Abstract
Lutein, made by the α-branch of the methyl-erythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway, is one of the most abundant xanthophylls in plants. It is involved in the structural stabilization of light-harvesting complexes, transfer of excitation energy to chlorophylls and photoprotection. In contrast, lutein and the α-branch of the MEP pathway are not present in cyanobacteria. In this study, we genetically engineered the cyanobacterium Synechocystis for the missing MEP α-branch resulting in lutein accumulation. A cassette comprising four Arabidopsis thaliana genes coding for two lycopene cyclases (AtLCYe and AtLCYb) and two hydroxylases (AtCYP97A and AtCYP97C) was introduced into a Synechocystis strain that lacks the endogenous, cyanobacterial lycopene cyclase cruA. The resulting synlut strain showed wild-type growth and only moderate changes in total pigment composition under mixotrophic conditions, indicating that the cruA deficiency can be complemented by Arabidopsis lycopene cyclases leaving the endogenous β-branch intact. A combination of liquid chromatography, UV-Vis detection and mass spectrometry confirmed a low but distinct synthesis of lutein at rates of 4.8 ± 1.5 nmol per liter culture at OD730 (1.03 ± 0.47 mmol mol–1 chlorophyll). In conclusion, synlut provides a suitable platform to study the α-branch of the plastidic MEP pathway and other functions related to lutein in a cyanobacterial host system.
Introduction
Carotenoids consist of unbranched hydrocarbon chains, which are terminated by ionone rings. They are found in photosynthetic organisms, as well as in some non-photosynthetic bacteria and fungi (). They are directly involved in photosynthesis and photoprotection, and serve as precursors for the synthesis of certain hormones. Moreover, large-scale industrial production of carotenoids for use as food colorants, additives and antioxidants is of considerable commercial interest ().
Carotenoids are derived from the isoprenoid biosynthetic pathways. The mevalonate (MEV) pathway takes place in the cytosol of plant cells, while the methyl-erythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway is localized in plastids (). The first step in the carotenoid pathway per se is the synthesis of phytoene, which is then converted via several desaturation steps into lycopene, the branch-point for the generation of all other carotenoids (Figure 1A; ; ). In principle, plants and cyanobacteria share the same lycopene synthesis pathway, but they differ in the subsequent cyclization steps (; ). The enzymes that create the rings at the ends of the hydrocarbon chain belong to the lycopene cyclase family (LCYs). Subsequently, cytochrome P450 (CYPs) and non-heme di-iron (HYD) enzymes are required for xanthophyll generation. In cyanobacteria, the MEP pathway is the sole pathway available for carotenoid formation (). Cyanobacteria produce mainly β-carotene, zeaxanthin and the cyanobacterium-specific xanthophylls myxol glycosides (hereafter referred to as myxoxanthophyll) and echinenone (). In 2008, a new additional carotenoid – synechoxanthin - was found in Synechococcus and Synechocystis (; ). However, Synechocystis lack the plant α-branch of the MEP pathway and the xanthophylls lutein, violaxanthin and neoxanthin (; ). A more detailed overview of the carotenoid biosynthesis pathway in cyanobacteria is given elsewhere (; ).
FIGURE 1
Lutein is the most abundant xanthophyll in plants, and is essential for stabilization of the light-harvesting complexes (LHC), transfer of excitation energy to chlorophylls and photoprotection of photosystem II (PSII) (). Lutein is also employed as a food colorant and its antioxidant properties have been investigated in several studies for their therapeutic potential in cardiovascular disease (), atherosclerosis () and age-related macular degeneration (). Marigold flowers are currently the major commercial source of lutein. However, recent studies have shown that microalgae have the potential to increase lutein productivity significantly, because they outperform higher plants in terms of growth rates and do not require cropland for their cultivation (; ).
In this work, the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 (Synechocystis) was genetically engineered for the missing MEP α-branch and finally the production of the plant-specific xanthophyll lutein. Cao and co-workers have already shown that Synechocystis cells can be modified to produce lutein by interruption of the echinenone synthesis pathway and introduction of the two Arabidopsis enzymes lycopene cyclase LCYe (AtLUT2) and hydroxylase CYP97C (AtLUT1) (). Here we describe a different approach, with the aim of introducing the entire MEP α-branch of higher plants into Synechocystis in the presence of an intact β-branch to have minimal impact on native carotenoid composition and growth performance. We demonstrate in the present study that, following the introduction of four enzymes from higher plants, Synechocystis is able to produce detectable amounts of lutein without dramatically altering the endogenous carotenoid composition. Such strain with ideally more enhanced lutein levels may provide a suitable cellular chassis for studying lutein-associated processes, such as the assembly of plant-type LHCs and other carotenoid-binding proteins.
Materials and Methods
Growth Conditions
Escherichia coli strains DH5α and TOP10 were grown at 37°C in lysogeny broth (LB) medium under continuous shaking at 225 rpm. The pAC-LYC () and the pAC-LYC/pKS-LUT strains were grown at 30°C in LB medium supplemented with 34 μg mL–1 chloramphenicol and 100 μg mL–1 kanamycin (pAC-LYC/pKS-LUT only).
A glucose-tolerant strain of Synechocystis (GT, H. Pakrasi, Department of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis) was chosen as the WT control. Unless otherwise stated, all strains were grown in blue-green-11 (BG-11) medium containing 5 mM glucose at 23°C under continuous illumination at 30 μmol photons m–2 s–1 (). Solid medium contained BG11 supplemented with 1.5% agar (w/v), 0.3% (w/v) sodium thiosulfate, and was buffered with 10 mM TES-KOH (pH 8.0). Cell growth was monitored with a UV-VIS spectrophotometer by recording the optical density (OD) at 730 nm. In general, cultures used for pigment extraction were grown in triplicate at 23°C under 30 μmol photons m–2 s–1, and adjusted to an OD of 0.8 at 730 nm before extraction. Cultures for lutein quantification were grown at 30°C under 100 μmol photons m–2 s–1 to a higher OD of 1.5 at 730 nm to increase lutein amounts.
