Abstract
We focused on the geminiviral vector systems to develop an efficient vector system for plant biotechnology. Begomoviruses and curtoviruses, which belong to the Geminiviridae family, contain an intergenic region (IR) and four genes involved in replication, including replication-associated protein (Rep, C1), transcriptional activator (TrAP, C2), and replication enhancer (REn, C3). Geminiviruses can amplify thousands of copies of viral DNA using plant DNA polymerase and viral replication-related enzymes and accumulate viral proteins at high concentrations. In this study, we optimized geminiviral DNA replicon vectors based on tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV), honeysuckle yellow vein virus (HYVV), and mild curly top virus (BMCTV) for the rapid, high-yield plant-based production of recombinant proteins. Confirmation of the optimal combination by co-delivery of each replication-related gene and each IR harboring the Pontellina plumata-derived turbo green fluorescence protein (tGFP) gene via agroinfiltration in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves resulted in efficient replicon amplification and robust protein production within 3 days. Co-expression with the p19 protein of the tomato bush stunt virus, a gene-silencing suppressor, further enhanced tGFP accumulation by stabilizing mRNA. With this system, tGFP protein was produced at 0.7–1.2 mg/g leaf fresh weight, corresponding to 6.9–12.1% in total soluble protein. These results demonstrate the advantages of rapid and high-level production of recombinant proteins using the geminiviral DNA replicon system for transient expression in plants.
1 Introduction
Plant-based expression systems have emerged as promising alternatives to traditional systems, such as mammalian cells, insect cell cultures, and yeast or bacterial fermentation. Plant-derived recombinant proteins have many advantages, including high scalability, low upstream costs, and improved safety (; ; ). Both stable transformation and transient expression approaches have been investigated for producing recombinant proteins in plants. Although using stable transgenic plants are well-established, Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression is an attractive alternative because it significantly reduces development and production timelines. Although plant-based production of recombinant proteins has been greatly improved by the use of transient expression systems, the low yield of some proteins remains a problem, and efforts to increase expression levels (; ; ). Various viral vectors can be used to amplify target genes, leading to the increased expression of recombinant proteins. Previous studies have used plant RNA viruses, such as alfalfa mosaic virus (Yusibov et al., 2002), cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) (), potato virus X (; ), and tomato mosaic virus (), to create plant expression vectors that can increase the expression of recombinant proteins in plants. In addition, some DNA viruses, such as geminiviruses, have moved to the spotlight as highly effective expression vectors (; ).
Geminiviruses are a family of plant viruses with circular, single-stranded DNA genomes (). These viruses are characterized by a relatively small genome (~3.0 kb) and can replicate their genome in enormously large copy numbers in infected (). Although they are highly effective for recombinant protein expression in plants, their cloning capacity is limited, and they have a narrow host range. A deconstructed viral vector approach, which involves the removal of undesired viral genes related to movement and coat proteins and their replacement with an expression cassette, resulting in a smaller and more efficient vector, has been developed to overcome these limitations (). Replicons replicate after delivery to the plant cells and increase the copy number of the carried DNA, leading to high levels of target gene expression (). This approach has been successfully used to generate geminiviral replicon-based deconstructed vectors for the expression of reporter proteins, antigen proteins as vaccine candidates, and monoclonal antibodies (, ; ; ; ; ).
Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) and honeysuckle yellow vein virus (HYVV) belong to the genus Begomovirus (; ; Wang et al., 2011), while beet mild curly top virus (BMCTV) is a member of the genus Curtovirus (), which have a monopartite genome. Monopartite begomoviruses and curtoviruses have similar genomic structures and encode 6 or 7 multifunctional proteins (; Zerbini et al., 2017). They have an intergenic region (IR), including the origin of replication and bidirectional promoters for the expression of viral genes, and encode two or three proteins in the virion-sense strand, V1, V2, and V3 (curtoviruses only), and four proteins in the complementary strand, C1, C2, C3, and C4.
The replication of each T-DNA replicon is seen as being crucial for gene amplification in geminivirus replication systems. For this, it is essential IR and Rep protein encoded by the C1 ORF. IR carries the universal TAATATT/AC motif, which is required for the cleavage and joining of viral DNA during replication (, ). The replication-associated protein (Rep) encoded by the C1 open reading frame (ORF) is conserved in sequence, position, and function. Rep is essential for rolling circle replication (RCR) in geminiviruses and initiates DNA replication under the control of the bidirectional core promoter in IR (). Rep binds to the Rep complex-binding site, which contains a directly repeated sequence between the TATA box and the transcription start site, to initiate RCR () (Supplementary Figure S1). Transcription activation protein (TrAP) encoded by the C2 ORF is a multifunctional protein involved in gene activation, viral pathogenicity, and suppression of gene silencing (; ). The replication enhancer (REn), encoded by the C3 ORF, enhances viral DNA accumulation via interaction with the Rep protein and promotes symptom development (; ; ). Taken together, these proteins have evolved into a multifunctional nature and have contributed to the viral genetic economy because of their very small genomes. Protein multifunctionality, together with overlapping genes, is evidence of the plasticity through which evolution brings together functional domains into a single polypeptide chain. Although many of these interactions and their biological functions have been elucidated, the optimization of viral replication systems for the production of recombinant proteins in plant-based transient expression systems remains poorly understood.
Nicotiana benthamiana is one of the most widely used hosts for the transient expression of recombinant proteins because of its advantages over other plant systems, including fast growth, high biomass, and efficient infiltration of A. tumefaciens (; ). These systems with virus-based vectors can produce high-level expression of recombinant proteins, sometimes accumulating more than 5 g of target proteins per kilogram of leaf fresh weight within a few days (; ; Yamamoto et al., 2018). It is conceivable that N. benthamiana-based virus expression systems are attractive and may be of significant importance in plant-based recombinant protein production systems.
Deconstructed viral vectors based on three Geminiviridae-belonging viruses, TYLCV, HYVV, and BMCTV, were constructed for high expression of recombinant proteins in this study. We used Pontellina plumata-derived turbo GFP (tGFP) with each IR and co-delivered it to each replication-related gene (C1/C2/C3) for transient expression in N. benthamiana leaves. We cloned the C1 (C1 and modified C2), C12 (C1, C2, and modified C3), or C123 (C1, C2, and C3) genes of the three geminiviruses and fused the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S short promoter (s35SP) for driving expression, and each IR-carrying tGFP under the control of the 35S double promoter (d35SP) and PinII terminator (PinIIT) in a plant expression vector. The rapidity, simplicity, and high yield potential of this vector system greatly enhance the commercial feasibility of recombinant protein production in plants.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Cloning of geminiviral DNA elements and vector construction
The MoClo system, based on Golden Gate cloning technology, has been used for viral gene cloning and binary vector construction for plant transformation (Weber et al., 2011; ; ). Briefly, restriction-ligations were set up in one tube containing approximately 20 fmol of each plasmid DNA, 10 U of the required type IIS restriction enzymes, such as BsaI and BpiI (New England BioLabs, Frankfurt, Germany), 10 U T4 DNA ligase, and 1×T4 DNA ligase buffer (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany) in a final reaction volume of 20 μL. The reaction was incubated in a thermocycler for 5 hours at 37°C, 5 min at 50°C and 10 min at 80°C. The mixture was transformed into competent DH5α cells using heat shock. Colonies were selected on LB plates containing appropriate antibiotics and extrapolated for the entire transformation.
