Abstract
During leaf development, the timing of transition from cell proliferation to expansion is an important factor in determining the final organ size. However, the regulatory system involved in this transition remains less understood. To get an insight into this system, we investigated the compensation phenomenon, in which the cell number decreases while the cell size increases in organs with determinate growth. Compensation is observed in several plant species suggesting coordination between cell proliferation and expansion. In this study, we examined an Arabidopsis mutant of ANGUSTIFOLIA 3 (AN3)/GRF-INTERACTING FACTOR 1, a positive regulator of cell proliferation, which exhibits the compensation. Though the AN3 role has been extensively investigated, the mechanism underlying excess cell expansion in the an3 mutant remains unknown. Focusing on the early stage of leaf development, we performed kinematic, cytological, biochemical, and transcriptome analyses, and found that the cell size had already increased during the proliferation phase, with active cell proliferation in the an3 mutant. Moreover, at this stage, chloroplasts, vacuoles, and xylem cells developed earlier than in the wild-type cells. Transcriptome data showed that photosynthetic activity and secondary cell wall biosynthesis were activated in an3 proliferating cells. These results indicated that precocious cell differentiation occurs in an3 cells. Therefore, we suggest a novel AN3 role in the suppression of cell expansion/differentiation during the cell proliferation phase.
1 Introduction
Cell proliferation occurs first during organ development in plants, followed by cell expansion and differentiation. The transition timing from cell proliferation to expansion significantly influences the final size of organs that exhibit determinate growth, such as leaves. In Arabidopsis thaliana (hereafter, Arabidopsis), all cells first proliferate throughout the leaf primordium, and then the cells cease to proliferate and start cell expansion and differentiation. This transition occurs in a basipetal (from the leaf tip to the base) manner so that distal cells start cell expansion earlier while proximal cells continue proliferating. Finally, cell proliferation activity in the proximal region stops abruptly, and cells rapidly increase in size, leading to rapid expansion of the leaf (; ; ; ). Many factors, including transcription factors, kinases, and phytohormones, regulate cell proliferation, expansion, and differentiation. Although several factors have been revealed to be involved in regulating the phase transition, the mechanisms connecting each developmental phase are much less understood (reviewed by ; ). The compensation phenomenon, in which the cell number is severely decreased and the cell size is increased in an organ with determinate growth, suggests a coordinated system between cell proliferation and expansion. It has been observed in various species and different types of systems enhance cell expansion, suggesting that several pathways induce compensation (, , ; , reviewed by ; ; ). One example is the Arabidopsis overexpression line KIP-RELATED PROTEIN 2 (KRP2ox). Excess cell expansion, called compensated cell enlargement (CCE), in KRP2ox is caused by increased activity of vacuolar-type H+-ATPase (V-ATPase), and cell size increases during the cell proliferation phase (). A suppressor mutant of KRP2ox compensation is de-etiolated 3 (det3), which has a molecular lesion in the large subunit of V-ATPase (; ; ), but det3 mutation cannot repress CCE in other compensation-exhibiting mutants (). Another example is the fugu5 mutant, which has a mutation in vacuolar H+-pyrophosphatase that leads to deficient gluconeogenesis and fewer cells. The CCE in fugu5 is induced through auxin biosynthesis, which extends the cell expansion phase (; ; ; ), but this system is not functional in KRP2ox compensation. Although several examples of compensation have been identified, only a few mechanisms have been described in detail.
ANGUSTIFOLIA 3 (AN3), also known as Arabidopsis thaliana GRF-INTERACTING FACTOR 1 (GIF1), is a positive regulator of cell proliferation that works together with the SWITCH/SUCROSE NONFERMENTING chromatin-remodeling complex to regulate the expression of target genes. GROWTH REGULATING FACTORs (GRFs) are AN3 interactors, many of which positively regulate cell proliferation. AN3 activates cell proliferation with GRFs and other factors (; ; , reviewed by ; ). In the leaf primordia, AN3 is expressed in the proximal region and diffuses to the distal region, resulting in a graded distribution of active cell proliferation (). AN3 and GRFs are negatively regulated by TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1/CYCLOIDEA/PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN FACTOR 4 (TCP4). TCP4 also produces microRNA miR396, which targets seven of nine GRFs and decrease their expression levels (; ; ). In a developing leaf primordium, the level of miR396 increases along the proximal-distal axis and accumulates more in the distal part. It makes GRFs expression exhibit the opposite pattern (i.e., higher in the proximal and lower in the distal) and leads to lower cell proliferation activity in the distal part (). By introducing miRNA-resistant version of GRFs, the graded pattern of GRF distribution disappear and cell proliferation activity is maintained for longer time (; ). Thus, AN3-GRF module is an important factor to regulate cell proliferation activity.
The an3 mutants in several plant species, including Arabidopsis, Oryza sativa (rice), and Zea mays (maize), exhibit compensation (hereafter, an3-mediated compensation; ; ; ) with severe decrease in leaf cell proliferation. For example, in Arabidopsis an3 mutants, leaf cell number decreases to approximately 30% and cell size increases to approximately 150% compared to that of the wild type (). Previous studies have shown several features of an3-mediated compensation: the cell expansion rate in an3 is distinctively increased (; ); ribosome biogenesis- or activity-related mutations synergistically enhance an3-mediated compensation (); an3 CCE is ploidy-independent process and is suppressed by extra-small sister 2 mutant, in which salicylic acid signaling is highly activated (, ); an3 CCE occurs non-cell-autonomously in palisade tissue cells and cell-autonomously in epidermal cells (; ). However, the detailed mechanism of an3-mediated compensation, particularly the cause of an3-mediated CCE has not yet been elucidated.
During leaf development, the cell size is regulated differently during the proliferation and expansion phases. In the cell proliferation phase, cells repeatedly undergo cell division to maintain a constant cell size. A constant cell size in proliferating cells is a universal phenomenon called cell-size homeostasis, which is observed in bacteria, animals, and plants. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain how cells maintain constant size (; ; ; ; ). In plants, cell-size homeostasis is often investigated in the shoot apical meristem cells. A specific factor other than KRP4, which is inherited on the chromatin during mitosis, has not yet been identified. KRP4 is an indicator of DNA content and inhibits cell division until it is sufficiently diluted during cell growth (). As seen in shoot apical meristem cells, proliferating cells in developing leaf primordia maintain a constant size (; ; ). Long-term live cell imaging showed that these cells slightly increase in size just before the onset of the cell expansion phase, which occurred concurrently with an extended cell cycle length ().