Vector Generation
For lutein synthesis in Synechocystis, a plasmid carrying four Arabidopsis genes (AtLCYe: ε-cyclase, AT5G57030; AtLCYb: β-cyclase, AT5G57030; AtCYP97A: β-hydroxylase, AT1G31800; AtCYP97C: ε-hydroxylase, AT3G53130), together with the homologous flanking regions (HR1, HR2), two different promoters (Pro1, psbA2 derived and Pro2, rbcL derived), four different terminators (Ter1 and Ter2, slr0012 derived, Ter3, sll1389 derived and Ter4, slr1311 derived) and the double selection cassette (kanamycin resistance [nptI], sucrose sensitivity [sacB]) was generated (Figure 1B). Gateway cloning was used for its assembly (). The nucleotide sequences of the inserted Arabidopsis thaliana genes were adapted for Synechocystis (in terms of codon usage) with the aid of the OptimumGene-Codon Optimization tool1 (Genscript, Piscataway, NJ, United States). The genes were synthesized without the predicted chloroplast-transit peptide sequences () and placed under the control of native promoters (Pro1, psbA2 derived for LCYe and CYP97A3, Pro2, rbcL derived for LCYb and CYP97C1) (; ) and terminator sequences. The genes were cloned into the EcoRV sites of the cloning vector pUC57. The construct was designed to integrate into the neutral region slr0168 (). The two 600-bp flanking regions were amplified from Synechocystis genomic DNA. The double selection cassette was amplified from pRL250 and placed downstream of the genes.
For the generation of the cruA insertion cassette, two 500-bp flanking regions were amplified from genomic DNA, so as to eliminate the complete sll0147 gene from the Synechocystis genome. The spectinomycin resistance gene was amplified from plasmid pICH30971 and placed between the flanking regions using the Golden Gate cloning system (). The primers used are listed in the Supplementary Table 3 and the vector sequence is given in the NCBI BioProject repository: PRJNA731655.
Color Complementation Experiment in E. coli
For functional analysis of the lutein synthesis genes, pKS-LUT was introduced into pAC-LYC-containing E. coli cells that produce lycopene. These cells were first rendered competent and then transformed with the pKS-LUT vector.
Generation of Transgenic Synechocystis
The glucose-tolerant WT Synechocystis strain (see above) was transformed with the plasmid pKS-LUT. Subsequently, segregated transformants were employed to disrupt cruA which resulted in the synlut strain. The strain ΔcruA was created by a deletion of the cruA gene in the same glucose tolerant wild-type strain. Transformation of Synechocystis wild type and mutant strains was performed as described (). Briefly, Synechocystis cells in exponential growth phase were harvested and resuspended in BG11 to a density of 109 cells mL–1. Plasmid DNA (2 μg) was added to the suspension and then incubated for 6 h at 25°C under illumination and (during the last 3 h) agitation. To allow these cells to recover, they were transferred to fresh BG11 and incubated at 28°C overnight in the dark. Then, the cells were harvested, and plated on BG11 agar plates supplemented with the appropriate antibiotic. To achieve complete segregation of the transformed from the starting strain, the antibiotic concentration was steadily increased (up to 100 μg mL–1 spectinomycin for ΔcruA and additionally 100 μg mL–1 kanamycin for synlut). Genomic DNA was isolated by the xanthogenate-SDS method (). To verify correct integration of the constructs into the chromosome, diagnostic PCRs were performed with specific primers (Supplementary Table 3) and genomic DNA from the mutant strains as template.
Whole-Genome Re-Sequencing Analyses
Genomic DNA for whole-genome re-sequencing was extracted from 5 mL of late exponential-phase cultures grown mixotrophically in BG11 supplemented with 5 mM glucose at 23°C under 30 μmol photons m–2 s–1. DNA was extracted using the xanthogenate method (), and DNA integrity was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis and subsequent ethidium bromide staining. Illumina MiSeq genome re-sequencing (5 × 106, 2 × 250 bp paired-end reads) was performed by the in-house sequencing service at the LMU Biocenter. Reads were mapped onto either the Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 WT reference genome (Genbank ID BA000022) or the transformed plasmid, using CLC Genomics Workbench (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands); coverage statistics, sliding-window average coverage scores, and consensus sequences were obtained using Geneious (Geneious Prime 2020.1.1)2.
Reverse Transcription PCR
Cultures of WT and mutant strains were harvested in the exponential growth phase for RNA isolation. Total RNA was extracted using the Trizol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA (1 μg) was reverse-transcribed to cDNA with the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, United States). For normalization of transcript levels, the 16S rRNA abundance was used as control. Transcription of the heterologous expressed genes was checked with specific oligonucleotides, which are listed in the Supplementary Table 3.
Northern Blot Analysis
Northern blot analysis was performed using 5 μg of total RNA. The RNA was fractioned by denaturing agarose gel (1.2%) electrophoresis and blotted onto a nylon membrane (Hybond N+; GE Healthcare, Freiburg, Germany) (). Transcripts were detected with radioactive 32P[dCTP]-labeled probes, which were generated by the random primer method. The probes were amplified from Arabidopsis genomic DNA using the primers listed in the Supplementary Table 3. Signals were detected with a Typhoon scanner (GE Healthcare, Freiburg, Germany).
Pigment Extractions and Analyses
Samples of Synechocystis (1 mL) and E. coli (10 mL) cells used for absorption-spectrum analysis were grown to OD 1 at 730 nm (Synechocystis) or 600 nm (E. coli), and harvested by centrifugation. Total non-polar pigments were extracted using 1 mL of 100% methanol. The samples were incubated on ice for 30 min in the dark, with intermediate vortexing (600 rpm). The extraction procedure was repeated until the cell pellets were colorless in the case of E. coli, and bright blue in the case of Synechocystis (owing to the phycocyanobilin remaining in the precipitated protein fraction). The cell debris was removed by centrifugation and the supernatants were measured in a spectrophotometer (350–800 nm). To quantify the Synechocystis and E. coli pigments, the samples were extracted as described above using 100% acetone The samples were directly subjected to high-performance liquid chromatography analysis, as described by Faber and co-workers (). Pigment peaks of the HPLC runs were annotated using appropriate standards and quantified by their specific extinction coefficient. The standards were purified from Synechocystis extracts by thin-layer chromatography and identified on the basis of their spectra. The HPLC analyses revealed a low-intensity lutein peak with a retention time close to that of zeaxanthin.
