Abstract
Tropical trees store a large amount of nutrients in their woody tissues, thus triggering the question of what the functional association of these elements with other wood traits is. Given the osmotic activity of mineral elements such as potassium, sodium, and calcium, these elements should be strong candidates in mediating the water storing capacity in tropical trees. We investigated the role of wood nutrients in facilitating wood water storage in trees by using branch samples from 48 tropical tree species in South America and examined their associations with wood density (ρ). Wood density varied from 316 kg/m3 in Peru plots, where the soil nutrient status is relatively higher, to 908 kg/m3 in Brazil plots, where the nutrient availability is lower. Phosphorus content in wood varied significantly between plots with lowest values found in French Guiana (1.2 mol/m3) and plots with highest values found in Peru (43.6 mol/m3). Conversely, potassium in woody tissues showed a significant cross-species variation with Minquartia guianensis in Brazil showing the lowest values (8.8 mol/m3) and with Neea divaricata in Peru having the highest values (114 mol/m3). We found that lower wood density trees store more water in their woody tissues with cations, especially potassium, having a positive association with water storage. Specific relationships between wood cation concentrations and stem water storage potential nevertheless depend on both species’ identity and growing location. Tropical trees with increased water storage capacity show lower wood density and have an increased reliance on cations to regulate this reservoir. Our study highlights that cations play a more important role in tropical tree water relations than has previously been thought, with potassium being particularly important.
Introduction
Plants employ a plethora of ecological strategies to facilitate the acquisition of light, water, CO2, and mineral nutrients necessary for their growth, reproduction, and dispersal. These strategies should be reflected in physiological and morphological features indicating differences between species in terms of their adaptive design. For example, wood density (ρ) is considered to reflect a range of hydraulic functionalities (), with high-density wood being linked to increased hydraulic safety (; ; Pratt et al., 2007, 2021; ) and an associated capacity for maintaining operational functionality at lower water potentials (; ; Santiago et al., 2004; ; Pratt et al., 2021). At the other end of the spectrum, several studies have noted a negative association between wood water storage capacity and ρ (; Scholz et al., 2007; Richards et al., 2014; Oliva Carrasco et al., 2015; ; ).
Plants can rely substantially on the stem water reservoir to buffer daily transpiration (; ; ; Preisler et al., 2021). Moreover, as transpiration creates negative hydraulic pressures, surrounding tissues should, if hydrated, be able to provide water to the vascular tissues to reduce the risk of embolism. The structural mechanisms responsible for enhancing the water storage capacity in trees are underpinned by the anatomical configuration of the woody tissues with both capillary storage compartments (i.e., open vessels, tracheids, fibers, intercellular spaces, and cracks) and elastic storage compartments (i.e., living parenchyma cells) likely to be relevant (; Scholz et al., 2008; ; ). Not only the anatomic features define plant water storing capacity but also the chemical compounds with osmotic activity play an essential role in plant osmotic adjustment (Turner and Jones, 1980; Turner, 2018; Signori-Müller et al., 2021). The accumulation of osmotically active elements in the tissues decreases the water potential, thus enabling the maintenance of high cellular turgor potential and water retention (; Traversari et al., 2020; ). Soluble carbohydrates act as osmolytes and control the cell pressure by decreasing the osmotic potential from cells and increasing the water retention, thus avoiding tissue water deficit (; Ozturk et al., 2021; Tomasella et al., 2021); but, these are rather metabolically expensive use for these metabolites compared with ionic solutes (; Sevanto et al., 2014). Given the important roles played by mineral nutrients such as potassium and sodium as osmotically active solutes in both leaves and roots (; Shabala and Shabala, 2011; ; Tavakol et al., 2018; ), inorganic cations, in general, are strong candidates for evaluation as potential facilitators of water storage in woody tissues. For instance, K and Ca have been indicated as strong drivers of water balance in the xylem of poplar trees (Traversari et al., 2020). Furthermore, K is known to have a positive effect on wood formation by driving the osmotic potential of the cambium ().
In this study, to test the hypothesis that trees with increased internal water storage should have higher concentrations of osmotically active ions within their tissues, we examined associations between wood water content, wood nutrients, and wood density using branch material collected from moist tropical forests in Brazil, French Guiana, and Peru. We expect any observed trait variation to be mediated not only by changes in soil nutrient status and climate but also by species turnover in response to these environmental properties (; Patiño et al., 2009; Schrodt et al., 2015). Therefore, we used a mixed-effect (MEM) model approach (Lira-Martins et al., 2019) to specifically probe whether relationships between stem water content, wood density, and stem nutrient concentrations also vary according to both species’ identity and growing conditions.
Materials and Methods
Study Sites
We sampled a total of six plots of 1 ha with two “paired” plots in each of Brazil, French Guiana, and Peru (Figure 1) chosen based on contrasting soil chemical properties. Climatic conditions of the plot pairs were similar within each country (Supplementary Table 1).
FIGURE 1
Sampling
Within each plot, professional tree climbers trimmed one branch sample from the upper canopy of the selected trees, all of which were of diameter at breast height greater than 10 cm, and we sampled in total 2–12 branches per species with each branch representing a single tree. We attempted to consistently sample fully sun-exposed branches close to the canopy apex. For each plot, the most abundant species were identified before sampling, and a minimum of two trees per species were sampled. We also included in the sampling design species that were locally less abundant but were found across the studied plots. This assured a minimal overlap of species across plots, thus allowing us to disentangle the influence of species from the local environmental effects on the assessed traits. A total of 48 species were sampled in this study (Supplementary Table 2) with 6 species overlapping across plots. All of the species in the study have ring diffuse porosity.
Wood Trait Determinations
After collection, branches were kept inside plastic bags and brought back to the field laboratory for processing. This was usually on the same day, but when not possible, samples were wrapped in humid paper towels, sealed in plastic bags, and stored in the fridge for processing within 24 h. For the determination of wood density, water content, and nutrient concentration, we trimmed a piece of ca. 20 cm length and ca. 2 cm diameter from the sampled branch. This 20 cm piece was divided in two parts, with one sample used for nutrient determinations, and the other retained for wood density and water content measurements. Since we were mostly interested in xylem properties of wood, bark and pith greater than 2 mm diameter were removed from all samples prior to analysis. We did not use the same piece of wood for all measurements as rehydration of the piece can potentially rinse off nutrients, especially mobile ones such as potassium. Nevertheless, we were aware of wood density variation along the branch (Longuetaud et al., 2017), and therefore, we used these consecutive pieces assuming their lack of independence to represent the branch traits.
