Abstract
Drought is a major factor affecting crops, thus efforts are needed to increase plant resilience to this abiotic stress. The overlapping signaling pathways between drought and cell wall integrity maintenance responses create a possibility of increasing drought resistance by modifying cell walls. Here, using herbaceous and woody plant model species, Arabidopsis and hybrid aspen, respectively, we investigated how the integrity of xylan in secondary walls affects the responses of plants to drought stress. Plants, in which secondary wall xylan integrity was reduced by expressing fungal GH10 and GH11 xylanases or by affecting genes involved in xylan backbone biosynthesis, were subjected to controlled drought while their physiological responses were continuously monitored by RGB, fluorescence, and/or hyperspectral cameras. For Arabidopsis, this was supplemented with survival test after complete water withdrawal and analyses of stomatal function and stem conductivity. All Arabidopsis xylan-impaired lines showed better survival upon complete watering withdrawal, increased stomatal density and delayed growth inhibition by moderate drought, indicating increased resilience to moderate drought associated with modified xylan integrity. Subtle differences were recorded between xylan biosynthesis mutants (irx9, irx10 and irx14) and xylanase-expressing lines. irx14 was the most drought resistant genotype, and the only genotype with increased lignin content and unaltered xylem conductivity despite its irx phenotype. Rosette growth was more affected by drought in GH11- than in GH10-expressing plants. In aspen, mild downregulation of GT43B and C genes did not affect drought responses and the transgenic plants grew better than the wild-type in drought and well-watered conditions. Both GH10 and GH11 xylanases strongly inhibited stem elongation and root growth in well-watered conditions but growth was less inhibited by drought in GH11-expressing plants than in wild-type. Overall, plants with xylan integrity impairment in secondary walls were less affected than wild-type by moderately reduced water availability but their responses also varied among genotypes and species. Thus, modifying the secondary cell wall integrity can be considered as a potential strategy for developing crops better suited to withstand water scarcity, but more research is needed to address the underlying molecular causes of this variability.
Introduction
As a major adverse factor, drought impacts crops and forests, endangering yield, and causing important economic losses (; ). With rising pressure on food and energy production entangled with water scarcity and increasing global drought events, tackling plants’ intricate and multifaceted physiological mechanisms toward better water management appears to be crucial. Drought stress alters whole plant physiology triggering adaptive changes in cell homeostasis and plant morphology that are qualified as drought avoidance, escape, acclimation, tolerance, and resistance (). Growth of all organs is affected, ranging from the roots to increase water uptake, to the leaves to limit water loss, and to the whole vascular system to avoid cavitation (; ). Drought induces ABA signaling, resulting in stomatal closure to reduce evaporation which affects photosynthesis and reduces shoot growth, in osmolyte accumulation to counter cell’s dehydration stress and in root system increased growth to explore deeper soil. At the cellular level, drought-induced plasmolysis is sensed by mechanosensitive ion channels which regulate intracellular Ca2+ concentration triggering calcium signaling (Scharwies and Dinneny, 2019). Calcium signaling activates membrane NADPH oxidases RESPIRATORY BURST OXIDASE HOMOLOGUE (RBOH) D and F, generating apoplastic reactive oxygen species (ROS) which activate H2O2 signaling (Ravi et al., 2023). RBOH activation is additionally promoted by ABA through a series of phosphorylation relay events involving an array of protein kinases (). The central role is played by sucrose nonfermenting1 (SNF1)-related protein kinase 2 (SnRK2) which is part of ABA receptor complex. Its activation by ABA triggers mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades, calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs/CPKs), CALCINEURIN B-LIKE (CBL)-INTERACTING PROTEIN KINASEs (CIPKs), different receptor-like kinases (RLKs) and plasma membrane proteins. Among them, aquaporins, anion channels SLAC1 or QUAC1 and inward rectifying K+ channels regulate osmotic cell status and stomatal movement (; ). Peptide signaling is also involved in drought response. CLE25 peptide perceived by BARELY ANY MERISTEM1 and 3 (BAM1/3) triggers ABA biosynthesis (Takahashi et al., 2018), and RALF1 peptide perceived by FERONIA (FER) transduces signaling by ROP-GEF pathway (). Moreover, the proteins with disordered domains that could acquire new functions in response to osmotic changes are thought to participate in drought stress perception (; Scharwies and Dinneny, 2019).
Drought signaling pathways partially overlap with other signaling events including cell wall integrity (CWI) maintenance (; ; Swaminathan et al., 2022). Several malectin-domain receptor kinases, which are key transducers of CWI signaling, are induced by drought (; Wang et al., 2021; ). Previous exposure to stress tends to increase resilience to different stresses upon subsequent exposures resulting in cross-stress tolerance via mechanisms jointly called priming or stress memory (; ). Priming can involve epigenetic changes, accumulation of different protective or signaling compounds including hormones, or morphological adaptations to stress (; ). In agreement with these concepts, the modification of cell wall frequently results in increased stress resilience to biotic (; Pogorelko et al., 2013; Pawar et al., 2016) and abiotic (; Ramírez and Pauly, 2019; Reem et al., 2020) stresses and in activation of defense pathways (; ; Reem et al., 2020). Increased drought tolerance in lew2 Arabidopsis mutants, impaired in CesA8 encoding a member of the secondary wall cellulose synthase complex (), and in lignin deficient plants (; ; Yan et al., 2018) suggest that secondary CWI maintenance could be involved in its mediation. Defects in xylan structure affecting the integrity of secondary cell walls of xylem leading to irregular xylem (irx) phenotype are also known to increase drought and/or freezing stress resistance. For example, xylan acetylation mutant eskimo1/tbl29 and engineered plants with reduced xylan content and acetylation have increased ability to survive drought and freezing stress (Xin et al., 2007; ; ; Ramírez et al., 2018; Yan et al., 2018). Similarly increased stress resistance was observed in xylan backbone and reducing end sequence biosynthetic mutants irx14, irx9 and parvus (; Ramírez and Pauly, 2019). The underlying mechanism remains elusive but seems to involve an indirect mechanism that require strigolactone biosynthesis (but not signaling) (Ramírez et al., 2018, 2019) or KAKTUS function (), that mediate xylan integrity defects. Moreover, there is evidence that xylobiose which could result from xylan damage can act as a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) (). These observations indicate that xylan structure impairments could be perceived via CWI or DAMP signaling resulting in increased drought resilience. However, it is still unclear if different xylan defects in secondary cell walls cause similar drought responses, which would be expected if the same secondary CWI pathways were activated in these plants. Moreover, it is unknown if increased drought resilience is caused by the dwarf phenotype of the studied mutants which decreases water consumption. To answer these questions, we monitored growth and physiological responses to controlled drought exposure in transgenic plants with xylan backbone defects induced by various ways but specifically in secondary walls, to study: i) if the impairment of the xylan network in the secondary cell walls leads to physiological changes that mitigate the drought impact; ii) if the drought responses of different transgenic lines are comparable; and iii) if xylan-defect induced drought resistance is similar between herbaceous and woody plants. For the last objective, two well-established model plant species, Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis) and Populus tremula L. x tremuloides Michx. (hybrid aspen), having similarly impaired xylan, were studied in controlled drought conditions. These species were studied in high-throughput phenotyping facilities that implement a plethora of advanced technologies such as RGB imaging, chlorophyll fluorescence and hyperspectral imaging to capture subtle physiological changes. For Arabidopsis, this approach was combined with analyses of stomatal function and xylem conductivity offering a more holistic view of the drought response of xylan-impaired plants.
Materials and methods
Generation of expression vectors for plant transformation
The Aspergillus nidulans cDNA clones GH10 (AN1818.2; GenBank: ABF50851.1) and GH11 (ANIA_03613; NCBI_GeneID:2873037, XP_661217.1) encoding GH10 and GH11 xylanases, respectively, originally described by and obtained from the authors were used to create plant expression vectors. In the case of GH10, the sequence of native A. nidulans signal peptide was exchanged to the hybrid aspen (Populus tremula L. x tremuloides Michx.) signal peptide from gene PtxtCel9B3 (alias PttCel9B) (GenBank accession no. AY660968.1; Rudsander et al., 2003) with use of the following primers: OC9Bf1, OC9Br5, FC5f1, FC5r and FC5r1s (Supplementary Table S1) and the method described previously (). GH11 was cloned with its native signal peptide using the primers FC4f1, FC4r1s, FC4r1 (Supplementary Table S1). The entry clones were created using the pENTR/D-TOPO cloning system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden), and the expression clones were obtained using the Gateway System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in pK-pGT43B-GW7 (Ratke et al., 2015) for expression specifically in cells developing secondary cell walls driven by the wood-specific promoter (WP). The vectors (WP::GH10 and WP::GH11) were introduced into competent Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Smith and Townsend, 1907) Conn 1942, strain GV3101 using electroporation.
Intracellular localization of cloned fungal proteins in plant cells
Both xylanase constructs (with PtxtCel9B3 signal peptide or with native A. nidulans signal peptide) were subcloned to binary destination vector pK7FWG2.0 () using Gateway System (Life Technologies™) and primers listed in Supplementary Table 1. Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 plants were transformed using the floral dip method (). T2 seedlings were tested for the presence of GFP protein in plasmolyzed root tissue as described in . The confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica TCS SP2, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) used an excitation light at 488 nm produced by an argon laser and emission signals between 498 and 530 nm. To verify that the signal had the spectrum of GFP, the lambda scan was performed every 10 nm between 480 and 630 nm and compared to that of GFP (Supplementary Figure S1).
Arabidopsis mutants used and generation of xylanase-expressing lines
Three T-DNA insertion lines SALK_057033 (irx9–2), SALK_046368 (irx10), and SALK_038212 (irx14), all in Col-0 background, were generously shared by the authors (Wu et al., 2009, 2010). The wild-type Col-0 was obtained from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre (NASC).
Arabidopsis xylanase-expressing lines were obtained by Agrobacterium-mediated floral-dip transformation () of Col-0. Transformed seeds were grown on ½ Murashige & Skoog medium (½ MS) plates with kanamycin (50 μg ml−1) to select homozygous single insert lines by segregation. Two best-expressing lines were selected from six to seven independent lines of original WP::GH10 and WP::GH11 lines based on transgene expression levels determined by RT-qPCR.
RT-qPCR analysis
RNA was extracted using TRI Reagent™ (Applied Biosystems, Bedford, MA, USA) from three 8 cm basal segments of mature stems each from an approx. 20 cm - tall plant. DNA was removed using (DNA-free™ DNA Removal Kit; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden) and cDNA was synthesized with iScript™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories AB, Hercules, CA, USA). qPCR was carried out using 5 ng of cDNA per 10 μL reaction containing PCR primers at the 500 nM concentration (Supplementary Table S1) and 5 μL of SYBR green-labeled nucleotides in a LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), and a 384-well plate reader (CFX384 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System; Bio-Rad Laboratories AB). Expression levels were determined following the method described by using ACTIN2 (AT3G18780) and EF1α (AT5G60390) as reference genes and presented relative to the line with the highest expression.