To improve lutein detectability and the difference in retention time between the two pigments for absolute quantification, a new chromatographic strategy was employed. First, cultures were grown at higher temperature (30°C) and under higher light intensities (100 μmol photons m–2 s–1) to an OD of 1.5 at 730 nm. Secondly, larger culture volumes (50 mL) were harvested. Thirdly, the extraction, separation, and detection methods were specifically tailored to lutein. In brief, 1.5 mL of 100% methanol was used for overnight extraction in the dark at 4°C, with continuous mild shaking (300 rpm). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation and the supernatant was fractionated on a home-made C18 column (C18 reversed-phase silica gel, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), pre-equilibrated with mixture 1 (acetone/methanol, 40/60 v/v). Elution was performed under gravity flow using mixture 1. The fractions were dried in vacuo on a sample concentrator, and stored at −80°C until analysis. For absolute quantification of lutein, the pellet was dissolved in 100 μL of 100% methanol. The analyses were performed on a Dionex Ultimate 3000 UHPLC including a diode array detector (DAD) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, United States). Furthermore, a timsTOF (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) was used to verify the mass spectrum, fragments, and isotopic pattern. Samples (10 μL) were injected and separated at a flow rate of 500 μL min–1 on a C30 reversed-phase column (Acclaim C30, 3 μm, 2.1 × 150 mm, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, United States) at 15°C. The solvents used were (A) acetonitrile and (B) a mixture of methanol and ethyl acetate (50/50 v/v), both containing 0.1% formic acid. The gradient started with 14.5% B followed by a ramp to 34.5% B within 15 min. The latter was maintained for 10 min, before returning to 14.5% B with additional 5 min of re-equilibration. Lutein was identified using a commercial standard (Extrasynthese, Genay Cedex, France), by retention time, specific m/z values, MS/MS fragmentation and the true isotopic pattern, as well as by the full absorption spectrum of the DAD. For absolute quantification, the lutein standard was spiked into Synechocystis WT sample extracts to create a calibration curve within the natural background. Three different concentrations (100 pM, 1 nM, 10 nM, each 4 replicates) were added to aliquots of the same Synechocystis wild-type culture. A non-spiked Synechocystis wild-type was used to perform baseline subtraction. Using Synechocystis as background for quantification kept potential matrix effects equal between calibrant and sample. Lutein was quantified using the DAD signal at 450 nm. Mass spectrometry was used for lutein identification. Data were acquired by otofControl 4.0 in positive MS mode from the 50–1300 m/z mass range, and evaluated using DataAnalysis 5.0 and MetaboScape 4.0. All software tools were provided by Bruker. In general, three independent biological replicates, grown in parallel in separate culture batches, were used for each analysis.
Results
The Lutein Synthesis Construct
Lutein production under photoautotrophic conditions in Synechocystis requires that endogenous synthesis pathways for essential carotenoids are not significantly impaired. Thus, a four-gene construct was designed (Figure 1B) and assembled into the vector pKS-LUT (NCBI BioProject: PRJNA731655) which provides for homologous recombination into the neutral genomic locus slr0168 (). The step of β-cyclization and β-hydroxylation could be achieved by endogenous CruA and CrtR activity. However, it is known that LCYb is important to sustain LCYe mono-cyclase activity () and ε- and β-hydroxylases require synergistic interaction to form lutein (). Consequently, Arabidopsis genes coding for the ε-cyclase LCYe (At5G57030), β-cyclase LCYb (At3G10230), ε-hydroxylase CYP97C1 (At1G31800), and β-hydroxylase CYP97A3 (At3G53130) were optimized with respect to their codon-usage frequency for use in Synechocystis. For efficient transcription, either psbA2 or rbcL promoter sequences were placed upstream of each of the Arabidopsis genes, omitting ChloroP-predicted () transit peptide sequences (Figure 1B). Important promoter elements – such as the σ70 motif, ribosome-binding and transcription activation sites, and the cis-element in the PpsbA2 promoter that is responsible for light regulation (; ) – were left intact. Finally, the various building blocks were assembled into pKS-LUT using the Golden Gate Shuffling Cloning system, which permits seamless ligation of up to 10 fragments in a single reaction ().
Lutein Synthesis in E. coli
To test whether all four enzymes are functional, pKS-LUT was transformed into a lycopene-accumulating E. coli strain carrying the plasmid pAC-LYC containing the genes for lycopene production (). The change in the color of E. coli cells from red to orange was the first indication of the conversion of lycopene to other carotenoids (Figure 2A), as was confirmed by a shift in the maximum absorption of isolated total pigments from 468 nm in cells bearing pAC-LYC to 448 nm in pAC-LYC/pKS-LUT. To determine the carotenoid compositions of the pAC-LYC and pAC-LYC/pKS-LUT strains, their pigments were extracted and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The E. coli pAC-LYC/pKS-LUT strain accumulated two major pigments (Figure 3B) and comparison of their retention times and absorption spectra with commercial standards proved that these were lutein and β-carotene. (Figures 3B,C). Based on HPLC quantitation, β-carotene (13.8 nmol ml–1) was produced at a considerably higher level than lutein (0.8 nmol ml–1). Together, these results demonstrate that the four enzymes encoded by the cassette present in pKS-LUT were functionally expressed and enabled the production of lutein in E. coli.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
Integration of the Lutein Synthesis Pathway Into Synechocystis
Next, the pKS-LUT cassette was stably integrated by homologous recombination into the neutral site slr0168 in the genome of the wild-type (WT) Synechocystis strain. However, no lutein was detected in HPLC analyses of the pigments isolated from the resulting strain (data not shown). This finding suggested that either one or more of the introduced Arabidopsis enzymes were not sufficiently expressed, their activity too low, or that the endogenous carotenoid pathways effectively outcompeted for the common substrate lycopene. To test this hypothesis, the cruA gene that codes for the endogenous Synechocystis β-cyclase (; ) was disrupted in order to redirect the synthesis pathway away from β-carotene and zeaxanthin toward lutein.
