Abstract
Upland rice production is limited by the low phosphorus (P) availability of many highly weathered tropical soils and P deficiency is likely to become increasingly limiting in future drier climates because P mobility decreases sharply with soil moisture. Good seedling root development will be crucial to cope with the combined effects of low P and water availability. Upland rice genebank accession DJ123 was used as a donor for P efficiency and root vigor traits in a cross with inefficient local variety Nerica4 and a set of backcross lines were used to characterize the seedling stage response of upland rice to low P availability and to identify associated QTL in field trials in Japan and Madagascar. Ten QTL were detected for crown root number, root, shoot and total dry weight per plant in a highly P deficient field in Japan using the BC1F3 generation. Of these, qPef9 on chromosome 9 affected multiple traits, increasing root number, root weight and total biomass, whereas a neighboring QTL on chromosome 9 (qPef9-2) increased shoot biomass. Field trials with derived BC1F5 lines in a low-P field in Madagascar confirmed a highly influential region on chromosome 9. However, qPef9-2 appeared more influential than qPef9, as the shoot and root biomass contrast between lines carrying DJ123 or Nerica4 alleles at qPef9-2 was +23.8% and +13.5% compared to +19.2% and +14.4% at qPef9. This advantage increased further during the growing season, leading to 46% higher shoot biomass at the late vegetative stage. Results suggest an introgression between 8.0 and 12.9 Mb on chromosome 9 from P efficient donor DJ123 can improve plant performance under P-limited conditions. The QTL identified here have practical relevance because they were confirmed in the target genetic background of the local variety Nerica4 and can therefore be applied directly to improve its performance.
Introduction
The growing global population necessitates continuous increases in crop production and this need is especially urgent for rice in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) where a second trend, the shifting consumer preferences away from traditional crops towards rice consumption, has caused local rice production to increasingly fall behind local rice demand (). The total rice cultivation surface harvested in SSA was around 11.2 million hectares in 2016 () and that included an expansion of the upland rice area by more than 1 million ha in Africa (). Upland rice in SSA is predominantly grown by subsistence farmers that either lack the financial resources to purchase off-farm inputs such as fertilizers or may decide not to apply fertilizers as a risk-avoidance strategy given that upland rice productivity fluctuates strongly with year-to-year variation in rainfall patterns (). As a result upland rice yields are typically far below those achieved in irrigated lowland rice (; ) and the vulnerability of upland rice production is expected to further increase with global climate change as rainfall patterns are expected to become more irregular (; ).
Upland rice is typically grown on the highly weathered soils of the humid tropics that strongly sorb P due to the abundance of iron and aluminum oxides in their clay fractions, rendering P largely unavailable to plant roots (). P deficiency is therefore considered to be the most important yield-limiting factor in upland rice production of SSA together with drought (). P deficiency is likely to be increasingly limiting in future drier climates because P mobility decreases sharply with the decline of soil moisture (). This would particularly affect seedling establishment and early crop development when roots are developing and soil exploration by roots is not sufficiently large to acquire the immobile P. To overcome P limitations during this early phase, one low-cost strategy would be to apply a micro-dose of P fertilizer together with seeds into the planting hole (), while exploring genotypic variation for early seedling vigor during P deficiency would represent a second option.
Genotypic differences in P uptake by rice plants do exist and are mainly caused by genotypic differences in root growth rates and to a lesser extent by differences in the quantity of P acquired per root size, or root efficiency (; ). It was furthermore shown that differences in P acquisition ability exist during the early seedling stages that are driven by rapid seedling root development (). It would thus be beneficial to explore such traits leading to better crop establishment in rice breeding and this study attempts to do so for upland rice in Madagascar.
Nerica4 is a popular upland rice variety in Africa including Madagascar due to its good grain quality, good response to fertilizer, tolerance to drought stress and resistance to the parasitic weed striga (). However, Nerica4 does not perform well on infertile soils in the absence of fertilizers (; ). This poor performance may be caused in part by its low capacity to acquire P from P-sorbing soils (; ). In contrast, the genebank accession DJ123 of Bangladeshi origin and belonging to the aus sub-species of rice was identified as being well-adapted to low-P African soils, especially if P deficiency coincided with water limitations (). Subsequently it was shown that DJ123 has much faster seedling root development than Nerica4 and that it combines early root growth with superior root efficiency and internal P utilization efficiency (), making it a potential donor for these desired traits.
Quantitative trait loci (QTL) for performance under P deficient conditions had been identified earlier in rice (; ; ; ) and of these, only the large-effect QTL Pup1 had been narrowed down to a single gene (OsPSTOL1; ) and was subsequently utilized in marker-assisted selection to develop rice varieties with improved performance under P deficiency (). Many modern varieties developed for favorable lowland conditions completely lack the entire Pup1 locus including OsPSTOL1, but both Nerica4 and DJ123 carry OsPSTOL1 alleles (, and unpublished data). To identify novel loci that further improve seedling vigor under P deficiency beyond the level conferred by Pup1, it may thus be desirable that both parents of the mapping population were carriers of OsPSTOL1.
The present study utilized a QTL mapping population derived from P efficient donor DJ123 and inefficient recurrent parent Nerica4 with the aim to identify novel loci controlling early vigor traits under P deficient conditions. We used a back-cross population to minimize potentially negative effects of exotic donor DJ123. Specifically, our objectives were to perform QTL mapping in a BC1F3 population on a highly P-sorbing soil in Japan in the absence of water limitations; and to confirm identified QTL in field trials in Madagascar and Japan using selected homozygous lines in the BC1F5 generation.
