Abstract
Tea (Camellia sinensis) has been an immensely important commercially grown crop for decades. This is due to the presence of essential nutrients and plant secondary metabolites that exhibit beneficial health effects. UDP-glycosyltransferases (UGTs) play an important role in the diversity of such secondary metabolites by catalysing the transfer of an activated sugar donor to acceptor molecules, and thereby creating a huge variety of glycoconjugates. Only in recent years, thanks to the sequencing of the tea plant genome, have there been increased efforts to characterise the UGTs in C. sinensis to gain an understanding of their physiological role and biotechnological potential. Based on the conserved plant secondary product glycosyltransferase (PSPG) motif and the catalytically active histidine in the active site, UGTs of family 1 in C. sinensis are identified here, and shown to cluster into 21 groups in a phylogenetic tree. Building on this, our current understanding of recently characterised C. sinensis UGTs (CsUGTs) is highlighted and a discussion on future perspectives made.
The role of tea: past and present
With an over thousand-year long history that spans numerous countries, tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) is one of the oldest tree crop species (Meegahakumbura et al., 2018). According to legend, the origin of the tea culture began around 2737 B.C. when leaves of the tea tree fell into a pot with boiling water. China’s second emperor Shen Nung was immediately fascinated by the pleasant scent and drank the intriguing brew (). Tea was first cultivated 2100 years ago and the infusion with hot water of the leaves is known since the Western Han Dynasty (207 B.C. – 9 A.D.) (Lu et al., 2016). In traditional Chinese medicine the tea plant was used as a herbal medicine and as a stimulant for promoting digestion, detoxification, regulation of blood sugar and body temperature, and healing of wounds ().
Today it is the most popular caffeine-containing beverage across the world, and after water, the most frequently consumed drink (Schneider and Segre, 2009; Xia et al., 2017). In the year 2021 the worldwide tea production was an estimated 6.5 million tonnes (). Besides China, India and Kenya (the three largest producers with an approximate 2.74, 1.26 and 0.57 million tonnes respectively in 2020), tea is currently grown in 50 countries demonstrating its immense economic importance (Ridder, 2022b). Despite of sustainability challenges, the demand for tea all over the world is growing rapidly with a rate of 5% every year (). The global tea industry reached a value of approximately 229.3 billion USD in the year 2022 (Ridder, 2022a).
The post-harvest processing is what affects the composition of the final tea leaf product as, black, green, white, oolong and Pu-erh tea are all produced from the fresh leaves of the same plant (). After the harvesting of fresh leaves, the processing comprises withering, rolling, and fermentation steps, while enzymatic oxidation reactions are responsible for the characteristic aroma and colour of tea (Palmer, 1984). The three major classes of tea are the unfermented green, semi-fermented oolong and fully-fermented black tea (Yang et al., 2013). With a global annual production of 76 - 78%, black tea is the most consumed form worldwide. The remaining 20 - 22% are produced as green tea, which is mainly consumed in Asia and North Africa, followed by less than 2% as oolong tea (McKay and Blumberg, 2002; ). Due to its attractive aroma, pleasant taste, health-promoting benefits and medicinal effect, resulting from the content of secondary plant metabolites, tea has a high medicinal as well as cultural significance ().
The tea plant
Camellia sinensis is an evergreen perennial shrub or small tree that belongs to the genus Camellia within the flowering plant family Theaceae, and can grow naturally up to 15 m high (Wei et al., 2018). However, a bush height of up to 1 m is maintained for appropriate cultivation and harvesting conditions (Mondal et al., 2004). The white coloured flowers appear individually or in pairs at the axils. Approximately 5 years after planting, the plant starts bearing green fruits containing 2 to 3 seeds. Both the leaves and the leaf buds are used for the production of tea ().
Out of 119 species belonging to the genus Camellia, the family of Theaceae comprises further economically important species such as C. japonica and C. reticulata with their attractive flowers, as well as C. oleifera, a traditional oil tree for production of high-quality edible seed oil (Xia et al., 2017). The breeding history of the tea plant is over 1000 years old and resulted in a large number of land races and elite cultivars that were grown and selected from naturally occurring seed sources (Meegahakumbura et al., 2018). Cultivated C. sinensis plants have two distinct tea varieties: the China type tea C. sinensis var. sinensis and the Assam type tea C. sinensis var. assamica from which all kinds of tea originated from (Wachira et al., 2013). The slow-growing shrubs of C. sinensis var. sinensis with small leaves are able to tolerate cold climates. Therefore, this variety is adaptable to a broad geographic range, and has become the most popular elite tea tree cultivar in China. In contrast, the quick-growing tea plant of C. sinensis var. assamica with large leaves and high sensitivity to cold weather is primarily grown in tropical and subtropical regions such as Yunnan Province, China and India (Willson and Clifford, 2012). More than 600 cultivated tea varieties are available with distinctive properties such as disease tolerance, drought or frost resistance, or high contents of certain compounds such as caffeine (Mondal et al., 2004). Especially with respect to biotic and abiotic stress such as climate change, cultivars have to adapt to different habitat conditions to ensure tea productivity and quality in the future.
Compared to other essential crops (e.g. rice), research on functional genomics of the tea plant was lagging behind for a long time (Xia et al., 2020). Especially for modern breeding, the use of genetic resources is required. Through the successful next-generation sequencing of the tea plant genome in 2017 and 2018, significant progress in enabling the genomic and genetic study of the plant has been made (Xia et al., 2017; Wei et al., 2018).
Glycoside precursors determine the aromatic qualities of tea leaves
In plants, the process of the biosynthesis and emission of particular low molecular-weight volatile compounds is developmentally regulated and serves different functions in the organism (). While fresh leaves are odorless or show a slight smell (especially the sweet and floral tea), it is the aroma developed during the tea manufacturing process by endogenous enzymes that is a crucial factor affecting the preferences of consumers for evaluating the character and quality of tea products (Mizutani et al., 2002). In fresh tea leaves, many aromatic compounds occur in forms of water-soluble glycosides or non-volatile precursors that are finally liberated due to glycosidases during the tea processing (Zheng et al., 2016). The monoterpene alcohols geraniol and linalool as well as the aromatic alcohols 2-phenylethanol and benzyl alcohol are released from their respective glycosides and pose the predominant volatile compounds that contribute to the specific floral aroma of oolong tea and black tea (). The grassy note present in green tea can be attributed to (Z)-3-hexenol (Ohgami et al., 2015). Linalool and (Z)-3-hexenol are on the one hand responsible for the aromatic qualities of tea leaves, on the other hand, they are involved in tea plant defence responses to herbivore attack as leaves emit various volatiles in high concentrations ().
Numerous non-volatile, water-soluble, glycosidically bound volatiles (GBV) that accumulate in fresh tea leaves, were identified, structurally investigated and studied in detail (Figure 1, Table 1). Due to their frequently low abundance in plant tissues as well as a lack of chromophores, molecules consisting of a sugar unit linked to a small volatile compound escaped detection for a long time and thus represent a relatively new class of plant secondary products (Song et al., 2018).
Figure 1
Table 1
| Phenols | Volatiles | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Aglycone | Sugars | Aglycone | Sugars |
| apigenin | di-6,8-C-diglucose | benzyl alcohol | glucose |
| 6-C-glucose-8-C-arabinose | glucose-6’-O-xylose | ||
| 6-C-arabinose-8-C-glucose | (Z)-3-hexenol | glucose | |
| 5-O-glucose-4’-O-rhamnose | glucose-6’-O-xylose | ||
| 8-C-glucose-2’-O-rhamnose | geraniol | glucose | |
| 6-C-glucose | glucose-6’-O-xylose | ||
| 8-C-glucose | glucose-6’-O-arabinose | ||
| 6-C-glucose-2’-O-glucose | (E)- and (Z)-linalool 3,6-oxide | glucose | |
| 6-C-glucose-7-O-glucose | glucose-6’-O-xylose | ||
| luteolin | 6-C-glucose | (E)- and (Z)-linalool 3,7-oxide | glucose |
| 8-C-glucose | glucose-6’-O-xylose | ||
| myricetin | 3-O-galactose-6-O’’-rhamnose | glucose-6’-O-apiose | |
| 3-O-glucose-2-O’’-rhamnose | 2-phenylethanol | glucose | |
| 3-O-galactose | glucose-6’-O-xylose | ||
| 3-O-glucose | 1-phenylethanol | glucose | |
| 3-O-glucose-6-O’’-rhamnose | glucose-6’-O-xylose | ||
| quercetin | 3-O-glucose | methyl salicylate | glucose |
| 3-O-galactose | glucose-6’-O-xylose | ||
| 3-O-galactose-O’’-glucose-6-O’’’-rhamnose | mandelonitrile | glucose | |
| 3-O-glucose-O’’-glucose-6-O’’’-rhamnose | megastigma-6,7-dien-3,5,9-triol | glucose | |
| 3-O-glucose-6-O’’-rhamnose | 3-hydroxy-7,8-didehydro-β-ionol | glucose | |
| 3-O-hexose-arabinose-rhamnose-glucose | 8-hydroxygeraniol | glucose-6’-O-xylose | |
| 3-O-hexose-hexose-rhamnose-glucose | (S)-linalool | glucose-6’-O-xylose | |
| 7-O-rhamnose-3-O’’-hexose-rhamnose-glucose | (3R, 9R)-3-hydroxy-7,6-dihydro-β-ionol | glucose-6’-O-apiose | |
| 3-O-glucose-6’’-O-rhamnose-3’’’-O-glucose | |||
| 3-O-galactose-6’’-O-rhamnose-3’’’-glucose | |||
| kaempferol | 3-O-glucose | ||
| 3-O-galactose | |||
| 3-O-galactose-O’’-glucose-6-O’’’-rhamnose | |||
| 3-O-glucose-O’’-glucose-6-O’’’-rhamnose | |||
| 3-O-glucose-6-O’’-rhamnose | |||
| 3-O-hexose-arabinose-rhamnose-glucose | |||
| 3-O-hexose-hexose-rhamnose-glucose | |||
| 7-O-rhamnose-3-O’’-hexose-rhamnose-glucose | |||
| 3-O-glucose-6’’-O-rhamnose-3’’’-O-glucose | |||
| 3-O-galactose-6’’-O-rhamnose-3’’’-O-glucose | |||
| eriodictyol | di-5,3-O-glucose | ||
| 7-O-glucose | |||
| naringenin | di-O-glucose | ||
| gallic acid | glucose | ||
| catechin | 7-O-rhamnose | ||
| 3-O-galactose | |||
| 3-O-glucose-6’’-O-rhamnose | |||
Selected small molecule glycosides found in C. sinensis.