Level 0 (L0) fragments were synthesized as linear fragments and cloned into the pBHK cloning vector (Bioneer, Daejeon, Republic of Korea). Adaptor sequences were introduced at both the 5′- and 3′- ends of the recognition site of BpiI or BsaI type IIS restriction enzyme as design changes prior to synthesis during initial assembly. For geminiviral-based deconstructed vector construction, viral sequences for L0 parts were based on the genome of the TYLCV Korean Isolate (2,774 bp, GenBank accession no. KF225312), the HYVV Korean Isolate (2,763 bp, GenBank accession no. GQ477135), and the BMCTV Worland isolate (2,930 bp, GenBank accession no. U56975). Overlapping complementary sense ORFs and the C1, C2, and C3 genes were modified and synthesized. For the replication-related gene expression vectors, the C3 start codon harbored in C12 (C1 and C2), and the C2 start codon harbored in C1 were modified to prevent spontaneous C3 and C2 truncation, respectively. The complete sequences are shown in Supplementary Figures S2-S5. ORFs of each synthesized replication-related genes in pBHK (L0), s35SP (L0; pICH41388) and NosT (L0; pICH41421) were inserted into Level 2 destination vector (pICH86969) using Golden Gate cloning method with BsaI to make binary vectors as follows: TYLCV-based replication-related gene vectors, pTC1, pTC12, pTC123, HYVV-based replication-related gene vectors, pHC1, pHC12, pHC123, and BMCTV-based replication-related gene vectors, pBC1, pBC12, and pBC123, respectively.
Plant codon-optimized Pontellina plumata-derived turbo GFP (tGFP, level 0; pICSL80005) was used as a reporter gene in this study. tGFP (L0; pICSL80005), d35SP, tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) 5′-leader sequence (Ω) (L0; pICH51288), and PinIIT (L0; pBHK) were inserted into Level 1-2 destination vector (L1-2; pICH47751) using Golden Gate cloning method with BsaI to construct expression vector pSPtGFP, i.e., the GFP expression vector. Each IR was cloned into L1-1 and L1-3 using PCR and specific primers (Supplementary Table S1). Each IR (in L1-1 and L1-3), pSPtGFP (L1-2), and end linker L3E were inserted into the Level M1 destination vector (pAGM8031) using the Golden Gate cloning method with BpiI to construct IR-carrying tGFP expression vectors, i.e., TYLCV-based IR vector, pTIRtGFP; HYVV-based IR vector, pHIRtGFP; and BMCTV-based IR vector, pBIRtGFP. The pSPtGFP expression vector served as a nonreplicating control. A schematic diagram of the geminivirus-based deconstructed vectors is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1
2.2 Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transient expression
Binary vectors were separately introduced into A. tumefaciens GV3101 by using 50–500 ng of recombinant plasmid in the freeze-thaw method, as described by . Recombinant strains were grown overnight at 28°C with agitation in LB medium supplemented with appropriate antibiotics for infiltration. Cells were pelleted using centrifugation 2,000 × g for 5 min, and then suspended in infiltration buffer [10 mM 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid (MES) (pH 5.6) and 10 mM MgCl2 supplemented with 100 μM acetosyringone] and diluted in infiltration buffer to OD600 = 0.5, unless otherwise described. When mixing the two constructs, each Agrobacterium concentration was set to OD600 = 1.0, and mixed 1:1. For co-infiltration with tomato bushy stunt virus (TBSV) p19 (kindly provided by Prof. Inhwan Hwang, POSTECH, Republic of Korea), each was set to OD600 = 1.0, and mixed 1:1:0.5. After incubation at 25°C for 3 h, cells were infiltrated into the leaves of 4–5 weeks old N. benthamiana plants grown in a hydroponic growing media at 23°C under a 16 h light and 8 h dark photoperiod at a light intensity of 100 mol m-2 s-1. The resulting bacterial suspensions were infiltrated using syringe without needles into fully expanded leaves through a small puncture ().
2.3 Polymerase chain reaction analysis
Genomic DNA was isolated from plant tissue using the NucleoSpin Plant II (Machery-Nagel GmbH & Co, Düren, Germany) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Genomic DNA was quantified on a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and diluted to 50 ng/μL. PCR was performed in reaction volumes of 20 μL using 100 ng of genomic DNA with Ex-Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan). The primers (Supplementary Table S1) used in the PCR analysis were designed to amplify each replicon recirculation and C1, C12, and C123 in the co-infiltrated N. benthamiana genome. The PCR products were electrophoresed on 1.0% (w/v) agarose gels, stained with StaySafe Nucleic Acid Gel Stain (Real Biotech Corporation, Taipei, Taiwan), and visualized under ultraviolet light.
Quantitative PCR was performed using a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) real-time PCR machine together with AccuPower 2×GreenStar qPCR Master Mix (Bioneer). Triplicate reactions were performed, and tGFP gene copy numbers were normalized using β-actin of N. benthamiana (GenBank accession no. JQ256516) as the reference. PCR primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
2.4 Quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNAs was purified from infiltrated N. benthamiana leaves at 1, 3, 5, and 7 day post infiltration (DPI) using the Spectrum™ Plant Total RNA Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and the residual DNA was removed with RNase-free DNase I (Takara, Shiga, Japan). First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 5 μg of total RNA and oligo dT primers using RNA-to-cDNA EcoDry Premix (Takara, Shiga, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis was performed with 100 ng of cDNA in a 20 μL reaction volume using AccuPower 2×GreenStar™ qPCR Master Mix (Bioneer, Daejeon, Republic of Koread). Gene-specific primers used are listed in Supplementary Table S1. qRT-PCR was performed with an initial step at 95°C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 20 s, 58°C for 20 s, and 72°C for 25 s. Fluorescence was recorded after the last step of every cycle. Three replicates were performed for each sample. Amplification, data processing, and detection were performed using the CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Quantification cycle (Cq) values were examined using the 2-ΔCT method to determine changes in gene expression.