Materials and methods
Plant material
An initial breeding population targeting P deficient upland environments in SSA had been developed from a cross of P efficient genebank accession DJ123 with P inefficient upland variety Nerica4 by the Africa Rice Center and shared with FOFIFA for further advancement and evaluation in Madagascar. DJ123 belongs to the aus subpopulation of rice whereas Nerica4 had been developed from an interspecific cross between an Oryza glaberrima donor and recurrent parent WAB56-104 belonging to the tropical japonica subpopulation of Oryza sativa. From the initial DJ123 x Nerica4 population, line NDJ188 was found to have good field performance in Madagascar and was back-crossed to Nerica4 to develop a BC1 QTL mapping population of 201 lines. These were genotyped in the BC1F2 and phenotyped in the derived BC1F3 generation. The confirmation of detected QTL was done in the BC1F5, which was developed by advancing one single selected BC1F3 plant to the F4, where another single selected plant was used as the founder of the BC1F5.
Phenotyping under hydroponic and rhizobox conditions
Parents (DJ123, Nerica4 and NDJ188) were characterized through nutrient solution and rhizobox experiments. Plants were grown with Yoshida nutrient solution () in which the standard P concentration of 320 μM P was reduced to 2 μM P to evaluate plant growth under P deficiency. The rhizobox experiment used the same low-P soil described for field experiment 1 below. The dimensions of the plexiglas rhizoboxes were 30 x 30 x 3 cm (height x width x depth for outer dimensions). Plants in both experiments were sampled at 35 days after sowing (DAS). The number of crown roots (RN) was counted and root dry weight (RW) and shoot dry weight (SW) were determined after oven-drying samples at 65°C for 3 days. Total dry weight per plant (TW) was calculated from the sum of RW and SW.
Phenotyping under field conditions
Three field experiments were conducted in Japan and Madagascar over the 2020-2022 period.
Experiment 1
The 201 BC1F3 lines were evaluated at the experimental field station of JIRCAS in Tsukuba, Japan (36°05’N, 140°08’E; altitude 50 m above sea level) in 2020 in an upland field plot that had not been fertilized with P for more than 15 years. The soil at the site is a volcanic ash soil (Humic Haplic Andosol) with a pH of 5.8 and very high P fixing capacity, leading to a very low level of plant available P (5 mg P kg−1 soil, Bray-II). Before sowing, basal NPK fertilizer was applied at the recommended rate of 50-0-50 kg/ha. Parents and 201 BC1F3 lines of the mapping population were sown in a randomized complete block design with four replications on 16th June, 2020. Each entry was sown in double-row microplots with spacing of 15 cm between rows and 10 cm within rows. The length of each row was 2 m. The field was occasionally supplied with water to prevent drought stress and weeds were manually removed. Three plants per replicate plot were sampled 40 DAS (n=12). The evaluated traits were RN, RW, SW, and TW. Plants were dug out to a depth of 20 cm using a spade and soil was washed off with water. The number of crown root per plant was counted, then shoot and root were separated, dried in the oven for 3 days at 70°C and weighed. Total dry weight was obtained by adding RW and SW.
Experiment 2
BC1F5 lines were used in 2021 to confirm the QTLs detected in 2020 in the BC1F3 population. Experiment 2 was sown at JIRCAS in Tsukuba on June 2nd, 2021 in a neighboring field with slightly higher P availability (7 mg P kg−1 soil, Bray-II) but also without fertilizer-P application (N and K were applied as in 2020). BC1F5 lines were sown in a randomized complete block design with two replications in 2-row microplots as described above and 3 plants were sampled per plot (n=6). Sampling was done 40 DAS using same procedures as above.
Experiment 3
BC1F5 lines were furthermore evaluated in Ankazo, Madagascar (19° 39’S 46° 30’E; altitude 1016 m above sea level), to confirm the efficacy of detected QTL in a very different environment. Fields in Ankazo were unfertilized following typical farmers practice in the region. The soil at the site is classified as Oxisol/Ferrasol, with a pH of 5.1 and a low level of plant available P of 6.63 mg P kg−1 soil (Olsen). Lines were sown in double-rows, with a spacing of 10 cm between rows and 10 cm within rows, on February 8th, 2022. The experiment was not replicated but 5 plants per plot were sampled 40 and 70 DAS from the same lines as in Experiment 2, considering the AA and BB alleles of the detected QTL on chromosome 9.
Molecular marker detection through restriction site associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq)
DNA was extracted from leaves by the standard phenol-chloroform method, and genotype data were obtained using restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) (). The detailed methods and information for library construction for RAD-seq were described in . The resultant library was sequenced with the Hiseq-X instrument (Illumina). The quality of reads was analyzed by FastQC software (ver 0.11.9) (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). The raw sequence reads generated were trimmed for remaining adapters and low-quality regions using the trimmomatic software (ver 0.38) () with the following settings: LEADING:3, TRAILING:3, SLIDINGWINDOW:4:15, MINLEN:100.