(
GBVs are mostly present in forms of β-D-glucosides and β-primeverosides (6-O-β-D-xylopyranosyl-β-D-glucopyranoside; glucose-6-O-xylose) (Wang et al., 2001b; Wang et al., 2001a). The hydrolysis of aroma precursors of ß-primeverosides, catalysed by a unique disaccharide-specific glycosidase present in tea plant, the ß-primeverosidase, causes the release of various aroma compounds (Mizutani et al., 2002). However, the content of aroma glycosides that exists in form of disaccharides is higher than that of monoglucosides due to the higher content of primeverosides (Wang et al., 2000). Furthermore, tea leaves also accumulate significant amount of flavonoid O- and C-glycosides (
UDP-glycosyltransferases catalyse the formation of glycosides in the tea plant
The glycosylation of small volatile compounds is a common modification process of naturally occurring plant secondary metabolites and widespread in the plant kingdom (Wang and Hou, 2009). As a key reaction glycosylation determines the chemical complexity of natural substances and further effects the chemical stability and water solubility while simultaneously reducing the chemical reactivity and toxicity (
The accumulation of aroma or flavour compounds, natural colorants, phytohormones and phytoanticipins in form of glycosides occurs in various organs such as flowers, fruits, or leaves (Markham et al., 2001; Zagrobelny et al., 2004;
In plants, the transfer of sugars is catalyzed by glycosyltransferases (EC 2.4.x.y). According to sequence identity, the consensus sequences, and catalytic specificity, GTs can be classified into more than 115 protein families (http://www.cazy.org/GlycosylTransferases.html) (Ross et al., 2001). Uridine diphosphate (UDP) glycosyltransferases (UGTs) catalyze the transfer of an activated nucleotide diphosphate sugar (usually UDP-glucose, UDP-D-glucuronic acid, UDP-D-xylose, UDP-L-rhamnose, and UDP-galactose) to acceptor aglycones with high stereo- and regiospecificity. Saccharides, polypeptides or proteins, lipids, nucleic acids, antibiotics or low molecular weight compounds (known as secondary metabolites) are potential acceptor molecules for UGTs (Yonekura-Sakakibara and Hanada, 2011;
Plant UGTs that are involved in glycosylation of secondary metabolites have a common signature motif of ~44 amino acids near the C-terminus called PSPG motif (Plant Secondary Product Glycosyltransferase) (Figure 2) (
Figure 2

Conserved protein sequence of the Plant Secondary Product Glycosyltransferase motif (PSPG box).
UGTs have various biological roles in plants. They glycosylate phytohormones and thus are involved in plant growth and development as well as the adaptation to environmental stresses (
Studies over recent years have underlined the significance of the GT superfamily, however the availability of biochemical data on individual member enzymes is still limited, hindering the understanding of their function in plants. In the Protein Data Bank, more than 150 GT crystal structures are listed (https://www.rcsb.org/) but among them, there are less than 30 plant UGTs. To date, only a few combinations of volatiles and their responsible UGTs have been functionally characterized (Song et al., 2018). The presence of hundreds of genes coding for UGTs in tea plant and their interesting substrate spectrum would give new insights into the biochemistry, function and physiological role of enzyme members.
Although C. sinensis UGTs (CsUGT) have a relevant role in tea plant performance and determine the quality of the tea product, little is known about their physiological roles. With the constantly increasing number of plant genome sequences, as well as transcriptome data and metabolite profiles, it is possible to identify and verify genes of novel glycosyltransferases and further characterize their catalytic ability to form small-molecule glycosides (Song et al., 2018). The availability of the tea plant genome sequence (Xia et al., 2017; Wei et al., 2018) presents the possibility to generate a collection of CsUGT that would greatly enhance the scientific research on tea glycosides.
This review provides an overview of UGTs from the tea plant and introduces the biochemically characterized representatives and their biological significance.
Functionally characterized UGTs from the tea plant
Glycosyltransferase and glucosyltransferase protein sequences were retrieved from the Tea Plant Information Archive by name search (http://tpdb.shengxin.ren/), aligned and manually inspected for the presence of the PSPG motif, catalytically active His and the co-activating Asp residue. Biochemically characterized, literature-known tea UGTs, were added and the UGT80 subfamily, known to glycosylate sterols, were deleted because of their additional sequence length encoding the structure responsible for anchoring into membranes. Similarly, putative protein modifying UGTs and presumed polysaccharide-forming enzymes were removed. A phylogenetic tree was constructed from the remaining 230 sequences (Figure 3). The sequences were 400 to 637 amino acids long and were clustered into 15 subgroups (Table 2) designated A to R, with the groups N and O found to be absent in tea plant (Li et al., 2001;
Figure 3

Phylogenetic analysis of 276 C. sinensis family 1 glycosyltransferases. Twenty-one major UGT groups were found. The neighbour joining tree was constructed by Geneious Basic 5.6.7 software with 1000 replications. Substrates, products, and regioselectivity of biochemically characterized UGTs are indicated.
Table 2
| Species | Phylogenetic groups | References | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A 79, 91, 94 | B 89 | C 90 | D 73 | E 71 72 88 | F 78 | G 85 | H 76 | I 83 | J 87 | K 86 | L 74 75 84 | M 92 | N | O 93 | P | R 95 | Total | ||
| Malus x domestica | 34 | 0 | 8 | 11 | 50 | 3 | 50 | 17 | 12 | 13 | 7 | 15 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 242 | (Zhou et al., 2017) |
| Camellia sinensis | 56 | 3 | 3 | 27 | 27 | 4 | 38 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 29 | 9 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 230 | This study |
| Vitis vinifera | 25 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 45 | 8 | 29 | 7 | 13 | 7 | 2 | 23 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 228 | (Wei et al., 2021) |
| Populus trichocarpa | 12 | 2 | 6 | 14 | 49 | 0 | 42 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 23 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 178 | ( |
| Arabidopsis thaliana | 14 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 22 | 3 | 6 | 19 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 107 | (Li et al., 2001) |
Number of UGT members in different crop plants and model plants.
The UGTs of tea plant were retrieved from the Tea Plant Information Archive (TPIA; http://tpdb.shengxin.ren/) by name search using the terms glycosyltransferase and glucosyltransferase.
The tea plant C. sinensis contains a similar number of UGT genes as other woody crops such as Malus x domestica and Vitis vinifera, whereas Populus trichocarpa and especially the weed Arabidopsis thaliana have significantly fewer UGT genes (Table 2). The woody plants are particularly rich in group G UGT85 genes, which encode GBV-producing enzymes and others (Ohgami et al., 2015; Song et al., 2018). A distinctive feature of the tea plant is the high number of group A UGT79, UGT91, and UGT94 genes. This is reflected in the large number of distinct di- and even trisaccharide glycosides in tea leaves (Table 1), the formation of which, among others, is catalyzed by UGT94 enzymes (Ohgami et al., 2015). These UGTs are thus, classified as glycoside specific glycosyltransferases (GGTs), which specifically catalyse sugar-sugar glycosylation with a high regioselectivity. They contribute to the formation of di/triglycosides, and are typically composed of families UGT79, UGT91 and UGT94 (Ono et al., 2020).
The first report on the identification of a UGT from the tea plant was not published until 2014 (Ohgami et al., 2014). High-throughput RNA sequencing of fresh tea leaves, followed by rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE), yielded the first full-length cDNA of a UGT from the tea plant. The recombinant UGT73A17 protein catalyzed 3-O-glucosylation and, to a lesser extent, 7-O-glucosylation of the flavonol quercetin. UDP-glucose was the preferred donor substrate. The preferential expression of the UGT73A17 gene in mature leaves and the concomitant accumulation of quercetin-3-O-glucoside indicated that UGT73A17 is involved in part in the biosynthesis of flavonol glucosides.
The same group also isolated the first UGTs involved in the glycosylation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the tea plant (Ohgami et al., 2015). Tea plants store numerous volatile organic compounds such as benzyl alcohol, 2-phenylethanol, (Z)-3-hexenol, linalool, and geraniol as water-soluble disaccharide glycosides, mainly as ß-primeverosides (6-O-ß-D-xylopyranosyl-ß-D-glucopyranosides). These glycosides are formed by sequential glucosylation and xylosylation catalyzed by CsUGT85K11 and CsUGT94P1, respectively. CsUGT85K11 showed promiscuity for the acceptor substrate as it catalyzed the glucosylation of monoterpenes, aromatic and aliphatic alcohols, but selectivity for the donor substrate UDP-glucose. On the other hand, CsUGT94P1 preferentially xylosylated the sugar moiety of geranyl glucoside at the 6’-hydroxy group, but was also able to use UDP-glucose as a donor substrate, albeit with one-third reduction in activity, and can therefore also be classed as a GGT. CsUGT94P1 gene expression correlated with flavonoid content in shoots of two metabolically distinct tea cultivars (Liu et al., 2023).