Disruption of the Endogenous Synechocystis β-Cyclase
First, we investigated the effects of β-cyclase disruption in the absence of the engineered lutein synthesis pathway. To this end, we tried to generate a cruA knockout mutant strain (ΔcruA) in the WT background by replacing the sll0147 coding sequence with a spectinomycin resistance-mediating gene (Figure 3A). Successful integration was verified by PCR in the ΔcruA strain (Figure 3B). However, even after selection on high concentrations of spectinomycin (up to 100 μg mL–1), the insertion cassettes of the strain did not segregate completely (Figure 3B). To determine the level of transcription of the β-cyclase gene, RNA gel-blot hybridization analyses were carried out on samples of total RNA isolated from WT and ΔcruA (Figure 3C). Since the expression of sll0147 was indeed significantly reduced in the ΔcruA mutant, it was used as cruA knockdown in subsequent analyses.
To study the effect of β-cyclase disruption on pigment composition, HPLC analyses (Figure 3D) were performed with pigments isolated from ΔcruA knockdown strain as described previously (). Levels of zeaxanthin, echinenone and β-carotene were significantly reduced in ΔcruA (Figures 3D,4D). As expected, lycopene accumulated in ΔcruA, indicating that its conversion to β-carotene was less efficient when the endogenous β-cyclase activity was depressed.
FIGURE 4
cruA Knockout in the Presence of the Lutein Synthesis Pathway Genes
In the next step, a strain with stably integrated pKS-LUT cassette was transformed with the cruA insertion cassette (Figure 3A) and progenies were selected on high concentrations of spectinomycin. The resulting strain was named synlut and subjected to whole genome re-sequencing (Figure 5). Reads were mapped to the Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 WT reference genome with a coverage of 249 ± 62 and an Illumina quality score (>Q20) of 93% (Figure 5A and Table 1). Interestingly, examination of the cruA locus (Figure 5B and Table 1) in synlut revealed that it had been completely lost, as indicated by the absence of corresponding sequence reads. We also verified the genetic integrity of the pKS-LUT cassette and the correct double homologous recombination event into the neutral site slr0168 in synlut. As in the case of the pKS-LUT cassette, complete segregation was observed for the cruA knockout in the neutral region slr0168 (Figure 3C and Table 1) of synlut.
FIGURE 5
TABLE 1
| Locus | MV | SD | >Q20 (in%) |
| whole chromosome | 249 | 62 | 94 |
| cruA (sll0147) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| specR (ΔcruA) | 244 | 61 | 90 |
| slr0168 total | 251 | 118 | 93 |
| slr0168 insertion site | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| pKS-LUT cassette | 273 | 50 | 100 |
Analysis of genetically modified loci in synlut by whole-genome re-sequencing.
Fold per-site coverage mean values (MV) and corresponding standard deviations (SD), as well as percentage of mapped reads with Illumina quality score >20 (Q20; i.e., percentage of reads with an inferred per-site base call accuracy >99%).
Data were obtained by mapping synlut sequencing reads to the Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 wild-type reference genome (BA000022) using CLC Genomics Workbench.
To determine the expression levels of the four Arabidopsis genes encoded by the pKS-LUT cassette, reverse transcription-PCR analyses were performed (Figure 5D). All genes were transcribed and, as expected from the whole genome re-sequencing analyses, no cruA transcripts could be detected in synlut. Moreover, the incomplete segregation of ΔcruA already identified in RNA gel-blot hybridization analyses (Figure 3C) was confirmed by the detection of cruA cDNAs upon increasing the number of PCR cycles performed.
The impact of the cruA knockdown and genetic modifications in synlut on growth performance and pigment composition was then examined in more detail (Figure 4). While synlut showed wild-type-like growth rate, the ΔcruA knockdown did not reach a comparable growth performance (Figure 4A). The doubling time of ΔcruA (13.9 ± 1.2 h) during the exponential growth phase was ∼ 40% longer compared to the WT (9.6 ± 0.8 h) and the restored synlut strain (9.6 ± 0.6 h). UV-Vis spectra of total pigments isolated from both ΔcruA and synlut revealed a lower absorption value at 460 nm compared to wild-type samples, which pointed to a lower carotenoid content in both strains (Figure 4B). Indeed, the molar ratios of total carotenoids to chlorophyll a in ΔcruA (0.424 ± 0.002) and synlut (0.530 ± 0.009) were significantly lower than that of the wild type (0.790 ± 0.001), although levels of chlorophyll a were similar in all genotypes (Figure 4C). Quantification of major carotenoids by HPLC demonstrated that the ΔcruA knockdown produced less zeaxanthin (85 ± 11%), echinenone (82 ± 12%) and β-carotene (61 ± 14%), but more myxoxanthophyll (326 ± 70%) relative to WT samples. In synlut, the zeaxanthin level (100 ± 7%) was equal to that in the ΔcruA strain, but amounts of myxoxanthophyll (70 ± 0.5%) and echinenone (64 ± 6%) were lower (Figure 4D). The restoration of zeaxanthin to WT levels and the increase in β-carotene to 79% (±8%) of WT in synlut indicated that the transgenic Arabidopsis cyclases of the α-branch were able to functionally replace the endogenous Synechocystis β-cyclase of the β-branch. Consequently, full segregation of the cruA knockout could be achieved in the presence of the Arabidopsis enzymes in synlut (Figure 5).