Aspen lines used in the study
Hybrid aspen (P. tremula L. × tremuloides Michx., clone T89) was transformed by A. tumefaciens to obtain WP::GH10 and WP::GH11 lines as described in the accompanying paper (Sivan et al., 2024). Two or three lines with the highest expression were selected out of approx. 20 regenerated independent lines and propagated in vitro as described previously (Urbancsok et al., 2023).
Growth conditions
Standard growth conditions for Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis were grown under long-day conditions (16/8 h light/dark; 100 μmol m−2 s−1 light intensity) with a day temperature of ~22°C and a night temperature of ~18°C. Pots were covered with plastic masks and the soil was mixed with vermiculite at 3:1 ratio (v:v).
Water withholding experiment
For the complete water withholding experiment, plants were grown in a standard growth conditions except that a mixture of soil, perlite, and vermiculite (2:1:1; v:v:v) was used (Yao et al., 2018). The soil mixture was saturated with water, left to drain for two days at which stage the soil was considered to contain water at field capacity, and then used for planting the cold-vernalized seeds. The plants were grown without watering for 40 days, and then they were watered for estimation of survival rate one week later. Plants were considered as surviving when they generated new shoots or leaves. The soil water content was assessed weekly by weighing individual pots and comparing their weight to the weight of these pots after complete drying of soil (the weight of plants was negligible). The soil water content was then related to the water content at field capacity.
Growth conditions in Arabidopsis high throughput phenotyping facility
The seeds were vernalized and sown into 250 ml pots filled with 110 g (+/- 5%) soil (NF U 44–551, Botanic, France) saturated with water to field capacity, and placed on Plantscreen™ (PSI, Photon Systems Instruments, spol. s r. o., Czech Republic) transportation trays for 20 pots. Each tray contained one plant per genotype. The genotypes were arranged in five different ways to account for a positional effect, each arrangement replicated 8 times. Plants were grown in Plantscreen™ Modular Facility for 38 days. Day/night conditions of 16 h/8 h with 140 μmol m−2 s−1 of light (Neptune LED, France) during daytime, temperatures of 19°C/15°C and an average relative humidity of 60%. The soil moisture content at field capacity was determined prior to the experimentation, and three different watering regimes (Figure 1A) were applied by daily adjusting watering. The control, i.e. well-watered (WW) conditions correspond 70% (w:w) of soil water content, the moderate drought (MD) and severe drought (SD) conditions correspond to 50% and 30% (w:w) of soil water content, respectively.
Figure 1
Growth conditions in aspen high throughput phenotyping facility
Aspen phenotyping platform (WIWAM Conveyor, custom designed by SMO, Eeklo, Belgium) was used described by Wang et al. (2022b). Plants were grown for nine weeks under 18 h/6 h (day/night) regime with 160–230 µmol m-2 s -1 light intensity during the day, 22°C/18°C temperature, and the average air relative humidity of 60%. White light (FL300 LED Sunlight v1.1) and far-red light (FL100 LED custom-made, 725–735 nm) lamps from Senmatic A/S (Søndersø, Denmark) were used for illumination. In vitro propagated aspen saplings were planted in soil (K-jord, Hasselfors Garden AB, Örebro, Sweden) in 7 L plastic pots, watered to average soil moisture content of 25% to 30% (v:v), and covered immediately with transparent 8 L plastic bags for two weeks. Dry soil weight in each pot (determined using approximately 80 g of soil that was dried at 60°C for 6 days) was subsequently used by the WIWAM system to bring the humidity of soil to a configured target humidity (TH) level. After one week, the corners of the bags were cut open and after two weeks the bags were removed, and plants were watered automatically based on weight. After four weeks of growth, the soil humidity was reduced gradually over nine days by lowering the TH of WIWAM system from the starting 1.6–1.7 to 0.7 that corresponds to approx. 10% (v/v) soil moisture content for the drought-treated (D) trees (Figure 1B), similar to conditions used by Yu, et al. (2021). At the same time the soil humidity for the well-watered (WW) trees gradually increased over two days to TH of 1.9, corresponding to soil moisture content of 30–35% (v/v), the field capacity corresponding to TH 2.1. The weight of used water was replaced but weight of trees was not compensated by the system. D and WW treatments continued for an additional 3.5 weeks. During weeks three and four, all trees received 50 mL of 0.57% (v/v) fertilizer (SW Bouyant Rika S, SW Horto AB, Hammenhög, Sweden) applied every second day after imaging. Starting from the 7th week, trees received 60 ml and 40 ml of fertilizer every other day for WW and D sets, respectively. As a pest control, plants were treated with Nemasys solution containing nematodes (Steinernema feltiae) (Bionema AB, Umeå, Sweden) against flies on the third and sixth week of growth. The weight of these solutions contributed to the total pot weight and the amount of water given to plants was then automatically adjusted. Soil moisture in the pots was periodically measured approximately 7 hours after watering using WET-2 sensor (HH2 reader, Delta-T devices, Cambridge, England).
Phenotyping of Arabidopsis
High throughput Arabidopsis phenotyping analysis
Red-Green-Blue (RGB) and hyperspectral imaging were performed at 12:00 am every day in the PlantScreen™ Modular System. RGB images were obtained with a top-down camera (GigE μEye UI-5580SE-C/M - 5 Megapixels QSXGA Camera with 1/2” CMOS Sensor) to assess the morphometric parameters related to the rosette growth. Quadratic equations were fitted into growth kinetics data using Python v. 3.7, then, growth rates were calculated based on these quadratic equations in Microsoft Excel. Nine clusters of hues () were used for the color segmentation analysis. Hyperspectral image acquisition was performed in the range of visible and near-infrared spectrum (VNIR, 380 – 870 nm) and shortwave infrared spectrum (SWIR, 930 – 1670 nm) with two different cameras, displaying a spectral resolution of 0.8 nm and 2 nm, respectively. Chlorophyll fluorescence images were taken during night-time, at 04:00 am, when the plants were dark-adapted. The kinetic chlorophyll fluorescence imaging unit (1.4 Mega-pixel High quality CCD sensor, 35 × 35 cm) used a pulse amplitude modulated (PAM) technique with the Fv/Fm protocol, consisting of a F0 duration of 2 s followed by a saturating pulse of 800 ms set at 20% of intensity (~1137 µmol m-2 s -1) according to the previous study () and as recommended by Photon Systems Instruments. This protocol allowed to measure the F0, Fm and Fv parameters and to calculate the Fv/Fm ratio, also known as the maximum quantum yield (QY_max) of photosystem II (PSII). Image segmentation and automatic raw data processing were done using the PlantScreen™ Analyzer software (v3.3.10.7, PSI, Drásov, Czech Republic). Different parameters used in this study calculated based on the spectral values are listed in Supplementary Table S2.
Cell wall analyses
A pool of eight debarked mature hypocotyls from approx. 25 cm-tall Arabidopsis plants per each line were freeze-dried and finely ground using a bead mill (Retsch MM400, Haan, Germany). The alcohol insoluble residue (AIR) was prepared by washing the powder successively with 80% ethanol, 70% ethanol, 95% methanol, methanol-chloroform 1:1 (v:v) mixture, and acetone before vacuum-drying (modified from ). Approximately 70 ± 10 μg of powder from four technical replicates per pool were loaded onto a pyrolyzer with an autosampler (PY-2020iD and AS-1020E; Frontier Lab, Koriyama, Japan), which was linked to a GC/MS (7890A/5975C; Agilent Technologies AB, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The resulting pyrolysate was then separated and analyzed following the method by . Methanolysis-Trimethyl Silyl (TMS) analysis was carried out using 500 ± 30 μg of AIR material with an internal standard (10 μg of inositol) and five to seven technical replicates per line, alongside nine monosaccharide standards, as described in . Silylated monosaccharides were separated using GC/MS (7890A/5975C; Agilent Technologies AB). Raw data MS files were converted to CDF format in Agilent Chemstation Data Analysis (v.E.02.00.493) and then processed in R software (v.3.0.2; R Foundation for Statistical Computing) to perform data pretreatment steps, with baseline correction, chromatogram alignment, time-window setup, multivariate curve resolution (MCR) processing, and peak identification. The identification of 4-O-methylglucuronic acid was done following .
Hypocotyl histological analysis
Cross sections (100 μm – thick) of Arabidopsis hypocotyls of approx. 20 cm-tall plants were obtained using a vibratome (VT100S; Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, Germany) and were stained for three minutes with 1% (w/v) phloroglucinol dissolved in 18% (v/v) HCl, rinsed in water, and observed using a bright field mode of a DMi8 microscope (Leica Microsystems, Mannheim/Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a camera (Leica DFC9000GT). The proportions between areas of xylem 2 to the total xylem (xylem 1 + xylem 2) () were calculated for four hypocotyls per genotype from the three radii evenly spaced around the circumference per section (with ImageJ) of xylem 1 and total xylem, and assuming their circular shape.
Leaf water usage, water loss, stomatal analyses, and xylem conductivity in the stem
To assess the water usage per rosette area, the rosette areas of 40-days-old Arabidopsis were determined for ten plants per genotype from the RGB images, processed with scripts written in the object-oriented programming language Python (Van Rossum and Drake, 2009) at PlantCV library () available at https://plantcv.readthedocs.io/en/stable/analyze_size/. The total amount of water used by each plant during 40 day-cultivation was determined by pot weighing as the plant weight was negligeable.
The leaf water loss test was performed as described by using six plants per genotype. Entire rosettes were cut from 3-week-old plants two hours after dawn, promptly weighed, and placed in open Perti dishes on a bench in ambient temperature (22°C). After 3 h, they were reweighed and then dried at 60°C for 6 hours to determine the dry weight. The water loss from the leaves was calculated by subtracting the final weight from the initial weight, and the difference was divided by the initial water content.
Stomatal density and pore area were analyzed on a fully developed green leaf from 17 ± 1cm-tall plants using four plants per genotype. For stomatal visualization, a thin layer of transparent nail polish was applied to cover the abaxial leaf surface (Wu and Zhao, 2017), and the resulting imprint was analyzed by a Leica DMI8 microscope (Leica Microsystems). The imprint was divided into four sections having an area of 0.28 mm2 and all stomates in each section were counted to determine stomatal density. The stomatal pore area was measured as described by using leaves sampled two hours after dawn. Three leaf discs, 5 mm in diameter, were dissected from the collected leaf of each of four plants and exposed to light for 2 h at 22°C in a 10 mM 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES)/KOH buffer, pH 6.2, supplemented with 50 mM KCl to induce full stomatal opening at the start (0 min). Then, two discs were subjected to 10 μM abscisic acid (ABA), one for 30-min and another for 60-min, to induce stomatal closure. After each treatment, discs were transferred to a microscope slide and imaged using a Leica DMI8 light microscope (Leica Microsystems). The experiment was performed using 45 stomata measured per plant per treatment. Images were analyzed using ImageJ.