Wood Density and Water Content
Branch segments allocated for wood density and water content were soaked in water for 24 h, blotted dry, and weighed on a precision balance. Their hydrated volume (υs) was then measured by the water displacement method (Archimedes’ principle). Samples were then dried in a fan oven at 105°C until constant weight, usually 2 days, with wood density calculated as:
where md is the dry mass of the sample (kg) and υs is the volume of the hydrated sample (m3).
Although previous studies examining relationships between wood water content and wood density have expressed the former on a dry weight basis (Lima and Rodal, 2010), a more parsimonious approach that also serves to avoid spurious correlations (Lloyd et al., 2013) is to consider wood density, wood nutrient concentrations, and wood water content variations all on a per unit tissue volume basis. In this study, water content is thus expressed as the hydrated water content per unit tissue volume and is estimated as follows:
where Θ is the hydrated volumetric water content (m3/m3), υw is the volume of water (cm3) of an assumed density of 1,000 kg/m3, and ms is the mass of the saturated sample (kg).
Nutrient Determinations
Wood samples were first dried for 48 h at 65°C, after which they were ground in a planetary ball mill (Retsch PM 400). For the determination of Ca, K, Mg, Na, and P, 200 mg of the finely ground material was digested in a microwave system (CEM MARS X) using XP1500 Plus fluoropolymer vessels with 5 ml of concentrated nitric acid and 0.5 ml of hydrogen peroxide (both of trace element analysis grade). Certified reference material of Willow wood (WEPAL-IPE-220) was run every three batches with 11 samples in each batch. The extracts were then diluted to 50 ml in ultrapure water and subsequently analyzed using ICP-OES (Thermo iCap 6500 Duo). For all elements analyzed, reference material values were within the stated uncertainty limits.
Nitrogen analyses were undertaken using a CHN elemental analyser Vario EL cube (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH). For each measurement of N per tree, we used 5 mg of wood material. For each tree, we ran three replicates of the same sample to ensure consistency of N determination. Certified Birch Leaf (Catalog code B2166) material and Acetanilide standards (Catalog code B2000), both from Elemental Microanalysis Ltd., United Kingdom, were used to check the accuracy of the N analysis. The ICP-OES and N analyses were undertaken at the Imaging and Analysis Centre at the Natural History Museum in London, United Kingdom, with the digestions having been carried out at Imperial College London—Silwood Park Campus, United Kingdom. Element concentration in wood is given as follows:
where Θm represents the nutrient amount per unit tissue dry mass with values given by the nutrient amount, mΘ (mol), in an amount of tissue of dry weight, md (g). The nutrient content per tissue volume Θv (mol/m3) was then calculated as follows:
Statistical Analyses
We employed a mixed effect model (MEM) accounting for each tree (t) being located within a specific sampling plot (p) and of a known species identity (s). To examine the sources of variability of the assessed traits, a null multilevel model was first fitted at the log10 transformed data. This model deals with this hierarchy structure by using crossed random factors (Snijders and Bosker, 2012) as follows:
We used the same notation as in Snijders and Bosker (2012) and Lira-Martins et al. (2019), where Wt(p,s) represents one of the evaluated wood traits of each individual of known species identity located within a given plot, γ00 is the overall intercept, U0p is a random variable that quantifies the variance associated with sampling location (i.e., the plot effect), V0s is the random variation associated with species identity (i.e., the species effect), and Rtp represents the residual variance. These random effects were computed by the best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) that provides estimates from the distances between the terms and the grand means (Zuur et al., 2009). The Rtp, U0p, and V0s terms are assumed to be drawn from normally distributed populations, and the variance of the residuals (Rtp) is assumed to be independent of species or sampling location. Individual proportions of each term were calculated as the variance of each term divided by the sum of all terms, i.e., Rtp + U0p + V0s.
To examine the associations of nutrients with wood density (ρ) and water content (Φ) in wood, Equation 5 was extended to accommodate an independent variable as follows:
where γ10 is the overall regression coefficient quantifying the relationship between the evaluated trait and the independent variable Xtp for any given tree. In all cases, traits had been log10 transformed to help meet linear model assumptions of a normal distribution of residuals.
All MEM model fits were carried out using the lme4 package () available within the R (3.4.3) statistical platform (R Core Team., 2018). Associated probability values were extracted using the lmerTest package (), and to assess the significance of the random intercept terms, a restricted likelihood ratio test was implemented using the function exactRLRT from package RLRsim (Scheipl et al., 2008). This test simulates values from a finite distribution of simultaneous tests, thereby providing an exact likelihood ratio test. We also tested for the significance of random slopes by using the same function. The r.squaredGLMM function from the MuMin package () was also used to quantify the marginal and conditional R2. These can be considered to represent the variation explained by the fixed effects and by the whole model (including the random effects), respectively (Nakagawa and Schielzeth, 2013).
Results
Intraspecific, Interspecific, and Between Plot Wood Trait Variation
The plot shown in Figure 2 denotes the data ranges observed for branch wood density (ρ), branch water content (Φ), and associated concentrations of Ca, Mg, K, Na, N, and P when expressed on a volume basis. The lowest ρ value was observed for the two Peruvian sites (Figure 2A), where the lowest value reached 316 kg/m3, whereas the highest value was found in Brazil (908 kg/m3) (Supplementary Table 3). Conversely, branch volumetric water contents showed the opposite pattern. The MAN-12 and the French Guiana sites showed similar patterns (Figure 2B) with no significant differences detected between them (Supplementary Table 3). For [Ca]v, the Brazilian sites and TAM-07 (Peru) had the lowest values, with the French Guiana sites being intermediate and CUZ-03 (Peru) being the highest (Figure 2C). Contrasting that pattern was magnesium content in wood, with an overall between-plot variability being much less than for Ca content in wood, but with [Mg]v for the Peruvian CUZ-03 plot being, on average, higher than for the plots in Brazil and French Guiana (Figure 2D). Potassium content in wood was higher in the Peruvian sites, where Neea divaricata showed the highest value (114 mol/m3), and with little difference between the other four sites (Figure 2E), where the Brazilian Minquartia guianensis showed the lowest value (8.8 mol/m3). Sodium concentrations in branch tissues were ca. 10-fold lower in Peru as compared with both Brazil and French Guiana (Figure 2F). For nitrogen, a Peru vs. Brazil/French Guiana contrast was less apparent, with the highest values found for the Brazilian MAN-12 and the Peruvian TAM-07 (Figure 2G). Phosphorus content in branch tissues showed little variation amongst sites in Brazil and French Guiana, with the latter having the lowest value (1.2 mol/m3). The two Peruvian sites had the highest P content in wood (43.6 mol/m3), and they were significantly higher than the other sites (Figure 2H). Supplementary Table 3 further summarizes the data underlying Figure 2 with the results of a similar analysis using the more conventional dry-mass-based nutrient metrics. Essentially the results are the same irrespective of whether nutrients are expressed on a dry-mass or volumetric basis. Nevertheless, site-to-site differences in the former sometimes assume a higher level of significance. For example, when expressed on a dry-mass basis, there is a difference in potassium content in wood between the two Peruvian sites (P = 0.008), but this is not the case when potassium content is expressed on a volumetric basis (P = 0.062).
