Abstract
Powdery mildew (PM) is one of the most important diseases of greenhouse and field-grown tomatoes. Viruses can intervene beneficially on plant performance in coping with biotic and abiotic stresses. Tomato yellow leaf curl Sardinia virus (TYLCSV) has been reported recently to induce tolerance against drought stress in tomato, and its C4 protein acts as the main causal factor of tolerance. However, its role in response to biotic stresses is still unknown. In this study, transgenic tomato plants carrying the TYLCSV C4 protein were exposed to biotic stress following the inoculation with Oidium neolycopersici, the causal agent of tomato PM. Phytopathological, anatomic, molecular, and physiological parameters were evaluated in this plant pathosystem. Heterologous TYLCSV C4 expression increased the tolerance of transgenic tomato plants to PM, not only reducing symptom occurrence, but also counteracting conidia adhesion and secondary hyphae elongation. Pathogenesis-related gene expression and salicylic acid production were found to be higher in tomato transgenic plants able to cope with PM compared to infected wild-type tomato plants. Our study contributes to unraveling the mechanism leading to PM tolerance in TYLCSV C4-expressing tomato plants. In a larger context, the findings of TYLCSV C4 as a novel PM defense inducer could have important implications in deepening the mechanisms regulating the management of this kind of protein to both biotic and abiotic stresses.
1 Introduction
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is one of the most agronomically important food crops, with a total of 186 million tons globally produced in 2020 on more than 5 million hectares, out of which approximately 0.1 million hectares are cultivated in Italy (FAOSTAT; https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL). Although the tomato market is continuously growing, a large number of different pathogens affect this crop, inducing significant yield losses (). Powdery mildew (PM) is a widespread disease affecting more than 10,000 different botanical species. It is caused by several ascomycete fungi (order Erysiphales), ectoparasites that act as obligate biotrophic organisms (). On tomatoes, PM is caused frequently by Oidium neolycopersici L. Kiss (On), which is considered a worldwide emerging pathogen that induces white powdery lesions on the upper surface of the leaves. White powdery colonies may also develop on lower leaf surfaces during late disease stages and, in case of severe epidemics, petioles, stems, and sepals, but not fruits can be attacked (; ). On causes significant yield losses both in the greenhouse and in the open field, favoring temperate and humid climates. These yield losses might be exacerbated by events related to the ongoing climate change, particularly increased humidity following heavy rainfalls ().
New global pathogen containment strategies are being developed to foster the transition towards sustainable farming practices and sustainable lifestyles, based on reduced pesticide use and on the selection of low-risk active substances. Innovative strategies are becoming fundamental as many previously registered pesticides are being withdrawn from commercialization, due to the development of resistance in the target pathogen or because of toxicity concerns. One of these strategies implies the use of biological control agents that may protect the plant from pathogen attack in different ways (e.g., competition for nutrients and space), complying with a sustainable disease management approach. In nature, combinations of virus and other pathogen infections cause the activation of overlapping or synergistic molecular and metabolic mechanisms, which can change the outcome of the disease epidemics (; ; ). Furthermore, there are reports of virus infection reducing the incidence of other pathogens in the same plants, including PM fungi, such as the cases of barley yellow dwarf virus, potato virus Y, and zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) active against Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei, Erysiphe cichoracearum, and Podosphaera ssp., respectively (; ; ). However, these reports are mainly focused on the phytopathological aspects of the plants and do not thoroughly describe the key molecular and phytohormonal aspects involved in this kind of defense reaction.
Pathogen recognition activates signaling cascades resulting in conserved defense responses that can also act against other co-infecting viral and nonviral agents or towards subsequent parasite attacks (; ). Signaling cascades mainly operate through the recruitment of phytohormones, mostly salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA), which are key actors of plant defense strategies. Specifically, SA is considered the primary phytohormone that mediates resistance against biotrophic pathogens (), while JA is primarily responsible for regulating defense responses against necrotrophic pathogens and herbivores (Wasternack, 2007). SA-dependent disease resistance was reported in the case of the PM-resistant 4 (pmr4) Arabidopsis mutant line () and in the PM partially resistant tomato line carrying the Ol-1 resistance gene when subjected to single (PM) or combined (PM and drought) stress (). In the last decade, the biochemical processes underlying the infection and the resistance responses of tomato plants to On are being investigated, including the role not only of hormones (; ), reactive oxygen species (ROS) (; ), and reactive nitrogen species (; ), but also of elicitors (oligandrin, BABA) (), whose effect can be related either to effector-triggered immunity (ETI) or to pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI).
A crosstalk between responses to different stresses exists and plants carrying genes from certain pathogens were shown to display resistance towards other pathogens, such as bacterium vs. virus and yeast vs. virus (; Zhirnov et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2019). Given that plant disease management is continuously evolving and that the presence of viruses in plants can also have beneficial outcomes (), we investigated if the presence of viruses or the expression of viral proteins in plants may be beneficial against other pathogen infections.
Geminiviruses are circular single-stranded DNA viruses belonging to one of the largest families of plant viruses (Geminiviridae), infecting an extremely broad number of hosts (). Several species from this family have the potential to trigger and overcome the complex antiviral immune response of the plant, which include RNA interference (RNAi), ETI, and PTI ().
The C4/AC4 proteins of geminiviruses are the less conserved proteins within this family, display a broad diversity of functions during viral infection, and have been implicated in several functions (), such as virus movement (; ), suppression of RNA silencing (; ; ; ), symptom induction (), promotion of hypersensitive response (), and hyperplasia (). Recently, we reported that the C4 protein of tomato yellow leaf curl Sardinia virus (TYLCSV) empowers drought stress tolerance in transgenic tomato plants overexpressing it (), similarly to the C4 protein of a related begomovirus, i.e., tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) (; ; ). These TYLCSV-C4 overexpressing lines C4-151, -153, and -156 exhibit varying degrees of phenotypic alterations, including deformed leaves with a curly and crispy morphology, and a reduced size showed considerable level of resistance to drought compared to wild-type (WT) individuals. To date, the role of the C4 protein in tackling biotic stress responses remains elusive.
In this work, we explored whether the transgenic expression of the TYLCSV C4 protein, besides being beneficial for the plant response to abiotic stresses, might also have a role in the response to biotic stresses. For this purpose, we inoculated TYLCSV C4-expressing tomato plants with the biotrophic pathogen On, measuring the progress of the PM disease in both WT and transgenic plants and exploring molecular, anatomic, physiological, and phytohormonal responses. The expression of the TYLCSV C4 protein induced tolerance to PM disease in tomato plants, mainly through the modulation of stress marker genes and the biosynthesis of the SA phytohormone, providing novel insights into the molecular and phytohormone mechanisms tackled by this multifunctional viral component.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Fungal maintenance
The isolate MB1 of the pathogenic fungus On originating from commercial tomato plants was maintained on tomato WT plants (cv. Moneymaker) in a greenhouse compartment at 23°C (day) and 19°C (night) with 70% relative humidity. ITS sequence was amplified through PCR using ITS4 and ITS5 primers (White et al., 1990) on DNA extracted from On. The obtained PCR amplicon (594 bp) was sequenced through the Sanger method (Biofab s.r.l., Rome, Italy) to identify the PM species as On (Supplementary File 1).