Xylem conductivity assay was adopted from the protocol used for rice (Wang et al., 2022a). Stems from eight 17 ± 1 cm-tall plants per genotype were dissected in water to avoid introducing air bubbles, placed vertically in PCR tubes filled with 200 μL of 0.5 mM rhodamine B (Sigma, 79754) for a 1-hour dye uptake period, and then divided into four successive three-cm sections and the side-shoots, which were weighed, frozen, and ball-milled into powder. The frozen powders were suspended in water at the same w/v concentration for each sample and 100 μL of each extract was analyzed using FluoroMax Plus spectrofluorometer (Horiba, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA), with excitation at 553 nm and emission spectrum measurements at 627 nm. In parallel, 100 μm - thick cross sections were cut from the stems between sections 3 and 4 using a vibratome (VT100S; Leica Biosystems) and observed under a DMI8 fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems) using 550 nm excitation.
Clustering of genotypes according to drought responses in Arabidopsis
Eight different Arabidopsis genotypes were examined in WW, MD, and SD conditions with respect to 18 traits, with measurements taken on the day of reaching the target soil moisture level (“early response”) and ten days later (“late response”). To evaluate effects of drought in each genotype, the measurements taken under MD and SD conditions were divided by the average values in WW conditions for each genotype. The clustering analysis was performed using the Ward Linkage method (Ward, 1963; ). Between 24 to 37 replicates per line, occasion, and treatment were used. The computations were performed in Python 3.7 using the code available at the github website (https://github.com/bdallard/xylan_backbone_effects).
Growth-related parameters in aspen
Plant height was recorded by the WIWAM system every second day during the imaging treatment as described by (Wang et al., 2022b). In addition, the WIWAM system acquired thermal top images of individual trees with the thermal camera FLIR A655sc (FLIR System Inc., Wilsonville, OR, USA). Mean pseudo-temperatures were computed in the object-oriented programming language Python (Van Rossum and Drake, 2009) using the PlantCV library (). The method used is available at https://plantcv.readthedocs.io/en/stable/analyze_thermal. At the end of experiment, the final stem height and diameter at the stem base were measured manually using a measuring tape and a caliper, respectively. The above-ground biomass was determined by weighing freshly collected plant stems with the leaves. To evaluate leaf morphology, leaf number 20 from the top was collected and its image was digitized using a scanner. The leaf area was then computed using ImageJ software, following the methodology of Schneider et al. (2012). For the belowground biomass determination, the pots were allowed to dry for 20 days, and then roots were cleaned, dried for additional ten days and weighed. Wood anatomical and mechanical traits were analyzed using SilviScan for samples dissected from the stem base using methods described previously (Urbancsok et al., 2023).
Results
Arabidopsis lines expressing fungal xylanases exhibited reduced xylan content, altered lignin content and irregular xylem phenotype similar to xylan backbone mutants
To modify xylan in specifically in secondary walls, we expressed fungal GH10 and GH11 xylanases under control of aspen wood-specific promoter (WP) from aspen GT43B gene (Ratke et al., 2015). WP was shown to drive expression in cells depositing secondary cell walls in Arabidopsis (Pawar et al., 2016). The relative expression levels of transgenes in basal stem tissues assessed using RT-qPCR showed that the two selected lines of GH10 had similar expression levels, but for the GH11, the second most expressed line (GH11.2) had only 2.3% of the expression seen in the first line (GH11.1) (Figure 2A). The GH10 and GH11 xylanases were targeted to the apoplast by a signal peptide. To verify this targeting, 35S::GH10:eGFP and 35S::GH11:eGFP constructs were introduced to Arabidopsis and their root cells were plasmolyzed to reveal the GFP signal in cell walls (Figure 2B). Wild-type plants showed no fluorescence (Supplementary Figure S1). This shows that the signal peptides were capable of apoplastic targeting.
Figure 2
To confirm that the generated lines had altered xylan structure, we analyzed their matrix sugar composition in the secondary xylem of eight-week-old hypocotyls by acid methanolysis -TMS, and compared with that of irx9, irx14, and irx10 mutants, with defects in xylan backbone elongation (, ; Wu et al., 2009, 2010; ). The results (Table 1) showed that xylose content was lower compared to Col-0 for all transgenic lines and irx mutants but the line GH11.2, in agreement with its low level of relative GH11 expression. In addition, the mannose content was increased in GH10 lines and irx mutants, and galactose and galacturonic acid increased in all lines but GH11.2 whereas glucuronic acid decreased in these lines which led to a higher ratio of methylated to unmethylated glucuronic acid, a defect previously reported in many xylan mutants (, ; ; Wu et al., 2010). Thus, GH10 and GH11 expression affected xylan integrity similar to the defects seen in irx9, irx10, and irx14 mutants, and led to compensatory changes in pectins and mannan. Pyrolysis-GC/MS (Table 2) analyses revealed a reduction in lignin content, in GH10 and GH1 lines, and in irx9 and irx10 mutants, compared to wild-type mainly driven by decrease in G-lignin. irx14 mutant showed an opposite phenotype – increased total lignin content caused by an increase in S, G, and H lignin. irx9 mutant was the only genotype with lower carbohydrates in addition to lower lignin content, which was partially compensated by increased S lignin and phenolics.
Table 1
| Col-0 | GH11.1 | GH11.2 | GH10.1 | GH10.2 | irx9 | irx10 | irx14 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arabinose | 22.5±1.0 | 24.6±0.7 | 19.1±0.5 | 24.9±1.1 | 24.5±1.7 | 32.2±2.4 | 21.9±0.6 | 27.3±1.8 |
| Rhamnose | 14.3±0.2 | 17.8±0.5 | 13.2±0.2 | 15.4±0.5 | 16.5±1.0 | 19.8±1.4 | 16.0±0.5 | 18.8±0.8 |
| Fucose | 12.5±1.0 | 16.9±0.9 | 11.2±0.8 | 14.8±0.8 | 13.6±1.2 | 16.8±1.9 | 13.8±0.5 | 13.9±1.2 |
| Xylose | 189.8±5.3 | 158.3±3.4 | 193.4±6.0 | 163.8±4.2 | 167.7±3.7 | 81.1±5.5 | 121.6±2.8 | 100.9±4.6 |
| Mannose | 7.3±0.3 | 8.3±0.3 | 6.8±0.3 | 10.0±0.5 | 10.2±0.7 | 11.3±1.0 | 8.9±0.2 | 19.0±1.2 |
| MeGlcA | 1.7±0.1 | 1.7±0.1 | 1.8±0.1 | 2.0±0.1 | 2.1±0.1 | 1.5±0.1 | 1.6±0.0 | 1.6±0.1 |
| Galactose | 20.4±0.8 | 24.3±1.0 | 16.9±1.1 | 25.1±1.5 | 23.3±1.4 | 29.5±2.5 | 19.6±0.8 | 26.3±1.7 |
| Galacturonic acid | 66.0±2.2 | 100.0±7.9 | 61.3±3.9 | 87.8±5.8 | 83.2±4.7 | 88.6±6.4 | 76.8±2.2 | 84.1±6.0 |
| Glucose | 40.2±1.1 | 60.0±1.9 | 38.3±1.2 | 46.2±1.9 | 34.9±1.7 | 19.1±1.1 | 53.5±1.7 | 35.7±2.2 |
| Glucuronic acid | 4.9±0.2 | 3.2±0.2 | 5.2±0.3 | 3.3±0.2 | 3.5±0.3 | 1.8±0.2 | 1.9±0.1 | 1.7±0.1 |
| Total | 382±10 | 410±16 | 365±8 | 390±10 | 380±13 | 302±22 | 330±8 | 345±3 |
| MeGlcA/GlcA | 0.4±0.0 | 0.6±0.0 | 0.4±0.0 | 0.6±0.0 | 0.6±0.0 | 0.8±0.0 | 0.9±0.0 | 0.9±0.0 |
Matrix sugar composition of cell walls in secondary xylem of eight-week-old hypocotyls of xylan-modified Arabidopsis based on acid methanolysis –TMS.
Data show sugar content (μg mg-1); means ± SE; bold font indicates means significantly different from Col-0 (Dunnett-test at P≤0.05). MeGlcA: 4-O-methylglucuronic acid.
Table 2
| Col-0 | GH11.1 | GH11.2 | GH10.1 | GH10.2 | irx9 | irx10 | irx14 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S lignin | 2.6±0.1 | 2.7±0.3 | 2.6±0.1 | 2.3±0.0 | 2.6±0.1 | 4.2±0.2 | 3.0±0.4 | 3.4±0.0 |
| G lignin | 16.0±0.5 | 11.1±0.3 | 14.6±0.1 | 14.0±0.1 | 13.1±0.1 | 11.5±0.5 | 9.4±0.7 | 17.6±0.6 |
| H lignin | 0.9±0.0 | 1.00±0.1 | 0.8±0.1 | 0.9±0.0 | 1.1±0.0 | 1.0±0.1 | 1.1±0.1 | 1.3±0.1 |
| Phenolics | 0.5±0.0 | 0.8±0.1 | 0.5±0.0 | 0.5±0.0 | 0.7±0.0 | 1.7±0.2 | 1.3±0.5 | 0.6±0.0 |
| Total lignin | 20.0±0.5 | 15.5±0.2 | 18.5±0.2 | 17.8±0.2 | 17.4±0.2 | 18.4±0.2 | 14.8±0.3 | 23.0±0.5 |
| Carbohydrates | 75.0±0.6 | 75.7±1.7 | 75.9±0.6 | 76.7±0.2 | 75.7±0.6 | 66.0±1.1 | 75.3±3.6 | 72.4±0.4 |
| Ratio S/G lignin | 0.2±0.0 | 0.2±0.0 | 0.2±0.0 | 0.2±0.0 | 0.2±0.0 | 0.4±0.0 | 0.3±0.1 | 0.2±0.0 |
| Carbohydrate/lignin | 3.8±0.1 | 4.9±0.2 | 4.1±0.1 | 4.3±0.1 | 4.4±0.1 | 3.6±0.1 | 5.1±0.3 | 3.2±0.1 |
Cell wall composition in secondary xylem of eight-week-old hypocotyls of xylan-modified Arabidopsis analyzed by pyrolysis – GC/MS.
Data are means ± SE (%); bold font indicates means significantly different from Col-0 (Dunnett-test at P≤0.05).