The remaining high-quality sequences were aligned to an in-house genome assembly of parent DJ123 for the BC1F3 and to the publicly available genome assembly of a tropical japonica cultivar Azucena (NCBI BioProject PRJNA424001) for the BC1F5, using bwa software (ver 0.7.17) (). Aligned reads were ordered, indexed and converted to BAM format with samtools (ver 1.9) (). Variants were extracted using bcftools software (ver 1.9) (). The extracted single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) markers were filtered by vcftools software (ver 0.1.16) () using the following settings: –min-meanDP 10 –max-meanDP 50 –max-missing 0.95 –minQ 20 –min-alleles 2 –max-alleles 2 for the BC1F3 population. For BC1F5 population, –max-meanDP 100 option was used due to deeper sequencing depth. Monomorphic and indel markers were further removed. For the BC1F3 population, missing alleles were imputed by BEAGLE software (ver 5.1) (). Further removal of monomorphic and indel markers resulted in a total of 1578 markers in the BC1F3 population, which was further manually reduced to 222 based on minor allele frequency (> 0.1), physical positions and likelihood of genotyping error calculated by the R/qtl software (http://www.rqtl.org; ). For the BC1F5 population, SNPs within 20 bp of detected indel sites were removed. To minimize spurious heterozygous calls, heterozygous allele was defined only when >5 reads from each parent supported the genotype. Subsequently, missing alleles were imputed by the k-nearest neighbor imputation method using TASSEL 5 software (; ). Further removal of monomorphic and indel markers resulted in a total of 7398 genome-wide SNP markers in the BC1F5. These markers were reduced to 299 markers based on minor allele frequency (> 0.1) and physical distance.
Genetic linkage map construction and QTL analysis
Above process retained 222 SNP markers for the BC1F3 and 299 SNP markers for the BC1F5. SNP calls were converted to the ABH-format, where “A’, ‘B’ and ‘H’ denote the donor DJ123 allele, recipient Nerica4 allele and heterozygote state, respectively. The genetic linkage map was constructed using R software package Rqtl and LinkageMapView (; ). Markers were initially ordered based on their physical map positions but the final order was determined after applying the ripple function in Rqtl. Genetic distances were estimated in cM using the Kosambi option.
The software PLABQTL (http://www.uni-hohenheim.de/ipspwww/soft.html; ) was used for QTL mapping. Mean phenotypic values of 4 replicates with 3 sampled plants per replicate were used as the input. Putative QTL were detected by Composite Interval Mapping, in which the most influential markers based on an F-to-enter of 8.0 were used as cofactors in the analysis. For each trait, significance threshold was determined by 1000 times of permutation test at a significance level of 5% and 10%.
For the confirmation of detected QTL in the BC1F5, only lines homozygous at both flanking markers were selected. The effect of substituting Nerica4 (BB) alleles by DJ123 (AA) alleles was estimated based on mean phenotypic values of respective classes using Welch’s t test.
Results
Phenotypic variation
The comparison of parents used to develop the QTL mapping population in nutrient solution, rhizobox and field experiments under P deficient conditions showed that P efficient donor DJ123 had significantly higher biomass compared to recurrent parent Nerica4 and that parental line NDJ188 resembled DJ123 in most traits (Figure 1A). Under field conditions the higher biomass was accompanied by a larger root system (Figure 1B). In the field experiment conducted in Japan and providing the phenotypic data for QTL mapping or the 201 BC1F3 lines, large variation was observed for the traits measured at 40 DAS (Figure 2). Root number varied by two-fold from 7 to 14 crown roots and root biomass varied from 100 mg to 300 mg per plant with 60 lines being superior to the two parents Nerica4 and NDJ188. Similar 3-fold variation was observed for shoot weight and total biomass weight. The distribution of the four traits (RN, RW, SW and TW) was close to a normal distribution. Nerica4 had below average values for all traits whereas DJ123 was among the best performers for biomass traits and NDJ188 for root number (Figure 2). Correlations between biomass traits were high; Pearson’s correlation coefficient ranged from r = 0.75 (P < 1.0 × 10-15) between root and shoot biomass to r = 0.96 (P < 1.0 × 10-15) for shoot and total biomass (Supplementary Table S1). Root number (RN) had moderate positive correlations of around r = 0.5 (P = 8.1 × 10-13) with biomass traits.
Figure 1
Figure 2
QTL detection
A linkage map containing 222 SNP markers was generated for the BC1F3 mapping population, by aligning RAD-seq reads to the parental DJ123 reference sequence and subsequent reduction of very closely linked markers (Supplementary Figure S1). Since this is a backcross population of Nerica4-derived NDJ188 to Nerica4, the linkage map is characterized by large non-recombinant blocks. This resulted in very small recombinant regions on chromosomes 3, 4, 7, 11, and 12.
A total of 10 putative QTL were detected for the traits RN, SW, RW and TW and several traits mapped to the same locus, indicating that only 6 distinct putative QTL were identified. One QTL affecting the P efficiency traits RN, RW and TW was detected on chromosome 9 (qPef9 – for P efficiency) within the same interval (Figure 3, Table 1), whereas two QTL overlapped for SW and TW on chromosomes 1 (qPef1) and 6 (qPef6). Two QTL were detected for RN; qRNO8 and qPef9, jointly explaining 23.4% of the variation for RN among the 201 backcross lines. Alleles increasing RN were from donor DJ123. In addition to qPef9, one minor locus was detected for RW on chromosome 2 (qPef2) and this locus was the only one for which Nerica4 contributed the positive allele (Table 1). Variation in SW was attributed to three putative QTL on chromosomes 1 (qPef1), 6 (qPef6) and 9 (qPef9-2), together explaining 46.8% of the variation for this trait. Of the three putative QTL detected for TW, two coincided with QTL for SW (qPef1) and (qPef6) and one with a QTL for RW and RN (qPef9) (Figure 3).