In 2016, 178 UGT genes were identified in a C. sinensis transcriptome dataset, greatly facilitating the isolation and characterization of full-length UGT genes from the tea plant (
Later, CsUGT78A14 was found to be strongly induced by cold stress in C. sinenesis, and two allelic forms of the gene were isolated (Zhao et al., 2019). While the CsUGT78A14-1 protein produced mainly kaempferol-3,7-di-O-glucoside in addition to the corresponding monoglucosides, CsUGT78A14-2 catalyzed primarily the formation of the 3-O-glucoside. The amino acid sequences of the two proteins differ only by an Ala residue at position 438. The accumulation of kaempferol glycosides was consistent with CsUGTA14 gene expression levels in response to cold stress. Down-regulation of the gene resulted in reduced tolerance of C. sinensis to cold stress, probably due to a reduced ability to scavenge reactive oxygen species.
The transcriptome dataset of the tea plant was also the starting point for the isolation and characterization of a flavonoid 7-O-glucosyltransferase (CsUGT75L12; (
Bitter and astringent tasting flavonoid 7-O-neohesperidosides are biosynthesized in tea plants through the sequential 7-O-glucosylation of flavonoids catalysed by CsUGT75L12 and 2’-O-rhamnosylation catalysed by CsUGT79B28 (
CsUGT72AM1 was able to glucosylate not only flavonols but also flavanones, dihydroflavonols, anthocyanidins, and monolignols (Zhao et al., 2017a;
CsUGT72B23 was detected in mesophyll cells of C. sinensis by means of a gene co-expression network based on a single-cell transcriptome atlas (Wang et al., 2022). The encoded protein transferred a glucose unit from UDP-glucose to the gallic acid residue of epicatechin gallate and epigallocatechin gallate. CsUGT73A17 also produced epicatechin gallate glucoside, but in small amounts with the binding site of the sugar not analyzed in detail (Su et al., 2018).
In addition, the CsUGT73A20 gene was identified in the tea transcriptome database (Zhao et al., 2017b). The recombinant protein was produced and functional characterization revealed broad substrate tolerance to several flavonoids but high specificity for the donor substrate UDP-glucose. CsUGT73A20 glucosylated several hydroxyl groups of acceptor substrates and produced mainly 3- and 7-O-glucosides, but disaccharides were also found. The regioselectivity was pH-dependent. The results of overexpression of CsUGT73A20 in tobacco and Arabidopsis plants indicated that the encoded enzyme might function as a 3- and 7-O-rhamnosyl- and glucosyltransferase in plants, because quercetin and kaempferol rhamnosides and glucosides accumulated in the transgenic plants (
Similarly, the CsUGT73A17 enzyme exhibited broad acceptor substrate tolerance as it glucosylated flavonols, flavones, flavanones, isoflavones, and epicatechin gallate (Su et al., 2018). The 7-O-glucosides were the major products. Since the expression level of CsUGT73A17 increased significantly at 50°C, the enzyme might be involved in the heat response of the tea plant.
In addition to their proposed role in plant stress response, UGTs may have other biological functions. Thus, CsUGT74B1 was identified as a differentially expressed gene by comparative transcriptome analysis of self-pollinated and cross-pollinated pistils, suggesting a role for this enzyme in the mechanism of self-incompatibility in tea plants (Ma et al., 2018). Recently, competition between anthocyanin and kaempferol glycoside biosynthesis was shown to affect pollen tube growth and seed set in Malus (
However, tea UGTs not only glucosylate phenolics including flavonoids, in recent years a number of CsUGTs have also been functionally characterized that glycosylate plant volatiles (
Expression of CsUGT85A53 was also strongly induced by various abiotic stresses, and the encoded protein was found in the cytoplasm and nucleus (Jing et al., 2020). Ectopic expression of the gene in Arabidopsis resulted in reduced transcription levels of the flowering repressor gene FLC and an activator of FLC ABI5 in transgenic plants, leading to an early flowering phenotype. The CsUGT85A53 protein glucosylated abscisic acid (ABA) in vitro and in planta, which was confirmed by overexpression of the corresponding gene in Arabidopsis. Application of ABA restored the early-flowering phenotype in the CsUGT85A53-overexpressing lines, which had higher germination rates than the controls. Thus, CsUGT85A53 promotes the transition to flowering as a positive regulator through an ABA-controlled mechanism.
The sesquiterpene nerolidol appears to play a role in the response of tea plants to cold stress, as the accumulation of nerolidol glucosides was induced by cold stress, consistent with the increased expression level of CsUGT91Q2 in different tea cultivars (Zhao et al., 2020b). The encoded protein showed nerolidol glucosyltransferase activity, and downregulation of the gene in C. sinensis resulted in lower levels of nerolidol glucoside and compromised the cold tolerance of the tea plant. Similar to the experiments with (Z)-3-hexenol, the tea plants were able to take up the sesquiterpene from the air and transform it into the glucoside. Nerolidol may play a role in triggering communication between plants in response to cold stress.
Low temperature treatment also results in accumulation of eugenol glucoside in C. sinensis, and analysis of cold stress-induced UGT genes yielded CsUGT78A15 whose protein was able to glucosylate the phenolic compound (Zhao et al., 2020a). When eugenol was used as an acceptor substrate, UDP-glucose was the preferred donor substrate, followed by UDP-galactose and UDP-glucuronic acid, although CsUGT78A15 had been characterized as a flavonoid 3-O-galactosyltransferase in a previous study (
Cold and drought stress trigger the expression of CsUGT71A59, whose encoded protein specifically glucosylates eugenol in vitro and in vivo, resulting in the formation of eugenol glucoside (Zhao et al., 2022). Down-regulation of CsUGT71A59 gene expression in C. sinensis reduced eugenol glucoside content and impaired cold and drought stress tolerance of plants. Exposure of tea plants to airborne eugenol induced CsUGT71A59 expression, increased eugenol content, and enhanced cold tolerance by modulating the accumulation of reactive oxygen species. Drought tolerance was improved by altering abscisic acid homeostasis and stomatal closure. Eugenol and its glucoside thus play a role in tolerance to cold and drought whereby CsUGT78A15 and CsUGT71A59 can produce the glucoside.
In fruits, 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethylfuran-3(2H)-one (HDMF) is an important odorant and contributes to the caramel-like notes of some teas. HDMF has been identified in tea plants and two allelic proteins CsUGT74AF3a and b have been characterized that catalyze the formation of HDMF glucoside (
Although menthol, an important aroma chemical, has not previously been found as a natural constituent of the tea plant, CsUGT93Y1 and CsUGT93Y2 were identified as (+/-)-menthol glucosyltransferases in a whole-cell biotransformation screen (Kurze et al., 2021). The results demonstrate once again that several enzymes involved in the transformation of secondary metabolites exhibit substrate promiscuity.
The expression of CsUGT87E7 was significantly induced by the application of salicylic acid (SA), a plant hormone that plays an important role in the establishment of basal resistance, and infection with the tea pathogen Pseudopestalotiopsis camelliae-sinensis (
Table 3
| Group | Enzyme | Genetic Source | Host Characterisation | Sugar Donor | Acceptor(s) | Product(s) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | UGT79B28 | C. sinensis | E. coli (in vitro assays) N. benthamiana (in vivo expression) | UDP-Rha (others tested) | Flavonoid 7-O-glucosides e.g. Naringnin-7-O-glucoside Apigenin-7-O-glucoside Quercetin-7-O-glucoside Luteolin-7-O-glucoside | Flavonoid 7-O-di-glycosides | ( |
| UGT91Q2 | C. sinensis | E. coli (in vitro assays) C. sinensis (in vivo suppression) | UDP-Glc | Nerolidol (further substrates, 60 tested in total) | Nerolidol glycoside | (Zhao et al., 2020b) | |
| UGT94P1 | C. sinensis | E. coli (in vitro assays) | UDP-Xyl (others tested) | Geranyl O-β-D-glucopyranoside (Specific activity; xylosylation of the 6’-hydroxy group of geranyl β-D-glucopyranoside, other aroma glucosides tested) | Geranyl O-β-primeveroside | (Ohgami et al., 2015) | |
| D | UGT73A17 | C. sinensis var sinensis cv. Yabukita | E. coli (in vitro assays) | UDP-Glc (others tested) | Quercetin (others tested) | Quercetin 3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside | (Ohgami et al., 2014) |
| UGT73A17 | C. sinensis | E. coli (in vitro assays) | UDP-Glc | Flavonols: kaempferol, quercetin and myricetin Flavones: apigenin, luteolin and tricetin Flavanone: naringenin Isoflavones: genistein and epicatechin gallate (17 flavonoids tested in total) | Major products 7-O-glucosides | (Su et al., 2018) | |