Lutein Quantification in synlut
In order to detect small amounts of lutein in Synechocystis, an optimized pigment extraction and carotenoid separation procedure was developed (Figure 6). First, Synechocystis cells were grown mixotrophically at higher light intensities (100 μmol photons m–2 s–1) to enhance the light-inducible activity of the psbA2 promoters that drive the transgenes AtLCYe and AtCYP97A. Second, crude extracts were pre-fractionated using a home-made C18 column to reduce sample complexity and concentrate carotenoids (Figure 6A). Finally, pigments were run on a UHPLC using a C30 reversed-phase column optimized for the separation of carotenoids, which were detected using a DAD and mass spectrometry. This procedure enabled clear-cut separation of the isomers lutein and zeaxanthin, with a retention time difference of 0.8 min (Figure 6B). However, separation of carotenoid fractions resulted in the identification of three synlut-specific peaks with retention times similar to the lutein standard (Figure 6C). Examination of the absorption spectrum of peak 1, which appeared with the same retention time as the standard (4.2 min), confirmed that this peak indeed contained lutein (Figure 6D). Peak 2 and 3 showed also a carotenoid-like absorption spectrum and could represent isomeric carotenoid forms such as the cis-form of lutein.
FIGURE 6
Furthermore, the lutein standard and synlut carotenoid extracts with a retention time of 4.2 min on the C30 column, were examined in more detail by mass spectroscopy (Figure 7A). As was also observed for the lutein standard, synlut samples contained the radical (M+, 568.4253 m/z) (Figure 7B) and the characteristic water-loss ion of lutein ([M + H-H2O]+, 551.4228 m/z) (Figure 7C), which was also identified in an earlier study (). Accordingly, lutein is produced by synlut, at rates equivalent to 4.8 ± 1.5 nmol per liter culture at OD730 (1.04 ± 0.47 mmol mol–1 chlorophyll), which corresponds to 0.5 ± 0.3% of the zeaxanthin or 0.145 ± 0.002% of the total carotenoid level in the strain.
FIGURE 7
Discussion
In the present study, a metabolic bifurcation was successfully introduced into the carotenoid synthesis pathway of Synechocystis. A set of four Arabidopsis enzymes (Figure 1B) encoded by the stably integrated genetic cassette pKS-LUT was able to divert metabolic fluxes through the introduced MEP α-branch toward lutein. The major challenge in this work was to balance lutein production with endogenous pigment synthesis, since the newly introduced pathway must compete with endogenous reactions for the common substrate lycopene. In addition, parallel synthesis of lutein and endogenous pigments requires tight coordination between ε- and β-cyclization of the ionone rings in lycopene. These problems are clearly illustrated by our failure to produce lutein following transformation of the pKS-LUT cassette into the Synechocystis WT background, while the presence of the same cassette in pAC-LYC-containing E. coli cells led directly to lutein synthesis (Figure 3).
Competing Pathways Lead to Moderate Lutein Levels but Unimpaired Growth
Since a cruA knockout mutant of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 accumulates substantial amounts of lycopene (; ), we modulated the endogenous lycopene β-cyclase activity to promote lutein synthesis. However, in contrast to Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 (), full segregation of the cruA knockout could not be achieved in Synechocystis (Figure 3). Presumably, intact copies of cruA had to be retained and a complete knockout may not be viable even under heterotrophic conditions, since endogenous carotenoids are required to structure the cell wall of Synechocystis, to organize the thylakoid membranes and to serve as a defense against reactive oxygen species (ROS) (; ). Nevertheless, in line with observations in Synechococcus, the cruA knockdown of Synechocystis grew more slowly and accumulated less zeaxanthin and β-carotene, but produced more lycopene (Figure 3D). Thus, these data provide further evidence that cruA (sll0147) encodes the lycopene β-cyclase in Synechocystis. In contrast, for the paralog CruP no β-cyclase activity could be proven (Figure 1A; ; ). Rather, CruP seems to be involved in ROS scavenging processes (). Thus, CruP cannot complement the β-cyclase activity of CruA in Synechocystis. Remarkably, the transgenic Arabidopsis cyclases could replace the β-cyclase activity of CruA and led to full segregation of the cruA knockout in synlut (Figure 5). This finding is an important prerequisite for metabolic engineering of the critical branch point in carotenoid biosynthesis.
Interestingly, the myxoxanthophyll content in the cruA knockdown strain increased compared to the WT (326 ± 70%), while other carotenoid levels of the β-branch decreased (Figure 3D). The higher myxoxanthophyll level could be attributed to unbalanced fluxes at the γ-carotene branch point (Figure 1A). Since both, myxoxanthophyll and β-carotene synthesis compete for the γ-carotene pool, a reduced β-cyclase activity could lead to a diversion of fluxes toward the unaltered myxoxanthophyll synthesis pathway in cruA. Alternative explanations for the high myxoxanthophyll levels in cruA might be that other, unknown enzymes synthesize lycopene to γ-carotene without further β-carotene generation or convert lycopene directly to myxoxanthophyll as indicated by Zhang and co-workers ().