Figure 3
Table 1
| Trait | QTL name | Chromosome | Nearest markera | Positionb (cM) | Support intervalc | LODd | R2(%)e | Additive effectf | Positive allele |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Root Number | qRNO8 | 8 | C8M27 | 200 | 186-216 | 5.55** | 11.9 | -0.36 | DJ |
| Root Number | qPef9 | 9 | C9M16 | 96 | 86-110 | 5.35** | 11.5 | -0.37 | DJ |
| Total | 23.4 | ||||||||
| Root Weight | qPef2 | 2 | C2M16 | 136 | 126-148 | 4.46* | 9.7 | 1.24 | N4 |
| Root Weight | qPef9 | 9 | C9M16 | 96 | 88-108 | 5.91** | 12.7 | -1.23 | DJ |
| Total | 22.4 | ||||||||
| Shoot weight | qPef1 | 1 | C1M29 | 216 | 208-232 | 7.11** | 15 | -3.37 | DJ |
| Shoot weight | qPef6 | 6 | C6M23 | 242 | 238-254 | 7.64** | 16.1 | -3.6 | DJ |
| Shoot weight | qPef9-2 | 9 | C9M9 | 66 | 62-70 | 7.48** | 15.7 | -2.65 | DJ |
| Total | 46.8 | ||||||||
| Total Weight | qPef1 | 1 | C1M29 | 218 | 208-232 | 6.48** | 13.8 | -6.8 | DJ |
| Total Weight | qPef6 | 6 | C6M23 | 242 | 238-264 | 6.33** | 13.5 | -4.07 | DJ |
| Total Weight | qPef9 | 9 | C9M16 | 94 | 88-102 | 9.3** | 19.2 | -4.66 | DJ |
| Total | 46.5 |
Putative QTL for root number and biomass traits based on phenotypic data generated for the BC1F3 population from a field experiment conducted on highly P deficient soil in Japan.
Nearest marker from the peak of the QTL. Marker name indicates the chromosome and the relative position of the markers in the chromosome.
Genetic position of the putative QTL in cM.
Confidence interval of the location of the putative QTL in cM.
Logarithm of the odds score of QTL detected using the threshold of LOD, based on the 1000 times of permutation test. * and ** indicate significance level at 10% (LOD> 4.22 for RW) and 5% (LOD> 4.83, 4.72, 4.72 and 4.78 for RN, RW, SW and TW), respectively.
Percentage of the variation explained by the QTL.
Additive effect: negative value indicates the genotype from the parent DJ123 toward increasing the trait value.
QTL interactions and effects in BC1F3
To what extent interactions between two detected QTL affected phenotypic values in the BC1F3 was explored in Supplementary Tables S2 – S4 where AA and BB stand for the DJ123 and Nerica4 allele, respectively. The interaction for root number QTL qPef9 with qRNO8 indicated the presence of small non-additive effects, since having DJ alleles at both loci increased root number more than expected from the single locus effects (Supplementary Table S2). On the other hand, the interaction between root biomass QTL (qPef9 and qPef2) was not significant (Supplementary Table S3). Among shoot biomass QTL (qPef9-2, qPef1, and qPef6) the interaction between qPef9-2 and qPef1 was not significant but the other 2 combinations yielded significance (Supplementary Table S4). The interaction between the total biomass QTL (qPef6 and qPef9) was significant, with AAAA types having a larger advantage (+23 to +26%) over double-negative BBBB, than expected from a single allele change (+5 to +8% in AABB or BBAA).
Confirmation of QTL effects in Madagascar and Japan using derived BC1F5 lines
To genotypically characterize the BC1F5 lines derived from the original BC1F3 lines, a new set of 299 SNP markers was utilized from a new RAD-seq analysis. Their average segregation ratio was 44.3% DJ123 allele (AA), 39.5% Nerica4 allele (BB) and 16.1% heterozygotes. Six distinct QTL had been identified in the initial BC1F3 experiment and to what extent their effects can be confirmed was examined in field experiments with BC1F5 lines selected for homozygosity using markers flanking the QTL position.
Locus qPef9 had strong positive effects on TW, SW and RN in the initial experiment in Japan, and in both confirmatory experiments, the DJ123 allele improved performance, although effects were smaller than anticipated (Table 2), except for RN where the effect of the AA allele is significantly higher than the BB allele. Interestingly the largest effect was observed for SW, for which a different QTL (qPef9-2) on chromosome 9 had been mapped in the BC1F3 (Figure 3). This second QTL on chromosome 9 generally had very strong effects in Madagascar, increasing SW and TW by 23.8% and 18.2%, respectively, but also significantly increasing RW and RN (Table 2). Remarkably, the two QTL observed on chromosome 9 do have similar and significant effects in all the traits in Madagascar site and only on RN in Japan site. Two other QTL could be confirmed in Japan but not in Madagascar, namely qPef6 that increased RN, SW and TW and qRNO8 that increased RN. The remaining QTL, qPef1 and qPef2, had only minor influence in the BC1F5 lines in either site, and did not yield significant difference (Table 2),
Table 2
| Madagascar | Japan | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTL | Allele | RN | RW | SW | TW | (n)a | RN | RW | SW | TW | (n)a |
| qPef1 | AA | 20.3 | 172 | 654 | 809 | 90 | 13.4 | 213 | 220 | 433 | 87 |
| BB | 21 | 186 | 629 | 834 | 19 | 13.9 | 208 | 213 | 420 | 20 | |
| % | -3.4 | -8.1 | 3.8 | -3.1 | -3.7 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 3.0 | |||
| qPef2 | AA | 20.5 | 170 | 631 | 796 | 57 | 14 | 211 | 218 | 429 | 52 |
| BB | 20.2 | 171 | 660 | 800 | 58 | 13.1 | 211 | 219 | 430 | 57 | |
| % | 1.5 | -0.6 | -4.6 | -0.5 | 6.4 | 0.0 | -0.5 | -0.2 | |||
| qPef6 | AA | 21 | 180 | 678 | 819 | 59 | 13.8 | 218 | 226 | 444 | 52 |
