Abstract
There are considerable variations in the percentage loss of hydraulic conductivity (PLC) at mid-day minimum water potential among and within species, but the underpinning mechanism(s) are poorly understood. This study tested the hypothesis that plants can regulate leaf specific hydraulic conductance (Kl) via precise control over PLC under variable ΔΨ (water potential differential between soil and leaf) conditions to maintain the −m/b constant (−m: the sensitivity of stomatal conductance to VPD; b: reference stomatal conductance at 1.0 kPa VPD), where VPD is vapor pressure deficit. We used Populus euphratica, a phreatophyte species distributed in the desert of Northwestern China, to test the hypothesis. Field measurements of VPD, stomatal conductance (gs), gs responses to VPD, mid-day minimum leaf water potential (Ψlmin), and branch hydraulic architecture were taken in late June at four sites along the downstream of Tarim River at the north edge of the Taklamakan desert. We have found that: 1) the −m/b ratio was almost constant (=0.6) across all the sites; 2) the average Ψ50 (the xylem water potential with 50% loss of hydraulic conductivity) was −1.63 MPa, and mid-day PLC ranged from 62 to 83%; 3) there were tight correlations between Ψ50 and wood density/leaf specific hydraulic conductivity (kl) and between specific hydraulic conductance sensitivity to water potential [d(ks)/dln(−Ψ)] and specific hydraulic conductivity (ks). A modified hydraulic model was applied to investigate the relationship between gs and VPD under variable ΔΨ and Kl conditions. It was concluded that P. euphratica was able to control PLC in order to maintain a relatively constant −m/b under different site conditions. This study demonstrated that branchlet hydraulic architecture and stomatal response to VPD were well coordinated in order to maintain relatively water homeostasis of P. euphratica in the desert. Model simulations could explain the wide variations of PLC across and within woody species that are often observed in the field.
Introduction
A global convergence has been demonstrated in the relationship between drought-induced embolism and daily minimum xylem water potential (; ). The safety margin of the plant hydrautic system refers to the difference between the daily minimum xylem water potential and the xylem water potential at which 50% of the hydraulic conductance is lost due to the cavitation of xylem vessels. Plants are generally able to maintain the integrity of their hydraulic system within the safety margin by the stomatal regulation of water loss to maximize the carbon gain without the risk of catastrophic hydraulic failure. However, the functional association between minimum xylem water potential and hydraulic safety does not prove that all the plants can control embolisms to the same extent because PLC is a function of water potential, Ψ50, and the slope of the cavitation vulnerability curve. As such, there are considerable inter- and intra-specific variations in PLC at the daily minimum xylem water potential (; ; ). However, the underpinning mechanism(s) are not fully understood.
The stomatal regulation of xylem pressure is a function of vapor pressure deficit (VPD), leaf specific hydraulic conductance (Kl), soil water potential (Ψs), and leaf water potential (Ψl) (see Table 1 for the definitions of major acronyms/symbols in the present study) according to the following simplified hydraulic model (; ):
Table 1
| Symbol/Abbreviations | Definition | Units |
|---|---|---|
| a | vulnerability curve steepness | |
| b | reference conductance at VPD = 1 kPa | mmol m−2 s−1 |
| d(ks)/dln(−Ψ) | sensitivity of ks to decreasing water potential | kg m−1 MPa−2 s−1 |
| gbl | the boundary layer conductance to water vapor | mmol m−2 s−1 |
| gl | leaf conductance to water vapor | mmol m−2 s−1 |
| gs | stomatal conductance | mmol m−2 s−1 |
| gsm | the maximum physiological gs | mmol m−2 s−1 |
| Huber value | the total cross-section sapwood area per unit leaf area | m2 m−2 |
| kl | leaf specific hydraulic conductivity, | kg m−1 MPa−1 s−1 |
| ks | specific conductivity | kg m−1 MPa−1 s−1 |
| Kh | the maximum hydraulic conductivity | kg m MPa−1 s−1 |
| Khi | the hydraulic conductivity measured at pressure i | kg m MPa−1 s−1 |
| Kl | leaf specific hydraulic conductance | mmol m−2 MPa−1 s−1 |
| −m | the sensitivity of gs to VPD | mmol m−2 s−1 ln (kPa)-1 |
| −m/b | the sensitivity of gs to VPD standardized by the stomatal conductance at 1.0 kPa VPD | |
| PLC | percentage loss of hydraulic conductivity | |
| Tr | transpiration rate | mol m−2 s−1 |
| VPD | leaf vapor pressure deficit | kPa |
| WD | woody density | g dry mass cm−3 |
| Ψ | the negative of the injection pressure for vulnerability curve establishment | MPa |
| Ψl | leaf water potential | MPa |
| Ψmin | daily minimum branchlet xylem water potential | MPa |
| Ψlmin | daily minimum leaf xylem water potential | MPa |
| Ψs | soil water potential | MPa |
| ΔΨ | water potential differential between soil and leaf | MPa |
List of symbols, abbreviations and their units.