After the onset of the cell expansion phase, cells rapidly increase in size through several processes, such as vacuole development and changes in the mechanical properties of the cell wall (reviewed by ). The process of vacuole development has been well-documented in root cells (; ). In meristematic cells, several small vacuoles are distributed in a cell and gradually fuse to increase the total volume and occupancy of the cell. Fused vacuoles become a large central vacuole which is required for water uptake and increase of the cell size (). Cell wall loosening is another factor that increases cell size in response to increased turgor pressure (). Several cell wall modification proteins, such as expansins and xyloglucan endotransglucosylases/hydrolases, and the methylesterification of pectins, such as homogalacturonan, change cell wall rigidity in both directions to increase or reduce stiffness. Pectin demethylesterification triggers cell-wall loosening during organ development in the shoot apical meristem and hypocotyl, as well as cell shape changes in leaf pavement cells (; , , , ; , reviewed by ). In addition, chloroplast development has been suggested to be associated with the onset of cell expansion. showed that chloroplast development and upregulation of photosynthesis-related genes occur just before the onset of cell expansion in developing Arabidopsis leaf primordia. They treated developing leaf primordia with norflurazon, a chemical inhibitor of chloroplast differentiation, resulted in delayed cell expansion onset. This suggests that chloroplast development and retrograde signaling are important triggers for the onset of cell expansion.
In this study, we examined the an3-mediated compensation mechanism, focusing on early-stage leaf primordia, the timing AN3 is expressed in wild type. We conducted kinematic, cytological, biochemical, and transcriptome analyses, and the results suggested that an3 cells exhibit precocious cell expansion and differentiation during the cell proliferation phase.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Plant materials and growth conditions
The wild-type accession was Columbia-0 (Col-0). The seeds of Col-0 and an3-4 were provided by Dr. Kensuke Kawade (Saitama University), and an3-2 from Dr. Ushio Fujikura (Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development). The original description of an3-2 and an3-4 was provided by an3-2 has a 6-base deletion in the SNH domain and an3-4 is a null allele having a large deletion. Seeds were sown on rockwool (Nittobo, Tokyo, Japan or Grodan, Roermond, Netherlands), watered daily with 0.5 g L-1 Hyponex (Hyponex, Osaka, Japan), and grown under white fluorescent lamps (50–90 μmol m-2 sec-1) at 22°C, in a long-day photoperiod of 16-hour light/8-hour dark.
2.2 Histological observation
Seedlings were fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde solution containing 0.05% (v/v) Triton-X100 using vacuum desiccator or centrifugation to measure the leaf size and adaxial subepidermal cell size in the first foliage leaf primordia. After fixation, the samples were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and cleared using ClearSee () containing 1% (v/v) Calcofluor White Stain (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) to stain the cell wall (the final calcofluor white concentration was 10 μM). For observation of nuclei, SYBR Green I Nucleic Acid Gel Stain (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) was added to ClearSee at a 2000-fold dilution. Leaf primordia were cut under a stereomicroscope and observed under a confocal microscope (FV3000, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan or FV10i, Olympus). Calcofluor was excited with a laser at 405 nm, emission was detected between 430 and 470 nm, and SYBR Green was excited at 488 nm and emission was detected between 490 and 540 nm. The measurements were performed using ImageJ (; RRID: SCR_003070) or Fiji (; RRID: SCR_002285). Leaf and cell shape were traced manually or by using ‘Morphological Segmentation’ plugin (), and the area was measured using the “Analyze particles” function.
2.3 Kinematic analyses
Adaxial subepidermal cells were measured in the kinematic analyses. For early small leaf primordia (from 3 to 5 DAS), the cell area was measured using the Volume Viewer plugin in Fiji to make optical sections parallel to the adaxial surface. Proximal and distal cells were measured at approximately 25% and 75% of the leaf blade length, respectively, as described by . For 3 and 4 DAS leaf primordia, cell area was measured at around 50% of the leaf blade length because the leaf was too small to measure proximal/distal cell area separately. For leaves on 5 DAS afterwards, average cell area was calculated by taking the average of proximal and distal cell area. The number of cells per leaf was estimated by dividing the leaf size by the average cell area. Statistical analyses were performed using R software.
2.4 Cytological observation by FE-SEM
The 4 DAS seedlings were fixed with 0.05 M cacodylic acid buffer containing 4% paraformaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde in a vacuum for 40 min and kept at 4°C overnight. After post-fixation with 1% (w/v) osmium tetroxide, samples were dehydrated with a graded methanol series, embedded in TAAB Epon812 resin (Nisshin EM Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and sectioned at 1 μm thickness. Sections on a glass slide were stained with 0.4% uranyl acetate and lead citrate solution and coated with osmium using an osmium coater (HPC-1SW, Vacuum Device, Ibaraki, Japan). Cross-sections around the 50% of the leaf blade length were observed using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) (SU8220, Hitachi High-Tech, Tokyo, Japan) with an yttrium aluminum garnet backscattered electron detector at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV. Cell wall thickness was measured in adaxial subepidermal cells where a pair of facing plasma membranes was clear. Three to five locations were measured for each individual, and a minimum value was obtained from 20 measurements for each part (n = 3 individuals for the wild type and an3).
2.5 Vacuole observation and measurement
Vacuoles were observed in the first foliage leaf primordia at 5 DAS. The vacuoles and plasma membranes were stained with BCECF-AM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and FM4-64 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), respectively. A basal buffer [50 mM KCl, 5 mM 2-(N-morpholino)-ethanesulfonic acid (MES)-Tris (pH 6.5), and 10 mM CaCl2] () was used as a solvent to minimize the osmotic change. After one of the cotyledons was cut, the seedlings were placed in a staining solution and kept in the dark for 2 h at approximately 22°C. After staining, foliage leaf primordia were dissected and mounted with basal buffer for observation under a confocal microscope (FV3000, Olympus). BCECF was excited with a laser at 488 nm, and the emission was detected between 500 and 570 nm. For FM4-64, the excitation wavelength was 514 nm, and emission was detected between 600 and 640 nm.
Image analysis was conducted using Fiji software. For cell segmentation, we used 1.5-pixel Gaussian-filtered images of plasma membranes labeled using FM4-64 and the ‘Morphological Segmentation’ plugin (). Segmentation was performed with a tuned tolerance value that was adjusted depending on the image. For vacuole segmentation, we used images of vacuoles labeled with BCECF. The BCECF images were subjected to a bandpass filter (3–18 pixels), and then they were manually binarized. Finally, we measured the cell and vacuole areas using the ‘Analyze particles’ function. The volumes were calculated based on the areas and z-stack thickness (0.42 μm).