2.2 Experimental conditions
To evaluate if TYLCSV C4 expression has an impact on the infection by On, tomato plants of lines C4-151, C4-153, and C4-156 overexpressing the viral C4 gene under the control of the constitutive 35S promoter () were artificially inoculated with On, using WT tomato plants (cv. Moneymaker) as controls. As all transgenic lines exhibited reduced PM symptomatology, further systematic experiments were conducted on the C4-151 line whose plants exhibit a homogeneous morphology which was described in detail by .
In detail, T3 plants of the C4-151 line, together with WT control plants, were grown in a glasshouse, under partially controlled climatic conditions, as described above. Each plant was grown in a 6-L pot filled with a substrate composed of sandy-loam soil/expanded clay/peat mixture (3:2:4 by volume). Two months after sowing, nine plants of each genotype were inoculated on two primary leaflets of three randomly selected leaves, using 10 µl of an On suspension (5 × 104 spores ml−1) prepared by washing conidial spores from leaves of heavily infected (sporulation stage) plants. After inoculation, plants were grown for another 20 days, daily monitoring the PM development. The experiment was repeated twice during the same season and the results shown in the manuscript have been mediated between the two repetitions.
2.3 Plant and fungal performanceе
The presence of On symptoms was assessed by visual inspection at 8, 13, and 15 days post-inoculation (dpi), according to . Plants were photographed with a Casio Exilim EX-Z85 digital camera and images were analyzed with a dedicated Wolfram Mathematica script (Long Hanborough, UK). Depending on the stage of symptoms developed, the area of infection on individual leaves was quantified either considering the PM colonized region (white color) or the necrotic one (brown color), based on changes deduced from the RGB (red, green, and blue) values. The disease index (DI) was assessed at the same time points and on the same leaflets, using a scale from 0 to 4, according to and Patil et al (), as follows: 0, apparently not infected; 1, 0%–25% leaf area infected; 2, 25%–50% leaf area infected; 3, 50%–75% leaf area infected; 4 >75% leaf area infected.
2.4 Chlorophyll content index
The chlorophyll content index (CCI) was determined on the second, third, and fourth fully developed leaves counting from the plant apex of three plants (nine leaflets in total), using a portable chlorophyll meter (SPAD 502, CCM-200; Opti-Sciences, Hudson, NH, USA).
2.5 Analysis of adhesion and elongation of germ tubes and secondary hyphae of On conidia
Conidia density and elongation of germ tubes and secondary hyphae of On were determined with scanning electron microscope (SEM) (TM3000, Hitachi High-Technologies Corp., Tokyo, Japan) images (120× magnification). For each group, three plants were observed, counting conidia of two leaves each.
2.6 Analysis of hormone content
Hormone content was quantified as reported in and . Following freeze drying, 40 mg of tissue was homogenized and extracted in an ultrasonic bath for 1 h with 1 ml of a mixture of methanol:water (1:1, v/v), acidified with 0.1% formic acid. After centrifugation (15,000 rpm, 10 min, 4°C), the supernatant was used to quantify abscisic acid (ABA), indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), and SA, adopting the external standard technique, with calibration curves made with original analytical standards (all from Sigma Aldrich, purity ≥98.5% for ABA and ≥99% for IAA and SA). The HPLC apparatus (Agilent 1220 Infinity LC system model G4290B, Agilent, Waldbronn, Germany) was equipped with a gradient pump, an autosampler, and a column oven set at 30°C. A 170 Diode Array Detector (Gilson, Middleton, WI, USA) set at 265 nm was employed, using a Nucleodur C18 analytical column (5 μm length: 250 mm, ID: 4.6 mm, Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany). The mobile phases were water acidified with 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B), at a flow rate of 0.600 ml min−1 in gradient mode, 0–6 min: from 10% to 30% of B, 6–16 min: from 30% to 100% B, 16–21 min: 100% B. Twenty microliters per sample was injected, testing all biological replicates (n = 3).
2.7 Total RNA isolation and quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was extracted from 100 mg of leaf sample using Trizol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and treated with TURBO DNase (Ambion, Waltham, MA, USA) to eliminate DNA contamination. cDNA was synthesized from 500 ng of total RNA with the high-capacity cDNA reverse transcription kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA), incubating samples at 25°C for 10 min, then at 37°C for 2 h , and finally at 85°C for 5 min. The qRT-PCR analysis was carried out in a CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The mixture consisted of 1 µl of cDNA, 1× iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad), and 0.25 µM of each primer. Thermal cycling conditions included an initial denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. Specific annealing of primers was checked on dissociation kinetics performed at the end of each qRT-PCR run. The expression level of each tomato target transcript was normalized to the geometric mean of the elongation factor (SlEF) and ubiquitin (SlUBI) transcripts, used as endogenous controls, according to the 2−ΔΔCT method (). Three biological replicates, each with three technical repetitions, were tested for each sample for every condition. Gene-specific primers used in the qRT-PCR experiments are listed in Table 1.
Table 1
| Primer name | Sequence | Ref. |
|---|---|---|
| PR1b1F | GCACTAAACCTAAAGAAA | () |
| PR1b1R | TAGTTTTGTGCTCGGGATGC | |
| SR1a4F | GTGTCCGAGAGGCCAGACTA | () |
| SR1a4R | CATTGTTGCAACGAGCCCGA | |
| SlPR2F | TCCAGGTAGAGACAGTGGTAAA | () |
| SlPR2R | CCTAAATATGTCGCGGTTGAGA | |
| SlPR5F | GGCCCATGTGGTCCTACAAA | () |
| SlPR5R | GGCAACATAGTTTAGCAGACCG | |
| SlPODF | TTGGAGTGTCTCGTTGCTCA | () |
| SlPODR | TTCACCAGCACTCCCTGTCT | |
| SlNPR1F | GGGAAAGATAGCAGCACG | () |
| SlNPR1R | GTCCACACAAACACACACATC | |
| SlNPR3F | CTGAGGTTCTTGGACTGGGT | This study |
| SlNPR3R | GCCTAGTCAGCCTCCTACAG |
List of gene-specific primers used for qRT-PCR.
2.8 Statistical analyses
The significance of sampling genotype (G), infection (I), and genotype × infection (G × I) interaction was performed by running a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), or Kruskal–Wallis test, for non-normally (Figure 1), or normally (Figures 2–6) distributed datasets, respectively. When results of the ANOVA test indicated that either genotype (G: “WT”, “C4”) or infection (I: healthy, infected at different time points) or their interaction (G × I) was significant, the Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) post-hoc test (Figures 2–5, 6B) or the Student’s t-test (Figure 6A) was used to separate the means at the 1% probability level. The post-hoc Dunn’s test has been used to separate means at the 5% probability level for datasets of Figure 1. OriginPro software (Northampton, MA, USA) was applied for statistical elaborations and graphs.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
3 Results and discussion
3.1 TYLCSV C4 transgenic plants exhibit reduced symptoms of On infection
The morphological features of the TYLCSV C4 transgenic lines used in this work, mainly consisting of convoluted, crumpled, and downward curled leaves (Supplementary Figure 1), were previously described in detail (). During the fungal infection experiments, typical PM symptoms induced by On started to become visible on leaves of WT plants at 6 dpi. As shown in Figure 1A, in these plants, the initially localized lesions evolved to necrosis by 13 dpi, along with the onset of diffuse chlorosis over the rest of the leaflets. Two days later (15 dpi), the whole leaf became completely necrotic. Since 8 dpi, all (100%) leaves of artificially inoculated WT plants showed On lesions (Supplementary Table 1). In the case of plants of lines C4-151, C4-153, and C4-156 overexpressing the viral C4 gene (), PM symptoms started to become evident at approximately 8 dpi, but fungal lesions were visible only in 60%–70% of leaves of inoculated plants (Supplementary Table 1). At later observation times (13 and 15 dpi), the percentage of symptomatic leaves ranged from 60% to 85% and 80% to 90%, respectively (Supplementary Table 1); moreover, fungal lesions remained typically restricted to a portion of the leaflets, without evolving to necrosis (Figure 1A).