2.5 Protein extraction
Total soluble proteins were extracted by homogenizing agroinfiltrated leaf samples harvested 1, 3, 5, and 7 DPI with 1:2 (w/v) ice-cold extraction buffer [200 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.0), 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 0.5% Triton X-100, and a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany)]. Cleared supernatants were obtained by centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C. The protein concentration in the leaf samples was determined using the Bradford Protein Assay Reagent kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) () with bovine serum albumin as the reference standard.
2.6 Turbo GFP fluorescence assay
The tGFP samples were prepared by dilution in extraction buffer and 100 μL of each sample was added to a 96-well plate (SPL, Republic of Korea) in duplicate. The tGFP fluorescence intensity was examined using a Victor3 microplate reader (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The excitation and emission wavelengths were 485 nm and 538 nm, respectively. All measurements were performed at 25°C and the negative control (extract of un-infiltrated plant leaves) was subtracted before graphing. E. coli-derived tGFP protein (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia) was used to generate a standard curve. Leaves expressing tGFP harvested at 1, 3, 5, and 7 DPI were viewed under UV illumination generated by a LAS4000 (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan).
2.7 Western blot analysis
Total soluble protein (25 μg) was mixed with sample buffer [10% glycerol, 60 mM Tris–HCl (pH 6.8), 2% SDS, 0.5M dithiothreitol, 0.01% bromophenol blue] at 25°C and were separated using 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then electrophoretically transferred to a iBlot 2 polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) Regular Stacks (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The protein-transferred membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat skim milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween-20 (TBST, pH 7.4) for 2 h at 25°C. tGFP protein was detected with mouse anti-tGFP monoclonal antibody (Origene, Rockville, MD, USA) at 1:5,000 dilutions. The secondary antibody used was alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) at 1:10,000 dilutions. The membranes were developed using nitro blue tetrazolium chloride and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Purified E. coli expressing tGFP protein (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia) was used as a positive control.
2.8 Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
The amount of tGFP protein extracted from the agroinfiltrated leaf tissues was determined using indirect ELISA. Briefly, a 96-well Maxisorp microtiter plate (NUNC, Roskilde, Sjelland, Denmark) was coated with tGFP plant extracts in coating buffer (15 mM Na2CO3, 35 mM NaHCO3, pH 9.6) at 4°C overnight, and washed with 200 μL of PBST (PBS with 0.1% Tween-20, pH 7.4) four times. The wells were then blocked with 1% BSA in PBS at 37°C for 2 h. After washing the wells three times, 100 μL of diluted anti-mouse tGFP monoclonal antibody (1:5,000) (Origene, Rockville, MD, USA) were added to the wells and incubated at 37°C for 2 h. After washing four times, anti-mouse IgG-conjugated horseradish peroxidase (1:10,000) (GenDepot, Baker, TX, USA) was added to each well and incubated at 37°C for 2 h. After five times washing, 100 μL of TMB (3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine) containing H2O2 solution were added and the plate was incubated for 15 min at 25°C. The enzyme reaction was stopped by quickly pipetting 50 μL of 2 N H3PO4 into each well. The absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader. To calculate the relative amount of tGFP in the plant sample, the OD value from each sample was subtracted from the untransformed plant OD value before converting by reference to an ELISA standard curve constructed with purified bacterial tGFP (Evrogen, Moscow, Russia). Plant samples were analyzed by diluting from 1:1,000 to 1:4,000 with a coating buffer.
3 Results
3.1 Geminivirus-based deconstructed viral vector construction
We deconstructed TYLCV, HYVV, and BMCTV strains belonging to the Geminiviridae family to develop viral vector systems for the high expression of target proteins. These vectors were based on the replication machinery related to IR and Rep to induce viral replicons and the transcription unit of the target recombinant protein gene instead of the sequence-coding coat and movement proteins (). This system used two vectors containing different portions of the TYLCV, HYVV, or BMCTV genomes. The first vector carried the transcription unit of tGFP gene and the IRs of the TYLCV, HYVV, or BMCTV genome, which are essential for each episomal replication, incorporating at its 5′- and 3′-ends, and the second vector contained each replication-related gene.
We modified and constructed vectors using MoClo systems to investigate the efficient combination of each IR and replication-related gene for the amplification of episomal replicons and high protein expression. Each IR-carrying tGFP vector, i.e., pTIRtGFP, pHIRtGFP, and pBIRtGFP, was controlled by d35SP, Ω, and PinIIT, respectively. PinIIT is a strong terminator () and reports have shown that the use of PinIIT results in 10–50 times greater HBsAg accumulation and 8.5−fold higher GFP fluorescence than NosT (; ). pSPtGFP was used as the negative control (Figure 1). Each Rep-supplying vector, i.e., C1ΔC2 (named pTC1, pHC1, and pBC1), C1/C2/ΔC3 (named pTC12, pHC12, and pBC12), and C1/C2/C3 (named pTC123, pHC123, and pBC123), was controlled by s35SP and NosT. Agrobacterium strains carrying these constructs were co-infiltrated at the same ratio, and N. benthamiana leaves were then sampled in a time-dependent manner.
3.2 Amplification of episomal replicons induced an increase in the tGFP gene copies
Following a previous report, genomic DNA was extracted from 3 DPI leaf samples () to confirm the formation of episomal replicons containing three different IRs, respectively, in co-infiltrated leaves. The formation of episomal replicon from T-DNA is essential for the amplification using the primers oriented for both ends (Figure 2A). Approximately 1.2 kb PCR products were amplified an only from circularized unit-length replicons (Figure 2B). The results showed that replicon formation occurred in the co-infiltrated N. benthamiana leaves. We also tested whether the amplification of episomal DNA was associated with an increase in the tGFP copy number. Real-time PCR was used to determine the tGFP gene copy number in co-infiltrated N. benthamiana leaves with each replicon vector combination. In combination with TIRtGFP and replication-related genes, tGFP gene amplification levels were high, ranging from 433- to 701-times compared to the negative control (Figure 2C). In addition, in combination with HIRtGFP and replication-related genes, tGFP gene amplification levels increased 201- to 731-times compared with the negative control (Figure 2D). The data indicated that the highest tGFP amplification was achieved with the combination of TIRtGFP+TC123 or HIRtGFP+HC123, which was 701- to 731-times increase compared to that in the negative control. However, in the case of the combination of BIRtGFP and replication-related genes, the tGFP gene amplification level showed a 2- to 11-times increase compared to the negative control (Figure 2E). Co-infiltration with BIRtGFP+BC1 resulted in the highest copy number (11-times) of tGFP gene among the combinations of BIRtGFP and BMCTV replication-related genes, which was different from the other cases (Figures 2C–E).