| UGT73A20 | C. sinensis | E. coli (in vitro assays) N. tabacum (in vivo expression) | UDP-Glc (others tested) UDP-Rhm (in vivo) | Flavonoids: Kaempferol, quercetin, myricetin, naringenin, apigenin and kaempferide In vivo: Flavanols and flavanol monoglucosides | Flavonoid 3-O-glucosides/7-O-glucosides Kaempferol 7-O-glucoside (dominant at pH 8) Kaempferol 3-O-glucoside (dominant at pH 9) In vivo: Q3G7Rha, Q3Rha7Rha, K3G7Rha and K3G | (Zhao et al., 2017a) | |
| UGT73A20 | C. sinensis | A. thaliana (in vivo over expression) N. tabacum (in vivo expression) | UDP-Glc | Kaempferol Quercetin | Flavonoid 3-O-glucosides/7-O-glucosides: kaempferol-3-O-rhamnoside (K-3-R) kaempferol-3, 7-di-O-rhamnoside (K-3-R-7-R) K-3-R, quercetin-3-O-glucoside (Q-3-G), quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside (Q-3-R), quercetin-3,7-di-O-rhamnoside, quercetin-3,7-di-O-rhamnoside (Q-3-R-7-R) | ( | |
| E | UGT71A59 | C. sinensis | E. coli (in vitro assays) C. sinensis (in vivo suppression) | UDP-Glc (preferred) UDP-Gal UDP-Glu | Eugenol Further acceptors: Vanillin, geraniol, 4-hydroxycoumarin, ABA, salicylic acid, pyrogallic acid, and jasmonic acid, among other | Eugenol glucoside | (Zhao et al., 2022) |
| UGT72AM1 | C. sinensis var ‘Mooma1’ | E. coli (in vitro assays) | UDP-Glc | Quercetin Cyanidin (also Kaempferol and Myricetin) | Quercetin 3-O-glucoside Cyanidin 3-O-glucoside | ( | |
| UGT72AM1 | C. sinensis | E. coli (in vitro assays) | UDP-Glc | Flavonols: kaempferol, quercetin, myricetin Flavanones: naringenin, eriodictyol Phenolic acid: coniferyl aldehyde | Flavonoid 3-O-glucosides Coniferyl aldehyde 4-O-glucoside Naringenin 7-O-glucoside and 4’-O-glucoside | (Zhao et al., 2017a) | |
| UGT72B23 | C. sinensis var. sinensis cv. ‘Shuchazao’ | E. coli (in vitro assays) N. benthamiana (in vivo expression) C. sinensis (in vivo suppression) | UDP-Glc | Epicatechin gallate (ECG) Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) Further acceptors: Myricetin, 4-Hydroxycoumnarin, catechins (GCG), quercetin dehydrate, vanillin, naringenin, pelargonidin, kaempferol | ECG-Glucoside CGCG-Glucoside | (Wang et al., 2022) | |
| F | UGT78A14 | C. sinensis | E. coli (in vitro assays) | UDP-Glc (preferred) UDP-Gal | Kaempferol Quercetin Myricetin | Kaempferol-3-O-glycoside Quercetin-3-O-glycoside Myricetin-3-O-glycoside | ( |
| UGT78A14 | C. sinensis | A. thaliana (in vivo expression) N. tabacum (in vivo expression) | UDP-Glc | Quercetin Kaempferol | Quercetin 3-O-glucoside Kaempferol 3-O-glucoside (also accumulated: K-3-G-R-7-G, and Q-3-G-R-7-G) | ( | |
| UGT78A14-1 & UGT78A14-2 | C. sinensis var. sinensis cv. Shuchazao | E. coli (in vitro assays) C. sinensis (in vivo suppression) | UDP-Glc (preferred, others tested in vitro) | Kaempferol Quercetin Myricetin (53 further substrates tested in vitro) | Flavonol 3-O-glucosides UGT78A14-2: Kaempferol mono glucoside UGT78A14-1: Kaempferol 3,7-di glucoside (3- and 7-O-glucoside) | (Zhao et al., 2019) | |
| UGT78A15 | C. sinensis | E. coli (in vitro assays) | UDP-Gal (preferred) UDP-Glc | Kaempferol Quercetin Myricetin | Kaempferol-3-O-glycoside Quercetin-3-O-glycoside Myricetin-3-O-glycoside | ( | |
| UGT78A15 | C. sinensis | A. thaliana (in vivo over expression) N. tabacum (in vivo over expression) | UDP-Gal | Quercetin Kaempferol | Falavanol-3-O-glycosides (e.g. Q-3-Gal-R-7-G, K-3-Gal-R-7-G and K-3-Gal-R) (New glycosides: Q-3-Gal-7-R, K-3-Gal-7-R) | ( | |
| UGT78A15 | C. sinensis | E. coli (in vitro assays) C. sinensis (in vivo suppression) | UDP-Glc (preferred) UDP-Gal UDP-Glu | Eugenol Quercetin Kaempferol (52 acceptor substrates tested total) | Flavonoid-3-O-glucosides Eugenol glucoside | (Zhao et al., 2020a) | |
| G | UGT85A53 | C. sinensis | E. coli (in vitro assays) A. thaliana (in vivo expression) | UDP-Glc | ABA | ABA-glucoside | (Jing et al., 2020) |
| UGT85A53-1 &, UGT85A53-2 & UGT85A53-3 | C. sinensis | E. coli (in vitro assays) N. benthamiana (in vivo expression) | UDP-Glc (preferred) UDP-Gal UDP-Glu | (Z)‐3‐hexenol Further acceptors: (E)-3-hexanol, 1-hexanol, benzyl alcohol, 2-phenylethanol, geraniol, nerol, linalool oxide and citronellol, among other | (Z)‐3‐hexenyl glucoside | (Jing et al., 2019) | |
| UGT85K11 | C. sinensis | E. coli (in vitro assays) | UDP-Glc (others tested) | Geraniol (Broad activity towards monoterpene, aromatic, and aliphatic alcohols) | Geranyl O-β-D-glucopyranoside | (Ohgami et al., 2015) | |
| UGT85K11 | C. sinensis | E. coli (in vitro and in vivo assays) | UDP-Glc | (±)-menthol | (±)-menthyl-O-β-D-glucopyranoside | (Kurze et al., 2021) | |
| J | UGT87E7 | C. sinensis | E. coli (in vitro assays) C. sinensis (in vivo suppression) | UDP-Glc (others tested) | Salicylic acid | Salicylic acid glycoside Salicylic acid glucose ester | ( |
| L | UGT74AF3a & UGT74AF3b | C. sinensis | E. coli (in vitro assays) N. benthamiana (in vivo expression) C. sinensis (in vivo suppression) | UDP-Glc (preferred) UDP-Gal UDP-Glu | HDMF EHMF HMF (further substrates tested) | HDMF-glucoside EHMF-glucoside HMF-glucoside | ( |
| UGT75L12 | C. sinensis | E. coli (in vitro assays) A. thaliana (in vivo expression) | UDP-Glc UDP-Gal | Flavonoids: naringenin, apigenin, flavanol and genistein Flavonoid mono-glucosides: Kaempferol 3-O-glucoside and Quercetin 3-O-glucoside | in vitro: Flavonoid 7-O-glycosides in vivo: Quercetin 3-O-rhamnoside-7-O-glucoside and Kaempferol 3-O-rhamnoside-7-O-glucoside | ( | |
| UGT75L12 | C. sinensis | A. thaliana (in vivo over expression) N. tabacum (in vivo over expression) | UDP-Glc | Quercetin Kaempferol | Quercetin-3-O-rhamnoside-7-O-glucoside and Kaempferol-3-O-rhamnoside-7-O-glucoside | ( | |
| UGT75L12 | C. sinensis | E. coli (in vitro assays) N. benthamiana (in vivo expression) | UDP-Glc (preferred) UDP-Gal | Flavonoids: Naringenin, Apigenin, Luteolin, Kaempferol and Quercetin Flavonoid mono-glucosides: Kaempferol 3-O-glucoside and Quercetin 3-O-glucoside | Flavonoid 7-O-glucosides | ( | |
| UGT84A22 | C. sinensis | E. coli *(in vitro assays) | UDP-Glc (preferred) UDP-Gal | Gallic acid Benzoic acids: p- hydroxybenzoic acid, benzoic acid, and syringic acid Cinnamic acids: cinnamic acid, p-coumaric acid, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, and sinapic acid | Galloyl-β-D-glucose ester Syringoyl-β-D-glucose ester Cinnamoyl-β-D-glucose ester p-Coumaroyl-β-D-glucose ester Caffeoyl-β-D-glucose ester Feruloyl-β-D-glucose ester Sinapoyl-β-D-glucose ester | ( | |
| O | UGT93Y1 | C. sinensis | E. coli (in vitro and in vivo assays) | UDP-Glc | (±)-menthol (+)-Isomenthol Fenchyl alcohol (+)-Neomenthol | (±)-menthyl-β-D-glucopyranoside | (Kurze et al., 2021) |
| UGT93Y2 | C. sinensis | E. coli (in vitro and in vivo assays) | UDP-Glc | (±)-menthol | (±)-menthyl-β-D-glucopyranoside | (Kurze et al., 2021) |
Characterised Glycosyltransferases from C. sinensis.
Characterised glycosyltransferases form C. sinensis. UDP-Glc; UDP-glucose, UDP-Gal; UDP-galactose, UDP-Glu; UDP-glucuronic acid, UDP-Xyl; UDP-xylose, UDP-Rha; UDP-rhamnose. The table lists a selection of donors, acceptors, substrates and products of each respective CsUGT and, for more detailed information references are provided.
UGT expression analysis
We also studied transcriptome data from the Tea Plant Information Archive (TPIA, http://tpdb.shengxin.ren/) and examined the expression levels of the various UGT genes in eight different tissues of C. sinensis (Figure 4). None of the UGT genes of the enzymes already biochemically characterized were among the 20 most highly expressed transcripts. Two of the three UGT95 genes of the tea genome (TEA025983 and TEA025984) showed the highest expression levels. These are tea-specific genes that are rarely found in other plant species. The encoded proteins catalyze the O-glycosylation of flavonoids (Wilson and Tian, 2019). None of the three UGT95 genes from C. sinensis has been previously studied. Abundant mRNA levels of one of the two UGT88 and one of the three UGT84 genes were also found. The products of these genes can form O-, N-, S-glycosides, and sugar esters (Wilson and Tian, 2019). The encoded protein of CsUGT84A22, a paralog of TEA026127, generates β-glucogallin, the glucose ester of gallic acid (
Figure 4

Tissue specific expression of UGT genes of C. sinensis family 1 glycosyltransferases. Expression levels (TPM) of UGT genes in eight tissues of the tea plant was extracted from the Tea Plant Information Archive (TPIA, http://tpdb.shengxin.ren/). RNA-seq data was acquired from eight representative tissues of tea plant, including apical buds, young leaves, mature leaves, old leaves, immature stems, flowers, young fruits and tender roots (Wei et al., 2018).