FIGURE 2
Figure 3 shows a partitioning of variance as quantified through Equation 5. This shows the proportion of the total trait variance explained by species and environment varying substantially according to the trait. For example, species identity explained most of the variation in ρ (0.59) and [Mg]v (0.55), with the effect of plot location explaining only 0.16 and 0.05 of the total variances, respectively. In contrast, sampling location explained most of the variance in [P]v (0.65), [Na]v (0.60), and [Ca]v (0.43). In terms of the residual term, which should include intra-species variation and measurement sampling error, this component was largest for Φ (0.60) and [Mg]v (0.39). For consistency, we also employed the same approach for data on a mass basis (Supplementary Figure 1), with results indicating that nutrients on a mass basis followed basically the same patterns as in a volumetric basis with only subtle differences between the two metrics.
FIGURE 3
Nutrient Associations With Wood Density
The magnitude and significance of the within-tree associations between wood nutrient concentrations and ρ as determined by the MEM are shown in Table 1. For all six nutrients examined, likelihood ratio tests indicated significant random intercept terms associated with both species identity (V0s) and plot location (U0p) (P = 0.012, results not shown). Nevertheless, in no case were random slope effects detected (P = 0.109, results not shown). Only [K]v showed any sort of statistically meaningful association with ρ with a slope of −0.55 ± 0.27 (P = 0.046). Although the marginal R2, metric quantifying only the variation explained by the fixed effect component of the model (RM2), was only 0.03, the conditional R2 of the model was much higher (RC2 = 0.65). This indicates that the systematic variations between species and across sites form a critically important part of the ρ: [K]v association. Indeed, an analysis of the random terms indicates that with σs2 = 0.026, species identity accounted for 0.43 (i.e., 0.026/(0.026 + 0.012 + 0.022) of the total variance not accounted for by the fixed term. A similar calculation for plot location yields an estimate of 0.20.
TABLE 1
| Θv (mol/m3) vs. Wood density ρ (kg/m3) | ||||||
| Nutrient | [Ca]v | [K]v | [Mg]v | [N]v | [Na]v | [P]v |
| Fixed effects | ||||||
| Intercept (γ00) | 0.45 | 2.96 | 1.71 | 1.00 | 1.80 | 1.82 |
| Slope (γ10) | 0.31 | −0.55 | –0.22 | 0.45 | –0.45 | –0.41 |
| P | 0.456 | 0.046 | 0.537 | 0.121 | 0.370 | 0.218 |
| 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.01 | |
| 0.74 | 0.65 | 0.56 | 0.67 | 0.91 | 0.75 | |
| Random effects | ||||||
| Species (σs2) | 0.062 | 0.026 | 0.049 | 0.014 | 0.166 | 0.021 |
| Plot (σp2) | 0.070 | 0.012 | 0.003 | 0.017 | 0.382 | 0.093 |
| Residual (σr2) | 0.047 | 0.022 | 0.041 | 0.016 | 0.057 | 0.037 |
Mixed effect modeling of the relationships between nutrients expressed on a tissue volume basis (Θv) and wood density (ρ).
Subscript “v” indicates that concentrations are on a volume basis.
σ2 represents the variance of each term.
All parameters were estimated using restricted maximum likelihood (REML).
Significant relationships (P < 0.05) are in bold.
Random effects present the variance of the random intercepts (Equation 6).
, marginal R2 that represents the variation explained by the fixed effects; , conditional R2 that represents the variation of the whole model (including the random effects).
For comparative purposes, modeled associations with nutrients expressed on a mass rather than a volume basis are shown in Supplementary Table 4. In all cases, the fixed effect slope estimates were exactly 1.0 unit more negative for Θm than Θv, and due to the same standard errors, in most cases, the mass-based metrics present a higher level of statistical significance. The mathematics underlying the consistent differences between the mass vs. volume-based slopes (despite the same standard errors) is presented in Supplementary Information 2. Also, for any given nutrient random variance, partitioning results and fitted intercepts were identical for the Θm vs. Θv models.
Figure 4 shows in graphical form the data underlying the analyses of Table 1 with fitted relationships indicated where the fixed slope estimate was significant. This shows, for example, the two plots in Peru tend to have a higher [K]v at any given ρ than do those of Brazil (Figure 4A). Figure 4B shows the same data, but in this case with the species effects displayed. This shows that superimposed on the general negative relationship, there should be ca. fourfold differences between species average [K]v at any given ρ. But after accounting for the generally lower ρ in Peru, there is no clear systematic difference in the spectrum of [K]v vs. ρ associations for species typically found in Peru vs. those found in Brazil and/or French Guiana. This can be observed when comparing the within-country range of variation in the [K]v vs. ρ relationship (Figure 4B), which are similar across countries.
FIGURE 4
Although according to the MEM analysis, relationships between wood density ρ and [Ca]v (Figure 4C), [Mg]v (Figure 4D), [P]v (Figure 4E), [Na]v (Figure 4F), and [N]v (Figure 4G) were not significant at P = 0.05 or better, when the data for all plots and species are simply pooled and analyzed using OLS, all five of these elements show apparent relationships with ρ at P < 0.001. Correlation coefficients ranged from R2 = 0.06 for [Mg]v to R2 = 0.26 for [Na]v (Supplementary Table 5) with the latter relationship being especially interesting. This is because a simple examination of Figure 4F suggests that there is less, if any, relationship between [Na]v vs. ρ within plots and thus with the biased OLS relationship simply being due to trees in plots with higher overall ρ also tending to have a higher [Na]v.
Wood Density/Water Associations
The MEM model results for the relationship between water content in wood (Φ) with ρ are shown in Table 2, with underlying data and model predictions shown in Figure 5. Together these show a strong negative within-plot association between ρ and Φ (P < 0.001) but also with a large proportion of the variation in water content not accountable by variations in wood density, as indicated by the larger (0.57) than (0.12). Systematic differences between species and plots were also modest as can be seen by the large variance in the residuals (σ2 = 0.0019) as compared with the species (σ2 = 0.0012) and plot variance (σ2 = 0.005) terms. Overall, the slope of −0.38 ± 0.07 suggests a less than 1:1 replacement of dry matter by water as wood density declines. For example, given the log transformation of the variables, the model predicts that, on average, a doubling in wood density is associated with a [1 − 2(–0.38)] = 23% decrease in wood volumetric water content. For consistency, we also evaluated the association of ρ with water content on a mass basis. This relationship showed a slope of −1.39 ± 0.07 (P < 0.001, Supplementary Figure 2).
