Abstract
Harnessing cold-resilient and calcium-enriched peanut production technology are crucial for high-yielding peanut cultivation in high-latitude areas. However, there is limited field data about how exogenous calcium (Ca2+) application would improve peanut growth resilience during exposure to chilling stress at early sowing (ES). To help address this problem, a two-year field study was conducted to assess the effects of exogenous foliar Ca2+ application on photosynthetic carbon fixation and pod yield in peanuts under different sowing scenarios. We measured plant growth indexes, leaf photosynthetic gas exchange, photosystems activities, and yield in peanuts. It was indicated that ES chilling stress at the peanut seedling stage led to the reduction of Pn, gs, Tr, Ls, WUE, respectively, and the excessive accumulation of non-structural carbohydrates in leaves, which eventually induced a chilling-dependent feedback inhibition of photosynthesis due mainly to weaken growth/sink demand. While exogenous Ca2+ foliar application improved the export of nonstructural carbohydrates, and photosynthetic capacity, meanwhile activated cyclic electron flow, thereby enhancing growth and biomass accumulation in peanut seedlings undergoing ES chilling stress. Furthermore, ES combined with exogenous Ca2+ application can significantly enhance plant chilling resistance and peanut yield ultimately in the field. In summary, the above results demonstrated that exogenous foliar Ca2+ application restored the ES-linked feedback inhibition of photosynthesis, enhancing the growth/sink demand and the yield of peanuts.
1 Introduction
Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important oil and industrial crop that originated in tropical South America (Bolivia and adjacent countries), which is sensitive to chilling stress due to a lack of naturally-endowed cold acclimation (Prasad et al., 2006; Song et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2022). Considering the achievable net economic return, early sowing is a useful agricultural cultivation strategy to avoid drought stress during spring sowing and especially during the vulnerable seedling stages (Chen et al., 2012). Thus, it is paramount for peanut growers and researchers to uncover suitable sowing windows and cultivation durations in high-latitude areas to deliver successful peanut production (Dai et al., 2017; Li et al., 2018; Virk et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). For the cropping boundary in the high-latitude crop, especially in response to low-temperature stress, the peanut’s light interception and strong sink demand are the major determinants of high yield and quality (Bagnall et al., 1988; Itoh, 2003; Salessesmith et al., 2020; Ensminger et al., 2006). However, the ES (early sowing) window in the most high-latitude area would naturally subject the crop to a greater probability of chilling exposure. Past studies have documented that chilling stress leads to a decrease in sink demand and lowers the capacity to utilize energy metabolically (Wan, 2003; Liu et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2020). The resultant is an imbalance source-to-sink relationship situation within the whole plant which affects many biochemical and physiological processes thereby curtailing growth. With more unpredictable and extreme weather events especially in high-latitude areas, establishing a simple exogenous chemical priming strategy to improve the cold adaptability of peanuts, is a major contribution toward improving peanut production (Song et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020; Aryal and Sollenberger, 2021; Liu et al., 2022).
For optimizing the cropping season, adjusting the sown date and the harvest date are the fundamental prerequisites to guarantee a consistent and acceptable yield of peanuts (Chen et al., 2012; Dai et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2020). In Northern China, early sowing, i.e. sowing around half a month earlier than current local agronomic practices, is widely used to avoid drought stress and maximize the yield of the new high-yielding big-seed type peanut cultivars in recent years (Wan, 2003; Zhang et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2022). Past research has shown that 12°C and below are unfavorable cultivation temperatures for peanut physiology and growth. These low temperatures are common during the early spring/early sowing peanut cultivation scenario, especially low nocturnal temperature stress during the early spring night (Melkonian et al., 2004; Wu et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). Previous studies have shown that chilling stress induced the peroxidation of membrane lipids (Zhang et al., 2000) and the accumulation of soluble sugars (Song et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020), reduced stomatal conductance (Melkonian et al., 2004), reduced photosynthetic carbon fixation and the reaction centers’ activities (Long et al., 1983; Stirling et al., 2006; Friese and Sage, 2016; Yamori and Shikanai, 2016), and decreased activities of carbon assimilation enzymes (Riva-Roveda et al., 2016). Positively, several studies reported that appropriate early planting and late-season harvest produced adequate photosynthates and higher yields (Kasai, 2008; Srivastava et al., 2016). However, the apparent benefits of late-season harvest have to be evaluated with the higher risk of diseases; mold production (Aspergillus flavus) and pod loss, leaf spot disease, or even threatened by deadly extreme autumn chilling injury due to climate change (Fountain et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2019).
Chemical priming is a promising measure in plant stress physiology and crop stress management (Nayyar, 2003; Fernández and Eichert, 2009). Exogenous foliar calcium (Ca2+) is absorbed by leaves through the hydrophilic pores in leaf stomata or epidermis which are affected by leaf temperature, relative humidity, light, and other factors (Li et al., 2020). In response to different chilling stresses, exogenous Ca2+ priming significantly improved the physiological response including growth and photosynthesis in low-temperature sensitive plant species such as peanuts (Liu et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2022), wheat (Nayyar, 2003), loquat fruit (Li et al., 2020), and tomato (Zhang et al., 2014). It is generally believed that plant cell walls, mitochondria, and chloroplasts have an enormous capacity to store Ca2+ (Tian et al., 2019). And optimal levels of Ca2+ can sustain cell wall growth and membrane integrity as well as osmotic functioning (Kreimer et al., 1988; Rocha and Vothknecht, 2012). The concentration of free Ca2+ in cytosol further improved the resilience to cold injury of plants (Kreimer et al., 1988; Brauer et al., 1990; Gan et al., 2019). Ca2+ is a cofactor of the oxygen-evolving complex (OEC), which is involved in light-induced water photodissociation (Thor, 2019), regulated the formation of assimilatory power (Wang et al., 2019) and the activity of carbon assimilation-related enzymes (Rocha and Vothknecht, 2012). Ca2+ is involved in regulating carbohydrate metabolism, including sucrose synthesis, which is implicated in phloem function (Rufty and Huber, 1983; Brauer et al., 1990; Tian et al., 2019; Kinose et al., 2020). Furthermore, the Ca2+/calmodulin interaction is involved in regulating NAD kinase, photosynthesis, and photoprotection (Klughammer and Schreiber, 1994; Liu, 2020). In particular, exogenous foliar Ca2+ application maintained peanut photosynthesis and growth during nocturnal chilling stress (Liu et al., 2013; Song et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2022). However, the underlying mechanisms of how exogenous foliar Ca2+ application enhanced peanut chilling resilience, growth, and yield is unclear under early sowing-induced moderate/natural fluctuating chilling stress (field conditions). Therefore, this study examined the effects of exogenous foliar Ca2+ application on seedling growth, leaf photosynthetic reactions, nonstructural carbohydrates accumulations, and yield under early sowing scenarios in the field. Those mentioned above are vital to improving and stabilizing peanut production in Northern China facing more unpredictable and extreme weather events.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Plant material and experimental design
A two-year field experiment was conducted at a farm station of Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China (41°82’ N, 123°56’ E) in 2015 and 2016. The study area has a temperate monsoon climate with an average annual air temperature of 12.1°C. The photoperiod (daylight + twilight) varied within the range of 11-15 hr in the natural field of Liaoning province. The average annual rainfall is 604.8 mm, with the main precipitation season from Jun. to Sep. The Fenghua No.1 (abbreviated as FH1), the common high-yielding big-seed peanut cultivar (Shi et al., 2020), was used in this study. The farm soil was a simply cultivated wet-leached soil developed from Quaternary loess parent material with pH 6.56 (1:2.5, w/v), 12.86 g kg-1 organic matter, 1.36 g kg-1 total N, 48.52 mg kg-1 Olsen-P, 64.29 mg kg-1 available K, 351.92 mg kg-1 exchangeable Ca, 12.7 cmol kg-1 cation exchange capacity, and 1.49 g cm-3 bulk density. Daily meteorological data, including the average day and night air temperature and daily precipitation, were recorded by an automatic meteorological station located ~60 m from the experimental site. The average day and night air temperature (°C) and daily precipitation (mm) from early sowing on Apr. 25, 2015, and Apr. 23, 2016, to late harvest on Oct. 9, 2015, and Oct. 7, 2016, were recorded, respectively (Figure 1).