2.6 Cell wall monosaccharide analysis
The 4 DAS first-foliage leaf primordia (from Col and an3-4, n = 60 individuals, N = 4 replicates) were fixed in 80% (v/v) ethanol. After fixation, samples were treated with methanol three times for 30 min, three times with acetone for 30 min, and three times with methanol/chloroform for 30 min, rinsed twice with ethanol, and dried at 65°C overnight. The dried tissues were hydrolyzed with sulfuric acid and neutralized with calcium carbonate. The neutralized solution was labeled with p-aminobenzoic ethyl ester (ABEE) and analyzed using UPLC (ultra-performance liquid chromatography).
2.7 mRNA sequencing analysis in 5 DAS leaf primordia
For RNA isolation, the first foliage leaf primordia at 5 DAS were collected under a stereomicroscope (30–50 individuals per a replicate, three replicates each for wild type and an3). The collected samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and crushed using zirconia beads (TOMY, Tokyo, Japan) and a bead beater (TissueLyser II, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). RNA was extracted using the FastGene RNA Premium Kit (NIPPON Genetics Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and modified to use a QIA shredder column (Qiagen) in the first step. Sequencing libraries were prepared using the NEBNext Ultra II Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs, Tokyo, Japan) and the NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (New England Biolabs). Libraries were sequenced on the HiSeqX platform (Illumina, Inc., California, USA) by Macrogen Japan (Kyoto, Japan) to obtain 150 bp paired-end reads. The reads were trimmed and filtered based on quality using fastp (version 0.20.1) () and then mapped to the public Arabidopsis thaliana reference genome (TAIR10) using STAR (version 2.7.7) (). Read counts were calculated using RSEM (version 1.3.3). Count normalization and DEG detection were performed using the TCC R package () with EdgeR (). The data were visualized using the following packages of the R software: tidyverse () and Heatmaply (). The reads were deposited in the DDBJ Sequence Read Archive under the run accession number DRR506123–DRR506128.
3 Results
3.1 The an3 mutant exhibited precocious cell enlargement in proliferating cells
To investigate the mechanism of an3-mediated compensation, we focused on the early-stage leaf primordia, in which all cells proliferate. We performed kinematic analyses in the first foliage leaf primordia of wild type and an3-4 mutant (), which is a null allele of an3 mutant, to measure the leaf area, the adaxial subepidermal cell area, and estimated cell number (Figures 1A–E). The cell size was already larger in the an3 mutant at 3 DAS (Figure 1B) when the leaf primordia still exhibited a cylinder shape (Figure 1D). Previous studies of wild type leaf primordia showed that in the early-stage leaf primordia, actively proliferating cells exhibit a constant size throughout a leaf (; ; ). In our kinematic analysis, cell size was relatively constant throughout the leaf primordium in both the wild type and an3 mutant at 5 DAS (Supplementary Figure 1), indicating that actively proliferating cells were enlarged in the an3 mutant. After 6 DAS, the distal cells started to expand in both wild-type and an3 plants, with a higher expansion rate in the an3 mutant (Figure 1B). This was consistent with the results of previous studies (; ). The same tendency of cell size increase in the early stage was confirmed in another an3 mutant allele, an3-2 (), which has a 6-base deletion in the SNH domain (Supplementary Figure 2). These results indicated that the an3 mutant had larger cells during the proliferation phase. In addition, we measured cell size in the shoot apical meristem (SAM) and did not detect significant difference between wild type and an3 (Supplementary Figure 3), suggesting that at least after the leaf primordia emergence, the cell size difference start to be appeared.
Figure 1
In the proximal region, the an3 cells started to further increase in size at 7 DAS, which was earlier than the wild type (Figure 1B). This was when the decrease in cell proliferation became apparent (Figure 1A), therefore, we checked if those an3 cells had already lost their cell proliferation ability. To this end, we stained the nuclei and cell walls using SYBR Green and calcofluor white, respectively, to identify cells undergoing mitosis (M phase), which had one or two condensed nuclei with high fluorescent intensity (Figure 1F). M phase cells in the an3 mutant were observed until 9 DAS but not at 10 DAS, whereas dividing cells were still observed at 10 DAS in the wild type (Figures 1G–I). In the wild type, the M phase cell size was relatively constant from 7 to 9 DAS and was slightly enlarged at 10 DAS (Figures 1G, I), showing an increase in cell size only at the end of the proliferation phase, which is consistent with a previous study (). In contrast, the M phase cells in the an3 mutant already exhibited much larger and more varied sizes at 7 DAS (Figures 1H, I). In addition, cell size increased until 9 DAS, which is the end of the proliferation phase, indicating that cell size increased regardless of proliferation activity. Taken together, the an3 cells exhibited larger proliferating cells which did not maintain a certain size, and those precociously enlarged an3 cells exited proliferation earlier than the wild type.
3.2 Cytological and biochemical phenotypes indicated precocious cell differentiation in the an3 mutant
Since the an3 mutant exhibited larger cells regardless of cell proliferation ability, we examined the factors that expand an3 cells. We performed cytological observations of cross-sections of 4 DAS leaf primordia using a field emission-scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM). Even though cells were actively dividing at this stage, an3 cells had larger vacuoles and extended intercellular spaces, whereas wild-type cells exhibited only small vacuoles and much less intercellular space (Figures 2A, B). In addition, chloroplasts in an3 cells were more developed with more thylakoid membranes than those in the wild type (Figure 2C). It implied that chloroplast development was accelerated precociously in an3 proliferating cells. In mature leaves, it has been reported that the chloroplast number per cell was increased in an3 leaves (). To examine whether the mature chloroplast size was changed in an3 leaves, we measured the chloroplast size in mature leaves (27 DAS). However, it was not significantly different between wild-type and an3 cells (Figure 2D).
Figure 2
We then measured vacuole volume to determine its effect on cell size. To this end, vacuoles and plasma membranes in living 5 DAS leaf primordia, in which still all cells were proliferating, were stained using BCECF-AM and FM4-64, respectively, and observed using confocal microscopy. The constructed 3D images showed clear differences in vacuole size and shape, which were small and dispersed in the wild type but larger and more unified in the an3 cells (Figure 3A). The vacuolar occupancy, the percentage of vacuole volume in cell volume, was much higher in an3 cells than in wild type (Figure 3B). The fused vacuole in the an3 cells was similar to that observed in more differentiated wild-type cells (). Moreover, vacuole volume was correlated with cell volume, especially in an3 cells (Figure 3C), indicating that more-developed vacuoles participated in precocious cell enlargement in proliferating an3 cells.