TABLE 2
| ρ vs. Φ | |
| Fixed effects | |
| Intercept | 0.73 |
| Slope | −0.38 |
| P | <0.001 |
| 0.12 | |
| 0.57 | |
| Random effects | |
| Species (σs2) | 0.0012 |
| Plot (σp2) | 0.0005 |
| Residual (σr2) | 0.0019 |
Mixed effect modeling of relationships between wood density (ρ) and water content per unit tissue volume (Φ).
All parameters were estimated using restricted maximum likelihood (REML).
σ2 represents the variance of each term.
, marginal R2 that represents the variation explained by the fixed effects; , conditional R2, which represents the variation of the whole model (including the random effects).
Significant relationships (P < 0.05) are mentioned in bold.
Random effects present the variance of the random intercepts and slope (Equation 6).
FIGURE 5
Wood Nutrient/Water Association
The magnitude and statistical significance of the within-tree associations between wood nutrient concentrations and wood water content as determined are shown in Table 3 with the underlying data presented in Figure 6. As for the nutrient wood vs. density associations, likelihood ratio tests indicated that although for all six nutrients there was significant random intercept terms associated with both species identity and plot location (P < 0.004, data not shown), in no case were random slope effects detected (P > 0.098, data not shown).
TABLE 3
| Θv (mol/m3) vs. Water content Φ (m3/m3) | ||||||
| Nutrient | [Ca]v | [K]v | [Mg]v | [N]v | [Na]v | [P]v |
| Fixed effects | ||||||
| Intercept (γ00) | 1.59 | 1.89 | 1.42 | 2.44 | 0.70 | 0.97 |
| Slope (γ10) | 0.71 | 1.34 | 0.98 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.84 |
| P | 0.102 | <0.001 | 0.008 | 0.012 | 0.175 | 0.014 |
| 0.01 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.02 | |
| 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.61 | 0.74 | 0.91 | 0.76 | |
| Random effects | ||||||
| Species (σs2) | 0.061 | 0.023 | 0.052 | 0.017 | 0.133 | 0.015 |
| Plot (σp2) | 0.059 | 0.009 | 0.006 | 0.021 | 0.502 | 0.107 |
| Residual (σr2) | 0.050 | 0.020 | 0.038 | 0.014 | 0.063 | 0.041 |
Mixed effect modeling of the relationships between nutrients expressed on a tissue volume basis (Θv) and water content (Φ).
Subscript “v” indicates that concentrations are on a volume basis.
All parameters were estimated using restricted maximum likelihood (REML).
σ2 represents the variance of each term.
, marginal R2 that represents the variation explained by the fixed effects; , conditional R2 that represents the variation of the whole model (including the random effects).
Significant relationships (P < 0.05) are in bold.
Random effects present the variance of the random intercepts (Equation 6).
FIGURE 6
Overall, potassium was the nutrient showing the strongest association with Φ with a fixed effect slope of 1.3 ± 0.26 (P < 0.001). As can be seen through a comparison of Figures 6A,B, the species random term accounted for the highest fraction of the random variance component, this being over twice that associated with plot identity (Table 3). Magnesium also showed a positive association with Φ (slope = 0.98 ± 0.37; P = 0.008) with much of the variance not accounted for by the fixed effect component attributable to species identity (Figures 6C,D and Table 3). Also, [P]v showed a positive association with Φ (slope = 0.84 ± 0.34; P = 0.014). However, in contrast to K and Mg, it was sampling location (Figure 6E) rather than species identity (Figure 6F) which was the dominant random variance term (Table 3). In addition, [N]v showed a positive association with Φ (slope = 0.66 ± 0.26; P = 0.012) with similar variance apportionments to both plot and species identity (Figures 6G,H and Table 3). Finally, [Ca]v and [Na]v also showed positive relationships with Φ (Supplementary Figures 3A,B), but with neither of these being significant at P < 0.05.
Again, for comparison, we analyzed the same relationships, but with the nutrients expressed on a mass rather than a volume basis (Supplementary Table 6). In all cases, relationships showed slightly steeper slopes when expressed on a mass basis and, in most cases, with marginally higher RM2 and RC2 as well.
Associations Between Random Effects
For each trait examined, the individual species effect term of Equation 5 (i.e., V0s) provides an estimate of the differences between each species and the grand mean of that trait (see section “Wood Trait Determinations”). Thus, using the non-parametric Kendall’s τ as a measure of associations, the strength of these “species effects” relationships is shown in Figure 7A. This suggests a strong species-dependent positive association of [K]v with tissue water content (τ = 0.37, P = 0.001) as shown in Figure 7B. This occurred despite the lack of any sort of strong association between ρ and Φ (τ = −0.23, P = 0.081, Figure 7C) or between ρ and [K]v (τ = −0.11, P = 0.363, Figure 7D). For the interested reader, individual species effects are detailed in Supplementary Table 2. This shows, for example, that, even after accounting for differences in growing conditions, N. divaricata and Matisia bicolor (in this study found growing in Peru) and Helicostylis tomentosa (in this study found growing in Brazil) are typically characterized by higher-than-average values of both [K]v and Φ. On the contrary, Bocoa prouacensis, Licania heteromorpha, and Lecythis persistens—all sampled in French Guiana in this study—typically have lower-than-average values for both [K]v and Φ. These strong species influences are further illustrated for [K]v in Supplementary Figure 4 and for Φ in Supplementary Figure 5 using a “box and whisker” approach. In these figures, observed values for each species are ranked from the lowest to the highest median value with a separate panel for each studied plot.