The cell wall chemical composition analyses were carried out in the secondary xylem of hypocotyl, which contains two types of tissue, xylem 1 having lignified vessel elements and non-lignified parenchyma cells, and xylem 2 having lignified vessel elements and lignified fibers (). To attest that the differences among the genotypes in cell wall composition are not driven by secondary xylem tissue composition, the anatomy of hypocotyls was analyzed and the areas of xylem 1 and xylem 2 were determined (Supplementary Figures S2A, B). We observed a similar ratio of xylem 2 to the total secondary xylem for all analyzed lines, except irx9 which had increased content of xylem 2. This indicates that differences in chemical composition observed among the genotypes except irx9 (Tables 1, 2) reflect changes in xylem cell wall composition.
Next, to test if xylan deficiency in transgenic lines induced irregular xylem (irx) phenotype as known for irx mutants (, 2009; Wu et al., 2009, 2010), we examined xylem morphology in the stem vascular bundles (Figure 2C). All lines but the low-expressed GH11.2 had the irx phenotype, like irx mutants. Majority of xylan-deficient lines grew like Col-0, only irx9 and irx14 showed approx. 50% reduction in rosette area, and GH11.1 line rosette area was slightly reduced (Figures 3A, B; data for WW conditions). On the other hand, a slight increase in leaf slenderness was observed in GH10.2 and GH11.2 lines, which could be interpreted as effect of minor xylan alterations.
Figure 3
Xylan integrity status affected different aspects of plant reaction to drought stress in Arabidopsis
Controlled drought stress
To investigate responses of xylan-compromised plants to reduced soil water content, we reduced watering to reach approx. 50% and 30% of the water content at field capacity to simulate MD and SD, respectively. These levels were reached after 5 and 10 days, respectively, from the start of the drought treatment (Figure 1A). The soil water content level in the control WW condition was maintained at 70% of water content at field capacity. The plants were monitored until day 38 at which point the rosettes were filling the pots, but bolting was not initiated.
Rosette growth was less affected in xylan-modified Arabidopsis lines than in wild-type by moderate but more affected by severe controlled drought
Representative images of rosettes of plants grown for 38 days in WW, MD, and SD conditions are shown in Figure 3A. Drought did not induce any strong stress phenotypes as wilting, yellowing, or curling in any of the studied lines but it affected the morphometric parameters (Figure 3B). In the wild-type (Col-0), the SD treatment reduced rosette area by approx. 40% whereas only a slight not statistically significant area reduction was recorded in MD. A contrario, the irx14 rosette area was not affected by MD or SD, revealing its resilience to the controlled drought. The irx9, irx14 and GH11.1 rosette was smaller than that of Col-0 for all conditions, however, the reduction of rosette area by MD (but not SD) expressed as % of WW area tended to be less in all irx mutants and GH10 lines than observed for Col-0 (PContrastirxand GH10vsCol-0<0.08). The leaf slenderness decreased in Col-0 when exposed to drought already in MD and no further change was observed in SD. In contrast, irx9, irx10, and GH11.1 did not exhibit reduced slenderness even under SD, but generally all xylan-impaired genotypes but irx14 tended to have more slender leaves than Col-0 in all conditions. irx9 reaction to drought was clearly different compared to Col-0 and other lines since it increased slenderness in MD conditions. In contrast, line GH11.2 showed a more pronounced reduction in slenderness in response to SD compared to Col-0.
The kinetics of rosette area showed that in Col-0, MD treatment negatively impacted the area five days after target drought level was reached (Pt-test ≤0.05) which is shown by the vertical dashed gray line (Figure 4A). However, from day 37, the rosette growth recovered, which could be the result of adaptation to the MD. The rosette area became smaller under SD compared to MD six days after the target SD moisture level was reached (vertical dotted gray line). Interestingly, in all xylan-affected genotypes, the first sign of rosette growth reduction under MD was detected much later, whereas under SD it was detected earlier than in Col-0, as shown by the dashed and dotted arrows, respectively. This indicates a better drought tolerance of xylan-affected genotypes compared to wild-type when coping with MD but worse when coping with SD.
Figure 4
Quadratic equations were fitted into the kinetics data for rosette areas with the coefficient of determination R2 > 0.99 for all the fits (Supplementary Table S3). The rates of rosette growth (calculated as first derivatives of kinetics data) at early and late stages of MD adaptation relative to WW conditions were increased in irx10 while other genotypes did not show any difference compared to Col-0 (Figure 4B). However, in SD, irx14 had a higher growth rate relative to WW condition during late response, whereas the growth rate of irx9 and GH11.1 at the early stage was decreased compared to Col-0. Interestingly, in three genotypes, irx9, irx14, and GH10.1, the speed of rosette growth increased at the late compared to early SD response, showing the adaptation to stress in these genotypes.
Effects of drought on fluorescence and reflected light spectra were altered in xylan-modified Arabidopsis lines
To study the subtle differences in plant physiology in drought stress conditions among the different xylan-modified plants, we analyzed their spectral values obtained using different cameras available in the PlantScreen™ system (Figure 1). The quantum yield of photosystem II, also referred to as the Fv/Fm ratio, is the most commonly used parameter to assess photosynthesis efficiency from the fluorescence camera measurements and changes in this parameter occur under drought stress (; Yao et al., 2018). In Col-0, Fv/Fm increased under SD compared to MD or WW conditions through the treatment (Figure 5A; Supplementary Figure S3A). Strikingly, Fv/Fm was lower in all xylan-modified plants than in Col-0 in one or more of the analyzed growth conditions. Moreover, the irx mutants exhibited differences in changes in this parameter in response to drought as expressed in % to WW conditions, compared to Col-0. irx9 plants showed a smaller increase in Fv/Fm under SD conditions whereas irx10 and irx14 mutants exhibited a greater increase than Col-0 in both, MD and SD conditions. This highlights that xylan-modified Arabidopsis responds in opposite directions between irx9 versus irx10 and irx14. Overall, based on the Fv/Fm parameter, all xylan-modified Arabidopsis lines showed differences in photosystem II efficiency compared to Col-0, with irx10 and irx14 having a stronger reaction to drought compared to Col-0, contrasting with irx9.
Figure 5
The water loss analyzed by the normalized water loss index (WLI/NDVI) increased significantly between WW, MD, and SD conditions for Col-0, whereas the reaction of irx10 and irx14 plants was reduced in MD or SD conditions, respectively (Figure 5B). This is in agreement with the previous conclusions that irx10 and irx14 might be tolerant to MD and SD, respectively. However, these mutants as well as irx9 and GH11.1, but strikingly not GH10 lines, had increased WLI/NDVI index compared to Col-0 under at least one or more growth conditions.
The Photochemical Reflectance Index (PRI) that is linked to photosynthetic parameters () was decreased during late stage of SD for all genotypes but irx14 (Supplementary Figure S3). The Plant Senescence Reflectance Index (PSRI) which corresponds to the carotenoid-to-chlorophyll ratio and serves as an indicator of leaf senescence (Merzlyak et al., 1999) progressively increased under drought in all studied genotypes and was the highest in irx9 under SD (Figure 5C). Lines expressing either GH10 or GH11 had lower PSRI compared to Col-0 in WW conditions and in one or more drought conditions. It was also true for irx10 in MD conditions. In addition, whereas the amplitude of response to MD expressed in % of WW status was uniform across all the genotypes, the response to SD was much increased in irx9, both GH10 lines and GH11.1 compared to Col-0. To conclude, the xylanase-expressing lines exhibited reduced senescence in WW and MD but these lines and irx9 showed a stronger induction of senescence under SD conditions.
Drought also impacted the leaf colors depicted through color segmentation analysis. There was a shift in greenness hues with the plant development, especially between the 26th and 30th day after sowing, which was more pronounced under SD conditions (Supplementary Figure S4A). At the end of the experiment in drought conditions, hue 3 and hue 5 became most pronounced whereas hues 4 and 6 became reduced, and therefore these changes could constitute the senescence markers. Hues 3 and 5 were intensified by the drought severity, whereas hues 4 and 6 showed an opposite trend (Figure 5D; Supplementary Figures S4B, C). All xylan-affected genotypes except irx9 reacted to SD and in some cases also MD with increased magnitude compared to Col-0. irx9 displayed a particular phenotype showing very high levels of hue 3 + 5 versus hue 4 + 6, and the strongest decrease in hue 4 + 6 in drought conditions. In general, the analysis of color segmentation highlighted irx9 having the most distinct phenotype and most prominent changes under drought but overall, we observed a general pattern of a stronger reaction to drought for all xylan-affected lines compared to Col-0, especially under SD.
Ward linkage clustering of different phenotypic parameters and genotypes allowed complexity reduction
To evaluate overall similarities and differences in drought responses of different xylan-integrity compromised genotypes, we used the Ward linkage clustering method (Ward Jr., 1963; ). Eighteen parameters (Supplementary Table S2) measured by PlantScreen™ system at early and late stages of exposure to MD and SD were expressed as ratios relative to WW conditions (Supplementary Table S4) and were used to construct two clusters, one for the MD and the other for the SD responses (Figure 6).
Figure 6
Some parameters, for example, hues 4 and 6, MCARI and the growth rate in MD, as well as the slenderness, the hues 3 and 4, the Fv/Fm, and WLI/NDVI in SD, clustered together at early and late stage of droughts, which indicates that these parameters were stable through the MD and SD treatments, respectively. These parameters provide potential predictive indicators for the plant behavior during stress. In contrast, some other parameters, such as NDVI and NDVI2, SIPI, OSAVI, and the fluorescence parameters Fo, Fm, and Fv, showed clustering according to early and late drought responses, in both SD and MD, indicating temporal differences in plant responses to drought.
In MD, irx10 and irx14 mutants were grouped together, separately from the xylanase-expressing lines and Col-0 which formed a cluster, and the irx9 mutant stood alone. In SD, the lower expressing line GH11.2 was clustered with Col-0 and GH10 lines, while the GH11.1 line clustered with irx10 mutant. irx9 and irx14 were not clustered with any other lines and exhibited opposite parameter values. This regrouping shows that the reaction to drought by xylan integrity-compromised plants depended on the intensity of drought. Interestingly, GH10 and GH11 xylanases induced different responses in SD. To conclude, the physiological responses to drought as monitored by these various parameters differed in genotypes characterized by xylan integrity defects and depended on drought intensity and duration.
Xylan integrity-compromised plants survived better the complete withholding of watering than wild-type
To extend our understanding of the role of xylan in drought resilience, we subjected xylan-impaired plants to complete water-withholding for 40 days and subsequent re-watering – mimicking the real field situation. Although both irx9 and irx14 exhibited decreased rosette size compared to other genotypes (Figures 3A, B), thus were expected to use less water, the soil water depletion was slower only in pots with irx9 compared to pots with other plants and this mutant was the only one that did not suffer any drought stress (Figure 7A). All irx mutants and GH10 lines used more water per rosette area compared to Col-0 with irx9 showing the highest water usage (Figure 7B). After 40 days without watering, wild-type plants exhibited leaf yellowing and withering but these symptoms were mitigated in xylan-affected plants, especially in irx9, irx14, GH10.1, and GH11.1 (Figure 7C). After re-watering, all xylan-modified genotypes but GH11.2 showed a higher rate of survival compared to Col-0 (Figure 7D).