Lutein could only be detected in Synechocystis after knocking out cruA in the presence of the introduced MEP α-branch. Conversely, lutein could not be detected in the simultaneous presence of cruA and the transgenic MEP α-branch. This indicates that the low level of lutein in synlut is not simply due to too low expression level or low activity of the introduced enzymes. It is more likely an effect of metabolic competition for lycopene by the transgenic α- or the endogenous β-branch of the carotenoid biosynthesis.
synlut as Cellular Chassis
Besides its economic potential, synlut can also serve as a photoautotrophic platform for the investigation of lutein-associated processes. Lutein is a structural component of the light-harvesting complexes (LHCs), and acts as an accessory pigment, which extends the absorption spectra of chlorophylls in land plants (; ). Lutein is required for LHC assembly and interacts with chlorophyll a () and, according to a previous study, LHCII from plants can be assembled in cyanobacteria and stabilized after exogenous pigment addition (). The introduction of plant pigments into cyanobacteria could provide an opportunity to study the formation of membrane-integral LHCs in genetic and adaptive laboratory approaches by taking advantage of a prokaryotic expression system (). All attempts to use synlut as a cellular chassis to modify pigment profiles and photosynthesis ideally require the absence of detrimental phenotypic effects. Previously, induced the production of lutein and other non-cyanobacterial carotenoids in Synechocystis by replacing the endogenous CrtO (Slr0088), encoding the β-carotene ketolase for echinenone production, with various exogenous genes. They employed the endogenous Synechocystis gene expression machinery to overcome problems such as suppressed expression rates and preferential utilization of certain precursor metabolites during metabolic channeling. They produced lutein in an echinenone-deficient Synechocystis background co-expressing only two Arabidopsis genes (LCYe/AtLUT2, CYP97C/AtLUT1) and demonstrated the functional collaboration of the endogenous Synechocystis enzymes CruA/CruP and CrtR with exogenous AtLUT1 and AtLUT2. Thus, introduction of LCYb and CYP97A is not essential for lutein synthesis in Synechocystis and might even lead to unwanted by-products (Figure 6C). However, the absence of echinenone in Synechocystis can result in suppression of the de novo synthesis of various proteins, and provoke singlet oxygen production by impaired thermal dissipation (). This might trigger severe growth effects under certain conditions. Our lutein-producing strain synlut shows no alterations in growth phenotype, in contrast to ΔcruA, in which the synthesis of native carotenoids was partially suppressed (Figure 4A). This indicates that the full spectrum of native Synechocystis carotenoids is required to avoid deleterious effects on growth and fitness.
Strategies to Enhance the Lutein Content
Even though we were able to demonstrate lutein synthesis, yields were low relative to zeaxanthin in synlut (Figure 6). One reason for this might be that the complementation of CruA by the Arabidopsis β-cyclase supports both the α- and β-branches of the MEP pathway (). In fact, the Arabidopsis β-cyclase can produce β-carotene in E. coli (Figure 2), in contrast to CruA that requires chlorophyll to be functional and therefore could not synthesize β-carotene from lycopene in E. coli (). Another reason might be an imbalance between the activities of the transgenic Arabidopsis ε- and β-cyclases. The fact that more β-carotene than lutein was produced in pAC-LYC/pKS-LUT-bearing E. coli cells supports this explanation (Figure 2). Indeed, the Arabidopsis β-cyclase is a bicyclase, and the two β-cyclization steps for β-carotene synthesis might be more efficient than α-carotene formation, which requires two different enzymes for ε- and β-cyclization. Consequently, enhancing lycopene ε-cyclization activity and subsequent α-carotene formation might be a promising strategy for the moderate enhancement of lutein production in synlut.
It has been shown that a fusion protein from Ostreococcus lucimarinus simultaneously catalyzes formation of α- and β-carotene, and their stoichiometry could be modulated by C-terminal truncations of a light-harvesting domain in the fusion cyclase (). Therefore, in addition to adjusting the expression rates of the two Arabidopsis cyclases by means of different or inducible promoters, the use of truncated versions of the fusion cyclase from Ostreococcus lucimarinus or lycopene ε-cyclases from other organisms with higher activity () presents further options for improving lutein production in Synechocystis. The synlut strain also represents a good starting point for the application of established strategies in metabolic engineering () with a view to obtaining economically viable titers of lutein. These include engineering of the carotenoid precursor pathway (; ), downregulation of alternative pigment synthesis routes () and adaptive laboratory evolution approaches ().
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA731655, accession number: PRJNA731655.
Author contributions
ML, EV, DL, and TR conceptualized the project. ML, EV, AT, DL, and TR wrote the manuscript. ML, EV, AT, PJ, MD, LR, and AA performed the experiments. ML and TR made the figures. All authors discussed the results and approved the manuscript.
Funding
This work was financially supported by the ERC synergy project “PhotoRedesign” and the GRK2062 “Molecular Principles of Synthetic Biology”.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Peter Wolk (MSU-DOE Plant Research Laboratory Michigan State University, United States) for providing vector pRL250, Sylvestre Marillonnet and Ernst Weber (Icon Genetics GmbH, Halle, Germany) for providing vector pICH30791, and Francis Cunningham for providing vector pAC-LYC. We also thank the European Research Council (ERC SyG project PhotoRedesign) for funding and Paul Hardy for critical reading the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.699424/full#supplementary-material