FIGURE 7
Given that we only had six plots, the statistical power to test the relationships between individual plot random effect terms was limited. Thus, there were no correlations at P = 0.05 or better. Similarly, due to the small sample size, we could evidence systematic associations at P = 0.05 or between any of the plot-level random effects and any of the climate/soil variables as listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Discussion
For the analysis in this study, we used branch samples to examine the interrelationships between wood nutrient concentrations, wood water content and wood density with all entities expressed on a volumetric basis. We have also undertaken all analysis with nutrients and/or water on a dry mass basis in Supplementary Information 2. The structural parameters in woody tissues tend to vary along the main axis of the tree (
Contrasting Sources of Variation for Different Nutrients
When analyzed in the simplest way via the null model of Equation 5, the different wood traits studied showed contrasting underlying sources of variation. For example, Figure 3 suggests that much of the variation in ρ was attributable to species identity, a result consistent with this trait being associated with many aspects of the life history of trees, namely, growth and mortality rates (
The partitioning of the variance for [N]v, [Ca]v, and [K]v also showed broadly similar contributions of the species and sampling location. In contrast, the strong contribution of species identity to the observed variations in [Mg]v suggests a strong phylogenetic constraint on wood Mg concentrations. This has also been found to be the case for foliar tissues (
In contrast with the above elements, variations in [P]v and [Na]v were mainly driven by plot location, i.e., [P]v varied more between plots than between species and therefore with different species in the same plot tending to have similar [P]v. Although high [Na] in plant tissues seems to be phylogenetically conserved (White et al., 2017), in this study variation in [Na]v was strongly driven by sampling location. Although trees growing closer to the coast should receive an increased input of Na from the coast (Stallard and Edmond, 1981; Vet et al., 2014), this does not help explain the relatively high [Na]v for the central Amazonian DUK-26 and MAN-12 sites. However, we noted that, interestingly, relatively high aerosol sodium concentrations of an apparently fungal origin have been recently reported in this area (
Wood Density and Nutrients
Only [K]v showed a significant relationship with ρ at P = 0.05 or better (Table 1). This relationship was negative suggesting that lighter woods are characterized by higher concentrations of this nutrient per unit volume within their cell walls and/or living cells. Nevertheless, the random variance component associated with species identity was also large, and as can be seen from Figure 4B, different species varied in their [K]v: ρ relationship. Even once differences in wood density are accounted for, there exists significant systematic differences between different species in their characteristic potassium concentrations per unit wood volume.
Although none of the other elements showed significant associations with wood density when expressed on a volume basis, when the same nutrients were expressed on a dry mass basis, then significant negative slopes were found for magnesium and phosphorus (Supplementary Table 4) with the fixed effect slope of all elements examined being exactly 1.0 unit more negative than on a mass basis (Supplementary Information 2). Although the functional significance of the negative [K]v:ρ association remains unclear, it is interesting to note that Quesada et al. (2012) found a strong negative relationship between soil exchangeable potassium concentrations and tropical forest stand level wood densities across the Amazon Basin. This raises the interesting possibility that one factor accounting for the tendency for higher wood density trees to dominate on relatively dystrophic soils is their overall lower potassium requirement per unit volume growth increment. Nevertheless, the fixed effect slope of the [K]v: ρ relationship of −0.55 ± 0.27 is relatively modest meaning, for example, that a halving of wood density requires, on average (for any given species located in any given plot), an increase in [K]v of [1 − 0.5(–0.55)] or just 46%.
Interestingly, it should be noted that tropical trees with low [K] in wood also show low levels of this nutrient in foliar tissues (
Relationships Between Wood Density and Wood Water Contents
Although Φ and ρ were negatively associated (Figure 5), this is hardly surprising as water and dry matter must (along with air) necessarily compete for the limited space within a given stem tissue volume. Nevertheless, when comparing across species, there was no convincing negative correlation between Φ and ρ (Figure 7C), suggesting that a lower wood density does not necessarily imply a higher amount of water when species contrasts constitute the sole source of variation. Perhaps this is because space in a given volume not occupied by mass nor water will be filled by gas, which can itself be considered a costless filler, with the mechanical advantage of not unnecessarily overloading the stems of taller trees (
Water Content and Wood Nutrients
Overall, our MEM analysis showed a significant increase in the nutrient tissue concentration with water content Φ and with [Ca]v and [Na]v being the only elements that did not vary systematically with Φ. For the Φ:[K]v and Φ:[Mg]v associations, as is evidenced by the relatively high random species associated variances (Table 3), differences between species identity were also clearly important. This suggests that although similar relationships exist across all species, individual species tend to differ in their characteristic “operating points” (Figures 6B,D). This adds information to the intra-specific variation of Φ detected by the variance partitioning (Figure 3) and suggests that variations in the water content within the species may be partially explained by the variation in cations, especially [K]v. The positive association between the species random effects of Φ and [K]v (Figure 7B) indicates that, other things being equal, species with higher than average [K]v typically also have a higher-than-average wood tissue water content. That a somewhat similar pattern observed for P (Figure 7A) further demonstrates that internal water storage differences may underpin a suite of physiological mechanisms taking place within woody tissues. Indeed, all of the cations studied have well-documented roles acting as osmolytes in plant tissues (
The existence of significant random plot effects (Table 3) indicates that, even after accounting for species differences, there was still an effect of growing location on many nutrient vs. Φ associations. This was especially the case for nitrogen (Figure 6G), phosphorus, and, to a lesser extent, potassium (Figure 6A). Although there was no significant correlation with Φ for both [Ca]v and [Na]v, there was still evidence of systematic plot-to-plot variation in these elements (Figure 2) which would be useful to understand. Nevertheless, as we only had six plots within our dataset, we lacked sufficient statistical power to identify the underlying climatic and/or edaphic drivers behind these effects of sampling location.
Conclusion
Our study brings new insights into the nutritional associations with wood density and water storage in woody tissues of tropical trees by using branch samples. Specifically, the evaluation of the underlying causes for the observed covariation between these traits indicates that some of them are most strongly influenced by species identity, whilst others are primarily determined by environmental conditions. Potassium was the only element showing a significant association with wood density. Furthermore, the ability of tropical woods to store water is clearly linked with wood nutrient contents with K apparently being the most important cation in this respect.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, DL-M, upon reasonable request.
Author contributions
DL-M and JL designed the study and wrote the manuscript. DL-M, EH-W, and SS developed the laboratory protocols and analyzed the wood samples. DL-M conducted the fieldwork and carried out all the statistical analyses. CQ provided the Peruvian and Brazilian soil data. BH provided the logistical support in French Guiana. All authors edited the manuscript and approved its current version.
Funding
This research was funded by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico—CNPq, and DL-M was funded through the Brazilian Science without Borders Program—CNPq (249585/2013-8). JL was supported by a Royal Society of London Wolfson Research Merit Award and São Paulo Excellence Chair.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful for the logistic and fieldwork support of Abel Monteagudo, Lucero Dongo, Antonio Peña Cruz, Erik Hsu, and Rocio Rojas in Peru; Paul Peña, Alexandre Brunello, Aurélie Dourdain, and Pascal Petronelli in French Guiana; Alberto Vicentini, Luciano Castilho, Alberto Fialho Neves, José da Costa Souza, Hellen Santana, Adria Arcos, and Amanda Damasceno in Brazil.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.778403/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AckerlyD. (2004). Functional strategies of chaparral shrubs in relation to seasonal water deficit and disturbance.Ecol. Monogr.7425–44. 10.1890/03-4022
2
AsnerG. P.MartinR. E. (2016). Convergent elevation trends in canopy chemical traits of tropical forests.Glob. Chang Biol.222216–2227. 10.1111/gcb.13164
3
AsnerG. P.MartinR. E.SuhailiA. B. (2012). Sources of canopy chemical and spectral diversity in lowland Bornean forest.Ecosystems15504–517. 10.1007/s10021-012-9526-2
4
BaralotoC.PaineC. E. T.PoorterL.BeaucheneJ.BonalD.DomenachA. M.et al (2010). Decoupled leaf and stem economics in rain forest trees.Ecol. Lett.131338–1347. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01517.x
5
BartonK. (2018). MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. Available online at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=MuMIn(accessed June 05, 2018).
