In recent years, buckwheat has gathered increasing attention as a promising functional food source, owing to its numerous human health benefits and absence of gluten. Furthermore, buckwheat species possess various properties that enhance habitats and associated biodiversity, making it an environmentally-friendly crop (). Additionally, buckwheat is considered an alternative to wheat for extreme drought conditions (). Given these facts, it is imperative to conduct extensive molecular and field studies dedicated to fully realize the potential of this crop. The advancement of genetic studies and molecular breeding programs for buckwheat has been made possible through the gradual refinement of the genomes of Fagopyrum species, which was initiated with the release of the genome of Fagopyrum esculentum by , Fagopyrum tataricum cv. Pinku1 by , and Fagopyrum cymosum by . The improved genome of F. esculentum cv. Dasha was later released by together with a high-resolution transcriptome atlas, including 46 organs and developmental stages. This transcription atlas constitutes a powerful tool for formulating and validating hypotheses regarding gene functionality in buckwheat. Utilizing these sequenced genomes, reported a comprehensive database of Tartary buckwheat genomic variation based on whole-genome resequencing of 510 germplasms, while described the seed metabolome during Tartary buckwheat domestication. Recently, high-quality genomes and chromosome-level genome assembly of F. esculentum cv. Pintian4 and F. tataricum cv. Pinku1 were made assessable to the research community ().
The available genome sequence of F. tataricum was instrumental in the transcriptomic analysis of response to cadmium stress brought by Ye et al. This study’s findings reveal Tartary buckwheat’s tolerance to high cadmium concentrations (50 mg/L) and accumulation of the cadmium predominantly in the roots, with limited translocation to the upper portion of the plant. Together with a short life cycle, low nutritional requirements, and abundant biomass production, these features led authors to propose that Tartary buckwheat could be utilized in the phytoremediation of cadmium. Indeed, previous studies showed that Tartary buckwheat, due to its high tolerance, could be suitable for the phytoremediation of other heavy metals, e.g. lead, aluminum, and mercury (; ; ). While Tartary buckwheat meets the criteria given for plants suitable for phytoremediation, more comprehensive field studies, including a combination of various contaminants, are needed to fully harness the potential of this species (). Besides the potential for phytoremediation, Fagopyrum plants contain phytoliths and phytolith-occluded organic carbon (PhytOC) that are relevant for carbon sequestration mechanisms, as described by Wang and Sheng. Thus, the cultivation of buckwheat has a phytolith carbon sink potential and can partake a significant role in carbon cycle regulation. The phytolith carbon sequestration of common and Tartary buckwheat were estimated to be equal to that of terrestrial shrub vegetation.
Most scientific attention on buckwheat species is focused on various medicinal and nutritional metabolites, predominantly flavonoids. To date, most of the studies focus on Tartary buckwheat due to its high content of flavonoids and their diversity, leading to well-described biosynthesis and regulatory mechanisms for this species (; ; ; ). The study by Huang et al. shifted the attention to rhizomes of Golden buckwheat (Fagopyrum cymosum) used in Traditional Chinese Medicine, describing its flavonoid biosynthesis pathway and regulatory network for the first time. Integrative transcriptome and metabolome analysis allowed the identification of SG5 R2R3-MYB transcription factor that plays the role of transcriptional activator in catechin biosynthesis. Presented here and other studies of flavonoid biosynthesis and its regulation in buckwheat species identified numerous genes that could be used to improve flavonoid production. In order to make full use of this knowledge, reliable protocols for the stable transformation of buckwheat species are needed. Moreover, successfully applying the CRISPR/Cas9 system could deepen our understanding of fundamental processes and the development of plant varieties with improved agronomical traits (). The detailed study by Sokoloff et al. on the inflorescence morphology of common buckwheat and its wild relatives established a formalized approach that can be applied in breeding buckwheat, its taxonomy, and evolutionary biology. The authors proposed that the Fagopyrum genus provides a suitable model for evolutionary developmental biology studies dedicated to inflorescence architecture, which could leverage recent advances in buckwheat genomes sequencing.
The articles gathered in Research Topic titled Advances in Buckwheat Research truly harness the outcomes of numerous studies of Fagopyrum genus bringing new and relevant results that will propel improvements of agronomical traits and a basic understanding of buckwheat biology. With growing research groups focusing on this magnificent genus, establishing a buckwheat community could facilitate further progress resulting in agriculture-relevant outcomes.