Furthermore, UGT expression in tea plants under different stress conditions (cold, salt, and drought) and plant hormone treatment (methyl jasmonate) was investigated by RNA-Seq analysis. The data was taken from the Tea Plant Information Archive (TPIA, http://tpdb.shengxin.ren/). The different treatments resulted in different changes in UGT gene expression, yielding stress-specific patterns (Figure 5). Under cold stress, the expression of 26 UGT genes correlated directly with treatment duration, while under salt, drought, and methyl jasmonate treatments, this was only 8, 11, and 6 genes, respectively. Cold stress strongly increased the transcript levels of several UGT74 and UGT85 genes in particular as a function of stress duration, but also those of representatives of the UGT73, UGT79, UGT83, and UGT91 classes. CsUGT91Q2 has previously been shown to modulate cold stress tolerance in C. sinensis (Zhao et al., 2020b). Furthermore, CsUGT78A14, CsUGT78A15, and CsUGT71A59 have also been characterized as cold stress-induced genes whose gene products can improve the cold tolerance of tea plants (Zhao et al., 2019; Zhao et al., 2020a; Zhao et al., 2022). Two UGT74 and UGT72 genes each were up-regulated in addition to one UGT71 and UGT83 gene each as a function of salt stress duration, while drought stress mainly up-regulated UGT72, UGT87, as well as UGT71, UGT73, UGT75, and UGT91 genes, and after methyl jasmonate treatment UGT94, UGT72, UGT73, and UGT87 genes were more strongly expressed. Consistent with these results, CsUGT73A17 and CsUGT71A59 have already been identified as heat- and drought-responsive genes whose gene products catalyse the formation of flavonoid and eugenol glucosides, respectively (Su et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2022).
Figure 5

Transcriptome heatmap of family 1 UGTs from C. sinensis under different abiotic stress conditions and plant hormone treatment. Data was retrieved from the Tea Plant Information Archive (TPIA, http://tpdb.shengxin.ren/). (A)Cold tolerance: RNA-Seq reads were collected from leaves of tea plant at three stages of cold acclimation (CA) process, including nonacclimated (CK), fully acclimated (CA1) and de-acclimated (CA3) (Wang et al., 2013). Salinity stress: RNA-seq reads were collected from leaves of tea plant under salt stress (Zhang et al., 2017). A 200 mM NaCl solution was used to simulate salt-stress conditions for C. sinensis plant within 0, 24, 48 and 72 h. Drought tolerance: RNA-seq reads were collected from young leaves of tea plant subjected to four stages of drought stress: 25% polyethylene glycol (PEG) treatment for 0, 24, 48 and 72 h (Zhang et al., 2017). Methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatment: RNA-seq data from tea plant leaves in response to MeJA treatment were adopted from (Shi et al., 2015). Leaves were treated with MeJA for 0, 12, 24, and 48 hours. Red bars indicate UGT genes whose expression levels correlate directly with treatment duration. (B) Detailed expression levels of CsUGT genes whose gene products have already been biochemically characterized and shown to be involved in stress responses; in light blue CsUGT91Q2, in orange CsUGT78A14, in grey CsUGT78A15, in yellow CsUGT78A59, and in dark blue CsUGT73A17.
Conclusion
Of the 276 family 1 UGTs of the tea plant postulated in this work, i.e. enzymes that glycosylate small molecules, only about 18 members have been functionally biochemically characterized so far. The total number of UGTs is a conservative estimate since in this work, the catalytically active His served as selection criterion but for CsUGT75L12 it could be shown that an alternative amino acid can take over this function (
Future perspective: glycosides with modifications - the case of sulphates
Glycosides can undergo modifications such as malonylation, further glycosylation, and even the addition of sulphate groups by sulfotransferases (
Table 4
| Name | Plant | Structure | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tricin 7-O-β-glucopyranoside-2”-sulphate sodium salt | Livistona australis | ![]() | (Kassem et al., 2012) |
| Isovitexin 2”-sulfate | Camellia sinensis | ![]() | ( |
| Vitexin 2”-sulfate | Camellia sinensis | ![]() | ( |
| Chafuroside A | Camellia sinensis | ![]() | ( |
| Chafuroside B | Camellia sinensis | ![]() | ( |
Structures of glycosides with sulphated sugar moieties and their derivatives.
For example the Arabidopsis thaliana sulfotransferase AtSULT202B7 prefers flavonoid glycosides over their aglycone counterparts, introducing a sulphate at position 7 on the flavonoid skeleton (
Statements
Author contributions
TDH: Writing - Review & Editing, Conceptualization, Writing – Original Draft, Visualization. EK: Writing - Review & Editing, Conceptualization, Writing – Original Draft. JL: Writing – Review & Editing. TH: Writing – Review & Editing. CS: Writing – Review & Editing. WS: Writing - Review & Editing, Conceptualization, Writing – Original Draft, Visualization, Supervision, Funding Acquisition. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
DFG SCHW 634/34-1
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AhnS. J.Badenes-PérezF. R.ReicheltM.SvatošA.SchneiderB.GershenzonJ.et al. (2011). Metabolic detoxification of capsaicin by UDP-glycosyltransferase in three helicoverpa species. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol.78 (2), 104–118. doi: 10.1002/arch.20444
2
AlcázarA.BallesterosO.JuradoJ. M.PablosF.MartínM. J.VilchesJ. L.et al. (2007). Differentiation of green, white, black, oolong, and Pu-erh teas according to their free amino acids content. J. Agric. Food Chem.55 (15), 5960–5965. doi: 10.1021/jf070601a
3
BowlesD.IsayenkovaJ.LimE.-K.PoppenbergerB. (2005). Glycosyltransferases: managers of small molecules. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.8 (3), 254–263. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.03.007
4
CaputiL.MalnoyM.GoremykinV.NikiforovaS.MartensS. (2012). A genome-wide phylogenetic reconstruction of family 1 UDP-glycosyltransferases revealed the expansion of the family during the adaptation of plants to life on land. Plant J.69 (6), 1030–1042. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04853.x
5
ChaturvedulaV. S. P.PrakashI. (2011). The aroma, taste, color and bioactive constituents of tea. J. Medicinal Plants Res.5 (11), 2110–2124.
6
ChenY.GuoX.GaoT.ZhangN.WanX.SchwabW.et al. (2020). UGT74AF3 enzymes specifically catalyze the glucosylation of 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethylfuran-3(2H)-one, an important volatile compound in Camellia sinensis. Horticulture Res.7 (1), 25. doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-0248-x
7
ChenW.-H.HsuC.-Y.ChengH.-Y.ChangH.ChenH.-H.GerM.-J. (2011). Downregulation of putative UDP-glucose: flavonoid 3-o-glucosyltransferase gene alters flower coloring in phalaenopsis. Plant Cell Rep.30 (6), 1007–1017. doi: 10.1007/s00299-011-1006-1
8
ChenS.LiM.ZhengG.WangT.LinJ.WangS.et al. (2018). Metabolite profiling of 14 wuyi rock tea cultivars using UPLC-QTOF MS and UPLC-QqQ MS combined with chemometrics. Molecules23 (2), 104. doi: 10.3390/molecules23020104
9
ChenW.XiaoZ.WangY.WangJ.ZhaiR.Lin-WangK.et al. (2021). Competition between anthocyanin and kaempferol glycosides biosynthesis affects pollen tube growth and seed set of malus. Horticulture Res.8 (1), 173. doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00609-9
10
ChoiJ. S.Nurul IslamM.Yousof AliM.KimE. J.KimY. M.JungH. A. (2014). Effects of c-glycosylation on anti-diabetic, anti-alzheimer’s disease and anti-inflammatory potential of apigenin. Food Chem. Toxicol.64, 27–33. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.11.020
11
ChongJ.BaltzR.SchmittC.BeffaR.FritigB.SaindrenanP. (2002). Downregulation of a pathogen-responsive tobacco UDP-Glc:Phenylpropanoid glucosyltransferase reduces scopoletin glucoside accumulation, enhances oxidative stress, and weakens virus resistance. Plant Cell14 (5), 1093–1107. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010436
12
ChopadeV. V.PhatakA. A.UpaganlawarA. B.TankarA. A. (2008). Green tea (Camellia sinensis): chemistry , traditional , medicinal uses and its pharmacological activities- a review. Pharmacognosy Rev.2 (3), 157–162.
13
CuiL.YaoS.DaiX.YinQ.LiuY.JiangX.et al. (2016). Identification of UDP-glycosyltransferases involved in the biosynthesis of astringent taste compounds in tea (Camellia sinensis). J. Exp. Bot.67 (8), 2285–2297. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw053
14
DaiW.QiD.YangT.LvH.GuoL.ZhangY.et al. (2015). Nontargeted analysis using ultraperformance liquid chromatography–quadrupole time-of-Flight mass spectrometry uncovers the effects of harvest season on the metabolites and taste quality of tea (Camellia sinensis l.). J. Agric. Food Chem.63 (44), 9869–9878. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b03967
15
DaiX.ShiX.YangC.ZhaoX.ZhuangJ.LiuY.et al. (2022). Two UDP-glycosyltransferases catalyze the biosynthesis of bitter flavonoid 7-O-Neohesperidoside through sequential glycosylation in tea plants. J. Agric. Food Chem.70 (7), 2354–2365. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c07342
16
DaiX.ZhuangJ.WuY.WangP.ZhaoG.LiuY.et al. (2017). Identification of a flavonoid glucosyltransferase involved in 7-OH site glycosylation in tea plants (Camellia sinensis). Sci. Rep.7 (1), 5926. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06453-z
17
DewitteG.WalmaghM.DiricksM.LepakA.GutmannA.NidetzkyB.et al. (2016). Screening of recombinant glycosyltransferases reveals the broad acceptor specificity of stevia UGT-76G1. J. Biotechnol.233, 49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.06.034
18
DongF.YangZ.BaldermannS.SatoY.AsaiT.WatanabeN. (2011). Herbivore-induced volatiles from tea (Camellia sinensis) plants and their involvement in intraplant communication and changes in endogenous nonvolatile metabolites. J. Agric. Food Chem.59 (24), 13131–13135. doi: 10.1021/jf203396a
19
DouJ.LeeV. S. Y.TzenJ. T. C.LeeM.-R. (2008). Rapid identification of acylated flavonol tetraglycosides in oolong teas using HPLC-MSn. Phytochemical Anal.19 (3), 251–257. doi: 10.1002/pca.1044
20
DudarevaN.PicherskyE.GershenzonJ. (2004). Biochemistry of plant volatiles. Plant Physiol.135 (4), 1893–1902. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.049981
21
EffenbergerI.HoffmannT.JonczykR.SchwabW. (2019). Novel biotechnological glucosylation of high-impact aroma chemicals, 3(2H)- and 2(5H)-furanones. Sci. Rep.9 (1), 10943. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47514-9
22
EngelhardtU. H.FingerA.KuhrS. (1993). Determination of flavone c-glycosides in tea. Z. für Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und -Forschung197 (3), 239–244. doi: 10.1007/BF01185278
23
FAO (2022). International tea market : market situation, prospects and emerging issues (Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations).