Where gl is leaf conductance to water vapor, which is a function of boundary layer conductance to water vapor (gbl) and stomatal conductance (gs). It has been demonstrated that the sensitivity of stomatal conductance to VPD (−m) has a close relationship with the stomatal conductance at 1 kPa VPD (b) and the −m/b ratio is found to be 0.6 for various mesic species across a variety of growth forms and habitats (; ; ; ) and the relationship is described as follows:
The above models predict that if Kl decreases due to xylem cavitation, the −m/b ratio will need to increase because a more sensitive stomatal response is required to keep transpiration and ΔΨ (=ΨS – Ψl, i.e., water potential difference between soil and leaf) relatively constant (; ). Furthermore, the large variations in PLC (which regulates Kl) will likely lead to variations in the −m/b ratio. However, it is unlikely in nature that ΔΨ remains constant when Kl varies even in isohydric species (). Therefore, the assumption of constant ΔΨ needs to be relaxed. In this study, we simultaneously examined stomatal conductance to water vapor pressure deficit, the response of branch and leaf hydraulic conductance to water potential differential between leaf and soil, and xylem vulnerability to cavitation. We conducted the study on four populations of a desert phreatophyte tree species, Populus euphratica, along a gradient of water table depths. We test the hypothesis that if stomata are perfectly efficient in regulating leaf water status as indicated by a constant −m/b both within and between species (; ), plants would fine-tune Klvia precise control over PLC (control the embolism degree) under variable ΔΨ and Kl conditions. The results can provide an explanation for the considerable inter- and intra-specific variations in PLC at the daily minimum xylem water potential in the field.
From Equation 1, gl can be obtained with the input of Kl, VPD, Ψl, and Ψs, while Kl is the product of maximum Kl and PLC. gs can be obtained provided gbl is known. Then −m/b can be calculated based on Equation 2. Among all parameters required by the model, Kl, VPD, Ψl, and PLC can be measured/calculated in the field. In desert environment, gbl is large and has minor impact on the model simulation (; ). As such, the only obstacle to verify the above hypothesis for trees with a deep root system is that it is difficult to know the water availability in the entire rhizosphere because of the difficulty in obtaining a reliable Ψs, mainly due to the temporal–spatial soil moisture heterogeneity and nocturnal transpiration (; ). In this study, we used Populus euphratica, an obligate phreatophyte species, to test the hypothesis. Because the root system of phreatophytes can reach and access the groundwater to avoid drought stress (; ; ), the ΔΨ is largely determined by Ψl because Ψs is close to zero and the gravitational potential (−0.01MPa m−1) is ignorable for groundwater tables of a few meters (). P. euphratica mainly grows along the riverside of Tarim River at the north edge of the Taklimakan Desert, NW China. Previous greenhouse studies have found that stems of P. euphratica seedlings are highly vulnerable to cavitation (high Ψ50) and considerable PLC occurs at noon (), but there are no such field studies on this species. and have found associations between gs, VPD, kl, and Ψl, but the relationship between stomatal sensitivity to VPD and hydraulic traits is still poorly understood. We hypothesize that the stomatal response to VPD and xylem response to water potential are functionally converged to maintain a functional coherence and integrity of the hydraulic system of the tree.
Materials and Methods
Study Site
The study was carried out at four sites along the downstream of Tarim River (elevation of 931 m) in the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region, NW China (Figure 1). The four sites are located at least 138 km east of Korla, at the northern fringe of the Taklamakan desert. Korla has a warm temperate continental arid climate; the average length of the frost-free season is 210 days. The annual average temperature is about 11°C, the average annual precipitation is less than 60 mm, and the annual maximum evaporation is about 2,800 mm. The average maximum temperature and average minimum relative humidity in June are 30.9°C and 9.9% respectively.
Figure 1
The four sites had natural P. euphratica stands with relatively uniformly distributed trees. The stand density was 100–300 stems per hectare. Four to five trees with diameter at breast height of 30–40 cm were selected from each site and south-facing sunlit branchlets, and leaves at 1.3–1.5 m height from the outermost part of the lower canopy were selected for measuring in situ gs and hydraulic characteristics. Two branches per tree were selected for the branch architecture measurement and one to two leaves per tree were used to measure in situ gs response to VPD. The groundwater tables of the four sites measured at local wells within 1 km from the sites were 2.49, 3.49, 4.46, and 7.92 m, respectively, for site 31 Tuan (site A), 33 Tuan (site B), Yingsu (site C) and Alagan (site D).
Measurements of gs Response to VPD
gs responses to VPD were measured on clear days in the field around noon (12:00 to 14:00 h) in late June under two sets of conditions: (1) controlled VPD and (2) un-controlled natural VPD, using a Li 6400 open gas exchange system (Li-Cor Cooperate, Lincoln, NE, USA). In the controlled-VPD measurements, a range of VPD from 0.8 to 3.5 kPa was achieved by using the apparatus on the equipment to vary the mixing ratio of water-vapor saturated air and dry air (after passing through desiccant). When the relative humidity in the leaf chamber exceeded 80% (VPD was about 0.8 kPa), the instrument displayed a warning sign of “High humidity alert”, gs and intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (Ci) readings fluctuated (e.g., Ci fluctuated from negative to very large values), indicating the gs measurement was not reliable. Therefore, data points with VPD values less than 1 kPa were discarded. Other environmental conditions in the leave cuvette were set as follows: Leaf temperature 31°C, Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) 1,200 µmol m−2 s−1, CO2 concentration 390 µmol mol−1. Only steady-state gs readings at each VPD were recorded (; ). Measurements under un-controlled natural VPD were taken in June and again in July. The conditions in the leaf chamber were set the same in in the two measurements (Leaf temperature 31°C, PAR 1,200 µmol m−2 s−1, CO2 concentration 390 µmol mol−1). The −m and b were estimated using Equation 2 and the non-linear regression model with gnls () function of the R software ().