Figure 2
3.3 Episomal replication resulted in enhanced tGFP mRNA expression and fluorescence intensity
The impact of tGFP gene amplification on transient expression was determined by comparing tGFP expression of the three geminivirus-based deconstructed vectors. We investigated the potential of various geminivirus-derived IR- and replication-related gene combinations to enhance tGFP mRNA expression and fluorescence. Plant extracts prepared from samples taken from agroinfiltrated N. benthamiana leaves over 7 d were analyzed using qRT-PCR and tGFP fluorescence.
The relative mRNA expression of tGFP in each vector combination peaked at 1 DPI, after which there was a steady decline. The mRNA expression patterns at 3 DPI varied depending on the presence or absence of geminivirus-derived replication-related factors. In the case of tGFP only, the relative mRNA expression decreased to 87% at 3 DPI, and IR-carrying tGFP only, TIRtGFP, HIRtGFP, and BIRtGFP also sharply declined to 96.3%, 94.5%, and 88.2%, respectively, at 3 DPI (Figures 3A–C). However, when co-expressed with each IR and replication-related gene, relative mRNA expression was maintained at 47.8, 38.8, and 50% in TIRtGFP+TC123, TC12, or TC1 (Figure 3A) and 40.5, 51.6, and 63.1% in HIRtGFP+HC123, HC12, and HC1 (Figure 3B), respectively, compared to that of the negative control at 3 DPI. In contrast, BMCTV-related combinations showed lower mRNA expression in all combinations compared to the negative control at 1 DPI and dropped quickly as in the controls, with the exception of BIRtGFP+BC1, which was maintained at 99.8% at 3 DPI (Figure 3C).
Figure 3
The expression levels among vector combinations were further compared by determining the fluorescence intensity of the crude extract of agroinfiltrated N. benthamiana leaf tissues transiently expressing tGFP with various vector combinations. Unlike the maximum mRNA expression at 1 DPI, no tGFP fluorescence was detected, and the highest fluorescence was quantified at 3 DPI for all combinations, after which it decreased. Leaf tissues co-infiltrated with TIRtGFP+TC123, HIRtGFP+HC123, or BIRtGFP+BC1 showed the highest fluorescence intensity of vector combinations with high mRNA expression (Figure 3). The relative fluorescence intensities of TIRtGFP+TC123, HIRtGFP+HC123, and BIRtGFP+BC1 at 3 DPI increased 31-, 22-, and 11-fold, respectively, compared to the negative control on 7 DPI (Figures 3D–F). When tGFP was expressed from TIRtGFP+TC123 at 3 DPI, higher mRNA expression and fluorescence intensity were observed compared to those of the other combinations and other DPIs (Figures 3A, D). These results demonstrated a similar correlation between replicon amplification and tGFP expression in various vector combinations, strongly suggesting that higher gene expression is due to the high copy number of replicons.
Each single vector or vector combination was infiltrated into a single leaf to determine the fluorescence intensity and phenotypic changes in tGFP in the infiltrated N. benthamiana leaf tissues. An illustration of the approach used to directly compare tGFP expression between different vector combinations are presented in Figure 3G. Images are representative of tGFP fluorescence intensity and photographs of infiltrated leaves in TYLCV, HYVV, and BMCTV at 3, 5, and 7 DPI under UV and visible light (Figures 3H–J). The green fluorescence of the infiltrated areas at 3–7 DPI was brighter than that of the negative control under UV light (Figures 3H–J). Severe tissue necrosis was not observed under visible light in agroinfiltrated N. benthamiana leaves expressing tGFP with a combination of various geminivirus-derived IR and replication-related genes; however, inspection of leaves under visible light revealed that fluorescing leaf regions infiltrated with vector combinations were gradually brighter and curlier than those of the negative control as DPI increased (Figures 3H–J).
3.4 Post-transcriptional gene silencing suppressor p19 enhanced accumulation of tGFP mRNA and protein
We chose three deconstructed geminiviral vector combinations (TIRtGFP+TC123, HIRtGFP+HC123, and BIRtGFP+BC1) for high production of tGFP. Bottlenecks in gene silencing exist during the transcription in transient expression systems. TBSV p19 co-infiltrated to enhance transcript levels and protein accumulation in N. benthamiana leaf tissues by suppressing gene silencing (). We co-infiltrated a p19 vector with the three most effective combinations based on our data to test whether the expression of p19 in our replicon system can further elevate tGFP mRNA levels and fluorescence intensity. We found that co-expression with p19 resulted in a shift in maximal mRNA expression from 1 to 3 DPI. The highest tGFP relative mRNA expression reached 529-, 749-, 714-, and 726-times (increased 19.6-, 27.7-, 26.4-, and 26.9-times compared to that of tGFP at 3 DPI, respectively) in the tGFP+p19, TIRtGFP+TC123+p19, HIRtGFP+HC123+p19, and BIRtGFP+BC1+p19 combinations compared to the negative control at 7 DPI, respectively, and then gradually decreased over time in all three combinations (Figure 4A).
Figure 4
The fluorescence intensity in tGFP+p19, TIRtGFP+TC123+p19, and HIRtGFP+HC123+p19 reached the highest levels (2-, 7.1-, and 6.4-times, respectively) at 3 DPI, whereas that of BIRtGFP+BC1+p19 reached the highest level (18.5-times) at 5 DPI compared to the negative control of each DPI (Figure 4B). It gradually decreased, as did the mRNA expression for all combinations except tGFP+p19, which increased over time (Figure 4B). The fluorescence intensity under UV light was much stronger in the leaf spots infiltrated with p19 than in the leaf spots infiltrated without p19 (Figures 4C–F).