24
FingerA.EngelhardtU. H.WrayV. (1991). Flavonol glycosides in tea–kaempferol and quercetin rhamnodiglucosides. J. Sci. Food Agric.55 (2), 313–321. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740550216
25
FurutaT.KimuraT.KondoS.MiharaH.WakimotoT.NukayaH.et al. (2004). Concise total synthesis of flavone c-glycoside having potent anti-inflammatory activity. Tetrahedron60 (42), 9375–9379. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2004.08.015
26
FurutaT.NakayamaM.SuzukiH.TajimiH.InaiM.NukayaH.et al. (2009). Concise synthesis of chafurosides a and b. Organic Lett.11 (11), 2233–2236. doi: 10.1021/ol900689m
27
GuoW.HosoiR.SakataK.WatanabeN.YagiA.InaK.et al. (1994). (S)-linalyl, 2-phenylethyl, and benzyl disaccharide glycosides isolated as aroma precursors from oolong tea leaves. Bioscience Biotechnology Biochem.58 (8), 1532–1534. doi: 10.1271/bbb.58.1532
28
GuoW.SakataK.WatanabeN.NakajimaR.YagiA.InaK.et al. (1993). Geranyl 6-o-β-d-xylopyranosyl-β-d-glucopyranoside isolated as an aroma precursor from tea leaves for oolong tea. Phytochemistry33 (6), 1373–1375. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(93)85093-7
29
HarbowyM. E.BalentineD. A. (1997). Tea chemistry. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.16 (5), 415–480. doi: 10.1080/07352689709701956
30
HashiguchiT.SakakibaraY.ShimohiraT.KurogiK.YamasakiM.NishiyamaK.et al. (2014). Identification of a novel flavonoid glycoside sulfotransferase in arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biochem.155 (2), 91–97. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvt102
31
HeX.ZhaoX.GaoL.ShiX.DaiX.LiuY.et al. (2018). Isolation and characterization of key genes that promote flavonoid accumulation in purple-leaf tea (Camellia sinensis l.). Sci. Rep.8 (1), 130. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18133-z
32
HeJ.ZhaoP.HuZ.LiuS.KuangY.ZhangM.et al. (2019). Molecular and structural characterization of a promiscuous c -glycosyltransferase from trollius chinensis. Angewandte Chemie Int. Edition58 (33), 11513–11520. doi: 10.1002/anie.201905505
33
HilalY.EngelhardtU. (2007). Characterisation of white tea – comparison to green and black tea. J. für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit2 (4), .414–.421. doi: 10.1007/s00003-007-0250-3
34
HoC.-T.ZhengX.LiS. (2015). Tea aroma formation. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness4 (1), 9–27. doi: 10.1016/j.fshw.2015.04.001
35
HouB.LimE.-K.HigginsG. S.BowlesD. J. (2004). N-glucosylation of cytokinins by glycosyltransferases of arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem.279 (46), 47822–47832. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409569200
36
HuY.ZhangM.LuM.WuY.JingT.ZhaoM.et al. (2022). Salicylic acid carboxyl glucosyltransferase UGT87E7 regulates disease resistance in Camellia sinensis. Plant Physiol.188 (3), 1507–1520. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab569
37
HuangF.-C.GiriA.DaniilidisM.SunG.HärtlK.HoffmannT.et al. (2018). Structural and functional analysis of UGT92G6 suggests an evolutionary link between mono- and disaccharide glycoside-forming transferases. Plant Cell Physiol.59 (4), 862–875. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcy028
38
HughesJ.HughesM. A. (1994). Multiple secondary plant product UDP-glucose glucosyltransferase genes expressed in cassava (Manihot esculenta crantz) cotyledons. DNA Sequence5 (1), 41–49. doi: 10.3109/10425179409039703
39
HusarS.BerthillerF.FujiokaS.RozhonW.KhanM.KalaivananF.et al. (2011). Overexpression of the UGT73C6 alters brassinosteroid glucoside formation in arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol.11 (1), 51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-51
40
IshidaH.WakimotoT.KitaoY.TanakaS.MiyaseT.NukayaH. (2009). Quantitation of chafurosides a and b in tea leaves and isolation of prechafurosides a and b from oolong tea leaves. J. Agric. Food Chem.57 (15), 6779–6786. doi: 10.1021/jf900032z
41
JayasingheS. L.KumarL. (2019). Modeling the climate suitability of tea [Camellia sinensis(L.) o. kuntze] in Sri Lanka in response to current and future climate change scenarios. Agric. For. Meteorology272–273, 102–117. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.03.025
42
JiangH.EngelhardtU. H.ThräneC.MaiwaldB.StarkJ. (2015). Determination of flavonol glycosides in green tea, oolong tea and black tea by UHPLC compared to HPLC. Food Chem.183, 30–35. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.024
43
JiangX.ShiY.DaiX.ZhuangJ.FuZ.ZhaoX.et al. (2018). Four flavonoid glycosyltransferases present in tea overexpressed in model plants arabidopsis thaliana and nicotiana tabacum for functional identification. J. Chromatogr. B1100–1101, 148–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2018.09.033
44
JingT.ZhangN.GaoT.WuY.ZhaoM.JinJ.et al. (2020). UGT85A53 promotes flowering via mediating abscisic acid glucosylation and FLC transcription in Camellia sinensis. J. Exp. Bot.71 (22), 7018–7029. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa373
45
JingT.ZhangN.GaoT.ZhaoM.JinJ.ChenY.et al. (2019). Glucosylation of (Z)-3-hexenol informs intraspecies interactions in plants: a case study in Camellia sinensis. Plant Cell Environ.42 (4), 1352–1367. doi: 10.1111/pce.13479
46
KassemM. E. S.ShoelaS.MarzoukM. M.SleemA. A. (2012). A sulphated flavone glycoside from livistona australis and its antioxidant and cytotoxic activity. Natural Product Res.26 (15), 1381–1387. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2011.587188
47
KinoshitaT.HirataS.YangZ.BaldermannS.KitayamaE.MatsumotoS.et al. (2010). Formation of damascenone derived from glycosidically bound precursors in green tea infusions. Food Chem.123 (3), 601–606. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.04.077
48
KobayashiA.KubotaK.JokiY.WadaE.WakabayashiM. (1994). (Z)-3-Hexenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside in fresh tea leaves as a precursor of green odor. Bioscience Biotechnology Biochem.58 (3), 592–593. doi: 10.1271/bbb.58.592
49
KurahayashiK.HanayaK.HigashibayashiS.SugaiT. (2020). Improved preparation of vitexin from hot water extract of basella alba, the commercially available vegetable malabar spinach (“Tsurumurasaki” in Japanese) and the application to semisynthesis of chafuroside b. Bioscience Biotechnology Biochem.84 (8), 1554–1559. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2020.1761286
50
KurzeE.RußV.SyamN.EffenbergerI.JonczykR.LiaoJ.et al. (2021). Glucosylation of (±)-menthol by uridine-Diphosphate-Sugar dependent glucosyltransferases from plants. Molecules26 (18), 5511. doi: 10.3390/molecules26185511
51
LiY.BaldaufS.LimE.-K.BowlesD. J. (2001). Phylogenetic analysis of the UDP-glycosyltransferase multigene family of arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem.276 (6), 4338–4343. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M007447200
52
LiJ.Ou-LeeT.-M.RabaR.AmundsonR. G.LastR. L. (1993). Arabidopsis flavonoid mutants are hypersensitive to UV-b irradiation. Plant Cell5 (2), 171–179. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.2.171
53
LimE.-K.JacksonR. G.BowlesD. J. (2005). Identification and characterisation of arabidopsis glycosyltransferases capable of glucosylating coniferyl aldehyde and sinapyl aldehyde. FEBS Lett.579 (13), 2802–2806. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.04.016
54
LiuZ.-W.ShiX.-Y.DuanS.-M.NianB.ChenL.-J.ZhangG.-H.et al. (2023). Multiomics analysis of the mechanisms behind flavonoid differences between purple and green tender shoots of Camellia sinensis var. assamica. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics13 (2) 1–12. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac297
55
LuH.ZhangJ.YangY.YangX.XuB.YangW.et al. (2016). Earliest tea as evidence for one branch of the silk road across the Tibetan plateau. Sci. Rep.6 (1), 18955. doi: 10.1038/srep18955
56
MaQ.ChenC.ZengZ.ZouZ.LiH.ZhouQ.et al. (2018). Transcriptomic analysis between self- and cross-pollinated pistils of tea plants (Camellia sinensis). BMC Genomics19 (1), 289. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4674-1