Leaf Water Potential and Branchlet Xylem Water Potential Measurements
The daily minimum leaf xylem water potential (Ψlmin) was measured in the field between 12:00 and 14:00 using a Scholander pressure chamber (PMS Instrument, Corvallis, Oregon, USA). The measurements were taken on the same trees on which the VPD responses were measured. The daily minimum branchlet xylem water potential (Ψmin) was estimated according to the method of : a branchlet of similar size to that used in subsequent cavitation vulnerability measurements was selected and sealed in a plastic bag containing a moist paper towel for 30 min in darkness to allow the equilibration of water potential between leaves and the subtending branchlet before a leaf was sampled and the petiole water potential was measured.
Cavitation Vulnerability Curve Measurement
A branchlet (50–70 cm long, 2–4 year-old) near that used for the gs–VPD response measurement was cut from each sample tree before sunrise (before 8:00 AM) to measure kl and the cavitation vulnerability curve. The branchlet was wrapped in moist paper towels immediately after being cut and transported to the laboratory. The maximum vessel length was measured from six samples randomly chosen from all the four sites together, based on the method (pressurized gas bubble under water) of . Since the maximum measured vessel length was less than 21 cm, all the samples (7–10 per site) were re-cut to 22–24 cm under water, and all the measurements were carried out in an air-conditioned laboratory (26°C). The maximum flow rate was measured under 8 kPa hydrostatic pressure after air emboli were flushed out by perfusion with 110 kPa distilled water (flowing through 0.2 μm filter) for 30 min. Measurements were initiated after ~2 min when the flow rate stabilized. The weight of the collected efflux was measured every 30 s with a precision balance (Sartorius, BP221S, Göttingen, Germany) to obtain the flow rate. Maximum kl was calculated by dividing the maximum flow rate by the total leaf area distal to the measured segment and by the pressure gradient. The leaf area was determined using a WinFOLIA system (Regent Instruments, Quebec City, Canada). ks was calculated by dividing the maximum flow rate by the segment’s cross-section sapwood area. The total acropetal-end cross-section area of the branch segment was determined from its maximum and minimum diameter. The area of the pith was determined from its dimensions measured under a dissecting microscope equipped with a stage micrometer and subtracted from the above acropetal-end cross-section area to determine the cross-section sapwood area. The Huber value was calculated as the total cross-section sapwood area per unit leaf area ().
The vulnerability of xylem to cavitation was characterized using a vulnerability curve which was measured using a Cavitation pressure chamber (PMS Instrument, Corvallis, Oregon, USA) according to . A branch segment was inserted into a collar and sealed with both ends protruding. Air was injected into the collar at a set pressure, which was maintained for 15 min and then slowly decreased to 0.1 MPa. The hydraulic conductivity was then re-measured at a higher pressure. This procedure was repeated until at least 85% loss of hydraulic conductivity was reached. The PLC following each pressurization was calculated as PLC = 100 × (Kh − Khi)/Kh, where Khi is the hydraulic conductivity measured at pressure i. The vulnerability curve for each sample was fitted with an exponential sigmoidal equation ():
where Ψ is the negative of the injection air pressure and coefficients a and Ψ50 are estimated using a non-linear regression model with gnls() function of R software (). Ψ50 represents the xylem water potential at which 50% of the hydraulic conductance is lost, a represents the steepness of vulnerability curve. kl at noon was estimated from Ψmin, the vulnerability curve, and maximum kl (; ).
Wood Density and ks Sensitivity to Water Potential
Wood density (WD) was measured on stem segments used in the measurement of vulnerability curves after the removal of pith and bark, and the fresh volume was measured by the Archimedes principle of water displacement. The dry mass was determined after drying at 104°C for 24 h. WD is expressed as dry mass per unit fresh volume (g cm−3).
Specific hydraulic conductance sensitivity to water potential [d(ks)/dln(−Ψ)] was calculated based on the method by : we related maximum ks, obtained at −Ψ = 0, to the branchlet ks sensitivity to decreasing Ψ from −0.5 to −3.0 MPa. The slope of the −Ψ–ks relationship was linearized by using the natural logarithm of –Ψ, and the logarithm transformation resulted in a good fit (R2 = 0.91 to 0.95).
The Hydraulic Model
We used Equation 1 and the following equation:
to model the response of gs to VPD at noon. We set constraints for gsm (the maximum physiological gs for P. euphratica), gbl, Kl, and ΔΨ according to the corresponding measured physiological range for P. euphratica. It is assumed that gs had an upper limit of gsm which was set as 1,000 mmol m−2 s−1, based on our field measurements and the reported values for poplars (). The gbl for desert environment was set as 2,000 mmol m−2 s−1 (). Kl at noon was set between 0.5 and 4.0 mmol MPa−1 m−2 s−1. ΔΨ at noon (Ψs − Ψlmin) was set at 2.0 to 3.2 MPa according to the measured range of Ψlmin in the field. VPD was allowed to vary between 1 and 4 kPa, similar to the range observed in the field (). Before running the simulation, we calculated Kl at noon from the estimated kl at noon, assuming hydraulic path length = underground water table + sample height + branch length, and hydraulic conductance was uniformly distributed along the flow path from soil to branchlet (). Note the unit of kl is kg m−1 MPa−1 s−1, and the unit of Kl is mmol m−2 MPa−1 s−1. We converted the unit VPD into the unit of mol mol−1 as required by the model. We relaxed the assumption of constant ΔΨ when exploring the relationship between Kl and −m/b. By allowing Kl and ΔΨ to vary simultaneously, the gs responses to VPD (−m/b) under all the combinations of Kl and ΔΨ were solved. The simulation procedure was as follows (): 1) the Kl and ΔΨ were assigned to specific values; 2) gl as the function of VPD was calculated from Equation 1; 3) gs was solved from Equation 4; 4) when gs > gsm (occurred occasionally), we set gs = gsm and re-solved the equation for ΔΨ; 5) the calculated gs and assigned VPD were fitted by a non-linear regression model with the gnls () function of R software () to obtain −m/b from Equation 2; 6) a semi-contour plot −m/b versus ΔΨ and Kl was constructed.