Figure 1
The field experiments were conducted from Apr.25 to Oct.9 of 2015 and from Apr.23 to Oct.7 of 2016. The experimental design involved a randomized 12 plots with four treatments and three replicates of each treatment (3 plots/replicates per treatment). The plot size was 4 m long and 3 m wide with three beds per plot, and each bed contained two rows of peanuts which were planted at 0.2 m intervals, with two plants per hill. The number of peanut seedlings planted in each plot was calculated as follows: No. = (4 m/0.2 m) × 3 (beds/plot) × 2 (rows/bed) × 2 (peanuts/row) = 240 seedlings/plot. Peanut special biochar-based fertilizer (N-P2O5-K2O=13-15-17, Liaoning Jinhefu Agricultural Science and Technology Co. Ltd, China) was applied and mixed evenly in the plough layer (depth of approximately 20 cm) to each plot at the time of planting with 750 kg ha-1. The pre-sowing herbicide, trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N, N-dipropyl-p-toluidine), was applied to the soil, and the plots were kept weed-free thereafter by hand weeding. Other planting inputs were consistent with current local agronomic practices. The treatments were (1) CK (Normal sowing according to the local farmer’s preference and current agronomic practices + foliar spraying of ddH2O); (2) CK+Ca (Normal sowing + foliar spraying of 15 mM CaCl2); (3) ES (Early sowing + foliar spraying of ddH2O); (4) ES+Ca (Early sowing + foliar spraying of 15 mM CaCl2). The optimal levels of exogenous foliar Ca2+ (15 mM CaCl2) and the application techniques (the leaves were sprayed evenly until just dripping) were established in the previous relative peanut studies (Liu et al., 2013; Song et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2022). As for early sowing treatments (ES, ES+Ca), peanuts sowing dates were on April. 25, 2015, and April. 23, 2016, respectively. While as for normal sowing treatments (CK, CK+Ca), peanuts’ sowing dates were on May. 9, 2015, and May. 7, 2016, respectively. At the peanuts seedling stages (≥3 leaves), all plants were foliar-sprayed carefully and evenly using moisture sprayers twice a week (every Wednesday and Friday from May. 20 to Jun. 5 of 2015, and May. 18 to Jun. 3 of 2016) plus twice a day (at around 8:30 am and 4:30 pm) with 15 mM CaCl2 (CK+Ca and ES+Ca) or ddH2O (CK and ES).
2.2 Plant sampling and measurements
2.2.1 Plant morphological indexes and nonstructural carbohydrates measurements
All plant sampling and measurements were carried out every 7 days at the seedling stage from May. 23, 2015, and May. 21, 2016 onward, respectively. The main stem height was estimated carefully using a meter scale. The leaf area was measured using LI-3000C (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln NE, USA). All samples were oven-dried at 105°C for 0.5 hr and then at 70°C to a constant weight. Also, oven-dried leaflets from the third youngest fully expanded leaves were pooled by treatment and ground to a powder, and triplicate subsamples were used for carbohydrate measurements. Soluble sugars were extracted from approximately 0.1 g of the oven-dried leaf powder with 80% (v/v) ethanol at 85°C and quantified using the microtiter method (Hendrix, 1993). Pellets containing starch were oven-dried overnight at 60°C. Starch in the pellet was first gelatinized by the addition of 1 ml of 0.2 M KOH and incubated in a boiling water bath for 0.5 hr (Rufty and Huber, 1983). After cooling, 0.2 ml of 1 M acetic acid was added, and the solution was incubated with 2 ml acetate buffer (pH 4.6) containing amyloglucosidase (6 units, Roche) at 55°C for 1 hr. The reaction was terminated in a boiling water bath, and the resulting supernatant was analyzed for glucose (Song et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2022).
2.2.2 Peanut yield measurement
Peanut yield was measured at different harvesting times [i.e. Sep. 25 (early harvest) and Oct. 9 (late harvest), 2015 or Sep. 23 (early harvest) and Oct.7 (late harvest), 2016]. During the early harvest in September, the reproductive period of the CK is 139 d, and the ES is 153 d. During the late harvest in October, the CK is 153 d, and the ES is 167 d. In order to improve the peanut yield estimation and accuracy in each plot, samples were collected in the specific one-third area of the experimental plot; when harvested at different times, the other two-thirds area of the plot was harvested to calculate the pod yield (Kramer et al., 2004). The pod yield was determined on Sep.25 (early harvest), Oct.9 (late harvest), 2015, and Sep.23 (early harvest), Oct.7 (late harvest), 2016, respectively. For representative sampling, an area of 2 × 2 m2 in the center of each plot was selected accordingly. Plants were harvested at maturity (100 days after planting) and the number and dry matter per pot were determined. These pods were air-dried for 1 week and then weighted.
2.2.3 Leaf gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and P700 measurements
On each observation date, the chlorophyll fluorescence was measured at 6:00 am after a dark adaptation of 1 hr, and leaf gas exchange was measured at 10:00 am. Leaf gas exchange was measured on the third youngest fully expanded leaves using an open system of gas exchange equipment (GFS-3000, Heinz Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany). During gas exchange measurements, an LED array provided a PPFD 1000 μmol·quanta·m-2·s-1, and the leaf cuvette temperature was set to 25°C and 60% RH. The CO2 concentration was maintained at 400 ± 5 μmol·mol-1. The third youngest fully expanded leaf was kept in the chamber by ensuring the thermo-couple touching it from the underside. Gas exchange parameters included net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs), atmospheric CO2 concentration (Ca), transpiration rate (Tr), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), water-use efficiency (WUE), and leaf stomatal limitation (Ls).