Figure 7
Physiological parameters of xylan-modified Arabidopsis plants observed under well-watered conditions that could explain their reaction to drought
Xylan-modified plants exhibited reduced water evaporation and altered stomatal characteristics
Plants with a higher capacity to keep their water in their leaves might be more drought tolerant. To estimate how easily the plants lose water from detached leaves we exposed their leaves to ambient atmosphere for three hours. The percentage of lost water was reduced in irx9, irx10, and irx14 mutants and in the line GH11.1 compared to Col-0 (Figure 8A). Leaf water loss depends on the leaf stomatal function (). Interestingly, we observed that all xylan-modified plants but irx10 showed a significantly higher density of stomata than Col-0 (Figure 8B) and the size of their pores, except for GH11.1, were reduced (Figure 8C). To investigate the stomatal capacity to close in reaction to ABA, we measured pore sizes after 30 min and 60 min exposure to ABA. We found that the lines with decreased pore size prior to ABA treatment maintained smaller pore sizes after exposure to ABA. Moreover, irx9, irx10 and GH10.1 did not show a pronounced reaction to ABA after 30 min exposure. The closure was induced in irx9 upon longer ABA exposure (60 min), but not in irx10 or GH10.1. These measurements highlight the unique nature of each xylan-modified line while also revealing some similarity in terms of parameters determining stomatal transpiration. However, it is still unclear why some xylan-modified plants exhibit improved drought survival and reduced leaf water loss.
Figure 8
Vasculature conductivity was impaired in most xylan-modified Arabidopsis lines
We hypothesized that water loss and drought survival phenotypes could be related to changes in xylem conductivity, especially that most xylan-compromised lines described here exhibited irregular xylem phenotype (Figure 2C). Therefore, we measured xylem conductivity by monitoring rhodamine uptake into four successive stem sections and side shoots as shown in Figure 8D. Based on dye concentration and dye staining of the stem cross-sections, both irx9 and GH11.1 conducted significantly less rhodamine into the upper stem part (sections 3 and 4) than Col-0, indicating a reduced capacity for stems to conduct water in these genotypes, whereas all lines but irx14 had impaired transport to the side shoots (Figures 8E, F).
Xylan integrity-impairment strongly affected aspen growth and its drought responses
To gain information on the impact of xylan modification on drought resilience in woody plant species, we investigated drought responses in aspen plants harboring the same transgenes (GH10 and GH11 xylanases under the control of WP) and plants affected in expression of GT43B and C clade genes (homologous to IRX9 and IRX14) involved in xylan backbone elongation (Ratke et al., 2018). The lines with different transgene expression levels are indicated by letters: from a – the strongest to c – the weakest. The phenotypes of xylanase-expressing lines are described in detail in the accompanying paper (Sivan et al., 2024).
Plants were subjected to a controlled drought regime (Figure 1B). At the end of the drought treatment, the morphology of wild-type plants (T89) was severely altered compared with plants in the WW conditions (Figure 9A) with all measured growth parameters (height, leaf size, above- and belowground biomass) reduced, whereas leaf slenderness was not affected (Figures 9B, D, E, G, H). The rate of stem elongation decreased upon drought treatment to approx. 50% of the rate in WW conditions (Figure 9C) and the water usage per plant was reduced to approx. 20% (Supplementary Figure S5), with concomitant increase in leaf temperature (Figure 9F).
Figure 9
GT43 lines were taller than T89 under WW conditions and had higher above- and belowground biomass (Figures 9A, B, G, H) in agreement with previous reports (Ratke et al., 2018). Better growth was maintained under drought conditions in line GT43.a. The reaction of GT43 lines to drought was generally similar to T89 for all analyzed growth parameters (Figures 9A–H). We concluded that in aspen with mildly reduced xylan content due to the wood-specific downregulation of GT43B and C genes leads to better-growing trees that cope with drought similarly as the T89.
The lines expressing GH10 and GH11 xylanases in the wood-forming tissues grew significantly worse than wild-type, showing reduced height, leaf size, and above- and belowground biomass in WW conditions (Figures 9A, B, D, G, H). The shoot growth of line GH10.b (but not line GH10.a which showed a very strong dwarf phenotype) was more affected by drought than that of T89 considering height, leaf size, and shoot biomass, whereas the shoot growth of GH11 lines was less affected. Noteworthy, the line GH10.a did not reach the target water stress during the experiment so its drought responses are not comparable with those of other lines. All three GH11 lines and GH10.a line showed almost no effect of drought on root biomass in contrast to T89 (Figure 9H). The rate of stem elongation under drought expressed in % of the rate in WW plants was more affected in GH10 lines than in T89, but less affected in GH11 even though this advantage appeared to be transient (Figure 9C). This was mirrored by the change in daily water usage per plant (Supplementary Figure S5). The leaves formed under drought stress in all xylanase-expressing lines but GH10.a were visibly smaller, as in wild-type (Figure 9A) but the measurements carried on leaf 20 (Figure 9D) did not reflect this phenotype in very dwarf plants because leaf 20 was formed under WW conditions in these plants. The leaves formed under drought were less slender than those formed in WW conditions in line GH10.b, whereas leaves of lines GH11 did not differ in slenderness between drought and WW conditions similarly as in T89 (Figure 9E). Despite the increased drought inhibition of shoot elongation in the GH10.b line compared to T89, its shoot temperature was not affected while it was almost doubled in all other lines (Figure 9F). This indicates a higher transpiration rate per leaf area in this line compared to other genotypes. Thus, the GH10 and GH11 lines differed in many aspects of their shoot and root growth responses to drought from those observed in T89.
In all genotypes, drought significantly reduced stem diameters and these reductions were much smaller in GH10.a and all GH11 lines than in other lines (Figure 10A). The impact of drought on wood production and properties in xylan-modified aspen lines was assessed at the stem base by SilviScan. Drought decreased wood diameters in majority of genotypes but not in the two most highly expressing GH11 lines, and all GH11 lines showed reduced drought effects on wood production relative to WW condition compared to T89 (Figure 10B). While wood density was increased by drought in T89, either no change or a decrease was observed in xylan-affected lines (Figure 10C). Cellulose microfibril angle was increased by drought in the T89 and GT43.a plants but it remained unchanged in xylanase-expressing lines. Remarkably, all GH11-expressing lines had substantially increased microfibril angles in both drought and WW conditions compared to T89 plants. Overall, the wood production and wood properties were less affected by drought in GH11 lines than in the T89.
Figure 10
Discussion
Different xylan-impaired Arabidopsis genotypes showed common changes in their responses to drought
Characterization of the drought reaction in xylan-altered plants has revealed a plethora of modified reactions compared to wild-type, shedding light on complex plant mechanisms to cope with drought. Remarkably, disregarding line GH11.2 which had minor cell wall composition changes due to low transgene expression, all xylan-modified genotypes exhibited certain developmental alterations that expectedly altered their drought resilience. For example, all lines had increased stomatal density (Figure 8B) which could potentially influence transpiration rates. Also, all lines showed better survival rates after the re-watering (Figure 7D), including the genotypes without any growth penalty (irx10, GH10). Compared to wild-type, all xylan-impaired lines showed reduced rosette growth inhibition by MD but increased inhibition by SD (Figure 4), which correlated with increased compared to wild-type SD-induced increase in senescence index PSRI relative to WW condition (Figure 5C; PContrast allvsCol-0<0.0001). Overall, xylan impairment leads to better growth resilience under moderate or short-duration stress, but inferior growth maintenance under severe stress. Such a strategy could ultimately lead to a better survival.
The common reaction to drought observed in xylan-impaired Arabidopsis is connected to their altered secondary wall, with matrix polysaccharide composition depleted in xylose and enriched in pectin-related sugars (Tables 1, 2). These alterations are in one way or another leading to a weaker secondary wall as supported by the presence of collapsed vessels (the irregular xylem phenotype) (Figure 2C) (Turner and Somerville, 1997). This kind of defect has been correlated with drought and freezing tolerance (Xin and Browse, 1998; Xin et al., 2007; ; ; Ramírez and Pauly, 2019). The xylanase-expressing genotypes characterized here exhibited not only the irx phenotype in common with secondary wall mutants but also better drought survival. These phenotypes of secondary wall mutants were demonstrated to be at least partially dependent on the biosynthesis of carlactone – an intermediate compound in the strigolactone biosynthetic pathway (Ramírez and Pauly, 2019), which was shown to mediate these responses downstream the cell wall biosynthesis defect. These observations support the conclusion that secondary wall defects are mediated through specialized signaling pathway (; Ratke et al., 2018) leading to altered cellular and physiological responses.
Drought responses of irx14 and irx10 mutants correlated with their lignin content
We showed that the better survival rate after re-watering following uncontrolled drought observed in irx14 (Figure 7), and previously reported by , was not caused by reduced growth and thus reduced water usage () since the soil water content in pots with irx14 plants decreased during drought at the same pace as for Col-0. Moreover, we found that irx14 has increased ability to cope with moderate and severe drought compared with other xylan-impaired lines as supported by many different parameters. Controlled drought exposures indeed showed that among all genotypes studied here, only irx14 maintained rosette growth under MD, slowed down growth and reduced water content less than wild-type under SD (Figures 4, 5B) and responded to MD by changing Fv/Fm earlier than the wild-type (Figure 5A; Supplementary Figure S3A). This indicates that the photosystem II electron transport chain adapts to drought stress in this mutant in advance (Woo et al., 2008; ), enabling it to react faster thus cope with the stress better. Similar trend in Fv/Fm ratio was observed in irx10 mutant, but it could cope better with drought than wild-type only when the stress was moderate. The similarity in responses of the two mutants to MD is shown by their clustering together in MD but not in SD (Figure 6), when only irx14 showed better relative growth performance compared to wild-type. Two other specific features of irx14 not observed in irx10 or other xylan-impaired genotypes were: the normal xylem conductivity to the side shoots (whereas it was defective in other xylan-impaired genotypes) (Figure 8D) and the increased xylem lignin content while other genotypes had decreased lignin contents (Table 2). Whereas these traits could be connected, it remains elusive why this mutant shows such unique traits not found in other xylan-deficient mutants. It still remains to be investigated if IRX14 could complement increased lignin content of irx14 (; Wu et al., 2010; ; Ren et al., 2014), which could be responsible for exceptional drought resilience of irx14 (; Tu et al., 2020).