Statistical Analyses
The distribution normality of branchlet xylem hydraulic traits and leaf water status data were tested by calculating the Shapiro–Wilk W statistics for each sample (n = 4–5 for leaf water status variables, n = 7–10 for branchlet xylem hydraulic traits). Differences between sites were tested using Kruskl–Wallis H test if P(W) < 0.05. The Spearman rank correlation analysis was applied to investigate correlations among branchlet xylem hydraulic traits. ANOVA and Pearson correlation analysis were subsequently conducted if P(W) > 0.05. We conducted all the statistical analyses using R version 3.4.0 ().
Results
gs, Ψlmin, b were significantly lower, and VPD was significant higher at Alagan than other sites (Table 2). Transpiration rate (Tr), −m, and −m/b (0.57–0.61) were not significantly different among the four sites (Table 2). Differences in all the traits were smallest between 31 Tuan site and Yingsu site than among all the sites.
Table 2
| Population | gs | Tr | VPD | Ψlmin | −m | b | −m/b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 Tuan | 536 ± 68a | 7.28 ± 1.48a | 1.56 ± 0.10b | −2.30 ± 0.03a | 518.9 ± 130.6a | 802.5 ± 102.9a | 0.61 ± 0.10a |
| 33 Tuan | 396 ± 39ab | 7.62 ± 0.63a | 1.96 ± 0.10b | −2.55 ± 0.05a | 333.7 ± 54.8a | 588.1 ± 72.0ab | 0.57 ± 0.07a |
| Yingsu | 490 ± 41a | 8.73 ± 0.90a | 1.88 ± 0.22b | −2.45 ± 0.06a | 435.2 ± 60.0a | 769.7 ± 8.3a | 0.57 ± 0.08a |
| Alagan | 328 ± 39b | 8.07 ± 0.65a | 2.46 ± 0.08a | −3.01 ± 0.09b | 328.3 ± 33.2a | 577.1 ± 35.7b | 0.58 ± 0.08a |
| P value | ≤0.05 | >0.05 | ≤0.05 | ≤0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 | >0.05 |
Means and standard error of the mean for gs, Tr, VPD, Ψlmin, −m, b and −m/b at the four sites.
Symbols, their definition and units are provided in Table 1.
Different letters among populations indicate significant difference at p = 0.05.
The branchlet hydraulic architecture of P. euphratica also varied with site (Table 3). Yingsu had significantly greater ks, kl, and d(ks)/dln(−Ψ) than the other three sites (Table 3). Huber value was lowest at Alagan and highest at 33 Tuan among the four sites although their differences from 31 Tuan and Yingsu were not statistically significant (Table 3). WD was lowest at 31 Tuan and highest at Alagan, but their differences from 33 Tuan and Yingsu were not statistically significant (Table 3). Ψmin had the same trend as Ψlmin, i.e., significantly more negative at Alagan than at all other sites, while there was no significant difference among the other sites (Tables 2 and 3). Ψ50 was most negative at Alagan (−2.22 MPa) and the least negative at Yingsu (−1.22 MPa) among the four sites, but the trend for a was the opposite (Table 3).
Table 3
| Population | ks | kl(×10−4) | WD | Ψmin | Huber(×10−4) | Ψ50 | a | d(ks)/dln(−Ψ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 Tuan | 1.52 ± 0.16b | 3.51 ± 0.43b | 0.405 ± 0.035b | −2.14 ± 0.06a | 2.79 ± 0.34ab | −1.39 ± 0.12ab | 1.71 ± 0.16a | 0.59 ± 0.06b |
| 33 Tuan | 1.51 ± 0.34b | 3.68 ± 0.28b | 0.491 ± 0.007ab | −2.27 ± 0.16a | 3.05 ± 0.35a | −1.67 ± 0.15b | 1.35 ± 0.15ab | 0.49 ± 0.15b |
| Yingsu | 2.94 ± 0.36a | 6.63 ± 0.84a | 0.474 ± 0.006ab | −2.23 ± 0.08a | 2.40 ± 0.36ab | −1.22 ± 0.23a | 1.72 ± 0.19a | 1.08 ± 0.20a |
| Alagan | 2.02 ± 0.49b | 3.04 ± 0.35b | 0.496 ± 0.010a | −2.73 ± 0.03b | 31.63 ± 0.22b | −2.22 ± 0.11c | 0.94 ± 0.08b | 0.83 ± 0.17ab |
| P value | ≤0.01 | ≤0.001 | ≤0.01 | ≤0.001 | ≤0.01 | ≤0.001 | ≤0.01 | ≤0.05 |
Means and the standard error of the mean for ks, kl, WD, Ψmin, Huber value, Ψ50, d(ks)/dln(−Ψ), and a at the four sites.
Symbols, their definition, and units are given in Table 1.
Different letters among populations indicate significant difference at p = 0.05.