3.5 Geminivirus-based deconstructed vectors can be used in scaling up production of recombinant proteins
The impact of transient protein production was determined using SDS-PAGE, western blot analysis, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Plant extracts were prepared from agro-infiltrated N. benthamiana leaves at 3 DPI for determining tGFP protein production. The E. coli-derived tGFP as a positive control was observed at 27 kDa and β-actin was used as an internal loading control. In total, 25 μg of leaf total soluble protein (TSPs) from N. benthamiana leaf tissue samples at 3 DPI were separated using SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. As expected, SDS-PAGE gels showed the three major protein bands in the mass range of 14–45 kDa, i.e., ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase small (rbcS) and large (rbcL) subunits (). In addition, a 27 kDa recombinant tGFP protein were weakly and strongly expressed in agroinfiltrated N. benthamiana leaves in all three geminiviral vector combinations without p19 and with p19, respectively (Figures 5A, C). A faint 27 kDa tGFP band was detected in tGFP-only and HIRtGFP+HC123 combination, and distinct in TIRtGFP+TC123 combination. However, this was not observed in the BIRtGFP+BC1 combination (Figure 5A). In the case of p19 co-expression, TIRtGFP+TC123 and HIRtGFP+HC123 showed stronger tGFP bands compared to that of tGFP-only and BIRtGFP+BC1 (Figure 5C). Western blot analysis using a mouse monoclonal tGFP antibody at 3 DPI revealed that tGFP expression with p19 was higher than that without p19 in the tGFP-only, TIRtGFP+TC123, HIRtGFP+HC123, and BIRtGFP+BC1 combinations under reducing conditions (Figures 5B, D). The production of tGFP in co-infiltrated N. benthamiana leaves was estimated using ELISA (Figure 5E). When co-expressed with p19, tGFP protein production increased 4.8-, 3.4-, 3.9-, and 11.5-times compared to tGFP alone, TIRtGFP+TC123, HIRtGFP+HC123, and BIRtGFP+BC1 combinations, respectively, reaching the highest levels of 0.1, 1.1, 1.0 and 0.7 mg/g fresh weight (FW), corresponding to 1.9, 12.1, 10.6, and 6.9% TSP, respectively (Figures 5E, F). These results indicated that p19 can increase tGFP mRNA and protein accumulation, most likely by suppressing post-transcriptional silencing of the transgene in agroinfiltrated N. benthamiana leaves.
Figure 5
4 Discussion
We constructed the DNA-replicating geminivirus-based deconstructed vectors to enhance the expression of recombinant proteins. It was previously reported that several geminiviral vectors based on mastreviruses [bean yellow dwarf virus (BeYDV), tobacco yellow dwarf virus (TYDV)], and curtovirus [beet curly top virus (BCTV)] for overexpression (; Zhang and Mason, 2006; ; ; ; ). Several geminivirus-based vectors also have been developed for genome editing and virus-induced gene silencing (; ; ). Only TYLCV-based vectors has been reported to enhance protein expression; however, the vector was a disarmed TYLCV viral vector, not a binary vector using an Agrobacterium-mediated transformation or transient expression ().
Viral vectors were developed using IR elements and replication-related genes from TYLCV and HYVV, both of the Begomovirus genus of the Geminiviridae family, and BMCTV, which belongs to the Curtovirus genus. The degree of expression enhancement was examined using tGFP. The findings of this study are as follows: (1) The use of viral vectors led to a significant increase in both the copy number and transcript level of tGFP compared to non-viral vectors. (2) The increase in tGFP expression was the highest for TYLCV-based viral vectors, comparable to HYVV-based viral vectors, but significantly lower for BMCTV-based viral vectors. (3) The replication-related genes that most enhanced tGFP expression among vectors of the same viral origin were C123 in TYLCV- and HYVV-based vectors and C1 in BMCTV-based vectors. (4) When co-expressed with the silencing suppressor p19, the yield of tGFP co-expressed with HYVV- and TYLCV-derived C123 was approximately 1.1–1.2 mg/g FW and 10.6–12.1% TSP, respectively, indicating a high level of expression.
Viral vectors, including tobamoviruses, potexviruses, tobraviruses, geminiviruses, and comovirus-based vectors, have been developed to enhance the expression of recombinant proteins (). Among these, tobamovirus-, geminivirus-, and comovirus-based vectors have been the most successful. Using the magnICON system, a hybrid vector composed of elements from TMV, which belongs to the tobamovirus, and turnip vein-clearing virus, has been used to generate very high yields of recombinant proteins, for example, 5 mg/g FW GFP (), 2 mg/g FW plague antigen (), 2.4 mg/g FW hepatitis B virus core antigen (HBcAg) virus-like particles (VLPs) (), and 0.8 mg/g FW Norwalk virus VLPs (). In addition, viral vectors based on CPMV and bean pod mottle virus, both members of the Comoviridae with bipartite single-stranded RNA genomes, have been developed (; ; Zhang et al., 2010). The CPMV-HT 5′-UTR, which was made hyper translatable by removing the two internal ATG sequences, was inserted between the target gene and the promoter, and this insertion significantly enhanced protein expression, resulting in 1.6 g/kg FW GFP and 1 g/kg FW HBcAg (). This led to the creation of the pEAQ series of vectors that were smaller and more simplified (). The study utilized the pEAQ-HT vector to transiently express the four main structural proteins of the bluetongue virus (VP3, VP7, VP5, and VP2) in sheep. The results showed that Virus-like particles (VLPs) are formed, and purified VLPs have been found to induce a defensive immune response in sheep ().
Several viral vector systems utilizing geminiviruses have been reported for In-Plant Activation (INPACT), TYDV-based systems (), BeYDV-based systems (; Zhang and Mason, 2006; ), which have long/short IR (LIR/SIR) and two replication-related genes (Rep/RepA), and BCTV-based systems (; ), which has IR and three replication-related genes (Rep, TrAP and REn). Using these viral vector systems, very high yields of recombinant proteins were produced, including 0.8 mg/g FW HBcAg, 0.34 mg/g FW Norwalk virus coat protein (), 0.5 mg/g FW anti-ebola monoclonal antibody 6D8 (), and 0.55 mg/g FW human papillomavirus coat protein L1 ().
In this study, up to 1.2 mg/g FW of tGFP was produced (Figure 5E), showing a high level of expression. However, tGFP production was relatively low compared to 5 mg/g FW GFP using the magnICON system () or 1.6 g/kg FW GFP using a CPMV-based viral vector (). This expression was achieved by episomal replicon formation of the tGFP expression cassette by geminivirus-based viral vectors, resulting in a dramatically higher number of copies and, correspondingly, higher mRNA and protein expression levels (Supplementary Figure S1). The tGFP expression cassette formed a circular episomal replicon under the interaction between IRs at both ends and the proteins encoding replication-related genes (Figures 2A, B) and had a copy number approximately 700-fold higher than that of tGFP-only expression (Figures 2C, D). This is consistent with reports that vectors that replicate have 100-1000-fold higher copy numbers than those that do not replicate (). Furthermore, at 3 DPI, the tGFP transcript level of TIRtGFP+TC123 increased 7.9-fold compared to that of tGFP expression alone (Figure 3A). However, compared with the dramatic increase in copy number, the increase in transcript levels was only approximately 1.1%. This tendency is consistent with the results of recombinant protein expression in plants with geminivirus-based viral vectors (; ).
In the case of enhancement of transient expression of tGFP by the replication-related genes TYLCV and HYVV, the synergistic effect of C123 was the highest, and C12 was not statistically significant compared to C123 (Figures 3D, E). However, in the case of BMCTV, it was highest in C1, but C12 and C123 had an antagonistic effect, resulting in a significant decrease in fluorescence compared to tGFP alone (Figure 3F). BMCTV also showed little increase in tGFP fluorescence by C1, unlike TYLCV and HYVV, and the overall tGFP expression was relatively weak (Figures 3D–F). This seemingly correlated with the mild symptoms in BMCTV-infected plants (; ).