To more precisely quantify the effect of fungal infection and to be in line with our previous observation in the context of abiotic stress (), we focused on the C4-151 line, which displayed attenuated On symptoms. Thus, the extension of the affected leaflet area was evaluated at each of the above time points on both WT and C4 plants. In WT plants, 34% of the leaflet area was affected at 8 dpi, reaching approximately 46% and 94% at 13 and 15 dpi, respectively (Figure 1B). Conversely, for C4 plants, the leaflet-affected areas were approximately 4%, 6%, and 11% at 8, 13, and 15 dpi, respectively, the latter corresponding to an 83% reduction compared to WT plants (Figure 1B). Therefore, expression of TYLCSV C4 leads to a dramatic reduction of On symptoms compared to non-transgenic plants.
Further confirmations of these results were obtained measuring the incidence of the PM through a DI scale ranging from 0 to 4. Indeed, the DI of C4 plants was significantly lower than that of WT plants, at all the time points considered (Figure 1C). In particular, at the end of the experiment (15 dpi), 94% of leaflets of WT plants reached the highest DI level of 4, while at the same time point, the majority (67%) of leaflets of transgenic TYLCSV C4 plants reached DI 1, and none of them overcame the DI of 2, a value overall lower than that of WT plants at 8 dpi (Figure 1C).
Altogether, the level of On symptom reduction here described for TYLCSV C4-expressing tomato plants is similar to that reported for the Arabidopsis line pmr4-1 () and the tomato Ol-1 line ().
3.2 On infection has a lower impact on the chlorophyll content in TYLCSV C4-expressing tomato plants
The infection by biotrophic organisms is an energy-consuming process, due to the activation of plant defense responses and the competition for nutrients. Therefore, during plant–pathogen interactions, the photosynthetic process can be altered, as is the case of plants infected by On. Here, we evaluated the CCI of WT and C4-expressing transgenic plants inoculated with On. The CCI of uninfected WT and C4 plants did not statistically differ, in agreement with our previous data () supporting the assumption that C4 does not impact the photosynthetic process. Following On inoculation, a strong decrease in CCI occurred in WT plants along with time progression, while the CCI value remained almost unaltered in C4-expressing plants (Figure 2A), a result in line with their reduced On symptoms. In addition, as shown in Figure 2B, WT infected plants were significantly smaller than On infected C4-expressing plants (124 ± 8 cm vs.149 ± 15 cm), possibly as the result of reduced photosynthesis. Since healthy C4-expressing plants are smaller than WT ones (), it is possible that C4 plants are less affected by the reduction of plant growth induced by On.
The strong impact on CCI recorded for WT tomato plants upon PM infection is in line with the trend reported by Kubienová et al (). at early stages of infection and fits also with the behavior of plants at late infection stages, as previously predicted (). Interestingly, the attenuated CCI decrease here observed for TYLCSV C4 plants challenged by On is in line with the results reported for tomato lines resistant to PM, which were obtained following partial introgression of the PM resistance genes Ol, such as the Ol-1 and Ol-4 (); these plants were partially resistant to On when subjected to mild or severe drought stress (), suggesting the hypothesis that C4 mimics the priming of drought stress imposition on fungal infection. Moreover, the lower impact of On infection on plant height observed for C4 plants compared to WT individuals is in line with the results of the Arabidopsis line pmr4-1 and the tomato line Ol-1, displaying partial PM resistance upon fungal inoculation (; ).
3.3 TYLCSV C4 influences On conidia adhesion and secondary hyphae elongation
To provide insights into the mechanisms responsible for the delayed and reduced infection by On in the transgenic TYLCSV C4-expressing plants, the initial steps of fungal infection were explored. For this, a new inoculation experiment was conducted and both the number of conidia present on leaves and the emergence of germination tubes and secondary hyphae elongation were evaluated a few hours after the inoculation, using SEM observations. At 6 hours post-inoculation (hpi), no difference in the number of conidia was detected between WT and C4-expressing leaves (Figure 3A). However, at later observations, the number of conidia on leaves of WT plants was significantly higher than in C4-expressing plants, i.e., 5.4 ± 0.9 and 6.2 ± 1.6 conidia per mm2 at 24 and 48 hpi in WT plants, respectively, vs. 2.1 ± 1.5 and 1.4 ± 1.1 per mm2 in C4 plants (Figures 3A, B). In addition, the germination tubes were always visible along with secondary hyphae formation in WT at 24 hpi (100 ± 30 µm), while the C4 plants barely showed few germ tubes and secondary hyphae (30 ± 20 µm). At 48 hpi, secondary hyphae were significantly longer in WT (150 ± 60 µm) than in C4 plants (100 ± 40 µm) (Figures 3A, C). Overall, these results indicate that the expression of the TYLCSV-C4 product influences the first stages of On infection, by inhibiting conidia adhesion and disturbing/delaying not only their germination but also germ tube elongation. This indicates that the inhibition of On infection is affected by the host genotype and possibly relies on cellular-based processes, such as local production of ROS occurring after fungal penetration and their involvement in the plant resistance responses ().
3.4 The plant hormone metabolism is altered in TYLCSV C4-expressing tomato plants during On infection
Since plant pathogen defense responses are orchestrated by a tightly organized hormonal network, we further quantified key hormones in both WT and C4-expressing tomato plants at the end of the On inoculation experiment (15 dpi). Firstly, we concentrated on SA, as it has a prominent role in local and systemic defense against biotrophs, and it was shown to play a key role in basal defense against PM, as well as in PM resistance mediated by some genes, such as the Arabidopsis pmr4 and tomato Ol-1 genes (; ). A strong decrease in the accumulation of SA following fungal infection occurred in WT plants, differently from C4-expressing plants (Figure 4A). This may indicate that C4 expression helps to maintain a level of SA sufficient to counteract On infection. Alternatively, it is possible that On colonization, which is more abundant in WT plants, is associated with a pathogen-mediated suppression of the SA defense pathway. This possibility is consistent with the notion that pathogen effectors favor disease establishment by suppressing plant defense mechanisms (). In further support of this hypothesis, it was previously reported that no difference in On susceptibility occurred in NahG tomato plants (unable to accumulate SA) compared to WT susceptible plants (). However, there are disagreeing reports regarding the involvement of SA during PM infection. In fact, an SA-dependent disease resistance mechanism was described for the pmr4 Arabidopsis plants () and for the Ol-1 partially resistant PM tomato line, irrespective of a concomitant drought stress treatment ().