Subtle differences in drought responses were observed between xylanase-expressing Arabidopsis and irx mutants
The apoplast-targeted endo-β-1,4-xylanases induced sometimes specific drought responses, different than those of irx mutants. Indeed under MD, the xylanase-expressing lines clustered separately from irx mutants (Figure 6A). Notably, the PSRI values were always significantly higher in irx mutants when contrasted to xylanase lines (Figure 5C, supported by PContrast GHvs irx <0.0001 for each WW, MD and SD condition) and increase in PSRI under SD compared to WW conditions tended to be less pronounced in these mutants (Pcontrast GH10.1, GH10.2, and GH11.1vs irx <0.002). This indicates that leaves of xylanase-expressing plants have reduced carotenoid:chlorophyll ratio corresponding to lower senescence. Delayed leaf senescence was shown to play a role in drought tolerance (Rivero et al., 2007) and it could constitute a specific mechanism of increased drought resilience in xylanase-expressing lines.
Subtle differences between plants with synthetically- and post-synthetically modified xylan are to be expected. Altered xylan backbone biosynthesis in irx mutants could lead to substrate imbalance in the Golgi and the subsequent substrate-driven changes in the products by enzymatic reactions, as it was most likely causing altered xylan acetylation in gux biosynthetic mutants and changes in xylan glucuronidation in tbl mutants (; ). These imbalances are likely to be sensed by plants leading to specific metabolic and physiological adjustments. On the other hand, xylanase-expressing plants could be affected by the transgene product alone, which could be perceived as a PAMP (; Zhang et al., 2014), or by the product of xylanase activity – xylobiose – which can be perceived as a DAMP ().
GH10 and GH11 xylanases differentially affected drought responses of Arabidopsis and aspen
Whereas both GH10 and GH11 enzymes are endo-β-1,4-xylanases, their specificities slightly differ (, ; ). In general, only GH10 xylanases can hydrolyze directly β-1,4-glycosidic linkage in the xylan backbone adjacent to GlcA substituent at the nonreducing end, whereas GH11 xylanases display higher activity. This results in a different oligosaccharide spectrum that the two xylanases release from the secondary wall xylan (Persson et al., 2007), which could have different DAMP-inducing potency ().
In Arabidopsis, the effect of GH11 (considering line GH11.1) on cell wall composition was more pronounced and different than the effect of GH10 (Tables 1, 2). Also, GH11 had more detrimental effect on rosette area in MD (Figure 4A, PContrast GH10vsGH11.1< 0.0004) and early rosette growth rate (expressed in % of WW) in MD (Figure 4B PContrast GH10vsGH11.1< 0.09). This was correlated with both a lower Fv/Fm ratio in MD (Figure 5A, PContrast GH10vsGH11.1< 0.05), a higher water loss index in MD (Figure 5B, PContrast GH10vsGH11.1< 0.003), and a higher senescence index in all conditions (Figure 5C, PContrast GH10vsGH11.1< 0.0003). In addition, it was supported by severely reduced stem conductivity (Figures 8E, F) and transpiration during drought (Figure 7B, PContrast GH10vsGH11.1<0.02) in GH11- compared to GH10-expressing plants. Moreover, line GH11.1 exhibited much larger pore size than that of GH10-expressing lines regardless the ABA treatment (Figure 8C, PContrast GH10vsGH11.1<0.0001 for all treatments). The smaller stomata could help to mitigate the effect of the drought by increasing WUE and leaf water retention (Xu and Zhou, 2008; Zhao et al., 2015) which could have perhaps mediated a better performance of GH10 lines compared to GH11.
Opposite effects of the two xylanases on drought resilience have been observed in aspen, where GH11-expressing plants appeared more drought tolerant compared GH10-expressing ones. This was particularly striking when we analyzed the change in the rate of stem elongation (Figure 9C), xylem production (Figure 10B) and xylem density (Figure 10C) under drought. Likewise, the abnormally high leaf pseudo-temperature registered for GH10.b in WW conditions and no change in the drought conditions (Figure 9F) indicate low transpiration rates and impaired reaction to drought in this line. The latter is supported by a reduced effect of ABA on stomatal closure in Arabidopsis line GH10.1, compared to GH11 or Col-0, so with this regard, effects of GH10 might share similarities between the two species. Opposite effects of the two xylanases on plant growth in aspen and Arabidopsis could be related to different parameters that were measured, the rosette area in Arabidopsis and the stem height and diameter growth in aspen. It is also possible that the differences are caused by severity of stress signaling. Aspen lines expressing xylanases exhibited growth penalty under WW conditions, that was not seen in Arabidopsis. The aggravation of the impact of xylanases in aspen was expected as the altered xylan structures would affect proportionally more cells of its body compared to herbaceous plant, resulting in a stronger stress signaling. Finally, there are probably different mechanisms for coping with severe drought stress in plants with different lifestyles, particularly when considering annual herbaceous and perennial woody plants.
Conclusions and perspectives
Our research has shown that xylan integrity in the secondary cell walls is an important factor contributing to plant development under normal and drought stress conditions. By comparing different plant models transformed with the same fungal xylanases and targeting them to secondary walls or affected during similar stage of xylan backbone biosynthesis, we identified similar effects of different xylan impairment within a species as well as differences among different types of impairment within a species, and differences between woody and herbaceous species. Molecular mechanisms mediating drought resilience by these specific mechanisms are currently unknown and deserve investigations. We have shown that while obtaining transgenic crops with improved performance in normal and drought condition is feasible (e.g. GT43BC lines), increased drought resistance seems to be correlated with growth penalty under well-watered conditions and breaking this correlation is still a task ahead. Fine-tuning plants to survive a range of conditions is a challenge that needs to be addressed with very thorough attention as we demonstrate the plant’s reaction to subtle changes in the xylan could lead to various physiological adjustments. This work also illustrates that stress resilience might be connected to secondary cell wall integrity signaling which needs to be addressed when generating crops that effectively fulfill the specified objectives. Understanding this mechanism acting during secondary cell wall formation would be a breakthrough in the field of wood biology (Zhao et al., 2013; Ratke et al., 2018; ; ). Moreover, elucidation of molecular pathways of these responses should be addressed in evolutionary context as even closely-related species can adopt different stress managing mechanisms ().
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
FRB: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft. EC: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. END: Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. IG: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. JU: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. GP: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. HD: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. DJ: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. ZY: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. MD-M: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. ERM: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. GS: Methodology, Writing – review & editing. LG: Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. EJM: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Kempe Foundation, Formas project Hemipop, Bio4Energy (https://bio4energy.se) and the SSF program ValueTree RBP14-0011 to EJM, and by grants from the Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems (VINNOVA), KAW (The Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation) and TC4F project supporting UPSC facilities.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank B. Dallard for high throughput computational analyses, Q. Moindze for the Arabidopsis drawing, Dr. J. Takahashi-Schmidt of the Biopolymer Analytical Platform of KBC at Umeå University for help with cell wall analyses, and acknowledge the Umeå Plant Science Centre (UPSC) Microscopy Facility and Tree Phenotyping Platform.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1422701/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AwliaM.NigroA.FajkusJ.SchmoeckelS. M.NegrãoS.SanteliaD.et al. (2016). High-throughput non-destructive phenotyping of traits that contribute to salinity tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci.7. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01414
2
BaceteL.HamannT. (2020). The role of mechanoperception in plant cell wall integrity maintenance. Plants9, 574. doi: 10.3390/plants9050574
3
BangS. W.LeeD. K.JungH.ChungP. J.KimY. S.ChoiY.et al. (2019). Overexpression of OsTF1L, a rice HD-Zip transcription factor, promotes lignin biosynthesis and stomatal closure that improves drought tolerance. Plant Biotechnol. J.17, 118–131. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12951
4
BauerS.VasuP.PerssonS.MortA. J.SomervilleC. R. (2006). Development and application of a suite of polysaccharide-degrading enzymes for analyzing plant cell walls. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.103, 11417–11422. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604632103
5
BensussanM.LefebvreV.DucampA.TrouverieJ.GineauE.FortabatM. N.et al. (2015). Suppression of dwarf and Irregular Xylem phenotypes generates low-acetylated biomass lines in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol.168, 452–463. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00122
6
BielyP.MalovíkováA.HirschJ.Morkeberg KroghK. B. R.EbringerováA. (2015). The role of the glucuronoxylan carboxyl groups in the action of endoxylanases of three glycoside hydrolase families: A study with two substrate mutants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1850, 2246–2255. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2015.07.003
7
BielyP.VršanskáM.TenkanenM.KluepfelD. (1997). Endo-β-1,4-xylanase families: Differences in catalytic properties. J. Biotechnol.57, 151–166. doi: 10.1016/S0168–1656(97)00096–5
8
Bouchabke-CoussaO.QuashieM.-L.Seoane-RedondoJ.FortabatM.-N.GeryC.YuA.et al. (2008). ESKIMO1 is a key gene involved in water economy as well as cold acclimation and salt tolerance. BMC Plant Biol.8, 1–24. doi: 10.1186/1471–2229-8–125
9
BrodribbT. J.BowmanD. J. M. S.NicholsS.DelzonS.BurlettR. (2010). Xylem function and growth rate interact to determine recovery rates after exposure to extreme water deficit. New Phytol.188, 533–542. doi: 10.1111/j.1469–8137.2010.03393.x
10