The chlorophyll fluorescence and P700 parameters on the third youngest fully expanded leaf (ca. 1 cm2) were made using the Dual-PAM 100 measuring system (Heinz Walz, Effeltrich, Germany) which is controlled by Dual-PAM V1.19 software. All steps were carried out following the standard protocols and appropriate modifications (Shi et al., 2020; Song et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2022). The fluorescence slow-kinetics were measured after a dark adaptation of 1 hr, and the intensity of saturation pulse light (red light) and actinic light (red light) were set as 10,000 and 132 μmol·quanta·m-2·s-1, respectively. The chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were calculated by Fo, Fm, Fo’, Fm’, F. The Fo and Fm are respectively the minimum and maximum fluorescence yield of the dark-adjusted sample with the PSII center open and closed, while the Fo’ and Fm’ are the illuminated sample with some PSII center open and closed. The maximal/intrinsic photochemical efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) is calculated by Fv/Fm=(Fm−Fo)/Fm (Klughammer and Schreiber, 1994). The actual quantum yield of PSII [Y(II)] is calculated by Y(II)=(Fm"−F)/Fm (Genty et al., 1989). The non-regulated energy loss in PSII [Y(NO)] is calculated by Y(NO)=F/Fm (Klughammer and Schreiber, 2008). The regulatory quantum yield in PSII [Y(NPQ)] is calculated by Y(NPQ)=1−Y(II)−Y(NO) (Kramer et al., 2004). The relative electron transfer rate in PSII [ETR(II)] is calculated by ETR(II)=PAR·Y(II)·0.84·0.5 is photosynthetically active radiation which is 184 μmol·quanta·m-2·s-1 in this study (Yamori and Shikanai, 2016).
The PSI parameters were based on the redox kinetics of P700 induced by far-red light (ΔA830-ΔA875, P700+), as well as the PSII was measured by the Dual-pam 100 device and based on the previous studies (Shi et al., 2020; Song et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2022). The P700 parameters were calculated as: The actual quantum yield in PSI [Y(I)] is calculated by Y(I)=(Pm"−P)/Pm . The quantum yield of PSI non-photochemical energy dissipation due to the donor-side limitation [Y(ND)] is calculated by Y(ND)=P/Pm . The quantum yield of PSI non-photochemical energy dissipation due to the acceptor-side limitation [Y(NA)] is calculated by Y(NA)=(Pm"−P)/Pm . The cyclic electron flow (CEF) was estimated as CEF=ETR(I)−ETR(II) . Similarly, Y(CEF)=Y(I)−Y(II) was calculated as the ratio of the quantum yield of CEF to Y(II) and later used to estimate cyclic electron transfer.
2.4 Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were carried out using one-way ANOVA in SPSS 19.0 (Chicago, IL, USA). Values are means ± SD (n= 3). Different letters indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range tests (p < 0.05). All graphs were plotted using Origin 8.0 and Excel 2016 software.
3 Results
3.1 Effects of exogenous foliar calcium (Ca2+) application on peanut growth under early and normal sowing scenarios
The ES treatment significantly enhanced the main stem height (10.5% in Jun. 6, 2015 and 20.6% in Jun. 4, 2016) and leaf area (20.8% in Jun. 6, 2015 and 19.1% in Jun. 4, 2016) compared with that of the CK. Meanwhile, ES+Ca and CK+Ca treatments further increased main stem height (ES+Ca: 19.0%, CK+Ca: 6.3% in Jun. 6, 2015) and leaf area (ES+Ca: 20.8%, CK+Ca: 6.6% in Jun. 6, 2015) than that of ES treatment (seedling stage, Figure 2).
Figure 2
The ES treatment enhanced dry matter accumulation in roots (17.1% in Jun. 6, 2015 and 12.2% in Jun. 4, 2016), stems (15.6% in Jun. 6, 2015 and 16.2% in Jun. 4, 2016), and leaves (16.6% in Jun. 6, 2015 and 15.1% in Jun. 4, 2016) compared with that of CK. Meanwhile, ES+Ca and CK+Ca treatments further enhanced dry matter accumulation in roots (ES+Ca: 30.8%, CK+Ca: 8.2% in Jun. 6, 2015), stems (ES+Ca: 19.0%, CK+Ca: 7.4% in Jun. 6, 2015), and leaves (ES+Ca: 17.0%, CK+Ca: 4.7% in Jun. 6, 2015, seedling stage, Figure 3).
Figure 3
3.2 Effects of exogenous foliar calcium (Ca2+) application on soluble sugar, starch, and total nonstructural carbohydrates concentrations of peanut leaves under early and normal sowing scenarios
The ES treatment reduced soluble sugar (2.6% in Jun. 6, 2015 and 2.1% in Jun. 4, 2016), starch (4.4% in Jun. 6, 2015 and 4.8% in Jun. 4, 2016), and total nonstructural carbohydrates (4.0% in Jun. 6, 2015 and 4.2% in Jun. 4, 2016) concentrations compared with that of CK. Meanwhile, ES+Ca and CK+Ca treatments further decreased soluble sugar (ES+Ca: 8.1%, CK+Ca: 4.3% in Jun. 6, 2015), starch (ES+Ca: 9.9%, CK+Ca: 5.3% in Jun. 6, 2015), and total nonstructural carbohydrates (ES+Ca: 9.5%, CK+Ca: 5.1% in Jun. 6, 2015) concentrations than that of ES treatment. However, the levels of soluble sugar, starch, and total nonstructural carbohydrates had no significant difference between all treatments on Jun. 6, 2015, and Jun. 4, 2016 (Figure 4).
Figure 4
3.3 Effects of exogenous foliar calcium (Ca2+) application on the gas exchange under early and normal sowing scenarios
The ES treatment increased Pn, gs, Tr, Ls, and WUE and decreased Ci when compared to CK. While ES+Ca and CK+Ca treatments further increased Pn, gs, Tr, Ls, and WUE and decreased Ci compared with that of ES. Moreover, as the peanut grows, the gas exchange characteristics did not differ between CK and ES treatments on Jun. 6, 2015, and Jun. 4, 2016, but they were still at a lower level than ES+Ca and CK+Ca treatments (Figure 5, 6).
Figure 5
Figure 6
3.4 Effects of exogenous foliar calcium (Ca2+) application on peanut photosystem activities under early and normal sowing scenarios
The Fv/Fm increased markedly under the ES treatment than CK. Furthermore, ES+Ca and CK+Ca treatments also enhanced Fv/Fm compared with the ES treatment. The Fv/Fm had no significant difference between ES and CK treatments on Jun. 6, 2015, and Jun. 4, 2016, but they were still lower than ES+Ca and CK+Ca treatments (Figure 7).
Figure 7
The ES treatment significantly enhanced Y(II) compared with that of CK. In addition, Y(II) in CK decreased markedly and dissipated excess energy by increasing the regulatory quantum yield of PSII [Y(NPQ)]. The dissipated excess energy depended mainly upon Y(NPQ) which was likely to be insufficient thus increasing Y(NO) to a higher level. Conversely, ES+Ca and CK+Ca treatments increased Y(II) and decreased Y(NPQ) and Y(NO). As the peanut growing season progresses, the Y(NO) did not differ between all treatments on Jun. 6, 2015, and Jun. 4, 2016 (Figure 8).
Figure 8
The ES treatment enhanced Y(I) and reduced Y(ND) and Y(NA) when compared to CK. Moreover, ES+Ca and CK+Ca treatments delivered higher Y(I) and lower Y(ND), and Y(NA) than the ES treatment. While Y(I), Y(ND), and Y(NA) had no significant difference between CK and ES treatments on Jun. 6, 2015, and Jun. 4, 2016, and they remained at a lower level than ES+Ca and CK+Ca treatments (Figure 9).