As there was no significant difference in −m/b among the sites, we pooled all the VPD response data from the four sites and evaluated the general relationship between gs and VPD for the species. We fit Equation 1 separately for the two sets of VPD response data. The estimated −m/b was 0.607 for the controlled-VPD data set and 0.615 for the natural VPD field measurement (Figures 2A, B). −m was positively correlated with b across the individuals of the four sites (Figure 2C).
Figure 2
The estimated PLC ranged from 62% at Alagan site to 83% at Yingsu site (Figure 3). The corresponding estimated kl at noon for 31 Tuan, 33 Tuan, Yingsu, and Alagan sites was 1.11 × 10−4, 1.09 × 10−4, 1.12 × 10−4, and 1.16 × 10−4 kg m−1 MPa−1 s−1, respectively.
Figure 3
ks was positively correlated with kl (F = 6.637, P = 0.014), negatively correlated with Huber value (F = 19.407, P < 0.001) (Table 4). However, ks showed no significant relationship with safety (Ψ50) (F = 1.917, P = 0.175) (Table 4). There was a negative association between Ψ50 and WD (F = 8.566, P = 0.006) across the four sites (Table 4, Figure 4A). There was a positive correlation between Ψ50 and kl (F = 5.937, P = 0.017) (Table 4, Figure 4B); kl also showed a positive correlation with the reference stomatal conductance at 1.0 kPa (F = 37.274, P = 0.009) at the population scale (Figure 4C). d(ks)/dln(−Ψ) was positively correlated with ks (F = 680.782, P < 0.001) (Figure 4D) across the individuals, and b at the population scale (F = 33.249, P = 0.01) (Figure 4F), but had no relationship with Ψ50 (F = 0.438, P = 0.51) (Figure 4E). There was no association between gs and Ψlmin at the population scale (F = 12.047, P = 0.071) (Figure 4H). There was no significant relationship between gs and Tr (F = 0.99, P = 0.33) (Figure 4G). There was also a marginally positive association (F = 13.048, P = 0.061) between Ψ50 and Ψmin across the four sites, and the slope of this relationship is similar to the slope for other angiosperm species in the world (Figure 5). The safety margin (Ψmin − Ψ50) was negative (i.e., below the 1:1 line in Figure 5) because the actual measured Ψmin was more negative than Ψ50 and the actual PLC was greater than 50%. gs increased with increasing (i.e., becoming less negative) Ψmin, and the rate of increase was greater at sites with less negative Ψmin (Figure 4H).
Table 4
| ks | kl | WD | Huber | Ψ50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ks | 1 | ||||
| kl | 0.399** | 1 | |||
| WD | 0.236ns | 0.06 ns | 1 | ||
| Huber | −0.581*** | 0.265 ns | −0.172 ns | 1 | |
| Ψ50 | −0.228 ns | 0.355* | −0.443** | 0.387** | 1 |
Pearson correlations between branchlet hydraulic traits of Populus euphratica.
Symbols, their definition, and units can be found in Table 1.
*, **, *** and ns denote significance at P ≤ 0.05, P ≤ 0.01, P ≤ 0.001 and no significant difference, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6 demonstrated the effect of −m/b on the relationship between Kl and ΔΨ. The average values of Kl and ΔΨ around noon for the four sites all fell well within the range of 0.58–0.60 −m/b. Belt A and belt B in Figure 6 were within the same −m/b range (0.58–0.60) but different Kl at noon. Belt C had a −m/b range of 0.62–0.64, but its Kl at noon was higher than belt A but lower than belt B.
Figure 6

Semi-contour plots of −m/b as dependent on ΔΨ and Kl. Plots are derived from the hydraulic model (Equation 1). The simulated −m/b at the four studied sites are shown as (Δ). A and B in the figure represent belts with same −m/b but different Kl at noon, C represents belt with higher −m/b than A and B, but its Kl at noon is between those of A and B. Note the unit of Kl is mmol m−2 MPa−1 s−1.
Discussion
The Ψ50 values measured in this study are within the range of values reported for poplar trees around the world, e.g., −1.30 MPa for P. tremula, −2.95 MPa for P. nigra (
The results of this study suggest that P. euphratica is a mesic-adapted species. In a mesic-adapted species, gs generally has a much tighter relationship with VPD (Figures 2A, C) than with ks (F = 0.02, P = 0.89 at the population scale) or Tr (Figure 4G) (
The “safety margin” (Ψmin − Ψ50) of P. euphratica ranged from −0.5 to −1.01 MPa across the four sites in this study. While these values are within the general range of values reported for other tree species in the world that grow under comparable environmental conditions to those of our study sites (
The results of this study suggest that the hydraulic model (Equation 1) and/or its assumptions may need to be modified when used to examine the relationship between Kl and −m/b. The model predicts that if Kl decreases due to xylem cavitation, the −m/b will increase because a greater stomatal response is required to keep transpiration and ΔΨ (Soil water potential minus leaf water potential) constant (
The output of the hydraulic model with our modifications was supported by our field measurements. The modeled relationship between Kl and ΔΨ at noon for our four sites was within the band of 0.58–0.60 −m/b (Figure 6), and the −m/b range calculated from our field measurements was 0.57–0.61. The in situ native midday PLC for P. euphratica (76%) measured by
There are generally considerable variations in PLC at mid-day minimum xylem water potential among and within species (
The result that increased cavitation resistance was linked to increased wood density (Figure 4A) is expected because denser wood tends to be better able to sustain the compressive forces generated by lower negative pressures and to minimize air permeability that might cause xylem cavitation (
Transpiration is controlled by both vapor pressure deficit and leaf conductance. Therefore, it is not surprising that gs was not significantly correlated to Tr (Figure 4G). The leaf conductance in turn is controlled by VPD and the internal water status as demonstrated by Equations 1 and 2. Equation 1 demonstrates that leaf conductance is the linkage between the internal water relations in the tree and the moisture conditions of the ambient air. This conclusion can further enforced the coherent functional relationships discussed in the previous paragraph, such as the significant, linear relationship between d(ks)/dln(−Ψ) and ks (Figure 4D). This relationship could facilitate the fine-tuning of PLC to sustain transpiration (
In summary, this study demonstrates that the hydraulic architecture of branchlets and stomatal response to VPD were well coordinated with each other so that the water homeostasis of P. euphratica was maintained in the desert environment. The high xylem vulnerability to cavitation and the pattern of gs response to VPD measured in the field further corroborated previous conclusions that the distribution and growth of P. euphratica in the desert solely depend on its access to groundwater (
Funding
This study was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFA0600802), State Key Project of Research and Development Plan (2016YFC0502104) and the Science and Technology Project of Beijing (Z171100004417019).