6
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB. M.WalkerS. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.J. Stat. Softw.671–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
7
Battie-LaclauP.Delgado-RojasJ. S.ChristinaM.NouvellonY.BouilletJ. P.PiccoloM.et al (2016). Potassium fertilization increases water-use efficiency for stem biomass production without affecting intrinsic water-use efficiency in Eucalyptus grandis plantations.For. Ecol. Manage36477–89. 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.004
8
Battie-LaclauP.LaclauJ. P.DomecJ. C.ChristinaM.BouilletJ. P.de Cassia PiccoloM.et al (2014). Effects of potassium and sodium supply on drought-adaptive mechanisms in Eucalyptus grandis plantations.New Phytol.203401–413. 10.1111/nph.12810
9
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing.J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B57289–300. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
10
Benlloch-GonzálezM.ArqueroO.FournierJ. M.BarrancoD.BenllochM. (2008). K+ starvation inhibits water-stress-induced stomatal closure.J. Plant Physiol.165623–630. 10.1016/j.jplph.2007.05.010
11
BjörklundJ.SeftigenK.SchweingruberF.FontiP.von ArxG.BryukhanovaM. V.et al (2017). Cell size and wall dimensions drive distinct variability of earlywood and latewood density in Northern Hemisphere conifers.New Phytol.216728–740. 10.1111/nph.14639
12
BlackmanC. J.LiX.ChoatB.RymerP. D.De KauweM. G.DuursmaR. A.et al (2019). Desiccation time during drought is highly predictable across species of Eucalyptus from contrasting climates.New Phytol.224632–643. 10.1111/nph.16042
13
BlumA. (2017). Osmotic adjustment is a prime drought stress adaptive engine in support of plant production.Plant Cell Environ.404–10. 10.1111/pce.12800
14
BorchertR.PockmanW. T. (2005). Water storage capacitance and xylem tension in isolated branches of temperate and tropical trees.Tree Physiol.25457–466. 10.1093/treephys/25.4.457
15
BroadleyM. R.BowenH. C.CotterillH. L.HammondJ. P.MeachamM. C.MeadA.et al (2004). Phylogenetic variation in the shoot mineral concentration of angiosperms.J. Exp. Bot.55321–336. 10.1093/jxb/erh002
16
BroadleyM. R.HammondJ. P.KingG. J.AstleyD.BowenH. C.MeachamM. C.et al (2008). Shoot calcium and magnesium concentrations differ between subtaxa, are highly heritable, and associate with potentially pleiotropic loci in Brassica oleracea.Plant Physiol.1461707–1720. 10.1104/pp.107.114645
17
BucciS. J.GoldsteinG.MeinzerF. C.ScholzF. G.FrancoA. C.BustamanteM. (2004). Functional convergence in hydraulic architecture and water relations of tropical savanna trees: from leaf to whole plant.Tree Physiol.24891–899. 10.1093/treephys/24.8.891
18
ChaoK.-J.PhillipsO. L.BakerT. R. (2008). Wood density and stocks of coarse woody debris in a northwestern Amazonian landscape.Can. J. For. Res.38267–276. 10.1139/X07-163
19
ChaturvediR. K.TripathiA.RaghubanshiA. S.SinghJ. S. (2021). Functional traits indicate a continuum of tree drought strategies across a soil water availability gradient in a tropical dry forest.For. Ecol. Manage.482:118740. 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118740
20
ChaveJ.CoomesD. A.JansenS.LewisS. L.SwensonN. G.ZanneA. E. (2009). Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum.Ecol. Lett.12351–366. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01285.x
21
ChinaS.BurrowsS. M.WangB.HarderT. H.WeisJ.TanarhteM.et al (2018). Fungal spores as a source of sodium salt particles in the Amazon basin.Nat. Commun.9:4793. 10.1038/s41467-018-07066-4
22
da SilvaA. A.LinharesP. C. A.de AndradeL. I. F.ChavesJ. T. L.BarbosaJ. P. R. A. D.MarchioriP. E. R. (2021). Potassium supplementation promotes osmotic adjustment and increases water use efficiency in sugarcane under water deficit.Sugar Tech.231075–1084. 10.1007/s12355-021-00997-1
23
DiasA. S.OliveiraR. S.MartinsF. R. (2020). Costs and benefits of gas inside wood and its relationship with anatomical traits: a contrast between trees and lianas.Tree Physiol.40856–868. 10.1093/treephys/tpaa034
24
DóriaL. C.PodaderaD. S.LimaR. S.LensF.MarcatiC. R. (2019). Axial sampling height outperforms site as predictor of wood trait variation.IAWA J.40191–S3. 10.1163/22941932-40190245
25
FrommJ. (2010). Wood formation of trees in relation to potassium and calcium nutrition.Tree Physiol.301140–1147. 10.1093/treephys/tpq024
26
FuX.MeinzerF. C. (2019). Metrics and proxies for stringency of regulation of plant water status (iso/anisohydry): a global data set reveals coordination and trade-offs among water transport traits.Tree Physiol.39122–134. 10.1093/treephys/tpy087
27
FyllasN. M.PatinoS.BakerT. R.Bielefeld NardotoG.MartinelliL. A.QuesadaC. A.et al (2009). Basin-wide variations in foliar properties of Amazonian forest: phylogeny, soils and climate.Biogeosciences62677–2708. 10.5194/bg-6-2677-2009
28
GartnerB. L.MooreJ. R.GardinerB. A. (2004). Gas in stems: abundance and potential consequences for tree biomechanics.Tree Physiol.241239–1250. 10.1093/treephys/24.11.1239
29
GoldsteinG.AndradeJ. L.MeinzerF. C.HolbrookN. M.CavelierJ.JacksonP.et al (1998). Stem water storage and diurnal patterns of water use in tropical forest canopy trees.Plant Cell Environ.21397–406. 10.1093/treephys/tpu087
30
HackeU. G.SperryJ. S.PockmanW. T.DavisS. D.McCullohK. A. (2001). Trends in wood density and structure are linked to prevention of xylem implosion by negative pressure.Oecologia126457–461. 10.1007/s004420100628
31
HartmannH.TrumboreS. (2016). Understanding the roles of nonstructural carbohydrates in forest trees - from what we can measure to what we want to know.New Phytol.211386–403. 10.1111/nph.13955
32
HawkesfordM.HorstW.KicheyT.LambersH.SchjoerringJ.MøllerI. S.et al (2012). “Functions of macronutrients,” in Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 3rd Edn, ed.MarschnerP. (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), 135–189. 10.1016/B978-0-12-384905-2.00006-6
33
HeD.DeaneD. C. (2016). The relationship between trunk- and twigwood density shifts with tree size and species stature.For. Ecol. Manage.372137–142.