Therefore, the significant change in SA regulation in WT plants and the unaltered SA content in TYLCSV C4 plants upon On infection warrant more extensive studies to clarify the role of SA in the tomato PM pathosystem. Moreover, the importance of such studies is also supported by recent reports describing a significant overproduction of SA in other hosts infected by PM, such as wheat (), Arabidopsis (Wang et al., 2020), and grapevine (Yin et al., 2022).
In the case of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), an auxin signaling molecule that promotes pathogen infection (; ; ; ), we observed that in the absence of On infection, C4 plants accumulated almost 2.7 less IAA compared to WT individuals (Figure 4B). Upon fungal inoculation, WT plant encountered a strong reduction of IAA accumulation, while only a slight but non-significant decrease occurred in C4 plants (Figure 4B). In general, increased IAA level can be considered as part of a defense strategy and auxins have been reported to possess fungicidal activity (). Thus, the significant reduction of IAA in WT upon PM infection is expected to contribute to the fungal proliferation, while the lack of regulation in TYLCSV C4 plants suggests that the overexpression of this viral gene disrupts the IAA dependence of the PM infection process, in a way similar to results obtained for the grapevine-PM pathosystems ().
ABA has a pivotal role in regulating abiotic (mainly drought and salt stress) responses, but recent studies indicate that this hormone also plays an important function in the response of plants to pathogen attack, implying considerable crosstalk between biotic and abiotic stresses tolerance pathways. In the course of this study, we observed that WT and C4 plants accumulate similar basal levels of ABA and that, upon On infection, ABA levels reach a higher, though non-significant, level in the WT group of plants compared to TYLCSV C4-expressing plants (Figure 4C). These results partially disagree with the report of showing sensitivity of On infection to ABA.
3.5 Transcriptional changes of key plant defense genes
3.5.1 Pathogenesis-related genes and the stress-responsive POD gene
To better evaluate the effect of TYLCSV C4 expression on infection, the expression of key defense genes, i.e., pathogenesis-related (PR) genes and the stress-responsive gene POD, was analyzed at 15 dpi. The activation of defense responses via the SA signaling pathway is accompanied by the expression of PR genes (; ; ; ; ). In this work, we investigated the transcriptional response of the PR1 gene encoding an antifungal protein (; ), the PR2 gene encoding a β-1,3-glucanase (), and the PR5 gene encoding osmotin and thaumatin-like proteins (; Van Loon and Van Strien, 1999), which are considered markers for the activation of the SA defense pathway upon infection by biotrophic pathogens ().
The transcriptional profile of the PR1a SA marker gene (; ; ) was similar in uninfected WT and C4-expressing plants; however, upon On infection, significantly higher PR1a expression occurred in C4-expressing plants (Figure 5), in agreement with their higher SA content (Figure 4). Therefore, the increased PR1 expression (and SA accumulation) might contribute to the PM tolerance in C4 plants, in accordance with other plant defense responses activated against fungal infections and biotrophic pathogens (; ; ).
A similar transcriptional profile during PM infection was observed for the other defense gene PR5, which was strongly activated in C4 plants compared to the WT controls. Such PR5 gene activation is expected to induce the production of osmotin, a multifunctional stress-responsive protein belonging to the PR-5 defense protein family, shown to have a strong antifungal activity (). Thus, our results indicate that the PR5 proteins might also contribute to confer PM tolerance in C4-expressing tomato plants, possibly being involved in favoring the protection of native proteins under stress conditions ().
Conversely, upon On infection, the PR2 gene, encoding enzymes of the β-1,3-endoglucanase defense response family (), was more upregulated in infected WT plants compared to TYLCSV C4-expressing plants. Such transcriptional regulation might indicate that β-1,3-endoglucanase defense is not directly involved in the C4-associated tolerance to PM in this host. Our results are in agreement with data reported in () where genes encoding PR1 proteins are more highly upregulated during On infection in a susceptible tomato cultivar compared to genes encoding for β-1,3-endoglucanase.
Overall, we can conclude that the TYLCSV C4 gene product acts as an activator of SA in tomato, the main phytohormone inducing local and systemic-acquired resistance against biotrophic pathogens and of the downstream defense genes PR1 and PR5 (; ). This finding points to a novel role for this multifunctional protein, which can be added to the other previously described functions, such as virus movement (; ), suppression of RNA silencing (; ; ; ), symptom induction (), hypersensitive response (), hyperplasia (), and induction of drought stress tolerance in tomato ().
The observed effective defense response against tomato PM involving the phytohormone SA and the subsequent activation of the defense genes PR1 and PR5 fits with previous studies regarding other biotrophic pathogens, such as Peronospora tabacina, Phytophthora parasitica var. nicotianae, Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, and tomato spotted wilt virus (; ; ).
Regarding the transcriptional regulation of the POD gene an expression trend analogous to the PR1 and PR5 genes was observed (Figure 5D). POD expression is associated with the production of peroxidase, one of the most important antioxidant enzyme, contributing to alleviate the oxidative damage induced by scavenging ROS resulting from stress conditions, such as pathogen infection, as documented for other biotrophic pathogens (; ; ), such as Phytophthora infestans and Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria.
3.5.2 Early defense genes
To further assess the impact of TYLCSV C4-expression on PM infection in tomato, we analyzed the expression of two early defense genes at 8, 24, and 48 hours after On inoculation. The two genes considered were (i) non-expressor of PR1 (NPR1) (), encoding a signaling component that acts downstream of SA () to activate defense-related genes, and (ii) the NPR1-paralog NPR3, coding for a receptor of the plant hormone SA, promoting the proteasomal degradation of NPR1 (). During our experiments, NPR1 gene expression initially decreased and then increased upon infection in WT and TYLCSV C4-expressing plants compared to their uninfected counterparts; however, no significant difference was observed between the two genotypes at any of the different time points (Figure 6). Conversely, NPR3 expression was more upregulated in C4-expressing individuals compared to WT controls at all the time points considered, but especially at 24 and 48 hpi (Figure 6).
Overall, this confirms the concept that SA regulates the degradation of NPR1 mediated by the higher expression of NPR3, maintaining an appropriate NPR1 level to establish a plant immune response to pathogen attack (; Wang and Xiang, 2020), in our case mediated by the TYLCSV C4 protein. Moreover, NPR3 acting as a receptor in the SA signaling pathway can bind to SA, regulating the content of NPR1, and the subsequent SA-mediated resistance response to PM, as already reported for other biotic stresses (Wang and Xiang, 2020).
4 Conclusions
Several geminiviruses are documented to have the ability to trigger the complex antiviral immune response of the plant cell, involving RNAi, PTI, and ETI (). Such recognition scheme induces the activation of plant defense mechanisms that can protect plants against different co-infecting pathogens or against subsequent parasite attacks (; ). These signaling pathways act through the activity of phytohormones such as SA, being key factors of plant defense. In this study, we demonstrated that the C4 protein of a geminivirus (TYLCSV) might act as an activator of the signaling cascade and defense mechanism in tomato against the PM infection. This protein exploits the SA signaling pathway and the activation of the PR1 and PR5 genes, which lie behind the plant defense against biotrophic pathogens, such as On. Moreover, the activation of the POD gene in the C4-expressing plants might be associated with alleviation of oxidative damage caused by scavenging ROS, which are produced in response to the fungal infection. Such processes led to an increased tolerance of transgenic tomato plants to PM, enabling the reduction of the DI, mainly through the inhibition of conidial adhesion and sporulation and through the activation of molecular and hormonal pathways. These findings were supported by anatomic and physiological analyses showing that C4-On infected plants grew better and had a higher photosynthetic activity compared to WT control plants.