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author contributions
D-YF and S-RZ designed the experiment. D-YF, C-DJ, X-WX, and X-FY carried out the experiment. D-YF, S-RZ, C-YX, and Q-LD performed the statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. W-FZ assisted in the experiment. All authors commented on the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Ram Oren and two reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions on the previous version of this manuscript, which have contributed substantially toward enhancing the quality of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
BruelheideH.JandtU. (2004). “Vegetation types in the foreland of the Qira Oasis: present distribution and changes during the last decades,” in Ecophysiology and Habitat Requirements of Perennial Species in the Taklimakan Desert. Eds. RungeM.ZhangX. (Aachen, Germany: Shaker), 27–34.
2
BruelheideH.JandtU.GriesD.ThomasF. M.FoetzkiA.BuerkertA.et al. (2003). Vegetation changes in a river oasis on the southern rim of the Taklamakan Desert in China between 1956 and 2000. Phytocoenologia33, 801–818. doi: 10.1127/0340-269X/2003/0033-0801
3
BucciS. J.GoldsteinG.MeinzerF. C.FrancoA. C.CampanelloP.ScholzF. G. (2005). Mechanisms contributing to seasonal homeostasis of minimum leaf water potential and predawn disequilibrium between soil and plant water potential in Neotropical savanna trees. Trees19, 296–304. doi: 10.1007/s00468-004-0391-2
4
BucciS. J.ScholzF. G.PeschiuttaM. L.AriasN. S.MeinzerF. C.GoldsteinG. (2013). The stem xylem of P atagonian shrubs operates far from the point of catastrophic dysfunction and is additionally protected from drought-induced embolism by leaves and roots. Plant Cell Environ.36, 2163–2174. doi: 10.1111/pce.12126
5
BuckleyT. N. (2019). How do stomata respond to water status? New Phytol.224, 21–36. doi: 10.1111/nph.15899
6
CharrierG.Torres-RuizJ. M.BadelE.BurlettR.ChoatB.CochardH.et al. (2016). Evidence for hydraulic vulnerability segmentation and lack of xylem refilling under tension. Plant Physiol.172, 1657–1668. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01079
7
ChenY.LiW.XuC.YeZ.ChenY. (2015). Desert riparian vegetation and groundwater in the lower reaches of the Tarim River basin. Environ. Earth Sci.73, 547–558. doi: 10.1007/s12665-013-3002-y
8
ChoatB.JansenS.BrodribbT. J.CochardH.DelzonS.BhaskarR.et al. (2012). Global convergence in the vulnerability of forests to drought. Nature491, 752–755. doi: 10.1038/nature11688
9
ChoatB.BrodribbT. J.BrodersenC. R.DuursmaR. A.LopezR.MedlynB. E. (2018). Triggers of tree mortality under drought. Nature558, 531–539. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0240-x
10
ComstockJ.MencucciniM. (1998). Control of stomatal conductance by leaf water potential in Hymenoclea salsola (T. & G.), a desert subshrub. Plant Cell Environ.21, 1029–1038. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00353.x
11
ComstockJ. (2002). Hydraulic and chemical signalling in the control of stomatal conductance and transpiration. J. Exp. Bot.53, 195–200. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/53.367.195
12
DangQ. L.MargolisH. A.CoyeaM. R.SyM.CollatzG. J. (1997). Regulation of branch-level gas exchange of boreal trees: roles of shoot water potential and vapor pressure difference. Tree Physiol.17, 521–535. doi: 10.1093/treephys/17.8-9.521
13
DangQ. (2013). Improving the quality and reliability of gas exchange measurements. J. Plant Physiol. Pathol.1, 2. doi: 10.4172/jppp.1000e101
14
EwersB.OrenR.SperryJ. (2000). Influence of nutrient versus water supply on hydraulic architecture and water balance in Pinus taeda. Plant Cell Environ.23, 1055–1066. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00625.x
15
FanD. Y.ZhangS. R.YanH.WuQ.XuX. W.WangX. P. (2018). Do karst woody plants control xylem tension to avoid substantial xylem cavitation in the wet season? For. Ecosyst5, 40–50. doi: 10.1186/s40663-018-0158-7
16
FichotR.BrignolasF.CochardH.CeulemansR. (2015). Vulnerability to drought-induced cavitation in poplars: synthesis and future opportunities. Plant Cell Environ.38, 1233–1251. doi: 10.1111/pce.12491
17
GleasonS. M.WestobyM.JansenS.ChoatB.HackeU. G.PrattR. B.et al. (2016). Weak tradeoff between xylem safety and xylem-specific hydraulic efficiency across the world’s woody plant species. New Phytol.209, 123–136. doi: 10.1111/nph.13646
18
GriesD.ZengF.FoetzkiA.ArndtS. K.BruelheideH.ThomasF. M.et al. (2003). Growth and water relations of Tamarix ramosissima and Populus euphratica on Taklamakan desert dunes in relation to depth to a permanent water table. Plant Cell Environ.26, 725–736. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01009.x
19
HackeU. G.SperryJ. S.PockmanW. T.DavisS. D.MccullohK. A. (2001). Trends in wood density and structure are linked to prevention of xylem implosion by negative pressure. Oecologia. 126, 457–461. doi: 10.1007/s004420100628
20
HackeU. G. (2015). “The hydraulic architecture of Populus,” in Functional and ecological xylem anatomy (Cham: Springer), 103–131.