References
1
BaiL.KimE. H.DellaPennaD.BrutnellT. P. (2009). Novel lycopene epsilon cyclase activities in maize revealed through perturbation of carotenoid biosynthesis.Plant J.59588–599. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03899.x
2
BarrosT.KühlbrandtW. (2009). Crystallisation, structure and function of plant light-harvesting complex II.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1787753–772. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.03.012
3
BlattA.BauchM. E.PörschkeY.LohrM. (2015). A lycopene β-cyclase/lycopene ε-cyclase/light-harvesting complex-fusion protein from the green alga Ostreococcus lucimarinus can be modified to produce α-carotene and β-carotene at different ratios.Plant J.82582–595. 10.1111/tpj.12826
4
BradburyL. M.ShumskayaM.TzfadiaO.WuS. B.KennellyE. J.WurtzelE. T. (2012). Lycopene cyclase paralog CruP protects against reactive oxygen species in oxygenic photosynthetic organisms.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.109E1888–E1897. 10.1073/pnas.1206002109
5
BreitenbachJ.GerjetsT.SandmannG. (2013). Catalytic properties and reaction mechanism of the CrtO carotenoid ketolase from the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803.Arch. Biochem. Biophys.52986–91. 10.1016/j.abb.2012.11.003
6
CaoT. J.WangL. J.HuangX. Q.DengY. Y.YangL. E.LuS. (2020). Manipulation of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 as a platform for functional identification of genes involved in carotenoid metabolism.Plant Biotechnol. J.18605–607. 10.1111/pbi.13245
7
ChopraM.ThurnhamD. I. (1999). Antioxidants and lipoprotein metabolism.Proc. Nutr. Soc.58663–671. 10.1017/s0029665199000865
8
CroceR.WeissS.BassiR. (1999). Carotenoid-binding sites of the major light-harvesting complex II of higher plants.J. Biol. Chem.27429613–29623. 10.1074/jbc.274.42.29613
9
CunninghamF. X.Jr.GanttE. (2001). One ring or two? Determination of ring number in carotenoids by lycopene epsilon-cyclases.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.982905–2910. 10.1073/pnas.051618398
10
CunninghamF. X.Jr.PogsonB.SunZ.McDonaldK. A.DellaPennaD. (1996). Functional analysis of the beta and epsilon lycopene cyclase enzymes of Arabidopsis reveals a mechanism for control of cyclic carotenoid formation.Plant Cell81613–1626. 10.1105/tpc.8.9.1613
11
CunninghamF. X.Jr.SunZ.ChamovitzD.HirschbergJ.GanttE. (1994). Molecular structure and enzymatic function of lycopene cyclase from the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp strain PCC7942.Plant Cell61107–1121. 10.1105/tpc.6.8.1107
12
DannM.LeisterD. (2017). Enhancing (crop) plant photosynthesis by introducing novel genetic diversity.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.372:1730. 10.1098/rstb.2016.0380
13
DomonkosI.KisM.GombosZ.UghyB. (2013). Carotenoids, versatile components of oxygenic photosynthesis.Prog. Lipid Res.52539–561. 10.1016/j.plipres.2013.07.001
14
DwyerJ. H.NavabM.DwyerK. M.HassanK.SunP.ShircoreA.et al (2001). Oxygenated carotenoid lutein and progression of early atherosclerosis: the Los Angeles atherosclerosis study.Circulation1032922–2927. 10.1161/01.cir.103.24.2922
15
EmanuelssonO.NielsenH.von HeijneG. (1999). ChloroP, a neural network-based method for predicting chloroplast transit peptides and their cleavage sites.Protein Sci.8978–984. 10.1110/ps.8.5.978
16
EnglerC.GruetznerR.KandziaR.MarillonnetS. (2009). Golden gate shuffling: a one-pot DNA shuffling method based on type IIs restriction enzymes.PLoS One4:e5553. 10.1371/journal.pone.0005553
17
FarberA.YoungA. J.RubanA. V.HortonP.JahnsP. (1997). Dynamics of xanthophyll-cycle activity in different antenna subcomplexes in the photosynthetic membranes of higher plants (the relationship between zeaxanthin conversion and nonphotochemical fluorescence quenching).Plant Physiol.1151609–1618. 10.1104/pp.115.4.1609
18
FuW.MagnúsdóttirM.BrynjólfsonS.PalssonB.PagliaG. (2012). UPLC-UV-MS(E) analysis for quantification and identification of major carotenoid and chlorophyll species in algae.Anal. Bioanal. Chem.4043145–3154. 10.1007/s00216-012-6434-4
19
Goodwin (1980). The Biochemistry of the Carotenoids.Berlin: Springer.
20
GrahamJ. E.LecomteJ. T.BryantD. A. (2008). Synechoxanthin, an aromatic C40 xanthophyll that is a major carotenoid in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002.J Nat Prod711647–1650. 10.1021/np800310b
21
HeQ.SchlichT.PaulsenH.VermaasW. (1999). Expression of a higher plant light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding protein in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803.Eur. J. Biochem.263561–570. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00526.x
22
JahnsP.HolzwarthA. R. (2012). The role of the xanthophyll cycle and of lutein in photoprotection of photosystem II.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1817182–193. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2011.04.012
23
KellyJ. R.RubinA. J.DavisJ. H.Ajo-FranklinC. M.CumbersJ.CzarM. J.et al (2009). Measuring the activity of BioBrick promoters using an in vivo reference standard.J. Biol. Eng.3:4. 10.1186/1754-1611-3-4
24
KunertA.HagemannM.ErdmannN. (2000). Construction of promoter probe vectors for Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 using the light-emitting reporter systems Gfp and LuxAB.J. Microbiol. Methods41185–194. 10.1016/s0167-7012(00)00162-7
25
KusamaY.InoueS.JimboH.TakaichiS.SonoikeK.HiharaY.et al (2015). Zeaxanthin and echinenone protect the repair of photosystem II from inhibition by singlet oxygen in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803.Plant Cell Physiol.56906–916. 10.1093/pcp/pcv018
26
LauN. S.MatsuiM.AbdullahA. A. (2015). Cyanobacteria: photoautotrophic microbial factories for the sustainable synthesis of industrial products.Biomed. Res. Int.2015:754934. 10.1155/2015/754934
27
LichtenthalerH. K.SchwenderJ.DischA.RohmerM. (1997). Biosynthesis of isoprenoids in higher plant chloroplasts proceeds via a mevalonate-independent pathway.FEBS Lett.400271–274. 10.1016/s0014-5793(96)01404-4
28
LinJ. H.LeeD. J.ChangJ. S. (2015). Lutein production from biomass: marigold flowers versus microalgae.Bioresour. Technol.184421–428. 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.099