| BB | 20.1 | 162 | 640 | 807 | 42 | 13 | 209 | 200 | 409 | 45 | |
| % | 4.3 | 10.0 | 5.6 | 1.5 | 28.8 | 5.8* | 4.1 | 11.5* | 7.9* | ||
| qRNO8 | AA | 20.2 | 174 | 691 | 811 | 47 | 13.9 | 215 | 222 | 437 | 41 |
| BB | 20.9 | 181 | 653 | 842 | 60 | 13.3 | 213 | 223 | 435 | 57 | |
| % | -3.5 | -4.0 | 5.5 | -3.8 | 4.3* | 0.9 | -0.5 | 0.5 | |||
| qPef9-2 | AA | 21.3 | 185 | 711 | 878 | 74 | 14 | 217 | 225 | 441 | 74 |
| BB | 19.5 | 160 | 542 | 718 | 42 | 12.9 | 203 | 212 | 415 | 38 | |
| % | 8.5* | 13.5* | 23.8* | 18.2* | 7.9* | 6.5 | 5.8 | 5.9 | |||
| qPef9 | AA | 21.3 | 187 | 708 | 885 | 68 | 14.1 | 217 | 224 | 442 | 69 |
| BB | 19.4 | 160 | 572 | 731 | 41 | 12.8 | 208 | 213 | 420 | 38 | |
| % | 8.9* | 14.4* | 19.2* | 17.4* | 9.2* | 4.1 | 4.9 | 5.0 | |||
Effect of the positive alleles at detected QTL on average phenotypic values of selected homozygote lines in the BC1F5 generation.
Percent values indicate the difference between AA (DJ123) and BB (Nerica4) genotypic classes, using flanking markers of Figure 3 to define QTL positions (corresponding markers in the BC1F5 are shown in Supplementary Table S5). Traits highlighted in bold print are those for which a particular QTL had been identified in the BC1F3.
The initial QTL mapping study identified two apparently distinct QTL on chromosome 9 controlling different traits. However, confirmatory trials in Madagascar placed this distinction in question as qPef9 and qPef9-2 affected traits similarly, but with stronger effects for qPef9-2 compared to qPef9 on SW and TW in Madagascar. The general similarity of effects of both chromosome 9 QTL with stronger effects in qPef9-2 were confirmed by some additional plant sampling for SW during the late vegetative stage in Madagascar. Results are summarized in Figure 4, showing highest SW being achieved by lines homozygous for DJ123 at qPef9-2, which outperformed their Nerica4 allele counterparts by 46% and parent Nerica4 by 64.8%. Lines homozygous for DJ123 at qPef9 also significantly outperformed their Nerica4 allele counterparts (+34.8%) and parent Nerica4 (+61.9%).
Figure 4
Discussion
Upland rice has the potential to play an important role in satisfying the increasing demand for rice in SSA, but two recent global trends make improvements in upland rice productivity even more precarious. These are the increasing costs of fertilizers that place P fertilizer purchases out of reach of small-holder farmers (), and global climate change leading to less predictable rainfall patterns that more strongly affect rice as a relatively drought-sensitive crop (). These combined effects are likely to particularly affect upland rice crop establishment on the highly weathered tropical soils such as Oxisols that represent the typical soils in upland rice farming regions of Madagascar (). Such soils are characterized by strong sorption and low mobility of P and with less frequent rainfall, P mobility and therefore plant availability will decrease further because P mobility decreases sharply with reduced soil moisture ().
Rapid seedling root development is a key trait to assure P uptake quickly reaches sufficiently high rates to support crop establishment after seed-P reserves have been depleted () and the donor (DJ123) used in developing the QTL mapping population was found to be far superior to the recurrent parent Nerica4, which is characterized by rather slow seedling growth and root development when P is growth-limiting (). Identifying QTL for rapid seedling root development and seedling biomass accumulated under P deficiency in the Nerica4 genetic background could therefore be a potentially important step towards improving these traits in the otherwise well-adapted variety Nerica4.
Root trait differences between both parents have been explored in detail but apart from slightly more pronounced lateral root branching in DJ123, root system architecture was remarkably similar between both parents, which included a rather similar distribution at soil depth (; ). Despite concentrating most roots in the plow layer, neither parent was classified as having a shallow root system when compared to other rice genotypes more adapted to flooded conditions () and the detailed evaluation of the DJ123 confirmed an intermediate root type with a root angle distribution peaking around 30° from the soil surface (). Considering the similarity of root systems between parents, but the very pronounced difference in early seedling vigor, this study focused on this latter trait.
QTL mapping and confirmation of QTL effects
QTL mapping was conducted in Japan on the same soil used to characterize the parental accessions and Nerica4 was confirmed to lack early seedling vigor while the majority of BC1F3 lines surpassed the recurrent parent. We detected 6 distinct QTL associated with traits RN, RW, SW, and TW. Three QTL detected for SW and TW on chromosomes 1, 6 and 9 jointly explained 47% of the variation for the respective traits. Given the tight correlation (r = 0.96) between SW and TW, it was expected that QTL for both biomass traits would overlap, as in the case of qPef1 and qPef6, and possibly for the neighboring chromosome 9 loci qPef9 and qPef9-2 that may represent one large peak rather than two distinct loci, as to be discussed in a following paragraph.