57
MaS.-J.WatanabeN.YagiA.SakataK. (2001). The (3R,9R)-3-hydroxy-7,8-dihydro-β-ionol disaccharide glycoside is an aroma precursor in tea leaves. Phytochemistry56 (8), 819–825. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00361-7
58
MarkhamK. R.GouldK. S.RyanK. G. (2001). Cytoplasmic accumulation of flavonoids in flower petals and its relevance to yellow flower colouration. Phytochemistry58 (3), 403–413. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(01)00276-X
59
MashimaK.HatanoM.SuzukiH.ShimosakaM.TaguchiG. (2019). Identification and characterization of apigenin 6-C-Glucosyltransferase involved in biosynthesis of isosaponarin in wasabi (Eutrema japonicum). Plant Cell Physiol.60 (12), 2733–2743. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcz164
60
McKayD. L.BlumbergJ. B. (2002). The role of tea in human health: an update. J. Am. Coll. Nutr.21 (1), 1–13. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2002.10719187
61
MeegahakumburaM. K.WambulwaM. C.LiM.-M.ThapaK. K.SunY.-S.MöllerM.et al. (2018). Domestication origin and breeding history of the tea plant (Camellia sinensis) in China and India based on nuclear microsatellites and cpDNA sequence data. Front. Plant Sci.8, 1–12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02270
62
MizutaniM.NakanishiH.EmaJ.MaS.-J.NoguchiE.Inohara-OchiaiM.et al. (2002). Cloning of β-primeverosidase from tea leaves, a key enzyme in tea aroma formation. Plant Physiol.130 (4), 2164–2176. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.011023
63
MondalT. K.BhattacharyaA.LaxmikumaranM.Singh AhujaP. (2004). Recent advances of tea (Camellia sinensis) biotechnology. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture76 (3), 195–254. doi: 10.1023/B:TICU.0000009254.87882.71
64
MoonJ.-H.WatanabeN.IjimaY.YagiA.SakataK. (1996). Cis- and trans-linalool 3,7-oxides and methyl salicylate glycosides and (Z)-3-Hexenyl β-D-Glucopyranoside as aroma precursors from tea leaves for oolong tea. Bioscience Biotechnology Biochem.60 (11), 1815–1819. doi: 10.1271/bbb.60.1815
65
MoonJ.-H.WatanabeN.SakataK.YagiA.InaK.LuoS. (1994). Trans- and cis-linalool 3,6-oxide 6-O-β-d-Xylopyranosyl-β-d-glucopyranosides isolated as aroma precursors from leaves for oolong tea. Bioscience Biotechnology Biochem.58 (9), 1742–1744. doi: 10.1271/bbb.58.1742
66
NakatsukaT.TomimoriY.FukudaY.NukayaH. (2004). First total synthesis of structurally unique flavonoids and their strong anti-inflammatory effect. Bioorganic Medicinal Chem. Lett.14 (12), 3201–3203. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2004.03.108
67
NishikitaniM.KubotaK.KobayashiA.SugawaraF. (1996). Geranyl 6-O-α-L-Arabinopyranosyl-β-D-glucopyranoside isolated as an aroma precursor from leaves of a green tea cultivar. Bioscience Biotechnology Biochem.60 (5), 929–931. doi: 10.1271/bbb.60.929
68
NishikitaniM.WangD.KubotaK.KobayashiA.SugawaraF. (1999). (Z)-3-Hexenyl and trans-linalool 3,7-oxide β-primeverosides isolated as aroma precursors from leaves of a green tea cultivar. Bioscience Biotechnology Biochem.63 (9), 1631–1633. doi: 10.1271/bbb.63.1631
69
NoguchiA.SaitoA.HommaY.NakaoM.SasakiN.NishinoT.et al. (2007). A UDP-Glucose:Isoflavone 7-O-Glucosyltransferase from the roots of soybean (Glycine max) seedlings. J. Biol. Chem.282 (32), 23581–23590. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M702651200
70
OffenW.Martinez-FleitesC.YangM.Kiat-LimE.DavisB. G.TarlingC. A.et al. (2006). Structure of a flavonoid glucosyltransferase reveals the basis for plant natural product modification. EMBO J.25 (6), 1396–1405. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600970
71
OhgamiS.OnoE.HorikawaM.MurataJ.TotsukaK.ToyonagaH.et al. (2015). Volatile glycosylation in tea plants: sequential glycosylations for the biosynthesis of aroma β-primeverosides are catalyzed by two Camellia sinensis glycosyltransferases. Plant Physiol.168 (2), 464–477. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00403
72
OhgamiS.OnoE.ToyonagaH.WatanabeN.OhnishiT. (2014). Identification and characterization of Camellia sinensis glucosyltransferase, UGT73A17: a possible role in flavonol glucosylation. Plant Biotechnol.31 (5), 573–578. doi: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.14.1027a
73
OnoE.WakiT.OikawaD.MurataJ.ShiraishiA.ToyonagaH.et al. (2020). Glycoside-specific glycosyltransferases catalyze regio-selective sequential glucosylations for a sesame lignan, sesaminol triglucoside. Plant J.101 (5), 1221–1233. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14586
74
OnoueS.MatsuiT.AokiY.IshidaH.NukayaH.KouK.et al. (2012). Self-assembled micellar formulation of chafuroside a with improved anti-inflammatory effects in experimental asthma/COPD-model rats. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.45 (1–2), 184–189. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2011.11.003
75
OstrowskiM.JakubowskaA. (2014). UDP-Glycosyltransferases of plant hormones. Adv. Cell Biol.4 (1), 43–60. doi: 10.2478/acb-2014-0003
76
PalmerJ. K. (1984). Enzyme reactions and acceptability of plant foods. J. Chem. Educ.61 (4), 284–289. doi: 10.1021/ed061p284
77
PaquetteS.MøllerB. L.BakS. (2003). On the origin of family 1 plant glycosyltransferases. Phytochemistry62 (3), 399–413. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(02)00558-7
78
PetersonJ.DwyerJ.BhagwatS.HaytowitzD.HoldenJ.EldridgeA. L.et al. (2005). Major flavonoids in dry tea. J. Food Composition Anal.18 (6), 487–501. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2004.05.006
79
PlumbG. W.PriceK. R.WilliamsonG. (1999). Antioxidant properties of flavonol glycosides from tea. Redox Rep.4 (1–2), 13–16. doi: 10.1179/135100099101534684
80
PriceK. R.RhodesM. J. C.BarnesK. A. (1998). Flavonol glycoside content and composition of tea infusions made from commercially available teas and tea products. J. Agric. Food Chem.46 (7), 2517–2522. doi: 10.1021/jf9800211
81
PutkaradzeN.GalaV.DellaWelnerD. H.VaitkusD.TezeD. (2023). Sequence mining yields 18 phloretin c-glycosyltransferases from plants for the efficient biocatalytic synthesis of nothofagin and phloretin-di-C-glycoside. Biotechnol. J., 1–10. doi: 10.1002/biot.202200609
82
PutkaradzeN.TezeD.FredslundF.WelnerD. H. (2021). Natural product: c-glycosyltransferases-a scarcely characterised enzymatic activity with biotechnological potential. Natural Product Rep.38 (3), 432–443. doi: 10.1039/D0NP00040J
83
RichmanA.SwansonA.HumphreyT.ChapmanR.McGarveyB.PocsR.et al. (2004). Functional genomics uncovers three glucosyltransferases involved in the synthesis of the major sweet glucosides of stevia rebaudiana. Plant J.41 (1), 56–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02275.x
84
RidderM. (2022a) Tea market worldwide - statistics & facts. Available at: https://www.statista.com/topics/6922/tea-market-worldwide/ (Accessed 04 April 2023).
85
RidderM. (2022b) U.S. tea market - statistics & facts. Available at: https://www.statista.com/topics/1513/tea-market/ (Accessed 04 April 2023).
86
RossJ.LiY.LimE.-K.BowlesD. J. (2001). Higher plant glycosyltransferases. Genome Biol.2 (2), 5–10. doi: 10.1186/gb-2001-2-2-reviews3004
87
SangS.LambertJ. D.HoC.-T.YangC. S. (2011). The chemistry and biotransformation of tea constituents. Pharmacol. Res.64 (2), 87–99. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2011.02.007
88
SasakiN.NishizakiY.YamadaE.TatsuzawaF.NakatsukaT.TakahashiH.et al. (2015). Identification of the glucosyltransferase that mediates direct flavone c-glucosylation in gentiana triflora. FEBS Lett.589 (1), 182–187. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.11.045
89
ScharbertS.HolzmannN.HofmannT. (2004). Identification of the astringent taste compounds in black tea infusions by combining instrumental analysis and human bioresponse. J. Agric. Food Chem.52 (11), 3498–3508. doi: 10.1021/jf049802u
90
SchneiderC.SegreT. (2009). Green tea: potential health benefits. Am. Family Physician79 (7), 591–594.