As shown in Figure 3, the expression of tGFP using the geminivirus-based vector was highest at 3 DPI, and the infiltrated leaves showed a slightly pale color, but the expression decreased at 5 and 7 DPI. However, the leaves infiltrated with both Rep and tGFP showed a pale green color and leaf curl. This is consistent with reports that when recombinant proteins are expressed using geminivirus-based vectors, protein expression is the highest in the early stage after infiltration, followed by a rapid decrease in protein expression by gene silencing and the subsequent induction of chlorosis and necrosis due to an increase in Rep and Rep-induced replicons (; ; ). Therefore, the co-expression of a silencing suppressor, such as p19, has been reported to help increase recombinant protein expression. When the p19 gene-silencing suppressor was added, transient GFP expression by the BCTV-based vector increased 1.6-fold increased ().
When comparing the transcript levels of co-infiltration without p19 and with p19, we observed that the peak of the former was at 1 DPI, whereas that of the latter shifted to 3 DPI. This indicated that p19 suppressed PTGS expression, resulting in increased expression (Figure 4A). We also observed that the co-infiltration of p19 resulted in stronger tGFP fluorescence (Figure 4B). TC123+TIRtGFP+p19 and HC123+HIRtGFP+p19 peaked at 3 DPI, whereas BC1+BIRtGFP+p19 peaked at 5 DPI. Furthermore, although the fluorescence of BC1+BIRtGFP+p19 at 5 DPI was the highest compared to that of the others, it was only approximately 73–82% of the fluorescence at 3 DPI compared to the other cases (Figure 4B). At 3 DPI, TC123+TIRtGFP showed a 7.9-fold increase in transcript levels and a 3.1-fold increase in fluorescence compared with tGFP, whereas TC123+TIRtGFP+P19 showed a 27.7-fold increase in transcript levels and a 7.1-fold increase in fluorescence compared with tGFP (Figures 3, 4). This indicated that p19 co-infiltration increased transcript levels by approximately 3.5-fold and fluorescence by approximately 2.3-fold. Protein electrophoresis and western blotting also showed that tGFP accumulated at much higher levels in the presence of p19 (Figures 5B, D).
5 Conclusion
Overall, we found that TYLCV- and HYVV-based viral vectors are suitable for high production of recombinant proteins. Although the yield of recombinant proteins was not as high as that of the other two viral vectors, the BMCTV-based viral vector had the potential to produce moderately high yields with less necrosis when expressing animal/virus-derived proteins, given the mild symptoms and an increase in fluorescence at 5 DPI with the addition of p19. We expected that BMCTV-based viral vectors might have an advantage over other viral vectors that offer a higher accumulation of recombinant proteins but have the potential for reduced biomass due to necrosis.
Therefore, we anticipated that these viral vectors could also be used to express viral antigenic or therapeutic proteins of animal/human origin with a high yield of recombinant proteins, and we are currently conducting experiments to prove this. Experimental validation is essential for selecting optimal vector elements to further increase the yield. These elements include a strong promoter such as the cassava vein mosaic virus (CsVMV) promoter (), a 5′-UTR as a strong translation enhancer, a double terminator combination that is known to further increase recombinant protein production and reduce necrosis, and the addition of a matrix attachment region at the 3′-end of the terminator ().
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.
Author contributions
N-SK: Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. K-RL: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JiL: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. E-JK: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. JuL: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. S-KL: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by a research grant from the Rural Development Administration (Project No. PJ01724501, K-RL).
Acknowledgments
We thank Prof. Inhwan Hwang (POSTECH, Pohang, Republic of Korea) for kindly providing the TBSV p19 expression vector.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1407240/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AnG.MitraA.ChoiH. K.CostaM. A.AnK.ThornburgR. W.et al. (1989). Functional analysis of the 3′ control region of the potato wound-inducible proteinase inhibitor II gene. Plant Cell.1, 115–122. doi: 10.1105/tpc.1.1.115
2
Argüello-AstorgaG. R.Guevara-GonzálezR. G.Herrera-EstrellaL. R.Rivera-BustamanteR. F. (1994). Geminivirus replication origins have a group-specific organization of iterative elements: a model for replication. Virology203, 90–100. doi: 10.1006/viro.1994.1458
3
BaltesN. J.Gil-HumanesJ.CermakT.AtkinsP. A.VoytasD. F. (2014). DNA replicons for plant genome engineering. Plant Cell.26, 151–163. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.119792
4
BhattacharjeeB.HallanV. (2022). Geminivirus-derived vectors as tools for functional genomics. Front. Microbiol.13. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.799345
5
BradfordM. M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem.72, 248–254. doi: 10.1006/abio.1976.9999
6
CermákT.BaltesN. J.ČeganR.ZhangY.VoytasD. F. (2015). High-frequency, precise modification of the tomato genome. Genome Biol.16, 232. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0796-9
7
ChenQ.DavisK. R. (2016). The potential of plants as a system for the development and production of human biologics. F1000Res5, 912. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8010.1
8
ChenQ.LaiH. (2013). Plant-derived virus-like particles as vaccines. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother.9, 26–49. doi: 10.4161/hv.22218
9
ChungH. Y.LeeH. H.KimK. I.ChungH. Y.Hwang-BoJ.ParkJ. H.et al. (2011). Expression of a recombinant chimeric protein of hepatitis A virus VP1-Fc using a replicating vector based on Beet curly top virus in tobacco leaves and its immunogenicity in mice. Plant Cell Rep.30, 1513–1521. doi: 10.1007/s00299-011-1062-6
10
DiamosA. G.MasonH. S. (2018a). Modifying the replication of geminiviral vectors reduces cell death and enhances expression of biopharmaceutical proteins in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. Front. Plant Sci.9. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01974
11
DiamosA. G.MasonH. S. (2018b). Chimeric 3′ flanking regions strongly enhance gene expression in plants. Plant Biotechnol. J.16, 1971–1982. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12931
12
DugdaleB.MortimerC. L.KatoM.JamesT. A.HardingR. M.DaleJ. L. (2013). In plant activation: an inducible, hyperexpression platform for recombinant protein production in plants. Plant Cell.25, 2429–2443. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.113944
13