The C4/AC4 proteins of geminiviruses are the less conserved proteins encoded by this group of viruses (). These proteins display a broad diversity of functions which are deployed not only during viral infection, but also during abiotic stresses. A few motifs potentially determining its localization on organelles and structures of the cell have been identified, such as myristoylation (myr), palmitoylation (pal), and a chloroplast transit peptide (cTP) sites (); in addition, lines of experimental evidence that the C4/AC4 from TYLCV, beet curly top virus, and East African cassava mosaic virus are localized in the plasma membrane were also produced, as reviewed by . Whether the TYLCSV C4 protein is associated with membranous structures is presently unknown. Indeed, while the presence of a myr site was predicted in the TYLCSV-C4 protein, no pal site could be detected using the GPS Lipid—an integrated resource for lipid modification tool (http://lipid.biocuckoo.org/webserver.php (). In addition, using both the Psort (https://www.genscript.com/tools/psort) and the Balanced Subcellular Localization Predictor (http://gpcr2.biocomp.unibo.it/bacello/pred.htm), a high probability of nuclear localization was also predicted for TYLCSV-C4. As a dual membrane/nuclear localization was determined for the AC4 protein of the bipartite begomovirus mungbean yellow mosaic virus (), experimental proofs of the real subcellular distribution of TYLCSV-C4 would deserve further attention.
Indeed, membrane-associated protein components involved in the resistance towards PM have been recently identified, such as proteins of the soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive-factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) complex (; Wang et al., 2020), the actin-related protein 2/3 complex (Arp2/3 complex) (Yin et al., 2022), Rho-like GTPases (ROP) (), and protein encoded by Solanum habrochaites Oidium Resistance Required-1 gene (ShORR-1) (). Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that localization of TYLCSV C4 on the membrane together with the above-mentioned membrane-anchored resistance associated components could reinforce the defense barriers, though by still unidentified mechanisms.
Interestingly, the perception of a biotic threat at the cell surface led to a membrane-to-chloroplast transition of the TYLCV C4 protein, reducing chloroplast-associated defense mechanisms, such as SA biosynthesis and downstream processing (), crucial elements in the antiviral defense (). Although it is unknown if On infection determines membrane-to-chloroplast translocation, our results indicate that the accumulation of SA in C4 plants infected by On was not impaired.
Another conserved feature of the C4/AC4 proteins from different geminiviruses is related to their ability to physically interact with receptor-like kinases (RLKs), altering signal transduction involved in the PTI response (). As the relevance of RLKs in the initial steps of infection by extracellular pathogens such as bacteria or fungi is uncontested, future studies should be devoted to identify RLKs involved in the C4-mediated tomato resistance to PM.
On a broader perspective, the finding that TYLCSV C4 acts as a novel PM defense inducer in tomato deepens our knowledge on the mechanisms adopted by this multifunctional protein in the management of both biotic and abiotic stresses and adds new layers in the definition of the resistance mechanisms towards On. Overall, the obtained results indicate that the anti-PM activity based on TYLCSV-C4 operating in the tomato immune response might involve the activation of a PTI response. Future investigations will be devoted to evaluate the ability of C4 to counteract other tomato pathogens, such as Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, considering that common resistance-inducing genes have been recently discovered (). Further omics-based analyses on the tomato C4 overexpressing lines will help to decipher the candidate genes responsible for the priming activity of this protein against environmental stresses.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Author contributions
SM, CD, and EN conceived the study and participated in its design. SM, CD, and MF performed the experiments. CD analyzed the data. SM, CD, MP, and SP validated the results. EN, CD, and SM wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Walter Chitarra and Dr. Luca Nerva (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Centre of Viticultural and Enology Research, Conegliano, Italy) for technical support of phytohormone analyses, and Dr. Massimo Turina (CNR-IPSP, Torino, Italy) for helpful discussions.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1163315/full#supplementary-material
References
1
Abdel-AtyA. S. (2010). Fungicidal activity of indole derivatives against some plant pathogenic fungi. J. Pestic. Sci.35 (4), 431–440. doi: 10.1584/jpestics.G09-66
2
AchuoE. A.AudenaertK.MezianeH.HöfteM. (2004). The salicylic acid-dependent defence pathway is effective against different pathogens in tomato and tobacco. Plant Pathol.53 (1), 65–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2004.00947.x
3
AchuoE. A.PrinsenE.HöfteM. (2006). Influence of drought, salt stress and abscisic acid on the resistance of tomato to botrytis cinerea and oidium neolycopersici. Plant Pathol.55 (2), 178–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2006.01340.x
4
AlexanderD.GoodmanR. M.Gut-RellaM.GlascockC.WeymannK.FriedrichL.et al. (1993). Increased tolerance to two oomycete pathogens in transgenic tobacco expressing pathogenesis-related protein 1a. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.90 (15), 7327–7331. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.15.7327
5
AliS.GanaiB. A.KamiliA. N.BhatA. A.MirZ. A.BhatJ. A.et al. (2018). Pathogenesis-related proteins and peptides as promising tools for engineering plants with multiple stress tolerance. Microbiol. Res.212-213, 29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2018.04.008
6
AminI.HussainK.AkbergenovR.YadavJ. S.QaziJ.MansoorS.et al. (2011). Suppressors of RNA silencing encoded by the components of the cotton leaf curl begomovirus-betasatellite complex. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.24 (8), 973–983. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-01-11-0001
7
AnC.MouZ. (2011). Salicylic acid and its function in plant immunity. J. Integr. Plant Biol.53 (6), 412–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2011.01043.x
8
AnandA.UppalapatiS. R.RyuC. M.AllenS. N.KangL.TangY.et al. (2008). Salicylic acid and systemic acquired resistance play a role in attenuating crown gall disease caused by agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Physiol.146 (2), 703–715. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.111302
9
AntoniwJ. F.RitterC. E.PierpointW. S.Van LoonL. C. (1980). Comparison of three pathogenesis-related proteins from plants of two cultivars of tobacco infected with TMV. J. Gen. Virol.47 (1), 79–87. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-47-1-79
10
