In the original article, there were mistakes in the legend for Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure S1, Figure S2, and Figure S3 as published. Some words and representative colors were incorrectly provided. The corrected legends appear below.
Figure 2. Linkage map for U. decumbens: homologous groups from 1 to 4. The genotype configuration of each marker is indicated by the marker name prefix and color. Simplex markers are represented in black; duplex markers are represented in green; double-simplex markers are represented in purple; X-double-simplex markers are represented in light blue; duplex-simplex markers are represented in dark blue and double-duplex markers are represented in orange. QTLs are identified in HG1 and HG2.
Figure 3. Linkage map for U. decumbens: homologous groups from 5 to 9. The genotype configuration of each marker is indicated by the marker name prefix and color. Simplex markers are represented in black; duplex markers are represented in green; double-simplex markers are represented in purple; X-double-simplex markers are represented in light blue; duplex-simplex markers are represented in dark blue and double-duplex markers are represented in orange. A QTL is identified in HG6.
Figure S1. Homology groups 1, 2, and 3 of the D24/27 maternal linkage map and of the D62 paternal linkage map. The genotype configuration of each marker is indicated by the marker name prefix and color. Simplex markers are represented in black; duplex markers are represented in green; double-simplex markers are represented in purple; X-double-simplex markers are represented in light blue; duplex-simplex markers are represented in dark blue and double-duplex markers are represented in orange.
Figure S2. Homology groups 4, 5, and 6 of the D24/27 maternal linkage map and of the D62 paternal linkage map. The genotype configuration of each marker is indicated by the marker name prefix and color. Simplex markers are represented in black; duplex markers are represented in green; double-simplex markers are represented in purple; X-double-simplex markers are represented in light blue; duplex-simplex markers are represented in dark blue and double-duplex markers are represented in orange.
Figure S3. Homology groups 7, 8, and 9 of the D24/27 maternal linkage map and of the D62 paternal linkage map. The genotype configuration of each marker is indicated by the marker name prefix and color. Simplex markers are represented in black; duplex markers are represented in green; double-simplex markers are represented in purple; X-double-simplex markers are represented in light blue; duplex-simplex markers are represented in dark blue and double-duplex markers are represented in orange.
Additionally, the accession number for the GBS sequences, deposited in the NCBI, was wrong. A correction has been made to the Results section, subsection SNP Calling, paragraph three: “GBS sequence data have been submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number SRP148665”.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that they do not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Summary
Keywords
allele dosage, Brachiaria, linkage map, polyploidy, signalgrass, SNP, quantitative traits
Citation
Ferreira RCU, Lara LAC, Chiari L, Barrios SCL, do Valle CB, Valério JR, Torres FZV, Garcia AAF and de Souza AP (2019) Corrigendum: Genetic Mapping With Allele Dosage Information in Tetraploid Urochloa decumbens (Stapf) R. D. Webster Reveals Insights Into Spittlebug (Notozulia entreriana Berg) Resistance. Front. Plant Sci. 10:855. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00855
Received
26 April 2019
Accepted
13 June 2019
Published
26 June 2019
Volume
10 - 2019
Edited and reviewed by
Sergio J. Ochatt, INRA UMR1347 Agroécologie, France
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Ferreira, Lara, Chiari, Barrios, do Valle, Valério, Torres, Garcia and de Souza.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Anete Pereira de Souza anete@unicamp.br
This article was submitted to Plant Breeding, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.