersonK.RussoR. C.LundR. E.ThurstonR. V. (1975). Aqueous ammonia equilibrium calculations: effect of pH and temperature.J. Fish. Res. Board Can.322379–2383. 10.1021/jo900391n
11
GaoJ. Q.LiL. S.HuZ. Y.ZhuS. F.ZhangR. Q.XiongZ. T. (2015). Ammonia stress on the carbon metabolism of Ceratophyllum demersum.Environ. Toxicol. Chem.34843–849. 10.1002/etc.2866
12
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China [AQSIQ] (2002a). Discharge Standard of Pollutants for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant.Shanghai: AQSIQ.
13
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China [AQSIQ] (2002b). Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water.Shanghai: AQSIQ.
14
HuangX. F.ChenW. M.CaiQ. M. (1999). Standard Methods for Observation and Analysis in Chinese Ecosystem Research Network-Survey, Observation and Analysis of Lake Ecology.Beijing: Standards Press of China.
15
HudonC.LalondeS.GagnonP. (2000). Ranking the effects of site exposure, plant growth form, water depth, and transparency on aquatic plant biomass.Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.5731–42. 10.1139/cjfas-57-S1-31
16
ISO 5664 (1984). Water Quality; Determination of Ammonium; Distillation and Titration Method.Geneva: ISO.
17
ISO 7150-1 (1984). Water Quality; Determination of Ammonium. Part 1. Manual Spectrometric Method.Geneva: ISO.
18
JacksonL. J.KalffJ. (1993). Patterns in metal content of submerged aquatic macrophytes: the role of plant growth form.Freshw. Biol.29351–359. 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1993.tb00769.x
19
JeppesenE.MeerhoffM.JacobsenB. A.HansenR. S.SøndergaardM.JensenJ. P.et al (2007). Restoration of shallow lakes by nutrient control and biomanipulation-the successful strategy varies with lake size and climate.Hydrobiology581269–285. 10.1007/s10750-006-0507-3
20
JeppesenE.SøndergaardM.SøndergaardM.ChristoffersenK. (1998). The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes.New York, NY: Springer. 10.1007/978-1-4612-0695-8
21
KörnerS. (2002). Loss of submerged macrophytes in shallow lakes in north-eastern Germany.Int. Rev. Hydrobiol.87375–384. 10.1002/1522-2632(200207)87:4<375::AID-IROH375>3.0.CO;2-7
22
KrupaS. V. (2003). Effects of atmospheric ammonia (NH3) on terrestrial vegetation: a review.Environ. Pollut.124179–221. 10.1016/S0269-7491(02)004347
23
LiH. S.SunQ.ZhaoS. J.ZhangW. H. (2004). Plant Physiology Biochemistry Principle and Experimental Technique.Beijing: Higher Education Press.
24
MossB. (2001). The Broads. The People’s Wetland. The New Naturalist.London: Harper Collins Publishers.
25
MossB.JeppesenE.SøndergaardM.LauridsenT. L.LiuZ. W. (2013). Nitrogen, macrophytes, shallow lakes and nutrient limitation: resolution of a current controversy?Hydrobiology7103–21. 10.1007/s10750-012-1033-0
26
NimptschJ.PflugmacherS. (2007). Ammonia triggers the promotion of oxidative stress in the aquatic macrophyte Myriophyllum mattogrossense.Chemosphere66708–714. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.07.064
27
OlsenS.ChangF. Y.LiW.ZhaoS. T.SøndergaardM.JeppesenE. (2015). Strong impact of nitrogen loading on submerged macrophytes and algae: a long-term mesocosm experiment in a shallow Chinese lake.Freshw. Biol.81525–1536. 10.1111/fwb.12585
28
ÖzkanK.JeppesenE.JohanssonL. S.BekliogluM. (2010). The response of periphyton and submerged macrophytes to nitrogen and phosphorus loading in shallow warm lakes: a mesocosm experiment.Freshw. Biol.55463–475. 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02297.x
29
RareE. (1990). Stress physiology: the functional significance of the accumulation of nitrogen-containing compounds.J. Hortic. Sci.65231–243. 10.1080/00221589.1990.11516052
30
SayerC. D.BurgessA. M. Y.KariK.DavidsonT. A.PeglarS.YangH.et al (2010a). Long-term dynamics of submerged macrophytes and algae in a small and shallow, eutrophic lake: implications for the stability of macrophyte-dominance.Freshw. Biol.55565–583. 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02353.x
31
SayerC. D.DavidsonT. A.JonesJ. I. (2010b). Seasonal dynamics of macrophytes and phytoplankton in shallow lakes: an eutrophication-driven pathway from plants to plankton?Freshw. Biol.55500–513. 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02365.x
32
SchefferM. (1998). Ecology of Shallow Lakes.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
33
Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China [SAC] (2006). Standards for Drinking Water Quality.Beijing: SAC.