BaiY.PavanS.ZhengZ.ZappelN. F.ReinstädlerA.LottiC.et al. (2008). Naturally occurring broad-spectrum powdery mildew resistance in a central American tomato accession is caused by loss of mlo function. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.21 (1), 30–39. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-21-1-0030
11
BaiY.van der HulstR.BonnemaG.MarcelT. C.Meijer-DekensF.NiksR. E.et al. (2005). Tomato defense to oidium neolycopersici: Dominant ol genes confer isolate-dependent resistance via a different mechanism than recessive ol-2. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.18 (4), 354–362. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-18-0354
12
BashirM. A.SilvestriC.AhmadT.HafizI. A.AbbasiN. A.ManzoorA.et al. (2020). Osmotin: A cationic protein leads to improve biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Plants (Basel)9 (8), 992. doi: 10.3390/plants9080992
13
BielachA.HrtyanM.TognettiV. B. (2017). Plants under stress: Involvement of auxin and cytokinin. Int. J. Mol. Sci.18 (7), 1427. doi: 10.3390/ijms18071427
14
CaoH.BowlingS. A.GordonA. S.DongX. (1994). Characterization of an arabidopsis mutant that is nonresponsive to inducers of systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell.6 (11), 1583–1592. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.11.1583
15
CaoX.LuY.DiD.ZhangZ.LiuH.TianL.et al. (2013). Enhanced virus resistance in transgenic maize expressing a dsRNA-specific endoribonuclease gene from e. coli. PloS One8 (4), e60829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060829
16
CarluccioA. V.PrigigalloM. I.Rosas-DiazT.Lozano-DuranR.StavoloneL. (2018). S-acylation mediates mungbean yellow mosaic virus AC4 localization to the plasma membrane and in turns gene silencing suppression. PloS Pathog.14 (8), e1007207. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007207
17
ChenZ.AgnewJ. L.CohenJ. D.HeP.ShanL.SheenJ.et al. (2007). Pseudomonas syringae type III effector AvrRpt2 alters arabidopsis thaliana auxin physiology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.104 (50), 20131–20136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704901104
18
ChengY.ZhangH.YaoJ.HanQ.WangX.HuangL.et al. (2013). Cytological and molecular characterization of non-host resistance in arabidopsis thaliana against wheat stripe rust. Plant Physiol. Biochem.62, 11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.10.014
19
Corrales-GutierrezM.Medina-PucheL.YuY.WangL.DingX.LunaA. P.et al. (2020). The C4 protein from the geminivirus tomato yellow leaf curl virus confers drought tolerance in arabidopsis through an ABA-independent mechanism. Plant Biotechnol. J.18 (5), 1121–1123. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13280
20
DoH. M.HongJ. K.JungH. W.KimS. H.HamJ. H.HwangB. K. (2003). Expression of peroxidase-like genes, H2O2 production, and peroxidase activity during the hypersensitive response to xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria in capsicum annuum. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.16 (3), 196–205. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.3.196
21
El OirdiM.El RahmanT. A.RiganoL.El HadramiA.RodriguezM. C.DaayfF.et al. (2011). Botrytis cinerea manipulates the antagonistic effects between immune pathways to promote disease development in tomato. Plant Cell.23 (6), 2405–2421. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.083394
22
Fiallo-OlivéE.LettJ. M.MartinD. P.RoumagnacP.VarsaniA.ZerbiniF. M.et al. (2021). ICTV virus taxonomy profile. J. Gen. Virol.102 (12), 001696. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001696
23
FiocchettiF.CarusoC.BertiniL.VittiD.SaccardoF.TucciM. (2006). Over-expression of a pathogenesis-related protein gene in transgenic tomato alters the transcription patterns of other defence genes. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol.81 (1), 27–32. doi: 10.1080/14620316.2006.11512024
24
FuZ. Q.YanS.SalehA.WangW.RubleJ.OkaN.et al. (2012). NPR3 and NPR4 are receptors for the immune signal salicylic acid in plants. Nature486 (7402), 228–232. doi: 10.1038/nature11162
25
GhozlanM. H.El-ArgawyE.TokgözS.LakshmanD. K.MitraA. (2020). Plant defense against necrotrophic pathogens. Am. J. Plant Sci.11 (12), 2122–2138. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2020.1112149
26
GorovitsR.ShteinbergM.AnfokaG.CzosnekH. (2022). Exploiting virus infection to protect plants from abiotic stresses: Tomato protection by a begomovirus. Plants (Basel).11 (21), 2944. doi: 10.3390/plants11212944
27
HalderV.SulimanM. N. S.KaschaniF.KaiserM. (2019). Plant chemical genetics reveals colistin sulphate as a SA and NPR1-independent PR1 inducer functioning via a p38-like kinase pathway. Sci. Rep.9 (1), 11196. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47526-5
28
HarthJ. E.FerrariM. J.TookerJ. F.StephensonA. G. (2018). Zucchini yellow mosaic virus infection limits establishment and severity of powdery mildew in wild populations of Cucurbita pepo. Front. Plant Sci.9, 792. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00792
29
HennigJ.MalamyJ.GrynkiewiczG.IndulskiJ.KlessigD. F. (1993). Interconversion of the salicylic acid signal and its glucoside in tobacco. Plant J.4 (4), 593–600. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1993.04040593.x
30
IsmayilA.HaximY.WangY.LiH.QianL.HanT.et al. (2018). Cotton leaf curl multan virus C4 protein suppresses both transcriptional and post-transcriptional gene silencing by interacting with SAM synthetase. PloS Pathog.14 (8), e1007282. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007282
31
JacobD.DavidD. R.SztjenbergA.EladY. (2008). Conditions for development of powdery mildew of tomato caused by oidium neolycopersici. Phytopathology98 (3), 270–281. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-98-3-0270
32
JingC.LiP.ZhangJ.WangR.WuG.LiM.et al. (2019). The malvastrum yellow vein virus C4 protein promotes disease symptom development and enhances virus accumulation in plants. Front. Microbiol.10. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02425
33
JonesJ. D.DanglJ. L. (2006). The plant immune system. Nature444 (7117), 323–329. doi: 10.1038/nature05286
34
JonesH.WhippsJ. M.GurrS. J. (2001). The tomato powdery mildew fungus oidium neolycopersici. Mol. Plant Pathol.2 (6), 303–309. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-6722.2001.00084.x
35
JupinI.De KouchkovskyF.JouanneauF.GronenbornB. (1994). Movement of tomato yellow leaf curl geminivirus (TYLCV): Involvement of the protein encoded by ORF C4. Virology204 (1), 82–90. doi: 10.1006/viro.1994.1512
36
KissoudisC.SunartiS.van de WielC.VisserR. G.van der LindenC. G.BaiY. (2016). Responses to combined abiotic and biotic stress in tomato are governed by stress intensity and resistance mechanism. J. Exp. Bot.67 (17), 5119–5132. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw285
37
KöhlJ.KolnaarR.RavensbergW. J. (2019). Mode of action of microbial biological control agents against plant diseases: Relevance beyond efficacy. Front. Plant Sci.10, 845. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00845
38