21
HölttäT.JuurolaE.LindforsL.Porcar-CastellA. (2011). Cavitation induced by a surfactant leads to a transient release of water stress and subsequent ‘run away’embolism in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings. J. Exp. Bot.63, 1057–1067. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err349
22
HukinD.CochardH.DreyerE.Le ThiecD.Bogeat-TriboulotM. B. (2005). Cavitation vulnerability in roots and shoots: does Populus euphratica Oliv., a poplar from arid areas of Central Asia, differ from other poplar species? J. Exp. Bot.56, 2003–2010. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri198
23
JacobsenA. L.PrattR. B.DavisS. D.EwersF. W. (2007). Cavitation resistance and seasonal hydraulics differ among three arid Californian plant communities. Plant Cell Environ.30, 1599–1609. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01729.x
24
JohnsonD. M.MeinzerF. C.WoodruffD. R.MccullohK. A. (2009a). Leaf xylem embolism, detected acoustically and by cryo-SEM, corresponds to decreases in leaf hydraulic conductance in four evergreen species. Plant Cell Environ.32, 828–836. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01961.x
25
JohnsonD. M.WoodruffD. R.MccullohK. A.MeinzerF. C. (2009b). Leaf hydraulic conductance, measured in situ, declines and recovers daily: leaf hydraulics, water potential and stomatal conductance in four temperate and three tropical tree species. Tree Physiol.29, 879–887. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpp031
26
KavanaghK. L.PangleR.SchotzkoA. D. (2007). Nocturnal transpiration causing disequilibrium between soil and stem predawn water potential in mixed conifer forests of Idaho. Tree Physiol.27, 621–629. doi: 10.1093/treephys/27.4.621
27
KikutaS.Lo GulloM.NardiniA.RichterH.SalleoS. (1997). Ultrasound acoustic emissions from dehydrating leaves of deciduous and evergreen trees. Plant Cell Environ.20, 1381–1390. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-34.x
28
LandsbergJ.WaringR.RyanM. (2017). Water relations in tree physiology: where to from here? Tree Physiol.37, 18–32. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpw102
29
LaurJ.HackeU. G. (2014). The role of water channel proteins in facilitating recovery of leaf hydraulic conductance from water stress in Populus trichocarpa. PloS One9, e111751. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111751
30
Macinnis-NgC.McclenahanK.EamusD. (2004). Convergence in hydraulic architecture, water relations and primary productivity amongst habitats and across seasons in Sydney. Funct. Plant Biol.31, 429–439. doi: 10.1071/FP03194
31
MaheraliH.PockmanW. T.JacksonR. B. (2004). Adaptive variation in the vulnerability of woody plants to xylem cavitation. Ecology85, 2184–2199. doi: 10.1890/02-0538
32
McdowellN. G. (2011). Mechanisms Linking Drought, Hydraulics, Carbon Metabolism, and Vegetation Mortality. Plant Physiol.155, 1051–1059. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.170704
33
NavarroA.Portillo-EstradaM.ArrigaN.VanbeverenS. P.CeulemansR. (2018). Genotypic variation in transpiration of coppiced poplar during the third rotation of a short-rotation bio-energy culture. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy.10, 592–607. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12526
34
OrenR.SperryJ.KatulG.PatakiD.EwersB.PhillipsN.et al. (1999). Survey and synthesis of intra-and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. Plant Cell Environ.22, 1515–1526. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00513.x
35
PammenterN. W.Vander WilligenC. (1998). A mathematical and statistical analysis of the curves illustrating vulnerability of xylem to cavitation. Tree Physiol.18, 589–593. doi: 10.1093/treephys/18.8-9.589
36
PockmanW. T.SperryJ. S. (2000). Vulnerability to xylem cavitation and the distribution of Sonoran Desert vegetation. Am. J. Bot.87, 1287–1299. doi: 10.2307/2656722
37
QuX.CaoB.KangJ.WangX.HanX.JiangW.et al. (2019). Fine-tuning stomatal movement through small signaling peptides. Front. Plant Sci.10, 69. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00069
38
R Development CoreT (2017). A language and environment for statistical computing (Vienna: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing).