Figure 3
We also analyzed the cell wall composition of proliferating cells to gain insights into cell wall properties. The relative amounts of monosaccharides in the total sugar were measured in leaf primordia at 4 DAS, in which all cells proliferated. The an3 mutant contained lower level of glucose and more xylose, galactose, D-galacturonic acid, and D-rhamnose (Figure 3D). In an3, the relative levels of galactose, D-galacturonic acid, and D-rhamnose, which are pectin components, were higher compared to those in wild type, suggesting that pectin in the intercellular matrix, such as the middle lamella, was increased in the an3 mutant. Pectin is often associated with cell wall loosening through demethylesterification during the organ formation or cell differentiation (, , , ). The changed cell wall composition in an3 proliferating cells may lead to altered cell wall extensibility. Glucose is a component of cellulose and hemicellulose; therefore, less glucose and more pectin in an3 would change cell wall characteristics. However, no significant difference was detected in cell wall thickness between the wild type and the an3 mutant (Figure 3E).
The an3 cells in the proliferation phase exhibited more-developed vacuoles, chloroplasts, and intercellular spaces as well as different cell wall composition. These phenotypes indicated that the an3 cells differentiated precociously despite their active proliferative activity. Moreover, the precocious cell expansion in the an3 mutant was at least partially attributed to more fused and developed vacuoles.
3.3 Gene expression during the proliferation phase also supported the precocious cell differentiation in an3
To examine the altered gene expression profile in the an3 mutant associated with the precocious onset of cell expansion, we conducted mRNA sequencing (mRNA-seq) analyses using 5 DAS leaf primordia, in which all cells proliferated. In total, 1683 genes were detected as differentially expressed genes (DEGs; 1154 upregulated and 529 downregulated, including AN3 itself) in the an3 mutant compared to the wild type (false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05; Table S1). Although many GRFs are AN3-interactors, only GRF4 and GRF9 were involved in DEGs that were down- and upregulated, respectively.
Next, we compared published data on gene expression changes in the wild type during the transition phase from cell proliferation to expansion. We used microarray data from 3rd foliage leaf primordia between days 9 and 10, which corresponds to the timing that distal cells cease proliferation and start expansion (2,208 DEGs; ). With an3 DEGs, 396 genes were found in common. Of these 396 genes, 392 genes showed the same tendency in expression changes (i.e., upregulated or downregulated) in an3 mutant and in day 10 leaf primordia, while only 4 genes exhibited the opposite pattern (Spearman’s rank correlation: ρ = 0.86; Supplementary Figure 4A). It suggested that gene expression changes in an3 mutant was at least partially similar to those in the more-developed stage leaf primordia. Gene Ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis () of the 392 common genes showed that many genes related to photosynthesis were upregulated in an3 (Figure 4Ai). These involved genes encoding chlorophyll-binding proteins and factors in photosystems I and II, suggesting that photosynthetic activity was higher in an3 cells than that in wild-type cells during the proliferation phase. This was consistent with the FE-SEM observations, which showed more-developed chloroplasts in an3 cells (Figure 2C). In addition, many upregulated genes among the an3 DEGs were involved in secondary cell wall biosynthesis, such as CELLULOSE SYNTHASE A4 (CESA4), CESA7, and CESA8 (; ; Figure 4Aii). It would be associated with xylem formation since the master regulators of xylem vessel formation, i.e., VASCULAR RELATED NAC-DOMAIN 4 (VND4) and VND7 (; ), were also included in an3 DEGs and were upregulated in an3 (Figure 4B). This was consistent with the an3 mutant phenotype showing earlier xylem differentiation than the wild type (Figure 4D). These results, together with the cytological observations described above, indicate that an3 cells exhibited accelerated cell expansion and differentiation processes.
Figure 4
To focus on genes related to precocious cell expansion and differentiation downstream of AN3, we compared microarray data for 164 DEGs from AN3-induced leaf primordia that was 8 DAS 1st foliage leaves, 8-hour after the AN3 induction, which contained both proliferating and expanding cells (). Among the three transcriptome datasets, 14 genes (6 upregulated and 8 downregulated in an3) were common (Figure 4E, Supplementary Figure 5, Table S2). Among these common DEGs, some genes downregulated in an3 were associated with chromatin or ribosome processing, such as EBNA1 BINDING PROTEIN 2 and OLIGOCELLULA 2 (; ), both of which are related to the AN3 role in cell proliferation. In contrast, upregulated genes in an3 did not show any apparent characteristics, except for AT1G68570, named NRT1/PTR FAMILY 3.1 (NPF3) encoding a membrane-localized gibberellic acid (GA) transporter. A previous study has indicated that NPF3 plays a role in GA uptake in elongated endodermal cells in Arabidopsis roots (). Moreover, GA plays a role in regulating the phase transition from cell proliferation to expansion in maize leaf development (). By comparing the data sets of AN3-induced leaf primordia and wild-type transition-phase leaf primordia, all of 59 common DEGs showed the opposite pattens in gene expression changes (Spearman’s rank correlation: ρ = -0.56; Supplementary Figure 4B). It also supported our hypothesis that AN3 has a roll in suppression of cell differentiation. GO term enrichment analysis of these genes showed many terms related to RNA processing and gene expression.
Other studies have shown that cytokinin (CK) deficiency during the cell proliferation phase suppresses cell division and induces precocious cell differentiation, leading to fewer and larger cells (; ). This phenotype was very similar to that in the an3 mutant. In wild-type leaf primordia, the amount of CKs, especially trans-zeatin (tZ), dramatically changes, peaking around the transition phase and dropping afterwards. Among CK biosynthesis genes, such as ISOPENTENYL TRANSFERASEs (IPTs) and LONELY GUYs (LOGs), only LOG3 showed decreased expression just before the CK decrease (). Analogous to this change, no LOGs and IPTs except for LOG3 was present in an3 DEGs, and LOG3 was downregulated in the an3 mutant (Figure 4C). Among ARABIDOPSIS HISTIDINE KINASEs (AHKs), the CK receptors, AHK4 was included in an3 DEGs and downregulated, and among type-A ARABIDOPSIS RESPONSE REGULATORs (ARRs), the CK response genes, ARR4 and ARR9 were in an3 DEGs and upregulated (Figure 4C). The expression changes in AHK4 and ARR4 were similar to those in wild-type leaf primordia during the transition phase from proliferation to expansion ().
4 Discussion
4.1 A novel AN3 role suppressing the onset of cell differentiation during the cell proliferation phase
In this study, we investigated Arabidopsis an3 mutants to determine the CCE mechanism in an3-mediated compensation. We found that the cell size in the an3 mutant significantly increased while cells were actively dividing. Since an3 proliferating cells increased in size, the precocious cell expansion and differentiation in an3 was not a simple shift of the transition timing but an abnormal overlap between the cell proliferation and expansion/differentiation phases. In our cytological observations and RNA-seq analyses, more-developed chloroplasts and vacuoles, earlier xylem development, and accelerated photosynthetic activity were observed in an3 proliferating cells. These results support the idea that an increase in cell size in the an3 mutant occurred through precocious cell differentiation, suggesting that AN3 suppresses cell differentiation during the cell proliferation phase.