EllisR. J. (1979). The Most abundant protein in the world. Trends Biochem. Sci.4, 241–244. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(79)90212-3
14
EnglerC.YoulesM.GruetznerR.EhnertT. M.WernerS.JonesJ. D.et al. (2014). A Golden Gate modular cloning toolbox for plants. ACS Synth. Biol.3, 839–843. doi: 10.1021/sb4001504
15
FondongV. N. (2013). Geminivirus protein structure and function. Mol. Plant Pathol.14, 635–649. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12032
16
FontesE. P. B.LuckowV. A.Hanley-BowdoinL. (1992). A geminivirus replication protein is a sequence-specific DNA binding protein. Plant Cell.4, 597–608. doi: 10.1105/tpc.4.5.597
17
GlebaY. Y.MarillonnetS.KlimyukV. (2004). Engineering viral expression vectors for plants: the ‘full virus’ and the ‘deconstructed virus’ strategies. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.7, 182–188. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.01.003
18
GlebaY. Y.TuséD.GiritchA. (2014). Plant viral vectors for delivery by Agrobacterium. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.375, 155–192. doi: 10.1007/82_2013_352
19
GoodinM. M.ZaitlinD.NaiduR. A.LommelS. A. (2008). Nicotiana benthamiana: its history and future as a model for plant-pathogen interactions. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.21, 1015–1026. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-21-8-1015
20
HefferonK. L. (2014). DNA virus vectors for vaccine production in plants: spotlight on geminiviruses. Vaccines2, 642–653. doi: 10.3390/vaccines2030642
21
HuangZ.ChenQ.HjelmB.ArntzenC.MasonH. (2009). A DNA replicon system for rapid high-level production of virus-like particles in plants. Biotechnol. Bioeng.103, 706–714. doi: 10.1002/bit.22299
22
HuangZ.PhoolcharoenW.LaiH.PiensookK.CardineauG.ZeitlinL.et al. (2010). High-level rapid production of full-size monoclonal antibodies in plants by a single-vector DNA replicon system. Biotechnol. Bioeng.106, 9–17. doi: 10.1002/bit.22652
23
HuangZ.SantiL.LePoreK.KilbourneJ.ArntzenC. J.MasonH. S. (2006). Rapid, high-level production of hepatitis B core antigen in plant leaf and its immunogenicity in mice. Vaccine24, 2506–2513. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.12.024
24
JyothishwaranG.KotreshaD.SelvarajT.SrideshikanS. M.RajvanshiP. K.JayabaskaranC. (2007). A modified freeze-thaw method for efficient transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Curr. Sci93, 770–772.
25
KimK. I.SunterG.BisaroD. M.ChungI. S. (2007). Improved expression of recombinant GFP using a replicating vector based on Beet curly top virus in leaf-disks and infiltrated Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. Plant Mol. Biol.64, 103–112. doi: 10.1007/s11103-007-9137-z
26
KobayashiM.Fuhrmann-AoyagiM. B.UtoA.MiuraK. (2024). Tomato mosaic virus movement protein enhances the transient expression of recombinant protein in the stem of the tomato plant, Solanum lycopersicum. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol.33, 97–101. doi: 10.1007/s13562-023-00857-x
27
LaufsJ.JupinI.DavidC.SchumacherS.Heyraud-NitschkeF.GronenbornB. (1995a). Geminivirus replication: genetic and biochemical characterization of rep protein function, a review. Biochimie77, 765–773. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(96)88194-6
28
LaufsJ.TrautW.HeyraudF.MatzeitV.RogersS. G.SchellJ.et al. (1995b). In vitro cleavage and joining at the viral origin of replication by the replication initiator protein of tomato yellow leaf curl virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.92, 3879–3883. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.9.3879
29
LiuL.CañizaresM. C.MongerW.PerrinY.TsakirisE.PortaC.et al. (2005). Cowpea mosaic virus-based systems for the production of antigens and antibodies in plants. Vaccine23, 1788–1792. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.11.006
30
Lozano-DuránR. (2016). Geminiviruses for biotechnology: the art of parasite taming. New Phytol.210, 58–64. doi: 10.1111/nph.13564
31
MahmoodM. A.NaqviR. Z.RahmanS. U.AminI.MansoorS. (2023). Plant virus-derived vectors for plant genome engineering. Viruses15, 531. doi: 10.3390/v15020531
32
MardanovaE. S.BlokhinaE. A.TsybalovaL. M.PeyretH.LomonossoffG. P.RavinN. V. (2017). Efficient transient expression of recombinant proteins in plants by the novel pEff vector based on the genome of Potato Virus X. Front. Plant Sci.8. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00247
33
MarillonnetS.GiritchA.GilsM.KandziaR.KlimyukV.GlebaY. (2004). In planta engineering of viral RNA replicons: efficient assembly by recombination of DNA modules delivered by Agrobacterium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.101, 6852–6857. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400149101
34
MarillonnetS.GrütznerR. (2020). Synthetic DNA assembly using Golden Gate cloning and the hierarchical modular cloning pipeline. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol.130, e115. doi: 10.1002/cpmb.115
35
MatobaN.DavisK. R.PalmerK. E. (2011). Recombinant protein expression in Nicotiana. Methods Mol. Biol701, 199–219. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61737-957-4_11
36
MontagueN. P.ThuenemannE. C.SaxenaP.SaundersK.LenziP.LomonossoffG. P. (2011). Recent advances of cowpea mosaic virus-based particle technology. Hum. Vaccin.7, 383–390. doi: 10.4161/hv.7.3.14989
37
MorT. S.MoonY. S.PalmerK. E.MasonH. S. (2003). Geminivirus vectors for high-level expression of foreign proteins in plant cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng.81, 430–437. doi: 10.1002/bit.10483
38
NaseriZ.KhezriG.DavarpanahS. J.OfoghiH. (2019). Virus-based vectors: A new approach for the production of recombinant proteins. J. Appl. Biotechnol. Rep.6, 6–14. doi: 10.29252/JABR.06.01.02
39
NavotN.PicherskyE.ZeidanM.ZamirD.CzosnekH. (1991). Tomato yellow leaf curl virus: a whitefly-transmitted geminivirus with a single genomic component. Virology185, 151–161. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(91)90763-2
40
PantaleoV. (2011). Plant RNA silencing in viral defence. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.722, 39–58. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0332-6_3
41
PasumarthyK. K.ChoudhuryN. R.MukherjeeS. K. (2010). Tomato leaf curl Kerala virus (ToLCKeV) AC3 protein forms a higher order oligomer and enhances ATPase activity of replication initiator protein (Rep/AC1). Virol. J.7, 128. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-7-128
42
PeretzY.Mozes-KochR.AkadF.TanneE.CzosnekH.SelaI. (2007). A universal expression/silencing vector in plants. Plant Physiol.145, 1251–1263. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.108217
43
PeyretH.LomonossoffG. P. (2015). When plant virology met Agrobacterium: the rise of the deconstructed clones. Plant Biotechnol. J.13, 1121–1135. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12412
44