34
SuS. Q.ZhouY. M.QinJ. G.WangW.YaoW. Z.SongL. (2012). Physiological responses of Egeria densa to high ammonium concentration and nitrogen deficiency.Chemosphere86538–545. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.10.036
35
TurnerA. M.CholakE. J.GronerM. (2010). Expanding American lotus and dissolved oxygen concentrations of a shallow lake.Am. Midl. Nat.1641–8. 10.1674/0003-0031-164.1.1
36
WangC.ZhangS. H.WangP. F.HouJ.LiW.ZhangW. J. (2008). Metabolic adaptations to ammonia-induced oxidative stress in leaves of the submerged macrophyte Vallisneria natans (Lour.) Hara.Aquat. Toxicol.8788–98. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2008.01.009
37
WangC.ZhangS. H.WangP. F.LiW.LuJ. (2010). Effects of ammonium on the antioxidative response in Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle plants.Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.73189–195. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.08.012
38
WangH. J.WangH. Z.LiangX. M.WuS. K. (2014). Total phosphorus thresholds for regime shifts are nearly equal in subtropical and temperate shallow lakes with moderate depths and areas.Freshw. Biol.591659–1671. 10.1111/fwb.12372
39
WoodC. M. (1993). “Ammonia and urea metabolism and excretion,” inThe Physiology of Fishesed.EvansD. H. (Ann Arbor, MI: CRC Press) 379–425.
40
XiaQ.ChenY. Q.LiuX. B. (2004). Water Quality Criteria and Water Quality Standards.Beijing: Standards Press of China.
41
YuQ.WangH. J.WangH. Z.LiY.LiangX. M.XuC.et al (2017). Does the responses of Vallisneria natans (Lour.) Hara to high nitrogen loading differ between the summer high-growth season and the low-growth season?Sci. Total Environ.601513–1521. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.268
42
YuQ.WangH. Z.JeppesenE.XuC.WangH. J. (2018). Reply to Cao et al.’s comment on “Does the responses of Vallisneria natans (Lour.) Hara to high nitrogen loading differ between the summer high-growth season and the low-growth season? Science of the Total Environment 601-602 (2017) 1513-1521”.Sci. Total Environ.6151093–1094. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.306
43
YuQ.WangH. Z.LiY.ShaoJ. C.LiangX. M.JeppesenE.et al (2015). Effects of high nitrogen concentrations on the growth of submersed macrophytes at moderate phosphorus concentrations.Water Res.83385–395. 10.1016/j.watres.2015.06.053
44
YuanG. X.CaoT.FuH.NiL. Y.ZhangX.LiW.et al (2013). Linking carbon and nitrogen metabolism to depth distribution of submersed macrophytes using high ammonium dosing tests and a lake survey.Freshw. Biol.582532–2540. 10.1111/fwb.12230
45
YuanG. X.FuH.ZhongJ. Y.CaoT.NiL. Y.ZhuT. S.et al (2015). Nitrogen/carbon metabolism in response to NH4+ pulse for two submersed macrophytes.Aquat. Bot.2176–82. 10.1016/j.aquabot.2014.12.001
46
YuanG. X.FuH.ZhongJ. Y.LouQ.NiL. Y.CaoT. (2016). Growth and C/N metabolism of three submersed macrophytes in response to water depths.Environ. Exp. Bot.12294–99. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.09.009
47
ZhangM.CaoT.NiL.XieP.LiZ. (2010). Carbon, nitrogen and antioxidant enzyme responses of Potamogeton crispus to both low light and high nutrient stresses.Environ. Exp. Bot.6844–50. 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.09.003
48
ZhangM.WangZ.XuJ.LiuY.NiL. Y.CaoT.et al (2011). Ammonium, microcystins, and hypoxia of blooms in eutrophic water cause oxidative stress and C-N imbalance in submersed macrophytes and floating-leaved aquatic plants in Lake Taihu. China.Chemosphere82329–339. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.10.038
49
ZhangZ. S.HuangX. F. (1991). Research Methods for Freshwater Plankton.Beijing: Science Press of China.
50
ZhaoS. T.YinL. Y.ChangF. Y.OlsenS.SøndergaardM.JeppesenE.et al (2016). Response of Vallisneria spinulosa (Hydrocharitaceae) to contrasting nitrogen loadings in controlled lake mesocosms.Hydrobiologia766215–223. 10.1007/s10750-015-2456-1
Summary
Keywords
whole-ecosystem experiment, growth form, submersed macrophytes, ammonium, phosphorus, phytoplankton, periphyton
Citation
Yu Q, Wang H-Z, Xu C, Li Y, Ma S-N, Liang X-M, Jeppesen E and Wang H-J (2018) Higher Tolerance of Canopy-Forming Potamogeton crispus Than Rosette-Forming Vallisneria natans to High Nitrogen Concentration as Evidenced From Experiments in 10 Ponds With Contrasting Nitrogen Levels. Front. Plant Sci. 9:1845. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01845
Received
29 September 2017
Accepted
28 November 2018
Published
13 December 2018
Volume
9 - 2018
Edited by
Richard K. F. Unsworth, Swansea University, United Kingdom
Reviewed by
Douglass Grayland James, Florida Gulf Coast University, United States; Carl Sayer, University College London, United Kingdom
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Yu, Wang, Xu, Li, Ma, Liang, Jeppesen and Wang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Hai-Jun Wang, wanghj@ihb.ac.cn
This article was submitted to Functional Plant Ecology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.