BrownD. M.GoubetF.WongV. W.GoodacreR.StephensE.DupreeP.et al. (2007). Comparison of five xylan synthesis mutants reveals new insight into the mechanisms of xylan synthesis. Plant J.52, 1154–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1365–313X.2007.03307.x
11
BrownD. M.ZhangZ.StephensE.DupreeP.TurnerS. R. (2009). Characterization of IRX10 and IRX10-like reveals an essential role in glucuronoxylan biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J.57, 732–746. doi: 10.1111/j.1365–313X.2008.03729.x
12
Caño-DelgadoA.PenfieldS.SmithC.CatleyM.BevanM. (2003). Reduced cellulose synthesis invokes lignification and defense responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J.34, 351–362. doi: 10.1046/j.1365–313X.2003.01729.x
13
ChaffeyN.CholewaE.ReganS.SundbergB. (2002). Secondary xylem development in Arabidopsis: A model for wood formation. Physiol. Plant114, 594–600. doi: 10.1034/j.1399–3054.2002.1140413.x
14
ChenJ.YuF.LiuY.DuC.LiX.ZhuS.et al. (2016). FERONIA interacts with ABI2-type phosphatases to facilitate signaling cross-talk between abscisic acid and RALF peptide in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.113, E5519–E5527. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608449113
15
ChenX.DingY.YangY.SongC.WangB.YangS.et al. (2021). Protein kinases in plant responses to drought, salt, and cold stress. J. Integr. Plant Biol.63, 53–78. doi: 10.1111/jipb.13061
16
ChenZ.HongX.ZhangH.WangY.LiX.ZhuJ. K.et al. (2005). Disruption of the cellulose synthase gene, AtCesA8/IRX1, enhances drought and osmotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J.43, 273–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1365–313X.2005.02452.x
17
ChongS. L.KoutaniemiS.VirkkiL.PynnönenH.TuomainenP.TenkanenM. (2013). Quantitation of 4-O-methylglucuronic acid from plant cell walls. Carbohydr. Polym.91, 626–630. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.078
18
ChongS. L.VirkkiL.MaaheimoH.JuvonenM.Derba-MaceluchM.KoutaniemiS.et al. (2014). O-Acetylation of glucuronoxylan in Arabidopsis thaliana wild type and its change in xylan biosynthesis mutants. Glycobiology24, 494–506. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwu017
19
CloughS. J.BentA. F. (1998). Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J.16, 735–743. doi: 10.1046/j.1365–313X.1998.00343.x
20
Cuevas-VelazquezC. L.DinnenyJ. R. (2018). Organization out of disorder: liquid–liquid phase separation in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.45, 68–74. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2018.05.005
21
DewanganB. P.GuptaA.SahR. K.DasS.KumarS.BhattacharjeeS.et al. (2023). Xylobiose treatment triggers a defense-related response and alters cell wall composition. Plant Mol. Biol.113, 383–400. doi: 10.1007/s11103–023-01391-z
22
DietzK. J.ZörbC.GeilfusC. M. (2021). Drought and crop yield. Plant Biol.23, 881–893. doi: 10.1111/plb.13304
23
D’OdoricoP.SchönbeckL.VitaliV.MeusburgerK.SchaubM.GinzlerC.et al. (2021). Drone-based physiological index reveals long-term acclimation and drought stress responses in trees. Plant Cell Environ.44, 3552–3570. doi: 10.1111/pce.14177
24
EnkerliJ.FelixG.BollerT. (1999). The enzymatic activity of fungal xylanase is not necessary for its elicitor activity. Plant Physiol.121, 391–397. doi: 10.1104/pp.121.2.391
25
Fleta-SorianoE.Munné-BoschS. (2016). Stress memory and the inevitable effects of drought: A physiological perspective. Front. Plant Sci.7. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00143
26
Gallego-GiraldoL.JikumaruY.KamiyaY.TangY.DixonR. A. (2011). Selective lignin downregulation leads to constitutive defense response expression in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). New Phytol.190, 627–639. doi: 10.1111/j.1469–8137.2010.03621.x
27
Gallego-GiraldoL.LiuC.Pose-AlbaceteS.PattathilS.PeraltaA. G.YoungJ.et al. (2020). ARABIDOPSIS DEHISCENCE ZONE POLYGALACTURONASE 1 (ADPG1) releases latent defense signals in stems with reduced lignin content. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.117, 3281–3290. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1914422117
28
GamonJ. A.PeñuelasJ.FieldC. B. (1992). A narrow-waveband spectral index that tracks diurnal changes in photosynthetic efficiency. Remote Sens. Environ.41, 35–44. doi: 10.1016/0034–4257(92)90059-S
29
GandlaM. L.Derba-MaceluchM.LiuX.GerberL.MasterE. R.MellerowiczE. J.et al. (2015). Expression of a fungal glucuronoyl esterase in Populus: Effects on wood properties and saccharification efficiency. Phytochemistry112, 210–220. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.06.002
30
GehanM. A.FahlgrenN.AbbasiA.BerryJ. C.CallenS. T.ChavezL.et al. (2017). PlantCV v2: Image analysis software for high-throughput plant phenotyping. Peer J.2017, 1–23. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4088
31
GerberL.EliassonM.TryggJ.MoritzT.SundbergB. (2012). Multivariate curve resolution provides a high-throughput data processing pipeline for pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis95, 95–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2012.01.011
32
Gigli-BiscegliaN.TesterinkC. (2021). Fighting salt or enemies: shared perception and signaling strategies. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.64, 102120. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2021.102120
33
GilbertM. E.MedinaV. (2016). Drought adaptation mechanisms should guide experimental design. Trends Plant Sci.21, 639–647. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.03.003
34
Gonzalez-GuzmanM.PizzioG. A.AntoniR.Vera-SireraF.MeriloE.BasselG. W.et al. (2012). Arabidopsis PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors play a major role in quantitative regulation of stomatal aperture and transcriptional response to abscisic acid. Plant Cell24, 2483–2496. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.098574
35
GuoY.TanJ. (2015). Recent advances in the application of chlorophyll a fluorescence from photosystem II. Photochem. Photobiol.91, 1–14. doi: 10.1111/php.12362
36
GuptaA.Rico-MedinaA.Caño-DelgadoA. I. (2020). The physiology of plant responses to drought. Science.368, 266–269. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz7614
37
HarrisF. M.MouZ. (2024). Damage-associated molecular patterns and systemic signaling. Phytopathology. 144, 308–327. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-03–23-0104-RVW
38
Hernández-BlancoC.FengD. X.HuJ.Sánchez-ValletA.DeslandesL.LlorenteF.et al. (2007). Impairment of cellulose synthases required for Arabidopsis secondary cell wall formation enhances disease resistance. Plant Cell19, 890–903. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048058
39
HsuP. K.TakahashiY.MeriloE.CostaA.ZhangL.KernigK.et al. (2021). Raf-like kinases and receptor-like (pseudo)kinase GHR1 are required for stomatal vapor pressure difference response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.118, 1–12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2107280118
40
HuangJ.GuM.LaiZ.FanB.ShiK.ZhouY. H.et al. (2010). Functional analysis of the Arabidopsis PAL gene family in plant growth, development, and response to environmental stress. Plant Physiol.153, 1526–1538. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.157370
41
JansenM.GilmerF.BiskupB.NagelK. A.RascherU.FischbachA.et al. (2009). Simultaneous phenotyping of leaf growth and chlorophyll fluorescence via Growscreen Fluoro allows detection of stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and other rosette plants. Funct. Plant Biol.36, 902–914. doi: 10.1071/FP09095
42
JuengerT. E.VersluesP. E. (2023). Time for a drought experiment: Do you know your plants’ water status? Plant Cell35, 10–23. doi: 10.1093/plcell/koac324
43
KarimiM.InzéD.DepickerA. (2002). GATEWAY vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Trends Plant Sci.7, 193–195. doi: 10.1016/s1360–1385(02)02251–3
44
KepplerB. D.ShowalterA. M. (2010). IRX14 and IRX14-LIKE, two glycosyl transferases involved in glucuronoxylan biosynthesis and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant3, 834–841. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssq028
45
KerchevP.van der MeerT.SujeethN.VerleeA.StevensC. V.Van BreusegemF.et al. (2020). Molecular priming as an approach to induce tolerance against abiotic and oxidative stresses in crop plants. Biotechnol. Adv.40, 107503. doi: 10.1016/j.bioteChadv.2019.107503
46
KojimaK.SunagawaN.YoshimiY.TryfonaT.SamejimaM.DupreeP.et al. (2022). Acetylated xylan degradation by glycoside hydrolase family 10 and 11 xylanases from the white-rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. J. Appl. Glycosci.69, 35–43. doi: 10.5458/jag.jag.JAG-2021_0017
47
KumarV.DonevE. N.BarbutF. R.KushwahS.MannapperumaC.UrbancsokJ.et al. (2020). Genome-wide identification of Populus malectin/malectin-like domain-containing proteins and expression analyses reveal novel candidates for signaling and regulation of wood development. Front. Plant Sci.11. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.588846
48
LeeM.Dominguez-FerrerasA.KaliyadasaE.HuangW. J.AntonyE.StevensonT.et al. (2021). Mediator subunits MED16, MED14, and MED2 are required for activation of ABRE-dependent transcription in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci.12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.649720
49
LeeC.TengQ.HuangW.ZhongR.YeZ. H. (2010). The Arabidopsis family GT43 glycosyltransferases form two functionally nonredundant groups essential for the elongation of glucuronoxylan backbone. Plant Physiol.153, 526–541. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.155309
50
LeeC.TengQ.ZhongR.YeZ. H. (2014). Alterations of the degree of xylan acetylation in Arabidopsis xylan mutants. Plant Signal. Behav.9(2), e277797. doi: 10.4161/psb.27797
51
LeeC.ZhongR.YeZ. H. (2012). Arabidopsis family GT43 members are xylan xylosyltransferases required for the elongation of the xylan backbone. Plant Cell Physiol.53, 135–143. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcr158
52
LefebvreV.FortabatM. N.DucampA.NorthH. M.Maia-GrondardA.TrouverieJ.et al. (2011). ESKIMO1 disruption in Arabidopsis alters vascular tissue and impairs water transport. PloS One6(2), e16645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016645
53
LiX.GuoC.WangQ.LiZ.CaiJ.WuD.et al. (2022). Systematic analysis of tobacco CrRLK1L family genes and functional identification of NtCrRLK1L47 in environmental stresses. Front. Plant Sci.13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.838857
54
LimC. W.BaekW.JungJ.KimJ. H.LeeS. C. (2015). Function of ABA in stomatal defense against biotic and drought stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci.16, 15251–15270. doi: 10.3390/ijms160715251
55
LiuH.AbleA. J.AbleJ. A. (2022). Priming crops for the future: rewiring stress memory. Trends Plant Sci.27, 699–716. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.11.015
56
LivakK. J.SchmittgenT. D. (2001). Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods25, 402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262
57
LuganR.NiogretM. F.KervazoL.LarherF. R.KopkaJ.BouchereauA. (2009). Metabolome and water status phenotyping of Arabidopsis under abiotic stress cues reveals new insight into ESK1 function. Plant Cell Environ.32, 95–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1365–3040.2008.01898.x