In the previous studies, AN3 has been identified as a transcriptional coregulator (; ; ). AN3-GRF module has a key role in activating the cell proliferation in the shoot (; ; ), and another module together with PLETHORA1 (PLT1) and SCARECROW regulates the meristem size in the root. In roots, AN3 and other GIFs repression on PLT1 expression limits the meristem size (). Although several different AN3-interactors have been identified, AN3 role is supposed to regulate cell proliferation activity. Here, we propose a novel AN3 role for suppression of cell expansion/differentiation during the cell proliferation phase. Suppressing those later developmental processes may be important for cell proliferation activity because as seen in cell-size homeostasis phenomenon, cell proliferation and cell expansion/differentiation are often temporarily separated. In the following part, we will discuss candidate pathways.
4.2 Gibberellin is a candidate factor downstream of AN3 to regulate the transition from cell proliferation to expansion
Based on comparison with previous transcriptome datasets, we identified a candidate gene associated with precocious cell differentiation in an3 cells. NPF3 (AT1G68570), which encodes a membrane-localized GA transporter, was upregulated in the an3 mutant (Supplementary Figure 5, Table S2). The npf3 mutant is defective in GA accumulation in elongating endodermal cells, and ectopic expression of NPF3 increases GA accumulation in various root cell types (). Therefore, upregulated NPF3 in the an3 mutant may increase the uptake of GA by an3 proliferating cells.
The relationship between GA and the phase transition from proliferation to expansion has been demonstrated during maize leaf development. GA accumulates around the transition zone in maize leaves, making a narrow peak around the boundary between the division zone (DZ) and the elongation zone (EZ); the accumulated GA is immediately catabolized in the EZ. Increased or decreased GA levels in leaves changed the position of the GA peak closer to the base or distal to the leaf primordia, respectively, resulting in a longer or shorter DZ (). This indicates that the position of the GA accumulation peak regulates the transition from cell proliferation to expansion. It should be noted that the complex formed between ZmAN3 and ZmGRFs is also a key regulator of this phase transition. In the wild type, ZmAN3 changes its interacting GRFs in the DZ and EZ depending on the enrichment of each GRF. By changing these interactors, the AN3 complex regulates the transition from proliferation to expansion. For example, the overexpression of ZmGRF1, a positive regulator of cell division that interacts with ZmAN3 in the DZ, leads to a longer DZ (). Thus, ZmAN3 and GA are significant regulators of the transition from cell proliferation to expansion.
Considering the role of ZmAN3 and GA in maize leaves, together with our data showing upregulated NPF3 in the Arabidopsis an3 mutant, we suggest that GA plays a role in regulating the phase transition from cell proliferation to expansion downstream of AN3, as well as in Arabidopsis leaf primordia. One possible scenario is that AN3 suppresses the expression of NPF3, and in the absence of AN3, the upregulation of NPF3 leads to increased cellular uptake of GA into the cell. Similar to maize leaves, accumulated GA may cause a transition from cell proliferation to expansion. Our results suggest a novel role of AN3 and GA through NPF3 in the transition regulation of Arabidopsis leaf development.
4.3 Cytokinin is another candidate involved in the precocious onset of cell differentiation in the an3 mutant
A previous study has shown that CK levels in Arabidopsis leaf primordia changes dynamically. The level of tZ, the active form of CK, is high when all cells proliferate in the leaf primordia and rapidly decreases after the onset of cell expansion (). They have shown that only LOG3, which encodes a cytokinin-activating enzyme, alters the expression levels among CK biosynthesis genes. Its expression level is high when all cells are proliferating and decreases before the onset of cell expansion. Other LOGs and IPTs do not significantly alter the expression levels. In addition, if CK-degradation is induced during the proliferation phase, smaller leaves with fewer and larger cells are produced. This is caused by a premature transition from the cell proliferation phase and a precocious acceleration of cell expansion and differentiation (; ). These phenotypes resembled those of the an3 mutant. Our RNA-seq analyses showed that LOG3 expression was significantly lower in the an3 mutant than in the wild type (Figure 4C). Altered expression of AHK4 and ARR4 also suggested that the CK response in an3 proliferating cells was similar to that in wild-type expanding cells. In addition, ARR4 is directly suppressed by AN3 (). ARR4 is a type-A ARR, a negative regulator of CK signaling (), suggesting that ARR4 expression in wild type is suppressed during the cell proliferation phase while its suppression is released in the an3 mutant, leading to the repression of CK signaling. Antagonistic interactions among type-A ARRs have been also suggested (), therefore, upregulated ARR4 may not directly lead to CK deficiency. However, the similarity in the phenotypes between the an3 mutant and the CK-deficient line strongly suggests that CK levels or signaling are decreased in the an3 proliferating cells.
CK is well known to play a role in promoting chloroplast development (reviewed by ). If CK level or signaling is decreased in an3, the accelerated chloroplast development in the an3 proliferating cells was seemingly opposite phenotype. However, the effect of CK on chloroplast development differed depending on developmental timing. Previous study has shown that CK deficiency in proliferating cells does not change the final chlorophyll fluorescence levels in mature leaves (). Another study has shown that the chloroplast number per cell increases in the an3 mutant, making the chloroplast density in a cell comparable to that of the wild type (). Thus, the accelerated chloroplast development in the an3 proliferating cells could result in more chloroplasts but it does not change the final density of chloroplasts per a mature cell. The phenotypes we observed in the an3 mutant indicated that the CK level would be decreased in an3 proliferating cells compared to that in the wild type and that decreased CK level could be involved in the precocious activation of cell differentiation in an3.
In the present study, we found that an3 mutant leaf primordia showed precocious cell expansion, chloroplast development, vacuole development, and cell wall composition alterations during the cell proliferation phase. These results, together with the RNA-seq data, suggested that AN3 plays a role in suppressing cell differentiation during the cell proliferation phase. This is a novel role for AN3, which is known to be a positive cell proliferation regulator. Because precocious cell differentiation in the an3 mutant was observed with active cell proliferation, AN3 plays a dual role in regulating phase transition and cell proliferation. Moreover, our results suggested that GA and CK are involved in regulating the transition from cell proliferation to expansion downstream of AN3 during Arabidopsis leaf development.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The data presented in the study are deposited in the DDBJ Sequence Read Archive, the run accession number DRR506123–DRR506128.