39
SaliendraN. Z.SperryJ. S.ComstockJ. P. (1995). Influence of leaf water status on stomatal response to humidity, hydraulic conductance, and soil drought in Betula occidentalis. Planta196, 357–366. doi: 10.1007/BF00201396
40
ScholanderP. F.BradstreetE. D.HemmingsenE. A.HammelH. T. (1965). Sap Pressure in Vascular Plants: Negative hydrostatic pressure can be measured in plants. Science148, 339–346. doi: 10.1126/science.148.3668.339
41
ScoffoniC.AlbuquerqueC.BrodersenC. R.TownesS. V.JohnG. P.BartlettM. K.et al. (2017). Outside-Xylem Vulnerability, Not Xylem Embolism, Controls Leaf Hydraulic Decline during Dehydration. Plant Physiol.173, 1197–1210. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01643
42
SperryJ.SaliendraN. (1994). Intra-and inter-plant variation in xylem cavitation in Betula occidentalis. Plant Cell Environ.17, 1233–1241. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb02021.x
43
SperryJ. S.SullivanJ. E. (1992). Xylem embolism in response to freeze-thaw cycles and water stress in ring-porous, diffuse-porous, and conifer species. Plant Physiol.100, 605–613. doi: 10.1104/pp.100.2.605
44
SperryJ. S. (1995). “Limitations on stem water transport and their consequences”, in Plant stems. Physiology and functional morphology. Ed. GartnerB. L. (San Diego: Academic Press), pp. 105–121.
45
TardieuF.SimonneauT. (1998). Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: modelling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. J. Exp. Bot.49, 419–432. doi: 10.1093/jxb/49.Special_Issue.419
46
ThomasF. M.ArndtS. K.BruelheideH.FoetzkiA.GriesD.HuangJ.et al. (2000). Ecological basis for a sustainable management of the indigenous vegetation in a Central-Asian desert: presentation and first results. J. Appl. Bot.74, 212–219.
47
ThomasF. M.FoetzkiA.GriesD.BruelheideH.LiX. Y.ZengF. J.et al. (2008). Regulation of the water status in three co-occurring phreatophytes at the southern fringe of the Taklamakan Desert. J. Plant Ecol.1, 227–235. doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtn023
48
Torres-RuizJ. M. (2020). Virtual issue on Plant hydraulics: update on the recent discoveries. Physiol. Plant.168, 758–761. doi: 10.1111/ppl.13081
49
TyreeM. T.SperryJ. S. (1988). Do woody plants operate near the point of catastrophic xylem dysfunction caused by dynamic water stress? : answers from a model. Plant Physiol.88, 574–580. doi: 10.1104/pp.88.3.574
50
VolaireF. (2018). A unified framework of plant adaptive strategies to drought: Crossing scales and disciplines. Global Change Biol.24, 2929–2938. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14062
51
WayD. A.DomecJ. C.JacksonR. B. (2013). Elevated growth temperatures alter hydraulic characteristics in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) seedlings: implications for tree drought tolerance. Plant Cell Environ.36, 103–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02557.x
52
WheelerJ. K.HuggettB. A.TofteA. N.RockwellF. E.HolbrookN. M. (2013). Cutting xylem under tension or supersaturated with gas can generate PLC and the appearance of rapid recovery from embolism. Plant Cell Environ.36, 1938–1949. doi: 10.1111/pce.12139
53
WoodruffD. R.MccullohK. A.WarrenJ. M.MeinzerF. C.LachenbruchB. (2007). Impacts of tree height on leaf hydraulic architecture and stomatal control in Douglas-fir. Plant Cell Environ.30, 559–569. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01652.x
54
WuJ.ZhangX.DengC.LiuG.LiH. (2010). Characteristics and dynamics analysis of Populus euphratica populations in the middle reaches of Tarim River. J. Arid. Land.2, 250–256. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1148.2010.00242
55
YuT.FengQ.SiJ.PinkardE. A. (2019). Coordination of stomatal control and stem water storage on plant water use in desert riparian trees. Trees33, 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s00468-019-01816-7
56
ZhangY. J.RockwellF. E.GrahamA. C.AlexanderT.HolbrookN. M. (2016). Reversible Leaf Xylem Collapse: A Potential “Circuit Breaker” against Cavitation. Plant Physiol.172, 2261–2274. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01191
57
ZhouH.ChenY.LiW.AyupM. (2013). Xylem hydraulic conductivity and embolism in riparian plants and their responses to drought stress in desert of Northwest China. Ecohydrology6, 984–993. doi: 10.1002/eco.1412
58
ZhouX. (1993). “Features of the deserts and changes in the desert surrounding in Xinjiang,” in Desertification Control of Blown Sand Disasters in Xinjiang (Beijing: Science Press), 1–63.
Summary
Keywords
hydraulic model, xylem cavitation, leaf specific hydraulic conductance, stomatal conductance, water homeostasis
Citation
Fan D-Y, Dang Q-L, Xu C-Y, Jiang C-D, Zhang W-F, Xu X-W, Yang X-F and Zhang S-R (2020) Stomatal Sensitivity to Vapor Pressure Deficit and the Loss of Hydraulic Conductivity Are Coordinated in Populus euphratica, a Desert Phreatophyte Species. Front. Plant Sci. 11:1248. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01248
Received
23 April 2020
Accepted
29 July 2020
Published
14 August 2020
Volume
11 - 2020
Edited by
Virginia Hernandez-Santana, Institute of Natural Resources and Agrobiology of Seville (CSIC), Spain
Reviewed by
Alejandra Navarro, Council for Agricultural and Economics Research (CREA), Italy; Dirk Vanderklein, Montclair State University, United States
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2020 Fan, Dang, Xu, Jiang, Zhang, Xu, Yang and Zhang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Da-Yong Fan, dayong.fan@anu.edu.au; Shou-Ren Zhang, zsr@ibcas.ac.cn
This article was submitted to Plant Abiotic Stress, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.