34
HeinemanK. D.TurnerB. L.DallingJ. W.JensenE.ShaplandA.BogenriefB.et al (2016). Variation in wood nutrients along a tropical soil fertility gradient.New Phytol.2611820–1832. 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.02.005
35
HolbrookN. M. M.SinclairT. R. (1992). Water balance in the arborescent palm, Sabal palmetto. II. Transpiration and stem water storage.Plant Cell Environ.15401–409. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb00990.x
36
JacobsenA. L.EwersF. W.PrattR. B.PaddockW. A. I.DavisS. D. (2005). Do xylem fibers affect vessel cavitation resistance?Plant Physiol.139546–556. 10.1104/pp.104.058404
37
JacobsenA. L.PrattR. B.EwersF. W.DavisS. D. (2007). Cavitation resistance among 26 chaparral species of Southern California.Ecol. Monogr.7799–115.
38
JansenS.GortanE.LensF.Lo GulloM. A.SalleoS.ScholzA.et al (2011). Do quantitative vessel and pit characters account for ion-mediated changes in the hydraulic conductance of angiosperm xylem?New Phytol.189218–228. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03448.x
39
JeschkeW. D.KirkbyE. A.PeukeA. D.PateJ. S.HartungW. (1997). Effects of P deficiency on assimilation and transport of nitrate and phosphate in intact plants of castor bean (Ricinus communis L.).J. Exp. Bot.4875–91. 10.1093/jxb/48.1.75
40
JupaR.PlavcováL.GloserV.JansenS. (2016). Linking xylem water storage with anatomical parameters in five temperate tree species.Tree Physiol.36756–769. 10.1093/treephys/tpw020
41
KawaiK.MinagiK.NakamuraT.SaikiS.-T.YazakiK.IshidaA. (2021). Parenchyma underlies the interspecific variation of xylem hydraulics and carbon storage across 15 woody species on a subtropical island in Japan.Tree Physiol.42337–350. 10.1093/treephys/tpab100
42
KuznetsovaA.BrockhoffP. B.ChristensenR. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models.J. Stat. Softw.821–26.
43
LeighR. A.Wyn JonesR. G. (1984). A hypothesis relating critical potassium concentrations for growth to the distribution and functions of this ion in the plant cell.New Phytol.971–13. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1984.tb04103.x
44
LimaA. L. A.RodalM. J. N. (2010). Phenology and wood density of plants growing in the semi-arid region of northeastern Brazil.J. Arid. Environ.741363–1373.
45
Lira-MartinsD.Humphreys-WilliamsE.StrekopytovS.IshidaF. Y.QuesadaC. A.LloydJ. (2019). Tropical tree branch-leaf nutrient scaling relationships vary with sampling location.Front. Plant Sci.10:877. 10.3389/fpls.2019.00877
46
LloydJ.BloomfieldK.DominguesT. F.FarquharG. D. (2013). Photosynthetically relevant foliar traits correlating better on a mass vs an area basis: of ecophysiological relevance or just a case of mathematical imperatives and statistical quicksand?New Phytol.199311–321. 10.1111/nph.12281
47
LonguetaudF.MotheF.SantenoiseP.DiopN.DlouhaJ.FournierM.et al (2017). Patterns of within-stem variations in wood specific gravity and water content for five temperate tree species.Ann. For. Sci.741–19.
48
NakagawaS.SchielzethH. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models.Methods Ecol. Evol.4133–142. 10.1093/sysbio/syy060
49
Oliva CarrascoL.BucciS. J.Di FrancescantonioD.LezcanoO. A.CampanelloP. I.ScholzF. G.et al (2015). Water storage dynamics in the main stem of subtropical tree species differing in wood density, growth rate and life history traits.Tree Physiol.35354–365. 10.1093/treephys/tpu087
50
OlsonM. E.AnfodilloT.GleasonS. M.McCullohK. A. (2021). Tip-to-base xylem conduit widening as an adaptation: causes, consequences, and empirical priorities.New Phytol.2291877–1893. 10.1111/nph.16961
51
OzturkM.Turkyilmaz UnalB.García-CaparrósP.KhursheedA.GulA.HasanuzzamanM. (2021). Osmoregulation and its actions during the drought stress in plants.Physiol. Plant1721321–1335. 10.1111/ppl.13297
52
PatiñoS.LloydJ.PaivaR.BakerT. R.QuesadaC. A.MercadoL. M.et al (2009). Branch xylem density variations across the Amazon Basin.Biogeosciences6545–568.
53
PoorterL. (2008). The relationships of wood-, gas- and water fractions of tree stems to performance and life history variation in tropical trees.Ann. Bot.102367–375. 10.1093/aob/mcn103
54
PoorterL.McDonaldI.AlarconA.FichtlerE.LiconaJ.-C. C.Peña-CarlosM.et al (2010). The importance of wood traits and hydraulic conductance for the performance and life history strategies of 42 rainforest tree species.New Phytol.185481–492. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03092.x
55
PrattR. B.JacobsenA. L.EwersF. W.DavisS. D. (2007). Relationships among xylem transport, biomechanics and storage in stems and roots of nine Rhamnaceae species of the California chaparral.New Phytol.174787–798. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02061.x
56
PrattR. B.JacobsenA. L.PercollaM. I.de GuzmanM. E.TraughC. A.TobinM. F. (2021). Trade-offs among transport, support, and storage in xylem from shrubs in a semiarid chaparral environment tested with structural equation modeling.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.118:2104336118. 10.1073/pnas.2104336118
57
PreislerY.HölttäT.GrünzweigJ. M.OzI.TatarinovF.RuehrN. K.et al (2021). The Importance of Tree Internal Water Storage Under Drought Conditions. Tree Physiologly. Available online at: https://academic.oup.com/treephys/advance-article/doi/10.1093/treephys/tpab144/6415545(accessed December 15, 2021).
58
QuesadaC. A.PhillipsO. L.SchwarzM.CzimczikC. I.BakerT. R.PatiñoS.et al (2012). Basin-wide variations in Amazon forest structure and function are mediated by both soils and climate. Biogeosciences9, 2203–2246. 10.5194/bg-9-2203-2012
59
R Core Team. (2018). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Found Stat Comput Vienna Austria.Vienna: R Core Team.