Author contributions
KE: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. HK: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. NT: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. KT: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. TH: Data curation, Validation, Writing – review & editing. SS: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing. HT: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by a Grand-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovation Areas (HT, JP25113002 and JP19H05672) from MEXT.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Kensuke Kawade (Saitama University) for giving seeds of Col-0 and an3-4, Dr. Ushio Fujikura (AMED) for providing seeds of an3-2, and Dr. Kazuo Ebine (NIBB) for advice regarding vacuole observation. We also thank Drs. Kensuke Kawade, Ali Ferjanji (Tokyo Gakugei University), and Gorou Horiguchi (Rikkyo University) for helpful discussion. Finally, we appreciate the reviewers for their constructive and critical comments.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that this study was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1322223/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AndriankajaM.DhondtS.De BodtS.VanhaerenH.CoppensF.De MildeL.et al. (2012). Exit from proliferation during leaf development in Arabidopsis thaliana: A not-so-gradual process. Dev. Cell22, 64–78. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.11.011
2
BeemsterG. T. S.FioraniF.InzéD. (2003). Cell cycle: the key to plant growth control? Trends Plant Sci.8, 154–158. doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(03)00046-3
3
BerardiniT. Z.MundodiS.ReiserL.HualaE.Garcia-HernandezM.ZhangP.et al. (2004). Functional annotation of the Arabidopsis genome using controlled vocabularies. Plant Physiol.135, 745–755. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.040071
4
CamposM.SurovtsevI. V.KatoS.PaintdakhiA.BeltranB.EbmeierS. E.et al. (2014). A constant size extension drives bacterial cell size homeostasis. Cell159, 1433–1446. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.022
5
ChenS.ZhouY.ChenY.GuJ. (2018). fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics34, i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560
6
CortlevenA.SchmüllingT. (2015). Regulation of chloroplast development and function by cytokinin. J. Exp. Bot.66, 4999–5013. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv132
7
CosgroveD. J. (2005). Growth of the plant cell wall. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.6, 850–861. doi: 10.1038/nrm1746
8
CuiY.CaoW.HeY.ZhaoQ.WakazakiM.ZhuangX.et al. (2019). A whole-cell electron tomography model of vacuole biogenesis in Arabidopsis root cells. Nat. Plants5, 95–105. doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0328-1
9
D’ArioM.SablowskiR. (2019). Cell size control in plants. Annu. Rev. Genet.53, 45–65. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-112618-043602
10
D’ArioM.TavaresR.SchiesslK.DesvoyesB.GutierrezC.HowardM.et al. (2021). Cell size controlled in plants using DNA content as an internal scale. Science372, 1176–1181. doi: 10.1126/science.abb4348
11
DebernardiJ. M.MecchiaM. A.VercruyssenL.SmaczniakC.KaufmannK.InzeD.et al. (2014). Post-transcriptional control of GRF transcription factors by microRNA miR396 and GIF co-activator affects leaf size and longevity. Plant J.79, 413–426. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12567
12
De VeylderL. D.BeeckmanT.BeemsterG. T. S.KrolsL.TerrasF.LandrieuI.et al. (2001). Functional analysis of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell13, 1653–1668. doi: 10.1105/TPC.010087
13
DobinA.DavisC. A.SchlesingerF.DrenkowJ.ZaleskiC.JhaS.et al. (2013). STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics29, 15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
14
DonnellyP. M.BonettaD.TsukayaH.DenglerR. E.DenglerN. G. (1999). Cell cycling and cell enlargement in developing leaves of Arabidopsis. Dev. Biol.215, 407–419. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1999.9443
15
ErcoliM. F.FerelaA.DebernardiJ. M.PerroneA. P.RodriguezR. E.PalatnikJ. F. (2018). GIF transcriptional coregulators control root meristem homeostasis. Plant Cell30, 347–359. doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00856
16
FantesP. A. (1977). Control of cell size and cycle time in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Cell Sci.24, 51–67. doi: 10.1242/jcs.24.1.51
17
FerjaniA.HoriguchiG.YanoS.TsukayaH. (2007). Analysis of leaf development in fugu mutants of Arabidopsis reveals three compensation modes that modulate cell expansion in determinate organs. Plant Physiol.144, 988–999. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.099325
18
FerjaniA.IshikawaK.AsaokaM.IshidaM.HoriguchiG.MaeshimaM.et al. (2013). Enhanced cell expansion in a KRP2 overexpressor is mediated by increased V-ATPase activity. Plant Cell Physiol.54, 1989–1998. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pct138
19
FerjaniA.SegamiS.HoriguchiG.MutoY.MaeshimaM.TsukayaH. (2011). Keep an Eye on PPi: the vacuolar-type H+-pyrophosphatase regulates postgerminative development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell23, 2895–2908. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.085415
20
FoxS.SouthamP.PantinF.KennawayR.RobinsonS.CastorinaG.et al. (2018). Spatiotemporal coordination of cell division and growth during organ morphogenesis. PloS Biol.16, e2005952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2005952
21
FujikuraU.EzakiK.HoriguchiG.SeoM.KannoY.KamiyaY.et al. (2020). Suppression of class I compensated cell enlargement by xs2 mutation is mediated by salicylic acid signaling. PloS Genet.16, e1008873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008873
22
FujikuraU.HoriguchiG.PonceM. R.MicolJ. L.TsukayaH. (2009). Coordination of cell proliferation and cell expansion mediated by ribosome-related processes in the leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J.59, 499–508. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03886.x
23
FujikuraU.HoriguchiG.TsukayaH. (2007). Dissection of enhanced cell expansion processes in leaves triggered by a defect in cell proliferation, with reference to roles of endoreduplication. Plant Cell Physiol.48, 278–286. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcm002
24
FukaoY.FerjaniA. (2011). V-ATPase dysfunction under excess zinc inhibits Arabidopsis cell expansion. Plant Signal. Behav.6, 1253–1255. doi: 10.4161/psb.6.9.16529
25
FukaoY.FerjaniA.TomiokaR.NagasakiN.KurataR.NishimoriY.et al. (2011). iTRAQ analysis reveals mechanisms of growth defects due to excess zinc in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.155, 1893–1907. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.169730
26
GaliliT.O’CallaghanA.SidiJ.SievertC. (2018). heatmaply: an R package for creating interactive cluster heatmaps for online publishing. Bioinformatics34, 1600–1602. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx657
27
GardinerJ. C.TaylorN. G.TurnerS. R. (2003). Control of cellulose synthase complex localization in developing xylem. Plant Cell15, 1740–1748. doi: 10.1105/tpc.012815