Statements
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
DingM.HeY.ZhangK.LiJ.ShiY.ZhaoM.et al. (2022). JA-induced FtBPM3 accumulation promotes FtERF-EAR3 degradation and rutin biosynthesis in Tartary buckwheat. Plant J.111, 323–334. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15800
2
DingM.ZhangK.HeY.ZuoQ.ZhaoH.HeM.et al. (2021). FtBPM3 modulates the orchestration of FtMYB11-mediated flavonoids biosynthesis in Tartary buckwheat. Plant Biotechnol. J.19, 1285. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13587
3
HeM.HeY.ZhangK.LuX.ZhangX.GaoB.et al. (2022). Comparison of buckwheat genomes reveals the genetic basis of metabolomic divergence and ecotype differentiation. New Phytol.235, 1927–1943. doi: 10.1111/nph.18306
4
HeQ.MaD.LiW.XingL.ZhangH.WangY.et al. (2023). High-quality Fagopyrum esculentum genome provides insights into the flavonoid accumulation among different tissues and self-incompatibility. J. Integr. Plant Biol. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13459
5
KafleA.TimilsinaA.GautamA.AdhikariK.BhattaraiA.AryalN. (2022). Phytoremediation: mechanisms, plant selection and enhancement by natural and synthetic agents. Environ. Adv.8, 100203. doi: 10.1016/j.envadv.2022.100203
6
MartÃnez-GoñiX. S.Miranda-ApodacaJ.Pérez-LópezU. (2023). Could buckwheat and spelt be alternatives to wheat under future environmental conditions? Study of their physiological response to drought. Agric. Water Manag.278, 108176. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108176
7
PeninA. A.KasianovA. S.KlepikovaA. V.KirovI. V.GerasimovE. S.FesenkoA. N.et al (2021). High-resolution transcriptome atlas and improved genome assembly of common buckwheat, Fagopyrum esculentum. Front. Plant Sci.12, 612382. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.612382
8
PirzadahT. B.MalikB.TahirI.IrfanQ. M.RehmanR. U. (2018). Characterization of mercury-induced stress biomarkers in Fagopyrum tataricum plants. Int. J. Phytoremediation20, 225–236. doi: 10.1080/15226514.2017.1374332
9
PirzadahT. B.MalikB.TahirI.RehmanR. U.HakeemK. R.AlharbyH. F. (2019). Aluminium stress modulates the osmolytes and enzyme defense system in Fagopyrum species. Plant Physiol. Biochem.144, 178–186. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.09.033
10
SmallE. (2017). Buckwheat – the world’s most biodiversity-friendly crop? Biodiversity18, 108–123. doi: 10.1080/14888386.2017.1332529
11
TomasiakA.ZhouM.BetekhtinA. (2022). Buckwheat in tissue culture research: current status and future perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci.23, 2298. doi: 10.3390/ijms23042298
12
WangL.ZhengB.YuanY.XuQ.ChenP. (2020). Transcriptome profiling of Fagopyrum tataricum leaves in response to lead stress. BMC Plant Biol.20, 54. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-2265-1
13
YasuiY.HirakawaH.UenoM.MatsuiK.Katsube-TanakaT.YangS. J.et al. (2016). Assembly of the draft genome of buckwheat and its applications in identifying agronomically useful genes. DNA Res.23, 215–224. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsw012
14
ZhangK.HeM.FanY.ZhaoH.GaoB.YangK.et al. (2021). Resequencing of global Tartary buckwheat accessions reveals multiple domestication events and key loci associated with agronomic traits. Genome Biol.22, 1–17. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02217-7
15
ZhangL.LiX.MaB.GaoQ.DuH.HanY.et al. (2017). The Tartary buckwheat genome provides insights into rutin biosynthesis and abiotic stress tolerance. Mol. Plant10, 1224–1237. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.08.013
16
ZhaoH.HeY.ZhangK.LiS.ChenY.HeM.et al. (2023). Rewiring of the seed metabolome during Tartary buckwheat domestication. Plant Biotechnol. J.21, 150–164. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13932
Summary
Keywords
buckwheat, Fagopyrum (buckwheat) species, flavonoid biosynthesis, heterostylous self-incompatibility, CRISPR/Cas9
Citation
Pinski A, Zhou M and Betekhtin A (2023) Editorial: Advances in buckwheat research. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1190090. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1190090
Received
20 March 2023
Accepted
11 April 2023
Published
18 April 2023
Volume
14 - 2023
Edited and reviewed by
Leo Marcelis, Wageningen University and Research, Netherlands
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Pinski, Zhou and Betekhtin.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Artur Pinski, artur.pinski@us.edu.pl; Meiliang Zhou, zhoumeiliang@caas.cn; Alexander Betekhtin, abetekht@us.edu.pl
This article was submitted to Crop and Product Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.