QiuW.ParkJ. W.ScholthofH. B. (2002). Tombusvirus P19-mediated suppression of virus-induced gene silencing is controlled by genetic and dosage features that influence pathogenicity. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.15, 269–280. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.3.269
45
RegnardG. L.Halley-StottR. P.TanzerF. L.HitzerothI. I.RybickiE. P. (2010). High level protein expression in plants through the use of a novel autonomously replicating geminivirus shuttle vector. Plant Biotechnol. J.8, 38–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00462.x
46
RichterL. J.ThanavalaY.ArntzenC. J.MasonH. S. (2000). Production of hepatitis B surface antigen in transgenic plants for oral immunization. Nat. Biotechnol.18, 1167–1171. doi: 10.1038/81153
47
RybickiE. P. (2009). Plant-produced vaccines: promise and reality. Drug Discovery Today14, 16–24. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2008.10.002
48
SainsburyF.LavoieP. O.D’AoustM. A.VézinaL. P.LomonossoffG. P. (2008). Expression of multiple proteins using full-length and deleted versions of cowpea mosaic virus RNA-2. Plant Biotechnol. J.6, 82–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00303.x
49
SainsburyF.LomonossoffG. P. (2008). Extremely high-level and rapid transient protein production in plants without the use of viral replication. Plant Physiol.148, 1212–1218. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.126284
50
SainsburyF.ThuenemannE. C.LomonossoffG. P. (2009). pEAQ: versatile expression vectors for easy and quick transient expression of heterologous proteins in plants. Plant Biotechnol. J.7, 682–693. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00434.x
51
SantiL.BatchelorL.HuangZ.HjelmB.KilbourneJ.ArntzenC. J.et al. (2008). An efficient plant viral expression system generating orally immunogenic Norwalk virus-like particles. Vaccine26, 1846–1854. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.01.053
52
SantiL.GiritchA.RoyC. J.MarillonnetS.KlimyukV.GlebaY.et al. (2006). Protection conferred by recombinant Yersinia pestis antigens produced by a rapid and highly scalable plant expression system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.103, 861–866. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510014103
53
ShivaprasadP. V.AkbergenovR.TrinksD.RajeswaranR.VeluthambiK.HohnT.et al. (2005). Promoters, transcripts, and regulatory proteins of Mungbean yellow mosaic geminivirus. J. Virol.79, 8149–8163. doi: 10.1128/JVI.79.13.8149-8163.2005
54
SindarovskaY.KuchukM. (2021). Long-term Potato Virus X (PVX)-based transient expression of recombinant GFP protein in Nicotiana benthamiana culture in vitro. Plants (Basel)10, 2187. doi: 10.3390/plants10102187
55
SotoM. J.GilbertsonR. L. (2003). Distribution and rate of movement of the Curtovirus Beet mild curly top virus (family Geminiviridae) in the beet leafhopper. Phytopathology93, 478–484. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.4.478
56
StanleyJ. (1985). The molecular biology of geminiviruses. Adv. Virus Res.30, 139–177. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3527(08)60450-9
57
StrausbaughC. A.WintermantelW. M.GillenA. M.EujaylI. A. (2008). Curly top survey in the western United States. Phytopathology98, 1212–1217. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-98-11-1212
58
ThuenemannE. C.MeyersA. E.VerweyJ.RybickiE. P.LomonossoffG. P. (2013). A method for rapid production of heteromultimeric protein complexes in plants: assembly of protective bluetongue virus-like particles. Plant Biotechnol. J.11, 839–846. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12076
59
TimmermansM. C. P.DasO. P.MessingJ. (1994). Geminiviruses and their uses as extrachromosomal replicons. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.45, 79–112. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.45.060194.000455
60
TuséD.TuT.McDonaldK. A. (2014). Manufacturing economics of plant-made Biologics: case studies in therapeutic and industrial enzymes. BioMed. Res. Int.2014, 256135. doi: 10.1155/2014/256135
61
WangM.LuY.BotellaJ. R.MaoY.HuaK.ZhuJ. K. (2017). Gene targeting by homology-directed repair in rice using a geminivirus-based CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol. Plant10, 1007–1010. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.03.002
62
WangM. B.MasutaC.SmithN. A.ShimuraH. (2012). RNA silencing and plant viral diseases. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.25, 1275–1285. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-04-12-0093-CR
63
WangY.JiJ.OhT.-K.OhS.KimS. H.LeeH. J.et al. (2011). Occurrence of honeysuckle yellow vein virus (HYVV) containing a monopartite DNA-A genome in Korea. Eur. J. Plant Pathol.129, 361–370. doi: 10.1007/s10658-010-9716-8
64
WeberE.EnglerC.GruetznerR.WernerS.MarillonnetS. (2011). A modular cloning system for standardized assembly of multigene constructs. PloS One6, e16765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016765
65
YamamotoT.HoshikawaK.EzuraK.OkazawaR.FujitaS.TakaokaM.et al. (2018). Improvement of the transient expression system for production of recombinant proteins in plants. Sci. Rep.8, 4755. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23024-y
66
YusibovV.HooperD. C.SpitsinS. V.FleyshN.KeanR. B.MikheevaT.et al. (2002). Expression in plants and immunogenicity of plant virus-based experimental rabies vaccine. Vaccine20, 3155–3164. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00260-8
67
ZerbiniF. M.BriddonR. W.IdrisA.MartinD. P.MorionesE.Navas-CastilloJ.et al. (2017). ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Geminiviridae. J. Gen. Virol.98, 131–133. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000738
68
ZhangC.BradshawJ. D.WhithamS. A.HillJ. H. (2010). The development of an efficient multipurpose bean pod mottle virus viral vector set for foreign gene expression and RNA silencing. Plant Physiol.153, 52–65. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.151639
69
ZhangX.MasonH. (2006). Bean yellow dwarf virus replicons for high-level transgene expression in transgenic plants and cell cultures. Biotechnol. Bioeng.93, 271–279. doi: 10.1002/bit.20695
Summary
Keywords
viral vector, geminivirus, transient expression, turbo green fluorescence protein, Nicotiana benthamiana
Citation
Kim N-S, Lee K-R, Lee J, Kil E-J, Lee J and Lee S-K (2024) High production of recombinant protein using geminivirus-based deconstructed vectors in Nicotiana benthamiana. Front. Plant Sci. 15:1407240. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1407240
Received
26 March 2024
Accepted
08 July 2024
Published
23 July 2024
Volume
15 - 2024
Edited by
Moonhyuk Kwon, Gyeongsang National University, Republic of Korea
Reviewed by
Taeho Kwon, Genecellbiotech Inc., Republic of Korea
Hugh S. Mason, Arizona State University, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Kim, Lee, Lee, Kil, Lee and Lee.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kyeong-Ryeol Lee, realdanny@korea.kr
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.