Figure 9
The ES treatment increased ETR(II), ETR(I), and CEF when compared with that of CK. Meanwhile, ES+Ca and CK+Ca treatments produced higher ETR(II), ETR(I), CEF, and Y(CEF)/Y(II) than the ES treatment. The CEF and Y(CEF)/Y(II) did not differ between all treatments on Jun. 6, 2015, and Jun. 4, 2016 (Figure 10).
Figure 10
3.5 Effects of exogenous foliar calcium (Ca2+) application on peanut yield under early and normal sowing scenarios
The ES treatment dramatically enhanced the number of full pods per plant and the 100-pod weight compared with that of CK. Meanwhile, the ES+Ca treatment further increased the number of full pods per plant and the 100-pod weight on different harvest dates (Sep. 25 and Oct. 9, 2015, Sep. 23 and Oct 7, 2016) compared with the CK and ES treatments (Table 1).
Table 1
| Years | Treatments | No. of full pods per plant (g) | 100-pod weight (g) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep. 25 | Oct. 9 | Sep. 25 | Oct. 9 | ||
| 2015 | CK | 15.7±0.6 c | 18.0±1.0 c b | 165.8±4.6 c | 180.8±4.6 c b |
| CK+Ca | 18.0±1.0 b | 20.3±0.6 b a | 177.3±3.1 b | 197.3±2.7 b a | |
| ES | 18.0±1.0 b b | 20.3±0.6 b | 176.9±3.5 b b | 193.5±8.2 b | |
| ES+Ca | 20.7±0.6 a a | 22.3±0.6 a | 193.9±2.3 a a | 209.1±2.9 a | |
| Sep. 23 | Oct. 7 | Sep. 23 | Oct. 7 | ||
| 2016 | CK | 16.0±1.0 c | 19.0±1.0 c b | 172.3±4.1 c | 183.5±2.6 c b |
| CK+Ca | 18.3±0.6 b | 21.7±0.6 b a | 183.3±3.9 b | 203.7±5.7 b a | |
| ES | 18.7±0.6 b b | 21.3±0.6 b | 183.4±3.4 b b | 200.7±8.9 b | |
| ES+Ca | 21.3±0.6 a a | 23.3±0.6 a | 200.0±3.8 a a | 216.7±3.2 a | |
Effects of exogenous foliar calcium (Ca2+) application on the number of full pods per peanut plant and the 100-pod weight under early and normal sowing scenarios in 2015 and 2016.
Values are means ± SD (n = 3). Different black letters (a, b and c) in the same column indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range tests (p < 0.05). Different red letters (a and b) in the same index indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences between CK (Oct. harvest date), CK+Ca (Oct. harvest date), ES (Sep. harvest date), and ES+Ca (Sep. harvest date) at the relative full maturity stages (Shown in red dashed box).
Values are means ± SD (n = 3). Different black letters (a, b and c) in the same column indicate significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range tests (p < 0.05). Different red letters (a and b) in the same index indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences between CK (Oct. harvest date), CK+Ca (Oct. harvest date), ES (Sep. harvest date), and ES+Ca (Sep. harvest date) at the relative full maturity stages (Shown in red dashed box).
The ES treatment significantly increased peanut yield when compared to CK. Moreover, ES+Ca and CK+Ca treatments further increased peanut yield on different harvest dates. Compared to the CK, the ES treatment increased peanut yield by 21.9% and 21.4% in the Sep. harvest date in 2015 and 2016, respectively. While in the Oct. harvest date, the ES treatment increased peanut yield by 23.3% and 21.7% in 2015 and 2016, respectively, compared with that of CK. Compared to CK+Ca, the ES+Ca treatment increased peanut yield by 22.4% and 21.3% in the Sep. harvest date in 2015 and 2016, respectively. While the ES+Ca treatment increased peanut yield by 13.7% and 13.6% in the Oct. harvest date in 2015 and 2016, respectively, compared to CK+Ca. When plants were harvested at full maturity (ES and ES+Ca harvested in Sep., CK and CK+Ca harvested in Oct.), it was observed that peanut yield did not differ between ES and CK or ES+Ca and CK+Ca (Figure 11).
Figure 11
4 Discussion
4.1 Exogenous Ca2+ enhanced peanut growth and photosynthetic capacity under early sowing scenario in the field
Variations in temperature and precipitation were the primary factors that influenced the peanut seedling stage under the 15 d early sowing (daily minimum temperature [Tmin] > 13.4°C) and normal sowing (daily minimum temperature [Tmin] > 12.0°C) conditions (Figure 1). The chilling injury and other combined chilling injuries are the primary factors curtailing peanut production during the seedling vegetative stage (Allen and Ort, 2001; Zhou et al., 2017; Tian et al., 2019). Exogenous foliar Ca2+ application restored the inhibition of plant growth and biomass accumulation under the ES scenario (Figures 2, 3), which was consistent with earlier research reported in maize and soybean (Sicher, 2011; Alsajri et al., 2019; Román et al., 2021). Unlike the regular sowing practice, the ES approach is likely to create new biological challenges such as changes in the duration of the nocturnal phase, and also the light-to-dark conversion chilling adaptations (Virk et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020). Previous studies have shown that high levels of non-structural carbohydrates are useful in conferring cellular protection; these serve as either signaling substance(s) or act as osmoprotectants during cold acclimation (Sicher, 2011). Chilling stress not only damaged the chloroplast grana and expansion of starch grains but also inhibited nonstructural carbohydrate translocation from source to sink (Song et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2022). No matter whether in short-term or long-term chilling stress (including early sowing and normal sowing of early spring season), excessive accumulation of non-structural carbohydrates at the seedling stage would significantly lead to a negative feedback inhibition of leaves photosynthesis and causes an over-reduction of the photosynthetic electron chain to impair photosynthetic machinery and chloroplast morphology (Adams et al., 2013; Liu, 2020; Wu et al., 2020). Exogenous Ca2+ effectively promoted the export of nonstructural carbohydrates and then decreased the excessive accumulation of nonstructural carbohydrates in peanut photosynthesizing leaves under ES stress (Figure 4). Carbohydrate synthesis (such as soluble sugars, starch) occurs generally in mature leaf (sources) and follows a circadian rhythm (e.g., for sucrose) (Tovignan et al., 2016). The source-to-sink sugar translocation linked to photosynthesis is closely associated with plant growth (Brauer et al., 1990; Sonoike, 1996; Tan et al., 2011). Exogenous foliar Ca2+ application ameliorated photoinhibition due to the stomatal limitations in peanut photosynthesizing leaves under ES (Figure 5), which was consistent with findings in Commelina communis L (Suorsa, 2015). Peanut is a typical calciphilous plant and is vulnerable to photoinhibition caused by the accumulation of photosynthetic end-products (e.g. starch) (Virk et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2020). To maintain optimal growth, there must be sufficient sinks to utilize the translocated carbohydrates produced earlier by the sources through photosynthesis; thus, any disruption to these processes by unfavorable factors (e.g. chilling) will alter the source-sink relationship. Ca2+ regulates carbon assimilation by mediating the activity of deinoheptanose-1,7-diphosphatase (SBPase) and fructose-1,6-diphosphatase (FBPase) (two key enzymes in the Calvin cycle), where Ca2+ improved the synthesis, phloem loading, and export of photosynthetic carbohydrates (Brauer et al., 1990; Tan et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2013; Wu et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2022). Thus, exogenous Ca2+ alleviated the early sowing chilling-dependent feedback limitation on peanut photosynthesis by increasing growth/sink demand.