91
SchwabW.FischerT. C.GiriA.WüstM. (2015). Potential applications of glucosyltransferases in terpene glucoside production: impacts on the use of aroma and fragrance. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.99 (1), 165–174. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-6229-y
92
SchweigerW.PasquetJ.-C.NussbaumerT.ParisM. P. K.WiesenbergerG.MacadréC.et al. (2013). Functional characterization of two clusters of brachypodium distachyon UDP-glycosyltransferases encoding putative deoxynivalenol detoxification genes. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.26 (7), 781–792. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-08-12-0205-R
93
ShiJ.MaC.QiD.LvH.YangT.PengQ.et al. (2015). Transcriptional responses and flavor volatiles biosynthesis in methyl jasmonate-treated tea leaves. BMC Plant Biol.15 (1), 233. doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0609-z
94
SongC.HärtlK.McGrapheryK.HoffmannT.SchwabW. (2018). Attractive but toxic: emerging roles of glycosidically bound volatiles and glycosyltransferases involved in their formation. Mol. Plant11 (10), 1225–1236. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.09.001
95
SongC.HongX.ZhaoS.LiuJ.SchulenburgK.HuangF. C.et al. (2016). Glucosylation of 4-hydroxy-2,5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone, the key strawberry flavor compound in strawberry fruit. Plant Physiol.171 (1), 139–151. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00226
96
SuX.WangW.XiaT.GaoL.ShenG.PangY. (2018). Characterization of a heat responsive UDP: flavonoid glucosyltransferase gene in tea plant (Camellia sinensis). t. k. mondal, ed. PLoS One13 (11), e0207212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207212
97
SugimotoK.MatsuiK.IijimaY.AkakabeY.MuramotoS.OzawaR.et al. (2014). Intake and transformation to a glycoside of (Z)-3-hexenol from infested neighbors reveals a mode of plant odor reception and defense. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.111 (19), 7144–7149. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320660111
98
SugimotoK.OnoE.InabaT.TsukaharaT.MatsuiK.HorikawaM.et al. (2023). Identification of a tomato UDP-arabinosyltransferase for airborne volatile reception. Nat. Commun.14 (1), 1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36381-8
99
TelesY.SouzaM.SouzaM. (2018). Sulphated flavonoids: biosynthesis, structures, and biological activities. Molecules23 (2), 480. doi: 10.3390/molecules23020480
100
TiwariP.SangwanR. S.SangwanN. S. (2016). Plant secondary metabolism linked glycosyltransferases: an update on expanding knowledge and scopes. Biotechnol. Adv.34 (5), 714–739. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.03.006
101
TognettiV. B.Van AkenO.MorreelK.VandenbrouckeK.van de CotteB.De ClercqI.et al. (2010). Perturbation of indole-3-Butyric acid homeostasis by the UDP-glucosyltransferase UGT74E2 modulates arabidopsis architecture and water stress tolerance. Plant Cell22 (8), 2660–2679. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.071316
102
WachiraF. N.KamunyaS.KaroriS.ChaloR.MaritimT. (2013). “The tea plants: botanical aspects,” in Tea in health and disease prevention (Elsevier), 3–17.
103
WangJ.HouB. (2009). Glycosyltransferases: key players involved in the modification of plant secondary metabolites. Front. Biol. China4 (1), 39–46. doi: 10.1007/s11515-008-0111-1
104
WangD.KubotaK.KobayashiA.JuanI.-M. (2001a). Analysis of glycosidically bound aroma precursors in tea leaves. 3. change in the glycoside content of tea leaves during the oolong tea manufacturing process. J. Agric. Food Chem.49 (11), 5391–5396. doi: 10.1021/jf010235+
105
WangD.KurasawaE.YamaguchiY.KubotaK.KobayashiA. (2001b). Analysis of glycosidically bound aroma precursors in tea leaves. 2. changes in glycoside contents and glycosidase activities in tea leaves during the black tea manufacturing process. J. Agric. Food Chem.49 (4), 1900–1903. doi: 10.1021/jf001077+
106
WangQ.WuY.PengA.CuiJ.ZhaoM.PanY.et al. (2022). Single-cell transcriptome atlas reveals developmental trajectories and a novel metabolic pathway of catechin esters in tea leaves. Plant Biotechnol. J.20 (11), 2089–2106. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13891
107
WangD.YoshimuraT.KubotaK.KobayashiA. (2000). Analysis of glycosidically bound aroma precursors in tea leaves. 1. qualitative and quantitative analyses of glycosides with aglycons as aroma compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem.48 (11), 5411–5418. doi: 10.1021/jf000443m
108
WangX.-C.ZhaoQ.-Y.MaC.-L.ZhangZ.-H.CaoH.-L.KongY.-M.et al. (2013). Global transcriptome profiles of Camellia sinensis during cold acclimation. BMC Genomics14 (1), 415. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-415
109
WeiJ.KangL. (2011). Roles of (Z)-3-hexenol in plant-insect interactions. Plant Signaling Behav.6 (3), 369–371. doi: 10.4161/psb.6.3.14452
110
WeiY.MuH.XuG.WangY.LiY.LiS.et al. (2021). Genome-wide analysis and functional characterization of the UDP-glycosyltransferase family in grapes. Horticulturae7 (8), 204. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae7080204
111
WeiC.YangH.WangS.ZhaoJ.LiuC.GaoL.et al. (2018). Draft genome sequence of Camellia sinensis var. sinensis provides insights into the evolution of the tea genome and tea quality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.115 (18), E4151–E4158. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719622115
112
WillsonK. C.CliffordM. N. (Eds.) (2012). Tea: cultivation to consumption (Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media).
113
WilsonA. E.TianL. (2019). Phylogenomic analysis of UDP-dependent glycosyltransferases provides insights into the evolutionary landscape of glycosylation in plant metabolism. Plant J.100 (6), 1273–1288. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14514
114
WuC.XuH.HéritierJ.AndlauerW. (2012). Determination of catechins and flavonol glycosides in Chinese tea varieties. Food Chem.132 (1), 144–149. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.10.045
115
XiaE.-H.TongW.WuQ.WeiS.ZhaoJ.ZhangZ.-Z.et al. (2020). Tea plant genomics: achievements, challenges and perspectives. Horticulture Res.7 (1), 7. doi: 10.1038/s41438-019-0225-4
116
XiaE.-H.ZhangH.-B.ShengJ.LiK.ZhangQ.-J.KimC.et al. (2017). The tea tree genome provides insights into tea flavor and independent evolution of caffeine biosynthesis. Mol. Plant10 (6), 866–877. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.04.002
117
XiaoJ.CapanogluE.JassbiA. R.MironA. (2016). Advance on the flavonoid c-glycosides and health benefits. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.56, S29–S45. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2015.1067595
118
YangZ.BaldermannS.WatanabeN. (2013). Recent studies of the volatile compounds in tea. Food Res. Int.53 (2), 585–599. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.02.011
119
YangL.GuY.ZhouJ.YuanP.JiangN.WuZ.et al. (2022). Whole-genome identification and analysis of multiple gene families reveal candidate genes for theasaponin biosynthesis in Camellia oleifera. Int. J. Mol. Sci.23 (12), 6393. doi: 10.3390/ijms23126393
120
Yonekura-SakakibaraK.HanadaK. (2011). An evolutionary view of functional diversity in family 1 glycosyltransferases. Plant J.66 (1), 182–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04493.x
121
ZagrobelnyM.BakS.RasmussenA. V.JørgensenB.NaumannC. M.Lindberg MøllerB. (2004). Cyanogenic glucosides and plant–insect interactions. Phytochemistry65 (3), 293–306. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2003.10.016
122
ZhangQ.CaiM.YuX.WangL.GuoC.MingR.et al. (2017). Transcriptome dynamics of Camellia sinensis in response to continuous salinity and drought stress. Tree Genet. Genomes13 (4), 78. doi: 10.1007/s11295-017-1161-9
123
ZhaoM.CaiB.JinJ.ZhangN.JingT.WangJ.et al. (2020a). Cold stress-induced glucosyltransferase CsUGT78A15 is involved in the formation of eugenol glucoside in Camellia sinensis. Hortic. Plant J.6 (6), 439–449. doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2020.11.005
124
ZhaoX.DaiX.GaoL.GuoL.ZhuangJ.LiuY.et al. (2017a). Functional analysis of an uridine diphosphate glycosyltransferase involved in the biosynthesis of polyphenolic glucoside in tea plants (Camellia sinensis). J. Agric. Food Chem.65 (50), 10993–11001. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04969
125
ZhaoM.JinJ.GaoT.ZhangN.JingT.WangJ.et al. (2019). Glucosyltransferase CsUGT78A14 regulates flavonols accumulation and reactive oxygen species scavenging in response to cold stress in Camellia sinensis. Front. Plant Sci.10, 1–14. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01675
126
ZhaoM.JinJ.WangJ.GaoT.LuoY.JingT.et al. (2022). Eugenol functions as a signal mediating cold and drought tolerance via UGT71A59-mediated glucosylation in tea plants. Plant J.109 (6), 1489–1506. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15647
127
ZhaoX.WangP.LiM.WangY.JiangX.CuiL.et al. (2017b). Functional characterization of a new tea (Camellia sinensis) flavonoid glycosyltransferase. J. Agric. Food Chem.65 (10), 2074–2083. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05619
128
ZhaoM.ZhangN.GaoT.JinJ.JingT.WangJ.et al. (2020b). Sesquiterpene glucosylation mediated by glucosyltransferase UGT91Q2 is involved in the modulation of cold stress tolerance in tea plants. New Phytol.226 (2), 362–372. doi: 10.1111/nph.16364
129
ZhengX.-Q.LiQ.-S.XiangL.-P.LiangY.-R. (2016). Recent advances in volatiles of teas. Molecules21 (3), 338. doi: 10.3390/molecules21030338
130
ZhouY.DongF.KunimasaA.ZhangY.ChengS.LuJ.et al. (2014). Occurrence of glycosidically conjugated 1-phenylethanol and its hydrolase β-primeverosidase in tea (Camellia sinensis) flowers. J. Agric. Food Chem.62 (32), 8042–8050. doi: 10.1021/jf5022658
131
ZhouK.HuL.LiP.GongX.MaF. (2017). Genome-wide identification of glycosyltransferases converting phloretin to phloridzin in malus species. Plant Sci.265, 131–145. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.10.003
Summary
Keywords
tea plant, Camellia sinensis, secondary plant metabolites, UDP glycosyltransferases, glycosides
Citation
Hoffmann TD, Kurze E, Liao J, Hoffmann T, Song C and Schwab W (2023) Genome-wide identification of UDP-glycosyltransferases in the tea plant (Camellia sinensis) and their biochemical and physiological functions. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1191625. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1191625
Received
22 March 2023
Accepted
02 May 2023
Published
06 June 2023
Volume
14 - 2023
Edited by
Fumihiko Sato, Kyoto University, Japan
Reviewed by
Goro Taguchi, Shinshu University, Japan; Jun Murata, Suntory Foundation for Life Sciences, Japan
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2023 Hoffmann, Kurze, Liao, Hoffmann, Song and Schwab.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Timothy D. Hoffmann, timothy.d.hoffmann@tum.de; Wilfried Schwab, wilfried.schwab@tum.de
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.