The confirmation with a smaller set of lines in the subsequent BC1F5 generation was conducted in Japan and in the target upland rice region of central Western Madagascar where Nerica4 is a commonly grown variety. While most small-effect QTL could not be confirmed, qPef9-2 and to a lesser extent qPef9 showed very positive effects in Madagascar, from a 8.5% increase in crown root number to a 23.8% improvement of SW in 40-day old plants. The positive effect increased further over time to 46% higher SW at the late vegetative stage, indicating that QTL effects are not limited to the seedling stage. Instead, good seedling development under P deficiency was expected to lay the foundation for subsequent crop development and this appears to have been the case here. To what extent better root development was the driving factor for plant growth on these low-P soils cannot be answered with certainty, however, that chromosome 9 significantly increased RN in all 3 experiments may indicate that root development is a key process affected by qPef9/qPef9-2.
A question to be resolved through subsequent fine-mapping is whether chromosome 9 harbors two distinct and closely linked loci or whether qPef9 and qPef9-2 should in fact be considered as a single locus spanning the region from 9.19 to 12.92 Mb on chromosome 9. However, based on the evidence obtained in the current study, we may cautiously conclude that a single locus is the most likely scenario based on the confirmatory data obtained in Madagascar that no longer distinguishes shoot from root-related QTL effects. Furthermore, using the seq/s command in PlabQTL to return LOD estimates in 10 cM intervals for the 56 – 106 cM region on chromosome 9 indicated that the entire 66 – 106 cM region was above LOD 3.0 for biomass traits, with peaks at 66 and 96 cM (Supplementary Figure S2) but without a clear drop in significance between the peaks. Last but not least, a QTL region of 3.72 Mb size is not excessively large. Evaluation of a large number of F2 plants derived from the cross between the recurrent parent Nerica4 and a line containing this entire region would allow us to resolve whether a single or two distinct QTL exist through fine-mapping, which would also be the first step towards identifying the underlying causal gene(s).
Supporting evidence from other QTL mapping studies
Several QTL associated with tolerance to P deficiency have been detected in rice (; ; ; ), of which the most influential appears to be the Pup1 locus on chromosome 12 (; ). Among these studies, detected a QTL for P deficiency-induced root elongation under a hydroponic condition on chromosome 6 that appears to be overlapping with qPef6 detected here for SW and TW. The same study also detected QTL for shoot dry weight under P deficiency and P deficiency-induced changes in shoot P content at very close positions, suggesting that root growth under P deficiency is linked with P uptake and shoot growth under P deficient conditions. Further investigations are necessary to determine if qPef6 is related with root elongation and if such trait is relevant with P uptake and shoot growth under P-deficient field conditions. Another QTL detected by was located on chromosome 8, but seemingly towards the opposite end of chromosome from qRNO8 detected here.
For the main QTL qPef-9/qPef9-2 affecting root number and biomass traits, two studies detected QTL at similar positions in relation to biomass production in pot experiments under fertilized well-watered upland conditions. identified rdw9 between 12.41 – 18.49 Mb on chromosome 9 in the Yuefu x IRAT 109 population, explaining 18.5% of the variation for root dry weight. A second QTL at the very similar interval of 9.78 – 12.41 Mb was detected in the IAC165 x Co39 population, explaining 5.5% of the variation for seedling shoot weight of plants (). Thus, a region containing qPef-9 and qPef9-2 might be responsible for root growth under upland conditions irrespective of P conditions, which improves biomass production under P deficient conditions by enhancing P uptake as a consequence of extending the effective soil volume for P uptake.
Resolving to what extent this presumed chain of events is correct would be highly desirable as this would allow fine-tuning strategies for future fine-mapping and candidate gene identification. For a QTL affecting root growth screening would be possible in nutrient solution or greenhouse experiments, providing data less prone to environmental effects. In contrast, a QTL related to P uptake processes at the soil-root interphase would require screening in soil, and the more positive effect in Madagascar would suggest that fine-mapping should ideally be done under these local conditions. A third possibility is that qPef9 may be due to processes related to internal P efficiency or P allocation between shoot and root, and such effects are notoriously difficult to phenotype in field experiments, thus would ideally require very specific screening experiment during fine-mapping. In order to provide insights into these alternative underlying mechanisms physiological studies should be conducted using contrasting lines identified in experiment 3.
Conclusions
We have detected and confirmed a strong QTL on chromosome 9 that increased crown root number and improved plant growth under P deficient conditions in Madagascar. Lines with the donor DJ123 alleles at this locus had more than 60% higher shoot biomass compared to recurrent parent Nerica4. The QTL identified here are practically relevant because they were detected and confirmed in the target genetic background of the local variety Nerica4. Superior performing lines of the mapping population can therefore enter multi-local yield trials in the target region.
Funding
This research was supported by the Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development (SATREPS), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)/Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)—Grant No. JPMJSA1608.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank field technical staff members of JIRCAS and at local farmers’ site in Madagascar for management of the field and assistance in plant phenotyping. The authors thank M. Yonemoto for preparation of DNA samples. We acknowledge Dr. Nani Drame (Former Africa Rice Center staff) for sharing seeds of the Nerica4 x DJ123 mapping population with FOFIFA.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The data presented in the study are deposited in the NCBI SRA repository, accession number PRJNA870681 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA870681) and PRJNA870975 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/PRJNA870975).