4.2 Exogenous Ca2+ alleviated the adverse photodamage of photosystems under the early sowing scenario in the field
Exogenous Ca2+ alleviated the adverse photodamage of PSII and PSI, which promoted photosynthetic electron transport flow under early and normal sowing scenarios (Figures 7–10). Exposing the leaves of Calathea makoyana to chilling in darkness did not affect photosystems’ activities and visual appearance, but chilling in the light led to severe photodamage and leaf necrosis (Hogewoning and Harbinson, 2007). Both PSI and PSII are known to be sensitive to excess light under chilling stress; PSII is easily inactivated by an excess of excitations and PSI is more prone to potential photo-damage caused by excess electrons arriving from PSII and the decrease in the rate of photosynthetic carbon fixation (Wang et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2016). Chilling in light will decrease the production of △pH with the accumulation of NADPH and reduce the production of ATP, which inhibited CO2 fixation (Yamori and Shikanai, 2016; Huang et al., 2021). The stress conditions will start photosystem protective mechanism, such as stimulation of violaxanthin de-epoxidase (VDE) activity and increase the de-epoxidation state of xanthophyll pigments to accelerate NPQ, or activate the cyclic electron flow (Ding et al., 2017; Paredes and Quiles, 2017; Ma et al., 2021). Exogenous calcium priming is necessary when environmental conditions are extremely harsh and self-protection mechanisms are not enough to resist environmental stress (Liu, 2020). Ca2+ can bind to its receptor protein CaM and produce a Ca2+-CaM complex by activating phosphodiesterase, Ca2+-ATPase, and decarboxylase at low temperatures (Ranty et al., 2006; Li et al., 2017). Meanwhile, exogenous Ca2+ (i) promoted the photosystem self-repairing by enhancing the calcium-binding protein (Terashima et al., 2012); (ii) increased △pH which promoted Ca2+ combined with PsbO to stabilized PSII reaction center (Yi et al., 2005); (iii) reduced the accumulation of NADPH (Zhang et al., 2014); (iv) enhanced ATPase activity and CEF, which effectively ameliorated the PSII and PSI-linked photochemical disruptions (Figure 10, Song et al., 2020). In addition, cold signal-induced calcium may trigger downstream signaling molecules such as CaM, ROS, and Rbohs-respiratory burst oxidase (= NADPH oxidase) fully regulated in the photoreaction and carbon assimilation of chloroplasts (Pirayesh et al., 2021). In particular, exogenous Ca2+ could promote endogenous [Ca2+]cyt entering thylakoid lumen regulated by a light signal, and enhanced intracellular [Ca2+]cyt, which can maintain oxygen release complex (OEC) activity and equilibrium regulation of transmembrane proton dynamics (Krieger and Weis, 1993; Liang et al., 2009; Huang et al., 2016).
4.3 Exogenous Ca2+ enhanced peanut yield under the early sowing scenario in the field
In general, ES effectively avoids drought stress and improved peanut yield significantly (Wan, 2003; Zhang et al., 2022). When ES was combined with exogenous foliar Ca2+ application, the stimulation effect on yield will be amplified significantly (Table 1). Previous studies showed that crop yield tends to decrease with later sowing (Sallam et al., 2017; Manning et al., 2020). Early sowing improves water availability (Soriano et al., 2004) and delivers a harvest rapidly for early high-price markets or extends the growth duration (Zhou et al., 2018). In our study, exogenous Ca2+ priming enhanced the peanut pod yield under early and normal sowing scenarios (Table 1). Compared to the CK, the ES treatment significantly increased peanut yield by 21.9% and 21.4% in the Sep. harvest date in 2015 and 2016, respectively. While in the Oct. harvest date, the ES treatment increased peanut yield significantly by 23.3% and 21.7% in 2015 and 2016, respectively. In particular, ES+Ca treatment further increased peanut yield significantly by 13.7% and 13.6% in the Oct. harvest date in 2015 and 2016, respectively (Figure 11). It was indicated that exogenous Ca2+ significantly improved plant growth, leaf extension, the accumulation of photosynthates and pod yield in peanut seedlings, which is consistent with early studies (White and Broadley, 2003; Hepler, 2005; Zhang et al., 2020; Li et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2022). During early spring, especially in 40°N high latitude areas, an increase in yield and the concomitant economic value can be obtained by implementing proper early sowing cultivation strategies (Román et al., 2021). Thus, exogenous Ca2+ applications could further increase peanut yield under any ES and NS scenarios and offer practical options for growers to improve the yield through various early and late cultivation practices in a high-altitude area.
5 Conclusions
Exogenous Ca2+ applications were proven effective in restoring peanut photosynthesis and pod yield during early sowing and normal sowing scenarios in northern China. The two years experiments demonstrated that exogenous Ca2+ promoted foliar and root growth, alleviated PSI and PSII photoinhibition, and ameliorated the ES-linked photosynthetic feedback inhibition. Specifically for peanuts, moderate (15 mM) exogenous foliar Ca2+ application could improve the pod yield at both early and late harvest dates and include scenarios where cold-stress periods are possible. From the peanut growers’ perspective, the simple Ca2+ priming approach provided an effective biotechnological solution and delivered a concomitant financial guarantee to secure peanut production against potential abiotic stress periods commonly encountered in high latitudes.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (project nos. 31772391 and 31301842), ARC-Linkage Project (project no. LP200100341), and the Scientific Research Project of the Education Department of Liaoning Province, China (project no. LJKZ0661).