28
GinzbergM. B.KafriR.KirschnerM. (2015). On being the right (cell) size. Science348, 1245075. doi: 10.1126/science.1245075
29
HaasK. T.WightmanR.MeyerowitzE. M.PeaucelleA. (2020). Pectin homogalacturonan nanofilament expansion drives morphogenesis in plant epidermal cells. Science367, 1003–1007. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz5103
30
HigakiT.KutsunaN.HosokawaY.AkitaK.EbineK.UedaT.et al. (2012). Statistical organelle dissection of Arabidopsis guard cells using image database LIPS. Sci. Rep.2, 405. doi: 10.1038/srep00405
31
HisanagaT.KawadeK.TsukayaH. (2015). Compensation: a key to clarifying the organ-level regulation of lateral organ size in plants. J. Exp. Bot.66, 1055–1063. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv028
32
HolstK.SchmüllingT.WernerT. (2011). Enhanced cytokinin degradation in leaf primordia of transgenic Arabidopsis plants reduces leaf size and shoot organ primordia formation. J. Plant Physiol.168, 1328–1334. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.03.003
33
HoriguchiG.KimG. T.TsukayaH. (2005). The transcription factor AtGRF5 and the transcription coactivator AN3 regulate cell proliferation in leaf primordia of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J.43, 68–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02429.x
34
HoriguchiG.TsukayaH. (2011). Organ size regulation in plants: insights from compensation. Front. Plant Sci.2. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2011.00024
35
JohnstonG. C.PringleJ. R.HartwellL. H. (1977). Coordination of growth with cell division in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Exp. Cell Res.105, 79–98. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(77)90154-9
36
KalveS.De VosD. D.BeemsterG. T. S. (2014). Leaf development: a cellular perspective. Front. Plant Sci.5. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00362
37
KatanoM.TakahashiK.HiranoT.KazamaY.AbeT.TsukayaH.et al. (2016). Suppressor screen and phenotype analyses revealed an emerging role of the monofunctional peroxisomal enoyl-CoA hydratase 2 in compensated cell enlargement. Front. Plant Sci.7. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00132
38
KawadeK.HoriguchiG.IshikawaN.HiraiM. Y.TsukayaH. (2013). Promotion of chloroplast proliferation upon enhanced post-mitotic cell expansion in leaves. BMC Plant Biol.13, 143. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-143
39
KawadeK.HoriguchiG.TsukayaH. (2010). Non-cell-autonomously coordinated organ size regulation in leaf development. Development137, 4221–4227. doi: 10.1242/dev.057117
40
KawadeK.TanimotoH.HoriguchiG.TsukayaH. (2017). Spatially different tissue-scale diffusivity shapes ANGUSTIFOLIA3 gradient in growing leaves. Biophys. J.113, 1109–1120. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.06.072
41
KazamaT.IchihashiY.MurataS.TsukayaH. (2010). The mechanism of cell cycle arrest front progression explained by a KLUH/CYP78A5-dependent mobile growth factor in developing leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol.51, 1046–1054. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcq051
42
KimJ. H. (2019). Biological roles and an evolutionary sketch of the GRF-GIF transcriptional complex in plants. BMB Rep.52, 227–238. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2019.52.4.051
43
KimJ. H.KendeH. (2004). A transcriptional coactivator, AtGIF1, is involved in regulating leaf growth and morphology in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.101, 13374–13379. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405450101
44
KimJ. H.TsukayaH. (2015). Regulation of plant growth and development by the GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR and GRF-INTERACTING FACTOR duo. J. Exp. Bot.66, 6093–6107. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv349
45
KuboM.UdagawaM.NishikuboN.HoriguchiG.YamaguchiM.ItoJ.et al. (2005). Transcription switches for protoxylem and metaxylem vessel formation. Genes Dev.19, 1855–1860. doi: 10.1101/gad.1331305
46
KuriharaD.MizutaY.SatoY.HigashiyamaT. (2015). ClearSee: a rapid optical clearing reagent for whole-plant fluorescence imaging. Development142, 4168–4179. doi: 10.1242/dev.127613
47
LeeB. H.KoJ. H.LeeS.LeeY.PakJ. H.KimJ. H. (2009). The Arabidopsis GRF-INTERACTING FACTOR gene family performs an overlapping function in determining organ size as well as multiple developmental properties. Plant Physiol.151, 655–668. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.141838
48
LeglandD.Arganda-CarrerasI.AndreyP. (2016). MorphoLibJ: integrated library and plugins for mathematical morphology with ImageJ. Bioinformatics32, 3532–3534. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw413
49
LiuD.SongY.ChenZ.YuD. (2009). Ectopic expression of miR396 suppresses GRF target gene expression and alters leaf growth in Arabidopsis. Physiol. Plant136, 223–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01229.x
50
NelissenH.EeckhoutD.DemuynckK.PersiauG.Bel WaltonA.van BelM.et al. (2015). Dynamic changes in ANGUSTIFOLIA3 complex composition reveal a growth regulatory mechanism in the maize leaf. Plant Cell27, 1605–1619. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00269
51
NelissenH.RymenB.JikumaruY.DemuynckK.Van LijsebettensM.KamiyaY.et al. (2012). A local maximum in gibberellin levels regulates maize leaf growth by spatial control of cell division. Curr. Biol.22, 1183–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.065
52
NozakiM.KawadeK.HoriguchiG.TsukayaH. (2020). an3-mediated compensation is dependent on a cell-autonomous mechanism in leaf epidermal tissue. Plant Cell Physiol.61, 1181–1190. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcaa048
53
PeaucelleA.BraybrookS. A.Le GuillouL.BronE.KuhlemeierC.HöfteH. (2011). Pectin-induced changes in cell wall mechanics underlie organ initiation in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol.21, 1720–1726. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.057
54
PeaucelleA.LouvetR.JohansenJ. N.HöfteH.LaufsP.PellouxJ.et al. (2008). Arabidopsis phyllotaxis is controlled by the methyl-esterification status of cell-wall pectins. Curr. Biol.18, 1943–1948. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.065
55
PeaucelleA.WightmanR.HöfteH. (2015). The control of growth symmetry breaking in the Arabidopsis hypocotyl. Curr. Biol.25, 1746–1752. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.022
56
RobinsonM. D.OshlackA. (2010). A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol.11, R25. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25
57
RodriguezR. E.MecchiaM. A.DebernardiJ. M.SchommerC.WeigelD.PalatnikJ. F. (2010). Control of cell proliferation in Arabidopsis thaliana by microRNA miR396. Development137, 103–112. doi: 10.1242/dev.043067
58
RomanovaL.GrandA.ZhangL.RaynerS.Katoku-KikyoN.KellnerS.et al. (2009). Critical role of nucleostemin in pre-rRNA processing. J. Biol. Chem.284, 4968–4977. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M804594200
59