Author contributions
HR, DL, and JPT carried out field and greenhouse experiments and collected data. JPT and HT prepared DNA and sequencing library. YU conducted bioinformatic analyses and prepared markers. HR, DL, and MW conducted data analysis. HR and DL wrote the manuscript draft and prepared figures. MW conceived the research and wrote the manuscript. LR, TR, and MW supervised experiments. All the authors read and approved the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1017419/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AlewellC.RingevalB.BallabioC.RobinsonD.A.PanagosP.BorrelliP. (2020). Global phosphorus shortage will be aggravated by soil erosion. Nat. Commun.11, 4546. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18326-7
2
AtakoraW. K.FosuM.AbebreseS. O.AsantaM.WissuwaM. (2015). Evaluation of low phosphorus tolerance of rice varieties in northern Ghana. Sust Agric. Res.4, 109–114. doi: 10.5539/sar.v4n4p109
3
BairdN. A.EtterP. D.AtwoodT. S.CurreyM. C.ShiverA. L.LewisZ. A.et al. (2008). Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PloS One3, e3376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003376
4
BolgerA.M.LohseM.UsadelB. (2014). Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics30, 2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
5
BradburyP. J.ZhangZ.KroonD. E.CasstevensT. M.RamdossY.BucklerE. S. (2007). TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics23, 2633–2635. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308
6
BromanK. W.WuH.SenS.ChurchillG. A. (2003). R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses. Bioinformatics19, 889–890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg112
7
CourtoisB.ShenL.PetalcorinW.CarandangS.MauleonR.LiZ. (2003). Locating QTLs controlling constitutive root traits in the rice population IAC 165 × Co39. Euphytica134, 335–345. doi: 10.1023/B:EUPH.0000004987.88718.d6
8
DanecekP.AutonA.AbecasisG.AlbersC. A.BanksE.DePristoM. A.et al. (2011). The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics27, 2156–2158. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330
9
GamuyaoR.ChinJ. H.Pariasca-TanakaJ.PesaresiP.CatausanS.DalidC.et al. (2012). The protein kinase Pstol1 from traditional rice confers tolerance of phosphorus deficiency. Nature488, 535–539. doi: 10.1038/nature11346
10
GonzalezD.PostmaJ.WissuwaM. (2021). Cost-benefit analysis of the upland-rice root architecture in relation to phosphate: 3D simulations highlight the importance of s-type lateral roots for reducing the pay-off time. Front. Plant Sci12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.641835
11
HerediaM. C.KantJ.ProdhanM. A.DixitS.WissuwaM. (2021). Breeding rice for a changing climate by improving adaptations to water saving technologies. Theor. Appl. Genet.135, 17–33. doi: 10.1007/s00122-021-03899-8
12
KaleR. R.Durga RaniC. V.AnilaM.Mahadeva SwamyH. K.BhadanaV. P.SenguttuvelP.et al. (2021). Novel major QTLs associated with low soil phosphorus tolerance identified from the Indian rice landrace, wazuhophek. PloS One16, e0254526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254526
13
KobayashiM.OhyanagiH.TakanashiH.AsanoS.KudoT.Kajiya-KanegaeH.et al. (2017). Heap: A highly sensitive and accurate SNP detection tool for low-coverage high-throughput sequencing data. DNA Res.24, 397–405. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsx012
14
KoideY.Pariasca TanakaJ.RoseT.FukuoA.KonishoK.YanagiharaS.et al. (2013). QTLs for phosphorus-deficiency tolerance detected in upland NERICA varieties. Plant Breed.132, 259–265. doi: 10.1111/pbr.12052
15
LiH.DurbinR. (2009). Fast and accurate short read alignment with burrows-wheeler transform. Bioinformatics25, 1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
16
LiH.HandsakerB.WysokerA.FennellT.RuanJ.HomerN.et al. (2009). The sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics25, 2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
17
MarinM.FeeneyD. S.BrownL. K.RuizS.KoebernickN.BengoughA. G.et al. (2021). Significance of root hairs for plant performance under contrasting field conditions and water deficit. Ann. Bot.128, 1–16. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa181
18
MingF.ZhengX.MiG.et al. (2000). Identification of quantitative trait loci affecting tolerance to low phosphorus in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Chin. Sci. Bull.45, 520–525. doi: 10.1007/BF02887097
19
MoneyD.GardnerK.MigicovskyZ.SchwaningerH.ZhongG. Y.MylesS. (2015). LinkImpute: Fast and accurate genotype imputation for nonmodel organisms. G3 Genes Genomes Genet.5, 2383–2390. doi: 10.1534/g3.115.021667
20
MoriA.FukudaT.VejchasarnP.NestlerJ.Pariasca-TanakaJ.WissuwaM. (2016). The role of root size versus root efficiency in phosphorus acquisition in rice. J. Exp. Bot.67, 1179–1189. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv557
21
MuP.LiZ.LiC.ZhangH.WuC.LiC.et al. (2003). QTL mapping of the root traits and their correlation analysis with drought resistance using DH lines from paddy and upland rice cross. Chin. Sci. Bull.48, 2718–2724. doi: 10.1007/BF02901763
22
NigatuG.HansenJ.ChildsN.SeeleyR. (2017). Sub-Saharan Africa Is projected to be the leader in global rice imports. Amber Waves9, 17. doi: 10.22004/AG.ECON.266026
23
OuelletteL. A.ReidR. W.BlanchardS. G.BrouwerC. R. (2018). LinkageMapView-rendering high-resolution linkage and QTL maps. Bioinformatics34, 306–307. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx576
24
Pariasca-TanakaJ.ChinJ. H.DraméK. N.DalidC.HeuerS.WissuwaM. (2014). A novel allele of the P-starvation tolerance gene OsPSTOL1 from African rice (Oryza glaberrima steud) and its distribution in the genus Oryza. Theor. Appl. Genet.127, 1387–1398. doi: 10.1007/s00122-014-2306-y
25
Pariasca-TanakaJ.VandammeE.MoriA.et al. (2015). Does reducing seed-P concentrations affect seedling vigor and grain yield of rice? Plant Soil.392, 253–266. doi: 10.1007/s11104-015-2460-2
26
PookT.MayerM.GeibelJ.WeigendS.CaveroD.SchoenC. C.et al. (2020). Improving imputation quality in BEAGLE for crop and livestock data. G3 Genes Genomes Genomics10, 177–188. doi: 10.1534/g3.119.400798
27
RabeharisoaL. (2004). “Gestion de la fertilité et de la fertilisation phosphatée des sols ferrallitiques des hautes terres de Madagascar,” in Thèse d’Etat thesis (Antananarivo: University of Antananarivo), 213 pp. Available at: http://www.bordeaux.inra.fr/tcem/document/These%20Lilia%202004.pdf.