29
LinP. C.PakrasiH. B. (2019). Engineering cyanobacteria for production of terpenoids.Planta249145–154. 10.1007/s00425-018-3047-y
30
LiuZ.YanH.WangK.KuangT.ZhangJ.GuiL.et al (2004). Crystal structure of spinach major light-harvesting complex at 2.72 A resolution.Nature428287–292. 10.1038/nature02373
31
MarescaJ. A.GrahamJ. E.BryantD. A. (2008). The biochemical basis for structural diversity in the carotenoids of chlorophototrophic bacteria.Photosynth. Res.97121–140. 10.1007/s11120-008-9312-3
32
MarescaJ. A.GrahamJ. E.WuM.EisenJ. A.BryantD. A. (2007). Identification of a fourth family of lycopene cyclases in photosynthetic bacteria.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10411784–11789. 10.1073/pnas.0702984104
33
MeninB.SantabarbaraS.LamiA.MusazziS.Villafiorita MonteleoneF.CasazzaA. P. (2019). Non-endogenous ketocarotenoid accumulation in engineered Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803.Physiol Plant166403–412. 10.1111/ppl.12900
34
MohamedA.ErikssonJ.OsiewaczH. D.JanssonC. (1993). Differential expression of the psbA genes in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis 6803.Mol. Gen. Genet.238161–168. 10.1007/bf00279543
35
MohamedH. E.van de MeeneA. M.RobersonR. W.VermaasW. F. (2005). Myxoxanthophyll is required for normal cell wall structure and thylakoid organization in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803.J. Bacteriol.1876883–6892. 10.1128/jb.187.20.6883-6892.2005
36
Paniagua-MichelJ.Olmos-SotoJ.RuizM. A. (2012). Pathways of carotenoid biosynthesis in bacteria and microalgae.Methods Mol. Biol.8921–12. 10.1007/978-1-61779-879-5_1
37
PattanaikB.LindbergP. (2015). Terpenoids and their biosynthesis in cyanobacteria.Life5269–293. 10.3390/life5010269
38
QuinlanR. F.ShumskayaM.BradburyL. M.BeltránJ.MaC.KennellyE. J.et al (2012). Synergistic interactions between carotene ring hydroxylases drive lutein formation in plant carotenoid biosynthesis.Plant Physiol.160204–214. 10.1104/pp.112.198556
39
RippkaR.DeruellesJ.WaterburyJ. B.HerdmanM.StanierR. Y. (1979). Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria.J. Gen. Microbiol.21–61. 10.1099/00221287-111-1-1
40
SambrookJ.RusselD. W. (2001). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual.Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
41
SeddonJ. M.AjaniU. A.SperdutoR. D.HillerR.BlairN.BurtonT. C.et al (1994). Dietary carotenoids, vitamins A, C, and E, and advanced age-related macular degeneration. Eye Disease Case-Control Study Group.JAMA2721413–1420. 10.1001/jama.272.18.1413
42
SugiyamaK.EbisawaM.YamadaM.NagashimaY.SuzukiH.MaokaT.et al (2017). Functional lycopene cyclase (CruA) in cyanobacterium, Arthrospira platensis NIES-39, and its role in carotenoid synthesis.Plant Cell Physiol.58831–838. 10.1093/pcp/pcx015
43
SugiyamaK.TakaichiS. (2020). Carotenogenesis in cyanobacteria: CruA/CruP-type and CrtL-type lycopene cyclases.J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol.6653–58. 10.2323/jgam.2020.01.005
44
SunZ.LiT.ZhouZ. G.JiangY. (2016). Microalgae as a source of lutein: chemistry, biosynthesis, and carotenogenesis.Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol.15337–58. 10.1007/10_2015_331
45
TakaichiS.MaokaT.MasamotoK. (2001). Myxoxanthophyll in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 is myxol 2’-dimethyl-fucoside, (3R,2’S)-myxol 2’-(2,4-di-O-methyl-alpha-L-fucoside), not rhamnoside.Plant Cell Physiol.42756–762. 10.1093/pcp/pce098
46
TakaichiS.MochimaruM.UchidaH.MurakamiA.HiroseE.MaokaT.et al (2012). Opposite chirality of α-carotene in unusual cyanobacteria with unique chlorophylls, Acaryochloris and Prochlorococcus.Plant Cell Physiol.531881–1888. 10.1093/pcp/pcs126
47
TillettD.NeilanB. (2000). Xanthogenate nucleic acid isolation from cultured and 567 environmental cyanobacteria.J. Phycol.36251–258. 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2000.99079.x
48
WangC.KimJ. H.KimS. W. (2014). Synthetic biology and metabolic engineering for marine carotenoids: new opportunities and future prospects.Mar. Drugs124810–4832. 10.3390/md12094810
49
WilliamsJ. G. K. K. (1988). Construction of specific mutations in photosystem II photosynthetic reaction center by genetic engineering methods in Synechocystis 6803.Methods Enzymol.167766–778. 10.1016/0076-6879(88)67088-1
50
XiongW.ShenG.BryantD. A. (2017). Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 CruA (sll0147) encodes lycopene cyclase and requires bound chlorophyll a for activity.Photosynth. Res.131267–280. 10.1007/s11120-016-0316-0
51
ZhangC.WangY.WangW.CaoZ.FuQ.BaoM.et al (2019). Functional analysis of the marigold (Tagetes erecta) lycopene ε-cyclase (TeLCYe) promoter in transgenic tobacco.Mol. Biotechnol.61703–713. 10.1007/s12033-019-00197-z
52
ZhangL.SelãoT. T.SelstamE.NorlingB. (2015). Subcellular localization of carotenoid biosynthesis in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803.PLoS One10:e0130904. 10.1371/journal.pone.0130904
Summary
Keywords
lutein, carotenoids, cyanobacteria, Synechocystis, cyclase, genetic engineering, Arabidopsis thaliana
Citation
Lehmann M, Vamvaka E, Torrado A, Jahns P, Dann M, Rosenhammer L, Aziba A, Leister D and Rühle T (2021) Introduction of the Carotenoid Biosynthesis α-Branch Into Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 for Lutein Production. Front. Plant Sci. 12:699424. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.699424
Received
27 April 2021
Accepted
09 June 2021
Published
06 July 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Reimund Goss, Leipzig University, Germany
Reviewed by
Alexei E. Solovchenko, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia; Bo Wang, Vanderbilt University, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Lehmann, Vamvaka, Torrado, Jahns, Dann, Rosenhammer, Aziba, Leister and Rühle.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Martin Lehmann, martin.lehmann@biologie.uni-muenchen.de
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Marine and Freshwater Plants, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.