Acknowledgments
We sincerely thank the reviewers for all their valuable comments and recommendations to improve the manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
YL, QBS, SZ, and CB designed the experiment. QBS, CB, and DW conducted the study and collected data for preliminary analysis. YL, QWS, XH, TL, and JY further analyzed the data and prepared the manuscript. All authors reviewed and commented on the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1004721/full#supplementary-material
Glossary
| ATP | Adenosine triphosphate |
| Ca | Atmospheric CO2 concentration |
| Ci | Intercellular CO2 concentration |
| CEF | Cyclic electron flow |
| ES | Early sowing chilling |
| ETR(I) | Relative electron transport rate in Photosystem I |
| ETR(II) | Relative electron transport rate in Photosystem II |
| F | Fluorescence yield measured briefly before application of a saturation pulse |
| Fo | Minimal fluorescence yield of the dark-adapted sample with all PSII centers open |
| Fo’ | Minimal fluorescence yield of the illuminated sample with all PSII centers open |
| Fm | Maximal fluorescence yield of the dark-adapted sample with all PSII centers closed |
| Fm’ | Maximal fluorescence yield of the illuminated sample with all PSII centers closed |
| Fv/Fm | Maximal photochemistry efficiency in Photosystem II |
| FH1 | Fenghua 1 |
| gs | Stomatal conductance |
| LA | Leaf area |
| Ls | Leaf stomatal limitation |
| NAD | Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide |
| NADK | Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide kinase |
| NADP | Oxidation form of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate |
| NADPH | Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate |
| NPQ | Nonphotochemical quenching |
| PAR | Photosynthetically active radiation measured in mmol quanta m–2 s–1 |
| Pm | Maximal P700 signal |
| Pm’ | Realtime |
| P700 signal under light | |
| Pn | Net photosynthetic rate |
| PPFD | Photosynthetic photon flux density |
| Pred | P700 reduction coefficient under light |
| PSI | Photosystem I |
| PSII | Photosystem II |
| RH | Relative humidity |
| Tr | Transpiration rate |
| WUE | Water-use efficiency |
| Y(II) = FPSII | Actual quantum yield in PSII under light |
| Y(NO) | Non-regulatory quantum yield in PSII under light |
| Y(NPQ) | Regulatory quantum yield in PSII under light |
| Y(I) = FPSI | Actual quantum yield in PSI under light |
| Y(ND) | Quantum yield of PSI non-photochemical energy dissipation due to donor-side limitation |
| Y(NA) | Quantum yield of PSI non-photochemical energy dissipation due to acceptor-side limitation |
References
1
AdamsW. W.MullerO.CohuC. M.Demmig-AdamsB.. (2013). May photoinhibition be a consequence, rather than a cause, of limited plant productivity? Photosynth. Res.117 (1), 31–44. doi: 10.1007/s11120-013-9849-7
2
AllenD. J.OrtD. R. (2001). Impacts of chilling temperatures on photosynthesis in warm-climate plants. Trends Plant Sci.6 (1), 36–42. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01808-2
3
AlsajriF. A.SinghB.WijewardanaC.IrbyJ. T.GaoW.ReddyK. R. (2019). Evaluating soybean cultivars for low-and high-temperature tolerance during the seedling growth stage. Agron.9 (1), 13–33. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9010013
4
AryalP.SollenbergerL. E. (2021). Growth temperature and rhizome propagule characteristics affect rhizoma peanut shoot emergence and biomass partitioning. Agron. J.2, 20486–20510. doi: 10.1002/agj2.20486
5
BagnallD. J.KingR. W.FarquharG. D. (1988). Temperature-dependent feedback inhibition of photosynthesis in peanut. Planta.175, 348–354. doi: 10.1007/BF00396340
6
BrauerM.SandersD.StittM. (1990). Regulation of photosynthetic sucrose synthesis: A role for calcium? Planta.182 (2), 236–243. doi: 10.1007/BF00197117
7
ChenC.QianC.DengA.ZhangW. (2012). Progressive and active adaptations of cropping system to climate change in northeast China. Eur. J. Argon.38, 94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2011.07.003
8
DaiX.WangY.DongX.QianT.YinL.DongS.et al. (2017). Delayed sowing can increase lodging resistance while maintaining grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in winter wheat. Crop J.5 (6), 541–552. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2017.05.003
9
DingF.WangM. L.LiuB.ZhangS. X. (2017). Exogenous melatonin mitigates photoinhibition by accelerating non-photochemical quenching in tomato seedlings exposed to moderate light during chilling. Front. Plant Sci.8. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00244
10
EnsmingerI.BuschF.HunerN. P. (2006). Photostatic and cold acclimation: sensing low temperature through photosynthesis. Physiol. Plant126 (1), 28–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00627.x
11
FernándezV.EichertT. (2009). Uptake of hydrophilic solutes through plant leaves: current state of knowledge and perspectives of foliar fertilization. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.28 (1-2), 36–68. doi: 10.1080/07352680902743069
12
FountainJ. C.KheraP.YangL.NayakS. N.ScullyB. T.LeeR. D.et al. (2015). Resistance to Aspergillus flavus in maize and peanut: Molecular biology, breeding, environmental stress, and future perspectives. Crop J.3 (3), 229–237. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2015.02.003
13
FrieseP. C.SageR. F. (2016). Photosynthetic responses to chilling in a chilling-tolerant and chilling-sensitive miscanthus hybrid. Plant Cell Environ.39 (7), 1420–1431. doi: 10.1111/pce.12699
14
GanP.LiuF.LiR.WangS.LuoJ. (2019). Chloroplasts–beyond energy capture and carbon fixation: Tuning of photosynthesis in response to chilling stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci.20, 5046–5061. doi: 10.3390/ijms20205046
15
GentyB.BriantaisJ. M.BakerN. R. (1989). The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. BBA-GEN SUBJECTS.990 (1), 87–92. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4165(89)80016-9
16
HendrixD. L. (1993). Rapid extraction and analysis of nonstructural carbohydrates in plant tissues. Crop Sci.33 (6), 1306–1311. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300060037x
17
HeplerP. K. (2005). Calcium: A central regulator of plant growth and development. Plant Cell.17 (8), 2142–2155. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.032508
18
HogewoningS. W.HarbinsonJ. (2007). Insights on the development, kinetics, and variation of photoinhibition using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging of a chilled, variegated leaf. J. Exp. Bot.58, 453–463. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erl219
19
HuangW.SunH.TanS. L.ZhangS. B. (2021). The water-water cycle is not a major alternative sink in fluctuating light at chilling temperature. Plant Sci.305, 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2021.110828
20
HuangW.YangY. J.HuH.ZhangS. B. (2016). Moderate photoinhibition of photosystem II protects photosystem I from photodamage at chilling stress in tobacco leaves. Front. Plant Sci.7. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00182
21