28
RakotosonT.HolzM.WissuwaM. (2020). Phosphorus deficiency tolerance in Oryza sativa: Root and rhizosphere traits. Rhizosphere14, 100198. doi: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2020.100198
29
SaitoK.AsaiH.ZhaoD.LaborteA. G.GreinerC. (2018). Progress in varietal improvement for increasing upland rice productivity in the tropics. Plant Prod Sci.21, 145–158. doi: 10.1080/1343943X.2018.1459751
30
ShawR.NguyenH.HabibaU.TakeuchiY. (2011). “Chapter 1 overview and characteristics of Asian monsoon drought,” in Droughts in Asian monsoon region. Eds. ShawR.NguyenH. (Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited), (pp. 1–(pp24). doi: 10.1108/S2040-7262(2011)0000008007
31
ShimizuA.YanagiharaS.KawasakiS.IkehashiH. (2004). Phosphorus deficiency-induced root elongation and its QTL in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet.109, 1361–1368. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1751-4
32
SwamyH. K. M.AnilaM.KaleR. R. (2020). Marker assisted improvement of low soil phosphorus tolerance in the bacterial blight resistant, fine-grain type rice variety, improved samba mahsuri. Sci. Rep.10, 21143. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78186-5
33
TsujimotoY.RakotosonT.TanakaA.SaitoK. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for improving N use efficiency for rice production in sub-Saharan Africa. Plant Prod. Sci.22, 413–427. doi: 10.1080/1343943X.2019.1617638
34
UtzH. F.MelchingerA. E. (1996). PLABQTL: A program for composite interval mapping of QTL. J. Quant Trait Loci2, 1. Available at: https://wheat.pw.usda.gov/jag/papers96/paper196/utz.html
35
VandammeE.WissuwaM.RoseT. (2016). Genotypic variation in grain P loading across diverse rice growing environments and implications for field P balances. Front. Plant Sci.7. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01435
36
van OortP. A. J.SaitoK.TanakaA.Amovin-AssagbaE.Van BusselL. G. J.van WartJ.et al. (2015). Assesment of rice self-sufficiency in 2025 in eight African countries. Glob. Food Sec.5, 39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2015.01.002
37
WARDA. (2001). “NERICA rice for life,” in Bouake 01, cote d’Ivoire (Bouake, Cote d'Ivoire:WARD), pp: 8. Available at: http://www.warda.cgiar.org/Publications/Nerica8.pdf.
38
WassmannR.JagadishS. V. K.HeuerS.IsmailA.RedonaE.SerrajR.et al. (2009). Climate change affecting rice production: the physiological and agronomic basis for possible adaptation strategies. Adv. Agron.101, 59–122. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)00802-X
39
WissuwaM.GonzalezD.Watts-WillliamsS. J. (2020). The contribution of plant traits and soil microbes to phosphorus uptake from low-phosphorus soil in upland rice varieties. Plant Soil448, 523–537. doi: 10.1007/s11104-020-04453-z
40
WissuwaM.WegnerJ.AeN.YanoM. (2002). Substitution mapping of Pup1: A major QTL increasing phosphorus uptake of rice from a phosphorus-deficient soil. Theor. Appl. Genet.105, 890–897. doi: 10.1007/s00122-002-1051-9
41
WissuwaM.YanoM.AeN. (1998). Mapping of QTLs for phosphorus-deficiency tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet.97, 777–783. doi: 10.1007/s001220050955
42
YoshidaS.FornoD. A.CockJ. H.GomezK. A. (1972). Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. 2nd edn (Manila: International Rice Research Institute), 1–70.
Summary
Keywords
phosphorus deficiency, crop establishment, crown root number, NERICA, seedling vigor
Citation
Ranaivo HN, Lam DT, Ueda Y, Pariasca Tanaka J, Takanashi H, Ramanankaja L, Razafimbelo T and Wissuwa M (2022) QTL mapping for early root and shoot vigor of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) under P deficient field conditions in Japan and Madagascar. Front. Plant Sci. 13:1017419. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1017419
Received
12 August 2022
Accepted
03 October 2022
Published
24 October 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Hannah Schneider, Wageningen University and Research, Netherlands
Reviewed by
Giovanni Melandri, INRAE Nouvelle-Aquitaine Bordeaux, France; Patompong Johns Saengwilai, Mahidol University, Thailand
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Ranaivo, Lam, Ueda, Pariasca Tanaka, Takanashi, Ramanankaja, Razafimbelo and Wissuwa.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Matthias Wissuwa, wissuwa@affrc.go.jp
†ORCID: Matthias Wissuwa, orcid.org/0000-0003-3505-9398
This article was submitted to Plant Abiotic Stress, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.