KubienovaL.SedlarovaM.Viteckova-WunschovaA.PiterkovaJ.LuhovaL.MieslerovaB.et al. (2013). Effect of extreme temperatures on powdery mildew development and Hsp70 induction in tomato and wild solanum spp. Plant Prot. Science.49 (10), S41–S54. doi: 10.17221/45/2013-PPS
39
KunkelB. N.BrooksD. M. (2002). Cross talk between signaling pathways in pathogen defense. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.5 (4), 325–331. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00275-3
40
LebedaA.MieslerováB.PetřivalskýM.LuhováL.ŠpundováM.SedlářováM.et al. (2014). Resistance mechanisms of wild tomato germplasm to infection of oidium neolycopersici. Eur. J. Plant Pathol.138 (3), 569–596. doi: 10.1007/s10658-013-0307-3
41
LehtonenP. T.HelanderM.SiddiquiS. A.LehtoK.SaikkonenK. (2006). Endophytic fungus decreases plant virus infections in meadow ryegrass (Lolium pratense). Biol. Lett.2 (4), 620–623. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0499
42
LiW.CuiX.MengZ.HuangX.XieQ.WuH.et al. (2012). Transcriptional regulation of arabidopsis MIR168a and argonaute1 homeostasis in abscisic acid and abiotic stress responses. Plant Physiol.158 (3), 1279–1292. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.188789
43
LiN.HanX.FengD.YuanD.HuangL. J. (2019). Signaling crosstalk between salicylic acid and Ethylene/Jasmonate in plant defense: Do we understand what they are whispering? Int. J. Mol. Sci.20 (3), 671. doi: 10.3390/ijms20030671
44
LiT.HuangY.XuZ.-S.WangF.XiongA.-S. (2019). Salicylic acid-induced differential resistance to the tomato yellow leaf curl virus among resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars. BMC Plant Biol.19 (1), 173. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1784-0
45
LiJ.-b.LuanY.-s.LiuZ. (2015). SpWRKY1 mediates resistance to phytophthora infestans and tolerance to salt and drought stress by modulating reactive oxygen species homeostasis and expression of defense-related genes in tomato. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture (PCTOC).123 (1), 67–81. doi: 10.1007/s11240-015-0815-2
46
LivakK. J.SchmittgenT. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-delta delta C(T)) method. Methods25 (4), 402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262
47
López-GresaM. P.LisónP.YenushL.ConejeroV.RodrigoI.BellésJ. M. (2016). Salicylic acid is involved in the basal resistance of tomato plants to citrus exocortis viroid and tomato spotted wilt virus. PloS One11 (11), e0166938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166938
48
LunaA. P.MorillaG.VoinnetO.BejaranoE. R. (2012). Functional analysis of gene-silencing suppressors from tomato yellow leaf curl disease viruses. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.25 (10), 1294–1306. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-04-12-0094-R
49
ManghwarH.HussainA.UllahA.GulS.ShabanM.KhanA. H.et al. (2018). Expression analysis of defense related genes in wheat and maize against bipolaris sorokiniana. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.103, 36–46. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2018.04.002
50
MarteM.BuonaurioR.Della TorreG. (1992). RESISTANCE TO TOBACCO POWDERY MILDEW (ERYSIPHE CICHORACEARUM ) INDUCED BY a NECROTIC STRAIN OF POTATO VIRUS y (PVY n ). Rivista di Patol. Vegetale2 (2), 49–56.
51
McClerklinS. A.LeeS. G.HarperC. P.NwumehR.JezJ. M.KunkelB. N. (2018). Indole-3-acetaldehyde dehydrogenase-dependent auxin synthesis contributes to virulence of pseudomonas syringae strain DC3000. PloS Pathog.14 (1), e1006811. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006811
52
Medina-PucheL.OrílioA. F.ZerbiniF. M.Lozano-DuránR. (2021). Small but mighty: Functional landscape of the versatile geminivirus-encoded C4 protein. PloS Pathog.17 (10), e1009915. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009915
53
Medina-PucheL.TanH.DograV.WuM.Rosas-DiazT.WangL.et al. (2020). A defense pathway linking plasma membrane and chloroplasts and Co-opted by pathogens. Cell182 (5), 1109–24.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.020
54
MeiY.MaZ.WangY.ZhouX. (2020). Geminivirus C4 antagonizes the HIR1-mediated hypersensitive response by inhibiting the HIR1 self-interaction and promoting degradation of the protein. New Phytol.225 (3), 1311–1326. doi: 10.1111/nph.16208
55
MengY.ZhangA.MaQ.XingL. (2022). Functional characterization of tomato ShROP7 in regulating resistance against oidium neolycopersici. Int. J. Mol. Sci.23 (15), 23. doi: 10.3390/ijms23158557
56
MishraR.ShteinbergM.ShkolnikD.AnfokaG.CzosnekH.GorovitsR. (2022). Interplay between abiotic (drought) and biotic (virus) stresses in tomato plants. Mol. Plant Pathol.23 (4), 475–488. doi: 10.1111/mpp.13172
57
MlíckováK.LuhováL.LebedaA.MieslerováB.PecP. (2004). Reactive oxygen species generation and peroxidase activity during oidium neolycopersici infection on lycopersicon species. Plant Physiol. Biochem.42 (10), 753–761. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2004.07.007
58
NavarroL.DunoyerP.JayF.ArnoldB.DharmasiriN.EstelleM.et al. (2006). A plant miRNA contributes to antibacterial resistance by repressing auxin signaling. Science312 (5772), 436–439. doi: 10.1126/science.1126088
59
NervaL.GiudiceG.QuirogaG.BelfioreN.LovatL.PerriaR.et al. (2022). Mycorrhizal symbiosis balances rootstock-mediated growth-defence tradeoffs. Biol. Fertility Soils.58 (1), 17–34. doi: 10.1007/s00374-021-01607-8
60
NidermanT.GenetetI.BruyèreT.GeesR.StintziA.LegrandM.et al. (1995). Pathogenesis-related PR-1 proteins are antifungal. isolation and characterization of three 14-kilodalton proteins of tomato and of a basic PR-1 of tobacco with inhibitory activity against phytophthora infestans. Plant Physiol.108 (1), 17–27. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.1.17
61
NishimuraM. T.SteinM.HouB. H.VogelJ. P.EdwardsH.SomervilleS. C. (2003). Loss of a callose synthase results in salicylic acid-dependent disease resistance. Science301 (5635), 969–972. doi: 10.1126/science.1086716
62
PadmanabhanC.MaQ.ShekastebandR.StewartK. S.HuttonS. F.ScottJ. W.et al. (2019). Comprehensive transcriptome analysis and functional characterization of PR-5 for its involvement in tomato sw-7 resistance to tomato spotted wilt tospovirus. Sci. Rep.9 (1), 7673. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44100-x
63
PagliaraniC.MoineA.ChitarraW.NervaL.CatoniM.TavazzaR.et al. (2022). The C4 protein of tomato yellow leaf curl Sardinia virus primes drought tolerance in tomato through morphological adjustments. Horticulture Res.9, uhac164. doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac164
64
PálM.KovácsV.VidaG.SzalaiG.JandaT. (2013). Changes induced by powdery mildew in the salicylic acid and polyamine contents and the antioxidant enzyme activities of wheat lines. Eur. J. Plant Pathol.135 (1), 35–47. doi: 10.1007/s10658-012-0063-9
65
PannoS.DavinoS.CarusoA. G.BertaccaS.CrnogoracA.MandićA.et al. (2021). A review of the most common and economically important diseases that undermine the cultivation of tomato crop in the Mediterranean basin. Agronomy11 (11), 2188. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11112188
66
PatilS. B.BodheS. K. (2011). Leaf disease severity measurement using image processing. Int. J. Eng. Technol.3, 297–301.