ItohM. (2003). The effect of soil temperature on the source-sink economy in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Environ. Exp. Bot.50, 41–50. doi: 10.1016/S0098-8472(02)00111-9
22
KasaiM. (2008). Regulation of leaf photosynthetic rate correlating with leaf carbohydrate status and activation state of rubisco under a variety of photosynthetic source/sink balances. Physiol. Plant134 (1), 216–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01105.x
23
KinoseY.FukamachiY.OkabeS.HiroshimaH.WatanabeM.IzutaT. (2020). Toward an impact assessment of ozone on plant carbon fixation using a process-based plant growth model: A case study of fagus crenata grown under different soil nutrient levels. Sci. Total Environ.716, 137008.1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137008
24
KlughammerC.SchreiberU. (1994). An improved method, using saturating light pulses, for the determination of photosystem I quantum yield via P700+-absorbance changes at 830 nm. Planta.192 (2), 261–268. doi: 10.1007/BF00194461
25
KramerD. M.JohnsonG.KiiratsO.EdwardsG. E. (2004). New fluorescence parameters for the determination of QA redox state and excitation energy fluxes. Photosynth. Res.79 (2), 209–218. doi: 10.1023/B:PRES.0000015391.99477.0d
26
KreimerG.MelkonianM.HoltumJ. A.LatzkoE. (1988). Stromal free calcium concentration and light-mediated activation of chloroplast fructose-1, 6-bisphosphatase. Plant Physiol.86 (2), 423–428. doi: 10.1104/pp.86.2.423
27
KriegerA.WeisE. (1993). The role of calcium in the pH-dependent control of photosystem II. Photosynth. Res.37 (2), 117–130. doi: 10.1007/BF02187470
28
LiangW.WangM.AiX. (2009). The role of calcium in regulating photosynthesis and related physiological indexes of cucumber seedlings under low light intensity and suboptimal temperature stress. Sci. Hortic.123 (1), 34–38. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.07.015
29
LiL.SuH.MaH.LyuD. (2017). Differential proteomic analysis reveals the effect of calcium on Malus baccata borkh. leaves under temperature stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci.18:1755–1779. doi: 10.3390/ijms18081755
30
LiuY. F. (2020). Calcium chemical priming might play a significant role in relieving overnight chilling-dependent inhibition of photosynthesis in crops: A review. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol.126. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.607029
31
LiuY. F.HanX. R.ZhanX. M.YangJ. F.WangY. Z.SongQ. B.et al. (2013). Regulation of calcium on peanut photosynthesis under low night temperature stress. J. Integr. Agric.12, 2172–2178. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60411-6
32
LiuX. Y.LiuY. F.YiB. T.SunZ. Y.ZhangS. W.MaM. Z.et al. (2022). Foliar calcium application alleviates cold stress-induced photosynthetic inhibition in peanuts. J. Plant Nutr. Fertil.28, 291–301. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2021379
33
LiG. H.WangX. J.ShiS. H.SunJ. B.ZhaoS. Z. (2018). An overview of the research process and prospects for fresh peanuts in China. Oil Crop Sci.40, 604–607. doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084
34
LiZ.WangL.XieB.HuS.ZhengY.JinP. (2020). Effects of exogenous calcium and calcium chelate on cold tolerance of postharvest loquat fruit. Sci. Hortic.269, 109391. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109391
35
LiL.ZhangX.SiT.SuoY.ChengP.XuF.et al. (2022). Study on absorption characteristics of exogenous calcium in peanut roots and pods. J. Nucl. Agric. Sci.36 (10), 2046–2055. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2022.10.2046
36
LongS. P.EastT. M.BakerN. R. (1983). Chilling damage to photosynthesis in young Zea mays: I. effects of light and temperature variation on photosynthetic CO2 assimilation. J. Exp. Bot.34 (2), 177–188. doi: 10.1093/jxb/34.2.177
37
MaM. Z.LiuY. F.BaiC.YangY. H.SunZ. Y.LiuX. Y.et al. (2021). The physiological functionality of PGR5/PGRL1-dependent cyclic electron transport in sustaining photosynthesis. Front. Plant Sci.12. doi: 10.3389/FPLS.2021.702196
38
ManningB. K.AdhikariK. N.TrethowanR. (2020). Impact of sowing time, genotype, environment and maturity on biomass and yield components in faba bean (Vicia faba). Crop Pasture Sci.71 (2), 147–155. doi: 10.1071/CP19214
39
MelkonianJ.YuL. X.SetterT. L. (2004). Chilling responses of maize (Zea mays l.) seedlings: Root hydraulic conductance, abscisic acid, and stomatal conductance. J. Exp. Bot.55 (403), 1751–1760. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh215
40
NayyarH. (2003). Accumulation of osmolytes and osmotic adjustment in water-stressed wheat (Triticum aestivum) and maize (Zea mays) as affected by calcium and its antagonists. Environ. Exp. Bot.50 (3), 253–264. doi: 10.1016/S0098-8472(03)00038-8
41
ParedesM.QuilesM. J. (2017). Chilling stress and hydrogen peroxide accumulation in chrysanthemum morifolium and spathiphyllum lanceifolium. involvement of chlororespiration. J. Plant Physiol.211, 36–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2016.11.015
42
PirayeshN.GiridharM.KhedherA. B.VothknechtU. C.ChigriF. (2021). Organellar calcium signaling in plants: An update. BBA-Mol. Cell Res.1868 (4), 118948. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2021.118948
43
PrasadP. V. V.BooteK. J.ThomasJ. M. G.AllenL. H.Jr.GorbetD. W. (2006). Influence of soil temperature on seedling emergence and early growth of peanut cultivars in field conditions. J. Agron. Crop Sci.192 (3), 168–177. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2006.00198.x
44
RantyB.AldonD.GalaudJ. P. (2006). Plant calmodulins and calmodulin-related proteins: Multifaceted relays to decode calcium signals. Plant Signal. Behav.1 (3), 96–104. doi: 10.4161/psb.1.3.2998
45
Riva-RovedaL.EscaleB.GiauffretC.PérilleuxC. (2016). Maize plants can enter a standby mode to cope with chilling stress. BMC Plant Biol.16 (1), 212–226. doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0909-y
46
RochaA. G.VothknechtU. C. (2012). The role of calcium in chloroplasts–an intriguing and unresolved puzzle. Protoplasma.249 (4), 957–966. doi: 10.1007/s00709-011-0373-3
47
RománÁ.LiX.DengD.DaveyJ. W.JamesS.GrahamI. A.et al. (2021). Superoxide is promoted by sucrose and affects the amplitude of circadian rhythms in the evening. PNAS.118 (10), e2020646118. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.2020646118
48
RuftyJ. T. W.HuberS. C. (1983). Changes in starch formation and activities of sucrose phosphate synthase and cytoplasmic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase in response to source-sink alterations. Plant Physiol.72 (2), 474–480. doi: 10.1104/pp.72.2.474
49
Salesse-SmithC. E.SharwoodR. E.BuschF. A.SternD. B. (2020). Increased rubisco content in maize mitigates chilling stress and speeds recovery. Plant Biotechnol. J.18 (6), 1409–1420. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13306
50
SallamA.GhanbariM.MartschR. (2017). Genetic analysis of winter hardiness and effect of sowing date on yield traits in winter faba bean. Sci. Hortic.224, 296–301. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.04.015
51
SchreiberU. (2008). Saturation pulse method for assessment of energy conversion in PSI. PAM Appl. Notes.1, 11–14.