60
RathgeberC. B. K. (2017). Conifer tree-ring density inter-annual variability – anatomical, physiological and environmental determinants.New Phytol.216621–625. 10.1111/nph.14763
61
RichardsA. E.WrightI. J.LenzT. I.ZanneA. E. (2014). Sapwood capacitance is greater in evergreen sclerophyll species growing in high compared to low-rainfall environments.Funct. Ecol.28734–744.
62
SantiagoL. S.GoldsteinG.MeinzerF. C.FisherJ. B.MachadoK.WoodruffD.et al (2004). Leaf photosynthetic traits scale with hydraulic conductivity and wood density in Panamanian forest canopy trees.Oecologia140543–550. 10.1007/s00442-004-1624-1
63
SarmientoC.PatiñoS.Timothy PaineC. E.BeauchêneJ.ThibautA.BaralotoC. (2011). Within-individual variation of trunk and branch xylem density in tropical trees.Am. J. Bot.98140–149. 10.3732/ajb.1000034
64
ScheiplF.GrevenS.KuechenhoffH. (2008). Size and power of tests for a zero random effect variance or polynomial regression in additive and linear mixed models.Comput. Stat. Data Anal.523283–3299.
65
ScholzF. G.BucciS. J.GoldsteinG.MeinzerC.FrancoA. C.Miralles-wilhelmF. (2008). Temporal dynamics of stem expansion and contraction in savanna trees: withdrawal and recharge of stored water.Tree Physiol.28469–480. 10.1093/treephys/28.3.469
66
ScholzF. G.BucciS. J.GoldsteinG.MeinzerF. C.FrancoA. C.Miralles-WilhelmF. (2007). Biophysical properties and functional significance of stem water storage tissues in Neotropical savanna trees.Plant Cell Environ.30236–248. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01623.x
67
SchrodtF.DominguesT. F.FeldpauschT. R.SaizG.QuesadaC. A.SchwarzM.et al (2015). Foliar trait contrasts between African forest and savanna trees: genetic versus environmental effects.Funct. Plant Biol.4263–83. 10.1071/FP14040
68
SevantoS.McdowellN. G.DickmanL. T.PangleR.PockmanW. T. (2014). How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses.Plant Cell Environ.37153–161. 10.1111/pce.12141
69
ShabalaS.ShabalaL. (2011). Ion transport and osmotic adjustment in plants and bacteria.Biomol. Concepts2407–419. 10.1515/BMC.2011.032
70
Signori-MüllerC.OliveiraR. S.BarrosF. V.TavaresJ. V.GilpinM.DinizF. C.et al (2021). Non-structural carbohydrates mediate seasonal water stress across Amazon forests.Nat. Commun.121–9. 10.1038/s41467-021-22378-8
71
SnijdersT. A. B.BoskerR. J. (2012). Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modelling, 2nd Edn. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
72
StallardR. F.EdmondJ. M. (1981). Geochemistry of the Amazon 1. Precipitation chemistry and the marine contribution to the dissolved load at the time of peak discharge.J. Geophys. Res.869844–9858. 10.1029/jc086ic10p09844
73
SwensonN. G.EnquistB. J. (2008). The relationship between stem and branch wood specific gravity and the ability of each measure to predict leaf area.Am. J. Bot.95516–519. 10.3732/ajb.95.4.516
74
TaizL.ZeigerE.MøllerI. M.MurphyA. (2015). “Plant physiology and development,” in Plant Physiology and Development, 6th Edn, edsTaizL.ZeigerE.MøllerI. M.MurphyA. (Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Incorporated), 269–284.
75
TavakolE.JákliB.CakmakI.DittertK.KarlovskyP.PfohlK.et al (2018). Optimized potassium nutrition improves plant-water-relations of barley under PEG-induced osmotic stress.Plant Soil.43023–35. 10.1007/s11104-018-3704-8
76
TomasellaM.CasoloV.NataleS.PetruzzellisF.KoflerW.BeikircherB.et al (2021). Shade-induced reduction of stem nonstructural carbohydrates increases xylem vulnerability to embolism and impedes hydraulic recovery in Populus nigra.New Phytol.231108–121. 10.1111/nph.17384
77
TraversariS.NeriA.TraversiM. L.GiovannelliA.FranciniA.SebastianiL. (2020). Daily osmotic adjustments in stem may be good predictors of water stress intensity in poplar.Plant Physiol. Biochem.14613–22. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.10.039
78
TurnerN. C. (2018). Turgor maintenance by osmotic adjustment: 40 years of progress.J. Exp. Bot.693223–3233. 10.1093/jxb/ery181
79
TurnerN. C.JonesM. M. (1980). “Turgor maintenance by osmotic adjustment: a review and evaluation,” in Adaptation of Plants to Water and High Temperatures Stress, edsTurnerN. C.KramerP. J. (New York, NY: Wiley) 87–103.
80
VetR.ArtzR. S.CarouS.ShawM.RoC. U.AasW.et al (2014). Addendum to: ‘A global assessment of precipitation chemistry and deposition of sulfur, nitrogen, sea salt, base cations, organic acids, acidity and pH, and phosphorus’.Atmos Environ.933–100. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.10.060
81
WhiteP. J.BowenH. C.BroadleyM. R.El-SerehyH. A.NeugebauerK.TaylorA.et al (2017). Evolutionary origins of abnormally large shoot sodium accumulation in nonsaline environments within the Caryophyllales.New Phytol.214284–293. 10.1111/nph.14370
82
WhiteP. J.BowenH. C.FarleyE.ShawE. K.ThompsonJ. A.WrightG.et al (2015). Phylogenetic effects on shoot magnesium concentration.Crop. Pasture Sci.661241–1248. 10.1071/CP14228
83
ZuurA. F.IenoE. N.WalkerN. J.SavelievA. A.SmithG. M. (2009). “Mixed effects modelling for nested data,” in Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R (New York, NY: Springer), 101–142. Available online at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6_5(accessed June 20, 2018).
Summary
Keywords
ecophysiology, cations, potassium, tropical forests, water storage, wood traits, wood density, nutrients
Citation
Lira-Martins D, Quesada CA, Strekopytov S, Humphreys-Williams E, Herault B and Lloyd J (2022) Wood Nutrient-Water-Density Linkages Are Influenced by Both Species and Environment. Front. Plant Sci. 13:778403. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.778403
Received
16 September 2021
Accepted
11 February 2022
Published
04 April 2022
Volume
13 - 2022
Edited by
Peter Prislan, Slovenian Forestry Institute, Slovenia
Reviewed by
Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (CAS), China; Jens Mincke, Ghent University, Belgium
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2022 Lira-Martins, Quesada, Strekopytov, Humphreys-Williams, Herault and Lloyd.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Demetrius Lira-Martins, emaildemetrius@gmail.comJon Lloyd, readingroos@gmail.com
This article was submitted to Functional Plant Ecology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.