67
PimentelD.AmaroR.ErbanA.MauriN.SoaresF.RegoC.et al. (2021). Transcriptional, hormonal, and metabolic changes in susceptible grape berries under powdery mildew infection. J. Exp. Bot.72 (18), 6544–6569. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab258
68
PiterkováJ.LuhováL.MieslerováB.LebedaA.PetřivalskýM. (2013). Nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species regulate the accumulation of heat shock proteins in tomato leaves in response to heat shock and pathogen infection. Plant Science.207, 57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.02.010
69
PiterkováJ.PetrivalskýM.LuhováL.MieslerováB.SedlárováM.LebedaA. (2009). Local and systemic production of nitric oxide in tomato responses to powdery mildew infection. Mol. Plant Pathol.10 (4), 501–513. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00551.x
70
PotterL. R.JonesI. T. (1981). Interaction between barley yellow dwarf virus and powdery mildew in four barley genotypes. Plant Pathol.30 (3), 133–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.1981.tb01244.x
71
ProkopováJ.MieslerováB.HlaváčkováVHlavinkaJ.LebedaANaušJ.et al. (2010). Changes in photosynthesis of lycopersicon spp. plants induced by tomato powdery mildew infection in combination with heat shock pre-treatment. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.74 (3), 205–213. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2010.01.001
72
RigdenJ. E.KrakeL. R.RezaianM. A.DryI. B. (1994). ORF C4 of tomato leaf curl geminivirus is a determinant of symptom severity. Virology204 (2), 847–850. doi: 10.1006/viro.1994.1606
73
RojasM. R.JiangH.SalatiR.Xoconostle-CázaresB.SudarshanaM. R.LucasW. J.et al. (2001). Functional analysis of proteins involved in movement of the monopartite begomovirus, tomato yellow leaf curl virus. Virology291 (1), 110–125. doi: 10.1006/viro.2001.1194
74
Rosas-DiazT.ZhangD.FanP.WangL.DingX.JiangY.et al. (2018). A virus-targeted plant receptor-like kinase promotes cell-to-cell spread of RNAi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.115 (6), 1388–1393. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715556115
75
SatkováP.StarýT.PleškováV.ZapletalováM.KašparovskýT.Cincalová-KubienováL.et al. (2017). Diverse responses of wild and cultivated tomato to BABA, oligandrin and oidium neolycopersici infection. Ann. Bot.119 (5), 829–840. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw188
76
ShiW.HaoL.LiJ.LiuD.GuoX.LiH. (2014). The gossypium hirsutum WRKY gene GhWRKY39-1 promotes pathogen infection defense responses and mediates salt stress tolerance in transgenic nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Cell Rep.33 (3), 483–498. doi: 10.1007/s00299-013-1548-5
77
ShiZ.MaximovaS.LiuY.VericaJ.GuiltinanM. J. (2013). The salicylic acid receptor NPR3 is a negative regulator of the transcriptional defense response during early flower development in arabidopsis. Mol. Plant6 (3), 802–816. doi: 10.1093/mp/sss091
78
SunartiS.KissoudisC.van der HoekY.van der SchootH.VisserR. G. F.van der LindenC. G.et al. (2022). Drought stress interacts with powdery mildew infection in tomato. Front. Plant Sci.13, 845379. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.845379
79
SyllerJ.GrupaA. (2016). Antagonistic within-host interactions between plant viruses: Molecular basis and impact on viral and host fitness. Mol. Plant Pathol.17 (5), 769–782. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12322
80
TakamatsuS. (2004). Phylogeny and evolution of the powdery mildew fungi (Erysiphales, ascomycota) inferred from nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycoscience45 (2), 147–157. doi: 10.1007/S10267-003-0159-3
81
TeixeiraR. M.FerreiraM. A.RaimundoG. A. S.FontesE. P. B. (2021). Geminiviral triggers and suppressors of plant antiviral immunity. Microorganisms9 (4), 775. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9040775
82
TománkováK.LuhováL.PetřivalskýM.PečP.LebedaA. (2006). Biochemical aspects of reactive oxygen species formation in the interaction between lycopersicon spp. and oidium neolycopersici. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.68 (1), 22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2006.05.005
83
UknesS.Mauch-ManiB.MoyerM.PotterS.WilliamsS.DincherS.et al. (1992). Acquired resistance in arabidopsis. Plant Cell.4 (6), 645–656. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.6.645
84
van LoonL. C.PierpointW. S.BollerT.ConejeroV. (1994). Recommendations for naming plant pathogenesis-related proteins. Plant Mol. Biol. Reporter.12 (3), 245–264. doi: 10.1007/BF02668748
85
van LoonL. C.RepM.PieterseC. M. (2006). Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.44, 135–162. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143425
86
Van LoonL. C.Van StrienE. A. (1999). The families of pathogenesis-related proteins, their activities, and comparative analysis of PR-1 type proteins. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.55 (2), 85–97. doi: 10.1006/pmpp.1999.0213
87
WangL.DongM.ZhangQ.WuY.HuL.ParsonJ. F.et al. (2020). Silicon modulates multi-layered defense against powdery mildew in arabidopsis. Phytopathol. Res.2 (1), 7. doi: 10.1186/s42483-020-00048-9
88
WangP.XiangM. (2020). Research progress of NPR genes in signal pathway of salicylic acid mediated plant disease resistance. E3S Web Conferences.145, 01038. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202014501038
89
WasternackC. (2007). Jasmonates: An update on biosynthesis, signal transduction and action in plant stress response, growth and development. Ann. Bot.100 (4), 681–697. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm079
90
WhiteT. J.BrunsT.LeeS.TaylorJ. (1990). “38 - AMPLIFICATION AND DIRECT SEQUENCING OF FUNGAL RIBOSOMAL RNA GENES FOR PHYLOGENETICS,” in PCR protocols. Eds. InnisM. A.GelfandD. H.SninskyJ. J.WhiteT. J. (San Diego: Academic Press), 315–322.
91
YangX.NiuL.ZhangW.HeH.YangJ.XingG.et al. (2019). Increased multiple virus resistance in transgenic soybean overexpressing the double-strand RNA-specific ribonuclease gene PAC1. Transgenic Res.28 (1), 129–140. doi: 10.1007/s11248-018-0108-8
92
YinW.WangX.LiuH.WangY.NockerS.TuM.et al. (2022). Overexpression of VqWRKY31 enhances powdery mildew resistance in grapevine by promoting salicylic acid signaling and specific metabolite synthesis. Hortic. Res.9. doi: 10.1093/hr/uhab064
93
ZhirnovI. V.TrifonovaE. A.RomanovaA. V.FilipenkoE. A.SapotskyM. V.MalinovskyV. I.et al. (2016). Induced expression of serratia marcescens ribonuclease III gene in transgenic nicotiana tabacum l. cv. SR1 tobacco plants. Genetika52 (11), 1256–1261. doi: 10.1134/S102279541611017X
Summary
Keywords
tomato, geminivirus, C4 protein, Oidium neolycopersici, biotic stress, gene expression, phytohormones, transgenic plant
Citation
D’Errico C, Forgia M, Pisani M, Pavan S, Noris E and Matić S (2023) Overexpression of the C4 protein of tomato yellow leaf curl Sardinia virus increases tomato resistance to powdery mildew. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1163315. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1163315
Received
10 February 2023
Accepted
20 March 2023
Published
31 March 2023
Volume
14 - 2023
Edited by
Tao Zhang, Institute of Microbiology (CAS), China
Reviewed by
Zhong-Qi Chen, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, China; Ning Xu, China Agricultural University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 D’Errico, Forgia, Pisani, Pavan, Noris and Matić.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Slavica Matić, slavica.matic@ipsp.cnr.it; Emanuela Noris, emanuela.noris@ipsp.cnr.it
This article was submitted to Plant Pathogen Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.