58
Marín-de la RosaN.LinC. W.KangY. J.DhondtS.GonzalezN.InzéD.et al. (2019). Drought resistance is mediated by divergent strategies in closely related Brassicaceae. New Phytol.223, 783–797. doi: 10.1111/nph.15841
59
MerzlyakM. N.GitelsonA. A.ChivkunovaO. B.RakitinV. Y. (1999). Non-destructive optical detection of pigment changes during leaf senescence and fruit ripening. Physiol. Plant106, 135–141. doi: 10.1034/j.1399–3054.1999.106119.x
60
PawarP. M. A.Derba-MaceluchM.ChongS. L.GómezL. D.MiedesE.BanasiakA.et al. (2016). Expression of fungal acetyl xylan esterase in Arabidopsis thaliana improves saccharification of stem lignocellulose. Plant Biotechnol. J.14, 387–397. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12393
61
PerssonS.CaffallK. H.FreshourG.HilleyM. T.BauerS.PoindexterP.et al. (2007). The Arabidopsis irregular xylem8 mutant is deficient in glucuronoxylan and homogalacturonan, which are essential for secondary cell wall integrity. Plant Cell19, 237–255. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.047720
62
PogorelkoG.LionettiV.BellincampiD.ZabotinaO. (2013). Cell wall integrity: Targeted post-synthetic modifications to reveal its role in plant growth and defense against pathogens. Plant Signal. Behav.8(9), e25435. doi: 10.4161/psb.25435
63
RamírezV.PaulyM. (2019). Genetic dissection of cell wall defects and the strigolactone pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Direct3, 1–11. doi: 10.1002/pld3.149
64
RamírezV.XiongG.MashiguchiK.YamaguchiS.PaulyM. (2018). Growth- and stress-related defects associated with wall hypoacetylation are strigolactone-dependent. Plant Direct2, e00062. doi: 10.1002/pld3.62
65
RatkeC.PawarP. M. A.BalasubramanianV. K.NaumannM.DuncranzM. L.Derba-MaceluchM.et al. (2015). Populus GT43 family members group into distinct sets required for primary and secondary wall xylan biosynthesis and include useful promoters for wood modification. Plant Biotechnol. J.13, 26–37. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12232
66
RatkeC.TerebieniecB. K.WinestrandS.Derba-MaceluchM.GrahnT.SchiffthalerB.et al. (2018). Downregulating aspen xylan biosynthetic GT43 genes in developing wood stimulates growth via reprograming of the transcriptome. New Phytol.219, 230–245. doi: 10.1111/nph.15160
67
RaviB.FoyerC. H.PandeyG. K. (2023). The integration of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and calcium signalling in abiotic stress responses. Plant Cell Environ.46, 1985–2006. doi: 10.1111/pce.14596
68
ReemN. T.ChambersL.ZhangN.AbdullahS. F.ChenY.FengG.et al. (2020). Post-synthetic reduction of pectin methylesterification causes morphological abnormalities and alterations to stress response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plants9, 1–19. doi: 10.3390/plants9111558
69
RenY.HansenS. F.EbertB.LauJ.SchellerH. V. (2014). Site-directed mutagenesis of IRX9, IRX9L and IRX14 proteins involved in xylan biosynthesis: Glycosyltransferase activity is not required for IRX9 function in Arabidopsis. PloS One9(8), e105014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105014
70
RiveroR. M.KojimaM.GepsteinA.SakakibaraH.MittlerR.GepsteinS.et al. (2007). Delayed leaf senescence induces extreme drought tolerance in a flowering plant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.104, 19631–19636. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709453104
71
RudsanderU.RazaS.TeeriT. T. (2003). Molecular features of GH9 cellulases in hybrid aspen and the filamentous fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. J. Appl. Glycosci.50, 253–256. doi: 10.5458/jag.50.253
72
ScharwiesJ. D.DinnenyJ. R. (2019). Water transport, perception, and response in plants. J. Plant Res.132, 311–324. doi: 10.1007/s10265–019-01089–8
73
SchneiderC. A.RasbandW. S.EliceiriK. W. (2012). NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods9, 671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089
74
SivanP.UrbancsokJ.DonevE. V.Derba-MaceluchM.BarbutF. R.YassinZ.et al. (2024). Modification of xylan in secondary walls alters cell wall biosynthesis and wood formation programs. BioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.02.592170
75
SwaminathanS.LionettiV.ZabotinaO. A. (2022). Plant cell wall integrity perturbations and priming for defense. Plants11, 1–26. doi: 10.3390/plants11243539
76
TakahashiF.SuzukiT.OsakabeY.BetsuyakuS.KondoY.DohmaeN.et al. (2018). A small peptide modulates stomatal control via abscisic acid in long-distance signaling. Nature556, 235–238. doi: 10.1038/s41586–018-0009–2
77
TuM.WangX.YinW.WangY.LiY.ZhangG.et al. (2020). Grapevine VlbZIP30 improves drought resistance by directly activating VvNAC17 and promoting lignin biosynthesis through the regulation of three peroxidase genes. Hortic. Res.7, 150. doi: 10.1038/s41438–020-00372–3
78
TurnerS. R.SomervilleC. R. (1997). Collapsed xylem phenotype of Arabidopsis identifies mutants deficient in cellulose deposition in the secondary cell wall. Plant Cell9, 689–701. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.5.689
79
UrbancsokJ.DonevE. N.SivanP.van ZalenE.BarbutF. R.Derba-MaceluchM.et al. (2023). Flexure wood formation via growth reprogramming in hybrid aspen involves jasmonates and polyamines and transcriptional changes resembling tension wood development. New Phytol.240, 2312–2334. doi: 10.1111/nph.19307
80
Van RossumG.DrakeF. L. (2009). Python 3 reference manual. (Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace).
81
WangW.TalideL.ViljamaaS.NiittyläT. (2022b). Aspen growth is not limited by starch reserves. Curr. Biol.32, 3619–3627.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.056
82
WangH.YangH.WenZ.GaoC.GaoY.TianY.et al. (2022a). Xylan-based nanocompartments orchestrate plant vessel wall patterning. Nat. Plants8, 295–306. doi: 10.1038/s41477–022-01113–1
83
WangZ. Q.YuT. F.SunG. Z.ZhengJ. C.ChenJ.ZhouY.et al. (2021). Genome-wide analysis of the Catharanthus roseus RLK1-Like in soybean and GmCrRLK1L20 responds to drought and salt stresses. Front. Plant Sci.12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.614909
84
WardJ. J.H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc.58, 236–244. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845
85
WooN. S.BadgerM. R.PogsonB. J. (2008). A rapid, non-invasive procedure for quantitative assessment of drought survival using chlorophyll fluorescence. Plant Methods4, 1–14. doi: 10.1186/1746–4811-4–27
86
WuA. M.HörnbladE.VoxeurA.GerberL.RihoueyC.LerougeP.et al. (2010). Analysis of the Arabidopsis IRX9/IRX9-L and IRX14/IRX14-L pairs of glycosyltransferase genes reveals critical contributions to biosynthesis of the hemicellulose glucuronoxylan. Plant Physiol.153, 542–554. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.154971
87
WuA. M.RihoueyC.SevenoM.HörnbladE.SinghS. K.MatsunagaT.et al. (2009). The Arabidopsis IRX10 and IRX10-LIKE glycosyltransferases are critical for glucuronoxylan biosynthesis during secondary cell wall formation. Plant J.57, 718–731. doi: 10.1111/j.1365–313X.2008.03724.x
88
WuS.ZhaoB. (2017). Using clear nail polish to make arabidopsis epidermal impressions for measuring the change of stomatal aperture size in immune response. Methods Mol. Biol.1578, 243–248. doi: 10.1007/978–1-4939–6859-6_20
89
XinZ.BrowseJ. (1998). eskimo1 mutants of Arabidopsis are constitutively freezing-tolerant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.95, 7799–7804. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.13.7799
90
XinZ.MandaokarA.ChenJ.LastR. L.BrowseJ. (2007). Arabidopsis ESK1 encodes a novel regulator of freezing tolerance. Plant J.49, 786–799. doi: 10.1111/j.1365–313X.2006.02994.x
91
XuZ.ZhouG. (2008). Responses of leaf stomatal density to water status and its relationship with photosynthesis in a grass. J. Exp. Bot.59, 3317–3325. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern185
92
YanJ.AznarA.ChalvinC.BirdseyeD. S.BaidooE. E. K.EudesA.et al. (2018). Increased drought tolerance in plants engineered for low lignin and low xylan content. Biotechnol. Biofuels11, 1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13068–018-1196–7
93
YaoJ.SunD.CenH.XuH.WengH.YuanF.et al. (2018). Phenotyping of Arabidopsis drought stress response using kinetic chlorophyll fluorescence and multicolor fluorescence imaging. Front. Plant Sci.9. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00603
94
YuD.JanzD.ZienkiewiczK.HerrfurthC.FeussnerI.ChenS.et al. (2021). Wood formation under severe drought invokes adjustment of the hormonal and transcriptional landscape in poplar. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22, 9899. doi: 10.3390/ijms22189899
95
ZhangL.KarsI.EssenstamB.LiebrandT. W. H.WagemakersL.ElberseJ.et al. (2014). Fungal endopolygalacturonases are recognized as microbe-associated molecular patterns by the Arabidopsis receptor-like protein RESPONSIVENESS TO BOTRYTIS POLYGALACTURONASES1. Plant Physiol.164, 352–364. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.230698
96
ZhaoY.SongD.SunJ.LiL. (2013). Populus endo-beta-mannanase PtrMAN6 plays a role in coordinating cell wall remodeling with suppression of secondary wall thickening through generation of oligosaccharide signals. Plant J.74, 473–485. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12137
97
ZhaoW.SunY.KjelgrenR.LiuX. (2015). Response of stomatal density and bound gas exchange in leaves of maize to soil water deficit. Acta Physiol. Plant37, 1704. doi: 10.1007/s11738–014-1704–8
Summary
Keywords
glucuronoxylan, drought stress, Arabidopsis, Populus, secondary cell wall, hyperspectral imaging, high-throughput phenotyping, cell wall integrity
Citation
Barbut FR, Cavel E, Donev EN, Gaboreanu I, Urbancsok J, Pandey G, Demailly H, Jiao D, Yassin Z, Derba-Maceluch M, Master ER, Scheepers G, Gutierrez L and Mellerowicz EJ (2024) Integrity of xylan backbone affects plant responses to drought. Front. Plant Sci. 15:1422701. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1422701
Received
24 April 2024
Accepted
07 June 2024
Published
25 June 2024
Volume
15 - 2024
Edited by
Nora Gigli-Bisceglia, Utrecht University, Netherlands
Reviewed by
Vincenzo Lionetti, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Rudo Ngara, University of the Free State, South Africa
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Barbut, Cavel, Donev, Gaboreanu, Urbancsok, Pandey, Demailly, Jiao, Yassin, Derba-Maceluch, Master, Scheepers, Gutierrez and Mellerowicz.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ewa J. Mellerowicz, Ewa.Mellerowicz@slu.se
†ORCID: Félix R. Barbut, orcid.org/0000-0001-5395-6776; Emilie Cavel, orcid.org/0009-0001-4807-1372; Evgeniy N. Donev, orcid.org/0000-0002-7279-0481; János Urbancsok, orcid.org/0000-0003-3237-6806; Garima Pandey, orcid.org/0000-0001-9902-7294; Hervé Demailly, orcid.org/0000-0001-6662-7365; Zakiya Yassin, orcid.org/0000-0001-6878-3361; Marta Derba-Maceluch, orcid.org/0000-0002-8034-3630; Emma R. Master, orcid.org/0000-0002-6837-9817; Gerhard Scheepers, orcid.org/0000-0002-5630-1377; Laurent Gutierrez, orcid.org/0000-0003-4829-8531; Ewa J. Mellerowicz, orcid.org/0000-0001-6817-1031
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.