SchaechterM.WilliamsonJ. P.HoodJ. R. H.KochA. L. (1962). Growth, cell and nuclear divisions in some bacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol.29, 421–434. doi: 10.1099/00221287-29-3-421
60
SchindelinJ.Arganda-CarrerasI.FriseE.KaynigV.LongairM.PietzschT.et al. (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods9, 676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019
61
SchneiderC. A.RasbandW. S.EliceiriK. W. (2012). NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods9, 671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089
62
SchumacherK.VafeadosD.McCarthyM.SzeH.WilkinsT.ChoryJ. (1999). The Arabidopsis det3 mutant reveals a central role for the vacuolar H+-ATPase in plant growth and development. Genes Dev.13, 3259–3270. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.24.3259
63
ShimanoS.HibaraK. I.FuruyaT.ArimuraS. I.TsukayaH.ItohJ. I. (2018). Conserved functional control, but distinct regulation, of cell proliferation in rice and Arabidopsis leaves revealed by comparative analysis of GRF-INTERACTING FACTOR 1 orthologs. Development145, 159624. doi: 10.1242/dev.159624
64
SkalákJ.VercruyssenL.ClaeysH.HradilováJ.ČernýM.NovákO.et al. (2019). Multifaceted activity of cytokinin in leaf development shapes its size and structure in Arabidopsis. Plant J.97, 805–824. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14285
65
SunJ.NishiyamaT.ShimizuK.KadotaK. (2013). TCC: an R package for comparing tag count data with robust normalization strategies. BMC Bioinform.14, 219. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-219
66
TabetaH.GunjiS.KawadeK.FerjaniA. (2023). Leaf-size control beyond transcription factors: compensatory mechanisms. Front. Plant Sci.13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1024945
67
TabetaH.WatanabeS.FukudaK.GunjiS.AsaokaM.HiraiM. Y.et al. (2021). An auxin signaling network translates low-sugar-state input into compensated cell enlargement in the fugu5 cotyledon. PloS Genet.17, e1009674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009674
68
TakahashiK.MorimotoR.TabetaH.AsaokaM.IshidaM.MaeshimaM.et al. (2017). Compensated cell enlargement in fugu5 is specifically triggered by lowered sucrose production from seed storage lipids. Plant Cell Physiol.58, 668–678. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcx021
69
TalI.ZhangY.JørgensenM. E.PisantyO.BarbosaI. C. R.ZourelidouM.et al. (2016). The Arabidopsis NPF3 protein is a GA transporter. Nat. Commun.7, 11486. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11486
70
TaylorN. G.HowellsR. M.HuttlyA. K.VickersK.TurnerS. R. (2003). Interactions among three distinct CesA proteins essential for cellulose synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.100, 1450–1455. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0337628100
71
ToJ. P. C.DeruèreJ.MaxwellB. B.MorrisV. F.HutchisonC. E.FerreiraF. J.et al. (2007). Cytokinin regulates type-A Arabidopsis response regulator activity and protein stability via two-component phosphorelay. Plant Cell19, 3901–3914. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.052662
72
TsukayaH. (2002). Interpretation of mutants in leaf morphology: genetic evidence for a compensatory system in leaf morphogenesis that provides a new link between cell and organismal theories. Int. Rev. Cytol.217, 1–39. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7696(02)17011-2
73
TsukayaH. (2003). Organ shape and size: a lesson from studies of leaf morphogenesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.6, 57–62. doi: 10.1016/S1369526602000055
74
VercruysseJ.BaekelandtA.GonzalezN.InzéD. (2019). Molecular networks regulating the cell division during leaf growth in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot.71, 2365–2378. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz522
75
VercruyssenL.VerkestA.GonzalezN.HeyndrickxK. S.EeckhoutD.HanS. K.et al. (2014). ANGUSTIFOLIA3 binds to SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes to regulate transcription during Arabidopsis leaf development. Plant Cell26, 210–229. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.115907
76
ViottiC.KrügerF.KrebsM.NeubertC.FinkF.LupangaU.et al. (2013). The endoplasmic reticulum is the main membrane source for biogenesis of the lytic vacuole in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell25, 3434–3449. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.114827
77
WangL.GuX.XuD.WangW.WangH.ZengM.et al. (2011). miR396-targeted AtGRF transcription factors are required for coordination of cell division and differentiation during leaf development in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot.62, 761–773. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq307
78
WangX.WilsonL.CosgroveD. J. (2020). Pectin methylesterase selectively softens the onion epidermal wall yet reduces acid-induced creep. J. Exp. Bot.71, 2629–2640. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa059
79
WhiteD. W. R. (2006). PEAPOD regulates lamina size and curvature in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.103, 13238–13243. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604349103
80
WickhamH.AverickM.BryanJ.ChangW.McGowanL. D.FrançoisR.et al. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. J. Open Source Software4, 1686. doi: 10.21105/joss.01686
81
WolfS.GreinerS. (2012). Growth control by cell wall pectins. Protoplasma249, 169–175. doi: 10.1007/s00709-011-0371-5
82
ZhangD.SunW.SinghR.ZhengY.CaoZ.LiM.et al. (2018). GRF-interacting factor1 (gif1) regulates shoot architecture and meristem determinacy in maize. Plant Cell30, 360–374. doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00791
83
ZhouJ.ZhongR.YeZ. H. (2014). Arabidopsis NAC domain proteins, VND1 to VND5, are transcriptional regulators of secondary wall biosynthesis in vessels. PloS One9, e105726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105726
Summary
Keywords
Arabidopsis, leaf development, cell size, cell proliferation, cell differentiation
Citation
Ezaki K, Koga H, Takeda-Kamiya N, Toyooka K, Higaki T, Sakamoto S and Tsukaya H (2024) Precocious cell differentiation occurs in proliferating cells in leaf primordia in Arabidopsis angustifolia3 mutant. Front. Plant Sci. 15:1322223. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1322223
Received
16 October 2023
Accepted
02 April 2024
Published
16 April 2024
Volume
15 - 2024
Edited by
Neelima Roy Sinha, University of California, Davis, United States
Reviewed by
Fabrice Besnard, UMR5667 Laboratoire Reproduction et Développement des Plantes (RDP), France
Michael Gerard Muszynski, University of Hawaii at Manoa, United States
Michael Lenhard, University of Potsdam, Germany
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Ezaki, Koga, Takeda-Kamiya, Toyooka, Higaki, Sakamoto and Tsukaya.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kazune Ezaki, kazunezaki@gmail.com; Hirokazu Tsukaya, tsukaya@bs.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
†Present address: Kazune Ezaki, Department of Life Science, Rikkyo University, Toshima-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.