52
ShiQ. W.PangJ. YYongJ. W.H.BaiC. MLambersH. (2020). Phosphorus-fertilisation has differential effects on leaf growth and photosynthetic capacity of Arachis hypogaea L. Plant and Soil, 447(1-2), 99–116. doi: 10.1007/s11104-019-04041-w
53
SicherR. (2011). Carbon partitioning and the impact of starch deficiency on the initial response of Arabidopsis to chilling temperatures. Plant Sci.181 (2), 167–176. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.05.005
54
SongQ. B.LiuY. F.PangJ. Y.YongJ. W.ChenY. L.BaiC. M.et al. (20201637). Supplementary calcium restores peanut (Arachis hypogaea) growth and photosynthetic capacity under low nocturnal temperature. Front. Plant Sci.10. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01637
55
SonoikeK. (1996). Photoinhibition of photosystem I: its physiological significance in the chilling sensitivity of plants. Plant Cell Physiol.37 (3), 239–247. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a028938
56
SorianoM. A.VillalobosF. J.FereresE. (2004). The efficiency of water use of early plantings of sunflower. Eur. J. Agron.21, 465–476. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2004.07.001
57
SrivastavaA. K.MbohC. M.GaiserT.WebberH.EwertF. (2016). Effect of sowing date distributions on simulation of maize yields at regional scale–a case study in central Ghana, West Africa. Agr. Syst.147, 10–23. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.05.012
58
StirlingC. M.NieG. Y.AguileraC.NugawelaA.BakerN. R. (2006). Photosynthetic productivity of an immature maize crop: changes in quantum yield of CO2 assimilation, conversion efficiency and thylakoid proteins. Plant Cell Environ.14 (9), 947–954. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb00964.x
59
SuorsaM. (2015). Cyclic electron flow provides acclamatory plasticity for the photosynthetic machinery under various environmental conditions and developmental stages. Front. Plant Sci.6. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00800
60
TanW.Wei MengQ.BresticM.OlsovskaK.YangX. (2011). Photosynthesis is improved by exogenous calcium in heat-stressed tobacco plants. J. Plant Physiol.168 (17), 2063–2071. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.06.009
61
TerashimaM.PetroutsosD.HüdigM.TolstyginaI.TrompeltK.GäbeleinP.et al. (2012). Calcium-dependent regulation of cyclic photosynthetic electron transfer by a CAS, ANR1, and PGRL1 complex. PNAS.109, 17717–17722. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207118109
62
ThorK. (2019). Calcium–nutrient and messenger. Front. Plant Sci.10. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00440
63
TianW.HouC.RenZ.WangC.ZhaoF.DahlbeckD.et al. (2019). A calmodulin-gated calcium channel links pathogen patterns to plant immunity. Nature.572 (7767), 131–135. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1413-y
64
TianB.ZhuJ.NieY.XuC.MengQ.WangP. (2019). Mitigating heat and chilling stress by adjusting the sowing date of maize in the north China plain. J. Agron. Crop Sci.205 (1), 77–87. doi: 10.1111/jac.12299
65
TovignanT. K.FoncekaD.NdoyeI.CisseN.LuquetD. (2016). The sowing date and post-flowering water status affect the sugar and grain production of photoperiodic, sweet sorghum through the regulation of sink size and leaf area dynamics. Field Crops Res.192, 67–77. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.015
66
VirkG.PilonC.SniderJ. L.TubbsR. S. (2020). Early season vigor in peanuts is dependent on leaf area responses to temperature. Agron. J.112 (2), 899–910. doi: 10.1002/agj2.20017
67
WanS. B. (2003). Peanut cultivation in China (Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press).
68
WangC.XuW.JinH.ZhangT.LaiJ.ZhouX.et al. (2016). A putative chloroplast-localized Ca2+/H+ antiporter CCHA1 is involved in calcium and pH homeostasis and required for PSII function in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant9 (8), 1183–1196. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.05.015
69
WangQ.YangS.WanS.LiX. (2019). The significance of calcium in photosynthesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci.20 (6), 1353–1367. doi: 10.3390/ijms20061353
70
WhiteP. J.BroadleyM. R. (2003). Calcium in plants. Ann. Bot.92 (4), 487–511. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcg164
71
WuD.LiuY.PangJ.YongJ. W. H.ChenY.BaiC.et al. (2020). Exogenous calcium alleviates nocturnal chilling-induced feedback inhibition of photosynthesis by improving sink demand in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Front. Plant Sci.11. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.607029
72
YamoriW.ShikanaiT. (2016). Physiological functions of cyclic electron transport around photosystem I in sustaining photosynthesis and plant growth. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol.67, 81–106. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-112002
73
YiX.McChargueM.LabordeS.FrankelL. K.BrickerT. M. (2005). The manganese-stabilizing protein is required for photosystem II assembly/stability and photoautotrophy in higher plants. J. Biol. Chem.280, 16170–16174. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501550200
74
ZhangK.DongQ.HuoY.AiX.JiangC.YuH.et al. (2020). Effects of different calcium fertilizer dosages on nutrient uptake and utilization and growth and development of peanut. J. Peanut Sci.49 (3), 22–31. doi: 10.14001/j.issn.1002-4093.2020.03.004
75
ZhangH.JiangC.LeiJ.DongJ.RenJ.ShiX.et al. (2022). Comparative physiological and transcriptomic analyses reveal key regulatory networks and potential hub genes controlling peanut chilling tolerance. Genomics.114 (2), 110285. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110285
76
ZhangH.JiangC.RenJ.DongJ.ShiX.ZhaoX.et al. (2020). An advanced lipid metabolism system revealed by transcriptomic and lipidomic analyses plays a central role in peanut cold tolerance. Front. Plant Sci.11, 1110. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01110
77
ZhangG.LiuY.NiY.MengZ.LuT.LiT. (2014). Exogenous calcium alleviates low night temperature stress on the photosynthetic apparatus of tomato leaves. PloS One9 (5), e97322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097322
78
ZhangF.LuK.GuY.ZhangL.LiW.LiZ. (2020). Effects of low-temperature stress and brassinolide application on the photosynthesis and leaf structure of tung tree seedlings. Front. Plant Sci.10, 1767. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01767
79
ZhangZ.WhishJ.BellL. W.NanZ. (2017). Forage production, quality and water-use-efficiency of four warm-season annual crops at three sowing times in the loess plateau region of china. Eur. J. Agron.84, 84–94. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2016.12.008
80
ZhaoX.LiC.YanC.WangJ.YuanC.ZhangH.et al. (2019). Transcriptome and proteome analyses of resistant preharvest peanut seed coat in response to Aspergillus flavus infection. Electron. J. Biotechn.39, 82–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ejbt.2019.03.003
81
ZhouY.LiX.CaoJ.LiY.HuangJ.PengS. (2018). High nitrogen input reduces yield loss from low temperature during the seedling stage in early-season rice. Field Crops Res.228, 68–75. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.08.018
82
ZhouB.YueY.SunX.DingZ.MaW.ZhaoM. (2017). Maize kernel weight responses to sowing date-associated variation in weather conditions. Crop J.5 (1), 43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2016.07.002
Summary
Keywords
early sowing, peanut (Arachia hypogeae), cold tolerance, Ca2+, photosynthesis
Citation
Song Q, Zhang S, Bai C, Shi Q, Wu D, Liu Y, Han X, Li T and Yong JWH (2022) Exogenous Ca2+ priming can improve peanut photosynthetic carbon fixation and pod yield under early sowing scenarios in the field. Front. Plant Sci. 13:1004721. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1004721
Received
27 July 2022
Accepted
13 September 2022
Published
29 September 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
IFTIKHAR ALI, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Developmental Biology (CAS), China
Reviewed by
Fei Ding, Liaocheng University, China; Basharat Ali, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology (KFUEIT), Pakistan; Ali Raza, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, China; Yang Gao, Farmland Irrigation Research Institute (CAAS), China
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Song, Zhang, Bai, Shi, Wu, Liu, Han, Li and Yong.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yifei Liu, yifeiliu6@hotmail.com; liuyifei@syau.edu.cn
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
This article was submitted to Plant Abiotic Stress, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.